+ All Categories
Home > Documents > When Does 3D Echo Make a Difference?...2017/01/03  · Cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure...

When Does 3D Echo Make a Difference?...2017/01/03  · Cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure...

Date post: 26-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
102
When Does 3D Echo Make a Difference? Anthony DeMaria University of California, San Diego No Disclosures
Transcript
  • When Does 3D Echo Make a Difference?

    Anthony DeMariaUniversity of California, San Diego

    No Disclosures

  • Why do 3D imaging ?

  • •Matrix Array Transducer

    Real-time, Touch-button 3DE

    • Fully sampled

    • Supercomputing

    • Instantaneous volume rendering

    • Intelligent Navigator

    • Matrix Array Transducer

  • 3D &2D vs CMR

  • 3D Makes a Difference• LV volumes and EF

    – Choosing pharmacologic therapy– Using resynchronization– Implanting defibrillators– Cardio-oncology

    • RV structure and function• Mitral Valve Disease

    – Prolapse– Stenosis

    • Tricuspid Valve Disease

  • Published Trials in Which EF wasPart of the Entry Criteria (Partial List)

    • SOLVD Treatment Trial• SOLVD Prevention Trial• SAVE• US Cravedilol Trials• MERIT-HF• CIBIS 1 & 2• COPERNICUS

    • CAPRICORN• RALES• ELITE 1 & 2• Val-HEFT• PRAISE 1 & 2• OVERTURE• CHARM• PARADIGM

  • Guidelines for Cardiac Resynchronization

  • PresenterPresentation Notesthere is a growing number of cancer survivors in US, in 2012 there were over 13 millions, and it is estimated that by 2022 the number will exceed 17 millions.

  • Patnaik, 2011

    LEADING CAUSES OF DEATH AFTER BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS

  • CARDIOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS OF CANCER THERAPY

    Oeffinger, NEJM 2006

    PresenterPresentation NotesThis NEJM paper retrospectively compared incidence of various health conditions in cancer survivors and their cancer-free siblings as a control.

  • Yeh, 2009

    CHEMOTHERAPY ASSOCIATED WITH MYOCARDIAL DYSFUNCTION

    PresenterPresentation NotesCardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure are the most common complications of chemotherapy, and this is the list of agents which can cause this. This data is from MDACC, and 3 pluses means that over 5000 doses were dispensed in a year at MD Anderson. Incidence varies between the reports, and this depends on cumulative doses of anthracyclines, concomitant XRT, population studied, and various underlying risk factors

  • CLINICAL PROGRAMECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

    STRAIN IMAGING

    JASE 2014

  • Plana, JASE 2014

    • Anthracycline-based regimen: echo at baseline, upon completion of therapy and 6 months after

    • HER-2 inhibitors (Herceptin/trastuzumab): echo at baseline, and every 3 months during therapy, and once after completion of therapy

    PresenterPresentation NotesEcho is the mainstay for EF surveilance of cardiotoxicity during chemotherapy

  • MINIMAL DETECTABLE CHANGE BETWEEN SERIAL EXAMS FOR EF MEASUREMENT WITH

    SIMPSON’S BIPLANE METHOD IS 12%

    Thavendiranathan, 2013

  • 0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    Biplane Biplane+Co Triplane Triplane+Co 3D 3D+Co

    Thavendiranathan, 2013

    MINIMAL DETECTABLE CHANGE FOR EF MEASUREMENT

    %

    N=56

  • Thavendiranathan, 2013

    TEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF EFN=56

    1 year follow-up

    PresenterPresentation NotesTemporal variability is defined as standard error of measurement and 95% CI for each technique for entire 1 year follow-up period. Noncontrast 3D had the lowest temporal variability and CI for EF measurement.

  • Thavendiranathan, 2013

    TEMPORAL VARIABILITY IN EDV AND ESVN=56

    PresenterPresentation NotesTemporal variability is defined as standard error of measurement and 95% CI for each technique for entire 1-year follow-up period. Non-contrast 3D had the lowest temporal variability and CI for EDV and ESV measurements.

