Date post: | 15-Nov-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | khangminh22 |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication by J-STAGE DOI:10.1248/bpb.13-00634
Ⓒ 2013 The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
Advance Publication
September 26, 2013
Asiatic acid from Potentilla chinensis attenuate ethanol-induced
hepatic injury via suppression of oxidative stress and Kupffer cell
activation
Jinbin Weib,1
, Quanfang Huang
a,1, Renbin Huang
b, Yongxing Chen
b, Shujuan Lv
b, Ling Wei
b,
Chunhong Liangb, Shuang Liang
a, Lang Zhuo
b,c, Xing
Lin
b,*
aThe First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine; Nanning 530023,
China
bGuangxi Medical University; Nanning 530021, China
cInstitute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology; Singapore 169483, Singapore
*Corresponding author. Tel: +86-771-5358342. E-mail: [email protected] (X. Lin).
1These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
Abstract
This study examined the effect of asiatic acid from Potentilla chinensis (AAPC) on
chronic ethanol-induced hepatic injury. Rats underwent intragastric administration of ethanol
(5.0–9.0 g/kg) once a day for 12 weeks. A subset of rats were also intragastrically treated
with AAPC (2, 4 or 8 mg/kg) once a day. In the end, AAPC treatment significantly protected
against ethanol-induced liver injury, as evidenced by the decrease in serum alanine and
aspartate aminotransferases levels and the attenuation of histopathological changes in rats.
Additionally, AAPC significantly decreased blood alcohol and acetaldehyde concentrations
by enhancing alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase activities. Mechanistically,
studies showed that AAPC remarkably alleviated the formations of malondialdehyde and
myeloperoxidase, restored impaired antioxidants, including superoxide dismutase,
glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase and catalase, and inhibited CYP2El activity.
Moreover, the over-expression of cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, iNOS and COX-2, the
elevated plasma endotoxin level and the up-regulated Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) , CD14 and
myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) as well as nuclear factor-κB were also suppressed
by AAPC in ethanol-intoxicated rats. In conclusion, the protective effect of AAPC on
ethanol-induced hepatotoxicity was mainly due to its ability to attenuate oxidative stress and
inhibit Kupffer cell activation by decreasing the level of plasma endotoxin and the expression
of TLR4, CD14 and MyD88.
Keywords: Asiatic acid; Potentilla chinensis; Ethanol; Hepatic injury
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
1. Introduction
Alcohol abuse and alcoholism are major global health, social and economic issues.
Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a pathological process characterized by progressive liver
damage leading to steatosis, steatohepatitis, fibrosis and cirrhosis. Cirrhosis may eventually
progress to hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular cancer 1,2)
. Most of the evidence
shows that both oxidative stress and abnormal cytokine production play an important
etiological role in the pathogenesis of ALD. Ethanol intake causes the accumulation of
reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide, hydroxyl radical, and hydrogen peroxide
3). These reactive moieties cause lipid peroxidation (LPO) of cellular membranes and protein
and DNA oxidation, ultimately leading to hepatocyte injury 4)
. Therefore, agents with
antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties are promising therapeutic interventions for
ALD.
Thanks to thousands of years of experience, herbal medicines are considered as a rich
source of new therapeutic agents. Many compounds with new structural features and
mechanisms of actions have been isolated from herbal medicines. Natural products are
potential sources of novel anti-hepatitis drugs that may be applicable to liver disease therapy
5). An example of a traditional herb that is often used in popular folk medicine in China is
Rosaceae Potentilla chinensis Ser., which is often used for treating immune disorders and
liver diseases 6,7)
. Asiatic acid isolated from P. chinensis has several health benefits and has
thus attracted medical and research professionals. Previous studies have shown that asiatic
acid has a variety of pharmacological effects on anti-inflammation 8,9)
, anti-tumor 10)
,
neuroprotection 11)
. In particular, asiatic acid has been shown to be a hepatoprotective agent.
A number of studies demonstrated that asiatic acid can protect liver from injury via
mechanisms underlying antimitochondrial stress and cellular antioxidant system in cultured
hepatocytes and Kupffer cells, and in a mouse model induced by D-galactosamine and
lipopolysaccharides 12,13)
. It has been also reported that asiatic acid is able to inhibit liver
fibrosis by blocking TGF-beta/Smad signaling pathway 14)
. However, the role and
mechanisms by which asiatic acid inhibits liver injury induced by ethanol remain unknown.
Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate potential protective effects of
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
asiatic acid from P. chinensis on ethanol-induced liver injury in rats. The study also aimed to
explore the underlying mechanisms of such effects.
2. Materials and methods
2.1 Chemicals
P. chinensis was purchased from Nanning Qianjinzi Chinese Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd
(Nanning, China). A voucher specimen (CALX12071306) was identified by Q.F. Huang in
the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medicine University, and
deposited in the herbarium of Department of Pharmacology of Guangxi Medical University.
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), malondialdehyde
(MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), glutathione
reductase (GSH-Rd) and catalase kits were obtained from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering
Research Institute (Nanjing, China). Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α
(TNF-α) kits were purchased from Wuhan Boster Bio-engineering Co. Ltd. (Wuhan, China).
2.2 Preparation of asiatic acid from P. chinensis (AAPC)
Dried P. chinensis powder (5 kg) was extracted with 40 L of 95% ethanol by filtration.
