+ All Categories
Home > Documents > VLF sub-ionospheric signals and Earthquake precursor signatures? Results from the studies of some...

VLF sub-ionospheric signals and Earthquake precursor signatures? Results from the studies of some...

Date post: 21-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
36
VLF sub-ionospheric signals and VLF sub-ionospheric signals and Earthquake precursor signatures? Earthquake precursor signatures? Results from the studies of some Results from the studies of some recent Earthquakes recent Earthquakes Ajeet K Maurya, Rajesh Singh, B. Veenadhari Indian Institute of Geomagnetism New Panvel, Navi Mumbai – 410218, India The Sharjah-Stanford AWESOME VLF Workshop Feb The Sharjah-Stanford AWESOME VLF Workshop Feb 22-24, 2010 22-24, 2010
Transcript

VLF sub-ionospheric signals and Earthquake VLF sub-ionospheric signals and Earthquake precursor signatures? Results from the studies precursor signatures? Results from the studies of some recent Earthquakesof some recent Earthquakes

Ajeet K Maurya, Rajesh Singh, B. VeenadhariIndian Institute of Geomagnetism

New Panvel, Navi Mumbai – 410218, India

The Sharjah-Stanford AWESOME VLF Workshop Feb 22-24, 2010The Sharjah-Stanford AWESOME VLF Workshop Feb 22-24, 2010

Earthquakes: Facts and NomenclatureEarthquakes: Facts and Nomenclature

EQ-Magnitude

Category Number(/Year) Energy Released ( 1015J/yr)

≥ 8.0 Great EQ 0-1 0-1,000

7-7.9 Major EQ 12 100

6-6.9 Strong EQ 110 30

5-5.9 Moderate EQ 1,400 5

4-4.9 Light EQ 13,500 1

3-3.9 Minor EQ > 100,000 0.2

Source: Ionospheric Precursor of EQ, Springer

People who live in a seismically active region of the world would like to know when an earthquake will occur

But Earthquake are notorious for striking suddenly.

They cause death and devastation apparently without warning

Tens of thousand of lives and damage to the structures and infrastructures could be saved, if early warning are available

Earthquake prediction: A Challenge for Scientific Earthquake prediction: A Challenge for Scientific communitycommunity

In last couple of decades scientific community is trying to investigate problem of earthquake prediction by looking into:

(i) Are there other signals that rock produce when subjected to ever increasing stress?

(ii) If such signals are produced at depth, can they be transmitted or somehow carried from the seismogenic region to region of the earth?

Lithosphere-atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling – TypesLithosphere-atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling – Types

Electromagnetic Coupling: Connected with the direct penetration

of DC electric field induced due to the appearance of Seismic-

related electric charges on the Earth’s surface. It can lead to

substantial modifications of ionospheric properties.

Chemical Coupling: Determined by the variation of the fair

weather electric field in the lower ionosphere due to the

enhancement of conductivity of lower atmospheric layer ionized by

radon emanating from Seismic faults.

Dynamic Coupling: Implies influence of atmospheric wave

processes originating near the Earth surface on the lower ionosphere.

Prospective pre-earthquake signalsProspective pre-earthquake signals

Anomalous behavior in Low/Ultra low electromagnetic emissions recorded all around the globe

Local magnetic field variations over a wide range of timescales

Enhanced infrared emissions from the epicentral region

Change in the atmosphere near the ground and at altitudes up to ~ 1000 m

Unusual animal behavior, etc

Perturbations in the lower ionosphere above the epicentral region

The scientific community has been deeply divided over these signals and whether or not they are indeed pre-earthquake indicators

(Henderson et al., JGR, 1993; Rodger et al, Radio Sci., 1999 and others)

Ionospheric Precursors: For different ionospheric Ionospheric Precursors: For different ionospheric layerslayers

F-Layer: Critical frequency of F layer (foF2)

E-Layer: Critical frequency of Sporadic E-Layer (foEs)

D-Layer : Phase and Amplitude of ELF/VLF signals from navigational transmitters

Out of these three types lot of work have been done by Japanese and Russian group on D-region precursors studies.

