EIS for the Proposed Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project

EIS for the Proposed Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project

Executive Summary | Page 1 of 58

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-A Project Fact Sheet The Provincial Government of Samar proposes to develop a reclamation project in Barangay Mercedes, Catbalogan City. This project has an area of approximately 35 hectares. The Executive Summary briefly discusses the fundamentals of the proposed project including the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process documentation and its key findings that are essential to the formulation of the Environmental Management Plan. Table ES - 1. Basic Project Information

Project Name Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project Project Location Along the coastal waters of Barangay Mercedes,

Poblacion 3, Poblacion 4, and Poblacion 5, Catbalogan City, Samar

Project Classification per EMB MC 2014-005

Category A-1 (Reclamation Project)

Scope of the Project Horizontal development only (Note: separate ECCs will be applied for vertical development and for source of reclamation materials)

Summary of Project components 1. Land Mass 2. Coastal Dike and Drainage Improvement 3. Internal Road Network 4. Utilities

Project Area 35 hectares Project/Investment Cost PhP 328,445,099.93 Project Duration 15 months Profile of the Proponent Name of Proponent Provincial Government of Samar Address Provincial Capitol, Catbalogan City, Samar Authorized Signatory/Representative

Governor Reynolds Michael Tan

Contact Details Cellphone number: 0939 990 2021 E-mail: [email protected]

Profile of the Preparer EIA Preparer Engr. John Gilbert Gopez, EnP Address 27 Unit F, Mayaman St., UP Village, Quezon City, 1101 Contact Details Landline: (02) 247 3477

E-mail: [email protected] ES-B Process Documentation B.1. The EIA Team The Preparer’s field of expertise and the EIA module assigned to each member are shown on Table ES - 2.



Table ES - 2. EIA Team Members Team Member Field of Expertise/ Module IPCO No.

John Gilbert W. Gopez Team Leader / Water Quality Expert

Application with EMB Filed

Jean Ravelo Geologist / Land Application with EMB

Filed Emerson Darroles Oceanography /Water IPCO-153

Benjamin Francisco Marine and Freshwater Ecology Expert / Water

IPCO-038

Victor Pantaleon Coral Reef, Seagrass Expert / Water

Application with EMB Filed

Michael Francisco Fisheries / Water IPCO-040 Nazario Sabello Air Quality Expert / Air IPCO-240 Nadia Conde People Module Expert / People IPCO-102

B.2. EIA Study Schedule The activities undertaken and completed by the team as part of the preparation of EIS Report are detailed in Table ES - 3. Table ES - 3. Summary of EIA Study Schedule

Activity Date IEC Activities December 17-18, 2019, January

16, 2020, and February 27, 2020 Conduct of Perception Survey January 2021 Public Scoping May 10, 2021 Technical Scoping May 26, 2021 Secondary Data Gathering May 27 – June 15, 2021 Marine and Freshwater Ecology Survey June 4-7, 2021 Water Quality and ambient Air and Noise Sampling and Testing

June 10-16, 2021

Oceanographic Survey and Coastal Modeling Study June 11-13, 2021 Conduct of Geotechnical Investigation June 16-22, 2021 Preparation of EIS June 16-29, 2021

B.3. EIA Study Area The Study Area is where the Reclamation Project is expected to be constructed in Barangays Mercedes, Poblacion 3, Poblacion 4 and Poblacion 5, Catbalogan City, and neighboring barangays that is expected to have a direct and indirect impact from the project.



B.4. EIA Methodology The approach and methodology undertaken to prepare this EIS Report is in accordance with the prescribed methods and procedural manual (DAO 2003-30) mandated by the DENR-Environmental Management Bureau. Table ES - 4 provides the methodology used for each module. Table ES - 4. The EIA Methodology

Environmental Components Methodology and Approach on Baseline Survey Methodology and Approach on Impact Assessment

Land Land Use and Classification

• The updated Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) of Catbalogan City will be main source of information on land use and land compatibility. The preparers will secure map showing the project area in relation to existing land use.

• Identify areas vulnerable/susceptible to natural hazards where the project is located or near the project area (include map/s).

• Coordinate with relevant government agencies (i.e. NCIP, DAR, DENR, BFAR, MGB) to determine if the project area is under CARP or with CADC / CADT / CALC/ CALT, with IFMA/CBFMA, within COC, within MPSA or other tenurial instruments and identify corresponding existing tenure issues including presence of informal settlers.

• Discuss the project and secure clearances from the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR), Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), Department of Tourism (DOT), Philippine Ports Authority (PPA), and Philippine Reclamation Authority (PRA)

• Assessment of the compatibility of the proposed project vis-a-vis actual land use and the approved comprehensive land use plan/zoning classification, ECA Classification and/or the coastal resource management plan of the LGU if any.

• Identify and assess impact in terms of land tenure issues in relation to project implementation

• Identify and assess impact of the project on these visually significant landforms / landscape / structures

• Identify and assess impacts of the estimated generation of solid wastes in terms of amount and characteristics (hazardous or domestic).




• Secure the updated Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan of Catbalogan City to determine existing solid waste management.

Geology • The consultant will conduct geotechnical investigation to determine the soil engineering and geotechnical properties of the project site.

• The slope map will be sourced from the CLUP while and bathymetric map will be generated based on the bathymetry survey.

• Regional/General Geological Map Natural Hazard Map will be secured from NAMRIA, NDRRMC, MGB, PHIVOLCS, PAGASA.

• The following maps will also be provided: 1. Storm Surge Hazard Map 2. Tsunami Hazard Map 3. Earthquake generators 4. Ground shaking

• Identify and assess project impact in terms of the changes in surface landform / topography / terrain / slope /bathymetry including existing hazard as maybe aggravated by climate change as projected by PAGASA

• Identify and assess project impact in terms of the changes in sub-surface geology and inducement of subsidence, liquefaction, landslides, mud/debris flow to the environment including the possibility of aggravating existing natural hazards

• Discuss and assess the impacts of geologic hazards and planned earthworks on the project facilities.

• Discuss the potential impacts of these hazards and include proposed mitigation measures.

Pedology • Summary of Soil Investigation Report on soil type and quality

• Soil map showing soil types, sampling stations, topography, streams, built-up areas, and planned project features

• Water and wind erodibility potential • Sediment sources, and • Riverbank stability • Laboratory results on soil sample analysis for N, P,

K, pH, organic matter, micronutrients and trace metals e. g. Pb, Hg, As, Cd, Cr hexavalent, etc.

• Describe capability of the land to accommodate the proposed development with minimal or without soil erosion/loss of topsoil/overburden

• Describe the physical properties and erodibility potential of the soil, ongoing erosion processes and assess the erosional impacts of the project. The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and its variants may be used in the modeling.

• Assess the impact of the project activities including the possibility of spills on soil quality and fertility




Terrestrial Ecology • Map showing land cover; sampling sites; location of observed important, endangered, and keystone species; ecologically sensitive sites; planned land development works

• Flora and fauna species inventory or survey report to cover species listing, abundance, richness, dominance, diversity, evenness, ecological status, and uses

• Loss of species – Of special interest are the keystone, endangered, and endemic species.

• Pollution effects on species – The stressors include dust, noise, chemical/ petrochemical spills, eroded sediment, increased temperature, etc.

• Relate discussions to estimated GHG emissions and possible carbon sequestration program/s

• Water Hydrology & Hydrogeology

• Drainage map (also showing local drainage system/infrastructures);

• Historical flooding/drought occurrences, stream flow measurements/estimates;

• Delineation of watershed /sub watersheds/ floodplain; and identification of aquifers if any

• Regional hydrogeological map

• Identify and assess project impact on the change in drainage morphology/local drainage system and resulting effects of flooding pattern in the project area and surrounding. Include climate projections effects on flooding.

• Identify and assess project impact in terms of change in stream, lake water depth.

Oceanography • Bathymetric survey and map • Measurement of water currents • Hydrodynamic modeling • Particle dispersion modeling • Storm surge hazard, exposure, • vulnerability, risk maps

• Assess based on cumulative impacts with Pier Uno to Brgy. Bunuanan Reclamation Project

• Identify and assess project impact on the degree of change/disruption of circulation pattern and the potential for coastal erosion

• Build a hydrodynamic model based on the measured bathymetry and currents and tidal analysis and then validate the model.

• Use the hydrodynamic model to assess the impacts of the bathymetric changes. Discuss how the impacts may be affected by climate change. Compare projected new bathymetry as a result of the project with the existing.




Water Quality • Water quality sampling and testing will be employed by the EIA preparer through the engagement of an EMB-accredited laboratory. The sampling stations should be outside the area to be reclaimed. The following water quality parameters will be tested: Color, DO, Fecal Coliform, Nitrate, pH, Phosphate, Temperature, TSS, Ammonia, Boron, Fluoride, Selenium, Sulfate, Arsenic, Barium, and Cadmium

• Identify and assess project impact in terms of degradation of groundwater, coastal surface water and coastal/marine water quality. Use DENR standard methods and procedures for sampling and analysis.

• Assess impact on siltation of surface and coastal/marine waters.

Freshwater Biology • Summary of endemicity / conservation status • Abundance of ecologically and economically

important species (fishes, benthos, planktons); • Presence of pollution indicator species;

• Identify and assess project impact in terms of threats to existence/and or loss of species, abundance frequency and distribution species and include discussions on overall impact to freshwater ecology.

Marine Biology • Abundance/densities/distribution of ecologically and economically important species (mangroves, fishes, benthos, planktons, coral reefs, algae, seaweeds, sea grasses);

• Quadrat, transect, line intercept, spot dive, manta tow, marine resource characterization (e.g. municipal and commercial fisheries data) for baseline gathering.

• Conduct interview with key stakeholders to validate results of the data gathering and assessment.

• Identify and assess project impact in terms of threats to existence, loss of important local species, threat to abundance, frequency and distribution and include discussions on overall impact to marine ecology. Relate discussions to air, water and oceanography

• Use BMB Technical Bulletin 2017- 05 and 2019-04 as guide for the assessment

• Map showing the area to be reclaimed and coastal resources (mangroves, seagrasses and coral reef areas) inside and on the areas surrounding the area to be reclaimed.

Air Meteorology/ Climatology

• Data from PAGASA like the monthly average rainfall and temperature in Catbalogan will be ;

• Identify and assess project impact in terms of change in the local micro- climate change. Also discuss effects of




Climatological Normal/extremes; Wind rose diagrams;

• Frequency of Tropical cyclones • Data on Greenhouse gasses (i.e. carbon dioxide,

nitrous oxide);

climate change using PAGASA medium to long term projections

• Estimate projected greenhouse gases (GHG) (i.e. carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide) using IPCC guidelines; include mitigation and/or sequestration for both construction and operation phases.

Air Quality • Ambient air quality sampling and testing will be employed by the EIA preparer through the engagement of an EMB-accredited laboratory. Two (2) additional sampling stations will be identified to measure the air quality where the trucks will haul the embankment materials from the source of fill going to the reclamation area. The TSP, PM10, SOx, and NOx will be sampled and tested.

• Use DENR standard methods and procedures for sampling and analysis.

Noise • Ambient noise sampling will be employed by the EIA preparer through the engagement of an EMB-accredited laboratory. Two (2) additional sampling stations will be identified to measure the ambient noise level where the trucks will haul the embankment materials from the source of fill going to the reclamation area.

• Use DENR standard methods and procedures for sampling and measurement.

• Conduct rapid assessment for noise

• People Demography • Latest demographic data on the impact area such as

number of households and household size, land area, population, population density /growth, gender and age profile, literacy rate, profile of educational attainment, settlements map will be

• Identify and assess project impacts on demography of affected communities. Use assessment in the formulation of Social Development Plan/IEC

• Assess availability of alternative public access and housing options for displaced settlers




sourced out from City Planning and Development Office (CPDO)

• Census of population / property that will be displaced / disturbed

• Housing ownership profile / availability of housing/ number of informal settlers

• For project with displacement/ disturbance of properties/settlers, change/conflict in land ownership and change/conflict right of way, formulate resettlement framework plan or RAP

• Identify and assess project impact due to in-migration patterns including proliferation of informal settlers

Indigenous People • Demographic data on Indigenous People (if any) and existing Culture/Lifestyle that may be significantly affected

• Identity and assess project impact in terms of Culture/Lifestyle that may be affected and/or introduced

Historical and Cultural Heritage

• Inventory and description of physical cultural resources and landscapes that have archaeologic, palaeontologic, historical, religious, aesthetic, or cultural significance.

• Identify all potential project impacts in an integrated manner considering the type, significance, and value/importance of the physical cultural resource/s

Basic Infrastructure and Services

• Availability of public services (water supply, power supply, and communications /transportation

• Peace and order / crime • Statistical data / information related to public

services

• Identify and assess project impact in terms of threats to delivery of basic services including potential for resource competition in the area including effects of in-migration

Environmental Health and Sanitation Profile

• Availability of public services in terms of: health resources (Government and Private)

• Statistical data / information related to public services - morbidity and mortality rates (infants and adults – 5-year trend)

• Common diseases in the including endemic diseases.

• Identify and assess specific threats to public health and safety due to project impacts.

• Analysis of the impact of project implementation on existing disease profile including weather sensitive diseases and impact aggravation as a result of climate change.

• Include impacts on health and sanitation Generation of Local Benefits from the project

• Socioeconomic data:

• Identify and assess local benefits of the project in terms of enhancement of employment and livelihood opportunities, increased business opportunities and




associated economic activities and increased revenue of LGU

Existing Traffic Condition

• Road network/ systems • Existing Transportation/traffic situation (traffic for

land and water)

• Identify and assess project impact on the traffic situation in the area including congestion based on existing capacity of road system

Perception Survey • Perception survey questionnaires will be prepared by the EIA preparers and conduct primary data gathering.

• The result of the perception survey will be used to substantiate the findings and impacts under the People module.

B.5. Public Participation As per the DENR Administrative Order (DAO) 2017-15, Public Participation is mandatory in preparing the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Report to ensure its viability. It should be imposed as early as conducting the Information and Education Campaign (IEC) prior to public scoping. A summary of the public consultation meetings held throughout the formulation of this EIS can be seen on the table below. Table ES - 5. Summary of Public Consultation Meetings Held

Activity Date Venue Key Participants

Information Education and Communication (IEC) meeting with the Provincial Government of Samar and City Government of Catbalogan

December 17, 2019 (1:00 - 4:00 PM)

Conference Room, 2nd Floor, Capitol Building, Catbalogan City, Samar

Project Technical Working Group

IEC meeting with the Barangay Officials of Barangay Mercedes, Catbalogan City

December 18, 2019 (9:00AM to 11:00 AM)

Catbalogan V Central Elementary School

Barangay Officials of Barangay Mercedes

IEC meeting with the Provincial Government of Samar and City Government of Catbalogan

January 16, 2020 (1:00 PM - 3:00 PM)

Conference Room, 2nd Floor, Capitol Building, Catbalogan City, Samar




Activity Date Venue Key Participants

IEC meeting with DENR Region VIII and EMB Region VIII

February 27, 2020 (9:00AM to 11:00 AM)

Sangguniang Panlalawigan Conference Room, 2nd Floor, Capitol Building, Catbalogan City, Samar


Public Scoping May 10, 2021 (9:00AM to 12:00 PM)

Zoom Application and an on-site venue at Old Tia Anita’s

Project Technical Working Group & Barangay Officials of Barangay Mercedes

Public Hearing October 15, 2021 (9:00AM to 12:00 PM)

Zoom Application and an on-site venue at 2nd floor, Session Hall, Provincial Capitol Building in Catbalogan City

Government offices, Barangay officials, Business group and Fisherfolk Organization

Prior to the public consultation meetings held, the participants’ comments, issues raised, and their suggestions are summarized on the table below, greatly taken into consideration and integrated for the main report of the EIS. Table ES - 6. Summary of Issues, Concerns and Suggestions raised during Consultation Meetings

Activity, Date and Location Aspect Issues, Concerns, and

Suggestions Participant Response

Public Scoping, May 10, 2021 via Zoom Application and an on-site venue at Old Tia Anita’s

Land What is the total land area percentage? Are the roads

included in these?

Diomedes Tan (Philippine Reclamation

Authority)

The total land area is 100% and the roads are included in the

said project.

Land Is the PLGU of Samar aware of the greenspace requirement of PRA

which is at least 5%?

There is an allotted 30-40% of the total area for the open space

network.





Land Is PD 1586 considered when planning for the no build zone?

Gerry Malinao (Public Sector)

Yes, it is. Especially since the commercial space is near the

sea while the resettlement area is situated between the

commercial spaces.

People Is the distance for the fisher folk village considered in the plan?

Yes, it was considered but the city has a project for its tidal

wall and flood control design which we had to take into

consideration as well.

People What will happen to the reservation of SSU Mercedes

Campus (formerly Samar Regional School of Fisheries)? We are not talking about the existing

building and area of the said agency; we are talking about the reservation area for Samar State

University Mercedes campus (formerly Samar Regional School of Fisheries) which I think will be

affected by the said proposed development?

Ricardeo Severo

(Campus Director, SSU Mercedes Campus)

We don’t have any plans on changing anything in the

existing campus nor it would directly affect the reservation

area. However, a meeting between the provincial, city

government and representatives from SSU will

be conducted to discuss further the matter.





Water Is there a comprehensive flood control and sewerage plan for the proposed reclamation area? We are in the process of preparation

of plans and program of works for the existing canals and sewer

system.

Grace Lyneil (DPWH)

The hydrology study is part of the whole project and one of the

deliverables is the to come up with the flood control and

sewerage plan.

Water Is there a designated fish landing point?

Gualberto Alcober (DA-BFAR Region 8)

Yes, there is.

People In fishermen village allocated areas, what is the individual

household area to be allocated and the terms and conditions? Is

there any provision of fish landing points intended to the fishermen's sector fronting the sea adjacent to

the fishermen’s village? So that fishermen in the village can access

their fishing implements and be protected if natural and manmade

calamities will occur.

This will be finalized once the meeting with the local

government and fisherfolk organization is completed.

Water Is the comprehensive flood control a separate project from the

reclamation in terms of fund

Diomedes Tan

Yes, we also hired a separate consultant regarding this. The





source and implementation schedule?

(Philippine Reclamation Authority)

surveys and report is currently ongoing.

Public Hearing, October 15, 2021 via Zoom Application and an on-site venue at 2nd floor, Session Hall, Provincial Capitol Building in Catbalogan City

Project Description

Meron po bang private proponent for this project?

Isabel Calantoc (DIPH)

As of now ay wala tayong private proponent since the

project is initiated by the Provincial Government of

Samar.

Project Description

Meron na bang contractor for this project to do the reclamation?

Meron po bang bidding process?


Meron pong bidding process na ginawa dito, at meron na din po

tayong contractor. Pero ulitin ko lang po, this project is Provincial Government of

Samar initiated and funded.

Project Description

If awarded na yung project, may we know kung sino po yung

contractor to do the reclamation project?


Awarded na po siya sa Northern Builders. [Based po sila] sa Catarman, Northern

Samar.

Project Description

Na-implement na daw po ba o nagstart na yung project as of

today?

On-site stakeholder Kanina po nasagot na ng UPMO yan, ang ongoing pong

works ay para sa dike. Eto pong reclamation na ito ay for

implementation pa, at wala hindi pa pwedeng iimplement dahil wala pa tayong Notice to Proceed from PRA at ang ECC.

Kaya po tayo andito ngayon para sa ECC. Under DPWH po yung nakikita niyong works sa

ngayon.





Project Description

Sana ho ma-coordinate ni proponent sa barangay kung ano

mang activities or related activities na meron yung project,

especially daw itong implemented by the DPWH, kasi for example

daw po, eto ngayon ay hindi nila alam.

On-site stakeholder Actually po, nagkaroon kami recently lang ng Public Hearing

din po para doon sa works natin.

Project Description

Na-coordinate na ba City Government of Catbalogan?

On-site stakeholder Sa question po ninyo kung nagcoordinate ba sa City

[Government], nag-coordinate po tayo; meron po silang

representative na present sa meeting na ito at meron din po kaming nirequest sa kanila na No Objection Resolution para sa project na ito. Isa po yun sa

mga requirements na hinihingi.

Project Description

Please clarify, is this a PLGU proposal or from the PRA?

BFAR FRMD Province of Samar initiated and funded po, sir.

Project Description

Saan po kukunin ang filling material?

Ma’am Christine On-site po, sa Catbalogan City.

Land My next question ay doon sa pinresent kanina ni Ar. Gascon, about the masterplan. Kasi she

mentioned about the open space and green space. Included po ba

ang mga road sa kanyang computation?

Sir Mark John Pineda, PRA The green and open space computation includes all roads, retention ponds, and esplanade.





Irereiterate lang po namin ang

policy ng PRA, AO 2019-05, requiring all proposed

reclamation na magkaroon ng 5% open space. Excluded po dyan

ang roads sa green space. You can check po our policy para sa

provision na yan.

Land There was some mention of the connecting bridge from the reclamation site at sa road. Was that part of the development? Na-cover din ba siya ng application ng ECC?

Sir Mark John Pineda, PRA As of now, hindi pa siya nasali sa application namin for ECC kasi yung project pa lang po

natin na gagawin at ang priority is the reclamation. Kung meron na po kaming

pondo, then yun po yung time na mag-aapply kami for

another ECC for the separate project.

Land Hindi po kakailangain ang bridge sa pagtambak? Kasi po land-

based ang quarry natin.

Sir Mark John Pineda, PRA Yes po. Yung bridge po required lang siya para maka-connect ang Mercedes to the other proposed reclamation

site, which is located sa Pier 1 to Bunuanan.

Land Nakita ko po sa mapa na malawak pa ang land area ng Catbalogan.

So bakit po magrereclaim e malawak naman ang area?

Magkukumpulan tayo dito sa

Sir Rene Zaldy Porlaje, BFAR-CO

Ang structure po ng Catbalogan, mula po sa

shoreline, hindi po aabot ng isang kilometro ay bundok na

kaagad. So yung bundok po na





coastal area na maraming masisira na marine resources at

maapektuhan ang communities. Pwede pong pakipaliwanag sa

aming lahat kung bakit kailangan natin magreclaim e hindi pa naman po siksikan kagaya sa

Maynila?

yun, mas mahirap po tanggalin yun kesa mag-reclaim. Kung

andito po kayo sa Catbalogan, makikita niyo po na yung inexplain niyo ngayon na

malawak ang Catbalogan City, hindi po yun tugma in a way na ang Catbalogan po ay bundok-bundok, hindi po pwedeng i-

develop kaagad. So etong option po namin ay

reclamation, which is allowed naman po sa batas. So kung ang

sinasabi po ninyo ay mas madaling i-develop ang sa

bundok, hindi po kami agree doon, sir, dahil kung nakikita po ninyo ang topography dito

ay bundok po talaga.

Land Saan po kukunin ang filling materials for this project?

Ms. Nikka Oquias, Oceana Ma’am, the source of fill materials would be on-site po.

Water May cost-benefit analysis ba na ginawa for this project looking into its long-term effects on the

fragile marine ecosystem and the livelihood of the fisherfolks?

Ms. Nikka Oquias, Oceana Yes po, may ginawa pong cost-benefit analysis for this project.

