WEED SCIENCE
2002 Annual Research Report
James L. Griffin, Curtis A. Jones, and Jonathan D. Siebert
Department of Agronomy
104 Sturgis Hall Baton Rouge, LA 70803
William B. Richardson, Chancellor William H. Brown, Vice Chancellor & Director,
Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Rainfal l data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Herbicides and adjuvants evaluated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Abbreviat ions of weed species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Miscellaneous abbreviat ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Sugarcane Weed Control Research
Evaluation of After Planting Herbicide Treatments – Bermudagrass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Evaluation of After Planting Herbicide Treatments – Itchgrass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane #2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane #3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane #4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane Combined. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble #2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble #3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble Combined . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Response of LCP 85-384 in Reduced Tillage Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
CGA 362622/Evik Sugarcane Tolerance Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
LCP 85-384 Herbicide Response Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
HoCP 85-845 Herbicide Response Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
HoCP 91-555 Herbicide Response Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Asulox/Prowl and CGA 362-622 Johnsongrass Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Sugarcane Response to Clincher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Sugarcane Postemergence Study (NUP 7 B01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
Sugarcane Layby Test #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Sugarcane Layby Test #2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Sugarcane Tolerance to 2,4-D Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
2
Fallow PRE Test #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
Fallow PRE Test #2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Effects of 2,4-D on Seed Cane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Soybean Weed Control Research
Valor PRE Test #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
Valor PRE Test #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Nufarm Glyphosate Evaluation Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Monsanto Roundup Efficacy Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Fomesafen PRE Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
Roundup Efficacy Using Drif t Reduction Nozzles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
Corn Weed Control Research
BASF Performance Guard Corn Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
Syngenta Corn Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
Monsanto Roundup Test – Corn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
General Weed Control Research Asulox/Prowl Johnsongrass Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
Burndown Study #1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
Burndown Study #2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
Treflan/Spartan Red Morningglory Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
Late Season Postemergence Red Morningglory Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Postemergence Control of Red Morningglory with 2,4-D Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
Postemergence Control of 72 inch Red Morningglory #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
Postemergence Control of 72 inch Red Morningglory #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
Influence Of Shade On Emergence Of Red Morningglory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
Effect of Tillage on Emergence of Red Morningglory...........................................................175
3
Introduction
Louisiana can be divided into several areas based on cropping systems, climatic conditions, soil types, and pH. These factors are important in selecting specific herbicides and rates and can directly affect herbicide efficacy, crop safety, and injury to rotational crops. South Louisiana has an abundance of weed species, some not commonly found in other areas of the state. Our climatic conditions are favorable for prolific weed growth and subsequent competition with crops. Weeds can be controlled with mechanical cultivation, crop rotation, and herbicides. Louisiana producers currently use all these methods, but herbicides serve as the foundation for successful weed control programs. Steady progress has been made over the last 25 years in the development of effective herbicides with crop safety. Research and extension personnel with the LSU AgCenter work cooperatively with agri-chemical companies to evaluate new herbicides for weed control and crop tolerance as well as their effect on rotational crops.
This progress report summarizes weed research conducted in sugarcane, soybeans, and corn during the 2002 growing season. Results of herbicide efficacy and crop tolerance studies are presented. Results are preliminary since evaluation of some of the herbicides is limited. Data presented in this report should not be considered as an endorsement or recommendation of any herbicide and should not be reproduced without permission. Registration by the Environmental Protection Agency is required before any herbicide can be legally used.
Rainfall data for the 2002 growing season are shown in Table 1 and 2. Herbicides and adjuvants evaluated are presented in Table 3. Selected weed areas at the Ben Hur Research Farm, the St. Gabriel Research Station, and at several off-station sites have been managed to encourage uniform weed populations. Weed species evaluated for control are presented in Table 4. Specific information on location, soil type, variety, row spacing, treatment date, sprayer type, etc. for all experiments along with brief comments are presented followed by a table of experimental results. Data were summarized and statistically analyzed with the Agriculture Research Manager (ARM) by Gylling Data Management, Inc., Brookings, South Dakota. Control and crop injury ratings for all experiments are based on a scale of 0 to 100%, where 0 equals no control or crop injury and 100% equals complete control or crop injury. Injury ratings were based on chlorosis, necrosis, and stand and height reductions. Where appropriate, crop yields were obtained. Soybean and corn yields were adjusted to 13 and 12% moisture, respectively. Miscellaneous abbreviations used in this report are shown in Table 5.
For additional information concerning research activities covered in the report contact James L. Griffin, Department of Agronomy, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, (225) 578-1768, or by e-mail at [email protected]. This report is also available on the LSU AgCenter web site www.lsuagcenter.com/weedscience/.
4
Acknowledgments
The research information presented in this report was supported by Louisiana farmers through The Louisiana Soybean and Grain Research and Promotion Board and The American Sugarcane League. Funding support was also obtained from the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station and from numerous agri-chemical companies.
Appreciation is expressed to Jerry Berggren, Former Resident Director of the Central Stations for providing land and equipment; and to Donnie Miller and Bill Williams, Northeast Research Station, St. Joseph, LA; and Roy Vidrine, Dean Lee Research Station, Alexandria, LA; and for their assistance in planning and conducting several of these studies. Special thanks is expressed to Curtis Jones and Jonathan Siebert, Research Associates. Some of the research results presented in this report is from studies conducted as a portion of graduate research projects. In addition, I appreciate the patience and assistance of the student workers Christie Thomas, Wilson Judice, Kelly Patrick, Joey Boudreaux, and Nick Cagley.
Financial assistance to conduct portions of this research was provided by the following companies.
BASF Corporation Bayer CropScience Dow AgroSciences
DuPont Crop Protection FMC Corporation
Monsanto Company NuFarm
Stepan Company Syngenta
United Agri Products Valent USA
5
Table 1. Rainfall for the 2002 growing season (March - September) at the Ben Hur Research Farm, Baton Rouge, LA.
Month
Day
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
____________________________________________ in ____________________________________________
1 2.91 - - - - 0.60 - 2 - - - - - 0.01 0.11 3 - - - - 0.01 0.09 0.22 4 - - - - 0.01 0.02 1.00 5 - - - 0.07 0.05 - 0.01 6 - - - 0.01 - - 0.22 7 - - - 0.05 0.77 - 0.73 8 - 3.81 - 0.17 0.09 0.99 0.48 9 0.18 - - - 0.01 0.01 - 10 - - - - 0.07 - 0.01 11 0.02 0.19 - - 0.47 0.01 - 12 0.87 - - - - - 0.01 13 - - 0.09 - 0.03 - - 14 - - - - 0.53 - 0.02 15 - - - 0.01 0.01 0.38 1.17 16 - - - 0.05 0.21 0.01 0.08 17 - - 0.95 - - - 0.01 18 - - - - - 0.01 - 19 - - - 1.42 - - 0.15 20 0.09 - - 0.72 - 1.07 - 21 - - - - - - - 22 - - - - - 0.68 0.01 23 - - - 0.13 0.01 - 0.31 24 - - - 0.16 0.67 0.01 1.92 25 - - - 0.17 0.11 0.01 1.04 26 2.55 - - 0.60 0.05 - - 27 - - - 0.20 - 0.01 0.01 28 - - - 0.70 0.29 0.01 0.02 29 - - - 0.02 0.18 - 0.05 30 - - 0.47 - 0.26 - - 31 1.33 - - 0.36 0.02
Total 7.95 4.00 1.51 4.48 4.19 3.94 7.58
6
Table 2. Rainfall for the 2002 growing season (March - September) at the St. Gabriel Research Station, St. Gabriel, LA.
Month
Day
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
____________________________________________ in ____________________________________________
1 2.51 - - 0.01 - 0.37 - 2 0.01 - - - - 0.01 0.01 3 - - - 0.17 - 0.01 0.14 4 - - - - - - 0.12 5 - - - 0.11 0.02 - 0.01 6 - - - 0.01 0.01 - 0.07 7 - 3.56 - - 0.31 0.01 0.02 8 - 0.01 - 0.02 0.24 0.98 1.15 9 0.34 - - 0.74 - 0.03 10 - 0.29 - - 0.21 - 0.01 11 0.08 - - - 0.40 - - 12 0.14 - - - 0.01 - - 13 - - 0.08 - 0.54 0.01 - 14 - - - - 0.02 - - 15 - - - - 0.03 0.42 2.29 16 - - - 0.10 0.01 0.13 0.03 17 - 0.01 0.72 - - 0.02 0.01 18 - - 0.01 - - - - 19 - - - 2.41 - 0.23 - 20 0.43 - - 1.00 - 0.03 0.48 21 - - - 0.01 - - 1.87 22 - 0.01 - - 0.53 - 0.01 23 - - - 0.33 0.61 - 0.36 24 - 0.20 - 0.28 0.09 0.01 3.59 25 - - - 0.02 0.07 - 1.61 26 1.59 - - 0.84 1.08 - - 27 - - - 0.30 0.01 - - 28 - - - 0.42 - - - 29 - - - 0.01 1.11 - 0.02 30 - - 0.14 - 0.28 0.01 - 31 1.18 0.26 - 0.27
Total 6.28 4.08 1.21 6.04 6.32 2.51 11.83
7
Table 3. Herbicides and adjuvants evaluated in soybeans, sugarcane, corn, and rice in 2001. Trade Common name name Manufacturer A12854F mesotrione + S-metolachlor + Syngenta
atrazine + safener
A12909E mesotrione + S-metolachlor + safener Syngenta
Aatrex atrazine Syngenta
Accent nicosulfuron DuPont
Activator 90 nonionic surfactant UAP
Ag-98 nonionic surfactant Dow AgroSciences
Agridex crop oil concentrate Helena
Aim/Shark carfentrazone FMC
Arsenal imazapyr BASF
Assure II quizalofop DuPont
Asulox asulam Bayer CropScience
Authority (F6285) sulfentrazone Dupont
Backdraft imazaquin + glyphosate BASF
Balance Pro isoxaflutole Bayer CropScience
Banvel dicamba Micro Flo
Basis Gold nicosulfuron + rimsulfuron + atrazine Dupont
Bicep II Magnum metolachlor + atrazine Syngenta
Bicep II metolachlor + atrazine Syngenta
Blazer acifluorfen BASF
Boundry S-metolachlor + metribuzin Syngenta
Buctril bromoxynil Bayer CropScience
Cadre imazapic BASF
Continued.
8
Table 3. Continued. Trade Common name name Manufacturer Callisto mesotrione Syngenta
Canopy XL sulfentrazone + chlorimuron DuPont
Celebrity Plus dicamba + diflufenzapyr + nicosulfuron BASF
CGA-362622 trifloxysulfuron – sodium (proposed) Syngenta
Clarity dicamba BASF
Classic chlorimuron DuPont
Clincher cyhalofop Dow AgroSciences
Cobra lactofen Valent USA
Command clomazone FMC
Command Extra clomazone + sulfentrazone FMC
Detail dimethenamid + imazaquin BASF
Direx diuron Griffin
Distinct dicamba + diflufenzapyr BASF
Dual II Magnum metolachlor Syngenta
Envoke trifloxysulfuron – sodium (proposed) Syngenta
Evik ametryn Syngenta
Exceed primisulfuron + prosulfuron Syngenta
F6285 sulfentrazone FMC
FieldMaster acetochlor + atrazine Monsanto
FirstRate cloransulam-methyl Dow AgroSciences
Flexstar HL fomesafen Syngenta
Frontier dimethenamid BASF
Frontrow cloransulam-methyl + flumetsulam Dow AgroSciences
Continued.
9
Table 3. Continued. Trade Common name name Manufacturer Fultime acetochlor + atrazine Dow AgroSciences
Fusilade DX fluazifop-p-butyl Syngenta
Fusion fluazifop-p-butyl + fenoxaprop Syngenta
Gauntlet sulfentrazone + cloransulam-methyl FMC
Glyfos Extra glyphosate Cheminova
Glyphomax Plus glyphosate Dow AgroSciences
Goal oxyfluorfen Dow AgroSciences
Gramoxone Extra paraquat (2.5 L) Syngenta
Gramoxone Max paraquat (3 L) Syngenta
Grandstand triclopyr Dow AgroSciences
Guardsman Max dimethenamid-P + atrazine BASF
Harness Extra acetochlor + atrazine Monsanto
Harness acetochlor Monsanto
Hi-Dep 2,4-D (3.8 lb ai/gal – 33.2% dimethylammonium salt +
16.3% diethylamine salt) PBI/Gordon
Hornet flumetsulam + clopyralid Dow AgroSciences
ICIA 5676/ZA 1296 acetochlor + ZA 1296 Syngenta
Induce nonionic surfactant Helena
Karmex diuron Griffin
Kinetic organosilicone nonionic surfactant Helena
Liberty/Ignite glufosinate Bayer CropScience
Lightning imazethapyr + imazapyr BASF
Marksman atrazine + dicamba BASF
Continued.
10
Table 3. Continued. Trade Common name name Manufacturer Milestone azafenidin DuPont
MON 78270 glyphosate potassium Monsanto
NB 20652 2,4-D (1.88 lb ai/gal) PBI/Gordon
NB 20658 2,4-D + sulfentrazone (1.87 + 0.11 lb ai/gal) PBI/Gordon
NUP 7 B01 (KambaMaster) 2,4-D + dicamba NuFarm
Outlook dimethenamid-P BASF
PCC 1172 - UAP
PCC 1174 - UAP
Peak prosulfuron + primisulfuron Syngenta
Permit/Sempra halosulfuron Monsanto
Poast/Poast Plus sethoxydim Micro Flo
Prowl pendimethalin BASF
Pursuit imazethapyr BASF
Python flumetsulam Dow AgroSciences
Reflex fomesafen Syngenta
Regiment bispyribac-sodium Valent USA
Roundup D-Pak glyphosate Monsanto
Roundup Original glyphosate Monsanto
Roundup Ultra glyphosate Monsanto
Roundup Ultra Dry glyphosate Monsanto
Roundup Ultra Max glyphosate Monsanto
Saber 2,4-D (dimethylamine salt) UAP
Sahara imazapyr + diuron BASF
Continued.
11
Table 3. Continued. Trade Common name name Manufacturer Savage 2,4-D UAP
Scepter imazaquin BASF
Sencor metribuzin Bayer CropScience
Shotgun 2,4-D UAP
Sinbar terbacil DuPont
Spartan sulfentrazone FMC
Squadron pendimethalin + imazaquin BASF
Staple pyrithiobac DuPont
Starane fluroxypyr Dow AgroSciences
Strongarm diclosulam Dow AgroSciences
Sun-It II methylated sunflower oil AGSCO Inc.
Topnotch acetochlor (encapsulated) Dow AgroSciences
Touchdown 4L/5L glyphosate Syngenta
Treflan trifluralin Dow AgroSciences
V-10064 - Valent USA
V-10086 - Valent USA
Valor flumioxazin Valent USA
Velpar hexazinone DuPont
Velpar K4 hexazinone + diuron DuPont
Weedar 64 2,4-D (amine) Nufarm
Weedmaster 2,4-D + dicamba BASF
X-77 nonionic surfactant Valent USA
ZA 1296 mesotrione Syngenta
12
Table 4. Bayer codes and scientific names of weed species evaluated.
WSSA Common name abbreviation Scientific name
annual bluegrass POAAN Poa annua L.
annual sedge CYPCP Cyperus compressus L.
barnyardgrass ECHCG Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.
bermudagrass CYNDA Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.
broadleaf signalgrass BRAPP Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash
carpetweed MOLVE Mollugo verticillata L.
Carolina geranium GERCA Geranium carolinianum L.
common cocklebur XANST Xanthium strumarium L.
common purslane POROL Portulacca oleracea L.
cutleaf groundcherry PHYAN Physalis angulata L.
entireleaf morningglory IPOHG Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray
fall panicum PANDI Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx.
henbit LAMAM Lamium amplexicaule L.
hemp sesbania SEBEX Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rybd. ex A. W. Hill
hophornbeam copperleaf ACCOS Acalypha ostryifolia Riddell
horseweed ERICA Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.
itchgrass ROOEX Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) Clayton
ivyleaf morningglory IPOHE Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq.
johnsongrass SORHA Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.
large crabgrass DIGSA Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.
little barley HORPU Hordeum pusillum Nuttall.
morningglory species IPOSS Ipomoea species
Continued.
13
Table 4. Continued. WSSA Common name abbreviation Scientific name
mouseear chickweed CERVU Cerastium vulgatum L.
pitted morningglory IPOLA Ipomoea lacunosa L.
prickly sida SIDSP Sida spinosa L.
purple nutsedge CYPRO Cyperus rotundus L.
red morningglory IPOCC Ipomoea coccinea L.
redweed MEOCO Melochia corchorifolia L.
ryegrass, Italian LOLMU Lolium multiflorum Lam.
sicklepod CASOB Senna obtusifolia L.
smallflower morningglory IAQTA Jacquemontia tamnifolia (L.) Griseb.
smellmelon CUMMD Cucumis melo L. var. dudaim Naud.
spiny sowthistle SONAS Sonchus asper (L.) Hill
spreading dayflower COMDI Commelina diffusa Burm. f.
velvetleaf ABUTH Abutilion theophrasti Medik.
wild poinsettia EPHHL Euphorbia heterophylla L.
yellow nutsedge CYPES Cyperus esculentus L.
14
Table 5. Miscellaneous abbreviations used in the weed control studies. ai/A Active ingredient per acre
Amt Amount
AS Aqueous solution
AP After planting
Bdcst Broadcast application
bu/A Bushels per acre
CEC Cation Exchange Capacity
CO2bkpk CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer
col Collar
cot Cotyledon
CV Coefficient of variation
DAP Days after planting
DAT Days after treatment
DBP Days before planting
DF Dry flowable
DG Dispersible granule
EC Emulsifiable concentrate
F Flowable
fb Followed by
FF Flat fan nozzle
Fm Formulation
G Granular
GPA Gallons per acre
gr cover Ground cover
Grow stg Growth stage
ht Height
ht/collr Height to top visible collar
ht/lleaf Height to tip of longest leaf
ht:node Height to node ratio
in/col Inches to last visible collar
in/lftp Inches to tip of longest leaf
lbs Pounds
lb/A Pounds of product per acre
Continued.
15
Table 5. Continued.
lb ae/A Pounds of acid equivalent per acre
lb ai/A Pounds active ingredient per acre on broadcast basis
lb/bu Pounds per bushel
lf Leaf
L Liquid
LSD Least significant difference
ME Micro-encapsulated
# noz Number of nozzels
N/A Not applicable
NAWF Nodes above white flower
OM Organic matter
oz/A Ounces product per acre
p. cloudy Partly cloudy
PDIR Postemergence directed
plnt Plant
popltn Population
POST (x) Postemergence overtop application (first, second, etc.)
PPBD Preplant burndown
PPI Preplant soil incorporated
pr/A Product per acre
PRE Preemergence surface application
psi Pounds per square inch pressure
rep Replication
SC Soluble concentration
sq Square
std Standard
til Tillers
trctrCA Tractor compressed air
TRS Theoretical recoverable sugar
V (x) Refers to soybean growth stage e.g. V4=vegetative with
3 fully expanded trifoliate leaves
Continued.
16
Table 5. Continued.