The solvent was evaporated under a vacuum to obtain 785.2 g of crude extract, which was
successively extracted with petroleum ether, CHCl3 and acetic ether. Acetic ether (267.5 g)
was dissolved in CH3OH and filtered through a syringe filter (0.45 μm). The filtrate yielded a
powder (189.3 g) after concentration, which was purified by recrystallization in CH3OH to
yield a fraction (131.5 g). The fraction was then subjected to chromatography with a silica gel
column (200–300 mesh, Yantai, PR China; 10×300 cm) and was eluted with a gradient
mixture of CHCl3/CH3OH (100:0–0:100, each 500 mL) to afford 8 fractions (Frs. 1–8). Fr. 6
(65.9 g) was further separated by silica gel column (3×80 cm, 200–300 mesh) via successive
elutions with a gradient of CHCl3/CH3OH (100:0–0:100, each 200 mL), to yield 4
sub-fractions (Frs. I–IV). Frs. III was re-crystallized with CH3OH to yield a white crystal
after concentration, which was purified by Sephadex LH-20 and preparative HPLC to
produce a compound (4.17 g). Its structure was elucidated on the basis of physicochemical
properties and spectral data, and identified as aiasic acid (Fig. 1). This compound is normally
stored at 4 °C, and it is dissolved in distilled water and diluted with physiological saline for
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
animal tests.
2.3 Animals and treatments
Male SPF-Wistar rats weighing 180-200 g were provided by the Experimental Animal
Center of Guangxi Medical University (Guangxi, China). The research was conducted
according to protocols approved by the institutional ethical committee of Guangxi Medical
University (approval no.: 12061726). After a period of one week, the rats were divided into
six groups consisting of 15 rats per group as follows:
Group I received the same volume of saline.
Group II received 8 mg/kg AAPC.
Group III received ethanol.
Group IV received ethanol + 2 mg/kg AAPC.
Group V received ethanol + 4 mg/kg AAPC.
Group VI received ethanol + 8 mg/kg AAPC.
Rats in Groups III-VI were given intragastric ethanol infusions to induce chronic liver
injury. The ethanol dose was increased gradually by using a method of Zhang 15)
as follows:
5.0 g/kg/day from 1 to 4 weeks, 7.0 g/kg/day from 5 to 8 weeks, 9.0 g/kg/day from 9 to 12
weeks. Group III served as the ethanol-induced liver injury model. In addition to ethanol, rats
in groups IV -VI were also given AAPC orally on a daily basis. The doses of AAPC were
adopted according to the previous study 14)
.
At the end of 24 weeks, the rats were anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride (30
mg/kg b.w., i.v.) prior to euthanasia for 1.5 h after ethanol administration. Blood samples
were collected in heparinized tubes (50 U/mL). Liver samples were dissected and washed
immediately with ice-cold saline to remove as much blood as possible. One part of the liver
sample was immediately stored at -80 °C for future analysis. The other portion of the liver
sample was fixed in a 10% formalin solution for histopathological analysis.
2.4 Alcohol and acetaldehyde concentrations in plasma
Alcohol and acetaldehyde concentrations were determined according to the methods of
Sung et al 16)
. In brief, blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min. The
alcohol concentration was detected with a Roche Cobas Integra 400 analyzer (Roche
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
Diagnostics, Switzerland). The acetaldehyde concentration was determined by using a
commercial assay kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) following the manufacturer`s
instructions.
2.5 Estimation of hepatic alcohol metabolizing enzyme activities
Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) were measured in
liver homogenate according to the protocol established in previous studies 17,18)
.
2.6 CYP2E1 enzyme activity assay
CYP2E1 enzyme activity was determined by the method described previously 19)
. In brief,
the livers were perfused with ice-cold 0.15 M KCl and homogenised in a homogeniser with 4
volumes (w/v) of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 0.15 M KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1.0 mM
dithiothreitol and 0.01 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride. Hepatic microsomal fractions
were obtained by differential centrifugation. The microsomal fractions were used to
determine CYP2E1-specific oxidative activities. The aniline hydroxylase was determined by
measuring p-aminophenol formation activities, and the microsomal protein levels were
determined by using the Bradford method with bovine serum albumin as the standard 20)
. All
assays were run in triplicate. CYP2E1 was detected immunochemically, as in a previous
study 21)
.
2.7 Estimating AST and ALT activities
Serum levels of ALT and AST were measured using commercially available kits (Nanjing
Jiancheng Bioengineering Research Institute, Nanjing, China) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions.
2.8 Liver myeloperoxidase activity assays
Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity was measured according to the method of Yoshida et al
22). Tissue was homogenized in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) containing 0.5%
hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide. The supernatant remaining after centrifugation was
then mixed with 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) and 1 mL of 1.5 mM o-dianisidine
hydrochloride containing 0.2 mM H2O2. The change in absorbance for each sample was
recorded at 450 nm. MPO activity was expressed as μmol of oxidized product
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
formed/min/mg protein using the extinction coefficient 10,062 M−1
cm−1
. The protein content
was determined by using bovine serum albumin as the standard.
