+ All Categories
Home > Education > Who Are We, What Is It, What Can I Do With It and Why Does It Matter?

Who Are We, What Is It, What Can I Do With It and Why Does It Matter?

Date post: 18-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: charleston-conference
View: 364 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
53
Who are we? what is it? what can I do with it? – and why does it matter? Some thoughts on identity and identification in an increasingly complex environment
Transcript

Who are we? what is it? what can I

do with it? – and why does it matter?

Some thoughts on identity and identification in an increasingly complex environment

Agenda

Introduction

Mark Bide (EDItEUR)

Identifying people, places and organizations

Helen Henderson (Ringgold)

Identifying resources

Brian Green (International ISBN Agency)

Identifying deals

Mark Bide (EDItEUR)

Introduction

Mark Bide

The things we need to identify: the <indecs>

model of commerce

Peoplemake

Stuffis used by

Deals

do

about

What are identifiers?

An identifier is a unique expression in a written format either by a code, by numbers or by the combination of both to distinguish variations from one to another among a class of substances, items, or objects….

In computer science, identifiers are lexical tokens (that is, “nouns”) that name entities (or “things”). The concept is analogous to that of a "name." Identifiers are used extensively in virtually all information processing systems.

Naming entities makes it possible to refer to them, which is essential for any kind of symbolic processing.

[Based on Wikipedia]

Why do we need identifiers?

Identifiers are “just” a special class of name

Unique within a given context

Why do we assign identifiers?

Collocation – to bring together instances of the same thing

Disambiguation – to distinguish things that are not the same

What does “the same” mean?

Whether things are or are not the same is always contextual

For example, an ISBN identifies a class of individual instances as

being “the same” for particular purposes – meaning is not

universal

Why does this matter?

Unambiguous communication…

…particularly from machine to machine (people don’t often use

unique identifiers in discourse – “that one over there” is usually

enough)

Why do we need standard identifiers?

When there is a need to communicate across

organizational boundaries – within any sort of

“supply chain”…

…particularly where anyone in the supply chain

needs to manage and aggregate information from

multiple sources

That means nearly everyone, particularly in a digital

supply chain

What matters about standard identifiers?

That their semantic should be clear to everyone…

…in other words, everyone in the chain knows what type

of thing they are identifying

Why do we need identifiers?

“The Web was designed as an information space, with the

goal that it should be useful not only for human–human

communication, but that also machines would be able to

participate… One of the major obstacles to this has been

the fact that most information on the Web was designed

for human consumption.”

Tim Berners-Lee The Semantic Web (1998)

So, if we are to make the semantic web a

reality…

We need to establish “chains of identifiers”

Identifiers with explicit and well understood semantics

We need to link them together with “relators” which

have well-defined semantics

We need to establish and manage the relationships that

are important to us

We need to be careful about trivializing the task

Everything is related to everything else at some level

Saying that two things “are the same” is complex,

because it is always contextual [an ISBN does not identify

“a book”]

Identifying people, places and

organizations

Helen Henderson

Identifiers: People, Places and Organizations

Helen HendersonRinggold

[email protected]

Types of Identifiers (in our space)

o Organizations

o D-U-N-S

o …. and many tax related identifiers

o ISIL

o ISNI

o MARC Org Code

o OCLC Symbol

o People

o ISNI

o Researcher ID

o Scopus Author Identifier

o ORCID

o Places

o GLN

o SAN

o UN LOC

What is the need?o Places

o Delivery of physical objects

o Tax regime

o People

o Rights payments

o Author affiliation (ownership)

o Disambiguation

o Organizations

o Delivery and entitlements

o Access rights

o Hierarchy

o Usually comes down to …… MONEY

Placeso GLN (Global Locator Number)

o Physical location

o Legal entity

o Maintained by GS1 (formerly EAN International)

o SAN (Standard Address Number)

o Specific street address

o ANSI/NISO standard

o Maintained by Bowker

o UN LOC (United Nations Code for Trade and Transport Locations)

o Trade locations (e.g. airports, ports)

o Coordinates

o Maintained by UN Economic Commission for Europe

Peopleo ISNI (International Standard Name Identifier)

o “Names” include people and organizations

o Initial emphasis rights holders

o Maintained by International ISNI Agency (consortium of national libraries and bibliographic utilities)

o Virtual International Authority File

o Jointly run by LC, BnF, DNB and OCLC

o Implemented and hosted by OCLC

o ~20 files from around the world

o 13 million name records

o 10 million clusters

o Plan to include other names

• Corporations, works, geographics, families, imaginary characters, etc.

