Date post: | 01-Sep-2014 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | raju-mandhyan |
View: | 399 times |
Download: | 0 times |
04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati1
World's Worst EvaluatorsWorld's Worst Evaluators
Original Concept by:Steve Howard, ACGandMark D’Silva, ATM-S
Presented by: ATM-G Raju Mandhyan and ATM-S Khris Albano
04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati2
The Extra TerrestrialThe Extra Terrestrial
Does not know what the speech was all about.
Has no idea whatsoever of the objectives to be achieved
Talks about out of the world issues, gossip, etc.
Ends up using valuable time and space during a meeting.
Needs to be “beamed back by Scottie.”
04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati3
The EditorThe Editor
Is an advanced, high-class Nit-PickerEvaluates only language, forgets the
whole package of the presentationPrimarily puts forward own literary
views unknown to anyoneSpeaker gets de-motivated because of
the narrow perspective.
04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati4
The CriticThe Critic
Fault finding machine for Substance, Structure and Style
Appreciates nothing, offers no STGOs.Effect (not intent) Speaker’s self-
esteem goes to the dogs Critics are self-absorbed, they don’t
realize they are being so negative
04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati5
The Uni-CuristThe Uni-Curist
Has one kind of cure/feedback for all presentations
Generally makes comments about– Eye contact without explaining the benefits
thereof– Body language for the sake of talking about
body language– Etc;
Adds little new learning for the speaker.
04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati6
Mr. Nice GuyMr. Nice GuyHas nothing but praise for every
aspect of the presentationOmits STGO’s because emphasis is
on praise onlyIs liberal with words like “fantastic,”
“fabulous,” “superb,” until they become meaningless
Comes across as shallow and insincere
04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati7
The StarThe Star
Treats Speaker’s performance as secondary
Uses evaluation to promote SelfOverkills with personal skillsUses inane techniques, gimmicks +
lot of drama.Provides little constructive feedback
04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati8
The Sleaze-ballThe Sleaze-ball
Gushes over appearance of speakerHardly pays attention to what is said
because he/she is so captivated by looks alone
Most suggestions are about improvement of appearance and looks
Ends up annoying the speaker
04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati9
How To Be a Bad EvaluatorHow To Be a Bad Evaluator Evaluate as if you were E.T Edit as if you were Shakespeare Criticize speaker until he shrinks to death Provide one set of solutions for all kinds of
problems Flatter the speaker till her head floats in fatty
poo Smile, gush and constantly talk about yourself
until everyone leaves the room Slurp, lick and suck-up to the speaker till he/she
wants you to be padlocked in a pub.
04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati10
How How NotNot to be a Bad Evaluator to be a Bad Evaluator
Have fair knowledge of the principles of Public Speaking
Read and know objectives of speech project Listen actively, objectively and with a goal to
improve presentation and help speaker Shortlist suggestions and praise speech and
performance highlight Chuck out own ego and own bias Be genuine, gentle and giving towards the
speaker Keep feedback short, sweet and well structured
04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati11
Ultimate Purpose is to…Ultimate Purpose is to…
Coach the Speaker to Improve
04/07/23Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati12
World's Best EvaluatorsWorld's Best Evaluators
Presented By: ATM-G Raju Mandhyan and ATM-S Khris Albano