Water Na-delineate na po ba ang Catbalogan City, ang kanila pong city waters? Na-mapa na po ba ito

ng NAMRIA?


Hindi po natin masasagot yan sir, kung na-delineate na ang

city waters ng Catbalogan, pero I can assure you na ang





coverage ng project is well within the waters ng

Catbalogan. Whether or not may delineation po yun ay

hindi po affected ang nearby municipal waters.

Water Kaya ko po natanong ay kasi 35 hectares po itong project,

maapektuhan po ang municipal waters, mag-eextend po siya kasi shoreline po ang ating baseline.

Paano po ma-resolve ang issue na ito?


The definition of the municipal waters is that its coverage is measured at 90 degrees from the shoreline, 15 kilometers

outward. So, our reclamation project is less than 1 kilometer. What can I say is that it is well within the municipal waters of

Catbalogan City.

Water Gusto ho malaman kung ano ang plano nila para sa waterways, kasi po affected daw sila ng flooding

even before the implementation of the reclamation project.

On-site stakeholder Ito pong project na ito ay isa sa ginawa para maiwasan yung current flooding sa Mercedes.

Kung napansin po ninyo kanina, mayroon po doon sa

plano na mga waterways, tapos yung tubig po doon ay

mapupunta sa isang water pump. Mayroon po tayong

consultants na nagstudy kung ano po ang current status ng

flooding doon para ma-incorporate siya sa project.

Water Nakakasigurado ba ang project na hindi magagaya ang Barangay

On-site stakeholder Yung pagtatagpo po ng highest level ng lupa at tubig, yun po





Mercedes sa mga nangyaring baha sa Malabon?

ay act of God. Pero sinisigurado po ng Province na gagawin po namin lahat ng precautionary measures para hindi mangyari

yung pagbabaha ngayon sa Malabon. Kung sakali mang dumating yung panahon na

magbaha pa din, hindi po natin mapipigilan yun kasi ang ulan ay hindi po natin hawak. Pero yung project po natin ay may

ginagawang mga study, kasama po doon ang drainage

improvement, master development plan upang

matanggal ang problema sa pagbaha. Ang magagawa lang

po natin ay gawing leksyon kung ano man ang nangyayari

sa Malabon para ma-apply natin dito upang maiwasan

yun.

Ang maisasagot ko po, sa part ng DPWH, ay yung tide

embankment po na ginagawa natin ay nagkaroon po ng study

sa Bureau of Design na naka-design po siya na kahit

magkaroon po ng storm surge o di kaya ay highest tide na

sinasabi ninyo, naka-design po siya na i-withstand po yung





ganung klaseng sakuna. Pagkatapos po nitong coastal dike, may proposed po ang

DPWH doon po sa pumping stations. Ang mangyayari po

doon, ang magiging mechanics po ng pumping station, kapag

nagkaroon po ng baha sa reclamation area, i-pupump out

po ng pumping station yung tubig palabas para lahat po ng tubig na ma-iimpound doon sa loob ay mailabas po. Actually po yung coastal dike po natin

ay naka-design siya para sa 50-year return period, ibig sabihin

po ay doon po sa 50 years na yun, more or less ay kaya niya

i-withstand ang mga phenomena na pwede

mangyari.

Water Ilan po ba ang total area ng city waters ng Catbalogan at ilang percent po ang mababawas for

this project? The proponent po is requesting for a resource person

from the City Government.


Para lang po ma-clarify and additional information for Sir

Rene ng BFAR-CO, last January, Gov. Mike Tan

requested BFAR R8 to conduct a rapid resource assessment sa proposed reclamation area dito sa Catbalogan. Yung result ng

rapid resource assessment, finorward na po sa BFAR-CO, baka po Sir Rene hindi niyo pa





nakikita, last March 2021. Makikita niyo po doon ang coral assessment, yung fish biodiversity and biomass,

nandoon po.

Water I think you have to present din, in a powerpoint presentation, yung

assessment na nagawa. At sa source of filling materials, sinagot

naman siya dito, nakalagay sa Catbalogan City. Ang alam ko

dapat ito may ECC din. May ECC din ang area na pagkukuhanan

ninyo ng filling materials.

Ma’am Anita, DENR-BMB For the question ng kasamahan natin for BFAR, nagkaroon po ng rapid resource assessment

ang BFAR, as requested by the Provincial Government, and the

result of the assessment was forwarded to Director Bayate.

Then again, the Provincial Government, ni-reinforce po

nila ang resource assessment na ginawa ni BFAR; nagconduct

po ng another resource assessment yung preparer.

Basically, the methodology na ginamit po for the benthic

lifeforms is yung manta-tow and spot-dive surveys. Based po sa suggestion po ni Ma’am Anita, we shall include that in the powerpoint presentation

para po mas ma-appreciate ng participants dito sa Public

Hearing yung naging resulta po ng assessment. Tapos sa filling materials naman po, tama po

kayo doon na dapat may application yan ng ECC; but





dito po, for this reclamation project, hindi na po namin siya isinama. It will have a separate ECC application. Basically, the

coverage of the ECC application is yung reclamation lang po. Pero yung members po ng Review Committee, pina-

include lang po kung saan ang source of filling material para lang po ma-identify kung saan

dadaan yung mga hauling trucks para po makuhanan

namin ng air quality baseline data. We’ll closely coordinate with the PLGU regarding the

matter po, salamat.

People My question is paano yung mga kagaya namin na affected ng

project?

Raul, Vice Chairman of an organization of fisherfolks

As presented po by Ar. Gascon kanina, magkakaroon po tayo ng fisherman’s village, yung color orange. Maglalagay po

tayo ng area ng market para sa mga fresh catch natin. Actually po sir, magkausap kami ni Sir Gerry, at magcocoordinate po

kami para ma-address ang concern ni sir regarding the

project.

People Ano po ba ang plano ng project proponent during construction

para sa mga madidisplace o

On-site stakeholder Kung mapapansin niyo po sa presentation kanina, hindi po

siya one-time big-time na





maapektuhan ng trabaho? Saan po pupunta yung mga

madidisplace na fishermen temporarily, habang kino-

construct?

gagawin lahat. We shall be doing this po phase by phase.

Okay, to answer your question,

sir, hindi naman po lahat ay matatambakan. Sabi nga po si

Atty. Allan, by phasing po itong projects. So ang ginagawa

po ni contractor ay ito po munang sa isang side; at ongoing po ang aming

assessment para po sa right-of-way. Hindi naman po

matatambakan ito, so pwede po sa part na yun.

People Meron po kaya kayong listahan ng fisherfolks na maapektuhan? Tsaka kasama ang kanilang mga

bangka? Pwede po kami makakuha ng listahan?


Yes sir, meron po kaming listahan from BFAR R8, kasi

prior to our request sa DENR-EMB for the ECC Clearance, humingi tayo ng certification

from BFAR. Nagconduct po ang BFAR-RO ng assessment,

validation, and thankfully ang recommendation nila is okay to

construct the reclamation project. Kung wala po kayong

kopya sir, bibigyan namin kayo. Thank you.

People May cost-benefit analysis ba na ginawa for this project looking into its long-term effects on the

Ms. Nikka Oquias, Oceana Yes po, may ginawa pong cost-benefit analysis for this project.





fragile marine ecosystem and the livelihood of the fisherfolks?

People Yung mga residents daw from the Barangay Mercedes are worried

na baka sila ay maisali sa reclamation proponent.

Nanghihingi po si sir ng response or comment from the proponent.

On-site stakeholder Kagaya po ng sinabi ko kanina sir, yung mga residente po dito,

whether legal or illegal, hindi po sila kasama sa project na ito.

So kung ano po ang inookupahan nila dun ngayon, ay sasagutin nila sa PRA. Pero hindi po sila sakop sa area ng project na ito. So kung may

pag-aalala po sila sir, siguro po dapat ay makipagcoordinate na sila sa PRA tulad ng na-discuss natin kanina at yung discussion

ng CENRO at PRA regarding pending applications. Thank

you po.

Other Ano daw po ang magiging status ng occupancy ng mga existing land owners on the area which

will be affected by this proposed reclamation? Yung mga

nagreclaim na daw po, kasi meron na daw pong nagreclaim.

On-site stakeholder Yung mga private individuals na nagreclaim na, hindi po yun kasama dito sa project na ito.

PRA po ang may jurisdiction sa private individuals na

nagreclaim na; pero sa tanong niyo po ay magiging ano ang

status ng area na nireclaim nila, hindi po namin masasagot iyon

dahil hindi po namin sakop yun. Outside po iyan sa area of

this project.





That’s true – existing and unauthorized reclamations in

the area will be under the jurisdiction of PRA. We intend to undertake a survey of these

illegal reclamations in Mercedes. The survey and the Presidential Proclamation that

will be secured by PRA will cover the entire area that is

illegally reclaimed. The occupants or reclaimers can avail of the existing policy of

PRA on how to legally acquire the ownership of these

reclaimed lands. That’s all.

Other May concern lang po ako since na-mention po kanina na sa

reclamation, ang in charge po doon ay PRA. So, ang concern ko lang po ay anong mangyayari sa

may existing foreshore lease application sa office that are still

pending due to lack of certification from DPWH and CPDO since na-deny ang mga

application/certification nila since may proposed yung Province

natin for the reclamation. Although matagal na kasi yung ibang application doon sa table namin, hindi kasi namin siya

Ma’am Cherry Grace Ungab, CENRO

Our advice to the DENR-CENRO is that applications should be held in abeyance

because PRA is going to apply for the titling and ownership of those reclaimed lands, in behalf

of the national government. That’s the law, and that’s the

existing policy of the PRA. So, the applicant that can claim the ownership of those reclaimed lands will be the PRA. We’ll

just be complicating the process if DENR will have to

act/approve those applications for foreshore lease agreement,





maproprocess because of that lack of certification. Itatanong ko lang

sana kung pwede na ba namin ma-proceed yung processing o

kailangan po bang pending muna yun?

because at the end, PRA is going to apply for Presidential

Proclamation for those reclaimed lands, and PRA is

going to ask DENR to exclude those areas for the tenurial

instrument, so that the survey plan of those areas can be

approved in favor of the PRA. Maybe CENRO can process an irrevocable permit application, which is one-year renewable to

legalize the occupancy of the people residing in those areas.



ES-C EIA SUMMARY • Summary of alternatives considered in terms of siting, technology selection/operation processes and design • Summary of baseline characterization • Concise integrated summary of the main impacts and residual effects after applying mitigation. • Risks and uncertainties relating to the findings and implications for decision making Alternatives

The following criteria were considered for the selection of the proposed site for the area to be

reclaimed:

1. No sensitive area (presence of mangroves, coral reefs, MPAs or any rich biodiversity

area

The proposed reclamation project is not within a Marine Protected Area (MPA) nor

there are presence of mangroves within the project site.

2. Minimal displacement of fishing access and communities

There are two barangays which have affected residents due to the Project – Poblacion

3 and Mercedes. These residents shall be relocated to the fisherman’s village, which is

one of the delineated zones within the proposed development. Additionally, there are

no permanent fishing structures within the project site.

3. Bathymetry of the area

Based from the bathymetry data, once the Mercedes Reclamation Project is in place,

changes in the coastal configurations and topography of the coastline, and hence

changes in bathymetry due to the Project, are expected. However, the result shows

that the computed changes will not significantly alter the existing bathymetry of the

whole Bay.

4. Land Use Plan

The proposed Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project is aligned with the proposed

land use plan of the City Government. This means that the project is part of the

development goal of Catbalogan. It should also be noted that the Project Site has a

clearance with the Philippine Reclamation Authority (PRA) in a Memorandum of

Understanding dated October 3, 2018. PRA is the primary responsible agency for

integrating, directing and coordinating all reclamation projects for and on behalf of

the National Government and all reclamation projects shall be approved by the

President upon the recommendation of the PRA. Philippine government has given the



go signal to the PRA to engage in massive land reclamation all over the country

through Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) with the adoption of the Philippine

Reclamation Authority Resolution 4161 (Approval of the National Reclamation Plan)

on February 25, 2011.

5. Economic growth

Considering the whole stretch of the Catbalogan City shoreline facing the Samar Sea,

there are other possible sitting of the project. These possible reclamation sites are the

barangays Maulong and Payao which are located north of Mercedes and barangays

Guinsorongan and Bunuuan which are situated in the southern part of Mercedes. But

only Barangay Mercedes site has been found which will provide a significant economic

progress since Barangay Mercedes is the nearest barangay in the central business

district of Catbalogan City and Two (2) ports are adjacent to Barangay Mercedes and

these are Pier Uno and Pier Dos. This allows to maximize the use of these 2 ports since

they are near the proposed reclamation site.



Baseline Characterization The summary of baseline characterization is presented in the table below. Chapter 2 of this EIA Report provides a more detailed discussion. Table ES - 7. Summary of Baseline Characterization

Module Summary of Baseline Environmental Conditions/ Key Findings

Land

Land Use and Classification The City of Catbalogan having a mountainous and rugged terrain with small plain areas mostly found along the seacoast directed its expansion areas to seaward or reclamation. The increasing needs of additional areas for residential, commercial, industrial and institutional spaces to meet the demand to sustain the economic growth of the city led to the plan to expand areas seaward to barangays Mercedes, Maulong and Guinsorongan for residential, commercial and institutional while northern barangays for industrial uses.

Geology/Geomorphology Rugged terrain (with relatively high mountains) characterizes the general topography. Only two percent (2%) of its land area is plain while forty percent (40%) is hilly and fifty five percent (55%) upland. Due to its rugged terrain, the northern and eastern portions of the city revealed angular hills with deep gorges. While in its central portion, its upland surface is cut by many gullies, narrow ravines and canyons that reach the depth of two hundred (200) feet or more. The topography can be described as rolling to mountainous area towards the hinterland – plain to slightly sloping towards the coastal areas.

Pedology Catbalogan has two types of soil based on the records of the Bureau of Soil and Water Management (BSWM). The first type is Catbalogan Clay Loam – it is formed from shale and sandstones. Its topsoil is usually light brown to grey when dry, and appears grayish brown to dark grey when moist. Its texture is slightly sticky and its depth is about ten to 20 centimeters.




The second type is Faraon Clay Loam – a residue of coralline limestone. Its characteristic is its surface oil when wet, appears black grey to dark grey. It is soft, sticky medium granules and appears slightly hard and brittle when dry. It is fair medium in organic contents. Its depth ranges from 15 to 30 centimeters. Covering vegetation to date on the said type of soil are primary and secondary forests. Palay, corn and root crops are suited to this kind of soil type.

Terrestrial Ecology The project is to be constructed within a marine water space. Therefore, vegetation removal, loss of habitat of plant species, loss of important species, abundance, frequency and distribution of the species are very minimal. During the construction, the invasion of non-native species is not expected to occur from vehicles that transport the materials for the project which since the adjacent areas are characterized as built-up areas.

Water

Hydrology & Hydrogeology The Antiao river, commonly called Salug River, is the main river of Catbalogan City. However, along the periphery of the city, there are at least fourteen (14) identified smaller catchment basins that significantly contributes to surface runoff during heavy rainfall and sometimes caused heavy damages to properties and inconvenience to the residents. Catchment basin numbers 1 to 4 are found in Barangay Mercedes, number 5 to 7 are directly affecting the city proper and numbers 8 to 14 are affecting the Pier 1 to Barangay Bunuanan areas.

Water Quality Sea water and surface (fresh) water samples were collected on June 16, 2021 from the sea and Anitao River. Ten (10) sampling stations were identified and selected to establish water quality of the said water bodies that may be affected by the proposed project. Samples were then brought to University of San Carlos Water Laboratory in Cebu City for laboratory analysis of Color, Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Fecal Coliform, Nitrate, pH, Phosphate, Temperature, Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Ammonia, Boron, Fluoride, Selenium, Sulfate, Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Iron, Lead, Manganese, Mercury, Nickel, and Zinc. The samples were analyzed in accordance with the Standard Method for




the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd ed. Water quality survey was conducted to serve as baseline data in monitoring the effect of the project in the water quality.

Freshwater Biology Assessment of freshwater biota was conducted on 05 June 2021 in three sampling stations in the Antiao River in conjunction with marine ecology baseline assessments for the Brgy. Mercedes Reclamation Projects. Due to extremely polluted and turbid river water, the freshwater ecology surveys focused on (i) conduct of key informant interviews to determine fish species still present in the river system, (ii) sampling of benthic macro-invertebrates, if any, and (iii) identification of plankton communities. Sampling locations were distributed in upstream portion of the river, in midstream portion closest and in the Antiao River estuary. A total of three stations were surveyed for plankton communities, fish biota and macro-invertebrates. Four (4) key informants were interviewed for fish biota and macro-benthos.

Marine Biology The baseline assessment was conducted to characterize habitat types, diversity, spatial distribution and current condition of coastal habitats and resources in the Project’s impact area in conjunction with an estimation of potential negative issues and stressor pathways resulting from reclamation activities. In the absence of coral life forms, seagrass and mangrove resources in the impact area of the proposed reclamation project, the survey was conducted employing standard scientific assessment tools in-situ to determine the nature of the benthic environment and validate the absence of corals and seagrass beds, determine plankton community structure, catalogue presence of macro-invertebrates of commercial importance to local communities and census of pelagic fish resources and the fisheries that it supports. Drawing from results of the baseline assessment, the EIA attempts to predict the most likely impacts of anthropogenic origin on susceptible fragile coastal resources within the impact area, and prescribes the most suitable mitigating measures that can be adopted in order to maintain ecological integrity during all phases of project establishment and operation.




Air

Meteorology/Climatology The climate of Catbalogan City belongs to Type IV, wherein rainfall is more or less distributed equally throughout the year. The area is relatively hot and humid; with mean daily temperature of 28.8 °C (range is 23.77 °C and 33.41 °C). The annual rainfall averages about 2,178 mm. There is hardly any month without rainfall. Typhoons are very frequent during the months of August, September, October, November and December. Hence, Samar is popularly known as typhoon area because PAGASA uses the place as weather reference point.

Air Quality An ambient air quality survey was undertaken to check whether ambient air quality before and after the construction phase of the project are up to par with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR); and (2) to come up with potential mitigating measures to decrease the chances of exceeding the parameters set by DENR. As the project involves civil works, it is expected that total suspended particulates (TSP) and noise are to be generated by the project during the construction stage. Observation areas were selected based on the magnitude of civil works involve and proximity to nearest receptors such built up areas, schools and other crowded areas. There were four (4) sampling points for air and noise. In the reclamation area, source of fill materials and route of the hauling trucks.

Noise Noise level monitoring was conducted at four (4) locations within the vicinity. The measurement was performed for about one (1) hour and 24 hours. Noise sampler was handheld at about thirty degrees (30°) from the plane directly pointing at four (4) compass points to evaluate the noise level within the area.

People

Demography Historically, data from the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) showed that Catbalogan has a total population of 7,758 in the year 1903. In the year 1918 it gained an increase of 57%. Thus, reflecting an average annual growth rate (AAGR) of 4.97% annually then. In the year 1939, the population tripled




compare to the Census Year of 1903. The significant increase in population continues until the Census year of 1980 and by 1995, it ballooned into 76,324 or about ten times than that of 1903. Using the AAGR of 1.81% AGR for the 20-year period from 1995 to 2015, the projected population of the City of Catbalogan in 2020 is 113,599.

Migration Catbalogan is a migration and in-migration LGU, local folks look for greener pasture for employment opportunity in highly urbanizes areas while neighboring municipalities finds Catbalogan as an employment generator. However, both these are not included or not counted as population of the city as per guidelines of PSA. Investors finds the city’s population as unique having a smaller population count while actual population are greater (daytime population) in the Poblacion. This is supported by data from DTI that shows that Catbalogan has the biggest investment in terms of money and number one employment generator in the Province of Samar than Calbayog City.

Historical and Cultural Heritage and Indigenous People

The reclamation project aims to create new land that will develop the newest and most vibrant destination in the province merging tourism, business & leisure. Hence, with respect to this purpose, cultural/lifestyle change will be introduced to the residents of Barangay Mercedes or the whole Catbalogan as tourist may flock in the new destination this will create new jobs for the community. Based from the latest Ecological Profile of the City, there are no identified indigenous people nor indigenous cultural community (ICC) within the project site.

Basic Infrastructure and Services Water. According to the Ecological Profile, 2021 of Catbalogan City, the city has a potable water supply. Previously, LUWA was the water provider of the locality. Due to its inefficient services due to grossly inadequate water supply and losing operation, the management was transferred to what is now the Catbalogan Water District (CWD). Today, only 40% of the populace is being served. Immense water shortage/salty water supply is a perennial problem during dry spell.




Power. In terms of power supply, Catbalogan City has 88.46% of the total Household connections were already energized and 100% barangays wherein forty-nine (49) barangays connected to the main grid and eight (8) island barangays connected to Off-grid thru a genset owned by the NPC-SPUG.

Environmental Health and Sanitation Profile

The Samar Provincial Hospital is situated in the Poblacion of the city, being the capital town of the Province of Samar handles more complicated medical needs of the populace. The City’s Rural Health Unit has a complete personnel and Barangay Health Stations in almost all barangays. Presently, the Integrated Provincial Health Office (IPHO) is not totally equipped to meet the standard to serve the patients in the area. Sometimes, patients are referred to Tacloban City Hospitals for further check-up/consultations and medical need.

Economic Profile The local economy in Catbalogan is divided into three parts: the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors. The primary sector is made up of agriculture, fishery, livestock, and forestry. The secondary sector is composed of mining and quarrying, manufacturing, construction and energy generation/distribution. While, the tertiary sector consists of all service activities and commerce, real estate, finance, personal and community services, and transportation and communications.

Existing Traffic Condition Baseline traffic surveys were conducted during the feasibility study stage of the proposed project in order to assess the existing road network capacity and its capability to accept the combined traffic that will be generated from the proposed reclamation project and by natural traffic growth in the future. For the traffic study, only the Daang Maharlika National Road was examined as it is the only road which gives access to the proposed reclamation project. Daang Maharlika is a primary road that links the City of Catbalogan to Calbayog. This road will also be the main road that will be used to access the Proposed Catbalogan Airport in Buri Island. Its total carriageway width is 7 meters which is divided into two (2) lanes, and it is made of asphalt. It is bordered by mostly residential houses and is characterized by light traffic flows. Notable establishments within the are a distribution center for San Miguel Brewery, Samar State University, and Samar Doctor’s Hospital.




Perception Survey There were 500 respondents in total whom answered the socio-economic survey for the proposed Barangay Mercedes Reclamation. They were made to voluntarily accomplish a socio-economic survey form composed of the following questions organized into four (4) categories: (a) Household Profile; (b) Economic Profile; (c) Related to the Reclamation Project; and (d) Information regarding gender impact of the project.

Impact Assessment and Environmental Management Plan The summary of impact assessment and environmental management plan the proposed project are presented in Table 8. Chapter 2 of this EIA report presents a more detailed discussion. Table ES - 8. Summary of Impact Assessment and Environmental Management Plan

Environmental Component Likely to be Affected

Potential Impact Prevention/Mitigation/Enhancement Measures Residual Effects

The Land Terrestrial Ecology Earth moving during reclamation

works can generate sediment streams that, when not contained adequately, result to further river water discoloration and siltation, depth reduction and alteration, scouring and consequently the disturbance and modification of river habitat.

