+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs,...

Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs,...

Date post: 23-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: godfrey-hunter
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
16
vs. OLAP
Transcript
Page 1: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

vs.

OLAP

Page 2: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

Geographyheirarchy

Salescampaigns

Other dimension

Products

Time

Sales, profit,costs, key

numbers, etc.

Salesorganization

Star Scheme

Henrik Been
The star sheme is a common structure for storing data. Measures are stored in a central fact table surrounded by dimension tables.
Page 3: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

Snowflake Scheme

Geographyheirarchy

Salescampaigns

Other dimension

Products

Time

Sales, profit,costs, key

numbers, etc.

Salesorganization

Products

Time

Other dimension

Other dimension

Geographyheirarchy

Salesorganization

Henrik Been
A snowflake scheme is basically
Page 4: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

Data Warehouse

Geographyheirarchy

Salescampaigns

Other dimension

Products

Time

Sales, profit,costs, key

numbers, etc.

Salesorganization

Products

Time

Other dimension

Other dimension

Geographyheirarchy

Salesorganization

Page 5: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

Relational OLAP

Data Warehouse

SQL queries are generated graphically. Flexible, but neither fast nor user-friendly.

User Interface

Page 6: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

Multidimensional OLAP

Data Warehouse

User Interface

Hyper CubeBuild the cube. Lots of Data. Slow. Everything must be predefined.

Every click is a query. Fast, but not flexible. Limited number of dimensions.

Page 7: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

Hybrid OLAP

Data Warehouse

User Interface

Hyper Cube

Every click is a query. Fast, but not flexible. Limited number of dimensions.

Drill-through when needed. Slow, and not user-friendly.

Page 8: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

Data Warehouse

User Interface

QlikView file

Page 9: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

Relational database inside QlikView document.

Data Warehouse

User Interface

QlikView file

Data Warehouse is not required. Any data source will do.

Page 10: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

Data Source

User Interface

QlikView file

Load the data… then work off-line!

Page 11: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

User Interface

QlikView file

Page 12: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

Every click is a query. Extremely fast, and very flexible.

Click !

The selection propagates through the relational database. The technology used is called AQL.

User Interface

Page 13: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

AQL™ The patented AQL technology performs its associations when a QlikView user makes a query through the point-and-click interface.

As a value or several values (in a dimension) are selected, QlikView makes a split second association showing only values (in other dimensions and measures) associated with the current selection.

Simultaneously, graphs and tables (holding one or several general expressions), are calculated to show the result of the current selection.

Page 14: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

Any number of Virtual hypercubes (Pivot tables, Diagrams, Gauges etc.) can be put in the QlikView document.

These are calculated on demand, i.e. on every click.

User Interface

Page 15: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

• MOLAP– Limited number of dimensions– Not Flexible

• ROLAP– Not User-friendly

• HOLAP– A poor combination of the two above methods

Summary

Page 16: Vs. OLAP. Geography heirarchy Sales campaigns Other dimension Products Time Sales, profit, costs, key numbers, etc. Sales organization Star Scheme.

• Data warehouse not necessary• Unlimited number of dimensions• Possibility for several hypercubes talking to

each other• Flexible• User-Friendly

Summary


Recommended