WAKE CHARACTERISTICS OF YAWED
CIRCULAR CYLINDERS AND SUPPRESSION
OF VORTEX-INDUCED VIBRATION USING
HELICAL STRAKES
by
SITI FATIN MOHD RAZALI
This thesis is presented for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
of
The University of Western Australia
School of Civil and Resource Engineering
November 2010
DECLARATION FOR THESIS CONTAINING PUBLISHED WORK
AND/OR WORK PREPARED FOR PUBLICATION
This thesis contains published work and/or work prepared for publication, some of
which has been co-authored. The bibliographical details of the work and where it
appears in the thesis are outlined below.
1. Zhou, T., Razali, S.F.M., Zhou, Y., Chua, L.P. and Cheng, L. (2009). Dependence
of the wake on inclination of a stationary cylinder. Experiments in Fluids. 46,
1125-1138. (Chapter 2).
The estimated percentage contribution of the candidate is 40%.
2. Zhou, T., Wang, H., Razali, S.F.M., Zhou, Y. and Cheng, L. (2010). Three-
dimensionality vorticity measurements in the wake of a yawed circular
cylinder. Physics of Fluids. 22, 015108: 1-15. (Chapter 3).
The estimated percentage contribution of the candidate is 30%.
3. Wang, H., Razali, S.F.M., Zhou, T., Zhou, Y. and Cheng, L. (2011). Streamwise
evolution of an inclined cylinder wake. Accepted for publication in
Experiments in Fluids. (Chapter 4).
The estimated percentage contribution of the candidate is 40%.
4. Razali, S.F.M., Zhou, T., Rinoshika, A. and Cheng, L. (2010). Wavelet analysis of
the turbulent wake generated by an inclined circular cylinder. Journal of
Turbulence. 11, No. 15: 1-25. (Chapter 5).
The estimated percentage contribution of the candidate is 85%.
5. Razali, S.F.M., Zhou, T. and Cheng, L. (2010). On the study of the wake behind
two yawed cylinders in side-by-side arrangement. To be submitted. (Chapter
6).
The estimated percentage contribution of the candidate is 85%.
6. Zhou, T., Razali, S.F.M., Hao, Z. and Cheng, L. (2011). On the study of vortex-
induced vibration of a cylinder with helical strakes. Accepted for publication in
Journal of Fluids and Structures. (Chapter 7).
The estimated percentage contribution of the candidate is 45%.
Siti Fatin Mohd. Razali
Candidate‟s Name Signature Date
Prof. Tongming Zhou
Coordinating Supervisor‟s Name
Signature Date
Prof. Liang Cheng
Co-Supervisor‟s Name Signature Date
i
ABSTRACT
The research carried out in this thesis has been focused on the characteristics of
the wakes of a single cylinder and two cylinders arranged side-by-side at various
cylinder yaw angles (= 0°-45°). The independence principle (IP) was examined. As
helical strake is one of the most proven and widely used control measures in
engineering applications to suppress vortex-induced vibration (VIV) of cylindrical
structures, the mechanism of VIV mitigation using helical strakes is also investigated
for a single cylinder. The main findings are summarized as follow:
In Chapter 2, the dependence of the wake characteristics at streamwise locations
of x/d = 10-40 on cylinder yaw angles is examined. It was found that the spanwise mean
velocity W , which represents the three-dimensionality of the wake flow, increases
monotonically with . The root-mean-square (rms) values of the streamwise (u) and
spanwise (w) velocities and the three vorticity components decrease significantly with
the increase of , whereas the transverse velocity (v) does not follow the same trend.
The vortex shedding frequency decreases with the increase of . The Strouhal number
StN, obtained by using the velocity component normal to the cylinder axis, remains
approximately a constant within the experimental uncertainty when < 40, indicating
the validity of IP over this range of yaw angles.
In Chapter 3, phase-averaging technique is used to analyze the velocity and
vorticity signals and to obtain the coherent and incoherent contours at a streamwise
location of x/d = 10. When 15, the maximum coherent concentrations of the three
vorticity components do not change with . However, when is increased to 45, the
maximum concentrations of the coherent transverse and spanwise vorticity components
decrease by about 33% and 50% respectively while that of the streamwise vorticity
increases by about 70%, suggesting the generation of the secondary streamwise vortices
and that the strength of the Kármán vortex shed from the yawed cylinder decreases and
the three-dimensionality of the flow is enhanced.
In Chapter 4, the streamwise evolution of a yawed cylinder wake at downstream
locations x/d = 10-40 from the cylinder is examined by using phase-averaging
technique. At x/d = 10, the effects of on the three coherent vorticity components are
negligibly small for ≤ 15°. When increases further to 45°, the maximum of
coherent spanwise vorticity reduces by about 50%, while that of the streamwise
ii
vorticity increases by about 70%. Similar results are found at x/d = 20, indicating the
impaired spanwise vortices and the enhancement of the three-dimensionality of the
wake with increasing . The streamwise decay rate of the coherent spanwise
vorticity is smaller for a larger . This is because the streamwise spacing between the
spanwise vortices is bigger for a larger , resulting in a weak interaction between the
vortices and hence slower decaying rate in the streamwise direction.
In Chapter 5, wavelet method is used to examine the dependence of the velocity
and vorticity characteristics at different wavelet levels on as compared with that
obtained at = 0°. It was found that the IP is only applicable for < 40°. The energy
spectra for the intermediate- and large-scale structures decrease in terms of their
maximum energy and disperse extensively over an enlarged frequency band with the
increase of . At = 45, the large-scale vortex dislocations may occur due to the
increase of the three-dimensionality in the wake region. Although the large-scale
structures are the dominant contributors to the Reynolds stresses at all inclination angles
and followed by the intermediate-scale structures, the wake vorticity is mostly
dominated by the small and intermediate-scale structures and has the smallest values at
large-scale structures.
In Chapter 6, the wake structures behind two yawed cylinders in side-by-side
arrangement for two centre-to-centre cylinder spacings T* = 3.0 and 1.7 are studied. For
large cylinder spacing T* = 3.0, there exist two vortex streets and the cylinders behave
as independent and isolated ones. The lateral distance between the two centres of vortex
streets for the T* = 3.0 wake is about 3d. When < 40°, the IP is applicable in terms of
the Strouhal number. The coherent streamwise vorticity contours *~x for T
* = 3.0 is
only about 10% of that of *~z in a cross-flow. With the increase of , *~
x increases
while *~z decreases. At = 45°, *~
x is about 67% of *~z , indicating the existence of the
secondary axial vortices or the occurrence of the vortex dislocation with an enhanced
three-dimensionality with larger . For intermediate cylinder spacing T* = 1.7, the IP is
applicable to the wake when < 40°. The values of the spanwise velocity *W is not
close to zero, even at = 0°, which suggests that the vortex in the wake is inclined and
the wake may not behave a perfect two-dimensionality. The vorticity contours for T* =
1.7 have a more organized pattern at = 0° while become scattered and smaller with
the increase of yaw angles. The vorticity contours for T* = 1.7 are much less organized
iii
and the weakest in comparison with those for T* = ∞ and 3.0, indicating that the vortex
motion in the wake is not stable.
In Chapter 7, the mechanisms of VIV mitigation using helical strakes is studied.
It was found that the helical strakes can reduce VIV by about 98%. Unlike the bare
cylinder which experiences lock-in over the reduced velocity in the range of 5-8.5, the
straked cylinder does not show any lock-in region and the vortices shed from the straked
cylinder are weakened significantly. This is because the strakes do not necessarily
suppress vortex shedding, but the wake is strongly disorganized as the helical strakes
prevent the vortex from being correlated along the span, hence is not able to excite VIV
significantly. The correlation length of the vortex structures in the bare cylinder is much
larger than that obtained in the straked cylinder wake. As a result, the straked cylinder
wake agrees more closely with isotropy than the bare cylinder wake.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I owe my deepest gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Tongming Zhou for his
continuous support, guidance, priceless discussion, understanding and highly
responsibility throughout my PhD study. I deeply appreciate his effort to provide his
time enabled me to understand this subject.
I am grateful to my co-supervisor Prof. Liang Cheng for his help and guidance
and providing me the opportunity to pursue my PhD study at the University of Western
Australia (UWA) and some financial support
It is an honour for me to acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of
Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE), the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) and
the Ad-Hoc Scholarship from School of Civil and Resource Engineering and Graduate
Research School, UWA for me to pursue my PhD study.
I would like to thank the postgraduate students and staff of School of Civil and
Resource Engineering and Centre of Offshore Foundation Systems, UWA for providing
me a good and friendly study environment to maximize my learning efficiency in the
past years.
I am indebted to my husband Mohd. Thabrani Marwan and my daughter Nurina
Huda for their continuous love and patience for me to finish my PhD journey. They are
my motivation and have made available their support in a number of ways.
Finally, this thesis would not have been possible without encouragement from
my parents Mohd. Razali Mohd. Yunus and Wan Rihayah Wan Ahmad, my brother and
my sisters.
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS v
LIST OF TABLES ix
LIST OF FIGURES x
LIST OF SYMBOLS xvi
ABBREVIATIONS xx
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Research Motivations ................................................................................................ 5
1.3 Research Objectives .................................................................................................. 7
1.4 Thesis Outlines .......................................................................................................... 7
CHAPTER 2: DEPENDENCE OF THE WAKE ON YAW ANGLES OF A
STATIONARY CYLINDER 9
2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 9
2.2 Experimental Details ............................................................................................... 12
2.3 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................ 15
2.3.1 Mean streamwise and spanwise velocity distributions ............................... 15
2.3.2 Rms velocity and vorticity distributions across the wake ........................... 16
2.3.3 Dependence of the vortex shedding frequency on ................................... 19
2.3.4 Autocorrelation coefficients ........................................................................ 21
2.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 23
CHAPTER 3: THREE-DIMENSIONAL VORTICITY MEASUREMENTS
IN THE WAKE OF A YAWED CIRCULAR CYLINDER 33
3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 33
3.2 Experimental Details ............................................................................................... 37
3.3 Velocity and Vorticity Signals ................................................................................ 39
3.4 Phase-Averaged Velocity and Vorticity Fields ....................................................... 44
3.4.1 Phase-averaging .......................................................................................... 44
3.4.2 Structural averaging .................................................................................... 46
3.4.3 Coherent vorticity fields .............................................................................. 46
vi
3.4.4 Incoherent vorticity fields ........................................................................... 48
3.4.5 Topology of Reynolds stresses ................................................................... 49
3.5 Coherent and Incoherent Contributions to Velocity and Vorticity Variances ........ 51
3.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 53
CHAPTER 4: STREAMWISE EVOLUTION OF A YAWED CYLINDER
WAKE 67
4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 67
4.2 Experimental Details ............................................................................................. 69
4.3 Time-Averaged Velocities and Wake Periodicity ............................................... 71
4.3.1 Distributions of time-averaged streamwise and spanwise velocities..... 71
4.3.2 Power spectral density functions of velocities and vorticities ............... 72
4.4 Phase-Averaged Results ........................................................................................ 73
4.4.1 Brief introduction to phase-averaging technique .................................... 73
4.4.2 Phase-averaged vorticity fields ................................................................. 75
4.4.3 Phase-averaged velocity fields ................................................................. 77
4.4.4 Phase-averaged Reynolds shear stresses .................................................. 79
4.5 Coherent Contributions to Reynolds Stresses and Vorticity Variances ............ 80
4.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 84
CHAPTER 5: WAVELET ANALYSIS OF THE TURBULENT WAKE
GENERATED BY A YAWED CIRCULAR CYLINDER 101
5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 101
5.2 Experimental Details ............................................................................................. 105
5.3 Decomposition of Experimental Signals into Various Wavelet Levels ................ 107
5.4 Results and Discussion .......................................................................................... 109
5.4.1 Spectra of measured and wavelet components of the velocity signals ..... 110
5.4.2 Strouhal numbers from the measured and wavelet components of
velocity signals .......................................................................................... 112
5.4.3 Contributions to velocity variances from different wavelet components . 113
5.4.4 Contributions to vorticity variances from different wavelet components . 115
5.4.5 Autocorrelation coefficients of velocity components at different
wavelet levels ............................................................................................ 117
5.4.6 Flow visualization of the yawed cylinder wake ........................................ 119
5.5 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 120
vii
CHAPTER 6: ON THE STUDY OF THE WAKE BEHIND TWO YAWED
CYLINDERS IN SIDE-BY-SIDE ARRANGEMENT 131
6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 131
6.2 Experimental Details ............................................................................................. 134
6.2.1 Experimental arrangement ........................................................................ 134
6.2.2 Velocity and vorticity signals from the X-probes ..................................... 134
6.2.3 Phase-averaging method ........................................................................... 136
6.3 Results and Discussion .......................................................................................... 138
6.3.1 Mean streamwise and spanwise velocity profiles ..................................... 138
6.3.2 Power spectra of velocity and vorticity signals......................................... 141
6.3.3 Phase-averaged vorticity fields ................................................................. 143
6.3.4 Spanwise vortex patterns using the phase-averaged velocity
components ............................................................................................... 148
6.3.5 Incoherent vorticity fields ......................................................................... 149
6.3.6 Phase-averaged velocity components ....................................................... 149
6.3.7 Phase-averaged Reynolds shear stresses ................................................... 151
6.3.8 Incoherent Reynolds shear stresses ........................................................... 152
6.3.9 Coherent and incoherent contributions to Reynolds stresses .................... 153
6.3.10 Coherent and incoherent contributions to vorticity variances................... 155
6.4 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 157
CHAPTER 7: ON THE STUDY OF VORTEX-INDUCED VIBRATION
OF A CYLINDER WITH HELICAL STRAKES 183
7.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 183
7.2 Experimental Details ............................................................................................. 185
7.3 Results and Discussion .......................................................................................... 188
7.3.1 Vortex shedding frequency for the bare and straked cylinders ................. 188
7.3.2 Vortex-induced vibration for the bare and straked cylinders .................... 189
7.3.3 Energy spectra in the streamwise and spanwise directions of the
stationary cylinders ................................................................................... 191
7.3.4 Cross-correlations in the stationary cylinder wakes.................................. 194
7.3.5 Flow visualization of the stationary cylinder wakes ................................. 195
7.3.6 Isotropy assessments in the wake of stationary cylinders ......................... 196
7.4 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 198
viii
CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 209
8.1 Summary of Findings ............................................................................................ 209
8.2 Recommendations for Future Research ................................................................ 213
REFERENCES 215
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1. Values of U0, L and rms velocities on the wake centreline for different
downstream locations and yaw angles .......................................................... 25
Table 3-1. Flatness factors of the vorticity components at = 0° and 45° ..................... 56
Table 3-2. The vortex shedding angle , vortex shedding frequency f0, convection
velocity Uc, wavelength and the inclination angle between the main
vortex stretching direction and the x-axis for different cylinder yaw
angles............................................................................................................. 56
Table 3-3. The maximum contour values of the coherent vorticity and Reynolds
stresses for different yaw angles ................................................................... 56
Table 4-1. Position and the measured velocities of each X-probe contained in the
vorticity probe ............................................................................................... 86
Table 4-2. Maximum velocity deficit and wake half-width ............................................ 86
Table 4-3. The maximum values of the coherent vorticity, velocity and Reynolds
stresses contours for different yaw angles at x* = 10, 20 and 40 .................. 87
Table 4-4. Averaged contributions from the coherent motion to Reynolds stresses
and vorticity variances for different yaw angles at x* = 10, 20 and 40 ......... 88
Table 5-1. Summary of the experimental conditions on wake centreline ..................... 122
Table 5-2. Central frequencies f0 and their respective frequency bandwidth of the v
signal of wavelet levels 1-8 at y/d ≈ 0.5 for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° ........ 122
Table 6-1. The vortex shedding angle, maximum velocity defect, convection
velocity, half-width, normalized Strouhal number and wavelength at
different yaw angles for cylinder spacings T* = ∞, 3.0 and 1.7 .................. 159
Table 6-2. The maximum values of the coherent vorticity, velocity and Reynolds
stresses contours at different yaw angles for T* = ∞, 3.0 and 1.7 ............... 160
Table 7-1. Velocity ratio 22 / uv at different downstream locations in
the stationary bare and straked cylinder wakes ........................................... 200
x
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1 Definition of the coordinate system and the sketches of the vorticity
probe ........................................................................................................... 26
Figure 2-2. Normalized mean streamwise velocity distribution for different yaw
angles.. ......................................................................................................... 26
Figure 2-3. Normalized mean spanwise velocity distribution for different yaw
angles.. ......................................................................................................... 27
Figure 2-4. Normalized velocity gradients for different yaw angles at x/d = 20 ............. 27
Figure 2-5. Distributions of u′ for different yaw angles ................................................... 28
Figure 2-6. Distribution of v′ for different yaw angles .................................................... 28
Figure 2-7. Distributions of w′ for different yaw angles .................................................. 29
Figure 2-8. Distributions of x′, y′ and z′ at x/d = 10 for different yaw angles ........... 29
Figure 2-9. Dependence of the cross-correlation coefficient zw , between the
spanwise velocity w and the spanwise vorticity z on at different
streamwise locations .................................................................................... 30
Figure 2-10. Spectral density function v of the transverse velocity component at
x/d = 10 for different yaw angles ................................................................. 30
Figure 2-11. Comparison of StN with other experimental and numerical results ............ 31
Figure 2-12. Autocorrelation coefficient u for different yaw angles ............................ 31
Figure 2-13. Autocorrelation coefficient v for different yaw angles ............................ 32
Figure 2-14. Autocorrelation coefficient w for different yaw angles ............................ 32
Figure 3-1. Sketches of the coordinate system and the 3-dimensional vorticity probe ... 57
Figure 3-2. Time traces of the fluctuating transverse velocity v and the three
vorticity components measured at y/d = 0.5 ................................................ 58
Figure 3-3. Probability density function of vorticity components at = 0° and 45° ...... 59
Figure 3-4. Spectra of three vorticity components at (a): = 0° and (b) = 45° ........... 59
Figure 3-5. Normalized velocity gradients for different at x/d = 10 ............................ 60
Figure 3-6. Autocorrelation coefficient i
for different ............................................ 60
Figure 3-7. Phase-averaged coherent vorticity contours at different . .......................... 61
xi
Figure 3-8. Phase-averaged sectional streamlines at different . .................................... 62
Figure 3-9. Phase-averaged incoherent vorticity contours at different ........................ 63
Figure 3-10. Phase-averaged velocities contours at different . ..................................... 64
Figure 3-11. Phase-averaged Reynolds shear stresses at different ............................... 65
Figure 3-12. Time-averaged Reynolds normal stresses and their coherent and
incoherent contributions at different . ....................................................... 66
Figure 3-13. Lateral distribution of coherent contributions to vorticity variances .......... 66
Figure 4-1. Definition of the coordinate system and the sketches of the vorticity
probe.. .......................................................................................................... 89
Figure 4-2. Time-averaged u- and w-component velocities at different yaw angles ....... 89
Figure 4-3. Sketch of the inclined vortices in a yawed cylinder wake ............................ 90
Figure 4-4. The power spectra density function u, v and w of the three velocity
components for different yaw angles ........................................................... 90
Figure 4-5. The power spectra density function x ,
y and z of the three
vorticity components for different yaw angles ............................................ 91
Figure 4-6. Signal v from the X-probe B of the vorticity probe at x* = 10 and y
* ≈
0.5. The thicker line represents the filtered signal vf. .................................. 91
Figure 4-7. Phase-averaged vorticity components at x* = 20 for different yaw
angles ........................................................................................................... 92
Figure 4-8. Phase-averaged vorticity components at x* = 40 for different yaw angles ... 93
Figure 4-9. Phase-averaged velocities at x* = 20 for different yaw angles ...................... 94
Figure 4-10. Phase-averaged velocities at x* = 40 for different yaw angles .................... 95
Figure 4-11. Phase-averaged Reynolds stresses at x* = 20 for different yaw angles ....... 96
Figure 4-12. Coherent and incoherent contributions to time-averaged Reynolds
stresses for different yaw angle at x* = 20. .................................................. 97
Figure 4-13. Coherent and incoherent contributions to time-averaged Reynolds
stresses for different yaw angle at x* = 40. .................................................. 98
Figure 4-14. Coherent contribution to vorticity variances for different yaw angles
at x* = 10, 20 and 40 .................................................................................... 99
Figure 5-1. Definition of the coordinate system and the sketches of the vorticity
probe. ......................................................................................................... 123
xii
Figure 5-2. Basic concept of the wavelet multiresolution analysis ............................... 123
Figure 5-3. Spectra of the v-signal measured at y/d ≈ 0.5, and a correspondence
between the central frequencies (or levels i) and the dimensions of
the vortex structures for different cylinder yaw angles ............................. 124
Figure 5-4. Comparison between (a-d) spectra of the v-signal measured at y/d ≈ 0.5
for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° respectively; and (e-h) spectra of various
wavelet levels at y/d ≈ 0.5 for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° respectively ........ 125
Figure 5-5. Peak frequency fN on the energy spectra and the ratio 0
/ NN ff for
various wavelet levels at y/d ≈ 0.5 ............................................................. 126
Figure 5-6. Velocity variances 2u , 2v and 2w of the measured
signals for different cylinder yaw angles ................................................... 126
Figure 5-7. Velocity variances 2iu , 2
iv and 2iw at various wavelet
levels for = 0° and 45° ............................................................................ 127
Figure 5-8. Vorticity variances 2x , 2
y and 2z of the measured
signals for different cylinder yaw angles ................................................... 128
Figure 5-9. Vorticity variances 2,ix , 2
,iy and 2,iz at various wavelet
levels for = 0 and 45 ............................................................................ 129
Figure 5-10. Autocorrelation coefficients of v at y/d ≈ 0.5 for various wavelet
levels at different cylinder yaw angles ...................................................... 130
Figure 5-11. Flow visualization of wake with the existence of secondary vortex
and streamwise vortex when = 45° ........................................................ 130
Figure 6-1. Two cylinders side-by-side arrangement with definitions of the
coordinate system and the sketches of the vorticity probe ........................ 161
Figure 6-2. The experimental setup of two cylinders with side-by-side
arrangement ............................................................................................... 162
Figure 6-3. Time traces of v signals measured at y* = 0.5 for different angles in
arbitrary scales. (a) T* = 3.0; (b) T
* = 1.7. The thicker line represents
the filtered signal vf. ................................................................................... 163
Figure 6-4.Comparisons of time-averaged velocities at different yaw angles for
T* = 3.0 and 1.7. ......................................................................................... 164
xiii
Figure 6-5. Normalized velocity gradients at different yaw angles for (a) T* = 3.0;
(b) 1.7 ......................................................................................................... 164
Figure 6-6. The power spectra of u, v and w components for different cylinder
spacings at (a, c): = 0°; (b, d): 45° .......................................................... 165
Figure 6-7. The power spectra of x, y, z components for different cylinder
spacings at (a, c): = 0°; (b, d): 45° .......................................................... 165
Figure 6-8. Strouhal number StN for different cylinder spacings ................................... 166
Figure 6-9. Phase-averaged vorticity components at different yaw angles for
T* = 3.0. ..................................................................................................... 167
Figure 6-10. Phase-averaged vorticity components at different yaw angles for
T* = 1.7. ..................................................................................................... 168
Figure 6-11. Coherent vorticity contours *~z from phase-averaged *~u and *~v at
different yaw angles for T* = 3.0. .............................................................. 169
Figure 6-12. Coherent vorticity contours *~z from phase-averaged *~u and *~v at
different yaw angles for T* = 1.7. .............................................................. 169
Figure 6-13. Phase-averaged sectional streamlines at different yaw angles for
T* = 3.0. ...................................................................................................... 170
Figure 6-14. Phase-averaged sectional streamlines at different yaw angles for
T* = 1.7.. ..................................................................................................... 170
Figure 6-15. Phase-averaged incoherent vorticity contours at different yaw angles
for T*
= 3.0.. ............................................................................................... 171
Figure 6-16. Phase-averaged incoherent vorticity contours at different yaw angles
for T*
= 1.7 ................................................................................................. 172
Figure 6-17. Phase-averaged velocities components at different yaw angles for
T* = 3.0.. .................................................................................................... 173
Figure 6-18. Phase-averaged velocities components at different yaw angles for
T* = 1.7 ...................................................................................................... 174
Figure 6-19. Phase-averaged Reynolds stresses at different yaw angles for T* = 3.0.. . 175
Figure 6-20. Phase-averaged Reynolds stresses at different yaw angles for T* = 1.7. .. 176
Figure 6-21. Phase-averaged incoherent Reynolds stresses at different yaw angles
for T* = 3.0. ................................................................................................ 177
xiv
Figure 6-22. Phase-averaged incoherent Reynolds stresses at different yaw angles
for T* = 1.7 ................................................................................................. 178
Figure 6-23. Time-averaged Reynolds stresses and their coherent and incoherent
contributions at different yaw angles for T* = 3.0 ..................................... 179
Figure 6-24. Time-averaged Reynolds stresses and their coherent and incoherent
contributions at different yaw angles for T* = 1.7 ..................................... 180
Figure 6-25. Coherent contribution to vorticity variances for different yaw angles. .... 181
Figure 7-1. Geometry of the cylinder with three-strand helical strakes and
definition of the coordinate system. ........................................................... 201
Figure 7-2. Experimental setup of the straked cylinder ................................................. 201
Figure 7-3. Velocity spectra in the wake of the stationary bare and straked
cylinders on the centreline at x/d =5 for Re = 20430. ................................ 201
Figure 7-4. Vortex shedding frequency from the bare cylinder normalized by the
natural frequency. ...................................................................................... 202
Figure 7-5. Comparison of vibration response of a bare cylinder. ................................ 202
Figure 7-6. Comparison of vibration response between bare cylinder and straked
cylinder. ..................................................................................................... 203
Figure 7-7. Energy spectra obtained on the centreline at different streamwise
locations for Re = 20430 in the stationary bare and straked cylinder
wakes. ........................................................................................................ 203
Figure 7-8. Energy spectra obtained at different spanwise locations in the
stationary bare and straked cylinder wakes at x/d =5 for Re = 20430. ...... 204
Figure 7-9. Cross-correlation coefficients in the stationary bare and straked
cylinder at x/d =5 for Re = 20430. ............................................................. 204
Figure 7-10. Cross-correlation coefficients of the velocity components in the
stationary bare and straked cylinder wakes obtained at x/d =5 for
Re = 20430. ................................................................................................ 205
Figure 7-11. Flow visualization of the bare and straked cylinder wakes. ..................... 205
Figure 7-12. Velocity spectra calv and m
v and the ratio calv
mv / between the
measured and calculated transverse velocity spectra in the stationary
straked cylinder wake at various downstream locations and Reynolds
numbers. ..................................................................................................... 206
xv
Figure 7-13. Velocity spectra calv and m
v and the ratio calv
mv / between the
measured and calculated transverse velocity spectra in the stationary
bare cylinder wake at various downstream locations and Reynolds
numbers. ..................................................................................................... 207
xvi
LIST OF SYMBOLS
Re Reynolds number
Kinematic viscosity
Yaw / Inclination angle
Vortex shedding angle
Inclination angle between the main vortex stretching direction
and the x-axis
d Cylinder diameter
dw Hot wire diameter
t Time
l Length
P Pitch
h Height
k Stiffness
* Superscript asterisk denotes normalization
Difference value
U∞ Free-stream velocity
Uc Convection velocity of vortices
U0 Velocity defect
UN Velocity component normal to the cylinder axis
St Strouhal number
St0 Strouhal number at = 0°
StN Strouhal number normalized by velocity component normal to
the cylinder axis
f0 Peak/ central frequency
fc Cut-off frequency
fn Natural frequency
fs Sampling frequency
fk Kolmogorov frequency
fN Peak/ central frequency normalized by diameter and velocity
component normal to the cylinder axis
0Nf Peak/ central frequency normalized by diameter and velocity
component normal to the cylinder axis at = 0°
xvii
x Streamwise/ longitudinal direction (or location)
y Transverse / lateral direction (or location)
z Spanwise direction (or location)
U (or V and W) Measured velocity component
u (or v and w) Velocity fluctuation component
x (or y and z) Vorticity component
a′ Superscript prime denotes root-mean-square
a Over-bar denotes time-averaging (average value)
a Double over-bar denotes structural average
2a Variance of an instantaneous quantity a
ka Phase average of an instantaneous quantity a, where k
represents the phase
a~ Tilde denotes coherent structure
ar Subscript r denotes incoherent structure
af Filtered signal
Standard deviation
L Wake half-width
Wavelength
T Longitudinal Taylor microscale
R Taylor microscale Reynolds number
Kolmogorov length scale
uk Kolmogorov velocity
Mean turbulent energy dissipation rate
k1 Longitudinal wavenumber
SW Maximum velocity gradients on the distributions of yW /
SU Maximum velocity gradients on the distributions of yU /
yU / (or yW / ) Mean velocity gradient
N Total number
Ts Record duration
T0 Average vortex shedding period
Tu Integral time scale
s second
3D Three-dimensional
xviii
2D Two-dimensional
A/D Analogue-to-digital
a Autocorrelation coefficient of a velocity signal a
)(, zba Cross-correlation coefficient between two velocity signals a
and b in term of the spanwise variation
)(, baR Cross-correlation coefficient between two velocity signals a
and b in term of time delay
La Integral length scale
21,aaL Correlation length
Pa Probability density function
Fa Flatness factors
a Spectral density function of a signal
Phase
r Longitudinal separation between the two points (Taylor‟s
hypothesis eq.)
ar The location at which a has the first zero-crossing
Time delay
0 Time at which the first zero crossing occurs
i Wavelet level
G High-pass wavelet filter
H Low-pass wavelet filter
G~
High-pass synthesis filter
H~
Low-pass synthesis filter
i
vD High-pass subband
i
vA Low-pass residue
ivd Detail signal
iva Approximation signal
T Lateral spacing between two cylinders
Vr Reduced velocity
m Structural mass including the enclosed fluid mass
mf Displaced fluid mass
s Structural damping factor
xix
SG Response parameter
Ks Stability parameter
A Vibration amplitude
Hz Hertz
m metre
cm centimetre
mm millimetre
m micrometre
dB decibel
xx
ABBREVIATIONS
CFD Computational fluid dynamics
DWT Discrete wavelet transform
FFT Fast Fourier transform
IP Independence principle
LVDT Linear variable differential transformer
VIV Vortex-induced vibration
eq. Equation
pdf Probability density function
rms Root-mean-square
sect. Section
vs Versus
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Overview
Throughout the world there are at present about more than 180,000 km of subsea
pipelines. Pipeline systems evolve into two main types which include that situated on
the sea floor and that arranged in vertical configurations. Both types are used to
transport oil and gas. Examples of the vertical pipeline systems include risers to carry
electric power lines, drilling tools, cold water pipes for ocean thermal energy and
dredge pipes for deep sea mining (Wilson, 2002). Flows past pipelines can be best
represented by flows past circular cylinders. As a fluid particle flows towards the
leading edge of the cylinder, the pressure in the fluid increases from the free-stream
pressure to the stagnation pressure. The high pressure at the stagnation point “pushes”
the fluid particles to follow the cylinder surface as the boundary layers develop along
the surface. However, the pressure is not sufficiently high to force the fluid particle to
flow closely along the cylinder surface at high velocities (or Reynolds numbers Re).
Around the widest section of the cylinder, the fluid particles near the cylinder surface
cannot follow the cylinder and start to separate from the surface and form two shear
layers. Since the innermost portion of the shear layers moves much slower than the
outermost portion of the shear layers, they roll into the near wake alternatively and
regularly from both sides of the cylinder. This process is known as vortex shedding.
Vortex shedding is an unsteady flow that is created at the back of the cylinder
and formed periodically at both sides of the structure. A few flow regimes have been
identified for vortex shedding previously, depending on the magnitude of Reynolds
number Re, which is defined as Re = U∞d/, where U∞ is the free-stream velocity; d is
cylinder diameter and is kinematic viscosity of the fluid. When Reynolds number is in
the range of 5 Re 45, the flow separates from the cylinder surface to form a
symmetric pair of vortices in the near wake. As Re is increased further, the wake
becomes unstable and one of the vortices breaks away forming a periodic laminar wake
with staggered vortices of opposite sign. The wake becomes turbulent when Re is in the
range of 150 and 300, regardless of the boundary layer on the cylinder remains laminar.
2
The wake flow is completely turbulent when Reynolds number is in the range of 300
and 3105, which is called as subcritical regime. The boundary layer over the cylinder
surface remains laminar and separates from the cylinder surface at about 80° aft the
stagnation point. The vortex shedding is strong and periodic. When Reynolds number is
in the range of 3105 to 3.510
6, the boundary layer over the cylinder surface is in the
transition from laminar to turbulent. In this regime, the separation points move aft to
140° from the stagnation point and the wake becomes narrower and disorganized. The
laminar separation bubbles and three-dimensional effects disrupt the regular vortex
shedding process and resulting in the generation of smaller size vortices and the
broadening of the vortex shedding frequency. Lastly, when Re is increased over 3.5106
(supercritical flow regime), a new vortex shedding is formed with the both sides of
boundary layer are completely turbulent. When vortex is shed from a bluff body,
alternating low pressure vortexes are created along the surface of the structure. The
structure will tend to move towards the low pressure side resulting in the fluctuating
forces acting on the element in both transverse and in-line directions to the current. The
forces will result in large vibrations in the same manner as the vortex is shedding from
the structure, which will influence the life-span of the structure. This phenomenon is
called as vortex-induced vibration.
Vortex-induced vibration (VIV) is widely recognized in the offshore industry as
one of the main causes of fatigue damage to structures, such as marine piles, submarine
periscopes and braced members of offshore structures, exposing to flows and vacillating
in both the in line and cross flow directions. The cross flow oscillations can be excited
at flow velocities greater than the in-line motion (King, 1977b). VIV should be avoided
in engineering applications. This is because: (1) VIV will increase the fluid dynamic
loading to the structures; (2) it will also influence the stability of the structures; and (3)
the vibration of the structures will accelerate the fatigue failure etc. The above factors
will influence both capital investment of the structures and expenses for the
maintenance.
Despite of all previous investigations on vortex shedding from a single cylinder
with normal incidence of velocity where the flow is perpendicular to the cylinder, there
are also many studies concentrate on the vortex shedding behaviours from a yawed
cylinder (e.g. Hanson, 1966; Van Atta, 1968; King, 1977b; Ramberg, 1983;
Kozakiewicz et al., 1995; Lucor and Karniadakis, 2003; Marshall, 2003; Thakur et al.,
2004). These studies are important as in the engineering applications such as suspension
3
bridges, marine pipeline and risers; the flow may not be perpendicular to the bluff body.
In these cases, the vortex shedding from the yawed cylinder structures may be different
with that of a cylinder in a normal incidence flow. The definition of the yaw angle of
a cylinder is the angle between the free-stream flow and the plane which is
perpendicular to the cylinder. Therefore, = 0° is corresponding to the cross-flow case
while = 90° is corresponding to the axial flow case. In a yawed cylinder case, it was
suggested that the Strouhal number St are approximately independent of the yaw angle
when normalized by the free-stream velocity component normal to the cylinder axis UN
(≡ U∞ cos ). This is known as a cosine law or independence principle (IP). However,
there are several studies showed deviations from the IP, mostly at large yaw angles
(Van Atta, 1968; King, 1977a; Ramberg, 1983). They suggested that the IP may not be
suitable for all yaw angles. For example, based on the study of Van Atta (1968), the
vortex shedding frequency tends to decrease with the increase of , for < 35o, while
the decreasing vortex shedding frequency is slower for larger yaw angles. Therefore, the
IP is still a doubt principle in matter of its use in yaw circular cylinder.
In many engineering applications, multiple cylindrical structures are often found
in close proximity. Some examples include: (1) oil platform, which contains column
groups; (2) pile groups in marine structures; (3) floating structures either coupled or
interlinked; and (4) group of tall chimneys and tall buildings, etc. Thus, the study of the
flow in the wakes of multiple cylinders is relevant to many engineering applications and
will lead to improve understanding on the vortex shedding phenomenon on such
multiple bluff-body configurations. A critical review on wakes generated by multiple
cylinders of various arrangements has been given by Zdravkovich (1977). He stated that
there are mainly three groups of possible arrangements of two parallel cylinders,
depending on the approaching flow directions. The first group is cylinders which are in
a tandem arrangement, one behind the other at any longitudinal spacing; the second
group is cylinders placed side-by-side facing the flow at any transverse spacing and the
last group is staggered arrangement, a combination of the two previous arrangements.
Numerical and experimental studies of flow around cylinders in a side-by-side
arrangement have been done by many researchers (Gowda and Deshkulkarni, 1987;
Zhou et al., 2002; Jester and Kallinderis, 2004; Alam and Zhou, 2007a). There are many
major parameters that may be responsible for vortex shed from two cylinders arranged
side-by-side with normal velocity incidence (i.e. the flow is perpendicular to the
cylinders) such as initial conditions, pressure distribution and Reynolds number
4
(Zdravkovich, 1977; Williamson, 1985; Zhou et al., 2002). Besides the parameters
mentioned above, the vortex structures are also influenced by the centre-to-centre
cylinder spacing T. Various flow patterns and behaviours have been identified as the
cylinder spacing T is varied. For example, the variations of T from close proximity
spacing to large spacing could contribute to the formation of a single or multiple wakes.
The T variations are divided into three regimes classification, which are the large
cylinder spacings regime (T ≥ 2d), intermediate cylinder spacing regime (1.2d < T < 2d)
and small cylinder spacing regime (T 1.2d). It is expected that the turbulence wake for
the large cylinder spacing regime may form two vortex streets that are strongly coupled
forming symmetrical wake while that for the intermediate cylinder spacing regime may
form two vortex streets and forming deflected flow, one is wide and the other is narrow.
The small cylinder spacing regime may have the similar wake characteristics as those
for the single cylinder, generating a single vortex street (Sumner et al., 1999; Zhou et
al., 2002; Chen et al., 2003).
Many methods for VIV reduction have been invented by researchers all over the
world. They were suggested to inhibit the formation of vortices or disrupt their
structured formation through the application of the so-called suppression devices.
Zdravkovich (1981) reviewed that there are three categories for interfering vortex
shedding which are surface protrusions, shrouds and near wake stabilisers. Surface
protrusion devices can be grouped into two subdivisions; omnidirectional response type
and unidirectional response type. It suppresses vortex shedding by affecting separation
lines and/or separating shear layers. The examples of surface protrusion devices are
helical wires, helical strake, rectangular plates, bumpy cylinder, fins and spheres with
various arrangements and geometries. However, not all alternatives give satisfied results
in order to suppress the vortex shedding. Slightly change in geometry and arrangement
may give contrary results with an enhancement of oscillation that exceed that found for
the bare cylinders (Zdravkovich, 1981). Helical strake is one of the effective
omnidirectional devices, which is not influenced by fluid velocity direction. The strakes
are screw-like protrusions that are wrapped around the cylinders. It is commonly known
that helical strake is used on cylindrical element to break down large vortices which can
cause VIV and substantial vibrations of the structure, especially when the harmonic load
is at or near the structural natural frequency. However, there are other explanations
about the working mechanism of helical strakes on suppressing VIV. One explanation is
that the strakes cut off the correlation of vortices along the cylinder‟s length and
5
reducing the net transverse force on the cylinder induced by the flow (Thiagarajan et al.,
2005). There is also a belief that the three-dimensionality of separating flow introduced
by the helical strakes destructs the vortex shedding (Bearman and Branković, 2004).
Previous studies also showed that the efficiency of the helical strakes is generally
depending on its geometry, i.e. the height of the protrusion and the pitch of the strakes.
A drawback of the helical strakes is that they may increase drag on pipe sections
significantly. They will also increase the fabrication and installation cost of the
cylindrical structures. Flow visualization done by Constantinides and Oakley (2006)
affirms that the strakes can control the separation of the flow. The helical separation
point at the tip of the strakes induces a three-dimensional flow behind the cylinders
which breaks up the vortex shedding and thus, mitigates VIV. On the other hand, bare
cylinder vibrates with higher amplitude due to the coherent vortex shedding generated
where separation occurred uniformly on the span of the cylinder (Constantinides and
Oakley, 2006). Another mechanism of the helical strakes use to suppress VIV is by
restricting the interaction between two shear layers that are formed due to separation
and acts as obstacle from keeping the shear layers to connect and form the typical
vortices as found in bare cylinders (Constantinides and Oakley, 2006). Many researches
have shown the effectiveness of helical strakes on cylinders in mitigating VIV.
Branković and Bearman (2006) observed that cylinder with helical strakes responds
over a narrow range of reduced flow velocity and its maximum amplitude is decreased
by more than 60%, compared with a bare cylinder. Howells (1998) showed that the
helical strakes can reduce VIV fatigue damage by over 80%. This result was supported
by Vandiver et al. (2006) who performed a study to investigate the effectiveness of
helical strakes in VIV suppressing. They tested experimentally four pipes, which are
bare pipe, pipe with 40% and 70% strakes coverage and pipe with fully strakes
coverage. The study clearly proved that the strakes are effective in mitigating VIV.
1.2 Research Motivations
Since vorticity is an important characteristic of turbulence (Tennekes and
Lumley, 1972), it is important that the turbulent wake characteristics are studied by
measuring all three vorticity components simultaneously. There have been some
published experimental data on vorticity in turbulent near- and intermediate-wake of a
circular cylinder in a cross-flow ( = 0°) (e.g. Marasli et al., 1993; Zhou et al., 2003;
6
Yiu et al., 2004). However, there is no attempt to measure simultaneously the three-
dimensional vorticity components in a yawed cylinder wake. Therefore, the motivation
of the study in the first part of this thesis (Chapter 2) is to provide quantitative
measurements of three-dimensional (3D) velocity and vorticity components in the wake
of a yawed cylinder using a 3D vorticity probe consisting of eight-hot wires. Based on
these measurements, the effects of the yaw angle on the wake characteristics can be
examined in details.
Despite of previous literatures of the yawed cylinder wake studied both
experimentally and numerically (e.g. Lucor and Karniadakis, 2003; Marshall, 2003;
Thakur et al., 2004; Alam and Zhou, 2007b; Zhao et al., 2008), there is no
investigation on the flow structure and its streamwise evolution dependence on yaw
angles. This issue was the motivation of the study in Chapters 3 and 4. In this study, a
phase-averaging technique developed by Kiya & Matsumura (1985) is used to study the
topology of the coherent and incoherent flow structures in the cylinder wake. This
technique is used to analyze the velocity and vorticity signals to obtain the coherent and
incoherent contours and to examine their dependence on cylinder yaw angle. It provides
the quantitative information on the flow structures characteristics and the three-
dimensional velocity and vorticity fields at different downstream locations so that the
effects of the yaw angle on the wake structures and its streamwise evolution can be
examined in details.
In Chapter 5, a discrete wavelet transform (DWT) method is used to analyze the
measured signals by decomposing them into time and frequency domains with wavelet
method. It is a linear decomposition process to convert a signal into a sum of a number
of wavelet components at different scales. The motivation of this chapter is to study the
effect of the yaw angle of a single circular cylinder on the characteristics of large-,
intermediate- and small-scale turbulent structures and to compare them with the
measured large-scale structures.
Although there are some published experimental data on turbulence
characteristics in the wake behind a pair of circular cylinders arranged side-by-side in a
cross-flow (e.g. Bearman and Wadcock, 1973; Zdravkovich, 1977; Williamson, 1985;
Mahir and Rockwell, 1996; Zhou et al., 2001; Zhou et al., 2002), there is no study on
the three-dimensional vorticity characteristics in the wake behind yawed cylinders
arranged side-by-side. Therefore, to gain some more fundamental understanding of the
flow structures in the intermediate wake region, the three-components velocity and
7
vorticity fluctuations in the wake of yawed cylinders arranged side-by-side for cylinder
spacings T = 3.0d and 1.7d are measured using a multiple hotwires vorticity probe.
Based on the data, the effects of the yaw angle and the cylinder spacing on the
turbulence characteristics and vortical structures are examined in details. These aspects
are presented in Chapter 6.
Even though helical strakes are proven effective for suppressing VIV especially
for low mass-damping values, the mechanism of VIV suppression has not yet been fully
understood (Constantinides and Oakley, 2006). Therefore, Chapter 7 aims to shed some
light on the vortex characteristics and to enhance understanding on the mechanisms of
helical strakes have on VIV suppression and to investigate the effect of helical strakes
on vortex shedding from circular cylinders. Comparisons are made between bare
cylinder and the straked cylinder results where the bare cylinder experiment is
performed to provide a benchmark for the straked cylinder system. From the
investigations, the effectiveness of helical strakes on vortex shedding suppression is
evaluated.
The outcomes of this research present reliable deterministic and statistical
methods to predict the VIV effect for wake of a yawed cylinder, two yawed cylinders in
side-by-side arrangement and a helical strakes cylinder.
1.3 Research Objectives
The research objectives of this study are as follows:
i) To investigate the effect of cylinder yaw angle ( = 0°-45°) to the wake
structures and vortex shedding of a single cylinder;
ii) To examine the flow structures downstream of a yawed cylinder;
iii) To investigate the effect of cylinder yaw angle ( = 0°-45°) to the wake
structures and the vortex shedding of two cylinders arranged side-by-side with
centre-to-centre cylinder spacings T = 3.0d and 1.7d ; and
iv) To study the effectiveness of helical strake on a circular cylinder in the reduction
of VIV and to compare the results with those of a bare cylinder.
1.4 Thesis Outlines
This thesis comprises eight chapters. The organization of this thesis is as
follows:
8
In Chapter 1, the background of the study, motivations and objectives of the
study and the outlines of the thesis are presented.
In Chapter 2, three-dimensional velocity and vorticity characteristics of a
stationary cylinder in the streamwise range of x/d = 10-40 and yaw angle of = 0°-45°
are investigated.
In Chapter 3, further investigation on the dependence of the wake vortical
structures on the cylinder yaw angles in the intermediate wake region (x/d = 10) is
carried out by using phase-averaging technique.
In Chapter 4, the streamwise evolution of the yawed cylinder wake at three
downstream location, i.e. x/d = 10, 20 and 40 from the cylinder is investigated by using
phase-averaging technique.
In Chapter 5, wavelet method is used to examine the validity of the
independence principle (IP) of a yawed circular cylinder wake with = 0°-45° at x/d =
10. The velocity and vorticity characteristics at different wavelet scales were also
examined.
In Chapter 6, the wake structures behind two yawed circular cylinders ( = 0°-
45°) in side-by-side arrangement (centre-to-centre cylinder spacings T = 3.0d and 1.7d)
are studied using phase-averaging method.
In Chapter 7, the mechanisms of the reduction of vortex-induced vibration
(VIV) using helical strakes is studied by using hot wire technique and comparisons are
done between the results of the bare cylinder wake and those of the staked cylinder
wake.
In Chapter 8, general conclusions of this study and suggestions for future work
are presented.
9
CHAPTER 2
DEPENDENCE OF THE WAKE ON YAW ANGLES OF A
STATIONARY CYLINDER
2.1 Introduction
Vortex shedding is a phenomenon when a fluid flows over a bluff body at a
sufficiently high velocity, or Reynolds number Re (≡ U∞d/, where U∞ is the free-stream
velocity in the streamwise direction, d is the cylinder diameter and is the kinematic
viscosity of the fluid). When vortex is shed from the bluff body, the latter is subjected to
time-dependent drag and lift forces. The forces will result in vibrations if the vortex shedding
frequency is close to the natural frequency of the bluff body, which may influence the fatigue
life of the structure. This phenomenon is called vortex-induced vibration (VIV). VIV is
widely recognized in the offshore industry as one of the main causes of fatigue damage to
structures, such as marine piles and pipelines, submarine periscopes and braced members of
offshore structures exposing to flows and oscillating in both the in-line and cross-flow
directions. VIV should be avoided in engineering applications due to its influence on the
stability and fatigue life of the structures.
Vortex shedding from a single circular cylinder with normal incidence of velocity (i.e.
the flow is perpendicular to the bluff body) is well documented. The phenomenon has been
investigated extensively by many researchers both in air and water. Previous investigations
have shown that there are three types of vortical structures in the near wake, namely, the
Kármán alternating vortices with predominantly spanwise vorticity (Roshko, 1961), the
longitudinal smaller scale rib-like vortices wrapping around and connecting the consecutive
spanwise structures (Williamson, 1992) and the Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices in the shear layer
(Bloor, 1964). In practical engineering applications, such as the flow past cables of a
suspension bridge (Matsumoto et al., 1992; 2001; Alam and Zhou, 2007b), subsea pipelines
and risers etc., the direction of the flow may not be perpendicular to the bluff body. In these
cases, the fluid velocity in the axial direction of the structure may not be negligible and
vortex shedding from these yawed structures may be different from that of a cylinder in a
cross-flow. Wake flows of a stationary yawed cylinder have been studied by a number of
10
investigators both experimentally in a wind tunnel or water flume (e.g. King, 1977a;
Ramberg, 1983; Kozakiewicz et al., 1995; Lucor and Karniadakis, 2003; Thakur et al., 2004)
and numerically (e.g. Chiba and Horikawa, 1987; Marshall, 2003) for inclination or yaw
angles ranging from 0° to 75°. They have also been studied when a rigid cylinder is subjected
to vibration (e.g. King, 1977b; Ramberg, 1983; Lucor and Karniadakis, 2003). The yaw angle
() is defined as the angle between the free-stream and the plane which is perpendicular to
the cylinder axis so that = 0° corresponds to the cross-flow case while = 90° corresponds
to the axial flow case. The results on cylinder base pressure and vortex shedding frequency
have shown that the yawed cylinders behave in a similar way to the normal-incidence case
through the use of the component of the free-stream velocity normal to the cylinder axis. For
example, the force coefficients and the Strouhal number, when normalized by the velocity
component normal to the cylinder axis, are approximately independent of . This is often
known as the independence principle (IP) or the cosine law in the literature.
Several theoretical and experimental studies have verified the IP (Hoerner, 1965;
Schlichting, 1979). Most experimental and numerical studies have shown deviations from the
predictions based on the IP (Hanson, 1966; Surry and Surry, 1967; Van Atta, 1968; King,
1977b; Ramberg, 1983; Kozakiewicz et al., 1995; Lucor and Karniadakis, 2003; Marshall,
2003; Thakur et al., 2004), especially at large yaw angles. Hanson (1966) studied vortex
shedding from vibrating inclined hot wires in air flow for low Reynolds numbers.
Independence principle was validated at < 68°. Deviation from the IP for vortex shedding
frequencies is found at = 70°. Van Atta (1968) showed that for the non-vibrating yawed
cylinders, the decrease in the vortex shedding frequency follows approximately the IP at ≤
35°, whereas for larger the decrease of vortex shedding frequency with the increase of is
slower than that predicted by the IP. Similar results were reported by Thakur et al. (2004).
Surry and Surry (1967) found that the Strouhal number based on the normal velocity
component is approximately constant for Re = 4,000-63,000 up to = 40°-50°. They also
found that the energy in the Strouhal peak disperses and decreases significantly with the
increase of . By measuring the lift and drag forces of a yawed cylinder in a steady current
and waves, Kozakiewicz et al. (1995) showed that the IP can be applied to stationary
cylinders in the vicinity of a plane wall in the subcritical range at = 0°-45°. Based on flow
visualization in a yawed cylinder wake, they explained that although the approaching flow is
at an angle to the cylinder ( 0°), the streamlines around the surface of the cylinder are
roughly perpendicular to the cylinder axis, justifying the use of the normal velocity
11
components in calculations of shedding frequency and steady drag forces. They found that
the wake flow characteristics began to change at = 55°, and at = 70° the water particles
moved along the cylinder axis rather than perpendicular to the cylinder axis. From the flow
visualization experiments, they inferred that the IP is valid till = 55°. Ramberg (1983)
studied the effect of the yaw angle ( = 60°) and the end conditions on vortex shedding for
stationary and forced vibrating circular cylinders with aspect ratios of 20–90 at Re = 160–
1,100. He found that the results were very sensitive to end-conditions especially at low
Reynolds numbers. He showed that slantwise vortex shedding at angles other than the
cylinder yaw angles is intrinsic to stationary yawed cylinders in the absence of end effects.