The primary mitigation strategy to prevent escape of sediments and terrigenous material disturbed during reclamation excavation and filling is the establishment of a series of silt curtains around the reclamation sites. Control measures will also include a series of sediment mitigation structures, including catchment and diversion canals to ensure that silt and sediments will not flow into the river estuary and enter the river system.

No residual effects





Heavy equipment areas will be located away from waterways where erosion control measures can be easily applied. Reclamation operation material stockpiles shall be covered. As a precautionary approach, slurry walls will be built around areas where such slurries can emanate extensively.

During the project’s operations phase, poorly-managed domestic waste disposal system can lead to solid and liquid wastewater contamination in the river, with uncontained waste streams generated from personnel quarters and offices potentially carried by run-off water into river gullies.

Modern wastewater treatment facilities and a solid waste management plan will be implemented and strictly enforced as mitigation to potential waste disturbances in the reclamation sites. State-of-the art modern sanitation facilities with 3-chambered septic tanks will be installed in all project latrines.

No residual effects

The risk of oil and grease contamination of the river during incoming tides can only occur if disposal of fuel-based wastes is not undertaken properly and accidental spills near waterways that drain into the river happens. From portions of the river, oily sludge, processing slurry and hazardous wastes can be inadvertently carried to coastal waters if containment, recovery and

An oil and grease containment and oily waste containment and recovery plan will be formulated and enforced in all aspects of project operations. Remediation will include recovery and treatment of sludge. Carpools will be located farthest from the coast and driver system and all vehicle oil discards will be recovered.

No residual effects





treatment systems are not efficiently established and maintained. Such fugitive wastes will have far-reaching and irreversible impacts on benthic communities in the estuary, resulting to contamination of grazing areas that may further depress fish growth and recruitment, loss of fish habitats and reduction of primary productivity.

Geology/Geomorphology Inducement of liquefaction A detailed geotechnical investigation must be undertaken in case of construction of tall buildings (more than 3-storey) is planned to be erected at the site. This is necessary to determine the most suitable foundation scheme and the net bearing capacity as well as to identify any ground stability problem within the area.

No residual effects

Geology/Geomorphology Earthquake Induced Landslide: Based on the earthquake- induced landslide susceptibility map from PHIVOLCS, the coastal areas where the project site is situated is unlikely to be susceptible to earthquake- induced landslides since it has flat terrain. However, the reclamation project is highly susceptible to lateral spread and flow failure since

A properly anchored retaining structure that could hold in-place the reclaimed land should be constructed to mitigate this hazard. The slope of the fill should not be overly steepened to minimize slope failures.

No residual effects





its offshore perimeter will form a steep slope rising above the seabed.

Geology/Geomorphology Settlement: AMH study indicates that the reclaimed land would not settle uniformly.

To avoid excessive settlement in the reclaimed land, the fill should be engineered to improve its consistency. The fill should be designed to have the characteristic of a vibrocompacted sand fill. The soil that should be used for reclamation should not contain high amount of silty and clayey materials. Preferably, well-graded sand and gravel materials should be used. It should be mixed with stabilizing material such as cement.

No residual effects

Geology/Geomorphology Ground Subsidence, Collapse, Heave:

Ground subsidence should be monitored continuously from the start of the reclamation, during construction of buildings in the industrial park, and even after all constructions are finished.

No residual effects

Geology/Geomorphology Other Geo Hazards Awareness and preparedness raising of construction managers on each of the known hazards to include drills, proper signages and alarm systems

No residual effects

Geology/Geomorphology

Aggravated flooding in nearby coast due to the reclaimed area which at inease siltation and erosion and impede tidal flushing

Adequate and efficient drainage design is recommended to prevent localized flooding at the site especially during heavy downpours. The drainage lines in the area should regularly be cleaned and maintained of waste materials. Proper waste management should be implemented.

No residual effects

Geology/Geomorphology Sea reclamation is simply filling the area with large amounts of heavy rock and/or cement, then filling with clay and soil until the desired height is

No residual effects





reached. The earthfilling procedures should conform to engineering application standards that requires materials to be properly compacted. Compaction of soil should be 95% of maximum dry density (MDD) and should be done at every lift thickness of 20 centimeters. The same requirement should be applied when compacting disturbed natural soil such as those directly below the foundation and floor slabs where a 10-centimeter thick clean gravel should be placed. Only granular or sandy soils should be used as backfill materials. Retaining walls that will hold the earthfill materials in place must be of high integrity (founded on rigid bedrock and can resist impact of waves during tropical cyclones) with good drainage. The ground elevation must be high enough to minimize the effects of coastal flooding.

Land Use and Classification Solid waste littering on terrestrial environment. Reclamation activities do not generate debris and wastes, except domestic garbage from construction crews, which might be disposed on shore. However, there may be accidental spillage.

Littering, accidental spillage of any construction wastes should be avoided by pre- planning ways of their transportation and/or unloading at the temporary storage. Careful planning of the work activities can also reduce the amount of waste generated.

No residual effects

Geology/Geomorphology Possible flooding due to the limited, narrow and shallow drainages along the road and through the built-up areas along the coastal community

The existing drainage system in the built-up coastal areas should be improved to accommodate floodwaters. There should be a properly designed

No residual effects





drainage network that is sufficient to channel the flood to the sea.

Geology/Geomorphology Increase in Ground Water Demand - The influx of workers and their families in the residential area outside the reclamation site will lead to an increase in the consumption of groundwater. If the groundwater provided by the local water district is not sufficient, there would possibly be an increase in groundwater wells in the area. This could lead to over extraction of groundwater and would contribute to ground subsidence.

The extraction of groundwater in the existing residential and industrial areas should be monitored and regulated to avoid the negative effects of subsidence due to over extraction of groundwater. Regular ground survey should be conducted to monitor ground subsidence. Rainwater harvesting during the rainy season could be done to augment the water source. The community should also be trained on how to conduct rainwater harvesting and on proper water management.

No residual effects

Geology/Geomorphology Siltation and transport of silt to other areas that may have marine resources

Silt curtains shall be installed in the reclamation area. This shall hold the silt within the area

No residual effects

Geology/Geomorphology Soil erosion The edge of the reclamation area shall be placed with armor rocks that shall prevent waves to erode the soils being dumped.

No residual effects

The Water Marine Ecology Enhanced silt and sediment

intrusion into coastal waters. Earthmoving, dredging, reclamation filling and construction of reclamation facilities in the proposed Brgy. Mercedes

Wall containment structure will be installed around the perimeter of the proposed reclamation area. The general procedure in the installation of sheet pile is the choice of a suitable driving system which is of fundamental importance.

No residual effects





Reclamation Project Reclamation Project will likely lead to cumulative sediment discharges into coastal waters, spilled directly from reclamation works or carried down through waterways, in ditches, canals and carried by rainwater outfall.

Marine Ecology Wastewater from heightened personnel presence in the project’s operation and land-based facilities, combined with organic wastes and nutrients stirred up during soil-moving activities, can exacerbate seawater pollution and in extreme cases lead to hyper-nutrient loading that can trigger algal blooms. The immediate impacts can include biotoxins in shellfish populations, particularly filter-feeding mussels and oysters found in Catbalogan coastal waters.

Wastewater from the reclamation works will not be disposed in waterways that ultimately contribute to coastal water pollution. Temporary containment ponds will be built, and the use of 3-chambered septic tanks shall be installed in all project facilities where wastewaters and other effluents are generated. A network of canals to divert fugitive wastewater spills will be set up to divert all waters into a containment area where that can be re-used or collected and disposed properly. Waste minimization will be practiced in all aspects of project operation. The objective is to ensure that pollution-causing effluents that can be potentially carried downstream are treated at the source.

No residual effects

Marine Ecology Oil and grease contamination. While this issue is not anticipated to be severe, oil slicks from spills and

Potential risks of small oil spills will be addressed through strict fuel and oil dispersal protocols backed-up by an oil/fuel spill contingency plan.





vehicle maintenance can be very detrimental not only to benthic organisms in the shelf but can also cause migration of fish and crustaceans to other areas, leading to lower fisheries productivity. Macro-invertebrates are susceptible to immediate mortality. The detrimental effects can be irreversible.

Oil depots will be located a good distance from the coastline. No oil wastes will be disposed into waterways or canals. An oil and grease containment and recovery plan will be formulated in accordance with MARPOL protocols and enforced in all aspects of project operations. Prohibition of wanton disposal of oily wastes will be absolute and a rigid monitoring system around the reclamation works will be carried out constantly.

Marine Ecology Impacts on crab habitats from dredging and soil filling activities. Sustained sediment and silt loading can result to habitat alteration and the emigration of some crab population. Growth and recruitment overfishing can also seriously affect resiliency of the population and can lead to irreversible loss. Nevertheless, in as much as the reclamation area is small and does not host sizeable crab populations, dredging and reclamation filling will result only to temporary and shallow disturbance of crab habitats and feeding regimen.

Fisheries management should be at the forefront of programs by both the LGU of Catbalogan and management of the four reclamation projects in Catbalogan City. This should be pursued through the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management. The fishery must have an effective basis for the implementation of rules for conserving all species involved in the fishery, ensuring a harvest threshold for mature species. Along this view the fishery must also ensure that juvenile fish (i.e. below age of maturity) are subject to low fishing mortality and species retained by the fishery – like mature and undersize crabs - must be managed in a way as to minimize the risk of over-exploitation.

No residual effects





The establishment of Marine Protected Ares (MPAs) will be at the forefront of fisheries management.

Marine Ecology Wastewater from heightened personnel presence in the project’s operation and land-based facilities, combined with organic wastes and nutrients stirred up during soil-moving activities, can exacerbate seawater pollution and in extreme cases lead to hyper-nutrient loading that can trigger algal blooms. The immediate impacts can include biotoxins in shellfish populations, particularly filter-feeding mussels and oysters found in Catbalogan coastal waters.

Wastewater from heightened personnel presence in the project’s operation and land-based facilities, combined with organic wastes and nutrients stirred up during soil-moving activities, can exacerbate seawater pollution and in extreme cases lead to hyper-nutrient loading that can trigger algal blooms. The immediate impacts can include biotoxins in shellfish populations, particularly filter-feeding mussels and oysters found in Catbalogan coastal waters.

No residual effects

Water Quality Degradation of surface water quality due to Local and temporal re-suspension of sediments causing increased turbidity.

Silt curtains, using geo-textile materials, shall be installed in the reclamation area. This shall hold the silts within the area.

No residual effects

Degradation of surface water quality due to potential accidents and damages/injury to another vessel/structure or cetacean

This is of low impact with minor consequence/severity because it is unlikely to happen with only 1 or 2 vessels/barges.

No residual effects

Contamination of water / Possible oil spills/leaks

Regular checking of all equipment including vessels or barges for leakage will be done.

No residual effects





Moreover, oil spill kits will be ready in case there will be accidental spills. Institute and implementation of oil spill containment protocols should be followed during development in cases of occurrence.

No residual effects

Contamination of water brought by heavy equipment and vessels

Regular checking of all equipment (including sea vessels) for leakage will be done. Moreover, oil spill kits will be ready in case there will be accidental spills.

No residual effects

Marine water quality Solid and Hazardous waste management shall be strictly implemented in compliance with RA 9003 and RA 6969. A centralized treatment facility can be established to ensure wastewater has been treated before discharging to any bodies of water

No residual effects

Water availability and competition for use

· IEC should be conducted by the MDRRMC and the barangay for water conservation program and water reuse and recycling.

No residual effects

· Adaptation measures include protection of water aquifer, conduct of massive information and education campaign, establishment of protection measures for coastal areas, and strengthening the protection of ecosystems.

No residual effects

The Air Air Quality Degradation of air quality due to

dust and particulate matter generation and GHG generation.

Minimize heavy machinery during reclamation works. Regularly maintain diesel driven engines of transport vehicles, equipment and barges and ensure they meet required emission levels for diesel vehicles.

No residual effects





Noise Increase in noise pollution during operation of various construction equipment and vehicles

Proper scheduling of high noise generating construction activities during the daytime to avoid sensitive periods; Installation of temporary noise barriers such as galvanized iron shields will also be used particularly in noise-sensitive areas such as churches, schools and hospitals in the immediate vicinities of the construction area; Positioning of temporary site compounds as far as reasonably practicable from sensitive receptors.

No residual effects

Meteorology/Climatology Contribution in terms of greenhouse gas emissions (or GHG mitigation potential)

It is recommended that the proponent initiate enhancement programs related to carbon sink sequestration in line with the government’s greening program considering that a 100-hectare land mass will be generated as a result of the reclamation project.

No residual effects

The People People Possible accidents for workers Orientations and strict implementation of safety

practices will be done. No residual effects

Health hazard to Workers (Increased Dust Generation)

Use of protective gears No residual effects

Social unrest of sectors in the community, psycho-social impacts on communities surrounding the project and disturbance in their socio- economic activities

The proponent initiate intensive IEC activities to update stakeholders on the status of the project, initiate programs that will promote livelihood, skills development, health and nutrition, disaster risk reduction and response and other similar

No residual effects





activities as part of the proponent’s Social Development Plan. Proponent with the LGU to Implement appropriate sectoral consultations and IEC programs to raise project knowledge and awareness an community engagement

Employment generation · Priority jobs for the men and women of direct and indirect impact areas

· IEC on nature of jobs · Consultation on job requirements and qualification · Local hiring priority for qualified Barangay residents · Skills training to upgrade local skills of residents that can be hired by the project · Engagement of residents as manpower for the preliminaries and implementation pf the Coastal Resource Management Program · Generation of livelihood opportunities by putting-up food stalls, variety stores and other services near the Project

Positive effects in terms of employment, livelihood

People Risk to flooding after the development of the reclamation project. Storm surge hazard and other Hazards

Storm surges are one of the many natural hazards that are difficult to control. Break waters and barriers may help or minimize the effect of coastal waves. Vigilance and awareness about storm surges must be undertaken with the help of PAGASA that regularly give weather information on the direction and strength of typhoon. It is very important that the people and the local leaders in

No residual effects





the coastal areas know of the basic things that they should undertake if they experience the effects of the storm surges.

For offshore earthquakes capable of generating tsunami

Even if the future tsunami has a low impact to the proposed project site, vigilance and sustained community-level public education on tsunami awareness, preparedness and mitigation are still very important. Coastal communities must be aware of tsunami facts and must react appropriately during an earthquake at any time. It is very important that the people and the local leaders in the coastal areas are aware of the basic things that they should know and do if they experience a very strong earthquake.

No residual effects

Impact of Climate Change Vulnerability mapping should be conducted to identify priority households for evacuation.

No residual effects

Non-structural disaster mitigation measures should be implemented in line with the LGUs Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) plans.

No residual effects

Peace and Order Unauthorized entry of outsiders and establishments which might cause problems in peace and order

· Coordination with the Barangay LGU Tanods to ensure authorized establishments and control of unauthorized entry of outsiders. Buffer zones should be established around the perimeter of the reclamation area during construction

No residual effects





Health and Safety · Entry of migrant workers with families, which might cause problems of congestion, peace and order and security, breaches. · In like manner, cause health problems due to diseases, overuse of public utilities /services, competition of resources, social conflicts, peace and order, increase in pollution due to solid, liquid and toxic wastes. · Possible Health and safety risk in the operation of the reclaimed area due to noise and air pollution · Increase in traffic flow causing air (dust) and noise pollution

· Management of entry of migrant workers. · Increase and train Barangay tanods to be deployed in areas where migrant workers reside as well as the management of waste. · Proponent provide Health clinic with a Doctor, Nurse and Health workers · Health certificate for workers prior to hiring into the project · Implementation of the Social Development Program · IEC on proper scheduling of hauler trucks and construction operations to avoid entry and dismissal of school children as well as late hours. · Environment Risk Management for the operation of the Plant and surrounding communities

No residual effects



Environmental Monitoring Plan Table ES - 9 presents the summary of environmental monitoring plan, which contains the environmental concerns, parameters to be monitored, sampling measurement plan and estimated cost. Table ES - 9. Summary of Environmental Monitoring Plan

Environmental Aspect

Potential Impacts Parameters

Environmental Monitoring Form Lead

Person

Annual Estimate

d Cost

Environmental Quality Performance Level (EPQL) Management

Method Frequency

Location EPQL Range Management Measure

Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit

Construction Phase (Reclamation and Land Development) Water Quality

Coastal (Marine) water quality degradation caused by reclamation activities

pH Grab sampling

Monthly All stations

considered in this

study

Proponent’s /

Contractor’s PCO

Included in the

project cost

4.2 – 5.1 (60% of Std.)

5.3 – 6.4 (75% of Std.)

7.0-8.5 (Std. Class SB)

Report actual status on a periodic basis, document results and continue monitoring. Identify source of pollution / exceedance. Increase sampling frequencies. Conduct clean up activities along streams that discharge to the sea.

Revalidate results and continue monitoring. Revalidate previously identify source of pollution / exceedance. If source of exceedance are leaks or spills, implement spill containment and clean up measures.

Compare how values of results escalated relating each result to actual occurring situation during sampling and validate identified sources. As necessary, temporary stoppage of concerned activities may be needed until remedial measures are in place.

Temperature

15.6 - 18.0

19.5-22.5 26-30

Oil and grease, mg/L

1.8 2.25 3

TSS, mg/L 30 37.5 80

DO, mg/L 3.6 4.5 6

Cr (VI), mg/L

0.03 0.0375 0.05

As, mg/L 0.006 0.0075 0.01

Cd, mg/L 0.0018 0.00225 0.003

Pb, mg/L 0.006 0.0075 0.01

Hg, mg/L 0.0006 0.00075 0.001

Cu, mg/L 0.012 0.015 0.02

Total Coliform, MPN/100mL

6000 7500 10000






Person

Annual Estimate

d Cost


Method Frequency


Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit Strict implementation of good house-keeping practices / measures at the site.

Water Quality

Change in species composition and abundance of marine, freshwater, and riparian biota due to reclamation and dredging activities within the immediate vicinity of the reclamation area, the dredge area and the

Density of fish catch per unit effort (Kilos of fish caught/person/ trip)

Interview Annual Immediate fishing areas around the project

Proponent Included in project cost






Person

Annual Estimate

d Cost


Method Frequency


Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit area study for the Tungkop Fish Sanctuary

Threat to Abundance / Degradation of mangrove area

- Mangrove growth including its height, basal area and its diameter-at- breast height

Census or manual count Physical Measurement

Quarterly

Open Area /mangrove park within the project


assessment in abundance and taxa richness of aquatic biota

baseline assessment in abundance and taxa richness of aquatic biota; Decreasing trend across three monitoring periods.

abundance and taxa richness of aquatic biota across monitoring periods accompanied by exceedances in water quality parameters being monitored

Investigate and identify possible cause of decline. Conduct initial inspection of control measures being implemented

Values Check results of the aquatic biota analyses against the water quality status. Improve or enhance existing control measures to improve water quality

Sediment Deposition

May adversely affect ecosystem

Heavy metals and nutrients

Grab sampling

Quarterly

Area near mouth of the rivers and other stations that the MMT may further recommend

Proponent / Contractor

Included in project cost

Same levels as in Water Quality (TSS)



Report results to Project Manager

If values are exceeded transfer to another location

Management remedial measures if necessary






Person

Annual Estimate

d Cost


Method Frequency


Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit Waste management Hazardous substances Chemical storage areas

Impacts on sanitation and water pollution Risk to human health

Type and volume of waste Present in harmful quantities and safe storage

Visual inspection

Daily Reclamation site and Staging Area




Adopt remedial actions and safety measures

There should not be any untoward incident

Air Quality Possible degradation of air quality due to reclamation activities

SO2, ug/NCM

Gas Bubbler and Pararosaniline Method

Quarterly

Stations considered in the report

Proponent’s / Contractor’s PCO

50,000 204 255 340 Report actual status on a periodic basis, document results. Investigate possible cause of pollution and continue monitoring. Conduct dust suppression measures.

Prepare statistical report highlighting the findings. Regular maintenance of all fuel-burning equipment.

Revisit /audit the functionality of air pollution control installations. Replace all non- conforming equipment / machineries.

NO2, ug/NCM

Gas Bubbler and Pararosaniline Method

156 195 260

PM10, mg/L High Volume Sampler

120 150 200

TSP, ug/NCM

High Volume and Gravimetric Method

180 225 300






Person

Annual Estimate

d Cost


Method Frequency


Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit Possible increase in ambient noise level due to reclamation activities

Noise, dbA Noise meter

Quarterly or as required in response to any noise complaints.



Minimal cost; Included in the project cost

55 60 65 Report actual status on a periodic basis, document results and continue monitoring. Investigate possible cause of exceedance.

Fix broken equipment or machine, as necessary. Regularly maintain equipment to keep these working at their optimum and minimize noise. Continue noise level monitoring and increase frequency as necessary .

Conduct site noise audit of equipment and machineries. Install noise suppression structures and/or equipment appropriate to mitigate the situation.






Person

Annual Estimate

d Cost


Method Frequency


Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit Community consultation

Socio-economic status of the host communities vis- à-vis the project operations Community benefits from the project due to taxes, employment, and social development programs (SDP)

Efficiency of SDP programs, employment generation (in terms of local engagement on the project itself) and tax revenues Number of beneficiaries and other parameters required under SDP (i.e. involvement of locals in CRM programs, Health statistics, etc)

Review of complaints records and outcome of dredging events to community to guide future management strategy.

Weekly Barangay Mercedes

HR, CSR Staff (contractor) or authorized department of the municipal government, affected barangays

Included in the SDP fund

Negative feedback to the company

Formal complaint lodged by the community

Multiple complaints feed to local media organizations

Company to investigate/ inspect subject of negative feedback Coordinate with the barangay and MMT

Validate previous findings in coordination with stakeholders Coordinate with the concerned LGUs and MMT

Immediate consultation with the MMT and the LGU to resolve issue/s Release an official statement to clarify the issue/s. Monitor and report results on implementation of resolution.

Key informant interviews; Census and surveys in Coordination with the affected barangays;

Quarterly



Health and safety impacts from reclamation activities

Safe man-hours

Incident reporting, regular monitoring integrated in the Health and Safety Plan of the company

Daily inspection of work conditions, PPEs and compliance to the company’s Health and Safety Plan

Project site and vicinity

Safety Officer

Minimal cost


Formal complaint lodged by the community and/or employees


Company to investigate/ inspect subject of negative feedback;. Improvement of health and safety measures to address negative feedback

Revalidate previous investigation results- reason for complaint and address complaint immediately through consultations with employees, contractors or affected stakeholders Improvement of health and safety measures to address negative feedback

Immediately conduct consultations or dialogues with complainants and affected stake-holders to determine reason for complaints. Address the complaints and document the responses and actions that will be done Release an official statement to media to clarify the issue Make improvements on health and safety plan to reflect the



actions that were conducted so a repeat of the incident or complaints will not happen.






