Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 1 of 30
INTRODUCTION
On any given night, 663 transition-aged youth and unaccompanied youth are homeless in
Sonoma County. This gives the Santa Rosa/Petaluma/Sonoma County Continuum of Care (CoC) the
dubious distinction of documenting more homeless youth than any other CoC of its kind in the nation
(2015 Annual Homeless Assessment Report). The Sonoma County CoC views the Youth
Homelessness Demonstration Program (YHDP) as a critical opportunity to end youth homelessness,
building on a strong existing partnership between county stakeholders and nonprofit youth providers,
and breaking the mold by testing new interventions. The YHDP Community Planning Process and
subsequent project funding will effectively address several of Sonoma County’s unique challenges: a
vacancy rate of less than 1% and absence of housing stock; its role as a “gateway” for sex trafficking
and the marijuana trade due to the US Highway 101 corridor that runs through our geography and
connects San Francisco to the “Emerald Triangle”; and a disproportionate number of homeless youth
relative to the overall homeless population.
Forty miles north of San Francisco, Sonoma County is home to 502,146 residents, 90,744 of
whom are ages 10-24, living across 1,576 square miles. Seventy percent of residents live in the county
seat, Santa Rosa, or in 8 smaller cities; the remaining thirty percent live in rural and wilderness areas.
Rapid economic growth and sparse housing have combined to produce extremely high rent burdens: 4
out of 5 families pay more than 45% of their household income for housing and transportation. In part
due to these rent burdens, on any given night 5.8 out of every 1,000 residents is homeless.
Despite these challenges, this community has been a leader in cross-sector collaboration, as
evidenced by the success of partnerships built through the CoC to reduce homelessness 36% since
2011 (from 4,539 in 2011 to 2,906 in 2016). Comprised of the HUD entitlement cities of Santa Rosa
and Petaluma and an “Urban County”, the CoC is the primary body for policy and planning to end
homelessness in Sonoma County. This proposal exemplifies this CoC’s leadership in implementing
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 2 of 30
innovative policies, building collaboration and systems change, and engaging young people in
developing plans that will most effectively serve them. The YHDP offers a focused opportunity to
expand our partnerships via a Coordinated Community Plan, and to put into action innovative project
models such as shared housing, wellness-focused supportive services, and expanded rapid re-housing
with aggressive landlord engagement. We are pleased to submit this application for the full CoC
geographic area—to reduce, and ultimately end, youth homeless in our community in accordance with
our local plan to end homelessness overall by 2025.
1. LEADERSHIP CAPACITY
1.1. Addressing a Similar Systemic Challenge Related to Homelessness
Since 1997, the CoC has addressed numerous systemic challenges towards ending
homelessness in Sonoma County. One significant effort has been collaborative action to end veteran
homelessness since 2007. The CoC convened a Homeless Veterans Committee to increase housing for
homeless disabled veterans, and to link them to mental health, primary health and substance abuse
treatment. In direct response to input from homeless veterans themselves, the Committee on Homeless
Veterans documented the need and over the next decade increased the number of beds for homeless
veterans and their families nearly fifty-fold—from 8 in 2007 to 365 in 2016. As a result, the number of
homeless veterans has declined 33% from a high of 402 in 2011 to 271 in 2016.
Also based on veteran input, the Committee launched Sonoma County Vet Connect, which
provides one-stop, no-cost information, assistance, and referral for veterans' benefits, VA health care,
counseling for veterans and their families, and housing and employment counseling through weekly
half-day clinics in Santa Rosa and monthly clinics in Guerneville, Petaluma, and Sonoma. Through the
Vets@Home Initiative, the CoC has entered into agreements with the VA Medical Center and HUD-
VASH Case Manager, Coordinated Entry, North Bay Veterans Resource Center (the local SSVF
Provider), and all supportive housing providers working with veterans. Using a By Names List of
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 3 of 30
homeless veterans, this collaborative aims to end veteran homelessness in Sonoma County by 2018.
The CoC also led an extensive planning process to develop its Coordinated Entry pilot and
project model. This three-year intensive community-wide planning process engaged over 20 agencies,
concluding with the 2014 publication of A New Front Door for Homeless Services: Coordinated Intake
and Homeless System Entry Planning in Sonoma County, California. A pilot project began in early
2015, serving homeless families and unsheltered chronically homeless persons reached through the
county’s Homeless Outreach Services Team (HOST). System-wide implementation serving all
individuals experiencing homelessness will begin in early 2017. The breadth of our unique challenge—
implementing a single point of entry across a large geographic area with limited transportation—has
been met by the CoC’s training of providers in the county’s five geographic regions to screen clients
with the VI-SPDAT screening tool in walk-in settings, as well as providing mobile intake services.
1.2. Proposed YHDP Lead Agency
1.2.a Proposed Lead Agency
The Sonoma County Community Development Commission (SCCDC) is the CoC
Collaborative Applicant and will serve as lead agency for the YHDP. SCCDC administers an Urban
County entitlement, and convened the CoC with the cities of Santa Rosa and Petaluma in 1997.
1.2.b Type of Organization
The SCCDC is an agency of county government, operating the Sonoma County Housing
Authority and administering HUD CPD and CoC funds, as well as many other State and locally funded
community development and affordable housing assets.
1.2.c Lead Staff Member
The SCCDC provides staff to the Continuum of Care through CoC Coordinator Michael Gause.
Mr. Gause will serve as lead staff for the YHDP, bringing more than a decade of experience managing
homeless/supportive housing and mental health programs in nonprofit organizations and local
government, including experience coordinating homeless and peer-based youth programs.
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 4 of 30
1.2.d Dedication of a Full-Time Position to Lead the YHDP
The SCCDC will retain consultant services under the supervision of the CoC Coordinator and
possibly dedicate a part-time position/internship to the YHDP during the community planning process.
1.2.e Experience of Lead Agency in Other Youth Homelessness Initiatives
The SCCDC is the chief planning, coordinating, and policy agency on homelessness for all of
Sonoma County and serves as the hub for collaboration and stakeholder engagement for preventing
and ending youth homelessness. In 2013, a peak count of 1,128 transition aged-youth and
unaccompanied children were found during the Point In Time Homeless Count; in the most recent
2016 PIT Count, 663 TAY and unaccompanied youth were found (a 41% reduction). In part due to
improved count methodology, this decrease was also achieved via establishment of Rapid Re-Housing
and Housing First practices system-wide in both CoC-funded and non-CoC funded projects.
As lead agency of the CoC, the SCCDC has convened a Homeless Youth Task Force (HYTF)
since 2011. The HYTF is the primary planning body for addressing youth homelessness in the CoC’s
geographic area. Its membership includes youth housing providers, county stakeholders, and
homeless/formerly homeless youth. The HYTF conducts an annual assessment of the needs of
homeless youth, including the number of youth-dedicated beds required to end youth homelessness.
Additionally, the SCCDC leads the annual Point In Time Homeless Count and its specialized youth
count, staffed by paid homeless youth enumerators.
