+ All Categories
Home > Documents > with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>....

with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>....

Date post: 28-Feb-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
49
with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil 1 November 2017 | Strategic Frameworks
Transcript
Page 1: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil

1 November 2017 | Strategic Frameworks

Page 2: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 1 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

Readiness and Preparatory Support Proposal

How to complete this document? - A Readiness Guidebook is available to provide information on how to access funding under the GCF

Readiness and Preparatory Support programme. It should be consulted to assist in the completion of this proposal template.

- This document should be completed by National Designated Authorities (NDAs) or focal points with support from their delivery partners where relevant.

- Please be concise. If you need to include any additional information, please attach it to the proposal.

- Information on the indicative list of activities eligible for readiness and preparatory support and the process for the submission, review and approval of this proposal can be found on pages 11-13 of the guidebook.

- For the final version submitted to GCF Secretariat, please delete all instructions indicated in italics in this template and provide information in regular text (not italics).

Where to get support? - If you are not sure how to complete this document, or require support, please send an e-mail to

[email protected]. We will aim to get back to you within 48 hours. We will aim to get back to you within 48 hours.

- You can also complete as much of this document as you can and then send it to [email protected]. We will get back to you within 5 working days to discuss your submission and the way forward.

Note: Environmental and Social Safeguards and Gender

Throughout this document, when answering questions and providing details, please make sure to pay special attention to environmental, social and gender issues, particularly to the situation of vulnerable populations, including women and men. Please be specific about proposed actions to address these issues. Consult page 7 of the readiness guidebook for more information.

Page 3: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 2 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

SECTION 1: SUMMARY

1. Country submitting the proposal

Country name: Brazil

Name of institution representing National Designated Authority (NDA) or Focal Point: Secretariat for International Affairs, Ministry of Finance

Name of NDA/Focal Point: Mr. Marcello de Moura Estevão Filho

Position: Secretary for International Affairs

Telephone: +55 61 3412 2237 Email: [email protected]

Full office address: Esplanada dos Ministérios, Bloco P, 2° andar, Sala 219

70048-900 Brasília (DF) - Brazil

2. Date of initial submission

31/10/2017

3. Last date of resubmission

21/03/2018

4. Which entity will implement the Readiness and Preparatory Support project?

National Designated Authority X Accredited Entity Delivery Partner

Ermira Fida

Coordinator, Green Climate Fund

Corporate Services Division

UN Environment

Telephone: +254 -20 76 23113

Email: [email protected]

Full Office address:

United Nations Avenue, Gigiri

P.O. Box 30552

Nairobi 00100

5. Title of the Readiness support proposal

Technology Needs Assessment for the Implementation of Climate Action Plans in Brazil

6. Type of Readiness support sought

Please select one option below (one box or circle)

X Readiness (See attached Annex I) o Establishing and strengthening national designated authorities or focal points o X Strategic frameworks, including the preparation of country programmes o Support for accreditation and accredited direct access entities

Adaptation Planning

7. Brief summary of the Brazil submitted the document ratifying the Paris Agreement in September 2016, in which it committed to reduce GHG emissions by means of a Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC). The

Page 4: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 3 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

request NDC targets to reduce GHG emissions by 37% in 2025 and 43% in 2030.1 The project ’Mitigation Options of GHG Emissions in Key Sectors in Brazil’, prepared in a partnership between the Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications (MCTIC) and UN Environment, indicated a rationale that takes into consideration sector cost-effectiveness and key technologies for compliance with the NDC.2 However, it is necessary to establish a national consensus where Technology Action Plans can build from, aiming at developing local content of priority technologies and sectors for compliance with the NDC. Therefore, this proposal seeks to develop a comprehensive ‘Technology Needs Assessment for the Implementation of Climate Action Plans in Brazil’ through the following two outcomes and four activities:

• Outcome 1. Country capacity strengthened o Activity 1 – Establish an effective coordination mechanism for the implementation of the

TNA process

• Outcome 2. Access to finance o Activity 2 – Identification and Prioritization of the sectors and technologies to mitigate

GHG emissions for compliance with the NDC o Activity 3 – Elaborate the roadmaps for the implementation of the priority technologies

for compliance with the NDC o Activity 4 – Validation of the Technology Action Plan for the development of local

content of priority technologies for compliance with the NDC

The baseline from the ’Mitigation Options of GHG Emissions in Key Sectors in Brazil’ project and the ‘Third Communication of Brazil to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’3 points out to technologies and key sectors for the fulfilment of national mitigation com-mitments. These are in line with strategic axes and investment areas in the “Background Docu-ment for discussions about Brazil’s strategy for the Green Climate Fund – GCF’4, which will be the basis for the drafting of Brazil’s Country Work Programme.5 The outcomes of this TNA project will provide subsidies for the country to develop good projects to submit to GCF, since it will build a technology roadmap to serve as a guide on the analysis and construction of Funding Proposals for the Fund. Besides that, the workshops and stakeholders engagement predicted on project's activi-ties will amplify the engagement of relevant actors on the Brazilian society with the GCF, specially improving their knowledge about funding and project development possibilities, and also will foster analytical capacity on the Ministries involved in the no-objection procedure in Brazil (coor-dinated by the Ministry of Finance), thus improving the quality of proposals submitted by the country to GCF. As well as key low-carbon activities that must be adopted in the Agriculture, For-estry and Other Land Use sectors (Afolu) and energy system aiming at fulfilling the NDC, respec-tively. The anticipated outcomes from the assistance will be tailored to the conditions in Brazil and thus will be of immediate use to support the goals of the current climate political strategies, such as the National Policy on Climate Change – PNMC, the National Plan on Climate Change, the Na-tional Adaptation Plan – PNA, and the Brazilian NDC. The requested assistance is aligned with Brazil’s NDC, as it will allow for its complete implementation, as well as create, by means of the development of local content of key low-carbon technologies, for the adoption of more ambitious mitigation plans as at 2030. Finally, the project´s outcomes will be made available and will be used to upgrade the National Emissions Registration System – SIRENE,6 which will make outcomes more

1Available at: <http://www.mma.gov.br/images/arquivo/80108/BRAZIL%20iNDC%20english%20FINAL.pdf>. 2 Available at: <http://sirene.mcti.gov.br/documents/1686653/2098519/Trajetorias-J.pdf/74fdd21e-f10c-41d2-abbe-29450e1d40c5>. 3 Available at: <http://sirene.mcti.gov.br/documents/1686653/1706740/Volume+3.pdf/6bb2f28a-02ca-4072-980b-1b2514a87cab>. 4 Available at: <http://fazenda.gov.br/assuntos/atuacao-internacional/fundo-verde-do-clima/arquivos/documento-base-para-discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of the Country Program with the GCF Secretariat; the current estimative is to submit the final Country Program to the Secretariat until May 2018, in order to enable the presentation of the document at B.20. 6 Platform created in 2016, with the aim of granting security, perenniality and transparency to the process of drafting inventories of greenhouse gas emissions, and support decision-making within the scope of policies, plans, and projects in the area of climate change in the country. Available at: <http://sirene.mcti.gov.br/>.

Page 5: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 4 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

transparent, besides allowing for their verification of how they apply to Technologic Action Plans. Therefore, the project implementation is in line with national needs and priorities, in such a way that it contributes to the strategy to engage with GCF.

8. Total requested amount and currency

USD 700,000

9. Anticipated duration 18 months

Page 6: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 5 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

SECTION 2: LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Please complete the table below by including proposed outcomes, baseline situations, the targets for implementation period, and the activities to be undertaken, including key outputs or deliverables. Please add rows for additional outcomes as needed.For further guidance on completing the table, please refer to the guidebook “Accessing the GCF Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme”, including specific Outcomes to select from.

OUTCOMES BASELINE TARGET

ACTIVITIES Please include at least one specific deliverable output for each activity, and the

timeframe (month number) in which it will be delivered to GCF.

1. Country capacity strengthened

1.1. National Designated Entity (NDE) for the Technology Mecha-nism lead effective coordination mechanism for the implementation of the TNA

( ) 0 (X) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 (X) 2 Activity 1 – Establish an effective coordination mechanism for the implementation of the TNA process The first activity aims at defining stakeholders to be directly involved in running the project, in cooperation with the national coordination team (Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications – MCTIC and UN Environment). A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) must be established to this end, whose members must be appointed from the public service and private initiative, selected by the national coordination team in compliance with its acting capacity and affinity with the TNA scope. The TAC will be responsible for: a) assessing and supporting the work plan for the execution of the project prepared by the national coordination team; b)appointing key stakeholder groups to engage in the TNA process during its execution, and define their roles and responsibilities in the TNA process; c) contributing with technical guidelines in every execution stage of the project; d) reviewing outcomes prepared by the hired consultants; e) promoting a comprehensive participation of key stakeholders in preparing the TNA. The main actors that should be included at the TAC (but not be limited to) are: - Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications (MCTIC); - Ministry of Finance (MF); - Ministry of Environment (MMA); - Ministry of Planning, Development and Management (MPDG); - Ministry of Industry, Foreign Trade and Services (MDIC);

Page 7: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 6 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

- Chief of Staff of the Presidency of the Republic; - Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME); - Ministry of Transport (MT); - Ministry of Cities (MCidades); - National Confederation of Industry (CNI); - Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA); - Brazilian Company of Research and Industrial Innovation (EMBRAPII); and - Brazilian Research Network on Climate Change (Rede Clima). Activity 1.1 – Implement administrative and organizational processes to structure the project The outputs of activity 1.1 will be: 1.1.1. Minutes of meetings towards the definition of the main members of the TAC elaborated; 1.1.2. Official publication on the establishment of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC); 1.1.3. Work plan elaborated by the national coordination team (MCTIC/UN environment). Estimated completion date: Month 1. Activity 1.2 – Develop a stakeholder analysis to determine the roles/responsibilities of main stakeholder groups in the TNA process and method of engagement

Page 8: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 7 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

7 The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) included in the proposal is part of the TNA methodology. The TAC reflects the

involvement of the key actors involved and/or affected by the project. These stakeholders will be representatives of Brazilian government agencies and research institutions. The activities as members of the TAC are not remunerated by the project, consisting in counterpart in kind for the development of TNA. The participation of these stakeholders in the process of the prioritization of sectors and technologies, and approval of the technological action plan is extremely relevant. Technical decisions during the implementation of the project will be the responsibility of the TAC, and this committee shall be in force until the end of the project. The permanent coordination mechanism for the Brazilian TNA is the Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications (MCTIC), which, by official indication of the Brazilian government to the UNFCCC, is the National Designated Entity (NDE) for the Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN). The CTCN is the operational arm of the UNFCCC Technology Mechanism. Thus, MCTIC is responsible for the preparation of this readiness proposal and will be responsible for the national coordination of the implementation of the proposal, as well as for the dissemination of the results in the country.

