Dow
nloadedfrom
https://journals.lww.com
/ajpmrby
BhDMf5ePH
Kav1zEoum1tQ
fN4a+kJLhEZgbsIH
o4XMi0hC
ywCX1AW
nYQp/IlQ
rHD3SN
2oLfdKwVfzdlQ
chOq4IyK9U
J3LZP4I3hrlDBG
r9VE=on
04/29/2020
Downloadedfromhttps://journals.lww.com/ajpmrbyBhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3SN2oLfdKwVfzdlQchOq4IyK9UJ3LZP4I3hrlDBGr9VE=on04/29/2020
1
When Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation became Medicine—Life in the
Time of COVID-19
Ihsan Y. Balkaya, MD1, Jose A. Fernandez, MD1, Wessam Gerguis, MD1,
Mahmut T. Kaner, MD1, Matthew Lamagna, DO1, Anusha Lekshminarayanan, MD1,
He Meng, MD1, S.M. Monir Mohar, MD1, Sonika Randev, MD1, Iliana Sanchez, MD1,
Sumankumar Brahmbhatt, MD1, Mohammed Islam, MD1,
Michael Frankenthaler, MD2, Paul T. Diamond, MD1, Eric L. Altschuler, MD, PhD1
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2Department of Pain and Palliative
Medicine, Metropolitan Hospital, New York, NY, USA
Ihsan Y. Balkaya, Jose A. Fernandez, Wessam Gerguis, Mahmut T. Kaner, Matthew Lamagna,
Anusha Lekshminarayanan, He Meng, S.M. Monir Mohar, Sonika Randev, and Iliana Sanchez
contributed equally.
To whom correspondence should be addressed:
Eric L Altschuler, MD, PhD
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Articles Ahead of Print DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001454
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
ACCEPTED
2
Metropolitan Hospital
1901 First Avenue
New York, NY, 10029, USA
email: [email protected]
Phone: (212) 423-6448
Fax: (212) 423-6326
We have no financial or other conflicts. No funding was received for this study.
This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses
in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are
granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing.
Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article
available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
ACCEPTED
3
The first COVID-19 infection was reported in New York State on March 1, 2020; the first
person died from COVID-19 infection in New York City on March 14, 2020. The number of
COVID-19+ cases in New York City was increasing and on March 12th 358 cases were reported.
It soon became clear that most of our hospital would be devoted to care of COVID-19 patients. In
order to ensure that adequate acute care beds would be available for the surge in patients, we made
the decision to stop accepting referrals to our twenty-bed acute inpatient rehabilitation unit and
discharge the remaining patients as safely and quickly as possible. On March 12th, we admitted
the last patient for acute rehabilitation to our unit. Daily COVID-19 admissions to New York City
hospitals quickly escalated (https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid-19-data.page): on March
12th NYC hospitals admitted 75 patients. On March 19th hospitals admitted 512 patients and by
March 24th daily admissions had increased to 1045. Admissions continued to increase and on
March 30th had reached a new daily high of 1565.
Initially, the plan was for internal medicine and other services to admit and care for non-
COVID positive patients on our unit. However, with the rapid influx of patients and critical need
for physicians, we were asked by hospital administration to consider running a medical unit on our
floor; we agreed and our acute rehab unit was transitioned to a medical unit.
The initial plan was to transfer non-COVID+ patients who were medically stable to our
unit for post-discharge planning. Leveraging and utilizing our experience and infrastructure on
matters related to disposition, we were able to efficiently and quickly discharge these patients. But,
as the hospital began to exceed capacity and additional ICU units were opened, the medical service
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
ACCEPTED
4
began transferring patients requiring active medical management to our unit where we assumed
their care. We also started accepting low acuity admissions—of both COVID negative and positive
patients—directly from the ED as requested. Along with the patients we were covering on our
floor, other available rooms in the rehab unit started to be filled with COVID+ patients who were
being taken care of by medicine services. As the need for medical residents and staff became
greater in the ICUs, we began caring for COVID+ patients with less severe symptoms.
As the hospital’s needs continued to evolve, we were asked to accept critically ill patients
from our ICUs, on ventilators. All of these patients had been seen by our palliative care team prior
to transfer and goals of care were clearly delineated. These were patients that were not expected
to survive and no longer required the interventions only available in an intensive care setting.
Palliative continued to consult on all these patients and were instrumental in the care plans. An
advantage for these patients was the ability to allow visitation by loved ones prior to death. Visitors
were limited to one at a time and they had to be healthy as well as wear masks and other appropriate
protective gear. Visitors could not be allowed in our ICUs due to the sheer volume of critical work
by staff and the high likelihood of COVID-19 exposure.
In addition to managing medical patients on our unit and covering a busy in-house PM&R
consult service, some PM&R residents volunteered to work on the medicine wards or ICU with
COVID+ patients. PM&R residents and attendings also staffed the COVID screening annex of our
hospital’s Emergency Department. PM&R resident work hours were adjusted and coordinated
with medicine so as to stay well within ACGME duty hour guidelines. Despite busy and ever-
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
ACCEPTED
5
changing clinical demands and varying schedules, we have been able to continue our PM&R
didactics by shifting to guided independent study.
Some lessons and points we would like to share with other PM&R departments during this
pandemic: It is crucial to establish a formal and robust procurement process for personal protective
equipment (PPE) for physiatrists who are working with COVID+ patients. Close communication
with internal medicine, their subspecialties and other services such as palliative care has been key
to the successful transfer of patients from the medical services to the care of the PM&R service.
The transfer protocol included a detailed handoff with a clearly delineated plan of care before
transfer or admission of medical patients to a Physiatry service. Patients with higher medical acuity
should remain under the care of the medical service and therefore appropriate triaging is critical.
The spirit of teamwork within physiatry is of great benefit when taking care of any patient, but
especially so for medical patients. Interestingly, we have also found that a thorough physiatric
history and physical examination, assessment and plan is an extremely effective tool and resource
even when applied to the care of non-rehab medical patients.
As of April 15th there seems to be a plateau in COVID admissions in NYC and our hospital.
But as with everything else about this novel human coronavirus there is uncertainty about the
future and we have not yet made plans to transition back to running an acute inpatient rehabilitation
unit.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
ACCEPTED