1.3. How CoC Structure Will Support the Lead Agency
The CoC’s Governing Board will hold primary responsibility for evaluating, ranking, and
approving all YHDP-funded projects in accordance with the CoC Interim Rule, and will provide key
input into the Community Planning Process described in this proposal. Multiple CoC working groups
are engaged in collaborative efforts to expand housing opportunities, improve health, increase income,
and address the special needs of youth and veterans. Five CoC committees will be involved in the
coordinated community approach to end youth homelessness under the auspices of the YHDP:
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 5 of 30
(1) Homeless Youth Task Force (12 members). Objectives: (a) Ongoing need/bed inventory
assessment for homeless youth; (b) Alignment with system-wide planning and policy for CoC.
(2) Best Practices & Integrative Health Committee (10 members). Objectives: (a) Bringing evidence-
based training/practices to the Coordinated Community Plan such as Seeking Safety, QPR, and
Motivational Interviewing; (b) Training for all projects selected as part of the YHDP.
(3) Workforce Development Committee (12 members). Objectives: (a) Develop system performance
measures for earned income during the Coordinated Community Planning Process and align them
with HUD standards; (b) Connection to the County’s job search resource, JobLink, and private
sector employers for homeless youth employment and training.
(4) SOAR Committee (15 members). Objectives: (a) Train staff of youth-serving agencies in SOAR
methodology through the SOAR Local Lead (CoC Coordinator) and provide input via the CoC
Coordinator for appropriate SOAR cases; (b) Track outcomes for youth SOAR cases in the national
SOAR Online Application Tracking System to set baseline targets for increasing income for youth
with disabilities.
(5) RENT Sonoma County Housing Location Committee (15 members). Objectives include: (a)
Engage landlords via survey to identify barriers to renting to homeless youth, and effective
incentives for renting to youth; (b) Identify alternative strategies for youth such as double security
deposits, home sharing, and interface with private-market landlords; (c) Increase rental housing
stock via landlord outreach, and seek funds for additional interventions aside from YHDP funding.
1.4. How the CoC Includes Direct Youth Participation
Co-chaired by the Foster Youth Liaison with the Sonoma County Office of Education and the
Executive Director of Community Support Network (CSN) (provider of permanent supportive housing
for TAY), the Homeless Youth (HYTF) has been the CoC’s primary means of engaging youth
feedback since it was established in 2011. Homeless and formerly homeless youth attend the HYTF’s
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 6 of 30
bimonthly meetings and provide feedback and approval for the annual Homeless Youth Needs
Assessment as well as the annual Point in Time Homeless Count’s youth survey. In addition to staffing
the specialized youth count, youth advocates from VOICES (a peer-run youth advocacy and service
organization) and Social Advocates for Youth (SAY) attend quarterly
Continuum of Care membership meetings. Homeless/formerly homeless
youth from the Coalition for Foster Youth also assist in asset mapping
and inventorying beds for foster and homeless youth.
During the development of this proposal, a Youth Advisory
Board (YAB) was formed via outreach to homeless and formerly
homeless youth members of the HYTF and the VOICES advisory board.
The YAB is comprised of 7 members, including 5 formerly homeless and homeless youth.
Finally, Sonoma County was an early adopter of California Assembly Bill AB12, which
provided funding for extended foster care. The AB12 Cohort, a group of youth who have experienced
homelessness and the foster care system, has provided critical input into system-wide programming for
youth homeless services and housing through a May 2016 report, Changing the Story:
Recommendations to Improve Services for Transition Age Foster Youth in Sonoma County. If selected
for the YHDP, the CoC will work to incorporate the AB12 Cohort’s recommendations for housing and
services grounded in wellness and trauma-informed care.
1.5. CoC's Willingness and Ability to Engage Youth Providers
Virtually all of the existing youth provider organizations within the geographic area of the CoC
are active participants in the CoC as either full voting members of the CoC (which requires
participation in at least 50% of quarterly meetings and at least 50% of a designated CoC Committee’s
meetings) or as subject matter experts on ad hoc committees, not to mention lead stakeholders in the
PIT Homeless Youth Count. When a new provider that is not yet a part of the CoC begins offering
This issue is in no way solved by one more youth shelter or one
more housing program. We need to fund the
projects that the youth who have lived this issue create and stop
creating things that we think they need.
Sunshine H., Youth Formerly Homeless
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 7 of 30
services to youth, existing youth leaders at VOICES, SAY, or other agencies engage that entity
through a personal or written invitation to join the CoC. The CoC Coordinator routinely reaches out to
new providers when they are identified, for example through the annual Housing Inventory Count or as
new agencies begin participating in the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS).
1.6. CoC Plans to Engage Other Entities that are not Currently Working on Youth Homelessness
During planning for this YHDP proposal, the CoC engaged new stakeholders not currently
working on youth homelessness, and will continue to engage them as the project proceeds. The YHDP
Steering Committee is comprised of over 15 organizations from the nonprofit, government, and private
sectors and will be integral to carrying out our Coordinated Community Plan. The CoC will partner
with the Youth Advisory Board and YHDP Steering Committee in the following ways:
• Engage CoC-funded and non CoC-funded housing providers to dedicate permanent
supportive housing beds for chronically homeless youth in existing and new projects.
• Advocate with affordable housing providers to set aside units in new and existing
affordable housing developments for homeless youth.
• Enhance partnerships between Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and youth
service providers for intensive case management and wrap-around services.
• Provide Youth Advisory Board technical assistance regarding best practices in working
with homeless youth to agencies not yet working with them.
2. CURRENT RESOURCE CAPACITY
2.1. Crisis Response System
See Attachment 1: Crisis Response System Chart.
3. COMMUNITY NEED
Successive AHAR Reports to Congress have shown the Santa Rosa/Petaluma/Sonoma County
CoC as documenting the highest number of unaccompanied children and youth in the nation among
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 8 of 30
comparable CoCs. The 2016 PIT Count identified 566 youth 18-24, and 663 youth in total under the
age of 25 in Sonoma County—23% of the county’s homeless population.
3.1. Youth Specific Homelessness Needs Assessment
The CoC’s Homeless Youth Task Force (HYTF) has conducted a homeless youth needs
assessment since 2011. The homeless youth needs assessment was conducted in 2011, 2013, and 2015
when the Point In Time Count was conducted biannually; since annual youth PIT counts began in 2015,
the assessment has been conducted annually.
3.2. Most Recent Youth Homelessness Needs Assessment
The 2016 Homeless Youth Needs Assessment was conducted April-September, 2016.
3.2.a Methodology Or Methodologies Used To Conduct The Assessment
The Homeless Youth Needs Assessment has employed two primary methodologies since 2011.
First, the annual Point In Time census and survey data are utilized to estimate the number of youth
experiencing homelessness over the course of a year, and to project needed beds and units to house
those youth. In addition, an in-depth survey is administered by peer enumerators (homeless and
formerly homeless youth) and provides information about the need for specific youth services.
