Welcome to Teaching + Learning Tuesdays Year Interim Review... · Expand/Collapse button 2....

Welcome to Teaching + Learning Tuesdays

July 15, 2014 I 2:30PM to 4:00 PM

AUDIO SETUP WIZARD Microphone & Speaker Setup

The Audio Setup Wizard button is located at the top of the Audio & Video Panel to the left of the Whiteboard. 1.Select your audio output device (speakers), following the instructions given in the dialog box. 2.Play the recorded audio message provided and adjust your speaker volume to a suitable level. (Follow the instructions given in the dialog box.) 3.Confirm whether or not your speaker was set to an appropriate level. ■If you clicked on Yes, go to step 4. ■If you clicked on No, click on Try Again to go back to step 1. 4.Select an audio input device (microphone), following the instructions given in the dialog box.

1. Expand/Collapse button 2. Feedback menu 3. Step Away button 4. Raise Hand button 5. Polling Response menu 6. Participants list

The Participant panel Participant chat panel

2. Message text box

3. Conversation tabs

4. Options menu

5. Conversation pane

6. Emoticon menu

Title: Overview of the Fifth-Year Interim Review Process and Tips for Submission

Presenter: Ms. Alana Veal SACSCOC, Legal & Governmental Affairs

OVERVIEW OF THE FIFTH-YEAR INTERIM REVIEW PROCESS & TIPS FOR SUBMISSION

Alana T. Veal Coordinator of Legal and Governmental Affairs, and Commission Support

SACS Commission on Colleges

South Carolina Technical College System 2014 Summer Workshop Series

Session Objectives • Outline the Fifth-Year Interim Review Process

• Review data on most cited standards for institutions completing Fifth-Year Interim Reports

• Share common trouble spots with each standard and tips on how to avoid them

• Review components of the QEP Impact Report

• Share tips from evaluators

Why a Fifth-Year Interim Review Process? Higher Education Opportunity Act requires that accrediting agencies must: • 34 CFR 602.19 (a),(b) – reevaluate, at regularly

established intervals, the institutions or programs it accredits to monitor ongoing compliance

• 34 CFR 602.22 (c) – have an effective mechanism for conducting, at reasonable intervals, visits to a representative sample of additional locations of institutions that operate more than three additional locations

Steps in Process

• SACSCOC notifies Track A institutions by letter about 11 months prior to submission by October 15.

NOTIFICATION

Steps in Process


NOTIFICATION

• Fifth-Year Interim Reports for Track A institutions are due September 15.

SUBMISSION

• Report is reviewed by the Fifth-Year Review Committee in December.

Steps in Process


NOTIFICATION


SUBMISSION

REVIEW

• A letter with results of the review is sent out to each institution in January.

RESULTS

Steps in Process


NOTIFICATION


REVIEW


SUBMISSION

• A letter with results of the review is sent out to each institution in January.

RESULTS

• No additional report requested? The process ends. • Report requested? An additional report is to be submitted to the Compliance &

Reports (C & R) Committee.

FOLLOW-UP

Steps in Process


NOTIFICATION


REVIEW


SUBMISSION

Components of the Report

Part I: Signatures Attesting

to Integrity

Part II: Institutional Summary

Form Prepared for Commission Reviews

Part III: Fifth-Year Compliance

Certification

Part IV: Followup Report

(applicable only to select institutions)

Part V: Impact Report of the Quality Enhancement

Plan

Review of off-campus instructional sites initiated since last reaffirmation but not reviewed by a committee (indicated in notification letter)



to Integrity




Certification




Plan




to Integrity




Certification




Plan




to Integrity




Certification




Plan




to Integrity




Certification




Plan


Institutional Summary Form • Serves as the blueprint for the evaluators in conducting

the review of your institution • Sets expectation of what is to follow in the Compliance