2.9 Liver TNF-α and IL-1β assays
Liver samples were disintegrated in 4 volumes of icecold RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 5
mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris [pH 7.4]), containing protease inhibitors (1 μg/mL aprotinin, 10
μg/mL leupeptin and 1 μg/mL pepstaitn), DNase (0.05 mg/mL), and detergents (0.3% Triton
X-100, 0.03% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.3% sodium deoxycholate). After incubating on ice
for 30 min, samples were centrifuged twice at 20,000 ×g for 15 min at 4 °C. The resulting
supernatants were harvested and stored at -80 °C until the quantification of intrahepatic
cytokines by murine ELISA kits (Minneapolis, MN). Liver lysates were adjusted to equal the
protein concentrations after being quantified with the Coomassie blue (BioRad, Hercules,
USA). The results were expressed as pg/mg protein.
2.10 Estimation of antioxidant enzyme and lipid peroxidation
Liver tissue was homogenized on ice with Tris-HCl (5 mmol/L containing 2 mmol/L
EDTA, pH7.4). Homogenates were centrifuged at 1000×g for 15 min at 4 °C. The
supernatants were used immediately for SOD, GSH-Px, GSH-Rd and catalase assays. All
enzymes were evaluated according to our previously established methods 23)
. Liver lipid
peroxidation was determined by measuring the MDA level, an end product of lipid
peroxidation, using a thiobarbituric acid method 24)
. The level of hepatic MDA was expressed
as μmol/g protein.
2.11. Determination of plasma endotoxin level
The plasma endotoxin level was measured by using a quantitative chromogenic end-point
tachypleus amebocyte lysate endotoxin detection kit (Chinese Horseshoe Crab Reagent
Manufactory, Xiamen, China) following the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, plasma
samples were diluted to 1:10 with water/Tris-HCl buffer and heated at 70 °C for 10 min to
denature endogenous endotoxin inhibitors. After being centrifuged at 1500 ×g for 10 min, the
supernatant was removed and incubated with limulus amebocyte lysate at 37 °C for 10 min,
followed by incubation with chromogenic substance for 6 min. The absorbance was measured
at 545 nm after adding the appropriate azo-reagents.
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
2.12. Western blot immunoassay
Liver protein was prepared and determined as previously described 25)
. In brief, whole
protein was extracted from liver tissue and analyzed with a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein
concentration assay kit (Shanghai Haoran Bio Technologies Co., Ltd, China). A total of 20
μg of whole protein was used to determine the content of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), CD14,
myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), TIR domain-containing adapter-inducing
interferon-b (TRIF), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS).
NE-PER reagents (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) were used to extract the nuclear and
cytosolic fractions according to the manufacturer`s instructions. A total of 20 μg of nuclear
protein was used to determine the NF-κB/p65 subunit level. The protein samples were
separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a
polyvinylidene fluoride membrane using a semi-dry transfer process. After the transfer, the
membranes were washed with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and blocked for 1 h at room
temperature with 5% (w/v) skim milk powder in TBS. The blots were then incubated
overnight at 4 °C with polyclonal antibodies. The following primary antibodies were used:
TLR4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), CD14 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), MyD88
(Lab Vision, Fremont, CA, USA), COX-2 (Cayman Chem, Ann Arbor, MI), iNOS (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), and NF-κB/p65 (Lab Vision, Fremont, CA). The signals were
normalized to that of β-actin (Sigma Chemical Co.) or lamin B1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA),
respectively. On the following day, the primary antibody was removed, and the blots were
washed with TBS/T (0.1% Tween 20 in TBS), followed by an incubation with the appropriate
secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The immunoreactive bands intensity was
determined by using a densitometer equipped with Image QuaNT software (Molecular
Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
2.13 Pathological examination
Liver fragments were fixed in 10% formalin, processed and embedded in paraffin. Five
μm sections were cut and mounted on glass slides. The slices were stained with
hematoxylin-eosin (H&E). All histological examinations were performed by an experienced
pathologist who was blinded to the experimental groups.
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
2.14 Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 11.5 for Windows. Differences between
the groups were assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Tukey`s test
for post hoc multiple comparisons. The data are presented as the means ± SE. A p-value <
0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1 The effects of AAPC on blood alcohol and acetaldehyde concentrations
Treatment of rats with AAPC significantly decreased both alcohol and acetaldehyde
concentrations in the plasma when compared with the ethanol-only group (model group).
Neither alcohol nor acetaldehyde was detected in the plasma from the normal control and
AAPC control groups (Fig. 2).
3.2 The effects of AAPC on hepatic alcohol metabolizing enzyme activities
As shown in Fig. 3, hepatic ADH and ALDH levels were decreased after ethanol
treatment. Treatment with 4 or 8 mg/kg of AAPC exhibited protection against
ethanol-induced hepatic ADH and ALDH depletion, as evidenced by its reverse to a nearly
normal level. AAPC did not significantly alter basal ADH and ALDH activities.
3.3 The effect of AAPC on CYP2E1 activity
As shown in Fig. 4, ethanol feeding significantly increased the levels of aniline
4-hydroxylation (the CYP2E1-specific substrate) and CYP2E1 protein, whereas treatment
with 4 or 8 mg/kg AAPC significantly decreased both levels. In addition, AAPC alone had a
negligible effect on the basal activation of CYP2E1.