The outputs of activity 1.2 will be: 1.2.1. Matrix of mapping and assigning the stakeholders responsible for conducting the TNA process; 1.2.2. Decree creating the TAC with stakeholders mapped. Estimated completion date: Month 2. Activity 1.3 – Establish an effective coordination mechanism for the TNA process with comprehensive participation of key stakeholders and agreed meeting schedule7. The outputs of activity 1.3 will be: 1.3.1. Work plan endorsed by the TAC; 1.3.2. Minutes of ordinary quarterly TAC meetings conducted in Brasília/DF, in venues assigned by the Federal Government; Estimated completion date: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18.

1.2. No objection procedure ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

1.3. Bilateral agreements between the country and the GCF executed

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

1.4. Monitoring, oversight and streamlining of climate finance

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

Page 9: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 8 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

2. Stakeholders engaged

2.1. Stakeholder engaged in consul-tative processes

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

2.2. Country programmes, including adaptation priorities, developed and continuously updated

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

2.3. Gender considerations ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

2.4. Annual participatory review ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

3. Direct access realized

3.1. Direct access entities’ nomina-tion

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

3.2. Accreditation of direct access entities

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

3.3. Direct access entity’s annual work programme

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

3.4. Enhanced direct access (EDA) ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

4. Access to finance

4.1. Structured dialogue ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

4.2. Country programme/Concept note development, including on adaptation

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

4.3. Project preparation support, including for adaptation pro-jects/projects programmes

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

4.4. Funding proposal development, including Technology Needs As-sessment for the Implementation of Climate Action Plans in Brazil

() 0 (X) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 (X) 2 Activity 2 – Identification and prioritization of the sectors and technologies to mitigate GHG emissions for compliance with the NDC This activity aims at identifying and obtaining consensus about priority sectors and technologies to fulfil the NDC. In order to achieve that, the first sub-activity aims at updating and summarizing the baseline of sectors and barriers against the implementation of priority technologies for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action, which has been detailed in the project ‘Mitigation Options of GHG Emissions in Key

Page 10: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 9 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

Sectors in Brazil. Building on this baseline, an analysis and multi-criteria of the TNA will be conducted, with stakeholders aiming at establishing technology and sectoral priorities for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action plans and aligned with the Brazil´s Country Work Programme. Such outcomes will be validated by key stakeholders in a workshop. With this, priorities for the fulfilment of the NDC will be defined, and together with factsheets for each technology, will allow for the drafting of the roadmaps established in activity 3. Attention should be drawn to the fact that the participation of key stakeholders in the validation process of priority technologies must also consider the long-term development priorities. Therefore, this activity should focus on: - Identification of development needs already formulated in national development strategies for the country (discuss priorities with stakeholders); - Analysing the range of expected climate change impacts on the country (discuss implications on the country's development priorities); - Grouping up the development priorities identified in the categories economic, social and environmental development priorities; - Alignment of priority sectors and technologies with the strategic axes and investment areas mapped at the GCF Brazil´s Country Work Programme. in order to improve the possibilities of development of projects in Brazil, also enhancing the way to address mitigation aspects at these initiatives. (See attached Annex I) Activity 2.1 – Pre-selection of sectors and GHG emissions mitigating technologies for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action. The outputs of activity 2.1 will be: 2.1.1. Report describing methodology, sectors e barriers to implementing GHG emissions mitigating technologies that have been pre-selected for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action elaborated; 2.1.2. Executive summary of this report drafted; Estimated completion date: Month 4. Activity 2.2 – Assess technologies through a multi-criteria analysis and a participatory process The outputs of activity 2.2 will be: 2.2.1. Preliminary TNA report containing the technology sectors prioritized based on

Page 11: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 10 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

a multi-criteria analysis with the key stakeholders elaborated; 2.2.2. Meeting report of the validation workshop of technology and sectoral priorities elaborated (20-30 participants, during 2 days in Brasília/DF); 2.2.3. List of attendance of the validation workshop of technology and sectoral priorities; 2.2.4. Final report and executive summary on technology and sectoral priorities for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action through a TNA, multi-criteria analysis and participatory process elaborated; 2.2.5. Factsheets for each of the priority technologies drafted. Estimated completion date: Month 6. Activity 3 – Elaborate the roadmaps for the implementation of the priority technologies for compliance with the NDC This activity aims at elaborating and validating roadmaps and analysing co-benefits from the implementation of priority technologies, aiming at fulfilling GHG emissions reduction targets. Initially, a comprehensive roadmap and value chain analysis for removing the barriers and risks (policy and financial de-risking instruments) for the implementation of the priority technology with regards to the scale and scope of the roadmap (national vs. local levels), duration, institutional and political ownership, implementation arrangements and oversight structure, funding modality and expected impacts will be developed. Then, a qualitative analysis of the co-benefits (mitigation and adaptation), environmental, ecosystem, water, health and social, resulting from the implementation of technologies prioritized for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets will be conducted. Finally, outcomes will be validated by key stakeholders during a workshop. Activity 3.1 – Develop a roadmap and value chain analysis for removing the barriers and risks for the implementation of the prioritized technologies The outputs of activity 3.1 will be: 3.1.1. Preliminary report with the roadmap and value chain analysis for removing the barriers and risks for the implementation of the prioritized technologies elaborated. Estimated completion date: Month 10.

Page 12: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 11 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

Activity 3.2 – Analyse the co-benefits (mitigation and adaptation), environmental, ecosystem, water, health and social, resulting from the implementation of the technologies prioritized for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets. The outputs of activity 3.2 will be: 3.2.1. Preliminary report with the analysis of co-benefits from implementing the technologies prioritized for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets elaborated. Estimated completion date: Month 10. Activity 3.3 – Discuss and validate the roadmap by the TNA key stakeholders The outputs of activity 3.3 will be: 3.3.1. Meeting report of the workshop for the validation of technology roadmaps and analysis of co-benefits elaborated (20-30 people, for 2 days in Brasília/DF); 3.3.2. List of attendance of the workshop for the validation of technology roadmaps and analysis of co-benefits; 3.3.3. Report and executive summary of roadmap and value chain analysis for removing the barriers and risks for the implementation of the prioritized technology elaborated; 3.3.4. Report and executive summary of assessment of co-benefits from the implementation of technologies prioritized for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets elaborated. Estimated completion date: Month 12. Activity 4 – Validation of the Technology Action Plan for the development of local content of priority technologies for compliance with the NDC This activity aims at preparing Technology Action Plan (TAP) for the development of local contents and capacity for the fulfilment of the Brazilian NDC. The TAP will be validated by means of a workshop with stakeholders, and must include relevant participants(including the NDA, NDE, GCF and GEF focal points) for the development and application of prioritized technologies, such as Chief of Staff of the Presidency of the Republic, Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications

Page 13: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 12 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

(MCTIC); Ministry of Industry, Foreign Trade and Services (MDIC); Ministry of Finance (MF); Ministry of the Environment (MMA); the National Development Bank (BNDES); the Funding Authority for Studies and Projects (Finep), the Brazilian Industrial Development Agency(ABDI), and others. Within the scope of capacity-building, dissemination and training, activities 4.3, 4.4 e 4.5. will be carried out. Activity 4.1 – Develop the Technology Action Plan for the elaboration of local content of prioritized technologies for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets The outputs of activity 4.1 will be: 4.1.1. Preliminary Technology Action Plan for the elaboration of local content of prioritized technologies for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets elaborated. Estimated completion date: Month 15. Activity 4.2 – Discuss and validate the Technology Action Plan with the key stakeholders The outputs of activity 4.2 will be: 4.2.1. Meeting report of the validation workshop of the Technology Action Plan elaborated (20-30 stakeholders and key institutions, for 2 days in Brasília/DF); 4.2.2. List of attendance of the validation workshop of the Technology Action Plan; 4.2.3. Technology Action Plan for the elaboration of local content of prioritized technologies for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets elaborated; 4.2.4. Executive summary with information for the implementation of Technology Plan aiming at fulfilling the GHG emissions mitigation commitments elaborated. Estimated completion date: Month 16. Activity 4.3 – Support the implementation of the Technology Action Plan with communications, guidance and training The outputs of activity 4.3 will be: 4.3.1. Checklists, policy briefs and technical guidance developed; 4.3.2. Summary of the regional seminars and evaluation forms to communicate the project’s results, as well as guidance and training for the implementation of the

Page 14: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 13 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

Technology Action Plan realized (Five seminars will be carried out, per each region of Brazil: South, Southeast, Centre-West, North and Northeast, for 30-50 people each. These activities will be conducted by national consultants and supervised by the Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications). Estimated completion date: Month 18 Activity 4.4 – Organize a participatory and interactive training for access to financing of prioritized technologies with the financial mechanisms of the UNFCCC and other national and international funding sources The outputs of activity 4.4 will be: 4.4.1. Handbook for access to financing of prioritized technologies with the financial mechanisms of the UNFCCC and other national and international sources of financing; 4.4.2. Meeting report and summary of the evaluation forms of the training applicated (training will be carried out in Brasilia/DF for some 100 participants); 4.4.3. List of attendance of the workshop. Estimated completion date: Month 18. Activity 4.5 – Consolidate and publish the outputs aiming at promoting at the ‘National Emissions Registry System (SIRENE)’, Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) and the UNFCCC home for technology (ttclear) The outputs of activity 4.5 will be: 4.5.1. Outputs published on the SIRENE’s website; 4.5.2. TNA and TAP submitted to the UNFCCC; 4.5.3. Report with the improved items at SIRENE elaborated. Estimated completion date: Month 18.