Trt No Treatment number
v/v Volume/volume basis
vin vining
WAE Weeks after emergence
WAT Weeks after treatment
WBP Weeks before planting
WG Water dispersible granule
WP Wettable powder
wt/p weight per plant
wt/st weight per stem
w/w Weight/weight basis
% emerg. Percent panicle emergence
17
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Evaluation of At Planting Herbicide Treatments - Bermudagrass
Experiment number ................. : 02SC01JG Location................................... : Mike Melancon Farm - Henderson, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 12’ x 40’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/2 Soil type................................... : silt loam Planting date ............................ : 09-03-01 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : Gramoxone Extra on 09-13-01 Application type ...................... : PRE Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 09-13-01 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 1:00-3:00p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 88/81 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 2-5 NW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 15 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 56 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 5-7” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/36” GPA/psi ................................... : 20/34 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) CYNDA................................... : 3-6” _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Rainfall was received before PRE herbicides could be applied. Gramoxone Extra was applied with the PRE herbicides to control Bermudagrass that had begun to establish. Activating rainfall was received within 10 days. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
18
Evaluation of At Planting Herbicide Treatments - Bermudagrass Project Code: 02SC01JG CYNDA Cane control injury Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 10-29-01 10-29-01
1 Velpar 75 DF 0.53 lb ai/A PRE A 44 d 0 a
2 Velpar 75 DF 1.06 lb ai/A PRE A 50 cd 0 a
3 Velpar 75 DF 0.53 lb ai/A PRE A 88 ab 0 a Karmex 80 DF 1.87 lb ai/A PRE A
4 K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 78 abc 0 a
5 Milestone 80 DF 0.5 lb ai/A PRE A 41 d 1 a
6 Milestone 80 DF 0.625 lb ai/A PRE A 31 d 1 a
7 Milestone 80 DF 0.75 lb ai/A PRE A 46 d 1 a
8 Karmex 80 DF 1.87 lb ai/A PRE A 61 bcd 0 a
9 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 33 d 0 a Atrazine 4 L 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A
10 Command 3 ME 1.25 lb ai/A PRE A 93 a 0 a Karmex 80 DF 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A
11 Sencor 75 DF 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A 60 bcd 0 a
12 Nontreated 0 e 0 a LSD (P=.05) 30.6 1.6 Standard Deviation 21.2 1.1 CV 40.63 361.81 Replicate F 1.405 3.667 Replicate Prob(F) 0.2588 0.0220 Treatment F 6.143 1.000 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.4671
19
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Evaluation of At Planting Herbicide Treatments – Itchgrass
Experiment number ................. : 02SC02JG Location................................... : Mike Melancon Farm - Henderson, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 12’ x 40’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/2 Soil type................................... : silt loam Planting date ............................ : 09-12-01 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : PRE Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 09-13-01 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 1:00-3:00p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 88/81 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 2-5 NW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 15 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 56 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 5-7” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/36” GPA/psi ................................... : 20/34 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 3rd week/4th week................... : _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: No itchgrass emerged in the experimental area. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
20
Evaluation of At Planting Herbicide Treatments - Itchgrass. Project Code: 02SC02JG ROOEX Cane control injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 10-29-01 10-29-01
1 Velpar 75 DF 0.53 lb ai/A PRE A 0 0 b
2 Velpar 75 DF 1.06 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b
3 Velpar 75 DF 0.53 lb ai/A PRE A 0 0 b Karmex 80 DF 1.87 lb ai/A PRE A
4 K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 0 0 b
5 Milestone 80 DF 0.5 lb ai/A PRE A 0 0 b
6 Milestone 80 DF 0.625 lb ai/A PRE A 0 0 b
7 Milestone 80 DF 0.75 lb ai/A PRE A 0 0 b
8 Karmex 80 DF 1.87 lb ai/A PRE A 0 0 b
9 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 0 0 b Atrazine 4 L 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A
10 Command 3 ME 1.25 lb ai/A PRE A 0 16 a Karmex 80 DF 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A
11 Sencor 75 DF 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A 0 0 b
12 Nontreated 0 0 b LSD (P=.05) . 1.0Standard Deviation . 0.7CV . 53.29 Replicate F . 1.000Replicate Prob(F) . 0.4051Treatment F . 169.000Treatment Prob(F) . 0.0001
21
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane #1 Experiment number ................. : 02SC04JG Location................................... : Rene Simon Farm - St. Mary Parish, LA Experimental design ................ : Demonstration Plot size ................................. : 18’ x 150’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/3 Soil type................................... : clay loam Planting date ............................ : 09-01 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : Spring (PRE) Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : Mar-11-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 1:30-2:45p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 71/ Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 4-9 Cloud cover (%)....................... : 60 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 59 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/N/A Crop stage/height..................... : N/A Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/33 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: In most cases cane shoot population was greater where sugarcane was not cultivated. Weeds were not a limiting factor. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
22
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane #1 Project Code: 02SC04JG Cane Cane Cane Plts/60' plnt/ht Plts/A Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl # in # No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 04-17-02 04-17-02 04-17-02
1 With tillage 344 12.0 41624 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
2 With tillage 309 11.8 37389 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
3 With tillage 408 13.7 49368 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
4 With tillage 262 11.3 31702 Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
5 With tillage 375 12.8 45375 Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A
6 With tillage 350 14.2 42350 Nontreated
7 Without tillage 427 11.2 51667 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
8 Without tillage 424 12.5 51304 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
9 Without tillage 478 13.8 57838 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
10 Without tillage 312 10.5 37752
Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
11 Without tillage 349 9.2 42229
Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 12 Without tillage 313 11.2 37873
Nontreated LSD (P=.05) . . . Standard Deviation . . . CV . . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F)
23
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane #2 Experiment number ................. : 02SC06JG Location................................... : Andy Lanie Farm - Youngsville, LA Experimental design ................ : Demonstration Plot size ................................. : 18’ x 100’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/3 Soil type................................... : sandy loam Planting date ............................ : 09-01 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : Spring Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 03-14-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:00-3:30p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 80/61 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 18/S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 20 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 54 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : see comments Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/32 Applied by ............................... : Griffin Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Cane just initiating greenup at time of application. Area received killing frost 1 week earlier. Very few winter weeds present. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
24
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane #2 Project Code: 02SC06JG Cane Cane Cane plts/40' plnt/ht plts/A Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl # in # No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 04-17-02 04-17-02 04-17-02
1 With tillage 482 15.0 87483 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
2 With tillage 448 14.4 81312 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
3 With tillage 453 14.6 82220 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
4 With tillage 467 16.8 84761 Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
5 With tillage 416 15.8 75504 Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A
6 With tillage 353 18.2 64070 Nontreated
7 Without tillage 427 15.6 77501 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
8 Without tillage 435 15.2 78953 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
9 Without tillage 513 15.0 93110 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
10 Without tillage 502 13.8 91113
Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
11 Without tillage 480 17.8 87120
Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 12 Without tillage 425 17.6 77138
Nontreated LSD (P=.05) . . . Standard Deviation . . . CV . . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F)
25
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane #3 Experiment number ................. : 02SC08JG Location................................... : Mike Melancon Farm – Henderson, LA Experimental design ................ : Demonstration Plot size ................................. : 18’ x 100’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/3 Soil type................................... : clay loam Planting date ............................ : 09-00 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 03-14-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:00-3:30p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 80/61 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 18 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 20 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 54 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 1-3” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/32 Applied by ............................... : Griffin Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Sugarcane was emerged when application was made. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
26
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane #3 Project Code: 02SC08JG Cane Cane Cane plts/40' plnt/ht plts/A Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl # in # No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 04-18-02 04-18-02 04-18-02
1 With tillage 200 20 36300 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
2 With tillage 277 19 50276 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
3 With tillage 250 20 45375 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
4 With tillage 279 19 50639 Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
5 With tillage 245 21 44468 Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A
7 Without tillage 246 19 44649 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
8 Without tillage 210 19 38115 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
9 Without tillage 212 22 38478 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
10 Without tillage 182 23 33033
Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
11 Without tillage 207 19 37571
Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A LSD (P=.05) . . . Standard Deviation . . . CV . . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F)
27
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane #4 Experiment number ................. : 02SC10JG Location................................... : St. James Parish, LA Experimental design ................ : Demonstration Plot size ................................. : 18’ x 100’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/3 Soil type................................... : silt loam Planting date ............................ : 09-00 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 03-14-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:00-3:30p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 80/61 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 18 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 20 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 54 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 1-3” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/32 Applied by ............................... : Griffin Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Sugarcane was emerged when application was made. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
28
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane #4 Project Code:02SC10JG Cane Cane Cane plts/40' plts/ht plts/A Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl # in. # No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 04-19-02 04-19-02 04-19-02
1 With tillage 263 18 47735 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
2 With tillage 167 18 30311 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
3 With tillage 219 16 39749 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
4 With tillage 173 16 31400 Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
5 With tillage 197 16 35756 Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A
6 With tillage 180 17 32670 Nontreated
7 Without tillage 280 16 50820 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
8 Without tillage 265 16 48098 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
9 Without tillage 287 19 52091 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
10 Without tillage 215 17 39023
Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
11 Without tillage 231 17 41927
Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 12 Without tillage 212 18 38478
Nontreated LSD (P=.05) . . . Standard Deviation . . . CV . . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F)
29
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane Combined Experiment number ................. : 02SCPCtillageJG Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 18’ x 100’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/3 Soil type................................... : silt loam Planting date ............................ : 09-00 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application .............................. : See individual test Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: See individual test. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
30
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane Combined Project Code:02SCPCtillageJG Cane Cane Cane plts/40' plnt/ht plts/A # in # Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 04-17-02 04-17-02 04-17-02 No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 34 DA-A 34 DA-A 34 DA-A 1 With tillage 322 abc 16.4 ab 58488 abc Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A 2 With tillage 300 bc 15.9 ab 54495 bc Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A 3 With tillage 333 ab 16.0 ab 60349 ab Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A 4 With tillage 295 bc 15.8 ab 53588 bc Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A 5 With tillage 308 bc 16.3 ab 55947 bc Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 6 With tillage 264 c 17.7 a 47849 c Nontreated
7 Without tillage 345 ab 15.5 b 62618 ab
Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
8 Without tillage 334 ab 15.6 b 60530 ab
Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
9 Without tillage 373 a 17.4 ab 67609 a
Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
10 Without tillage 303 bc 16.0 ab 54949 bc
Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
31
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – Plant Cane Combined Project Code:02SCPCtillageJG Cane Cane Cane plts/40' plnt/ht plts/A # in # Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 04-17-02 04-17-02 04-17-02 No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 34 DA-A 34 DA-A 34 DA-A
11 Without tillage 317 abc 15.6 b 57490 abc
Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A
12 Without tillage 286 bc 17.0 ab 51903 bc
Nontreated LSD (P=.05) 63.2 2.02 11470.2 Standard Deviation 43.8 1.40 7943.9 CV 13.9 8.61 13.9 Replicate F 77.847 70.350 77.847 Replicate Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 Treatment F 1.745 1.078 1.745 Treatment Prob(F) 0.1091 0.4093 0.1091
32
33
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble #1 Experiment number ................. : 02SC07JG Location................................... : Andy Lanie Farm - Youngsville, LA Experimental design ................ : Demonstration Plot size ................................. : 18’ x 100’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/3 Soil type................................... : sandy loam Planting date ............................ : 09-00 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (first stubble) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : Spring Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 03-14-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:00-3:30p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 80/61 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 18/S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 20 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 54 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : see comments Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/32 Applied by ............................... : Griffin Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Sugarcane was just beginning to greenup when application was made. Very few winter weeds were present. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
34
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble #1 Project Code: 02SC07JG Cane Cane Cane plts/40' plnt/ht plts/A Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl # in # No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 04-17-02 04-17-02 04-17-02
1 With tillage 479 16.0 119932 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
2 With tillage 495 15.2 123932 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
3 With tillage 451 12.8 112932 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
4 With tillage 426 14.2 106682 Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
5 With tillage 481 17.0 120432 Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A
6 With tillage 496 17.4 124182 Nontreated
7 Without tillage 420 15.2 105182 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
8 Without tillage 512 16.8 128182 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
9 Without tillage 574 15.0 143682 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
10 Without tillage 420 13.8 105182
Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
11 Without tillage 567 17.2 141932
Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 12 Without tillage 416 17.4 104182
Nontreated LSD (P=.05) . . . Standard Deviation . . . CV . . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F)
35
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble #2 Experiment number ................. : 02SC09JG Location................................... : Mike Melancon Farm – Henderson, LA Experimental design ................ : Demonstration Plot size ................................. : 18’ x 100’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/3 Soil type................................... : clay loam Planting date ............................ : 09-00 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (first stubble) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 03-14-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:00-3:30p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 80/61 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 18 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 20 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 54 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 1-3” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/32 Applied by ............................... : Griffin Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Sugarcane was emerged when application was made. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
36
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble #2 Project Code: 02SC09JG Cane Cane Cane plts/40' plts/ht plts/A Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl # in. # No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 04-18-02 04-18-02 04-18-02
1 With tillage 279 17 50639 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
2 With tillage 255 16 46283 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
3 With tillage 339 16 61529 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
4 With tillage 273 15 49550 Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
5 With tillage 243 16 44105 Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A
6 With tillage 247 19 44831 Nontreated
7 Without tillage 360 18 65340 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
8 Without tillage 377 17 68426 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
9 Without tillage 318 18 57717 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
10 Without tillage 329 17 59714
Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
11 Without tillage 271 18 49187
Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 12 Without tillage 206 22 37389
Nontreated LSD (P=.05) . . . Standard Deviation . . . CV . . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F)
37
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble #3 Experiment number ................. : 02SC11JG Location................................... : St. James Parish, LA Experimental design ................ : Demonstration Plot size ................................. : 18’ x 100’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/3 Soil type................................... : silt loam Planting date ............................ : 09-00 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (first stubble) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 03-14-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:00-3:30p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 80/61 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 18 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 20 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 54 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 1-3” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/32 Applied by ............................... : Griffin Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Sugarcane was emerged when application was made. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
38
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble #3 Project Code:02SC11JG Cane Cane Cane plts/40' plts/ht. plts/A Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl # in. # No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 04-19-02 04-19-02 04-19-02
1 With tillage 288 13 52272 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
2 With tillage 258 13 46827 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
3 With tillage 291 12 52817 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
4 With tillage 266 12 48279 Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
5 With tillage 225 11 40838 Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A
6 With tillage 210 12 38115 Nontreated
7 Without tillage 376 13 68244 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
8 Without tillage 361 16 65522 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
9 Without tillage 328 14 59532 Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
10 Without tillage 321 11 58262
Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
11 Without tillage 260 12 47190
Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 12 Without tillage 235 11 42653
Nontreated LSD (P=.05) . . . Standard Deviation . . . CV . . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F)
39
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble Combined Experiment number ................. : 02SCFStillageJG Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 18’ x 100’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/3 Soil type................................... : silt loam Planting date ............................ : 09-00 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application .............................. : See individual test Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: See individual test. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
40
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble Combined
Project Code:02SC11JG Cane Cane Cane plts/40' plts/ht. plts/A Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl # in. # No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 04-02 04-02 04-02 1 With tillage 349 a-d 15 ab 63283 a-d Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A 2 With tillage 336 bcd 15 ab 60984 bcd Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A 3 With tillage 360 a-d 14 b 65401 a-d Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A 4 With tillage 322 cd 14 b 58383 cd Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A 5 With tillage 316 cd 15 ab 57415 cd Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 6 With tillage 318 cd 16 ab 57657 cd Nontreated
7 Without tillage 385 abc 15 ab 69938 abc
Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
8 Without tillage 417 a 17 a 75625 a
Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
9 Without tillage 407 ab 16 ab 73810 ab
Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A POST A
10 Without tillage 357 a-d 14 b 64735 a-d
Command 3 L 2.7 pt pr/A POST A Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A POST A
41
Reduced Spring Tillage Experiment – First Stubble Combined
Project Code:02SC11JG Cane Cane Cane plts/40' plts/ht. plts/A Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl # in. # No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 04-02 04-02 04-02
11 Without tillage 366 abc 16 ab 66429 abc
Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A
12 Without tillage 286 d 17 a 51849 d
Nontreated LSD (P=.05) 75.8 2.5 13754.4 Standard Deviation 44.8 1.5 8122.3 CV 12.73 9.78 12.73 Replicate F 72.104 32.705 72.104 Replicate Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 Treatment F 2.261 1.387 2.261 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0498 0.2466 0.0498 Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)
42
43
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Response of LCP 85-384 in Reduced Tillage Systems Experiment number ................. : 02SC12JG Location................................... : St. Gabriel Research Station - St. Gabriel, LA Experimental design ................ : Split-plot Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 12’ x 37.5’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/3 Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.0 pH .......................................... : 5.9 Planting date ............................ : 09-18-2001 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : Layby Prowl 3 lbs/A + atrazine 2 lbs/A Application type ...................... : PRE Layby Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 03-25-02 05-17-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:00-3:00p 9:00-11:30a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 86 88 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3 S 3-5 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 70 60 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 55 53 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 4-7” 10-13” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS OC04 Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” 18”/4/36” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/33 10/23 Applied by ............................... : Jones Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/1.59 0.72/0.01 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 1.18/3.56 0.00/0.40 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.03/0.02 0.03/0.02 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Temperature probes were placed in the center of the sugarcane drill in early March to determine if tillage (off-barring) prior to the herbicide application affected soil temperature. Soil temperature was consistent whether or not sugarcane was off-barred in March. Early season shoot emergence and growth were not affected by tillage. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
44
Response of LCP 85-384 in Reduced Tillage Systems Project Code: 02SC12JG Cane Cane Cane Cane shoots height height stalks # cm cm #Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 04-30-02 04-30-02 05-24-02 09-13-02No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 36 DA-A 36 DA-A 60 DA-A 172 DA-A
1 Spring off-bar 188 a 5 a 14 b 165 ab Velpar |(banded) Direx (banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
2 Spring off-bar 163 a 6 a 16 ab 157 ab Velpar (broadcast) Direx (broadcast) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
3 Spring off-bar 179 a 6 a 15 b 175 ab Velpar (banded) Direx (banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A No tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
4 Spring off-bar 176 a 6 a 14 b 183 a Velpar (broadcast) Direx (broadcast) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A No tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
5 No spring off-bar 173 a 6 a 16 ab 168 ab Velpar (banded) Direx (banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
6 No spring off-bar 159 a 6 a 15 b 152 b Velpar (broadcast) Direx (broadcast) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
7 No spring off-bar 167 a 6 a 15 ab 164 ab Velpar (banded) Direx (banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A No tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
8 No spring off-bar 160 a 6 a 17 a 159 ab Velpar (broadcast) Direx (broadcast) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A No tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
LSD (P=.05) 46.8 1.0 2.3 28.4Standard Deviation 31.8 0.7 1.6 19.2CV 18.68 11.22 10.16 11.62 Replicate F 0.240 4.780 5.742 3.240Replicate Prob(F) 0.8678 0.0108 0.0050 0.0451Treatment F 0.407 0.562 2.029 1.089Treatment Prob(F) 0.8872 0.7780 0.0991 0.4085
45
Response of LCP 85-384 in Reduced Tillage Systems Project Code: 02SC12JG Cane Height CmTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 09-13-02No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 172 DA-A
1 Spring off-bar 103 A Velpar (banded) Direx (banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
2 Spring off-bar 106 A Velpar (broadcast) Direx (banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
3 Spring off-bar 105 A Velpar (banded) Direx(banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A No tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
4 Spring off-bar 107 A Velpar (broadcast) Direx (broadcast) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A No tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
5 No spring off-bar 103 A Velpar (banded) Direx (banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
6 No spring off-bar 107 A Velpar (broadcast) Direx (broadcast) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
7 No spring off-bar 107 A Velpar (banded) Direx (banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A No tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
8 No spring off-bar 106 A Velpar (broadcast) Direx(broadcast) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A No tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
LSD (P=.05) 4.4Standard Deviation 3.0CV 2.86 Replicate F 1.706Replicate Prob(F) 0.1964Treatment F 1.060Treatment Prob(F) 0.4218
46
Response of LCP 85-384 in Reduced Tillage Systems Project Code: 02SC12JG Cane Cane Cane Cane Yield yield TRS sugar yieldTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl lbs/plot ton/A lbs/ton lbs/ANo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 10-24-02 10-24-02 10-24-02 10-24-02
1 Spring off-bar 1159 A 55 a 198 b 10790 a Velpar (banded) Direx (banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
2 Spring off-bar 1015 Ab 48 ab 194 b 9334 ab Velpar (broadcast) Direx (broadcast) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
3 Spring off-bar 813 C 38 c 215 ab 8205 b Velpar (banded) Direx (banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A No tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
4 Spring off-bar 838 bc 40 bc 231 a 8960 ab Velpar (broadcast) Direx (broadcast) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A No tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
5 No spring off-bar 963 abc 46 abc 197 b 8988 ab Velpar (banded) Direx (banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
6 No spring off-bar 1010 abc 48 abc 217 ab 10418 ab Velpar (broadcast) Direx (broadcast) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A Tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
7 No spring off-bar 963 abc 46 abc 219 ab 10031 ab Velpar (banded) Direx (banded) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A No tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
8 No spring off-bar 916 bc 43 bc 213 ab 9221 ab Velpar (broadcast) Direx (broadcast) 75 DF 11 oz pr/A POST A No tillage at layby 80 DF 2.25 oz pr/A POST A
LSD (P=.05) 201.5 9.5 31.5 2306.8Standard Deviation 137.0 6.5 21.4 1568.4CV 14.28 14.28 10.17 16.52 Replicate F 6.984 6.983 3.092 6.975Replicate Prob(F) 0.0019 0.0019 0.0491 0.0020Treatment F 2.549 2.549 1.458 1.191Treatment Prob(F) 0.0457 0.0457 0.2356 0.3502
47