3.4 The effects of AAPC on serum ALT and AST activities
To evaluate the extent of liver injury in rats, we conducted an analysis of serum ALT
and AST activities. As shown in Fig. 5, a significant increase in the activity of both enzymes
was observed in the ethanol only group (model group) when compared with the normal
control. Conversely, animals treated with AAPC exhibited a significant decrease in the
activity of these enzymes. AAPC had no effect on the basal serum AST and ALT activities.
3.5 The effect of AAPC on liver myeloperoxidase activity
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
The MPO activity of the model group was significantly higher when compared with that
of the normal control group. This up-regulation was normalized after AAPC treatment. There
was no significant difference in the MPO level between the AAPC only and normal control
groups (Fig. 6).
3.6 The effects of AAPC on liver TNF-α and IL-1β levels
Liver TNF-α and IL-1β expression was evaluated by ELISA. The results showed that
hepatic TNF-α and IL-1β levels were elevated after ethanol administration. AAPC
significantly alleviated hepatic TNF-α and IL-1β production in a dose-dependent manner. In
addition, the AAPC only treatment had a negligible effect on TNF-α and IL-1β basal
expression (Fig. 7).
3.7 The effects of AAPC on antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation
Ethanol-induced liver injury provoked significant reductions in liver SOD, GSH-Px,
GSH-Rd and catalase activities and a remarkable promotion of liver MDA content when
compared with the normal control. The results showed that liver SOD, GSH-Px, GSH-Rd and
catalase activities were obviously increased after AAPC treatment (Fig. 8A); in addition, the
liver MDA level was markedly decreased after AAPC treatment (Fig. 8B).
3.8. The effect of AAPC on level of plasma endotoxin
As shown in Fig. 9, the plasma endotoxin level was markedly increased, and AAPC
treatment significantly inhibited plasma endotoxin level.
3.9 The effects of AAPC on expression of NF-κB
Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) plays a critical role in chronic inflammatory diseases and
its activation is essential for cytokine production. As shown in Fig. 10A, after chronic ethanol
consumption, the levels of NF-κB markedly increased, and that increase was attenuated by
AAPC.
3.10. The effects of AAPC on expression of TLR4, CD14, MyD88, COX-2, and iNOS protein
Western blot analysis showed a significant increase in the expression of TLR4, CD14,
MyD88, COX-2, and iNOS in the liver of the model group when compared with the normal
control. These expressions were significantly lower in the liver tissue of rats treated with
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
AAPC. There was no significant difference in the expression of TLR4, CD14, MyD88,
COX-2, or iNOS between the AAPC control and the normal control groups (Fig. 10B).
3.11 Histopathological findings
The H&E staining assay results showed that the hepatocytes in normal rats exhibited an
intact cellular architecture without necrosis, inflammatory infiltration or impaired progression
(Fig. 11A). There were no pathological changes in AAPC-only control rats (Fig. 11B).
Conversely, pronounced morphological alterations occurred in ethanol-treated rats, including
fat deposition, hepatocellular degeneration, inflammatory responses and necrosis, which were
accompanied by a reduction in the number of cells (Fig. 11C). AAPC supplementation
ameliorated the deleterious effects of chronic ethanol exposure on the liver, as seen in the
diminished fatty infiltration, lipid change and necrosis (Fig. 11D-F).
4. Discussion
Chronic ethanol ingestion is known to be associated with defective gut motility that
results indirectly in an elevated level of liver endotoxin 26)
. Furthermore, the major metabolic
product of alcohol, that is, acetaldehyde, leads to serious consequences to the individual.
Increasing and repeating acetaldehyde exposure from increased alcohol consumption can
increase the risk of developing acetaldehyde-related pathologies in the patient; thus,
acetaldehyde is more toxic to the body than alcohol 16)
. Therefore, the complications of
ethanol intake can be solved by effectively decreasing the plasma acetaldehyde concentration.
In the present study, blood alcohol and acetaldehyde concentrations in the ethanol only group
(model group) were significantly higher than those of the normal control group; however, the
concentrations were significantly lower in AAPC-treated groups. These data indicate that the
effect of AAPC in decreasing hepatic damage may be mainly linked to faster rates of alcohol
and acetaldehyde elimination.
The ingestion of alcohol leads to the rapid conversion of acetaldehyde to acetate by
ADH; therefore, very low levels of acetaldehyde should remain in the liver tissue or in the
blood after alcohol consumption. ALDH also plays an important role in the elimination of
acetaldehyde via oxidative reactions. Therefore, liver damage can be proportional to the
down-regulation of the activity of ADH or ALDH 27)
. In this study, ethanol-treated rats
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
showed significant reductions in ADH and ALDH levels, suggesting that alcohol,
acetaldehyde and other toxic metabolites were deposited in the liver tissue, which induced
hepatotoxicity over time. This result is consistent with the previous study 28)
. Interestingly,
these metabolism-specific enzymes were effectively increased by AAPC treatment. These
data suggest that AAPC-mediated alcohol metabolism was associated with enhanced ADH
and ALDH activities.
Ethanol is also oxidized by CYP2E1, an ethanol-inducible isoform of CYP-450 enzymes.