As a result, the IP is not valid in the case of stationary yawed cylinders because the shedding
frequency is always greater than that predicted by the IP, while the shedding angle, the
vortex-formation length, the base pressure and the wake width are all less than expected.
However, for vibrating yawed cylinders at Reynolds number in the range of 160-460, vortex
shedding parallel to the cylinder axis is found. Frequency lock-in between the wake and the
cylinder motion was accompanied by vortex shedding parallel to the cylinder axis and the
lock-in vortex wakes can be described successfully by means of the IP. These results were
supported by Lucor and Karniadakis (2003) using a direct numerical simulation of flow past a
yawed cylinder with infinite length, who showed that at high yaw angles (e.g. > 60°), the
vortices shed from the cylinder orientated at a yaw angle somewhat less than the cylinder
yaw angle. They also showed that slantwise shedding at angles other than the cylinder yaw
angle is intrinsic to stationary yawed cylinders in the absence of end effects. The base
pressure is lower than the value predicted by the IP and hence the drag coefficient is higher
than the value predicted the IP. Despite the previous experimental and numerical studies of
yawed cylinder wakes on vortex shedding patterns and base pressure etc., there is no
information about the effect of on 3-dimensional (3D) velocity and vorticity distributions
across the wake of a yawed circular cylinder. Most of the previous numerical and
experimental works have shown, at least in the subcritical region, that the vortex shedding
frequency and forces of a yawed cylinder can be obtained by using the velocity component
normal to the cylinder axis (Lucor and Karniadakis, 2003). Nevertheless, there are some
controversial reports about the range of over which the prediction of vortex shedding
frequency based on the IP is reliable.
In the present study, the effects of on the velocity and vorticity distributions across
the wake, the vortex shedding frequencies and wake characteristics are examined using a 3-
12
dimensional vorticity probe consisting of 8-hot wires at a free-stream velocity U∞ of about
8.5 m/s, corresponding to Re = 7,200, which is high enough to classify the flow as in the
turbulent regime. Since vorticity is an important characteristic of turbulence (Tennekes and
Lumley, 1972), it is important that the turbulent wake characteristics are studied by
measuring all three vorticity components simultaneously. However, the measurement of
vorticity has proven to be a big challenge (e.g. Tsinober et al., 1992; Marasli et al., 1993;
Wallace and Foss, 1995; Antonia et al., 1998; Cavo et al., 2007), especially when all three
components of the vorticity vector are needed in high Reynolds number flows. A few types of
multiple hot wire probes have been developed over the past decades to measure the 3D
vorticity components simultaneously (e.g. Tsinober et al., 1992; Antonia et al., 1998; Gulitski
et al., 2007). Gulitski et al. (2007) used a probe consisting of 20 wires to measure all velocity
and temperature derivatives without invoking Taylor‟s hypothesis in an atmospheric surface
layer. The 3D vorticity probe developed by Antonia et al. (1998) consists of 4 X-probes (i.e.
with a total number of 8 hot wires). The most significant advantage of the probe is its ease in
making the wires and the simple calibrating process, which involves only the same
calibration procedures as for a single X-probe. This kind of probe has been successfully used
in grid and wake flows to measure the 3D vorticity components simultaneously (Antonia et
al., 1998; Zhou et al., 2003). There have been some published experimental data on vorticity
in turbulent near- and intermediate-wake of a circular cylinder in a cross-flow ( = 0°) (e.g.
Marasli et al., 1993; Zhou et al., 2003; Yiu et al., 2004). However, there is no attempt to
measure simultaneously the 3-dimensional vorticity components in yawed cylinder wakes.
Therefore, the main objective of the present paper is to provide quantitative measurements of
3D velocity and vorticity components in the wake of a yawed cylinder. Based on these
measurements, the effects of the yaw angle on the wake characteristics can be examined in
details.
2.2 Experimental Details
The experiments were conducted in a closed loop wind tunnel with a test section of
1.2 m (width) 0.8 m (height) and 2 m long. The free-stream across the tunnel is uniform to
within 0.5%. The free-stream turbulence intensity is less than 0.5%. Three-components
vorticity are measured simultaneously in the cylinder wake at downstream locations x/d = 10,
20 and 40 for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°, respectively. The cylinder is a 115 cm long smooth
stainless steel cylinder with an outer diameter of 12.7 mm, i.e. an aspect ratio of about 86,
13
which is close to the value used by Ramberg (1983) for studying the end effects in yawed
cylinder wakes. The cylinder is aligned horizontally at the centre of the test section and
supported rigidly at the ends by two aluminium plates. A vorticity probe was moved across
the wake in the y-direction to measure simultaneously the 3D vorticity components. The
probe consists of 4 X-probes (i.e. X-probes A, B, C and D), as shown in Figure 2-1. In the
present paper, the coordinate system is defined such that the x-axis is in the same direction as
the incoming flow, the y-axis is perpendicular to the x-axis in the vertical plane through the
cylinder and the z-axis is normal to both x and y axes. Two X-probes (B and D) aligned in the
x-y plane and separated in the z-direction measure velocity fluctuations u and v; the other two
(A and C) aligned in the x-z plane and separated in the y-direction measure velocity
fluctuations u and w. The separations between the centres of the two opposite X-probes
(either B and D or A and C) are about 2.7mm. The separation between the two inclined wires
of each X-probe was about 0.7 mm. The hot wires were etched from Wollaston (Pt-10% Rh)
wires. The active length was about 200dw, where dw (2.5 m) is the hot wire diameter. The
wires were operated with in-house constant temperature circuits at an overheat ratio of 0.5.
The vorticity probe was calibrated at the centreline of the wind tunnel against a Pitot-static
tube connected to a MKS Baratron pressure transducer (least count = 0.01 mm H2O). The
angle calibration was performed over 20°. The included angle of each X-probe was about
110° and the effective angle of the inclined wires was about 35°. Output signals from the
anemometers were passed through buck and gain circuits and low-pass filtered at a cut-off
frequency fc of 5,200 Hz, which is high enough for the purposes to detect the vortex shedding
frequency. The filtered signals were subsequently sampled at a frequency fs of 10,400 Hz
using a 16 bit A/D converter. The record duration Ts was about 60s.
Since an X-probe measures the two velocity components at the centre of the probe,
the measured velocity components can be significantly in error if the velocity gradients are
large. In the present study, as the measurement locations are from x/d = 10-40, the mean
velocity gradient is not significant. Using a range of hot wire yaw factors corresponding to
the present experimental conditions, the errors in neglecting the velocity gradients are
estimated to be about 4% and 5% for u′ and v′ (or w′), respectively, where u’, v’ and w’ are
the velocity fluctuations in the x, y and z directions, respectively, and a superscript prime
denotes root-mean-square (rms) values. The binormal cooling effect on each X-probe has
also been neglected, which only gives rise to an error of 1-3% for u′ and v′ (or w′) when the
local turbulence intensity is about 10%. The present u′/U ranges from 20% -10% for x/d=10
14
to 40, where U is the local streamwise mean velocity and an over-bar denotes time-
averaging. Therefore, the error in neglecting the binormal cooling effect is estimated to be
about 36%. Experimental uncertainties in U and u′ (or v′ and w′) were inferred from the
errors in the hot wire calibration data as well as the scatter (20 to 1 odds) observed in
repeating the experiment for a number of times. The uncertainty for U (≡ Uu ) was about
±3%, while the uncertainties for u′, v′ and w′ were about ±7%, ±8% and ±8%, respectively.
The vorticity components are calculated from the measured velocity signals via.
z
v
y
w
z
v
y
wx
, (2-1)
x
w
z
u
x
w
z
uy
, (2-2)
y
uU
x
v
y
uU
x
vz
)()(
. (2-3)
where w and u in Eqs. (2-1) and (2-3), respectively, are velocity differences between X-
probes A and C (Figure 2-1b and c); v and u in Eqs. (2-1) and (2-2), respectively, are
velocity differences between X-probes B and D. The velocity gradients in the streamwise
direction w/x and v/x are obtained by using a central difference scheme to the time
series of the measured velocity signals, e.g. v/x ≈ xiviv /)]1()1([ , where the
streamwise separation x is estimated based on Taylor‟s hypothesis given by x = -Uc(2t).
Uc is the convection velocity of vortices and t ( 1/fs) is the time interval between two
consecutive points in the time series of the velocity signals. Zhou and Antonia (1992) showed
that Uc is in the range of 0.87-0.89U∞ for measurement locations x/d = 10-40. The value of Uc
at location y is obtained by performing an ensemble average given by
n
i
cic yUn
yU1
)(1
)(
where Uci (y) is the velocity at the centre of the ith
vortex and n is the total number of vortices
detected at the location y (Zhou and Antonia, 1992). A central difference scheme in
estimating w/x and v/x would have the advantage to avoid phase shifts between the
velocity gradients involved in Eqs. (2-2) and (2-3) (Wallace and Foss, 1995), where the phase
shift is any change that occurs in the phase of one quantity, or in the phase difference
between two or more quantities (Ballou, 2005).
15
2.3 Results and Discussion
2.3.1 Mean streamwise and spanwise velocity distributions
Before the vorticity components are calculated, it is necessary to make sure that the
velocity components are measured correctly. It has been checked that the mean velocity in
the streamwise direction measured from the 4 Xprobes agree favourably. Therefore, only
the values averaged from the 4 X-probes are shown for each x/d station. The mean velocity
distributions U measured at x/d = 10-40 for different are shown in Figure 2-2 (a-c). The
distributions are symmetric about the centreline. The velocity defect, which is the difference
between the free-stream velocity U∞ and the measured local mean velocity U , is the largest
for = 0°. With increasing , the velocity defect decreases, which is consistent with that
shown by Surry and Surry (1967). This result reflects a decreased maximum velocity defect
U0 and wake half-width L with the increase of , which is defined as the lateral distance from
the centreline to the point where the velocity defect is 0.5U0. The values of U0 and L for
different downstream locations and yaw angles are listed in Table 2-1. The values of U0 and
L for = 0° agree very well with those given by Antonia and Mi (1998) for a circular
cylinder wake. If the mean velocity distributions shown in Figure 2-2 are replotted in the
form of the velocity defect (U∞-U )/U0 as a function of y/L, there is excellent agreement of
the data at different x/d and (results are not shown here). However, this result does not
necessarily mean that self-preservation of the mean velocity has been achieved for all these
cases. Previous studies showed that self-preservation is not attained until / 280x d (e.g.
Zhou and Antonia, 1995). The spanwise velocity W provides a measure of the flow three-
dimensionality (Matsumoto et al., 1992). A larger magnitude in W implies a higher degree of
three-dimensionality. The spanwise velocity in general acts to impair the 2-dimensionality of
the wake and hence the vorticity strength (Marshall, 2003; Alam and Zhou, 2007b). The
values of W for different are shown in Figure 2-3 (a-c). For = 0°, W is nearly zero
across the wake at all downstream locations, which is expected in a two-dimensional plane
wake. When increases, W increases significantly around the centreline and yet remains
symmetric about y/d = 0. This trend is consistent with that reported by Alam and Zhou
(2007b). The significant larger values of W reported in the latter are due to the measurement
location, which is much closer to the cylinder than in the present study. The magnitude of W
is at least 3 times larger than that of V (results are not shown here) at the same , indicating
16
a strong three-dimensionality of the yawed circular cylinder wake. With the increase of the
downstream locations, the magnitude of W decreases. The values of W are positive for y/d <
2 and negative for y/d > 2. The mechanism of such a change in W has been explained by
Alam and Zhou (2007b). Using flow visualization, Kozakiewicz et al. (1995) showed that the
streamlines that approach the leading surface of the cylinder bend to the cross cylinder
direction and then some of the dye moves in a helical track along the cylinder axis for a short
distance while the rest continues to move in the streamwise direction. Similar results are also
obtained by Zhao et al. (2008) for an yawed cylinder wake using direct numerical
simulations. These results indicate an enhanced velocity component in the spanwise direction
as the yaw angle increases, which is consistent with the trend shown by the present
distribution of W in Figure 2-3. As the mean velocity gradients are related with the mean
vorticity components, it would be interesting to examine the dependence of the former on .
The mean velocity gradients are obtained by first applying polynomial curve fits to the
measured time-averaged velocity distributions. The gradients are then calculated from the
fitted curves. The variations of /W y at x/d = 20 for different are shown in Figure 2-4.
The trends of the velocity gradients at other downstream locations are comparable with that
shown in Figure 2-4 and are therefore not given here. The values of /W y at = 0° are
close to zero, consistent with the two-dimensionality of the flow. The maximum mean
velocity gradient /W y occurs at around y/d = 0.75, implying a strong mean streamwise
vorticity )//( zVyWx for the yawed cylinder wakes. Clearly, with the increase of
, the magnitude of /W y increases. For comparison, the distributions of /U y at x/d =
20 for different are also included in the figure. The magnitude of /U y is comparable
with that of /W y . Its values decrease with the increase of , indicating a decreased mean
shear /U y with the increase of . Due to the small magnitude of V and hence the small
gradients of V in all three directions, it is expected that the spanwise mean vorticity
)//( yUxVz is comparable in magnitude with the streamwise mean vorticity.
2.3.2 Rms velocity and vorticity distributions across the wake
The root-mean-square (rms) values of the longitudinal velocity component u at x/d =
10-40 for different are shown in Figure 2-5 (a-c). The distributions of u′/U∞ are symmetric
about y/d = 0 and show twin peaks, especially at = 0°. With the increase of , the
17
magnitude of u′ decreases significantly, which is consistent with that shown by Surry and
Surry (1967), especially when is changed from 15° to 45°. The decay of u′ in the
streamwise direction for all is significant. Both the decay rate and the magnitude of u′ for
= 0° agree well with those published previously (e.g. Zhou et al., 2003). If the rms values are
renormalized by the maximum wake velocity deficit U0 and y is normalized by the wake half-
width L for the purpose to examine the self-preservation, the distribution of u′/U0 versus y/L
at x/d = 40 is still much smaller than that at x/d = 20 (results are not shown here), indicating
that self-preservation is not attained for all cases. In contrast to the distribution of u′, the
distributions of v′ at a fixed downstream location show reasonable agreement for different
(Figure 2-6a-c) although there is a significant decrease of v′ in the streamwise direction.
There is only one peak occurring at the wake centreline for all cases. This result is in
agreement with that shown by Alam and Zhou (2007b) for of 10° and 35°. The
distributions of w′ are shown in Figure 2-7 (a-c). Similar to that of u′, the distributions of w′
have twin peaks. With the increase of , w′ decreases consistently.
Based on the measured velocity signals, the three-dimensional vorticity components
are calculated using Eqs. (2-1) to (2-3). Their rms values at x/d = 10, normalized by U∞ and d,
are shown in Figure 2-8 (a-c) for different . It can be seen that with the increase of , the
rms values of all three vorticity components decrease, even though the change from = 0° to
15° is not significant. This is consistent with the increase of the spanwise mean velocity W ,
which in general acts to impair the two-dimensionality of the wake and reduce the vorticity
strength. The numerical simulations by Lucor and Karniadakis (2003) and Zhao et al. (2008)
showed that with the increase of , the vortex shedding angle is less well defined and the
vortices are distorted. Locally the axial vortices may or may not be parallel to the cylinder.
The decrease of velocity and vorticity rms values with the increase of may be related with
the instability of the wake vortices and the decrease of the vortex strength. The magnitude of
z′ is comparable with that of y′ and they are about 20% larger than that of x′ for all yaw
angles over the range of y/d = ±1. It needs to be noted that this result may not necessarily
mean that the transverse and spanwise vorticity components are stronger than that of the
streamwise one due to the spatial resolution of the probe. The spatial resolution y or z of
the probe in the y or z-direction is about 2.7mm. When the velocity gradients in the
streamwise direction xv / and xw / involved in Eqs. (2-2) and (2-3) are calculated, to
avoid phase shift between the two velocity gradients in the expression of y and z, the
18
spatial separation x in the streamwise direction is calculated from the time delay by using
Taylor's hypothesis via x = -Uc(2t). This will result in a separation in the streamwise
direction x ≈ 1.47 mm, which is only half of y or z (≡ 2.7 mm). Therefore, the spatial
resolution of the probe in the x-direction is better than that both in the y and z-directions. This
may result in larger measured values of both y and z than x. The trends of the rms
vorticity components at other downstream locations are similar to those shown in Figure 2-8
(x/d = 10) and are therefore not shown in this paper.
By examining the dependence on of the cross-correlation coefficient zw , between
the spanwise velocity w and the spanwise vorticity z, some light may be shed on the axial
velocity deficit reported by Marshall (2003) using computations of quasi-two-dimensional
theory. The cross-correlation coefficient zw , is defined as
''/))()()((, zzzw wtWtwz
, (2-4)
where the angular brackets denote time-averaging. For a yawed cylinder wake, the incoming
velocity can be decomposed into two components, the normal and the axial to the cylinder.
The normal velocity generates Kármán vortices and the axial component generates the axial
vortices. Computations using a quasi-two-dimensional theory by Marshall (2003) showed
that the cross-stream vorticity is shed from the cylinder as thin sheets and to wrap around the
Kármán vortices, which in turn induce an axial velocity deficit, i.e., with axial velocity lower
than the surrounding fluid, within the wake vortex cores. He proposed two mechanisms by
which the axial velocity might act to destabilize the vortex street for large yaw angles. The
first mechanism is the Kelvin-Helmholtz type instability of the cross-stream vorticity sheets
in the cylinder near wake, partially inhibited by stretching from the cylinder wake vortices
and by shear in the cross-stream plane acting orthogonally to the shear induced by the vortex
sheet. The second mechanism is the instability of the downstream Kármán vortices due to the
presence of axial velocity deficit within the vortex cores. Recent direct numerical simulations
by Zhao et al. (2008) supported Marshall‟s (2003) theoretical predictions for the existence of
the axial velocity deficit within the wake vortex cores. These authors also showed that the
axial velocity deficit exists for all yaw angles considered and its magnitude increases with the
increasing . Figure 2-9 shows the cross-correlation coefficient zw , at y/d = 0.75 (i.e. the
location with maximum mean shear as shown in Figure 2-4) for different downstream
locations and at different . The values of zw , are negative. This result is consistent with
19
the theoretical prediction of Marshall (2003) that the wake vortices exhibit an axial velocity
deficit. When = 0°, zw , is very close to zero ( 0.04 to 0.05) at all measurement
locations, which is consistent with 2D characteristics. At x/d = 10, when increases, zw ,
increases monotonically, changing from 0.06 to about 0.17, indicating an enhanced axial
velocity deficit, which is consistent with the direct numerical simulations of Zhao et al.
(2008). At x/d = 20 and 40, the increase of zw , with is also evident even though the rate
of increase is smaller than that at x/d = 10. It is apparent that zw , decreases consistently in
magnitude for all yaw angles with downstream distance, which is consistent with the trend
expected by Marshall (2003). The decrease of the correlation coefficient is related with the
decay of the vortices in the streamwise direction.
2.3.3 Dependence of the vortex shedding frequency on
The vortex shedding frequency can be determined by examining the peak frequency
on the power spectral density function, which is obtained by calculating fast Fourier
transform (FFT) of the velocity signals. It is well known that the transverse velocity
component v is more sensitive to the organized structures than the other two components.
Therefore, only the spectra of the transverse velocity component v are shown. The velocity
spectra obtained at y/d = 0.5 for different at x/d = 10 are shown in Figure 2-10. The
normalized spectral density function is defined such that
0
2)/()( Uvdxxv , where x
represents the frequency, which is normalized by U∞ and d, i.e. x = fd/UN and UN (≡ U∞ cos
) is the velocity component normal to the cylinder axis. With this normalization, the peak
frequency f0, or after normalization f0d/UN, on the spectrum corresponds to the Strouhal
number StN (≡ f0d/UN). The peak frequency for other downstream locations (x/d = 20 and 40)
is the same as that for x/d = 10 and was not shown. For all the cases, there is a clear peak on
the energy spectra, which corresponds to the Strouhal number. For = 0°, St0 = 0.195, which
is the same as our previous result (Zhou et al., 2003). There are second and third harmonics at
= 0° and 15° due to the effect of the alternate vortex shedding from both sides of the
cylinder at y/d 0.5. The harmonic peaks diminish as the yaw angle increases. At the
downstream location x/d = 20, the second harmonic peak disappears completely except for
= 0°. A compilation of some existing results on St0 (Surry and Surry, 1967; Norberg, 2003) in
a cross-flow have shown that for Re 300, St0 of circular cylinder wakes depends
significantly on Re, while for Re > 300in the subcritical flow regime, the change in St0 is not
20
very significant. Ideally, to examine the effects of on StN, the experiments should be done
at the same ReN. In the present study, Re = 7,000, and ReN at = 45° is about 5,100.
According to the compilation of St0 on Re (Surry and Surry, 1967; Norberg, 2003), the
change of St0 over this Reynolds number range is not significant. Therefore, we have used a
constant value for St0 at different Reynolds numbers (ReN = 5,1007,000). Our results for all
three downstream locations have shown pronounced peaks, which correspond to the Strouhal
numbers StN of 0.195, 0.202, 0.206 and 0.224 for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°, respectively,
increasing monotonically with . However, for = 15° and 30°, the StN values are only about
4% and 6% higher than that obtained at = 0°. These differences may be disguised by the
experimental uncertainty of StN, which is estimated to be within 8% and StN can be
considered as a constant. The increase of StN from = 0° to 45° (by about 15%) cannot be
ascribed to experimental uncertainty. It may reflect a genuine departure from the IP for large
. In this case, significant spanwise velocity component W has been measured (Figure 2-3).
Marshall (2003) suggested that two mechanisms by which the axial velocity might act to
destabilize the vortex street and lead to the breakdown of the IP for sufficiently large yaw
angles. At low frequencies, the spectra level out, but at decreasing levels with the increase of
(Figure 2-10), indicating that the energy contained by the lower frequency structures,
which correspond to larger size structures, decreases and so a reduced vortex strength. At
high frequencies, the spectra collapse well for all with a common slope of about 2 for 4f0
f 15f0, which is larger than that of the energy spectra for an isotropic flow (5/3). For
even higher frequencies, say f ≥ 30f0, the energy spectra drops at a much higher rate of
around 3.8. From Figure 2-10, it is also noted that for = 0°, the peak is sharp and narrow.
The ratio between the peak height and the height of the plateau on the spectra over the range
of f* = 0.006-0.06 is as high as 110. Hereafter, an asterisk denotes normalization by d or/and
U∞. When is increased, the height of the peak decreases and the ratio between the peak
height and the plateau reduces to 90, 50 and 30 for = 15°, 30° and 45°, respectively,
indicating a reduced vortex shedding intensity. The width of the peak region on the spectra,
as indicated by the arrows, broadens as is increased. This result indicates the dispersion of
the vortex shedding frequency which may be caused by the breakdown of the large organized
structures as is increased. These results are consistent with the vorticity contours obtained
by Lucor and Karniadakis (2003) and Zhao et al. (2008), who showed that, as is increased,
the shape of the vortices is distorted and locally the axial vortices may or may not be parallel
21
to the cylinder axis. It is also found that vortices right behind the cylinder are convected not
only in the incoming flow direction, but also in the cylinder axial direction. This results in
dispersion of the large-organized vortical structures.
Figure 2-11 shows the comparison of the present Strouhal numbers with the
experimental data obtained by Ramberg (1983) for flows past an yawed cylinder of 90d long,
experimental results by Surry and Surry (1967), the fitted curve from Van Atta (1968) and the
numerical results of Thakur et al. (2004). Instead of showing the measured StN, the ratio
StN/St0 is shown in Figure 2-11, where St0 represents the Strouhal number at = 0°. If IP
prediction works satisfactorily, the ratio StN/St0 should be equal to 1 for all . The
experimental uncertainty of the present StN is estimated to be around 8%. The results show
that if a tolerance of 8% is applied, most of the data support the IP till = 40°. This means
that the IP works reasonably well if the yaw angle is smaller than about 40°. For > 40°,
the results show a systematically increased departure from the IP. At = 60°, the departure
from the IP prediction is as high as 40%.
2.3.4 Autocorrelation coefficients
Autocorrelation coefficients can be used to highlight the differences of the organized
structures at different yaw angles and it has been known that the transverse velocity
component v is a more sensitive indicator of the large-scale structures than either u or w. The
autocorrelation coefficient is defined as 2/)()( arxaxaa , where a represents
the velocity components u, v and w and r is the longitudinal separation between the two
points, which is calculated using Taylor‟s hypothesis by converting the time delay to a
streamwise separation via r = U∞/fs. The autocorrelation coefficients for u, v and w at
different downstream locations and different yaw angles are shown in Figure 2-12 to Figure
2-14, respectively. For all , u shows apparent periodicity (Figure 2-12). Their periods are
consistent with the vortex shedding frequency for each . Clearly, with the increase of , the
vortex shedding frequency decreases. At x/d = 10 (Figure 2-12a), u drops quickly from 1 to
about 0.3. The autocorrelation coefficient for = 0° persists for a long distance. Even at
tU∞/d = 200, the periodicity is still apparent. But with the increase of , the magnitude of u
decreases and approaches zero at a faster rate. For example, at = 15°, u approaches zero at
about tU∞/d = 60. This has been decreased to 40 and 14 for = 30° and 45°, respectively.
This result indicates that the vortices shed from the yawed circular cylinder decay more
22
rapidly as compared with that at = 0° and the decay is more apparent with the increase of .
At further downstream location, e.g. x/d = 20 (Figure 2-12b), the magnitude of u for all
decreases significantly, even though they still show clear periodicity. Their values approach
zero even faster than those at x/d = 10. This result indicates that at this downstream location,
the vortices have decayed significantly. At x/d = 40 (Figure 2-12c), all u distributions show
no periodicity, even for = 0°. These results are consistent with that reported by Zhou et al.
(2003), who showed using a phase-averaging technique that the Kármán vortex street broke
down at x/d = 40. The decay of the wake vortices in the streamwise direction at different
needs further investigation by using either phase-averaging or flow visualization techniques.
The autocorrelation coefficients v at x/d = 10 for different are shown in Figure
2-13a. Their magnitudes are much larger than that of u at the same streamwise location,
indicating that the v signals are more sensitive to the large-scale organized structures than u.
The periodicity reflected by this figure for each yaw angle is the same as that in Figure 2-12a.
For = 0°, v persists for a long distance. Its magnitude is about 0.17 at tU∞/d = 200. When
is increased to 15°, v does not change significantly for tU∞/d 10. But from tU∞/d > 10, v
starts to depart from that at = 0° and approaches zero at tU∞/d = 75. This has been further
reduced to tU∞/d =50 and 20 when is increased to 30° and 45°, respectively. This result
suggests that with the increase of , the organized large-scale structures decay faster and lose
their initial characteristics quickly, as shown by Lucor and Karniadakis (2003) and Thakur et
al. (2004) in their numerical simulations. At x/d = 20 (Figure 2-13b), the magnitude of v
decreases significantly with apparent periodicity for all yaw angles. The v signals lose their
autocorrelation at tU∞/d = 70, 30 and 20 for = 15°, 30° and 45° respectively. At x/d = 40
(Figure 2-13c), the magnitude of v decreases further as compared with that at x/d = 10 or 20
and yet still keeps apparent periodicity with a magnitude of about 0.1 for all yaw angles.
Compared with Figure 2-12c, which shows no periodicity at x/d = 40 usingu, Figure 2-13c
indicates that the v signals are indeed more sensitive to the organized structures than u. It is
expected that at further downstream locations, the organized structures decay completely and
there would be no periodicity on v observed. Antonia et al. (2002) have shown in a circular
cylinder wake that at x/d = 70, there is no periodicity in the distribution of v, indicating that
the large-organized structures completely disappeared at this location.
Significant differences can be observed between the autocorrelation coefficient w of
the spanwise velocity component w and both u (Figure 2-12) and v (Figure 2-13). The
23
autocorrelation coefficient w is very small, even at x/d = 10 (Figure 2-14a). At this location,
w increases with the increase of . It shows apparent periodicity for 30°. This result is
consistent with the increase of W as increases (Figure 2-3). Since the increase of W
implies the enhancement of the 3-dimensionality of the wake, the periodicity of w for
30° also indicates a stronger 3-dimensionality as increases. The values of w approach zero
quickly, say before tU∞/d = 20. At a further downstream location (x/d = 20) (Figure 2-14b),
the values of w reduce significantly, even for = 45° and approach zero quickly. At x/d = 40
(Figure 2-14c), the autocorrelation coefficient w is nearly zero for all yaw angles, which is in
agreement with that of u at this location, suggesting that the large-scale organized structures
generated in the near wake have decayed significantly at x/d = 40.
2.4 Conclusions
The dependence of the wake characteristics on cylinder yaw angle bas been studied using a
multi-hot wire vorticity probe over the region of x/d = 10-40 for of 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°,
respectively. The results are summarized as follows:
1. The mean streamwise and spanwise velocity components U and W increase with .
The increase of the streamwise mean velocity U indicates a reduction of the wake
width whereas the increase of the spanwise mean velocity W represents that the three-
dimensionality of the wake flow is enhanced.
2. The root-mean-square (rms) values of the longitudinal (u) and spanwise (w) velocities
and the three vorticity components decrease with the increase of . This result reflects
the reduction of the vortex strength as increases.
3. The vortex shedding frequency decreases with the increase of . The Strouhal number
(StN), obtained by using the velocity component normal to the cylinder axis, also
increases monotonically with . However, when is smaller than 40°, StN keeps
approximately a constant within the experimental uncertainty (±8%), supporting the
use of the IP. The intensity of vortex shedding is decreased and the frequency is
dispersed with the increase of .
4. The autocorrelation coefficients of the u and v signals show apparent periodic
characteristics of the vortex structures. With the increase of , the autocorrelation
24
coefficients u and v reduce and approach zero quickly. In contrast, the
autocorrelation coefficient w increases with at x/d = 10 and 20, indicating the
enhancement of the three-dimensionality of the wake.
5. The values of the cross-correlation coefficient zw , between the spanwise velocity w
and the spanwise vorticity z are negative for all yaw angles. This result is consistent
with the theoretical prediction by Marshall (2003) that an axial velocity deficit exists
in the wake vortex cores. With the increase of , the magnitude of zw , increases,
indicating an enhanced axial velocity deficit, consistent with the direct numerical
simulation results of Zhao et al. (2008). In the streamwise direction, zw , decreases
apparently, which is related with the decay of the vortices.
25
Table 2-1. Values of U0, L and rms velocities on the wake centreline for different
downstream locations and yaw angles.
x/d U0 (m/s) L (mm) u′ (m/s) v′(m/s) w′(m/s)
0° 1.417 10.1 1.506 2.227 1.109
10 15° 1.165 10.4 1.484 2.364 1.06
30° 0.855 10.10 1.348 2.329 1.025
45° 0.631 8.64 1.18 2.204 0.942
0° 1.604 12.93 1.06 1.305 0.849
20 15° 1.446 12.7 1.055 1.356 0.843
30° 1.119 11.72 0. 96 1.38 0.827
45° 0.761 11.3 0.89 1.372 0.781
0° 1.266 19.6 0.642 0.67 0.609
40 15° 1.172 19.04 0.642 0.688 0.55
30° 0.971 17.08 0.62 0.708 0.55
45° 0.702 15.57 0.589 0.704 0.54
26
(a) Coordinate system
y
z
x
V
U
W
U
z
x
y
(a) Coordinate system
y
z
x
V
U
W
U
z
x
y
y
z
x
V
U
W
y
z
x
V
U
W
U
z
x
y
(c) Side view of the probe
U
4,7
C(u,w)
B,D
y
3,8
1
2
5
x
A(u,w)
U
4,7
C(u,w)
B,D
y
3,8
1
2
5
x
A(u,w)
(b) Front view of the probe
8 74
z
y
y
1
2
6
3
5
z
A(u,w)
C(u,w)
B(u,v)
D(u,v)
8 74
z
y
y
1
2
6
3
5
z
A(u,w)
C(u,w)
B(u,v)
D(u,v)
Figure 2-1 Definition of the coordinate system and the sketches of the vorticity probe.
Note: X-probe A contains wires 1 and 2 to measure u and w; X-probe B contains wires 3 and 4 to
measure u and v; X-probe C contains wires 5 and 6 to measure u and w; X-probe D contains wires 7
and 8 to measure u and v.
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(a)
y/d
U/U
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(b)
y/d
U/U
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
0
15
30
45
(c)
y/d
U/U
Figure 2-2. Normalized mean streamwise velocity distribution for different yaw angles. (a)
x/d = 10; (b) 20; (c) 40.
27
-0.05
0
0.05
0.10
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(a)
y/d
W/U
-0.05
0
0.05
0.10
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(b)
y/d
W/U
-0.05
0
0.05
0.10
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
0
15
30
45
(c)
y/d
W/U
Figure 2-3. Normalized mean spanwise velocity distribution for different yaw angles. (a) x/d
= 10; (b) 20; (c) 40.
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
W*/y
*
U*/y
*
y/d
U
* /y* ,
W
* /y*
Figure 2-4. Normalized velocity gradients for different yaw angles at x/d = 20. The arrows
indicate the direction of increasing . : = 0°; ---: 15°; - : 30°; : 45°.
28
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(a)
y/d
u'/U
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(b)
y/d
u'/U
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
0
15
30
45
(c)
yld
u'/U
Figure 2-5. Distributions of u′ for different yaw angles. (a): x/d = 10; (b): 20; (c): 40.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(a)
y/d
v'/U
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(b)
y/d
v'/U
0
0.03
0.06
0.09
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
0
15
30
45
(c)
y/d
v'/U
Figure 2-6. Distribution of v′ for different yaw angles. (a): x/d = 10; (b): 20; (c): 40.
29
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(a)
y/d
w'/U
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(b)
y/d
w'/U
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
0
15
30
45
(c)
y/d
w'/U
Figure 2-7. Distributions of w′ for different yaw angles. (a): x/d = 10; (b): 20; (c): 40.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(a)
y/d
' xd
/U
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(b)
y/d
' yd
/U
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
0
15
30
45
(c)
y/d
' zd
/U
Figure 2-8. Distributions of x′, y′ and z′ at x/d = 10 for different yaw angles. (a): x′; (b):
y′: (c): z′.
30
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0 15 30 45
x/d = 10
x/d = 20
x/d = 40
(deg)
w,
z
Figure 2-9. Dependence of the cross-correlation coefficient zw , between the spanwise
velocity w and the spanwise vorticity z on at different streamwise locations.
10-5
10-3
10-1
101
10-2
10-1
100
101
0
15
30
45
Slope: –3.8
Slope: –2
fd/UN
v
Figure 2-10. Spectral density function v of the transverse velocity component at x/d = 10 for
different yaw angles. The arrows represent the direction of increasing yaw angle. : =
0°; ---: 15°; - : 30°; : 45°.
31
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Re=3600 (Surry and Surry, 1967)
Re=25000 (Surry and Surry, 1967)
Re=63000(Surry and Surry, 1967)
Present
Thakur et al. (2003)
Van Atta (1968) (fitted curve)
Ramberg (1968) (Re=1100)
Ramberg (1968) (Re=900)
-8%
+8%
(degree)
St N
/St 0
Figure 2-11. Comparison of StN with other experimental and numerical results. Present:
. Surry and Surry (1967): + (Re = 3,600); (25000); (63,000). Thakur et al. (2004):
■. Ramberg (1983): □ (Re = 1,100); 〇 (900). Van Atta (1968): . The horizontal
short dashed lines represent the range of experimental uncertainty.
-1.0
-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
0.1 1 10 100
0
15
30
45
(a)
tU/d
u
0
0.5
1.0
0.1 1 10 100
0
15
30
45
(b)
tU/d
u
0
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.1 1 10 100
0
15
30
45
(c)
tU/d
u
Figure 2-12. Autocorrelation coefficient u for different yaw angles. (a): x/d = 10; (b): 20;
(c): 40. : = 0°; - : 15°; ---: 30°; : 45°.
32
-1.0
-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
0.1 1 10 100
0
15
30
45
(a)
tU/d
v
-1.0
-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
0.1 1 10 100
0
15
30
45
(b)
tU/d
v
-1.0
-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
0.1 1 10 100
0
15
30
45
(c)
tU/d
v
Figure 2-13. Autocorrelation coefficient v for different yaw angles. (a): x/d = 10; (b): 20;
(c): 40. : = 0°; - : 15°; ---: 30°; : 45°.
-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
0.1 1 10 100
0
15
30
45
(a)
tU/d
w
-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
0.1 1 10 100
0
15
30
45
(b)
tU/d
w
-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
0.1 1 10 100
0
15
30
45
(c)
tU/d
w
Figure 2-14. Autocorrelation coefficient w for different yaw angles. (a): x/d = 10; (b): 20;
(c): 40. : = 0°; - : 15°; ---: 30°; : 45°.
33
CHAPTER 3
THREE-DIMENSIONAL VORTICITY MEASUREMENTS
IN THE WAKE OF A YAWED CIRCULAR CYLINDER
3.1 Introduction
When a fluid flows over a circular cylinder at a Reynolds number exceeding 47-
49 (Provansal, 1987; Norberg, 1994; Williamson, 1996c), a laminar 2-dimensional (2D)
periodic wake of staggered vortices of opposite sign is formed. The vortices can be
either parallel or oblique to the cylinder axis, depending on the end boundary conditions
which also caused vortex dislocation in the laminar shedding regime (Williamson,
1996b). These forms of vortex shedding result in a 20% disparity in the relationship
between the Strouhal number and Reynolds number in the laminar shedding regime
(Williamson, 1988). When Re is increased to above 180, there exists a transition of the
2D wake to 3D wake. It is now well known that this transition is associated with two
discontinuous changes in the wake formation (Williamson, 1996b), which may be
manifested by discontinuous changes in the Strouhal number ~ Reynolds number
relationship, or the change in base suction coefficient (Williamson and Roshko, 1990;
Norberg, 1994). The first discontinuity, defined as Mode A shedding by Williamson
(1992), is hysteric and occurs at Re = 180-190, depending on the experimental
conditions (Williamson and Roshko, 1990; Norberg, 1994; Leweke and Provansal,
1995; Williamson, 1996c; Thompson et al., 2006). It is associated with the inception of
the vortex loops and the formation of the streamwise vortex pairs due to deformation of
the primary vortices. The spanwise wavelength of the loops is around 3-4d. Using
highly accurate numerical methods and Floquet stability analysis, Henderson and
Barkley (1996) predicted the onset of Mode A instability occurring at Re = 188.5 with a
spanwise wavelength of 4d, which is very close to the experimental results above
(Provansal, 1987; Williamson, 1988; Norberg, 1994; Williamson, 1996c, 1996b). The
second discontinuity occurs over Re = 230-260, defined as Mode B shedding
(Williamson, 1988), which involves a gradual transfer of energy from Mode A to Mode
B. It is associated with the formation of the rib-like small-scale streamwise vortex pairs
with a spanwise wavelength of about 1d (Williamson, 1996b). Within the transition,
34
large-scale spot-like vortex dislocations caused by local shedding-phase dislocation
along the span of the cylinder have been identified (Williamson, 1992). The above
phenomena, namely vortex dislocation, parallel and oblique shedding and cellular
shedding at low Re, are also observed at high Re turbulent wakes. Prasad and
Williamson (1997) showed that at Re = 5,000, parallel and oblique shedding can be
triggered by manipulating the cylinder end conditions. Some evidences of vortex
dislocation over the span at Re = 10,000 were also provided by Norberg (1992). Even at
Re = 130,000, the experimental results for cylinder aspect ratio of 7 by Szepessy and
Bearman (1992) strongly suggested the existence of vortex dislocation in their wakes.
Therefore, Prasad and Williamson (1997) suggested that vortex dislocation may be a
feature of the flow for Re up to 200,000. When vortices are shed from a cylindrical
structure, the latter is subjected to time-dependent drag and lift forces. The forces will
result in vibrations if the vortex shedding frequency is close to the natural frequency of
the bluff body, which may influence the fatigue life of the structure. As in nearly all the
engineering applications such as marine piles and pipelines and braced members of
offshore structures, the Reynolds numbers are much larger than the above critical
values, turbulent vortex shedding is a widely existing phenomenon.
In some engineering applications, such as flow past cables of a cable-stayed
bridge (Matsumoto et al., 1992; Matsumoto et al., 2001; Alam and Zhou, 2007b),
subsea pipelines and marine risers, raker piles on deep-water oil terminals (King,
1977a), etc., the incoming flow approaches the cylindrical structures obliquely. In these
cases, the fluid velocity in the axial direction of the structure may not be negligible,
which may influence the vortex structures and enhance the three-dimensionality of the
flow downstream. However, the study of yawed cylinder wakes is far less extensive
than that of a cylinder in a cross-flow. In the present study, the yaw angle () is defined
as the angle between the free-stream velocity and the plane which is perpendicular to
the cylinder axis so that = 0° corresponds to the cross-flow case while = 90°
corresponds to the axial-flow case. A number of studies have been conducted on the
vortex shedding from a stationary yawed cylinder both experimentally and numerically
at yaw angles ranging from 0° to 75°. It was found that the force coefficients and the
Strouhal number, when normalized by UN (≡ U∞ cos ) the velocity component normal
to the cylinder axis, are approximately independent of . This is often known as the
independence principle (IP), or the cosine law. One implication of the IP is that the yaw
angle does not influence the spanwise coherence of the vortex shedding (King, 1977a).
35
There are a number of studies on the validity of the IP. Van Atta (1968) showed that for
non-vibrating yawed cylinders, the decrease in the vortex shedding frequency followed
approximately the IP for 35°, whereas this decrease was slower than that predicted
by the IP for larger . Kozakiewicz et al. (1995) showed that the IP could be applied to
stationary cylinders in the vicinity of a plane wall in the subcritical range, and explained
based on the flow visualization results that, although the approaching flow was at an
angle to the cylinder (i.e. ≠ 0°), the streamlines around the surface of the cylinder
were roughly perpendicular to the cylinder axis, providing a validation for the use of the
normal velocity component in determining the normalized shedding frequency or the
Strouhal number and steady drag. These authors found that the wake characteristics
began to change at = 55°. They inferred that the IP was valid till = 55°. The
numerical simulations by Zhao et al. (2008) verify the IP satisfactorily in terms of
Strouhal numbers up to = 60°. They also showed that with the increase of , the
vortex shedding angle is less well defined as compared with that in a cross-flow and the
vortices are distorted. Ramberg (1983) studied the effect of the yaw angle up to = 60°
and the end conditions on vortex shedding for both stationary and forced vibrating
circular cylinders with aspect ratios of 20-90 at Re = 160-1100. His results were very
sensitive to the end conditions especially at low Reynolds numbers, and the slantwise
vortex shedding at an angle other than the cylinder yaw angle was intrinsic to the
stationary yawed cylinders in the absence of the end effects, leading to the violation of
the IP. Based on numerical simulations, Lucor & Karniadakis (2003) found that the
angle of vortex shedding from a yawed stationary cylinder was somewhat less than the
cylinder‟s yaw angle, which violated the IP. While the previous studies mostly focused
on vortex shedding frequencies, base pressure, and drag and lift forces, there has been
no detailed study on the effect of on the three-dimensionality of the wake flow behind
a yawed circular cylinder. This knowledge is of both fundamental and practical
importance to our understanding of the physics of vortex shedding, three-dimensionality
of the velocity and vorticity fields, the change of the coherent structures and the vortex
dislocation in the yawed cylinder wake at subcritical Reynolds numbers. A three-
dimensional detached eddy simulation (DES) was conducted by Yeo and Jones (2008)
for three different spanwise aspect ratios (l/d = 10, 20 and 30, where l and d are the
length and diameter of the cylinder respectively) using both slip wall and periodic wall
conditions for the spanwise wall boundary conditions. They found that the slip wall
spanwise boundary conditions influenced the vortex flow structures significantly over
36
quite a large spanwise range from the upper end of the cylinder, which was not the case
if the periodic spanwise wall boundary conditions were used. It can also be inferred
from their iso-surface contours of the second invariant that the vortex flow structures
downstream of the cylinder was generally parallel to the cylinder except at locations
where intense vorticity, low pressure and swirling flow were found. These locations
were not fixed but shifted along the cylinder axis, which was associated with the
spanwise velocity component of the flow.
In the present study, the effects of on the three-dimensional velocity and
vorticity fields, the strength of the coherent structures and the vortex shedding
frequency are examined using a three-dimensional vorticity probe, consisting of 8-hot
wires, at U∞ of about 8.5 m/s, corresponding to Re = 7,200. Since vorticity is an
important characteristic of turbulence (Tennekes and Lumley, 1972), it would be ideal
to measure all three vorticity components simultaneously across the wake. This is,
however, impractical due to possible blockage to the flow and the tremendous
difficulties involved in dealing with a great number of three-dimensional vorticity
probes. Alternatively, a phase-averaging technique developed by Kiya & Matsumura
(1985) can be used to study the topology of the coherent and incoherent flow structures
in the cylinder wake. This technique has also been used by Zhou et al. (2002) to
investigate the wake of two interfering cylinders. It requires only one moving
measurement probe and one fixed single-wire or X-wire for reference signals, thus
providing a good compromise between the sophistication of the vorticity probe and the
need to measure the flow field for the study of large-scale vortical structures. The
present work provides a relatively complete set of data for the three-velocity and
vorticity components at a streamwise location of x/d = 10 for different cylinder yaw
angles. The analysis of the measurements is conducted by using the phase-averaging
technique to the velocity and vorticity signals to obtain the coherent and incoherent
contours and to examine their dependence on cylinder yaw angle. This study also
quantified the contributions of the phase-averaged coherent and incoherent structures to
the velocity and vorticity components and based on these results, the effects of the yaw
angle on the wake structures can be examined in details. After an introduction in Sect.
3.1, the experimental setup is given in Sect. 3.2. The velocity and vorticity signals for
cylinder yaw angles of 0° and 45° are examined in Sect. 3.3. The phase-averaging and
structural averaging of the vorticity and Reynolds stresses and their dependence on
37
are discussed in Sects. 3.4 and 3.5. Based on the above discussion, conclusions are
drawn in Sect. 3.6.
3.2 Experimental Details
The experiments were conducted in a closed loop wind tunnel with a test section
of 1.2 m (width) 0.8 m (height) and 2 m long. The free-stream across the tunnel is
uniform to within 0.5%. The free-stream turbulence intensity is less than 0.5%. All
three-components of the vorticity vector are measured simultaneously in the cylinder
wake at downstream location x/d = 10 for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°, respectively. The
cylinder is a 115 cm long smooth stainless steel cylinder with an outer diameter of 12.7
mm. It is aligned horizontally at the centre of the test section and supported rigidly at
the ends by two square aluminium plates to eliminate the side wall boundary layer
effects. The coordinate system is defined such that the x-axis is in the same direction as
the incoming flow. The y-axis is perpendicular to the x-axis in the vertical plane through
the cylinder and out of the paper towards the reader, and the z-axis is normal to both x
and y axes (Figure 3-1a). A vorticity probe was moved across the wake in the y-
direction to measure simultaneously the three-dimensional vorticity components.
Another X-probe located at y = 4-7d was used in conjunction with the vorticity probe to
provide a phase reference for the measured velocity and vorticity signals (Figure 3-1b).
The vorticity probe consists of four X-probes (i.e. X-probes A, B, C and D), as shown in
Figure 3-1 (c, d). Two X-probes (B and D) aligned in the x-y plane and separated in the
z-direction measure velocity fluctuations u and v; the other two (A and C) aligned in the
x-z plane and separated in the y-direction measure velocity fluctuations u and w. The
separations between the centres of the two opposite X-probes (either B and D or A and
C) were about 2.7mm. The separation between the two inclined wires of each X-probe
was about 0.7 mm. The hot wires were etched from Wollaston (Pt-10% Rh) wires. The
active length was about 200dw, where dw (2.5 m) is the wire diameter. The angle
calibration was performed over 20°. The included angle of each X-probe was about
110° and the effective angle of the inclined wires was about 35°. The signals were low
pass filtered at a frequency of 5,200 Hz and subsequently sampled at a frequency fs =
10,400 Hz using a 16 bit A/D converter. The record duration Ts was about 20s. As in the
present study, the measured minimum vortex shedding frequency at = 45° is 102 Hz,
this record duration corresponds to 2040 cycles, which is about 14 times of the
suggested signal length (Sakamoto et al., 1987) for studying the vortex shedding. The
38
number of independent samples N ≡Ts/2Tu suggested by Tennekes and Lumley (1972) is
around 12,320, where Tu 0
0)(
du is an integral time scale, u is the longitudinal
velocity autocorrelation coefficient of u and 0 is the time at which the first zero
crossing occurs.
The vorticity components are calculated from the measured velocity signals viz.
z
v
y
w
z
v
y
wx
, (3-1)
x
w
z
u
x
w
z
uy
, (3-2)
y
uU
x
v
y
uU
x
vz
)()(
. (3-3)
where w and u in Eqs. (3-1) and (3-3), respectively, are the velocity differences
between X-probes A and C (Figure 3-1c and d); v and u in Eqs. (3-1) and (3-2),
respectively, are the velocity differences between X-probes B and D. The velocity
gradients in the streamwise direction w/x and v/x are obtained by using a central
difference scheme to the time series of the measured velocity signals, e.g. v/x ≈
xiviv /)]1()1([ , where the streamwise separation x is estimated based on
Taylor‟s hypothesis given by x = -Uc(2t) as Uc is the convection velocity of vortices
and t ( 1/fs) is the time interval between two consecutive points in the time series of
the velocity signals. A central difference scheme in estimating w/x and v/x would
has the advantage to avoid phase shifts between the velocity gradients involved in Eqs.
(3-2) and (3-3) (Wallace and Foss, 1995).
Experimental uncertainties in U and u′ (or v′ and w′) were inferred from the
errors in the hot wire calibration data as well as the scatter (20 to 1 odds) observed in
repeating the experiment for a number of times. Hereafter, a superscript prime denotes
root-mean-square values. The uncertainty for U was about ±3%, while the uncertainties
for u′, v′ and w′ were about ±7%, ±8% and ±8%, respectively. The uncertainty for wire
separation x was about ±4% and that for y or z was about ±5%. Using these values,
the uncertainties for vorticity components were estimated by the method of propagation
of errors (e.g. Kline and McClintock, 1953; Moffat, 1985, , 1988). The resulting
maximum uncertainties for x, y and z were about ±14%, ±13% and ±13%,
39
respectively. It needs to be noted that these estimations of uncertainties do not include
the spectral attenuation caused by the unsatisfactory spatial resolution in x, y and z
of the 3D vorticity probe (Antonia et al., 1998). The correction of the spectral
attenuation is based on the assumption of isotropy of the flow. Unfortunately, the
spectral attenuation effect cannot be corrected in the present study due to the lack of
isotropy at x/d = 10 for the shedding of large organized vortex structures. The vortex
shedding frequency is identified using the fast Fourier transform algorithm with a
window size of 211
. The frequency resolution on the power spectra is about 2.5 Hz.
