+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Yunuspaper on PMC

Yunuspaper on PMC

Date post: 04-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: mohammed-yunus
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 13

Transcript
  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    1/13

    Road Map for the Selection of Characteristic

    Parameters of Polymer Matrix Composites for

    Engineering ApplicationsDr.J.Fazlur Rahman

    1Mohammed Yunus

    2T.M. Tajuddin Yezdani

    3and

    Dr.A.Ramakrishna4

    1. Professor Emeritus, Department of Mechanical Engineering,H.K.B.K. C.E., Bangalore, Karnataka State, India.

    2. Professor, Department of Mechanical EngineeringH.K.B.K.C.E., Bangalore, Karnataka State, India.

    3. Professor, Department of Mechanical EngineeringH.K.B.K.C.E., Bangalore, Karnataka State, India.

    4. Professor and Dean, Department of Mechanical EngineeringAndhra University Engineering College, Vishakhapatnam

    Andhra Pradesh, India.

    ABSTRACT

    An important technological development that has contributed significantly to the

    growth of the composite is the development of a strong and stiff fibres such as glass,

    carbon and aramide along with the concurrent development in polymer industry,

    resulting in various polymeric materials such as epoxy, vinyl ester, phenolic resins,

    etc. to serve as matrix materials. Over the last few years, usage of FRPs using

    polymer matrices have seen tremendous growth as they can be tailored to suit specific

    application. The mechanical and physical properties of FRP depend upon type, shape,

    length and orientation of the fibres. Generally long fibres transmit loads more

    effectively through the matrix. In spite of the complexity of their behaviour and theunconventational nature of fabrication, and other aspects, the usage of FRPs in

    automotive industry, aerospace, marine application, sports equipments, house hold

    articles, construction of structural frames and many more has been beneficially

    realised. This paper deals with the charting of strategy for the application of PMCs

    citing the specific reasons for selecting the particular material systems to its

    functionality. A brief review of modern FRPs is followed by a general discussion and

    the logical choice of a particular material system that has gained wide acceptance.

    With this knowledge as the basis, a material engineer is well placed to create

  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    2/13

    innovative designs that are having fast effective gains and also material enhanced

    properties.

    Keywords: Polymer Matrix Composites-PMC, Mechanical and Physical Properties of

    FRP, Degradation of PMC, Moulding Processes, Types of Resins, Natural Fibres.

    1. INTRODUCTIONRecently, many advances have been made in the design, manufacture and

    application of composite materials which can be very strong and stiff, yet very light in

    weight, that is strength to weight ratio and stiffness to weight ratio are several times

    greater than steel and aluminium. These composites also exhibit fatigue and toughness

    properties better than common engineering materials. A great deal of progress has

    been made in the field of FRPs which makes them ideal for use in many applications.

    The most commonly used composite class for load bearing structural applications isthe continuous fibre reinforced polymer matrix composite. The most popular material

    system has been the epoxy based resins reinforced with carbon, glass, or aramid

    (Kevlar) fibres. FRPs are commonly used in the aerospace, automotive, marine and

    construction industries[19]. Attention is now focused on expanding the usage of such

    composites to other areas where temperatures could be higher. As the polymer matrix

    material is the most affected (rather than the reinforcing fibres) by high temperature, it

    is the matrix material that has been the focus of attention in the development of high

    temperature PMCs [8]. The research and development efforts to produce polymer

    matrices with higher service temperatures (up to 500 C) have shown encouraging

    trends.

    Composite materials and layered structures based on natural plant fibres are

    increasingly regarded as an alternative to artificial fibre reinforced parts [5]. These

    new FR materials are called as bio-composites. Natural fibres such as hemp, flax,

    cotton, jute, coir, sisal, kenaf, etc., are generally applied for reinforcement. The

    various advantages of natural fibres over man made fibres (glass, Kevlar and carbon )

    are, low cost, low density and comparable specific tensile properties, recyclability,

    and biodegradability and their field of application is generally found in the structural

    components in automotive industries, aerospace, construction, sports and packaging

    industry [1,2]. The selection of a particular system required to be tailored depends on

    a host of conflicting requirements, which a system has to satisfy. It is important to

    note here that the production and the properties of several PMCs either for continuous

    fibre or discontinuous fibre is profoundly affected by the reinforcement. These

    property enhancements due to the reinforcement are comparable to the hybrid polymer

    matrix composites [9].