Activation of CYP2E1 by ethanol produces hydroxyl radicals that contribute to the toxic
effects of alcohol. Further, the activity of aniline hydroxylase, another CYP2E1-dependent
enzyme, was also higher, resulting in greater cytotoxicity 29)
. Many studies reported that
CYP2E1 and aniline hydroxylase were elevated after ethanol administration 30)
. Treatment
with inhibitors of CYP2E1, such as cyclosporine A and diallyl sulphide, have been shown to
reduce ethanol-induced liver injury 31)
. Our data showed that AAPC treatment significantly
decreased CYP2E1-dependent aniline hydroxylation in rats. This result suggests that the
suppression of CYP2E1 by AAPC in rats was an important aspect of the hepatoprotective
effect of AAPC against liver injury as induced by chronic alcohol exposure.
The AST and ALT serum marker enzymes are usually cytoplasmic and they leak into
the blood upon liver injury as a consequence of altered membranes permeability 32)
. Our
results indicated a significant elevation in the AST and ALT serum levels from the ethanol
control group, and the effects were markedly reduced when the rats were treated with AAPC.
Histological liver sample observations also strongly supported the release of
aminotransferases and pro-inflammatory cytokines by damaged hepatocytes as well as the
protective effect of AAPC. Chronic ethanol administration caused pathological changes to the
liver, including micro- and macro-vesicular steatosis and neutrophil infiltration. Those
alterations were attenuated by AAPC, with livers showing only mild steatosis and
inflammatory cell infiltration. Those results suggest that ethanol-induced hepatocyte damage
was largely prevented by AAPC treatment.
Ethanol-induced liver injury has been associated with increased lipid peroxidation, lipid
radical formation and decreased hepatic antioxidant protection 33)
. Oxidative stress is caused
by an imbalance in pro-oxidants and antioxidants, which cause a depletion or inactivation of
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
the antioxidant in hepatocytes, ultimately leading to necrosis and/or apoptosis 34,35)
. MDA is
an indicator of oxidative stress and a major by-product resulting from lipid peroxidation. In
addition, SOD, GSH-Px, GSH-Rd and catalase are the enzymes for which reduced activity is
associated with the accumulation of reactive free radicals, leading to deleterious effects 32)
.
Therefore, these oxidative stress parameters, including SOD, GSH-Px, GSH-Rd, catalase and
MDA, were examined in this study. Our results revealed a decreased tendency in the former
four and an increase in the last one from the model group. AAPC significantly increased the
SOD, GSH-Px, GSH-Rd and catalase activities and markedly decreased the MDA level,
indicating that AAPC inhibits lipid peroxidation and effectively recruits the anti-oxidative
defense system during ethanol-induced liver injury.
In addition to oxidative injury, abnormal cytokine metabolism is also a major feature of
alcoholic liver disease 36)
. The expression of TNF-α and IL-1β were found to be enhanced in
both animal models and patients with alcoholic liver disease 37)
. The critical role of TNF-α in
alcoholic liver disease has been demonstrated in TNFR1-deficient mice, which were
protected against alcohol-induced liver injury relative to wild type mice 38)
. Furthermore, the
neutralization of TNF-α by a specific antibody has been shown to attenuate hepatic necrosis
and inflammation caused by chronic alcohol exposure 39)
. In addition, myeloperoxidase
(MPO) is present in the cytoplasm of myeloid-derived cells, such as neutrophils, and has been
considered to be a reliable marker of tissue inflammation 40)
. In this study, AAPC treatment
significantly attenuated ethanol-induced TNF-α, IL-1β and MPO levels, suggesting that
AAPC protection against ethanol-induced liver damage might also be associated with the
inhibition of inflammatory mediator release.
One central component in the complex network of processes leading to the development
of alcoholic liver disease is the activation of Kupffer cells by endotoxin, which is released by
bacteria living in the intestine 41)
. Ethanol consumption can lead to increased endotoxin levels
in the blood and liver. When activated, Kupffer cells produce signaling molecules (i.e.,
cytokines) that promote inflammatory reactions as well as reactive oxygen species (ROS),
which can damage liver cells 42)
. In the present study, we found that the plasma endotoxin
level was enhanced by alcohol. AAPC treatment effectively suppressed the endotoxin level.
These data indicate that the protective effect of AAPC against alcohol-induced hepatotoxicity
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
is at least partly responsible for its ability to inhibit Kupffer cell activation by decreasing the
plasma endotoxin level.
Furthermore, there is growing evidence to suggest that endotoxin interacts with a
receptor complex consisting of proteins CD14 and TLR4. This interaction initiates a variety
of signaling cascades in the cell. One of these cascades, which involves interleukin 1
receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) and the associated proteins MyD88 and tumor necrosis
factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF), acts on a regulatory molecule called nuclear factor
kappa B (NF-κB), which is inactive in the cell if it is associated with inhibitory molecule
IκBα. In response to the signals initiated by endotoxin binding, IκBα is released from NF-κB,
leading to NF-κB activation 43,44)
. This activation in turn results in superoxide generation
through the NADPH oxidase complex and the production of inflammation mediators, such as
TNF-α, IL-1β, iNOS and COX-2, etc. 45)
. In the present study, the levels of TLR4, CD14 and
MyD88 were increased in alcohol-treated rats, and AAPC attenuated those increases.