Taking into the uncertainties in hot wire calibration, incoming velocity measurements
and misalignment, etc., the uncertainty in the Strouhal number (will be defined later) is
conservatively estimated to be not more than 8%.
3.3 Velocity and Vorticity Signals
Figure 3-2 shows the filtered time traces of the fluctuating velocity v measured
at y/d = 0.5 for = 0° and 45°, respectively, together with signals for x, y and z. In
the figure, an asterisk denotes normalization by d and U∞. Previous studies have shown
that y/d = 0.5 is the location of the vortex centres (Zhou et al., 2002). The v-signals at
both yaw angles show apparent large-scale quasi-periodical fluctuations with relatively
fixed frequency, indicating the occurrence of the Kármán vortices. The fluctuation of
the velocity signals is not as significant as the vorticity signals. This result clearly shows
that the vorticity signals represent more small-scale structures. As indicated by the
dashed vertical lines, there is in general a correspondence between the large negative z
fluctuations and zero-crossing point (positive dv/dt) of the v-signal. Based on
conditional analysis results, Zhou and Antonia (1993) found a correspondence between
the centre of spanwise vortices (negative sign) and zero v of positive dv/dt. Therefore,
the zero values of v at positive dv/dt, marked by dots in the v-signals (Figure 3-2), are
identified with the possible Kármán vortex centre. Similarly, the x and y signals also
exhibit considerable fluctuations at the vortex centres, though at relatively small-scales
in terms of time-wise or longitudinal spatial distance, reflecting the three-dimensionality
of the Kármán vortices. At = 0°, the fluctuations of the vorticity signals are quite
significant. However, at = 45°, all the three vorticity signals show apparent enhanced
intermittency which can be reflected by the flatness factors )/( 224 iiiF of
the vorticity components. The values of i
F for the two angles are given in Table 3-1.
40
This result indicates that the shedding of vortices at high yaw angles are not as strong as
that in a cross-flow ( = 0°). We have checked that with the increase of from 0° to
45°, the change of vorticity signals is gradual. Zhao et al. (2008) and also Lucor &
Karniadakis (2003) have shown that as is increased, the shape of the vortices is
distorted and locally the axial vortices may or may not be parallel to the cylinder axis. It
is also found by these authors that the vortices right behind the cylinder are convected
not only in the incoming flow direction, but also in the cylinder axial direction, which is
consistent with that of Yeo and Jones (2008). The enhanced spanwise velocity as is
increased helps to dislocate the large-scale structures and enhance the three-
dimensionality of the flow, resulting in dispersion of the large-scale vortical structures.
This result may indicate that with the increase of , the intermittency of the vortex
structures increases, which can be revealed also by the probability density function of
the vorticity signals.
The probability density function (pdf) of the three vorticity components for =
0° and 45° are shown in Figure 3-3. Also shown in the figure is the Gaussian
distribution. The pdf is defined such that
1idP
i . The measured distributions of
the vorticity pdf are apparently non-symmetric. They exceed the Gaussian distribution
for both large and small amplitude fluctuations. The distributions of x
P and y
P show
a pronounced peak at around zero. It can be seen that for small vorticity fluctuations,
with the increase of , the shapes of the pdfs of x and y contracted and their
amplitudes increase. For large vorticity fluctuations, the tails of both x
P and y
P
spread out slightly and follow a single exponential distribution as is increased from 0°
to 45°, indicating an increased y
F and z
F . The distribution of z
P exhibits twin
peaks (Figure 3-3c). The peak of negative vorticity is due to the spanwise vortices of
negative sign that occur at y/d > 0, whereas that of positive vorticity is attributed to the
spanwise vortices of positive sign, whose centre is at y/d < 0. As is increased from 0°
to 45°, the twin peaks in z
P increase slightly and shift to larger values of '/ zz while
the magnitude of z
P around zero also increases. For = 0°, an expression xePi
~
fits the exponential tail adequately (where = 1.3 and x stands for the negative vorticity
fluctuations normalized by the rms values), which is close to that reported by Kida and
Murakami (1989) using DNS, where a power of 2 was reported. When is increased
41
to 45°, the slope of the tails for x
P and y
P decreases slightly even though it still
shows a single exponential distribution. The slightly increased peaks for all the three
vorticity components in the vicinity of the origin indicate the increased flatness factors
with the increase of the yaw angle, which is consistent with the results shown in Figure
3-2.
Figure 3-4 shows the vorticity spectra ,x
y and ,z
measured at the wake
vortex centre (y/d = 0.5) for = 0° and 45° respectively. The vorticity spectrum i
has
been normalized to the decibel scale using the maxima of z at = 0° and 45°
respectively, while the frequency is normalized by UN and d, i.e. x = fd/UN and UN (≡
U∞ cos ) is the velocity component normal to the cylinder axis. With this
normalization, the peak frequency f0 on the spectrum, or after normalization, fd/UN,
corresponds to the Strouhal number StN (≡ f0d/UN). For all cases, there is a clear peak on
the vorticity spectra, which corresponds to the Strouhal number. For = 0°, St0 = 0.195,
which is the same as our previous results (Zhou et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2009). The
peak on the spectrum z is sharp and narrow, which occurs over a narrow range (f
*)
of f* = 0.146-0.223. There is only a minor peak on
x . The peak heights relative to the
heights of the plateaux on the vorticity spectra x and
z over the range of f* =
0.004-0.12 are 2.6 dB and 14 dB, respectively. When is increased to 45°, the peak on
the spectrum z is much less sharp and the peak region (f
*) is enlarged to f
* = 0.090-
0.34. In contrast to = 0°, the peak on x is increased and becomes more apparent,
even though the peak region is enlarged. The peak heights relative to the heights of the
plateaux on the vorticity spectra x and
z over the range of f* = 0.004-0.1 are 6 dB
and 10.6 dB, respectively, indicating a reduced spanwise vortex shedding intensity and
an enhanced streamwise vortex shedding intensity. These results indicate the dispersion
of the turbulent energy over the vortex shedding frequency, as well as the enhancement
of the three-dimensionality of the flow. Williamson (1996b) stated that after the onset of
the turbulent shedding and with the increase of Reynolds number, there seems to be an
increased disorder in the fine-scale three-dimensionality associated with the secondary
and essentiality streamwise-oriented vortices of type mode B. The study of Mansy et al.
(1994) showed that the increase in the secondary or streamwise vortices probably is at
the expense of the primary spanwise vortices, which is consistent with the trend shown
42
in Figure 3-4. The present results are also consistent with the vorticity iso-contours
obtained by Lucor & Karniadakis (2003) and Zhao et al. (2008), who showed that, as
is increased, the shape of the spanwise vortices is distorted and reveals a helical style.
The large-scale organized structures found in the wake of a cross-flow are broken down
and the vortex shedding angle of the spanwise vortices is much less well defined. They
may or may not be parallel to the cylinder axis. It is also found that vortices right behind
the cylinder are convected not only in the incoming flow direction, but also in the
cylinder axial direction. This results in the dispersion of the large-organized vortical
structures. The peak frequencies on the spectra of i
suggest that with the increase of
, the Strouhal number StN changes gradually from 0.195 at = 0° to 0.202, 0.206 and
0.224 for = 15°, 30° and 45°, respectively, increasing monotonically with (Figures
for = 15° and 30° are not shown here). However, as the StN values at = 15° and 30°
are only about 4% and 6% higher than that obtained at = 0°, these differences may be
disguised by the experimental uncertainty of StN, which is estimated to be not more than
8% and StN can be considered as a constant. The increase of StN from = 0° to 45° (by
about 15%) cannot be ascribed to the experimental uncertainty. It may reflect a genuine
departure from the IP for large . In this case, significant mean spanwise velocity
component W has been measured as is increased (Zhou et al., 2009), which was
conjectured as the main mechanism by which the axial velocity might act to destabilize
the vortex street and cause the vortex dislocation in the spanwise direction, leading to
the breakdown of the IP for sufficiently large yaw angles (Chiba and Horikawa, 1987).
The spanwise velocity W provides a measure of three-dimensionality of the
flow (Matsumoto et al., 1992). A larger magnitude in W implies a higher degree of
three-dimensionality and a stronger instability of the vortex filament (Szepessy and
Bearman, 1992). The variations of /W y at x/d = 10 for different are shown in
Figure 3-5. The values of /W y for = 0° are close to zero, consistent with the quasi-
two-dimensionality of the flow. This result also implies that the vortex shedding is
parallel with the cylinder axis (Hammache and Gharib, 1991). Clearly, with the increase
of , the magnitude of /W y increases. The maximum mean velocity gradient
/W y occurs at around y/d = 0.5-0.65, depending on ; with the increase of , the
location of the maximum mean shear /W y approaches to the centreline. This result
43
implies an increased mean streamwise vorticity )//( zVyWx as is
increased. For comparison, the distributions of /U y at x/d = 10 for different are
also included in the figure. The magnitude of /U y is comparable with that of
/W y at large yaw angles. Its values decrease with the increase of , indicating a
decreased mean spanwise vorticity )//( yUxVz with the increase of . Due
to the small magnitude of V and hence the small velocity gradients of V in the x and z-
directions, the magnitudes of xV / and zV / in the expressions of z and x
should be negligible and the spanwise mean vorticity z is comparable in magnitude
with the streamwise mean vorticity x .
The present measurements allow the shedding angle downstream of the cylinder
to be evaluated using the method proposed by Hammache and Gharib (1991). They
showed that for oblique shedding, the shedding angle is related with the vorticity
components x and z viz.,
zx /tan , (3-4)
which can then be simplified further as
UW SS /tan , (3-5)
where SW and SU are the maximum velocity gradients on the distributions of yW /
and yU / . The shedding angle ( UW SS /(tan 1 ) at different cylinder yaw angle
can then be calculated from the values of SW and SU (Figure 3-5). The shedding angles
for different cylinder yaw angles are listed in Table 3-2. The values of agree very well
with the corresponding cylinder yaw angle , indicating that the vortex is parallel to the
cylinder in the present study.
Autocorrelation coefficient can be used to highlight the differences of the
organized structures at different yaw angles. The autocorrelation coefficient is defined
as 2/)()( arxaxaa , where a represents the vorticity components x, y
and z and r is the longitudinal separation between the two points, which is calculated
using Taylor‟s hypothesis by converting the time delay to a streamwise separation via
r = UN/fs. The autocorrelation coefficients for x, y and z at different cylinder yaw
44
angles are shown in Figure 3-6. For ≤ 15°, the autocorrelation coefficient x
is very
small and there is nearly no periodicity. When is increased to 30°, x
starts to reveal
some periodicity, especially at 45°. This result is consistent with the increase of W as
increases since the increase of W causes the instability of the primary vortex shedding,
leading to the enhancement of the 3-dimensionality of the wake (Szepessy and
Bearman, 1992). The distributions of y show no periodicity at all . This is
consistent with the spectrum of y (Figure 3-4), where no peak on y is identified. The
periodicity on the distribution of z
is very apparent. This is true as z mainly
represents the primary vortices. At = 0°, z
persists for a long distance. Even at
tU∞/d = 200, the periodicity on z
is still very apparent. However, with the increase of
, the magnitude of z
decreases and approaches zero at a faster rate. For example, at
= 15°, u approaches zero at about tU∞/d = 60. This has been decreased to 40 and 14
for = 30° and 45°, respectively. This result indicates that the vortices shed from a
yawed circular cylinder decay more rapidly as compared with that at = 0° and the
decay is more apparent with the increase of . Comparing with Figure 3-6a, where x
increases with , it seems that the increase in the secondary or streamwise vortices,
reflected by x, is at the expense of the primary spanwise vortices, reflected by z,
which is in agreement with Mansy et al. (1994).
3.4 Phase-Averaged Velocity and Vorticity Fields
3.4.1 Phase-averaging
The phase-averaging method is similar to that used by Kiya & Matsumura (1985) and
Zhou et al. (2002). Briefly, the v-signal measured by the reference X-probe was band-
pass filtered with the central frequency set at f0. The two phases of particular interest
were identified on the filtered signal vf, viz.
Phase A: 0fv
and ,0
dt
dv f
(3-6)
Phase B: 0fv
and .0
dt
dv f
(3-7)
45
The two phases correspond to time tA,i and tB,i (measured from an arbitrary time origin),
respectively. The phase was then calculated from vf, viz.
,,,
,
iAiB
iA
tt
tt
where iBiA ttt ,, (3-8)
,,1,
,
iBiA
iB
tt
tt
where 1,, iAiB ttt (3-9)
The interval between phases A and B was made equal to 0.5/f0 by compression or
stretching, which was further divided into 30 equal intervals. The difference between
the local phase at each y-location of the vorticity probe and the reference phase of the
fixed X-wire was used to produce phase-averaged sectional streamlines and contours of
the coherent vorticity in the (, y)-plane. The phase-average of an instantaneous
quantity B is given by
N
iikk B
NB
1,
1 (3-10)
where N is the number detected and k represents the phase. For convenience, the
subscript k will be omitted hereinafter. The variable B can be written as the sum of a
time-averaged component ,B a coherent fluctuation ~
and a remainder r (Hussain,
1986), viz.
rBB ~
(3-11)
where B stands for instantaneous vorticity or velocity signals and the fluctuation b is
given by
b = ~
+ r (3-12)
The coherent fluctuation ~
( ) reflects the effect from the large-scale coherent
structures while the remainder r mainly refers to the incoherent structures. The
following equation may be derived from Eq. (3-12):
222 ~r (3-13)
46
3.4.2 Structural averaging
Once the coherent components of velocity and vorticity are extracted, the
coherent contributions to the vorticity variances can be obtained in terms of the
structural average. For each wavelength, the phase-averaged structure begins at j1
samples (corresponding to = -π) before = 0 and ends at j2 samples (corresponding to
= π) after = 0. The structural average, denoted by a double over-bar, is defined by
2
121
22 ~
1
1~ j
jjj (3-14)
The value for j1 (= j2) is 24 so that the value (j1 + j2 + 1) corresponds approximately to
the average vortex shedding frequency. The structurally averaged quantities can provide
a measurement of the contribution from the coherent structures to the vorticity
variances. Similarly, Eq. (3-14) may also be used to calculate the contribution of
2r , the incoherent structures make to the vorticity variances. The structural
average 2 of the vorticity variances may be derived from Eqs. (3-13) and (3-14),
viz.
2 = 2~ + 2
r (3-15)
It has been verified that the difference between 2 and 2 in general is within 5%,
suggesting that for vorticity, the selected data for phase-averaging/structural averaging
is representative to the flow.
3.4.3 Coherent vorticity fields
Figure 3-7 presents the iso-contours of the phase-averaged or coherent vorticity
** ~ ,~yx and *~
z for different yaw angles. The phase , ranging from 2π to +2π, can be
interpreted in terms of a longitudinal distance; = 2π corresponds to the average vortex
wavelength ( Uc/f0), which is given in Table 3-2 for different cylinder yaw angles.
The values of Uc for different cylinder yaw angles are estimated with the values of
uU ~ at the vortex centres. These values are also included in Table 3-2. At = 0°, the
wavelength of the spanwise vortices is about 4.2d, in agreement with that found
previously (Zhou et al., 2003). With the increase of cylinder yaw angle, the wavelength
increases systematically. However, if a factor of cos () is multiplied with , the value
47
(cos ) is approximately constant for different angles. This result indicates that the
spanwise vortices shed from the yawed cylinder are parallel to the cylinder axis, which
is consistent with the shedding angle obtained using Eq. (3-5) (Table 3-2). In Figure
3-7 and other figures for iso-contours that follow, to avoid any distortion of the physical
space, the same scales are used in the - and y*-directions. The *~
z contours (Figure
3-7i-l) display the well-known Kármán vortex street for all yaw angles. The vortex
centres, identified by the maximum concentration of *~z , coincide well with the foci
(marked by “+” in the figure) determined from the phase-averaged sectional streamlines
shown in Figure 3-8, which were constructed based on the velocity signals measured by
one of the two X-wires aligned in the xy plane. The saddle points determined from the
sectional streamlines are marked by “”. The spanwise vortices shrink slowly with the
increase of , changing from y/d = 0.4 at = 0° to y/d = 0.2 at = 45° (Figure 3-7i, l),
indicating a reduced wake region. These results agree well with those reported
previously (Lucor and Karniadakis, 2003). The maximum concentration of *~z at = 0°
is 0.8 (the negative value of the vorticity contours represents the vorticity above the
centreline). This value is slightly lower than that reported previously at a comparable
Reynolds number (Zhou et al., 2003) due mainly to the difference in spatial resolution
of the probes between the two studies. For 15°, the maximum concentration of *~z
does not change. When is increased further, the maximum concentration of *~z
decreases. The maximum concentration of *~z at = 45° decreases by about 50%
compared with that at = 0°. This result indicates that with the increase of the yaw
angle, the spanwise vortex strength decreases, which is in agreement with that shown in
Figure 3-4.
The *~x contours (Figure 3-7a-d) are much weaker than those of *~
z even
though they also exhibit organized patterns, especially at large yaw angles. The size of
the longitudinal vortices is much smaller than that of the spanwise structures. The
strength of *~x for = 0° at the vortex centre is only about 1/5 of that of *~
z . The
maximum longitudinal vortex concentrations are shifted away from the Kármán vortex
centres. The change of *~x for 15° is not apparent. When is further increased to
30°, the contours of the longitudinal vortices become more organized and the maximum
longitudinal vorticity concentration increases by about 70%. This result indicates the
48
generation of the secondary axial vortices or the occurrence of vortex dislocation
(Williamson, 1996b) and an enhanced three-dimensionality with the increase of . As
the calculation of x is related with the velocity signal for w, the increase of *~x should
be caused by the increase of w at large yaw angles (see Figure 3-10 below). The *~y
contours at = 0° (Figure 3-7e) are comparable to that of *~x . With the increase of ,
the organized patterns of the *~y contours become less apparent and the maximum
concentration of *~y decreases consistently. The reduction of *~
y at = 45° is
comparable with that of *~z , which is about 33% compared with that at = 0°. Overall,
from the contours of *~x and *~
z , it can be seen that with the increase of , the strength
of the former increases while it decreases for the latter. At = 45°, the magnitudes of
the coherent vorticity components *~x and *~
z tend to be comparable, which are about
0.25 to 0.4. This result further confirms that with the increase of , the three-
dimensionality of a yawed cylinder wake tends to be enhanced, consistent with that
shown by Zhou et al. (2009). This result is also consistent with that of Mansy et al.
(1994) who argued that the increase in the streamwise circulations occurs probably at
the expense of the primary spanwise vortex circulation. The maximum contour values
of the coherent vorticity for different are summarised in Table 3-3.
3.4.4 Incoherent vorticity fields
Figure 3-9 shows the incoherent vorticity contours *2 xr , *2 yr and
*2 zr for different yaw angles. The magnitudes of the maximum incoherent vorticity
concentrations at = 0° agree well with our previous published results (Zhou et al.,
2003). They occur at approximately the same location, which is slightly downstream of
the vortex centres for all cylinder yaw angles. Note that the *2 xr contours running
along the diverging separatrix through the saddle point (marked in the figure by “”)
wrap around the consecutive spanwise structures of opposite sign. Presumably, these
contours represent the signature of the streamwise or rib-like structures of the wake. It
seems that the incoherent vorticity contours *2 xr are stretched along an axis which
inclines to the x-axis at an angle in the range between 60° (when = 0°) and 25°
(when = 45°) (shown in Table 3-2). The magnitude of the maximum incoherent
49
vorticity concentration decreases with the increase of . At = 0°, the *2 xr
contour level through the saddle point is about 0.62, corresponding to a magnitude of
79.0*2 xr , which is the same as the maximum magnitude of the coherent
spanwise vorticity component *~z (Figure 3-7i). With the increase of , the *2 xr
contour level through the saddle point decreases. However, as the spanwise coherent
vorticity *~z decays faster, the magnitude of *2 xr exceeds *~
z for > 15°. The
values of *2 xr through the saddle points for different are compared with the
maximum concentration of *~z in Table 3-3. Also given are the values of *2 yr
through the saddle points. It can be seen that the magnitudes of *2 xr and
*2 yr exceed the spanwise coherent vorticity at large yaw angles. These results
seem to support the speculation of Hayakawa & Hussain (1989) that the strength of the
rib-like structures in the cylinder wake is about the same as that of the spanwise
structures, even in the yawed cylinder wake.
3.4.5 Topology of Reynolds stresses
The phase-averaged velocity components u, v and w for different yaw angles are
shown in Figure 3-10. The *~u contours (Figure 3-10a-d) are symmetric about y-axis
and anti-symmetric about the x-axis. The maximum concentration occurs at about y/d =
0.75. The maximum value at = 0° agrees well with those reported previously in
cylinder wake of a cross-flow (Matsumura and Antonia, 1993; Zhou et al., 2002). When
is increased to 15°, there is no apparent change in *~u , which is consistent with the
trend revealed by the root-mean-square (rms) values of u (Zhou et al., 2009). When is
further increased to 30°, the maximum value of *~u decreases by about 20%, and the
range of the vortices also reduces, changing from y/d = 3.0 at = 0° and 15° to about
y/d = 2.7 at = 30° The decreasing in the maximum *~u concentration becomes more
apparent at = 45° with a reduction in the wake range to y/d = 2.5. This trend of *~u
indicates a reduction of the vortex shedding strength with the increase of in a yawed
cylinder wake. The *~v contours (Figure 3-10e-h) are anti-symmetric about = 0. The
maximum value occurs at the centreline located in the alleyways between adjacent and
opposite-signed spanwise vorticity contours. The maximum concentration of *~v
50
occurring at = 0° agrees well with those published previously (Matsumura and
Antonia, 1993; Zhou et al., 2002). With the increase of to 30°, the maximum contour
of *~v decreases by about 7%. When is further increased to 45°, the maximum value
of *~v reduces to 0.24, which is about 14% lower than that for = 0°. These results
indicate that with the increase of , the intensity of the vortices decreases, which is
consistent with that revealed by the vorticity contours (Figure 3-7). The magnitude of
*~v is more than 2 times larger than that of ,~*u indicating that the coherent structures
contribute more to v than to u component, especially at large yaw angles.
In contrast to the coherent contours of *~u and *~v , the magnitudes of
*~w contours (Figure 3-10i-l) are much smaller, indicating that the coherent structures
contribute much less to w than that to the other two velocity components. This result is
consistent with the quasi-two-dimensional flow, especially when 15°. Over this
range of angles, the *~w contours show much less regular patterns than that at higher .
When is increased further, the organized patterns of *~w become more apparent, with
the maximum concentration being increased by about 50% at = 30° and by 100% at
= 45° compared with that at = 0°. At = 45°, the maximum contour of *~u and *~w
are comparable. The *~w contours are anti-symmetric about y/d = 0 with the maximum
concentration occurring at y/d = ±0.75. These results indicate that with the increase of
, secondary axial organized structures may be generated (Hammache and Gharib,
1991; Szepessy and Bearman, 1992; Matsumoto et al., 2001; Norberg, 2001). These
structures may impair the quasi-two-dimensional structures and enhancing the three-
dimensionality of the flow. This result is consistent with that shown by the increase of
the spanwise mean velocity W and the increase of the autocorrelation coefficient of the
spanwise velocity fluctuations for large values of (Zhou et al., 2009). The maximum
contour values of the coherent phase-averaged velocity components u, v and w are also
summarised in Table 3-3.
The phase-averaged Reynolds shear stresses **~~ vu , ** ~~ wu and ** ~~ wv for different
are shown in Figure 3-11. The **~~ vu contours display a clover-leaf pattern about the
vortex centre, which is the result of the coherent velocity field associated with the
vortical motion in a reference frame translating at Uc (Zhou et al., 2002). They are both
anti-symmetric about = 0 and about y/d = 0 which implies that the distribution of uv
51
should pass the origin of the coordinate system, due to the cancellation of positive and
negative **~~ vu . The maximum value of **~~ vu contours do not change when is
increased from 0° to 15°. However, when is increased to 30°, the **~~ vu contours
decrease by about 40%. When is further increased to 45°, the wake region shrinks and
the maximum contour value decreases significantly by 50%. This result is consistent
with that given by Zhou et al. (2009), who showed that with the increase of , the
spanwise vortex shedding weakens. The contours of ** ~~ wu also reveal apparent
organized patterns (the negative contours in the upper part of the wake), though with
much lower maximum concentration compared with that of **~~ vu . With the increase of
, the maximum concentration of ** ~~ wu increases gradually, and at = 45°, it is
increased by 80% compared with that at = 0°. This result confirms the generation of
the secondary vortex induced by the spanwise mean velocity shear yW / (Zhou et al.,
2009). The ** ~~ wv -contours display an alternately signed pattern similar to those of
**~~ vu , though there is a considerable phase difference between them (Figure 3-11c, d, k
& l), which increases with increasing , reaching about π at = 45°. This is expected
since the *~u - and *~w -contours are similar in pattern but opposite in sign, i.e. with a
phase difference, which grows with (Figure 3-10c, d, k & l). The maximum
magnitude of ** ~~ wv at = 0° is much smaller than that of **~~ vu but comparable with
that of ** ~~ wu , and is furthermore essentially independent of , probably because, with
increasing , the maximum magnitude reduces in *~v but increases in *~w (Figure 3-10).
The maximum magnitudes of **~~ vu , ** ~~ wu and ** ~~ wv for different are summarised in
Table 3-3.
3.5 Coherent and Incoherent Contributions to Velocity and
Vorticity Variances
After the coherent components of the velocity and vorticity signals are extracted,
the coherent contributions to Reynolds stresses and vorticity variances can be obtained
in terms of their structural average. The coherent and incoherent contributions of the
velocity variances for different yaw angles are shown in Figure 3-12. The time-averaged
values are also included. For the u component (Figure 3-12a-d), the coherent
contribution displays a peak at around y/d = 0.75. Due to the symmetry of the flow,
52
another peak in the distribution is expected at y/d = -0.75. This distribution results in
double peaks on the u velocity variance across the wake, which is consistent with Figure
3-10 (a-d). The main contribution to the velocity variance is from the incoherent
component, especially at the wake centreline, where the coherent component is nearly
zero. For = 0°, the coherent component 2*~u is about 50% of the incoherent one 2*~ru
at y/d = 0.75, which is consistent with that reported previously (Zhou et al., 2002). This
value is comparable with those for = 15° (60%) and 30° (57%). When = 45°, the
coherent component reduces to 30% of the incoherent one, suggesting that with the
increase of , the large-scale organized structures become less intensified, which may
be related with the breakdown of the large-scale structures. This result may also be
related with the increase of the spanwise velocity component, which is generally
regarded as the deterioration of the two-dimensionality of the flow (Hammache and
Gharib, 1991; Zhou et al., 2009). It is apparent that the coherent structures contribute to
the v velocity component more significantly than to the other two velocity components
at all yaw angles (Figure 3-12e-h). The coherent contribution to 2*v for all yaw angles
dominates in the central part of the wake (-1 y/d 1). When is increased, the
coherent contribution to 2*v decreases while the incoherent contribution increases. For
example, at = 45°, the ratio of the coherent component to the incoherent component is
about 1.8 at the wake centreline. This ratio is smaller than those at other yaw angles on
the wake centreline, which are 2.9, 3.9 and 2.9 for = 0°, 15° and 30°, respectively. As
the v velocity component is sensitive to the large organized structures, this result
indicates that with the increase of , the large-scale organized structures break down
and become less intensified as compared with that at = 0°. The coherent contributions
to 2*w are very small at = 0° and 15° (Figure 3-12i-l). Nearly 96% contribution to the
time-averaged 2*w is from the incoherent structures. This result is consistent with the
quasi-two-dimensionality of the wake flow for small yaw angles. When increases to
30° and 45°, the coherent contribution to 2*w increases, changing to 15% and 22%,
respectively. The coherent component 2*~w also displays a peak at about y/d = 0.75.
This peak location is consistent with that revealed by 2*~u (Figure 3-12a-d) and the
mean velocity gradients (Figure 3-5).
53
The coherent contributions to the vorticity variances for different are shown in
Figure 3-13. At = 0° (Figure 3-13a), the coherent contribution to the longitudinal
vorticity component is essentially negligible (less than 1%). This result is consistent
with that shown by Zhou et al. (2003) and is also consistent with that revealed by the
longitudinal vorticity contours (Figure 3-7a). As pointed out earlier, the detection of the
organized structures is based on the spanwise structures, which may result in negligibly
small values of *~x due to the cancellation of the opposite-signed vorticity in phase-
averaging. It can still be seen that with the increase of , the coherent contribution to x
increases, changing from about 1% at = 0° to 6% at = 45°. This result is in
agreement with the phase-averaged longitudinal vorticity contours (Figure 3-5a), which
shows that with the increase of , the maximum longitudinal vorticity concentration
also increases. The coherent contribution to the lateral vorticity variance 2~y is one
order smaller than that for x (Figure 3-13b). The largest coherent contribution is to the
spanwise vorticity 2~z (Figure 3-13c), which is about 24% on the centreline. With the
increase of , the coherent contribution toz decreases. This result indicates that with
the increase of , the intensity of the spanwise vorticity components decreases, resulting
in a reduction in the coherent vorticity variance. It seems that the increase in the
streamwise vorticity is at the expense of the reduction in the spanwise vorticity,
supporting the result of Mansy (1994). The present results shown in Figure 3-13
indicate that vorticity mostly resides in relatively smaller scale structures. Note the fact
that the coherent contribution is calculated based on the detection of the spanwise
vortical structures, the contribution from the longitudinal structures to the vorticity
variances may not be taken into account in the coherent variances ;~ 2 rather this
contribution may be included in the incoherent variances 2r .
3.6 Conclusions
An eight-hot wire vorticity probe has been used to measure simultaneously the three-
dimensional velocity and vorticity components in the intermediate wake (x/d = 10) of a
stationary circular cylinder at a yaw angle in the range of 0°-45°. The phase-averaged
technique is used to analyze the large-scale organized vortex structures of the wakes.
The main results are summarised as follows:
54
1. The instantaneous vorticity signals of x, y and z are comparable in
magnitude and show relatively large-scale fluctuations near the spanwise vortex
centres. When increases, the vorticity signals exhibit higher intermittency.
2. There is an apparent peak on the spanwise vorticity spectrum, which
corresponds to the shedding frequency of the Kármán vortex. When is small,
the peak is narrow and sharp. When is increased to 45°, the peak region of the
spanwise vorticity spectra is enlarged and the peak height of z is reduced
while that of x is increased, indicating a dispersion of the turbulent energy
over the vortex shedding frequency, as well as the enhancement of the three-
dimensionality of the flow at large yaw angles.
3. Based on the phase-averaging technique, the coherent contours of the three
vorticity components show apparent Kármán vortex shedding phenomena. At
= 0°, the maximum concentration of the spanwise vorticity component is about 6
times of the longitudinal and transverse ones. For 15°, the maximum
concentration of the three vorticity components does not depend on . However,
when increases to 45°, the maximum coherent concentrations of the transverse
and spanwise vorticity components at the vortex centre decrease by about 33%
and 50% respectively while the contours of the longitudinal vortices become
more organized with the maximum concentration being increased by 70%. This
result indicates the generation of the secondary axial vortices, which is
consistent with that found by Matsumoto et al. (2001). It also supports the
argument of Mansy et al. (1994) that the increase in the streamwise circulations
is at an expense of the primary spanwise vortex circulation. The maximum
coherent concentrations of the streamwise and spanwise vorticity components at
the vortex centre are comparable in magnitude at = 45°. These results indicate
that the three-dimensionality of the wake flow has been enhanced significantly
when is increased to 45°.
4. The incoherent vorticity contours *2 xr are stretched along an axis inclining
to the x-axis at an angle in the range of 60°-25° when is changed from 0° to
45°. The magnitudes of *2 xr and *2 yr (Figure 3-9) through the
saddle point are comparable with the maximum magnitude of the coherent
55
spanwise vorticity component *~z at all cylinder yaw angles (Figure 3-7). This
result supports the speculation of Hayakawa & Hussain (1989) that the strength
of the rib-like structures in the cylinder wake is about the same as that of the
spanwise structures, even in the yawed cylinder wakes.
5. The contours of the three velocity components exhibit apparent vortex patterns
at all yaw angles. With the increase of , the maximum concentrations of u and
v contours decrease while that of *~w become more apparent with the maximum
concentration being increased by about 50% at = 30° and by 100% at = 45°
compared with that at = 0°. Correspondingly, the coherent contributions to the
velocity variances 2u and 2v decrease while that to 2w increases.
6. The coherent contribution to 2~x at = 0° is negligible. With the increase of ,
the coherent contribution to 2~x increases slightly. In contrast, the coherent
contributions to 2~y and 2~
z decrease with increasing . These results suggest
that the strength of the Kármán vortex shed from the yawed cylinder decreases
and the three-dimensionality of the flow is enhanced when is increased.
56
Table 3-1. Flatness factors of the vorticity components at = 0° and 45°
i
F
x y
z
0° 5.83 6.6 6.02
45° 7.46 8.94 6.24
Table 3-2. The vortex shedding angle , vortex shedding frequency f0, convection velocity Uc, wavelength and the inclination angle between the
main vortex stretching direction and the x-axis for different cylinder yaw angles.
(°) (°) f0 (Hz) Uc/U∞ /d /d (cos ) (°)
0 0.53 132 0.82 4.16 4.16 60
15 16.8 131.2 0.83 4.23 4.09 57
0 33 121.7 0.87 4.8 4.16 45
45 45.6 101.6 0.89 5.86 4.14 25
Table 3-3. The maximum contour values of the coherent vorticity and Reynolds stresses for different yaw angles.
(°) *~x
*~y *~
z *~u *~v *~w **~~ vu ** ~~ wu
** ~~ wv *2 xr
*2 yr
0 –0.15 –0.12 –0.8 0.12 –0.28 –0.04 –0.018 –0.005 –0.004 0.79 0.82
15 –0.15 –0.1 –0.8 0.14 –0.28 –0.04 –0.018 –0.006 –0.004 0.77 0.86
30 –0.25 –0.1 –0.6 0.10 –0.26 –0.06 –0.012 –0.007 –0.006 0.71 0.77
45 –0.25 –0.08 –0.4 0.08 –0.24 –0.08 –0.009 –0.009 –0.004 0.63 0.69
57
U
= 0
= 0
Tunnel wall
Tunnel wall
End plate
45z
x
Yaw angle
U
= 0
= 0
Tunnel wall
Tunnel wall
End plate
45z
x
Yaw angle
(a) Cylinder arrangement and
coordinate system (plan view)
(b) Wake profile and probe
arrangements (side view)
U
4,7
C
B, D
y
3,8
1
2
6
5
X
A
U
4,7
C
B, D
y
3,8
1
2
6
5
X
A
(c) Enlarged 3D vorticity probe (side view) (d) Enlarged 3D vorticity probe (front view)
8D
A
z
y
y
1
6
B
3
5
C
z
4 7
2
8D
A
z
y
y
1
6
B
3
5
C
z
4 7
2
Moveable 3D
Vorticity Probe
Fixed referenceX-probe
U
Moveable 3D
Vorticity Probe
Fixed referenceX-probe
U
Figure 3-1. Sketches of the coordinate system and the 3-dimensional vorticity probe.
58
-2
0
2
-2
0
2
-2
0
2
-0.4
0
0.4
0 5 10 15
z*
y*
x*
v*
t/T
(a)
-2
0
2
-2
0
2
-2
0
2
-0.4
0
0.4
0 5 10 15
z*
y*
x*
v*
t/T
-2
0
2
-2
0
2
-2
0
2
-0.4
0
0.4
0 5 10 15
z*
y*
x*
v*
t/T
(a)
-2
0
2
-2
0
2
-2
0
2
-0.4
0
0.4
0 5 10 15
z*
y*
x*
v*
t/T
(b)
-2
0
2
-2
0
2
-2
0
2
-0.4
0
0.4
0 5 10 15
z*
y*
x*
v*
t/T
(b)
Figure 3-2. Time traces of the fluctuating transverse velocity v and the three vorticity
components measured at y/d = 0.5. The dots on the traces of the v signals indicate the
possible centres of the spanwise vortices. (a) = 0°; (b) = 45°.
59
10-5
10-3
10-1
101
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
x(0)
x(45)
Gaussian
y=0.6e1.3x (a)
x/x'
P
x
10-5
10-3
10-1
101
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
y(0)
y (45°)
Gaussian
(b)y=0.6e
1.3x
y/y'
P
y
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
z(0)
z(45)
Gaussian
(c)
y=0.6e1.3x
z/z'
P
z
Figure 3-3. Probability density function of vorticity components at = 0° and 45°. (a) x;
(b) y and (c) z.
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10
f
(a) = 0
y
z
x
fd/UN
i(dB
)
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10
f
(b) = 45
y
z
x
fd/UN
i(dB
)
Figure 3-4. Spectra of three vorticity components at (a): = 0° and (b) = 45°.
60
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
-1 0 1 2 3
W*/y
*
U*/y
*
y/d
U
* /y
* ,
W* /
y*
Figure 3-5. Normalized velocity gradients for different at x/d = 10. The arrows
indicate the direction of increasing . ---: = 0°; - : 15°; : 30°; : 45°.
-0.2
0.2
0.6
1.0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
= 0
15
30
45
(a)
tUN/d
x
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
= 0
15
30
45
(b)
tUN/d
y
-0.4
0
0.4
0.8
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
= 0
15
30
45
(c)
tUN/d
z
Figure 3-6. Autocorrelation coefficient i
for different . (a): x ; (b)
y ; (c) z .
: = 0°; ---: 15°; - : 30°; : 45°.
61
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
-1
0
1
2
3
-1
0
1
2
3
-1
0
1
2
3 (a) (b) (c) (d)
(e) ( f) (g) (h)
( i) ( j ) (k) ( l)
= 0o
= 15o
= 30o
= 45o
-0.15 0.1
-0.12 0.06
0.8 -0.8
-0.15 0.15
0.08 -0.1
-0.80.9
-0.25 0.25
0.08 -0.1
-0.60.6
-0.25 0.25
-0.08 0.08
0.4 -0.4
Figure 3-7. Phase-averaged coherent vorticity contours at different . (a-d) *~x ; (e-h) *~
y ; (i-l) *~z . Centre and saddle points are marked by plus and
cross, respectively. (a-d) Contour interval = 0.05; (e-h) 0.02; (i-l) 0.1.
62
(a) (b) (c) (d)
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
-1
0
1
2
3
Figure 3-8. Phase-averaged sectional streamlines at different . Centre and saddle points are marked by plus and cross, respectively. (a) = 0°; (b) =
15°; (c) = 30°; (d) = 45°.
63
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
-1
0
1
2
3
-1
0
1
2
3
-1
0
1
2
3(a) (b) (c) (d)
(e) ( f) (g) (h)
( i) ( j ) (k) ( l)
= 0o
= 15o
= 30o
= 45o
1.1
1.6
2.0
1.1
1.6
2.0
0.9
1.3
1.7
0.7
1.0
1.3
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
-1
0
1
2
3
-1
0
1
2
3
-1
0
1
2
3(a) (b) (c) (d)
(e) ( f) (g) (h)
( i) ( j ) (k) ( l)
= 0o
= 15o
= 30o
= 45o
1.1
1.6
2.0
1.1
1.6
2.0
0.9
1.3
1.7
0.7
1.0
1.3
Figure 3-9. Phase-averaged incoherent vorticity contours at different . (a-d) *2 xr ; (e-h) *2 yr ; (i-l) *2 zr . Centre and saddle points are
marked by plus and cross, respectively. The thick dash line represents the stretching direction of the contours in *2 xr and is the angle of the
stretching with respect to x-direction. Contour interval = 0.1.
64
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
= 0o
= 15o
= 30o
= 45o
(a) (b) (c) (d)
(e) ( f ) (g) (h)
( i) ( j ) (k) ( l )
0.12-0.12
0.28-0.28
-0.04 0.04
-0.14 0.14
-0.28 0.28
-0.04 0.04
-0.1 0.1
-0.26 0.26
-0.06 0.07
-0.08 0.08
-0.24 0.24
-0.08 0.09
Figure 3-10. Phase-averaged velocities contours at different . (a-d) *~u ; (e-h) *~v and (i-l) *~w . Centre and saddle points are marked by plus and cross,
respectively. (a-d) Contour interval = 0.02; (e-h) 0.04; (i-l) 0.01.
65
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
= 0o = 15
o = 30
o = 45o
(a) (b) (c) (d)
(e) ( f ) (g) (h)
( i) ( j ) (k) ( l )
-0.018 0.018 -0.018 0.021 -0.012 0.015 -0.009 0.009
-0.0050.004 -0.006 0.002 -0.007 0.001 -0.0090.001
-0.0040.01 -0.0040.01 -0.0060.01 -0.0040.004
Figure 3-11. Phase-averaged Reynolds shear stresses at different . (a-d) **~~ vu ; (e-h) ** ~~ wu and (i-l) ** ~~ wv . Centre and saddle points are marked by
plus and cross, respectively. (a-d) Contour interval = 0.003; (e-f) 0.001; (g-l) 0.002.
66
(a) (b) (c) (d)
(e) ( f ) (g) (h)
(i) (j) (k) (l)
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.005
0.000
Time-averaged
Coherent
Incoherent
y* y* y* y*
Figure 3-12. Time-averaged Reynolds normal stresses and their coherent and incoherent
contributions at different . (a, e, i) = 0°; (b, f, j) = 15°; (c, g, k) = 30°; (d, h, l)
= 45°.
Figure 3-13. Lateral distribution of coherent contributions to vorticity variances. (a)
22 /~xx ; (b)
22 /~yy ; (c) 22 /~
zz .
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0 1 2 3
(c)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
22
/~
xx
2
2
/~
yy
2
2
/~
zz
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0 1 2 3
(b)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0 1 2 3
(a)
= 45
= 15
= 30
= 0
y/d
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0 1 2 3
(c)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
22
/~
xx
2
2
/~
yy
2
2
/~
zz
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0 1 2 3
(b)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0 1 2 3
(a)
= 45
= 15
= 30
= 0
y/d
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0 1 2 3
(c)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
22
/~
xx
2
2
/~
yy
2
2
/~
zz
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0 1 2 3
(b)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0 1 2 3
(a)
= 45
= 15
= 30
= 0
y/d
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0 1 2 3
(c)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
22
/~
xx
2
2
/~
yy
2
2
/~
zz
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0 1 2 3
(b)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0 1 2 3
(a)
= 45
= 15
= 30
= 0
y/d
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0 1 2 3
(c)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0 1 2 3
(a)
= 45
= 15
= 30
= 0
y/d
22
/~
xx
2
2
/~
yy
2
2
/~
zz
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0 1 2 3
(b)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0 1 2 3
(a)
= 45
= 15
= 30
= 0
y/d
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0 1 2 3
(c)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
22
/~
xx
2
2
/~
yy
2
2
/~
zz
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0 1 2 3
(b)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0 1 2 3
(a)
= 45
= 15
= 30
= 0
y/d
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0 1 2 3
(c)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0 1 2 3
(b)
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
y/d
67
CHAPTER 4
STREAMWISE EVOLUTION OF A YAWED CYLINDER
WAKE
4.1 Introduction
Flow around a circular cylinder is of both fundamental and practical significance in
many branches of engineering. The related papers amount to thousands, mostly
focused on the flow behind a two-dimensional circular cylinder placed normal to uniform
incoming flow. This flow is characterized by periodic alternating Kármán vortex shedding
downstream of the cylinder when Reynolds number Re (≡ U∞d/, where U∞ is the
incoming velocity, d is the cylinder diameter and is the kinematic viscosity of the
fluid) exceeds 47 (Provansal, 1987; Norberg, 1994; Williamson, 1996c, 1996b).
Previous investigations have unveiled three types of vortical structures in the cylinder
near wake, i.e. the Kelvin-Helmholtz (K-H) vortices in the shear layers, alternating
spanwise Kármán vortices which dominate the near wake, longitudinal rib-like vortices
wrapping around and connecting the consecutive Kármán vortices. The Kármán vortex
shedding and its streamwise evolution have significant effects on mass and heat transport
in the wake and also the aerodynamic forces acting on the cylinder (Bisset et al., 1990;
Antonia, 1991; Matsumura and Antonia, 1993; Nishimuraa and Taniike, 2001).
In many engineering applications, such as the cables of a suspension bridge and
subsea pipelines, the direction of the incoming flow may not be perpendicular to the
cylinder axis. The incoming flow velocity results in a projection along the cylinder
axis, which may affect the vortex formation and its streamwise evolution, and thus
is not negligible (Marshall, 2003). In this work, the yaw angle () is defined as the
angle between the incoming flow velocity and the direction normal to the cylinder axis.
Thus, = 0° and 90° correspond to the cross flow and axial flow cases, respectively. It
has been found previously that the yawed cylinder near wake was dominated by
vortices aligned parallel to the cylinder axis given a sufficiently far distance from
cylinder ends (Ramberg, 1983; Matsuzaki et al., 2004; Thakur et al., 2004). The
aerodynamic forces on and the frequency of vortex shedding from a yawed cylinder
behave similarly to their counterparts in the wake of a cylinder normal to incident
68
flow. If normalized by the component, U∞ cos , of U∞ normal to the cylinder
axis, the force coefficient and the Strouhal number StN (≡ f0d/U∞ cos , where f0 is
the vortex shedding frequency) are approximately independent of . This is the well
known independence principle (IP) (Van Atta, 1968).
Van Atta (1968) and also Thakur et al. (2004) noted that the IP was valid for ≤
35°, and beyond = 35°, the decrease in f0 with the increasing was slower than
that predicted by the IP. For Re = 4,000-63,000, Surry and Surry (1967) suggested the
IP could be applied up to = 40°-50°. Smith et al. (1972) measured f0 for a yawed
cylinder at 2,000 < Re < 10,000, and suggested that the IP was applicable only
for < 45°. It was also noted that the peak corresponding to the predominant
frequency in the velocity spectrum was sharp and narrow-banded for cross-flow cases,
but became less pronounced and wide-banded for yawed cylinder cases. No pronounced
peak was observable at = 60°, indicating the lack of periodic coherent structures at
this yaw angle. Based on flow visualization, Ramberg (1983) suggested that the IP
was valid till = 55°. More recently, based on the measurement of the instantaneous
lift and drag forces on a fixed yawed cylinder, Kozakiewicz et al. (1995) proposed that the
IP was applicable for = 0°-45° in the subcritical regime.
The flow behind a yawed cylinder is highly three-dimensional because of the
presence of spanwise flow (U∞ sin ) along the cylinder span (e.g. Alam and Zhou,
2007b). This spanwise flow is directed away from the upstream end to the
downstream end. The interference between this spanwise flow and the near wake is
enhanced with increasing (Matsuzaki et al., 2004). Ramberg (1986) demonstrated
based on flow visualization that there were two regions in a yawed cylinder wake.
One was near the upstream end of the cylinder, where vortices were aligned at an
angle greater than the cylinder yaw angle. The other was near the mid-span of the
cylinder, where the vortices were oriented at approximately the cylinder yaw angle.
The spanwise flow may also vary along the streamwise direction. Smith et al. (1972)
measured the velocity direction behind a yawed circular cylinder of = 30° (Re =
7,400). They found that at x* = 0.5, 1 and 2 the flow was directed along the span near
the wake centre line. In this paper, an asterisk denotes normalization by U∞ and/or d.
Further away from the centreline, the flow direction might be opposite to the direction
of spanwise flow. This flow in the opposite direction vanished at about x* = 5-10.
69
Utilizing a vorticity probe, Zhou et al. (2010) measured the three-
dimensional vortical structure in a yawed cylinder wake at x* = 10. They found that
at = 0°, the maximum concentration of the spanwise vorticity component is about 6
times of the longitudinal and transverse ones; while at = 45°, the three vorticity
components at vortex centre is comparable in magnitude. Although the effect of the
yaw angle on the three-dimensional vortical structure was quantitated at x* = 10
(Zhou et al., 2010), its streamwise evolution has not been revealed yet.
Previous investigations have improved tremendously our understanding of the
yawed cylinder wake, in particular on vortex shedding patterns and frequencies.
Nevertheless, there is no detailed information on how the yaw angle alters the flow
structure and its streamwise evolution. This work aims to fill in this gap and provide the
quantitative information on how the yaw angle of cylinder influences the flow structure
and the three-dimensional velocity and vorticity fields at different downstream locations.
A three-dimensional vorticity probe developed by Antonia et al. (1998), consisting of
four X-probes, was used to measure the three-dimensional velocities and vorticities
simultaneously. The coherent structures have been detected from the data through the
use of a phase-averaging technique (Kiya and Matsumura, 1988; Matsumura and
Antonia, 1993; Zhou et al., 2002). These structures and their contributions are
quantified and discussed in the context of the vortex pattern of velocities and
Reynolds stresses. The effects of the yaw angle on the wake and their streamwise
evolution are examined in details.
4.2 Experimental Details
The experiments were conducted in a closed-loop low-speed wind tunnel
with a 2.0 m long test section of 1.2 m (width) × 0.8 m (height). The free-stream
velocity in the test section was uniform to 0.5% and the longitudinal turbulence
intensity was less than 0.5%. A stainless steel circular cylinder was installed
horizontally at the centre of the test section and supported rigidly at both ends by two
aluminium end plates. The cylinder diameter (d) is 12.7 mm, and the space between
the two end plates is 1.1 m, resulting in an aspect ratio of about 86. Four yaw
angles were tested, i.e. = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°, respectively. Figure 4-1 (a) shows the
installation of the cylinder and the definition of the coordinates system. All
measurements were performed at the mid-span of the cylinder along y direction.
70
All measurements were accomplished at a free-stream velocity (U∞) of 8.5 m/s,
corresponding to a Reynolds number Re of 7,200. For each yaw angle, measurements
were conducted at three downstream locations, i.e. x* = 10, 20 and 40, to study the
streamwise evolution of the wake.
The vorticity probe consists of four X-probes (X-probe A, B, C and D), as
shown in Figure 4-1 (b). The position of each X-probe and the velocity components
they measured are listed in Table 4-1. As an example, the X-probe B consisting of
wires 3 and 4 aligning in the (x, y)-plane measures velocity components u and v. The
separations between the centres of the two opposite X-probes, i.e. y or z in Figure
4-1 (b), are 2.7 mm. For each X-probe, the clearance between the two wires was about
0.7 mm. The hot wires of the vorticity probe were etched from Wollaston (Pt-10% Rh)
wires. The active length was etched to about 200dw, where dw = 2.5 μm is the hot
wire diameter. The hot wires were operated on constant temperature circuits at an
overheat ratio of 1.5. All output signals from the anemometers were offset, low-pass
filtered with a cut-off frequency of 5,200 Hz, and sampled at a frequency fs = 10,400
Hz using a 16 bit A/D converter. The sampling duration for each measurement point
was 60 s.
