Date post: | 04-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | mohammed-yunus |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 13
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
1/13
Road Map for the Selection of Characteristic
Parameters of Polymer Matrix Composites for
Engineering ApplicationsDr.J.Fazlur Rahman
1Mohammed Yunus
2T.M. Tajuddin Yezdani
3and
Dr.A.Ramakrishna4
1. Professor Emeritus, Department of Mechanical Engineering,H.K.B.K. C.E., Bangalore, Karnataka State, India.
2. Professor, Department of Mechanical EngineeringH.K.B.K.C.E., Bangalore, Karnataka State, India.
3. Professor, Department of Mechanical EngineeringH.K.B.K.C.E., Bangalore, Karnataka State, India.
4. Professor and Dean, Department of Mechanical EngineeringAndhra University Engineering College, Vishakhapatnam
Andhra Pradesh, India.
ABSTRACT
An important technological development that has contributed significantly to the
growth of the composite is the development of a strong and stiff fibres such as glass,
carbon and aramide along with the concurrent development in polymer industry,
resulting in various polymeric materials such as epoxy, vinyl ester, phenolic resins,
etc. to serve as matrix materials. Over the last few years, usage of FRPs using
polymer matrices have seen tremendous growth as they can be tailored to suit specific
application. The mechanical and physical properties of FRP depend upon type, shape,
length and orientation of the fibres. Generally long fibres transmit loads more
effectively through the matrix. In spite of the complexity of their behaviour and theunconventational nature of fabrication, and other aspects, the usage of FRPs in
automotive industry, aerospace, marine application, sports equipments, house hold
articles, construction of structural frames and many more has been beneficially
realised. This paper deals with the charting of strategy for the application of PMCs
citing the specific reasons for selecting the particular material systems to its
functionality. A brief review of modern FRPs is followed by a general discussion and
the logical choice of a particular material system that has gained wide acceptance.
With this knowledge as the basis, a material engineer is well placed to create
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
2/13
innovative designs that are having fast effective gains and also material enhanced
properties.
Keywords: Polymer Matrix Composites-PMC, Mechanical and Physical Properties of
FRP, Degradation of PMC, Moulding Processes, Types of Resins, Natural Fibres.
1. INTRODUCTIONRecently, many advances have been made in the design, manufacture and
application of composite materials which can be very strong and stiff, yet very light in
weight, that is strength to weight ratio and stiffness to weight ratio are several times
greater than steel and aluminium. These composites also exhibit fatigue and toughness
properties better than common engineering materials. A great deal of progress has
been made in the field of FRPs which makes them ideal for use in many applications.
The most commonly used composite class for load bearing structural applications isthe continuous fibre reinforced polymer matrix composite. The most popular material
system has been the epoxy based resins reinforced with carbon, glass, or aramid
(Kevlar) fibres. FRPs are commonly used in the aerospace, automotive, marine and
construction industries[19]. Attention is now focused on expanding the usage of such
composites to other areas where temperatures could be higher. As the polymer matrix
material is the most affected (rather than the reinforcing fibres) by high temperature, it
is the matrix material that has been the focus of attention in the development of high
temperature PMCs [8]. The research and development efforts to produce polymer
matrices with higher service temperatures (up to 500 C) have shown encouraging
trends.
Composite materials and layered structures based on natural plant fibres are
increasingly regarded as an alternative to artificial fibre reinforced parts [5]. These
new FR materials are called as bio-composites. Natural fibres such as hemp, flax,
cotton, jute, coir, sisal, kenaf, etc., are generally applied for reinforcement. The
various advantages of natural fibres over man made fibres (glass, Kevlar and carbon )
are, low cost, low density and comparable specific tensile properties, recyclability,
and biodegradability and their field of application is generally found in the structural
components in automotive industries, aerospace, construction, sports and packaging
industry [1,2]. The selection of a particular system required to be tailored depends on
a host of conflicting requirements, which a system has to satisfy. It is important to
note here that the production and the properties of several PMCs either for continuous
fibre or discontinuous fibre is profoundly affected by the reinforcement. These
property enhancements due to the reinforcement are comparable to the hybrid polymer
matrix composites [9].