Person

Annual Estimate

d Cost


Method Frequency


Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit Navigational restriction and Traffic congestion

Visual inspection to ensure navigation is not restricted and land traffic situation

Adjust vessel movement and location accordingly and Implement the necessary traffic management scheme

Daily Project site and vicinity

Contractor / Proponent

Included in the project cost

Negative feedback

Formal complaint lodged by the community and/or other stake-holders (e.g. other business centers in the area)

Multiple complaints

Proponent to investigate/ inspect subject of negative feedback; Improvement of traffic management plan / measures to address negative feedback

Revalidate previous investigate result on reason for complaint and address complaint immediately through consultations with affected stake-holders Improvement of traffic management plan / measures to address negative feedback

Immediately conduct consultations or dialogues with complainants and affected stakeholders to determine reason for complaints. Address the complaints and document the responses and actions that will be done; Release an official statement to media to clarify the issue; Improvement of traffic management plan / measures to address






Person

Annual Estimate

d Cost


Method Frequency


Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit negative feedback and to reflect the actions that were conducted so a repeat of the complaints will not happen.



Environmental Management Fund and Environmental Guarantee Fund Commitments Upon the issuance of the ECC, a financial grant to support the multi-partite monitoring team is distributed in accordance with the approved Work Plan and Financial Plan by the Proponent. A summary of the Environmental Management Plan is shown below. The Proponent will also set aside a fund to support the immediate clean-up and rehabilitation of areas directly affected by the Project during the construction, operation and abandonment phase. This includes compensations to communities afflicted by the project, not limited to the parties’ preparedness programs, and environmental-related projects to sustain any impending risks that may deteriorate the environment in direct consequence of the project phases.


1 Project Description |

Table of Contents

1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Project Location and Area 4

1.1.1 Direct Impact Area (DIA) ............................................................................................ 11 1.1.2 Indirect Impact Area (IIA) ........................................................................................... 11

1.2 Project Rationale 14 1.3 Project Alternatives 15

1.3.1 Project Siting .................................................................................................................. 15 1.3.2 Without Project Scenario .............................................................................................. 16

1.4 Project Components 16 1.4.1 General Layout of Facilities ......................................................................................... 16

1.4.1.1 Land Mass ............................................................................................................. 21 1.4.1.1.1 Dredging/ Filling ............................................................................................. 21 1.4.1.1.2 Soil Stabilization ............................................................................................... 23

1.4.1.2 Coastal Dike and Drainage Improvement ........................................................ 23 1.4.1.3 Internal Road Network ........................................................................................ 24 1.4.1.4 Utilities ................................................................................................................... 27

1.4.1.4.1 Drainage System .............................................................................................. 27 1.4.1.4.2 Water Supply System ...................................................................................... 28 1.4.1.4.3 Sewerage Collection System ........................................................................... 28 1.4.1.4.4 Power Supply System ..................................................................................... 30

1.4.1.5 Pollution Control Devices ................................................................................... 30 1.4.1.5.1 Water Pollution ................................................................................................ 30 1.4.1.5.2 Air Pollution ..................................................................................................... 30 1.4.1.5.3 Noise Pollution ................................................................................................. 30

1.5 Process/Technology 31 1.5.1 Reclamation Methodology .......................................................................................... 31

1.5.1.1 Dredging Equipment ........................................................................................... 32 1.5.1.2 Quarrying Methodology ..................................................................................... 32 1.5.1.3 Embankment Construction ................................................................................. 32 1.5.1.4 Construction Requirements ................................................................................ 33 1.5.1.5 Methods ................................................................................................................. 33 1.5.1.6 Protection During Construction ......................................................................... 34 1.5.1.7 Protection of Structure ......................................................................................... 34

1.6 Project Size 35



1.7 Development Plan, Description of Project Phases and Corresponding Timeframes 36 1.7.1 Project Duration and Schedule ................................................................................... 36 1.7.2 Description of Project Phases ...................................................................................... 37

1.7.2.1 Pre-Construction Phase ....................................................................................... 37 1.7.2.2 Construction/Development Phase ..................................................................... 38 1.7.2.3 Operational Phase ................................................................................................ 38 1.7.2.4 Abandonment Phase ............................................................................................ 38

1.8 Manpower 38 1.9 Project Cost 39



List of Tables

Table 1.1. Geographical coordinates of the proposed reclamation project (WGS 84 UTM Zone 51N) ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Table 1.2. Description of Project Components ................................................................................ 19 Table 1.3. Summary of Major Construction Equipment ............................................................... 21 Table 1.4. Summary of Project Components and corresponding Process/Technology ............ 34 Table 1.5. Summary of Major Equipment ....................................................................................... 34 Table 1.6. Land Area of Facilities ...................................................................................................... 35 Table 1.7. Project Time Frame ........................................................................................................... 37 Table 1.8. Manpower Requirement during Construction Phase of the Project ......................... 39 Table 1.9. Summary of Quantities .................................................................................................... 40

List of Figures

Figure 1.1. Administrative Map .......................................................................................................... 7 Figure 1.2. Barangay Classification Map ........................................................................................... 8 Figure 1.3. Location Map of the proposed Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project ................ 9 Figure 1.4. Location Map showing the Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project .................... 10 Figure 1.5. Direct Impact Area Map ................................................................................................. 12 Figure 1.6. Indirect Impact Area Map .............................................................................................. 13 Figure 1.7. Project Component Map ................................................................................................ 18 Figure 1.8 Map showing the location of the site for the disposal of ............................................ 22 Figure 1.9. Typical design plan for the coastal dike component ................................................. 24 Figure 1.10. Road Network for the Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project ........................... 25 Figure 1.11. Road Design: Typical Cross Section of Bypass Road ............................................... 25 Figure 1.12. Circulation Plan - Vehicular Route for the Barangay Mercedes ............................ 26 Figure 1.13. Circulation Plan - Main Pedestrian Route for the Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project ................................................................................................................................................... 26 Figure 1.14. Circulation Plan - Bike Route for the Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project .. 27 Figure 1.15. Infrastructure Map ........................................................................................................ 27 Figure 1.16. Drainage Map ................................................................................................................ 28 Figure 1.17. Green and Open Space Network ................................................................................ 28 Figure 1.18. Schematic Flow Diagram of the Membrane Aerated Biofilm Reactor and Aeration Basin ...................................................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 1.19. Proposed Land Use Plan of Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project .................. 36



1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1.1 Project Location and Area The City of Catbalogan is the capital of the Province of Samar. It is located in the western seacoast of the said province, with the coordinates of 11 4636.83” north latitude and 124 5306.63” east latitude. It is approximately 800 kilometers southeast of Manila, the national capital, and 107 kilometers north of Tacloban City, the regional capital. It is bounded on the western side by Maqueda Bay; on its north by the municipalities of Tarangnan and San Jorge; and on the east by Jiabong. The Maharlika Highway traverses the City from the south thru Barangay Lagundi; while it enters thru Barangay San Vicente from the north. The total land area of the City is 274.22 square kilometers Its city proper covers an area of 130 hectares. There are 57 barangays in the entire city – twenty-one (21) of which are situated in the Poblacion; another 21 in the coastal area; while 15 barangays are in the interior and/or upland area. The proposed reclamation project covers an area of 35 hectares. It is located along the coastline of Barangays Mercedes, Poblacion 3, Poblacion 4, and Poblacion 5 in Catbalogan City, Samar as shown in Figure 1-1. Table 1.1. Geographical coordinates of the proposed reclamation project (WGS 84 UTM Zone 51N)

Point Longitude Latitude

1 124.867733 11.785858

2 124.867757 11.785628

3 124.867057 11.785272

4 124.869158 11.782533

5 124.871152 11.783234

6 124.870971 11.783878

7 124.871125 11.783971

8 124.870943 11.784424

9 124.871104 11.78453

10 124.871237 11.784324

11 124.872272 11.784712

12 124.872339 11.7849

13 124.872408 11.785042

14 124.872775 11.785088

15 124.873257 11.784911

16 124.873259 11.784619

17 124.873207 11.784331




18 124.873834 11.784075

19 124.87421 11.784543

20 124.874516 11.78439

21 124.874765 11.78426

22 124.874955 11.78408

23 124.875153 11.783963

24 124.875416 11.78381

25 124.875507 11.783691

26 124.875457 11.782981

27 124.875248 11.7831

28 124.876002 11.783234

29 124.876244 11.783168

30 124.876546 11.782707

31 124.87568 11.781948

32 124.876364 11.78117

33 124.877451 11.781974

34 124.877675 11.781661

35 124.877068 11.781212

36 124.877562 11.7805

37 124.877901 11.780712

38 124.877972 11.780576

39 124.877023 11.779927

40 124.877274 11.779643

41 124.878424 11.780482

42 124.878547 11.780242

43 124.878524 11.780057

44 124.878697 11.779915

45 124.87857 11.779682

46 124.878678 11.779512

47 124.87857 11.779423

48 124.878742 11.779442

49 124.878745 11.779233

50 124.879253 11.779038

51 124.879114 11.778928




52 124.879138 11.7787

53 124.879291 11.778801

54 124.879291 11.778638

55 124.879387 11.778756

56 124.879455 11.778431

57 124.878199 11.778411

58 124.86921 11.781867

59 124.869032 11.781936

60 124.869013 11.782365 61 124.866815 11.785294



Source: City Planning and Development Office of Catbalogan City, Samar

Figure 1.1. Administrative Map



Figure 1.2. Barangay Classification Map



Source: City Planning and Development Office of Catbalogan City, Samar Figure 1.3. Location Map of the proposed Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project



Source: Google Earth, 2021

Figure 1.4. Location Map showing the Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project



1.1.1 Direct Impact Area (DIA) Based on the revised procedural manual of DAO 2003-03, the direct impact area (DIA) is the area where all project facilities are proposed to be constructed and/or situated and where all operations are proposed to be undertaken. For most projects, the DIA is equivalent to the total area applied for an ECC. Given this,, the primary impact area is the total land and water area covered by the implementation and operation of the said project, which is within Barangay Mercedes. The following are considered as the DIA, as shown in Figure 1-5:

a. The total 35-hectare land mass to be built, wherein all the construction activities will take place

b. Barangays Mercedes, Poblacion 3, Poblacion 4 and Poblacion 5 in Catbalogan City, wherein the reclamation area will be constructed;

c. The location of borrow fill materials, designated by the PLGU of Samar; and d. The site for the disposal of the dredged out unsuitable bed materials.

1.1.2 Indirect Impact Area (IIA)

Generally, this refers to the influence area that could be indirectly affected by the proposed project. These include various industries and establishments such as industrial, commercial, medical, education, food chains, supermarket, gasoline stations, hotels and inns, restaurants and other shops and stores. The following are considered as the IIA, as shown in Figure 1-6:

a. Adjacent barangays and the whole City of Catbalogan, wherein construction materials and equipment will be sourced;

b. Access roads for hauling of construction materials, equipment mobilization, and the place from which most of the construction workers will come; and

c. The Social Impact Area (SIA) – which is the whole City of Catbalogan as it would benefit in terms of employment and livelihood opportunities, taxes paid, and an additional land area for development purpose.



Figure 1.5. Direct Impact Area Map



Figure 1.6. Indirect Impact Area Map



1.2 Project Rationale Coastal cities have long struggled to accommodate urban growth given the difficulties of finding space within geographically constrained and densely populated areas. However, because of innovative dredging techniques introduced over the last few decades, land can nowadays be reclaimed under advantageous economic conditions. Having to cope with pressing urbanization trends, coastal cities have a lot to gain from the more competitive costs of reclamation. Reclaimed areas can make strategic spatial development plans feasible in overcrowded areas and can be used to accommodate the demand for new housing, employment, transport, and other urban facilities. This enables the alleviation of congestion and the enhancement of urban services so as to remain attractive locations to both people and businesses. These functions are of relevance for the entire community, since they produce positive returns not only for investors and users, but for the overall quality of life and competitiveness of the locality. The objective of the Provincial Government of Samar in reclaiming and developing additional areas is to provide much needed space for business, residential, and government facilities. It will support the accelerated and balanced growth of Catbalogan City and the Province of Samar, and will also help generate much-needed employment and additional revenues for the continuous development and provision of basic social services for the residents. This creation of new land through reclamation aims to develop the newest and most vibrant destination in the Province – thus merging tourism, business, and leisure in order to become the center for growth in the commercial, residential and recreational sectors. The Mercedes Reclamation Project will benefit the Province of Samar through the following:

a. Catbalogan City will have additional land areas for expansion and development; b. The City will have new saleable and leasable prime properties; c. The reclamation project will generate opportunities for local employment; d. The construction and eventual operation of the project will generate additional

revenues through taxation, permits, and licenses; e. The project will become a new destination for local and international tourists; f. The project is envisioned to be an ecologically-friendly city destination which gives

importance to the conservation of local flora and fauna; and g. The reclamation project will serve as a buffer, thus protecting adjacent inland

properties from storm surge.



1.3 Project Alternatives

1.3.1 Project Siting The following criteria were considered for the selection of the proposed reclamation site:

1. No sensitive area (presence of mangroves, coral reefs, MPAs or any rich biodiversity area

The proposed reclamation project is not within a Marine Protected Area (MPA) nor are there presence of mangroves within the project site.

2. Minimal displacement of fishing access and communities There are two barangays which have affected residents due to the Project – Poblacion 3 and Mercedes. These residents shall be relocated to the fisherman’s village, which is one of the delineated zones within the proposed development. Additionally, there are no permanent fishing structures within the project site.

3. Bathymetry of the area Based from the bathymetry data, once the Mercedes Reclamation Project is in place, changes in the coastal configurations and topography of the coastline, and hence changes in bathymetry due to the project, are expected. However, the result shows that the computed changes will not significantly alter the existing bathymetry of the whole bay.

4. Land Use Plan The proposed Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project is aligned with the proposed land use plan and development goals of the City Government. It should also be noted that the Philippine Reclamation Authority (PRA) has issued a clearance for the project site in a Memorandum of Understanding dated October 3, 2018. PRA is the primary agency responsible for the integration, direction, and coordination of all reclamation projects for and on behalf of the National Government. Given this, all reclamation projects shall be approved by the President upon the recommendation of the PRA. The former has given the go signal to the PRA to engage in massive land reclamation all over the country through Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) with the adoption of the Philippine Reclamation Authority Resolution 4161 (Approval of the National Reclamation Plan) on February 25, 2011.

5. Economic growth Considering the whole stretch of the Catbalogan City shoreline facing the Samar Sea, there are other possible sites for the reclamation project – Barangays Maulong and Payao, which are located north of Mercedes; and Barangays Guinsorongan and Bunuanan, which are located to the south of Mercedes.



However, only the Barangay Mercedes site has been found suitable for two reasons: it is the nearest barangay to the central business district of Catbalogan City; and there are two ports are adjacent to it – namely, Pier Uno and Pier Dos.

1.3.2 Without Project Scenario

Without the project, the area will remain part of the Samar Sea. Economic activity as well as the local population will continue to increase within the next decade. While the government has been trying to decongest economic activities, the Poblacion parts of the City will remain as the central economic zone. Traffic congestion will also worsen since no new roads will be constructed along the seaside portion of Barangay Mercedes. Furthermore, as the population growth continues to correlate with the economic activities in the City, there will be a lack of urban spaces to accommodate the urban development requirements. The absence of this additional spaces will also reduce the City’s attractiveness as a tourism spot and as an investment haven, thus resulting in deterred business and livelihood opportunities.

1.4 Project Components The major components of this project are the following:

1. Land mass 2. Infrastructure

a. Coastal Dike/Containment Structure and Drainage Improvement b. Internal road network

3. Utilities a. Water supply system b. Drainage system c. Sewerage collection system d. Power distribution system

1.4.1 General Layout of Facilities

The footprint of proposed project layout facilities is shown in Figure 1-7. During the Operation Phase, locators should follow the design concept of the reclaimed area based on its containment and/or carrying capacity. Given this, the proposed island has designated areas – the middle of the island is designated as a high-density area; the waterfront area is a low-density area; and the in-between areas are classified as mid density. All locators should also comply with all the following: existing ordinances of the City Government of Catbalogan; P.D. No. 1096, the 1977 National Building Code of the Philippines (NBCP) and with its 2004 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR); the Electrical Code of the Philippines; the Clean Water Act; the Clean Air Act; the Safety Code of the



Philippines; and all recent and new issuances by the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) pertaining to buildings and grounds. The design criteria of the structures should comply with the following:

1. The building height (including spires/towers and parapet walls) should not exceed 30-storeys or 90 meters, as duly qualified by CAAP aerodrome restrictions;

2. The Gross Floor Area (GFA) and Total Gross Floor Area (TGFA) must both be based on the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 6 to 12;

3. Seismicity factors should be only as allowed under the 2016 National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) or its most recent edition;

4. The 2015 Philippine Green Building Code; and 5. The Implementing Rules and Regulation of P.D. No. 957 of the Housing and Urban

Development Coordinating Council, including new issuances by the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB).



Figure 1.7. Project Component Map


19

Project Description |

Description of project components for the proposed project is presented in Table 1-2.

Table 1.2. Description of Project Components

Component Materials Size/Capacity Safety Features (during project implementation)

Land mass Filling materials 35 hectares (approximately 517,440.12 cubic meters estimated volume of filling materials)

Use of proper navigational equipment; use of safety gears and well-maintained equipment

Coastal dike and drainage improvement

Concrete, steel bars and structures

1,250 linear meters Use of proper equipment and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

Internal road network

Sub-base materials, concrete and asphalt pavement materials

1. Bypass Road: a. 4 Main Vehicular Lanes (2 each way) – 3.30 meters lane width b. One way designated bike lane – 3.00 meters lane width 2. Coastal Road: 4 Vehicular lanes a. Fast lane (1 each way) – 3.30 meters lane width b. Slow lane (1 each way) – 2.50 meters lane width 3. Waterway Boulevard: a. 4 Vehicular Lanes (2 each way) – 3.00 meters lane width b. One way designated bike lane – 1.25 meters lane width 4. Promenade Road: a. 4 Vehicular Lanes: Fastlane (1 each way) – 3.50 meters lane width; Slow lane (1 each way) – 2.50 meters lane width b. Two way designated bike lane – 2.50 meters lane width 5. Secondary Road: a. 3 Vehicular Lanes: Fast

Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)


20


Component Materials Size/Capacity Safety Features (during project implementation)

lane (1 each way) – 3.30 meters lane width; Slow lane (1 way) – 2.50 meters lane width b. One way designated bike lane – 1.20 meters lane width (Final quantities are to be determined after the detailed design)

Utilities 1. Water supply

system 2. Drainage

system 3. Sewerage

system 4. Power

distribution system

Reinforced conc. pipes, UPVC pipes, UPVC or PE pipes, poles and power lines

1. Water reservoir: four units, 200,000 gallons each

2. Six catchment basins and two retention ponds

3. Wastewater treatment plant: two units, 500,000 gallons each

4. Power interconnection: five electrical service points, 13.8 kV RMU

(Final quantities and sizes to be determined after the detailed design)

Use of proper equipment and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE); use of highly skilled linemen/electrician and protective/safety gears


21


Table 1.3. Summary of Major Construction Equipment

Major Construction Equipments Quantity/Size

Dredging vessels 3

Backhoe 0.8 m3

Pay loader 1.5 m3

Vibratory roller 10 tons

Water truck 16 m3

Bulldozer 20 tons

Dump truck 12 yd3

Road grader 140 HP

Concrete screed 5.5 HP

Concrete transit mixer 5 m3

One bagger mixer 4-6 ft3/min

Concrete vibrator 5.5 HP

Plate compactor 5 HP

Bar Cutter and Concrete Saw 7.5 HP

Standby generator set 700 kW

1.4.1.1 Land Mass

The area to be utilized for the project is approximately 35 hectares, located along the coastline

of Barangays Mercedes, Poblacion 3, Poblacion 4 and Poblacion 5. The estimated volume of

filling material is approximately 517,440.12 cubic meters, wherein the bulk of the materials

will be sourced out from land.

With Catbalogan City’s history of being susceptible to flooding, the development will utilize

a design grade elevation of +4.00 meters above sea level. To develop the island mass for the

proposed reclamation project, the following components/activities will be done:

1.4.1.1.1 Dredging/ Filling

The dredging operation shall involve the removal of 67,058 cubic meters of unsuitable

materials within the project area, while the filling operation shall involve the extraction of

suitable borrow materials from the source which are to be utilized in the reclamation area.

There shall be continuous extraction, transport, and placement activities in the project area

until the desired construction level is obtained to allow for installation of steel sheet piles and

the continuous filling up of the enclosed area until the final elevation is achieved.


22


Considering that the Mercedes coastline is made up of silted and clay sediment materials,

cutter suction dredgers are commonly used in dredging works because of their productivity

and mobility; and given that the coastline of Barangay Mercedes has both a confined area and

a shallow water area, the use of barge mounted clamshell crane or backhoe will be effective

in dredging for the extraction of the contaminated mud, and silted soil.

The identified site for the disposal of excavated materials is located inland, in Barangay

Bununan, with the distance between the project site and the disposal area being 2.72

kilometers.

Sea transportation is highly recommended for the transportation of excavated materials in

dredging works; an alternative can be the use of dump trucks for land transportation.

However, the latter can worsen the traffic flow of within the project site; thus, a traffic

management plan is necessary to ease the traffic congestion of the area.

Created b y Md S aiful A lam Saiffrom the Noun Project

Figure 1.8 Map showing the location of the site for the disposal of

excavated materials


23


Commonly-used equipment for digging and/or excavation are backhoes, payloaders, and

dozers; while the blasting method would require dippers, jumpers, priming needles, scraping

spoons, and tamping bars.

There are many local quarries which can be utilized as sources of filling materials in and

around the City of Catbalogan; still, the hauling cost should be considered, as it depends on

the travel distance required. The filling source in Barangay Lagundi is the closest, but it cannot

sufficiently fill the overall volume for the reclamation project.

The recycled materials (soft materials of fine sediment components such as clay and silt) are

not suitable for use directly in reclamation work without treatment; nevertheless, there is

reason to consider recycling soft materials obtained by dredging works for reclamation since

the procurement of good quality mountain sand is assumed to be difficult due to the limitation

of resources or productivity at the quarry.

For the transportation of filling materials, the quarry site is located inland 5 km southwest

from the city. The road to the site is narrow, with flat to rolling terrain. There are two ways to

access the project site: one is via the national road, while the second is via the by-pass road.

Therefore, construction of a temporary working road or access road should be considered in

the construction schedule.

1.4.1.1.2 Soil Stabilization

The current technique which is widely adopted in soil stabilization of reclaimed areas is the

surcharge loading with vertical drains method. It should be anticipated that the project area

will require soil stabilization with tolerable settlement required, or no settlement at all.

1.4.1.2 Coastal Dike and Drainage Improvement

The construction of the coastal dike aims to protect the western seaboard of Catbalogan City

against storm/tidal surge, while the drainage improvement will enhance the city’s existing

drainage system capacity in mitigating local flooding.


24


Figure 1.9. Typical design plan for the coastal dike component

1.4.1.3 Internal Road Network

The road network – which includes the main roads, interior secondary roads,

esplanades/promenades, coastal roads, sidewalks and curb & gutters – will service vehicular

traffic generated by the proposed developments within the area.