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test Experiment number ................. : 02SC13JG Location................................... : St. Gabriel Research Station – St. Gabriel, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 12’ x 30’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/2 Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.0 pH .......................................... : 5.9 Planting date ............................ : 09-18-2001 Harvest date ............................. : 11-26-2002 Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : PRE POST Layby Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 03-25-01 04-18-02 05-17-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:00-3:00p 10:00-12:00a 9:00-11:30a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A N/A N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 86/65 83/68 88/75 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3 S 1-3 S/SW 3-5 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 70 50 60 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 55 59 53 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 4-7” 6-10” 8-12” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 trctrCA/5.0 trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS FF/8002VS OC04 Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” 18”/4/20” 18”/4/36” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/33 15/33 10/40 Applied by ............................... : Jones Jones Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.01/0.00 0.01/0.00 0.72/0.01 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.21/0.00 0.21/0.00 0.00/0.40 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.00/0.08 0.00/0.08 0.03/0.02 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Valor with Agridex crop oil concentrate should not be applied overtop of sugarcane in April or at layby if sugarcane is small where a directed application contacts the new leaves in the sugarcane whorl. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
48
Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test Project Code: 02SC13JG Cane Cane Cane Cane injury injury injury injury % % % %Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 04-20-02 04-26-02 05-10-02 05-24-02No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 2DAPOST 8DAPOST 22DAPOST 7DALayby
1 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 7 b 5 c 6 bc 4 de Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby C
2 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 9 b 5 c 8 b 4 de Valor 50 WP 0.38 lb ai/A PRE A Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby C
3 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 75 a 44 a 23 a 17 b Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/A POST B Agridex L 1.0 % v/v POST B Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby C
4 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 7 b 4 c 10 b 40 a Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Valor 50 WP 0.125 lb ai/A Layby C Agridex L 1.0 % v/v Layby C
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 7 b 5 c 8 b 41 a Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/A Layby C Agridex L 1.0 % v/v Layby C
6 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 5 b 4 c 0 c 0 e Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby C
7 Atrazine 4 L 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A 5 b 23 b 28 a 20 b Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A POST B Agridex L 1.0 % v/v POST B Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby C
8 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 8 b 7 c 6 bc 15 bc Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A Layby C Agridex L 1.0 % v/v Layby C
49
Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test Project Code: 02SC13JG Cane Cane Cane Cane injury injury injury injury % % % %Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 04-20-02 04-26-02 05-10-02 05-24-02No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 2DAPOST 8DAPOST 22DAPOST 7DALayby
9 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 6 b 5 c 9 b 8 cd Karmex 80 DF 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby C Karmex 80 DF 2.0 lb ai/A Layby C
LSD (P=.05) 4.2 3.5 7.0 7.9Standard Deviation 2.9 2.4 4.8 5.4CV 20.33 21.33 44.45 32.43 Replicate F 2.442 0.280 1.325 3.590Replicate Prob(F) 0.0889 0.8390 0.2895 0.0283Treatment F 250.492 130.540 13.084 31.573Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
50
Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test
Project Code:02SC13JG Cane Cane Cane Cane yield yield TRS sugar yield Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl lbs/plot ton/A lbs/ton lbs/A No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 11-26-02 11-26-02 11-26-02 11-26-02
1 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 493 ab 29 ab 236 a 6935 Abc Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby C
2 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 533 a 31 a 245 a 7897 A Valor 50 WP 0.38 lb ai/A PRE A Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby C
3 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 469 abc 28 abc 254 a 6372 Abc Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/A POST B Agridex L 1.0 % v/v POST B Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby C
4 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 424 abc 25 abc 233 a 5518 Bcd Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Valor 50 WP 0.125 lb ai/A Layby C Agridex L 1.0 % v/v Layby C
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 409 bcd 24 bcd 232 a 5156 Cd Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/A Layby C Agridex L 1.0 % v/v Layby C
6 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 508 ab 30 ab 238 a 7393 Ab Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby C
7 Atrazine 4 L 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A 415 bc 25 bc 244 a 5893 Bcd Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A POST B Agridex L 1.0 % v/v POST B Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby C
51
Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test
Project Code:02SC13JG Cane Cane Cane Cane yield yield TRS sugar yield Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl lbs/plot ton/A lbs/ton lbs/A No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 11-26-02 11-26-02 11-26-02 11-26-02
8 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 303 d 18 d 241 a 4325 D Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A Layby C Agridex L 1.0 % v/v Layby C
9 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 379 cd 22 cd 234 a 5182 Cd Karmex 80 DF 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A Agridex L 1.0 % v/v PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby C Karmex 80 DF 2.0 lb ai/A Layby C
LSD (P=.05) 111.5 6.6 29.0 1912.8 Standard Deviation 76.4 4.5 16.7 1105.0 CV 17.49 17.49 6.98 18.19 Replicate F 4.274 4.274 1.087 6.276 Replicate Prob(F) 0.0149 0.0149 0.3610 0.0097 Treatment F 3.524 3.524 0.540 3.358 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0078 0.0078 0.8100 0.0187
52
53
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
CGA 362622/Evik Sugarcane Tolerance Test
Experiment number ................. : 02SC14JG Location................................... : St. Gabriel Research Station – St. Gabriel, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 12’ x 40’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/2 Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.0 pH .......................................... : 5.9 Planting date ............................ : 09-18-2001 Harvest date ............................. : 11-26-2002 Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 04-18-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 9:00-10:00a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 83/68 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 1-3 S/SW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 50 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 59 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 6-10” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/33 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.01/0.00 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.21/0.00 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.00/0.08 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: The high rate of Evik (1.12 lb/A) could not be applied due to clogging of the nozzles. Sugarcane showed excellent tolerance to CGA 362622. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
54
CGA 362622/Evik Sugarcane Tolerance Test Project Code: 02SC14JG Cane Cane injury injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-10-02 05-24-02
1 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 7 b 1 bc Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
2 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 11 ab 3 bc Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
3 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 14 a 8 a Evik 80 WP 0.56 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
4 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 7 b 1 bc Evik 80 WP 0.125 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
5 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 11 ab 4 abc Evik 80 WP 0.063 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
6 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 11 ab 3 bc Evik 80 WP 0.031 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
7 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 9 ab 1 bc Evik 80 WP .0156 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
8 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 0 c 0 c Evik 80 WP 1.12 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
9 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 16 a 5 ab Evik 80 WP 0.125 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
10 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 10 ab 1 bc Evik 80 WP 0.063 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
55
CGA 362622/Evik Sugarcane Tolerance Test Project Code: 02SC14JG Cane Cane injury injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-10-02 05-24-02
11 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 12 ab 0 c
Evik 80 WP 0.031 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
12 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 14 a 4 abc Evik 80 WP .0156 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
13 Asulox 3.34 SL 3.34 lb ai/A POST A 12 ab 1 bc Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
LSD (P=.05) 6.6 4.7Standard Deviation 4.6 3.3CV 44.45 136.14 Replicate F 2.099 2.200Replicate Prob(F) 0.1175 0.1050Treatment F 3.062 1.698Treatment Prob(F) 0.0046 0.1085
56
CGA 362622/Evik Sugarcane Tolerance Test Project Code:02SC14JG Cane Cane Cane Cane yield yield TRS sugar yi Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl lbs/plot ton/A lbs/ton lbs/A No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 11-26-02 11-26-02 11-26-02 11-26-02
1 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 690 ab 31 ab 252 a 8184 ab Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
2 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 630 ab 28 ab 251 a 7454 abc Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
3 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 674 ab 30 ab 237 ab 6776 bc Evik 80 WP 0.56 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
4 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 664 ab 29 ab 246 ab 7305 abc Evik 80 WP 0.125 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
5 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 720 ab 32 ab 232 ab 7135 bc Evik 80 WP 0.063 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
6 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 551 b 25 b 251 a 6612 bc Evik 80 WP 0.031 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
7 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 679 ab 30 ab 237 ab 6709 bc Evik 80 WP .0156 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
8 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 741 ab 33 ab 261 a 9005 a Evik 80 WP 1.12 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
9 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 646 ab 29 ab 241 ab 7125 bc Evik 80 WP 0.125 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
57
CGA 362622/Evik Sugarcane Tolerance Test Project Code:02SC14JG Cane Cane Cane Cane yield yield TRS sugar yi Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl lbs/plot ton/A lbs/ton lbs/A No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 11-26-02 11-26-02 11-26-02 11-26-02
10 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 790 a 35 a 219 b 6197 c
Evik 80 WP 0.063 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
11 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 658 ab 29 ab 244 ab 7306 abc
Evik 80 WP 0.031 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
12 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 664 ab 29 ab 252 a 7720 abc
Evik 80 WP .0156 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
13 Asulox 3.34 SL 3.34 lb ai/A POST A 641 ab 29 ab 249 ab 7927 abc
Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A LSD (P=.05) 194.3 8.5 31.0 1831.7 Standard Deviation 135.9 6.0 18.4 1086.9 CV 20.2 20.06 7.53 14.8 Replicate F 1.756 1.764 0.186 4.406 Replicate Prob(F) 0.1731 0.1714 0.8318 0.0234 Treatment F 0.716 0.734 1.057 1.403 Treatment Prob(F) 0.7263 0.7095 0.4342 0.2312
58
59
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
LCP 85-384 Herbicide Response Test Experiment number ................. : 02SC15JG Location................................... : St. Gabriel Research Station - St. Gabriel, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 12’ x 40’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/2 Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.0 pH .......................................... : 5.9 Planting date ............................ : 09-23-2001 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : PRE POST1 POST2 Layby Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 03-25-01 04-18-02 04-29-02 05-17-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:00-3:00p 10:00-12:00a 1:00-2:00p 9:00-11:30a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A N/A N/A N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A N/A N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 86/70 83/68 88/79 88/80 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3 S 1-3 S/SW 2-3 S 3-5 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 70 50 30 60 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 55 59 50 53 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry dry/dry dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 5-8” 6-10” 7-11” 8-12” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 trctrCA/5.0 trctrCA/5.0 trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS FF/8002VS FF/8002VS OC04 Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” 18”/3/12” 18”/3/12” 18/4/36 GPA/psi ................................... : 15/33 15/33 15/33 10/23 Applied by ............................... : Jones Jones Jones Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/1.59 0.01/0.00 0.00/0.00 0.72/0.01 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 1.18/3.56 0.21/0.00 0.00/0.08 0.00/0.40 3rd week/4th week................... : .30/0.02 0.00/0.08 0.73/0.00 0.03/0.02 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: LCP 85-384 sugarcane was not injured by Valor or Velpar K4. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
60
LCP 85-384 Herbicide Response Test Project Code: 02SC15JG Cane Cane Cane Cane injury injury height injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % in %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 04-20-02 04-26-02 05-27-02 05-10-02
1 Valor 50 DF 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b 5 c 13 a 13 b Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
2 Atrazine 4 L 2 lb ai/A PRE A 10 a 12 b 13 a 7 c Valor 50 DF 0.25 lb ai/A POST1 B Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
3 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b 3 c 12 a 10 bc Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
4 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b 1 c 13 a 5 c Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A Layby D
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b 3 c 12 a 9 bc Karmex 80 DF 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
LSD (P=.05) 0.9 6.7 1.9 5.6Standard Deviation 0.6 4.5 1.2 3.8CV 43.2 37.25 11.4 13.25 Replicate F 1.000 0.703 3.299 1.690Replicate Prob(F) 0.4155 0.5626 0.0441 0.2047Treatment F 150.000 34.478 26.638 317.802Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
61
LCP 85-384 Herbicide Response Test Project Code: 02SC15JG Cane injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-24-02
1 Valor 50 DF 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A 7 c Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
2 Atrazine 4 L 2 lb ai/A PRE A 5 c Valor 50 DF 0.25 lb ai/A POST1 B Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
3 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 5 c Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
4 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 1 c Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A Layby D
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 5 c Karmex 80 DF 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
LSD (P=.05) 6.1Standard Deviation 4.1CV 17.99 Replicate F 0.485Replicate Prob(F) 0.6972Treatment F 232.593Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001
62
63
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
HoCP 85-845 Herbicide Response Test
Experiment number ................. : 02SC16JG Location................................... : St. Gabriel Research Station - St. Gabriel, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 12’ x 40’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/2 Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.0 pH .......................................... : 5.9 Planting date ............................ : 09-23-2001 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/HoCP 85-845 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : PRE POST1 Layby Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 03-25-01 04-18-02 05-17-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:00-3:00p 10:00-12:00a 9:00-11:30a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A N/A N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 86/70 83/68 88/80 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3 S 1-3 S/SW 3-5 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 70 50 60 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 55 59 53 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 5-9” 6-10” 8-13” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 trctrCA/5.0 trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS FF/8002VS OC04 Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” 18”/3/12” 18”/4/36” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/33 15/33 10/23 Applied by ............................... : Jones Jones Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/1.59 0.01/0.00 0.72/0.01 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 1.18/3.56 0.21/0.00 0.00/0.40 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.30/0.02 0.00/0.08 0.03/0.02 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: HoCP 85-845 was not injured by valor or velpar K4. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
64
HoCP 85-845 Herbicide Response Test Project Code: 02SC16JG Cane Cane Cane Cane injury injury height injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % in %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 04-20-02 04-26-02 05-27-02 05-10-02
1 Valor 50 DF 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b 4 c 15 a 12 b Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
2 Atrazine 4 L 2 lb ai/A PRE A 12 a 11 b 14 a 7 bc Valor 50 DF 0.25 lb ai/A POST1 B Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
3 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b 3 c 15 a 11 bc Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
4 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b 0 c 13 a 8 bc Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A Layby D
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b 1 c 14 a 5 c Karmex 80 DF 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
LSD (P=.05) 1.3 6.5 2.4 6.6Standard Deviation 0.9 4.3 1.6 4.4CV 53.21 45.28 13.19 17.37 Replicate F 1.000 0.787 2.319 2.510Replicate Prob(F) 0.4155 0.5167 0.1099 0.0914Treatment F 98.910 24.166 19.205 174.850Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
65
HoCP 85-845 Herbicide Response Test Project Code: 02SC16JG Cane injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-24-02
1 Valor 50 DF 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A 7 b Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
2 Atrazine 4 L 2 lb ai/A PRE A 4 b Valor 50 DF 0.25 lb ai/A POST1 B Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
3 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 4 b Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
4 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 7 b Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A Layby D
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 2 b Karmex 80 DF 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
LSD (P=.05) 7.3Standard Deviation 4.9CV 22.13 Replicate F 1.437Replicate Prob(F) 0.2649Treatment F 148.305Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001
66
67
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
HoCP 91-555 Herbicide Response Test
Experiment number ................. : 02SC17JG Location................................... : St. Gabriel Research Station - St. Gabriel, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 12’ x 40’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/2 Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.0 pH .......................................... : 5.9 Planting date ............................ : 09-23-2001 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/HoCP 91-555 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : PRE POST1 Layby Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 03-25-01 04-18-02 05-17-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:00-3:00p 10:00-12:00a 9:00-11:30a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A N/A N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 86/70 83/68 88/80 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3 S 1-3 S/SW 3-5 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 70 50 60 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 55 59 53 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 5-7” 6-10” 8-12” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 trctrCA/5.0 trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS FF/8002VS OC04 Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” 18”/3/12” 18/4/36 GPA/psi ................................... : 15/33 15/33 10/23 Applied by ............................... : Jones Jones Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/1.59 0.01/0.00 0.72/0.01 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 1.18/3.56 0.21/0.00 0.00/0.40 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.30/0.02 0.00/0.08 0.03/0.02 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: HoCP 91-555 was not injured by Valor or Velpar K4. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
68
HoCP 91-555 Herbicide Response Test Project Code: 02SC17JG Cane Cane Cane Cane injury injury height injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % in %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 04-20-02 04-26-02 05-27-02 05-10-02
1 Valor 50 DF 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b 3 b 10 a 8 a Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
2 Atrazine 4 L 2 lb ai/A PRE A 17 a 9 a 10 a 11 a Valor 50 DF 0.25 lb ai/A POST1 B Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
3 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b 1 b 11 a 3 a Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
4 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b 0 b 10 a 4 a Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A Layby D
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 0 b 3 b 11 a 7 a Karmex 80 DF 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
LSD (P=.05) 2.7 5.3 1.6 9.7Standard Deviation 1.8 3.5 1.0 6.3CV 52.7 110.09 10.07 98.09 Replicate F 1.000 0.636 5.043 0.574Replicate Prob(F) 0.4262 0.6059 0.0173 0.6428Treatment F 72.016 3.769 0.599 0.898Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0329 0.6704 0.4953
69
HoCP 91-555 Herbicide Response Test Project Code: 02SC17JG Cane injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-24-02
1 Valor 50 DF 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A 3 b
Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
2 Atrazine 4 L 2 lb ai/A PRE A 13 a Valor 50 DF 0.25 lb ai/A POST1 B Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
3 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 1 b Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
4 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A PRE A 1 b Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/A Layby D
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A PRE A 6 ab Karmex 80 DF 2.0 lb ai/A PRE A Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/A Layby D
LSD (P=.05) 8.7Standard Deviation 5.7CV 117.79 Replicate F 0.755Replicate Prob(F) 0.5405Treatment F 3.216Treatment Prob(F) 0.0519
70
71
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Asulox/Prowl and CGA 362-622 Johnsongrass Test
Experiment number ................. : 02SC18JG Location................................... : St. James Parish, LA – Schexnayder Farms Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 12’ x 40’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/2 Soil type................................... : silt loam Planting date ............................ : 08-2000 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (first stubble) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 04-16-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 2:30-3:30p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 83/80 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 2-3 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 35 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 65 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 7-11” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/3/12” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/33 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) SORHA ................................... : 12-24” _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Prowl in combination with Azulox did not improve johnsongrass control over that of Asulox alone. CGA 362622 (Envoke) did not control johnsongrass. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
72
Asulox/Prowl and CGA 362-622 Johnsongrass Test Project Code: 02SC18JG SORHA Cane SORHA Cane control injury control injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-03-02 05-03-02 05-24-02 05-24-02
1 Asulox 3.34 SL 3 qt pr/A POST A 45 abc 0 c 53 bc 0 a Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
2 Asulox 3.34 SL 4 qt pr/A POST A 48 ab 0 c 70 a 0 a Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
3 Asulox 3.34 SL 3 qt pr/A POST A 47 ab 0 c 53 bc 0 a Prowl 3.3 EC 1 qt pr/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
4 Asulox 3.34 SL 4 qt pr/A POST A 37 a-d 3 bc 63 ab 0 a Prowl 3.3 EC 1 qt pr/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
5 Asulox 3.34 SL 3 qt pr/A POST A 45 abc 3 bc 55 abc 0 a Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
6 Asulox 3.34 SL 4 qt pr/A POST A 48 a 5 abc 67 ab 0 a Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
73
Asulox/Prowl and CGA 362-622 Johnsongrass Test Project Code: 02SC18JG SORHA Cane SORHA Cane control injury control injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-03-02 05-03-02 05-24-02 05-24-02
7 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 32 bcd 11 a 35 de 0 a Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
8 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 23 d 9 ab 27 e 0 a Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
9 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 32 bcd 5 abc 33 de 0 a Evik 80 WP 0.063 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
10 CGA 362622 75 DF .0282 lb ai/A POST A 30 cd 8 abc 28 de 0 a Evik 80 WP 0.063 lb ai/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
11 CGA 362622 75 DF .0141 lb ai/A POST A 42 abc 3 bc 43 cd 0 a Asulox 3.34 SL 2 qt pr/A POST A Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
12 Nontreated 0 e 0 c 0 f 0 a LSD (P=.05) 16.3 7.6 15.3 0.0Standard Deviation 11.2 5.3 10.4 0.0CV 31.41 141.18 23.68 0.0 Replicate F 0.495 1.338 2.745 0.000Replicate Prob(F) 0.6893 0.2788 0.0700 1.0000Treatment F 6.158 2.068 15.311 0.000Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0529 0.0001 1.0000
74
75
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Sugarcane Response to Clincher
Experiment number ................. : 02SC20JG Location................................... : St. Gabriel Research Station – St. Gabriel, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 6’ x 45’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/1 Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.0 pH .......................................... : 5.9 Planting date ............................ : 09-18-2001 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment............. : Spring Sencor 2 lb/A Layby – Prowl 3 lbs/A + Atrazine 2 lbs/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 04-23-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 3:15-4:00p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 89/82 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 5-7 S/SW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 30 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 45 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 8-12” to collar Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/11003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/4/18” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/32 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/1.59 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.00/1.18 3rd week/4th week................... : 3.86/0.01 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Sugarcane exhibited some tolerance to Clincher. ____________________________________________________________________________________________
76
Sugarcane Response to Clincher Project Code: 02SC20JG Cane Cane Cane injury injury height % % in Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 05-10-02 05-27-02 05-27-02 No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 17DAT 32DAT 32DAT
1 Clincher 2.38 EC 15 oz pr/A POST A 34 a 21 a 11 c Agridex L 1 oz pr/A POST A
2 Clincher 2.38 EC 7.5 oz pr/A POST A 23 b 11 b 11 bc Agridex L 1 oz pr/A POST A
3 Clincher 2.38 EC 3.75 oz pr/A POST A 6 c 3 c 11 abc Agridex L 1 oz pr/A POST A
4 Clincher 2.38 EC 1.5 oz pr/A POST A 9 c 1 c 12 ab Agridex L 1 oz pr/A POST A
5 Clincher 2.38 EC 0.15 oz pr/A POST A 6 cd 0 c 12 a Agridex L 1 oz pr/A POST A
6 Nontreated 0 d 0 c 12 abc LSD (P=.05) 5.9 5.7 1.2 Standard Deviation 3.9 3.8 0.8 CV 30.86 62.15 6.67 Replicate F 2.341 1.650 10.062 Replicate Prob(F) 0.1145 0.2201 0.0007 Treatment F 41.533 20.823 2.710 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0614
77
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Sugarcane Postemergence Study (NUP 7 B01)
Experiment number ................. : 02SC21JG Location................................... : St. Gabriel Research Station – St. Gabriel, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 6’ x 45’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/1 Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.0 pH .......................................... : 6.0 Planting date ............................ : 09-13-00 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (first stubble) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 04-20-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 3:15-4:00p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 89/82 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 5-7 S/SW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 30 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 45 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 8-12” to collar Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/11003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/4/18” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/32 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/0.01 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.20/0.00 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.00/0.08 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Cane injury was rated on May 10 (20 days after treatment) and on May 24 (34 days after treatment) and injury was not observed with either Weedmaster or NUP 7 B01 (Kambamaster). _____________________________________________________________________________________________
78
Sugarcane Postemergence Study (NUP 7 B01) Project Code: 02SC21JG Cane Cane injury injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-10-02 05-24-02
1 NUP 7 B01 L 1 pt pr/A POST A 0 a 0 a
2 Weedmaster 3.87 L 1 pt pr/A POST A 0 a 0 a
3 NUP 7 B01 L 2 pt pr/A POST A 0 a 0 a
4 Weedmaster 3.87 L 2 pt pr/A POST A 0 a 0 a
5 Nontreated 0 a 0 a LSD (P=.05) 0.0 0.0Standard Deviation 0.0 0.0CV 0.0 0.0 Replicate F 0.000 0.000Replicate Prob(F) 1.0000 1.0000Treatment F 0.000 0.000Treatment Prob(F) 1.0000 1.0000
79
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Sugarcane Layby Test #1
Experiment number ................. : 02SC22JG Location................................... : Ronnie Roberts Farm – Henderson, LA Experimental design ................ : Demonstration Plot size ................................. : 12’ x 40’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/2 Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.0 pH .......................................... : 5.9 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (first stubble) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : Layby Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 05-21-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 9:00-11:30a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 88/80 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3-5 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 60 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 53 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 8-12” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : OC04 Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18/4/36 GPA/psi ................................... : 10/23 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: The itchgrass weed population was variable and control with the herbicide was no more than 80%. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
80
Sugarcane Layby Test #1 Project Code: 02SC22JG ROOEX Cane control injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-20-02 06-20-02
1 Velpar 75 DF 8.25 oz pr/A Layby A 60 0 Direx 80 DF 1.7 lb pr/A Layby A
2 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A Layby A 80 0 Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A Layby A
3 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A Layby A 70 0 Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A Layby A
4 Nontreated 0 0
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A Layby A 65 0 Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A Layby A
6 Command 3 ME 2.7 pt pr/A Layby A 40 0 Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A Layby A
7 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A Layby A 80 5 Spartan 75 DF 6.67 oz pr/A Layby A
LSD (P=.05) . . Standard Deviation . . CV . .