To determine the number of beds needed for the right-sized system and the appropriate mix of
permanent supportive housing, emergency shelter, transitional housing, and rapid re-housing, the
Homeless Youth Task Force has utilized methodology from a nationally recognized 7-year
longitudinal study reported in 2012 by Paul Toro, PhD: the Housing, Adolescence, and Life Outcomes
(HALO) Project, a longitudinal study of 250 homeless and 148 matched housed adolescents. This
study found that approximately 40% of homeless youth needed intensive intervention to become
housed, while the other 60% were able to resolve their housing crisis in the short-term. These general
typologies are corroborated by local data. Informed by the Toro study, the number of units needed was
determined by the following formula: 566 homeless youth ages 18-24 documented in the 2016 PIT
Count, multiplied by an annualizing factor of 2.7 (derived through a standardized formula from survey
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 9 of 30
data), yielded a total of 1,341 youth experiencing homelessness throughout the year. This was
multiplied by the Toro factor of 40% to determine that 536 beds would be needed. The HYTF removed
32 beds now under development to arrive at 504 beds needed. Assuming based on HMIS data that beds
turn over on average every 9 months; an annualized turnover factor of 1.25 persons served per bed
resulted in a calculation of 403 beds needed. (See question 3.2.e.)
3.2.b Specific Youth Systems, Organizations and Agencies from Which the Needs Assessment Originated
Community Support Network (a CoC-funded permanent supportive housing provider), Sonoma
County Office of Education, and the SCCDC provided leadership in developing the 2016 Homeless
Youth Needs Assessment on behalf of the Homeless Youth Task Force. Input included SAY (a CoC-
funded youth provider), VOICES (a peer-run youth provider), Sonoma County Behavioral Health
Division, Sonoma County Human Services Department, and homeless and formerly homeless youth.
3.2.c Scope of the Assessment
The majority of homeless youth are found along the US Highway 101 corridor between the
cities of Santa Rosa and Petaluma, but the annual needs assessment includes the entire geography of
the CoC, and is based on information gleaned from the annual Point In Time Homeless Count. All
youth providers are invited to provide input into the assessment, including youth homeless service and
housing providers, local government stakeholders such as the Sonoma County Human Services
Department/Division of Child Welfare, and peer-led youth providers such as VOICES. The assessment
focuses on the inventory of permanent supportive housing beds needed on an annual basis; it does not
include short-term emergency shelter for youth under 18 years old, but does weigh factors leading to
youth homelessness such as family separation, a history of foster care, and input from homeless and
formerly homeless youth on unmet needs. Due to the high percentage of homeless youth identifying as
LGBTQ, or who have histories of trauma, interrupted education or frequent incarceration, services
must be LGBTQ-friendly, trauma-informed, and must include assistance navigating the criminal
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 10 of 30
justice system, education, and employment assistance, with a focus on wellness.
3.2.d Youth Target Population
Of the 663 unaccompanied youth found in the 2016 PIT Count, 44% were youth of color and
17% identified as LGBTQQI. In the previous 12 months, 35% spent at least one night in jail, and 22%
were on probation or parole. While almost one-third (31%) were former foster youth, 19% became
homeless while on probation or parole. A significant number of homeless youth are also victims of sex
trafficking, tied to the marijuana trade along the Highway 101 corridor. The 2015 Point In Time Youth
Count study showed that homeless youth generally feel safer from emotional, physical, and sexual
abuse after becoming homeless than they did in their previous housed situations.1
3.2.e Key Findings from Youth Homelessness Needs Assessment
As noted in section 3.2.a, based on the 2016 assessment approximately 400 youth beds with a
range of intensive services are needed to adequately house Sonoma County’s homeless youth ages 18-
24. This is nearly unchanged from the 2015 Homeless Youth Needs Assessment (402 beds). The
needed beds should include a mix of permanent supportive housing and rapid re-housing for 18-24
year old youth. The HYTF recommended not adding homeless beds to the existing inventory for youth
ages 12-17, until the existing Sonoma County Homeless and Runaway Shelter (SAY’s Coffee House
Shelter) is able to address both Federal program requirements (short stay with reunification goals) and
State licensing/legal barriers, which will be required to consistently and fully utilize their beds.
Additional findings included a need for the following services related to the special needs of
Sonoma County youth: LGBTQ friendly, trauma-informed services, assistance with navigating the
criminal justice system, education and employment assistance, enhanced transportation assistance to
1 http://sonoma-county-continuum-of-
care.wikispaces.com/file/detail/SonomaCounty_HomelessReport_2015-10+29+15.pdf
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 11 of 30
mitigate the lack of public transit infrastructure, and a focus on both mental and physical wellness.
3.3. CoC’s Ability to Collect and Report Data on Sheltered and Unsheltered Homeless Youth During the 2016 Pit Count
3.3.a Number of Youth (24 &Younger) Identified in 2016 Sheltered and Unsheltered PIT Count
Table 1: Number of Youth (24 or Younger) Identified in the 2016 Youth PIT Count
Category Number
3.3.a Unaccompanied Youth – Sheltered 63
3.3.b Parenting Youth –Sheltered 4
3.3.c Unaccompanied Youth – Unsheltered 600
3.3.d Unaccompanied, Parenting Youth - Unsheltered 0
3.3.e CoC PIT Count Activities
3.3.e.1 ConductingaYouthSpecific2016PITCount
The CoC conducted a youth specific PIT Count on the same day as other 2016 PIT Count
activities. To ensure the most accurate numbers of homeless youth, the unsheltered youth-specific
count was carried out between the hours of 4:00 PM – 8:00 PM on January 29, 2016 while the adult
unsheltered PIT count was conducted between the hours of 6:00 AM – 10:00 AM on January 29, 2016.
This was done in accordance with best practices identified by HUD as well specific information from
homeless/formerly homeless youth enumerators who indicated that youth would be most easily
identified and accessible during those hours. (See 3.3.b.4 for de-duplication methodology.)
3.3.e.2 IntegrationofCountingStrategiestoEngageYouthinthe2016PITCount
Among other strategies, the CoC ensured it would be able to find and accurately identify
homeless youth by soliciting the assistance of the target population at every step. With its youth guides,
the CoC engaged in intensive planning and mapping activities, including identification of “hot spots”
and other known locations where homeless youth congregate. The CoC enlisted paid youth
enumerators familiar with homeless youth on the streets and able to establish a rapport with young
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 12 of 30
people they spoke with during post-count demographic surveys. Adult volunteers and youth service
provider staff provided transportation for over 20 homeless/formerly homeless youth enumerators.
3.3.e.3 ConductingaSeparateYouth2016PITCount
The youth PIT Count was conducted on the same day as the regular count, but during different
hours (4:00 pm-8:00 pm) to gain the most comprehensive, youth-informed information.