The Project is planned to:

1. Increase the transport system capacity and relieve traffic congestion in the City;

2. Open up the project site to additional land for commercial development; and

3. Improve road safety for vehicles and pedestrians


25


Figure 1.10. Road Network for the Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project

Figure 1.11. Road Design: Typical Cross Section of Bypass Road

The proposed circulation system seeks to attain efficient mobility and connectivity for the

Mercedes Reclamation Project. A hierarchy of routes that loop within each respective zone

and which are strategically connected to the other zones and external areas is envisioned to

facilitate traffic.


26


Figure 1.12. Circulation Plan - Vehicular Route for the Barangay Mercedes

Reclamation Project

One special consideration is the green ‘walkable’ neighborhood throughout the development.

The major pedestrian routes shall connect the existing developments to the Waterfront Project.

Designated bike lanes shall also be introduced in all major roads, which shall loop throughout

the whole site.

These areas are compliant with the PRA Administrative Order 2019-15 which states that 5%

of the whole project area should be designated as green spaces.

Figure 1.13. Circulation Plan - Main Pedestrian Route for the Barangay Mercedes

Reclamation Project


27


Figure 1.14. Circulation Plan - Bike Route for the Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project

1.4.1.4 Utilities

Figure 1.15. Infrastructure Map

1.4.1.4.1 Drainage System

The drainage system consists of network of pipelines (reinforced concrete pipe), covered

canals, box culvert, manholes, inlets and other appurtenant structures. These are generally

sited along the roadside and under the sidewalks. Retention ponds were designed as

impounding areas for the stormwater outfall from the barangays, before being discharged to

conveying canals and to the sea.


28


Figure 1.16. Drainage Map

Figure 1.17. Green and Open Space Network

1.4.1.4.2 Water Supply System

The proposed water supply system shall be connected to the Catbalogan City Water District.

As shown in Figure 1-14, there will be four (4) water reservoir areas, each having a capacity

of 200,000 gallons.

1.4.1.4.3 Sewerage Collection System

The proposed project will have two (2) units of wasterwater treatment plants, with the

capacity of 500 gallons each, as shown in Figure 1-15. The recommended technology to be

used is an advanced aerobic biological treatment based on Membrane Aerated Biofilm Reactor


29


(MABR) because of its cost-effectiveness, as compared to the conventional fine bubble aeration

system.

During the pre-treatment process, the raw wastewater is pumped into a pretreatment unit

where it is screened by an automatic coarse screen followed by a FOG separator. Wastewater

then flows to the EQ tank. The proposed sewerage system will be designed with an

equalization tank to allow the MABR unit to safely treat up to 120% of its average hourly

capacity. The pretreated wastewater then flows into a selector tank where the influent and

RAS streams are mixed and flow by gravity to the concrete tanks wherein the submerged

MABR modules allow for simultaneous nitrification and denitrification process removing

organic matter, total nitrogen and total phosphorous pollutants from the wastewater.

The solids content of the waste activated sludge pumped from the secondary settling tank

with a content of 1% solids will be thickened via belt press. It is expected that a fivefold

decrease in sludge volume will be achieved thru this process. Sludge produced after treatment

is further dewatered via addition of polymers and mechanical compaction for stabilization

and subsequent reduction of volume.

Figure 1.18. Schematic Flow Diagram of the Membrane Aerated Biofilm Reactor and

Aeration Basin


30


1.4.1.4.4 Power Supply System

The power supply requirement of the reclamation area shall be supplied by Samar Electric

Cooperative Inc. (SAMELCO) from their nearest existing transmission lines. Five (5) electrical

service points with a capacity of 13.8kV shall be installed, as shown in Figure 1-14.

1.4.1.5 Pollution Control Devices 1.4.1.5.1 Water Pollution

Dredging operations both in the reclamation and borrow materials site will create

environmental concerns regarding the generation of unsuitable materials. As a result,

disturbance in the nearby ocean and marine ecosystems may be observed caused by the

increase in turbidity and other possible suspended materials. One way of mitigating this

concern is through the use of appropriate dredging methodology and equipment. In line with

this, a containment structure shall be installed in the project site to ensure the prevention of

the spread of any unsuitable materials from the area of operations. Wall containment

structures consist of sheet piles installed around the perimeter. The general procedure in the

installation of sheet pile is the choice of a suitable driving system which is of fundamental

importance to ensure successful pile driving operation with due regards to safety.

1.4.1.5.2 Air Pollution

Air pollution for the reclamation project is expected to be minimal, but mitigating measures

are still listed as follows:

● The use of well-maintained equipment and vehicles/vessels. The sea vessels will be

utilizing internationally-accepted fossil-fuel driven equipment and will have their

individual smoke stacks;

● The use of efficient fuels; and

● The use of devices for fuel efficiency and Air Pollution Control Device (APCD)

onboard the vessels. The APCDs will be in accordance with maritime protocols such

as MARPOL 73/78 and applicable sections of the Philippine Clean Air Act (RA 8749)

1.4.1.5.3 Noise Pollution

Noise pollution is considered a minimal concern, as noise generating activities will be

confined during the day. As an effort to keep the noise at the lowest possible working levels,

equipment must be well-maintained and equipped with noise reduction devices.

The use of environmentally safe materials, construction methods that minimize waste, and

the collection of waste materials and their removal from site to a place of proper disposal will

be specified by the construction contract.


31


1.5 Process/Technology

Land reclamation demands extensive and elaborate planning. This will include identifying

suitable fill at a borrow area, selecting the appropriate equipment, executing extensive site

investigations and collecting hydrographic data.

1.5.1 Reclamation Methodology

Reclamation is a process of converting foreshore land, submerged areas or bodies of water

into land by filling or other means using dredge fill and other suitable materials. There are

several methods of land reclamation, depending upon the type of fill material, foundation

soil, topography of the seabed, the availability of equipment, and allowable fine material for

reclamation. The list of priorities when considering the feasibility of a land reclamation project

is selecting a borrow area, evaluations have to be made and these are based on the availability,

the suitability and the quality of the potential fill material. The nature of the fill and its in-situ

characteristics will influence the type of equipment, the means of transport, the method of

reclamation and the possible need for ground improvement techniques.

1. Sailing to the discharge / dumping point – As soon as the hopper dredge is fully

loaded, the suction tubes will be hoisted back on board and course will be set towards

the area for unloading the hopper dredge where it will sail as a regular cargo vessel.

2. Discharging and Dumping – There are several ways to discharge the hopper head:

a. Bottom dumping – The fastest way to unload is by discharging the load through

the opened bottom doors of the hopper. The vessel is exactly at the area where the

load will be discharged, the bottom doors open and the material is directly

dumped on site. A new cycle commences as soon as the load is fully dumped by

sailing back to the fill source.

b. Pumping – Some hopper dredgers are equipped with pumping facilities. This

enables them to pump the load on a floating pipeline directly into the reclamation

area. The hopper dredger will be connected via the bow connection on board to

this floating pipeline.

In this method, jets in the hopper will fluidize the sand in the hopper and pumps

will convey the mixture through the pipelines to the reclamation area.

For sections where pipeline route has to cover large/long distances over water

where it has to cross a surf zone or shipping channel, a submersible pipe resting

on the seabed is chosen.

c. Reclamation with a spray-pontoon – If bottom dumping is not possible, the

unloading done using a spray-pontoon. The spray-pontoon is connected to the

hopper dredge using a similar pipeline system, which will be moved over

prescribed tracks to deposit the load evenly over the required surface area.


32


1.5.1.1 Dredging Equipment

Dredging works are commonly described as removal of sediments from underwater which

involving excavation process. Unsuitable materials, silted sand and contaminated soil are

excavated for channel and harbor deepening and for land reclamation. Mechanical and

hydraulic dredgers are commonly used in construction and trenching purposes.

Mechanical dredging is conducted using a barge-mounted clamshell crane or backhoe, which

excavate materials and places them into waiting barges, which are then towed to disposal

areas it is used in narrow and shallow wet areas.

Hydraulic dredging by using cutter suction dredger or Trailing Suction Hopper Dredger

(TSHD) is used mainly for then maintenance dredging of channels and specializes in dredging

‘soft and loose’ deposit materials in a wide range area.

The total volume to be extracted for the Mercedes coastline reclamation project (Phase 1) is

about 162,168.08 cubic meters With an area of 108,112.05 square meters and a depth of 1.5

meter contaminated mud and silted sand.

1.5.1.2 Quarrying Methodology

Quarrying is the process of removing rock, sand, gravel or other minerals from the ground in

order to use them to produce materials for construction or other uses.

There are several types of methodology in quarrying (i.e., digging, heating, wedging, and

blasting) but the commonly used in locality are digging or excavation and blasting.

• Digging: In this method, granular materials are excavated with the help of suitable

instruments. This method is useful when soft stones occur at low levels in the ground.

• Blasting,: This method is used when hand rocks having no fissures or cracks are to be

broken down the rocks and convert into small pieces by using explosive devices.

The total volume to be hauled out for quarry is about 517,436 cubic meters to reclaimed the

102,112.05 square meters with an average height of 3.83 meters.

1.5.1.3 Embankment Construction

The construction of embankment in accordance with the specifications of the plans or as

established by the engineer will be utilized for the project. Borrow selected should be soil of

such gradation that all particles will pass a sieve with 0.75 millimeter square openings and

not more than 15 mass percent will pass the 0.075 millimeter sieve, as determined by AASHTO

T 11. In addition to that, the materials shall have a plasticity index of not more than 5, as

determined by AASHTO T 90, and liquid limit of not more than 30, as determined by

AASHTO T 65.


33


1.5.1.4 Construction Requirements

Prior to construction of embankment, all cleaning and grubbing shall have been performed in

conformity with the standards; with the area containing no deleterious matter upon

commencement of operations. The surface of the existing ground shall be compacted to a

depth of 150 millimeters and to the specified requirements, as shown on the Plans or as

directed by the engineer. Along with that, the top portions of the roadbed in both cuts and

embankments, shall consist of selected borrow for topping from excavations also as indicated.

Embankment construction shall consist of constructing roadway embankments, including

preparation of the areas upon which they are to be placed; the construction of dikes within or

adjacent to the roadway; and the placing and compacting of approved material.

1.5.1.5 Methods

a. Where there is evidence of discrepancies on the actual elevations and that shown on

the plans, a preconstruction survey referred to the datum plane used in the approved

plan shall be undertaken under the control of the engineer to serve as a basis.

b. Embankment of earth material shall be placed in horizontal layers not exceeding 200

millimeters, and shall be compacted as specified before the next layer is placed.

However, a thicker layer maybe placed if vibratory roller with high compactive effort

is used provided that density requirement is attained and as approved by the engineer.

c. When excavated material contains more than 25 mass percent of rock larger than 150

millimeters in greatest diameter and cannot be placed in layers of the thickness

prescribes without further breaking down the pieces resulting from excavation

methods, such materials may be placed on the embankment in layers not exceeding in

thickness the approximate average size of the larger rocks but no greater than 600

millimeters.

d. The placing of individual rocks and boulders greater than 600 millimeters in diameter

will be permitted provided that they do not exceed 1200 millimeters in height when

placed and are carefully distributed to form a dense and compact mass

e. Each level shall be leveled and smoothed with suitable leveling equipment and by

distribution of spalls and finer fragments of earth.

f. Dumping and rolling areas shall be kept separate, with no lift covered by another until

compaction complies with the requirements.

g. Hauling and leveling equipment shall be so routed and distributed over each layer of

the fill in such a manner as to make use of compaction effort afforded thereby and to

minimize rutting and uneven compaction.

Before commencing the formation of embankment, an approval in writing should be

submitted by the contractor to the engineer containing his proposals for the compaction of

each type of fill material to be used. The proposal should also include the relationship between

the types of compaction equipment, the number of passes required, and the method of

adjusting moisture content. Compaction trials with the main types of fill materials to be used

in the project shall be completed before work with the corresponding materials will be

allowed to commence.


34


When the compaction is in progress, the contractor shall adhere to compaction procedures

found from the compaction trials for every type of material and equipment utilized, as well

as, each degree of compaction specified.

1.5.1.6 Protection During Construction

During the construction, embankments shall be maintained in such condition that it will be

well drained at all times. Side ditches or gutters emptying from cuts to embankments or

otherwise shall be so constructed as to avoid damage by erosion.

1.5.1.7 Protection of Structure

If embankments can be deposited on one side only of abutments, wing walls, piers, or culvert

headwalls, care shall be taken that the area immediately adjacent to the structure is not

compacted to the extent that it will cause overturning of, or excessive pressure against the

structure.

Table 1.4. Summary of Project Components and corresponding Process/Technology

Project Component Process/Technology Land mass Reclamation method

Infrastructure 1. Coastal Dike and Drainage

Improvement

2. Road Network

Construction

Utilities 1. Water Supply System

2. Drainage System

3. Sewerage Collection System

4. Power Distribution System

Distribution and construction

Table 1.5. Summary of Major Equipment

Major Equipment Estimated Quantity/Size

Dredging vessels 3Backhoe 0.8 m3Pay loader 1.5 m3Vibratory roller 10tWater truck 16 m3Bulldozer 20tDump truck 12 yd3Road grader 140hpConcrete screed 5.5hp


35


Major Equipment Estimated Quantity/Size

Concrete transit mixer 5m3One bagger mixer 4-6 ft3/minConcrete vibrator 5.5hpPlate compactor 5hpBar cutter, concrete saw 7.5hpStandby generator set 700kW

1.6 Project Size

The proposed reclamation project covers an area of 35 hectares. It is located along the coastline

of barangays Mercedes, Poblacion 3, Poblacion 4, and Poblacion 5 in Catbalogan City, Samar.

The estimated volume of filling material is approximately 517,440.12 cubic meters.

The Mixed-Use Institutional Zone can carry sports and civic buildings (e.g. arena, MICE

buildings, museum, theatre); the Mixed-Use Commercial Zone is comprised of the high-

density commercial/office and residential areas; while the first-class commercial areas and

business hotels will be in the Mixed-Use Tourism Zone. The Fisherman’s Village is the

resettlement site and marketplace for the public.

Table 1.6. Land Area of Facilities

Project Facilities Area (ha)

A. Saleable

Mixed-Use Institutional 3.71

Mixed-Use Commercial 6.79

Mixed-Use Tourism 7.42

Industrial 1.89

Sub-total A 19.81 B. Non-Saleable Utility & Transportation 2.00

Parks & Open Spaces 7.23

RROWs 4.00

Fisherman’s Village 1.96

Sub-total B 15.19 Grand Total 35.00


36


Figure 1.19. Proposed Land Use Plan of Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project

1.7 Development Plan, Description of Project Phases and Corresponding Timeframes

1.7.1 Project Duration and Schedule

The implementation of the reclamation projects and its components has a four (4) year

construction period.

• Preparatory works such as detailed engineering design would take place right at the

start of the implementation schedule.

• The procurement of civil works will require three (3) months to complete. Reclamation

works would commence on the middle of the same year.

• A two (2) year period would be needed to allow the embankment to consolidate to

attain the allowable compaction of the land mass.

• The last activity that will be undertaken is the development of the site. Construction

of road network, coastal dike and drainage improvement and installation of different

utilities such as water, power, drainage, sewage, and telecommunication systems

would commence on the middle of fourth year.


37


Table 1.7. Project Time Frame

Project Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

A. Detailed Engineering Design

B. Procurement of Civil Works

C. Construction Phase

C.1. Reclamation (or construction)

C.2. Consolidation/stabilization

C.3. Site development (horizontal)

1.7.2 Description of Project Phases

1.7.2.1 Pre-Construction Phase

During the pre-construction phase, the Provincial Government of Samar is currently

conducting the following activities:

1. Preparation of the Project Feasibility Study;

2. Conduct of geotechnical investigation;

3. Conduct of marine and freshwater ecology assessment;

4. Conduct of hydrodynamic modelling;

5. Completion of the Detailed Engineering Design;

6. Conduct of the required Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and the subsequent

securing of an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) for the project (the subject

of this application/study) and Area Clearance;

7. Securing of relevant permits, endorsements and clearances;

8. Procurement of construction services and of facilities;

The securing of clearances, permits, and all other administrative requirements of concerned

agencies will also be completed. The list of such concerned agencies are as follows:

1. Philippine Reclamation Authority

2. Philippine Ports Authority

3. Philippine Coast Guard

4. National Historic Commissions of the Philippines

5. Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources

6. Department of Public Work and Highways

7. Department of Information and Communications Technology


38


8. Philippine Navy

9. Department of Energy

10. Department of Tourism

11. National Mapping and Resource Information Authority

12. Department of Health

1.7.2.2 Construction/Development Phase

All activities during construction phase will involve the construction of components of the

project. Project features and components to be constructed include the road network, coastal

dike and drainage improvement, and the installation of different utilities such as water,

power, drainage, and sewerage collection system. The Barangay Mercedes reclamation project

is projected to be completed in four (4) years.

The detailed activities, potential impacts and proposed mitigating measures during the

construction phase is presented in Section 3 of this report.

1.7.2.3 Operational Phase

Once all the reclamation/construction activities are completed, an evaluation of all

construction activities will be undertaken as to whether improvements in schedule and

costing have been implemented.

The Operations Phase involves the construction of buildings and structures by various

locators and the operation of their activities. This phase is not included in the scope of this EIS

and in the application for an ECC.

1.7.2.4 Abandonment Phase

Given the nature of the project has a perpetual lifespan, the proponent must continue to

maintain and enhance the project components so that the project will be environmentally-

compliant and safe. Structures and equipment will be assessed regularly as the project

continues its operation.

However, in case abandonment of the project is necessary, all waste materials and garbage

left behind will be sorted for recycling and then will be sold to interested buyers, while the

residual wastes will be dumped in landfills (for non-hazardous wastes) or treated by third-

party waste treaters (for hazardous wastes).

1.8 Manpower

During the construction phase, the project will require about 184 personnel consisting of

experts and laborers. The manpower requirement during reclamation (or construction),

consolidation/stabilization, and site development (horizontal only) of the project is presented

in Table 1-8.


39


Table 1.8. Manpower Requirement during Construction Phase of the Project

Manpower Requirement Expertise/Skills Total Reclamation (or construction) Resident Engineer Structural Engineer Specialist 1

Material Testing Engineer Material Testing 1

Construction Engineer Civil/Structural 1

Geologist (on call basis) Engineering Geology 1

Laborers Skilled and Unskilled 100

Consolidation/stabilization Resident Engineer Structural Engineer Specialist 1

Geologist (on call basis) Engineering Geology 1

Heavy Equipment Operator Skilled labor 5


Site development (horizontal) Resident Civil Engineer Structural Engineer Specialist 1

Resident Electrical Engineer Power Distribution 1

Resident Mechanical Engineer Sewerage/Septage Design 1


Total 184

1.9 Project Cost

All expenses that will be incurred in the construction of the reclamation project, including its

supporting structures and facilities, are considered as implementation costs on the part of the

government.

The estimated project costs were based on the quantities using design drawings and

specifications prepared by the Provincial Engineering Office of Samar in conjunction with the

most appropriate scheme among alternative options that was considered in the study. The

cost estimates were based on the average prevailing prices of labor, materials and equipment

rentals in the area. The basic costs include all the relevant charges, which are usually borne by

the Contractor. The labor costs are inclusive of the minimum wage and of the cost of fringe

benefits required by Philippine laws and regulations. The costs of materials are inclusive of

supply, loading, sea and land transportation, unloading, storage and possible wastage.

The cost of the proposed Reclamation Project in Barangay Mercedes is estimated at

approximately 328.445 Million Pesos. This includes the direct and indirect costs of the project

accumulated within the different stages of construction.


40


Table 1.9. Summary of Quantities

Item No. Description Uni

t Quantity Unit cost Total Cost

PART I FACILITIES OF THE ENGINEER

A.1 Provide and Maintain Engrs. Office and Laboratory

L.s. 1.00 283,834.98 283,835

SUBTOTAL: 283,835 PART II OTHER GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

B.7 Construction Safety and Health L.s. 1.00 351,377.19 351,377 B.8 Reimbursables L.s. 1.00 5,832.08 5,832 B.9 Mobilization & Demobilization L.s. 1.00 93,704.00 93,704

SUBTOTAL: 450,913 PART III EMBANKMENT FROM BORROW (COMMON SOIL)

Embankment from Borrow (common soil) m3 517,440.12 633.33 327,710,352 SUBTOTAL: 327,710,352 TOTAL COST 328,445,100


Environmental Management Plan | i

Table of Contents 3 Environmental Management Plan ............................................................................................. 1


Environmental Management Plan | 1

3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN In the previous chapter, all the environmental impacts on land, water, air and people during the construction of land mass and land development phase have been presented, the summary of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) that was derived from baseline data, on impact wherein mitigation measures are required and impacts raise during the Public Scoping. All the mitigating measures will be implemented by the proponent, some of which will be monitored and supervised by other concerned government agencies. The cost of implementation for all the mitigating measures will be integrated in the operational budget of the proponent to make sure that the proper structures or systems are fully implemented. The impact analysis and proposed mitigation/management measures for the project phases are presented in the table below:



Activity Environmental

Component Likely to be Affected

Potential Impact

Options for Prevention or Mitigation or Enhancement

Efficiency of Measures

Responsible Entity

Cost

Guarantee /Financial

Arrangements

Schedule of Implementation

Pre-Construction Phase The Land Conduct of Environmental Impact Assessment and other related studies

Land Use and Classification

The proposed project is within ECA given that it is near the Maqueda Bay and a major river, the area is prone to flooding and storm surge.

The proponent will conduct a flood study and hydrodynamic modelling study to show the flood scenario without and with project. Appropriate alignment as well as tidal wall height will be incorporated in the detailed engineering design.

Presence of a flood study and hydrodynamic modelling study Incorporation of the recommendations on the actual design of the reclamation project.

Proponent Part of Feasibility and design cost

Compliance to requirements of the DENR and the National Building Code

Prior to Construction





Potential Impact



Responsible Entity Cost


Arrangements


Preparation of Detailed Engineering Design


Geohazards (Liquefaction, risk due to earthquakes, inducement of subsidence), Storm surge, typhoons, tsunami Structural integrity of the project Climate Change and Sea Level Rise

The structural design of buildings should strictly follow other specifications set by the National Structural Code for Buildings (NSCB) and other relevant requirements specified in the National Building Code of the Philippines (NBCP). Maximum wave heights to be considered in the design of structures. For safety purposes, the higher PGA values should be considered in the design of the structures to be built.

With a detailed engineering design incorporating the results of the geotechnical study.

Proponent Part of Feasibility and design cost

Compliance to requirements of the PRA and the National Building Code

Prior to Construction





Potential Impact





Arrangements


Consider factors and result in the hydrodynamic modeling and in the detailed engineering design.

The People Processing of all regulatory permits and clearances

People Safety and Compliance

Compliance to all Permitting and Clearance requirements with the LGUs and concerned government regulatory agencies (i.e. PRA, PCG, etc.)

All required permits must be secured before the implementation of the project.

Proponent/Contractor

Part of the initial cost project

Incorporated in the work and financial plan of the company

Start of Admin operations





Potential Impact





Arrangements


Procurement of Infrastructure Project

Generation of local benefits/enhancement of emplyment

Employment Pooling and pre- qualification of possible contractors and manpower. Priority will be given to qualified residents of the host barangays/city.