    1.1Criteria for the Selection of Polymer Matrix Composites

  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    3/13

    The selection of the materials comprising the PMC is by no means a random

    process. The systematic selection apart from the composition of the component

    comprising the PMC also takes into account the optimization factor, where the so

    called merit parameters play a significant role in analysing the competitiveness

    between the materials that are functionally related to material properties such as

    density, tensile strength, stiffness, resistance to corrosion, resistance to temperaturebesides, cost and value of weight savings. In the aerospace sector, cost is not

    necessarily the governing factor because of the low production volume and profit

    realized by weight savings. The continuous fibre reinforced PMCs have low density,

    more stiff and strong [7], are known to have weight optimized performance and are

    performance oriented design. As far as the automotive sector is concerned, cost plays

    a vital role. Since large volume prevails and as such material cost will significantly

    affect the competitiveness of the component produced.

    A great deal of progress has been made in the field of FRPs which makes them

    ideal for use in many applications [19]. The matrix materials used for reinforcedplastics are epoxy, polyester and vinyl ester resins. The most popular material systems

    have been epoxy based resins reinforced with carbon, glass or aramide (Kevlar fibres).

    The application of reinforced plastic include, acid resistant tanks made of phenolic

    resins and asbestos fibres, boats made of epoxies with glass fibre, advanced fibres

    made with glass or carbon fibre. For high temperature (up to 5000C) application,

    components of aircraft and rockets, helicopter blades, automobile blades and pressure

    vessels and vessels, ladders etc., [6]. Aluminium application in aircraft has been

    replaced by graphite epoxy reinforced plastics with reduced weight and cost with

    improved resistance to corrosion and fatigue.

    1.2 Selection of Right Polymer Matrix

    The role of matrix in a fibre-reinforced composite is to transfer stress between

    the fibres, to provide a barrier against an adverse environment and to protect the

    surface of the fibres from mechanical abrasion [15]. The matrix plays a major role in

    the tensile load carrying capacity of the composite structure. The binding agent or

    matrix in the composite is of critical importance. Four major types of matrices have

    been reported: Polymeric, Metallic, Ceramic and Carbon. Most of the composites used

    in the industry today are based on polymer matrices. Polymers are generally classified

    into two classes, thermoplastics and thermosetting. Thermoplastics currently dominateas matrices for bio-fibres (forming bio-composites). The most commonly used

    thermoplastics for this purpose are Polypropylene (PP), Polyethylene , High density

    Polyethylene (HDPE), Low density Polyethylene (LDPE) ( processing temperature

    less than 230 degrees C), and Poly vinyl- Chloride (PVC).

    By heating, thermoplastic resins are softened from solid state before processing

    (i.e., before making a composite) without chemical reaction. Thermoplastics return tosolid state (matrix) once processing is done. The primary advantage of thermoplastic

    resin over thermoset resins is their high impact strength and fracture toughness.

    Thermoplastic resins also provide higher strains-to-failure, which is manifested by

    better resistance to micro cracking in the matrix of a composite. Some of the otheradvantages of thermoplastic resins are [24, 25]:

  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    4/13

    1. Unlimited storage (shelf) life at room temperature.

    2. Shorter fabrication time.

    3. Postformability (e.g., by thermoforming)

    4. Ease of repair by (plastic) welding, solvent bonding, etc.

    5. Ease of handling (no tackiness).

    6. Recyclability.7. Higher fracture toughness and better delamination resistance under fatigue than

    thermosets such as epoxies.

    Depending on the application, there are 3 types of thermosetting resins used -

    polyester, vinyl ester, and epoxy.

