+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Date post: 31-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: gino
View: 34 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees. Workshop on Options in Financial Products Fields Institute – December 8, 2000 Allan Brender, OSFI. Actuarial Valuation of Liabilities. The object of valuation of actuarial liabilities is not to determine a market price. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
23
Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees Workshop on Options in Financial Products Fields Institute – December 8, 2000 Allan Brender, OSFI
Transcript
Page 1: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Valuation and Capital:Segregated Fund Guarantees

Workshop on Options in Financial ProductsFields Institute – December 8, 2000

Allan Brender, OSFI

Page 2: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Actuarial Valuation of Liabilities

The object of valuation of actuarial liabilities is not to determine a market price.

Provision sufficient to meet policy liabilities

Cash flows contingent upon uncertain future events over a long term

Assumptions about the future include margins for adverse deviations

Page 3: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Actuarial Valuation of Liabilities

Actuarial liabilities represent an apportionment of the company’s assets required to satisfy obligations to policyholders. Assets are segmented to back specific

portfolios of business. Insurers’ investment policy is long

term, buy and hold, and built around ALM.

Page 4: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Actuarial Valuation of Liabilities

Policy cash flows are discounted at the yield earned on the supporting asset portfolio, or

The actuarial liability is equal to the statement value of the supporting asset portfolio.

Page 5: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Actuarial Valuation of Liabilities

Why not use market interest rates?

With market interest rates, separate provision would be required for asset/liability mismatch.

When insurance portfolios do trade, the trade usually involves transfer of the supporting asset portfolio.

Page 6: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Actuarial Valuation of Liabilities

Based upon projection of all relevant cash flowsUse a variety of economic scenariosPolicy cash flows may be sensitive to the economic scenarioRequires dynamic investment policy

Page 7: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Actuarial Valuation of Liabilities

Assume economic scenarios are generated stochastically.

We obtain a distribution of the cost of meeting obligations to policyholders.

We use this distribution to determine both the valuation of the liability and required capital.

Page 8: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Actuarial Valuation of Liabilities

How do we allow for economic uncertainty in the liability valuation ? Use the risk-neutral (Q) measure and set

the liability value equal to the mean, or Use the ‘realistic’ (P) measure and set

the liability value at some point in excess of the mean. Actuaries choose this approach

Page 9: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Segregated Fund Guarantees

Individual seg fund product is similar to a mutual fund.A seg fund is required when the return to the policyholder is directly related to a specific block of assets (ICA).Guarantees of return of at least 75% of premiums upon death or maturity are required by provincial securities laws.

Page 10: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Segregated Fund Guarantees

OSFI requires (1971)

Guarantees not to exceed 100% of gross premiums (investments)

Maturity period of at least 10 years

Liabilities for seg fund guarantees to be established in an insurer’s general fund

Page 11: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Segregated Fund Guarantees

Initially, all seg funds carried 75% guarantees and maturities at a high (retirement) age.In the mid-1980’s, one large insurer moved to 100% guarantees. In the mid-1990’s, the market heated up, offering 10 year maturity periods and resets.

Page 12: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Segregated Fund Guarantees

In the mid and late 1990’s, we had low policy liabilities no capital requirement for these guarantees

in spite of results of the U.K. Maturity

Guarantees Working Party unfolding experience in Japan

Page 13: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Segregated Fund Guarantees

OSFI and the Canadian Institute of Actuaries (CIA) both expressed concern over the situation.

In 2000, the CIA’s Task Force on Segregated Fund Guarantees developed an approach to liability valuation and required capital.

Page 14: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Segregated Fund Guarantees

The Task Force’s approach is through projection of cash flows under stochastically generated scenarios, to generate the distribution of costs of these guarantees.

The resulting distribution is strange – ‘all tail’ with a large probability mass at 0.

Page 15: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Segregated Fund Guarantees

The Task Force considered a variety of economic models.

Not wishing to choose among them, the Task Force developed calibration criteria for the various models to ensure reasonably thick tails.

Page 16: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Calibration – Maximum Returns

Accumulation Period

2.5 percentil

e

5.0 percentil

e

10.0 percentil

e

1-year 0.76 0.82 0.90

5-year 0.75 0.85 1.05

10-year 0.85 1.05 1.35

Page 17: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Segregated Fund Guarantees

An interesting new model is the Regime Switching Lognormal Model developed by Prof. Mary Hardy of the University of Waterloo Six parameters Makes maximal use of calibration

points

Page 18: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Segregated Fund Guarantees

Two levels are specified in the distribution The first for the liability value The second for the total of liabilities

and required capital

Levels are specified in terms of the Conditional Tail Expectation at the xth percentile, CTE(x)

Page 19: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Capital Requirements

OSFI has selected CTE(95) for the total of liabilities and required capital.Required capital is subject to the usual MCCSR multiplier.There is a phase-in over 2000-2001.For 2000, required capital is to be determined through a factor-based formula.

Page 20: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Use of Internal Models

If internal models are used to determine capital requirements, these will be subject to a regime similar to that applied to banks’ models for determining capital for trading risk. Audit of models by OSFI Required risk management program

with oversight by OSFI

Page 21: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Use of Internal Models

Credit for dynamic hedging requires modelling of the hedging activity. The economic scenario generator will

have an underlying P-measure. It must incorporate a Q-measure

generator to price hedges at future time points within any scenario.

Page 22: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Use of Internal Models

Credit for dynamic hedging requires modelling of the hedging activity. Hedges will increase costs in all

scenarios. Hedge pay-offs in unfavourable

scenarios will reduce costs.

Page 23: Valuation and Capital: Segregated Fund Guarantees

Valuation and Capital:Segregated Fund Guarantees

Allan Brender

[email protected]


Recommended