3.3.e.4 MethodologyforYouth-SpecificPortionoftheCount
This CoC has been nationally recognized for enhanced strategies to find and locate youth, using
the following enhanced methodologies since 2009: 1) Peer youth enumerators meet with CoC staff
prior to the count to map specific locations in the CoC’s geography that homeless youth are known to
frequent; 2) Conducting the youth-specific count between 4:00 pm and 8:00 pm when youth are more
visible, as opposed to the general street count hours of 6:00-10:00 am; 3) To avoid duplication of youth
seen in the morning count and evening youth count, CoC staff and consultants compare the number of
youth found in each census tract map in the morning count with the evening youth count, and select the
higher number; 4) An additional youth-focused survey is conducted after the youth count that includes
questions, developed by youth peer advocates to be trauma-informed, on causes of homelessness
(separation from parents/guardians, trauma, etc.), homelessness and justice system involvement prior
to age 18, stays with friends/family in the weeks prior to the count, and experiences with sex
trafficking and sexual exploitation; 5) Only homeless/formerly homeless youth perform field surveys.
3.3.e.5 UseofDataNotRequiredbyHUDtoBetterUnderstandLocalYouthHomelessness
To gain a fuller picture of youth homelessness in the CoC’s geographic area and to inform the
annual Homeless Youth Needs Assessment, enhanced data is collected for youth. This information
includes experience with sex trafficking; trading drugs or sex for a place to stay; victimization due to
physical, sexual, or emotional abuse; whether youth have any supportive adult; as well as youth-
specific questions on causes of homelessness, such as separation from parents or guardians, gang
activity or violence, and attempts to reconcile with parents.
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 13 of 30
3.3.f Number of Unaccompanied Homeless Youth Reported by LEAs
The most recent information from Sonoma County Office of Education (SCOE) is from the
2014-2015 academic year. A total of 1,147 unaccompanied homeless students were counted in schools.
This included students living in doubled-up or overcrowded circumstances that do not meet the
Category 1 (“literally homeless”) definition of homelessness, but may well meet the Category 3
definition. This also represents a 36% decrease from 1,796 students counted in fiscal year 2013-2014.
3.3.g Factors Currently Contributing to Youth Homeless in the Community
Family Conflict: Family conflict was the most frequently reported cause of homelessness
among youth in Sonoma County. The 2016 PIT Count and Survey reported that 32% of young people
said an argument with a family or friend who asked them to leave was the cause of their homelessness.
These findings are consistent with the California Research Bureau report, Voices from the Street: A
Survey of Homeless Youth by their Peers,2 which states: “The great majority of young people did not
seek or choose to be homeless; they were pushed into it, either because their parents explicitly ‘kicked
them out’ or family conflict forced them to leave. In most cases, it was the deterioration or implosion
of a personal relationship that propelled young youth onto the streets.”
History with the Child Welfare System: Nearly one third (31%) of unaccompanied children
and youth surveyed in the 2016 PIT Count reported spending time in the foster care system. Of these,
nearly 1 in 4 said that aging out of foster care was the primary event that led to their homelessness.
Lack of Employment: In the 2016 PIT Count and Survey, 26% of youth identified the loss of
a job as the primary factor that led to them becoming homeless. In a recent survey of participants in a
local employment program for at-risk, runaway, and homeless youth, more than 50% reported
2 Bernstein, Nell, & Foster, Lisa K. Voices from the street, a survey of homeless youth by their peers.
California Research Bureau, 2008
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 14 of 30
spending their paychecks on family bills and necessities (Sonoma County Youth Ecology Corps 2015
Evaluation). Lacking money for basic needs, a significant number of homeless youth turn to petty
theft, gang involvement, crime, and survival sex to meet their basic needs: 38% of Sonoma County’s
homeless children and youth reported interacting with police since becoming homeless.
Poverty and a High Cost of Living: The vast majority of Sonoma County’s runaway and
homeless youth come from families living at or below the poverty line. According to Portrait of
Sonoma County 2015, about one in eight people (12%) in the county live below the poverty line and
nearly half of all households in the County (46%) are rent-burdened, spending more than 30% of their
income on housing. When families earn too little to meet basic needs, the impact on children and youth
is particularly pronounced: research shows that deep poverty in early childhood has immediate and
lifelong adverse outcomes, including poorer health, lower educational attainment, and a higher
likelihood of poverty in adulthood.
Youth disconnection (neither working nor in school) is a significant contributing factor to
youth homelessness that is highly correlated with poverty is named as a high priority in a report
commissioned by the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors.3 The majority of disconnected youth
come from impoverished communities; where the adults are also disconnected from mainstream
institutions and struggle with limited education, frequent periods of unemployment, and limited social
networks. About 25% of Sonoma County residents are under the age of 18; more than 10% of these
(over 12,000 young people) are estimated to be “disconnected” and therefore at risk of homelessness.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Issues: Often intimately tied to family dysfunction,
substance abuse and mental health challenges contribute to causing and perpetuating youth
3 Burd-Sharps, S. and Lewis, K. A Portrait of Sonoma County: Sonoma County Human Development
Report 2014, Measure of America, of the Social Science Research Council.
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 15 of 30
homelessness. The 2016 Homeless Youth Needs Assessment found that 26% of youth reported prior or
current drug or alcohol abuse, and 25% reported current or prior emotional or psychiatric conditions.
Criminal Justice System Involvement: Involvement with the criminal justice system is an
important contributing factor to youth homelessness in Sonoma County. Youth returning to the
community from criminal confinement face barriers to employment and education opportunities and
are likely to have difficulty reintegrating with their families and communities. Of the homeless youth
surveyed in the 2016 PIT Youth Count, 22% reported justice system involvement before age 18.
Geographic Impacts: US Highway 101, which traverses the length of Sonoma County,
connects Southern California and Bay Area population centers with the major marijuana growing
regions in northern California’s “Emerald Triangle”. The local community has suffered numerous
homicides related to the marijuana trade, and youth migrating to the area for illicit harvest work are
frequently prey to sexual assault and trafficking. Trauma among traveling youth significantly impacts
the needs of homeless youth seeking services in Sonoma County.
4. CAPACITY FOR INNOVATION (MAXIMUM POINTS: 15)
4.1. Successful Adoption of a New Broad Reaching Methodology
The CoC has adopted several broad reaching methodologies leading to system-wide changes in
behavior through prevention-focused services and practices:
Housing Retention/Reducing Recidivism/Housing First: Over
the past 5 years, the CoC has been a leader in directing both CoC and
non-CoC- funded projects toward a low-barrier, Housing First approach
for all homeless populations, including youth. In a related effort, the
CoC has implemented evidence-based training that focuses on housing retention and prevention of
returns to homelessness. The CoC secured $25,000 to roll out system-wide trainings in these evidence-
based models to reduce homeless recidivism: Seeking Safety, Question Persuade Respond for Suicide
Having a stable place to live needs to be a priority because it makes all the other pieces come easier.