81
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Sugarcane Layby Test #2
Experiment number ................. : 02SC23JG Location................................... : Levert St. John – St. Martinville, LA Experimental design ................ : Demonstration Plot size ................................. : 12’ x 40’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/2 Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.0 pH .......................................... : 5.9 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 (first stubble) Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : Layby Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 05-21-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 9:00-11:30a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 88/80 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3-5 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 60 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 53 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 8-12” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/5.0 Nozzle type/size....................... : OC04 Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18/4/36 GPA/psi ................................... : 10/23 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Sugarcane was not injured with Velpar plus Direx. The bermudagrass infestation was variable. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
82
Sugarcane Layby Test #2 Project Code: 02SC23JG BRAPP CYNDA Cane control control injury Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-20-02 06-20-02 06-20-02
1 Velpar 75 DF 8.25 oz pr/A Layby A 100 40 0 Direx 80 DF 1.7 lb pr/A Layby A
2 Velpar 75 DF 11 oz pr/A Layby A 100 35 0 Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A Layby A
3 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A Layby A 90 25 0 Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A Layby A
4 Nontreated 0 0 0
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A Layby A 100 80 0 Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A Layby A
6 Command 3 ME 2.7 pt pr/A Layby A 100 80 0 Direx 80 DF 2.25 lb pr/A Layby A
7 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A Layby A 100 70 0 Spartan 75 DF 6.67 oz pr/A Layby A
LSD (P=.05) . . . Standard Deviation . . . CV . . .
83
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Sugarcane Tolerance to 2,4-D Alternatives
Experiment number ................. : 02SC25 JG Location................................... : St. Gabriel Research Station – St. Gabriel, LA Experimental design ................ : Demonstration Plot size ................................. : 6’ x 100’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 6’/1 Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.0 pH .......................................... : 5.9 Planting date ............................ : 08-2000 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 08-21-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 7:00-8:00a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 82 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 0 Cloud cover (%)....................... : 10 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 83 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : wet/moist Crop stage/height..................... : 84-102” Sprayer type/mph..................... : CO2bkpk/3.4 Nozzle type/size....................... : OC03 Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/2/36” GPA/psi ................................... : 8/20 Applied by ............................... : Siebert Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/0.01 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.00/0.56 3rd week/4th week................... : 1.29/2.33 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Sugarcane was not injured with any of the treatments. Yields were variable due to severe lodging _____________________________________________________________________________________________
84
Sugarcane Tolerance to 2,4-D Alternatives Project Code:02SC25JG Cane Cane Cane Cane yield yield TRS sugar yi Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl lbs/plot lbs/plot lbs/ton lbs/A No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 11-26-02 11-26-02 11-26-02 11-26-02
1 Garlon 3 L 1 pt pr/A POST A 850 30 234 7012
2 Garlon 3 L 2 pt pr/A POST A 695 25 256 6403
3 PCC 1174 L 1 % v/v POST A 455 16 263 4215 Savanna L 48.6 oz pr/A POST A Activator 90 L 0.25 % v/v POST A
4 PCC 1174 L 1 % v/v POST A 810 29 255 7391 PCC 1172 L 25.6 oz pr/A POST A Activator 90 L 0.25 % v/v POST A
5 2,4-D L 1.5 qt pr/A POST A 770 27 267 7213
6 Clarity L 16 oz pr/A POST A 500 18 257 4629
7 Nontreated 1000 35 258 9035
LSD (P=.05) . . . . Standard Deviation . . . . CV . . . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F)
85
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Fallow PRE Test #1
Experiment number ................. : 02SC26JG Location................................... : Mike Melancon Farm– Henderson, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 3 Plot size ................................. : 18’ x 45’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/3 Soil type................................... : clay loam Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : N/A Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : PRE Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 06-11-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 9:30-10:45a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 85/80 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3-5 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 37 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 53 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : N/A/dry Crop stage/height..................... : N/A Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/10/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 10/23 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Excellent weed control was not obtained with velpar K4. ____________________________________________________________________________________________
86
Fallow PRE Test #1 Project Code: 02SC26JG ECHCG MOLVE CYPRO ECHCG control control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-11-02 07-11-02 07-11-02 07-26-02
1 Velpar K4 97 a 99 a 95 ab 98 a Velpar 75 DF 0.53 lb ai/A PRE A Direx 80 DF 1.87 lb ai/A PRE A
2 Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A PRE A 100 a 100 a 93 ab 96 a
3 Sencor 75 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A 100 a 100 a 97 a 100 a
4 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A PRE A 100 a 100 a 88 b 100 a Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A PRE A
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A PRE A 93 a 93 a 96 a 97 a Direx 80 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A
6 Sahara 70 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A 100 a 100 a 98 a 100 a
7 Arsenal 2 L 0.92 pt pr/A PRE A 93 a 100 a 98 a 99 a LSD (P=.05) 9.3 7.2 8.0 5.3Standard Deviation 5.3 4.1 4.5 3.0CV 6.19 4.77 5.47 3.5 Replicate F 3.723 0.888 0.753 0.771Replicate Prob(F) 0.0505 0.4333 0.4891 0.4814Treatment F 128.660 216.021 165.541 399.963Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
87
Fallow PRE Test #1 Project Code: 02SC26JG MOLVE CYPRO control control Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-26-02 07-26-02
1 Velpar K4 100 a 99 a Velpar 75 DF 0.53 lb ai/A PRE A Direx 80 DF 1.87 lb ai/A PRE A
2 Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A PRE A 100 a 93 a
3 Sencor 75 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A 100 a 99 a
4 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A PRE A 100 a 78 b Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A PRE A
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A PRE A 100 a 67 c Direx 80 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A
6 Sahara 70 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A 100 a 98 a
7 Arsenal 2 L 0.92 pt pr/A PRE A 70 a 98 a
LSD (P=.05) 32.2 11.1 Standard Deviation 18.4 6.3 CV 21.94 8.0 Replicate F 1.000 0.340 Replicate Prob(F) 0.3927 0.7176 Treatment F 11.159 87.065 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001
88
89
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Fallow PRE Test #2
Experiment number ................. : 02SC27JG Location................................... : Levert St. John – St. Martinville, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 18’ x 40’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/3 Soil type................................... : silt loam Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : N/A Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : PRE Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 06-11-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 2:00-3:15p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 92/85 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3-6 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 35 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 50 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : N/A/dry Crop stage/height..................... : N/A Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8002VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/10/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 10/23 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 3rd week/4th week................... : _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Bermudagrass control with Velpar K4 (78%) was comparable to that of Sencor at 1.5 or 3 lbs/A. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
90
Fallow PRE Test #2 Project Code: 02SC27JG CYNDA BRAPP PHYAN CUMMD control control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-11-02 07-11-02 07-11-02 07-11-02
1 Velpar K4 85 a 100 a 100 a 100 a Velpar 75 DF 0.53 lb ai/A PRE A Direx 80 DF 1.87 lb ai/A PRE A
2 Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A PRE A 96 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
3 Sencor 75 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A 96 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
4 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A PRE A 79 a 100 a 100 a 100 a Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A PRE A
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A PRE A 83 a 100 a 98 a 99 a Direx 80 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A
6 Sahara 70 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A 90 a 99 a 99 a 100 a
7 Arsenal 2 L 0.92 pt pr/A PRE A 79 a 99 a 99 a 93 a
8 Nontreated 0 c 0 c 0 c 0 d LSD (P=.05) 23.9 0.9 1.8 7.1Standard Deviation 13.6 0.5 1.0 4.0CV 17.88 0.61 1.2 4.67 Replicate F 0.187 2.333 3.098 1.233Replicate Prob(F) 0.8316 0.1335 0.0769 0.3212Treatment F 16.028 13076.000 3414.115 225.454Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
91
Fallow PRE Test #2 Project Code: 02SC27JG CYPXX CYNDA PHYAN CYPXX control control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-11-02 07-26-02 07-26-02 07-26-02
1 Velpar K4 91 ab 78 ab 100 a 82 ab Velpar 75 DF 0.53 lb ai/A PRE A Direx 80 DF 1.87 lb ai/A PRE A
2 Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A PRE A 93 ab 84 ab 100 a 75 abc
3 Sencor 75 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A 95 a 91 a 100 a 84 a
4 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A PRE A 85 ab 70 ab 97 ab 63 bc Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A PRE A
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A PRE A 72 b 60 b 92 b 57 c Direx 80 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A
6 Sahara 70 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A 78 ab 75 ab 96 ab 68 abc
7 Arsenal 2 L 0.92 pt pr/A PRE A 82 ab 68 ab 96 ab 63 bc
8 Nontreated 0 c 0 c 0 c 0 d LSD (P=.05) 21.1 29.9 7.0 20.3Standard Deviation 12.1 17.1 4.0 11.6CV 16.21 25.96 4.73 18.84 Replicate F 1.519 1.724 1.209 5.122Replicate Prob(F) 0.2529 0.2141 0.3278 0.0214Treatment F 19.943 8.219 220.708 15.762Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0005 0.0001 0.0001
92
Fallow PRE Test #2 Project Code: 02SC27JG PHYAN controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-26-02
1 Velpar K4 100 a Velpar 75 DF 0.53 lb ai/A PRE A Direx 80 DF 1.87 lb ai/A PRE A
2 Sencor 75 DF 1.5 lb pr/A PRE A 100 a
3 Sencor 75 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A 100 a
4 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A PRE A 97 a Atrazine 4 L 2 qt pr/A PRE A
5 Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A PRE A 88 a Direx 80 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A
6 Sahara 70 DF 3 lb pr/A PRE A 87 a
7 Arsenal 2 L 0.92 pt pr/A PRE A 90 a
8 Nontreated 0 b LSD (P=.05) 13.6Standard Deviation 7.7CV 9.35 Replicate F 0.340Replicate Prob(F) 0.7174Treatment F 57.495Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001
93
LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy
Effects of 2,4-D on Seed Cane
Experiment number ................. : 01SC01JS Location................................... : St. Gabriel Research Station – St. Gabriel, LA Experimental design ................ : Split plot Number of reps ...................... : 5 Plot size ................................. : 6’ x 60’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 72”/1 Soil type................................... : Commerce silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.16 pH .......................................... : 7.35 Planting date ............................ : 9-18-01 Harvest date ............................. : 10-21-02 Crop/Variety ............................ : Sugarcane/LCP 85-384 Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST1 POST2 POST3 POST4 Application timing................... 7 WBP 5 WBP 3 WBP 1 WBP Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 7-31-01 8-14-01 8-28-01 9-11-01 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:15-11:20 11:45-12:00 3:15-3:40 2:45-3:05 Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A N/A N/A N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A N/A N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 98/88 96/82 96/84 91/84 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 4-5/W 4-6/NW 2-3/NW 2-3/NW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 30 35 25 30 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 56 55 56 50 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry dry/dry dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 65-72” 85-95” 104-110” 106-120” Sprayer type/mph..................... : CO2bkpk CO2bkpk CO2bkpk CO2bkpk Nozzle type/size....................... : flood/KLC5 flood/KLC5 flood/KLC5 flood/KLC5 Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/1 18”/1 18”/1 18”/1 GPA/psi ................................... : 8/32 8/36 8/35 8/32 Applied by ............................... : Siebert Siebert Siebert Siebert Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/0.86 0.00/1.05 0.00/0.42 0.00/0.00 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.52/2.70 0.44/0.33 3.00/1.17 0.00/0.09 3rd week/4th week................... : 1.49/0.33 3.42/1.17 0.00/0.09 0.00/0.51 _____________________________________________________________________________________________
94
Effects of 2,4-D on Seed Cane Project Code: 02SC02JS Cane Cane Cane Cane shoots shoots shoots shootsTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl #/plot #/plot #/plot #/plotNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 10-10-01 10-24-01 11-16-01 04-01-02
1 Whole stalks 21 gh 106 e 153 c 342 de 2,4-D (7WBP)
2 Whole stalks 10 h 97 e 140 c 255 f 2,4-D (5WBP)
3 Whole stalks 22 gh 125 de 164 c 320 def 2,4-D (3WBP)
4 Whole stalks 43 ef 154 cd 148 c 461 ab 2,4-D (1WBP)
5 Whole stalks 31 fg 119 de 153 c 301 ef NO 2,4-D
6 Billets 92 ab 247 b 307 ab 439 abc 2,4-D (7WBP)
7 Billets 60 de 191 c 248 b 386 bcd 2,4-D (5WBP)
8 Billets 72 cd 243 b 323 a 381 cd 2,4-D (3WBP)
9 Billets 87 bc 254 b 293 ab 469 a 2,4-D (1WBP)
10 Billets 107 a 309 a 334 a 425 abc NO 2,4-D
LSD (P=.05) 19.4 42.9 60.1 76.4Standard Deviation 15.2 33.5 47.0 44.6CV 27.84 18.17 20.75 11.79 Replicate F 0.210 0.197 0.804 0.032Replicate Prob(F) 0.9309 0.9381 0.5309 0.9687Treatment F 24.951 24.859 15.257 7.873Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
95
Effects of 2,4-D on Seed Cane Project Code: 02SC02JS Cane Cane Cane Cane shoots height height heightTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl #/plot inches inches inchesNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-01-02 05-01-02 05-27-02 07-12-02
1 Whole stalks 412 bc 7 b 18 ab 51 c 2,4-D (7WBP)
2 Whole stalks 403 bc 7 b 17 bc 52 c 2,4-D (5WBP)
3 Whole stalks 373 c 7 b 18 bc 54 bc 2,4-D (3WBP)
4 Whole stalks 511 a 8 a 20 a 61 a 2,4-D (1WBP)
5 Whole stalks 453 ab 7 b 20 a 58 ab NO 2,4-D
6 Billets 401 bc 5 c 17 c 53 c 2,4-D (7WBP)
7 Billets 360 c 5 d 15 d 50 c 2,4-D (5WBP)
8 Billets 403 bc 6 c 15 d 52 c 2,4-D (3WBP)
9 Billets 466 ab 6 c 17 bc 58 ab 2,4-D (1WBP)
10 Billets 518 a 6 b 19 ab 60 a NO 2,4-D
LSD (P=.05) 66.4 0.6 1.4 4.3Standard Deviation 52.0 0.4 1.1 3.3CV 12.09 6.99 6.26 6.11 Replicate F 0.492 1.743 1.491 0.825Replicate Prob(F) 0.7417 0.1620 0.2253 0.5181Treatment F 5.549 22.995 9.007 6.637Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
96
Effects of 2,4-D on Seed Cane Project Code: 02SC02JS Cane Cane Cane Cane shoots height yield yieldTrt treatment form fm Rate Grow Appl #/plot inches lbs/plot T/ANo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 09-07-02 09-07-02 10-24-02 10-24-02
1 Whole stalks 303 cde 104 bcd 599 bc 72479.0 bc 2,4-D (7WBP)
2 Whole stalks 333 bcd 103 cde 585 bcd 70785.0 bcd 2,4-D (5WBP)
3 Whole stalks 334 bcd 106 abc 594 bc 71874.0 bc 2,4-D (3WBP)
4 Whole stalks 394 a 109 a 700 a 84700.0 a 2,4-D (1WBP)
5 Whole stalks 351 abc 106 a-d 724 a 87647.7 a NO 2,4-D
6 Billets 280 e 102 de 460 e 55660.0 e 2,4-D (7WBP)
7 Billets 299 de 100 e 521 de 63041.0 de 2,4-D (5WBP)
8 Billets 313 cde 104 cd 530 cde 64130.0 cde 2,4-D (3WBP)
9 Billets 304 cde 108 ab 490 e 59290.0 e 2,4-D (1WBP)
10 Billets 373 ab 106 a-d 629 b 76109.0 b NO 2,4-D
LSD (P=.05) 48.8 4.0 70.5 8534.46Standard Deviation 37.8 3.1 54.6 6608.31CV 11.52 2.92 9.36 9.36 Replicate F 3.436 0.963 1.596 1.596Replicate Prob(F) 0.0180 0.4400 0.1972 0.1972Treatment F 4.482 4.086 12.405 12.405Treatment Prob(F) 0.0006 0.0012 0.0001 0.0001
97
Effects of 2,4-D on Seed Cane Project Code: 02SC02JS Cane yieldTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl T/ANo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 10-24-02
1 Whole stalks 36.24 bc 2,4-D (7WBP)
2 Whole stalks 35.39 bcd 2,4-D (5WBP)
3 Whole stalks 35.94 bc 2,4-D (3WBP)
4 Whole stalks 42.35 a 2,4-D (1WBP)
5 Whole stalks 43.82 a NO 2,4-D
6 Billets 27.83 e 2,4-D (7WBP)
7 Billets 31.52 de 2,4-D (5WBP)
8 Billets 32.06 cde 2,4-D (3WBP)
9 Billets 29.65 e 2,4-D (1WBP)
10 Billets 38.05 b NO 2,4-D
LSD (P=.05) 4.267Standard Deviation 3.304CV 9.36 Replicate F 1.596Replicate Prob(F) 0.1971Treatment F 12.405Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001
98
99
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Valor PRE Test #1
Experiment number ................. : 02SB01JG Location................................... : Ben Hur Research Farm - Baton Rouge, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 10’ x 25’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 30”/4 (2 rows treated) Soil type................................... : clay %OM ..................................... : 1.8’ pH .......................................... : 6.7 Planting date ............................ : 05-20-02 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Soybean/Hartz H5885RR Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : PRE POST1 Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 05-20-02 06-07-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 4:00-5:00p 11:00-1:00p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 84/72 94/86 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 4-6 SW 2-4 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 20 40 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 56 53 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/N/A dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : N/A V 2-3/5-7” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/11003VS FF/11003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”4/20” 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/26 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Jones Siebert Weed species (population)...... : (height/# leaves) CASOC.................................... : N/A 3-4”/3-4 lf ECHCH ................................... : N/A 4-5”/4-5 lf CYPRO.................................... : N/A 6-8” SEBEX .................................... : N/A 2-3 lf IPOXX..................................... : N/A 2-3 lf Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/0.00 0.05/0.00 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.00/0.17 0.00/2.20 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.22/0.06 1.96/0.09 _____________________________________________________________________________________________
100
Valor PRE Test #1 Project Code: 02SB01JG _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Weed emergence was very erratic. Because of lack of activating rainfall, PRE herbicides were not rated. After POST application study was terminated. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
101
Valor PRE Test #1 Project Code: 02SB01JG ECHCG SEBEX control control Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-14-02 06-14-02
1 Prowl 3.3 EC 2.4 pt pr/A PRE A 93 b 69 c Backdraft 1.5 L 5 pt pr/A POST1 B
2 Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B 100 a 100 a
3 Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B 98 ab 94 ab Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST2 C
4 Valor 51 WP 1 oz pr/A PRE A 100 a 99 ab Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B
5 Valor 51 WP 1.5 oz pr/A PRE A 99 a 93 ab Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B
6 Valor 51 WP 2 oz pr/A PRE A 100 a 94 ab Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B
7 Valor 51 WP 2.5 oz pr/A PRE A 100 a 93 ab Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B
8 Valor 51 WP 3 oz pr/A PRE A 100 a 90 b Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B
9 Nontreated 0 c 0 d