1.1Criteria for the Selection of Polymer Matrix Composites
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
3/13
The selection of the materials comprising the PMC is by no means a random
process. The systematic selection apart from the composition of the component
comprising the PMC also takes into account the optimization factor, where the so
called merit parameters play a significant role in analysing the competitiveness
between the materials that are functionally related to material properties such as
density, tensile strength, stiffness, resistance to corrosion, resistance to temperaturebesides, cost and value of weight savings. In the aerospace sector, cost is not
necessarily the governing factor because of the low production volume and profit
realized by weight savings. The continuous fibre reinforced PMCs have low density,
more stiff and strong [7], are known to have weight optimized performance and are
performance oriented design. As far as the automotive sector is concerned, cost plays
a vital role. Since large volume prevails and as such material cost will significantly
affect the competitiveness of the component produced.
A great deal of progress has been made in the field of FRPs which makes them
ideal for use in many applications [19]. The matrix materials used for reinforcedplastics are epoxy, polyester and vinyl ester resins. The most popular material systems
have been epoxy based resins reinforced with carbon, glass or aramide (Kevlar fibres).
The application of reinforced plastic include, acid resistant tanks made of phenolic
resins and asbestos fibres, boats made of epoxies with glass fibre, advanced fibres
made with glass or carbon fibre. For high temperature (up to 5000C) application,
components of aircraft and rockets, helicopter blades, automobile blades and pressure
vessels and vessels, ladders etc., [6]. Aluminium application in aircraft has been
replaced by graphite epoxy reinforced plastics with reduced weight and cost with
improved resistance to corrosion and fatigue.
1.2 Selection of Right Polymer Matrix
The role of matrix in a fibre-reinforced composite is to transfer stress between
the fibres, to provide a barrier against an adverse environment and to protect the
surface of the fibres from mechanical abrasion [15]. The matrix plays a major role in
the tensile load carrying capacity of the composite structure. The binding agent or
matrix in the composite is of critical importance. Four major types of matrices have
been reported: Polymeric, Metallic, Ceramic and Carbon. Most of the composites used
in the industry today are based on polymer matrices. Polymers are generally classified
into two classes, thermoplastics and thermosetting. Thermoplastics currently dominateas matrices for bio-fibres (forming bio-composites). The most commonly used
thermoplastics for this purpose are Polypropylene (PP), Polyethylene , High density
Polyethylene (HDPE), Low density Polyethylene (LDPE) ( processing temperature
less than 230 degrees C), and Poly vinyl- Chloride (PVC).
By heating, thermoplastic resins are softened from solid state before processing
(i.e., before making a composite) without chemical reaction. Thermoplastics return tosolid state (matrix) once processing is done. The primary advantage of thermoplastic
resin over thermoset resins is their high impact strength and fracture toughness.
Thermoplastic resins also provide higher strains-to-failure, which is manifested by
better resistance to micro cracking in the matrix of a composite. Some of the otheradvantages of thermoplastic resins are [24, 25]:
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
4/13
1. Unlimited storage (shelf) life at room temperature.
2. Shorter fabrication time.
3. Postformability (e.g., by thermoforming)
4. Ease of repair by (plastic) welding, solvent bonding, etc.
5. Ease of handling (no tackiness).
6. Recyclability.7. Higher fracture toughness and better delamination resistance under fatigue than
thermosets such as epoxies.
Depending on the application, there are 3 types of thermosetting resins used -
polyester, vinyl ester, and epoxy.
1.2.1. Polyester resin, tends to have yellowish tint, and is suitable for most backyard
projects. Its weaknesses are that it is UV sensitive and can tend to degrade over time,
and thus generally is also coated to help preserve it. It is often used in the making of
surfboards and for marine applications. Its hardener is a MEKP, and is mixed at 14
drops per oz. MEKP is composed of methyl ethyl ketone peroxide, a catalyst. When
MEKP is mixed with the resin, the resulting chemical reaction causes heat to build up
and cure or harden the resin.
1.2.2. Vinyl ester resin tends to have a purplish to bluish to greenish tint. This resin
has lower viscosity than polyester resin, and is more transparent. This resin is often
billed as being fuel resistant, but will melt in contact with gasoline. This resin tends to
be more resistant over time to degradation than polyester resin, and is more flexible. It
uses the same hardener as polyester resin (at the same mix ratio) and the cost is
approximately the same.1.2.3. Epoxy resin is almost totally transparent when cured. Epoxy Resins are
thermosetting resins, which cure by internally generated heat. Epoxy systems consistof two parts, resin and hardener. When mixed together, the resin and hardener
activate, causing a chemical reaction, which cures (hardens) the material. Epoxy resins
generally have greater bonding and physical strength than do polyester resins. In the
aerospace industry, epoxy is used as a structural matrix material or as structural glue.