Jessica F., Youth Formerly Homeless
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 16 of 30
Prevention, and Motivational Interviewing. All CoC Permanent Supportive Housing providers have
adopted Housing First practices, and most shelter providers have moved rapidly to a behavior-based
model. In February 2016, the Palms Inn, a converted hotel, opened to house 104 veterans and
chronically homeless persons directly from the streets—the region’s largest Housing First effort to date.
Upstream Investments: Both the CoC and the SCCDC are engaged in an “Upstream
Investments” initiative, created in 2010 by the Sonoma County Human Services Department with
support from the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors and all County Departments, another system-
wide strategy that can directly impact youth homelessness. Through a rigorous process of application
to an approved Portfolio of evidence-based practices (EBPs), Upstream Investments facilitates
adoption of proven prevention-focused policies and interventions across the lifespan, to increase
equality and reduce monetary and societal costs for all local residents. The Upstream Investments
initiative has spurred adoption of a “collective impact” approach by County Departments, non-profits,
local funders, and other decision makers. Currently, 85 local organizations have submitted Resolutions
of Alignment to show support of Upstream principles, including many partners in this application.
CoC Outcomes-Driven Priorities: The CoC has embraced Upstream Investments methods
and prioritizes CoC and ESG funding for projects that utilize evidence-informed approaches. Scoring
to rate and rank CoC and ESG projects in local competitions includes points for incorporation of EBPs.
In 2017, the CoC Coordinator and Upstream Investments staff plan to assist CoC-funded PSH
providers to submit their programs to the Upstream Portfolio, documenting fidelity to the “Housing
First for Permanent Supportive Housing” EBP. This will be the first effort to offer fidelity training in
Housing First in this community, and underscores the CoC’s commitment to Housing First.
Cradle to Career Sonoma County is a historic partnership that connects the entire educational
continuum with broad community support to improve the educational, economic, and health outcomes
for Sonoma County youth, and is an example of another collective impact strategy within the county
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 17 of 30
that takes a preventive approach to issues directly tied to youth homelessness.
Building HOMES Report: In 2015, the SCCDC published Building HOMES: A Policy
Maker’s Toolbox for Ending Homelessness. This report provided an understanding of the needs and
opportunities to end homelessness in Sonoma County by 2025 and builds upon the 10 Year Homeless
Action Plan published by the CoC. This report was endorsed by the Sonoma County Board of
Supervisors, and the Continuum of Care has also aligned with this countywide effort. In November
2016, a Housing Summit, “Homes for All”, was held to build upon the efforts laid out in the Toolbox,
and the SCCDC routinely updates the CoC Board and full membership of these efforts.
4.2. Adoption of a New Innovation by Community Homeless Providers
Following the PIT Homeless Youth Counts in 2009, 2011, and 2013, Sonoma County leaders
across the government, private sector, and nonprofit organizations came together to declare a “youth
homelessness state of emergency”. The community was galvanized by the surge in the number of
homeless youth and unaccompanied children (a high of 1,128 in 2013) as well as of the slow progress
in developing affordable housing following the Great Recession. A 60,000 square foot facility that
formerly served as a hospital was identified and donated to local youth housing provider Social
Advocates for Youth (SAY). A 100% community-funded capital campaign ensued to raise the $9.5
million necessary to renovate the facility and create a new home for 63 local homeless youth. SAY
opened its Dream Center in January 2016 and currently has 40 of the possible 63 beds funded. Beds
have been at or near 100% utilization since May 2016. SAY anticipates full occupancy by 2018 and
maintains a wait list of over 400 youth who are seeking housing and support services. The project has
been successful in engaging and housing unsheltered youth despite neighborhood concerns faced
during project development and ongoing challenges in obtaining adequate operational funding.
Also during this period, in 2014 the Walter S. Johnson Foundation began work with the
Sonoma County Family, Youth, and Children’s Services Division (FYC), the County’s Child Welfare
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 18 of 30
Agency, on a multi-year planning effort to improve services for transition-age foster youth, in
partnership with local youth nonprofit VOICES and other stakeholders including Community Support
Network. A significant motivating factor for change was the critical need for youth input from their
lived experience to determine the most effective services, supports, and types of housing for the former
foster youth population. This public-private partnership also focused on homeless and at-risk youth; its
central focus was designing a program that would engage a group of passionate and dedicated foster
youth (“the AB12 Cohort”) to re-imagine the local service system for transition age foster and
homeless youth. The YHDP offers a unique opportunity to implement the AB12 Cohort’s
recommendations detailed in the report, Changing the Story: Recommendations to Improve Services
for Transition Age Foster Youth in Sonoma County.4 The AB12 Cohort’s recommendations include:
Goal 1: Ensure Foster Youth Access, Enroll and Receive Benefits
Enhance screening and assessment for all vulnerable youth, and support access to benefits,
programs, and services. This recommendation seeks to improve access to AB12 benefits among
probation youth and improve benefits enrollment and receipt among vulnerable transition age youth.
Goal 2: Eliminate Foster Youth Homelessness and Housing Instability
Develop a mixed-use, single-site housing model for current and former AB12 foster youth and
other at-risk community members; within this model, create a wellness center and supportive
community for residents to utilize as a tool for personal growth.
Goal 3: Increase High School Graduation Rates and College Access
Develop a Summer Academy Program for high school age foster youth to help them become
familiar with and prepare for postsecondary education, and establish an Education Navigator position
4 VOICES AB12 Youth Cohort. Changing the Story: Recommendations to Improve Services
for Transition Age Foster Youth in Sonoma County, May 2016.
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 19 of 30
to collaborate with the Sonoma County Office of Education (SCOE) to support foster youth
postsecondary academic, financial, and emotional readiness and success; incorporate supports for
independent living, including training and guidance in financial literacy.
The AB12 Cohort has played a key role in providing input to the CoC’s HYTF and this YHDP
proposal (the Youth Advisory Board Chair is a member of the AB12 Cohort). Challenges to
implementing these goals include few models of mixed-use single-site housing for youth; if awarded
funding under the YHDP, this will be further explored in the Coordinated Community Plan process.
4.3. Operation of Rapid Rehousing or Housing First Models
The CoC project portfolio includes two youth-dedicated PSH projects. The first is Sponsor-
Based Rental Assistance operated by SAY, which provides 8 scattered-site permanent supportive
housing beds for chronically homeless transition aged-youth. The second is the SCCDC’s Youth with
Disabilities CoC Rental Assistance Project, which provides 12 permanent supportive housing beds at
Tamayo Village, with services provided by SAY and rental assistance provided by the SCCDC. Both
projects utilize a low barrier Housing First approach. Additionally, SAY provides 4 units of rapid re-
housing in a Housing First model using local funds. The primary obstacle to further expansion has
been a need for education of the larger community and private funders regarding the viability of a
Housing First model in new developments. Extensive neighborhood outreach (via nonprofit providers
and the CoC’s Rent Sonoma County Housing Placement Committee) and the recent passage of SB
1380 in California (which mandates Housing First in all state-funded programs) will be critical in
engaging the broader community to support reducing barriers to rapid re-housing.