5. Private sector mobilization

5.1. Private sector engagement

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

Page 15: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 14 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

5.2. Crowding-in private sector investments

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

5.3. Funding proposals developed by the private sector, including adaptation projects/programmes

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

5.4. Private sector engagement in the GCF Private Sector Facility (PSF) call for proposals

( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 ( ) 0 ( ) 1 ( ) 2 The baseline and targets indicated to the left do not relate to the activities for which readiness funding is being requested in the present proposal.

Page 16: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 15 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

SECTION 3: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was established during the Earth Summit, in 1992, in Rio de Janeiro. The Convention’s main goal is to stabilize GHG concentrations at a level that avoids a harmful anthropogenic interference in the climate system. This objective must be achieved within a timeframe that allows for the adaptation of ecosystems, sustainable development and does not threaten food production. The Paris Agreement is the most recent climate agreement, entered into force during the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21) of the UNFCCC, in 2015. Its central aim is to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change and the ability of countries to deal with associated impacts. The Agreement was approved by the 195 countries that are part of UNFCCC, aiming at reducing GHG emissions, keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees by 2100. Brazil submitted the document ratifying the Paris Agreement in September 2016, which took effect at the international level in November 2016. In this document, Brazil committed to adopt measures to reduce GHG emissions by means of a Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC). The Brazilian NDC committed to reduce GHG emissions by 37% in 2025 (with reference to emissions reported in the Second National Communication of Brazil to the UNFCCC), with a possible effort to reach 43% below the 2005 level by 2030, which is equivalent to an emissions cap of 1,300 and 1,200 MtCO2e in 2025 and 2030, respectively. The implementation of mitigation actions brings costs and opportunities for economic sectors in the country. Identifying cost-effectiveness of mitigation options requires an integrated approach that combines measures to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels and emissions from land use and land use changes. The project ’Mitigation Options of GHG Emissions in Key Sectors in Brazil’, prepared in a partnership between the Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications (MCTIC) and UN Environment, indicated a rationale that takes into consideration sector cost-effectiveness and key technologies for compliance with the NDC. However, it is necessary to establish a national consensus where Technology Action Plans can build from, aiming at developing local content of priority technologies and sectors for compliance with the NDC. Therefore, this proposal supported by CTCN seeks to develop a comprehensive ‘Technology Needs Assessment for the Implementation of Climate Action Plans in Brazil’ through the following two outcomes and four activities:

• Outcome 1. Country capacity strengthened o Activity 1 – Establish an effective coordination mechanism for the implementation of the TNA process

• Outcome 2. Access to finance o Activity 2 – Identification and Prioritization of the sectors and technologies to mitigate GHG emissions for compliance with the NDC o Activity 3 – Elaborate the roadmaps for the implementation of the priority technologies for compliance with the NDC o Activity 4 – Validation of the Technology Action Plan for the development of local content of priority technologies for compliance with the NDC

This assistance will promote utilization of key data for key technologies and sectors for compliance with the Brazilian NDC, which will be made available, as the Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications’ contribution, at the National Emissions Registry System (SIRENE in the Portuguese acronym). SIRENE is a relevant tool that grants security and transparency to the outcomes of national GHG emissions, and is acknowledged by the Brazilian Government as a landmark for the establishment of the measuring, report and verification process, being an effective tool to assist decision makers in the context of policies, plans, programs and projects that aim at complying with national and international plans to tackle climate change. Therefore, this project’s outcomes will upgrade SIRENE, by means of incorporating information from Outcomes 1and 2 herein, such as: mitigation potential and costs; technology roadmaps; Technology Action Plans; cost-effectiveness ranking of key mitigation options; among others. The anticipated

Page 17: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 16 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

outcomes from the assistance will be tailored to the conditions in Brazil and thus will be of immediate use to support the goals of the current climatic political strategies, such as the National Policy on Climate Change – PNMC, the National Plan on Climate Change, the National Adaptation Plan and Brazilian NDC. The requested assistance is aligned with Brazil’s NDC, as it will allow for its complete implementation, as well as create, by means of the development of local content of key low-carbon technologies, for the adoption of more ambitious mitigation plans as at 2030. The outcomes of the assistance are designed to address a critical knowledge gap and provide an essential platform for future projects and funding. Lack of reliable technologies mitigation data are often a serious impediment for the ability to execute meaningful climate mitigation projects, thus the outcomes of this assistance will also have the potential to serve as a catalyser for financing of larger projects focusing on climate mitigation within Brazil. The Technological Action Plan (TAP) resulting from this proposal will guide, with regard to the use of low carbon technologies, for the execution of projects aligned to the effective implementation of NDC of Brazil, considering the potential of mitigation of for each technology prioritized in TNA. Such information, validated by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will serve as a basis to Brazilian NDA for the selection and prioritization of technology projects to be presented to the GCF. Regarding the connections between the TAP and Brazil's Country Program to GCF, it is important to remark that the TAC will be an important tool for the identification of possibilities and further development of new projects aligned with the main strategic axes and areas of investment mapped on the Country Program, since it will provide a cost-effective panel of mitigation technologies to be considered and implemented by these projects. In addition, the workshops and stakeholder engagement predicted on project's activities, especially Activity 4.4, will enhance the knowledge about climate funding possibilities and also the analytical capacity for development of proposals aligned with the GCF criteria in relevant actors in the Brazilian society. Finally, the workshops and activities will also foster capacity-building on the Ministries involved in the no-objection procedure in Brazil, coordinated by the Ministry of Finance, thus improving the quality of proposals submitted by the country to GCF.

Gant chart for the implementation

Gant Chart for Implementation Months

Responsible part

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Activity 1. Establish an effective coordination mechanism for the implementation of the TNA process

MCTIC; UN Environment; Technical Advisory Committee; National Technical Coordinator.

Activity 1.1. Implement administrative and organizational processes to structure the project

MCTIC; UN Environment.

Deliverable 1.1.1. Minutes of meeting to define members of the TAC elaborated

MCTIC.

Deliverable 1.1.2. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) established, by means of an official publication

MCTIC.

Deliverable 1.1.3. Work plan elaborated by the national coordination team

MCTIC; UN Environment.

Page 18: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 17 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

(MCTIC/UN Environment)

Activity 1.2. Develop a stakeholder analysis to determine the roles/responsibilities of main stakeholder groups in the TNA process and method of engagement

MCTIC; UN Environment; Technical Advisory Committee; National Technical Coordinator.

Deliverable 1.2.1. Matrix of mapping and assigning the stakeholders responsible for conducting the TNA process.

MCTIC; UN Environment; Technical Advisory Committee; National Technical Coordinator.

Deliverable 1.2.2. Decree creating TAC with mapped stakeholders

MCTIC.

Activity 1.3. Establish an effective coordination mechanism for the TNA process with comprehensive participation of key stakeholders and agreed meeting schedule

MCTIC; Technical Advisory Committee; National Technical Coordinator.

Deliverable 1.3.1. Work plan endorsed by the TAC

MCTIC; Technical Advisory Committee.

Deliverable 1.3.2. Minutes of ordinary quarterly TAC meetings

MCTIC; National Technical Coordinator.

Activity 2. Identification and prioritization of the sectors and technologies to mitigate GHG emissions for compliance with the NDC

MCTIC; National Climate Change Consultants; National Technical Coordinator; Workshop participants.

Activity 2.1. Pre-selection of sectors and GHG emissions mitigating technologies for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action

National Climate Change Consultants.

Deliverable 2.1.1. Report describing methodology, sectors e barriers to implementing GHG emissions mitigating technologies that have been pre-selected for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action elaborated

National Climate Change Consultants.

Deliverable 2.1.2. Executive summary of deliverable 2.1.1 drafted

National Climate Change Consultants.

Page 19: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 18 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

Activity 2.2. Assess technologies through a multi-criteria analysis and a participatory process

MCTIC; National Climate Change Consultants; National Technical Coordinator; Workshop participants.

Deliverable 2.2.1. Preliminary TNA report containing the technology sectors prioritized based on a multi-criteria analysis with the key stakeholders elaborated

National Climate Change Consultants.

Deliverable 2.2.2. Meeting report from the workshop elaborated

MCTIC; National Technical Coordinator.

Deliverable 2.2.3. List of attendance of the workshop

MCTIC; National Technical Coordinator; Workshop participants.