Certification ▫ Governance ▫ Mission ▫ List of Degrees ▫ Off-Campus Instructional Locations and Branch Campuses ▫ Distance and Correspondence Education ▫ Accreditation ▫ Relationship to the U.S. Department of Education



to Integrity




Certification




Plan


Part III: Fifth-Year Compliance Certification

Core Requirements

Comprehensive Standards

Federal Requirements

2.8 Faculty

2.10 Student Support Services


Core Requirements



3.2.8 Qualified Administrative / Academic Officers

3.3.1.1 Institutional Effectiveness: Educational Programs, to include Student Learning Outcomes

3.4.3 Admissions Policies

3.4.11 Academic Program Coordination

3.11.3 Physical Facilities

3.13 Policy Compliance - “Accrediting Decisions of Other Agencies” - “Complaint Procedures Against the Commission or Its Accredited Institutions” - “Reaffirmation of Accreditation and Subsequent Reports”


Core Requirements



4.1 Student Achievement

4.2 Program Curriculum

4.3 Publication of Policies

4.4 Program Length

4.5 Student Complaints

4.6 Recruitment Materials

4.7 Title IV Program Responsibilities and CS 3.10.2 Financial Aid Audits

4.8 Distance and Correspondence Education

4.9 Definition of Credit Hours

Standard/Requirement Track A 230 Institutions

CS 3.3.1.1 Institutional Effectiveness: Educational Programs, to include Student Learning Outcomes 104 45%

CR 2.8 Faculty 85 37%

CS 3.4.11 Academic Program Coordination 70 30%

FR 4.5 Student Complaints 56 24%

FR 4.7 Title IV Program Responsibilities/CS 3.10.2 Financial Aid Audits 56 24%

Most Cited Standards for Fifth-Year Interim Reports (Track A)

FR 4.2 Program Curriculum

19%

22%

29%

35%

2%

CR 2.10 Student Support Services

FR 4.6 Recruitment Materials

FR 4.3 Publication of Policies

CS 3.4.3 Admissions Policies

9%

6%

4%

3%

Least Cited Standards for Fifth-Year Interim Reports over the Past 5 Years

230 Track A institutions

2%

CR 2.8 Faculty • The number of full-time

faculty members is adequate to support the mission of the institution and to ensure the quality and integrity of each of its academic programs. (Core Requirement 2.8)

CR 2.8 Faculty

COMMON ISSUES TIPS

X Not presenting a case for why the number of full-time faculty is adequate or not explaining what the data mean

Define full-time faculty and part-time faculty.

Identify role, responsibilities, and functions of full-time faculty.

Provide persuasive evidence that the number of full-time faculty is adequate.

X Presenting faculty data that is not disaggregated by academic program

Describe the distribution/ disaggregation of full-time and part-time faculty by academic program.

X Not addressing responsibility of full-time faculty regarding academic programs offered at off-campus instructional sites and via distance education

Discuss full-time faculty responsibility for ensuring quality of academic programs offered at off-campus instructional sites and via distance education.

CR 2.10 Student Support Services • The institution provides

student support programs, services, and activities consistent with its mission that are intended to promote student learning and enhance the development of its students. (Core Requirement 2.10)

CR 2.10 Student Support Services COMMON ISSUES TIPS

X No mention is made of how support is provided to students enrolled in distance education programs or at off-campus instructional sites

Explain how the services meet the needs of your students, including those enrolled in programs offered via distance education and at off- campus sites.

X Inconsistency in how Student Support programs are described in narrative of report and cited sources (website, catalog, etc.)

Be consistent in how Student Support programs are described in all materials.

CS 3.2.8 Qualified Administrative/ Academic Officers • The institution has qualified administrative and

academic officers with the experience and competence to lead the institution. (Comprehensive Standard 3.2.8)

CS 3.2.8 Qualified Administrative/ Academic Officers

COMMON ISSUES TIPS

Identify administrative and academic officers in leadership positions.

X Giving a list of names and degrees, or set of vitae with no explanation

Describe the qualifications of the administrators and academic officers, building a case for why they are qualified for their respective roles.