4.4. Interventions the Community Wishes to Pursue
Sonoma County has had a rental vacancy rate of less than 1% for the past 30 months. Primary
barriers include both a shortage of available units and insufficient financial resources to rapidly house
youth in the current overheated housing market. If awarded YHDP funds, the CoC will pursue a range
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 20 of 30
of interventions that lower barriers and creatively address the shortage of available housing in the
geographic area: 1) Implement shared housing modeled after SHARE Sonoma County, which houses
homeless persons with senior homeowners who need financial and daily living assistance to remain
stably housed. The CoC will use new YHDP resources to expand this model to provide a mutually
beneficial, holistic relationship between homeowners and homeless youth. 2) Implement Rapid Re-
Housing 2.0. While not currently eligible under the CoC Interim Rule, longer time limits for assistance
in rapid re-housing will provide homeless youth more time for stabilization paired with holistic,
recovery-oriented services. 3) Increased security deposits. Within a tight rental market, increasing
security deposits will make it easier to persuade landlords to rent to transition-aged homeless youth; 4)
Mixed-use, single site housing models. As noted by recommendations from the AB12 Cohort and from
youth in the CoC’s Homeless Youth Task Force, our community requires multiple models of housing
to fit the diverse needs of all homeless youth. Based on extensive feedback from youth, we will aim to
strike a balance between promoting community with housing on a single site while affirming
independence and ensuring privacy with a low number of units (8-14). To avoid feeling like “just
another placement”, youth have recommended developing a housing facility that includes youth from
varied backgrounds (foster youth, homeless youth, etc.). A search for a locations is underway.
4.5. SCCDC and Stakeholder Willingness to Engage in New Models & Methodologies
Our stakeholders are highly motivated to use the YHDP as an opportunity to leverage our
community strengths with new methodologies. The CoC has a long history of creating new projects,
including youth projects, through the CoC competition, having reallocated an average of 25% of
funding annually since 2013 to continue sparking new projects. In the 2014 CoC Competition, a
transitional housing program for youth (operated by SAY) was reallocated into funding for a
permanent supportive housing for TAY youth via sponsor-based rental assistance. Funding was also
reallocated from other CoC projects to double the funding available for this effort, resulting in 8 PSH
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 21 of 30
beds for transition aged youth with approximately $94,000 in funding for rental assistance and
supportive services. This reallocation also represented a strategic redistribution of resources from an
abstinence-based program to a low-barrier Housing First program. In 2015, the CoC reallocated over
$300,000 in funding to create enhanced support for Coordinated Entry and HMIS Expansion, including
Housing Navigation services that will benefit youth.
5. COLLABORATION (MAXIMUM POINTS: 20)
5.1. CoC Current Written Plan
The written plan to address youth homelessness is an integral part of the Sonoma County
Continuum of Care’s 10-Year Homeless Action Plan. The Action Plan was updated in 2014 and
challenges the community to ensure that all county residents have access to the building blocks that
make up the Plan’s key goals: Housing, Health, and Income. The 10 Year Plan specifies the following
actions for addressing youth homelessness: 1) Collaborative Outcomes Measurement: Fully implement
data sharing and shared outcome measurement to understand what works best to end youth
homelessness (in progress); 2) Development of 270 units for homeless youth with specialized services
that increase their economic security per the 2013 Homeless Youth Needs Assessment (in progress,
over 50 units have been developed); 3) Establish a homeless youth seat on the CoC Board to ensure
homeless youth issues are heard (achieved in 2016); 4) Engage Cradle to Career and Sonoma County
Behavioral Health in strategizing critical barriers to youth becoming housed (in progress). These steps
are included in the 10-Year Homeless Action Plan 2014 Update. The Plan leadership committee
included Community Foundation Sonoma County, County Health Services and Human Services
Departments, and the SCCDC (Collaborative Applicant). Over 20 CoC member agencies contributed
to the plan, including providers such as SAY and VOICES.
5.2. How CoC is Working with Stakeholders to Prevent and End Homelessness
See Attachment 2: CoC Stakeholder Collaboration Table
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 22 of 30
5.3. Incorporation of Youth into Coordinated Entry Process
The CoC began a Coordinated Entry pilot in February 2015, serving homeless families and
unsheltered individuals including youth, who are identified by the HOST Team. Coordinated Entry
will expand to all single adults and youth in early 2017 with new CoC funding. Youth are incorporated
into the Coordinated Entry process, and unsheltered youth are currently served by the pilot.
5.3.a Coordinated Entry Process for Unaccompanied Youth
Access points are designed to be accessible to all persons presenting for assistance, including
youth. This strategy includes a single point of telephone contact with Catholic Charities, the
Coordinated Entry operator, as well as connection via a countywide street and encampment outreach
team (HOST). The HOST team ensures a youth focus through SAY outreach staff, as well as
partnerships with Buckelew Programs, the Santa Rosa Police Department, and Sonoma County Sheriff;
HOST identifies unsheltered chronically homeless adults and youth in need of services.
5.3.b Prioritization of Youth Within the Coordinated Entry Process
In the Coordinated Entry pilot, unsheltered chronically homeless youth are prioritized for
Coordinated Entry via the CoC’s HOST street outreach team. Youth are scored for vulnerability on a
youth version of the VI-SPDAT, an evidence-informed tool that assesses an individual’s need for
support. In 2015, 39 youth were interviewed utilizing the VI-SPDAT for adults; of these, 31% scored
0-4 (minimal supports), 46% scored 5-9 (Rapid Re-Housing), and 23% scored 10+ (Permanent
Supportive Housing). These initial findings are generally aligned with the Toro study used in our
homeless youth needs assessment, which states that 40% of homeless youth will need little to no
intervention. Specific factors used to prioritize youth are length of time homeless, mental health
conditions, substance abuse, and vulnerability to victimization.
5.3.c CoC and ESG Funded Resources Available to Youth through Coordinated Reentry
CoC-funded resources available through Coordinated Entry include youth-dedicated Permanent
Supportive Housing (PSH) projects operated by SAY (Sponsor-Based Rental Assistance and Tamayo
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 23 of 30
Village’s rental assistance PSH for youth operated by the Sonoma County Housing Authority and
SAY). All other CoC-funded PSH projects are available to TAY 18-24 including the following:
Committee on the Shelterless (COTS) PSH projects in the Petaluma in south county; the Palms Inn (a
104 unit PSH SRO Project) operated by Catholic Charities in Santa Rosa; Buckelew Programs’ two
PSH projects serving chronically homeless adults with severe mental illness in Santa Rosa; CSN’s
Stony Point Commons SRO development in Santa Rosa; and two PSH projects serving the chronically
homeless in Guerneville in west county, operated by West County Community Services. The two
largest shelters serving single adults in Sonoma County (supported by State ESG funds)—Sam Jones
Hall in central Santa Rosa and the Mary Isaak Center in Petaluma—also serve youth ages 18-24.