Deliverable 2.2.4. Final report and executive summary of technology and sectoral priorities for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action through a TNA, multi-criteria analysis and participatory process elaborated

National Climate Change Consultants.

Deliverable 2.2.5. Factsheets for each of the priority technologies drafted

National Climate Change Consultants.

Activity 3. Elaborate the roadmaps for the implementation of the priority technologies for compliance with the NDC

MCTIC; Climate Change Consultants; National Technical Coordinator; Workshop participants.

Activity 3.1. Develop a roadmap and value chain analysis for removing the barriers and risks for the implementation of the prioritized technology

National Climate Change Consultants.

Deliverable 3.1.1. Preliminary report with the roadmap and value chain analysis for removing the barriers and risks for the implementation of the prioritized

National Climate Change Consultants.

Page 20: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 19 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

technology elaborated

Activity 3.2. Analyse the co-benefits, environmental, ecosystem, water, health and social, resulting from the implementation of the technologies prioritized for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets.

National Climate Change Consultants.

Deliverable 3.2.1. Preliminary report with the analysis of co-benefits from implementing the technologies prioritized for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets elaborated

National Climate Change Consultants.

Activity 3.3. Discuss and validate the roadmap by the TNA key stakeholders

MCTIC; National Climate Change Consultants; National Technical Coordinator; Workshop participants.

Deliverable 3.3.1. Meeting report from the workshop elaborated

MCTIC; National Technical Coordinator.

Deliverable 3.3.2. List of attendance of the workshop

MCTIC; National Technical Coordinator; Workshop participants.

Deliverable 3.3.3. Report and executive summary of roadmap and value chain analysis for removing the barriers and risks for the implementation of the prioritized technology elaborated

National Climate Change Consultants.

Deliverable 3.3.4. Report and executive summary of assessment of co-benefits from the implementation of technologies prioritized for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets elaborated

National Climate Change Consultants.

Activity 4. Validation of the technology Action Plan for the development of local

MCTIC; National Climate Change Consultants;

Page 21: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 20 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

content of priority technologies is validated for compliance with the NDC

National Technical Coordinator; Key stakeholders and institutions; Workshop participants; UN Environment.

Activity 4.1. Develop the Technology Action Plan for the elaboration of local content of prioritized technologies for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets

National Climate Change Consultants.

Deliverable 4.1.1. Preliminary Technology Action Plan for the elaboration of local content of prioritized technologies for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets elaborated

National Climate Change Consultants.

Activity 4.2. Discuss and validate the Technology Action Plan with the key stakeholders

MCTIC; National Climate Change Consultants; National Technical Coordinator; Key stakeholders and institutions.

Deliverable 4.2.1. Meeting report from the workshop elaborated

MCTIC; National Technical Coordinator.

Deliverable 4.2.2. List of attendance of the workshop

MCTIC; National Technical Coordinator; Key stakeholders and institutions; Workshop participants.

Deliverable 4.2.3. Technology Action Plan for the elaboration of local content of prioritized technologies for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets elaborated

National Climate Change Consultants.

Deliverable 4.2.4. Executive summary with information for the implementation

National Climate Change Consultants.

Page 22: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 21 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

of Technology Action Plan aiming at fulfilling GHG emissions mitigation commitments elaborated

Activity 4.3. Support the implementation of the Technology Action Plan with communications, guidance and training

MCTIC; National Climate Change Consultants; National Technical Coordinator.

Deliverable 4.3.1. Policy briefs and technical guidance developed

National Climate Change Consultants.

Deliverable 4.3.2. Summary of outputs and evaluation forms of regional seminars elaborated

MCTIC; National Technical Coordinator.

Activity 4.4. Organize a participatory and

interactive training for access to financing

of prioritized technologies with the

financial mechanisms of the UNFCCC and

other national and international funding

sources.

MCTIC; National Climate Change Consultant; National Technical Coordinator; key stakeholders and institutions.

Deliverable 4.4.1. Handbook for access to financing of prioritized technologies with the financial mechanisms of the UNFCCC and other national and international sources of financing

National Climate Change Consultant.

Deliverable 4.4.2. Meeting report and evaluation forms of the training applicated

MCTIC National Technical Coordinator; key stakeholders and institutions.

Deliverable 4.4.3. List of attendance of the training

MCTIC National Technical Coordinator; key stakeholders and institutions.

Activity 4.5. Consolidate and publish the outputs aiming at promoting at the

MCTIC; National Climate Change Consultant;

Page 23: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 22 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

8 The external audits will be developed by the Comptroller General (CGU), the official institution responsible for evaluation and audits of the expenditures of the main programs,

projects and other initiatives in Brazil. UN Environment will be responsible to request the audits to CGU, and it will be realized without any cost to the project.

‘National Emissions Registry System (SIRENE)’, Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) and the UNFCCC home for technology (ttclear)

National Technical Coordinator.

Deliverable 4.5.1. Outputs published on the SIRENE’s website

MCTIC.

Deliverable 4.5.2. TNA and TAP submitted to the UNFCCC

MCTIC.

Deliverable 4.5.3. Report with the improved items at SIRENE elaborated

MCTIC; National Climate Change Consultant; National Technical Coordinator.

Mid-term evaluation8 UN Environment.

Final evaluation6 UN Environment.

Page 24: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 23 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

SECTION 4: BUDGET, PROCUREMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND DISBURSEMENT

4.1. Budget Plan

Please provide a breakdown of cost estimates and implementation schedule analysed according to the activities suggested in Section 2. Please feel free to replicate this table on Excel spreadsheet if needed.

OUTCOMES

(same as in section 2)

ACTIVITIES

(same as in section 2. Include at least one specific deliverable output for each activity, and the month

number in which it will be delivered to GCF)

TOTAL COST

(per activity)

COST CATEGORIES

EXPENDITURE AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

(add columns if >24 months)

Consultants9 Travel Workshops/

Trainings Others 6m 12m 18m 24m

9 Consultants will be hired in accordance with modalities available at UN Environment. The Technical Coordinator will have a Service Contract, which provides for a monthly pay subject to completion of activities described in a work plan. National Climate Change Consultants will preferably be hired by means of Individual Contracts or Cooperation Agreements, with individuals or legal entities, subject to payment per product.

Page 25: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 24 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

1. Country capacity strengthened

1.1. National Designated Entity (NDE) for the Technology Mechanism lead effective coordination mechanism for the implementation of the TNA

Activity 1 - Establish an effective coordination mechanism for the implementation of the TNA process The first activity aims at defining stakeholders to be directly involved in running the project, in cooperation with the national coordination team (Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications – MCTIC and UN Environment). A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) must be established to this end, whose members must be appointed from the public service and private initiative, selected by the national coordination team in compliance with its acting capacity and affinity with the TNA scope. The TAC will be responsible for: a) assessing and supporting the work plan for the execution of the project prepared by the national coordination team; b) appointing key stakeholder groups to engage in the TNA process during its execution, and define their roles and responsibilities in the TNA process; c) contributing with technical guidelines in every execution stage of the project) reviewing outcomes prepared by the hired consultants; e) promoting a comprehensive participation of key stakeholders in preparing the TNA.

It includes the following activities (described in

section 2):

140,000 130,000 (Technical

Coordinator)

10,00010 50,000 50,000 40,000

10 Miscellaneous Expenses.

Page 26: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 25 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

1.1. Implement administrative and

organizational processes to structure the

project

Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

1.1.1. Minutes of meeting to define members of the TAC elaborated (month 1); 1.1.2. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) established, by means of an official publication (month 1); 1.1.3. Work plan elaborated by the national coordination team (MCTIC/UN environment) (month 1);

1.2. Develop a stakeholder analysis to

determine the roles/responsibilities of main

stakeholder groups in the TNA process and

method of engagement

Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

1.2.1. Matrix of mapping and assigning the stakeholders responsible for conducting the TNA process (month 2); 1.2.2. Decree creating TAC with mapped stakeholders (month 2).

1.3. Establish an effective coordination mechanism for the TNA process with comprehensive participation of key stakeholders and agreed meeting schedule Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

1.3.1. Work plan endorsed by the TAC (month 3); 1.3.2. Minutes of ordinary quarterly TAC

Page 27: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 26 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

meetings conducted in Brasília/DF, in venues assigned by the Federal Government (months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18).

4. Access to finance

4.4. Funding proposal development, including Technology Needs Assessment for the Implementation of Climate Action Plans in Brazil

Activity 2 – Identification and Prioritization of

the sectors and technologies to mitigate GHG

emissions for compliance with the NDC

This activity aims at identifying and obtaining

consensus about priority sectors and

technologies to fulfil the NDC.

It includes the following sub-activities:

2.1. Pre-selection of sectors and GHG emissions

mitigating technologies for the fulfilment of

Brazil’s climate action

100,000 80,000 (Climate Change

Consultants)

3,00011 15,00012 2,00013 100,000

11 Trip of a consultant in order to participate in the workshop and two TAC meetings in Brasília/DF (USD 200 x 4 DSA + national flight tickets). 12 Validation workshop of technology and sectoral priorities, for 20-30 participants, for 2 days in Brasília/DF. 13 Miscellaneous Expenses.

Page 28: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 27 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

2.1.1. Report describing methodology, sectors e barriers to implementing GHG emissions mitigating technologies that have been pre-selected for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action elaborated (month 4); 2.1.2. Executive summary of deliverable 2.1.1 drafted (month 4).

