+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior ...

Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior ...

Date post: 16-Nov-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH On behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering Committee and Investigators NCT00526474; Trial funded by Merck Clinical Trial Update European Society of Cardiology Munich, August 26, 2012
Transcript

Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPHOn behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering Committee and Investigators

NCT00526474; Trial funded by Merck

Clinical Trial UpdateEuropean Society of Cardiology

Munich, August 26, 2012

Background

• The benefit of adding other antiplatelet drugs to aspirin for long-term 2°prevention in stable patients with prior MI is uncertain

• Vorapaxar inhibits platelet activation by antagonizing thrombin-mediated activation of the protease activated receptor (PAR)-1

Prior MI, CVA, or PADN=26,449

Vorapaxar2.5 mg/d

Placebo

RANDOMIZE 1:1 DOUBLE BLIND

Follow up VisitsDay 30, Mo 4, Mo 8, Mo 12

Q6 months

Standard care including oral antiplt rx

Final Visit

Primary Efficacy Analysis:1. CVD/MI/Stroke2. CVD/MI/Stroke/Urgent

Coronary RevascPrincipal Safety EP:• GUSTO Mod/Sev bleeding

Median F/U 30 Months

Prior MI Inclusion:Type 1 MI >2 wks and <12 months before randomization

Trial Design

Stratified by:1) Qualifying Disease State2) Use of thienopyridine

Morrow et al. N Engl J Med 2012ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00526474

Background – 1° Efficacy EvaluationOverall Population

CV Death, MI, or Stroke

9.3%

10.5%

Hazard Ratio 0.87p < 0.001

N = 26449Mean f/u: 2.5 years Placebo

Vorapaxar

GUSTO Mod/Sev at 3 yrs4.2 v. 2.5%, HR 1.66, p<0.001

Morrow et al. N Engl J Med 2012ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00526474c

Statistical MethodsPrior MI Cohort

Prior MI Cohort• Prospectively defined subgroup of 1° interest• 17,779 patients (67% of total trial population)Low-bleeding Risk Cohort• Based on prior studies1, we applied previously

established criteria to identify patients with a low risk of bleeding who have potential for improved net clinical outcomes with potent antiplatelet Rx:• No hx of stroke/TIA• Weight ≥60 kg• Age <75 yr-14,909 patients (84% of prior MI cohort)

1 Wiviott SD, et al. NEJM 2007

Baseline CharacteristicsPrior MI Cohort

Prior MI CohortN=17,779

DemographicsAge, median (IQR) 59 (51-66)Age >=75 years (%) 8Female (%) 21

Clinical CharacteristicsDiabetes mellitus (%) 22Hypertension (%) 63Hyperlipidemia (%) 85Current smoker (%) 20Prior coronary revasc (%) 86Any cerebrovascular event (%) 5

Baseline Medical TherapyAspirin (%) 98Thienopyridine (%) 78Lipid-lowering therapy (%) 96

No differences between treatment groups

Primary Efficacy EvaluationPrior MI Cohort

CV Death, MI, or Stroke

8.1%

9.7%

Hazard Ratio 0.80;95% CI 0.72 - 0.89p < 0.001

Placebo

Vorapaxar

N = 17,779Mean f/u: 2.5 years

Vora Plac HR P-valueCV Death 2.0 2.4 0.84 0.12MI 5.7 7.0 0.79 <0.001Stroke 1.3 1.6 0.77 0.06

Efficacy by Time from Qual MIPrior MI Cohort

Time from qualifying MI to Randomizations

7.1%

8.8%

HR 0.82p = 0.011

< 3 months 3 to 6 months >6 monthsHR 0.79

p = 0.023HR 0.78

p = 0.026

7.5%

9.4%8.9%

10.4%

N = 7801 N = 5151 N = 4703

Efficacy Early and LatePrior MI Cohort

Days 0 to 360

3.2%

4.0%

HR 0.79p = 0.003

Day 360 to 1080

5.5%

6.5%HR 0.82

p = 0.004

Efficacy in Key Subgroups Prior MI Cohort

Bleeding EndpointsPrior MI Cohort

2,1

10,4

1,60,4 0,1

3,4

15,1

2,20,6 0,2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

GUSTO Mod/Sev

TIMI Clinically Significant*

TIMI Non-CABG Major

ICH Fatal

PlaceboVorapaxar

HR 1.61p < 0.001

HR 1.49p < 0.001

HR 1.29p = 0.033

HR 1.54p = 0.076

HR 1.56p = 0.30

3-yr KM rates (%)

* TIMI Major/Minor/Requiring medical attention

3-yr KM rate (%) Voran=8880

Placn=8849 HR

p-value

All-cause death, MI, stroke, GUSTO Severe bleeding

10.1 11.4 0.86 0.003

CV Death, MI, Stroke,UCR, GUSTO Mod/Severe bleeding

12.5 13.4 0.91 0.038

Net Clinical Outcome

GU

STO

Mod

erat

e / S

ever

e B

leed

ing

(%)

Bleeding in Select SubgroupsPrior MI Cohort

1,9

4,6

2,13,1

2,1

3,4

1,8

3,93,0

7,1

3,2

6,0

3,2

8,0

2,7

6,9

0

2

4

6

8

Placebo Vorapaxar

Age Weight Prior Stroke/TIA

Any High Risk Feature

<75 yr >75 yr >60 kg <60 kg No Yes No Yes

3-yr

Kap

lan-

Mei

er ra

tes

(%)

GUSTO Mod/Severe

Bleeding

Efficacy EvaluationLow Bleeding Risk Cohort (N= 14,909)

CV Death

6.8%

8.6%

Placebo

Vorapaxar

HR 0.75p < 0.0001

CV Death, MI, or Stroke

1.5%

2.0%

HR 0.73p = 0.02

SummaryWhen added to standard of care including aspirin ± thienopyridine in stable pts w/ hxprior MI, vorapaxar significantly:• ↓ CV death, MI, or stroke• ↑ mod & severe bleeding• Improved net clinical outcome

The benefit of vorapaxar was consistent:• Regardless of the timing of MI• Both early (<1 yr) and late (>1 yr from rando.)• With or without thienopyridine use

Conclusions

In appropriately selected patients, our findings demonstrate the benefit of prolonged antiplatelet therapy through inhibition of PAR-1, when added to ASA + thienopyridine for long-term 2° prevention in patients with prior MI

www.thelancet.com

Now available online


Recommended