Moreover, the nuclear translocation of NF-κB was markedly decreased by AAPC, reflecting
the decreased inflammatory responses, as demonstrated by significant decreases in TNF-α,
IL-1β, iNOS and COX-2 levels. Taken together, our results suggest that AAPC suppresses
the over-expression of TLR4, CD14 and MyD88, resulting in the suppression of NF-κB
nuclear translocation and subsequent pro-inflammatory mediators.
In conclusion, AAPC had a significant protective effect on chronic ethanol-induced liver
injury. The hepatoprotective action of AAPC is most likely mediated by its ability to
attenuate oxidative stress and inhibit the activation of Kupffer cells.
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81260674; 81260505), the Guangxi Natural
Science Foundation (No. 2013GXNSFAA019146; 2013GXNSFAA019150), and the
Foundation for the Guangxi Key Laboratory for Prevention & Treatment of Regional
High-Incidence Diseases (KFJJ2010-71; KFJJ2011-37).
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
References
1) Tsukamoto Hidekazu, Lu Shellyc, Current concepts in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver injury. The
FASEB Journal, 15, 1335-1349 (2001).
2) Lieber Charles S, Ethanol metabolism, cirrhosis and alcoholism. Clinica Chimica Acta, 257, 59-84
(1997).
3) Koch Osvaldo R, Pani Giovanni, Borrello Silvia, Colavitti Renata, Cravero Amerys, Farrè Stella,
Galeotti Tommaso, Oxidative stress and antioxidant defenses in ethanol-induced cell injury. Molecular
aspects of medicine, 25, 191-198 (2004).
4) Khan Abdul Quaiyoom, Nafees Sana, Sultana Sarwat, Perillyl alcohol protects against ethanol induced
acute liver injury in Wistar rats by inhibiting oxidative stress, NFκ-B activation and proinflammatory
cytokine production. Toxicology, 279, 108-114 (2011).
5) Zou Y.H., Yang Y., Li J., Wu Q., Li W.P., Lu J.T., Roberts M.S., Potential therapeutic effects of a
traditional Chinese formulation, BJ-JN, on liver fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride in rats.
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 120, 452-457 (2008).
6) Li Zhen, Cheng Liufang, Zhang Tiequan, Li Shu, Jua Yuhai, Experimental Study of the Ethanolic
Estract from Potentilla Chinensis on Rat Hepatic Fibrosis Induced by Carbon Tetrachloride. Liaoning
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 34, 1157-1159 (2007).
7) Zhen Li, Tiequan Zhang, Liang Ye, Yuhai Jia, Protective effects of the ethanolic extract from potentilla
chinensis on mice acute hepatic injury induced by carbon tetrachloride. Liaoning Journal of
Traditional Chinese Medicine, 31, 422-423 (2003).
8) Yun Kyungjin, Kim Jiyeon, Kim Jongbin, Lee Kyungwon, Jeong Seoyoung, Park Heejuhn, Jung
Hyunju, Cho Youngwuk,Yun Kijoo, Lee Kyung-Ae, Inhibition of LPS-induced NO and PGE 2
production by asiatic acid via NF-κB inactivation in RAW 264.7 macrophages: Possible involvement
of the IKK and MAPK pathways. International immunopharmacology, 8, 431-441 (2008).
9) Huang Shyhshyun, Chiu Chuansung, Chen Hsienjung, Hou Wenchi, Sheu Mingjyh, Lin Yingchih,
Shie Peihsin, Huang Guanjhong, Antinociceptive activities and the mechanisms of anti-inflammation
of asiatic acid in mice. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2011, 1-10 (2011).
10) Park Byung Chul, Bosire Kefa O, Lee Eungseok, Lee Yong Soo, Kim Jung, Asiatic acid induces
apoptosis in SK-MEL-2 human melanoma cells. Cancer letters, 218, 81-90 (2005).
11) Krishnamurthy Rajanikant G, Senut Marieclaude, Zemke Daniel, Min Jiangyong, Frenkel Mark B,
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
Greenberg Eric J, Yu Seongwoon, Ahn Nick, Goudreau John, Kassab Mounzer, Asiatic acid, a
pentacyclic triterpene from Centella asiatica, is neuroprotective in a mouse model of focal cerebral
ischemia. Journal of neuroscience research, 87, 2541-2550 (2009).
12) Ma Kuifen, Zhang Yuyu, Zhu Danyan, Lou Yijia, Protective effects of asiatic acid against
D-galactosamine/lipopolysaccharide-induced hepatotoxicity in hepatocytes and kupffer cells
co-cultured system via redox-regulated leukotriene C4 synthase expression pathway. European journal
of pharmacology, 603, 98-107 (2009).
13) Seunghyun Kim, Hyekyung Yang, Jeho Ryu, Sangsup Jew, Youngchoong Kim, Asiatic acid
derivatives protect primary cultures of rat hepatocytes against carbon tetrachloride-induced injury via
the cellular antioxidant system. Natural Product Communications, 4, 765-768 (2009).
14) Tang Lixia, He Ruihua, Yang Guang, Tan Jiaju, Zhou Li, Meng Xiaoming, Huang Xiaoru, Lan
Huiyao, Asiatic acid inhibits liver fibrosis by blocking TGF-beta/Smad signaling in vivo and in vitro.
PloS one, 7, 1-13 (2012).