    1.2.1. Polyester resin, tends to have yellowish tint, and is suitable for most backyard

    projects. Its weaknesses are that it is UV sensitive and can tend to degrade over time,

    and thus generally is also coated to help preserve it. It is often used in the making of

    surfboards and for marine applications. Its hardener is a MEKP, and is mixed at 14

    drops per oz. MEKP is composed of methyl ethyl ketone peroxide, a catalyst. When

    MEKP is mixed with the resin, the resulting chemical reaction causes heat to build up

    and cure or harden the resin.

    1.2.2. Vinyl ester resin tends to have a purplish to bluish to greenish tint. This resin

    has lower viscosity than polyester resin, and is more transparent. This resin is often

    billed as being fuel resistant, but will melt in contact with gasoline. This resin tends to

    be more resistant over time to degradation than polyester resin, and is more flexible. It

    uses the same hardener as polyester resin (at the same mix ratio) and the cost is

    approximately the same.1.2.3. Epoxy resin is almost totally transparent when cured. Epoxy Resins are

    thermosetting resins, which cure by internally generated heat. Epoxy systems consistof two parts, resin and hardener. When mixed together, the resin and hardener

    activate, causing a chemical reaction, which cures (hardens) the material. Epoxy resins

    generally have greater bonding and physical strength than do polyester resins. In the

    aerospace industry, epoxy is used as a structural matrix material or as structural glue.

    In working with epoxies, the resin to hardener ratio is very important and should never

    be adjusted in an attempt to slow down or speed up the curing process. The

    importance of epoxy resin can be more fully understood by studying the followingtable.

    Table 1. Characteristics of different resins

    Characteristics Polyester Resin Epoxy Resin

    Flexural Strength Good Best

    Tensile Strength Good Best

    Elongation % Good Lowest

    Water Absorption Good Lowest/Excellent

    Hardness Good Best

    Pot Life 4 7 Minutes 14 20 Minutes

    Working Time 20 30 Minutes - 6 Hours

    Above Waterline Yes Yes

    Below Waterline Yes Yes

    Major Construction Yes Yes

    General Repairs Yes Yes

    Shelf Life 18 24 Months 2 Year +

  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    5/13

    Catalyst MEKP 2-Part System

    Cure Time 6 8 Hours 5 7 Days

    The properties of typical thermoplastic polymers and thermoset polymers used in fiber

    reinforced composites are given in the Table-2.

    Table 2. properties of thermoplastic and thermoset polymers used in FRP

    Property PP* LDPE* HDPE* PS* Nylon6 Nylon6.6 Polyester

    resin

    Vinyl

    ester resin

    Epoxy

    Density(g/cm2) 0.899-

    0.9200.910-0.925

    0.94-0.96 1.04-1.06 1.12-1.14 1.13-1.15 1.2-1.5 1.2-1.4 1.1-1.4

    Tensile strength

    (MPa)

    26-41.4 40-78 14.5-38 25-69 43-79 12.4-94 40-90 69-83 35-100

    Elastic modulus

    (GPa)

    0.95-1.77 0.055-

    0.38

    0.4-1.5 4-5 2.9 2.5-3.9 2-4.5 3.1-3.8 3-6

    Elongation (%) 15-700 90-800 2.0-130 1-2.5 20-150 35->300 2 4-7 1-6

    Water absorption24hrs (%)

    0.01-0.02 854 26.7-1068 1.1 42.7-160 16-654 0.15-3.2 2.5 0.3

    *PP=Polypropylene, LEDP=Low density polyethylene, HDPE=High density

    polyethylene, PS=Polystyrene.

    1.3. Selection of Right FibresFibre reinforced plastics are made using fibres of glass, carbon ( graphite,

    aramide or boron) in a matrix of polyester or epoxy and have very high toughness and

    strength to weight ratio and stiffness to weight ratio. The mechanical and physical

    properties of reinforced plastics depend on type, shape, length and orientation of

    fibres. Long fibres transmit loads more effectively through the matrix. The important

    properties of different types of fibres used in reinforced plastics are given in the

    followings.