X Not providing an organizational chart to help evaluators understand who oversees what

Provide an organizational chart.

CS 3.3.1.1 Institutional Effectiveness: Educational Programs • The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses

the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of the results in the following area: (Comprehensive Standard 3.3.1) ▫ 3.3.1.1 educational programs, to include student learning

outcomes

CS 3.3.1.1 Institutional Effectiveness: Educational Programs

COMMON ISSUES TIPS X Non-representative sampling

If presenting a sampling, use a representative sampling and include a rationale for what makes the sample reasonable and representative of the programs offered.

X Lack of defined student learning outcomes and/or methods for assessing the outcomes

Focus on program outcomes and student learning outcomes

X Limited/Immature data Use mature data. If using a new system, provide data from the previous system, if necessary and possible, to demonstrate ongoing compliance.

X Not documenting use of data to make improvements

Document how the resulting data has been used to make improvements.

X Not addressing distance education and off-campus instructional site programs

Include data on programs offered at off-campus instructional sites and via distance learning - consider comparability, if appropriate.

CS 3.4.3 Admissions Policies • The institution publishes

admissions policies that are consistent with its mission. (Comprehensive Standard 3.4.3)

CS 3.4.3 Admissions Policies COMMON ISSUE TIPS

X Information provided in the report does not match what is cited in the catalog and/or on the website

X Information is inconsistent in the sources cited

Provide a clear and consistent narrative regarding admissions policies.

Address special admissions policies for specific programs as well as the institutional admissions policy.

Explain the connection between admissions policies and the mission.

CS 3.4.11 Academic Program Coordination • For each major in a degree program,

the institution assigns responsibility for program coordination, as well as for curriculum development and review, to persons academically qualified in the field. In those degree programs for which the institution does not identify a major, this requirement applies to a curricular area or concentration. (Comprehensive Standard 3.4.11)

CS 3.4.11 Academic Program Coordination

COMMON ISSUES TIPS

Identify coordinators for all programs, including those offered at off-campus instructional sites and via distance learning.

X Not providing a rationale for why an individual is qualified to coordinate a program, and oversee the development and review of the curriculum — especially in cases where the reasoning is not obvious

Make a case for the coordinator’s qualifications to oversee the development of the program.

X Listing a coordinator’s degree with no reference to major

List coordinator’s degree and major.

CS 3.11.3 Physical Facilities • The institution operates and maintains physical

facilities, both on and off campus, that appropriately serve the needs of the institution’s educational programs, support services, and other mission-related activities. (Comprehensive Standard 3.11.3)

CS 3.11.3 Physical Facilities COMMON ISSUES TIPS

X Providing a narrative with no (or dated) supporting documentation

X Data presented indicate a

lack of adequate/need for improved maintenance of physical facilities

Include supporting documentation such as current Facilities Master Plan, space utilization reports, satisfaction survey results, and facilities maintenance schedules.

X Not discussing off-campus instructional sites or distance education programs

Address facilities at off-campus instructional sites and technological infrastructure for distance education programs.

CS 3.13 Policy Compliance CS 3.13.1 (3.13.A) “Accrediting Decisions of Other Agencies” • Applicable Policy Statement. Any institution seeking or

holding accreditation from more than one U.S. Department of Education recognized accrediting body must describe itself in identical terms to each recognized accrediting body with regard to purpose, governance, programs, degrees, diplomas, certificates, personnel, finances, and constituencies, and must keep each institutional accrediting body apprised of any change in its status with one or another accrediting body.

CS 3.13 Policy Compliance CS 3.13.1 “Accrediting Decisions of Other Agencies”

Documentation: The institution should:

(1) list federally recognized agencies that currently accredit the institution and its programs;

(2) provide the date of the most recent review by each agency and indicate if negative action was taken by the agency and the reason for such action;

(3) provide copies of statements used to describe itself for each of the accrediting bodies;

(4) indicate any agency that has terminated accreditation, the date, and the reason for termination; and

(5) indicate the date and reason for the institution voluntarily withdrawing accreditation with any of the agencies.