5.3.d Integration of Other Providers into the Coordinated Reentry Process
All providers currently working with homeless youth in Sonoma County are involved in the
Coordinated Entry process via a monthly meeting of the Coordinated Entry Advisory Group. The
relatively small population of the county enables the CoC to also immediately engage any
organizations that have established new services addressing homeless youth.
5.4. System-Level Discharge Strategies
Child Welfare: The Sonoma County Human Services Department’s Families Youth and
Children Division has separate discharge plans foster youth who are: 1) Discharged at 18; and (2) 18-
24 years old (non-minor dependents, or NMD) and in Extended Foster Care (EFC). For foster youth
who have reached 18 and decline to participate in EFC, a 90-day plan is completed within 90 days of
the exit from foster care. Social workers assist youth to develop a transition plan addressing their needs
for housing, employment, education, mentors, continuing support services, and health insurance.
For NMD, the 90-day Transition Plan is completed within the 90-day period prior to exiting
EFC (either within the 90-day period prior to achieving the maximum age of foster care, or before an
earlier planned exit). Even if the NMD makes an unplanned exit from EFC, the 90-day Transition Plan
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 24 of 30
is still required per state law.
Juvenile and Adult Justice: Most probation youth returning from out-of-home placement
reunify with their families. Those whose families are not functional are eligible for AB12 services; a
few have used local transitional housing through TLC Children’s Services, a local foster care agency.
Youth in the delinquency system who have completed residential programs or a long term of detention
in the Juvenile Hall and who do not have a healthy home to return to (e.g., violence, abuse, drug
addiction, gang affiliation) face greater challenges, as they are not eligible for AB12 funding and often
end up homeless. County Probation can fund short-term housing (6 months at $500 month) but lacks
viable housing options in the community. Thus County Probation is eager to participate in the YHDP.
Mental Health Institutions: Sonoma County Behavioral Health (SCBH) and its contractors
provide specialty mental health treatment services to local Medi-Cal beneficiaries who qualify for
specialty mental health services, including youth and young adults. Specialty mental health treatment
services are provided using trauma-informed and recovery based practices; SCBH works closely with
parents, caregivers, and other support systems to ensure mental health treatment services are
appropriate, safe, and supportive. For youth exiting an inpatient psychiatric hospital, SCBH’s Hospital
Discharge Planners work closely with the hospital and the youth’s caregivers to develop a discharge
plan that takes into account the individuals’ preferences and the need for safety, stability, and follow
up treatment. Youth and young adults requiring longer-term institutional mental health treatment are
assigned a Personal Service Coordinator who, like the Hospital Discharge Planners, helps coordinate
caregivers and other supports to develop an appropriate discharge plan.
For those youth and young adults who lack an appropriate living situation with a family
member or caregiver at discharge, SCBH facilitates a weekly placement meeting. SCBH has an
inventory of “post-institutional” treatment options that range from shelters to shared housing, to
supported independent living. The agency contracts with SAY to provide TAY-aged specific
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 25 of 30
transitional housing, and with board and care facilities that teach independent living skills, provide
specialty mental health services, and prepare young adults to live a life of their choosing.
5.5. Role of PCWAs in Serving Homeless Children and Youth
Sonoma County Human Services Department’s Family, Youth and Children Division (FYC)
(the local Department of Child Welfare) works diligently to place youth with family or stable adults
with whom they have a previous connection, including through a “Life Long Connections” program
operated in partnership with the Seneca Family of Agencies. FYC representatives participate in the
Homeless Youth Task Force and monthly Runaway Round Table meetings to identify all homeless and
potentially homeless foster youth, and are eager to participate in the YHDP to expand housing options
for former foster youth who have become homeless. The following placement resources are used to
help prepare youth for independent living to avoid homelessness upon exiting foster care:
Transitional Housing Program Plus Foster Care (THP-Plus-FC) is a foster care housing
program specifically for NMDs who are in an EFC placement under court jurisdiction and are not yet
ready for an independent living setting. The program offers more frequent and intensive services that
include case management, supervision, and supportive services to assist the NMD in obtaining the
skills needed to transition to independent living. These include meeting educational goals, obtaining
gainful employment, learning financial management and daily living skills, and more.
The Supervised Independent Living Placement (SILP) is a flexible placement for foster care
that was created for NMDs participating in EFC, to provide an opportunity for independent living
while receiving financial support for NMDs who are developmentally ready to live independently. In
planning SILP placements for NMDs, living situations that include adult siblings, appropriate extended
family members, tribal members, or mentors are possible options.
The Transitional Housing Plus (THP-Plus) Program provides affordable housing and
comprehensive supportive services for up to 24 months to help former foster care and probation youth
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 26 of 30
ages 18-24 transition from out-of-home placements to independent living. THP-Plus is based on four
key principles: (1) Emancipated youth are legal adults and should be subject to fewer restrictions than
minors; (2) Program rules for THP-Plus participants allow more independence regarding household
rules, financial decisions, and emancipation goals compared to minor youth; (3) THP-Plus should
allow youth the greatest amount of freedom possible to prepare them for self-sufficiency; (4) THP-Plus
is a supportive housing program which provides a wide range of intensive services on a regular basis.
Preference is given to youth exiting group homes, pregnant/parenting youth, and/or homeless youth.
The Stepping Stone program operated by SAY provides temporary housing and transitional
support services to assist homeless NMDs in acquiring and maintaining housing on the way to self-
sufficiency. The program provides services to 12-18 eligible youth per year in the following four areas:
Employment and Career, Education Opportunities, Living Situation, and Community Life Functioning.
6. FINANCIAL RESOURCES MAXIMUM POINTS: 10
6.1. How CoC will Obtain Additional Funding to Support the Planning Process
As the lead applicant, the SCCDC will contribute $14,000 in unrestricted funds to support the
planning process, available upon grant award, and documented in the attached commitment letter.
6.2. Proposed Six Month Budget
If awarded funding for the YHPD, the SCCDC will dedicate no more than 10% of the total
project award for the six-month community planning process. Proposed budget in Table 2 below:
Table 2: Proposed Six Month Budget Item Amount
Consulting services for facilitation of planning process $40,000
Enhanced data analysis regarding unmet needs $16,000
Part-time administrative staff supervised by CoC Coordinator $20,000
Stipends for homeless youth participation in Youth Advisory Board, evaluation $10,000
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 27 of 30
Local contribution for coordination of planning process (Letter attached) $14,000
Total $100,000
7. DATA AND EVALUATION CAPACITY MAXIMUM POINTS: 20
7.1. Percentage of Homeless Beds that Currently Participate in HMIS
Excluding 27 beds for victim service providers, the CoC has 2,522 year-round beds (including
permanent supportive housing, transitional housing, other permanent housing, emergency shelter, and
rapid re-housing). Of these beds, 451 are currently in the “U” category (under development) and not
yet active. Of the 2,071 beds in the HIC that are not under development, 1,620 (78%) are in HMIS.