2.2. Assess technologies through a multi-criteria

analysis and a participatory process

Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

2.2.1. Preliminary TNA report containing the technology sectors prioritized based on a multi-criteria analysis with the key stakeholders elaborated (month 4); 2.2.2. Meeting report from the workshop elaborated (month 5); 2.2.3. List of attendance of the workshop (month 5); 2.2.4. Final report and executive summary of technology and sectoral priorities for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action through a TNA, multi-criteria analysis and participatory process elaborated (month 6); 2.2.5. Factsheets for each of the priority technologies drafted (month 6).

Page 29: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 28 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

Activity 3 – Elaborate the roadmaps for the implementation of the priority technologies for compliance with the NDC

This activity aims at elaborating and validating roadmaps and analysing co-benefits from the implementation of priority technologies, aiming at fulfilling the GHG emissions reduction targets.

It includes the following sub-activities:

3.1. Develop a roadmap and value chain

analysis for removing the barriers and risks for

the implementation of the prioritized

technology

Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

3.1.1. Preliminary report with the roadmap and

value chain analysis for removing the barriers

and risks for the implementation of the

prioritized technology elaborated (month 10).

3.2. Analyse the co-benefits (mitigation and

adaptation), environmental, ecosystem, water,

health and social, resulting from the

140,000 100,000 (Climate Change

Consultants)

23,000 (1,500 for

climate change

consultants14 and 21,500 for

National Direction of the Project15

(technical team of the

Brazilian National

Designated Entity for the

CTCN)

15,00016 2,00017 140,000

14 Trip of the climate change consultants to participate in the workshop in Brasília/DF (USD 200 x 2 DSA + national flight ticket). 15 Trip for capacity-building purposes, aiming initiatives promoted by the Technology Executive Committee (TEC) and the Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) related to research, development and demonstration of climate technologies (USD 270 x 42 DSA + international flight tickets). TEC and CTCN meetings will be conducted in Bonn and Copenhagen, respectively. Therefore, 7 DSA + flight ticket (1 person) are being considered for participation in the three meetings of the CTCN Advisory Board and 7 DSA + flight ticket (1 person) for participation in the three TEC meetings. 16 Validation workshop of technology roadmaps and assessment of co-benefits, for some 20-30 participants, for 2 days in Brasília/DF. 17 Miscellaneous Expenses.

Page 30: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 29 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

implementation of the technologies prioritized

for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets

Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

3.2.1. Preliminary report with the analysis of co-

benefits from implementing the technologies

prioritized for the fulfilment of national

mitigation targets elaborated (month 10).

3.3. Discuss and validate the roadmap by the

TNA key stakeholders

Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

3.3.1. Meeting report from the workshop

elaborated (month 11);

3.3.2. List of attendance of the workshop

(month 11).

3.3.3. Report and executive summary of

roadmap and value chain analysis for removing

the barriers and risks for the implementation of

the prioritized technology elaborated (month

12);

3.3.4. Report and executive summary of

assessment of co-benefits from the

implementation of technologies prioritized for

the fulfilment of national mitigation targets

elaborated (month 12);

Activity 4 – Validation of the Technology

Action Plan for the development of local

content of priority technologies for compliance

180,000 80,000 (National experts)

40,000 (20,000 for

climate

55,00020 5,00021 180,000

Page 31: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 30 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

with the NDC

This activity aims at preparing Technology

Action Plan (TAP) for the development of local

contents and capacity for the fulfilment of the

Brazilian NDC.

It includes the following sub-activities:

4.1. Develop the Technology Action Plan for the

elaboration of local content of prioritized

technologies for the fulfilment of national

mitigation targets

Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

4.1.1. Preliminary Technology Action Plan for

the elaboration of local content of prioritized

technologies for the fulfilment of national

mitigation targets elaborated (month 15);

4.2. Discuss and validate the Technology Action

Plan with the key stakeholders

Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

change consultants18

and 20,000 for National

Direction of the project (technical

team of the Brazilian National

Designated Entity for the

CTCN19)

20 Workshop to validate the Technology Action Plan for some 20-30 key stakeholders and institutions, for 2 days in Brasília/DF; regional seminars to communicate project’s outcomes, as well as guidance and training for the implementation of the Technology Action Plan (South, Southeast, Center-West, North and Northeast regions), for some 30-50 people each; capacity-building to be conducted in Brasilia/DF for some 100 participants. 21 Miscellaneous Expenses. 18 Trips of the climate change consultants in order to participate in the workshop and offer training in Brasília/DF and regional seminars (USD 200 x 30 DSA + national flight tickets). 19 Trip for capacity-building purposes, aiming initiatives promoted by the Intersectional Meetings of Subsidiary Bodies (SBs) and the Conference of the Parties (COP) related to research, development and demonstration of climate technologies (USD 270 x 45 DSA + international flight tickets) and follow up of regional seminars (USD 200 x 10 DSA + national flight tickets). For the SBs meetings and COP, 45 DSA are considered for the participation of at least one person in two SBs meetings and one COP. In addition, 10 per diems are considered for 2 people (5 per diems per person) for participation in regional events (1 event per region x 5 regions).

Page 32: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 31 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

4.2.1. Meeting report from the workshop elaborated (month 15); 4.2.2. List of attendance of the workshop (month 15). 4.2.3. Technology Action Plan for the

elaboration of local content of prioritized

technologies for the fulfilment of national

mitigation targets elaborated (month 16);

4.2.4. Executive summary with information for

the implementation of Technology Action Plan

aiming at fulfilling GHG emissions mitigation

commitments elaborated (month 16);

4.3. Support the implementation of the

Technology Action Plan with communications,

guidance and training;

Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

4.3.1. Policy briefs and technical guidance developed (month 17) 4.3.2. Summary of outputs and evaluation

forms of regional seminars elaborated (month

18).

4.4. Organize a participatory and interactive

training for access to financing of prioritized

technologies with the financial mechanisms of

the UNFCCC and other national and

international funding sources.

Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

4.4.1. Handbook for access to financing of

prioritized technologies with the financial

mechanisms of the UNFCCC and other national

and international sources of financing (month

Page 33: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 32 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

18);

4.4.2. Meeting report and evaluation forms of

the training provided (month 18);

4.4.3. List of attendance of the training (month 18).

4.5. Consolidate and publish the outputs aiming

at promoting at the ‘National Emissions Registry

System (SIRENE)’, Climate Technology Centre

and Network (CTCN) and the UNFCCC home for

technology (ttclear).

Deliverables (Delivery month to GCF):

4.5.1. Outputs published on the SIRENE’s website (months 6, 12 and 18); 4.5.2. TNA and TAP submitted to the UNFCCC (month 18); 4.5.3. Report with the improved items at

SIRENE elaborated (month 18).

PROJECT MANAGEMENT COSTS

Project Manager in the Brazil Office (See

justification in attached Annex II) 36,000 36,00022 12,000 12,000 12,000

Office costs/operations 12,500 12,50023 4,000 4,000 4,500

Equipment (computer, monitor) 2,500 2,50024 2,500

22 With the support of UN Environment’s Project officer, the Project Manager will be responsible to overview the programmatic and financial activities of the project. S/he will work in close collaboration with the Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications to implement the outcomes/outputs established in the Readiness Proposal (USD 2,000 x 18 months). For more details, please see Annex II. 23 UN Environment is located inside the UN House in Brazil. With the addition of a new member to the office, it becomes necessary to include this cost to cover basic necessities (such as electricity, security, internet, Office supplies and others) that will be used by the Project manager (USD 694.44 x 18 months). 24 Minimum tool needed by the Project Manager to deliver the products. Consists of a laptop computer, monitor, keyboard and mouse.

Page 34: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 33 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

Travel budget 5,000 5,00025 1,000 2,000 2,000

CONTINGENCY (UP TO 5% OF TOTAL ACTIVITIES)26

28,000 28,000 9,350 9,350 9,300

DELIVERY PARTNER FEE (UP TO 10% OF TOTAL ACTIVITIES)

56,000 56,000 18,600 18,600 18,800

TOTAL

700,000 426,000 71,000 85,000 118,000 197,450 235,950 266,600

25 To cover missions to the 5 Regional Seminars and TNA meetings. 26 Miscellaneous expenses to be used for any unforeseen expenses at the outcome level.

Page 35: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 34 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

4.2. Procurement Plan

Overall financial management and procurement of goods and services under this readiness and preparatory support proposal will be guided by UN Environment’s regulations, rules, policies and procedures, as well as its programme manual. Further, procurement of goods and services will follow the general principles stated under clause 7 of Framework Readiness and Preparatory Support Grant Agreement (Framework Agreement) between Green Climate Fund (GCF) and UN Environment. UN Environment will comply with its obligation under clause 7(a) of the Framework Agreement, which states “The procurement of Goods and Services for Approved Readiness Support Proposals, whether by the Delivery Partner or by a third party, shall be done in accordance with the rules, policies and procedures of the Delivery Partner.” For this readiness and preparatory support proposal, services of a technical nature will be recruited, or acquired, and directly managed by UN Environment, in consultation with the Brazilian National Designated Entity (NDE) for the Technology Mechanism (MCTIC). Recruitment and management of consultants will be in accordance with UN Environment rules, policies and procedures. UN Environment will coordinate with the Brazilian National Designated Entity (NDE) –MCTIC to procure goods and services in delivering activities at national level [for example meetings, workshops, etc.] in accordance with the agreed procurement management plan and will be in accordance with UN Environment rules, policies and procedures.

ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST (US$)

PROCUREMENT METHOD

THRESHOLDS (Min-Max monetary value for which indicated procurement

method must be used)

ESTIMATED START DATE

PROJECTED CONTRACTING

DATE

Goods and Non-Consulting Services

Workshop cost

Workshop to validate technology and sectoral priorities for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action through a TNA, multi-criteria analysis and participatory process elaborated, for some 20-30 participants, for 2 days in Brasília/DF.