  • Thavendiranathan, 2013

    INTEROBSERVER AND INTRAOBSERVERVARIABILITY FOR EF MEASUREMENT

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    Biplane Biplane+Co Triplane Triplane+Co 3D 3D+Co

    IntraobserverInterobserverInterobservertest-retest

    %

    N=56

    PresenterPresentation NotesTemporal variability is defined as standard error of measurement and 95% CI for each technique for entire follow-up period. Noncontrast 3D had the lowest temporal variability and CI for EDV and ESV measurements.

  • CLINICAL PROGRAM

    ASE RECOMMENDATION FOR ECHO SURVEILLANCE OF

    ANTHRACYCLINE CARDIOTOXICITY

    Plana, JASE 2014

    PresenterPresentation NotesCurrent ASE guidelines call for 3D echo use for EF surveillance with chemotherapy when possible

  • 3D in Mitral Valve Disease

    http://files.abstractsonline.com/CTRL/59/C/42D/CDE/EDE/49F/2BE/77E/A4C/700/A52/B0/g391_1.gifhttp://files.abstractsonline.com/CTRL/59/C/42D/CDE/EDE/49F/2BE/77E/A4C/700/A52/B0/g391_1.gif

  • Regurgitation

    Round holeIn a flat object

    Perfect PISAhemisphere

    CircularVena Contrata

  • PISA, Vena ContractaPitfalls

    Assumptions“Regurgitant orifice circular”“Flow convergence perfect hemisphere”“Vena contracta circular”“1 frame in 1 view reflects whole Regurg”“There is only one regurgitant orifice”

  • 3D Imaging to studyCardiac Remodeling

    What isCardiac Remodeling ?

  • Remodeling

    RemakingAdjustmentAdaptationAlterationConversionRefittingTransformationReformationReshapingDistortionEnlargement

  • Ventricular Remodeling

    … more thanchamber enlargement …

  • Ventricular Remodeling

    Physiologic Pathologic

    AthletesNormal Growth

    IschemiaOther diseases

  • InjuryInflammation

    Increased Load

    Molecular PathwaysMetabolic Pathways

    Mechanical Pathways

    AdaptiveRemodeling

    AdverseRemodeling

    Cardiac Remodeling

  • LV Remodeling

    Normal Physiologic

    Pathologic

  • Ventricular Remodeling

    •Structural Remodeling

    Size, Mass, Shape

  • Ventricular Remodeling

    • Structural Remodeling

    Size, Mass, Shape

    • Mechanical Remodeling

    Systole, Diastole

  • Ventricular Remodeling

    • Structural Remodeling

    Size, Mass, Shape

    • Mechanical Remodeling

    Systole, Diastole

    • Electrical Remodeling

    Arrhythmias

  • Ventricular Remodeling

    Why worry aboutVentricular Remodeling ?

  • Ventricular DilatationMyocardial Stretch

    ChronicAcute

    Mechano-electrical coupling

    Stretch-activated channels(esp non-selective channels, Na and Ca entering the cells)

    Depolarization, Change in action potential duration

    Gene expression activation

    growth factorsAngiotensin IIEndothelin-1

    Cell proliferationHypertrophyFibrosis

    Arrhythmia

    Ravens. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 2003; 82:255-266

  • Dilatation of LV and ArrhythmiaAfter Myocardial Infarction

    Dilation of the infarcted/non-infarcted zonesIncreased dispersion in the refractorinessEarly afterdepolarizations

    (caused by an increased in wall stress;contraction-excitation feedback)

    LVESV: continued enlargement in 1 yearassociated with high frequency of arrhythmias

    (CATS: captril and thrombolysis study)

    J Cardiac Failure 1994; 1:3-11.

  • Multitude ofstudies and trials…

    Systolic Function

    Diagnosis Prognosis Therapy

  • 0.0

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    0 1 2 3 4

    1.0

    MADIT II

    Probability of survival

    Year

    Defibrillator

    Conventional

    No. at riskDefibrillator 742 503 (0.91) 274 (0.84) 110 (0.78) 9Conventional 490 329 (0.90) 170 (0.78) 65 (0.69) 3

    P=0.016

    CP1053888-2

    Coronary Disease

    EF < 30%

    ICD

    EF > 30%

    VT

    EPS

  • LV MassChiang et al. Circulation 41:31, 1970Koyanagi et al. Circulation 65:1192, 1982Casale et al. Ann Int Med 105:173, 1986Marcus et al. Circulation 75:119, 1987Cooper et al. 65:441, 1990Levy et al. NEJM 322:1561, 1990Verdecchia et al. Circulation 97:48, 1998Devereux et al. AJC 86:1090, 2000Aurigemma et al. JACC 37:1042, 2001Gardin et al. AJC 87:1051, 2001