CS 3.13 Policy Compliance

COMMON ISSUES TIPS

X Not providing narrative for programs accredited by bodies recognized by the U.S. Dept. of Education that are mentioned elsewhere in report (Institutional Summary Form, website, or other documentation provided as evidence)

Be sure that all listed accreditations from bodies that are recognized by the U.S. Dept. of Education are consistently listed throughout the report.

X Not providing evidence of statements used to describe the institution for each of the U.S. Dept. of Education recognized accrediting bodies listed in the report

Provide copies of statements used to describe the institution for each listed accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Dept. of Education.

CS 3.13.1 “Accrediting Decisions of Other Agencies”

CS 3.13 Policy Compliance CS 3.13.3 (3.13.B) “Complaint Procedures Against the Commission or Its Accredited Institutions” • Applicable Policy Statement. Each institution is required

to have in place student complaint policies and procedures that are reasonable, fairly administered, and well-publicized. (See FR 4.5). The Commission also requires, in accord with federal regulations, that each institution maintains a record of complaints received by the institution. This record is made available to the Commission upon request. This record will be reviewed and evaluated by the Commission as part of the institution’s decennial evaluation.

CS 3.13 Policy Compliance CS 3.13.3 “Complaint Procedures Against the Commission or Its Accredited Institutions” Documentation: The institution should provide information to the Commission describing how the institution maintains its record and also include the following: (1) individuals/offices responsible for the

maintenance of the record(s) (2) elements of a complaint review that are

included in the record; and (3) where the record(s) is/are located

(centralized or decentralized).


COMMON ISSUES TIPS

X Inconsistency in description of individuals/offices responsible for maintaining the records of student complaints cited on website and in publications

Make sure there is consistency with report, website and publications.

X Not providing a description of the individuals/offices responsible for maintaining the records of student complaints

Provide a description of the individuals/offices responsible for maintaining the records of student complaints.

X Not providing the location of the records

Provide the location of the records.

CS 3.13.3 “Complaint Procedures Against the Commission or Its Accredited Institutions”

CS 3.13 Policy Compliance CS 3.13.4 (3.13.C) “Reaffirmation of Accreditation and Subsequent Reports” • Applicable Policy Statement. An institution includes

a review of its distance learning programs in the Compliance Certification. Documentation: In order to be in

compliance with this policy, the institution must have incorporated an assessment of its compliance with standards that apply to its distance and correspondence education programs and courses.


Refer to the SACSCOC “Distance and Correspondence Education” Policy Statement.

NOTE: If an institution fails to assess its distance and correspondence education in its Fifth-Year Compliance Certification when it indicates on its Institutional Summary Form that it offers the courses/programs, then the Committee to Review the Fifth-Year Interim Reports will request a Referral Report in which the institution must document compliance with CS 3.13.4.

CS 3.13.4 “Reaffirmation of Accreditation and Subsequent Reports”

FR 4.1 Student Achievement • The institution evaluates success

with respect to student achievement consistent with its mission. Criteria may include: enrollment data; retention, graduation, course completion, and job placement rates; state licensing examinations; student portfolios; or other means of demonstrating achievement of goals. (Federal Requirement 4.1)

FR 4.1 Student Achievement COMMON ISSUES TIPS

Include a variety of measures and provide a rationale for each describing consistency with mission.

X Not describing the target that reflects student success

Provide a threshold of acceptability (target) for each measure and a rationale for each.

X Presenting data with no analysis or indication of how data is used to consider student achievement

Provide an analysis of the data and explain how data is used to demonstrate student achievement.

FR 4.2 Program Curriculum • The institution’s curriculum is directly related and

appropriate to the mission and goals of the institution and the diplomas, certificates, or degrees awarded. (Federal Requirement 4.2)

FR 4.3 Publication of Policies • The institution makes available to students and the

public current academic calendars, grading policies, and refund policies. (Federal Requirement 4.3)

FR 4.3 Publication of Policies TIPS

Verify that all versions of published academic calendars, grading, and refund policies are current, accurate and consistent.