LSD (P=.05) 5.2 9.8 Standard Deviation 3.5 6.7 CV 4.03 8.25 Replicate F 0.500 2.605 Replicate Prob(F) 0.6858 0.0752 Treatment F 347.556 89.946 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001
102
103
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Valor PRE Test #2
Experiment number ................. : 02SB01JG Location................................... : Ben Hur Research Farm - Baton Rouge, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized Complete Block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 10’ x 25’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 30”/4 (2 rows treated) Soil type................................... : clay %OM ..................................... : 1.8’ pH .......................................... : 6.7 Planting date ............................ : 05-20-02 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Soybean/Hartz H5885RR Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : PRE Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 07-18-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 4:00-5:00p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 84/72 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 4-6 SW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 20 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 56 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/N/A Crop stage/height..................... : N/A Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/11003 Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)...... : (height/# leaves) CASOC.................................... : N/A ECHCH ................................... : N/A CYPRO.................................... : N/A SEBEX .................................... : N/A IPOXX..................................... : N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/0.00 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.00/0.17 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.22/0.06 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________
104
Valor PRE Test #2 Project Code: 02SB01JG ECHCG SEBEX control control Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 08-08-02 08-08-02
1 Prowl 3.3 EC 2.4 pt pr/A PRE A 92 d 60 c Backdraft 1.5 L 5 pt pr/A POST1 B
2 Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B 0 e 0 d
3 Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B 0 e 0 d Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST2 C
4 Valor 51 WP 1 oz pr/A PRE A 95 bc 89 b Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B
5 Valor 51 WP 1.5 oz pr/A PRE A 95 c 91 ab Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B
6 Valor 51 WP 2 oz pr/A PRE A 98 ab 93 ab Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B
7 Valor 51 WP 2.5 oz pr/A PRE A 98 abc 94 ab Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B
8 Valor 51 WP 3 oz pr/A PRE A 99 a 96 a Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 2 lb ai/A POST1 B
9 Nontreated 0 e 0 d
LSD (P=.05) 2.9 6.4 Standard Deviation 2.0 4.4 CV 3.05 7.49 Replicate F 2.499 0.956 Replicate Prob(F) 0.0861 0.4309 Treatment F 2417.911 425.201 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001
105
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Nufarm Glyphosate Evaluation Test
Experiment number ................. : 02SB02JG Location................................... : Ben Hur Research Farm - Baton Rouge, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized Complete Block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 10’ x 25’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 30”/4 (2 rows treated) Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.9 pH .......................................... : 6.3 Planting date ............................ : 05-20-02 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Soybean/Hartz H5885RR Uniform std. treatment............. : POST Roundup Ultra Max (19.2 oz/A) Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 06-11-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 10:30-12:30 p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 93/89 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 1-3 S/SW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 60 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 46 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : V3-4/4-6” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/11003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/32 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)...... : (height/# leaves) IPOLA ..................................... : 6-8”/4-6 lf SEBEX .................................... : 4-6”/4-5 lf ECHCG ................................... : 4-6”/3-4 lf BRAPP .................................... : 4-6”/5-6 lf Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/0.00 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.06/2.60 3rd week/4th week................... : 1.52/0.94 _____________________________________________________________________________________________
106
Nufarm Glyphosate Evauation Test Project Code: 02SB02JG _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: The intent of this study was to evaluate various glyphosate formulations applied at rates equivalent to 16 and 24 oz/A of Roundup Ultra and 12.8 and 19.2 oz/A of Roundup UltraMax. Weeds were large at application to allow for relative comparisons among the formulations and rates. The NUP 0532 formulation was not sent to us so the control values are noted as zero (no control). Weed control ratings were made on June 18 (7 days after treatment) and on July 2 (21 days after treatment). No differences in control of hemp sesbania (SEBEX) or pitted morningglory (IPOLA) were observed among the glyphosate formulations or rates at either rating date. Soybean injury was not observed. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
107
Nufarm Glyphosate Evaluation Test Project Code: 02SB02JG SEBEX IPOLA Soybean control control injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-18-02 06-18-02 06-18-02
1 NUP 3A02 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 51 bc 49 c 0 a
2 NUP 3A02 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 56 abc 54 abc 0 a
3 NUP 3B02 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 54 abc 55 abc 0 a
4 NUP 3B02 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 56 abc 54 abc 0 a
5 NUP 3C02 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 59 abc 50 bc 0 a
6 NUP 3C02 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 58 abc 56 abc 0 a
7 NUP 3D02 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 53 abc 53 abc 0 a
8 NUP 3D02 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 55 abc 55 abc 0 a
9 NUP 3E02 L 12.8 oz pr/A POST A 50 c 55 abc 0 a
10 NUP 3E02 L 19.2 oz pr/A POST A 54 abc 50 bc 0 a
11 NUP 3F02 L 12.8 oz pr/A POST A 51 bc 53 abc 0 a
12 NUP 3F02 L 19.2 oz pr/A POST A 50 c 49 c 0 a
13 NUP 3G02 L 12.8 oz pr/A POST A 55 abc 53 abc 0 a
14 NUP 3G02 L 19.2 oz pr/A POST A 55 abc 58 ab 0 a
108
Nufarm Glyphosate Evaluation Test Project Code: 02SB02JG SEBEX IPOLA Soybean control control injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-18-02 06-18-02 06-18-02
15 NUP 3H02 L 12.8 oz pr/A POST A 61 a 53 abc 0 a
16 NUP 3H02 L 19.2 oz pr/A POST A 54 abc 58 ab 0 a
17 NUP 3A99 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 56 abc 58 ab 0 a
Induce L 0.5 % v/v POST A
18 NUP 3A99 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 54 abc 54 abc 0 a Induce L 0.5 % v/v POST A
19 NUP 0532 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 0 d 0 d 0 a
Induce L 0.5 % v/v POST A
20 NUP 0532 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 0 d 0 d 0 a Induce L 0.5 % v/v POST A
21 NUP 9E01 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 50 c 54 abc 0 a
22 NUP 9E01 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 50 c 53 abc 0 a
23 NUP 8M01 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 55 abc 60 a 0 a
24 NUP 8M01 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 60 ab 54 abc 0 a
25 Roundup Ultra 4 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 50 c 55 abc 0 a
26 Roundup Ultra 4 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 53 abc 50 bc 0 a
27 Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 12.8 oz pr/A POST A 54 abc 54 abc 0 a
28 Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 19.2 oz pr/A POST A 59 abc 51 bc 0 a
LSD (P=.05) 9.6 8.0 0.0Standard Deviation 6.8 5.6 0.0CV 13.53 11.35 0.0 Replicate F 1.438 0.569 0.000Replicate Prob(F) 0.2378 0.6368 1.0000Treatment F 18.262 25.673 0.000Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 1.0000
109
Nufarm Glyphosate Evaluation Test Project Code: 02SB02JG SEBEX IPOLA Soybean control control injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-02-02 07-02-02 07-02-02
1 NUP 3A02 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 75 ab 76 ab 0 a
2 NUP 3A02 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 78 ab 79 a 0 a
3 NUP 3B02 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 74 abc 73 ab 0 a
4 NUP 3B02 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 71 bc 79 a 0 a
5 NUP 3C02 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 68 c 78 ab 0 a
6 NUP 3C02 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 71 bc 79 a 0 a
7 NUP 3D02 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 73 abc 74 ab 0 a
8 NUP 3D02 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 73 abc 75 ab 0 a
9 NUP 3E02 L 12.8 oz pr/A POST A 71 bc 74 ab 0 a
10 NUP 3E02 L 19.2 oz pr/A POST A 74 abc 76 ab 0 a
11 NUP 3F02 L 12.8 oz pr/A POST A 74 abc 70 b 0 a
12 NUP 3F02 L 19.2 oz pr/A POST A 79 a 79 a 0 a
13 NUP 3G02 L 12.8 oz pr/A POST A 73 abc 73 ab 0 a
14 NUP 3G02 L 19.2 oz pr/A POST A 73 abc 75 ab 0 a
15 NUP 3H02 L 12.8 oz pr/A POST A 71 bc 73 ab 0 a
16 NUP 3H02 L 19.2 oz pr/A POST A 79 a 79 a 0 a
110
Nufarm Glyphosate Evaluation Test Project Code: 02SB02JG SEBEX IPOLA Soybean control control injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-02-02 07-02-02 07-02-02
17 NUP 3A99 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 74 abc 74 ab 0 a
Induce L 0.5 % v/v POST A
18 NUP 3A99 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 76 ab 78 ab 0 a Induce L 0.5 % v/v POST A
19 NUP 0532 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 0 d 0 c 0 a
Induce L 0.5 % v/v POST A
20 NUP 0532 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 0 d 0 c 0 a Induce L 0.5 % v/v POST A
21 NUP 9E01 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 73 abc 74 ab 0 a
22 NUP 9E01 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 76 ab 79 a 0 a
23 NUP 8M01 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 73 abc 74 ab 0 a
24 NUP 8M01 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 71 bc 78 ab 0 a
25 Roundup Ultra 4 L 16 oz pr/A POST A 71 bc 76 ab 0 a
26 Roundup Ultra 4 L 24 oz pr/A POST A 76 ab 80 a 0 a
27 Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 12.8 oz pr/A POST A 74 abc 74 ab 0 a
28 Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 19.2 oz pr/A POST A 76 ab 78 ab 0 a
LSD (P=.05) 7.0 8.4 0.0Standard Deviation 5.0 5.9 0.0CV 7.26 8.42 0.0 Replicate F 3.679 0.091 0.000Replicate Prob(F) 0.0154 0.9648 1.0000Treatment F 61.529 45.739 0.000Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 1.0000
111
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Monsanto Roundup Efficacy Test
Experiment number ................. : 02SB03JG Location................................... : Ben Hur Research Farm - Baton Rouge, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 10’ x 25’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 30”/4 (2 rows treated) Soil type................................... : sandy clay loam %OM ..................................... : 1.7 pH .......................................... : 6.4 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Soybean/Hartz H5885RR Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST1 Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 06-07-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:00-1:00p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 94/86 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 2-4 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 40 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 53 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : V2-3/5-7” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/11003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 20”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/28 Applied by ............................... : Siebert Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) SEBEX .................................... : 2-3”/3-4 lf IPOXX..................................... : 4-6”/5-6 lf Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.05/0.17 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.00/2.20 3rd week/4th week................... : 1.96/0.09 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: MON 78270 (Roundup Weathermax) was as affective as Roudup UltraMax. Soybeans were not injured with either herbicide. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
112
Monsanto Roundup Efficacy Test Project Code: 02SB03JG Soybean SEBEX Soybean SEBEX injury control injury controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-14-02 06-14-02 06-28-02 06-28-02
1 Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 26 oz pr/A POST1 A 0 a 60 b 0 a 71 b
2 Roundup Ultra Max 5 L 52 oz pr/A POST1 A 0 a 75 a 0 a 83 a
3 MON 78270 6 L 22 oz pr/A POST1 A 0 a 60 b 0 a 70 b
4 MON 78270 6 L 44 oz pr/A POST1 A 0 a 81 a 0 a 83 a
5 Nontreated 0 a 0 c 0 a 0 c
LSD (P=.05) 0.0 13.4 0.0 5.9Standard Deviation 0.0 8.7 0.0 3.8CV 0.0 15.72 0.0 6.23 Replicate F 0.000 3.155 0.000 4.429Replicate Prob(F) 1.0000 0.0645 1.0000 0.0258Treatment F 0.000 55.210 0.000 331.286Treatment Prob(F) 1.0000 0.0001 1.0000 0.0001
113
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Fomesafen PRE Test
Experiment number ................. : 02SB04JG Location................................... : Ben Hur Research Farm - Baton Rouge, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 10’ x 25’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 30”/4 (2 rows treated) Soil type................................... : clay %OM ..................................... : 1.8 pH .......................................... : 6.7 Planting date ............................ : 05-20-02 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Soybean/Hartz H5885RR Uniform std. treatment............. : POST Roundup Ultra Max (19.2 oz/A) on 06-07-02 Application type ...................... : PRE Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 05-20-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 4:00-5:00p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 84/72 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 4-6 SW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 20 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 56 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : N/A Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/11003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/0.00 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.00/0.47 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.12/0.06 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Weed control was variable because of lack of rainfall. Some broadleaf weed control was obtained with Reflex applied PRE. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
114
Fomesafen PRE Test Project Code: 02SB04JG ECHCG IPOLA SEBEX control control control Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-07-02 06-07-02 06-07-02
1 Reflex 2 L 0.125 lb ai/A PRE A 69 a 66 abc 70 a Dual II Magnum 7.6 EC 0.98 lb ai/A PRE A
2 Reflex 2 L 0.188 lb ai/A PRE A 55 abc 80 a 58 abc Dual II Magnum 7.6 EC 0.98 lb ai/A PRE A
3 Reflex 2 L 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A 59 abc 40 c 44 bc Dual II Magnum 7.6 EC 0.98 lb ai/A PRE A
4 Reflex 2 L 0.313 lb ai/A PRE A 58 abc 68 abc 53 abc Dual II Magnum 7.6 EC 0.98 lb ai/A PRE A
5 Reflex 2 L 0.375 lb ai/A PRE A 60 abc 51 abc 59 abc Dual II Magnum 7.6 EC 0.98 lb ai/A PRE A
6 Reflex 2 L 0.125 lb ai/A PRE A 58 abc 50 bc 45 abc Dual II Magnum 7.6 EC 1.18 lb ai/A PRE A
7 Reflex 2 L 0.188 lb ai/A PRE A 59 abc 56 abc 40 c Dual II Magnum 7.6 EC 1.18 lb ai/A PRE A
8 Reflex 2 L 0.25 lb ai/A PRE A 64 abc 45 bc 60 abc Dual II Magnum 7.6 EC 1.18 lb ai/A PRE A
9 Reflex 2 L 0.313 lb ai/A PRE A 68 ab 70 ab 50 abc Dual II Magnum 7.6 EC 1.18 lb ai/A PRE A
10 Reflex 2 L 0.375 lb ai/A PRE A 70 a 64 abc 61 abc
Dual II Magnum 7.6 EC 1.18 lb ai/A PRE A
11 Boundry 6.5 EC 1.22 lb ai/A PRE A 44 c 66 abc 51 abc
115
Fomesafen PRE Test Project Code: 02SB04JG ECHCG IPOLA SEBEX control control control Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-07-02 06-07-02 06-07-02
12 Boundry 6.5 EC 1.46 lb ai/A PRE A 65 abc 69 abc 50 abc
13 Dual II Magnum 7.6 EC 0.98 lb ai/A PRE A 60 abc 65 abc 69 ab
14 Dual II Magnum 7.6 EC 1.18 lb ai/A PRE A 46 bc 56 abc 56 abc
15 Nontreated 0 d 0 d 0 d
LSD (P=.05) 21.6 29.5 25.4 Standard Deviation 15.1 20.7 17.7 CV 27.19 36.6 34.79 Replicate F 1.647 1.481 0.470 Replicate Prob(F) 0.1930 0.2335 0.7051 Treatment F 5.097 3.341 3.456 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0012 0.0009
116
117
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Roundup Efficacy Using Drift Reduction Nozzles
Experiment number ................. : 02SB05JG Location................................... : Northeast Research Station - St. Joseph, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 13.3’ x 25’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 40”/4 (2 rows treated) Soil type................................... : loam %OM ..................................... : 1.4 pH .......................................... : 6.1 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Soybean/Pioneer 95B93 Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 06-12-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:30-1:00p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 91/87 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 2-4 S/SW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 40 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 60 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : moist/dry Crop stage/height..................... : V5-6/12” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/see comments Nozzle type/size....................... : see comments Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 20”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : see comments/30 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)...... : (height/# leaves) ECHCG ................................... : 5-7”/4-6 lf IPOHE ..................................... : 6-24”/5lf-run SEBEX .................................... : 5-8”/5-8 lf CASOB.................................... : 6-10”/6-8 lf Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/0.00 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.94/0.75 3rd week/4th week................... : 1.31/0.30
118
Roundup Efficacy Using Drift Reduction Nozzles Project Code: 02SB05JG _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Spraying Systems XR TeeJet®, AI TeeJet®, DG TeeJet®, and Turbo TeeJet®, and Greenleaf Technologies Air Mix® and Turbo Drop® were the nozzles evaluated. Roundup ultra Max applied using all nozzles All nozels controlled weeds. equivalent to where a XR110015 was used. In this study, speed was varied to obtain the desired output of 10, 5, and 2.5 GPA. Speeds used were 2.6, 5.2, and 10.4 MPH for the 10, 5, and 2.5 GPA, respectively. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
119
Roundup Efficacy Using Drift Reduction Nozzles Project Code: 02SB05JG IPOLA SEBEX ECHCG control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-28-02 06-28-02 06-28-02
1 10 GPA 64 cde 79 abc 86 ab Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A XR TeeJet
2 10 GPA 64 cde 51 fgh 88 ab Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Drift Guard
3 10 GPA 66 cde 66 c-f 75 b-e Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Turbo TeeJet
4 10 GPA 61 def 55 efg 70 cde Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Air Mix
5 10 GPA 56 ef 45 gh 69 de Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Turbo Drop
6 10 GPA 85 ab 78 abc 86 ab Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A AI Teejet
7 5 GPA 79 abc 83 abc 89 ab Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A XR TeeJet
8 5 GPA 64 cde 56 efg 83 a-d Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Drift Guard
9 5 GPA 79 abc 78 abc 84 a-d Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Turbo TeeJet
120
Roundup Efficacy Using Drift Reduction Nozzles Project Code: 02SB05JG IPOLA SEBEX ECHCG control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-28-02 06-28-02 06-28-02
10 5 GPA 66 cde 38 h 85 abc Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Air Mix
11 5 GPA 86 a 75 a-d 87 ab
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Turbo Drop
12 5 GPA 61 def 60 d-g 64 e
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A AI Teejet
13 2.5 GPA 83 ab 86 ab 93 a
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A XR TeeJet
14 2.5 GPA 74 a-d 79 abc 84 a-d
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Drift Guard
15 2.5 GPA 85 ab 88 a 90 ab
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Turbo TeeJet
16 2.5 GPA 66 cde 58 d-g 75 b-e
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Air Mix
17 2.5 GPA 70 b-e 70 b-e 76 b-e
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Turbo Drop
18 2.5 GPA 48 f 75 a-d 84 a-d
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A AI Teejet
19 Nontreated 0 g 0 i 0 f
LSD (P=.05) 15.8 16.8 15.4Standard Deviation 11.2 11.9 10.9CV 16.89 18.58 14.12 Replicate F 3.935 4.579 3.975Replicate Prob(F) 0.0133 0.0065 0.0127Treatment F 11.865 12.464 13.802Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
121
Roundup Efficacy Using Drift Reduction Nozzles Project Code: 02SB05JG ECHCG SEBEX IPOLA control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-23-02 07-23-02 07-23-02
1 10 GPA 89 a 86 abc 85 ab Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A XR TeeJet
2 10 GPA 89 a 68 def 85 ab Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Drift Guard
3 10 GPA 84 abc 84 abc 84 ab Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Turbo TeeJet
4 10 GPA 85 abc 58 fg 80 abc Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Air Mix