15) Liu Ya, Zhang Haigang, Jia Yi, Li Xiaohui, Panax notoginseng saponins attenuate atherogenesis
accelerated by zymosan in rabbits. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 33, 1324-1330 (2010).
16) Sung Chang Keun, Kim Seung Mi, Oh Chang Jin,Yang Sun A, Han Byung Hee, Mo Eun Kyoung,
Taraxerone enhances alcohol oxidation via increases of alcohol dehyderogenase (ADH) and
acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activities and gene expressions. Food and Chemical Toxicology,
50, 2508-2514 (2012).
17) Kaur Neha Pathania-Gagandeep, Singh Joginder, Vyas Ashish, Kumar Manoj, Response of
hydrogenase enzymes (ALDH and ADH) in Trapa natans under physiological stress. Advances in
Bioscience and Biotechnology, 3, 304-307 (2012).
18) Modig Tobias, Lidén Gunnar, Taherzadeh Mohammad J, Inhibition effects of furfural on alcohol
dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase. Biochemical Journal, 363,
769-776 (2002).
19) Lin Xing, Huang Renbin, Zhang Shijun, Zheng Li, Wei Ling, He Min, Zhou Yan, Zhuo Lang, Huang
Quanfang, Methyl helicterate protects against CCl4-induced liver injury in rats by inhibiting oxidative
stress, NF-κB activation, Fas/FasL pathway and cytochrome P4502E1 level. Food and Chemical
Toxicology, 50, 3413-3420 (2012).
20) Banni Mohamed, Jebali Jamel, Guerbej Hamadi, Dondero Francesco, Boussetta Hamadi, Viarengo
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
Aldo, Mixture toxicity assessment of nickel and chlorpyrifos in the sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax.
Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 60, 124-131 (2011).
21) Lee Kyung Jin, Choi Jae Ho, Khanal Tilak, Hwang Yong Pil, Chung Young Chul, Jeong Hye Gwang,
Protective effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester against carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity in
mice. Toxicology, 248, 18-24 (2008).
22) Yoshida N, Takagi T, Isozaki Y, Suzuki T, Ichikawa H, Yoshikawa T, Proinflammatory role of
protease-activated receptor-2 in intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Molecular medicine
reports, 4, 81-86 (2011).
23) Huang Quanfang, Zhang Shijun, Zheng Li, He Min, Huang Renbin, Lin Xing, Hepatoprotective
effects of total saponins isolated from Taraphochlamys affinis against carbon tetrachloride induced
liver injury in rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50, 713-718 (2012).
24) Janero David R, Malondialdehyde and thiobarbituric acid-reactivity as diagnostic indices of lipid
peroxidation and peroxidative tissue injury. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 9, 515-540 (1990).
25) Yoon Seongjin, Koh Eunji, Kim Changsoo, Jee Ok-Pyo, Kwak Jonghwan, Jeong Wonjin, Kim
Jeehyun, Lee Sunmee, Agrimonia eupatoria protects against chronic ethanol-induced liver injury in
rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50, 2335-2341 (2012).
26) Szabo G., Bala S., Alcoholic liver disease and the gut-liver axis. World journal of gastroenterology,
16, 1321 (2010).
27) Yoo Yeongmin, Jung Euiman, Kang Hayoung, Choi Ingyu, Choi Kyungchul, Jeung Euibae, The sap
of Acer okamotoanum decreases serum alcohol levels after acute ethanol ingestion in rats.
International journal of molecular medicine, 28, 489-495 (2011).
28) Choi Joo Sun,Yoon Taek Joon, Kang Kyung Ran, Lee Kyeong Ho, Kim Won Ho, Suh Young Ho,
Song Jihyun, Jung Myeong Ho, Glycoprotein isolated from Acanthopanax senticosus protects against
hepatotoxicity induced by acute and chronic alcohol treatment. Biological and Pharmaceutical
Bulletin, 29, 306-314 (2006).
29) Caro Andres A, Cederbaum Arthur I, Synergistic toxicity of iron and arachidonic acid in HepG2 cells
overexpressing CYP2E1. Molecular pharmacology, 60, 742-752 (2001).
30) Devi Shanmugam Lakshmi,Viswanathan Periyaswamy,Anuradha Carani V, Taurine enhances the
metabolism and detoxification of ethanol and prevents hepatic fibrosis in rats treated with iron and
alcohol. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 27, 120-126 (2009).
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
31) Morimoto Michio, Hagbjork Annlouise, Wan Yujui Yvonne, Fu Paul C, Clot Paolo, Albano Emanuele,
Ingelman-Sundberg Magnus, French Samuel W, Modulation of experimental alcohol-induced liver
disease by cytochrome P450 2E1 inhibitors. Hepatology, 21, 1610-1617 (1995).
32) Jayakumar T, Ramesh E, Geraldine P, Antioxidant activity of the oyster mushroom, Pleurotus
ostreatus, on CCl 4-induced liver injury in rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 44, 1989-1996 (2006).
33) Tomofuji Takaaki, Sanbe Toshihiro, Ekuni Daisuke, Azuma Tetsuji, Irie Koichiro, Maruyama
Takayuki, Tamaki Naofumi,Yamamoto Tatsuo, Oxidative damage of rat liver induced by
ligature-induced periodontitis and chronic ethanol consumption. Archives of Oral Biology, 53,
1113-1118 (2008).