15,000 Low value procurement

Up to USD 15,000 Month 3 Month 5

Workshop cost

Workshop to validate technology roadmaps and co-benefits analysis, for some 20-30 participants, for 2 days in Brasília/DF.

15,000 Low value procurement

Up to USD 15,000 Month 9 Month 11

Workshop cost

Workshop to validate the Technology Action Plan for some 20-30 key stakeholders and institutions, for 2 days in Brasília/DF,

15,000 Low value procurement

Up to USD 15,000 Month 13 Month 15

Regional seminars

Regional seminars to communicate the project’s outcomes, as well as guidance and training for the

25,000 Low value procurement (USD

Up to USD 15,000 Month 14 Month 16

Page 36: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 35 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

implementation of the Technology Action Plan (for the South, Southeast, Centre-West, North and Northeast regions,), for some 30-50 people each,

5,000 each)

Training Capacity-building, to be conducted for some 100 participants in Brasilia/DF

15,000 Low value procurement

Up to USD 15,000 Month 15 Month 17

SUB-TOTAL (US $) 85,000

Consultancy Services27 28

National Technical Coordinator

Hiring of a technical coordinator to work on the assessment of outputs; coordination of the activity 1.3; elaboration of Terms of Reference; coordination mechanism for the TNA process, among other activities29.

130,000

UN Environment rules and regulations for

consultancy contracts or partner agreements

Up to USD 140,000 Month 1 Month 2

National Climate Change Consultants (2 to 4 consultants for approximately 5 months)

- Report and executive summary describing

methodology, sectors e barriers against the

implementation of GHG emissions mitigating

technologies that have been pre-selected for the

fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action;

- Report and executive summary of technology and

sectoral priorities for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate

action through a TNA, multi-criteria analysis and

participatory process;

80,000

UN Environment rules and regulations for

consultancy contracts or partner agreements

Up to USD 80,000 Month 2 Month 4

27 Foundations will be hired based on decisions of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), after their deliberation on the technologies and sectors prioritized. The Foundations will present proposals regarding the necessary equipment for the elaboration of the products, which will be analyzed and validated by the TAC. The coordination mechanism of the TNA process (activity 1.3) aims to strengthen capacity in a long term, through capacity building resulting from the effective participation of TAC members. Finally, it should be emphasized that the capacities will be strengthened through engaging in TAC meetings and workshops, as well as training that will focus on rules and procedures listed in the "Handbook for Access to Finance Climate Technology Projects under the UNFCCC Financial Mechanisms and Other Sources of national and international financing", which will be elaborated based on the subsidies of this project. 28 The costs were based on the complexity of the elaboration of the products, according to the experts view who prepared the proposal, with agreement of the UN Environment. The ToRs will be drawn up after the approval of the proposal and validated by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). 29 The assignments of the Project Manager and the Technical Coordinator will be different. The Technical Coordinator will be responsible for conducting activity 1.3 throughout the project, and for the technical evaluation of the robustness of all project products and other activities briefly described in the item description. In turn, the Project Manager has the attribution to conduct the administrative management of the activities.

Page 37: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 36 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

- Factsheets for each of the priority technologies;

National Climate Change Consultants (2 to 4 consultants for approximately 6 months)

- Report and executive summary of roadmap and value

chain analysis for removing the barriers and risks for

the implementation of the prioritized technology;

- Report and executive summary of the analysis of co-

benefits from the implementation of technologies

prioritized for the fulfilment of national mitigation

targets.

100,000

UN Environment rules and regulations for

consultancy contracts or partner agreements

Up to USD 100,000 Month 5 Month 8

National Climate Change Consultants (for approximately 4 months)

- Technology Action Plan for the elaboration of local

content of prioritized technologies for the fulfilment of

national mitigation targets;

- Executive summary with information for the

implementation of Technology Action Plans aiming at

fulfilling the GHG emissions mitigation commitments;

- Meeting report from the workshop;

- Handbook, policy briefs and technical guidance;

- Summary of outcomes and evaluation forms of

regional seminars;

- Evaluation forms of participative and interactive

trainings;

- Report of items published at the SIRENE website.

80,000

UN Environment rules and regulations for

consultancy contracts or partner agreements

Up to USD 80,000 Month 12 Month 14

National expert (approximately 3 months)

Translation 17,000

UN Environment rules and regulations for

consultancy contracts or partner agreements

Up to USD 15,000 Month 13 Month 15

SUB-TOTAL (US$) 407,000

TOTAL COST (US$) 500,000

Page 38: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 37 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

4.3. Disbursement schedule UN Environment, as the Delivery Partner for this Readiness and Preparatory Support Proposal, will submit requests for disbursement to the GCF in accordance with the Framework Readiness and Preparatory Support Grant Agreement between the GCF and UN Environment for approved Proposals. Disbursement requests will be signed by the authorised representative of the UN Environment and will include details of the bank account into which the grant will be deposited. UN Environment, the Delivery Partner for this R&P Support Proposal for Brazil, will administer the grant disbursed by the GCF in accordance with UN Environment’s regulations, rules, and procedures including maintenance of records of grant, disbursements and expenditure. UN Environment will follow the disbursement schedule as per the Framework Readiness and Preparatory Support Grant Agreement between the GCF and UN Environment. UN Environment will allocate the grant proceeds as appropriate, in accordance with its obligations under clause 5 (Use of Grant Proceeds by the Delivery Partner) of Framework Readiness and Preparatory Support Grant Agreement between Green Climate Fund (GCF) and UN Environment. .

4.4. Additional information The follow activities will demand travel and other expenses as detailed below: Activity 1 - Establish an effective coordination mechanism for the implementation of the TNA process - Costs of 10,000 USD with workshop, TAC and regional meetings expenses related. Activity 2 – Identification and Prioritization of the sectors and technologies to mitigate GHG emissions for compliance with the

NDC

- Costs of 3,000 USD with trip of a consultant in order to participate in the workshop and two TAC meetings in Brasília/DF (USD 200 x 4 DSA + national flight tickets). - Costs of 2,000 USD com workshop expenses related. Activity 3 – Elaborate the roadmaps for the implementation of the priority technologies for compliance with the NDC - Costs of 1,500 USD with trip of the climate change consultants to participate in the workshop in Brasília/DF (USD 200 x 2 DSA + national flight ticket). - Costs of 21,500 USD with trip for capacity-building purposes, aiming initiatives promoted by the Technology Executive Committee (TEC) and the Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) related to research, development and demonstration of climate technologies (USD 270 x 30 DSA + international flight tickets). TEC and TCN meetings will be conducted in Bonn and Copenhagen, respectively. Therefore, 7 DSA + flight ticket (1 person) are being considered for participation in the three meetings of the CTCN Advisory Board and 7 DSA + flight ticket (1 person) for participation in the three TEC meetings. - Costs of 2,000 USD com workshop expenses related. Activity 4 – Validation of the Technology Action Plan for the development of local content of priority technologies for

compliance with the NDC

- Costs of20,000 USD with trips of the climate change consultants in order to participate in the workshop and offer training in Brasília/DF and regional seminars (USD 200 x 30 DSA + national flight tickets). - Costs of 20,000 USD with trip for capacity-building purposes, aiming initiatives promoted by the Intersectional Meetings of Subsidiary Bodies (SBs) and the Conference of the Parties (COP) related to research, development and demonstration of climate technologies (USD 270 x 45 DSA + international flight tickets) and follow up of regional seminars (USD 200 x 10 DSA + national flight tickets). For the SBs meetings and COP, 45 DSA are considered for the participation of at least one person in two SBs meetings and one COP. In addition, 10 per diems are considered for 2 people (5 per diems per person) for participation in regional events (1 event per region x 5 regions). - Costs of 5,000 USD com workshop and trainings expenses related.

Page 39: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSAL TEMPLATE

PAGE 38 OF 48 | Ver. 27 April 2018

Consultancy Services: - All consultants shall be national. - The selection process of the national consultants will be country-wide, and selection will be based on the expertise required for product elaboration. In case the selected consultants live in Brasilia, the funds estimated for DSA will not be used, and will be returned to GCF during accounts submission. However, we do consider the need to count on these funds, given that selection will be at a country level. - The average time to conclude the hiring of consultants shall be 2 to 3 months. - The length of the National Technical Coordinator’s contract shall be equivalent to the Project’s implementation period. - Length of National Climate Change Consultants’ contracts shall be proportional to the execution of the activity to be carried out. - Because each activity will demand a certain expertise depending on prioritized technologies and sectors, the consultants may vary according to the expertise needed. - Contract length will not necessarily be 18 months for all; it will be proportional to the complexity of the prioritized sectors and technologies. - Consultants will be hired in accordance with modalities available at UN Environment. The Technical Coordinator will have a Service Contract, which provides for a monthly pay subject to completion of activities described in a work plan. National Climate Change Consultants will preferably be hired by means of Individual Contracts or Cooperation Agreements, with individuals or legal entities, subject to payment per product. - The number of consultants will depend on prioritized sectors and technologies, and relevant expertise. - The cost of consultants as described on the table at page 25, 27and 29, was calculated based on services to be carried out. - Consultants may be hired as natural persons (the number of consultants is informed on the table at page 32), or legal persons which would be responsible for providing the number of specialists needed to carry out the planned activities. - Terms of Reference will be prepared after the establishment of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), considering that the preparation of the TNA is, by definition, a participatory process. - As informed on page 5 of this proposed Readiness, the TAC will be responsible for: a) assessing and supporting the work plan for the execution of the project prepared by the national coordination team; b) appointing key stakeholder groups to engage in the TNA process during its execution, and define their roles and responsibilities in the TNA process; c) contributing with technical guidelines in every execution stage of the project; d) reviewing outcomes prepared by the hired consultants; e) promoting a comprehensive participation of key stakeholders in preparing the TNA. - The assignments of the Project Manager and the Technical Coordinator will be different. The Technical Coordinator will be responsible for conducting activity 1.3 throughout the project, and for the technical evaluation of the robustness of all project products and other activities briefly described in the item description. In turn, the Project Manager has the attribution to conduct the administrative management of the activities. Finally, it should be emphasized that the capacities will be strengthened through engaging in in TAC meetings and workshops, as well as training that will focus on rules and procedures listed in the "Handbook for Access to Finance Climate Technology Projects under the UNFCCC Financial Mechanisms and Other Sources of national and international financing", which will be elaborated based on the subsidies of this project.