Numbers of residents from the host barangays/city that were hired during the construction and operation of the project.

Construction Phase (Reclamation and Land Development) The Land Mobilization of personnel and offshore equipment/vessel and heavy equipment


Solid waste generated from construction crews, which might be disposed on shore.

Littering, accidental spillage of any construction wastes should be avoided by pre-planning ways of their transportation and/or unloading at the temporary storage. Careful planning of the work activities can also reduce the

Presence of solid waste management plan and contigency plan prepared by the contractor and/or LGU. With hazardous waste generator ID secured from EMB Region 8

Proponent/PCO/ Contractor

Included as part of development Cost

Part of the project cost

To be implemented upon commencement of reclamation through land development.





Potential Impact





Arrangements


amount of waste generated.

Mobilization of personnel and offshore equipment/vessel and heavy equipment


Increase in Ground Water Demand due to the influx of workers and their families in the residential area outside the reclamation site will lead to an increase in the consumption of groundwater. This could lead to over extraction of groundwater and would

The extraction of groundwater in the existing residential and industrial areas should be monitored and regulated to avoid the negative effects of subsidence due to over extraction of groundwater. Regular ground survey should be conducted to monitor ground subsidence. Rainwater harvesting during the rainy

Water consumption report from Catbalogan water district showing it is within the average monthly water consumption. Presence of rainwater harvesting facility

Proponent in coordination with the Local Water Providers








Potential Impact





Arrangements


contribute to ground subsidence.

season could be done to augment the water source. The community should also be trained on how to conduct rainwater harvesting and on proper water management.

Removal and Disposal of unsuitable materials

Terrestrial Ecology Oil and grease contamination of grazing areas that may further depress fish growth and recruitment, loss of fish habitats and reduction of primary productivity.

An oil and grease contingency, containment and recovery plan will be formulated in accordance with MARPOL protocols and enforced in all aspects of project operations. Remediation will include recovery

Presence oil and grease contingency, containment and recovery plan prepared by the contractor and/or LGU. Passed an environmental audit to show that the proponent and contractor are following the









Potential Impact





Arrangements


and treatment of sludge. Carpools will be located farthest from the coast and driver system and all vehicle oil discards will be recovered.

conditions set by the DENR.

Removal and Disposal of unsuitable materials


Siltation and transport of silt to other areas that may have marine resources

Silt curtains shall be installed in the reclamation area. This shall hold the silt within the area

Presence of silt curtains Zero or minimal siltation/sedimentation


Part of the development budget of the project







Potential Impact





Arrangements


Fill of suitable materials to land mass level

Terrestrial Ecology Earth moving during reclamation works can generate sediment streams that, when not contained adequately, result to further river water discoloration and siltation, depth reduction and alteration, scouring and consequently the disturbance and modification of river habitat.

Establishment of series of silt curtains around the reclamation sites to prevent escape of sediments and terrigenous material disturbed during reclamation excavation and filling. Control measures will also include a series of sediment mitigation structures, including catchment and diversion canals to ensure that silt and sediments will not flow into the river estuary and enter the river system.

Presence of silt curtains Zero or minimal siltation/sedimentation









Potential Impact





Arrangements


Heavy equipment areas will be located away from waterways where erosion control measures can be easily applied. Reclamation operation material stockpiles shall be covered. As a precautionary approach, slurry walls will be built around areas where such slurries can emanate extensively.



Occurrence of ground subsidence, collapse, and heave.

Ground subsidence should be monitored continuously from the start of the reclamation and even after all constructions

No ground subsidence or settlement experienced.









Potential Impact





Arrangements


are finished. Proper compaction to be done by the contractor to reach the minimum allowable net bearing capacity



Aggravated flooding in nearby coast due to the reclaimed area which at inease siltation and erosion and impede tidal flushing

Adequate and efficient drainage design is recommended to prevent localized flooding at the site especially during heavy downpours. The drainage lines in the area should regularly be cleaned and maintained of waste materials. Proper waste management should be implemented.

Exisitng drainage system rehabilitated and new drainange constructed based on the result of the flood study.









Potential Impact





Arrangements


Construction of containment Wall/Sheet pile driving


Though the project is not much affected by earthquake- induced landslides since it has flat terrain but the it is highly susceptible to lateral spread and flow failure since its offshore perimeter will form a steep slope rising above the seabed.

A properly anchored retaining structure that could hold in-place the reclaimed land should be constructed to mitigate this hazard. The slope of the fill should not be overly steepened to minimize slope failures.

Well constructed retaining structure Zero or minimal siltation/sedimentation







Soil erosion The edge of the reclamation area shall be placed with armor rocks that shall prevent waves to erode the soils being dumped.

Presence of armor rocks









Potential Impact





Arrangements


Compaction and Soil Stabilization


Inducement of liquefaction

A detailed geotechnical investigation must be undertaken in case of construction of tall buildings (more than 3-storey) is planned to be erected at the site to determine the most suitable foundation scheme and the net bearing capacity as well as to identify any ground stability problem within the area.










Potential Impact





Arrangements




Settlement: AMH study indicates that the reclaimed land would not settle uniformly.

To avoid excessive settlement in the reclaimed land, the fill should be engineered to improve its consistency. The fill should be designed to have the characteristic of a vibrocompacted sand fill. The soil that should be used for reclamation should not contain high amount of silty and clayey materials. Preferably, well-graded sand and gravel materials should be used. It should be mixed with stabilizing material such as cement.










Potential Impact





Arrangements


Installation of drainage system, sewer line system, water line system, construction of sewerage treatment plant and road network.


Solid and hazardoues waste generated from construction crews, which might be disposed on shore.

Littering, accidental spillage of any construction wastes should be avoided by pre- planning ways of their transportation and/or unloading at the temporary storage. Careful planning of the work activities can also reduce the amount of waste generated.

Presence of solid waste management plan and contigency plan prepared by the contractor and/or LGU. With hazardous waste generator ID secured from EMB Region 8





The Water Mobilization of personnel and offshore equipment/vessel and heavy equipment

Water Quality Degradation of marine water quality due to generation of solid and hazardous wastes brought by the reclamation

Solid and Hazardous waste management shall be strictly implemented in compliance with RA 9003 and RA 6969. A centralized treatment facility

Presence of solid waste management plan and contigency plan prepared by the contractor and/or LGU. With hazardous waste generator ID









Potential Impact





Arrangements


project activities.

can be established to ensure wastewater has been treated before discharging to any bodies of water

secured from EMB Region 8


Water Ecology Water availability and competition for use

IEC should be conducted by the City Government and the barangay for water conservation program and water reuse and recycling. Adaptation measures include protection of water aquifer, conduct of massive information and education campaign, establishment of protection

Water consumption report from Catbalogan water district showing it is within the average monthly water consumption.

LGU / Proponent as apart of their IEC and SDP program

Included in the IEC and SDP funding


May be initiated prior to construction





Potential Impact





Arrangements


measures for coastal areas, and strengthening the protection of ecosystems.

Removal and Disposal of unsuitable materials and fill of suitable materials to land mass level

Marine Ecology and Water Quality

Oil and grease contamination from spills and vehicle maintenance can be very detrimental to benthic organisms in the shelf and may also cause migration of fish and crustaceans to other areas, leading to lower fisheries productivity.

An oil and grease contingency, containment and recovery plan will be formulated in accordance with MARPOL protocols and enforced in all aspects of project operations. Regular checking of all equipment including vessels or barges for leakage will be done.

Presence oil and grease contingency, containment and recovery plan prepared by the contractor and/or LGU. Passed an environmental audit to show that the proponent and contractor are following the conditions set by the DENR.









Potential Impact





Arrangements


Carpools will be located farthest from the coast and driver system and all vehicle oil discards will be recovered.


Marine Ecology Sustained sediment and silt loading can result to habitat alteration and the emigration of some crab population. Since the project is small and does not host sizeable crab populations, dredging and reclamation filling will

Implementation of Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM) of the City Government of Catbalogan. Concervation of marine resources through the establishment of a Marine Protected Ares (MPAs).

Presence of a fisheries management plan incorporating the basic concepts of EAFM and prepared with the consutlation of affected fisherfolk organization. With a city ordinance for the establishment of an MPA. With an MPA management plan and functioning









Potential Impact





Arrangements


result only to temporary and shallow disturbance of crab habitats and feeding regimen.

MPA management body.


Water Quality High sedimentation rate during the dredging and reclamation operations and may lead to exceedance in the range of 5 to 10 mg/L total suspended solids. This will result to poor water quality.

Confinement of the suspended material to prevent accidental spillage during the transport and hauling of dredged materials for maintaining the environmental integrity of the coast zone. Individual dredgers should not be deployed near each other to lessen the concentration of

Presence of contingency plan prepared by the contractor and/or LGU. Passed an environmental audit to show that the proponent and contractor are following the conditions set by the DENR.









Potential Impact





Arrangements


suspended sediments. The dredging track should be east-west and vice versa and as much as possible, should not run parallel to the shore as this area has shallower depths. Limit the dredging or reclamation activities in project areas near the shore especially during periods of calm wind or during low water levels.





Potential Impact





Arrangements



Marine Ecology Reclamation works can lead to sediment spills in the river estuary that may cause shallowing of navigational lane of the Catbalogan-Daram-ferry route.

Re-vegetation and stabilization of the reclaimed area will be a major strategy and a continuing program of the propoenent and this is designed to reinforce post-reclamation sediment management and will significantly help to minimize soil erosion and improve natural sediment accretion so that sediment spills into coastal waters are reduced even during construction of facilities and structures inside the reclaimed area.

Presence of open green space within the reclaimed area.









Potential Impact





Arrangements



Water Quality Contamination of water / possible oil spills/leaks

Regular checking of all equipment including vessels or barges for leakage will be done. Moreover, oil spill kits will be ready in case there will be accidental spills. Institute and implementation of oil spill containment protocols should be followed during development in cases of occurrence.

Presence oil and grease contingency, containment and recovery plan prepared by the contractor and/or LGU. Passed an environmental audit to show that the proponent and contractor are following the conditions set by the DENR.





Installation of drainage system, sewer line system, water line system, construction of sewerage treatment

Marine Ecology Wastewater from heightened personnel presence in the project’s operation and land-based facilities, combined

Wastewater from the reclamation works will not be disposed in waterways that ultimately contribute to coastal water pollution.

Water quality test result must be within the effluent standards set by DENR.









Potential Impact





Arrangements


plant and road network.

with organic wastes and nutrients stirred up during soil-moving activities, can exacerbate seawater pollution.

Temporary containment ponds will be built, and the use of 3-chambered septic tanks shall be installed in all project facilities where wastewaters and other effluents are generated.

The Air





Potential Impact





Arrangements



Noise Increase in noise pollution during removal/dospisal of dredge materaials and filling of suitable materials.

Proper scheduling of high noise generating construction activities during the daytime to avoid sensitive periods; Maintaining equipment in good working order and fitting with appropriate noise control at all times; Ensure deliveries arrive and depart so as not to disturb residents at inconvenient times; Workers exposed to high-level noise will be issued with, and required to wear,

Presence of contingency plan prepared by the contractor and/or LGU. Passed an environmental audit to show that the proponent and contractor are following the conditions set by the DENR.









Potential Impact





Arrangements


appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE); Undertaking construction activities in accordance with good practice; Setting noise limits.


Air Quality Degradation of air quality due to dust and particulate matter generation and GHG generation.

Minimize heavy machinery during reclamation works. Regularly maintain diesel driven engines of transport vehicles, equipment and

Ambient air quality test result must be within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards set by DENR.









Potential Impact





Arrangements


barges and ensure they meet required emission levels for diesel vehicles.

Site preparation, excavation, and foundations construction

Meteorology/Climatology

Contribution in terms of greenhouse gas emissions (or GHG mitigation potential)

It is recommended that the proponent initiate enhancement programs related to carbon sink sequestration in line with the government’s greening program considering that a 35 hectare land mass will be generated as a result of the reclamation project.

With programs and projects implemented by the City and Provincial Govrenment that are aligned with the National Greening Program of DENR.

Proponent Included as part of development Cost

Project Cost To be implemented upon commencement of reclamation through land development.





Potential Impact





Arrangements



Noise Increase in noise pollution during construction of contaimnment wall/sheet pile driving

Installation of temporary noise barriers such as galvanized iron shields will also be used particularly in noise-sensitive areas such as churches, schools and hospitals in the immediate vicinities of the construction area; Positioning of temporary site compounds as far as reasonably practicable from sensitive receptors; Use of site terrain, material stockpile and suitable work locations so as to screen work locations and

Noise level results must be within the NPCC maximum allowable noise level in general areas









Potential Impact





Arrangements


maximize the distance between work activities and receptors; Maintaining equipment in good working order and fitting with appropriate noise control at all times; Workers exposed to high-level noise will be issued with, and required to wear, appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE); Undertaking construction activities in accordance with good practice.





Potential Impact





Arrangements














Potential Impact





Arrangements



Noise Increase in noise pollution during compaction and soil stabilization that may affect the receptors near the project.

Proper scheduling of high noise generating construction activities during the daytime to avoid sensitive periods; Maintaining equipment in good working order and fitting with appropriate noise control at all times; Ensure deliveries arrive and depart so as not to disturb residents at inconvenient times; Workers exposed to high-level noise will be issued with, and required to wear,










Potential Impact





Arrangements


appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE); Undertaking construction activities in accordance with good practice; Setting noise limits.



Minimize heavy machinery during reclamation works. Regularly maintain diesel driven engines of transport vehicles, equipment and










Potential Impact





Arrangements


barges and ensure they meet required emission levels for diesel vehicles.

Site preparation, excavation, and foundations construction

Meteorology/Climatology

Contribution in terms of greenhouse gas emissions (or GHG mitigation potential)

It is recommended that the proponent initiate enhancement programs related to carbon sink sequestration in line with the government’s greening program considering that a 35 hectare land mass will be generated as a result of the reclamation project.

With programs and projects implemented by the City and Provincial Govrenment that are aligned with the National Greening Program of DENR.

Proponent Included as part of development Cost

Project Cost To be implemented upon commencement of reclamation through land development.





Potential Impact





Arrangements



Noise Increase in noise pollution during construction of contaim=nment wall/sheet pile driving

Installation of temporary noise barriers such as galvanized iron shields will also be used particularly in noise-sensitive areas such as churches, schools and hospitals in the immediate vicinities of the construction area; Positioning of temporary site compounds as far as reasonably practicable from sensitive receptors; Use of site terrain, material stockpile and suitable work locations so as to screen work locations and










Potential Impact





Arrangements


maximize the distance between work activities and receptors; Maintaining equipment in good working order and fitting with appropriate noise control at all times; Workers exposed to high-level noise will be issued with, and required to wear, appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE); Undertaking construction activities in accordance with good practice.





Potential Impact





Arrangements










The People





Potential Impact





Arrangements



People Employment generation. Priority jobs for the men and women of direct and indirect impact areas

IEC on nature of jobs Consultation on job requirements and qualification Local hiring priority for qualified Barangay residents Skills training to upgrade local skills of residents that can be hired by the project Engagement of residents as manpower for the preliminaries and implementation pf the Coastal Resource Management Program Generation of

Numbers of residents from the host barangays/city that were hired during the construction and operation of the project.

Proponent/Contractor LGU / Barangay TESDA

Part of the operations budget of the project







Potential Impact





Arrangements


livelihood opportunities by putting-up food stalls, variety stores and other services near the Project


People Impact of Climate Change

Vulnerability mapping should be conducted to identify priority households for evacuation. Non-structural disaster mitigation measures should be implemented in line with the

Presence of vulnerability asseessment and action plan to be implemented by the proponent.

Proponent / CRU / LGU








Potential Impact





Arrangements


LGUs Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) plans.


Peace and Order Unauthorized entry of outsiders and establishments which might cause problems in peace and order

Coordination with the Barangay LGU Tanods to ensure authorized establishments and control of unauthorized entry of outsiders Buffer zones should be established around the perimeter of the reclamation area during construction

Zero or minimal cases of unauthorized entry of outsiders.

MMMRP Community Relations Officer Security Force Barangay LGU & Tanods



Prior and during construction/reclamation

Removal and Disposal of unsuitable materials and fill of suitable materials to

Health and Safety Entry of migrant workers with families, which might cause

Management of entry of migrant workers.

Zero or minimal cases of migrant workers related problems.

• MHO Part of the operations budget of the project







Potential Impact





Arrangements


land mass level

problems of congestion, peace and order and security, breaches.


Health and Safety The project may cause health problems due to diseases, overuse of public utilities /services, competition of resources, social conflicts, peace and order, increase in pollution due to solid, liquid and toxic wastes.

Increase and train Barangay tanods to be deployed in areas where migrant workers reside as well as the management of waste.

Zero or minimal cases of project related health problems.

• MMRLDP Community Relations • Barangay LGU • Barangay Tanod • Barangay Health Workers




Removal and Disposal of unsuitable materials and fill of suitable materials to

Health and Safety Possible Health and safety risk in the operation of the reclaimed area due to

Proponent provide Health clinic with a Doctor, Nurse and Health workers










Potential Impact





Arrangements


land mass level

noise and air pollution


Health and Safety Possible accidents for workers

Orientations and strict implementation of safety practices will be done.







Health and Safety Health hazard to workers due to increased dust generation

Use of protective gears










Potential Impact





Arrangements



People Social unrest of sectors in the community, psycho-social impacts on communities surrounding the project and disturbance in their socioeconomic activities

The proponent initiate intensive IEC activities to update stakeholders on the status of the project, initiate programs that will promote livelihood, skills development, health and nutrition, disaster risk reduction and response and other similar activities as part of the proponent’s Social Development Plan. Alignment of the city resettlement program for settlers along the coastline with the preparation of a Resettlement Action Plan

With approved Resettlment Action Plan and implemented before the project commence.

Proponent/PCO/ Contractor LGU

Part of the project / IEC-SDP







Potential Impact





Arrangements


following R.A. 7279. and RA 10752. Proponent with the LGU to Implement appropriate sectoral consultations and IEC programs to raise project knowledge and awareness an community engagement


People For offshore earthquakes capable of generating tsunami

Sustained community-level public education on tsunami awareness, preparedness and mitigation are still very important. Coastal communities must be aware of

Zero or minimal cases of project related tsunami hazards.









Potential Impact





Arrangements


tsunami facts and must react appropriately during an earthquake at any time.


People Risk to flooding after the development of the reclamation project. Storm surge hazard and other Hazards

Storm surges are one of the many natural hazards that are difficult to control. Break waters and barriers may help or minimize the effect of coastal waves. Vigilance and awareness about storm surges must be undertaken with the help of PAGASA that regularly give weather information on the direction and strength of typhoon.

Zero or minimal cases of project related flood hazards.









Potential Impact





Arrangements



People Increase in traffic flow causing air (dust) and noise pollution

Health certificate for workers prior to hiring into the project Implementation of the Social Development Program IEC on proper scheduling of hauler trucks and construction operations to avoid entry and dismissal of school children as well as late hours. Environment Risk Management for the operation of the Plant and surrounding communities

Noise level results must be within the NPCC maximum allowable noise level in general areas Ambient air quality test result must be within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards set by DENR.





Demobilization Phase The Land





Potential Impact





Arrangements


Demobilization and clean up

Land : Sanitation Contamination due to improper waste disposal

Proper disposal of wastes, and as necessary/applicable through accredited waste transporters

Presence of plan prepared by the contractor and/or LGU. Passed an environmental audit to show that the proponent and contractor are following the conditions set by the DENR.

Proponent/Contractor/ PCO

Part of the environment al budget of the project

Part of the abandonment cost

To be implemented one (1) year prior and during demobilization phase

The Water Demobilization and clean up

Water Possible discrepancies with the baseline conditions

Mitigating measures will be done in case any damage was done in the area

Water quality test result must be within the effluent standards set by DENR.





The People Demobilization and clean up

People Possible damage on private properties, loss of employment for workers

Proper monetary compensation will be given in accordance to provisions of the law.

Presence of an Environmental Guarantee Fund






Environmental Risk Assessment & Emergency Response Policy and Guidelines | i

Table of Contents

4 Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) & Emergency Response Policy and Guidelines . 1

4.1 General Guidelines 1

4.2 Objective 1

4.3 Scope and Limitation 1

4.4 ERA Conceptual Framework 2

4.4.1 Environmental Risk Assessment Process .................................................................... 2

4.4.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 2

4.5 Environmental Risk Management Program 4

4.6 Emergency Response Procedure 4

4.6.1 Emergency Response and Preparedness Program .................................................... 5

4.6.2 Summary of Emergency Procedure ............................................................................. 5

4.6.3 Emergency Response Team ........................................................................................... 5

4.6.4 Emergency Plan ............................................................................................................... 5


Environmental Risk Assessment & Emergency Response Policy and Guidelines | 1

4 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA) & EMERGENCY RESPONSE

POLICY AND GUIDELINES This Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) was prepared for the proposed reclamation project. The ERA was undertaken in compliance with the scoping agreement between the Environmental Management Bureau (EMB), Provincial Government of Samar, City Government of Catbalogan and the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) report preparer. 4.1 General Guidelines

1. One of the major decision points during the Scoping Process is the determination of the need by the project to undertake an Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) or not.

2. As defined by DAO 2003-30, ERA is the use of universally accepted and scientific methods to assess the risks associated with a project. It focuses on determining the probability of occurrence of accidents and their magnitude (e.g., failure of containment or exposure to hazardous materials or situations.)

3. An ERA is not an entirely separate assessment but deals with the further analysis of hazards identified in the EIA. It builds upon the EIA such that risks are impacts where the likelihood of occurrence and magnitude of consequences are uncertain.

4. It should be noted that the ERA, within the context of Philippine EIS System, is concerned primarily with safety risks (characterized by low probability, high consequence, accidental nature and acute effects [human safety focus]). In contrast, geological risks are covered by the EGGAR requirement under the MGB while health risks (characterized by high probability, low consequence, ongoing or continuing exposure and chronic human health effects) are assessed in the environmental health impact assessment under the DOH mandate.

4.2 Objective This ERA aims to identify the hazards associated with the project, characterize the associated risks, and recommend measures to manage the identified risks. 4.3 Scope and Limitation The various physical and chemical environmental hazards associated with the project were analyzed. The ERA focused on safety risks, which are characterized by low probability, high consequence, accidental nature and acute effects, in compliance with the Procedural Guidelines for Scoping of Environmental Risk Assessment, Annex 2-7e of the Revised Procedural Manual of DAO 03-30) (EMB-EIAMD, 2007). The PAGASA- predicted climate changes, as expected by the years 2020 and 2050, were also taken into consideration. Risks from hazardous substances expected to be utilized and stored at the project site were qualitatively and quantitatively characterized. The scope of this ERA included the following aspects:

1. Hazard Identification;



2. Risk screening activity that included all identified hazardous substances projected to be used, handled, or stored at the proposed plant site to determine the type of environmental risk assessment to be conducted, and the focus of analysis;

3. Worst-case accident scenario analysis based on projected plant conditions and actual hazardous substance properties;

4. Application of appropriate modeling tools in consequence analysis; 5. Determination of the extent of hazard radii and areas; 6. Characterization of environmental risks associated with the project; and 7. Recommend measures to manage identified environmental risks.