• Not topical subject headings

More Peopleo Proprietary Author Identifiers

o Scopus (Elsevier)

o Scholar Universe (COS)

o Researcher ID (Thomson Reuters)

o RePEc (Research Paper in Economics)

o ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)

o Open version of Thomson Reuter’s Researcher ID

o Most ‘social’

• Claiming IDs

• Interactive verification of associated works

• Pulling together several current initiatives

o Driven by STM, university communities

o Primarily interested in researchers

o Large number of participants

o Mostly concerned with present and future names

Organizations

o OCLC Symbol

o Library identifier

o Maintained by OCLC

o ISNI (International Standard Name Identifier – ISO 27729)

o Recently adopted

o Emphasis on individuals

o Central registry

o Registration agencies

o D-U-N-S …. and many tax related identifiers

o Related to corporate entities

o ISIL (International Standard Identifier for Libraries - ISO 15511)

o Libraries only

o National agencies

o MARC Org Code

o Library identifier

o Maintained by LC

More organizationso OCLC WorldCat Registry ID

o Library identifier

o Voluntary registration and maintenance

o NISO I2

o International Institutional Identifier

o Hierarchical structure with relationships

o Identifies “licensing units”

o May be a sub-registry of ISNI, still to be decided

o Ringgold Identifier

o 200,000 institutions or institutional entities

o Worldwide, all categories

o Used by over 40 publishers and agents

Existing Identifiers Investigated for use with I2

Identifier Name Current Status

ISIL (ISO 15511) International Standard

OCLC symbol OCLC specific

OCLC WorldCat Registry ID OCLC specific

MARC organization code MARC standard

ISNI (ISO 27729) Final Committee draft

SAN Standard address number NISO standard Z39.43-1993

GLN Global location number GS1 (formerly EAN international)

DUNS Data Universal Numbering Dun and Bradstreet

International Standard for Describing Institutions with Archival Holdings Information (ISDIAH) New standard 2008 – International Council on Archives

What is next for I2?o NISO Working Group

o Publishers

o Agents

o Distributors

o Libraries

o Hosting services

o Institutional Repositories

o Scenarios

o Electronic supply chain

o Consortia

o Research funding

o Inter-library loan

o Implementation

Identifying resources

Brian Green

… e-books in particular

Brian Green

International ISBN Agency

“What matters is that everyone in the chain

knows what type of thing they are identifying”

FRBR: Endeavour

ITEM

WORK

EXPRESSION

MANIFESTATIO

N

realization

embodimen

t

exemplar

realizationO

f

embodiment

Of

exemplarOf

Book Industry

concept: e.g.

Moby-Dick

e.g. author’s

original text

both concept and

content

ISTC/ISBN

ACCESSIO

N Number

ISTC

ISBN

embodimen

t

exemplar

embodiment

Of

exemplarOf

“What matters is that everyone in the chain

knows what type of thing they are identifying”

“Collocation – to bring together instances of

the same thing”

The International Standard Text Code

Unambiguously identifies a textual work, even though it

may be published in many different forms (One ISTC

may link to many ISBNs)

For use in improved discovery services, collocation,

rights and royalties etc.

Identifies content separately from the products which

contain it

Also identifies the relationships between items of content

(ONIX for ISTC registration)

e.g. Abridged, Annotated, Compilation, Critical, Excerpt,

Expurgated, Non-text material added or revised, Revised,

Translated

Publisher record at work level

Example from Publishing Technology

Link to various manifestations

Example from Publishing Technology

Link to various manifestations

Example from Publishing Technology

One metadata

record – multiple

ISBNS

“Disambiguation – to distinguish things that

are not the same”

Under “Rules of assignment”, the 2005 revision of

the ISBN standard (ISO 2108) says:

Different product forms (e.g. hardcover, paperback,

Braille, audio-book, video, online electronic publication)

shall be assigned separate ISBNs

Each different format of an electronic publication (e.g.

‘.lit’, ‘.pdf’, ‘.html’, ‘.pdb’) that is published and made

separately available shall be given a separate ISBN.

Seemed adequate at the time but file format not

really an appropriate indicator of different products

What differentiates e-book products?

Ability to render book

Does it work on my device/platform/software?

User’s experience and usage rights

What can I do with it?

File format only part of the story. DRM is what really

differentiates e-book products and platforms

Why identify separate e-book products?

To ensure that the e-book ordered is the correct one

for the user’s e-reader device and/or software

platform

To enable bibliographic databases to provide

information about the different available versions of

an e-book

To facilitate electronic trading of e-books, particularly

where multiple formats are sold through the same

channel

To facilitate product level reporting of sales and

usage and facilitate management of e-book products

The e-book supply chain

For printed books, publishers assign ISBNs to each

format, and that product and it’s ISBN remains

constant throughout the supply chain

For e-books, there is an additional layer of

intermediaries providing conversion services to

publishers and producing new e-book products

Many publishers only produce a single generic file

format (e.g. “.epub” or “PDF”), and intermediaries or

Internet retailers add technical rights protection

(DRM) and create different formats/products

Publisher

Library

platformConversion

Random,

HarperCollins,

Faber...