34) Mircescu Gabriel, Oxidative stress: An accomplice to uremic toxicity? Journal of renal nutrition, 16,
194-198 (2006).
35) Ristow Michael, Pfister Markus F, Yee Andrew J, Schubert Markus, Michael Laura, Zhang Chenyu,
Ueki Kojhiro, Michael M Dodson, Lowell Bradford B, Kahn C Ronald, Frataxin activates
mitochondrial energy conversion and oxidative phosphorylation. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 97, 12239-12243 (2000).
36) Mcclain Craig J, Song Zhenyuan, Barve Shirish S, Hill Daniell B, Deaciuc Ion, Recent advances in
alcoholic liver disease IV. Dysregulated cytokine metabolism in alcoholic liver disease. American
Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 287, G497-G502 (2004).
37) An Leon, Wang Xiaodong, Cederbaum Arthur I, Cytokines in alcoholic liver disease. Archives of
toxicology, 86, 1337-1348 (2012).
38) Yin Ming, Wheeler Michael D, Kono Hiroshi, Bradford Blair U, Gallucci Randle M, Luster Michael
I, Thurman Ronald G, Essential role of tumor necrosis factor α in alcohol-induced liver injury in mice.
Gastroenterology, 117, 942-952 (1999).
39) Iimuro Yuji, Gallucci Randle M, Luster Michael I, Kono Hiroshi, Thurman Ronald G, Antibodies to
tumor necrosis factor alfa attenuate hepatic necrosis and inflammation caused by chronic exposure to
ethanol in the rat. Hepatology, 26, 1530-1537 (1997).
40) Forsyth Christopher B, Farhadi Ashkan, Jakate Shriram M, Tang Yueming, Shaikh Maliha,
Keshavarzian Ali, Lactobacillus GG treatment ameliorates alcohol-induced intestinal oxidative stress,
gut leakiness, and liver injury in a rat model of alcoholic steatohepatitis. Alcohol, 43, 163-172 (2009).
41) Adachi Yukito,Bradford Blair U,Gao Wenshi,Bojes Heidi K,Thurman Ronald G, Inactivation of
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
Kupffer cells prevents early alcohol‐induced liver injury. Hepatology, 20, 453-460 (1994).
42) Thurman Rg, II. Alcoholic liver injury involves activation of Kupffer cells by endotoxin. American
Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 275, G605-G611 (1998).
43) Beutler Bruce, Rietschel Ernst Th, Innate immune sensing and its roots: the story of endotoxin.
Nature Reviews Immunology, 3, 169-176 (2003).
44) Beutler Bruce, Inferences, questions and possibilities in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nature, 430,
257-263 (2004).
45) Wheeler Michael D, Endotoxin and Kupffer cell activation in alcoholic liver disease. Alcohol
research and Health, 27, 300-306 (2003).
Figure legends
Fig.1. The chemical structure of AAPC.
Fig.2. The effects of AAPC on plasma alcohol and acetaldehyde concentrations. The results are
presented as the means ± SE. *P< 0.05 when compared with the ethanol group (model group). ND: no
alcohol was detected.
Fig.3. The effects of AAPC on hepatic alcohol metabolizing enzyme activities. The results are
presented as the means ± SE. *P< 0.05 when compared with the ethanol group.
Fig. 4. The effect of AAPC on CYP2E1 enzyme activity. The aniline hydroxylase was determined by
measuring p-aminophenol formation activities (A), and the microsomal protein levels were determined by
using the Bradford method with bovine serum albumin as the standard (B and C). I: normal group; II: 8
mg/kg AAPC control group; III: ethanol control group; IV-VI: ethanol plus 2, 4 or 8 mg/kg AAPC treated
groups. The results are presented as the means ± SE. *P< 0.05 when compared with the ethanol group.
Fig.5. The effects of AAPC on serum ALT and AST activities. The results are presented as the means ±
SE. *P< 0.05 when compared with the ethanol group.
Fig.6. The effect of AAPC on liver myeloperoxidase activity. The results are presented as the means ±
SE. *P< 0.05 when compared with the ethanol group.
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Advance Publication
Fig.7. The effects of AAPC on liver TNF-α and IL-1β levels. The results are presented as the means ±
SE. *P< 0.05 when compared with the ethanol group.
Fig.8. The effects of AAPC on antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation. The results are presented
as the means ± SE. *P< 0.05 when compared with the ethanol group.
Fig.9. The effect of AAPC on plasma endotoxin level. The results are presented as the means ± SE. *P<
0.05 when compared with the ethanol group.
Fig.10. The effects of AAPC on the level of NF-κB (A), and the expression of TLR4, CD14, MyD88,
COX-2, and iNOS protein (B). I: normal group; II: 8 mg/kg AAPC control group; III: ethanol control
group; IV-VI: ethanol plus 2, 4 or 8 mg/kg AAPC treated groups. The results are presented as the means ±
SE. *P< 0.05 when compared with the ethanol group.
Fig.11. Histomorphological examination (H&E staining, 100×). I: normal group; II: 8 mg/kg AAPC
control group; III: ethanol control group; IV-VI: ethanol plus 2, 4 or 8 mg/kg AAPC treated groups.