In working with epoxies, the resin to hardener ratio is very important and should never
be adjusted in an attempt to slow down or speed up the curing process. The
importance of epoxy resin can be more fully understood by studying the followingtable.
Table 1. Characteristics of different resins
Characteristics Polyester Resin Epoxy Resin
Flexural Strength Good Best
Tensile Strength Good Best
Elongation % Good Lowest
Water Absorption Good Lowest/Excellent
Hardness Good Best
Pot Life 4 7 Minutes 14 20 Minutes
Working Time 20 30 Minutes - 6 Hours
Above Waterline Yes Yes
Below Waterline Yes Yes
Major Construction Yes Yes
General Repairs Yes Yes
Shelf Life 18 24 Months 2 Year +
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
5/13
Catalyst MEKP 2-Part System
Cure Time 6 8 Hours 5 7 Days
The properties of typical thermoplastic polymers and thermoset polymers used in fiber
reinforced composites are given in the Table-2.
Table 2. properties of thermoplastic and thermoset polymers used in FRP
Property PP* LDPE* HDPE* PS* Nylon6 Nylon6.6 Polyester
resin
Vinyl
ester resin
Epoxy
Density(g/cm2) 0.899-
0.9200.910-0.925
0.94-0.96 1.04-1.06 1.12-1.14 1.13-1.15 1.2-1.5 1.2-1.4 1.1-1.4
Tensile strength
(MPa)
26-41.4 40-78 14.5-38 25-69 43-79 12.4-94 40-90 69-83 35-100
Elastic modulus
(GPa)
0.95-1.77 0.055-
0.38
0.4-1.5 4-5 2.9 2.5-3.9 2-4.5 3.1-3.8 3-6
Elongation (%) 15-700 90-800 2.0-130 1-2.5 20-150 35->300 2 4-7 1-6
Water absorption24hrs (%)
0.01-0.02 854 26.7-1068 1.1 42.7-160 16-654 0.15-3.2 2.5 0.3
*PP=Polypropylene, LEDP=Low density polyethylene, HDPE=High density
polyethylene, PS=Polystyrene.
1.3. Selection of Right FibresFibre reinforced plastics are made using fibres of glass, carbon ( graphite,
aramide or boron) in a matrix of polyester or epoxy and have very high toughness and
strength to weight ratio and stiffness to weight ratio. The mechanical and physical
properties of reinforced plastics depend on type, shape, length and orientation of
fibres. Long fibres transmit loads more effectively through the matrix. The important
properties of different types of fibres used in reinforced plastics are given in the
followings.
1.3.1 Carbon fibres
Carbon fibres have low density, high strength and high stiffness but are costlier
than glass fibres. Carbon fibres are usually 80 to 85 % carbon, whereas graphite fibres
are more than 99% carbon. Conductive graphite fibres are available which give
enhanced electrical thermal conductivity to the reinforced plastic components. Carbon
fibres [14] are used for reinforcing certain matrix materials to form composites.
Carbon fibres are unidirectional reinforcements and can be arranged in such a way in
the composite that it is stronger in the direction, which must bear loads. The physicalproperties of carbon fibre reinforced composite materials depend considerably on the
nature of the matrix, the fiber alignment, the volume fraction of the fiber and matrix,
and on the molding conditions. Several types of matrix materials such as glass and
ceramics, metal and plastics have been used as matrices for reinforcement by carbonfibre. Carbon fibre composites, particularly those with polymer matrices, have become
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
6/13
the dominant advanced composite materials for aerospace, automobile, sporting goods
and other applications due to their high strength, high modulus, low density, and
reasonable cost for application requiring high temperature resistance as in the case of
spacecrafts.
1.3.2. Glass fibres
Glass fibres are most widely used being least expensive. E-type fibres have
tensile strength about 3500 MPa and lowest cost. S-type fibres are costlier and have
tensile strength of about 4600 MPa. E-ECR fibres have high resistance to elevated
temperatures and acid corrosion. Glass fibres are the most common of all reinforcing
fibres for polymeric (plastic) matrix composites (PMCs). The principal advantages of
glass fiber are low cost, high tensile strength, high chemical resistance and excellent
insulating properties [19, 26]. The two types of glass fibres commonly used in the
fiber reinforced plastics industries are E-glass and S-glass. Another type known as C-
glass is used in chemical applications requiring greater corrosion resistance to acids
than is provided by E-glass.