4.4 ERA Conceptual Framework 4.4.1 Environmental Risk Assessment Process Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA), as defined in the Procedural Manual for DAO 2003-30, is “the use of universally accepted and scientific methods to assess the risks associated with a project. It focuses on determining the probability of occurrence of accidents and their magnitude (e.g. failure of containment or exposure to hazardous materials or situations.)”. Risk is defined as a measure of potential human injury/death, economic loss, or environmental damage in terms of the probability of the loss, injury/death or damage occurring and the magnitude of the loss, injury/ death or damage if it occurs. Risk involves two measurable parameters: consequence and probability. It is the integrated result or product of the calculated consequence of a postulated accident scenario and the calculated probability or frequency of occurrence of such event. 4.4.2 Methodology 4.4.2.1 Hazard Identification The various hazardous processes, activities and substances associated with the project were identified at this stage. Risk screening that included all substances to be used, handled and stored at the proposed reclamation site was conducted. The potential of each substance to pose hazards to the environment, the public and the facility was analyzed based on a thorough review of its intrinsic physical and hazard characteristics. Risk screening was done according to the process and criteria described in the Revised Procedural Manual of DAO 2003-30: Guidelines for the Conduct of Environmental Risk Assessment, particularly Annex 2-7e. The risk screening process determines the level of risk assessment that must be conducted. 4.4.2.2 Hazard Identification Environmental hazards associated with reclamation project are fire/explosion accident due to lube oil; inherent presence of high voltage electricity from equipment use in dredging; and occupational hazards (exposure heavy equipment use, extreme temperatures in work site, high voltage electricity, etc.). Liquefaction in the area is controlled by the intensity and duration of ground shaking, geological formation and amount of civil structure development in the area. It can occur near



or far (>100 km) from the epicentre. Liquefaction occurs in water-saturated unconsolidated sediment due to shaking. In areas underlain by such material, the ground shaking causes the grains to lose grain to grain contact, and thus the material tends to flow. Earthquakes, with magnitude as small as 5.5, can induce liquefaction hazard and can affect areas hundreds of kilometers away from its epicenter. Mitigation of the risks from liquefaction can be undertaken through engineering interventions: The expected impact of PAGASA’s predictions on climate change was also integrated in the risk analysis. The highest single month recorded during said period has a precipitation of 1,885.3 mm recorded in July 1972. Such amount of rainfall can raise the water table and can cause flooding and soaking of the overlying material that may possibly cause differential settlement aggravated by the weight of civil structures erected and may also trigger liquefaction. The rains are brought in mainly by the southwest monsoons, the inter-tropical convergence zone, local thunderstorms, and tropical cyclones. A comprehensive design of drainage system as mitigation for flooding will be prepared and implemented by the project proponent taking into consideration the mean amount of rainfall and the effect of PAGASA projection of 2050 climate change in the project area. Based on data provided by the project proponent, the substances that will be stored and used at the project site is lubrication oil use in the maintenance of equipment use in dredging/filling, pile driving, infrastructures and horizontal construction. 4.4.2.3 Risk Screening of Hazardous Substances at the Reclamation Site A risk screening procedure was undertaken to determine the type of environmental risk assessment to be undertaken and to prioritize the environmental risks presented by the hazardous substances and activities. The criteria and process used in risk screening was primarily based on Annex 2-7e (Guidelines for the Conduct of Environmental Risk Assessment) of the Revised Procedural Manual of DAO 2003-30. The screening criteria for hazardous substances are (1) inherent hazardous characteristics of the substance and (2) maximum quantity involved. After classifying the substances according to defined categories (i.e. flammable, oxidizing, toxic, etc.), their respective maximum inventories were compared to DENR’s threshold inventory levels (Levels 1 and 2), which are defined in the Revised DAO 2003-30 guideline. A facility that will manufacture, process or store any hazardous substance in excess of DENR’s Threshold Inventory Level 2 is required to undertake a quantitative risk assessment. Those with any hazardous substance exceeding Level 1 threshold inventory but below Level 2 threshold inventory is required to undertake Hazard Analysis Study, and Emergency/Contingency Plan based on the study and worst-case scenario.



Figure 4-1. ERA Scoping Guidelines (Revised Procedural Manual for DAO 2003-30)

Referring to the above discussions there are no major hazards associated with the project, as presently planned, that will require a Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA). Further, the threshold limits prescribed to require an ERA are not exceeded. Initial estimate of the heavy fuel oil inventory of the prospective dredging vessel and pile driving equipment is approximately 300 tons much lower than the threshold of 5,000 tons for “flammable substances”. 4.5 Environmental Risk Management Program The ERA was able to show that both societal and individual fatality risks from the reclamation project are low and are expected to be within acceptable limits based on DENR environmental risk criteria. Notwithstanding this positive ERA result, however, it would be for the interest of both the project proponent and the public that appropriate environmental measures and plan are formulated and implemented to further reduce risks. Identified environmental hazards and associated risks should be appropriately addressed. With due consideration to the balance between environmental protection/safety/lives protected and the costs of risk mitigation, risks should be reduced to as low as reasonably practicable. Major considerations in risk reduction are appropriate embankment/structural design; compliance with standards in the design, construction and maintenance of equipment and facilities; well- maintained safety systems; well-trained and motivated workforce; and the establishment of an appropriate emergency response and contingency systems. Table 4.2 below lists the recommended risk management measures for particular identified hazards. 4.6 Emergency Response Procedure

Scoping

MaterialinventoryexceedsLEVEL2

threshold?

MaterialinventoryexceedsLEVEL1

threshold?

Istheac<vitylistedincoveredprojectforrisk

screening

ProjectnotcoveredbyERA

PrepareQuan<ta<veRiskAssessment

PrepareEmergencyPlanbasedonHazardAnalysis

PrepareRiskScreening

Doesriskscreeningwarrantprepara<onof

emergencyplan?

yes

yes

no

yes

yes

no

no

no



This presents the emergency preparedness and response procedure of the Proponent during disaster scenario within and around the proposed project site. This guideline will also serve as the project’s framework in ensuring alertness and safety of all its staff and employees during untoward incidences that may happen while in the implementation of reclamation. Proponent should properly respond to emergencies caused by the process itself and/or natural occurrences. 4.6.1 Emergency Response and Preparedness Program Proponent has prepared an ERP to act as an administrative guide outlining the procedures for individuals that provide essential services should a major emergency occur. Its main purpose is to mitigate, control and avoid the damage of events that could negatively affect the organization’s ability to function. It also includes provisions to assess the severity of an incident and implement procedures to eliminate or lessen the problem. The responsibility of initiating emergency procedures that need to be implemented lies on the Plant Manager. The Construction Manager, together with all supervisors concerned and the Emergency Response Team (ERT) ensure that procedures are carried out with appropriate work instructions. The proponent coordinates closely with local authorities such as the police, fire department, hospital, and other concerned agencies during emergencies. 4.6.2 Summary of Emergency Procedure It is recommended that all employees should adopt these instructions to ensure safety among individuals. 4.6.3 Emergency Response Team An Emergency Response Team (ERT) shall be organized by the Proponent to ensure safety of its employees and property. The ERT shall implement all the necessary procedure for each kind of emergency that occurs within and around the work area. 4.6.4 Emergency Plan 4.6.4.1 Fires The objective of this plan is to ensure the safety of personnel as well as reduce if not to totally avoid damage to property and equipment. Likewise, it is intended to prevent or control the spread of fire. The alert notification system for fire incidents shall be based either on information received from the seafarers on board or the sounding of fire alarms. The following measures shall be established to ensure the safety of persons on the vessels in the event of a potential incident to which this regulation applies.

1. An alarm system shall be installed and a procedure has been established for activating the system;



2. A procedure shall be established for the prompt notification of rescue and firefighting teams;

3. A procedure shall be established for evacuating personnel; 4. All seafarers shall be adequately trained and retrained in emergency procedures and 5. The use of emergency equipment and facilities; and 6. Emergency drills shall be conducted on a regular basis.

4.6.4.1.1 Prevention The proponent shall hold a regular meeting to constantly monitor the strict implementation and assess the system’s efficiency to manage emergency situations. Besides the regular meetings, all engaged contractors shall be required to conduct their own monthly safety briefing discussing government mandated and company safety requirements. 4.6.4.1.2 Safety Inspection As a general rule, all vessels to be engaged are required to conduct a safety inspection at least once every quarter. On an annual basis, the Company shall inspect the whole facility for fire hazards and inefficiencies of the fire safety equipment installed. 4.6.4.1.3 Preventive Maintenance 4.6.4.1.3.1 Vessel All ship components that may pose fire hazard will be inspected for fire risk by a competent person. This inspection should include a check of:

1. the fuel system (integrity of the fuel tank filler cap, fuel lines and their connections as applicable);

2. electrical harness (adequacy of protection from rub and wear damage); 3. the emergency engine shutdown device (if operates in accordance with manufacturer's

specifications and is fail safe); 4. replacement of parts that are defective or that may pose fire hazard; and 5. the battery (integrity and is effectively protected from any adverse effects of heat).

Where a blow torch, welding, cutting or other hot work equipment is used in a location where a fire may endanger or may jeopardize the safety of persons, implementation of standard written procedures for the safe use of such equipment is essential. 4.6.4.1.4 Fire safety and Fire Fighting Facilities Procedures and suitable firefighting facilities should be in place and notices placed close to electrical installations to ensure correct procedures are followed in case of fire. Firefighting equipment is best located on the ventilation intake side of the hazard. 4.6.4.1.5 Training



A regular and effective training program is probably the most crucial factor in determining the success of personnel protection strategies. The management shall ensure that all personnel including those of the contractor shall have an understanding of the appropriate action to take in a fire emergency. Scheduled and random drills shall also be implemented within the project site. 4.6.4.1.6 Safety Awareness Information and education materials on safety will be posted on all boards and will regularly be provided to all personnel. Postings will also include the contact number/s that have to be contacted during emergencies. 4.6.4.1.7 Fire Emergency Response

1. Evacuate according to established company procedures, and obtain a head count confirming location of those accounted for and those missing.

2. Notify the captain or other senior official. 3. Any person who detects smoke or locates a fire shall attempt to extinguish it with the

closest available extinguisher. 4. If the fire cannot be immediately extinguished, the person shall raise the alarm by

shouting “fire” and initiating the nearest fire alarm pull station. 5. Check the evacuation plan and procedures for the vessel. 6. A vessel official or other senior official will conduct a head count and advise the

Central Health and Safety Office. 7. Evacuate to the predetermined safe area, record all names of workers, and check

numbers to determine whether any individuals are missing. 4.6.4.2 Storm / Typhoon 4.6.4.2.1 Preparedness All seafarers are required to participate in drills that will be conducted. These exercises may or may not have prior notice. 4.6.4.2.2 Emergency Response The alert for such situation shall be based on weather forecasts from PAGASA. Alert Levels will be designated to determine appropriate response procedures to be followed:

1. Public Storm Signal No. 1 – Level 1 2. Public Storm Signal No. 2 – Level 2 3. Public Storm Signal No. 3 – Level 3 4. Public Storm Signal No. 4 – Level 4 (Major Emergency)

4.6.4.2.2.1 Level 1

1. Regular updates shall be provided to all personnel through their supervisors.



2. Employees and vessel personnel will be briefed on the course of actions to be done if the typhoon signal has elevated.

3. Level 2 procedure numbers 1, 2 and 3 may be initiated if typhoon is directly towards the vessel.

4.6.4.2.2.2 Level 2

1. Activation of the Emergency Response Team. 2. An initial meeting shall be initiated by the captain and land based officer, to plan the

overall actions required. The agenda should include: a. evaluation of possible evacuation of personnel; b. the evacuation planning for all personnel, vessel and equipment and other items;

and c. planning for the provision and protection of required resources of the evacuees

(food, water, medicines, standby power, fuel, transport and other basic needs) and other logistics such as hand held radios, laptop computers (for typhoon updates), cellular phones, satellite phones, standby vehicles and other required resources.

3. After the preliminary meeting, the Emergency Response Team shall ensure that coordinators are provided with an official communication to distribute to their supervisors and personnel.

4. In the event that the vessel needs to dock to a safe port, all personnel shall ensure that all equipment is evacuated or secured to designate areas. Non-priority resources may also be evacuated as time permits.

5. All electrical equipment should be waterproofed and moved away from possible wet areas (if any).

6. Equipment shall be securely anchored in a protected area. 7. All personnel should prepare for possible evacuation.

4.6.4.2.2.3 Level 3 and 4

1. The Emergency Response Team will determine the possible course of action to be

undertaken. Evacuate measures or to remain in the originally assigned areas shall be based on the assessment done during the preliminary meeting.

2. The Emergency Response Team leader shall only call for an evacuation upon confirmation by the Manager and/or the Head Office.

3. As a general rule, a first aider and a standby electrician should be stationed in preparation for possible emergencies.

4.6.4.2.3 Post Emergency Procedure Inspection after major storms shall be undertaken as the weather conditions permits to be able to evaluate the extent of possible storm damage. 4.6.4.3 Tsunami



The main damage from tsunami comes from the destructive nature of the waves themselves causing loss of lives and property. Secondary effects include debris acting as projectiles which then run into objects, erosion that can undermine the foundation of structures built along coastlines, and fires that result from disruption of gas and electrical lines. Other effects include loss of crops and water and electrical systems that could lead to famine and disease depending on the extent and gravity of the tsunami. Within the last century there have been 94 destructive tsunamis, which have resulted in more than 51,000 deaths. This statistics does not include the destructive tsunami effect brought about by the Japan earthquake in recent years. Despite the fact that tsunami warnings have been in place at most tsunami prone regions since 1950, loss of lives due tsunamis specially when the source earthquake is close to the shore where there is very little time for people to heed warnings and follow instructions associated with warnings. 4.6.4.3.1 Preparedness The vessel shall establish onboard emergency procedures posted or filed for the shipmaster to initiate upon receipt of the notice or warning. The ship’s communication system will be maintained to always have connection with the designated regional or local channel that releases tsunami warnings. All seafarers are required to participate in drills that will be conducted. These exercises may or may not have prior notice. 4.6.4.3.2 Emergency Response The alert for such situation shall be based on warnings from PHIVOLCS, PAGASA or other government designated agencies. 4.6.4.4 Hazardous / Noxious Liquid Material Spills (including Oil as applicable) 4.6.4.4.1 Prevention 4.6.4.4.1.1 Storage and Handling All hazardous materials must have a corresponding Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS). The MSDS should be readily available in areas where the material is stored and/or handled. Hazardous materials should be properly labeled, stored and handled. Storage shall be at designated areas in accordance with specified separation distance and inventory limits (as applicable). Only duly approved containers or storage vessels shall be used for storage and handling. 4.6.4.4.1.2 Drills



All personnel are required to participate in drills that shall be conducted by the HSU. These exercises may or may not have prior notice. This exercise shall be conducted at least twice a year. 4.6.4.4.1.3 Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) The proponent shall eliminate the identified occupational hazards through the introduction of hierarchy control measures whereby the use of personal protective equipment shall be monitored and strictly implemented. The proponent shall comply, as provided for under the existing Safety and Health Standards, to provide employees free of charge personal protective equipment to ensure that their physical well being are amply protected while performing their assigned tasks. Employee shall be issued personal protective equipment in accordance with the type of occupational hazards that they may likely be continuously exposed to as determined by the Safety and Health Office. 4.6.4.4.2 Emergency Response Any spills shall be reported, contained and cleaned up promptly and properly in accordance with prescribed procedures particularly in accordance with the Marine Environment Protection Policies of the PCG.

1. Every ship of 150 gross tonnages and above certified to carry noxious liquid substances in bulk shall carry on board a shipboard marine pollution emergency plan for noxious liquid substances approved by the MEPCOM.

2. Such a plan shall be based on the Guidelines developed by the MEPCOM and written in a working language or languages understood by the master and officers. The plan shall consist at least of:

a. The procedure to be followed by the master or other persons having charge of

the ship to report a noxious liquid substances pollution incident based on the Guidelines developed by the MEPCOM;

b. The list of authorities or persons to be contacted in the event of a noxious liquid substances pollution incident;

c. A detailed description of the action to be taken immediately by persons on board to reduce or control the discharge of noxious liquid substances following the incident to include provision of a stand-by spill boom; and

d. The procedures and point of contact on the ship for coordinating shipboard action with national and local authorities in combating the pollution.

3. In the case of ships to which Chapter II also applies, such a plan may be combined with

the shipboard oil pollution emergency plan. In this case, the title of such a plan shall be ‘‘Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plan’’.

4.6.4.5 Shipboard Oil Pollution



1. All oil tankers of 150 tonnes deadweight and above and every ship other than an oil tanker of 400 tonnes deadweight and above shall carry on board a Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP) approved by the MEPCOM.

2. Ensure the availability of SOPEP for inspection and evaluation at all times. 3. Prior to approval of the SOPEP, the MEPCOM shall conduct an Emergency Readiness

Evaluation (ERE) on the ship’s crew to determine their knowledge of the provisions of the SOPEP and if the procedures indicated therein are enough to combat an oil spill. Likewise, the crew should conduct regular drills/exercises and periodic review of the plan at least every year to keep up with changes in these Regulations. To ensure compliance of this requirement, MEPCOM shall supervise the aforesaid drills/exercise and shall certify thereon.

4. SOPEP of every ship shall consist at least of:

a. Procedures to be followed by the master or other persons having charge of the ship to report an oil pollution incident.

b. List of authorities or persons to contact in the event of an oil pollution incident. c. Detailed description of actions to be taken immediately by persons on board to

reduce or control the discharge of oil spill incident. d. Procedures and point of contact on the ship for coordinating shipboard action

with national and local authorities in combating pollution. e. Necessary assistance to the master in meeting the demands of a Tier III spill

should it involved one. f. Arrangement of SOPEP Provisions:

i. MEPCOM report on actual and probable discharge ii. Ship’s lay-out and plans appendices.

iii. National and local coordination entities and their roles in case of emergencies falling within their jurisdiction.

5. Ship-owners or shipping companies shall submit a copy of the proposed Plan in

writing to the Commander, MEPCOM for evaluation and approval prior to its implementation aboard ship.

4.6.4.5.1 Decontamination Procedure Decontamination will make an individual and/or their equipment safe by physically removing toxic substances quickly and effectively. Extra care should be taken during decontamination, because absorbed agent can be released from clothing and skin as a gas. 4.6.4.5.2 Spill Emergency

1. Notify all personnel in the area of the spill immediately 2. Cordon off the area. A spill boom shall always be made available (on stand-by) for

containment of accidental spills; 3. Do not touch or swim through the spilled material as much as possible. However, if

this cannot be avoided, the response personnel should wear the appropriate PPE during environmental decontamination. Adequate protective equipment must be worn.

4. Stop the spillage if it is possible to do so without risk to personnel. 5. Avoid contact of water runoff to the spilled material.



6. Remove other materials, equipment or containers in the path of the spill. 7. All spilled material must be disposed properly. 8. Adequate location of first aid kit should be adhered and available in strategic locations. 9. Adequate locations of Eyewash facilities must be available.

4.6.4.5.2.1 Post Emergency Procedure Likewise, an incident report shall be made with the corresponding assessment on the cause of the incident which will be prepared to prevent future occurrences and/or determine lapses or efficiency of control and handling procedures. A risk assessment will be undertaken and included in subsequent reviews of this document to ensure the controls are adequate for management of all material handling and disposal options. 4.6.4.6 Security Related Emergencies (Bomb Threats and Security Issues) 4.6.4.6.1 Prevention Simple activities that can reduce the threat shall be established and implemented. The following practices are an aid to reducing the potential places in which articles can be hidden:

1. Keep rooms, stairways, corridors and halls clean and tidy. 2. Lock unoccupied rooms and areas. 3. Encourage project members to know the vessel well. 4. Encourage project members to look out for and report suspicious or unusual behavior. 5. Challenge unknown persons who are in an area in which they should not be. Ensure

that packages and parcels are delivered under observation and are being checked.

4.6.4.6.2 Emergency Response The Safety/Security officer is responsible for directing the action to be taken in response to any bomb threat. Such incidences shall be immediately reported to the local police unit of the PNP. Responsibilities include the following:

1. Producing a risk assessment; 2. Devising and maintaining a search plan of the vessel; 3. Devising and maintaining an evacuation plan; 4. Liaising with the responsible authorities; and 5. Arranging project members awareness and bomb threat practices

Evacuation routes should be identified and clearly marked allowing the free movement of personnel in the event of an emergency. A responsible individual should be identified to expedite evacuation if ordered. Muster drills should be conducted at all locations so that all personnel are fully conversant with the evacuation procedures. 4.6.4.6.3 Post Emergency Procedure

1. Review all actions and procedures. 2. Implement improvements from the lessons learned.


Social Development Plan/Framework (SDP) and IEC Framework| i

Table of Contents

5 Social Development Plan/Framework (SDP) and IEC Framework ....................................... 1 5.1 Principles and Objectives of the SDP 1

5.1.1 Guiding principles .......................................................................................................... 1

5.1.2 Operating Principles ....................................................................................................... 1

5.1.3 Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 1

5.2 Social Development Plan/ Framework 2

5.3 Information, Education, and Communication Campaign (IEC) 3


Social Development Plan/Framework (SDP) and IEC Framework| 1

5 SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN/FRAMEWORK (SDP) AND IEC FRAMEWORK

5.1 Principles and Objectives of the SDP

5.1.1 Guiding principles

The social development plan adopts the following development principles: Condition of living or quality of life of the project affected persons (PAPs) should at least equal or improved after the project’s full development. These principles equally applied to both the adversely affected families and the project-beneficiaries, and geared towards the protection of their rights in order to attain the desired optimum benefits for the project. 5.1.2 Operating Principles

To attain a successful SDP, the following operating principles can be adopted: Transparency. The conduct of a truthful and culture-sensitive IEC enables stakeholders particularly the adversely affected sectors to fully understand the messages and benefits to be derived from the project and the guiding policies related to its implementation. This enables free-flowing communication between the proponent and the stakeholders in order to develop responsible feedback mechanisms to the eventual successful project implementation. Equity. Equal rights shall be provided to all concerned regardless of status and social affiliation, subject to qualifications and considering agreed norms and regulations. Accountability. Responsibilities shall be clearly identified, sanctions spelled out, and mechanisms for sanctions are likewise installed. Empowerment. When the people are well-informed on the project situation, they are keen enough and enticed to actively participate in the formation of policies and decision making relative to the project implementation and operations. Governance. Participatory involvement of stakeholders in major decision-making, planning, implementation that is useful in addressing concerns and issues taking place. In accordance with these principles, and in view of the inevitable and valuable involvement of key stakeholders to pursue an improved quality of life of the people along with development, the SDP shall attend to the aforementioned issues involving: adversely affected families/persons, the beneficiaries, the implementing organization and the support organizations/groups. Hence, convergence of key stakeholders shall be the main approach. 5.1.3 Objectives

The project’s SDP aims to mitigate adverse impacts of the project mainly restoration of income and livelihood, promote optimum benefits to target beneficiaries, and provide mechanism for



convergence and/or mobilization of other stakeholders in support to the project objectives and activities. Specifically, the proposed SDP aims to:

1. For the Project-affected Persons/Families (PAPs/PAFs):

• Prevent/mitigate project’s adverse impacts on the well-being of adversely affected persons/families (PAPs/PAFs); and

• Provide interventions/support to help restore income and improve the socio-economic situation of PAPs/PAFs.