5 10 GPA 81 abc 50 g 85 ab Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Turbo Drop
6 10 GPA 85 abc 85 abc 86 ab Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A AI Teejet
7 5 GPA 85 abc 90 a 86 ab Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A XR TeeJet
8 5 GPA 79 bc 73 b-f 84 ab Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Drift Guard
9 5 GPA 89 a 86 abc 86 ab Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Turbo TeeJet
122
Roundup Efficacy Using Drift Reduction Nozzles Project Code: 02SB05JG ECHCG SEBEX IPOLA control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-23-02 07-23-02 07-23-02
10 5 GPA 89 a 46 g 86 ab
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Air Mix
11 5 GPA 83 abc 76 a-e 87 a
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Turbo Drop
12 5 GPA 83 abc 67 def 78 bc
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A AI Teejet
13 2.5 GPA 88 ab 89 a 88 a
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A XR TeeJet
14 2.5 GPA 79 bc 80 a-d 84 ab
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Drift Guard
15 2.5 GPA 86 ab 89 a 88 a
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Turbo TeeJet
16 2.5 GPA 90 a 87 ab 86 ab
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Air Mix
17 2.5 GPA 84 abc 60 efg 81 ab
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A Turbo Drop
18 2.5 GPA 76 c 71 c-f 73 c
Roundup UltraMax 5 L 1 lb ai/A POST A AI Teejet
19 Nontreated 0 d 0 h 0 d LSD (P=.05) 9.9 15.6 8.3Standard Deviation 7.0 11.1 5.9CV 8.77 15.65 7.4 Replicate F 5.093 7.313 2.742Replicate Prob(F) 0.0037 0.0004 0.0527Treatment F 31.704 15.617 44.444Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
123
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
BASF Performance Guard Corn Test
Experiment number ................. : 02CN01JG Location................................... : Ben Hur Research Farm – Baton Rouge, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 12.6’ x 25’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 38”/4 Soil type................................... : clay loam %OM ..................................... : 1.9 pH .......................................... : 6.3 Planting date ............................ : 04-15-02 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Corn/Dekalb DK687RR Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : PRE POST1 POST2 Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 04-15-02 05-06-02 05-06-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 3:30-4:00 p 10:00-10:30a 10:00-10:30a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A N/A N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 88/62 90/78 90/78 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 1-3 SE 4-5 S 4-5 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 40 50 50 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 40 56 56 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : N/A V3-5/10-12” V3-5/10-12” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 trctrCA/3.75 trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/11003VS FF/11003VS FF/11003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 20”/4/20” 18”/4/20” 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/26 15/26 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Jones Jones Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) SEBEX .................................... : N/A 4-6”/2-4 4-6”/2-4 IPOHE ..................................... : N/A 6-10”/5-10 6-10”/5-10 PHYAN ................................... : N/A 2-4”/2-4 2-4”/2-4 BRAPP .................................... : N/A 4-6”/3-6 4-6”/3-6 Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.00/0.00 0.09/0.95 0.09/0.95 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.09/0.95 0.00/0.47 0.00/0.47 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Rainfall for activation of pre herbicide was not received until 4 weeks after application. Treatment containing mesotrion (Callisto) controlled entireleaf morningglory and hemp sesbania. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
124
BASF Performance Guard Corn Test Project Code: 02CN01JG IPOHE SEBEX IPOHE SEBEX control control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-06-02 05-06-02 05-30-02 05-30-02
1 Outlook 6 EC 18 oz pr/A PRE A 68 b 59 c 76 cd 70 c dimethenamid-P
2 Dual II Magnum 7.64 EC 2 pt pr/A PRE A 68 b 60 c 75 d 80 bc
3 Guardsman Max 5 EC 3.4 pt pr/A PRE A 88 a 88 ab 83 bcd 85 ab dimethenamid-P 1.7 atrazine 3.3
4 Bicep II Magnum 5.5 EC 2.1 qt pr/A PRE A 91 a 86 ab 86 ab 84 ab S-metolachlor 2.4 atrazine 3.1
5 A12909E 3.67 L 2.4 qt pr/A PRE A 91 a 94 a 90 ab 85 ab mesotrione S-metolachlor safener
6 A12854F 3.93 L 3 qt pr/A PRE A 90 a 94 a 85 abc 88 ab mesotrione S-metolachlor atrazine safener
7 Guardsman Max 5 EC 3.4 pt pr/A PRE A 89 a 83 b 94 a 96 a Distinct 70 DF 4 oz pr/A 10-24" C dicamba 50 diflufenzopyr 20 Induce L 0.25 % v/v 10-24" C
8 Outlook 6 EC 18 oz pr/A PRE A 64 b 48 d 91 ab 90 ab Distinct 70 DF 4 oz pr/A 10-24" C Induce L 0.25 % v/v 10-24" C
125
BASF Performance Guard Corn Test Project Code: 02CN01JG IPOHE SEBEX IPOHE SEBEX control control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-06-02 05-06-02 05-30-02 05-30-02
9 Distinct 70 DF 4 oz pr/A 10-24" C 0 c 0 e 91 ab 93 ab Induce L 0.25 % v/v 10-24" C
10 Celebrity Plus 70 DF 4.7 oz pr/A 4-10" B 0 c 0 e 91 ab 95 a dicamba 42.4 diflufenzopyr 17 nicosulfuron 10.6 Induce L 0.25 % v/v 4-10" B
11 Nontreated 0 c 0 e 0 e 0 d LSD (P=.05) 8.5 11.1 9.8 13.3Standard Deviation 5.9 7.7 6.8 9.2CV 9.95 13.81 8.67 11.73 Replicate F 0.199 1.085 0.738 1.112Replicate Prob(F) 0.8965 0.3703 0.5375 0.3599Treatment F 178.894 102.054 61.942 34.543Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
126
127
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Syngenta Corn Test
Experiment number ................. : 02CN02JG Location................................... : Ben Hur Research Farm – Baton Rouge, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized Complete Block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 25 ft. Row width/# per plot ............. : 38”/4 Soil type................................... : clay loam %OM ..................................... : 1.9 pH .......................................... : 6.3 Planting date ............................ : 04-15-02 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Corn/Dekalb DK687RR Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : PRE POST1 POST2 Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 04-15-02 05-06-02 05-06-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 3:30-4:00 p 10:00-10:30a 10:00-10:30a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A N/A N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 88/62 90/78 90/78 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 1-3 SE 4-5 S 4-5 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 40 50 50 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 40 56 56 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : N/A 3-5/10-12” 3-5/10-12” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 trctrCA/3.75 trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/11003VS FF/11003VS FF/11003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 20”/4/20” 18”/4/20” 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/26 15/26 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Jones Jones Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) SEBEX .................................... : N/A 4-6”/2-4 4-6”/2-4 IPOHE ..................................... : N/A 6-10”/5-10 6-10”/5-10 PHYAN ................................... : N/A 2-4”/2-4 2-4”/2-4 BRAPP .................................... : N/A 4-6”/3-6 4-6”/3-6 Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.00/0.00 0.09/0.95 0.09/0.95 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.09/0.95 0.00/0.47 0.00/0.47 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Rainfall for activation of PRE herbicides was not received until 4 weeks after application. At 45 days after PRE herbicide application treatment containing mesotrion (Callisto) controlled hemp sesbania, entireleaf morningglory, and prickly sida 74 to 81%. ______________________________________________________________________________
128
Syngenta Corn Test Project Code: 02CN02JG SEBEX IPOHE SEBEX IPOHE control control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-06-02 05-06-02 05-30-02 05-30-02
1 A12854F 3.93 L 2.5 qt pr/A PRE A 97 a 86 ab 81 bcd 74 bc mesotrione S-metolachlor atrazine safener
2 A12854F 3.93 L 3 qt pr/A PRE A 93 ab 89 a 80 cd 80 abc
3 A12909E 3.67 L 2 qt pr/A PRE A 93 ab 86 ab 78 cd 81 abc mesotrione S-metolachlor safener
4 A12909E 3.67 L 2.4 qt pr/A PRE A 93 ab 91 a 75 cd 86 ab
5 Bicep II Magnum 5.5 EC 2.1 qt pr/A PRE A 90 ab 90 a 88 abc 79 abc
6 Balance Pro 4 L 3 oz pr/A PRE A 93 ab 93 a 85 a-d 90 a Atrazine 4 L 1 qt pr/A PRE A
7 Harness XTRA 6 L 2 qt pr/A PRE A 88 b 88 ab 78 cd 81 abc
8 TopNotch 3.2 L 2.5 qt pr/A PRE A 86 b 81 b 74 d 68 c Hornet 78.5 WG 2.62 oz pr/A PRE A
9 Outlook 6 EC 0.56 qt pr/A PRE A 70 c 74 c 94 ab 90 a Marksman 3.2 SC 1.5 qt pr/A POST2 C Agridex L 1 % v/v POST2 C
10 A12854F 3.93 L 2.5 qt pr/A POST1 B 0 d 0 d 95 a 91 a Accent 75 WG 0.33 oz pr/A POST1 B
129
Syngenta Corn Test Project Code: 02CN02JG SEBEX IPOHE SEBEX IPOHE control control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-06-02 05-06-02 05-30-02 05-30-02
11 A12854F 3.93 L 3 qt pr/A POST1 B 0 d 0 d 96 a 93 a
Accent 75 WG 0.33 oz pr/A POST1 B
12 A12909E 3.67 L 2.0 qt pr/A POST1 B 0 d 0 d 95 a 93 a Accent 75 WG 0.33 oz pr/A POST1 B
13 A12909E 3.67 L 2.4 qt pr/A POST1 B 0 d 0 d 97 a 92 a Accent 75 WG 0.33 oz pr/A POST1 B
14 Nontreated 0 d 0 d 0 e 0 d LSD (P=.05) 8.1 7.4 12.7 16.0Standard Deviation 5.7 5.2 8.9 11.2CV 9.96 9.3 11.19 14.27 Replicate F 0.574 1.156 1.707 3.120Replicate Prob(F) 0.6355 0.3388 0.1815 0.0368Treatment F 246.009 280.078 29.952 18.193Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
130
Syngenta Corn Test Project Code: 02CN02JG SIDSP controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-30-02
1 A12854F 3.93 L 2.5 qt pr/A PRE A 85 cde mesotrione S-metolachlor atrazine safener
2 A12854F 3.93 L 3 qt pr/A PRE A 84 de
3 A12909E 3.67 L 2 qt pr/A PRE A 80 e mesotrione S-metolachlor safener
4 A12909E 3.67 L 2.4 qt pr/A PRE A 85 cde
5 Bicep II Magnum 5.5 EC 2.1 qt pr/A PRE A 89 bcd
6 Balance Pro 4 L 3 oz pr/A PRE A 91 abc Atrazine 4 L 1 qt pr/A PRE A
7 Harness XTRA 6 L 2 qt pr/A PRE A 80 e
8 TopNotch 3.2 L 2.5 qt pr/A PRE A 84 de Hornet 78.5 WG 2.62 oz pr/A PRE A
9 Outlook 6 EC 0.56 qt pr/A PRE A 93 ab Marksman 3.2 SC 1.5 qt pr/A POST2 C Agridex L 1 % v/v POST2 C
10 A12854F 3.93 L 2.5 qt pr/A POST1 B 95 ab Accent 75 WG 0.33 oz pr/A POST1 B
131
Syngenta Corn Test Project Code: 02CN02JG SIDSP controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-30-02
11 A12854F 3.93 L 3 qt pr/A POST1 B 96 a
Accent 75 WG 0.33 oz pr/A POST1 B
12 A12909E 3.67 L 2.0 qt pr/A POST1 B 94 ab Accent 75 WG 0.33 oz pr/A POST1 B
13 A12909E 3.67 L 2.4 qt pr/A POST1 B 96 a Accent 75 WG 0.33 oz pr/A POST1 B
14 Nontreated 0 f LSD (P=.05) 6.5Standard Deviation 4.5CV 5.52 Replicate F 0.465Replicate Prob(F) 0.7080Treatment F 114.735Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001
132
133
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Monsanto Roundup Test - Corn
Experiment number ................. : 02CN03JG Location................................... : Ben Hur Research Farm – Baton Rouge, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 25’ Row width/# per plot ............. : 38”/4 Soil type................................... : clay loam %OM ..................................... : 1.9 pH .......................................... : 6.3 Planting date ............................ : 04-15-02 Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : Corn/Dekalb DK687RR Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST1 POST2 Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 05-14-02 05-27-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 11:30-12:00a 9:15-9:45a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 73/67 78/69 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3-4 S 1-2 S Weather (sunny, etc.)............... : 20 20 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 38 66 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : V4-5/16-18” V6-7/20-24” Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 CO2bkpk/3.4 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/11003VS FF/11003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 20”/4/20” 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/36 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Jones Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) NA Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/0.95 0.00/0.47 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.29 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.47/0.29 0.06/2.60 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Roundup Ready corn was not injured with two application of MON 78270 (Roundup Weatermax). _____________________________________________________________________________________________
134
Monsanto Roundup Test - Corn Project Code: 02CN03JG Corn Corn Corn Corn height injury injury injuryTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl in % % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-24-02 05-24-02 06-07-02 06-19-01
1 Roundup UltraMax 5 L 26 oz pr/A POST1 A 24 a 0 a 0 a 0 a Roundup UltraMax 5 L 26 oz pr/A POST2 B
2 Roundup UltraMax 5 L 52 oz pr/A POST1 A 26 a 0 a 0 a 0 a Roundup UltraMax 5 L 52 oz pr/A POST2 B
3 MON 78270 6 L 22 oz pr/A POST1 A 22 a 0 a 0 a 0 a MON 78270 6 L 22 oz pr/A POST2 B
4 MON 78270 6 L 44 oz pr/A POST1 A 24 a 0 a 0 a 0 a MON 78270 6 L 44 oz pr/A POST2 B
5 Nontreated 24 a 0 a 0 a 0 a LSD (P=.05) 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0Standard Deviation 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0CV 12.26 0.0 0.0 0.0 Replicate F 1.642 0.000 0.000 0.000Replicate Prob(F) 0.2319 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000Treatment F 0.712 0.000 0.000 0.000Treatment Prob(F) 0.5991 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
135
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Asulox/Prowl Johnsongrass Test
Experiment number ................. : 02GN02JG Location................................... : Ben Hur Research Farm – Baton Rouge, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block (factorial treatment arrangement) Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 10’ x 25’ Row width/# per plot ............. : N/A Soil type................................... : clay %OM ..................................... : 1.5 pH .......................................... : 6.1 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : N/A Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 04-26-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 9:45-11:00a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 80/82 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3-4 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 40 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 50 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : N/A Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/14/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/27 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) SORHA ................................... : 15-20” Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.00/0.00 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.00/0.09 3rd week/4th week................... : 0.00/0.00 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Asulox at 4qts/A controlled Johnsongrass 71% 28 days after treatment and addition of Prowl did not increase control. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
136
Asulox/Prowl Johnsongrass Test Project Code: 02GN02JG SORHA SORHA SORHA control control control Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-14-02 05-24-02 06-20-02
1 Asulox 3.34 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 57 d 60 d 37 b Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 0 qt pr/A POST A
2 Asulox 3.34 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 64 a-d 63 bcd 35 b Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 1 qt pr/A POST A
3 Asulox 3.34 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 65 a-d 67 a-d 45 ab Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 2 qt pr/A POST A
4 Asulox 3.34 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 64 a-d 67 a-d 34 b Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A POST A
5 Asulox 3.34 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 68 ab 60 d 41 ab Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A
6 Asulox 3.34 L 3 qt pr/A POST A 60 bcd 61 cd 40 ab Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 0 qt pr/A POST A
7 Asulox 3.34 L 3 qt pr/A POST A 60 bcd 71 abc 45 ab Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 1 qt pr/A POST A
8 Asulox 3.34 L 3 qt pr/A POST A 58 d 72 abc 36 b Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 2 qt pr/A POST A
9 Asulox 3.34 L 3 qt pr/A POST A 61 a-d 64 bcd 44 ab Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A POST A
10 Asulox 3.34 L 3 qt pr/A POST A 65 a-d 72 ab 46 ab Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A
11 Asulox 3.34 L 4 qt pr/A POST A 66 abc 71 a-d 39 ab Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 0 qt pr/A POST A
137
Asulox/Prowl Johnsongrass Test Project Code: 02GN02JG SORHA SORHA SORHA control control control Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 05-14-02 05-24-02 06-20-02
12 Asulox 3.34 L 4 qt pr/A POST A 61 a-d 76 a 50 a Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 1 qt pr/A POST A
13 Asulox 3.34 L 4 qt pr/A POST A 59 cd 76 a 51 a Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 2 qt pr/A POST A
14 Asulox 3.34 L 4 qt pr/A POST A 66 abc 73 ab 46 ab Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 3 qt pr/A POST A
15 Asulox 3.34 L 4 qt pr/A POST A 68 a 73 ab 43 ab Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A Prowl 3.3 EC 4 qt pr/A POST A
16 Nontreated 0 e 0 e 0 c LSD (P=.05) 7.8 11.0 12.8 Standard Deviation 5.5 7.7 9.0 CV 9.31 12.02 22.74 Replicate F 3.201 1.056 4.071 Replicate Prob(F) 0.0326 0.3775 0.0124 Treatment F 34.388 21.721 6.824 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
138
139
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Burndown Study #1
Experiment number ................. : 02GN04JG Location................................... : West Baton Rouge Parish (Hwy 190) Experimental design ................ : Demonstration Number of reps ...................... : 1 Plot size ................................. : 10’ x 100’ Row width/# per plot ............. : N/A Soil type................................... : silt loam Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : N/A Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 09-12-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 3:00-3:45p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 90/85 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 2-3 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 45 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 60 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : N/A Sprayer type/mph..................... : CO2bkpk/3.4 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Siebert Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) IPOCC ..................................... : 24-48” _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Kambamaster (NUP 7 b01) controlled red morningglory equated to that of 2,4-D. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
140
Burndown Study #1 Project Code: 02GN04JG IPOCC IPOCC control control % %Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 09-21-02 09-30-02No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 9 DAT 18 DAT
1 NUP 7 B01 L 1 pt pr/A POST A 85 100
2 2,4 D amine 4 L 1.5 pt pr/A POST A 90 100
3 NUP 7 B01 L 1.5 pt pr/A POST A 85 100
4 2,4 D amine 4 L 2 pt pr/A POST A 87 100
5 Nontreated 0 0 LSD (P=.05) . . Standard Deviation . . CV . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F)
141
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Burndown Study #2
Experiment number ................. : 02GN10JG Location................................... : Ben Hur Research Farm – Baton Rouge, LA Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 10’ x 75’ Row width/# per plot ............. : N/A Soil type................................... : silt loam OM......................................... : 1.8 pH .......................................... : 6.52 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : N/A Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 09-24-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 9:00-9:45a Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 90/85 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 2-3 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 99 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 65 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : N/A Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) IPOLA ..................................... : 36-60” Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days....................... : 0.31/2.96 4-7 days/2nd week ................... : 0.08/2.68 3rd week/4th week................... : 1.53/0.13 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Kambamaster (NUP 7 B01) controlled pitted morningglory both at the higher rate and was equal to that of 2,4-D. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
142
Burndown Study #2 Project Code: 02GN10JG IPOLA IPOLA control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % %No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 10-02-02 10-10-02
1 NUP 7 B01 L 1 pt pr/A POST A 50 c 78 b
2 2,4 D amine 4 L 1.5 pt pr/A POST A 63 b 90 a
3 NUP 7 B01 L 1.5 pt pr/A POST A 79 a 98 a
4 2,4 D amine 4 L 2 pt pr/A POST A 78 a 95 a
5 Nontreated 0 d 0 c LSD (P=.05) 5.5 8.4Standard Deviation 3.6 5.5CV 6.69 7.61 Replicate F 0.355 2.111Replicate Prob(F) 0.7866 0.1522Treatment F 322.742 223.917Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001
143
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Treflan/Spartan Red Morningglory Test