Libre Digital,

Ingram,

PubDim, VCI...

PDF

XML

Disassemble

Markup

Convert

Master

format

.epub

PDF

.epub/PDF

.epub

PDF

MyiLibrary, Overdrive etc.

NetLibrary

Add DRM

Library

EDI order

EDI order

Library

ebrary

Add DRM

Convert

Add DRM

Acct No

epub+DRMOPAC

Library ID

Consumer

Overdrive “white label”...

Jobber

YBP, Ingram etc

New ISBN rule introduced 2008

Since some publishers do not provide separate

ISBNs for each version and some customers,

including libraries, need unique identification of

products from different platforms with different

functionality…

If a publisher does not identify each format with a

separate ISBN, intermediaries/re-sellers may do so

on their behalf

Not ideal but a necessary compromise until publishers

assign their own ISBNs

Requires central bibliographic agency to collect and list

ISBNs and related metadata

What’s actually happening?

Everything. It’s like the 1960’s before ISBN.

Some publishers assign separate ISBNs to each

version

Some assign the same ISBN to all versions

Some publishers assign an ISBN to the epub file and

let third parties assign their own ISBNs or proprietary

identifiers to their versions

Sometimes these proprietary “ISBN-like” identifiers

actually duplicate ISBNs assigned to books already

published elsewhere

All

different

All the

same

“Whether things are or are not the same is

always contextual”

Results of ISBN survey 2009/2010:

There is a need for each digital format to be

separately identified at various points in the supply

chain

However there seems to be a need for a more

abstract generic identifier to collocate different

versions of the same books

ISTC identifies underlying textual works and is a

potentially useful way of aggregating different

manifestations and their ISBNs regardless of media

“The use of a single ISBN would enable provider-neutral records and

act similarly to eISSNs. Open link resolution, federated search, and

unified discovery platforms would also benefit from the use of a single

eISBN.

It is also useful to have some sort of identifier by platform, particularly

for back-end vendor operations.”

Library comments from ISBNsurvey

“Essential to have a single 'matching point' to compare collections, pull-

in usage data, exclude already-purchased titles from lists, etc.

Useful to have a second ISBN for each platform as different platforms

have different DRM etc. Combined with a single ISBN for all formats,

would help to identify where we have purchased the same title from

more than one platform.”

In summary

The use of a single ISBN to identify multiple e-book formats is confusing and potentially unsafe

If two things are given the same identifier it becomes very hard to distinguish between them if/when we need to

The International ISBN Agency continues to recommend that publishers should assign ISBNs to each e-book version separately available (n.b.“version” needs defining)

…but we also need to use identifiers at higher levels of abstraction (ISTC?)

Consistent application of standard identifiers is essential

“particularly where anyone in the supply chain needs to manage and aggregate information from multiple sources”

Identifying “deals”

Mark Bide

We are getting better at automating license

communication

48

Creative Commons: http://creativecommons.org –standard licences most appropriate for noncommercial content [?] machine and human readable – and related approaches such as the UK’s “Open Government Licence”

ONIX-PL: www.editeur.org – a standard for the communication of publishers licenses to libraries, to make complex information human readable

ACAP: www.the-acap.org – a standard machine to machine communication of permissions, developed mainly in support of the news sector

PLUS Coalition: http://www.useplus.com – standards for licensing photographs and other visual images, machine and human readable

ODRL: http://odrl.net/ Open Digital Rights Language –“machine decidable permissions” – v2.0 in development

Related infrastructural developments

49

The Book Rights Registry (“the Google Settlement”):

http://books.google.com/googlebooks/agreement/

Global Repertoire Database (GRD)

http://globalrepertoiredatabase.com/faq.html

The ARROW project:

http://www.arrow-net.eu/

PLUS seeking to establish registries for visual

images

Standards for license identification

Musical Works License Identifier (MWLI)

There appears to be work to do here…..

Conclusions and discussion

Some questions for discussion

At what level would you like to see manifestations

separately identified?

By channel?

By DRM / usage features?

Should 2 e-book versions from different channels but with

the same usage features share an ISBN

At what level would you like to see them collocated?

All manifestations regardless of media?

All e-books (but excluding print and audio)?

What can libraries do about it?

Helen Henderson [email protected] Green [email protected]

Mark Bide [email protected]

ISBN: www.isbn-international.org

ISTC: www.istc-international.org

53

Thanks for coming


Recommended