Page 40: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSALTEMPLATE

PAGE 39 OF 48 | ver. 27 April 2018

SECTION 5: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS AND OTHER INFORMATION

5.1. Please attach an “implementation map” or describe how funds will be managed by the NDA/FP or delivery partner

UN Environment will manage the funds for the activities under this readiness agreement. UN Environment will agree on a plan with the NDA of Brazil to monitor the implementation of the activities using the grant proceeds. However, UN Environment will be responsible for the implementation of the activities under this readiness and preparatory support proposal. To avoid any possible conflicts of interest deriving from the delivery partner’s role as an accredited entity, the prioritization of investments and projects in the context of this readiness grant will be made through a broad consultation process with relevant stakeholders, including other potential implementing entities for Brazil. The final validation of these priorities will be carried out by the country’s coordination mechanism and institutional arrangements, under the leadership of the NDA to the GCF, with the participation of other government agencies, as well as representatives from civil society and private sector, to ensure chosen priorities are fully aligned with national plans and strategies and adequately includes inputs from consulted stakeholders. The Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications – MCTIC (National Designated Entity for the Technology Mechanism of the UNFCCC - NDE) is the National Executing Entity and proponent of this proposal. MCTIC will be responsible for the National Direction and Coordination of the Project. The Ministry of Finance - MF, as the National Designated Authority (NDA) for the GCF, will be engaged in the process endorsing this present proposal and will also be a member of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will be responsible for: a) assessing and supporting the work plan for the execution of the project prepared by the national coordination team; b)appointing key stakeholder groups to engage in the TNA process during its execution, and define their roles and responsibilities in the TNA process; c) contributing with technical guidelines in every execution stage of the project; d) reviewing outcomes prepared by the hired consultants; e) promoting a comprehensive participation of key stakeholders in preparing the TNA. A Project Manager (PM) and a Technical Coordinator (TC) will be hired for the project. The PM will be responsible for the day to day management of the Project. He/she will support to the implementation of the different project activities. PC will manage the climate change consultants recruited to deliver Programme activities, as well as assess technical outcomes of the project, and will act as Secretary of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). UN Environment will be responsible for project oversight and supervision, and to ensure consistency with GCF and UN Environment policies and procedures. The functions of the PO will include, but will not be limited to the following: i) participating in the Annual Project Steering Committee (PSC) meetings; ii) facilitating the mid-term and final evaluations; iii) clearing the Progress Reports and Project Implementation Reviews; and iv) undertaking the technical review of project deliverables v) providing input to periodic readiness portfolio reporting to GCF; vi) prepare requests for disbursements; among others; e) providing input to periodic readiness portfolio reporting to GCF; f) preparing requests for disbursements etc. UN Environment will submit semi-annual progress reports to the GCF in accordance with the terms of the Framework R&P Support Grant Agreement between GCF and UN Environment. The National stakeholders are climate change experts and members of the federal government responsible for sectoral policies for mitigation and adaptation to climate change. Recipients are the Federal Government, with input for the formulation of public policy instruments that promote Brazil’s technological transition for a low-carbon economy; the Brazilian NDA for GCF, with input for the selection of good proposals based on identifying climate Technologies with a high leverage and transformation impact potential; the National Designated Authority for the UNFCCC technology mechanism, with input to promote the implementation and operationalization of the said mechanism in Brazil; the entrepreneurial and industrial sectors, with information about high impact potential of the climate technologies available to leverage the transition for a low-carbon economy; and the Brazilian society, with input to decision-makers for the formulation of public policies, considering climate change. The implementation map below summarizes the different interactions between the different parties involved in this technical assistance:

Page 41: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSALTEMPLATE

PAGE 40 OF 48 | ver. 27 April 2018

5.2. Other relevant information

UN Environment

Project Implementation

Unit

National stakeholders and

beneficiaries

Ministry of Finance (NDA)

MCTIC (NDE Proponent)

Legend: Reporting Guidance, review, support Deliverance of technical assistance

TAC and TC

Page 42: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSALTEMPLATE

PAGE 41 OF 48 | ver. 27 April 2018

Risk factors associated with the project implementation include both technical and operational aspects associated with project implementation, engagement and interest of stakeholders. The proposed project includes mitigation measures to address these risks. This mitigation strategies include:

- Establishment of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) composed of climate change experts and members of the federal government responsible for sectoral policies for mitigation and adaptation to climate change;

- Careful selection of consultant to act as technical coordinator of the project;

- Prioritization of sectors and technologies;

- Promotion workshops, seminars and trainings aimed at engagement of key stakeholders;

- National Direction of the project under the responsibility of the technical team of the Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications (MCTIC) integrating the National Designated Entity (NDE) for the UNFCCC technology mechanism;

- Brazil recognizes the importance of the TNA to support national actions to mitigate emissions of greenhouse gases.

An indicative risk and contingency plan is listed below.

Description of risk Risk level Mitigation measures

1. Risk of delay in the implementation of the readiness programme activities

Medium MCTIC and UN Environment puts the progress of the project portfolio at the top of national priorities. A technical coordinator will be hired to assist in the procedures for hiring consultants, as well as ensuring that the products are delivered on time and that they are technically robust.

2. Risk of lack of communication with key stakeholders

Low The MCTIC is already well connected with the main stakeholders, since it integrates the structure of climate governance in Brazil; coordinates the Interministerial Commission on Global Climate Change (CIMGC), which includes key climate actors at the government level; acts as Designated National Entity for the technological mechanism of the UNFCCC; is responsible for the elaboration of the national inventory of greenhouse gas emissions and the National Communication of Brazil to the UNFCCC, which requires strong interaction with the public, private and academic sectors; coordinates the Brazilian Research Network on Global Climate Change For these reasons, it will be able promote the information flows towards the public, NGOs, academy and all relevant stakeholders as well.

3. Weak stakeholder engagement Low The project team will ensure key government stakeholders are involved throughout the process. To this end, it will form the Technical Advisory Committee, and will hold workshops aimed at validating the outputs, as well as the engagement of key stakeholders.

4. Lack of interest Low Awareness activities, such as regional seminars and training, will be given to interested stakeholders.

Page 43: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSALTEMPLATE

PAGE 42 OF 48 | ver. 27 April 2018

Annex I. Logical Framework

PROJECT SUMMARY INDICATORS BASELINES TARGETS / INTENDED RESULTS

OUTCOMES

National Designated Entity (NDE) for the Technology Mechanism leads effective coordination mechanism for the implementation of the TNA

- Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) officially established.

- Work plan elaborated by the national coordination team (MCTIC/UN environment) and endorsed by the TAC - Stakeholder group defined for the engagement by the TAC in the TNA process - Roles and responsibilities of main stakeholder groups in the TNA process and method of engagement defined by the TAC.

- There is a lack of robust data for the selection of low-carbon key technologies aimed at implementing the NDC; - Knowledge on climate change is robust but technology priori-ties have not been planned or addressed for compliance with NDC targets. - The MCTIC is already well connected with the main stakehold-

ers, since it integrates the structure of climate governance in

Brazil; coordinates the Interministerial Commission on Global

Climate Change (CIMGC), which includes key climate actors at

the government level; acts as Designated National Entity for the

technological mechanism of the UNFCCC; is responsible for the

elaboration of the national inventory of greenhouse gas emis-

sions and the National Communication of Brazil to the UNFCCC,

which requires strong interaction with the public, private and

academic sectors; coordinates the Brazilian Research Network

on Global Climate Change. However, Brazil lacks consistent

technical information to support the indication of low-carbon

key technologies, based on cost-effective criteria, for the imple-

mentation of the NDC.For these reasons, it will be able promote

the information flows towards the public, NGOs, academy and all

relevant stakeholders as well.

- Validation of low-carbon key technol-ogies for compliance with the NDC; - Engagement of key actors and sectors on technology priorities for compliance with the NDC; - Promoting a comprehensive participa-tion of key stakeholders in preparing the TNA; - Prioritize low-carbon technologies, according to the development agenda, and the strategy to implement the NDC from the first reviewing cycle.