The vorticity components can be calculated based on the measured velocity
signals via.
z
v
y
w
z
v
y
wx
, (4-1)
x
w
z
u
x
w
z
uy
, (4-2)
y
uU
x
v
y
uU
x
vz
)()(
. (4-3)
where w and u in Eqs. (4-1) and (4-3) are differences between the velocity signals
measured by X- probes A and C; v and u in Eqs. (4-1) and (4-2) are differences
between the velocity signals measured by X-probes B and D. The velocity gradients
in the streamwise direction w/x and v/x in Eqs. (4-2) and (4-3), respectively,
are obtained by using a central difference scheme to the time series of the measured
velocity signals, e.g. ∂v/∂x ≈ v/x ≈ xiviv /)]1()1([ , where x is estimated
based on Taylor‟s hypothesis given by x = -Uc(2t). A central difference scheme in
71
estimating w/x and v/x has the advantage to avoid phase shifts between the
velocity gradients involved in Eqs. (4-2) and (4-3) (Wallace and Foss, 1995). Uc is
the vortex convection velocity, which is in the range of 0.87-0.89U∞ for x* = 10-40
(Zhou and Antonia, 1992). t ( 1/fs) is the time interval between two consecutive
points in the time series of the velocity signals. The uncertainties for time-averaged
velocities U (a single over bar denotes conventional time-averaging) were about
±3%, while the uncertainties for fluctuation velocities u, v and w were about ±7, ±8
and ±8%, respectively. More details of this vorticity probe and the experiment
uncertainties were given in Zhou et al. (2009).
4.3 Time-Averaged Velocities and Wake Periodicity
4.3.1 Distributions of time-averaged streamwise and spanwise velocities
It has been confirmed that the time-averaged streamwise velocities measured
from the four X-probes agree quite well. Therefore, only the mean values measured
from the X-probes are presented. Similarly, the mean values of the spanwise velocities
measured by the X-probes A and C are given. Figure 4-2 shows the *U and *W at
different downstream locations for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°. Only the data at y*
≥ 0 are presented in view of the symmetry of the flow. The result for = 0° at x* =
10 corresponds well with that reported by Zhou et al. (2002), providing a validation
of the present measurement. For all downstream positions, *U is the smallest for =
0°. From = 0° to 45°, *U increases gradually as shown in Figure 4-2 (a-c).
The maximum velocity deficit (1- min*U ) and mean velocity half-widths L
*
are summarized in Table 4-2. The wake half-width grows less rapidly from x* = 10
to 40 with an increase in from 0° to 45°. For example, L* for = 0°, at x
* = 40 is 1.93
times larger than that at x*= 10, but is only 1.81 for = 45°. The faster growing wake
half-width at = 0° than that at ≠ 0° is consistent with the stronger vortex
shedding at = 0°, which enhances momentum transport in the wake.
The near wake of a circular cylinder with α = 0° is inherently three-dimensional
at Re > 140, caused by the occurrence of streamwise riblike vortices (Williamson,
1996c). However, the time-averaged spanwise velocity *W is still zero across the wake
because of the cancellation of the effects of the riblike structures. The *W provides a
72
measure for the time-averaged three dimensionality of the flow. A larger
*W corresponds to a higher degree of three-dimensionality (Marshall, 2003; Alam and
Zhou, 2007b). In the wake of cylinder placed normal to the incoming flow, *W is zero
across the wake. Figure 4-2 (d-f) shows the value of at different downstream positions
for = 0° to 45°. As expected, *W is approximately zero across the wake at all
x* for = 0°, suggesting the two-dimensionality of the wake at = 0°. With the
increase of , *W increases significantly near the centreline, but decreases
remarkably and becomes negative in other region (Figure 4-2d-f). For example, *W at
x* = 10 is positive for y
* < 2.2 at = 15° and 30° and for y
* < 1.75 at = 45°, and
negative for a larger y*. At all streamwise positions, the maximum *W at the
centreline increases monotonously as increases from 0° to 45°. A sketch of the
vortical structures in a yawed cylinder wake is shown in Figure 4-3 (a) to understand
the dependence of *W on . As noted by Marshall (2003) and Zhou et al. (2009), the
vortices in a yawed cylinder wake are oriented at approximately the same angle as the
cylinder when the latter is not too large. As the vortices are inclined, as shown in
Figure 4-3 (a), the vortices of both signs may result in a positive spanwise velocity
near the centreline and a negative one away from the centreline. This is consistent
with that shown in Figure 4-2 (d-f). Obviously, the maximal *W at the centreline
depends on two factors, i.e. and the vortex strength. The latter may not be
suppressed considerably when is not too large (Thakur et al., 2004), thus enlarging
the maximum of gradually from = 0° to 45° (Figure 4-2d-f). As becomes even
larger, the vortex strength will be restrained. This is expected since at = 90° no
vortex shedding occurs. Consequently, the magnitude of *W may increase first
and then decreases when is changed continuously from 0° to 90°. With the increase
of x*, the magnitude of *W decreases, though still appreciable at x
* = 40, indicating
the persistence of the three-dimensionality.
4.3.2 Power spectral density functions of velocities and vorticities
Figure 4-4 presents the power spectral density functions, u, v, w, of the
three velocity components for = 0° and 45°, measured at y* = 1.0 and x
* = 10 and
40. Note that u, v and w are normalized to decibel scale by the maximum of v.
For = 0°, both u and v at x* = 10 display one pronounced peak at f0
* = 0.195.
73
The peak in u is about 4 dB lower than that in v. A much less pronounced peak
occurs in w, only -14.2 dB. A minor peak is discernible in u and v at = 0.38
(Figure 4-4a) apparently the second harmonic of f0*. This minor peak vanishes at x
*
= 40. The major peak in u or w disappears, while that in v still exists at x* = 40
(Figure 4-4b), suggesting a faster decay of the coherent components in u and w.
The peak in u, v and w at x* = 10 is broad and less pronounced at =
45° (Figure 4-4c) than that at = 0°. The observation is consistent with Zhou et al.‟s
(2009) report that the sharp and narrow-banded peak is replaced by an order of
magnitude weaker and wide-banded peak as changes from 0° to 30°. The present
results indicates that this trend continues at least up to = 45°. The peak in u, v
and w occurs at f0* = 0.158. The dependence of the vortex shedding
frequency on has been discussed in Zhou et al. (2010), thus not repeated here. It is
worth mentioning that the peaks in u and w at x* = 10 exhibit a similar strength for
= 45° (Figure 4-4c), in distinct contrast with that for = 0°. Apparently, the inclined
vortices (Figure 4-3a) will have projections in both x and z directions, i.e. coherent u
and w, which may have a similar strength and the same periodicity for = 45°. The
power spectral density functions, x ,
y , z , of the three vorticity components are
shown in Figure 4-5. The x ,
y and z are normalized by the maximum of
z . A pronounced peak occurs in z , regardless of , at the same frequency as
in u, v and w (Figure 4-4). For = 45°, a relative weak peak is discernible in x
at x* = 10, which occurs at the same f0
* as in
z (Figure 4-5c). The observation is
ascribed to the inclination of vortices, which will be reflected inx .
4.4 Phase-Averaged Results
4.4.1 Brief introduction to phase-averaging technique
Vortices shed from a circular cylinder are characterized by a marked
periodicity in the near and intermediate wake. This remarkable periodicity persists
even for the cylinder yaw angle of 45°. Figure 4-6 presents the v-signals from the X-
probe B of the vorticity probe at the lateral location of y* ≈ 0.5 and x
* = 10. The filtered
signal vf is denoted by a thicker line in Figure 4-6. A fourth-order Butterworth filter
was used. The phase shift about 0.5% of the vortex shedding period caused by
74
filtering is very small, since the shift depends largely on the filtering frequency set at
vortices shedding frequency (Matsumura and Antonia, 1993; Zhou et al., 2002). Both
the raw and filtered v-signals exhibit a marked periodicity for all tested yaw angles, as
shown in Figure 4-6, suggesting a noticeable periodic vortices shedding in the wake.
Signals at x* = 20 and 40 are similar to those at x
* = 10, and thus are not shown here.
It is worth mentioning that, the scales of horizontal and vertical coordinates are
arbitrary, but the same scales are used for all the four tested yaw angles. The vortex
shedding period increases gradually as the yaw angle increases from 0° to 45°, as
shown in Figure 4-6. The detailed discussion about the behaviour of the vortex
shedding process for different yaw angles has been given in Section 3.2, in the context
of power spectral density function of v-signals. The phase of the vortex shedding
process could be identified on the filtered vf, as denoted by the thicker line in Figure
4-6, namely
Phase A: 0fv
and ,0
dt
dv f
(4-4)
Phase B: 0fv
and .0
dt
dv f
(4-5)
This two phases correspond to time tA,i and tB,i (measured from an arbitrary time origin),
respectively. The phase was then calculated from the filtered signals as:
,,,
,
iAiB
iA
tt
tt
iBiA ttt ,,
(4-6)
,,1,
,
iBiA
iB
tt
tt1,, iAiB ttt (4-7)
The interval between phases A and B was made equal to 0.5T0, half of the average
vortex shedding period, by compression or stretching. It was farther divided into 30
equal intervals. Phase-averaging was then conducted on the measured signals, not on the
filtered signals. The phase-average of an instantaneous quantity B is given by
N
iikk B
NB
1,
1 (4-8)
where k represents phase. N is about 1200 for all the presently tested cases. Following
the triple decomposition proposed by Reynolds and Hussain (1972), a variable B can be
viewed as the sum of the time-averaged component B and the fluctuation component β,
75
which can be further decomposed into coherent fluctuation and incoherent
fluctuation βr.
Once the coherent components of u, v and w fluctuations are extracted, the
coherent contributions to the conventional Reynolds stresses can be given in terms of
the structural average. The conditionally averaged structure begins at k1 (corresponding
to = -π) and ends at k2 (corresponding to = π). The structural average is defined by
2
11 2
1
1
k
kk k
(4-9)
where β, like γ denotes either u, v and w.
4.4.2 Phase-averaged vorticity fields
Figures 4-7 and 4-8 present the contours of phase-averaged vorticity
components, i.e. *~x , *~
y and *~z at x
* = 20 and 40 for all four tested yaw angles. The
contours of *~x , *~
y and *~z at x
* = 10 were given in Zhou et al. (2010), thus will not be
repeated here. Phase (from -2π to 2π) in the figures can be interpreted in terms of a
streamwise distance and = 2π corresponds to the Kármán wavelength Uc/fs, where Uc
is the vortex convection velocity. The same scales are used in - and y*-directions in
order to avoid any distortion of the physical space. The flow direction is left to right in
all the figures given in the (, y*)-plane.
At x* = 20, the coherent spanwise vorticity displays a marked periodicity for all
examined, similar to those shown by Zhou et al. (2010) at x* = 10. The maximum of
*~z for = 0°, 15° and 30° is identical and equals to 0.3, but decreases to 0.25 for =
45°, suggesting that the effect on spanwise vortices is appreciable only for > 30°.
At x* = 10, the maximal concentration of *~
z at = 45° remains only 50% of that at =
0° (Zhou et al., 2010). While as x* reaches 20, the maximal concentration of *~
z at =
45° remains 83.3% of that at = 0° (Figure 4-7i and l). This observation suggests that
the effect of yaw angle on the coherent spanwise vortices becomes less obvious with the
increasing of x*. The dependence of *~
z on conforms to Marshall‟s (2003) report that
the vorticity strength degrade gradually with the increase of . Note that the outermost
contour levels of *~z are 0.1 and -0.1, the same for all plots (Figure 4-7i-l). The area of
the outermost contour is smaller at = 45° than others, indicating a weakened vortex
76
strength and a reduced wake width, in good agreement with Lucor and Karniadakis‟s
(2003) report.
The phase-averaged lateral vorticity *~y (Figure 4-7e-h) fail to display any
coherence at x* = 20, for all tested . Similar observation was made by Zhou et al.
(2010) at x* = 10. Based on flow visualization and numerical simulation, Ramberg
(1983), Marshall (2003) and Matsuzaki et al. (2004) observed lateral coherent
structures near the upstream end of a yawed cylinder, which was caused by the
spanwise velocity. This lateral coherent structure is not observed presently because
measurements were conducted at the mid-span of the cylinder, which is essentially
unaffected by the end effects.
The coherent streamwise vorticity *~x (Figure 4-7a-d) exhibits organized
structures, especially at large , albeit with a much weaker strength than *~z . In
distinct contrast to *~z , *~
x is enhanced gradually from = 0° to 45°. For example,
the maximal magnitude of *~x is 0.04 at = 0°, about 13% of the corresponding *~
z
(Figure 4-7a and i), but becomes 0.12 at = 45°, about 50% of the corresponding *~z
(Figure 4-7d and l). That is, *~x is considerably better organized with increasing .
The observation is ascribed to the inclination of the vortex roll in a yawed cylinder
wake, which enhances the streamwise component of vortices. Considering the
distribution of *~z and *~
x at x* = 10 (Zhou et al., 2010), the systematically weakening
of spanwise vortices with the increase of is less obvious at x* = 20, though the gradual
enhancement of *~x is still remarkable. The observation, that the increase in the
streamwise circulation is at an expense of the primary spanwise circulation (Mansy et
al., 1994), is discernible at a small x*, e.g. x
* = 10, but almost vanishes with x
* increases
to 20. The phase of the concentrated *~x corresponds well with that of *~
z . For
example, the centres of positively signed structures occur at = ±π in both *~x -
and *~z -contours, while those of negatively signed structures are at = 0 and ±2π.
As a matter of fact, the observation conforms well to our schematic sketch of an
inclined vortex roll in Figure 4-3 (b). An inclined positively signed vortex roll can
result in a positive vortex in the (x, y)-plane, i.e. z > 0, and meanwhile cause a
positive vortex in the (y, z)-plane, i.e. x > 0. Similarly, for a negatively signed
77
vortex roll, the corresponding z- and x-components are both negative (not shown).
As evident in Figure 4-3 (b), both *~x and *~
z concentrations may be considered as
the projections of the inclined vortex roll in the (y, z)- and the (x, y)-planes,
respectively. Naturally, *~x and *~
z are in-phased.
The effect of on *~z at x
* = 40 is insignificant. The range of the maximum
*~z for all is 0.04-0.06 (Figure 4-8i-l). Considering *~
z at x* = 10 (Figure 3-7i-l
similar as in Zhou et al. 2010) and 20 (Figure 4-7i-l), it can be concluded that the
decay of *~z in the streamwise direction is slower for a larger . For instance, the
maxima of *~z at x
* = 40 remains 5% and 12.5% of their counterpart at x
* = 10 for
= 0° and 45°, respectively. The *~y -contours display no large-scale concentrations
and the maximum *~y remains about 10% of that at x
* = 10 (Figure 4-8e-h).
Similarly to that at x* = 10 and 20, *~
x at x* = 40 increases in strength and becomes
more organized with increasing . The maximum concentrations of *~x , *~
y and *~z
are summarized in Table 4-3. It is worth mentioning that, although the position of the
centres of *~z does not change significantly, the vortex strength and its size impair
considerably from x* = 20 to 40, since the outmost contour value in Figure 4-8 (i-l) is
only 1/5 of that in Figure 4-7 (i-l).
4.4.3 Phase-averaged velocity fields
The variation in *~x , *~
y and *~z with is connected to the dependence on
of the phase-averaged coherent velocities, i.e. *~u , *~v and *~w . Figures 4-9 and 4-10
present the iso-contours of *~u , *~v and *~w at x* = 20 and 40 for the four . The
maximum of is *~v considerably larger than that of *~u or *~w at all streamwise
positions, irrespective of , internally consistent with the more pronounced peak in
v than that inu or w.
At x* = 20, for all tested , the *~u contours display approximate up-down
antisymmetry about the vortex centre (the lower half is not shown), while the *~v
contours present antisymmetry about = 0 (Figure 4-9a-d, e-h). Both *~u and *~v
display qualitatively the same structure as those at x* = 10 (see Figure 3-10 similar as
in Zhou et al. 2010) and those reported by Matsumura and Antonia (1993) and Zhou et
78
al. (2002) for = 0°. The maximal concentrations of *~u and *~v are not altered at ≤
15°. They decrease when is increased from 30° to 45°, as shown in Figure 4-9 (a-h).
The maximum *~u and *~v for = 45° remain to be about 60% and 83% of their
counterparts for = 15°, suggesting that affects *~u more than *~v , as noted by Zhou
et al. (2010) at x* = 10.
At = 0° and 15°, the maximum contours of *~w is much smaller compared
with that of *~u and *~v , since the coherent motion contributes much less to *~w than to
*~u and *~v . This may suggest that inclination of the coherent spanwise vortices is
limited for ≤ 15°, thus resulting in negligible small *~w . In contrast to *~u and *~v , *~w
is enhanced and may be considered to be increasingly organized with increasing ,
showing up-down antisymmetry about the vortex centre (Figure 4-9i-l). The maximum
of *~w almost doubles from = 0° to 45°. In fact, it is comparable to the maximum of
*~u at = 45°. The contours of *~w is analogous but opposite in sign to those of *~u .
For instance, *~u > 0 and *~w < 0 at = 0 and y* > 0. Furthermore, the extremum in the
contours of *~u and *~w occurs at almost the same location, especially for = 30° and
45°. The observations indicate an inherent connection between *~u and *~w . Figure 4-3
(c) shows two schematic inclined vortices and the corresponding coherent velocities.
For the counterclockwise vortex of z > 0, *~u is negative in Quadrants 1 and 2 but
positive in Quadrants 3 and 4. Meanwhile, *~v is negative in Quadrants 2 and 3 but
positive in Quadrants 1 and 4. These distributions of *~u and *~v are consistent with
those at = 0° (Balachandar et al., 1997). Similarly, the distributions of *~w are also
shown in Figure 4-3 (c). For the vortex of z > 0, *~w is positive in Quadrants 1 and 2
and negative in Quadrants 3 and 4, opposite to *~u . The coherent velocity components
of the clockwise vortex of z < 0 are opposite in sign to those of the positively signed
vortex (Figure 4-3c), thus not discussed here. In conclusion, the phase- averaged
velocities shown in Figure 4-9 correspond well with those shown in Figure 4-3 (c).
The enhanced *~w with increasing was ascribed to the generation of the
secondary axial organized structures, i.e. the streamwise vortices, in some
investigations (Hammache and Gharib, 1991; Szepessy and Bearman, 1992;
Matsumoto et al., 2001). Based on the present measurements and the sketches in
79
Figure 4-3, *~u , *~v and *~w result from the projection of the inclined vortex roll in
the x-, y- and z-direction, respectively. Similarly, the streamwise projection of the
inclined vortex roll (Figure 4-3b) may also contribute to *~x (Figure 4-7a-d).
At x* = 40, the effect of on *~u , *~v and *~w (Figure 4-10) is insignificant,
consistent with the phase-averaged vorticity contours at the same x* (Figure 4-8).
The extremum of *~u is almost the same for all (Figure 4-10a-d). A comparison
with the data at x* = 10 (Zhou et al., 2010) and 20 (Figure 4-9a-d) unveils that *~u
and also *~v decay more rapidly downstream for a small , as observed earlier for
*~z . At x
* = 40, the concentrations of *~u and *~v are still discernible and show a
similar pattern to that at x* = 10 and 20. This is not the case for *~w (Figure 4-10i-l).
It can be concluded that the marked effect of on the flow diminishes downstream
and becomes negligibly small at x* = 40. The maximum levels of *~u , *~v and *~w at
x* = 10, 20 and 40 are summarized in Table 4-3.
4.4.4 Phase-averaged Reynolds shear stresses
The phase-averaged Reynolds shear stresses, i.e. **~~ vu , ** ~~ wu and ** ~~ wv , at
x* = 20 are presented in Figure 4-11 for all . Those at x
* = 40 are not shown
because the organized patterns have disappeared at this location. For all tested , the
* *u v contours (Figure 4-11a-d) are almost zero at the position of vortex centre, and
present a local extremum in each quadrant. This distribution is similar to the pattern of a
clover-leaf about the vortex centre (the lower half is not shown). This pattern results
from the coherent motion in a reference frame moving at Uc. For the vortex of *~z <
0, *~u > 0 and *~v <0 in Quadrant 1 yields **~~ vu < 0; *~u > 0 and *~v >0 in Quadrant
2 leads to **~~ vu > 0. The sign of **~~ vu in Quadrant 3 and 4 can be determined
accordingly. Obviously, **~~ vu is related to *~z . The maximum **~~ vu changes little,
about 0.0025, from = 0° to 30°, but reduces to 0.0015 at = 45°. This observation
conforms to the dependence of *~z on , as shown in Figure 4-7 (i-l). The
approximate antisymmetry of **~~ vu about = 0 implies a small net coherent
contribution to uv , due to the cancellation of positive and negative **~~ vu , which will
be further discussed later.
80
The ** ~~ wu contours (Figure 4-11e-h) display negatively signed concentrations
at y* ≈ 0.75-1.1. The concentrations shift toward the centreline with increasing .
As shown in Figure 4-9 (a-d, i-l), *~u and *~w exhibit similar distribution but
opposite signs. Consequently, ** ~~ wu is negative in most wake regions, especially for
a large . Although considerably smaller in magnitude than that of **~~ vu or ** ~~ wv ,
** ~~ wu appears to improve its periodicity from = 0° to 45°, apparently linked to the
enlarged projection of the vortex roll onto the (x, z)-plane.
At x* = 10, the maximum magnitude of the negative ** ~~ wu increases from
0.005 to 0.009 when is increased from 0° to 45°, while that of the positive ** ~~ wu
decreases significantly, from 0.004 to 0.001 (Figure 3-11 similar as in Zhou et al.
2010). However, at x* = 20, the dependence of the maximum level of ** ~~ wu on
becomes less pronounced (Figure 4-11e-h).
The contours of ** ~~ wv (Figure 4-11i-l) are less organized, compared with
**~~ vu and ** ~~ wu , probably due to the fact that both *~u and *~w are less organized
than *~v (Figure 4-9). Again, with increasing , ** ~~ wv appears better organized. The
maximum contour levels of **~~ vu , ** ~~ wu and ** ~~ wv are summarized in Table 4-3.
4.5 Coherent Contributions to Reynolds Stresses and Vorticity
Variances
The coherent contributions to Reynolds stresses can be quantified in terms of
the structure average and are shown in Figures 4-12 and 4-13 for x* = 20 and 40. All
profiles are either quite symmetrical or antisymmetrical about y* = 0 for all . At
x* = 10, 2*~u displays a pronounced peak at y
* ≈ 0.75, and is nearly zero at y
* = 0
(Zhou et al., 2010). At x* = 20, this peak shifts to y
* ≈ 1.25, and is less pronounced for
all (Figure 4-12a, g, m and s). The major contribution to 2*u is from the incoherent
component. The maximum 2*~u is almost independent of the yaw angle for ≤
30°, and becomes appreciably smaller at = 45°. This observation is consistent with
the dependence of *~u on (Figure 4-9), and is inherently connected to *~z (Figure 4-7i-
l). At x* = 40, 2*~u is more broadly distributed than at x
* = 10 and 20. The maximum
81
2*~u is similar in magnitude for all and considerably smaller than that at x* = 10
and 20, internally consistent with the streamwise variation of *~u (Figure 3-10a-d
similar as in Zhou et al. (2010), Figure 4-9a-d and 4-10a-d). The result suggests the
weakened coherent structures and a reduced effect as vortices are advected
downstream.
The maximum 2*v , 2*~v and 2*~
rv occur at the centreline for all , and are
larger than their counterparts of the streamwise and spanwise components (Figure
4-12b, h, n and t). Zhou et al. (2010) noted that the coherent contribution to 2*v at
x* = 10 is larger than the incoherent contribution over y
* = -1 to 1 for all . This is
not so at x* = 20 (Figure 4-12b, h, n and t). Two factors may be responsible for this
change, i.e. the downstream decay and moving away from the centreline of the
vortices. At x* = 40, the coherent contribution to 2*v almost completely vanishes except
near the centreline (Figure 4-13b, h, n and t). Note that at x* = 40, 2*~v increases
with an increase in (Figure 4-13b, h, n and t), suggesting a smaller downstream
decay rate for a larger
At x* = 10, Zhou et al. (2010) showed that 2*~w increases when is changed
from 30° to 45° and revealed a pronounced peak at y* ≈ 0.75. At x
* = 20-40, the
coherent contribution to 2*~w is essentially zero for all (Figure 4-12c, i, o, u and 4-
13c, i, o, u), suggesting that the coherent contribution to 2*w decays much faster
than to 2*u and 2*v .
The Reynolds shear stresses at x* = 20 are generally smaller in magnitude
than the Reynolds normal stresses. As shown in Figure 4-12 (d, j, p, v, f, l, r and x),
the **~~ vu and ** ~~ wv , are approximately antisymmetrical about y* = 0; so are their
coherent and incoherent contributions. The coherent and incoherent components of
** ~~ wu are opposite in sign, especially for beyond 15°; and the latter follows the
sign of ** ~~ wu . This observation suggests that the coherent motions tends to suppress the
production of ** ~~ wu , that is the ** ~~ wu is dominated by the incoherent motions. At x* =
40, the coherent contributions to all the Reynolds stresses, except to 2*u and 2*v ,
are approximately zero across the wake (Figure 4-13).This result reconfirms the
82
persistence of the spanwise coherent structures, as shown in Figure 4-8 (i-l), in view
of the association of *~u and *~v with *~z .
The coherent contributions to the variances of the three vorticity components
are shown in Figure 4-14 for different . At x* = 10,
22/~
xx is negligibly small,
less than 1%, at = 0°, as observed by Zhou et al. (2003). For = 30°-45°,
22/~
xx increases significantly, with its maximum reaching 5% (Figure 4-14a).
The dependence of 22
/~xx on at x
* = 20 (Figure 4-14b) is qualitatively the same
as that at x* = 10. It is worth mentioning that the maximum
22/~
xx reduces
markedly at x* = 20, compared with that at x
* = 10, in conformity with the
streamwise evolution of the phase-averaged longitudinal vorticity (Figures 4-7a-d
and 4-8a-d). The 22
/~yy is negligibly small for = 0° - 45° (Figure 4-14d, e and
f), which is not surprising in view of the result in Figures 4-7 and 4-8. The 22
/~zz
is by far larger than 22
/~xx and
22/~
yy at x* = 10 and 20, regardless of . At
x* = 10,
22/~
zz is essentially unchanged from = 0° to 15°, except near the
centreline, that is, the effect on spanwise vorticity may be neglected for ≤ 15°.
However, 22
/~zz retreats from = 15° to 45° (Figure 4-14g). At x* = 20, the
difference in 22
/~zz between different diminishes (Figure 4-14h) relative to that
at x* = 10.
22/~
zz decays rapidly downstream for ≤ 30°. On the other hand,
22/~
zz drops rather slowly for = 45°, that is, *~z decays slowly for a larger yaw
angle, as observed in Figures 4-7 (i-l) and 4-8 (i-l). At x* = 40,
22/~
zz is
negligibly small across the wake for all (Figure 4-14i), as 22
/~xx and
22/~
yy .
The streamwise variation of the coherent contribution may be quantified by
the dependence of the ratio qssq /~~ on x*, where q and s may represent u, v and w.
83
This ratio also depends on y*. Following Zhou et al. (2002), we define an averaged
contribution mqssq )/~~( , across the wake, from the coherent vortical structures:
** /~~)/~~( dyqsdysqqssq m
(4-10)
In view of the symmetry of the wake, the lower integral limit (-∞) may be replaced
by 0. The values of mqssq )/~~( at x* = 10, 20 and 40 are given in Table 4-4.
The coherent contribution to 2v is greater than that to 2u , this contribution
to 2w being smallest, regardless of . The difference is pronounced at x* = 10 and
20, but vanishes at x* = 40 where all of them approach zero because of the breakup
of vortices. At x* = 10, the coherent contribution to 2u or 2v differs little from =
0° to 15°. This contribution reduces gradually with a further increase in . On the
other hand, the coherent contribution to 2w increases constantly with increasing ,
due to the enhanced *~x and the three-dimensionality of the flow. The muvvu )/~~(
behaves quite similarly to muu )/~( 22 or mvv )/~( 22 , changing little from = 0° and
15° and decreasing more appreciably from = 30° to 45°. Note that muwwu )/~~(
exceeds 100% for all , as may be inferred from Figure 4-12 (e, k, q and w).
The downstream decrease in muu )/~( 22 is much slower than mvv )/~( 22 and
mww )/~( 22 . For example, muu )/~( 22 at x* = 40 remains at 15.2%, 18.7%, 25.7% and
28.6% of that at x* = 10 for u= 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°, respectively. However, the
corresponding mvv )/~( 22 is only 3.1%, 4.0%, 6.0% and 7.5%, and mww )/~( 22 is only
3.3%, 2.6%, 1.1% and 1.4%. Furthermore, muu )/~( 22 and mvv )/~( 22 decay more
rapidly at a small . The observation is linked to the streamwise evolution of *~z , as
shown in Figures 4-7 (i-l) and 4-8 (i-l). As noted earlier, the vortex shedding
frequency decreases gradually with increasing , that is, the vortices at a large
are longitudinally separated farther, implying a weak interaction between them and
hence a slow decay or longer survival.
84
The coherent contribution is much larger to 2
z than to 2
x and 2
y ,
especially at x* =10 and 20 because the vortex roll is predominantly spanwise. At x
* =
10, mzz )/~(22
is almost unchanged from = 0o to 15
o, but reduces appreciably
from = 30° to 45°. Meanwhile, mxx )/~(22
increases monotonically. A similar
observation is made at x* = 20. That is, with increasing , the streamwise
component of the vortex roll is enhanced at the expense of the weakening spanwise
component. The streamwise decay of 22
/~zz is less rapid for a large than for a
small one, consistent with that shown in Figures 4-7 and 4-8. For example, mzz )/~(22
at x* = 20 remains 29% and 55% of that at x
* = 10 for = 0° and 45°, respectively.
4.6 Conclusions
The yawed cylinder wake has been experimentally investigated using an
eight-wire vorticity probe. The three-dimensional velocity and vorticity components
are measured simultaneously at the streamwise position of x* = 10, 20 and 40, and the
yaw angle of = 0°-45°. The phase-averaged technique is utilized to extract the large-
scale coherent structures. The dependence of the coherent structures on and its
streamwise evolution are quantified. The major results are summarized below:
1. Both *~x and *~
z may be considered to result from the projection of the inclined
vortex roll in the (y, z)- and (x, y)-planes. At x* = 20, *~
x is enhanced
progressively with increasing , its maximum magnitude rising from 0.04 at
= 0° to 0.12 at = 45°. On the other hand, *~z is almost independent of for
≤ 30°, but reduces in magnitude for = 45°. The result reconfirms Mansy et
al. ‟s (1994) argument that the increase in the streamwise circulation was at an
expense of the primary spanwise circulation. At x* = 40, the organized motion
is still appreciable in terms of *~z . Its maximum concentration, which is
almost independent of , remains about 5.0%, 6.3%, 10.0% and 12.5% of that
at x* = 10 for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°, respectively, indicating a faster
streamwise decay of *~z for smaller . The observation is ascribed to the larger
85
streamwise spacing and hence weakened interactions between vortices for
larger .
2. The coherent velocities, *~u , *~v and *~w , depend on . With an increase in ,
the magnitude of *~u and *~v at x* = 20 retreats, while that of *~w grows,
with its maximum at = 45° nearly doubling that at = 0°. As x* reaches 40,
this dependence is hardly noticeable.
3. The coherent contributions to Reynolds stresses and vorticity variances are
approximately independent of for ≤ 15°. At x* = 10, the coherent
contribution to 2
x increases from = 15° to 45°. The opposite is observed
for the coherent contribution to 2
z . The result is essentially connected to the
fact that, with being increased, the streamwise component of the vortex roll
is enhanced at the expense of the spanwise component. Meanwhile, the
coherent contributions to 2u and 2v decrease, while those to 2w increase.
The coherent contribution remains dependent on at x* = 20 but not at x
* = 40.
4. The coherent contributions to 2u , 2v and 2
z decay less rapidly in the
streamwise direction, given a larger . At = 0°, the magnitude of
muu )/~( 22 , mvv )/~( 22 and mzz )/~(22
at x* = 40 are about 15.2%, 3.1% and
1.6% of those at x* = 10; at = 45°, however, the corresponding values are
28.5%, 7.5% and 8.7%, respectively. The result is connected to the dependence
on of the longitudinal spacing between the vortex rolls.
86
Table 4-1. Position and the measured velocities of each X-probe contained in the
vorticity probe.
X-probe Wires consisted Position Velocities
measured
A
B
C
D
1, 2
3, 4
5, 6
7, 8
(x, z)-plane
(x, y)-plane
(x, z)-plane
(x, y)-plane
u, w
u, v
u, w
u, v
Table 4-2. Maximum velocity deficit and wake half-width.
x*
0° 15° 30° 45°
min*1 U
10 0.17 0.14 0.10 0.07
20 0.19 0.17 0.13 0.09
40 0.15 0.14 0.11 0.08
*L
10 0.80 0.82 0.80 0.68
20 1.02 1.00 0.92 0.89
40 1.54 1.50 1.34 1.23
87
Table 4-3. The maximum values of the coherent vorticity, velocity and Reynolds stresses contours for different yaw angles at x* = 10, 20 and 40.
x* 10 20 40
0° 15° 30° 45° 0° 15° 30° 45° 0° 15° 30° 45°
*~x 0.15 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.04 0.06 0.1 0.12 0.01 0.02 0.025 0.03
*~y 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.025 0.025
*~z 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.05
| *~u | 0.12 0.14 0.10 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008
| *~v | 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.020 0.023 0.025 0.025
| *w | 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.015 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004
| **~~ vu | 0.018 0.018 0.012 0.009 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0015 --- --- --- ---
| ** ~~ wu | 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.0007 0.0005 0.0009 0.0007 --- --- --- ---
| ** ~~ wv | 0.004 0.004 0.006 0.004 0.001 0.0015 0.001 0.0015 --- --- --- ---
88
Table 4-4. Averaged contributions from the coherent motion to Reynolds stresses and vorticity variances for different yaw angles at x* = 10, 20 and 40
x* 10 20 40
0° 15° 30° 45° 0° 15° 30° 45° 0° 15° 30° 45°
2 2( )mu u (%) 22.3 24.2 21.0 16.4 9.0 9.2 9.1 7.4 3.4 4.7 5.4 4.7
2 2( )mv v (%) 64.1 64.3 61.5 54.7 24.6 25.7 24.3 18.2 2.0 2.6 3.7 4.1
2 2( )mw w (%) 3.0 3.8 9.0 14.5 0.5 0.7 1.3 1.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
( )muv uv (%) 37.7 38.9 28.6 27.7 24.1 15.8 27.5 21.6 1.4 1.9 1.5 1.1
( )muw uw (%) 105.5 102.6 123.0 112.3 45.0 59.1 60.4 55.5 5.9 5.4 7.7 8.2
( )mvw vw (%) 24.1 34.6 33.4 32.6 18.5 24.3 16.8 11.1 2.9 2.8 2.4 1.9
2 2( )x x m (%) 0.48 0.76 2.5 2.7 0.10 0.24 0.78 1.19 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.17
2 2( )y y m (%) 0.13 0.17 0.16 0.20 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05
2 2( )z z m (%) 13.2 14.5 11.4 5.3 3.8 4.27 4.23 2.94 0.21 0.28 0.39 0.46
89
Figure 4-1. Definition of the coordinate system and the sketches of the vorticity probe.
(a) definition of coordinate system; (b) Sketch of the vorticity probe.
Figure 4-2. Time-averaged u- and w-component velocities at different yaw angles. (a, d)
x* = 10; (b, e) 20; (c, f) 40.
90
x
y
z
+ +
-
Wake centerline
+ Positive vortex
Negative vortex
The (x, y)-plane
The (y, z)-plane
z > 0
x > 0
(a)
(b)
u > 0~
v < 0~
x
y
z
O w < 0~
Quadrant 1
u > 0~
v > 0~
w < 0~
Quadrant 2
u < 0~
v > 0~
w > 0~
Quadrant 3
u < 0~
v < 0~
w > 0~
Quadrant 4
u < 0~
v > 0~
x
y
z
O w > 0~
Quadrant 1
u < 0~
v < 0~
w > 0~
Quadrant 2
u > 0~
v < 0~
w < 0~
Quadrant 3
u > 0~
v > 0~
w < 0~
Quadrant 4
(c)
Negative vortexPositive vortex
O
Yawed-cylinder
Positive vortex roll
Figure 4-3. Sketch of the inclined vortices in a yawed cylinder wake. (a) inclined vortex
street, (b) projections of a positive vortex roll in the (x, y)- and the (y, z)-planes, (c)
distributions of the three phase-averaged velocity components in a inclined vortex
0.1 1 0.1 1
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
f *
x* = 10 x* = 40
f *
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
u
v
w
Figure 4-4. The power spectra density function u, v and w of the three velocity
components for different yaw angles. (a, b) = 0°; (c, d) 45°.
91
0.1 1 0.1 1-20
-15
-10
-5
0
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
f *
x* = 10 x* = 40
f *
x
y
z
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 4-5. The power spectra density function x ,
y and z of the three vorticity
components for different yaw angles. (a, b) = 0°; (c, d) 45°.
v
v
v
v
t
tA,i tB,i tA,i+1
o
o
o
o
Figure 4-6. Signal v from the X-probe B of the vorticity probe at x* = 10 and y
* ≈ 0.5.
The thicker line represents the filtered signal vf.
92
2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 -1 -2
0
1
2
3
-1
0
1
2
3
-1
0
1
2
3
-1
y *
y *
y *
(a) (b) (c) (d)
(e) (f) (g) (h)
( i) (j) (k)
-0.04 0.04
-0.04 0.04
0.3 -0.3
-0.06 0.06
-0.06 0.04
0.3 -0.3
-0.1 0.08
-0.04 0.04
0.3 -0.3
-0.12 0.12
-0.04 0.04
-0.250.25(l )
Figure 4-7. Phase-averaged vorticity components at x* = 20 for different yaw angles. (a-d) *~
x ; (e-f) *~y ; (i-l) *~
z . (a-h) Contour intervals = 0.02; (i-l)
0.05.
93
(a) (b) (c) (d)
(e) (f) (g) (h)
( i) (k) (l)-0.04 0.04 -0.060.05 -0.050.05
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
0
-1
1
2
3
0
-1
1
2
3
0
-1
1
2
3
y *
y *
y *
0.05 -0.05
2 1 0 -1 -2
( j)
Figure 4-8. Phase-averaged vorticity components at x* = 40 for different yaw angles. (a-d) *~
x ; (e-f) *~y ; (i-l) *~
z . (a) Minimum contour value = -0.01,
maximum contour value = 0.01, contour intervals = 0.005; (b) -0.02, 0.02, 0.005; (c) -0.025, 0.025, 0.005; (d) -0.03, 0.03, 0.005; (e) -0.01, 0.01, 0.005;
(f) -0.02, 0.02, 0.005, (g) -0.025, 0.025, 0.005, (h) -0.025, 0.025, 0.005, (i-l) contours intervals = 0.01.
94
2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 -1 -2
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
y *
y *
y *
(a) (b) (c) (d)
(e) (f) (g) (h)
( i) (j) (k) (l)
-0.050.05 -0.05 0.05 -0.040.04 -0.03 0.03
-0.12 0.12 -0.12 0.12 -0.12 0.12 -0.10 0.10
-0.0150.01 -0.015 0.01 -0.015 0.02 -0.02 0.025
Figure 4-9. Phase-averaged velocities at x* = 20 for different yaw angles. (a-d) *~u , (e-f) *~v , (i-l) *~w . (a-d) Contours intervals = 0.01, (e-f) 0.02 and (i-
l) 0.005.
95
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
2 1 0 -1 -2
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
y *
y *
y *
(a) (b) (c) (d)
(e) (f) (g) (h)
( i) (k) (l)( j)
0.008 -0.008 0.008 -0.008 0.008 -0.008 0.008 -0.006
-0.02 0.02 -0.023 0.023-0.025 0.025 -0.025 0.025
-0.004 0.004 -0.004 0.004 -0.004 0.004 -0.004 0.004
Figure 4-10. Phase-averaged velocities at x* = 40 for different yaw angles. (a-d) *~u , (e-f) *~v , (i-l) *~w . (a-d) Contour interval = 0.002, (e-f) 0.005 and
(i-l) 0.002.
96
2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 -1 -2
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
y *
y *
y *
(a) (b) (c) (d)
(e) (f) (g) (h)
( i) (j) (k) (l)
-0.002 0.0025 -0.002 0.0025 -0.002 0.0025 -0.001 0.0015
-0.0007 0.0003 -0.00050.0003 -0.00090.0003 -0.00070.0001
-0.0005 0.0010.0015 -0.0005
0.001 -0.001 0.0015-0.001
Figure 4-11. Phase-averaged Reynolds stresses at x* = 20 for different yaw angles. (a-d) **~~ vu ; (e-h) ** ~~ wu ; (i-l) ** ~~ wv . (a-d) Contour interval = 0.003;
(e-f) 0.002; (i-l) 0.0005.
97
0.008
0.004
0
-0.004
-0.008
0.002
0
-0.002
-0.004
0.002
0.001
0
-0.001
-0.002
0.015
0.010
0.005
0
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5
= 0o
= 15o
= 30o
= 45o
y* y* y* y*
Time-averaged
Coherent
Incoherent
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
( f )
(g)
(h)
( i )
(j )
(k)
(l ) (r) (x)
(q) (w)
(p) (v)
(o) (u)
(n) ( t )
(m) (s)
Figure 4-12. Coherent and incoherent contributions to time-averaged Reynolds stresses
for different yaw angle at x* = 20.
98
Time-averaged
Coherent
Incoherent
= 0o
= 15o
= 30o
= 45o
0
0.003
0.006
0
0.005
0
0.002
0.004
-0.002
-0.001
0
0.001
0.002
-0.002
-0.001
0
0.001
-0.0012
-0.0008
-0.0004
0
0.0004
0.0008
0.0012
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
( f )
(g)
(h)
(i )
(j )
(k)
(l ) (r) (x)
(q) (w)
(p) (v)
(o) (u)
(n) ( t )
(m) (s)
0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5
y* y* y* y*
Figure 4-13. Coherent and incoherent contributions to time-averaged Reynolds stresses
for different yaw angle at x* = 40.
99
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.0
0.1
0.2
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) ( f )
(g) (h) ( i )
x* = 10 x* = 20 x* = 40
y* y* y*
Figure 4-14. Coherent contribution to vorticity variances for different yaw angles at x* =
10, 20 and 40: (a-c) 22
/~xx ; (d-f)
22/~
yy ; (g-i) 22
/~zz .
101
CHAPTER 5
WAVELET ANALYSIS OF THE TURBULENT WAKE
GENERATED BY A YAWED CIRCULAR CYLINDER
5.1 Introduction
When fluid flows over a circular cylinder at a Reynolds number Re (≡ U∞d/,
where U∞ is the free-stream mean velocity in the streamwise direction, d is the cylinder
diameter and is the fluid kinematic viscosity) larger than 47-49 (Provansal, 1987;
Norberg, 1994; Williamson, 1996b), vortices are shed from the cylinder. Due to the
change of the pressure distribution on the surface of the structure, time-dependent drag
and lift forces will be generated. In engineering applications, these forces are highly
undesirables as they can induce vibration on the structure when the frequency of the
vortex shedding and the natural frequency of the structure are close, which is known as
the vortex-induced vibration (VIV). Nowadays, VIV is a widely recognized
phenomenon in offshore industry and is considered as one of the main causes of fatigue
damage to the offshore structures. Some examples include marine piles, umbilical
pipelines, braced members of offshore structures, etc. These structures face an external
fluid flow which may induce structural oscillation both in the flow and cross-flow
directions due to vortex shedding. Therefore, the study of VIV and vortex shedding
from a circular cylinder has both significant theoretical as well as practical applications.
There have been extensive studies on the vortex shedding regimes classified
based on Re. (Williamson, 1996b). When Re is smaller than 140-194, laminar two-
dimensional vortex shedding occurs (Provansal, 1987; Norberg, 1994; Williamson,
1996b). The shed vortices may be parallel or oblique to the cylinder, depending on the
end conditions. The end conditions may also induce vortex dislocations at the ends of
the cylinder (Williamson, 1996a). Due to the different shedding patterns, either parallel
or oblique, a difference of about 20% in the relationship between the Strouhal number
St and Re in this regime has been found (e.g. Norberg, 1994; Williamson, 1996a). When
Re is further increases, there exists a wake transition from two- to three-dimensional
involving two shedding modes; Mode A and Mode B (Karniadakis and Triantafyllou,
1992; Williamson, 1992; Thompson et al., 1996). The two modes are demonstrated by
102
two discontinuous changes in the St ~ Re relationship (e.g. Williamson, 1996b). The
first discontinuity (Mode A) is visible in the wake when Re ≈ 180-190 (Williamson,
1992; Norberg, 1994; Leweke and Provansal, 1995; Thompson et al., 1996; Williamson,
1996c), which is characterized by regular streamwise vortices with spanwise
wavelength of approximately 3 to 4d. It is associated with the origination of vortex
loops and the streamwise vortex pairs formation resulted from the deformation of the
primary vortices. According to Henderson & Barkley (1996), by using highly accurate
numerical methods and Floquet stability analysis, the onset of Mode A instability is
predicted at Re ≈ 188.5. When Re ≈ 230-260 (Williamson, 1988), the second
discontinuity (Mode B) appears which involves a gradual transfer of energy from Mode
A to Mode B. Mode B has more irregular array of rib-like small-scale streamwise
vortical structures with the mean spanwise wavelength of about 1d (Williamson,
1996b). In the transition process, large-scale spot-like vortex dislocations resulted by
local shedding-phase dislocation along the span of the cylinder are found in both low
and high Re turbulent wakes (Williamson, 1992). Eisenlohr and Eckelmann (1989) have
shown that the formation of the streamwise vortices superimposed on the large-scale
wake vortices is connected to the vortex splitting, namely vortex dislocations. In the
range of Reynolds number 103-10
4, Kelvin-Helmholtz (K-H) vortices which are linked
with the instability in the free-shear layer are formed at the surface of the structure
(Bloor, 1964; Chyu et al., 1995). The instability of K-H vortices appears as intermittent
patches in the hot wire measurement (Rajagopalan and Antonia, 2005) and eventually
lead to small-scale vortices which could influence on the Kármán vortices (Filler et al.,
1991; Sheridan et al., 1992).
In many practical engineering applications such as the flow past cables of a
suspension or a cable-stayed bridge, subsea pipelines and risers etc., the direction of the
flow may not be perpendicular to the structure. In these cases, the incoming flow
velocity can be decomposed into two components. One is perpendicular to the structure
while the other is parallel to it. The axial-flow may have significant effect to the wake
structures, especially when the yaw angle is large. Hereafter, the yaw angle is defined
as the angle between the free-stream flow direction and the normal to the cylinder so
that = 0° represents the cross-flow case while = 90° represents the axial-flow case.
Initiative study has been conducted by Hanson (1966) and followed by a number of
researchers both experimentally (e.g. Surry and Surry, 1967; Van Atta, 1968; King,
1977a; Ramberg, 1983; Kozakiewicz et al., 1995; Lucor and Karniadakis, 2003; Thakur
103
et al., 2004; Alam and Zhou, 2007b) and numerically (e.g. Chiba and Horikawa, 1987;
Marshall, 2003; Zhao et al., 2008) at yaw angles in the range of 0° to 75°. Generally, it
was found that when is small, say smaller than 35°, the results on cylinder base
pressure and vortex shedding frequency of a yawed cylinder behave in a similar way to
the normal-incidence case through the use of the component of the free-stream velocity
normal to the cylinder axis. This is often known as the independence principle (IP) or
cosine law in the literature (e.g. Hanson, 1966; Surry and Surry, 1967; Van Atta, 1968;
King, 1977a; Ramberg, 1983; Lucor and Karniadakis, 2003; Zhou et al., 2009). Zhou et
al. (2009) have shown that with the increase of , the spanwise mean velocity W which
represents three-dimensionality of the wake increases. This in turn results in a decrease
in the strength of the vortex shedding. They also found that with the increase of , the
root-mean-square (rms) values of the of the streamwise u and spanwise w velocities and
all three vorticity components (x, y and z) decrease significantly, whereas the
transverse velocity (v) does not follow that trend. Although the Strouhal numbers of the
numerical results by Zhao et al. (2008) follow the IP closely, they agree well with the
experimental data only when 30° and slightly smaller than the experimental data
when > 30°. A maximum discrepancy of about 20% was found between the numerical
results and that from the experiments at = 60°.
As turbulent structures are characterized by eddies of various sizes, namely
large-scale structures, intermediate-scale structures and small-scale structures, by
examining these various scales of the turbulent structures, deeper understanding of the
wake flows could be obtained. A number of methods for examining the large-scale
vortex structures have been proposed previously. These include the vorticity-based
technique (e.g. Hussain and Hayakawa, 1987; Zhou and Antonia, 1993), the window
average gradient method (e.g.Antonia and Fulachier, 1989; Bisset et al., 1990; Zhang et
al., 2000), the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) (e.g. Sullivan and Pollard, 1996;
Neumann and Wengle, 2004; Sen et al., 2007), the linear stochastic estimation (LSE)
(e.g. Bonnet et al., 1994; Sullivan and Pollard, 1996) and the phase-averaging technique
(e.g. Kiya and Matsumura, 1988; Zhou et al., 2002). The first two methods could not
extract the turbulent structures of scales except the large-scale vortices. POD is a
method that decomposes signals into a set of eigenmodes. The first eigenmode has the
maximum turbulence energy which is defined as a coherent structure while the second
eigenmode has smaller energy than the first one and more than the remaining and so on
(Sullivan and Pollard, 1996; Sen et al., 2007). According to Sullivan & Pollard (1996),
104
LSE provides essentially the same information of the coherent structure as POD and
therefore can be viewed as a weighted sum of an infinite number of POD eigenmodes.
Similarly, the phase-averaging technique is widely used to study the vortical structures
when a dominant frequency can be identified. Both coherent and incoherent turbulent
structures can be quantified using this method (Kiya and Matsumura, 1988; Zhou et al.,
2002).
Another useful method in analyzing turbulent structures is the wavelet method.
Unlike POD and the phase-averaging methods that decompose signals into coherent and
incoherent structures according to their energy and phase values respectively, wavelet
method is used by many researchers to decompose signals according to their scales or
frequencies (e.g. Mallat, 1989; Xu et al., 2006; Srinivas et al., 2007; Yoshimatsu and
Okamoto, 2008). By decomposing a measured signal into a number of scales or
frequencies, wavelet technique allows the measured time-frequency data to be analyzed
in time-domain, frequency-domain and a combination of both, which cannot be done by
the other techniques. Recently, orthogonal wavelet multiresolution analysis method has
been applied by a number of researchers to examine the turbulent wake structures (e.g.
Mallat, 1989; Li et al., 2001; Rinoshika and Zhou, 2005a; Rinoshika et al., 2006; Zhou
et al., 2006). This technique is used to decompose the measured velocity and vorticity
signals into a number of wavelet levels characterized by their central frequencies, which
represent the different scales of turbulent structures. Higher wavelet levels correspond
to lower frequency bands or larger scale structures while lower wavelet levels
correspond to higher frequency bands or structures in small-scales. The analysis would
give detailed results of various scales of the wake in terms of the three-dimensional
vorticity characteristics. More information on this method is given in Sect. 5.3.
In the present study, experiments were conducted using a three-dimensional
vorticity probe similar to that used by Antonia et al. (1998) and Zhou et al. (2003) in
order to measure all three velocity and vorticity components simultaneously. An
Uvi_Wave (version 3.0) wavelet toolbox (Sanchez et al., 1996) is used to analyze the
measured signals by decomposing them into time and frequency domains with wavelet
method. The objective of the current investigation is to study the effect of the yaw angle
of the cylinder on the characteristics of three-dimensional vorticity by examined the
effect of on the power spectral density, Strouhal number, velocities and vorticity
variances of the wake by using wavelet analysis. The motivation in the use of the
wavelet application is to make in depth understanding on the large-, intermediate- and
105
small-scale turbulent structures and to compare them with the measured large-scale
structures when the cylinder yaw angle is changed.
