+ All Categories
Home > Health & Medicine > Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Date post: 28-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: healthiermn
View: 803 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
40
Alliane Full Regional Comparison Made possible with funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sponsored by the Minnesota Department of Health.
Transcript
Page 1: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Alliane

Full Regional Comparison

Made possible with funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sponsored by the

Minnesota Department of Health.

Page 2: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

What types of health care plans, if any, does your organization cur-

rently offer your employees?

Pima, AZ, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

Page 3: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

A - Excel-lent

B - Good

C - Fair

D - Poor

F - Failing

Don't know

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

What grade would you give your organiza-tion’s employees in terms of being healthy?

Pima, AZMiami-DadeWood, WIHawaiiMinnesotaNational

Page 4: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Not Important At All = 1

3

5

7

9

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

How important are health insurance costs to your organization?

NationalMinnesotaHawaiiWood, WIMiami-DadePima, AZ

Page 5: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Not Important At All = 1

3

5

7

9

0% 15% 30% 45% 60%

How important is absenteeism to your organization?

NationalMinnesotaHawaiiWood, WIMiami-DadePima, AZ

Page 6: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Not Important At All = 1

3

5

7

9

0% 15% 30% 45% 60%

How important is decreased pro-ductivity to your organization?

NationalMinnesotaHawaiiWood, WIMiami-DadePima, AZ

Page 7: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Not Important At All = 1

3

5

7

9

0% 15% 30% 45%

How important to your organization is workers compensation or disability

claims?

NationalMinnesotaHawaiiWood, WIMiami-DadePima, AZ

Page 8: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

In general, how beneficial would you say worksite wellness initiatives are

to organizations like yours?

Very beneficialSomewhat beneficialNot very beneficialNot beneficial at allDon't know

Page 9: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Worksite wellness initiatives help workers develop healthier lifestyles.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly DisagreeDon't Know

Page 10: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Worksite wellness initiatives make employees feel that their privacy is

being intruded upon.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly DisagreeDon't Know

Page 11: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Worksite wellness initiatives reduce worker absenteeism.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly DisagreeDon't Know

Page 12: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Worksite wellness initiatives reduce worker absenteeism.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly DisagreeDon't Know

Page 13: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Worksite wellness initiatives lower health care costs.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly DisagreeDon't Know

Page 14: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Worksite wellness initiatives do little to improve overall worker health.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly DisagreeDon't Know

Page 15: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Worksite wellness initiatives only impact a limited number of workers.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly DisagreeDon't Know

Page 16: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pim

a, A

Z

Mia

mi-D

ade

Woo

d, W

I

Hawai

i

Min

neso

ta

Natio

nal

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Does your organization have a worksite wellness initiative?

YesNoDon't know

Page 17: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Other (please specify):

Worksite wellness initiatives were part of the existing health plan

To reduce employee turnover rates

Was requested by employees

To attract and recruit employees

To reduce the costs associated with disability claims

To reduce employee absenteeism

To improve employee morale

To improve employee productivity

To reduce health care costs

To improve the overall health of employees

0% 50% 100%

What are your organization’s reasons for offering a worksite wellness ini-

tiative? (Check all that apply.)

National

Minnesota

Hawaii

Wood, WI

Miami-Dade

Pima, AZ

Page 18: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pim

a, A

Z

Mia

mi-D

ade

Woo

d, W

I

Hawai

i

Min

neso

ta

Natio

nal

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Do employees who participate in the worksite wellness initiative receive a

financial incentive?

YesNoDon't know

Page 19: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Very interested

Somewhat interested

Not very interested

Not interested at all

Don't know

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

How interested is your organization in expanding or improving your current

worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years?

Pima, AZMiami-DadeWood, WIHawaiiMinnesotaNational

Page 20: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

How interested is your organization in expanding or improving your current

worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years?

Very interestedSomewhat interestedNot very interestedNot interested at allDon't know

Page 21: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

How interested is your organization in developing a worksite wellness initia-tive in the next one to three years?

Very interestedSomewhat interestedNot very interestedNot interested at allDon't know

Page 22: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

How beneficial do you think employ-ees find your organization’s worksite

wellness initiative to be?