Address how this information is disseminated to distance education and off-campus instructional site students.

FR 4.4 Program Length • Program length is

appropriate for each of the institution’s educational programs. (Federal Requirement 4.4)

FR 4.4 Program Length COMMON ISSUES TIPS

X All programs are not included in narrative

Identify measures of program length for all programs, including those offered at off-campus instructional sites and via distance learning.

X No justification provided for program length that exceeds those allowed by internal or system policy

Explain any significant variances in program length that are not in keeping with accepted practice.

X Inconsistency between program length presented in the narrative of the report and what is cited in the catalog

Verify that program length information is published and reported accurately.

FR 4.5 Student Complaints • The institution has adequate procedures for

addressing written student complaints and is responsible for demonstrating that it follows those procedures when resolving student complaints. (Federal Requirement 4.5)

FR 4.5 Student Complaints COMMON ISSUES TIPS

Provide a copy of student complaint policies.

X No evidence of implementation provided

X Inappropriate examples are

provided (e.g., a complaint from a parent)

Provide appropriate, real examples (student names redacted) that document and illustrate how complaints are resolved.

X Not addressing how complaints from students enrolled in distance education programs or at off-campus instructional sites are handled

Address how complaints are handled from students enrolled at off-campus instructional sites and via distance education.

FR 4.6 Recruitment Materials • Recruitment materials and

presentations accurately represent the institution’s practices and policies (Federal Requirement 4.6)

FR 4.6 Recruitment Materials COMMON ISSUE TIP

X Recruitment presentations are not addressed

Address how the institution ensures that recruitment materials and presentations accurately represent institutional practices and policies.

FR 4.7 Title IV Program Responsibilities and CS 3.10.2 Financial Aid Audits • The institution is in compliance

with its program responsibilities under Title IV of the most recent Higher Education Act as amended. (Federal Requirement 4.7)

• The institution audits financial aid programs as required by federal and state regulations. (Comprehensive Standard 3.10.2) formerly numbered CS 3.10.3

FR 4.7 Title IV Program Responsibilities and CS 3.10.2 Financial Aid Audits

COMMON ISSUES TIPS

X Financial aid audit results are not yet available.

X The institution has responded

to audit issues with a plan but has not yet received the U.S. Dept. of Education’s letter accepting the plan.

Work with auditors well in advance to ensure that audit results are available by report due date.

X For public institutions, state audits are not provided.

Present evidence of financial aid audits as required by state regulations, not just federal, for CS 3.10.2.

FR 4.8 Distance and Correspondence Education • FR 4.8.1: The institution demonstrates that the student

who registers in a distance or correspondence education course or program is the same student who participates in and completes the course or program and receives the credit by verifying the identity of a student who participates in class or coursework by using, at the option of the institution, methods such as: (a) a secure login and pass code (b) proctored examinations, or (c) new or other technologies and practices that are

effective in verifying student identification.

FR 4.8 Distance and Correspondence Education • FR 4.8.2: The institution has a written procedure for

protecting the privacy of students enrolled in distance and correspondence education courses or programs.

• FR 4.8.3: The institution has a written procedure distributed at the time of registration or enrollment that notifies students of any projected additional student charges associated with verification of student identity.

FR 4.9 Definition of Credit Hours • The institution has policies

and procedures for determining the credit hours awarded for courses and programs that conform to commonly accepted practices in higher education and to Commission policy. (Federal Requirement 4.9)

FR 4.9 Definition of Credit Hours COMMON ISSUES TIP

Refer to the SACSCOC “Credit Hours” policy statement which explains the flexibility you have in reporting.

X Not addressing policies and procedures for assigning credit to nontraditional formats, such as weekend courses, evening courses, on-line courses, labs, military experience, etc.

Address the criteria for assigning credit to courses offered in a nontraditional format (demonstrate how experiential learning and other experiences are converted to credit hour).

