Date post: | 13-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | sybil-barker |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Zijin Guo
Univ. of HawaiiRepresenting BES Collaboration
J/ pp and
BES
Beijing, China
The BES Detector
TOF
EM Shwrcounter
World J/ and (2S) Samples (106)
J/ (2S)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
MarkI I I DM2 BES I BES I I
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
MKI MKII MKIII CBAL BESI BESII
A narrow pp enhancementnear Mpp 2mp in J/pp
NN bound states (baryonium)??
+ n +
deuteron:
loosely bound 3-q 3-
q color singlets with
Md = 2mp-
baryonium:
loosely bound
3-q 3-q color singlets with Mb = 2mp-?
attractive nuclear force attractive force??
There is lots & lots of literature about this possibility
ppe+e
Bardin etal
e+ehadronsFENICE e+e6
2mp
2mp
Fit: M = 1870 ± 10 MeV= 10 ± 5 MeV
R. Calabrese PEP-N work-shop proceedings
DM2 unpub.
Is there a narrow JPC=1 pp system near Mpp = 2mp?
study pp from J/pp
• C-parity = +
• S (P?)-wave (for Mpp 2mp)
• probes JPC= 0(0?) states
• complements ppee and ee annihilation
• unpolluted (by other hadrons) environment
Use BESII’s 58M J/ decays
J/pp
Select J/pp
• 4-C kinematic fit
• dE/dx for proton id
• non-pp bkg small
• main bkg from J/pp
????
• J/ccpp (calibration reaction)
Fit signal with an S(P)-wave BW
200
220
2
312000
)()(
)/(
MMM
kqqMBW
l
q = daughter momentum
q0 = daughter momentum @ peak
keep consta
nt
threshold factor
Fit to data
M=1859 MeV/c2
< 30 MeV/c2 (90% CL)
J/pp
M(pp)-2mp (GeV)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
3-body phase spaceacceptance
2/dof=56/56
fitted peak location
acceptance weighted BW +3 +5
10 25
P-wave fit??
M=1876 ± 3 MeV < 30 MeV (90% CL)
2/dof=59/56
OK!
M=2mp
cos distribution
1+cos2(expected for
J/)
sin2
M(pp)<1.9 GeV
Summary (I)
if what we see is an S-wave resonance:
M=1859 MeV/c2
< 30 MeV/c2 (90% CL)
+3 +510 25
A narrow pp enhancementnear Mpp 2mp in J/pp
• not consistent with any PDG meson state
• peak below, but near 2mp : baryonium?
• narrow width: why so long-lived?
• similar patterns seen in baryon-antibaryon systems produced in B meson decays
– BppK BppD Bp Bpc
Strange & charmed systems
Bp
M(p)(GeV)
Bpc
M(cp)(GeV)
(in these cases, the peaking doesn’t seem to be right at threshold)
Partial Wave Analysis of J/KK
• Lattice QCD: the ground state scalar glueball should be in the mass range 1.5 – 1.7 GeV
• Long history of uncertainty about f0(1710)
• J/ K+K- and KSKS are very important to investigate the f0(1710)
Data and Analysis Method • Perform separate amplitude analyses for
J/ K+K-
KSKS
• Amplitudes are fit to relativistic covariant tensor expressions (mass range 1-2 GeV)
• The maximum likelihood method is employed
• Bin-by-bin fit: the data are analyzed independently in each mass bin (40MeV)
Global fit: Breit-Wigner structures + mass, width scan + lnL comparison
The K+K- and KSKS mass distributions from J/ radiative decay after
acceptance and isospin corrections
J/ f’2(1525)
f0(1710)
f2(1270)
f0(1500)
+broad 0++ and 2++
Components used in the PWA fit
Bin-by-bin fit Global fit
Amplitude intensity
Summary (II)
• Using BESII data, partial wave analyses
were done on the K+K- and KSKS
systems produced in J/ radiative decay for the mass range 1-2 GeV
• KK D- wave intensity shows a clear f’2(1525) signal and the helicity amplitude ratios x,y appear to be consistent with the theoretical prediction
• Strong production of f0(1710) M = 1740±4±10 MeV Г = 166+5+15 MeV (Global fit)
• The non-flat angular distribution in the KK mass region ~1.7 GeV is due to the interference between S- wave and weak D- wave amplitudes
• Bin-by-bin fit and global fit give very consistent analysis results
25
-8
-10
Results
Bin-by-bin
Global
Systematic Error global fit
Study J/0pp bkg with MC & data
J/0pp (data)
three-bodyphase spaceMonte Carlo
J/0pppp (MC)
M(pp)-2mp (GeV)
no peak!!
Is Mpeak really less than 2mp?
No turnover at thresholdpeak mass must be <2mp
weight events by q0/q:(i.e remove threshold factor)
M(pp)-2mp (GeV)
mass determination bias
threshold
observed peak
BW “peak”below-
threshold mass & widths measurement
s can be biased
when there is background
could it be a tail of a known resonance?
0 resonances in PDG tables:(1760) M=1760 = 60 MeV
(1800) M=1801 = 210 MeV
2/dof=323/58 2/dof=412/58
Coulomb effect?
2
)3(
)/exp(1
/ 2vv
v
v
coulomb factor
phase-spaceterm
BW vs Coulomb