Very beneficialSomewhat beneficialNot very beneficialNot beneficial at allDon't know

Page 23: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

How beneficial would your employees find a worksite wellness initiative if

your organization created one?

Very beneficialSomewhat beneficialNot very beneficialNot beneficial at allDon't know

Page 24: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pim

a, A

Z

Mia

mi-D

ade

Woo

d, W

I

Hawai

i

Min

neso

ta

Natio

nal

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Do you think that recent worksite wellness ini-tiatives were effective in reducing your orga-

nization’s health care costs?

YesNoDon't know

Page 25: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pim

a, A

Z

Mia

mi-.

..

Woo

d, W

I

Hawai

i

Min

neso

ta

Natio

nal

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Do you think that worksite wellness initia-tives are effective in reducing worker ab-

senteeism at your organization?

YesNoDon't know

Page 26: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pim

a, A

Z

Mia

mi-.

..

Woo

d, W

I

Hawai

i

Min

neso

ta

Natio

nal

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Do you think that worksite wellness initiatives are effective in improving worker productivity

at your organization?

YesNoDon't know

Page 27: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

We could demonstrate a financial return on investment for these ini-

tiatives.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly Disagree

Page 28: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

My employees actively requested such an initiative.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly Disagree

Page 29: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

There was a community initiative that recognized employers with healthy

worksites.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly Disagree

Page 30: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

It would help attract and retain talented employees.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly Disagree

Page 31: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Health plans offered premium dis-counts or rebates for these initiatives.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly Disagree

Page 32: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

The state and federal government provided tax incentives for these

initiatives.

Strongly AgreeSomewhat AgreeSomewhat DisagreeStrongly Disagree

Page 33: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pim

a, A

Z

Mia

mi-D

ade

Woo

d, W

I

Hawai

i

Min

neso

ta

Natio

nal

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Does your organization track the re-turn on investment (ROI) of its worksite wellness initiatives?

YesNoDon't know

Page 34: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

How important is it to your organization to have a measureable ROI one to three years from now in order to determine the value of

worksite wellness initiatives?

Very importantSomewhat importantNot very importantNot important at allDon't know

Page 35: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Other (please specify):

Would not reduce health insurance costs

Unable to find someone who will champion the initiative

Lack of facilities

Employees do not see the value of it

Lack of time

Cost of the initiative

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

What are some of the reasons why organi-zations like yours often decide NOT to offer

a worksite wellness initiative? (Check all that apply.)

National

Minnesota

Hawaii

Wood, WI

Miami-Dade

Pima, AZ

Page 36: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Other (please specify):

Business organizations and trade associations

Online resources

Non-profit health organizations

State and local health departments

Health care insurers

Worksite wellness vendors and consultants

Health care providers

Business peers or fellow human resource managers

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Which of the following would you consider to be TRUSTED and VALUED sources of information about creating or expanding a worksite well-

ness initiative for your organization?

National

Minnesota

Hawaii

Wood, WI

Miami-Dade

Pima, AZ

Page 37: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

 If there was a network in your community for business leaders to learn about issues

related to worksite wellness initiatives and to share information, how likely is it that

someone from your organization would join this network?

Very likelySomewhat likelySomewhat unlikelyVery unlikely

Page 38: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

56%

64%

46%

63%

48%

47%

13%

12%

15%

12%

21%

15%

31%

24%

39%

25%

30%

38%

How interested is your organization in de-veloping a worksite wellness initiative in the

next one to three years?

The state and local government should be MORE ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives

The state and local government should be LESS ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives

Page 39: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Pima, AZ

Miami-Dade

Wood, WI

Hawaii

Minnesota

National

48%

62%

36%

53%

37%

39%

17%

13%

20%

16%

28%

20%

35%

25%

44%

30%

34%

40%

How interested is your organization in de-veloping a worksite wellness initiative in the

next one to three years?The federal government should be MORE ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiativesThe federal government should be LESS ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiativesThe federal government should NOT REALLY CHANGE their level of involvement in helping create and expand worksite wellness initia-tives

Page 40: Workplace wellness-survey-2012-regional-comparison

Alliane

www.healthiermn.com |

Made possible with funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sponsored by the

Minnesota Department of Health.

www.statesofwellness.com

The Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 2690Minneapolis, MN 55402


Recommended