( Pulinets et al 1991, Lipervosky et al 2000, Hayakawa 1996, Gokhberg et al., 1982; Gufeld et al., 1992 )

Precursory Effects in D-layer : Use of VLF signalsPrecursory Effects in D-layer : Use of VLF signals

VLF waves are emerges as one of the most reliable and important method for continuous D-region monitoring.

The amplitude and phase distortion of the received VLF Navigational transmitter signal were interpreted as influence of the Earth-Ionosphere Waveguide where the VLF signals propagates.

This distortion is due to ionospheric lowering over the region of the Earth-quake preparation.

By the method of triangulation it is possible to determine the position of future epicenter and form the distortion amplitude to determine the EQ magnitude.

Earthquake Preparation ZoneEarthquake Preparation Zone

The area on the ground surface where precursory phenomenon associated with the approaching Earthquake are observed. It is also called the activation zone

The radius of preparation zone is given as :

M43.010 Km

Where ρ=radius of preparation zone, M= Earthquake magnitude

(Dobrovolsky et al 1979)

Primarily two methods of analysis is proposed using Primarily two methods of analysis is proposed using sub-ionospheric VLF data to make out precursory sub-ionospheric VLF data to make out precursory effects of ionospheric perturbationseffects of ionospheric perturbations

Terminator time method

Night time fluctuation method

(1) Terminator Time Method(1) Terminator Time Method

(Hayakawa et al., 1996; Molchanov and Hayakawa, 1998; Hayakawa 2007)

Abnormal behavior occurs around the sunrise & sunset of local times. Effective on E-W meridian plane propagation direction and Short paths (~ 1000-2000 km) Evening Terminator is more indicative of Seismic influence Generally an increase in the evening terminator and decrease in morning terminator time.

Kobe Earthquake (7.3 M) in 1995 (depth=20km)Kobe Earthquake (7.3 M) in 1995 (depth=20km)

Reported significant shift in the terminator times before the earthquake, inferring daytime felt by VLF signal is elongated for a few days around the earthquake. – Hayakawa et al., 1996

Sift for Evening T-T is ~45 min.

Distance between receiver and transmitter is ~1000km

(2) Nighttime fluctuation analysis(2) Nighttime fluctuation analysis

In this method VLF amplitude corresponding Local night-time is used.

Estimate Diff : dA = A(t) - <A> A(t) is the amplitude at time ‘t’ <A> is average over one month.

Finally, integrate dA2 over the night-time hours and have one data value for one day.

Use full for large distance (d>1000km)

(Shvets et al., 2004a, b; Roznoi et al., 2004; Maekawa at al., 2006)

– Hayakawa et al., 2007

Sumatra Earthquake – 26 December, 2004Sumatra Earthquake – 26 December, 2004

M=9.0 depth=30km

– Hayakawa et al., 2007

Recent Earthquake Recent Earthquake ObservationsObservations

Facts about propagation pathsFacts about propagation paths

JJI and Allahabad:

Distance ~4800 km

Time difference: ~3:30 hrs

Direction form Allahabad ~ East

NWC and Allahabad:

Distance ~ 6300 km

Time difference: ~ 2:30 hrs

Direction form Allahabad ~ South-East

China Earthquake: Special CaseChina Earthquake: Special Case May 12, 2008 Wenchuan

Magnitude: 7.9 M

Epicenter location: 31.021°N 103.367°E

Depth: 19 km (12 mi)

Aftershocks: 149 to 284 major & over 42,719 total

TIME: 06:28:01.42 UT

T-T Method is not applicable

Time diference~3.5hrsDifficult to apply T-T method

Adopted the Nighttime fluctuation analysis methodAdopted the Nighttime fluctuation analysis method

Adopted the Nighttime fluctuation analysis methodAdopted the Nighttime fluctuation analysis method