Experiment number ................. : 02GN06JG Location................................... : West Baton Rouge Parish (Hwy 190) Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 10’ x 15’ Row width/# per plot ............. : N/A Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.8 pH .......................................... : 6.5 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : N/A Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : PPI PRE Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 05-24-02 05-24-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 2:00-2:30p 3:30-4:00p Incorporation equipment.......... : field cultivator N/A Incorporation depth.................. : 2” N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 89/76 89/76 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 2-4 S 2-4 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 20 20 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 55 55 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : N/A N/A Sprayer type/mph..................... : trctrCA/3.75 trctrCA/3.75 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/11003VS FF/11003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/4/20” 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/26 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Jones Jones Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) N/A _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: For maximum red morningglory control Spartan should not be soil-incorporated. Treflan soil-incorporated followed by a surface application of Spartan provided superior weed control to that of Spartan applied alone. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
144
Treflan/Spartan Red Morningglory Test Project Code: 02GN06JG IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC control control control Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl % % % No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-12-02 06-26-02 07-16-02
1 Treflan 4 EC 2 qt pr/A PPI A 84 cd 76 b 60 f Spartan 75 DF 4 oz pr/A PPI A
2 Treflan 4 EC 2 qt pr/A PPI A 85 bcd 89 a 71 def Spartan 75 DF 5.3 oz pr/A PPI A
3 Treflan 4 EC 2 qt pr/A PPI A 89 abc 89 a 84 a-d Spartan 75 DF 6.7 oz pr/A PPI A
4 Treflan 4 EC 2 qt pr/A PPI A 97 ab 95 a 80 b-e Spartan 75 DF 8.0 oz pr/A PPI A
5 Treflan 4 EC 2 qt pr/A PPI A 98 a 98 a 94 abc Spartan 75 DF 4 oz pr/A PRE B
6 Treflan 4 EC 2 qt pr/A PPI A 97 a 98 a 97 a Spartan 75 DF 5.3 oz pr/A PRE B
7 Treflan 4 EC 2 qt pr/A PPI A 97 a 98 a 97 a Spartan 75 DF 6.7 oz pr/A PRE B
8 Treflan 4 EC 2 qt pr/A PPI A 98 a 98 a 96 ab Spartan 75 DF 8.0 oz pr/A PRE B
9 Treflan 4 EC 2 qt pr/A PPI A 73 d 62 c 38 g
10 Spartan 75 DF 4 oz pr/A PRE B 95 abc 95 a 64 ef
11 Spartan 75 DF 5.3 oz pr/A PRE B 96 abc 93 a 78 cde
12 Spartan 75 DF 6.7 oz pr/A PRE B 95 abc 95 a 79 cde
13 Spartan 75 DF 8.0 oz pr/A PRE B 98 a 99 a 91 abc
14 Nontreated 0 e 0 d 0 h LSD (P=.05) 12.6 11.3 16.3 Standard Deviation 8.8 7.9 11.4 CV 10.32 9.38 15.52 Replicate F 1.827 1.260 1.056 Replicate Prob(F) 0.1586 0.3018 0.3790 Treatment F 33.906 44.354 22.467 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
145
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Late Season Postemergence Red Morningglory Test
Experiment number ................. : 02GN09JG Location................................... : West Baton Rouge Parish (Hwy 190) Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 10’ x 50’ Row width/# per plot ............. : N/A Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.8 pH .......................................... : 6.52 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : N/A Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 09-12-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 3:00-3:45p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 90/85 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 2-3 S Cloud cover (%)....................... : 45 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 60 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : N/A Sprayer type/mph..................... : CO2bkpk/3.4 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Siebert Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) IPOCC ..................................... : 24-48” _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: Average water pH was 8.90. After adding PCC 1174 acidifier to water, solution average was pH 1.06. Adding herbicide and surfactant lowered solution pH to 1.01. On 09-16-02 1 inch of rainfall was received. Weed control was better with the 2,4-D formulation than with Clarity. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
146
Late Season Postemergence Red Morningglory Test Project Code: 02GN09JG IPOCC IPOCC control control % %Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 09-21-02 09-30-02No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 9 DAT 18 DAT
1 Saber L 1 pt pr/A POST A 70 100 Activator 90 L 0.25 % v/v POST A
2 Saber L 8 oz pr/A POST A 65 100 Activator 90 L 0.25 % v/v POST A
3 PCC 1174 L 1 % v/v POST A 85 100 Savana L 24.3 oz pr/A POST A Activator 90 L 0.25 % v/v POST A
4 PCC 1174 L 1 % v/v POST A 65 97 Savana L 12.15 oz pr/A POST A Activator 90 L 0.25 % v/v POST A
5 PCC 1174 L 1 % v/v POST A 85 100 Savana L 48.6 oz pr/A POST A Activator 90 L 0.25 % v/v POST A
6 Clarity L 8 oz pr/A POST A 40 70 Activator 90 L 0.25 % v/v POST A
147
Late Season Postemergence Red Morningglory Control Project Code: 02GN09JG IPOCC IPOCC control control % %Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 09-21-02 09-30-02No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 9 DAT 18 DAT
7 Clarity L 4 oz pr/A POST A 30 65 Activator 90 L 0.25 % v/v POST A
8 PCC 1174 L 1 % v/v POST A 50 75 PCC 1172 L 12.8 oz pr/A POST A Activator 90 L 0.25 % v/v POST A
9 PCC 1174 L 1 % v/v POST A 65 100 PCC 1172 L 6.4 oz pr/A POST A Activator 90 L 0.25 % v/v POST A
10 PCC 1174 L 1 % v/v POST A 50 85 PCC 1172 L 25.6 oz pr/A POST A Activator 90 L 0.25 % v/v POST A
11 Nontreated 0 0 LSD (P=.05) . . Standard Deviation . . CV . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F)
148
149
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Postemergence Control of Red Morningglory with 2,4-D Alternatives
Experiment number ................. : 02GN02JS Location................................... : West Baton Rouge Parish (Hwy 190) Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 5 Plot size ................................. : Row width/# per plot ............. : Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.8 pH .......................................... : 6.5 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : N/A Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 08-02-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 12:30-1:30p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 95/83 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3-4 S-SW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 50 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 45 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 72” Sprayer type/mph..................... : CO2bkpk/3.4 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Siebert Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) IPOCC ..................................... : 12-24” ______________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: All herbicides provided excellent control. ______________________________________________________________________________________
150
Postemergence Control of Red Morningglory with 2,4-D Alternatives Project Code: 02GN02JS IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC control control control Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 7 DAT 14 DAT 21 DAT No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 08-22-02 08-29-02 09-05-02
1 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a Valor 51 WP 1.5 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
2 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a Valor 51 WP 2 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
3 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a Valor 51 WP 3 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
4 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a Valor 51 WP 4 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
5 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a Spartan 75 DF 5 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
6 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a Spartan 75 DF 6 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
7 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a Spartan 75 DF 6.68 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
8 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a Spartan 75 DF 8 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
9 12 inch A 92 b 100 a 100 a Aatrex 4 L 1 qt pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
10 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a Aatrex 4 L 2 qt pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
11 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a Aatrex 4 L 3 qt pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
151
Postemergence Control of Red Morningglory with 2,4-D Alternatives Project Code: 02GN02JS IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC control control control Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 7 DAT 14 DAT 21 DAT No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 08-22-02 08-29-02 09-05-02
12 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a
Aatrex 4 L 4 qt pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
13 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a V10064 76.9 DF 2.054 lb ai/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
14 12 inch A 66 d 100 a 100 a Clarity 4 L 1.5 pt pr/A Induce L 0.25 % v/v
15 12 inch A 52 e 99 a 100 a Grandstand 3 L 1 pt pr/A
16 12 inch A 100 a 100 a 100 a Aim 2 L 1 oz pr/A Induce L 0.25 % v/v
17 12 inch A 66 d 100 a 100 a Envoke 75 WG 0.3 oz pr/A Induce L 0.25 % v/v
18 12 inch A 0 g 0 d 0 b Nontreated
19 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Valor 51 WP 1.5 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
20 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Valor 51 WP 2 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
21 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Valor 51 WP 3 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
22 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Valor 51 WP 4 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
23 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Spartan 75 DF 5 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
24 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Spartan 75 DF 6 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
152
Postemergence Control of Red Morningglory with 2,4-D Alternatives Project Code: 02GN02JS
IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC control control control Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 7 DAT 14 DAT 21 DAT No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 08-22-02 08-29-02 09-05-02
23 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a
Spartan 75 DF 5 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
24 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Spartan 75 DF 6 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
25 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Spartan 75 DF 6.68 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
26 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Spartan 75 DF 8 oz pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
27 24 inch B 87 c 99 a 100 a Aatrex 4 L 1 qt pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
28 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Aatrex 4 L 2 qt pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
29 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Aatrex 4 L 3 qt pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
30 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Aatrex 4 L 4 qt pr/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
31 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a V10064 76.9 DF 2.054 lb ai/A Agridex L 1 % v/v
32 24 inch B 55 e 85 c 100 a Clarity 4 L 1.5 pt pr/A Induce L 0.25 % v/v
153
Postemergence Control of Red Morningglory with 2,4-D Alternatives Project Code: 02GN02JS IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC control control control Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 7 DAT 14 DAT 21 DAT No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 08-22-02 08-29-02 09-05-02
33 24 inch B 41 f 94 b 100 a
Grandstand 3 L 1 pt pr/A
34 24 inch B 100 a 100 a 100 a Aim 2 L 1 oz pr/A Induce L 0.25 % v/v
35 24 inch B 56 e 93 b 100 a Envoke 75 WG 0.3 oz pr/A Induce L 0.25 % v/v
36 24 inch B 0 g 0 d 0 b Nontreated
LSD (P=.05) 4.4 2.0 0.0 Standard Deviation 5.0 2.3 0.0 CV 5.84 2.41 0.0 Replicate F 0.870 1.909 0.000 Replicate Prob(F) 0.5527 0.0501 1.0000 Treatment F 289.617 1058.510 0.000 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 1.0000
154
155
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Postemergence Control of 72 inch Red Morningglory #1
Experiment number ................. : 02GN03JS Location................................... : West Baton Rouge Parish (Hwy 190) Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 5 Plot size ................................. : 5’ x 10’ Row width/# per plot ............. : NA Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.8 pH .......................................... : 6.5 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : N/A Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST PDIR Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 08-02-02 08-02-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 12:30-1:30p 12:30-1:30p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 95/83 95/83 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3-4 S-SW 3-4 S-SW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 50 50 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 45 45 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 72” 72” Sprayer type/mph..................... : CO2bkpk/3.4 CO2bkpk/3.4 Nozzle type/size....................... : OC04 FF/8003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/2/36 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/30 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Siebert Siebert Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) IPOCC ..................................... : 72” _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: The most effective treatments 35 days after treatment were 2,4-D and (2pt/A) 2,4-D (1.5 pt/A) plus Weedmaster (4 oz/A). _____________________________________________________________________________________________
156
Postemergence Control of 72 inch Red Morningglory #1 Project Code: 02GN03JS IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC control control control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 7 DAT 14 DAT 21 DAT 28 DAT 35 DATNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 08-08-02 08-16-02 08-22-02 08-28-02 09-05-02
1 2,4-D Amine 3.8 L 2 pt pr/A POST A 39 bc 52 c 73 b 87 a 91 a
2 2,4-D Amine 3.8 L 3 pt pr/A POST A 43 ab 72 a 70 bc 78 bc 79 c
3 Weedmaster 3.87 L 2 pt pr/A POST A 24 de 48 cd 47 def 61 ef 74 d
4 2,4-D Amine 3.8 L 1 pt pr/A POST A 34 bc 42 de 53 d 54 f 54 f Weedmaster 3.87 L 0.5 pt pr/A POST A
5 2,4-D Amine 3.8 L 1 pt pr/A POST A 31 cd 48 cd 70 bc 71 cd 73 d Weedmaster 3.87 L 1 pt pr/A POST A
6 2,4-D Amine 3.8 L 1.5 pt pr/A POST A 49 a 70 a 81 a 87 a 94 a Weedmaster 3.87 L 4 oz pr/A POST A
7 Valor 51 WP 3 oz pr/A PDIR B 20 ef 61 b 64 c 77 bc 82 bc Agridex L 1 % v/v PDIR B
8 Valor 51 WP 4 oz pr/A PDIR B 14 f 70 a 69 bc 79 ab 83 bc Agridex L 1 % v/v PDIR B
9 Spartan 75 DF 6.68 oz pr/A PDIR B 24 de 39 e 47 def 66 de 67 e Agridex L 1 % v/v PDIR B
10 Spartan 75 DF 8 oz pr/A PDIR B 40 abc 50 c 51 de 70 cd 74 d Agridex L 1 % v/v PDIR B
11 Aatrex 4 L 4 qt pr/A PDIR B 11 f 23 f 44 ef 77 bc 86 b Agridex L 1 % v/v PDIR B
12 V10064 76.9 DF 2.054 lb ai/A PDIR B 17 ef 22 f 43 f 70 cd 80 c Agridex L 1 % v/v PDIR B
13 nontreated 0 g 0 g 0 g 0 g 0 g LSD (P=.05) 9.3 7.7 7.2 8.2 4.4Standard Deviation 7.3 6.0 5.7 6.4 3.4CV 27.34 13.11 10.34 9.44 4.73 Replicate F 0.370 2.138 0.468 0.467 1.759Replicate Prob(F) 0.8285 0.0905 0.7592 0.7595 0.1526Treatment F 19.178 62.057 67.069 61.658 248.387Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
157
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy
Postemergence Control of 72 inch Red Morningglory #2
Experiment number ................. : 02GN04JS Location................................... : West Baton Rouge Parish (Hwy 190) Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 5 Plot size ................................. : Row width/# per plot ............. : N/A Soil type................................... : silt loam %OM ..................................... : 1.8 pH .......................................... : 6.5 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : N/A Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Application type ...................... : POST(A) POST(B) Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 08-02-02 08-02-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 12:30-1:30p 12:30-1:30p Incorporation equipment.......... : N/A N/A Incorporation depth.................. : N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F) .......... : 95/83 95/83 Wind (mph, direction) ............. : 3-4 S-SW 3-4 S-SW Cloud cover (%)....................... : 50 50 Relative humidity (%) ............. : 45 45 Soil/Leaf surface moist ............ : dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height..................... : 72” 72” Sprayer type/mph..................... : CO2bkpk/3.4 CO2bkpk/3.4 Nozzle type/size....................... : OC04 FF/8003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/2/36 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/30 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Siebert Siebert Weed species (population)....... : (height/# leaves) IPOCC ..................................... : 72” _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: The POST (B) application was directed to the lower 18 inches of red morningglory plants that had climbed a 72 inch stake. The POST (A) application was made overtop. Red morningglory was controlled 84% with directed application of Valor (1.5 oz/A) and Spartan (5oz/A). _____________________________________________________________________________________________
158
Postemergence Control of 72 inch Red Morningglory #2 Project Code: 02GN04JS IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC control control control control controlTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl 7 DAT 14 DAT 21 DAT 28 DAT 35 DATNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 08-08-02 08-16-02 08-22-02 08-28-02 09-05-02
1 2,4-D Amine 3.8 L 0.5 pt pr/A POST A 19 de 33 cd 36 e 56 d 46 e
2 2,4-D Amine 3.8 L 0.5 pt pr/A POST A 26 cd 45 b 59 bc 75 a 75 b Weedmaster 3.87 L 0.5 pt pr/A POST A
3 Aatrex 4 L 2 qt pr/A POST A 26 cd 28 de 50 d 68 bc 75 b Agridex L 1 % v/v POST A
4 Valor 51 WP 1.5 oz pr/A POST B 18 e 27 e 35 e 79 a 84 a Agridex L 1 % v/v POST B
5 Valor 51 WP 2 oz pr/A POST B 34 b 35 c 66 a 66 c 69 cd Agridex L 1 % v/v POST B
6 Spartan 75 DF 5 oz pr/A POST B 17 e 18 f 54 cd 74 ab 84 a Agridex L 1 % v/v POST B
7 Clarity 4 L 1.5 pt pr/A POST A 42 a 59 a 67 a 62 cd 71 bc Induce L 0.25 % v/v POST A
8 Grandstand 3 L 1 pt pr/A POST A 33 bc 54 a 61 ab 65 c 66 d LSD (P=.05) 7.1 5.7 6.1 6.3 4.3Standard Deviation 5.5 4.4 4.7 4.8 3.3CV 20.43 11.87 8.8 7.09 4.59 Replicate F 1.296 4.556 1.242 1.475 2.735Replicate Prob(F) 0.2954 0.0058 0.3160 0.2363 0.0487Treatment F 13.200 50.717 35.032 12.226 68.742Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
159
LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory
Experiment number ................. : 02RM02CJ Location................................... : West Baton Rouge Parish (HWY 190) Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 2’ x 2’ Row width/# per plot ............. : N/A Soil type................................... : silt loam OM......................................... : 1.8 PH.......................................... : 6.5 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : N/A Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 05-29-02 06-19-02 07-16-02 08-14-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 09:00-10:00a 10:00-11:00a 02:00-03:00p 09:00-10:00a Incorporation equipment.......... : PTO tiller PTO tiller PTO tiller PTO tiller Incorporation depth.................. : 4” 4” 4” 4” Sprayer type/mph..................... : CO2bkpk/3.4 CO2bkpk/3.4 CO2bkpk/3.4 CO2bkpk/3.4 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8003VS FF/8003VS FF/8003VS FF/8003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/4/20” 18”/4/20” 18”/4/20” 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/26 15/26 15/26 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Jones Jones Jones Jones _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: On May 29, June 19, July 16 and August 14 the experimental area was tilled with a PTO tiller and then packed. Boxes with shade cloth to provide 90,70,50, and 30% shade were used to evaluate shade effect on emergence and growth of red morningglory across the growing season. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
160
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC emergenc #/sample lfarea/samp ht/sampl leafwt/sTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl #/box # sq cm cm gNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-19-02 06-19-02 06-19-02 06-19-02 06-19-02
1 90% shade 10 c 9 a 193.89 b 120.56 a 0.34 c
2 70 % shade 12 bc 9 a 441.39 ab 138.44 a 0.56 bc
3 50% shade 16 ab 10 a 622.09 a 132.19 a 1.88 a
4 30% shade 17 ab 10 a 375.28 ab 44.13 a 1.08 b
5 no shade 18 a 9 a 545.27 a 97.94 a 2.01 a LSD (P=.05) 4.7 1.3 269.567 117.094 0.547Standard Deviation 3.0 0.9 174.955 75.996 0.355CV 21.03 9.52 40.17 71.26 30.21 Replicate F 8.516 2.087 3.430 1.614 1.973Replicate Prob(F) 0.0027 0.1555 0.0523 0.2381 0.1719Treatment F 5.022 1.043 3.558 1.011 18.103Treatment Prob(F) 0.0130 0.4251 0.0390 0.4396 0.0001 .