  • LV Mass

    Chiang et al. Circulation 41:31, 1970Koyanagi et al. Circulation 65:1192, 1982Casale et al. Ann Int Med 105:173, 1986Marcus et al. Circulation 75:119, 1987Cooper et al. 65:441, 1990Levy et al. NEJM 322:1561, 1990Verdecchia et al. Circulation 97:48, 1998Devereux et al. AJC 86:1090, 2000Aurigemma et al. JACC 37:1042, 2001Gardin et al. AJC 87:1051, 2001

    Independent Predictor of MorbidityIndependent Predictor of Mortality

    Marker of Sudden DeathBoth in Preserved and Decreased EF

    Independent of Diastolic DysfunctionNeurohormonal Activation

    Deranged Myocyte Perfusion

  • LV Shape

    Diagnostic ImplicationsPrognostic Connotations

    Therapeutic Value

  • • Determinant of heart failureand related complications

    Ventricular Remodeling

  • HeartFailure

    Remodeling

    Ventricular Remodeling

  • Ventricular Remodeling

    HeartFailure

    Remodeling

    Need to reverse the process

    • Impacts Survival

  • Ventricular Remodeling

    What methods to studyVentricular Remodeling?

  • Ventricular Remodeling

    • Echocardiography

    • Radionuclide Anhiography

    • Magnetic Resonance

    • Computed Tomography

  • Echocardiography

    Increasd LVEDV and LVESVConcentric or Eccentric HypertrophyIncreased Volume/Mass RatioAltered GeometryReduced Ejection FractionIncreased global/regional wall stressImpaired diastolic functionVentricular dyssynchronyRV remodelingAtrial remodelingValvular Disorder

  • Echocardiography

    • M-mode: Dimension, %FS

    • 2D Echo: Volumes, EF,

    Shape, Mass

    • Doppler: Hemodynamics

    Flow disorders

  • … more thandimension/area increase …

    Ventricular Remodeling

  • M-mode, 2DELimitations

  • 50%

    40%

    35%

    Ejection FractionImpact Numbers

  • Problems in the 2D EchoQuantification of Volumes and EF :

    • Can’t see the borders

    • Foreshortened views

    • Off-axis views

    • Translational motion

  • Life is not always easy …

  • 118 ml 142 ml

  • • Foreshortened views

    • Off-axis views

    • Translational motion

    Problems in the 2D EchoQuantification of Volumes and EF :

    3D Echo improves the accuracy

  • 3D Echo Quantification

  • R=0.95 p

  • 3D quantitation ofLV Geometry

  • 3D Echo Quantitationof Ischemic Mass

  • Circulation 2003;107:2207-2212

    The left atrial function and volume: prognostic markers in different cardiac diseases (arrhythmias, valvular and congenital disease)

  • Monoplane volume (M-mode, Teicholz formula)

    (EDD³x 7)/(2.4 +EDD)

    Monoplane volume (area/length, Dodge correction)

    ((area planimetry² x 8)/(3 x π x long axis)) x 0.951)-3

    Biplane volume(area/length, Dodge correction)

    (area planimetry 1 x area planimetry 2 x 8)/(3 x π x smallest long axis)

    M-mode and 2D methods to measure LA size

  • LA Volumes

  • RV Dysfunction and Outcome

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    No RV Dysf RV Dysfunction

    DeathCVDHFDeath or HFRecurrent MI

    SAVE Investigators

    J Am Coll Cardiol 2002 May 1;39(9):1450-5

  • Studies examining RV Functionand Outcomes in Heart Failure

    DiagnosisClinical expression

    PrognosisTherapeutic decision makingImplications for assist devices

  • LVAD, RVAD or Both ?