5.2 Experimental Details
The experiments were conducted in a closed loop wind tunnel with a test section
of 1.2 m (width) 0.8 m (height) 2 m (length). Across the tunnel, the free-stream flow
was uniform within 0.5%. The free-stream turbulence intensity was not more than 0.5%.
For all the experiments, the free-stream velocity U∞ was about 8.5 m/s, resulting in a
Reynolds number of 7200. The three velocity components u, v and w were measured at
the downstream location x/d = 10 for four yaw angles, namely = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°.
In the present study, the coordinate system is defined such that the x-axis is in the
incoming flow direction, the y-axis is perpendicular to the x-axis in the vertical plane
through the cylinder while the z-axis is normal to the both x and y axes. The cylinder
was a smooth stainless steel tube with a diameter of 12.7 mm and 1.15 m long. It was
aligned horizontally at the centre of the test section and supported rigidly by two
aluminum plates at both ends to minimize the end effects (Figure 5-1a).
The probe used to measure the three velocity components is sketched in Figure
5-1 (c, d). It consists of 4 standard X-probes with X-probes A and C being used to
measure u and w at two locations separated by a finite distance y = 2.7 mm while X-
probes B and D are used to measure u and v at two locations separated by a finite
distance z = 2.7 mm. These separations correspond to about 33, where is the
Kolmogorov length scale estimated using 4/13 )/( , is the mean energy
dissipation rate and can be obtained using 2)/(15 xu based on the
isotropic assumption and the Taylor‟s hypothesis. The experimental conditions on the
wake centreline for different yaw angles are summarized in Table 5-1. The separation
between the inclined wires of each X-probe was about 0.6 mm which corresponds to
about 7. The 2.5 μm diameter hot wires were etched from Wollaston (Pt-10% Rh)
wires to an active length about 0.5 mm, which corresponds to about 200 times wire
diameter. The wires were operated with in-house constant temperature circuits at an
overheat ratio = 0.5. The wires were calibrated for velocity and yaw angle using a Pitot-
static tube connected to a MKS Baratron pressure transducer (least count = 0.01 mm
H2O) at the centreline of the tunnel while the angle calibration was performed over ±
20° both before and after the experiments to ensure high quality of the data. The
106
included angle of each X-wire was about 110° and the effective angle of the inclined
wires was about 35°. The output signals from the anemometers were passed through
buck and gain circuits and low-pass filtered at a cut-off frequency fc= 5,200 Hz which is
high enough to examine the vortex shedding frequency. This frequency is much smaller
than the Kolmogorov frequency fk (≡ U/2π), which is estimated to be about 14 kHz
(Table 5-1) on the centreline of the cylinder wake. However, as the contribution from
the high frequency turbulent structures to vorticity is very small (Sect.5.4.4), the low
cut-off frequency will not cause significant errors in the measurement of vorticity. The
filtered signals were subsequently sampled at a frequency fs = 10,400 Hz by using a 16
bit A/D converter. The sampling frequency is 2fc in order to satisfy the Nyquist
criterion. The duration of each record was about 20 seconds and the minimum number
of effective acquired independent samples N ≡Ts/2Tu for this experiment is 12,320.
Here, Ts is the total record length time and Tu
du )(0
0 is the integral time scale;
where u is the longitudinal autocorrelation coefficient, is the time delay and 0 is the
time at which the first zero crossing occurs (Tennekes and Lumley, 1972; Pearson and
Antonia, 2001).
The three vorticity components in the x, y and z directions are computed based
on the measured velocity signals u, v and w at different locations, viz.
,z
v
y
w
z
v
y
wx
(5-1)
,x
w
z
u
x
w
z
uy
(5-2)
y
uU
x
v
y
uU
x
vz
)()( (5-3)
where w and u in Eqs. (5-1) and (5-3), respectively are the velocity differences
between X-probes A and C (Figure 5-1b, c); v and u in Eqs. (5-1) and (5-2),
respectively are the velocity differences between X-probes B and D. The spatial
separation x is estimated based on Taylor‟s hypothesis given by Uc(2t), where Uc =
0.87 U∞ is the average convection velocity of vortices and t ≡ 1/fs is the time interval
between two consecutive points in the time series of velocity signals. Experimental
uncertainties in velocity and vorticity measurements were estimated from errors in the
107
hot wire calibration data as well as the scatter (20 to 1 odds) observed in repeating the
experiment a number of times. The uncertainty for U was about ±3%, while
uncertainties for 2/12 u , 2/12 v and 2/12 w were about ±7%, ±8% and ±8%,
respectively, where angular brackets represent time-averaging. The uncertainty for
streamwise separation x is about ±4% and that for y and z are about ±5%. Using
these values, the uncertainties for vorticity components were estimated by the method of
propagation of errors (e.g. Kline and McClintock, 1953; Moffat, 1985, , 1988). The
resulting maximum uncertainties for 2/12 x , 2/12 y and 2/12 z are about
±14%, ±13% and ±13%, respectively. It needs to be noted that these estimations of
uncertainties do not include the spectral attenuation caused by the unsatisfactory spatial
resolution in x, y and z of the 3D vorticity probe (Antonia et al., 1998). The
correction of the spectral attenuation is based on the assumption of isotropy of the flow.
Unfortunately, the spectral attenuation effect cannot be corrected in the present study
due to the lack of isotropy at x/d = 10 for the shedding of large organized vortex
structures.
5.3 Decomposition of Experimental Signals into Various Wavelet
Levels
Orthonormal discrete wavelet transform (DWT) is a linear decomposition
process to convert a signal into a sum of a number of wavelet components at different
scales. It uses G and H filters, which are high-pass and low-pass wavelet filters,
respectively, to perform wavelet transform on any one-dimensional input signal, v(x).
Both G and H filters are constructed from the filter family. In the present study, the
Daubechies filter family with an order of 20 is chosen as the wavelet basis (Daubechies,
1992) since it has a good frequency localization and characterized by its smoothness,
making it suitable for the turbulent signals analysis (Rinoshika and Zhou, 2007). The
outputs give results of a high-pass subband i
vD from the G branch and low-pass residue
i
vA from H filter branch, where v is the symbol of the input signal and i represent the
number of the wavelet level (i.e. the scale). The original signal can be reconstructed by
using the inversion of DWT. It is performed using the synthesis filter set ( G~
and H~
filter) with the same cell iterated in order to get the approximation signal for the
following stage.
108
The wavelet multiresolution analysis is used to represent a signal or image in
various resolutions and at the same time preserves all its essential components (Li et al.,
2002; Rinoshika et al., 2006). The aim is to decompose a non-linear function into the
sum of a number of wavelet components at various central frequencies. The basic
concept of the wavelet multiresolution analysis is shown in Figure 5-2. It first performs
a discrete time wavelet transform process followed by the independent inverse
transform in each generated subband which results in a number of detail signals and an
approximation signal. A detail signal ivd is the difference between two successive low
resolution representations of signals which is 1 iv
iv
iv aad and an approximation
signal iva is a low resolution representation of the original signal at wavelet level i. The
constructions of the original signal can be done by the summation of all wavelet
components in wavelet multiresolution analysis.
In the present study, the measured velocity component U (or V and W) can be
written as the total of a time-averaged velocity component and a velocity fluctuation, as
follows
,uUU (5-4)
where an over-bar denotes time-averaging. In order to extract the turbulent structures
into various scales, the wavelet multiresolution analysis is used to decompose the
fluctuation velocity component u into a number of wavelet levels, each corresponds to
different central frequencies and directly linked to turbulent structures scales (Li et al.,
2002; Rinoshika and Zhou, 2005a, 2005b; Rinoshika et al., 2006; Zhou et al., 2006).
Any information in the original turbulent structures will be sustained regardless of the
number of the wavelet levels, as each wavelet level represents the essential information
of original turbulent structures but only in its certain range of frequencies (or band).
Thus, the original fluctuation velocity data can be reconstructed by the summation of all
fluctuation velocity of each wavelet level in wavelet multiresolution analysis, viz.
,1
n
i
iuu (5-5)
where iu is the fluctuation velocity component of u at i-th wavelet level, and n is the
total number of wavelet levels. Therefore the measured velocity component of U (x, t)
also can be written as
109
n
i
iuUU1
(5-6)
To get the wavelet components of the instantaneous vorticity component of x (or y
and z), multiresolution analysis is done to the measured vorticity signals obtained by
using Eqs. (5-1) to (5-3). The summation of the vorticity vector of all wavelet levels
i, in wavelet multiresolution analysis has the same value as the original vorticity
signal, viz.
n
i
i
1
, , (5-7)
where i, is the vorticity component at i-th wavelet level, and n is the total number of
wavelet levels.
5.4 Results and Discussion
In the present study, the velocity and vorticity signals are decomposed into 17
orthonormal wavelet levels where higher wavelet levels correspond to lower frequency
bands or larger scale structures while lower wavelet levels correspond to higher
frequency bands or structures in small-scales. However, as the contributions to the
measured velocities at y/d ≈ 0.5 from wavelet levels higher than 8 are very small, where
each wavelet level is lower than 3%, 0.5% and 2.5% for U, V and W signals
respectively, the present discussion only concerns wavelet levels i = 1-8 where i = 1-3
represent the small-scale structures; i = 4 and 5 represent the intermediate-scale
structures; i = 6 represents the organized large-scale structures located at the vortex
shedding frequency band; and i = 7-8 represent the large-scale structures. A
correspondence between the central frequencies (or wavelet levels) and the dimensions
of the vortex structures can be found in Figure 5-3 (a-d) for = 0° to 45°. In Figure 5-3,
the x-axis is shown in longitudinal wavenumber k1 (≡ 2πf/UN) where UN (≡ U∞ cos ) is
the free-stream velocity component normal to the cylinder axis. The scales
corresponding to the longitudinal integral length
dUL uu )(≡ 0
0 and the Taylor
microscale T [≡ u′/(du/dx)′, where a prime denotes the root-mean-square value] are also
indicated in the figure. The unit for the k1 is m-1
, therefore smaller values of k1 represent
the larger turbulent structures. When = 0° for example, the small-scale structures refer
110
to structures with dimensions smaller than 2.13 mm, the intermediate-scale structures
are about 2.13-8.73 mm whilst the large-scale structures are larger than 8.73 mm.
5.4.1 Spectra of measured and wavelet components of the velocity signals
In order to use the wavelet multiresolution analysis, a fundamental or dominant
frequency of turbulent structures has to be determined. This frequency is selected at the
Kármán vortex shedding frequency in the present study. Figure 5-4 (a-h) presents the
power spectra of velocity v for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° measured at y/d ≈ 0.5, which
correspond roughly to the vortex centre, and the spectra at their respective wavelet
levels i = 1-8. The wavelet frequency bands are also indicated in the figure. The v
velocity component is chosen here because it is known that this velocity component is
more sensitive to the organized structures than the other two components u and w. Fast
Fourier Transform method is used to obtain the power spectra for the measured v signals
(Figure 5-4a-d) and the signals of wavelet levels 1 to 8 that resulting from wavelet
multiresolution analysis (Figure 5-4e-h) at yaw angles of 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°.
The power spectra of the measured v signal (Figure 5-4a-d) exhibit a strong peak
at the frequencies f0 = 129 Hz, 129 Hz, 119 Hz and 109 Hz for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°,
respectively. The strong peak on the distribution of the energy spectra is a consequence
of the occurrence of the large-scale Kármán vortex structures. In comparison among the
peaks of the energy spectra at different yaw angles, the maximum energy of the
measured v spectra decreases with the increase of , changing from v = 0.12 at = 0°
to v = 0.02 for = 45°. This result seems to suggest that the intensity of the vortex
shedding does not follow IP. By using a phase-averaging technique, Zhou et al. (2010)
also showed that the magnitudes of the maximum contours of the coherent velocities u,
v and w and vorticities x, y and z do not follow the IP either. The figure also shows
significant differences of the measured spectra at different yaw angles. For example, at
= 0°, the peak is sharp and restricted to a narrow frequency band, indicating a strong
and more periodic vortex shedding. However, when the yaw angle increases, the energy
at the peak decreases significantly and disperses over a wide frequency range. These
results agree well with those reported by Surry and Surry (1967), who showed that the
energy at the vortex shedding frequency decreases and disperses significantly with the
increase of .
Wavelet multiresolution analysis is performed in order to get a better view of the
turbulence structures of various frequencies. The signals of velocity component v at y/d
111
≈ 0.5 are decomposed into 17 wavelet levels. Each wavelet level represents a local
frequency band of the measured signal. Figure 5-4 (e-h) shows the spectra of the
wavelet levels 1 to 8 for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° respectively. All spectra show a clear
peak, representing their corresponding central frequency f0 and frequency bandwidth
(wavelet level), which are summarized in Table 5-2. The spectra of wavelet level 6 for
all (Figure 5-4e-h) show the same peak location as the measured signals for the yaw
angles considered (Figure 5-4a-d). This is because the peak of the measured signal is
located in the frequency band 6 (please see Figure 5-4a-d). Therefore, the justifications
for the central frequency for all yaw angles are true when the central frequency obtained
from wavelet level 6 of the wavelet analysis is compared with the shedding frequency
obtained from the measured signals, i.e. both shedding frequency for = 0° and central
frequency of wavelet level 6 for = 0° (Figure 5-4a, e) are about 129 Hz, hence
validating the present data analysis technique.
Energy spectra of v from small-scale structures (wavelet levels 1-3) are very
small and are not really affected by the cylinder yaw angles. For wavelet levels 4-7, the
energy spectra start to show some differences in magnitude as is increased. While the
peaks on the spectra at = 0° and 15° (Figure 5-4e, f) are more pronounced and limited
to a narrow frequency band, the magnitudes of the energy spectra decrease with the
increase of , indicating a more periodicity at small yaw angles. The dispersion of the
energy spectra of wavelet levels 4-6 at = 30° and 45° over a frequency band is also
apparent, i.e. the energy spectra at these two angles are largely dispersed over a large
frequency band rather than concentrated only in a small range of frequency. At these
yaw angles, the peak energy is dominated by wavelet level 8, which represents the even
larger vortex structures compared with wavelet level 6. This result indicates that the
strength of the Kármán vortex shedding at larger yaw angles is reduced. The numerical
simulations by Lucor and Karniadakis (2003) and Zhao et al. (2008) showed that with
the increase of , the vortex shed from the yawed cylinder is less well defined with the
vortex filament being distorted. They stated that the axial vortices in the form of vortex
cells may or may not be parallel to the cylinder, resulting in a reduction of the vortex
strength.
However, at the frequency band of wavelet level 7, the energy spectra are the
same for all angles except for = 45° which have the highest magnitudes. The ratio of
v at wavelet level 6 to v at wavelet level 7 decreases from 5.3 to 2.7, 1.9 and 0.9 for
112
= 0° to 15°, 30° and 45°, respectively. It was found that the peak of v at wavelet level 7
has increased by 30% at = 45° as compared with that for = 0°. The increase of the
peak of v at wavelet level 7 when = 45° may be because of the downstream induction
of the vortices in higher frequency cells (wavelet level 6) to the vortices in lower
frequency cells (wavelet level 7) (Williamson, 1989). These results may indicate that
the large-scale vortex dislocations occur due to the increase of the three-dimensionality
in the wake region (Williamson, 1992, , 1996c). A „vortex dislocation‟ is a region
constituting a whole set of „split‟ or divided vortices that represent 2π phase variation
between the neighbouring frequencies (Williamson, 1992). The occurrence of the vortex
dislocations is also supported by the appearance of the quasi-periodic spectrum in the
wavelet level 6 when = 45° (Figure 5-4h), while the spectra of the wavelet level 6 for
smaller yaw angles show only one apparent peak. The quasi-periodic spectrum is
reflecting the presence of different frequency cells where vortex dislocation may occur
(Williamson, 1989).
5.4.2 Strouhal numbers from the measured and wavelet components of velocity
signals
It may be interesting to examine how the central frequencies at different wavelet
levels are influenced by . For this purpose, the central frequencies in Figure 5-4 (e-h)
are normalized by using d and UN . The central frequencies at wavelet level 6 for all yaw
angles have the same values as that correspond to the Strouhal number StN calculated
from the measured signals at these angles. The StN is defined as:
.cos/ UfdStN (5-8)
They are 0.195, 0.20, 0.205 and 0.230 for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°, respectively.
Comparison of the measured StN in the present study with previous experimental and
numerical results obtained by other authors can be found in Zhou et al. (2009). It was
stated that the IP works reasonably well for lower than 40 (Zhou et al., 2009). The
normalized central frequencies fN at wavelet levels 1-8 for the four yaw angles are
plotted in Figure 5-5. It can be seen that fN decreases with the increase of the wavelet
levels which is obvious as the frequency band increases with wavelet level. At each
wavelet level, it is interesting to note that fN for = 0° to 30° have a quite similar values
except for = 45° which is larger than that at other angles. To illustrate the differences
between fN at different yaw angles more clearly, the ratio 0
/ NN ff at various wavelet
113
levels are also included in Figure 5-5, where 0Nf represents the central frequency at =
0° of various wavelet levels. Evidently, at wavelet level 6, the ratios are the smallest.
For an ideal case when IP applies perfectly, the ratio 0
/ NN ff should be 1. For = 15°
and 30° at wavelet level 6, the ratios 0
/ NN ff are about 1.04 and 1.07, which are close
to 1. These differences are within the experimental uncertainty for fN, which is estimated
to be about 8% and fN can be considered as a constant. Meanwhile, the increase of the
values for 0
/ NN ff from = 0° to 45° (by about 19%) cannot be ascribed to the
experimental uncertainty. It may reflect a genuine departure from the IP for large .
This result is consistent with that reported by Van Atta (1968) and Thakur et al. (2004)
who found that for yawed cylinders, the Strouhal number with high yaw angle ( ≥ 35°)
is larger than that predicted by the independence principle. At other wavelet levels, the
ratio 0
/ NN ff becomes larger with the increase of . At = 15° for example, the
maximum ratio 0
/ NN ff is less than 1.06 while it is 1.20 and 1.56 at = 30° and 45°,
respectively. It seems that there is a 30% jump of the ratio when is increased from 30°
to 45°. This result suggests that for < 40°, the IP can be applied to the wake while for
larger value of , the ratio0
/ NN ff is out of the experimental uncertainty.
5.4.3 Contributions to velocity variances from different wavelet components
Figure 5-6 presents the three velocity variances u, v and w across the wake at
different . The variances are normalized by the free-stream velocity U∞. Generally, the
velocity variances decrease with the increase of y/d for all . It is clear that the
magnitudes of fluctuating lateral velocity 2v are about two and four times larger
than that of 2u and 2w , respectively. This is apparent as the transverse velocity
v is more sensitive to the large-scale organized turbulent structures than the other two
velocity components. The results also show that with the increase of , the velocity
variances 2u , 2v and 2w decrease.
The velocity variances of the wavelet components 2
i are used to examine
the wake characteristics of the measured velocity in its local frequency subbands and to
quantify the contribution of each wavelet component to the measured velocity variances
with different yaw angles. The wavelet velocity variances are calculated using
114
(5-9)
where k is the total number of data points and βi represents wavelet components of
fluctuation velocities u, v or w and i is the wavelet level. Figure 5-7 shows the wavelet
components of the velocity variances of u, v and w for wavelet levels 1 to 8 at = 0°
and 45°. Results for = 15° and 30° are not shown here as they reveal the similar trends
as those when is increased from 0° to 45°. Velocity variances of u, v and w for
wavelet levels 1-8 contribute about 93-99% to the total of the measured velocity
variance at y/d ≈ 0.5 for all yaw angles. Those at other wavelet levels do not show
significant contributions to the measured velocity variances and therefore are not given
in the figure.
For velocity variances 2
iu (Figure 5-7a, b), the wavelet level 6 which
corresponds to the organized large vortex structures, makes the highest contribution to
2u (45%) compared with other wavelet levels and followed by wavelet levels 5
(21%) and 4 (11%), indicating that the organized large- and intermediate-scale
structures contain more energy in the streamwise direction than the smaller structures.
The magnitude of 2
iu at all wavelet levels decreases with the increase of . At
wavelet level 6, 2
iu peaks at y/d ≈ 0.5, where the maximum mean shear yU / and
yW / also occurs (Zhou et al., 2009).
In regards of 2
iv (Figure 5-7c, d), about 71% of the contribution to 2v
is from the wavelet level 6 on the centreline. This is followed by wavelet levels 5 (14%)
and 4 (6%). Compared with 2
iu shown in Figure 5-7 (a, b) and 2
iw shown in
Figure 5-7 (e, f), the magnitude of 2
iv at wavelet level 6 is much higher, indicating
that the organized large-scale structures contribute more to the measured transverse
velocity than to the other two velocity components. At wavelet level 7, the magnitude of
2
iv for = 45° at y/d 1 is about 4 times higher than that at other angles. It seems
that at wavelet level 7, the transverse velocity v for = 45° has higher fluctuations due
to the presence of the vortex dislocations and thus increases the energy of the turbulent
wake (Williamson, 1992). The effect of this phenomenon can be seen from the
measured v component spectra (Figure 5-4d), where the velocity spectra increase
monotonically in the frequency band of wavelet level 7 as is increased from 0° to 45°.
k
j
iik 1
22 ,1
115
Among the three velocity variances, the spanwise component 2
iw (Figure
5-7e, f) has the smallest magnitude. Compared with the magnitude of 2iu and
2iv , 2
iw at wavelet level 6 has relatively smaller magnitude for = 0° (Figure
5-7e). This result is consistent with the quasi-two-dimensionality of the wake flow for
small yaw angles. The fact that the most significant contributions to w are from the
smaller scale vortex structures, i.e. lower wavelet levels such as wavelet levels 4 and 5,
indicates that the fluctuation of 2
iw is mainly related with intermediate-scale
structures. With the increase of to 45° (Figure 5-7f), the magnitude at wavelet level 6
for y/d 1 increases apparently. This result may indicate the effect from the presence of
vortex dislocations in the wake region (Williamson, 1992). It may also suggest the
generation of the secondary axial vortex structures (see the flow visualization result in
Figure 5-11) which in return enhance the three-dimensionality of the turbulent wake at
high yaw angles, consistent with that reported by Matsumoto (2001) who showed that at
large yaw angles, additional axial vortex structures were generated in yawed cylinder
wakes. Zhou et al. (2009) found that with the increase of , the mean spanwise velocity
W and hence the spanwise mean velocity gradient yW / also increases. They also
found that the magnitude of yW / is comparable with that of yU / for large yaw
angles. This result indicates that the mean streamwise vorticity )( z/Vy/Wx
and the mean spanwise vorticity )( y/Ux/Vz are expected to have comparable
magnitudes for large values of . It is noteworthy that at wavelet level 6, the
distribution of 2
iw peaks at y/d = 0.6-0.7, which is coincidence with the peak
location of yW / (Zhou et al., 2009). For other frequency bands which also make
large contributions to 2w , the magnitude of 2
iw at these wavelet levels
decreases with the increase of .
5.4.4 Contributions to vorticity variances from different wavelet components
The time-averaged vorticity variances of the measured signals are shown in
Figure 5-8 for different yaw angles, where the vorticity components in the x, y and z
directions are calculated from Eqs. (5-1) to (5-3). Hereafter, a superscript asterisk
denotes normalization by d and U∞. It is shown that for y/d 1, *2 z has the largest
magnitude and followed by *2 y and *2
x components for all yaw angles.
116
However, the values of the vorticity variances here do not necessarily mean that z and
y are stronger than x. The differences may be caused by the unsatisfactory spatial
resolution of the probe. In order to avoid phase shifting between the two velocity
gradients in the expression of y and z, the spatial separation x in the streamwise
direction is calculated from the time delay by using Taylor‟s hypothesis via x = -
Uc(2t) (Wallace and Foss, 1995). Therefore, this will give a separation in the
longitudinal direction x = 1.47mm, which is only half of either y or z (≡ 2.7 mm).
Thus, the spatial resolution of the probe in the streamwise direction is better than either
in the lateral and spanwise directions which will result in larger measured values for
both z and y than x. From the figure, all components of vorticity variances decrease
with the increase of , which may reflect that at large yaw angles the strength of the
vortices decreases which is in agreement with that reported by Lucor and Karniadakis
(2003).
The vorticity variances of the wavelet components >< 2,i are calculated by
(5-10)
where k is the total number of data points and i, is vorticity components in the x, y or
z direction and i is the wavelet level. The values of vorticity variances are normalized by
d and U∞. Figure 5-9 shows the vorticity variances >< 2,ix , >< 2
,iy and >< 2,iz of
the wavelet components of levels 1-8 for = 0° and 45°. Although figures for = 15°
and 30° are not shown here, as they show quite similar features with the trend when is
changed from = 0° to 45°, the discussion on those angles are also included. It can be
seen from the figure that the vorticity variances for levels 1 to 8 contribute about 97-
99% to the total of the measured vorticity variances at y/d ≈ 0.5 for all yaw angles.
For >< 2,ix and >< 2
,iy (Figure 5-9a-d), the main contributions are from
wavelet levels 2-5 even though they decrease with the increase of . This result
indicates that the longitudinal and lateral vorticities reside in relatively small and
intermediate-scale structures. For = 45° and at wavelet level 6, 2,ix has larger
values than that for other yaw angles at y/d < 0.6. This may be due to the effect of
increased magnitude of the spanwise mean velocity at large yaw angles, which results in
the generation of secondary large-scale structures in the near wake region at y/d 1.
k
j
iik 1
2
,
2
, ,1
117
Zhou et al. (2010) have shown that with the increase of , the contours of the coherent
longitudinal vortices x become more organized and the maximum coherent x
concentration increases. This result is also consistent with the flow visualization (Figure
5-11) which shows the generation of the secondary streamwise vortices. For small yaw
angles, the dominant contributors to 2,iz (Figure 5-9e, f) are from the small-scale
structures (wavelet levels 2 and 3) and followed by followed the intermediate-scale
structures (wavelet levels 4 and 5). However, the values of 2,iz for wavelet level 6
at y/d < 0.5 have the higher contribution to 2z than the other wavelet levels for all
yaw angles. This result suggests that at vortex shedding frequency band (wavelet level
6), z is largely generated especially at the central region of the wake and becomes
weaker after that location. With the increase of , the magnitude of 2,iz from the
wavelet level 6 decreases (see Figure 5-9e, f) which is consistent with Zhou et al. (2010)
who showed that the intensity of the coherent spanwise vortices z decreases with the
increase of . This result seems to support Mansy et al. (1994) who stated that the
increase of the streamwise vortices (Figure 5-9a, b) is at the expense of the spanwise
vortices (Figure 5-9e, f).
5.4.5 Autocorrelation coefficients of velocity components at different wavelet
levels
The autocorrelation coefficient can be used to examine the periodicity of the
turbulence structures. It is defined as
></>)+()(=< 2, iiii rxx , (5-11)
where i represents the velocity component u, v or w at i-th wavelet level and r is the
separation between the two points, which is calculated using Taylor‟s hypothesis by
converting a time delay to a streamwise separation via r = U∞/fs. It is well known
that v is a more sensitive indicator to the large-scale turbulent structures. Also, as the
trends of the autocorrelation coefficients of u and w are similar to that of v at various
wavelet levels, in the present paper, only results for velocity component v are given.
The autocorrelation coefficient of the transverse velocity v of the wavelet component
levels 3, 5, 6 and 7 at y/d ≈ 0.5 which correspond roughly to the vortex centre, are
shown in Figure 5-10. The wavelet level 3 represents the small-scale structures; 5
represents the intermediate-scale structures; 6 represents the organized large-scale
118
structures at the vortex shedding frequency band; and 7 represents the large-scale
structures. For small-scale turbulence structures (Figure 5-10a), there are no significant
differences in iv, values among various yaw angles. The autocorrelation coefficients of
the small-scale structures decrease to zero at tU∞/d = 3. This is true as the small-scale
structures generated in the wake tend to be isotropic and the initial conditions for these
structures are not important. Therefore, the effect of on autocorrelation coefficients of
the small-scale structures for all velocity components is negligible. While for
intermediate-scale structures (Figure 5-10b), the magnitudes of iv, appear to be
affected by . With the increase of , the magnitudes of iv, decrease and approach to
zero at a faster rate. For example, the turbulence structures show apparent
autocorrelation even at tU∞/d = 200 for = 0° while this has been reduced to tU∞/d = 20
for = 45°. This result may be caused by the introduction of the spanwise velocity (w
component) which deteriorates the stability of the vortex filament and hence generates
the vortex cells (Hammache and Gharib, 1991; Szepessy and Bearman, 1992). These
cells are generated quite randomly, and they lose the self-similarity quickly. Wavelet
level 6 (Figure 5-10c) mainly represents the large-scale organized structures where the
magnitudes iv, of that wavelet level are significant for all and the period of iv,
increases slightly with . Although the periodicity of iv, for large-scale structures
persists for a long distance at = 0°, the periodicity decreases to zero quickly with the
increase of . This result indicates that the vortices shed from a yawed circular cylinder
decay and lose their initial characteristics quickly as compared with that at = 0° and
the decay is more apparent with the increase of . For wavelet level 7 (Figure 5-10d),
which corresponds to the larger scale structures, iv, is not largely affected by except
for = 45°. It seems that at = 45°, iv, has larger magnitude and more organized
periodicity than that at other yaw angles. The iv, magnitudes approach to zero quickly
after 2 periods. The effect of increasing to the large-scale structures of wavelet level 7
also can be seen in Figure 5-7 (c, d), where the velocity variances 2
iv for this
wavelet level at = 45° and y/d 0.5 are about 3 times larger than that at = 0°, which
is consistent with the increase in energy spectrum of v (Figure 5-4h, wavelet level 7).
These results indicate that the large-scale structures of wavelet level 7 at = 45° are
119
intensified which may be resulted from the induction of the vortices from wavelet level
6 due to the occurrence of the vortex dislocations.
5.4.6 Flow visualization of the yawed cylinder wake
Flow visualization was also conducted to reveal the generation of the secondary
axial and streamwise vortices when yaw angle is increased to 45°. It was conducted in a
wind tunnel with a cross section of 0.4 m 0.3 m using the smoke wire method for =
0°, 15°, 30° and 45°. A cylinder of 8 mm in diameter was used without the end plates at
both ends. The velocity was 0.3m/s, corresponding to a Reynolds number of about 200.
Figure 5-11 shows that when the cylinder yaw angle is increased to 45° (the figures for
= 0° to 30° are not shown here), some smoke moves along the cylinder axial direction
immediately downstream of the cylinder. In the streamwise direction, the Kármán
vortex is not as apparent as in a cross-flow ( = 0°). In the process when the large-scale
structures evolve downstream, they also rotate in clockwise direction, indicating the
generation of the secondary streamwise vortices. This result is in agreement with the
result shown in Figure 5-9, where 2,ix at vortex shedding frequency band (i.e.
wavelet level 6) for y/d < 0.6 suddenly increases with the increase of to 45°. Based on
the flow visualization results, the streamwise vortices at = 45° are more visible and
more organized compared with that at smaller yaw angles. This result also agrees with
that reported by Zhou et al. (2010) who found that the coherent streamwise contours
become more organized and the maximum streamwise vorticity concentration increases
by about 70% when is increased to 45° compared with that at = 0°. It can also be
seen that when the streamwise vortex strength increases, the spanwise vortex strength
decreases with the increase of , which support the speculation of Mansy et al. (1994)
that the increase of the streamwise vortices is at the expense of the spanwise vortices.
The secondary axial vortex tends to propagate along the cylinder axial direction and
helps to break down the large-scale structures downstream, which in return enhances the
three-dimensionality of the turbulent wake (Zhou et al., 2010). It is also apparent that
the large-scale vortex dislocation occurs in the wake. According to Maekawa & Abe
(2002), the vortex dislocations in the wake may also contribute to the disruption of the
large-scale vortices in the turbulence wake as they travel downstream.
120
5.5 Conclusions
A wavelet multiresolution technique has been used to examine the wake velocity and
vorticity characteristics obtained using an eight-hot wire 3D vorticity probe for = 0°,
15°, 30° and 45°, respectively. The results are summarized as follows:
5. With the increase of , the energy spectra for the intermediate- (wavelet levels 4
and 5) and large-scale structures (wavelet level 6) decrease in terms of their
maximum energy and disperse extensively over an enlarged frequency band. It is
found that at = 45°, the large-scale vortex dislocations may occur as reflected
by the increase in the energy spectrum at wavelet level 7.
6. The ratios 0
/ NN ff are far from 1 except for the wavelet level 6 located at the
vortex shedding frequency band for 30°. This result indicates that IP may be
implemented for < 40° while it is not suitable for larger values of .
7. From the results of 2
iu , 2
iv and 2
iw at various wavelet levels, it can
be seen that the most significant contributions to the measured velocity
variances are from the organized large-scale structures at the vortex shedding
frequency band and followed by the intermediate-scale structures. With the
increase of to 45°, the magnitude of 2iu at all wavelet levels decreases
monotonically while for 2
iv , there is an increase in wavelet level 7 which
may be related with the occurrence of vortex dislocations. The magnitude of
2
iw from level 6 at y/d 1 increases apparently when = 45° compared
with that at = 0°. This result indicates the effect of the presence of vortex
dislocations in the wake region (Williamson, 1992). It may also be related with
the generation of the secondary axial vortex structures which in return enhance
the three-dimensionality of the turbulent wake at high yaw angles.
8. Generally, the three vorticity variances at various wavelet levels decrease with
the increase of except that of 2,ix at wavelet level 6, which increases by
about 40% on the centreline for = 45°. In contrast, 2,iz decreases by
about 30% for = 45° compared with that at = 0°. This result seems to
support that the increase of the streamwise vortices is at the expense of the
spanwise vortices (Mansy et al., 1994). The three vorticity components are
121
mostly dominated by small and intermediate-scale structures and have the
smallest values at the large-scale structures. However, the magnitude of 2,iz
for wavelet level 6 at y/d < 0.5 has higher contribution to 2z than the other
wavelet levels for all yaw angles. This result suggests that at vortex shedding
frequency band (wavelet level 6), z is largely generated especially at the central
region of the wake and becomes weaker after that location.
9. The results of autocorrelation coefficients of the velocity component v at
different wavelet levels suggest that for small-scale turbulence structures, there
are no significant differences in the magnitude for different yaw angles while for
other frequency bands especially at wavelet level 6, the differences in
autocorrelation coefficients are significant among different yaw angles. At this
wavelet level, the periodicity in iv, persists for a long distance for small and
decreases to zero quickly with the increase of . It may imply that the vortices
shed from a yawed circular cylinder decay at a faster rate and consequently lose
their initial characteristics quickly when is increased. For wavelet level 7, the
magnitude of iv, at = 45° increase significantly and its periodicity becomes
more apparent compared with that at = 0°, indicating the occurrence of the
vortex dislocations.
10. The flow visualization result shows the generation of the secondary axial and
streamwise vortices at = 45°. The former propagate along the cylinder axial
direction and disrupt the formation of the Kármán type vortex structures,
resulting in the increase of three-dimensionality of the cylinder wake. The vortex
dislocation may also be responsible for the disruption of the large-scale
structures.
122
Table 5-2. Central frequencies f0 and their respective frequency bandwidth of the v
signal of wavelet levels 1-8 at y/d ≈ 0.5 for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°.
Level
0°
15°
30°
45° Frequency
bandwidth (Hz)
1 2,931 2,979 2,979 2,896 1,880-5,200
2 1,530 1,490 1,430 1,470 940-3,000
3 823 797 736 779 470-1,500
4 396 396 384 361 230-800
5 196 193 203 203 110-400
6 129 129 119 109 60-200
7 71 51 61 66 30-100
8 30 30 30 33 10-55
Table 5-1. Summary of the experimental conditions on wake centreline.
U u′ Lu T R fk uk
(m/s) (m/s) (m2s
-3) (mm) (mm) (mm) (Hz) (m/s)
0° 7.24 1.50 82.0 0.080 5.87 2.49 250 14,400 0.187
15° 7.45 1.48 79.6 0.081 6.03 2.49 246 14,700 0.186
30° 7.80 1.35 65.1 0.085 6.66 2.50 224 14,600 0.177
45° 7.97 1.17 52.5 0.090 7.11 2.42 188 14 ,100 0.167
Note: U is the local velocity of the wake. R ≡ u′/ is the Taylor microscale Reynolds
number where T ≡ u′/(du/dx)′ is the longitudinal Taylor microscale. is the mean
turbulent energy dissipation rate. 4/13 )/( is the Kolmogorov length scale.
dUL uu )(≡ 0
0 is the longitudinal integral length scale where u is the longitudinal
autocorrelation coefficient, is the time delay and 0 is the time at which the first zero
crossing occurs. fk ≡ U/2π is the Kolmogorov frequency and uk ≡ / is the
Kolmogorov velocity.
123
(a) Cylinder arrangement and
coordinate system (top view)
(b) Wake profile and probe
arrangements (side view)
(c) Enlarged 3D vorticity probe (side view) (d) Enlarged 3D vorticity probe (front view)
8D
A
z
y
y
1
6
B
3
5
C
z
4 7
2
8D
A
z
y
y
1
6
B
3
5
C
z
4 7
2
U
4,7
C
B, D
y
3,8
1
2
6
5
X
A
U
4,7
C
B, D
y
3,8
1
2
6
5
X
A
U
= 0
= 0
Tunnel wall
Tunnel wall
End plate
45z
x
Inclination angle
U
= 0
= 0
Tunnel wall
Tunnel wall
End plate
45z
x
Inclination angle
Moveable 3-D
Vorticity Probe
Fixed referenceX-probe
U
Moveable 3-D
Vorticity Probe
Fixed referenceX-probe
U
Figure 5-1. Definition of the coordinate system and the sketches of the vorticity probe.
G(z)
H(z) G(z)
H(z)
2
2
2vD
2 2
vd
2
va 2
: keep one sample out of two 2
v(x)
2
2
vA 2
2
)(~
zH
)(~
zH
)(~
zG 1
vd
2 : put one zero between each sample
1vD
Figure 5-2. Basic concept of the wavelet multiresolution analysis.
124
10-7
10-5
10-3
10-1
1 10 100 1000 10000
Small scale structures
Intermediate scale structuresLarge scale structures
Lu
i=6
i=1
i=4
i=3
i=7 i=5
i=2
i=8
(a) = 0o
k1 (m
-1) = 2f/U
N
(k
1)
10-7
10-5
10-3
10-1
1 10 100 1000 10000
Small scale structures
Intermediate scale structuresLarge scale structures
Lu
i=6
i=1
i=4
i=3
i=7 i=5
i=2
i=8
(b) = 15o
k1 (m
-1) = 2f/U
N
(k
1)
10-7
10-5
10-3
10-1
1 10 100 1000 10000
Small scale structures
Intermediate scale structuresLarge scale structures
Lu
i=6
i=1
i=4
i=3
i=7 i=5
i=2
i=8
(c) = 30o
k1 (m
-1) = 2f/U
N
(k
1)
10-7
10-5
10-3
10-1
1 10 100 1000 10000
Small scale structures
Intermediate scale structuresLarge scale structures
Lu
i=6
i=1
i=4
i=3
i=7
i=5
i=2
i=8
(d) = 45o
k1 (m
-1) = 2f/U
N
(k
1)
Figure 5-3. Spectra of the v-signal measured at y/d ≈ 0.5, and a correspondence between
the central frequencies (or levels i) and the dimensions of the vortex structures for
different cylinder yaw angles.
125
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
1 10 100 1000 10000
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
(a) = 0o
Level / Frequency band
f(Hz)
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
1 10 100 1000 10000
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
i=1i=2
i=7
i=6
i=5
i=4i=3
i=8
e) = 0o
f(Hz)
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
1 10 100 1000 10000
(b) = 15o
Level / Frequency band
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
f(Hz)
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
1 10 100 1000 10000
5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6
i=1i=2
i=8
i=7
i=6
i=5
i=4 i=3
f) = 15o
f(Hz)
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
1 10 100 1000 10000
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
(c) = 30o
Level / Frequency band
f(Hz)
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
1 10 100 1000 10000
5 4 3 2 1 12 11 10 9 8 7 6
i=1i=2i=3
i=8
i=7
i=6
i=5
i=4
g) = 30o
f(Hz)
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
1 10 100 1000 10000
(d) = 45o
Level / Frequency band
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
f(Hz)
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
1 10 100 1000 10000
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
i=1i=2i=3
i=8
i=7i=6
i=5 i=4
h) = 45o
f(Hz)
Figure 5-4. Comparison between (a-d) spectra of the v-signal measured at y/d ≈ 0.5 for
= 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° respectively; and (e-h) spectra of various wavelet levels at y/d
≈ 0.5 for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° respectively.
126
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
= 0o
30o
15o
45o
fN
15
/fN
0
fN
30
/fN
0
fN
45
/fN
0
Wavelet Level, i
f N=
fd
/(U
co
s
)
Figure 5-5. Peak frequency fN on the energy spectra and the ratio 0
/ NN ff for various
wavelet levels at y/d ≈ 0.5.
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0 1 2 3 4
= 0o
15o
30o
45o
(a)
y/d
<u
2>
/U2
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0 1 2 3 4
= 0o
15o
30o
45o
(b)
y/d
<
2>
/U2
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0 1 2 3 4
= 0o
15o
30o
45o
(c)
y/d
<w
2>
/U2
Figure 5-6. Velocity variances 2u , 2v and 2w of the measured signals
for different cylinder yaw angles.
127
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.014
0 1 2 3 4
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8
(a) = 0o
y/d
<u
i2>
/U2
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.014
0 1 2 3 4
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8
(b) = 45o
y/d
<u
i2>
/U2
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0 1 2 3 4
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8
(c) = 0o
y/d
<v
i2>
/U2
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0 1 2 3 4
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8
(d) = 45o
y/d
<v
i2>
/U2
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0 1 2 3 4
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8
(e) = 0o
y/d
<w
i2>
/U2
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0 1 2 3 4
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8
(f) = 45o
y/d
<w
i2>
/U2
Figure 5-7. Velocity variances 2iu , 2
iv and 2iw at various wavelet levels
for = 0° and 45°.
128
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 1 2 3 4
= 0o
15o
30o
45o
(a)
y/d
<
x2>
*
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 1 2 3 4
= 0o
15o
30o
45o
(b)
y/d
<
y2>
*
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 1 2 3 4
= 0o
15o
30o
45o
(c)
y/d
<
z2>
*
Figure 5-8. Vorticity variances 2x , 2
y and 2z of the measured signals
for different cylinder yaw angles.
129
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
0 1 2 3 4
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8
(a) = 0o
y/d
<
x,i
2>
*
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
0 1 2 3 4
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8
(b) = 45o
y/d
<
x,i
2>
*
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0 1 2 3 4
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8
(c) = 0o
y/d
<
y,i
2>
*
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0 1 2 3 4
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8
(d) = 45o
y/d
<
y,i
2>
*
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 1 2 3 4
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8
(e) = 0o
y/d
<
z,i
2>
*
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 1 2 3 4
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8
(f) = 45o
y/d
<
z,i
2>
*
Figure 5-9. Vorticity variances 2,ix , 2
,iy and 2,iz at various wavelet levels
for = 0 and 45.
130
-1.0
-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
= 0o
15o
30o
45o
(a) Level 3
tU/d
R,i
-1.0
-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
= 0o
15o
30o
45o
(b) Level 5
tU/d
R,i
-1.0
-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
= 0o
15o
30o
45o
(c) Level 6
tU/d
R,i
-1.0
-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
= 0o
15o
30o
45o
(d) Level 7
tU/d
R,i
Figure 5-10. Autocorrelation coefficients of v at y/d ≈ 0.5 for various wavelet levels at
different cylinder yaw angles.
x
z
= 45°
U
Secondary
axial vortex
Streamwise vortex
Vortex dislocations
x
z
= 45°
U
Secondary
axial vortex
Streamwise vortex
Vortex dislocations
Figure 5-11. Flow visualization of wake with the existence of secondary vortex and
streamwise vortex when = 45°.
131
CHAPTER 6
ON THE STUDY OF THE WAKE BEHIND TWO YAWED
CYLINDERS IN SIDE-BY-SIDE ARRANGEMENT
6.1 Introduction
When a fluid flows over a bluff body at a sufficiently high velocity or Reynolds
number Re (≡ U∞d/, where U∞ is the free-stream velocity in the streamwise direction, d
is the cylinder diameter and is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid), vortex shedding
occurs, which results in a time-dependent pressure distribution on the solid surface.
Therefore, the bluff body is subjected to the time-dependent in-line and transverse
forces. These forces will induce vibrations to the bluff body when the vortex shedding
frequency is close to its natural frequency. This phenomenon is known as vortex-
induced vibration (VIV). VIV is one of the most important aspects that should be
avoided in engineering applications as it will contribute to the stability and fatigue
damage to the structures. Thus, the studies in understanding the flow over bluff bodies
are important in engineering applications, such as fluid flow across heat exchangers, air
flow around high-rise buildings or yaw-cables of bridges. These studies would have
benefits in understanding the vortex structures to minimize many problems associated
with the VIV and to improve the efficiency in the maintaining operation of the structure.
Vortex shedding from a single cylinder wake is well documented both in air and
water flows. Many issues in this area have been resolved (e.g. Prasad and Williamson,
1997; Williamson and Govardhan, 2004). However, in the case when a fluid flows over
an identical neighbouring cylinder, the VIV caused by fluid-cylinder interaction is a far
more complicated problem than that of the single cylinder case. Therefore, to
investigate the problems, many researchers have contributed to better understanding in
the flow around a pair of cylinders in a side-by-side arrangement (e.g. Bearman and
Wadcock, 1973; Zdravkovich, 1977; Williamson, 1985; Mahir and Rockwell, 1996;
Zhou et al., 2001; Zhou et al., 2002).
There are many major parameters that may be responsible for vortex shed from
two cylinders arranged side-by-side with normal velocity incidence (i.e. the flow is
perpendicular to the cylinders) such as initial conditions, pressure distribution and
132
Reynolds number (Zdravkovich, 1977; Williamson, 1985; Zhou et al., 2002). Besides
the parameters mentioned above, the vortex structures are also influenced by the centre-
to-centre cylinder spacing T* (hereafter, an asterisk denotes normalization by the
diameter d and/or free-stream velocity U∞). Various flow patterns and behaviours have
been identified as the cylinder spacing T* is varied. For example, the variations of T
*
from close proximity spacing to large spacing could contribute to the formation of a
single or multiple wakes. At large cylinder spacing (T* ≥ 2), two coupled vortex streets
have been observed with a definite phase relationship (Chen et al., 2003). Based on
Williamson‟s (1985) results, the two streets may occur in phase or in anti-phase. The
two in-phase streets are antisymmetrical about the flow centreline but symmetrical for
the anti-phase case. The in-phase streets eventually merged downstream to form a single
street, while the anti-phase streets remained distinct farther downstream. He found that
for 2 < T* < 6, the vortex shedding is predominant in anti-phase. At intermediate
cylinder spacing, 1.2 < T*
< 2.0, the flow behind two cylinders produces two bi-stable
wakes, one is narrow and the other is wide (Chen et al., 2003). The flow was flip-
flopping and randomly changes over from one side to the other which is caused by the
bi-stable deflected flow between the cylinders (Ishigai et al., 1972; Bearman and
Wadcock, 1973; Kim and Durbin, 1988). By using phase-averaging method, Zhou et al.
(2002) found that the longitudinal and lateral spacing between vortices for T* = 1.5 are
larger than those for T* = ∞ and 3.0. Large lateral spacing implies a weak interaction
between vortical motions that may be responsible for the long lifespan and the stability
of the vortex street. They proposed that for T* = 1.5, the vortices developed from the
shear layer instability in the wide wake leading to the early disappearance of the narrow
wake. The dominant frequency in the narrow wake is about triple of that in the wide
wake (Bearman and Wadcock, 1973), which is caused by the flip-flopped flow due to
the squeezing effect and amalgamation of the vortices generated behind the cylinders
(Chen et al., 2003). They suggested that the vortices in the narrow wake have tendency
to pair and absorb the vortex from the wide wake.
Although many studies have been conducted in both large and intermediate
cylinder spacings, none of them measured the three-dimensional vorticity
simultaneously. What is more, the previous studies focused only on the cross-flow case
where the cylinder is perpendicular to the on-coming flow. While in practical
engineering applications, this is not always the case. More often, the pipelines are
yawed to the on-coming flow. In the present study, the yaw angle is defined as the angle
133
between the incoming flow direction and the direction which is perpendicular to the
cylinder axis, so that = 0° corresponds to the cross-flow case while = 90°
corresponds to the axial case (see Figure 6-1a). The flow structures and vortex shedding
for a single cylinder have been studied previously by a number of investigators (e.g.
Surry and Surry, 1967; Marshall, 2003; Alam and Zhou, 2007b; Zhou et al., 2009,
2010). It has been shown that the vortex shedding frequency of a yawed cylinder
behaves in a similar way to normal-incidence case through the use of the component of
the free-stream velocity normal to the cylinder axis. If the force coefficients and the
Strouhal number are normalized by the velocity component normal to the cylinder axis
(StN ≡ f0d/UN, where f0 is the vortex shedding frequency and UN ≡ U∞ cos ), the values
are approximately independent of . This is often known as the independence principle
(IP) or the Cosine Law in the literature. Several theoretical and experimental studies
have verified the IP (Hoerner, 1965; Schlichting, 1979). However, many studies also
shown some deviations from the predictions based on the IP (Hanson, 1966; Surry and
Surry, 1967; Van Atta, 1968; King, 1977b; Ramberg, 1983; Kozakiewicz et al., 1995;
Lucor and Karniadakis, 2003; Marshall, 2003; Thakur et al., 2004), especially at large
yaw angles. It has been suggested that the IP was valid for 35°-40° (Van Atta, 1968;
Smith et al., 1972; Thakur et al., 2004; Zhou et al., 2009, 2010) while for larger , the
IP is not valid because the shedding frequency is greater than that predicted by the IP
and the vortices‟ slant angle is less than the cylinder yaw angle (Lucor and Karniadakis,
2003).
In this paper, the physical phenomena in the wake of two yawed cylinders with
cylinder spacings T* = 3.0 and 1.7 are investigated where the cylinder spacings T
* = 3.0
and 1.7 represent the large (T* ≥ 2) and intermediate (1.2 < T
* < 2) cylinder spacing,
respectively. It is expected that the turbulence wake for T* = 3.0 may form two vortex
streets that are strongly coupled forming symmetrical wake while that for T* = 1.7 may
form two vortex streets and forming deflected flow, one is wide and the other is narrow.
In the experiments, the three-dimensional vorticity in the wake was measured
simultaneously using a three-dimensional multi-hotwires vorticity probe at a free-stream
velocity (U∞) of 8.5 m/s, corresponding to a Reynolds number Re = 7200, at which the
flow can be classified as in the turbulent regime. As turbulent flow is three-dimensional,
it is characterized by the vorticity fluctuations (Tennekes and Lumley, 1972). Therefore,
it is important to measure all three vorticity components simultaneously using a
vorticity probe to provide more completed data for studying turbulence characteristics
134
than using simpler probe geometries. Although there are some published experimental
data on turbulence characteristics in the wake behind a pair of circular cylinders
arranged side-by-side in a cross-flow, there is no study on the three-dimensional
vorticity characteristics in the wake behind yawed cylinders arranged side-by-side.
Therefore, to gain some more fundamental understanding of the flow structures in the
intermediate wake region, the three-components velocity and vorticity fluctuations in
the wake of yawed cylinders arranged side-by-side for cylinder spacings T* = 3.0 and
1.7 are measured using a multiple hotwires vorticity probe. Based on the data, the
effects of the yaw angle and the cylinder spacing T *
on the turbulence characteristics
and vortical structures can be examined in details.