    1.3.1 Carbon fibres

    Carbon fibres have low density, high strength and high stiffness but are costlier

    than glass fibres. Carbon fibres are usually 80 to 85 % carbon, whereas graphite fibres

    are more than 99% carbon. Conductive graphite fibres are available which give

    enhanced electrical thermal conductivity to the reinforced plastic components. Carbon

    fibres [14] are used for reinforcing certain matrix materials to form composites.

    Carbon fibres are unidirectional reinforcements and can be arranged in such a way in

    the composite that it is stronger in the direction, which must bear loads. The physicalproperties of carbon fibre reinforced composite materials depend considerably on the

    nature of the matrix, the fiber alignment, the volume fraction of the fiber and matrix,

    and on the molding conditions. Several types of matrix materials such as glass and

    ceramics, metal and plastics have been used as matrices for reinforcement by carbonfibre. Carbon fibre composites, particularly those with polymer matrices, have become

  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    6/13

    the dominant advanced composite materials for aerospace, automobile, sporting goods

    and other applications due to their high strength, high modulus, low density, and

    reasonable cost for application requiring high temperature resistance as in the case of

    spacecrafts.

    1.3.2. Glass fibres

    Glass fibres are most widely used being least expensive. E-type fibres have

    tensile strength about 3500 MPa and lowest cost. S-type fibres are costlier and have

    tensile strength of about 4600 MPa. E-ECR fibres have high resistance to elevated

    temperatures and acid corrosion. Glass fibres are the most common of all reinforcing

    fibres for polymeric (plastic) matrix composites (PMCs). The principal advantages of

    glass fiber are low cost, high tensile strength, high chemical resistance and excellent

    insulating properties [19, 26]. The two types of glass fibres commonly used in the

    fiber reinforced plastics industries are E-glass and S-glass. Another type known as C-

    glass is used in chemical applications requiring greater corrosion resistance to acids

    than is provided by E-glass.

    1.3.3. Aramides / Kevlar fibres

    Aramide are the toughest fibres with highest strength to weight ratio of all

    fibres. Absorption of moistures by these fibres degrades the properties of the

    composite. Kevlar belongs to a group of highly crystalline aramide (aromatic amide)

    fibres that have the lowest specific gravity and the highest tensile strength to weight

    ratio among the current reinforcing fibres. They are being used as reinforcement inmany marine and aerospace applications [3, 12].

    The use of natural fibres for the reinforcement of the composites has received

    increasing attention both by the academic sector and the industry. Natural fibres have

    many significant advantages over synthetic fibres. Currently, many types of natural

    fibres have been investigated for use in plastics including flax, cotton, hemp, jute

    straw, wood, kenaf, ramie, sisal, coir and many more. Annual production of some of

    the natural fibres and its source are given in the table-3 below.

    Table 3.Annual production of natural fibres and their origin

    Fiber source World production (103tons) Origin

    Cotton lint 18500 Stem

    Jute 2500 Stem

    Flax 810 Stem

    Hemp 215 Stem

    Kenaf 770 Stem

    Ramie 100 Stem

    Sisal 380 Stem

    Coir 100 Fruit

    Table 4. The properties of various natural and manmade fibres.

    Fiber Density Elongation Tensile Elastic

  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    7/13

    (g/cm2) (%) Strength(MPa) Modulus(GPa)