1.3.3. Aramides / Kevlar fibres
Aramide are the toughest fibres with highest strength to weight ratio of all
fibres. Absorption of moistures by these fibres degrades the properties of the
composite. Kevlar belongs to a group of highly crystalline aramide (aromatic amide)
fibres that have the lowest specific gravity and the highest tensile strength to weight
ratio among the current reinforcing fibres. They are being used as reinforcement inmany marine and aerospace applications [3, 12].
The use of natural fibres for the reinforcement of the composites has received
increasing attention both by the academic sector and the industry. Natural fibres have
many significant advantages over synthetic fibres. Currently, many types of natural
fibres have been investigated for use in plastics including flax, cotton, hemp, jute
straw, wood, kenaf, ramie, sisal, coir and many more. Annual production of some of
the natural fibres and its source are given in the table-3 below.
Table 3.Annual production of natural fibres and their origin
Fiber source World production (103tons) Origin
Cotton lint 18500 Stem
Jute 2500 Stem
Flax 810 Stem
Hemp 215 Stem
Kenaf 770 Stem
Ramie 100 Stem
Sisal 380 Stem
Coir 100 Fruit
Table 4. The properties of various natural and manmade fibres.
Fiber Density Elongation Tensile Elastic
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
7/13
(g/cm2) (%) Strength(MPa) Modulus(GPa)
Cotton 1.5-1.6 7.0-8.0 400 5.5-12.6
Jute 1.3 1.5-1.8 393-773 26.5
Flax 1.5 2.7-3.2 500-1500 27.6
Hemp 1.47 2-4 690 70
Kenaf 1.45 1.6 930 53
Ramie N/A 3.6-3.8 400-938 61.4-128Sisal 1.5 2.0-2.5 511-635 9.4-22
Coir 1.2 3.0 593 4.0-6.0
E-glass 2.6 2.4 1720 72
S-glass 2.5 2.9 2530 87
Kevlar29 1.44 2.8 2270 83/100
Kevlar49 1.44 1.8 2270 124
Carbon
High Strength
1.8 1.1 2840 230
Carbon
High Modulus
1.9 0.5 1790 370
Carbon
Ultra HighModulus
2.0-2.1 0.2 1300-1310 520-620
2. SHAPING PROCESS FOR POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITESMany of the shaping processes are slow and labour incentive. In general the
techniques for shaping composites is less efficient than for other materials as
composites are more complex than other materials consisting of two or more phases
and particularly for FRPs the fibres must be correctly oriented. The shaping processes
of FRPs can be categorized asOpen mould Processes: Manual procedures for laying resins and fibres onto forms.
In this, successive layers of resin and reinforcement are manually applied to an open
mould to build the laminated FRP to the desired thickness. This is then followed by
curing and part removing.
Curing is required in all thermosetting resins used in FRP composites. Curing
cross links the polymer, transforming it from its liquid or highly plastic condition into
a hardened product. The various open mould processes are [16, 17]1) Hand-lay process.2) Spray-up process.3) Vacuum bagging4) Automated tape- laying machines.Close mould process: Molding takes place in moulds consisting of two sections
that open and close after each molding cycle. Cost is double that of open mould
process, but it gives a good surface finish, higher production rates, and has close
control over tolerance.
The various close moulding processes are
1) Compression moulding.2) Transfer moulding.3) Injection moulding.
Filament winding: continuous filaments are dipped into liquid resin and wrapped on a
mandrel in a helical pattern. The operation is repeated to form additional layers each
having criss-cross pattern with the pervious until desired part thickness is obtained for
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
8/13
producing rigid hollow cylindrical shape. The resin is then cured and the mandrel
removed.
Pultrusion: it is similar to extrusion but only adapted to include continuous fiber
reinforcement.
The classification of manufacturing processes of FRPs is shown in fig.1.
Fig.1.Classification of manufacturing processes of FRP
3. Advantages of FRPs over conventional materialsMerits of FRP over steel and suitability of application of FRP with respect to various
desired properties are tabulated [5, 6].
Table 5. Merit Comparison and Ratings for FRP and Steel
Property (Parameter) Merit/Advantage (Rating)
FRP Steel
Strength/stiffness 4-5 4
Weight 5 2
Corrosion resistance/
Environmental Durability
4-5 3
Ease of field construction 5 3-4
Ease of repair 4-5 3-5
Fire 3-5 4
Transportation/handling 5 3
Toughness 4 4
Acceptance 2-3 5
Maintenance 5 3
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
9/13
Note: Higher rating indicates better desirability of the property
Note: Different Rating Scales
1: Very Low, 2: Low, 3: Medium, 4: High, 5: Very High.