6.2 Experimental Details
6.2.1 Experimental arrangement
The measurements were conducted in a closed loop wind tunnel with test section
of 1.2 m (width) 0.8 m (height) and 2 m in length. The free-stream velocity in the test
section is uniform to within 0.5% and the free-stream turbulence intensity is less than
0.5%. Two similar circular cylinders arranged side-by-side with a diameter d = 12.7 mm
were used to generate the wake flow. The cylinders were installed horizontally at the
centre of the test section and supported rigidly at both ends by two aluminium end
plates to minimize the side effects to the wake flow. Two cases of different lateral
spacings between the cylinders, which are T* = 3.0 and 1.7, were tested. For each case,
four yaw angles, namely = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°, were tested at three downstream
locations x* = 10, 20 and 40. However, in this paper, only results for x
* = 10 are shown
and discussed. The arrangement of the cylinders and the definition of the coordinate
system are shown in Figure 6-1 and 6-2. As shown in the Figure 6-1, the coordinate
system is defined as the x-axis is in the similar direction as the incoming flow located at
the centre of the transverse spacing of both cylinders. The y-axis is perpendicular to the
x-axis in the vertical plane coming through the cylinders (another cylinder cannot be
seen in the plan view) and out of the paper while the z-axis is normal to both x- and y-
axes.
6.2.2 Velocity and vorticity signals from the X-probes
In the present study, a vorticity probe was moved across the wake along the y-
direction to measure simultaneously the three-dimensional vorticity component
135
simultaneously. Another X-probe was fixed at a location y = 4-7d (depending on the
measurement location in the x-direction) as a reference probe, used to provide a phase
reference for the measured signals by the moveable vorticity probe. To minimize the
end effect, the probes were located at the middle span of the cylinder diameter in y-
direction. The vorticity probe consists of 4 X-probes (X-probes A, B, C and D) as
shown in Figure 6-1 (c, d). Both X-probes A (wires 1 and 2) and C (wires 5 and 6)
which aligned in the x-z plane and separated in the y-axis (Δy) measure u and w velocity
signals while X-probes B (wires 3 and 4) and D (wires 7 and 8) which aligned in the x-y
plane and separated in the z-axis (Δz) measure u and v velocity signals. The separations
between the centres of the two opposite X-probes (Δy and Δz) were about 2.7mm. The
clearance between two hotwires for each X-probe was about 0.7mm. The hotwires of
the vorticity probe were etched from Wollaston (Pt-10% Rh) wires. The active length
was etched to about 200dw, where the hotwire diameter dw is about 2.5μm. The s were
operated on constant temperature circuits at an overheat ratio of 1.5. The angle
calibration was carried out at ±20°. The angle of each X-probe was about 110° and the
effective angle of the inclined wires was about 35°. All output signals were low-pass
filtered at a cut-off frequency fc = 5200 Hz, and sampled at a sampling frequency fs =
10400 Hz using a 16 bit A/D converter. The record duration for each measurement point
was about 20s. From the velocity signals obtained through the experiments, the vorticity
components can be calculated viz,
,z
v
y
w
z
v
y
wx
(6-1)
,x
w
z
u
x
w
z
uy
(6-2)
,)()(
y
uU
x
v
y
uU
x
vz
(6-3)
where Δw and Δu in Eqs. (6-1) and (6-3), respectively, are velocity differences between
those velocities measured by X-probes A and C; Δv and Δu in Eqs. (6-1) and (6-2),
repectively, are velocity differences between those velocities measured by X-probes B
and D. The velocity gradients in the streamwise direction in Eqs. (6-2) and (6-3), i.e.
Δw/Δx and Δv/Δx, respectively, are obtained by using a central difference scheme to the
time series of the measured velocity signals, e.g. Δv/Δx ≈
,/)]1()1([/ xivivxv where Δx is estimated based on Taylor‟s hypothesis
136
given by x = -Uc(2t). Uc is the vortex convection velocity and t ( 1/fs) is the time
interval between two consecutive points in the time series of the velocity signals. A
central difference scheme in estimating Δw/Δx and Δv/Δx is useful to avoid phase shifts
between the velocity gradients involved in Eqs. (6-2) and (6-3) (Wallace and Foss,
1995). The experimental uncertainty for U was about ±3%, while the uncertainties for
u′, v′ and w′ were about ±7%, ±8% and ±8%, respectively. Hereafter, a single over bar
denotes conventional time-averaging and a superscript prime denotes root-mean-square
values. More details of the vorticity probe were given in Zhou et al. (2009).
6.2.3 Phase-averaging method
Eduction of the large-scale organized structures from the wake by using phase-
averaging method has been popular among the late researcher. Here, the phase-
averaging method is similar to that used by Kiya & Matsumura (1985), Zhou et al.
(2002) and Zhou et al. (2010). The v and vr signals obtained from the moveable vorticity
probe and fixed reference probe, respectively, were band-pass filtered with the central
frequency set at f0 using a fourth-order Butterworth filter. The f0 is identified from the
frequency at which a significant peak occurred in v spectrum. The spectrum was
obtained from the velocity signal using fast Fourier transform method. The low-and
high-pass frequencies were chosen to be the same value as f0 so that band-pass width of
the filtered signal would be zero. This would allow a better focus on the large-scale
organized structure. Figure 6-3 presents examples of filtered and measured v-signals
from X-probes B in arbitrary scales. The same scales are used for all yaw angles for
both T* = 3.0 and 1.7. The thicker line denotes the filtered signal vf. The v-signals for T
*
= 3.0 are more periodic than those for T* =1.7. Both cylinder spacings have a decrease
in vortex shedding period with the increase of yaw angles especially when it reaches
45°. Details on this behaviour will briefly discuss in the next section.
From the filtered signals, two phases A and B can be identified on the vf, viz.
Phase A: 0fv and ,0dt
dv f (6-4)
Phase B: 0fv and .0dt
dv f (6-5)
Both phases A and B correspond to the time tA,i and tB,i (measured from the an arbitrary
time origin), respectively. The phase was then calculated from the filtered signal vf,
viz.
137
,,,
,
iAiB
iA
tt
tt
where iBiA ttt ,, (6-6)
,,1,
,
iBiA
iB
tt
tt where 1,, iAiB ttt (6-7)
The interval between phases A and B was made to be equal to 0.5/f0 by compression or
stretching and further divided by 30 equal intervals. The difference between the local
phase of the vorticity probe at each y-location and the reference phase of the fixed X-
probe was then used to obtain phase-averaged contours of vorticity in the (, y) plane
and the sectional streamlines. After that the phase-averaging was conducted on the
measured signal, not the filtered signals. The phase average of an instantaneous quantity
B is given by
N
iikk B
NB
1,
1 (6-8)
where N is the number detected which is 200 000 and k represents the phase. For
convenience, the subscript k will be omitted after this. The variable B can be written as
the summation of the time-averaged component B and the fluctuation component
where B stands for the instantaneous vorticity of velocity signals, viz.
. BB (6-9)
The fluctuation component can be further decomposed into a coherent fluctuation ~
and a remainder r (Hussain, 1986) as follow:
= ~
+ r (6-10)
The coherent fluctuation )(~
represents the large-scale coherent structures while
the remainder r represents the incoherent structures of the wake. By squaring to both
sides of the Eq. (6-10), the following equation may be derived:
.~ 222 r (6-11)
Once the deduction of coherent components of velocity (or vorticity) is obtained, the
coherent contributions to the velocity (or vorticity) variances can be given in terms of
the structural average denoted by a double over-bar, viz.
138
,~~
1
1~~ 2
121
k
kkk (6-12)
where and denote velocity signals (u, v or w) or vorticity signals (x, y or z ). For
each wavelength, the phase averaged structure begins at k1 samples (corresponding to
= -π) before = 0 and ends at k2 samples (corresponding to = π) after = 0.
6.3 Results and Discussion
6.3.1 Mean streamwise and spanwise velocity profiles
In this study, the experimental results of T* = 3.0 and 1.7 are compared with T
*
= ∞ (single cylinder) obtained by Zhou et al. (2009; 2010) for statistical and phase-
averaging methods, respectively. In the latter paper, the dependence of single cylinder
wake on the yaw angles ( = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°) was examined. Figure 6-4 shows the
time-averaged streamwise and spanwise velocity of the wake at = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°
for different cylinder spacings T* = 3.0 and 1.7. The *U profiles are generally
symmetric about the flow centreline y* = 0. The trend of *U profile at = 0° (Figure
6-4a, b) are comparable with that reported by Zhou et al. (2002). The variation in the
magnitude of *U between both studies may be because of the difference in Reynolds
numbers which was about 5800 for the former study. The *U profile displays a single
peak around y* = 0 for T
* = 1.7 which suggests the occurrence of a single vortex street
at this separation, similar to that for T* = ∞. The *U profile for T
* = 3.0 displays a peak
around y* = 1.5 (the other peak is expected to be around y
* = -1.5) representing two
vortex streets for T* = 3.0. It is apparent that *U for T
* = 3.0 at y
* > 0 has a quite
similar trend with that for T* = ∞ at y
* > -1.5. This suggests that each vortex street of the
former wake is similar with the single vortex street of the latter wake and the distance
between both vortices for the former wake is about y = 3d. For all spacings, *U
magnitudes at = 0° are the smallest. With the increase of , the magnitude of *U
increases gradually.
The maximum velocity deficit U0* and the mean velocity half-width L
* for
various yaw angles and cylinder spacings are summarized in Table 6-1. There is a
significant reduction in U0* with the increase of , regardless of the cylinder spacing. It
can be seen there is no much difference in the half-width of the mean velocity L* values
139
when varies from 0° to 45° for both T* = 3.0 and 1.7. The maximum difference is
only about 5% which may be subjected to the uncertainty in the experiments. This result
is in contrast with that for T* = ∞, where there is 15% decrease in L
* for T
* = ∞ when
changes from 0° to 45° which cannot be attributed to the experimental uncertainty. It
may imply that the L* values for T
* = 3.0 and 1.7 are almost constant between various
yaw angles.
Time-averaged spanwise velocity component *W is one of the methods used to
assess the three-dimensionality of the wake (Matsumoto et al., 1992). A larger value of
*W corresponds to the higher degree of three-dimensionality. The spanwise velocity
acts to impair the two-dimensionality of the wake and hence vorticity strength
(Marshall, 2003; Alam and Zhou, 2007b). The values of *W at various for T* = 3.0
and 1.7 are shown in Figure 6-4 (c, d). The profiles of *W are generally symmetric
about y* = 0 for T
* = 3.0 (Figure 6-4c). It is shown that, at = 0° and T
* = 3.0, *W is
almost zero across the wake. The trend is similar to that for single cylinder wake
observed by Zhou et al. (2009). This result is reasonable as for flow in normal direction
to the cylinders, the flow is expected to have two-dimensional plane wake
characteristics. With the increase of , the magnitude of *W (Figure 6-4c, d) increases
gradually for y* < 3 while decreases in other region. The maximum magnitude of *W
occurs at y* = 1.5 for T
* = 3.0 and increases monotonously as varies from 0° to 45°
suggesting a stronger three-dimensionality with the increase of .
At the intermediate cylinder spacing T* = 1.7, the *W profiles (Figure 6-4d) are
lack of symmetric about y* = 0 especially at = 0°. In contrast to T
* = 3.0 and ∞, the
values of *W is not equal to zero even at = 0°. It may suggest that the vortex in the
wake is inclined and the wake may not have a perfect two-dimensional plane. These
may be caused by the vortex evolution. The numerical simulation study by Chen et al.
(2003) suggest that the wake transition to turbulence in separating shear layer occurs at
x* = 1.5. Across the downstream wake location x
* = 10, due to the shear layer
instability, the vortices are formed in the wide wake. The vortices in the narrow wake
which caused by the wake deflection, are probably disappeared before x* = 10 (Zhou et
al., 2002). They suggest that the vortex evolution or regeneration is not completed yet at
this streamwise region. With the increase of to 15° (Figure 6-4d), the symmetrical
about y* = 0 is enhanced. When further increases to 30° and 45° the symmetrical trend
140
is apparent at about y* = -0.2 and -0.3, respectively. At the centreline for T
* = 1.7, the
maximum magnitudes of *W increases significantly as increases suggesting
enhanced three-dimensionality of the wake.
As a larger *W magnitude implies a higher degree of three-dimensionality
hence a stronger instability of the vortex filament (Zhou et al., 2010), the variation of
the normalized velocity gradient **/ yW implies the magnitude of the mean
streamwise vorticity )//( zVyWx . The **/ yW variation profiles for T
* =
3.0 and 1.7 at different are shown in Figure 6-5. At = 0°, the **/ yW values for
both T* are close to zero indicating the quasi-two-dimensionality of the wake flow. This
result implies that the vortex shedding is parallel with the cylinder axis (Hammache and
Gharib, 1991; Zhou et al., 2010). The absolute magnitudes of **/ yW for both T
*
increase with the increase of . This result suggests a larger x with the increase of .
The maximum **/ yW magnitudes are around y
* = 2.0-2.2 and 1.2-1.4 for T
* = 3.0
and 1.7, respectively. While the distribution of **/ yW provides a measure to the x ,
the **/ yU profile provides a measure to the spanwise vorticity
)//( yUxVz . The **/ yU profiles at different for both T
* are also
shown in the Figure 6-5. With increasing , the **/ yU magnitudes decrease
gradually. This result indicates smaller values of z at larger . In comparison for T* =
∞, 3.0 and 1.7, the the **/ yW and **
/ yU magnitudes for T* = 1.7 are the largest
for all yaw angles while those for T* = ∞ and 3.0 are comparable except those for T
* =
3.0 which are almost zero at around y* ≈ 1.3 instead at the wake centreline.
By using the shedding angle measurement which is proposed by Hammache
and Gharib (1991), the of the vortex shedding can be evaluated. They suggested that
for oblique shedding, the is related to the x and z components, where tan () =
x / z which can be simplified further as tan () = SW / SU, where SW and SU are the
maximum velocity gradients on the **/ yW and **
/ yU profiles, respectively.
Thus, the shedding angle [≡ tan-1
(SW / SU) can then be calculated form the values of SW
and SU from Figure 6-5a. The shedding angles for different yaw angles for T* = 3.0
141
and 1.7 are given in Table 6-1. It is shown that the values for T* = 3.0 is slightly larger
than the cylinder yaw angles , indicating that the vortex is not really parallel to the
cylinder. While for T* = 1.7, the values are quite close to the , suggesting the
shedding is oblique and the vortex is almost parallel to the cylinder axis.
6.3.2 Power spectra of velocity and vorticity signals
The power spectra of the velocity and vorticity signals at = 0° and 45°,
measured around y* = 1.5 are shown in Figures 6-6 and 6-7. The results at = 15° and
30° are not shown here as the spectra at these angles follow the trend when varies
from 0° to 45°. All power spectra are normalized to decibel scale by using the
maximum of v or z at = 0° and 45°, respectively. The x-axis in the figures is
normalized to fN (≡ fd/UN). This normalization allows the peak frequency of the
spectrum f0 to correspond to the Strouhal number StN (≡f0d/UN). The values of StN at
different yaw angles for various cylinder spacings are stated in Table 6-1.
For T* = 3.0 at = 0° (Figure 6-6a), each power spectra of all velocity
components u, v and w shows a discernible peak which corresponds to StN = 0.2. The
peak energy of v is the highest, followed by the u and w. The StN for T* = 3.0 is
comparable to that for a single cylinder at all yaw angles (see Table 6-1 for
comparisons). As an example, at = 0°, StN = 0.2 for T* = 3.0 while 0.195 for T
* = ∞.
The differences of StN for both T* = 3.0 and ∞ are around 5-11% for < 40°. In both T
*
= ∞ and 3.0 wakes, the second harmonic of vortex shedding is pronounced in u and v.
The small peak may be because of the occurrence of the second harmonic of vortex
shedding (Zhou et al., 2010). With the increase of to 45° (Figure 6-6b), the peak
spectra is broadening over the frequency axis. The second harmonic peak also vanishes
at this yaw angle. Zhou et al. (2009) has shown that for the single cylinder wake, when
is smaller than 40°, the StN keeps approximately constant within the experimental
uncertainty. For T* = 3.0, the peak of v at = 15°, 30° and 45° is evident which
corresponds to StN = 0.212, 0.220 and 0.246, respectively. The comparisons of the StN
between various yaw angles for T* = 3.0 and 1.7 are shown in Figure 6-8. The ratio
StN/St0 (St0 represents the Strouhal number at = 0°) and the error bar are used in the
figure to have a better visualization on the ratio StN/St0 and the range of experimental
uncertainty. The experimental uncertainty of StN of the present study is estimated to be
around 6%. The results are evident that if a tolerance of 6% is applied, the data
142
support the IP for < 40°. While for larger , the difference of StN/St0 value from 1 is
far from the experimental uncertainty, suggesting genuinely departure from the IP.
These variations indicate that the independence principle may also applicable to the T*
= 3.0 wake when < 40°.
For T* = 1.7, the velocity spectra at = 0° (Figure 6-6c) shows a dominant peak
occurring at a vortex shedding frequency f0 which corresponds to StN = 0.118.
Unfortunately, the authors cannot detect two peaks in the spectra near 0.16 and 0.24, as
observed by Chen et al. (2003) in their study for T* = 1.7. The two peaks represent the
Strouhal numbers for the wide and narrow wakes. The wide wake has a low Strouhal
number while the narrow wake has a high Strouhal number. The single peak observation
may be because at the downstream location x* = 10, the vortex regeneration or evolution
may not completed yet. The other peak cannot be detected in the present study as the
vortex in the narrow wake is probably diminished before this downstream location
(Zhou et al., 2002). It may be argued that the hotwire measurements may detect a
double peak frequency, given that the two lateral vortices are in very close proximity to
each other. This argument is not valid here as the StN of the single peak spectra of this
study (0.118) is not half of the total measured values as that obtained by Chen et al.
(2003). The similar observation has been made by Zhou et al. (2002), who reported a
single dominant frequency across the wake, which corresponding to StN = 0.11. A
possible transition from the wide and narrow regimes to a single vortex street may occur
at the present downstream location (Zhou et al., 2002). With the increase of from 0°
to 15°, 30° and 45°, the spectra exhibit a peak at vortex shedding frequency which
corresponds to StN = 0.122, 0.119 and 0.133, respectively. The comparison of the StN for
T* = 1.7 at = 15°, 30° and 45° with that at = 0° are given in Figure 6-8. It is shown
that the StN at = 15° and 30° are within the experimental uncertainty. Therefore, the
StN can be considered as a constant. The difference (12.7%) of StN at = 45° from that
at = 0° may not be ascribed to the experimental uncertainty. It may reflect a genuine
departure in the IP when is large. This observation is similar to that for the single
cylinder results which may be because of the occurrence of the vortex evolutions from
the wide and narrow regimes to a single vortex street. Therefore, this result suggests that
the IP is applicable in the intermediate cylinder spacing wake i.e. T* = 1.7 when <
40°.
143
The spanwise vorticity spectrum for T* = 3.0 at = 0° (Figure 6-7a) shows a
significant peak at the vortex shedding frequency, implying large spanwise vortices in
the wake. Similar to the single cylinder result, the transverse vorticity spectrum y
does not show any peak while the spanwise vorticity spectrum x shows a small peak
at f0. The peak heights relative to the heights of the plateaux of the x and
z
vorticity spectra over the range of fN = 0.004-0.1 are 3 dB and 15 dB, respectively. With
the increase of to 45° (Figure 6-7b), the peak of the z spectrum is changed from
sharp and narrow to broad and wide. At this yaw angle, the peak height relative to the
height of the plateaux of the x and
z vorticity spectra over the range of fN = 0.004-
0.1 are 5 dB and 11 dB, respectively, suggesting a decrease in spanwise vortex shedding
intensity and an enhanced streamwise vortex shedding intensity. This result has the
same trend as that for T* = ∞ by Zhou et al. (2009), which can be related to the Mansy
et al.(1994) quantitative study, where the authors found that the increase of the
streamwise vortices is at the expense of the primary spanwise vortices.
The spanwise vorticity spectrum for T* = 1.7 at = 0° (Figure 6-7c) shows a
very minor peak at the same f0 as that of the velocity spectra (Figure 6-6c). However,
the peak‟s magnitude of the former is not as large as that of the latter. This result may
indicate that at the cylinder spacing of T* = 1.7, the vortex shed from the two cylinders
is not as strong as that from both an isolated cylinder and two cylinders of large spacing
(e.g. T* = 3.0). The lack of an apparent sharp peak in Figure 6-7 (c) is consistent with
the trend of coherent vorticity contours (as shown in Figure 6-10 later). The peaks of
y and z are getting closer with the increasing . This result shows that the
transverse and spanwise vorticities are likely to have similar magnitudes and strength
when is increased, which will be confirmed later.
6.3.3 Phase-averaged vorticity fields
Figures 6-9 and 6-10 present the contours of the phase-averaged vorticity
components *~x ,
*~y and *~
z for T* = 3.0 and 1.7 at four yaw angles = 0°, 15°, 30°
and 45°. The contours for T* = ∞ were shown in Zhou et al. (2010) and will not repeat
here. The contours are in the (, y*) plane, where the phase (from 2π to 2π) can be
interpreted in terms of a streamwise distance and y* (from 0 to 4.8 for T
* = 3.0 and from
-1 to 4.8 for T* = 1.7) is the spanwise distance which normalized by diameter. = 2π
144
corresponds to the Kármán wavelength (≡ Uc/f0) or /2 (≡ Uc/2f0) for T* = 3.0 and 1.7
contours, respectively, where Uc is the vortex convention velocity. The values for Uc are
estimated with the values of uU ~ at the vortex centres (Zhou and Antonia, 1992). The
Uc and values for different yaw angles and cylinder spacings are also included in
Table 6-1. In comparison of for different cylinder spacings in Table 6-1, it is evident
that the Kármán wavelength for T* = 1.7 for all yaw angles are about 50-77% greater
than those for T* = 3.0 and ∞. The flow direction is from left to right for all phase-
averaged contours (Figures 6-9 to 6-22).
For T* = 3.0, the wavelength of the spanwise vortices is about 4.45d which is
larger than that for T* = ∞. At < 40°, the wavelength value is about the same, only
about 3% difference than that obtained at = 0°. This difference is within the
experimental uncertainty, and can be considered as a constant value. However, with the
increase of to 45°, the wavelength increases significantly by about 22% from that at
= 0°. If a factor of cos() is multiplied with , the cos() values at = 15°, 30° and
45° are about 7%, 12% and 14%, respectively, lower than that obtained at = 0°.
The phase-averaged *~z contours for T
* = 3.0 (Figure 6-9i-l) display remarkable
periodicity, resulting from the Kármán vortex street for all yaw angles. The contours are
symmetry with respect to the centreline y* = 0. At all yaw angles, the vorticity contours
display two distinct vortex streets and the magnitudes of the contours are smaller with
those for T* = ∞ (Zhou et al., 2010). Here, only a single vortex street is shown as the
wake is symmetric about y* = 0. Another vortex street is located below the centreline.
The spanwise vortex centres at = 0° for T* = 3.0 are around y
* = 1.3 and 1.9 for
positive and negative vortices, respectively, while those for T* = ∞ are around y
* = -0.2
and 0.4. From the figure, it seems that if the whole set of the phase-averaged *~z
contours for T* = 3.0 wake is shifting downward about y
* = 1.5, the vortex contours are
quite similar with those for T* = ∞ (figure shown by Zhou et al. 2010). This trend is
relevant in all phase-averaged vorticity and velocity components as comparisons are
done between Figures 6-9, 6-15, 6-17 and 6-19 for T* = 3.0 with that for T
* = ∞ in Zhou
et al. (2010). These results affirm that the wake of two cylinders for T* = 3.0 acts as a
two single-cylinder wake since it has similar vortex patterns as those for T* = ∞. The
maximum of coherent spanwise vortices at = 0° for T* = 3.0 is -0.7 (Figure 6-9i).
Even though there is a small decrease in the maximum contour value of *~z when
145
varies from 0° to 30°, the variation is not very apparent. When further increases to
45°, the maximum value of *~z decreases by about 50%. This observation suggests that
the effect of yaw angle on the coherent spanwise vortex is greater when > 30°. This
may be caused by the increase of the spanwise velocity *W as increases (Figure 6-4).
The *~x contours for T
* = 3.0 exhibits organized patterns at all yaw angles.
However, their strength are much weaker compared to those of *~z . At = 0°, the size
of the longitudinal vortices is much smaller than that of the spanwise vortices. The
maximum magnitude of *~x at this yaw angle is only about 7% of that of *~
z , which is
in agreement with the two-dimensionality of the flow. With the increase of yaw angles,
the *~x contours exhibit more apparent organised patterns and the maximum contour
value increases monotonously. This is consistent with that shown in Figure 6-7 (a, b) in
that the peak height of x increases with increasing . At = 45°, the maximum
contour value of *~x (Figure 6-9d) is about 67% of that of *~
z (Figure 6-9l). This result
indicates the existence of the secondary axial vortices or the occurrence of vortex
dislocation with an enhanced three-dimensionality when increases, consistent with the
result for a single cylinder wake (Zhou et al., 2010). Zhou et al. (2010) suggest that the
increase of streamwise vorticity is caused by the increase of the spanwise velocity w at
large yaw angles (see Figure 6-17i-l). This is because the x calculation is related with
the velocity component w where the increase of w contributes to the increase of *~x . The
maximum value of *~y at = 0° is about 2 times of that of *~
x , which is still relatively
smaller than that of *~z . In comparison between the *~
x and *~z contours for T
* = 3.0,
with the increase of , the strength of the former increases while it decreases in the
latter. The behaviour of the streamwise and spanwise vortex is consistent with the result
of single cylinder wake by Zhou et al. (2010). This result seems to support Mansy et al.
(1994), who stated that the increase of the streamwise vortices is at the expense of the
spanwise vortices. There is no apparent trend to be associated with the *~y contours
when increases from 0° to 45°. At = 45°, the maximum value of *~y is about half of
that of *~x . Overall, with the increase of , the magnitudes and the pattern of *~
x and
*~z contours tend to be comparable while those of *~
y are nearly unchanged. The
146
maximum contour values of coherent vorticity at different yaw angles are summarized
in Table 6-2.
The coherent vorticity contours for T* = 1.7 cylinder spacing are shown in
Figure 6-10. All vorticity contours for this spacing obviously have distinctly different
vortex patterns from the aforementioned wakes for T* = ∞ and 3.0. Evidently, the T
* =
1.7 wake regime has a larger vortex wavelength compared to that for T* = ∞ and 3.0
wake regimes. It can be seen that a single vortex street was shed from the top cylinder in
the range from y* ≈ -1 to 3. The vortex structures in the wake are deflected downward
below the wake centreline creating a wide wake. The lower part of the wake regime y* <
-1 may not be so important as it is believed that the vortex structures shed from the
bottom cylinder are already vanished before x* = 10 (Zhou et al., 2002; Chen et al.,
2003). Zhang and Zhou (2001) in their study of three side-by-side cylinders (x* 10 and
T* = 1.5) observed a wide wake behind the central cylinder and two narrow wakes on
each side of the wide wake. They found that at x* ≈ 5, the vortex structures in the
narrow wake on each side of the wide wake vanished while the vortex structures in the
wide wake started to roll up. The vortex structures in the wide wake were very weak
initially but became stronger with the streamwise direction which can be related to the
shear layer instability (Zhou et al., 2002). The formation of the vortex street in the wide
wake at large downstream region is also illustrated and briefly discussed by Chen et
al.(2003) through their numerical simulations for T* = 1.7 at low Reynolds number (Re
= 750). They suggested the mechanisms involved in the vortex evolution of the wide
and narrow wakes across the downstream region. Initially, the flow was deflected
upwards creating a narrow wake around the top cylinder. The vortices in the narrow
wake tend to pair and absorb the vortex from the bottom cylinder. Due to strong
interaction between both vortices, the vortex shed from the bottom cylinder collapsed,
thus encouraged the growth of the vortex from the top cylinder. As the vortex from the
narrow wake (top cylinder) tend to prevent the merging of the following vortex from the
wide wake (bottom cylinder), another vortex was created behind the bottom cylinder
(now is called as a narrow wake). However, the vortex also quickly collapsed. At the
same time, the vortex from the top cylinder become stronger and the flow deflected
toward the bottom cylinder creating a wide wake. Finally, a single vortex street was
formed in the wide wake at downstream region i.e. x* = 10, which is consistent with the
present results as shown in the Figure 6-10. These mechanisms also explained the bi-
stable deflected and flip-flopped flows with randomly changes from one side to the
147
other as observed by Ishigai et al. (1972), Bearman and Wadcock (1973) and Kim and
Durbin (1988). Further observation by Zhou et al. (2002) for two side-by-side cylinders
for T* = 1.5 at x
* = 10 shows that a row of weak vortices and another peculiar flow
pattern are apparent. Such a peculiar flow pattern is diminished after x* = 20, suggesting
that the vortex regeneration or evolution is probably completed (Zhou et al., 2002). The
two-cylinder case for T* = 1.7 may bear a resemblance to that for T
* = 1.5 as they are in
the same regime of the intermediate cylinder spacing (T* = 1.2-2.0).
While the vorticity contours for T* = 1.7 have a relatively more organised vortex
pattern at = 0°, it becomes scattered with the increase of the yaw angle. The
maximum value for *~z contours is 0.14, 0.08, 0.08 and 0.06 at = 0°, 15°, 30° and
45°, respectively. The values reveal approximately a decreasing trend as is increased
especially when = 45°. The unorganized vortex pattern of *~z contours may suggest
that the vortex in the wake region of x* = 10 is still not stable. This may support the
flow visualization results by Williamson (1985) behind two side-by-side cylinders for
T* = 1.5, who showed that the vortex regeneration or evolution may not complete yet at
x* = 10. These is also another speculation that the vortex in the narrow wake have a
coalescence with the vortices in the wide wake (Zhou et al., 2002). In comparison
between *~x , *~
y and *~z contours, it is obvious that the magnitudes of all coherent
vorticity components at each yaw angle are comparable (ranging from 0.06 to 0.12),
indicating a more three-dimensional characteristics of the flow. This result is consistent
with that shown in Figure 6-4. With increasing , the maximum value of *~y and *~
z
contours tend to be comparable especially when = 30° and 45°. This is consistent with
the results shown in Figure 6-10 (b, d) that with the increase of to 45°, the velocity
spectra of transverse and spanwise components are almost comparable. This confirms
that the transverse and spanwise vorticities are likely to have similar magnitudes and
strength when is increased to large yaw angles. When = 45°, the maximum value of
*~x , *~
y and *~z contours is similar (≈ 0.06). This shows that at large yaw angle, the
vortices have perfectly three-dimensional vortices as the strength of vortices for all
components is equal to each other. This result should also be related to the large values
of W for T* = 1.7. While there is an apparent dependence of *~
z on , which decays by
50% when is increased from 0° to 45°, the increase of *~x with for T
* = 1.7 is not as
apparent as that for T* = 3.0. This result indicate a strong interaction between the wake
148
structures when T* = 1.7. It is also evident that vortex contours at = 45° has a phase
variation of about = 0.5π compared with those at < 40°. The maximum contour
values of *~x , *~
y and *~z at different yaw angles for various cylinder spacings are
summarized in Table 6-2.
6.3.4 Spanwise vortex patterns using the phase-averaged velocity components
Figures 6-11 and 6-12 present the iso-contours of phase-averaged vorticity *~z
constructed from the phase-averaged *~u and *~v at various yaw angles for T* = 3.0 and
T* = 1.7, respectively. The corresponding sectional streamlines for T
* = 3.0 and T
* = 1.7
are shown in Figures 6-13 and 6-14, respectively.
For T* = 3.0, two distinct vortex streets are evident in Figure 6-11 at all yaw
angles (only one street at y* ≥ 0 are shown here). The contour pattern at = 0° and its
corresponding sectional streamlines (Figures 6-10a, 6-12a) have a good agreement with
those shown by Zhou et al. (2002). With increasing to 45°, the maximum contours for
*~z decreases by about 38% from that at = 0°. At = 45°, the contours seem to be
deflected and the vortex centre of the contours shifts to the right by about = 0.2π. The
maximum magnitudes of the *~z contours in Figure 6-11 agree quite well with those
shown in Figure 6-9. Although both results are from different methods, where the
phase-averaged *~z of the former is from the phase-averaged *~u and *~v while the latter
is from the instantaneous z signal, they provide quite similar results. The difference
between these methods is the streamwise separation x as presented in Eq. (6-3), where
the former method did not measure the x as the latter method.
For T* = 1.7, a single vortex street is displayed at all yaw angles (Figure 6-12)
confirming the earlier suggestion. The contour pattern at = 0° and its corresponding
sectional streamlines (Figures 6-12a, 6-14a) is consistent with that shown by Zhou et al.
(2002) for T* = 1.5. This is expected as both results are in the intermediate spacing
regime. Even though T* = 1.7 wake has a single street as that for T
* = ∞, the former
exhibit a largely different vortex pattern from that of the latter. At y* ≥ 0, only the
negative contours are shown while only the positive contours are apparent at y* < 0.
With the increase of from 0° to 45°, the maximum magnitude of the *~z contours
decreases gradually to about 56% of that at = 0°. In comparison of the *~z contours in
Figures 6-10 and 6-12, they display distinctly different contour patterns. The maximum
149
contours magnitudes are also largely different where the maximum contours magnitudes
for the *~z contours in Figure 6-10 are about 25-39% smaller than those in Figure 6-12.
As discussed before, the difference between both method are the non-existence
streamwise separation x variable in the latter calculation. This shows that the x value
may have influence to the results.
6.3.5 Incoherent vorticity fields
The phase-averaged incoherent vorticity contours *2 xr , *2 yr and
*2 zr at different yaw angles for T* = 3.0 and T
* = 1.7 are shown in Figures 6-15
and 6-16, respectively. It is evident that for T* = 3.0, the maximum contour values of all
incoherent vorticity components decrease gradually with the increase of . If the
*2 xr , *2 yr and *2 zr contours for T* = 3.0 (Figure 6-15) are shifted
downward by about y* =1.5, the contours display qualitatively the same contour patterns
as those for T* = ∞ (see Zhou et al. 2010), suggesting that the wake for large cylinder
spacing i.e. T* = 3.0 behaves as an independent and isolated cylinder wake. The
*2 xr contours for T* = 3.0 running along the diverging separatrix and wrapping
around the main spanwise structures. These contours may represent the existence of the
streamwise or riblike structures as have been suggested by Zhou et al. (2010). The
maximum magnitudes of *2 xr , *2 yr and *2 zr contours for T* = 3.0
decrease gradually with the increase of .
The incoherent vorticity contours *2 xr , *2 yr and *2 zr for T* = 1.7
at all yaw angles (Figure 6-16) do not show very apparent organized contour patterns
which are in contrast to those for T* = ∞ and 3.0. The contour patterns for the former are
scattered and the maximum magnitude of the contours become smaller with the increase
of .
6.3.6 Phase-averaged velocity components
The phase-averaged coherent velocities *~u , *~v and *~w for T* = 3.0 and 1.7 at
different yaw angles are shown in Figures 6-17 and 6-18, respectively. The velocity
contours for T* = 3.0 (Figure 6-17) show remarkably organized patterns. The maximum
contour value of *~v is the largest among all the three velocity components for all yaw
angles. While the *~v contours (Figure 6-17e-h) show apparent antisymmetry about =
150
0, the *~u contours (Figure 6-17a-d) display up-down antisymmetry about the vortex
centre (the bottom half is not shown). Both *~u and *~v at = 0° for T* = 3.0 exhibit
qualitatively the similar structures as those shown in Zhou et al. (2002). If the velocity
contours for T* = 3.0 (Figure 6-17) are shifted downward by about y
* =1.5, the contours
display qualitatively the same structures as those for T* = ∞ (see Zhou et al. 2010) albeit
with slightly different contour values. This further confirms that the wake of the two
side-by-side cylinders for large cylinder spacing i.e. T* = 3.0 behaves as an independent
and isolated cylinder (Sumner et al., 1999). The *~u and *~v contours at = 0° to 30° for
T* = 3.0 seem to have a quite similar maximum value for both positive and negative
contours. With the increase of to 45°, the maximum value of *~u and *~v contours
decreases by about 50% and 20%, respectively, as compared with that of = 0°. This
suggests that *~u is more dependent to yaw angles. At = 0°, the maximum value of *~w
contours is the smallest compare to that of *~u and *~v contours. The *~w contours
display up-down antisymmetry about the wake centreline and have one loop of vortex
structure. With the increase of to 30°, the vortex structures split and eventually form
two loops of vortex structures. The maximum value of *~w also increases gradually with
the increase of to 30°. When = 45°, the maximum value of *~w contours is about 2
times of that at = 0° and is comparable to that of *~u . The enhanced *~w with the
increase of yaw angles is related to a higher degree of three-dimensionality of the wake.
The *~u , *~v and *~w phase-averaged contours at various yaw angles for T* = 1.7
are shown in Figure 6-17. The *~u and *~v contours at = 0° for T* = 1.7 are
comparable with those for T* = 1.5 shown in Zhou et al. (2002). The comparable
patterns are expected because they are in the similar intermediate cylinder spacing (T* =
1.2-2.0) regime. It is evident that the *~u , *~v and *~w contours display discernible
structures at = 0°. However, with the increase of to 15°, the *~u , *~v and *~w vortex
contours become less organized and there is a large reduction by about 38-71% in the
contours maximum value. Although at = 45°, the maximum value of *~u , *~v and *~w
is about 38%, 22% and 50% of that at = 0°, there is minor decreasing trend in the
dependence of *~u , *~v and *~w on . For example, the maximum value of *~v contours
varies from 0.09 when = 0° to 0.05, 0.06 and 0.02 when = 15°, 30° and 45°,
respectively. The inconsistent of decreasing in the maximum values of vortex contours
151
may suggest that the vortex in the wake region of x* = 10 is unstable. When increases
from 0° to 45°, all velocities contours for T* = 1.7 have a large decrease in the
maximum values with *~v has the largest reduction compared with *~u and *~w . This
result is in contrast to that of T* = ∞ and 3.0, where more organised and enhanced
spanwise velocity contours are found. The velocity contours at = 45° has a variation
in phase of about 0.5π compared with other yaw angles. This observation is in contrast
with that for T* = 3.0 and ∞, where for both spacings, there is no apparent phase
variation between yaw angles. Also, large for both spacings contributes to smaller
maximum values in the *~u and *~v contours with *~u being more affected than *~v .
Besides that, the *~w contours for T* = 3.0 and ∞ have larger magnitude with the
increase of , suggesting higher three-dimensional vortex in the wake. This result
suggests that T* = 1.7 wake may have a totally different mechanism from that for T
* =
3.0 and ∞. The maximum levels of *~u , *~v and *~w contours for T* = ∞, 3.0 and 1.7 are
summarized in Table 6-2.
6.3.7 Phase-averaged Reynolds shear stresses
The phase averaged Reynolds shear stresses **~~ vu , ** ~~ wu and ** ~~ wv at different
yaw angles are shown in Figures 6-19 and 6-20 for T* = 3.0 and 1.7, respectively. The
**~~ vu , ** ~~ wu and ** ~~ wv contours for T* = 3.0 (in the range of y
* > 1.5) display similar
patterns with those for T* = ∞ (in the range of y
* > 0) as shown in Zhou et al. (2002) and
Zhou et al. (2010). The results show that the flow for T* = 3.0 at x
* = 10 behaves like
two distinct wakes with each one behaving wake characteristics similar to the wake of a
single cylinder. The **~~ vu contours display a clover-leaf pattern about the vortex centre
especially for = 0°-30°, which is led from the coherent motion of vortices with Uc as a
reference frame (Zhou et al., 2002). The contours of **~~ vu (Figure 6-19a-d) are
antisymmetry about = 0 and y* = 1.5. The maximum value of **~~ vu contours does not
change when is increased from 0° to 15°. However, when is further increased to 30°
and 45°, the maximum value decreases to about 22% and 67%, respectively, from that
when = 0°. When = 45°, the wake region shrinks and the contour is further declined
to the right. As **~~ vu is related to the *~
z , this result confirm the dependence of the
latter on where the spanwise vortices is weakened with the increase of . The
negative contours of ** ~~ wu at = 0° (Figure 6-19e) display organized patterns while
152
those of the positive contours exhibit a small clover-leaf pattern. The maximum contour
magnitudes of ** ~~ wu are considerably smaller than that of **~~ vu and ** ~~ wv . Apparently,
with the increase of , the positive contours of ** ~~ wu become smaller and almost
diminish. At = 45°, the positive ** ~~ wu contours have a reduction in their maximum
value by about 75% than that when = 0°, while the maximum value of the negative
** ~~ wu contours is increased by about 2.5 times than that when = 0°. The positive
contours of ** ~~ wv reveal a large clover-leaf pattern which is antisymmetrical about =
0 especially when = 0°-30°. The negative ** ~~ wv contours at = 0° have very small
magnitude, thus are not shown in the figure. However, with the increase of , the
negative contours appear slowly and grow larger while the positive contours shrinks
gradually leading to contours distortion when = 45°. The maximum magnitude of
** ~~ wv contours decreases from 0.006 to 0.004 with the increase of from 0° to 45°.
For T* = 1.7, the Reynolds shear stresses **~~ vu , ** ~~ wu and ** ~~ wv (Figure 6-20)
reveal a quite different pattern with those for T* = 3.0 and ∞. At = 0°, large **~~ vu ,
** ~~ wu and ** ~~ wv contours are evident where the contours are quite antisymmetry about
= 0. The magnitude of the maximum contours for the above terms are much smaller
than that for T* = 3.0. However, with increasing , the contours become more
asymmetrical about = 0. Although the **~~ vu , ** ~~ wu and ** ~~ wv contours at = 45° has
a large decrease in their maximum values by about 75-93% compared with those at =
0°, there is no identifiable trend of contour patterns and the maximum contour values
when changes. A phase variation of about 0.5π also is evident in the shear stress
contours when increases to 45°. This supports the previous results in Figures 6-10 and
6-18 that at x* = 10, the vortical motion is still in unstable mode. The vortex
regeneration or evolution process may contribute to the unstable wake. The maximum
magnitudes of **~~ vu , ** ~~ wu and ** ~~ wv contours are summarized in Table 6-2.
6.3.8 Incoherent Reynolds shear stresses
The phase-averaged incoherent Reynolds shear stresses **~~
rr vu , ** ~~
rr wu
and ** ~~
rr wv contours for T* = 3.0 and 1.7 are shown in Figures 6-21 and 6-22,
respectively. A weak vortical motion (i.e. a small value of **~~ vu ) is corresponding to a
strong incoherent motion (i.e. a large value of **~~
rr vu ) (Zhou et al., 2002). For T* =
153
3.0, the **~~
rr vu contour pattern at = 0° of this study (Figure 6-21a) is comparable
with that shown in Zhou et al. (2002). The extremum values of **~~
rr vu for the
former are larger than those for the latter. This is because of the Re of the former being
larger than that of the latter. The **~~
rr vu contours seem to stretch in the direction of
the diverging separatrix. With the increase of from 0° to 45°, the extremum value of
**~~
rr vu decreases gradually by about 58% of that when = 0°. At = 45°, the
positive contours of **~~
rr vu seem to dominate the region of y* < 1.5. While the
maximum values of ** ~~
rr wv contours for T* = 3.0 increase with increasing , there
is no trend to be associated with those of ** ~~
rr wu . The appearance of the negative
contours of ** ~~
rr wv when is increased from 0° to 30° indicates the generation of
the secondary spanwise structures, which become more apparent as is increased to
45°.
The strength of the incoherent motion for T* = 1.7 can be interpreted from the
**~~
rr vu , ** ~~
rr wu and ** ~~
rr wv contours as shown in Figure 6-22. Generally
the maximum values of **~~
rr vu and ** ~~
rr wu contours decrease with increasing
. In comparison of the **~~
rr vu contours for T* = 1.7 with that for T
* = 1.5 in Zhou
et al. (2002), the **~~
rr vu contours for the former have two sides about the wake
centreline where the upper side (y* > 0) is dominated by the negative contours while the
below side (y* 0) is dominated by the positive contours. The
**~~rr vu contours for
the latter at y* 0 is dominated by both the positive and negative contours.
6.3.9 Coherent and incoherent contributions to Reynolds stresses
By using structural average, the coherent and incoherent contributions to the
Reynolds normal and shear stresses could be quantified. The coherent and incoherent
contributions to Reynolds stresses for different yaw angles are shown in Figures 6-23
and 6-24, for T* = 3.0 and 1.7, respectively.
All distributions of the Reynolds stress profiles for T* = 3.0 at all yaw angles are
either symmetrical or antisymmetrical about wake centreline y* = 0. The distribution of
the Reynolds stresses for T* = 3.0 at = 0° agrees qualitatively with those of Zhou et al.
(2002), thus validating the present measurement. The coherent contribution to the
154
Reynolds stresses for T* = 3.0 is generally smaller than that for T
* = ∞ as shown in
Zhou et al. (2010). This may be because for T* = 3.0, the interaction between the two
vortex streets in the wake accelerate the vortex decay process (Zhou et al., 2002).
The profiles of the Reynolds normal stress 2*u for T* = 3.0 (Figure 6-23a-d)
display one peak while the coherent component 2*~u exhibits two peaks around y* ≈
0.75 and 2.25. Due to the symmetry of the flow, another two peaks are expected to be
located at y* ≈ -0.75 and -2.25. The existence of the four peaks on the 2*~u distribution
is because of the occurrence of the two vortex streets in the wake for T* = 3.0 (Zhou et
al., 2002). The figure shows that the coherent contribution to 2*u decreases slightly
with the increase of . This trend is consistent with the dependence of *~u on yaw
angles (Figure 6-17a-d) which is also related to *~z (Figure 6-9i-l). The coherent
contribution to 2*v for T* = 3.0 is quite significant for all yaw angles, indicating a
strong coherent motion in the transverse direction of the wake. It is apparent that
2*~v / 2*v is the largest and followed by 2*~u / 2*u and 2*~w / 2*w , regardless of the yaw
angles. This is expected as the v component is more sensitive to the organized structures
than u and w components. The magnitudes of 2*v (Figure 6-23e-h) are quite similar for
= 0°-30° even though they decrease slightly with the increase of , and becomes
appreciably smaller when increases to 45°. The coherent contribution to 2*w (Figure
6-23i-l) is very small, seems to be zero when < 40°. There is a slight increase in the
magnitude of the coherent component 2*~w when increases from 30° to 45°, which
peaks at around y* = 0.75 and 2.25, respectively. This result indicates the generation of
the secondary streamwise vortex structures in the yawed cylinder wake when is large.
The Reynolds shear stresses for T* = 3.0 (Figure 6-23m-x) are very small in
magnitude relative to the Reynolds normal stresses. The coherent component of **vu
has remarkable magnitude compared to that of incoherent component of **vu for y*
2, while the **~~ vu magnitude is approximately zero for y* > 2 at all yaw angles. This
observation indicates the existence of the strong spanwise coherent structures at y* 2,
in view of the association of *~u and *~v with *~
z . The ** ~~ wu magnitude has negative
sign for all yaw angles. The negative sign is related to the opposite signs of coherent
155
velocity components *~u and *~w which is shown in Figure 6-17 (a-d and i-l). The
magnitude of ** ~~ wu becomes larger with increasing , suggesting comparable
magnitudes of coherent velocity components *~u and *~w especially when = 45° and
the generation of the secondary streamwise vortical structures. The coherent
contribution to **wv decreases with increasing , suggesting a reduction of the
spanwise vorticity which cannot be compensated by the increase in the streamwise
vorticity.
The coherent contributions to Reynolds normal stresses for T* = 1.7 (Figure
6-24a-l) are approximately zero at all yaw angles. From the figure, it is evident that the
distribution of 2*~u does not present any peak which is contradict with that of T* = 3.0
and ∞. With the increase of , the time-averaged 2*u decreases gradually. The coherent
contributions to 2*v and 2*w are the largest when = 0° compared with that of larger
. The inconsistent trend in the magnitude of the time-averaged components 2*v and
2*w for = 15° to 45° suggests the instability of the wake structures at those . This
result is consistent with that in Figure 6-18, where the velocities contours are quite
organized when = 0° and become less organized with increasing .
The Reynolds shear stress profiles for T* = 1.7 (Figure 6-24m-x) shows that the
coherent contribution components **~~ vu , ** ~~ wu and ** ~~ wv are negligibly small for all
. However, the coherent contributions to the Reynolds shear stress are the largest when
= 0° which are consistent with those for Reynolds normal stress. The time-averaged
uw has negative sign in its magnitudes when = 0° while the uw magnitude increases
and shifts to the positive side at y* 0 with the increasing of to 15° and at y
* 1 when
= 30° and 45°. There is no absolute trend to be associated with the dependence of
**~~ vu and ** ~~ wv on yaw angles. These results seem to suggest the destructing effect by
the secondary spanwise flow on the wake structures when the gap between the two
cylinders is in the intermediate regime.
6.3.10 Coherent and incoherent contributions to vorticity variances
The structural average is done to measure the coherent contribution to the
vorticity variances for T* = 3.0 and 1.7. The results are shown in Figure 6-25. It is worth
156
to mention that the coherent contributions to vorticity variances 22
/~xx ,
22/~
yy
and 22
/~zz for T
* = 3.0 are qualitatively similar with that for T
* = ∞ by Zhou et al.
(2010). These are expected as the wake behind two cylinders for T* = 3.0 has two
distinct vortex streets with every street behaves like a vortex street found in a single
cylinder wake. Although each street for T* = 3.0 has the same qualitative trend to the
single cylinder street, the result shows that the maximum magnitudes of 22
/~xx ,
22/~
yy and 22
/~zz for the former are smaller, about 60%, 64% and 48%,
respectively, compare to those for the latter. The magnitude of 22
/~xx at = 0° for
T* = 3.0 is very small which is only about 0.2% and have a broad distribution along
lateral distance y*. However, with the increase of , the coherent contribution to the
longitudinal vorticity increases rapidly and exhibits a significant peak especially when
= 45°. The distribution also shows that the longitudinal vortex is largely occur at the
range of y* = 0.8-3.0 especially at = 15° to 45° which is consistent with that shown in
Figure 6-9 (a-d). The maximum magnitude of 22
/~xx at = 45° is equal to 3%
which is smaller than that for T* = ∞ (5.3%) by Zhou et al. (2010). The coherent
contribution to the lateral vorticity variance 22
/~yy is quite similar and very small
(less than 1%) for all yaw angles. This suggests that the transverse vorticity 22
/~yy
does not depend on the variation of yaw angles. With the increase of from 0° to 30°,
the coherent contribution to spanwise vorticity 22
/~zz decreases gradually. With
further increase of to 45°, the magnitude of 22
/~zz decreases significantly by about
60% of that when = 30°. These results confirm that the spanwise vortex is weaker
when > 30° while the lateral vortex is independent on .
Despite of the expected results that found in the coherent contributions to
vorticity variances 22
/~xx ,
22/~
yy and 22
/~zz for T
* = 3.0, the results of those
for T* = 1.7 are very different from those for T
* = 3.0 and ∞. The results show only the
wide wake part (y* ≥ -1). Generally,
22/~
xx , 22
/~yy and
22/~
zz have
appreciably small magnitudes for all yaw angles which are less than 1%. The maximum
157
magnitudes of 22
/~xx and
22/~
zz in the range of = 0° to 45° for T* = 1.7 are
quite small, which are only about 30% and 7% relative to those for T* = 3.0 while there
is no large differences in the magnitudes of 22
/~yy for both cylinder separations.