    Cotton 1.5-1.6 7.0-8.0 400 5.5-12.6

    Jute 1.3 1.5-1.8 393-773 26.5

    Flax 1.5 2.7-3.2 500-1500 27.6

    Hemp 1.47 2-4 690 70

    Kenaf 1.45 1.6 930 53

    Ramie N/A 3.6-3.8 400-938 61.4-128Sisal 1.5 2.0-2.5 511-635 9.4-22

    Coir 1.2 3.0 593 4.0-6.0

    E-glass 2.6 2.4 1720 72

    S-glass 2.5 2.9 2530 87

    Kevlar29 1.44 2.8 2270 83/100

    Kevlar49 1.44 1.8 2270 124

    Carbon

    High Strength

    1.8 1.1 2840 230

    Carbon

    High Modulus

    1.9 0.5 1790 370

    Carbon

    Ultra HighModulus

    2.0-2.1 0.2 1300-1310 520-620

    2. SHAPING PROCESS FOR POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITESMany of the shaping processes are slow and labour incentive. In general the

    techniques for shaping composites is less efficient than for other materials as

    composites are more complex than other materials consisting of two or more phases

    and particularly for FRPs the fibres must be correctly oriented. The shaping processes

    of FRPs can be categorized asOpen mould Processes: Manual procedures for laying resins and fibres onto forms.

    In this, successive layers of resin and reinforcement are manually applied to an open

    mould to build the laminated FRP to the desired thickness. This is then followed by

    curing and part removing.

    Curing is required in all thermosetting resins used in FRP composites. Curing

    cross links the polymer, transforming it from its liquid or highly plastic condition into

    a hardened product. The various open mould processes are [16, 17]1) Hand-lay process.2) Spray-up process.3) Vacuum bagging4) Automated tape- laying machines.Close mould process: Molding takes place in moulds consisting of two sections

    that open and close after each molding cycle. Cost is double that of open mould

    process, but it gives a good surface finish, higher production rates, and has close

    control over tolerance.

    The various close moulding processes are

    1) Compression moulding.2) Transfer moulding.3) Injection moulding.

    Filament winding: continuous filaments are dipped into liquid resin and wrapped on a

    mandrel in a helical pattern. The operation is repeated to form additional layers each

    having criss-cross pattern with the pervious until desired part thickness is obtained for

  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    8/13

    producing rigid hollow cylindrical shape. The resin is then cured and the mandrel

    removed.

    Pultrusion: it is similar to extrusion but only adapted to include continuous fiber

    reinforcement.

    The classification of manufacturing processes of FRPs is shown in fig.1.

    Fig.1.Classification of manufacturing processes of FRP

    3. Advantages of FRPs over conventional materialsMerits of FRP over steel and suitability of application of FRP with respect to various

    desired properties are tabulated [5, 6].

    Table 5. Merit Comparison and Ratings for FRP and Steel

    Property (Parameter) Merit/Advantage (Rating)

    FRP Steel

    Strength/stiffness 4-5 4

    Weight 5 2

    Corrosion resistance/

    Environmental Durability

    4-5 3

    Ease of field construction 5 3-4

    Ease of repair 4-5 3-5

    Fire 3-5 4

    Transportation/handling 5 3

    Toughness 4 4

    Acceptance 2-3 5

    Maintenance 5 3

  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    9/13

    Note: Higher rating indicates better desirability of the property

    Note: Different Rating Scales

    1: Very Low, 2: Low, 3: Medium, 4: High, 5: Very High.

    Table 6. Merits and suitability of applications of FRP

    Table 7. suitability for marine applications and use of FRPs

  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    10/13

    4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:Based on previous researchers work, on the characterization of fiber reinforced

    polymer composites, the following have been inferred for future studies.

    1. Natural fibers due to their low cost fairly good mechanical properties, highspecific strength, not abrasive, eco friendly and bio degradable characteristics,they are exploited as a replacement for conventional fiber, such as glass,

    aramid and carbon. The tensile properties of the natural fiber reinforced

    polymers are generally influenced by the inter-facial addition between the

    matrix and the fibers. Several chemical modifications are employed to improve

    the interfacial matrix-fiber bonding for the enhancement of tensile properties.

    In general, the tensile strength of the natural fiber reinforced. Polymer

    composite increased with the increase in fiber content up to an optimum valueand then the value will drop. The youngs modulus of the natural PMC

    increased with increase in fiber loading [3, 12 and 14].