Table 6. Merits and suitability of applications of FRP
Table 7. suitability for marine applications and use of FRPs
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
10/13
4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:Based on previous researchers work, on the characterization of fiber reinforced
polymer composites, the following have been inferred for future studies.
1. Natural fibers due to their low cost fairly good mechanical properties, highspecific strength, not abrasive, eco friendly and bio degradable characteristics,they are exploited as a replacement for conventional fiber, such as glass,
aramid and carbon. The tensile properties of the natural fiber reinforced
polymers are generally influenced by the inter-facial addition between the
matrix and the fibers. Several chemical modifications are employed to improve
the interfacial matrix-fiber bonding for the enhancement of tensile properties.
In general, the tensile strength of the natural fiber reinforced. Polymer
composite increased with the increase in fiber content up to an optimum valueand then the value will drop. The youngs modulus of the natural PMC
increased with increase in fiber loading [3, 12 and 14].
2. The PMC have been used in structures subjected to for a variety of applicationssuch as structural members of airplanes, automobiles, marine applications,
sports equipments, chemical plants etc. since they are outstanding
performances such as lighter weight, high strength and good fatigue propertiesand corrosion resistance but material characterization and failure evaluation of
the PMCs is in compression is still an item of research [6, 13 and 19].
3. Glass reinforced plastics have wide applications but is being proposed forcritical marine components such as Moisture resistance in submarine control
surfaces transmission shaft propellers and super structures, submarine casingsetc. due to limited durability in under water shock loading [27].
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
11/13
4. The long term durability and the residual life of the composites depends uponthe degradation of the PMC composites under hostile environments and service
conditions which often limits the service life of the component. Degradation
occurs as the results of environment dependent chemical or physical attack by
degradation agents.
The various causes of degradation of polymeric components are [28, 29]a) Photo oxidation
b) Thermal decompositionc) Hydrolytic attackd) Attack by pollutantse) Mechanical degradation andf) Stress - aided chemical degradation.
5. The selection the materials comparatively the polymer matrix materials such aspolyester resins, vinyl ester resins and epoxy resin depends upon the various
properties for a specific application involving the various factors such as
density, tensile strength, stiffness, resistance to corrosion and resistance to
temperature and also the cost and value of weight savings, which is highlighted
in detail aspects in table 1 and 2. The selection of right fibers namely glass,
carbon, aramid or boron in a matrix of polyester or epoxy depends upon three
main factors namely high toughness, strength o weight ratio and stiffness to
weight ratio. The mechanical and physical properties of reinforced plastics
depend on the type, shape, length and orientation of fibers. Generally the long
fibers transmit loads more effectively through the matrix, the various properties
of different types of fibers are given in table 3 and 4.
The merits and demerits of the different moulding processes namely open
mould and close mould processes of FRPs are highlighted with regards to
dimensional accuracy of the components surface finish produced, production
rate and the cost. Lastly, the merit comparison along with the rating for both
FRP and steel is presented in a tabular column 5.
REFERENCES
1.
Malkapuram. R, Kumar. V, and Yuvraj S.N., Recent developments Naturalflber reinforced polypropylene composite, Journal of Reinforced plastics and
composites, 2008, Vol. 28, pp. 1169-1189.
2. Nabi Saheb D. And Jog J.P., Natural fiber composites A Review AdvancePolymer Technology, 1999, Vol.18, pp.351-363.
3. H Ku, H Wang, N.N. Pattarachaiyakoop and M. Trada, A review of the tensileproperties of natural fibre reinforced polymer composites Centre of excellence
in Engineered fibre composites and faculty of Engineering, University of
Suthern Queensland.
4. Overview of Fiber-Reinforced Composites,4 Lubin, Handbook of Composites
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
12/13
5. Saira Taj, Munawar Ali Munawar and Shafiullah Khan, Review NATURALFIBER-REINFORCED POLYMER COMPOSITES, Proc. Pakistan Acad. Sci.
44(2S).
6. P.D. Mangalgiri, Polymer-matrix Composites for High-temperatureApplications, Defence Science Journal, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 175-193, April 2005.