These results indicate that the strength of coherent vorticity of the x and z components
for two cylinders arranged side-by-side with T* = 1.7 are weaker relative to those with
T* = 3.0 and ∞. There is no significant trend that can be related to the dependence of
22/~
xx and 22
/~yy on . Thus, the coherent contributions to the streamwise and
lateral vorticity variances for T* = 1.7 are not dependent on . While for
22/~
zz ,
there is a sudden decrease in the magnitude when increases from 0° to larger yaw
angles. This result is consistent with that shown in Figure 6-9 (i-l), where the spanwise
vortices have the most organized structures and the highest in contour magnitude when
= 0°. With increasing , the spanwise vortices structures are become less organized
and weakened.
6.4 Conclusions
Experiments of two cylinders in side-by-side arrangement with centre-to-centre
cylinder spacing of T* = 3.0 and 1.7 at yaw angles = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° have been
conducted in order to evaluate the wake behind the cylinders. It has been found that the
characteristics of the turbulent wake depend on the cylinder spacing.
For the large cylinder spacing T* = 3.0, a single peak is observed in the v which
corresponds to the Strouhal number StN. It is shown that for < 40°, the independence
principle is applicable to the wake. The velocity profiles suggest that both vortex streets
of the T* = 3.0 wake is similar to the single vortex street of the T
* = ∞ wake. The lateral
distance between both vortices for the T* = 3.0 wake is about 3d. The phase-averaged
velocity and vorticity contours for T* = 3.0 are comparable with those for T
* = ∞ when
the whole set of the contours is shifted downward about y* = 1.5. This result confirms
that the wake of the two side-by-side cylinders for large cylinder spacing i.e. T* = 3.0
behaves as an independent and isolated cylinder. The coherent streamwise vorticity
contours *~x for T
* = 3.0 is only about 10% of that of coherent spanwise vorticity
contours *~z . With the increase of ,
*~x increases while *~
z decreases. At = 45°, *~x
158
is about 67% of *~z . This result indicates the existence of the secondary axial vortices or
the occurrence of the vortex dislocation with an enhanced three-dimensionality with
larger . Although the wake behind two cylinders for T* = 3.0 has two distinct vortex
street and each street has the same qualitative trend to the single cylinder street, the
results show that the maximum magnitudes for 22
/~xx ,
22/~
yy and 22
/~zz for
the former are smaller which are about 60%, 64% and 48%, respectively, than those for
the T* = ∞ wake. The *~
z strength is weaker while the *~x strength increases rapidly
with increasing , especially when > 30°. On the other hand, the *~y magnitude is
independent on .
For the intermediate cylinder spacing T* = 1.7, only a single peak is detected in
the v. This is because at x* = 10, the vortex structures regeneration or evolution may
not be completed yet, whereas those in the narrow wake is probably diminished before
the downstream location. The independence principle (IP) is applicable to the wake
when < 40°. The values of spanwise velocity *W are not equal to zero, even at =
0°. It may suggest that the vortex in the wake is inclined and the wake may not have a
perfect two-dimensional plane, which may be because of the occurrence of the vortex
evolution. The vorticity contours for T* = 1.7 have a more organized pattern at = 0°
while become scattered and smaller with the increase of yaw angles. With increasing ,
there is a decreasing trend in the maximum value of vorticity contours. The less
organized *~z contours for T
* = 1.7 compared with those for T
* = ∞ and 3.0 indicate
that the vortex motion in the wake is still not stable, suggesting that the vortex evolution
or regeneration process may not be completed yet. At = 45°, the vortices show
apparent three-dimensionality as the strength of all vortices are same to each other.
Furthermore, the vorticity contours at = 45° have phase variation of about 0.2π
compared with that at smaller yaw angles. The maximum coherent vorticity *~x and *~
z
contours for T* = 1.7 are about 30% and 7% of those for T
* = 3.0 while there is no
apparent difference in the magnitudes of 22
/~yy for both T
*. These results suggest
that the coherent vorticity components for T* = 1.7 are mush weaker than both of T
* =
3.0 and single cylinder.
159
Table 6-1. The vortex shedding angle, maximum velocity defect, convection velocity,
half-width, normalized Strouhal number and wavelength at different yaw angles for
cylinder spacings T* = ∞, 3.0 and 1.7.
T*
0° 15° 30° 45°
(°)
∞ 0.5 16.8 33.0 45.6
3.0 4.6 19.4 37.8 52.2
1.7 3.9 12.6 25.8 42.9
U0*
∞ 0.17 0.14 0.10 0.07
3.0 0.20 0.19 0.13 0.10
1.7 0.39 0.37 0.29 0.20
Uc*
∞ 0.82 0.83 0.87 0.89
3.0 0.91 0.88 0.90 0.95
1.7 0.86 0.76 0.83 0.86
L*
∞ 0.80 0.82 0.80 0.68
3.0 2.57 2.53 2.53 2.69
1.7 1.38 1.43 1.39 1.39
StN
∞ 0.195 0.202 0.206 0.224
3.0 0.205 0.212 0.220 0.246
1.7 0.118 0.122 0.119 0.133
*
∞ 4.16 4.23 4.80 5.86
3.0 4.45 4.30 4.54 5.44
1.7 7.29 6.44 8.05 9.14
* (cos )
∞ 4.16 4.09 4.16 4.14
3.0 4.45 4.15 3.93 3.85
1.7 7.29 6.22 6.97 6.46
160
Table 6-2. The maximum values of the coherent vorticity, velocity and Reynolds stresses contours at different
yaw angles for T* = ∞, 3.0 and 1.7.
T* ∞ 3.0 1.7
0° 15° 30° 45° 0° 15° 30° 45° 0° 15° 30° 45°
*~x 0.15 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.06 0.12 0.06
*~y 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.08 0.06
*~z 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.70 0.60 0.60 0.30 0.14 0.08 0.08 0.06
*~u 0.12 0.14 0.10 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.06 0.065 0.040 0.045 0.025
*~v 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 -0.24 0.20 0.20 0.16 0.09 0.05 0.06 0.02
*~w 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.030 0.010 0.025 0.015
**~~ vu 0.018 0.018 0.012 0.009 0.018 0.018 0.014 0.006 0.0036 0.0009 0.0020 0.0004
** ~~ wu 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.0020 0.0030 0.0045 0.0030 0.0012 0.0003 0.0007 0.0003
** ~~ wv 0.004 0.004 0.006 0.004 0.006 0.007 0.006 0.004 0.0028 0.0004 0.0014 0.0002
161
(a) Cylinders arrangement and
coordinate system (top view)
(c) Enlarged 3D vorticity probe (side view) (d) Enlarged 3D vorticity probe (front view)
8D
A
z
y
y
1
6
B
3
5
C
z
4 7
2
8D
A
z
y
y
1
6
B
3
5
C
z
4 7
2
U
4,7
C
B, D
y
3,8
1
2
6
5
X
A
U
4,7
C
B, D
y
3,8
1
2
6
5
X
A
(b) Wake profile and probe
arrangements (side view)
T Moveable 3-D
Vorticity Probe
Fixed referenceX-probe
U
U0T Moveable 3-D
Vorticity Probe
Fixed referenceX-probe
UU
U0
U
= 0
= 0
Tunnel wall
Tunnel wall
End plate
45z
x
Yaw angle
U
= 0
= 0
Tunnel wall
Tunnel wall
End plate
45z
x
Yaw angle
Figure 6-1. Two cylinders side-by-side arrangement with definitions of the coordinate
system and the sketches of the vorticity probe.
162
Figure 6-2. The experimental setup of two cylinders with side-by-side arrangement.
Cylinders
End plate
Fixed reference X-probe
Moveable 3-D vorticity probe
Pitot tube
163
= 45
= 30
= 15
= 0
tA,i
tB,i
tA,i+1
= 0, , 2
t
v
v
v
v
(a) T* = 3.0
t
v
v
v
v
= 15
= 30
= 45
= 0
(b) T* = 1.7
tA,i
tB,i
tA,i+1
= 0, , 2
Figure 6-3. Time traces of v signals measured at y* = 0.5 for different angles in arbitrary
scales. (a) T* = 3.0; (b) T
* = 1.7. The thicker line represents the filtered signal vf .
164
T* = 3.0 T
* = 1.7
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0 1 2 3 4
= 0153045
(a)
y/d
U*
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
-1 0 1 2 3 4
(b)
y/d
U*
-0.05
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0 1 2 3 4
(c)
y*
W*
-0.05
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
-1 0 1 2 3 4
(d)
y*
W*
Figure 6-4.Comparisons of time-averaged velocities at different yaw angles for T
* = 3.0
and 1.7. (a, b) *U ; (c, d) *W . The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents
cylinder.
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0 1 2 3 4
= 0153045
U*/y*
W*/y*
(a) T* = 3.0
y/d
U
*/y*
, W
*/y*
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
-1 0 1 2 3 4
U*/y*
W*/y*
(b) T* = 1.7
y/d
U
*/y*
, W
*/y*
Figure 6-5. Normalized velocity gradients at different yaw angles for (a) T
* = 3.0; (b)
1.7. The arrows indicate the direction of increasing yaw angles. The open circle with a
cross at the centre
x represents cylinder
x
x
x
x
x
x
165
T* = 3.0 T
* = 1.7
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
u
v
w
(a)
fN*
u,
v,
w (
dB
)
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
(c)
fN*
u,
v,
w (
dB
)
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
(b)
fN
u,
v,
w (
dB
)
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
(d)
fN
u,
v,
w (
dB
)
Figure 6-6. The power spectra of u, v and w components for different cylinder spacings
at (a, c): = 0°; (b, d): 45°.
T* = 3.0 T
* = 1.7
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
x
y
z
(a)
fN*
x
,
y
,
z
(dB
)
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
(c)
fN*
x
,
y
,
z
(dB
)
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
(b)
fN
x
,
y
,
z
(dB
)
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
(d)
fN
x
,
y
,
z
(dB
)
Figure 6-7. The power spectra of x, y, z components for different cylinder spacings
at (a, c): = 0°; (b, d): 45°.
166
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
0 10 20 30 40 50
T* = 3.0T* = 1.7
-6%
+6%
(degree)
St N
/St 0
Figure 6-8. Strouhal number StN for different cylinder spacings. The horizontal short
dashed lines represent the range of experimental uncertainty.
.
167
Figure 6-9. Phase-averaged vorticity components at different yaw angles for T* = 3.0. (a-d) *~
x ; (e-h) *~y ; (i-l) *~
z . (a-d) Contour interval =
0.05; (e-h) 0.02; (i-l) 0.10. = 2π corresponds to the (≡ Uc/f0). The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45°
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(a)-0.05 0.05
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(b)-0.15 0.10
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(c)0.15-0.20
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (d)-0.20 0.20
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(e)-0.100.08
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(f)0.10 -0.10
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(g)0.06 -0.12
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (h)-0.080.06
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)-0.700.50
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(j)0.50 -0.60
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(k)0.50 -0.60
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (l)-0.300.30
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
x
x
x
168
Figure 6-10. Phase-averaged vorticity components at different yaw angles for T* = 1.7. (a-d) *~
x ; (e-h) *~y ; (i-l) *~
z . (a-l) Contour interval
= 0.02. = 2π corresponds to the /2 (≡ Uc/2f0). The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45°
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(a)
-0.08 0.12
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(b)-0.06 0.06
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(c)-0.12 0.12
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(d)-0.06 0.06
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(e)
0.08 -0.06
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(f)0.04 -0.04
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(g)0.08 -0.08
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(h)0.06 -0.04
Frame 001 11 Nov 2010 Frame 001 11 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(i)-0.14 0.12
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(j)-0.06 0.08
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(k)-0.08 0.08
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(l)-0.06 0.04
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
x
x
x
x
x
x
169
Figure 6-11. Coherent vorticity contours *~z from phase-averaged *~u and *~v at different yaw angles for T
* = 3.0. (a-d) Contour interval =
0.1. = 2π corresponds to the (≡ Uc/f0). The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
Figure 6-12. Coherent vorticity contours *~z from phase-averaged *~u and *~v at different yaw angles for T
* = 1.7. (a-d) Contour interval =
0.04. = 2π corresponds to the /2 (≡ Uc/2f0). The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45° y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(a)
-0.8 0.5
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(b)-0.7 0.5
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(c)
0.4 -0.6
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (d)-0.3 0.3
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45°
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(a)
-0.36 0.20
Frame 001 31 Oct 2010 Frame 001 31 Oct 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(b)
-0.28 0.24
Frame 001 31 Oct 2010 Frame 001 31 Oct 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(c)
-0.24 0.16
Frame 001 31 Oct 2010 Frame 001 31 Oct 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1011.99999
-1
0
1
2
3
4(d)
-0.20 0.12
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
x
x
x
170
Figure 6-13. Phase-averaged sectional streamlines at different yaw angles for T*
= 3.0. = 2π corresponds to the (≡ Uc/f0). The open
circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
Figure 6-14. Phase-averaged sectional streamlines at different yaw angles for T* = 1.7. = 2π corresponds to the /2 (≡ Uc/2f0). The open
circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45° y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(a)
Frame 001 31 Oct 2010 Frame 001 31 Oct 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(b)
Frame 001 31 Oct 2010 Frame 001 31 Oct 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(c)
Frame 001 31 Oct 2010 Frame 001 31 Oct 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (d)
Frame 001 31 Oct 2010 Frame 001 31 Oct 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45°
y*
x
y
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
x
y
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
x
y
-2-1012-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
x
y
-2-1012-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 -1 -2 2 1 0 -1 -2
0
1
2
3
4
-1
(a) (b) (c) (d)
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
x
x
x
(a) (b) (c)
171
Figure 6-15. Phase-averaged incoherent vorticity contours at different yaw angles for T* = 3.0. (a-d) *2 xr ; (e-h) *2 yr ; (i-l)
*2 zr . (a-d) Contour interval = 0.1; (e-l) 0.2. = 2π corresponds to the (≡ Uc/f0). The open circle with a cross at the centre
x
represents cylinder.
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45° y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(a)1.3
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(b)
1.3
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(c)1.1
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.000030
1
2
3
4 (d)0.80
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(e)2.2
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(f)2.0
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(g)1.6
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (h)1.2
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)2.4
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(j)2.4
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(k)2.0
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (l)1.4
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
x
x
x
172
Figure 6-16. Phase-averaged incoherent vorticity contours at different yaw angles for T* = 1.7. (a-d) *2 xr ; (e-h) *2 yr ; (i-l)
*2 zr . (a-l) Contour interval = 0.1. = 2π corresponds to the /2 (≡ Uc/2f0). The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents
cylinder.
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45°
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(a)0.9
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(b)
0.8
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(c)
0.9
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(d)
0.8
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(e)
1.4
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(f)
1.4
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(g)
1.2
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(h)
1.1
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(i)
1.3
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(j)
1.3
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(k)1.2
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(l)
1.1
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
x
x
x
x
x
x
173
Figure 6-17. Phase-averaged velocities components at different yaw angles for T* = 3.0. (a-d) *~u ; (e-h) *~v ; (i-l) *~w . (a-d) Contour interval
= 0.02; (e-h) 0.04; (i-l) 0.01. = 2π corresponds to the (≡ Uc/f0). The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45° y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(a)-0.08 0.12
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(b)-0.08 0.12
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(c)-0.08 0.10
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (d)-0.04 0.06
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(e)-0.20 0.24
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(f)-0.20 0.20
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(g)-0.20 0.20
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (h)-0.16 0.16
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(j)-0.03 0.02
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(k)-0.04 0.04
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (l)-0.04 0.04
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
x
x
x
174
Figure 6-18. Phase-averaged velocities components at different yaw angles for T* = 1.7. (a-d) *~u ; (e-h) *~v ; (i-l) *~w . (a-d) Contour interval
= 0.005; (e-h) 0.01; (i-l) 0.005. = 2π corresponds to the /2 (≡ Uc/2f0). The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45°
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(a)0.065 -0.030
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(b)0.040 -0.005
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(c)-0.0100.045
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(d)0.025 0.005
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(e)-0.08 0.09
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(f)-0.05 0.05
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(g)0.06-0.06
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(h)
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4 (i)-0.030 0.030
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(j)-0.010 0.010
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(k)0.025-0.020
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(l)0.015 -0.010
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
x
x
x
x
x
x
175
Figure 6-19. Phase-averaged Reynolds stresses at different yaw angles for T* = 3.0. (a-d) **~~ vu ; (e-h) ** ~~ wu ; (i-l) ** ~~ wv . (a-d) Contour
interval = 0.002; (e-f) 0.0005; (g-l) 0.001. = 2π corresponds to the (≡ Uc/f0). The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents
cylinder.
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45° y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(a)-0.014 0.018
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(b)-0.012 0.018
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(c)-0.010 0.014
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (d)-0.004 0.006
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(e)-0.0020 0.0015
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(f)-0.0030 0.0015
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(g)-0.0045 0.0005
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (h)-0.0030 0.0005
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)0.006
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(j)-0.001 0.007
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(k)-0.003 0.006
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4 (l)-0.002 0.004
Frame 001 08 Jul 2010 Frame 001 08 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
x
x
x
176
Figure 6-20. Phase-averaged Reynolds stresses at different yaw angles for T* = 1.7. (a-d) **~~ vu ; (e-h) ** ~~ wu ; (i-l) ** ~~ wv . (a-d) Contour
interval = 0.0003; (e-h) 0.0001; (i) 0.0004; (j-l) 0.0002. = 2π corresponds to the /2 (≡ Uc/2f0). The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45°
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(a)
-0.0036 0.0030
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(b)-0.0006 0.0009
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(c)
-0.0009 0.0018
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(d)-0.0003 0.0003
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(e)-0.0012 0.0011
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(f)-0.0003 0.0003
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4 (g)-0.0003 0.0007
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(h)0.0003 -0.0001
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4 (i)0.0028 0.0024
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(j)
0.00040.0006
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(k)
0.0010 0.0014
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012
-1
0
1
2
3
4(l)0.0002
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
x
x
x
x
x
x
177
Figure 6-21. Phase-averaged incoherent Reynolds stresses at different yaw angles for T* = 3.0. (a-d)
**~~rr vu ; (e-h)
** ~~rr wu ; (i-l)
** ~~
rr wv . (a-l) Contour interval = 0.001. = 2π corresponds to the (≡ Uc/f0). The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents
cylinder.
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45° y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.000030
1
2
3
4(a)
-0.011 0.012
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(b)-0.009 0.011
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1011.999980
1
2
3
4(c)
-0.006 0.009
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.000030
1
2
3
4 (d)0.005 -0.003
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.000030
1
2
3
4(e)
-0.004 0.001
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(f)-0.003 0.002
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1011.999980
1
2
3
4(g)0.002-0.004
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.000030
1
2
3
4 (h)0.001 -0.004
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.000030
1
2
3
4(i)
0.007
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(j)0.007 0.001
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1011.999980
1
2
3
4(k)-0.0040.007
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.000030
1
2
3
4 (l)0.008 -0.005
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
x
x
x
178
Figure 6-22. Phase-averaged incoherent Reynolds stresses at different yaw angles for T* = 1.7. (a-d)
**~~rr vu ; (e-h)
** ~~rr wu ; (i-l)
** ~~rr wv . (a-
l) Contour interval = 0.001. = 2π corresponds to the /2 (≡ Uc/2f0). The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45°
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.00003
-1
0
1
2
3
4(a)-0.0090.011
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.00003
-1
0
1
2
3
4(b)
-0.0090.009
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1011.99998
-1
0
1
2
3
4(c)
-0.0050.008
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1011.99999
-1
0
1
2
3
4(d)
-0.0040.003
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.00003
-1
0
1
2
3
4(e)
-0.009-0.007
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.00003
-1
0
1
2
3
4(f)
-0.0060.002
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1011.99998
-1
0
1
2
3
4(g)
-0.0040.005
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1011.99999
-1
0
1
2
3
4(h)
-0.0030.003
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
y*
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.00003
-1
0
1
2
3
4(i)0.016
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1012.00003
-1
0
1
2
3
4(j)0.011
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1011.99998
-1
0
1
2
3
4(k)
0.017
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-1011.99999
-1
0
1
2
3
4(l)
0.012
Frame 001 03 Nov 2010 Frame 001 03 Nov 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
Phase
y/d
-2-10120
1
2
3
4(i)
++ +
X X
-0.02 0.02
Frame 001 07 Jul 2010 Frame 001 07 Jul 2010
(π) (π) (π) (π)
x
x
x
x
x
x
179
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45°
2*2*
2*,
~ ,ru
uu
0 1 2 3 4 50
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
(a)
Frame 001 10 Jul 2010 Frame 001 10 Jul 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
(a)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
(b)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
(c)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
(d)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
2*2*
2*,
~ ,rv
vv
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.02
0.04
0.06 (e)
Frame 001 10 Jul 2010 Frame 001 10 Jul 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.02
0.04
0.06 (e)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.02
0.04
0.06 (f)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.02
0.04
0.06 (g)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.02
0.04
0.06 (h)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
2*2*
2*,
~ ,r
ww
w
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
(i)
Frame 001 10 Jul 2010 Frame 001 10 Jul 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
(i)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
(j)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
(k)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
(l)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
**
**
**
,~
~ ,r
rv
uv
uv
u
0 1 2 3 4 5
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
(m)
Frame 001 09 Aug 2010 Frame 001 09 Aug 2010
0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
(m)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
(n)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
(o)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
(p)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
**
**
**
,~
~ ,r
rw
uw
uw
u
0 1 2 3 4 5
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
(q)
Frame 001 09 Aug 2010 Frame 001 09 Aug 2010
0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
(q)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
(r)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
(s)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
(t)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
**
**
**
,~
~ ,r
rw
vw
vw
v
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
(u)
Frame 001 09 Aug 2010 Frame 001 09 Aug 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
(u)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
(v)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
(w)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
0 1 2 3 4
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
(x)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
y* y
* y
* y
*
Figure 6-23. Time-averaged Reynolds stresses and their coherent and incoherent
contributions at different yaw angles for T* = 3.0. Time-averaged: ; Coherent: ;
Incoherent: . The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
x
x
x
x
180
= 0° = 15° = 30° = 45°
2*2*
2*,
~ ,ru
uu
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
(a)
Frame 001 10 Jul 2010 Frame 001 10 Jul 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
(a)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
(b)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
(c)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
(d)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
2*2*
2*,
~ ,rv
vv
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.02
0.04
0.06 (e)
Frame 001 10 Jul 2010 Frame 001 10 Jul 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.02
0.04
0.06 (e)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.02
0.04
0.06 (f)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.02
0.04
0.06 (g)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.02
0.04
0.06 (h)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
2*2*
2*,
~ ,r
ww
w
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
(i)
Frame 001 10 Jul 2010 Frame 001 10 Jul 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
(i)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
(j)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
(k)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
(l)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
**
**
**
,~
~ ,r
rv
uv
uv
u
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
(m)
Frame 001 09 Aug 2010 Frame 001 09 Aug 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
(m)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
(n)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
(o)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
(p)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
**
**
**
,~
~ ,r
rw
uw
uw
u
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
(q)
Frame 001 09 Aug 2010 Frame 001 09 Aug 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
(q)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
(r)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
(s)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
-0.004
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
(t)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
**
**
**
,~
~ ,r
rw
vw
vw
v
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
(u)
Frame 001 09 Aug 2010 Frame 001 09 Aug 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
(u)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
(v)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
(w)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
-1 0 1 2 3 4
0
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
(x)
Frame 001 14 Oct 2010 Frame 001 14 Oct 2010
y* y
* y
* y
*
Figure 6-24. Time-averaged Reynolds stresses and their coherent and incoherent
contributions at different yaw angles for T* = 1.7. Time-averaged: ; Coherent: ;
Incoherent: . The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
181
T* = 3.0 T
* = 1.7
2
2/
xx
-0.01
0
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0 1 2 3 4
= 0 = 15 = 30 = 45
(a)
2
2/
xx
-0.005
0
0.005
0.015
0.010
0.020
-1 0 1 2 3 4
(b)
2
2/
yy
-0.005
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0 1 2 3 4
(c)
2
2/
yy
-0.005
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
-1 0 1 2 3 4
(d)
2
2/
~z
z
-0.05
0
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0 1 2 3 4
(e)
2
2/
~z
z
-0.005
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
-1 0 1 2 3 4
(f)
y
* y
*
Figure 6-25. Coherent contribution to vorticity variances for different yaw angles. (a-b)
22/~
xx ; (c-d) 22
/~yy ; (e-f)
22/~
zz . The open circle with a cross at the centre
x represents cylinder.
x
x
x
182
183
CHAPTER 7
ON THE STUDY OF VORTEX-INDUCED VIBRATION OF
A CYLINDER WITH HELICAL STRAKES
7.1 Introduction
When vortices are shed from a bluff body, the latter is subjected to time-
dependent drag and lift forces. The lift force oscillates at the vortex shedding frequency
while the drag force oscillates at twice the vortex shedding frequency (Sumer and
Fredsøe, 1997). If the cylinder is flexibly-mounted, these forces may induce vibration of
the cylinder. The lift force may induce cross-flow vibrations and the drag force may
induce in-line vibrations. This phenomenon is called vortex-induced vibration (VIV)
(Blevins, 2001). Vortex-induced vibration of bluff structures is one of the key issues in
riser and pipeline designs. This is because VIV will increase not only the dynamic load
to the structures but will also influence the structural stability. The vibrations may cause
structural failure or accelerate the fatigue failure. The above factors may result in an
increase in capital investment of the structures and the expenses for maintenance and
replacement.
The VIV of a cylindrical structure depends on various parameters, such as
Reynolds number Re, Strouhal number St (≡ f0d/U∞, where f0 in the vortex shedding
frequency, d is the cylinder diameter and U∞ is the free-stream velocity in the
streamwise direction) and the reduced velocity Vr (U∞/fnd, where fn is the natural
frequency of the structure) etc. The mechanism of vortex shedding of a circular cylinder
and the oscillation related to it have been studied for more than a century and yet our
understanding is still far from complete even though much progress has been made
during the past several decades, both numerically and experimentally due to the
advances of the technologies in experiments and computing powers (Roshko, 1954;
Bearman, 1969; Sarpkaya, 1979; Zdravkovich, 1981; Williamson and Govardhan, 2004;
Carberry et al., 2005; Elston et al., 2006). The ultimate objective of studies on VIV is
the understanding, prediction, and prevention of VIV preferably without drag penalty.
Since VIV phenomenon is very complex to model, its prediction is challenging because
commercially available predictive tools have not been extensively calibrated with valid
184
experimental data. In many situations, these tools provide different answers for the same
problem. As a result, the level of confidence in VIV analysis is low and conservative
approaches by using high factors of safety are used in design of the pipelines and risers.
With offshore facilities being installed in increasingly deeper waters, such conservative
designs have also become increasingly economically untenable. VIV prevention or
mitigation is therefore critically important, as it will yield solutions that enable safe,
cost-effective and reliable deep-water project developments.
Suppression of vortex shedding and VIV of a bluff body has been one of the
most active topics of research and patenting in fluid dynamics for many decades due to
its significance in engineering applications. Previous investigations on passive control
devices to suppress VIV have contributed significantly to the fields of buildings, bridges
and marine engineering and yet there are difficulties in achieving an optimal balance
between performance, cost and simplicity. To prevent VIV lock-in, one can either
change the natural frequency of the structure by structural modification or to inhibit the
formation of vortices or to disrupt their structural formation, through the application of
the suppression devices. Suppression of vortex shedding and hence VIV can be
achieved by active methods (where external energy is supplied), passive methods
(where no external energy is supplied to control the flow), or a combination of the
above two methods. Helical strake is one of the most proven and widely used control
measures in various industrial and offshore applications to suppress VIV. It normally
contains three-start strakes helically wound on the surface of the structural member in a
definite fashion. The efficiency of VIV suppression using helical strakes depends on the
dimensions of the strakes, i.e. the height of the protrusion and the pitch of the helical.
Previous studies have shown that the optimal height of strakes for VIV suppression is
about 0.05 0.2d and a pitch of about 3.6 5d has generally been accepted as optimal,
though recent tests have shown that a pitch of 15d may be just as effective (Jones and
Lamb, 1992). Basically, it is believed that they adversely affect the shear layer to roll up
and to disrupt the spanwise vortex formation and shedding process (Scruton and
Walshe, 1963). As fluid flows past a cylinder with helical strakes, the strake chops up
the flow and creates vortices at various places along the cylinder. These vortices are out
of phase with one another and produce destructive interference to the dominant vortex
shedding. Due to partial cancellation of the out-of-phase lift forces at different spanwise
positions, the lift coefficient for the straked cylinder is much smaller than that of a bare
cylinder, resulting in a significant reduction in the amplitude of VIV. Even though
185
helical strakes are found effective in suppressing VIV for high damping values, the
effectiveness of VIV suppression using helical strakes for low mass-damping values is
reduced. Although Bearman and Branković (2004) did not find evidence of regular
Kármán-type vortex shedding close to the stationary cylinder attached with helical
strakes of 0.12d in height and 5d in pitch, an undulation of the wake was observed at
about 2 cylinder diameters downstream. However, when the straked cylinder is free to
respond for Vr larger than about 5 and the mass and damping are low, the flow pattern
changes significantly. The straked cylinder not only experienced the lock-in but also
exhibited 2S and 2P vortex shedding modes, which is similar to that for a bare cylinder.
These results are different from those reported by Constantinides and Oakley (2006) for
strakes of 0.25d in height and 15d in pitch, due mainly to the difference in strake
height. The latter authors showed that the helical strakes can suppress VIV nearly
completely over the lock-in range of the bare cylinder. They found that the vibration
amplitude of the straked cylinder increased monotonically with the increase of reduced
velocity, which was attributed to the effect of wake galloping. There was no organized
vortex observed in the straked cylinder wake. Their flow visualization suggested that
the separation point was at the tip of the strake for most of the coverage. The
helical separation point induces a three-dimensional flow behind the cylinder
breaking the vortex coherence. In certain locations where the strake tip is aligned
with the flow, either upstream or downstream, separation is partially controlled by the
cylinder surface. The other mechanism that helical strakes use to mitigate VIV is by
limiting the interaction between the two shear layers that are formed due to
separation (Constantinides and Oakley, 2006). The helical strakes act as
obstacles preventing the shear layers to communicate and form the typical vortices
we find in bare cylinder wakes.
Even though helical strakes are proven effective for suppressing VIV especially
for low mass-damping values, the mechanism of VIV suppression has not yet been fully
understood (Constantinides and Oakley, 2006). Therefore, the present study aims to
shed some light on the vortex characteristics and to enhance our understanding on the
mechanisms of helical strakes have on VIV suppression.
7.2 Experimental Details
The experiments were conducted in a low speed section of the boundary layer
wind tunnel of the University of Western Australia. The dimensions of the test section
186
used are 2,230 mm high by 2,870 mm wide. An aluminium cylinder with a diameter d
of 80 mm and a length l of 1,600 mm was used either as a bare cylinder or after the
installation of the helical strakes, as a straked cylinder. The three-start strakes have a
pitch P of 10d and height h of 0.12d (Figure 7-1), which is in the range of the most
effective dimension in VIV suppression (e.g. Kumar et al., 2008). The aspect ratio of
the cylinder l/d is 20. The mass of the bare cylinder is 3.035 kg and the mass of the
cylinder with strakes is 3.496 kg. At each end of the cylinder, a steel „O‟ ring fits snug
around the outer diameter and provides an attachment for two steel eye-loops from
which the springs are attached. Four steel springs, two at either end of the cylinder,
suspend the cylinder approximately 1,000 mm off the wind tunnel floor. The springs
were selected based on their stiffness and length. They must be stiff enough and long
enough to remain in tension when measuring the amplitude of vibrations. All four
springs were of an equal stiffness k = 1,680 N/m and equal original length of 250 mm.
The stiffness was measured by applying a known load to the springs and measuring the
subsequent deflection. Once the springs were attached to the cylinder, the top and
bottom springs stretched to a length of 340 mm and 330 mm, respectively.
The amplitude of the vibrations was measured using a linear variable differential
transformer (LVDT) laser. The laser was cantilevered off the frame‟s vertical member
and is positioned 130 mm above the cylinder. The vibration signals from the laser were
sampled into a computer in the form of voltages, which have been calibrated that 1 Volt
= 10 mm, at a frequency of 50 Hz by using Labview 7.1. The natural frequencies of the
bare cylinder and the straked cylinder are obtained from the free-decay tests.
Displacements from the cylinders after an initial displacement were recorded using the
LVDT at a frequency of 50 Hz. Spectrum was then obtained by applying fast Fourier
transform (FFT) to the time series of the measured signals. A strong peak on the
distribution of the spectrum corresponds to the natural frequency, which is identified as
6.6 Hz and 6.37 Hz, for the bare and straked cylinders, respectively.
Velocity fluctuations u in the streamwise (x-) and v in the transverse (y-)
directions are measured using X-wire probes. For the purpose to examine the spanwise
cross-correlations, two X-wire probes located at x/d = 5 and 10 and y/d = 0.5 were used
with one probe fixed and the other moving along the cylinder length direction. The
separation between the two probes was in the range of 10 mm – 250 mm. For the
purpose to examine the evolution of the vortices in the streamwise direction,
measurements using a single X-wire probe were conducted in the range of x/d = 5-40 at
187
four different free-stream velocities U∞, i.e. 1.92, 3.83, 5.74 and 7.65 m/s,
corresponding to Re = 10,240; 20,430; 30,610 and 40,800; respectively. The hot wires
were operated with in-house constant temperature circuits at an over heat ratio of 1.5.
Each of the two wires in the X-wire probe had a diameter of 5 m. The wire separation
was about 1 mm. The output signals from the anemometers were low-pass filtered
through the buck and gain circuits at a cut-off frequency fc = 0.5–9.2 kHz, depending on
the measurement location and free-stream velocity. The values of fc were determined by
examining the spectrum of ∂u/∂t and identifying the onset of electronic noise (Antonia
et al., 2002), which were normally close to the Kolmogorov frequency fK (≡ U/2π,
where is the Kolmogorov length scale and can be calculated using
4/13 )/( ). Hereafter, the angular brackets denote time-averaging. The mean
energy dissipation rate is defined as ijij ss 2 , where
2/)( ,, ijjiij uus is the rate of strain, is the kinematic viscosity and jiji xuu /, .
Strictly, the mean energy dissipation rate should be obtained by measuring all the
12 terms in its expression. However, this is not normally feasible unless using a multi-
hot wire probe (e.g. Vukoslavčević et al., 2009). On the other hand, even though we can
measure the 12 terms by using the multiple hot wire probes, there also exist limitations
on spatial resolution of the probe on the measured velocity gradients, which result in an
underestimation of (e.g. Antonia et al., 1998). Therefore, a very common method
for experimentalists is to use 2)/(15 xu by assuming isotropy and using
Taylor‟s hypothesis by replacing ∂x with Ut, where t ( 1/fs) is the sampling time
interval between two consecutive points and fs is the sampling frequency.
The filtered signals were sampled at a frequency fs = 2fc into a PC using a 1-bit
A/D converter (National Instrument). The sampling period was 60–120 seconds,
depending on the Reynolds numbers and measurement locations. Experimental
uncertainties in U and u′ (or v′) were inferred from the errors in the hot wire calibration
data as well as the scatter (20 to 1 odds) observed in repeating the experiment for a
number of times. The uncertainty for U was about ±3%, while the uncertainties for u′
and v′ were about ±5% and ±6%, respectively. The experimental uncertainty for St
(Uf0/d) depends on that of the velocity and the vortex shedding frequency
measurements. The vortex shedding frequency is identified using the fast Fourier
transform (FFT) algorithm with a window size of 211
. Its uncertainty depends on the
188
sampling frequency and the window size when doing FFT (Xu and Zhou, 2004). In the
present study, we estimated that the uncertainty for St was around 6%.
To further examine the differences of the vortex structures in the wakes of the
bare cylinder and the straked cylinder, flow visualization in a wind tunnel of 25 cm
(height) 40 cm (width) and 2 m (length) was also conducted using a smoke wire at a
Reynolds number of about 300. The diameter of the cylinder for this experiment was
12.7 mm. The dimensions of the strakes are comparable to the first experiment, i.e.
0.12d in height and 10d in pitch.
7.3 Results and Discussion
7.3.1 Vortex shedding frequency for the bare and straked cylinders
The vortex shedding frequency at various flow velocities were examined by
performing FFT to the velocity signals measured in the wake using the hot wire
anemometers. Before the cylinder starts to vibrate, vortex shedding from the cylinder is
apparent with a peak frequency corresponding to a Strouhal number of 0.21, which
agrees well with the consensus values published in the literature. Figure 7-3 gives an
example of the spectrum obtained on the centreline of the bare cylinder wake at x/d = 5
for Re = 20430. The peak height relative to the height of the plateau at low frequency is
about 22 dB. After the cylinder starts to vibrate, the energy spectrum peaks at the
natural frequency of the cylinder over the whole lock-in range. The peak frequencies on
the energy spectra at different reduced velocities are replotted in the form of the ratio
f0/fn versus reduced velocities (Figure 7-4). The ratio increases linearly with Vr until it
reaches the lock-in regime at a reduced velocity of about 5. Over the lock-in regime, the
ratio f0/fn keeps a constant value of 1. The straight line in the figure has a slope of 0.21
which corresponds to the Strouhal number. In contrast to the bare cylinder, there is only
a minor peak on the spectrum for the straked cylinder (Figure 7-3). Various locations in
the streamwise (x) direction as well as in the transverse (y) direction were tested and yet,
no apparent peak on the energy spectra which is as apparent as that for the bare cylinder
was identified. The peak height of the straked cylinder relative to the height of the
plateau at low frequency is 4 dB, which is only about 1/6 of that in the bare cylinder
wake. It can also be seen that the peak region on the spectrum of the straked cylinder is
broadened, suggesting that the intensity of the vortices shed from the straked cylinder is
significantly reduced compared with that from the bare cylinder.
189
7.3.2 Vortex-induced vibration for the bare and straked cylinders
In order to validate the current experimental setup, the dynamic response of a
single bare cylinder is tested first. The response of the cylinder can be described in
terms of the vibration amplitude A/d versus the reduced velocity Vr. The cylinder was
free to oscillate in y-direction. It was found that for each reduced velocity, the vibrations
take about 50 seconds to stabilise, after which the amplitude of vibration does not
change. A test of about 60 seconds was recorded after stable patterns of vibrations were
observed. The amplitudes of vibration were determined by averaging the 10% highest
peaks recorded on the time history of the displacement after the vibration becomes
stable (Hover et al., 2001; Franzini et al., 2009). The vibration response at different
reduced velocities were compiled and displayed in Figure 7-5 for the bare cylinder. It
can be seen that the maximum peak amplitude is about 0.51, occuring at a reduce
velocity of about 6.5, which is within the consensus range found in the literature (Sumer
and Fredsøe, 1997). Experimental results by Feng (1968) in air and Khalak and
Williamson (1996) and Franzini et al. (2009) (l/d = 24) in water are also included for
comparison. It can be seen that the response amplitudes in the present study follow that
of Feng‟s results closely, especially in the upper branch. The lock-in region in the two
studies is also very similar. This is reasonable as the mass damping parameter m*s in
the two studies are comparable, with m*s being about 0.26 in the present study and
0.255 in Feng (1968), where m* (≡ m/mf, with m being the structural mass including the
enclosed fluid mass and mf being the displaced fluid mass) is the mass ratio and s is the
structural damping factor, which can be obtained using )/ln()2/1( 1 nns yy from a
free decay test. The mass damping parameters m*s in Khalak and Williamson (1996)
and Franzini et al. (2009) are 0.013 and 0.0092, respectively, which are much smaller
than that in the present study and in Feng (1968). Correspondingly, the maximum
vibration amplitudes in Khalak and Williamson (1996) and Franzini et al. (2009) are
much larger than that in the latter two studies. There exist two apparent branches, i.e.
the upper branch and the lower branch. Also in the former studies with low mass
damping parameters, the onset of cylinder vibration occurs earlier and diminishes
later in amplitude than the latter two studies.
The maximum vibration amplitude Amax/d obtained in the present study can be
compared with that obtained using the empirical relations (e.g. Sumer and Fredsøe,
1997; Sarpkaya, 2004). Sumer and Fredsøe (1997) proposed that for stability parameter
190
Ks larger than 2, where Ks can be quantified using Ks = 4πm*s, the maximum vibration
amplitude can be estimated using
sKd
A 7.1max for Ks ≥ 2. (7-1)
Based on the mass ratio m* and the structural damping factor s, the stability parameter
Ks in the present study is about 3.27. This value results in a maximum amplitude Amax/d
of 0.52 for the bare cylinder, which agrees very well with the value obtained in the
experiment. By introducing another parameter, the so-called response parameter SG
(≡2π3St
2m
*s), Sarpkaya (2004) proposed another relationship for quantifying the
maximum vibration amplitude Amax/d, viz.
GSdA 35.012.1/max (7-2)
For a rigid circular cylinder, the dimensionless mode factor = 1.0. With SG = 0.712 in
the present study, the maximum amplitude Amax/d using Eq. (7-2) is estimated to be
about 0.53, which also agrees very well with the present experimental value (0.51). The
above results for the single cylinder have justified the present experimental arrangement
for the single cylinder-spring system.
The vibration response of the cylinder attached with helical strakes is then
tested. It is found that the strakes can suppress the vibration significantly. With the
strakes attached, the cylinder does not vibrate apparently over the same reduced velocity
range of the bare cylinder. In contrary to the response of the bare cylinder which
vibrates severely over the lock-in range, it seems that the cylinder attached with strakes
does not experience a lock-in range. Actually, the peak on the energy spectra measured
using hot wire probes downstream of the straked cylinder does not coincide with the
natural frequency of the straked cylinder (= 6.4 Hz), indicating that lock-in phenomena
does not occur. The vibration amplitudes increase with Vr, even though with very small
magnitude compared with that for the bare cylinder. The vibration amplitudes of the
cylinder with strakes are shown in Figure 7-6. Even at a reduced velocity of 15, the
cylinder does not show a reduction in vibration amplitude, as that observed for a bare
cylinder. This trend is consistent with that reported by Constantinides and Oakley
(2006) and Ding et al. (2004). They suggested that the increased vibration amplitude
with the increase of reduced velocity might be attributed to wake galloping rather than
the classical VIV. Also shown in the figure is the vibration amplitude of the bare
cylinder. Apparently, the strakes can reduce the vibration amplitude by 98%. The
191
present result on the vibration amplitude for the straked cylinder is in contrast with that
reported by Bearman and Branković (2004) cylinder attached with helical strakes,
probably due to the low damping ratios used in the latter study. These authors found that
VIV occurs over a narrower range of reduced velocity. The response characteristics,
especially for the lowest mass ratio, are surprisingly similar to those for a bare cylinder
with what may be a lower branch appearing. They also found that for the straked
cylinder, lock-in phenomena occurs and the vibration exhibited 2S and 2P modes with a
behaviour similar to that for the bare cylinder, although the amplitudes were smaller.
7.3.3 Energy spectra in the streamwise and spanwise directions of the stationary
cylinders
In order to understand the physical mechanism of how the strakes mitigate VIV
on a bare cylinder, energy spectra measured using hot wire probes are analyzed. In
Figure 7-7, the energy spectra obtained in the stationary bare and straked cylinder wakes
at x/d = 5, 10, 20 and 30 on the centreline for Re = 20,430 are compared in order to
examine the evolution of the vortex structures in the streamwise direction. It can be seen
that for the bare cylinder (Figure 7-7a), the peaks of the spectra are sharp and occur at
approximately a fixed frequency in the streamwise direction, which, after normalization
by U∞ and d, gives a Strouhal number St of 0.21, consistent with the consensus values
published in the literature. This result indicates that the vortex shed from the bare
cylinder is regular. Zhou et al. (2003) showed that the vortex structures generated from
the bare cylinder broke down and the intensity of the vortices reduced significantly in
the streamwise direction. At about x/d = 40, the vortex structures nearly disappear. The
present result agrees with this. At x/d = 40, there is no peak discernable (spectrum for
this location is not shown to avoid crowding the figure) and at x/d = 30, only a very
minor peak exists. The peak frequency variation at different locations, as indicated by
f in the figure, is about 0.2 Hz, which is only about 2% of the averaged vortex
shedding frequency f0. This value should be within the experimental uncertainty for the
detection of f0 and therefore f0 can be regarded as a constant value. However, on the
spectra of the straked cylinder wake (Figure 7-7b), the peak location is not a constant
value at different downstream locations. The Strouhal number St, based on the averaged
value of f0 at different locations, is about 0.14. This value is much smaller than that for a
circular cylinder ( 0.21) at the tested Reynolds number range but closer to the value of
St found in a flat plate wake (Roshko, 1954; Castro and Rogers, 2002). Since the strakes
resemble flat plates perpendicular to the flow, they increase the effective diameter of the
192
cylinder, which correspond to a lower consensus Strouhal number of about 0.164
(Roshko, 1954). The peak varies at different locations. The maximum difference of the
peak frequency f between x/d = 5 and 30 is about 2.3 Hz. This value corresponds to a
variation of 32% of the averaged peak frequency, which is too big to be attributed to the
experimental uncertainty in measuring fs. Rather, it may indicate a dislocation of the
vortices in the streamwise direction, which may be caused by the spanwise motion of
the fluid downstream of the straked cylinder since parts of the wake will be transported
laterally and arrive in the neighbouring region. This effect will also enhance the three-
dimensionality of the flow. Flow visualization using computational fluid dynamics
(CFD) (Constantinides and Oakley, 2006) showed significant spanwise motion and
swirling in the near wake of the strake. These authors found that the spanwise motion
in the wake is caused by the fluid being channeled by the strakes and also by the
separated fluid that induces a spanwise flow.
The variation of vortex shedding frequency along the cylinder axial direction
can also be examined. Figure 7-8 shows the spectra measured in the stationary bare and
straked cylinder wakes at different locations along the cylinder length. For the bare
cylinder, the peaks are sharp and occur at a fixed frequency along the cylinder length,
i.e. f0 ≈ 10 Hz, or with a wavelength L/d = 4.8. This result indicates that vortices are
shed from the bare cylinder at a fixed frequency even though they may be shed in cells
along the cylinder length at slightly shifted phase (see discussion for Figure 7-9 below).
In contrast, the peaks on the energy spectra in the straked cylinder wake do not occur at
a fixed frequency (Figure 7-8b). The averaged frequency f0 is about 8.6 Hz which
corresponds to a wavelength L/d of 5.55. The maximum difference among the peaks
along the cylinder length direction is about 3.06 Hz, which corresponds to a variation of
39% of the averaged vortex shedding frequency. The variations of the vortex shedding
frequency in the energy spectra was also shown in the wake of wavy plate model by
Bearman and Owen (1998). The variations of near-wake width (Owen and Bearman,
2001) and the separation points (Constantinides and Oakley, 2006) along the cylinder
axis may contribute to the inconsistency of the peaks in the energy spectra along the
straked cylinder axis. The near-wake width and the separation points depend on the
cylinder surface i.e. the tip of the strakes and the alignment of the strake tip with the
flow (Constantinides and Oakley, 2006). The peak in Figure 7-8b at fd/U∞ = 0.21 (for
z/d = 1.25) corresponds to the separation at the cylinder surface while that at fd/U∞ =
0.14 (for z/d = 0.125 and 3.125) correspond to separation from the tips of the strakes,
193
which resemble the wake of a flat plate. This mechanism of the straked cylinder is in
contrast to the bare cylinder for which the flow separation points along the span are
more or less fixed, resulting in a coherent vortex shedding (Constantinides and Oakley,
2006). Using the spanwise vorticity iso-surface, Constantinides and Oakley (2006)
showed the separation lines and the disorganized vorticity in the straked cylinder
wake. The wake has a strong three-dimensional character without any coherent vortex
structures. This result may indicate that the strakes have disrupted the large-scale
structures from the cylinder. Bearman and Branković (2004) suggested that the three-
dimensionality of the separating flow introduced by the strakes could destroy the
regular vortex shedding and hence suppress the VIV of the cylinder.
Previous studies have shown that there is a phase shift among the vortex
structures shed from a bare cylinder (e.g. Roshko, 1954; Szepessy, 1994; Alam et al.,
2002; Fujisawa et al., 2004; So et al., 2005; Xu et al., 2008). To examine the phase shift
between the vortex structures, time series of the fluctuating quantities such as the
pressure, velocity or vorticity at a point may not show the phase variation along the
cylinder axis clearly. For this purpose, the cross-correlation coefficient of velocity or
pressure measured at two points along the cylinder axis as a function of time delay can
be used. This method has been used previously by a number of researchers (e.g.
Szepessy, 1994; Fujisawa et al., 2004; So et al., 2005; Xu et al., 2008). The cross-
correlation between two velocity signals measured at two points separated by a distance
z along the cylinder axial direction as a function of time delay is defined as
21
21
),(),()( 21
,vv
vv
tzzvtzvR
(7-3)
where 1v
and 2v are the standard deviations of the velocity components v1 and v2,
respectively. The cross-correlation coefficients measured in the stationary bare and
straked cylinder wakes for Re = 20,430 as a function of time delay are shown in Figure
7-9. It can be seen that there is a very small phase difference among the dominant
vortex structures for the bare cylinder (Figure 7-9a). The maximum phase difference is
about 0.25d over a spanwise length of 3.125d, which corresponds to 0.1π. This
behaviour of the vortical structures in the bare cylinder wake may imply a large
dynamic force induced on the cylinder and hence a large response in VIV. In contrast,
the phase variation of the velocity signals in the straked cylinder wake is apparent at all
probe separations (Figure 7-9b). The maximum phase variation is about 1.8d, which
194
corresponds to 0.65π. This result implies a significant phase variation of the vortical
structures along the spanwise direction in the vortex shedding process. It may suggest
that helical strakes prevent the vortex from being correlated along the spanwise
direction, in agreement with Bearman and Branković (2004). The variation in phase is
because of the different geometry of the helical strakes along the cylinder spanwise
direction (i.e. position of the helical strakes and the tip location of the strakes). The
above results confirm that the strakes do not necessarily suppress vortex shedding
from the cylinder but strongly disorganise the vortices, resulting in an apparent
reduction in VIV.
7.3.4 Cross-correlations in the stationary cylinder wakes
It has been demonstrated that in the turbulent wake regimes, vortices are shed in
cells in the cylinder axis direction (e.g. Williamson, 1996b). These cells are out-of-
phase. The averaged length of the cells is termed as the correlation length (Sumer and
Fredsøe, 1997). It can be quantified by measuring the spanwise variation of the cross-
correlation coefficients defined as
21
21
)()()( 21
,
aa
aa
zzazaz
(7-4)
where a and b represent velocity component u or v at two points separated along the
length of the cylinder by a distance z, and represents standard deviations of a1 and
a2. The cross-correlation can be used to quantify the three-dimensional flow
characteristics of the vortical structures in the wake of the cylinder in the spanwise
direction. Using two X-probes, with one probe being stationary to measure u and v at
location 1, and the other being movable to measure u and v at location 2 separated in the
spanwise direction by z, the cross-correlation coefficient between velocity component
u or v of the two probes can be calculated. The correlation length is then calculated
using the following integral:
dzzLz
aaaa )(0
2121 0 ,,
(7-5)
where z0 is the separation at which 21,aa first zero crossing.