NWC EarthquakeNWC Earthquake

Details of selected EarthquakeDetails of selected Earthquake

Date: 02-Sep-09,

Location: Java, Indonesia

Lat: 7.809S, 107.259 E

Magnitude: 7.0, Depth: 46.2Km

Time: at epicenter, 07:55:01UT

Radius of Preparation Zone: 1023.8Km

Date: 30-Sep-09,

Location: Southern Sumatra, Indonesia

Lat: 0.725S, 99.856 E

Magnitude: 7.5, Depth: 81Km

Time: at epicenter, 10:16:09UT

Radius of Preparation Zone:1678.8Km

Date: 01-Oct-09,

Location: Southern Sumatra, Indonesia

Lat: 2.508S, 101.484 E

Magnitude: 6.6, Depth: 15Km

Time: at epicenter, 01:52:28UT

Radius of Preparation Zone: 688.68Km

Date: 10-Aug-09,

Location: Andaman Islands, India

Lat: 14.013N, 92.923 E

Magnitude: 7.5, Depth: 33.1Km

Time: at epicenter, 19:55:39UT

Radius of Preparation Zone:1678.8Km

Methodology: T-T Method of analysisMethodology: T-T Method of analysis

10-Aug-EQ (Magnitude: 7.5, Depth: 33.1Km)

Change in Evening Terminator Time: ~11minute

Methodology: T-T Method of analysisMethodology: T-T Method of analysis

30-Sep & 1-Oct-EQ (Magnitude: 7.5, 6.6 Depth: 81Km, 15km)

Shift in Evening Terminator Time: ~20minute

Methodology: T-T Method of analysisMethodology: T-T Method of analysis

02-Sep-EQ (Magnitude: 7.0, Depth: 46.2Km)

Shift in Evening Terminator Time: ~22minute

Methodology: Night time Fluctuation Method of analysisMethodology: Night time Fluctuation Method of analysis

10-Aug-EQ (Magnitude: 7.5, Depth: 33.1Km)

Lowest

Methodology: Night time Fluctuation Method of analysisMethodology: Night time Fluctuation Method of analysis

30-Sep & 1-Oct-EQ (Magnitude: 7.5, 6.6 Depth: 81Km, 15km)

Lowest

Methodology: Night time Fluctuation Method of analysisMethodology: Night time Fluctuation Method of analysis

02-Sep-EQ (Magnitude: 7.0, Depth: 46.2Km)

Lowest

JJI-EarthquakeJJI-Earthquake

Date: 28-Aug-09,

Location: Northern Qinghai, China

Lat: 37.713N, 95.687 E

Magnitude: 6.2, Depth: 13Km

Time: at epicenter, 01:52:06UT

Radius of Preparation Zone: 463.45 Km

Date: 21-Sep-09

Location: Bhutan,

Lat: 27.346N, Long:91.412E

Magnitude: 6.1, Depth: 14Km

Time: at epicenter, 08:53:06 UT

Radius of Preparation Zone: 419.76 Km

Both method of analysis have been applied:Both method of analysis have been applied:

T-T Method of AnalysisT-T Method of Analysis

No Change in Terminator Time

Night time Fluctuation AnalysisNight time Fluctuation Analysis

It shows the lowest value of fluctuation amplitude on the day of EQ compared the days around the EQ days.

Lowest

Lowest

It shows the lowest value of fluctuation amplitude two days before the EQ day.

So, we clearly see the increase in the VLF amplitude fluctuation for 12 May, 2008 China Earthquake

This is not true for all the Earthquakes

Subject of Seismic-Ionospheric perturbations caused by Earthquakes needs more attention and study

In case of Andaman and Indonesian we see lowest values of fluctuation on EQ day - with increase before and after EQ Clear shift in Evening Terminator time ~ 10 – 25 min for Andaman and Indonesian EQ is seen

Summary

No Uniform Pattern is Observed

Thank you for your kind attention


Recommended