Resource Manual • Rationale and Notes • Relevant Questions for Consideration • Documentation • Reference to Commission Documents • Cross-References to Other Related Standards



to Integrity


form Prepared for Commission Reviews


Certification




Plan

Review of off-campus instructional sites initiated since last reaffirmation but not reviewed by a committee. (indicated in notification letter)

Part V: QEP Impact Report COMMON ISSUES

X Failure to launch project due to leadership and/or resource issues

X Not collecting and/or using data to assess the impact on student learning and/or the environment supporting student learning

X Not clearly discussing the changes made in implementing the QEP

Part V: QEP Impact Report TIPS

Address ALL of the elements

Use your 10 pages wisely



Use your 10 pages wisely 1. A succinct list of the initial goals and intended

outcomes of the Quality Enhancement Plan; 2. A discussion of changes made to the QEP and the

reasons for making those changes; 3. A description of the QEP’s impact on student

learning and/or the environment supporting student learning, as appropriate to the design of the QEP (to include the achievement of identified goals and outcomes, and any unanticipated outcomes of the QEP); and

4. A reflection on what the institution has learned as a result of the QEP experience.



Use your 10 pages wisely

Reviewers are looking to see that the institution… • Has done what it said it was going to do, given

reasonable adjustments to the plan • Has measured and analyzed the impact on student

learning and/or the learning environment as per project goals/objectives

• Has learned from the process

Words of Wisdom from Evaluators of the Fifth-Year Interim Report


Writing the Narrative

Quality Control

Packaging

Presenting the Data


Quality Control

Packaging

Presenting the Data

Words of Wisdom from Evaluators of the Fifth-Year Interim Report • Your narrative and

evidence for each standard should be as comprehensive as what you would submit in your Compliance

• Include your campus’ subject matter experts in developing your Report.

• For long electronic supporting documentation, have links go directly to the page being referenced.

• Follow all of the directions.

• Write clearly and succinctly, using pointed examples.

Certification Report for Reaffirmation.



Quality Control

Packaging

Presenting the Data

• Provide an analysis of data, not just a data dump. • Use tables and graphs when appropriate, along with

narrative to help the reader understand what you are trying to illustrate.

• Connect the dots for the reader— remember you are providing a context and building

a case for compliance.



Quality Control

Packaging

Presenting the Data

• If you plan to use sampling: • Be sure it is representative of the institution’s mission • Include a valid cross-section of programs from every

school or division and at each degree level • Make a compelling case as to why the sampling and

assessment findings are an appropriate representation of the institution’s programs.

• How many years of data are needed? • It depends; what are you trying to illustrate/document?



Quality Control

Packaging

Presenting the Data

• Use outside readers to identify and reduce institution-specific jargon and blind-spots as well as assist with editing.

• Make sure all electronic devices and links work! • Ensure that there is consistency throughout report, including

the Institutional Summary Form. • When in doubt, ask your

SACSCOC Vice President for advice.

• Serve as an evaluator, if you can.



Quality Control

Packaging

Presenting the Data

• Submit 1 printed copy for archival purposes, but the other copies can be printed, electronic, or a combination of the two.

• Consider the ease of the evaluators, who might not always have access to the internet or a specific type of computer. (Limit restrictions.)

• For electronic media: • Invest in a quality product. • Include instructions for how to access or make the starting point obvious. • Label clearly.

QUESTIONS?

Contact Information Alana Veal Coordinator of Legal and Governmental Affairs, and Commission Support 404-679-4501, ext. 4596 [email protected] For questions about developing your Fifth-Year Interim Report, contact your SACSCOC Vice President.

Next webinar:

Tuesday, August 12, 2014 @ 2:30 PM (The 2nd Tuesday in August)

SARA-State Reciprocity and the SREB Electronic

Campus

Presenter: Mary A. Larson, M.Ed., Director, S-SARA Southern Regional Education Board SREB

Date post:	05-Jun-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	dinhhanh
View:	213 times
Download:	0 times