The cross-correlation coefficients between a1 and a2 are shown in Figure 7-10. It
can be seen that all the cross-correlation coefficients decrease with the increase of probe
separation. In both wakes, )(21, zvv is larger than )(
21, zuu , indicating that v is more
195
representative to the large-scale structures than u. The magnitude of )(21, zvv in the
bare cylinder wake is much larger than that in the straked cylinder wake, indicating that
the vortical flow structures in the wake of the bare cylinder are larger than that in the
straked cylinders. Indeed, if Eq. (7-5) is used to determine the correlation length, it is
found that 21 ,vvL in the bare cylinder wake is about 2.1d. This value agrees well with
that found by Sumer and Fredsøe (1997) for the same range of Reynolds number as in
the present study. In contrast, the correlation length 21 ,vvL for the straked cylinder is
only about 0.44d, which is much smaller than that obtained in the bare cylinder wake.
This result suggests that the strakes have successfully disrupted the vortical structures in
the spanwise direction and thus enhancing the three-dimensionality of the flow. This
result is in agreement with that proposed by Bearman and Branković (2004), who
argued that the strakes do not necessarily suppress vortex shedding but they prevent
the shedding from becoming correlated along the span.
7.3.5 Flow visualization of the stationary cylinder wakes
To further examine the differences of the large-scale structures in the wakes of
the bare cylinder and the straked cylinder, flow visualization in a wind tunnel was
conducted using a smoke wire at a Reynolds number of about 300. For the bare cylinder
wake (Fig. 11a), the large organized vortices can be seen clearly with two rows of
counter-rotating vortex structures connected by the streamwise structures. The
formation length of the wake is about 2d (Unal and Rockwell, 1988). For the straked
cylinder wake (Fig. 11b), the separation point occurs either at the tip of the strakes or on
the surface of the cylinder, generating two shear layers. Small-scale Kelvin-Helmholtz
vortices are formed in the shear layers. However, these structures do not interact with
each other until x/d is larger than about 10. This flow characteristics are similar to the
wake of a circular cylinder fitted with surface bumps (Owen and Bearman, 2001). This
result also supports the numerical simulations on circular cylinder fitted with three-
strand helical strakes by Contantinides and Oakley (2006), who found that the strakes
limit the interaction between the two shear layers and hence prevented the formation of
the large organized vortices. In the near wake, swirling flow towards the leeward side is
also found. Flow visualization on the x-z plane (photos are not shown here) also reveals
that the smoke moves along the cylinder spanwise direction, indicating a strong velocity
component in the spanwise direction. It is expected that this velocity component helps
destroying the organized structures, dislocating the vortex structures which is in
196
agreement with the result shown in Figure 7-8b, forming a much stronger 3D wake than
that for a bare cylinder, resulting in a significant reduction in vibration response for the
straked cylinder.
7.3.6 Isotropy assessments in the wake of stationary cylinders
As the strakes have effectively disrupted the large organized structures in the
wake of the straked cylinder, it is therefore expected that the energy containing
structures in the straked cylinder wake should be smaller than that in the bare cylinder
wake. As a result, the flow field of the former should agree more favourably with
isotropy than the latter. This is true as the ratio 22 / uv in the former wake is
closer to 1 than the latter, irrespective of the downstream locations. Isotropy requires
that 22 / uv be 1. The ratio at different downstream locations for stationary
body of bare cylinder and straked cylinder wakes are given in Table 7-1. It can be seen
clearly that for the bare cylinder wake, 22 / uv is far from 1. Even in the far
wake, Browne et al. (1987) (at x/d = 420) and Zhu and Antonia (Zhu and Antonia,
1999) (at x/d = 240 found that the ratio 22 / uv is only around 0.73, indicating
that the effect of the large organized structures persists for a long time. A measure to
check the departure from isotropy for various turbulent scales is provided by comparing
the measured spectrum of transverse or spanwise velocity component with that
calculated based on the isotropic assumption. For isotropic turbulence, the relationship
between the streamwise and transverse (or spanwise) velocity spectra is (Zhu and
Antonia, 1995):
)(2
1)()(
1
111k
kkk uu
cal
w
cal
v
(7-6)
where the superscript cal represents “calculation” and k1 is the wavenumber. In Eq.
(7-6), the longitudinal velocity spectra u measured on the centreline at different
streamwise locations are used as the input for the calculation of v or u. The
distributions of mv , cal
v and the ratio m
v
cal
v at different streamwise locations and
different Reynolds numbers in the straked and bare cylinder wakes are shown in Figures
7-12 and 7-13, respectively, where the superscript m represents “measured” and the
superscript asterisk denotes normalization by Kolmogorov length scale and/ or
velocity scale UK ( /). When isotropy is satisfied, m
v
cal
v should be 1 at all scales.
At x/d = 10 of the straked cylinder wake (Figure 7-12a), the departure from isotropy for
197
scales k1* < 0.01 is apparent. The peak at k1
* = 0.004 is due to the vortex shedding. With
the increase of Re, the peak decreases and shifts towards the lower wavenumber region.
For wavenumbers higher than 0.01, there is satisfactory agreement between
measurement and calculation, indicating satisfactory agreement with isotropy at these
scales. The upturn at around k1* = 1 is caused by the imperfect spatial resolution of the
X-wire probe (Zhu and Antonia, 1995). At x/d = 20 (Figure 7-12b), the dependence of
the ratio on Reynolds number is comparable to that at x/d = 10. The magnitude of the
ratio at the vortex shedding frequency is still very apparent. Similar to that at x/d = 10,
the peak shifts to lower wavenumbers as Re increases. At x/d = 30 and 40, vortex
shedding is not as apparent as that at x/d = 10 and 20. The peaks in Figure 7-12 (c, d)
are much less apparent. The distribution of m
v
cal
v is quite flat and close to the
horizontal line of 1mv
calv at all wavenumbers. The results shown in Figure 7-12
indicate that the turbulent structures in the straked cylinder wakes agree well with
isotropy except in the region x/d 20, which is consistent with the results shown in
Table 7-1.
The vortex shedding phenomena in the bare cylinder wake at x/d 20 is very
apparent (Figure 7-13a, b). As a result, the ratio m
v
cal
v at these two locations departs
significantly from the isotropic value for scales larger than the most energy containing
structures. It is true that at these two locations, the values of the ratio 22 / uv
are 1.89 and 1.4, respectively (Table 7-1). With the increase of Reynolds number, the
peak reduces and shifts to the lower values of the wavenumbers, indicating that the
influence from the large organized structures to the smaller scale turbulent structures
become less dominated as Reynolds number increases. With the evolution of the
downstream locations, the influence from the large-scale structures persists, as reflected
by the apparent departure from 1mv
calv at the small wavenumber region
(corresponding to the large-scale structures). Even at x/d = 40 where the large-scale
structures disappear due to vortex break down (e.g. Zhou et al., 2003), the ratio m
v
cal
v
is far from 1 for k1* < 0.04, reflecting the departure from isotropy even when there is no
apparent large organized structures detected at this location. From Figures 7-12 and 7-
13, it can be inferred that the turbulent structures in the straked cylinder comply more
with isotropy than that in the bare cylinder wake. With the evolution of the downstream
198
locations, vortex structures break down and the ratio m
v
cal
v in the straked cylinder
wake complies more favourably with isotropy than in the bare cylinder wake.
7.4 Conclusions
In the present study, the effect and mechanism of three-strand helical strakes
with a dimension of 10d in pitch and 0.12d in height on VIV suppression are studied
experimentally in a wind tunnel. For the bare cylinder, lock-in occurs over the range of
reduced velocity of 5~8.5 with the maximum vibration amplitude of 0.51. This value
agrees well with that estimated using the empirical relation. However, after three-start
helical strakes are attached to the cylinder, vortex shedding is not apparent and lock-in
phenomena of the cylinder does not occur. The vibration amplitude of the cylinder is
suppressed by 98%.
The peak frequency on the energy spectra is very stable for the bare cylinder
both in the streamwise and in the spanwise directions. In contrast, the peak frequency on
the spectra of the straked cylinder wake varies significantly in both directions. The
separation points from the straked cylinder may contribute to the variation of the peak
frequency in the spanwise direction, which are controlled either by the strake tips or by
the cylinder surface. The strakes increase the effective diameter of the cylinder since
they behave like flat plates perpendicular to the flow, which corresponds to a lower
consensus value of St.
The generation of spanwise flow by the strakes could explain the streamwise
variations of frequency, since parts of the wake will be transported laterally and arrive
in a neighbouring region, causing a variation of frequency in the streamwise direction.
These results suggest that the strakes do not necessarily suppress vortex shedding, but
the wake is strongly disorganized as the helical strakes prevent the vortex from being
correlated along the span, hence is not able to excite VIV significantly. Flow
visualization results for the straked cylinder support the expectation that helical strakes
are able to disrupt the formation of the vortex structures and reduce the strength of the
vortices resulting in a significant reduction in vibration response for the straked
cylinder.
The cross-correlation coefficient in the straked cylinder wake is much smaller
than that in the bare cylinder wake. The correlation length of the vortical structures in
the former is only about 1/4 of the latter. As a result, the straked cylinder wake agrees
199
better with isotropy than that in the bare cylinder wake. This is verified by the
comparison of the measured transverse velocity spectra with the calculation based on
isotropy.
200
Table 7-1. Velocity ratio 22 / uv at different downstream locations in the
stationary bare and straked cylinder wakes.
x/d
22 / uv 5 10 20 30 40
Straked cylinder 0.96 1.33 1.23 1.07 0.99
Bare cylinder 1.89 1.4 0.78 0.71 0.7
201
Pitch length
Heightd
y
z
Pitch length
Heightd
y
z
Figure 7-1. Geometry of the cylinder with three-strand helical strakes and definition of
the coordinate system.
Figure 7-2. Experimental setup of the straked cylinder.
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
straked cylinder
bare cylinder
fd/U
v(f
) (d
B)
Figure 7-3. Velocity spectra in the wake of the stationary bare and straked cylinders on
the centreline at x/d =5 for Re = 20430.
202
0
1
2
3
4
0 5 10 15
Slope = 0.21
Vr
f 0/f
n
Figure 7-4. Vortex shedding frequency from the bare cylinder normalized by the natural
frequency.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 5 10 15
Upper branch
Lower branch
Vr
A/d
Figure 7-5. Comparison of vibration response of a bare cylinder. ▼: Present; : Khalak
and Williamson (1997); : Franzini et al. (2009); : Feng (1968).
203
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 5 10 15 20 25V
r
A/d
Figure 7-6. Comparison of vibration response between bare cylinder and straked
cylinder. Present bare cylinder: ▼; Present straked cylinder: ; Straked cylinder by
Ding et al. (2004): ; Straked cylinder by Constantinides and Oakley (2006): .
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.01 0.1 1 10
x/d = 5
10
20
30
(a)
f=0.2Hz
fd/U
v(f
)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.01 0.1 1 10
x/d = 5
10
20
30
(b)
f=2.2Hz
fd/U
v(f
)
Figure 7-7. Energy spectra obtained on the centreline at different streamwise locations
for Re = 20430 in the stationary bare and straked cylinder wakes. (a) Bare cylinder; (b)
Straked cylinder.
204
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.01 0.1 1 10
z/d = 0.1251.252.53.125
(a)
fd/U
v(f
)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.01 0.1 1 10
z/d = 0.1251.252.53.125
fd/U
(b)f=3.20Hz
v(f
)
Figure 7-8. Energy spectra obtained at different spanwise locations in the stationary
bare and straked cylinder wakes at x/d =5 for Re = 20430. (a) Bare cylinder wake; (b)
Straked cylinder wake.
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
-10 -5 0 5 10
z/d = 3.125
z/d = 2.5
z/d = 1.25z/d = 0.125
(a) Bare cylinder wake
tU/d
Rv
1,v
2(
)
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
-10 -5 0 5 10
z/d = 3.125
z/d = 2.5
z/d = 1.25
z/d = 0.125
(b) Straked cylinder wake
tU/d
Rv
1,v
2(
)
Figure 7-9. Cross-correlation coefficients in the stationary bare and straked cylinder at
x/d =5 for Re = 20430. (a) Bare cylinder wake; (b) Straked cylinder wake.
205
-0.2
0.2
0.6
1.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
u
1,u
2
(straked cylinder)
v
1,v
2
(straked cylinder)
u
1,u
2
(bare cylinder)
v
1,v
2
(bare cylinder)
z/d
u
1,u
2
(z),
v
1,v
2
(z)
Figure 7-10. Cross-correlation coefficients of the velocity components in the stationary
bare and straked cylinder wakes obtained at x/d =5 for Re = 20430.
(a) Bare cylinder
(b) Straked cylinder
Figure 7-11. Flow visualization of the bare and straked cylinder wakes.
206
10-2
100
102
104
106
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Re = 10240
20430
30610
40800
calv
mv
(a) x/d=10
k1*
u(k
1*),
v(k
1*),
vm
/vca
l
10-2
100
102
104
106
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Re = 10240
20430
30160
40800
calv
mv
(b) x/d = 20
k1*
u(k
1*),
v(k
1*),
vm
/vca
l
10-3
10-1
101
103
105
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Re = 10240
20430
30610
40800
calv
mv (c) x/d = 30
k1*
u(k
1*),
v(k
1*),
vm
/vca
l
10-3
10-1
101
103
105
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Re = 10240
20430
30610
40800
calv
mv
(d) x/d = 40
k1*
u(k
1*),
v(k
1*),
vm
/vca
l
Figure 7-12. Velocity spectra calv and m
v and the ratio calv
mv / between the measured
and calculated transverse velocity spectra in the stationary straked cylinder wake at
various downstream locations and Reynolds numbers.
207
10-2
100
102
104
106
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Re = 10240
20430
30610
40800
calv
mv
(a) x/d = 10
k1*
u(k
1*),
v(k
1*),
vm
/vca
l
10-3
10-1
101
103
105
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Re = 10240
20430
30610
40800
calv
mv
(b) x/d = 20
k1*
u(k
1*),
v(k
1*),
vm
/vca
l
10-3
10-1
101
103
105
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Re = 10240
20430
30610
40800
m
v
cal
v (c) x/d = 30
k1
*
u(k
1*),
v(k
1*),
vm
/vca
l
10-3
10-1
101
103
105
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Re = 10240
20430
30610
40800
mv
calv (d) x/d = 40
k1*
u(k
1*),
v(k
1*),
vm
/vca
l
Figure 7-13. Velocity spectra calv and m
v and the ratio calv
mv / between the measured
and calculated transverse velocity spectra in the stationary bare cylinder wake at various
downstream locations and Reynolds numbers.
209
CHAPTER 8
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
8.1 Summary of Findings
Several experimental studies on the turbulent structures in the wakes of a
circular cylinder and a pair of circular cylinders have been carried out and discussed in
this thesis. There are two types of circular cylinders, namely, bare cylinder and helical
straked cylinder. The results from the experimental studies of both types of cylinders are
compared to evaluate the mechanisms induced by the helical strakes as a passive
method in mitigating the vortex-induced vibration (VIV). General conclusions are
summarised as follows.
In Chapter 2, three-dimensional vorticity in the wake of a yawed stationary
circular cylinder was measured simultaneously using a multi-hot wire vorticity probe
over a streamwise range of x/d = 10-40. It was shown that the U and W magnitudes
increased with , indicating a reduction of the wake width and the increase of three-
dimensionality of the wake flow. The vortex is weakened with increasing as shown in
the decrease of all three vorticity components as is increased. The IP is applicable to
the wake when < 40. When is smaller than 40, the Strouhal number StN is
approximately constant within the experimental uncertainty. The intensity of vortex
shedding is reduced and the frequency region is dispersed with increasing . This is
caused by the break-down of the large organized structures at large . The
autocorrelation coefficients u and v of the u and v velocity signals show apparent
periodicity for all yaw angles. With increasing , u and v decrease and approach
zero quickly. In contrast, the autocorrelation coefficient w of w increases with in the
near wake, implying an enhanced three-dimensionality of the wake.
Chapter 3 provided analysis and discussion on the dependence of the wake
vortical structures on cylinder yaw angle (= 0-45) in the intermediate region (x/d =
10) using a phase-averaged technique. The technique is used to analyze the velocity and
vorticity signals and to obtain the coherent and incoherent contours. For all yaw angles,
the phase-averaged velocity and vorticity contours display apparent Kármán vortices.
210
When is smaller than 15, the maximum coherent concentrations of the three vorticity
components do not vary with. However, when = 45, there are large reductions of
about 33% and 50% in the maximum concentrations of the coherent transverse and
spanwise vorticity components respectively while that of the streamwise vorticity
increases by about 70%. This result suggests that at large yaw angles, the strength of the
Kármán vortex shed from the yawed cylinder decreases and the three-dimensionality of
the flow is enhanced. The maximum coherent concentrations of u and v contours
decrease by more than 20% while that of w increases by 100%. Correspondingly, the
coherent contributions to the velocity variances 2u and 2v decrease, while that
of 2w increases. These results indicate the generation of the secondary axial
vortices in yawed cylinder wakes when is larger than 15. The incoherent vorticity
contours 2xr are stretched along an axis inclining to the x-axis at an angle in the
range of 60-25 for = 0-45. The magnitudes of *2 xr and *2 yr through
the saddle points are comparable with the maximum concentration of the coherent
spanwise vorticity *~z at all cylinder yaw angles, supporting the previous speculation
that the strength of the rib-like structures in the cylinder wake is about the same as that
of the spanwise structures, even in the yawed cylinder wakes.
Further investigation on a yawed circular cylinder wake in the aspect of
streamwise evolution (x/d = 10-40) by using phase-averaging method was presented
in Chapter 4. Similar wake characteristics to those at x/d = 10 were found at x/d = 20.
At x/d = 20 when increases from 0° to 45°, the maximum of coherent streamwise
vorticity increases by about 2 times while that of the spanwise vorticity decreases by
about 17% compare with that of 0°. The results may suggest the impaired spanwise
vortices and the enhancement of the three-dimensionality of the wake with increasing
.. At x/d = 40, the maximum concentration of the coherent spanwise vorticity remains
about 5.0%, 6.3%, 10.0% and 12.5% of that at x* = 10 for = 0°, 15°, 30° and 45°,
respectively, indicating a slower streamwise decay rate of coherent spanwise vorticity
for larger . The slower decaying rate in the streamwise direction at larger can be
ascribed to the larger streamwise spacing between spanwise vortices at larger
resulting in a weak interaction between the vortices. For all yaw angles tested, the
coherent contribution to 2v is remarkable at x/d = 10 and 20, and
significantly larger than that to 2u and 2w . This contribution to all three
211
Reynolds normal stresses becomes negligibly small at x/d = 40. The coherent
contribution to 2u and 2v decays slower as moving downstream for a larger ,
consistent with the slow decay of the coherent spanwise vorticity for a larger .
In Chapter 5, the three-dimensional velocity and vorticity characteristics at the
downstream locations x/d = 10 of a yawed circular cylinder with (= 0-45) was
analyzed using the wavelet multiresolution method. The wavelet multiresolution method
is a linear decomposition process to convert a signal into a sum of a number of wavelet
components at different scales. The velocity and vorticity signals are decomposed into
17 wavelet levels where higher wavelet levels correspond to lower frequency bands or
larger scale structures while lower wavelet levels correspond to higher frequency bands
or small-scales structures. It is shown that IP is applicable for < 40 as the ratio of
normalized central frequency for the wavelet level 6 (located at the vortex shedding
frequency band) at larger to that of = 0 0
/ NN ff are far from 1. The maximum
energy of the energy spectra for intermediate- (wavelet levels 4 and 5) and large-scale
structures and decrease and the spectra disperse widely over an enlarged frequency band
with increasing . At = 45, the existence of vortex dislocations in the wake region is
apparent in the velocity variances results where with the increase of to 45°, the
2
iv magnitude for wavelet level 7 and 2
iw magnitude for level 6 at y/d 1
increase apparently compared with that at = 0°.The result may also be related with the
generation of the secondary axial vortex structures which in return enhance the three-
dimensionality of the turbulent wake at large yaw angles. The dominant contributors to
the Reynolds stresses at all yaw angles are the large-scale structures and followed by the
intermediate-scale structures while the three vorticity components are mostly dominated
by the small- and intermediate-scale structures and has the smallest values at large-scale
structures. The generation of the secondary axial and streamwise vortices at = 45° are
shown in the flow visualization results where the former propagate along the cylinder
axial direction and disrupt the formation of the Kármán type vortex structures, resulting
in enhanced three-dimensionality of the wake. It may suggest that the occurrence of the
vortex dislocation also responsible to the disruption of the large-scale structures.
Chapter 6 demonstrated an investigation on the wake flow behind two yawed
cylinders arranged side-by-side which has been done by measuring all three velocity
and vorticity components using an eight-hotwire vorticity probe in the intermediate
region (x/d = 10) at a Reynolds number of 7200. The stationary cylinders were tested at
212
four yaw angles (), namely, 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° for two centre-to-centre cylinder
spacings T, which are 3.0d and 1.7. For large cylinder spacing T* = 3.0, it was shown
that the IP may be implemented to the wake. A single peak is observed in the transverse
velocity spectrum which corresponds to the Strouhal number. The Strouhal number for
T* = 3.0 is larger than that of a T
* = ∞ (a single cylinder) at all yaw angles. The distance
between vortices for T* = 3.0 in lateral direction is about 3d. As the phase-averaged
velocity and vorticity contours for T* = 3.0 at y
* ≥ 1.5 are qualitatively comparable with
those for T* = ∞ at y
* ≥ 0, it may confirm that the wake for T
* = 3.0 behaves as that of
an independent and isolated cylinder. Although the wake behind two cylinders for T* =
3.0 has two distinct vortex street and each street has the same qualitative trend to the
single cylinder street, the maximum magnitudes for the coherent contribution to the
three vorticity variances components for T* = 3.0 are smaller than those for T
* = ∞.
When is increased from 0° to 45°, *~x magnitude increases rapidly while the *~
z
magnitude decreases. This result suggests that the T* = 3.0 wake experienced the
occurrence of the vortex dislocation or the existence of the secondary axial vortices at
large . For the intermediate cylinder spacing T* = 1.7, a single peak is observed in the
velocity spectrum. The peak represents a single vortex street in the wake and not a wide
and a narrow wakes, as been observed in some previous studies, mostly at around x/d
5. It is suggested that in the intermediate region (x/d = 10) the vortex structures
regeneration or evolution may not be completed yet, while those in the narrow wake is
probably diminished before the downstream location. The IP is applicable to the wake
when < 40°. The *W magnitudes are not equal to zero for all yaw angles. The result
indicates that the vortex in the wake is in inclined position and the wake may have an
impaired two-dimensional wake even at = 0°, which may be caused by the vortex
evolution. The vorticity contours for T* = 1.7 have a more organized pattern at = 0°
while become scattered and weaker in strength with the increase of . When = 45°,
the maximum magnitudes of all three vorticity contours are similar suggesting that the
wake has perfectly three-dimensional vortices. The vorticity contours for T* = 1.7 are
less organized and are the weakest compared with those for T* = ∞ and 3.0.
A study on the mechanism of VIV mitigation using helical strakes was presented
in Chapter 7. A rigid circular cylinder of diameter d = 80 mm attached with three-strand
helical strakes of a dimension of 10d in pitch and 0.12d in height was tested in a wind
tunnel. It was shown that while the bare cylinder experienced a lock-in phenomenon
213
over the range of reduced velocity of 5~8.5 with maximum vibration amplitude of 0.51,
the straked cylinder did not experience any lock-in. The vibration amplitude of the
straked cylinder is suppressed by about 98% compared to that of the bare cylinder. The
peak frequency of the energy spectra of the bare cylinder is apparent while that of the
straked cylinder varies significantly in streamwise and the spanwise direction. It may be
caused by the separation points from the straked cylinder which controlled either by the
strake tips or by the cylinder surface. It may also suggest that the generation of spanwise
flow by the strakes affect the frequency variations in the streamwise direction. Some
parts of the wake will be transported laterally and arrive in a neighbouring region hence
causing a variation of frequency in the streamwise direction. These results suggest that
the strakes do not necessarily suppress vortex shedding, but the wake is strongly
disorganized as the helical strakes prevent the vortex from being correlated along the
span, hence is not able to excite VIV significantly. The dominant frequency of the
vortex structures along the axial direction differs by about 36% of the averaged peak
frequency over a length of 3.125d. This is supported by the phase difference between
the velocity signals measured at two locations separated in the spanwise direction. The
correlation length of the vortex structures in the bare cylinder is much larger than that
obtained in the straked cylinder wake. Therefore, the straked cylinder wake agrees
better with isotropy than the bare cylinder wake, which is supported by the comparison
of the measured transverse velocity spectra with the calculation based on isotropy.
8.2 Recommendations for Future Research
According to the literature review and the present study, several
recommendations for future work are drawn as below:
i) This study did not study the effect of Reynolds numbers on the turbulent
structures. Such comparisons are recommended to improve understanding in the
vortex shedding mechanisms in the wake behind a yawed cylinder.
ii) The effect of yaw angles on the suppression of vortex-induced vibration using
straked cylinder need to be studied. Future work may include this as it may be
interesting to investigate the wake characteristics of yawed straked cylinder.
iii) The wake characteristics of two straked cylinders in side-by-side arrangement
also could be done in the future. No work has been done in this context. They
may be different from that of the bare cylinders.
214
iv) All experiments in this thesis have been done in a wind tunnel. These results in
air may be different from that in a water tunnel, especially when VIV
suppression is concerned. Therefore, it may be interesting to include this in the
future study.
215
REFERENCES
Alam, M.M., Moriya, M., Takai, K. and Sakamoto, H. 2002. Suppression of fluid forces
acting on two square prisms in a tandem arrangement by passive control of flow.
Journal of Fluids and Structures 16, (8) 1073-1092.
Alam, M.M. and Zhou, Y. 2007a. Flow around two side-by-side closely spaced circular
cylinders. Journal of Fluids and Structures 23, 799-805.
Alam, M.M. and Zhou, Y. 2007b. Turbulent wake of an inclined cylinder with water
running. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 589, 261-303.
Antonia, R.A. and Fulachier, L. 1989. Topology of a turbulent boundary layer with and
without wall suction. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 198, 429-451.
Antonia, R.A. 1991. Organization in a turbulent near-wake Fluid Dynamics Research 7,
139-149.
Antonia, R.A. and Mi, J. 1998. Approach towards self-preservation of turbulent cylinder
and screen wakes. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 17, 277-284.
Antonia, R.A., Zhou, T. and Zhu, Y. 1998. Three-component vorticity measurements in
a turbulent grid flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 374, 29-57.
Antonia, R.A., Zhou, T. and Romano, G.P. 2002. Small-scale turbulence characteristics
of two-dimensional bluff body wakes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 459, 67-92.
Balachandar, S., Mittal, R. and Najjar, F.M. 1997. Properties of the mean recirculation
region in the wakes of a two-dimensional bluff body. Journal of Fluid
Mechanics 351, 167-199.
Ballou, G. M. 2005. Handbook for sound engineers, Focal Press, Gulf Professional
Publishing.
Bearman, P. and Branković, M. 2004. Experimental studies of passive control of vortex-
induced vibration. European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids 23, 9-15.
Bearman, P.W. 1969. On vortex shedding from a circular cylinder in the critical
Reynolds number régime. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 37, 577-586.
Bearman, P.W. and Wadcock, A.J. 1973. The interaction between a pair of circular
cylinders normal to a stream. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 61, 499-511.
Bearman, P.W. and Owen, J.C. 1998. Reduction of bluff-body drag and suppression of
vortex shedding by the introduction of wavy separation lines. Journal of Fluids
and Structures 12, 123-130.
Bisset, D.K., Antonia, R.A. and Britz, D. 1990. Structure of large-scale vorticity in a
turbulent far wake. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 218, 463-482.
Blevins, R.D. 2001. Flow-induced vibration. Krieger Publishing Company.
Bloor, M.S. 1964. The transition to turbulence in the wake of a circular cylinder.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics 19, 290-304.
216
Bonnet, J.P., Cole, D.R., Delville, J., Glauser, M.N. and Ukeily, L.S. 1994. Stochastic
estimation and proper orthogonal decomposition: Complementary techniques for
identifying structure. Experiments in Fluids 17, 307-314.
Branković, M. and Bearman, P.W. 2006. Measurements of transverse forces on circular
cylinders undergoing vortex-induced vibration. Journal of Fluids and Structures
22, 829-836.
Browne, L.W.B., Antonia, R.A. and Shah, D.A. 1987. Turbulent energy dissipation in a
wake. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 179, 307-326.
Carberry, J., Sheridan, J. and Rockwell, D. 2005. Controlled oscillations of a cylinder:
forces and wake modes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 538, 31-69.
Castro, I.P. and Rogers, P. 2002. Vortex shedding from tapered plates. Experiments in
Fluids 33, 66-74.
Cavo, A., Lemonis, G., Panidis, T. and Papailiou, D.D. 2007. Performance of a 12-
sensor vorticity probe in the near field of a rectangular turbulent jet.
Experiments in Fluids 43, 17-30.
Chen, L., Tu, J.Y. and Yeoh, G.H. 2003. Numerical simulation of turbulent wake flows
behind two side-by-side cylinders. Journal of Fluids and Structures 18, 387-403.
Chiba, K. and Horikawa, A. 1987. Numerical solution for the flow of viscoelastic fluids
around an inclined circular cylinder. Rheologica Acta 26, (3) 243-254.
Chyu, C., Lin, J.C., Sheridan, J. and Rockwell, D. 1995. Brief communication: Kármán
vortex formation from a cylinder: Role of phase-locked Kelvin-Helmholtz
vortices. Physics of Fluids 7, (9) 2288-2290.
Constantinides, Y. and Oakley, O.H. 2006. Numerical prediction of bare and straked
cylinder VIV. Proc Proceedings of OMAE2006, 25th International Conference
on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Hamburg, Germany.
Daubechies, I. 1992. Ten lectures on wavelets. Society for Industrial and Applied
Mathematics Philadelphia, PA 129-167.
Ding, Z.J., Balasubramaniam, S., Lokken, R.T. and Yung, T.-W. 2004. Lift and
damping characteristics of bare and straked cylinders at riser scale Reynolds
numbers. Proc Offshore Technology Conference.
Eisenlohr, H. and Eckelmann, H. 1989. Vortex splitting and its consequences in the
vortex street wake of cylinders at low Reynolds number. Physics of Fluids 1, (2)
189-192.
Elston, J.R., Blackburn, H.M. and Sheridan, J. 2006. The primary and secondary
instabilities of flow generated by an oscillating circular cylinder. Journal of
Fluid Mechanics 550, 359-389.
Feng, C.C. 1968. The measurement of vortex induced effects in flow past stationary and
oscillating circular and D-section cylinders. University of British Columbia.
217
Filler, J.R., Marston, P.L. and Mih, W.C. 1991. Response of the shear layers separating
from a circular cylinder to small-amplitude rotational oscillations. Journal of
Fluid Mechanics 231, 481-499.
Franzini, G.R., Fujarra, A.L.C., Meneghini, J.R., Korkischko, I. and Franciss, R. 2009.
Experimental investigation of vortex-induced vibration on rigid, smooth and
inclined cylinders. Journal of Fluids and Structures 25, 742-750.
Fujisawa, N., Takeda, G. and Ike, N. 2004. Phase-averaged characteristics of flow
around a circular cylinder under acoustic excitation control. Journal of Fluids
and Structures 19, 159-170.
Gowda, B.H.L. and Deshkulkarni, K.P. 1987. Interference effects on the flow-induced
vibrations of a circular cylinder in side-by-side and staggered arrangement.
Journal of Sound and Vibration 122, (3) 465-478.
Gulitski, G., Kholmyansky, M., Kinzelbach, W., Lüthi, B., Tsinober, A. and Yorish, S.
2007. Velocity and temperature derivatives in high-Reynolds-number turbulent
flows in the atmospheric surface layer. Part I. Facilities, methods and some
general results. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 589, 57-81.
Hammache, M. and Gharib, M. 1991. An experimental study of the parallel and oblique
vortex shedding from circular cylinders. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 232, 567-
590.
Hanson, A.R. 1966. Vortex shedding from yawed cylinders. AIAA Journal 4, 738-740.
Hayakawa, M. and Hussain, F. 1989. Three-dimensionality of organized structures in a
plane turbulent wake. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 206, 375-404.
Henderson, R.D. and Barkley, D. 1996. Secondary instability in the wake of a circular
cylinder. Physics of Fluids 8, 1683-1685.
Hoerner, S.F. 1965. Fluid-dynamic drag: Practical information on aerodynamic drag and
hidrodynamic resistance. Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, 3-11.
Hover, F.S., Tvedt, H. and Triantafyllou, M.S. 2001. Vortex-induced vibrations of a
cylinder with tripping wires. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 448, 175-195.
Howells, H. 1998. Deep water drilling riser technology, VIV & fatigue management.
Proc 4th Quarter Meeting, Drilling Engineering Association, Paris.
Hussain, A.K.M.F. 1986. Coherent structures and turbulence. Journal of Fluid
Mechanics 173, 303-356.
Hussain, A.K.M.F. and Hayakawa, M. 1987. Eduction of large-scale organized
structures in a turbulent plane wakes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 180, 193-229.
Ishigai, S., Nishikawa, E., Nishimura, K. and Cho, K. 1972. Experimental study on
structure of gas flow on tube banks with tube axes normal to flow (Part 1,
Karman vortex flow from two tubes at various spacings). Bulletin of Japan
Society of Mechanical Engineers 15, 945-956.
218
Jester, W. and Kallinderis, Y. 2004. Numerical study of incompressible flow about
transversly oscillating cylinder pairs. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and arctic
Engineering 126, 310-317.
Jones, G.S. and Lamb, W.S. 1992. The use of helical strakes to suppress vortex induced
vibration. Proc 6th Conference on Behaviour of Offshore Structures, London.
Karniadakis, G.E. and Triantafyllou, G.S. 1992. Three-dimensional dynamics and
transition to turbulence in the wake of bluff objects. Journal of Fluid Mechanics
238, 1-30.
Khalak, A. and Williamson, C.H.K. 1996. Dynamics of a hydroelastic cylinder with
very low mass and damping. Journal of Fluids and Structures 10, 455-472.
Khalak, A. and Williamson, C.H.K. 1997. Fluid forces and dynamics of a hydroelastic
structure with very low mass and damping. Journal of Fluids and Structures 11,
973-982.
Kida, S. and Murakami, Y. 1989. Statistics of velocity gradients in turbulence at
moderate Reynolds numbers. Fluid Dynamics Research 4, 347-370.
Kim, H.J. and Durbin, P.A. 1988. Investigation of the flow between a pair of circular
cylinders in the flopping regime. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 196, 431-448.
King, R. 1977a. Vortex excited oscillations of yawed circular cylinders. Journal of
Fluids Engineering 99, 495-502.
King, R. 1977b. A review of vortex shedding research and its application. Ocean
Engineering 4, 141-171.
Kiya, M. and Matsumura, M. 1985. Turbulence structure in intermediate wake of a
circular cylinder. Bulletin of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers 28, (245)
2617-2624.
Kiya, M. and Matsumura, M. 1988. Incoherent turbulence structure in the near wake of
a normal plate. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 190, 343-356.
Kline, S.J. and McClintock, F.A. 1953. Describing uncertainties in single-sample
experiments. Mechanical Engineering 75, 3-8.
Kozakiewicz, A., Fredsøe, J. and Sumer, B.M. 1995. Forces on pipelines in oblique
attack: steady current and waves. Proc Proceedings of the fifth international
offshore and polar engineering conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, The
International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
Kumar, R.A., Sohn, C.-H. and Gowda, B.H.L. 2008. Passive control of vortex-induced
vibrations: an overview. Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering 1, (1) 1-11.
Leweke, T. and Provansal, M. 1995. The flow behind rings: bluff body wakes without
end effect. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 288, 265-310.
Li, H., Zhou, Y., Takei, M., Saito, Y. and Horii, K. 2001. Smart visualization of multi-
scale turbulent structures. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and
Mechanics 15, 393-402.
219
Li, H., Hu, H., Kobayashi, T., Saga, T. and Taniguchi, N. 2002. Wavelet multiresolution
analysis of stereoscopic Particle-Image-Velocimetry measurements in lobed jet.
AIAA Journal 40, (6) 1037-1046.
Lucor, D. and Karniadakis, G.E. 2003. Effects of oblique inflow in vortex-induced
vibrations. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 71, 375-389.
Maekawa, H. and Abe, S. 2002. Study of vortex dislocations in the wake of a flat plate
with finite thickness. JSME International Journal 45, (4) 843-849.
Mahir, N. and Rockwell, D. 1996. Vortex formation from a forced system of two
cylinders. Part II: Side-by-side arrangement. Journal of Fluids and Structures 10,
491-500.
Mallat, S.G. 1989. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet
representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
11, (7) 674-693.
Mansy, H., Yang, P.-M. and Williams, D.R. 1994. Quantitative measurements of three-
dimensional structures in the wake of a circular cylinder. Journal of Fluid
Mechanics 270, 277-296.
Marasli, B., Nguyen, P. and Wallace, J.M. 1993. A calibration technique for multiple-
sensor hot-wire probes and its application to vorticity measurements in the wake
of a circular cylinder. Experiments in Fluids 15, 209-218.
Marshall, J.S. 2003. Wake dynamic of a yawed cylinder. Journal of Fluids Engineering
125, 97-103.
Matsumoto, M., Shiraishi, N. and Shirato, H. 1992. Rain-wind induced vibration of
cables of cable-stayed bridges. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial
Aerodynamics 43, 2011-2022.
Matsumoto, M., Yagi, T., Shigemura, Y. and Tsushima, D. 2001. Vortex-induced cable
vibration of cable-stayed bridges at high reduced wind velocity. Journal of Wind
Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 89, 633-647.
Matsumura, M. and Antonia, R.A. 1993. Momentum and heat transport in the turbulent
intermediate wake of a circular cylinder. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 250, 651-
668.
Matsuzaki, K., Shingai, M., Haramoto, Y., Munekata, M. and Ohba, H. 2004.
Visualization of three-dimensional flow structures in the wake of an inclined
circular cylinder. Journal of Visualization 7, (4) 309-316.
Moffat, R.J. 1985. Using uncertainty analysis in the planning of an experiment. Journal
of Fluids Engineering 107, 173-178.
Moffat, R.J. 1988. Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Experimental
Thermal and Fluid Science 1, 3-17.
Neumann, J. and Wengle, H. 2004. Coherent structures in controlled separated flow
over sharp-edged and rounded steps. Journal of Turbulence 5, No. 22.
220
Nishimuraa, H. and Taniike, Y. 2001. Aerodynamic characteristics of fluctuating forces
on a circular cylinder. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial
Aerodynamics 89, 713-723.
Norberg, C. 1992. Pressure forces on a circular cylinder in cross-flow. Proc UITAM
Symposium Bluff-Body Wake, Dynamics and Instabilities, Göttingen, Germany,
Springer-Verlag 1993.
Norberg, C. 1994. An experimental investigation of the flow around a circular cylinder:
influence of aspect ratio. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 258, 287-316.
Norberg, C. 2001. Flow around a circular cylinder: Aspects of fluctuating lift. Journal of
Fluids and Structures 15, 459-169.
Norberg, C. 2003. Fluctuating lift on a circular cylinder: review and new measurements.
Journal of Fluids and Structures 17, 57-96.
Owen, J.C. and Bearman, P.W. 2001. Passive control of VIV with drag reduction.
Journal of Fluids and Structures 15, 597-605.
Pearson, B.R. and Antonia, R.A. 2001. Reynolds-number dependence of turbulent
velocity and pressure increments. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 444, 343-382.
Prasad, A. and Williamson, C.H.K. 1997. Three-dimensional effects in turbulent bluff-
body wakes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 343, 235-265.
Provansal, M. 1987. Bénard-von Kármán instability: transient and forced regimes.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics 182, 1-22.
Rajagopalan, S. and Antonia, R.A. 2005. Flow around a circular cylinder-structure of
the near wake shear layer. Experiments in Fluids 38, 393-402.
Ramberg, S.E. 1983. The effect of yaw and finite length upon the vortex wakes of
stationary and vibrating circular cylinders. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 128, 81-
107.
Ramberg, S.E. 1986. The influence of inclination angle upon the vortex wakes of
stationary and vibrating cylinders. Naval Research Laboratory NRL Mem. Rep.
3822 Washington DC.
Reynolds, W.C. and Hussain, A.K.M.F. 1972. The mechanics of an organized wave in
turbulent shear flow. Part 3. Theoretical models and comparisons with
experiments. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 54, (2) 263-288.
Rinoshika, A. and Zhou, Y. 2005a. Effects of initial conditions on a wavelet-
decomposed turbulent near-wake. Physical Review E 71, 46303-1-8.
Rinoshika, A. and Zhou, Y. 2005b. Orthogonal wavelet multi-resolution analysis of a
turbulent cylinder wake. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 524, 229-248.
Rinoshika, A., Zhou, T. and Zhou, Y. 2006. Orthogonal wavelet-decomposed 3-D
vorticity of a turbulent cylinder wake. JSME International Journal Series B, 49,
(4) 1149-1155.
221
Rinoshika, A. and Zhou, Y. 2007. Effects of initial conditions on wavelet-decomposed
structures in a turbulent far-wake. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
28, (5) 948-962.
Roshko, A. 1954. On the development of turbulent wakes from vortex streets. NACA
Report 1191.
Roshko, A. 1961. Experiments on the flow past a circular cylinder at very high
Reynolds numbers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 10, 345-356.
Sakamoto, H., Haniu, H. and Obata, Y. 1987. Fluctuating forces acting on two square
prisms in a tandem arrangement. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial
Aerodynamics 26, 85-103.
Sarpkaya, T. 1979. Vortex-induced oscillations: a selective review. Journal of Applied
Mechanics 46, 241-258.
Sarpkaya, T. 2004. A critical review of the intrinsic nature of vortex-induced vibrations.
Journal of Fluids and Structures 19, 389-447.
Schlichting, H. 1979. Boundary-layer theory. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Scruton, C. and Walshe, D.E. 1963. Stabilisation of wind-excited structures. United
States Patent Office, US 3076533.
Sen, M., Bhaganagar, K. and Juttijudata, V. 2007. Application of proper orthogonal
decomposition (POD) to investigate a turbulent boundary layer in a channel with
rough walls. Journal of Turbulence 8, No. 41.
Sheridan, J., Soria, J., Wu, J. and Welsh, M. 1992. The Kelvin-Helmholtz instability of
the separated shear layer from a circular cylinder. Proc Proceedings of IUTAM
Symposium, Goettingen, Germany, Springer-Verlag. Bertin.
Smith, A.R., Moon, W.T. and Kao, T.W. 1972. Experiments on flow about a yawed
circular cylinder. Journal Basic Engineering 94, 771-777.
So, R.M.C., Liu, Y., Cui, Z.X., Zhang, C.H. and Wang, X.Q. 2005. Three-dimensional
wake effects on flow-induced forces. Journal of Fluids and Structures 20, 373-
402.
Srinivas, A., Bhat, G.S. and Narasimha, R. 2007. Dynamic eduction of coherent
structures in turbulent jet flow imagery by wavelet techniques: part 1. Journal of
Turbulence 8, No. 15.
Sullivan, P. and Pollard, A. 1996. Coherent structure identification from the analysis of
hot-wire data. Measurement Science and Technology 7, 1498-1516.
Sumer, B.M. and Fredsøe, J. 1997. Hydrodynamics around cylindrical structures. World
Scientific, Singapore.
Sumner, D., Wong, S.S.T., Price, S.J. and Paidoussis, M.P. 1999. Fluid behaviour of
side-by-side circular cylinders in steady cross-flow. Journal of Fluids and
Structures 13, 309-338.
222
Surry, D. and Surry, J. 1967. The effect of inclination on the Strouhal number and other
wake properties of circular cylinders at subcritical Reynolds numbers. Technical
Report UTIAS TechnicaI Institute for Aerospace Studies, University of Toronto.
Szepessy, S. and Bearman, P.W. 1992. Aspect ratio and end plate effects on vortex
shedding from a circular cylinder. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 234, 191-217.
Szepessy, S. 1994. On the spanwise correlation of vortex shedding from circular
cylinder at high subcritical Reynolds number. Physics of Fluids 6, 2406-2416.
Tennekes, H. and Lumley, J.L. 1972. A first course in turbulence. The MIT Press,
Cambridge, USA.
Thakur, A., Liu, X. and Marshall, J.S. 2004. Wake flow of single and multiple yawed
cylinders. Journal of Fluids Engineering 126, 861-870.
Thiagarajan, K.P., Constantinides, Y. and Finn, L. 2005. CFD analysis of vortex-
induced motions of bare and straked cylinders in currents. Proc 24th
International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
(OMAE 2005), Halkidiki, Greece.
Thompson, M., Hourigan, K. and Sheridan, J. 1996. Three-dimensional instabilities in
the wake of a circular cylinder. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 12,
190-196.
Thompson, M.C., Hourigan, K., Ryan, K. and Sheard, G.J. 2006. Wake transition of
two-dimensional cylinders and axisymmetric bluff bodies. Journal of Fluids and
Structures 22, 793-806.
Tsinober, A., Kit, E. and Dracos, T. 1992. Experimental investigation of the field of
velocity gradients in turbulent flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 242, 169-192.
Unal, M.F. and Rockwell, D. 1988. On vortex formation from a cylinder. Part 1. The
initial instability. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 190, 491-512.
Van Atta, C.W. 1968. Experiments on vortex shedding from yawed circular cylinders.
AIAA Journal 6, (5) 931-933.
Vandiver, J.K., Jaiswal, V. and Marcollo, H. 2006. The effectiveness of helical strakes
in the suppression of High-Mode-Number VIV. Proc Offshore Technology
Conference.
Vukoslavčević, P.V., Beratlis, N., Balaras, E., Wallace, J.M. and Sun, O. 2009. On the
spatial resolution of velocity and velocity gradient-based turbulence statistics
measured with multi-sensor hot-wire probes Experiments in Fluids 46, 109-119.
Wallace, J.M. and Foss, J.F. 1995. The measurement of vorticity in turbulent flows.
Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 27, 469-514.
Williamson, C.H.K. 1985. Evolution of a single wake behind a pair of bluff bodies.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics 159, 1-18.
Williamson, C.H.K. 1988. The existence of two stages in the transition to three-
dimensionality of a cylinder wake. Physics of Fluids 31, 3165-3168.
223
Williamson, C.H.K. 1989. Oblique and parallel modes of vortex shedding in the wake
of a circular cylinder at low Reynolds number. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 206,
579-627.
Williamson, C.H.K. and Roshko, A. 1990. Measurements of base pressure in the wake
of a cylinder at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Flight Sciences and Space
Research 14, 38-46.
Williamson, C.H.K. 1992. The natural and forced formation of spot-like 'vortex
dislocations' in the transition wake. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 243, 393-441.
Williamson, C.H.K. 1996a. Three-dimensional vortex dynamics in bluff body wakes.
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 12, 150-168.
Williamson, C.H.K. 1996b. Vortex dynamics in the cylinder wake. Annual Review of
Fluid Mechanics 28, 477-539.
Williamson, C.H.K. 1996c. Three-dimensional wake transition. Journal of Fluid
Mechanics 328, 345-407.
Williamson, C.H.K. and Govardhan, R. 2004. Vortex-induced vibrations. Annual
Review of Fluid Mechanics 36, (4) 13-55.
Wilson, J.F. 2002. Dynamics of offshore structures.
Xu, C.-X., L.Li, Cui, G.-X. and Zhang, Z.-S. 2006. Multi-scale analysis of near-wall
turbulence intermittency. Journal of Turbulence 7, No. 25.
Xu, G. and Zhou, Y. 2004. Strouhal numbers in the wake of two inline cylinders.
Experiments in Fluids 37, 248-256.
Xu, S.J., Zhou, Y. and Tu, J.Y. 2008. Two-dimensionality of a cantilevered-cylinder
wake in the presence of an oscillating upstream cylinder. Journal of Fluids and
Structures 24, 467-480.
Yeo, D. and Jones, N.P. 2008. Investigation on 3-D Characteristics of flow around a
yawed and inclined circular cylinder. Journal of Wind Engineering and
Industrial Aerodynamics 96, 1947-1960.
Yiu, M.W., Zhou, Y., Zhou, T. and Cheng, L. 2004. Reynolds number effects on three-
dimensional vorticity in a turbulent wake. AIAA Journal 42, (5) 1009-1016.
Yoshimatsu, K. and Okamoto, N. 2008. Wavelet-based statistics of energy transfer in
high-resolution direct numerical simulation of three-dimensional homogeneous
isotropic turbulence. Journal of Turbulence 9, No. 45.
Zdravkovich, M.M. 1977. Review of flow interference between two circular cylinders
in various arrangements. Journal of Fluids Engineering 99, 618-633.
Zdravkovich, M.M. 1981. Review and classification of various aerodynamic and
hydrodynamic means for suppressing vortex shedding. Journal of Wind
Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 7, 145-189.
Zhang, H.J., Zhou, Y. and Antonia, R.A. 2000. Longitudinal and spanwise vortical
structures in a turbulent near wake. Physics of Fluids 12, 2954-2964.
224
Zhang, H.J. and Zhou, Y. 2001. Effect of unequal cylinder spacing on vortex streets
behind three side-by-side cylinders. Physics of Fluids 13, (12) 3675-3686.
Zhao, M., Cheng, L. and Zhou, T. 2008. Direct numerical simulation of three-
dimensional flow past a yawed circular cylinder of infinite length. Journal of
Fluids and Structures 25, 831-847.
Zhou, T., Zhou, Y., Yiu, M.W. and Chua, L.P. 2003. Three-dimensional vorticity in a
turbulent cylinder wake. Experiments in Fluids 35, 459-471.
Zhou, T., Rinoshika, A., Hao, Z., Zhou, Y. and Chua, L.P. 2006. Wavelet
multiresolution analysis of the three vorticity components in a turbulent far
wake. Physical Review E 73, 036307-1-12.
Zhou, T., Razali, S.F.M., Zhou, Y., Chua, L.P. and Cheng, L. 2009. Dependence of the
wake on inclination of a stationary cylinder. Experiments in Fluids 46, 1125-
1138.
Zhou, T., Wang, H., Razali, S.F.M., Zhou, Y. and Cheng, L. 2010. Three-dimensional
vorticity measurements in the wake of a yawed circular cylinder. Physics of
Fluids 22, 015108.
Zhou, Y. and Antonia, R.A. 1992. Convection velocity measurements in a cylinder
wake. Experiments in Fluids 13, 63-70.
Zhou, Y. and Antonia, R.A. 1993. A study of turbulent vortices in the near wake of a
cylinder. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 253, 643-661.
Zhou, Y. and Antonia, R.A. 1995. Memory effects in a turbulent plane wake.
Experiments in Fluids 19, 112-120.
Zhou, Y., Wang, Z.J., So, R.M.C., Xu, S.J. and Jin, W. 2001. Free vibrations of two
side-by-side cylinders in a cross-flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 443, 197-229.
Zhou, Y., Zhang, H.J. and Yiu, M.W. 2002. The turbulent wake of two side-by-side
circular cylinders. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 458, 303-332.
Zhu, Y. and Antonia, R.A. 1995. Effect of wire separation on X-probe measurements in
a turbulent flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 287, 199-223.
Zhu, Y. and Antonia, R.A. 1999. Performance of a three-component vorticity probe in a
turbulent far-wake. Experiments in Fluids 27, 21-30.