7. A S SINGHA And VIJAY KUMAR THAKUR,Material Science Laboratory,National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur 177 005, India, Mechanical
properties of natural fibre reinforced polymer composites, Bull. Material Sci.,
Indian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 791799, October 2008.
8. D. Pathania and D. Singh, A review on electrical properties of fibre reinforcedpolymer Composites, International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences,
Vol.1(2), pp.34-37, 2009.
9. Moe Moe Thwea, Kin Liaob,Durability of bamboo-glass fiber reinforcedpolymer matrix hybrid composites Composites Science and Technology 63,
pp.375387, 2003.
10.Sushma Singh, Strength degradation of laminated Composites underhygrothermalloading conditions, a Thesis Report.
11.Debabrata Chakraborty, Delamination of laminated fiber reinforced plasticcomposites under multiple cylindrical impact Materials and Design 28,
pp.1142 1153, 2007.
12.Wang, Y.C., Wong, P.M.H.; Kodur, V., Mechanical properties of fibrereinforced polymer reinforcing bars at elevated temperatures, National
Research Council Canada.
13.Shivakumar S1, G. S. Guggari, Literature review of fiber reinforced polymercomposites, International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology,
Vol. 1, Issue 5, pp. 218-226, Nov 2011.
14.Jane Maria Faulstich de Paivaa*, Alexandre De Nadai dos Santosb, MirabelCerqueira Rezendec, Mechanical and Morphological Characterizations of
Carbon Fiber Fabric Reinforced Epoxy Composites Used in Aeronautical Field,
Materials Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, 367-374, 2009.
15.Choosing the right resin epoxy resin, fibre glass-evercoat, a division of IllinoisTool Works Inc.
16.Hota V.S. gangarao, Feasibility review of FRP materials for structuralapplications, A thesis report.
17.P.V. Vijay, Ph.D., P.E. To Engineering Research & Development Center(CEERD-CT-T) - US Army Corps of Engineers ls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS
39180-6199.
18. Drop weight Impact Response of Woven Natural Silk/Epoxy Laminated
Composite Plates, A.U. Ude, A.K. Ariffin A.A. lashlem and C.H. Azhari,Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 6, Pp.289-295, 2011.
19. History on Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites, from internet.
20. M.S. Sham Prasad, C.S. Venkatesha, T. Jayaraju, Experimental Methods of
Determining Fracture Toughness of Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites under
Various Loading Conditions, Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization &
Engineering, Vol. 10, No.13, pp.1263-1275, 2011.
7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC
13/13
21. Y. R. Kharde And K. V. Saisrinadh Effect Of Various Fibers On Tribological
Properties Of Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE ) Composites In Dry Conditions.
22. Mohammed Yunus, Fazlur Rahman, J. And Tajuddin yezdani, T.M., Charting
of a Strategy for the Application of Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites for
Different Engineering Service Requirements, International Journal of Modern
Engineering Research (IJMER), Vol.2, Issue.3, pp-1408-1413, May-June 2012.23. Mohammed Yunus, Fazlur Rahman, J. and Ramesh, A. Recent vistas in
Engineering Surface Modification techniques, International Journal of Mechanical
Engineering & Technology, Vol. 3, No.1, pp. 77-89, 2012.
24. Facca, A.G., Kortschot, M.T. and Yan N., Predicting the elastic modulus of
natural fiber reinforced thermoplastics, Composites: Part A: Applied Science and
Manufacturing, Vol. 37, pp.1660-1671, 2007.
25. Ma, X., Yu, J. and Kennedy, J.F, Studies on the Propertied of Natural Fibers-
Reinforced Thermoplastic Starch Composites, Carbohydrate Polymers, Vol. 62, pp.
19-24, 2005.
26. Tungjitpornkull, S. and Sombatsompop, N, Processing Technique and fibre
orientation angle affecting the mechanical properties of E-glass reinforced
wood/PVC composites, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 209,
pp.3079-3088, 2009.
27. Shen, C.-H, and Springer, G.S., Moisture absorption and desorption of
composite materials, Composites, Volume 8, Issue 1, Page 63, January 1977.
28. H. Kawada, A. Kobiki, J. Koyanagi, A. Hosoi, Long-term durability of polymer
matrix composites under hostile environments, Materials Science and Engineering
A 412, 159164, 2005.
29. Jin-Chul Yun, Seong-Il Heo, Kyeong-Seok Oh, Kyung-Seop Han, Degradationof graphite reinforced polymer composites for PEMFC bipolar plate after
Hygrothermal ageing, 16th international conference on composite materials.