+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4...

Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4...

Date post: 05-Nov-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
21
Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart Paul Scherrer Institute Study of wake fields for short electron bunches using CST Particle Studio Dr Sladana Dordevic
Transcript
Page 1: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart

Paul Scherrer Institute

Study of wake fields for short electron bunches using CST Particle Studio

Dr Sladana Dordevic

Page 2: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 2

Introduction Analytical results CST Particle Studio results and comparison Summary

Outline

The 8th CST European User Conference (EUC) 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart, Germany

[email protected]

Page 3: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 3

The SwissFEL accelerator requires a high quality, ultra short electron bunch. The bunch travels parallel to the axis of the axially symmetric structure. The electromagnetic field of the charge bunch interacts with the surrounding accelerating structure generating the wake fields that act back on the bunch itself. Knowledge of the short range wakefields in accelerator structure in needed to predict the bunch energy spread and emittance.

Introduction

Page 4: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4

Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation with CST Particle Studio as the alternative. Unfortunately, for particle bunches shorter than ~200fs, the simulations are time consuming or even impossible due to the large number of mesh points required. In this study, the following conditions are taken: resistive wake fields, a simple round pipe and on-axis ultra-relativistic bunches with longitudinal Gaussian distribution. Analytic results are compared to wake fields from CST Particle Studio. Different meshing parameters in Wakefield Solver are compared in order to find the results in the best agreement with analytical results for progressively shorter bunch lengths. This allows at least an estimation of wake fields for bunches <33fs for complex structures.

Page 5: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 5

Analytic equations are used for longitudinal impedance calculation of simple geometries *. With the calculated impedance, the wake function is found with inverse Fourier Transform, then convolved with bunch shape to give wake potential.

Analytic results

* A. W. Chao, “Physics of Collective Beam Instabilities in High Energy Accelerators”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.1993.

Impedance Wake function Wake potential

Page 6: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 6

In analytical study two different regimes of conductivity are considered:

DC Conductivity model – field is constant between electron collisions

AC Conductivity model – field changes between electron collisions (frequency dependant)

0

1AC iσ

σωτ

=−

electron relaxation time (mean time between electron collisions)

DC wake function is valid for cτ /s0<<1

AC Conductivity Model needed

σDC = σ0

s0=(2r2/Z0σ0)1/3

Two materials are considered: Cu, σCu=6.45x107 S/m, =2.7x10-14 s Al, σAl=4.22x107 S/m, =8.1x10-15 s τ

τ

Page 7: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 7

Page 8: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 8

Page 9: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 9

20 um Gaussian bunch

For bunches ≥20um:

Page 10: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 10

Longitudinal resistive wall wake potential W(s) versus the relative longitudinal displacement from the bunch head s for different bunch length (Cu and AC model)

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100s [um]

W(s

) [V/

pC/m

]

10um Gaussian bunch 10um 5um 2.5um 1um - wake function

10 um Gaussian bunch

For bunches ≤10um:

Page 11: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 11

CST Particle Studio results and comparison

The lossy metal is modelled through a boundary condition

Integration Methods available for Wakefield Solver

Beam path

Integration path

Page 12: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 12

Indirect Testbeams is used for simulation

Factor of 1000 discrepancy Factor of 100 discrepancy

Page 13: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 13

Meshing parameters

Local mesh properties in longitudinal direction to improve

the dispersion characteristics

Local mesh properties in all directions

Global mesh properties

Since wakefield computations can be very time and resource consuming it is advisable to inspect the mesh.

Page 14: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 14

Different meshing parameters in Wakefield Solver are compared in order to find the results in the best agreement with analytical results for progressively shorter bunch lengths: 500um, 200um, 100um, 75um and 50um. .

Page 15: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 15

Page 16: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 16

Page 17: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 17

Page 18: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 18

Page 19: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 19

Page 20: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart 20

For ultra short bunches <10um (<33fs), a different method is proposed but not yet tried. Analytic results show that curves of wake potential have the same shape as wake function with opposite sign. The idea is to use CST Wakefield Solver with a longer bunch to find the impedance of a complex structure. With this impedance, the wake function for shorter bunches could be estimated with the inverse Fourier Transform.

Summary

Local meshing gives the minimal number of mesh cells for short bunches and resistive wake fields for bunches above 50um and gives results in very good agreement with analytical ones.

Page 21: Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen€¦ · CST EUC 2013, 23- 25 April 2013, Stuttgart 4 Analytical approach is not suitable for complex geometries, leaving numerical simulation

[email protected]

Thank you for your attention !

CST EUC 2013, 23-25 April 2013, Stuttgart


Recommended