7.2. Percentage of Youth Beds Covered in HMIS
The CoC currently has 83 beds in PSH and RRH for TAY and 6 beds for youth under 18 (with
6+ pending due to change in state licensure). Of these 89 beds, 43 are under development in the “U”
category of the HIC. Of the 46 available beds, 46 (100%) are covered in HMIS.
7.3. Active Recruitment of New Youth-Dedicated Homeless Projects to HMIS
Whenever new Youth-Dedicated Homeless Projects are developed, whether at HMIS
participating or non-HMIS participating agencies, the project developers are strongly encouraged to
participate in HMIS, due to all providers’ desired to track participant data, and report outcomes to their
funders. Information on the extensive, low-cost technical support provided by the HMIS Coordinator
and HMIS software vendor is presented during the recruitment process as a particular incentive.
7.4. Support for Transition of New Homeless Projects to HMIS
The HMIS Coordinator and CoC Coordinator work directly with designated HMIS Leads at
each participating agency. Training is held roughly once per month for new projects and users,
covering HMIS security and workflows. The HMIS Coordinator is available to all users as needed for
1-1 technical support. In addition, the HMIS software vendor, Social Solutions, provides robust user
support. Agencies participating in HMIS provide a cash match to the SCCDC as a user fee, and the
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 28 of 30
SCCDC received HMIS Expansion Funds in the 2015 CoC Competition to deepen provider training
and offer expanded data reporting at provider request. Enhanced HMIS services will include additional
training for HMIS leads and more SCCDC staff time to implement intensive training and TA.
7.5. Meeting HUD Data Reporting Requirements
The CoC has met all data requirements over the past 12 months. PIT and HIC data was
submitted into HDX by the May 2, 2016 deadline; HUD System Performance Measures were
submitted during the annual CoC NOFA period by the deadline of August 15, 2016; and draft 2016
AHAR data was submitted by the deadline of October 31, 2016.
7.6. Submission of AHAR Table Shells to HUD
All 12 AHAR table shells were submitted by December 23, 2015 and accepted by HUD.
7.7. Gathering Youth Data from Other Sources
HMIS is the primary source of youth data for the CoC. The Foster Youth Liaison at the
Sonoma County Office of Education (SCOE) shares McKinney Vento educational data on homeless
youth and families annually with the CoC Coordinator for the PIT Count and for tracking youth
homelessness. This data includes only the number of homeless youth and families and no identifying
information; it is stored in a secured file with the CoC Coordinator.
7.8. Performance Measures Implemented by the CoC
The CoC has had a data-driven culture of performance measurement for many years, and
enhanced its efforts since passage of the HEARTH Act of 2009 to more closely align with the goals of
Opening Doors. The CoC uses a structured approach to monitoring and evaluating ESG and CoC
funded programs, and monitors system-wide data for non-ESG or CoC funded agencies.
CoC-funded youth and other programs are monitored annually by the CoC Coordinator and
CoC Evaluation Committee, comprised of impartial subject matter experts. The CoC Coordinator
collects data from Annual Performance Reports, and the Committee examines agency financials,
spend-down of funds, and project/agency monitoring reports. Projects are scored on housing outcome
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 29 of 30
measures (retention of housing), the percentage of beds dedicated to chronically homeless individuals,
income performance (earned income and all income), the percentage of clients who access mainstream
resources, and year-end project utilization. Qualitative data analysis includes collaboration with
criminal justice partners, alignment with Upstream Investments, benefits advocacy using the SOAR
method, collaboration with Coordinated Entry, and utilization of a Housing First approach. The two
CoC-funded youth projects are monitored in this fashion along with all other CoC projects.
Projects are rated and ranked by the Evaluation Committee, and projects that meet 75% of the
top overall score are unconditionally approved for renewal. Projects that do not meet this threshold are
given a corrective action plan prior to the annual NOFA period. When issues are identified, technical
assistance provided by SCCDC staff, or an outside technical assistance provider may be suggested.
Feedback is also given in writing by the CoC Coordinator, Evaluation Committee, and CoC Board.
The SCCDC’s ESG and locally funded programs are monitored remotely on a quarterly basis,
and on-site annually, by its Public Services Funding Coordinator. Input into ESG project selection is
provided annually by the CoC Coordinator and CoC Evaluation Committee. The same data points are
monitored for income, housing retention, and qualitative data such as collaboration with Coordinated
Entry, health indicators, and Housing First approach are also monitored. These include Sanctuary
House, a youth PSH Project operated by CSN, VOICES day center for youth, and an RRH Project for
youth operated by SAY.
The CoC developed numerous system-wide outcomes measurements prior to HUD’s
introduction of System-Wide Performance Measures. The CoC monitors data for all providers in
HMIS (including CoC, ESG, CDBG, and locally funded projects). The CoC is currently monitoring
system-wide performance on a Quarterly Basis, with reports submitted to the CoC Board for review.
Data points include length of time homeless, exits to permanent housing and returns to homelessness,
number of homeless persons, jobs/income growth, homeless for the first time, and housing placement.
Youth Homeless Demonstration Program Grant Funding FY 2017 Application by the Sonoma County Community Development Commission
Page 30 of 30
The CoC also collects data on the length of stay in TH, RRH, PSH, and ES projects, and the cost per
stay for each model. As a result, we have determined that RRH is the most cost-effective intervention
and have encouraged expansion of new RRH programs.
7.9. Use of Data to Develop a Strategy to Prevent and End Youth Homelessness
Data has played a key role in the CoC’s development of a strategy to prevent and end youth
homelessness. Data collected from research projects such as Changing the Story Report and the AB12
Cohort led to enhancements in the Homeless Youth Task Force in analyzing pipeline beds and
inventory. Recently the CoC has also used data from the TAY VI-SPDAT to fine-tune our current
strategies to address youth homelessness and better engage at-risk youth. Finally, our utilization of
paid youth enumerators and survey interviewers in the Homeless Count since 2009 has been key in
obtaining key data from a youth-engaged perspective.
7.10. Proposed Demonstration Outcome Measures
If selected as a YHDP community, we will align outcome measures with core measurements of
our 10-Year Action Plan (focused on Housing, Health, and Income Indicators) and HUD System
Performance Standards. Outcome measures will be fully developed during Coordinated Community
Plan development, and will be monitored by the CoC Coordinator, HMIS Coordinator, and the CoC
Evaluation Committee. Our measures of success go beyond reducing/eliminating youth homelessness
to include key benchmarks in income, housing, and access to benefits. Potential outcomes include:
• Reduction in numbers of youth who are homeless within the CoC geographic area.
• Increased placement of homeless youth into permanent supportive housing.
• Increased retention of permanent supportive housing.
• Decreased returns to homelessness for youth residing in permanent supportive housing.
• Increased earned income and total income for youth in YHDP projects.
• Increased percentage of youth who obtain health insurance and mainstream benefits.