Page 44: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSALTEMPLATE

PAGE 43 OF 48 | ver. 27 April 2018

Funding proposal development, in-cluding Technology Needs Assessment for the Implementation of Climate Action Plans in Brazil

- Definition of low-carbon tech-nologies and key sectors for compliance with the NDC; - Capacity-building for public policy makers to improve the development of low-carbon technologies; - Establishment of guidelines for the identification of climate technologies that are more suitable for the Brazilian condi-tions, with high leverage poten-tial and transformation impact. - Transparency in communi-cating the project’s outcomes

- The ’Mitigation Options of GHG Emissions in Key Sectors in Brazil’ project identified technological priorities for compliance with the NDC via a rational of costs and mitigation potential. However, key technologies still have to be prioritized according to institutional, political, social and other criteria; - Capacitation level of key stakeholders is different in relation to the formulation of public policies instruments that will promote Brazil’s technological transition to a low carbon economy; - Despite the existing national industrial and technological strat-egy, it is necessary to insert criteria that promote the develop-ment and diffusion of low-carbon technologies; - The development of technically robust studies is pivotal to promote the necessary transparency towards the communica-tion of results. This aspect is still poorly used in the making of public policies at a national level.

- Prioritize and validate low-carbon key technologies from a multi-criteria analy-sis, and achieving consensus among the key stakeholders; - Standardization of capacities to im-plement the Technology Action Plans; - Foster the technological and industrial strategy to implement the NDC of key Technologies identified by the project; - - Broad dissemination and insertion of the project’s outcomes in public data-bases, such as the ‘National Emissions Registry System (SIRENE)’.

Page 45: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSALTEMPLATE

PAGE 44 OF 48 | ver. 27 April 2018

OUTPUTS

- Minutes of meeting towards the definition of the main members and establishment of the TAC - Work plan and terms of reference elaborated by the national coordina-tion team and endorsed by the TAC - Roles and responsibilities of main stakeholder groups in the TNA process and method of engagement defined by the TAC - Quarterly TAC meetings conducted in Brasília/DF

- Publication of ordinance estab-lishing the TAC - Elaboration of Work plan and terms of reference - Report on the matrix of roles and responsibilities of main stakeholder groups in the TNA process and method of engage-ment defined by the TAC - Minutes of ordinary quarterly TAC meetings conducted in Brasília/DF

Baseline will be established upon implementation of the project

A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) must be established to this end, whose members must be appointed from the public service and private initiative, selected by the national coordination team in compliance with its acting capacity and affinity with the TNA scope. The TAC will be responsible for: a) assessing and supporting the work plan for the execution of the project prepared by the national coordination team; b) appointing key stakeholder groups to engage in the TNA process during its execution, and define their roles and responsibilities in the TNA process; c) contributing with technical guidelines in every execution stage of the project) reviewing outcomes prepared by the hired consultants; e) promoting a comprehensive participation of key stakeholders in preparing the TNA.

Page 46: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSALTEMPLATE

PAGE 45 OF 48 | ver. 27 April 2018

- Report and executive summary about sectors e barriers against the imple-mentation of GHG emissions mitigat-ing technologies that have been pre-selected for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action; - Report and executive summary of technology and sectoral priorities for the fulfilment of Brazil’s climate action through a TNA, multi-criteria analysis and participatory process.

- Drafting of Reports and execu-tive summaries. - Elaboration of Workshop report and participant lists.

- Reports and list of participants of the workshop are available. Identification and achieving consensus about priority sectors and technologies to fulfil the NDC.

- Report and executive summary of roadmap and value chain analysis for removing the barriers and risks for the implementation of the prioritized technology; - Report and executive summary of assessment of co-benefits from the implementation of technologies priori-tized for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets

- Drafting of reports and execu-tive summaries; - Elaboration of Workshop re-ports and participant lists.

- Reports and list of participants of the workshop are available.

Roadmaps and co-benefits analysis from the implementation of priority technol-ogies, aiming at fulfilling the GHG emis-sions reduction.

Page 47: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSALTEMPLATE

PAGE 46 OF 48 | ver. 27 April 2018

- Report and executive summary of Technology Action Plan for the priori-tized technologies for the fulfilment of national mitigation targets; - Policy briefs and technical guidance about the implementation of the TAP; - Report of items published at the National Emissions Registration Sys-tem – SIRENE’s website. - Report with the improved items at SIRENE elaborated

- Electronic copy of the reports and executive summaries; - Workshop, seminars and train-ing reports minutes and partici-pant lists; - Dissemination of project’s outcomes to at least 100 people.

- Reports and list of participants of the workshop are available; - Evaluation forms of the participative and interactive trainings are available.

Technology Action Plans for the devel-opment of local contents and capacities to fulfil the Brazilian NDC

Page 48: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSALTEMPLATE

PAGE 47 OF 48 | ver. 27 April 2018

Annex I - Clarifications about the type of Readiness support sought

The Technology Needs Assessment (TNA) process maps a country’s long-term development priorities, and also identifies technologies that may achieve those priorities with less greenhouse gas emissions and more resilience towards climate change. Additionally, the TNA identifies and assesses barriers that hinder the implementation and diffusion of prioritized technologies, as well as actions towards overcoming those barriers, including technology enabling structures. The final step in a TNA process is the development of Technology Action Plans (TAP), which will support the implementation of prioritized technologies within the country, at the desired scale, in order to achieve the climate and development benefits identified in the TNA. In other words, TAPs are based on actions indicated in a TNA to overcome obstacles to the implementation of technology, and describe how to implement such actions, including who is in charge, and when and where to get funding. In essence, TAPs are a bridge between prioritized technologies assessment and their implementation. TAPs enable the identification of concrete actions needed to successfully implement technologies and develop proposals pointing to technology investments that might be considered by public and private investors. It also provides information on how to approach and tackle obstacles and advance the development, transfer, implementation and diffusion of prioritized technologies within the country. Along these lines, and also considering the guidelines of Brazil’s Program for the Green Climate Fund, particularly regarding “the contribution for the implementation of NDC using the Green Climate Fund’s resources in order to reduce implementation costs of national mitigation and adaptation objectives”, the Country Program’s strategic axis will be contemplated in the TNA, in a way to contribute to the development of local content and capacities for the achievement of the NDC, as per activities 2, 3 and 4 presented in this Readiness Proposal. Besides, the technologies prioritized in line with the strategic axes of the Country Program will provide consolidated and validated technical subsidies to the Brazilian DNA to select and prioritize climate technology projects proposals that are eligible to the GCF’s resources. This Readiness Proposal is also consistent with Decision14/CP.22 – paragraph 6 (Linkages between the Technology Mechanism and the Financial Mechanism of the Convention): “Invites Green Climate Fund national designated authorities and focal points to use the support available to the Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme to, inter alia, conduct technology needs assessment and develop technology action plans”. References: Enhancing Implementation of Technology Needs Assessments: Guidance for Preparing a Technology Action Plan. Available at: http://unfccc.int/ttclear/misc_/StaticFiles/gnwoerk_static/TNA_key_doc/b91e17559b3344aaae2428d4a3608d3c/1fb8784691984dcd9b76f7330d0c50d1.pdf Decision14/CP.22 – Linkages between the Technology Mechanism and the Financial Mechanism of the Convention. Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2016/cop22/eng/10a02.pdf

Page 49: with UNEP for Federative Republic of Brazil...discussao_estrategia-do-brasil-para-o-gcf_08_11.pdf>. 5 It is important to remark that Brazil has already exchanged a draft version of

READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT

PROPOSALTEMPLATE

PAGE 48 OF 48 | ver. 27 April 2018

Annex 2. Project Management Cost justification

The project will be executed by UN Environment (Brazil Office with support from Paris Office) on behalf of the Government of Brazil. UN Environment will therefore perform the project management function in accordance with its policies, rules, regulations and procedures. This will include the following tasks:

• Support the hiring of external consultants and/or services, when and as necessary and according to the activities and resources defined in the Project and in the workplan;

• Process, in accordance with MCTIC pre-approved workplan, all administrative actions required for achieving the objec-tive of the project, including hiring consultants, establishing partnership agreements, and organize work-shops/trainings, in compliance with the established criteria for technical quality, costs and timeframes;

• Cooperate with MCTIC on the elaboration the workplan for the implementation of the TNA/TAP process;

• Day to day coordination and follow-up with MCTIC, consultants and project partners;

• Participate in project meetings/events (inception workshop, stakeholder consultations…);

• Whenever necessary and jointly with MCTIC, draft budgetary and financial revisions, as well as annual work plan up-dates, as established under the Project;

• Manage the financial resources of the Project according to the applicable UN accounting and financial procedures, and forward, to MCTIC, Project financial execution reports every three months;

• Monitor and evaluate activities of the Project;

• Facilitate the access to copies of documents relating to administrative and financial management of the Project to the public control bodies, when applicable;

• Cooperate with MCTIC on the elaboration of Progress Reports and the Final Report of the Project;

• Coordinate communication of progress, results, success stories and best practices, and facilitate experience sharing with other TNA countries.

The Project Manager will be a national consultant hired by the UN Environment’s Project officer through a selective process. She/he, under supervision of the Project Officer, will be responsible to overview the programmatic and financial activities of the project and will work in close collaboration with the Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications to implement the out-comes/outputs established in the Readiness Proposal. The expected remuneration for this consultant is USD 36,000 (USD 2.000 x 18 months). UN Environment is located inside the UN House in Brazil. With the addition of a new member to the office (project manager), it

becomes necessary to include this cost to cover basic necessities (such as electricity, security, internet, Office supplies and others)

that will be used by the Project manager (USD 694.44 x 18 months).In this context, we clarify that Brazilian law does not allow the

allocation of consultants in the dependencies of public agencies, such that the project manager should carry out the activities for

which he will be contracted at the UN Environment office.

Thus, the Project Manager compensation and allocation alone costs 8.7% of total activities. The remainder will be used to acquire

the minimum instruments needed by the Project Manager to deliver the products (USD 2,500): a laptop computer, monitor, key-

board and mouse and to cover missions to the five Regional Seminars and TNA meetings (USD 5,000).


Recommended