    2. The PMC have been used in structures subjected to for a variety of applicationssuch as structural members of airplanes, automobiles, marine applications,

    sports equipments, chemical plants etc. since they are outstanding

    performances such as lighter weight, high strength and good fatigue propertiesand corrosion resistance but material characterization and failure evaluation of

    the PMCs is in compression is still an item of research [6, 13 and 19].

    3. Glass reinforced plastics have wide applications but is being proposed forcritical marine components such as Moisture resistance in submarine control

    surfaces transmission shaft propellers and super structures, submarine casingsetc. due to limited durability in under water shock loading [27].

  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    11/13

    4. The long term durability and the residual life of the composites depends uponthe degradation of the PMC composites under hostile environments and service

    conditions which often limits the service life of the component. Degradation

    occurs as the results of environment dependent chemical or physical attack by

    degradation agents.

    The various causes of degradation of polymeric components are [28, 29]a) Photo oxidation

    b) Thermal decompositionc) Hydrolytic attackd) Attack by pollutantse) Mechanical degradation andf) Stress - aided chemical degradation.

    5. The selection the materials comparatively the polymer matrix materials such aspolyester resins, vinyl ester resins and epoxy resin depends upon the various

    properties for a specific application involving the various factors such as

    density, tensile strength, stiffness, resistance to corrosion and resistance to

    temperature and also the cost and value of weight savings, which is highlighted

    in detail aspects in table 1 and 2. The selection of right fibers namely glass,

    carbon, aramid or boron in a matrix of polyester or epoxy depends upon three

    main factors namely high toughness, strength o weight ratio and stiffness to

    weight ratio. The mechanical and physical properties of reinforced plastics

    depend on the type, shape, length and orientation of fibers. Generally the long

    fibers transmit loads more effectively through the matrix, the various properties

    of different types of fibers are given in table 3 and 4.

    The merits and demerits of the different moulding processes namely open

    mould and close mould processes of FRPs are highlighted with regards to

    dimensional accuracy of the components surface finish produced, production

    rate and the cost. Lastly, the merit comparison along with the rating for both

    FRP and steel is presented in a tabular column 5.

    REFERENCES

    1.

    Malkapuram. R, Kumar. V, and Yuvraj S.N., Recent developments Naturalflber reinforced polypropylene composite, Journal of Reinforced plastics and

    composites, 2008, Vol. 28, pp. 1169-1189.

    2. Nabi Saheb D. And Jog J.P., Natural fiber composites A Review AdvancePolymer Technology, 1999, Vol.18, pp.351-363.

    3. H Ku, H Wang, N.N. Pattarachaiyakoop and M. Trada, A review of the tensileproperties of natural fibre reinforced polymer composites Centre of excellence

    in Engineered fibre composites and faculty of Engineering, University of

    Suthern Queensland.

    4. Overview of Fiber-Reinforced Composites,4 Lubin, Handbook of Composites

  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    12/13

    5. Saira Taj, Munawar Ali Munawar and Shafiullah Khan, Review NATURALFIBER-REINFORCED POLYMER COMPOSITES, Proc. Pakistan Acad. Sci.

    44(2S).

    6. P.D. Mangalgiri, Polymer-matrix Composites for High-temperatureApplications, Defence Science Journal, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 175-193, April 2005.

    7. A S SINGHA And VIJAY KUMAR THAKUR,Material Science Laboratory,National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur 177 005, India, Mechanical

    properties of natural fibre reinforced polymer composites, Bull. Material Sci.,

    Indian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 791799, October 2008.

    8. D. Pathania and D. Singh, A review on electrical properties of fibre reinforcedpolymer Composites, International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences,

    Vol.1(2), pp.34-37, 2009.

    9. Moe Moe Thwea, Kin Liaob,Durability of bamboo-glass fiber reinforcedpolymer matrix hybrid composites Composites Science and Technology 63,

    pp.375387, 2003.

    10.Sushma Singh, Strength degradation of laminated Composites underhygrothermalloading conditions, a Thesis Report.