    Patients waitingFor Transplant

  • 77% (95%CI 58-95%)80% (95%CI 62-97%)NPV

    57% (95%CI 35-79%)80% (95%CI 62-97%)PPV

    70% (95%CI 50-90%)80% (95%CI 62-97%)Accuracy

    77% (95%CI 58-95%)92% (95%CI 80-100%)Specificity

    57% (95%CI 35-79%)57% (95%CI 35-79%)Sensitivity

    TDI < 10TDI < 9

    Tricuspid Annulur Velocity in the Identification of Systolic RV dysfunction (RV EF < 40%)

  • Quantitation of RV volumes, EF

    http://files.abstractsonline.com/CTRL/8D/1/FDC/39F/BA9/42C/D8E/E23/273/689/7FE/63/g830_1.jpghttp://files.abstractsonline.com/CTRL/8D/1/FDC/39F/BA9/42C/D8E/E23/273/689/7FE/63/g830_1.jpg

  • 75,00 100,00 125,00 150,00

    50,00

    75,00

    100,00

    125,00

    150,00

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    AA

    A

    A

    A

    A

    AA

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A A

    A

    AA

    EDV (ml) Live 3D Echo

    ESV

    (ml)

    TEE

    40,00 60,00 80,00 100,00

    40,00

    60,00

    80,00

    100,00

    120,00

    G

    G

    G

    GG

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    GG

    G

    G

    G G

    ESV (ml) Live 3D Echo

    EDV

    (ml)

    TEE

    30,00 40,00 50,00

    20,00

    30,00

    40,00

    50,00

    B

    BB

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    BB

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    BB

    EF (%) Live 3D Echo

    EF (%

    ) TEE

    80,00 100,00 120,00 140,00-60,00

    -40,00

    -20,00

    0,00

    20,00

    40,00

    60,00

    A

    A

    A

    A AA

    A

    A

    AA

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    AA

    A

    A

    Mean EDV (ml)

    Diff

    EDV

    (ml)

    (3D

    Echo

    -TEE

    )

    40,00 60,00 80,00 100,00-20,00

    -10,00

    0,00

    10,00

    20,00

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    GG

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    GG G

    G

    G

    Mean ESV (ml)

    Diff

    ESV

    (ml)

    (3D

    Echo

    -TEE

    )

    30,00 40,00 50,00-20,00

    -10,00

    0,00

    10,00

    20,00

    B

    B

    B

    B

    BB

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    BB

    BB

    BB

    Mean EF (%)

    Diff

    EF (%

    ) (3D

    Ech

    o-TE

    E)

    Linear regression with 95% Mean Prediction Interval

    Bland-Altman Plots

    RV Volumes by Live 3D Echo

  • 75,00 100,00 125,00 150,00

    50,00

    75,00

    100,00

    125,00

    150,00

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    AA

    A

    A

    A

    A

    AA

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A A

    A

    AA

    EDV (ml) Live 3D Echo

    ESV

    (ml)

    TEE

    40,00 60,00 80,00 100,00

    40,00

    60,00

    80,00

    100,00

    120,00

    G

    G

    G

    GG

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    GG

    G

    G

    G G

    ESV (ml) Live 3D Echo

    EDV

    (ml)

    TEE

    30,00 40,00 50,00

    20,00

    30,00

    40,00

    50,00

    B

    BB

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    BB

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    BB

    EF (%) Live 3D Echo

    EF (%

    ) TEE

    80,00 100,00 120,00 140,00-60,00

    -40,00

    -20,00

    0,00

    20,00

    40,00

    60,00

    A

    A

    A

    A AA

    A

    A

    AA

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    AA

    A

    A

    Mean EDV (ml)

    Diff

    EDV

    (ml)

    (3D

    Echo

    -TEE

    )

    40,00 60,00 80,00 100,00-20,00

    -10,00

    0,00

    10,00

    20,00

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    GG

    G

    G

    G

    G

    G

    GG G

    G

    G

    Mean ESV (ml)

    Diff

    ESV

    (ml)

    (3D

    Echo

    -TEE

    )

    30,00 40,00 50,00-20,00

    -10,00

    0,00

    10,00

    20,00

    B

    B

    B

    B

    BB

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    BB

    BB

    BB

    Mean EF (%)

    Diff

    EF (%

    ) (3D

    Ech

    o-TE

    E)