161
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC stemwt/s lfarearea/p ht/plant leafwt/p stemwt/pTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl g sq cm cm g gNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-19-02 06-19-02 06-19-02 06-19-02 06-19-02
1 90% shade 0.26 b 21.840 b 14.427 a 0.040 c 0.031 b
2 70 % shade 0.37 b 49.776 a 16.393 a 0.064 bc 0.042 b
3 50% shade 2.51 a 63.176 a 13.401 a 0.191 a 0.269 a
4 30% shade 0.50 b 40.286 ab 4.712 a 0.115 b 0.053 b
5 no shade 0.68 b 58.524 a 10.379 a 0.219 a 0.072 ab LSD (P=.05) 1.825 27.4200 13.2485 0.0567 0.2041Standard Deviation 1.185 17.7961 8.5985 0.0368 0.1325CV 137.02 38.09 72.48 29.26 142.03 Replicate F 0.880 3.298 1.844 1.961 0.981Replicate Prob(F) 0.4789 0.0578 0.1930 0.1737 0.4343Treatment F 2.479 3.410 1.120 17.955 2.242Treatment Prob(F) 0.1001 0.0441 0.3922 0.0001 0.1253
162
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC lf:stem emergenc #/sample Lfarea ht/samplTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl ratio #/Box # sq cm cmNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-19-02 07-16-02 07-16-02 07-16-02 07-16-02
1 90% shade 1.25 b 2 b 2 b 45.40 b 27.13 b
2 70 % shade 1.61 b 2 b 2 b 67.07 b 49.75 ab
3 50% shade 1.47 b 5 ab 5 ab 156.83 ab 87.00 ab
4 30% shade 2.29 ab 7 ab 5 ab 363.86 a 128.88 a
5 no shade 3.23 a 8 a 7 a 323.02 ab 124.50 ab LSD (P=.05) 1.459 5.2 4.3 282.759 101.435Standard Deviation 0.947 3.4 2.8 183.516 65.833CV 48.11 70.6 66.6 95.96 78.89 Replicate F 0.226 1.660 1.176 1.658 6.570Replicate Prob(F) 0.8764 0.2280 0.3598 0.2286 0.0071Treatment F 2.889 2.878 2.419 2.525 1.862Treatment Prob(F) 0.0689 0.0696 0.1059 0.0959 0.1820
163
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC leafwt/s stemwt/s Lfarea/plan ht/plant leafwt/pTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl g g sq cm cm gNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-16-02 07-16-02 07-16-02 07-16-02 07-16-02
1 90% shade 0.03 c 0.06 b 22.904 b 11.958 a 0.014 c
2 70 % shade 0.16 bc 0.13 b 21.425 b 14.146 a 0.084 bc
3 50% shade 0.44 bc 0.36 ab 37.487 ab 20.091 a 0.108 bc
4 30% shade 0.94 ab 0.84 a 55.029 a 18.951 a 0.153 ab
5 no shade 1.60 a 0.79 a 52.606 ab 19.989 a 0.275 a LSD (P=.05) 0.824 0.593 32.0159 14.2607 0.1314Standard Deviation 0.535 0.385 20.7789 9.2554 0.0853CV 84.26 88.27 54.84 54.36 67.3 Replicate F 1.270 0.998 2.871 7.164 2.334Replicate Prob(F) 0.3287 0.4271 0.0806 0.0052 0.1255Treatment F 5.786 3.498 2.330 0.652 5.169Treatment Prob(F) 0.0078 0.0410 0.1152 0.6364 0.0118
164
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC stemwt/p lf:stem emergenc #/sample LfareaTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl g ratio #/box # sq cmNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-16-02 07-16-02 08-14-02 08-14-02 08-14-02
1 90% shade 0.031 b 0.59 b 3 b 3 b 46.66 c
2 70 % shade 0.078 ab 0.80 b 1 b 1 b 28.95 c
3 50% shade 0.078 ab 1.46 ab 4 b 4 b 205.10 bc
4 30% shade 0.185 a 1.06 b 4 ab 4 ab 455.92 ab
5 no shade 0.125 ab 2.03 a 12 a 7 a 523.71 a LSD (P=.05) 0.1216 0.904 7.7 3.4 255.553Standard Deviation 0.0789 0.587 5.0 2.2 164.201CV 79.7 49.43 104.61 57.45 65.14 Replicate F 0.449 0.721 2.065 3.308 4.128Replicate Prob(F) 0.7229 0.5587 0.1585 0.0573 0.0345Treatment F 2.182 3.829 2.719 4.155 7.771Treatment Prob(F) 0.1328 0.0314 0.0803 0.0244 0.0032
165
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC ht/sampl leafwt/s stemwt/s lfarea/p ht/plantTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl cm g g sq cm cmNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 08-14-02 08-14-02 08-14-02 08-14-02 08-14-02
1 90% shade 85.56 ab 0.08 a 0.10 c 8.840 c 17.813 a
2 70 % shade 23.75 b 0.05 a 0.09 c 14.476 c 11.875 a
3 50% shade 85.32 ab 0.40 a 0.73 bc 44.614 bc 19.508 a
4 30% shade 138.38 a 1.44 a 1.16 ab 104.594 a 29.667 a
5 no shade 144.22 a 0.94 a 2.07 a 81.689 ab 22.266 a LSD (P=.05) 84.432 1.430 0.943 52.3100 22.0285Standard Deviation 54.798 0.877 0.579 33.6108 14.2969CV 57.41 150.5 69.7 66.11 70.69 Replicate F 8.190 0.518 1.714 2.759 3.145Replicate Prob(F) 0.0031 0.6813 0.2410 0.0925 0.0650Treatment F 3.185 1.864 8.197 6.167 0.829Treatment Prob(F) 0.0533 0.2103 0.0062 0.0074 0.5320
166
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC leafwt/p stemwt/p lf:stem emergenc #/sampleTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl g g ratio #/box #No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 08-14-02 08-14-02 08-14-02 09-05-02 09-05-02
1 90% shade 0.017 a 0.021 b 0.78 a 1 b 1 b
2 70 % shade 0.026 a 0.044 b 0.61 a 5 a 5 a
3 50% shade 0.088 a 0.157 ab 0.56 a 3 ab 3 ab
4 30% shade 0.527 a 0.275 a 1.34 a 2 ab 2 ab
5 no shade 0.148 a 0.324 a 0.43 a 5 a 5 a
LSD (P=.05) 0.7203 0.1830 1.420 3.8 3.8Standard Deviation 0.4418 0.1122 0.871 2.5 2.5CV 273.89 68.33 117.18 77.92 77.92 Replicate F 0.700 1.644 0.743 0.938 0.938Replicate Prob(F) 0.5780 0.2550 0.5557 0.4527 0.4527Treatment F 0.914 5.769 0.663 2.461 2.461Treatment Prob(F) 0.5002 0.0174 0.6350 0.1018 0.1018
167
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC lfarea/samp ht/sampl leafwt/s stemwt/s lfarea/pTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl sq cm cm g g sq cmNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 09-05-02 09-05-02 09-05-02 09-05-02 09-05-02
1 90% shade 25.22 a 18.07 a 0.16 a 0.02 a 15.975 a
2 70 % shade 123.98 a 57.94 a 0.33 a 0.14 a 29.743 a
3 50% shade 117.79 a 64.53 a 0.23 a 0.12 a 52.741 a
4 30% shade 59.22 a 23.53 a 0.13 a 0.07 a 19.741 a
5 no shade 141.32 a 50.49 a 0.52 a 0.19 a 22.591 a LSD (P=.05) 156.208 81.207 0.686 0.224 46.2551Standard Deviation 97.662 50.771 0.429 0.140 28.9189CV 104.44 118.32 156.61 129.8 102.7 Replicate F 0.975 0.870 0.494 0.868 0.636Replicate Prob(F) 0.4462 0.4917 0.6952 0.4924 0.6103Treatment F 1.011 0.676 0.550 0.884 1.025Treatment Prob(F) 0.4509 0.6252 0.7045 0.5109 0.4448
168
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC ht/plant leafwt/p stemwt/p lf:stem emergencTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl cm g g ratio LOG #/boxNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 09-05-02 09-05-02 09-05-02 09-05-02 06-19-02
1 90% shade 12.533 a 0.135 a 0.014 a 9.73 a 9.42 c
2 70 % shade 12.295 a 0.066 a 0.030 a 2.46 b 11.87 bc
3 50% shade 22.081 a 0.099 a 0.049 a 1.76 b 15.81 ab
4 30% shade 7.844 a 0.042 a 0.023 a 1.78 b 16.16 ab
5 no shade 7.348 a 0.072 a 0.028 a 2.38 b 17.32 a
LSD (P=.05) 17.3529 0.1289 0.0408 4.436 0.621tStandard Deviation 10.8491 0.0806 0.0255 2.774 0.403tCV 87.35 97.04 89.23 76.6 10.6 Replicate F 0.386 0.295 0.656 0.687 7.651Replicate Prob(F) 0.7657 0.8281 0.5993 0.5822 0.0040Treatment F 1.190 0.781 1.033 6.114 5.038Treatment Prob(F) 0.3785 0.5651 0.4411 0.0117 0.0129
169
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC lfarea/samp ht/sampl ht/plant leafwt/p stemwt/pTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl LOG sq cm LOG cm LOG cm LOG g LOG gNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-19-02 06-19-02 06-19-02 06-19-02 06-19-02
1 90% shade 176.75 b 105.14 a 12.44 a 0.04 c 0.03 b
2 70 % shade 426.36 a 127.89 a 14.99 a 0.06 bc 0.04 b
3 50% shade 596.51 a 116.73 a 11.97 a 0.19 a 0.25 a
4 30% shade 359.84 ab 39.84 a 4.26 a 0.11 b 0.05 b
5 no shade 521.54 a 88.80 a 9.56 a 0.22 a 0.07 ab
LSD (P=.05) 6.222t 5.415t 1.759t 0.034t 0.110tStandard Deviation 4.038t 3.515t 1.142t 0.022t 0.071tCV 20.14 36.43 34.76 2.79 9.28 Replicate F 3.924 1.921 2.234 2.114 0.978Replicate Prob(F) 0.0365 0.1800 0.1368 0.1518 0.4356Treatment F 4.534 1.257 1.390 19.718 2.546Treatment Prob(F) 0.0184 0.3395 0.2952 0.0001 0.0940
170
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC lf:stem emergenc lfarea/samp lfarea/plan ht/plantTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl LOG ratio LOG #/Box LOG sq cm LOG sq cm LOG cmNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-19-02 07-16-02 07-16-02 07-16-02 07-16-02
1 90% shade 1.20 b 1.95 b 34.57 b 17.86 bc 10.65 a
2 70 % shade 1.59 ab 1.48 b 40.47 b 15.51 c 9.83 a
3 50% shade 1.36 b 4.89 ab 144.23 ab 36.67 abc 18.58 a
4 30% shade 2.23 ab 5.57 ab 271.40 a 52.48 a 16.44 a
5 no shade 3.16 a 8.02 a 310.95 a 49.22 ab 18.13 a LSD (P=.05) 0.469t 1.061t 9.218t 2.907t 1.924tStandard Deviation 0.304t 0.689t 5.983t 1.887t 1.248tCV 19.82 32.26 51.14 32.85 32.25 Replicate F 0.354 1.860 1.757 2.635 5.842Replicate Prob(F) 0.7874 0.1902 0.2087 0.0976 0.0107Treatment F 2.667 3.395 3.349 2.629 0.783Treatment Prob(F) 0.0842 0.0446 0.0463 0.0871 0.5573
171
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC leafwt/p stemwt/p lf:stem emergenc lfarea/sampTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl LOG g LOG g LOG ratio LOG #/box LOG sq cmNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-16-02 07-16-02 07-16-02 08-14-02 08-14-02
1 90% shade 0.01 c 0.03 b 0.55 b 2.69 b 30.34 c
2 70 % shade 0.08 bc 0.07 ab 0.72 b 0.81 b 15.44 c
3 50% shade 0.11 bc 0.08 ab 1.44 ab 2.99 b 203.98 b
4 30% shade 0.15 ab 0.18 a 1.01 ab 3.96 ab 390.18 ab
5 no shade 0.27 a 0.12 ab 2.00 a 10.06 a 495.02 a LSD (P=.05) 0.078t 0.075t 0.376t 1.216t 7.131tStandard Deviation 0.051t 0.049t 0.244t 0.789t 4.582tCV 6.43 6.32 19.26 38.82 34.78 Replicate F 2.432 0.475 0.570 2.924 5.053Replicate Prob(F) 0.1156 0.7053 0.6456 0.0773 0.0193Treatment F 5.427 2.283 3.355 3.798 12.843Treatment Prob(F) 0.0099 0.1205 0.0461 0.0321 0.0004
172
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC lfarearea/p ht/plant leafwt/p stemwt/p lf:stemTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl LOG cm2 LOG cm LOG g LOG g LOG ratioNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 08-14-02 08-14-02 08-14-02 08-14-02 08-14-02
1 90% shade 6.88 b 13.44 a 0.02 a 0.02 b 0.77 a
2 70 % shade 8.15 b 6.50 a 0.03 a 0.04 b 0.61 a
3 50% shade 45.83 a 15.20 a 0.09 a 0.16 ab 0.56 a
4 30% shade 95.52 a 26.89 a 0.43 a 0.27 a 1.14 a
5 no shade 76.67 a 20.34 a 0.14 a 0.32 a 0.43 a LSD (P=.05) 3.657t 3.008t 0.318t 0.101t 0.468tStandard Deviation 2.350t 1.952t 0.195t 0.062t 0.287tCV 37.84 48.46 24.54 7.68 26.35 Replicate F 2.198 2.558 0.734 1.736 0.801Replicate Prob(F) 0.1458 0.1040 0.5606 0.2367 0.5273Treatment F 7.743 0.983 1.066 6.801 0.704Treatment Prob(F) 0.0032 0.4532 0.4329 0.0109 0.6108
173
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC emergenc lfarea/samp lfarearea/p ht/plant leafwt/sTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl LOG #/box LOG sq cm LOG cm2 LOG cm LOG gNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 09-05-02 09-05-02 09-05-02 09-05-02 09-05-02
1 90% shade 0.61 b 23.80 a 15.88 a 12.49 a 0.13 a
2 70 % shade 4.60 a 110.33 a 26.21 a 12.06 a 0.07 a
3 50% shade 2.33 ab 97.84 a 43.08 a 19.07 a 0.10 a
4 30% shade 2.00 ab 58.32 a 19.45 a 7.41 a 0.04 a
5 no shade 4.94 a 117.16 a 21.82 a 6.87 a 0.07 a LSD (P=.05) 0.881t 6.856t 3.580t 2.044t 0.082tStandard Deviation 0.572t 4.287t 2.238t 1.278t 0.051tCV 32.09 48.83 44.75 37.36 6.71 Replicate F 1.162 1.293 0.787 0.322 0.288Replicate Prob(F) 0.3646 0.3352 0.5309 0.8092 0.8330Treatment F 3.392 1.343 0.771 1.177 0.768Treatment Prob(F) 0.0447 0.3264 0.5706 0.3831 0.5720
174
Influence of Shade on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 02RM02CJ IPOCC IPOCC stemwt/s lf:stemTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl LOG g LOG ratioNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 09-05-02 09-05-02
1 90% shade 0.01 a 8.76 a
2 70 % shade 0.03 a 2.29 b
3 50% shade 0.05 a 1.73 b
4 30% shade 0.02 a 1.69 b
5 no shade 0.03 a 2.35 b LSD (P=.05) 0.027t 0.855tStandard Deviation 0.017t 0.534tCV 2.35 28.49 Replicate F 0.657 0.616Replicate Prob(F) 0.5986 0.6219Treatment F 1.043 6.099Treatment Prob(F) 0.4367 0.0117
175
LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy
Effect of Tillage on Emergence of Red Morningglory
Experiment number ................. : 02RM03CJ Location................................... : West Baton Rouge Parish (HWY 190) Experimental design ................ : Randomized complete block Number of reps ...................... : 4 Plot size ................................. : 2’ x 2’ Row width/# per plot ............. : N/A Soil type................................... : silt loam OM......................................... : 1.8 PH.......................................... : 6.5 Planting date ............................ : N/A Harvest date ............................. : N/A Crop/Variety ............................ : N/A Uniform std. treatment............. : N/A Date applied (mm/dd/yy)......... : 05-29-02 06-19-02 07-16-02 08-14-02 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm) ............. : 09:00-10:00a 10:00-11:00a 02:00-03:00p 09:00-10:00a Incorporation equipment.......... : PTO tiller PTO tiller PTO tiller PTO tiller Incorporation depth.................. : 4” 4” 4” 4” Sprayer type/mph..................... : CO2bkpk/3.4 CO2bkpk/3.4 CO2bkpk/3.4 CO2bkpk/3.4 Nozzle type/size....................... : FF/8003VS FF/8003VS FF/8003VS FF/8003VS Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in) ....... : 18”/4/20” 18”/4/20” 18”/4/20” 18”/4/20” GPA/psi ................................... : 15/26 15/26 15/26 15/26 Applied by ............................... : Jones Jones Jones Jones _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments: On May 29, the experimental area was tilled with a PTO tiller and then packed. The tilled area was then re-tilled on June 19, July 16 and August 14. At each of these dates, the no-till area was sprayed with Liberty at 40 oz/A to control any emerged red morningglory. Prior to tillage or liberty application red morningglory population was determined. _____________________________________________________________________________________________
176
Effect of Tillage on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 01RM03CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC emergenc emergenc emergenc emergenc emergencTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl # # # # #/ftNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 06-19-01 07-16-01 08-14-01 09-05-01 06-19-01
1 No till 25 b 23 a 3 b 1 b 8.3 b
2 Tillage 36 a 21 a 28 a 18 a 11.9 a
LSD (P=.05) 4.9 9.3 5.6 3.7 1.63Standard Deviation 4.8 9.2 5.6 3.7 1.61CV 15.99 42.61 35.18 38.87 15.99 Replicate F 1.498 1.170 0.404 1.016 1.498Replicate Prob(F) 0.2785 0.4096 0.9037 0.4905 0.2785Treatment F 25.018 0.170 101.169 108.345 25.018Treatment Prob(F) 0.0007 0.6900 0.0001 0.0001 0.0007
177
Effect of Tillage on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 01RM03CJ IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC IPOCC emergenc emergenc emergenc emergenc emergencTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl #/ft #/ft #/ft LOG #/ft LOG #/ftNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 07-16-01 08-14-01 09-05-01 06-19-01 07-16-01
1 No till 7.5 a 1.1 b 0.3 b 8.12 b 6.59 a
2 Tillage 6.9 a 9.4 a 6.0 a 11.71 a 6.80 a
LSD (P=.05) 3.11 1.87 1.25 0.059t 0.169tStandard Deviation 3.08 1.85 1.23 0.058t 0.167tCV 42.61 35.18 39.32 5.63 18.86 Replicate F 1.170 0.404 0.988 1.657 1.001Replicate Prob(F) 0.4096 0.9037 0.5070 0.2316 0.4995Treatment F 0.170 101.169 107.293 30.673 0.026Treatment Prob(F) 0.6900 0.0001 0.0001 0.0004 0.8758
178
Effect of Tillage on Emergence of Red Morningglory Project Code: 01RM03CJ IPOCC IPOCC emergenc emergencTrt Treatment Form Fm Rate Grow Appl LOG #/ft LOG #/ftNo Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Stg Code 08-14-01 09-05-01
1 No till 0.89 b 0.25 b
2 Tillage 9.28 a 5.78 a
LSD (P=.05) 0.170t 0.099tStandard Deviation 0.168t 0.098tCV 26.1 21.07Bartlett's X2 6.176 0.515P(Bartlett's X2) 0.013* 0.473 Replicate F 0.446 1.157Replicate Prob(F) 0.8775 0.4158Treatment F 95.437 283.253Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001