    11.Debabrata Chakraborty, Delamination of laminated fiber reinforced plasticcomposites under multiple cylindrical impact Materials and Design 28,

    pp.1142 1153, 2007.

    12.Wang, Y.C., Wong, P.M.H.; Kodur, V., Mechanical properties of fibrereinforced polymer reinforcing bars at elevated temperatures, National

    Research Council Canada.

    13.Shivakumar S1, G. S. Guggari, Literature review of fiber reinforced polymercomposites, International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology,

    Vol. 1, Issue 5, pp. 218-226, Nov 2011.

    14.Jane Maria Faulstich de Paivaa*, Alexandre De Nadai dos Santosb, MirabelCerqueira Rezendec, Mechanical and Morphological Characterizations of

    Carbon Fiber Fabric Reinforced Epoxy Composites Used in Aeronautical Field,

    Materials Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, 367-374, 2009.

    15.Choosing the right resin epoxy resin, fibre glass-evercoat, a division of IllinoisTool Works Inc.

    16.Hota V.S. gangarao, Feasibility review of FRP materials for structuralapplications, A thesis report.

    17.P.V. Vijay, Ph.D., P.E. To Engineering Research & Development Center(CEERD-CT-T) - US Army Corps of Engineers ls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS

    39180-6199.

    18. Drop weight Impact Response of Woven Natural Silk/Epoxy Laminated

    Composite Plates, A.U. Ude, A.K. Ariffin A.A. lashlem and C.H. Azhari,Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 6, Pp.289-295, 2011.

    19. History on Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites, from internet.

    20. M.S. Sham Prasad, C.S. Venkatesha, T. Jayaraju, Experimental Methods of

    Determining Fracture Toughness of Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites under

    Various Loading Conditions, Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization &

    Engineering, Vol. 10, No.13, pp.1263-1275, 2011.

  • 7/30/2019 Yunuspaper on PMC

    13/13

    21. Y. R. Kharde And K. V. Saisrinadh Effect Of Various Fibers On Tribological

    Properties Of Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE ) Composites In Dry Conditions.

    22. Mohammed Yunus, Fazlur Rahman, J. And Tajuddin yezdani, T.M., Charting

    of a Strategy for the Application of Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites for

    Different Engineering Service Requirements, International Journal of Modern

    Engineering Research (IJMER), Vol.2, Issue.3, pp-1408-1413, May-June 2012.23. Mohammed Yunus, Fazlur Rahman, J. and Ramesh, A. Recent vistas in

    Engineering Surface Modification techniques, International Journal of Mechanical

    Engineering & Technology, Vol. 3, No.1, pp. 77-89, 2012.

    24. Facca, A.G., Kortschot, M.T. and Yan N., Predicting the elastic modulus of

    natural fiber reinforced thermoplastics, Composites: Part A: Applied Science and

    Manufacturing, Vol. 37, pp.1660-1671, 2007.

    25. Ma, X., Yu, J. and Kennedy, J.F, Studies on the Propertied of Natural Fibers-

    Reinforced Thermoplastic Starch Composites, Carbohydrate Polymers, Vol. 62, pp.

    19-24, 2005.

    26. Tungjitpornkull, S. and Sombatsompop, N, Processing Technique and fibre

    orientation angle affecting the mechanical properties of E-glass reinforced

    wood/PVC composites, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 209,

    pp.3079-3088, 2009.

    27. Shen, C.-H, and Springer, G.S., Moisture absorption and desorption of

    composite materials, Composites, Volume 8, Issue 1, Page 63, January 1977.

    28. H. Kawada, A. Kobiki, J. Koyanagi, A. Hosoi, Long-term durability of polymer

    matrix composites under hostile environments, Materials Science and Engineering

    A 412, 159164, 2005.

    29. Jin-Chul Yun, Seong-Il Heo, Kyeong-Seok Oh, Kyung-Seop Han, Degradationof graphite reinforced polymer composites for PEMFC bipolar plate after

    Hygrothermal ageing, 16th international conference on composite materials.


Recommended