    Linear regression with 95% Mean Prediction Interval

    Bland-Altman Plots

    RV Volumes by Live 3D Echo

  • Heart Failure

    Pharmacologic Rx

    Mechanical Interventions

    Transplantation

    Novel Therapy

  • • QRS does not

    predict response

    • QRS does not represent

    true dyssynchrony

    CRT - Issues

  • Before CRT After CRT

    Assessment of Dyssynchronyby 3D Echo

  • Geometric ProceduresFor Heart Failure

  • Surgical Ventricular Restoration

    ConstraintDevices

    SupportDevice

  • PISA technique

    Regurgitant volumeRegurgitant fraction

    Regurgitant Orifice Area

    http://files.abstractsonline.com/CTRL/59/C/42D/CDE/EDE/49F/2BE/77E/A4C/700/A52/B0/g391_1.gifhttp://files.abstractsonline.com/CTRL/59/C/42D/CDE/EDE/49F/2BE/77E/A4C/700/A52/B0/g391_1.gif

  • PISA, Vena ContractaAssumptions

    “Regurgitant orifice circular”“Flow convergence perfect hemisphere”“Vena contracta circular”“1 frame in 1 view reflects whole AR”“There is only one regurgitant orifice

  • Regurgitation

    Round holeIn a flat object

    Perfect PISAhemisphere

    CircularVena Contrata

    Reallife

    http://files.abstractsonline.com/CTRL/59/C/42D/CDE/EDE/49F/2BE/77E/A4C/700/A52/B0/g391_1.gifhttp://files.abstractsonline.com/CTRL/59/C/42D/CDE/EDE/49F/2BE/77E/A4C/700/A52/B0/g391_1.gif

  • MV TV

    Ao

  • Regurgitant Orifices

  • • Pts with post-MI MR more likely toexperience combined end point of

    CV mortalitysevere HF, orrecurrent MI

    • Independent predictor of CV mortality(relative risk, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.04)

    SOLVD trial 1997

    47% vs. 29%P < .001

    Mitral Regurgitation

  • Geometric Distortion Contributing to MR

    Regional LV dilation/dysfunction Global LV dilation/dysfunction

  • Surgical Annuloplasty for Functional MR in CHF

    First 48 patients*

    Operative Mortality = 2.1%

    LOS = 9 ± 4 d (5-37)

    Expanded series - 92 patients*

    30 d Operative Mortality = 5.4%

    Sicker pts, Less experienced Surgeon

    Operative Mortality = ?

    *Bolling S et al

  • Hung et al

  • LV

    LA

    Catheter device

  • 3D Imaging in Heart Failure

    3D Echo vs. CMR

    Widely available

    Easy to use in any setting

  • 3D Imaging in Heart Failure

    • Better appraisal of functional morphology

    • More accurate study of remodeling

    • Aid to innovative therapeutic procedures

    • Good investigative tool to study the heart

  • Thank you !

    Slide Number 1Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 83D &2D vs CMRSlide Number 10Slide Number 113D Makes a DifferenceSlide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Guidelines for Cardiac ResynchronizationSlide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26Slide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29Slide Number 303D in Mitral Valve DiseaseSlide Number 32Slide Number 33Slide Number 34Slide Number 44Slide Number 45Slide Number 46Slide Number 47Slide Number 50Slide Number 51Slide Number 52Slide Number 53Slide Number 54Slide Number 55Slide Number 56Slide Number 57Slide Number 58Slide Number 59Slide Number 60Slide Number 61Slide Number 62Slide Number 63Slide Number 64Slide Number 65Slide Number 66Slide Number 67Slide Number 68Slide Number 69Slide Number 70Slide Number 71Slide Number 72Slide Number 73Slide Number 74Slide Number 75Slide Number 76Slide Number 77Slide Number 78Slide Number 79Slide Number 80Slide Number 81Slide Number 82Slide Number 83Slide Number 84Slide Number 85Slide Number 86Slide Number 87Slide Number 88Slide Number 89Slide Number 90Slide Number 91Slide Number 92Slide Number 93Slide Number 94Slide Number 95Slide Number 96Slide Number 97Slide Number 98Slide Number 99Slide Number 100Slide Number 101Slide Number 102Slide Number 103Slide Number 104Slide Number 105Slide Number 106Slide Number 107Slide Number 108Slide Number 110Slide Number 111Slide Number 112Slide Number 113Slide Number 114


Recommended