2. For other stakeholders:

• Sustain/enhance stakeholder coordination in support to the project, its activities,

the PAPs/PAFs and the beneficiaries. The SDP of the project shall be derived from and aligned with LGUs existing SDP. The cost requirement shall be finalized once the specific projects have been processed and identified thru consultation with the concerned LGUs and sectors in the potentially affected communities. NIA shall share in the cost of the selected projects found to be relevant to the attainment of compliance or socially responsible EMP implementation. 5.2 Social Development Plan/ Framework

The social development plan framework (SDP) seeks to address the issues, concerns under impacts and mitigating measures. It incorporates the proposed interventions of the project proponent in favor of the various stakeholders of the project. As part of its social responsibility, the proponent aims to empower stakeholders, especially the affected residents as partners of development. As an active player in society, the proponent seeks to alleviate the low standard of living residents through programs that will harness their productive potentials to the fullest and reinforce their self-reliance and dignity as equal members of society. The following issues and concerns identified by the stakeholders during the consultation meetings, perception survey and Focus Group Discussions within the concerned barangays. The issues and concerns raised by the stakeholders will be the priority of the proponent in its Social Development Program. The framework seeks to establish the parameters in intervention to the host communities and to the various stakeholders. The social development plan framework is discussed in the following paragraphs to guide the proponent in the formulation of the SDP. These are the major features of the social development plan framework. Proper mechanisms should be put in place to ensure that livelihood projects will continue to exist and be viable. It is an opportunity for the residents to pursue self-sustaining livelihood activities and be self-reliant in the future.



Coordination should be undertaken to identify the priority needs of the residents of the host barangay, the rest of the barangays in City of Catbalogan. A mechanism should be put in place to ensure the timely payment of the taxes, fees, permits and license. Table 5-1. Social Development (SDP) Plan/Framework

Concern Responsible

Community Member / Beneficiary

Government Agency/ NGOs

Proponent Indicative Timeline

Source of fund

Impact on Fishing and

Livelihood

Fisher folks within the

area / Qualified

identified workers

within the area who

will be affected by the

project / Qualified

identified

beneficiaries in the

vicinity of the project

area that might be

adversely affected. /

BFARMC President

and qualified

identified affected

fisher folks

LGU, BFAR

Community

Relations

officer

Pre-

construction

Construction

-Operation

LGU-IRA/

Proponent

Gender Responsive

Livelihood/employment

and Credit Facilities

Association

Chairperson/Qualified

Project Affected Men,

Women, Youth and

Elderly

MPDO,

MSWD,

TESDA

Community

Relations

officer

Pre-

construction

Construction

-Operation

LGU-IRA/

Proponent

Health and safety

Barangay Kagawad

for Health

MHO,

Barangay

Disaster

Management

Community

Relations

officer

Pre-

construction

Construction

-Operation

LGU-IRA/

Proponent

Environment and

Sanitation

Barangay Kagawad

for Education and

Environment

DepEd

Community

Relations

officer

Pre-

construction

Construction

Operation

LGU-IRA/

Proponent

Peace and Order Barangay Kagawad

for Peace & Order LGU, PNP

Community

Relations

officer

Pre-

construction

Construction

-Operation

LGU-IRA/

Proponent

5.3 Information, Education, and Communication Campaign (IEC)

The IEC calls for transparency on the part of the proponent in dealing with the stakeholders on environmental issues which affect them. Community relations will be proactive and social development activities will be institutionalized. Central to the IEC Campaign of the Project implementer will be an environmental awareness program initially designed for workers but later adapted to various community members



interested in environmental protection and enhancement. Topics that will be covered include construction process, improvement of water and air quality, health and safety practices. An IEC Plan prior to the approval of the unsolicited proposal were held through a series of discussion and consultation by the City Government of Catbalogan and the Barangay Mercedes officials. The location, component of the project, construction schedule and the benefits to the City of Catbalogan and Barangay were discussed. Also in compliance of DENR DAO 2017-15 a series of focus group discussion were held, first group discussion focus on the requirement of the said DENR Administrative order and the implementation of the Perception Survey, another discussion were held both with the representative of the City Government, Barangay officials, Environmental consultants and the proponent of the original proposal. Discussed were some detail of the project, content of the perception survey and the schedule of Project presentation. For the proposed project, the IEC will be a continuing process. The generic IEC Plan/Framework is shown in Table 5-2.



Table 5-2. Generic IEC Plan/Framework

Target Sector Major Topic/s of concern in Relation to Project IEC Scheme/ Strategy/ Method Information Medium

Indicative Time/

Frequency

Indicative Cost

Barangay (Mercedes, Poblacion 3, 4 and 5) and Municipal council members

• Project Description • Impacts on environment and

health • Risks • Socio-Economic benefits • Socio-Economic impacts

particularly to fisher folks and vendors Climate Change Mitigation/Adaptation

Group Method Consultations with Stakeholders

Focus Group Discussion / Power Point Presentation Printed Materials Media releases

After receipt of NTP from PRA

To be determined

Barangay Council/association and City Officials

• Disaster Risk Reduction and Management/ Emergency Plan

City wide IEC Emergency Drills Participation by NDRRMC and PHIVOLCS

Visual Actual Drills (Fire, Earthquake, storm surges)

Prior to Project Implementation

To be determined

Impact Barangays Senior Citizens, Youth group and Fisher folks

• Health and Safety • Locally prevalent diseases

Group Method Consultations

Roundtable Discussions Prior to Project Implementation

To be determined

The Impact Barangays • Garbage Management • Plastic wastes

Technical Discussions Printed Materials

Invite experts on solid wastes

Prior to Project Implementation

To be determined

NGOs and Religious Groups • Nature of the Proposed Project

• Impacts on environment o Floods o Liquefaction o Marine Ecology

• Impacts on health • Socio-Economic impacts and

benefits to existing establishments

Group Method Consultations • Send invitations to various

barangay council members and impact sectors

• Continuous discussion and

consultation with the stakeholders to know their issues and concerns

Focus Group Discussion / Power Point Presentation Printed Materials

Before construction Phase

To be determined

Prospective MMT Members (if formed) PENRO

Environment and Health Group Method Focus Group Discussion Power Point Presentations

Same Same

MMT Members (if formed) The Project EIA Water and Marine Ecology Quality Management

Group method Individual

Printed materials Focus Group Discussions

Same

To be determined




Environmental Compliance Monitoring| i

Table of Contents

6 Environmental Compliance Monitoring ................................................................................... 1

6.1.1 Self-Monitoring Plan ...................................................................................................... 1 6.1.2 Multi-Sectoral Monitoring Framework ....................................................................... 2 6.1.3 Environmental Guarantee and Monitoring Fund Commitments ............................ 3

List of Tables Table 6-1. Summary of Multi-Sectoral Monitoring Framework .................................................... 2 Table 6-2. Summary Matrix of the Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP) with Quality Performance Levels (EQPLs) .............................................................................................................. 4


Environmental Compliance Monitoring| 1

6 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MONITORING 6.1.1 Self-Monitoring Plan The proposed SMP as shown in Table 6-2 using the recommended format in Annex 2-20 of RPM DAO 2003-30. The Provincial Government of Samar is primarily responsible for monitoring the approved Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP) based on the Environmental Management Plan. The proponent will commission third party testing firm to conduct monitoring activities. The proponent will submit Self-Monitoring Report which includes detailed report on compliance to environmental standard specific to environmental laws to EMB Regional Office on a quarterly basis. They will also submit a Compliance Monitoring Report (CMR) semi-annually to EMB CO which includes a trend analysis of Environmental Standards, cumulative summary of annual and historical performance/compliance analysis on key environmental and social parameters. Report will also include percentage exceedance to standard and total violation if any. Multipartite Monitoring Team (MMT) on the basis of Proponent ECC and submitted SMR/CMR will validate project compliance per ECC Condition and Environmental Management Program, validate the conduct of self-monitoring by the proponent and received complaints, determine the validity of said complaints and monitor action taken by the proponent on EMB recommended measures to address the complaints. They will submit a Compliance Monitoring and Validation Report (CMVR) to EMB CO semi-annually. Environmental Management Bureau is responsible for the overall evaluation/audit of the proponent monitoring and MMT’s validation. They shall prepare a Compliance Evaluation Report (CER) based on the submitted proponent SMR/CMR and MMT’s CMVR. EMB will also conduct field validation semi-annually or whenever there are complaints, exceedance on standard and if there are any suspicious data.



6.1.2 Multi-Sectoral Monitoring Framework

The planned reclamation project which qualifies to an Environmental Critical Project (ECP) will necessitate the formation of Multipartite

Monitoring Team (MMT). The Provincial Government is responsible for inviting stakeholders to be members of the MMT. It actually encourages

groups from the community to nominate their representatives. A general committee composed of these representatives will be established.

Table 6-1. Summary of Multi-Sectoral Monitoring Framework

Stakeholder Basis for Selection Specific Organization

Proposed Role in the MMT / scope of MMT

responsibilities/activities

Strategy in establishing and Monitoring EQPLs

Barangay LGU’s from the

impacted Coastal

Barangay of Mercedes

RHU and Chairpersons

Direct jurisdiction

of the area

LGU Suggest/Provide Inputs in the

implementation of mitigating

and enhancement programs

Participate in actual monitoring

Regularly conduct quarterly

meetings/consultations and

annual assessment

City Government of

Catbalogan

(MENRO/MPDO)

Provide reports and information

regarding proponent’s violation,

compliances and inputs

Provincial Government of

Samar (PENRO/PPDO)

Registered POs / NGOs Direct and Indirect

Affected Area

Sectoral

Representatives

Suggest/Provide Inputs in the

implementation of mitigating

and enhancement programs

Participate in actual monitoring

work, and concur with and/or

sign the monitoring reports, or

take exception to them as the

case may be.

Regularly conduct quarterly

meetings/consultations and

annual assessment



6.1.3 Environmental Guarantee and Monitoring Fund Commitments

The proponent will commit an Environmental Guarantee Fund of One Million Pesos (Php

500,000) intended to rehabilitate components of the environment and compensate damage/s

to properties adversely affected by the project. The proponent will also allocate

Environmental Monitoring Funding in the amount of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Pesos

(Php 150,000) for activities to be done by the MMT and replenish the same when necessary.

However the stated amounts on the said funds are only indicative, EMB will evaluate and

recommend the final amount of EMF and EGF fund.

Annex 3-6 of the Revised Procedural Manual provides the guidelines for the determination of

the EGF and is summarized hereunder with the more relevant provisions. There is no explicit

provision under DAO 2003-30 requiring valuation of potential impacts that may arise as a

result of changes in the use of natural and environmental resources. Impact valuation is

particularly crucial in estimating the EGF to derive estimates on the potential damage that

may occur, and the corresponding amount to be set aside through the EGF for such purpose.

Procedures for arriving at such estimates in a more rational and systematic manner will have

to be based on experiences that shall have been generated on Philippine examples and other

developing countries.

In the absence of such information, more recent experiences of projects of similar nature with

provisions for EGF may be utilized. The amount to be allocated for the EGF shall be

determined through negotiations between the proponent and the EMB (EMB-CO or EMB-

RO). It should take into consideration the following factors in determining the appropriate

amount for specific projects.

● the EIS committed programs

● the degree of environmental risk involved (based on number and extent of

potential

● damage)

● valuation of resources that would most likely to be affected

● the proponent’s ability to provide funds for the EGF

At the end of the project life, a sufficient amount should be left from the EGF to ensure that

rehabilitation, restoration, decommissioning, or abandonment shall be adequately financed.

Such amount may be increased during the project life span to ensure that the balance shall be

sufficient for the abandonment phase. In such case, the EGF Committee may require an

adjustment of such amount to cover inflation and other factors. The required submission to

the DENR-EMB of the project’s Abandonment Plan shall have a corresponding fund

commitment subject to the approval of the DENR or the lead government agency with direct

approving authority on the Abandonment/Decommissioning Plan of the project.



Table 6-2. Summary Matrix of the Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP) with Quality Performance Levels (EQPLs)


Potential Impacts

Parameters

Environmental Monitoring Form

Lead Person Annual

Estimated Cost


Method Frequency Location EPQL Range Management Measure

Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit

Construction Phase (Reclamation and Land Development) Water Quality Coastal

(Marine) water quality degradation caused by reclamation activities

pH Grab sampling Monthly All stations considered

in this study

Proponent’s / Contractor’s

PCO

Included in the project

cost

4.2 – 5.1 (60% of Std.)

5.3 – 6.4 (75% of Std.)

7.0-8.5 (Std. Class SB)

Report actual status on a periodic basis, document results and continue monitoring. Identify source of pollution / exceedance. Increase sampling frequencies. Conduct clean up activities along streams that discharge to the sea. Strict implementation of good house-keeping practices / measures at the site.

Revalidate results and continue monitoring. Revalidate previously identify source of pollution / exceedance. If source of exceedance are leaks or spills, implement spill containment and clean up measures.

Compare how values of results escalated relating each result to actual occurring situation during sampling and validate identified sources. As necessary, temporary stoppage of concerned activities may be needed until remedial measures are in place.

Temperature 15.6 - 18.0 19.5-22.5 26-30

Oil and grease, mg/L

1.8 2.25 3

TSS, mg/L 30 37.5 80

DO, mg/L 3.6 4.5 6

Cr (VI), mg/L 0.03 0.0375 0.05

As, mg/L 0.006 0.0075 0.01

Cd, mg/L 0.0018 0.00225 0.003

Pb, mg/L 0.006 0.0075 0.01

Hg, mg/L 0.0006 0.00075 0.001

Cu, mg/L 0.012 0.015 0.02

Total Coliform, MPN/100mL

6000 7500 10000

Water Quality

Change in species composition and abundance of marine, freshwater, and riparian

Density of fish catch per unit effort (Kilos of fish caught/person/ trip)

Interview Annual Immediate fishing areas around the project







Lead Person Annual

Estimated Cost



Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit biota due to reclamation and dredging activities within the immediate vicinity of the reclamation area, the dredge area and the area study for the Tungkop Fish Sanctuary Threat to Abundance / Degradation of mangrove area

- Mangrove growth including its height, basal area and its diameter-at- breast height

Census or manual count Physical Measurement

Quarterly Open Area /mangrove park within the project


assessment in abundance and taxa richness of aquatic biota

baseline assessment in abundance and taxa richness of aquatic biota; Decreasing trend across three monitoring periods.

abundance and taxa richness of aquatic biota across monitoring periods accompanied by exceedances in water quality parameters being monitored

Investigate and identify possible cause of decline. Conduct initial inspection of control measures being implemented

Values Check results of the aquatic biota analyses against the water quality status. Improve or enhance existing control measures to improve water quality






Lead Person Annual

Estimated Cost



Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit Sediment Deposition

May adversely affect ecosystem

Heavy metals and nutrients

Grab sampling Quarterly Area near mouth of the rivers and other stations that the MMT may further recommend







If values are exceeded transfer to another location

Management remedial measures if necessary

Waste management Hazardous substances Chemical storage areas

Impacts on sanitation and water pollution Risk to human health

Type and volume of waste Present in harmful quantities and safe storage

Visual inspection

Daily Reclamation site and Staging Area




Adopt remedial actions and safety measures

There should not be any untoward incident

Air Quality Possible degradation of air quality due to reclamation activities

SO2, ug/NCM Gas Bubbler and Pararosaniline Method

Quarterly Stations considered in the report


50,000 204 255 340 Report actual status on a periodic basis, document results. Investigate possible cause of pollution and continue monitoring. Conduct dust suppression measures.

Prepare statistical report highlighting the findings. Regular maintenance of all fuel-burning equipment.

Revisit /audit the functionality of air pollution control installations. Replace all non- conforming equipment / machineries.

NO2, ug/NCM Gas Bubbler and Pararosaniline Method

156 195 260

PM10, mg/L High Volume Sampler

120 150 200

TSP, ug/NCM High Volume and Gravimetric Method

180 225 300






Lead Person Annual

Estimated Cost



Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit Possible increase in ambient noise level due to reclamation activities

Noise, dbA Noise meter Quarterly or as required in response to any noise complaints.



Minimal cost; Included in the project cost

55 60 65 Report actual status on a periodic basis, document results and continue monitoring. Investigate possible cause of exceedance.

Fix broken equipment or machine, as necessary. Regularly maintain equipment to keep these working at their optimum and minimize noise. Continue noise level monitoring and increase frequency as necessary .

Conduct site noise audit of equipment and machineries. Install noise suppression structures and/or equipment appropriate to mitigate the situation.

Community consultation

Socio-economic status of the host communities vis- à-vis the project operations Community benefits from the project due to taxes, employment, and social

Efficiency of SDP programs, employment generation (in terms of local engagement on the project itself) and tax revenues Number of beneficiaries and other parameters

Review of complaints records and outcome of dredging events to community to guide future management strategy.

Weekly Barangay Mercedes

HR, CSR Staff (contractor) or authorized department of the municipal government, affected barangays

Included in the SDP fund


Formal complaint lodged by the community


Company to investigate/ inspect subject of negative feedback Coordinate with the barangay and MMT

Validate previous findings in coordination with stakeholders Coordinate with the concerned LGUs and MMT

Immediate consultation with the MMT and the LGU to resolve issue/s Release an official statement to clarify the issue/s. Monitor and report results on






Lead Person Annual

Estimated Cost



Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit development programs (SDP)

required under SDP (i.e. involvement of locals in CRM programs, Health statistics, etc)

Key informant interviews; Census and surveys in Coordination with the affected barangays;

Quarterly implementation of resolution.






Lead Person Annual

Estimated Cost



Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit Health and safety impacts from reclamation activities

Safe man-hours

Incident reporting, regular monitoring integrated in the Health and Safety Plan of the company

Daily inspection of work conditions, PPEs and compliance to the company’s Health and Safety Plan

Project site and vicinity

Safety Officer

Minimal cost


Formal complaint lodged by the community and/or employees


Company to investigate/ inspect subject of negative feedback;. Improvement of health and safety measures to address negative feedback

Revalidate previous investigation results- reason for complaint and address complaint immediately through consultations with employees, contractors or affected stakeholders Improvement of health and safety measures to address negative feedback

Immediately conduct consultations or dialogues with complainants and affected stake-holders to determine reason for complaints. Address the complaints and document the responses and actions that will be done Release an official statement to media to clarify the issue Make improvements on health and safety plan to reflect the actions that were conducted so a repeat of the incident or complaints will not happen.






Lead Person Annual

Estimated Cost



Alert Action Limit Alert Action Limit Navigational restriction and Traffic congestion

Visual inspection to ensure navigation is not restricted and land traffic situation

Adjust vessel movement and location accordingly and Implement the necessary traffic management scheme

Daily Project site and vicinity

Contractor / Proponent

Included in the project cost

Negative feedback

Formal complaint lodged by the community and/or other stake-holders (e.g. other business centers in the area)

Multiple complaints

Proponent to investigate/ inspect subject of negative feedback; Improvement of traffic management plan / measures to address negative feedback

Revalidate previous investigate result on reason for complaint and address complaint immediately through consultations with affected stake-holders Improvement of traffic management plan / measures to address negative feedback

Immediately conduct consultations or dialogues with complainants and affected stakeholders to determine reason for complaints. Address the complaints and document the responses and actions that will be done; Release an official statement to media to clarify the issue; Improvement of traffic management plan / measures to address negative feedback and to reflect the actions that were conducted so a repeat of the complaints will not happen.


Decommissioning / Abandonment / Rehabilitation Policy| i

Table of Contents

7 Decommissioning / Abandonment / Rehabilitation Policy .................................................... 1 7.1 Objectives of Decommissioning / Abandonment / Rehabilitation Policy 1

7.2 Indicative Demobilization Plan 1

7.3 Risk Assessment 1

7.4 General Description of Demobilization Activities 2


Decommissioning / Abandonment / Rehabilitation Policy| 1

7 DECOMMISSIONING / ABANDONMENT / REHABILITATION POLICY 7.1 Objectives of Decommissioning / Abandonment / Rehabilitation Policy The objectives of the decommissioning planning for the project are:

1. To provide an overall framework in terms of abonnement of the project including rehabilitation and decommissioning strategies that are consistent with national and local standards and regulatory requirements;

2. To establish selection criteria to be used as guide in the decommissioning or cessation of all project activities;

3. To minimize and/or eliminate adverse environmental impacts once the project cease operation;

4. To ensure that cessation of all activities is complete and in accordance with good industry practice and did not pose an unacceptable risk to public health and safety; and

5. To provide the local communities with long-term sustainable opportunities following closure.

7.2 Indicative Demobilization Plan The project is designed to become a high urban land uses for institutional, commercial, recreational, and industrial operations and is expected to retain such use in perpetuity. Collectively, ownership will eventually be shared by lot buyers (locators) and the Provincial Government of Samar. 7.3 Risk Assessment A risk assessment will be undertaken during the preparation of demobilization plan to ensure that risks are identified and appropriate mitigating measures are properly implemented. Before the conduct of demobilization, the Provincial Government of Samar will prepare a monitoring tool to ensure that all demobilization criteria are taken into consideration. Finding generated from the preparation of self-monitoring report (SMR), compliance monitoring report (CMR) and MMTs documents will be part of the monitoring program. Monitoring will be done continuously throughout the demobilization phase to demonstrate that the demobilization protocols and compliances are attained, that the environmental impacts and risks have been appropriately addressed and that any areas requiring remedial works are identified. Periodic reviews of monitoring data will be done to assess trends and the efficiency of the management activities. Monitoring will also prompt maintenance if necessary. For off-shore operations, there are no equipment or structures that will require dismantling except for the fixed maroon points which may be needed during development. Corresponding clearances from the LGU, the PRA, the local port authority and the Philippine Coast Guard shall be secured prior to vessel and off-shore facility decommissioning.


Decommissioning / Abandonment / Rehabilitation Policy| 2

7.4 General Description of Demobilization Activities The formulation of the detailed abandonment plan will be done by the Provincial Government of Samar within the specified timeframe as part of the post-ECC requirement. It will be submitted for approval to the EMB and other concerned government agencies on the activities such as Environmental Site Assessment to determine contaminants left by the operation, method and equipment to be used for dismantling of structures, clean-up or remediation plan and demobilization scheme before proceeding. Demobilization during post construction will be conducted by the contractors as per Provincial Government requirements which include all activities and costs for transport of all construction equipment used, all excess materials, disassembly and transport of temporary facilities (office, stock room, quarters, etc.) used during construction, removal and disposal of all construction debris and general clean-up of construction site. Considering that the project has no lifespan, continuous proper maintenance, enhancement and upgrading will be done to ensure high standard of the developed areas, environmentally compliant, sound and safe. Structures will be assessed regularly for the project to ensure continuous sound and safe area of development.


Institutional Plan for EMP Implementation | i

Table of Contents 8 Institutional Plan for EMP Implementation ............................................................................. 1

8.1 Designation of the Environmental Officer 1

8.2 Institutional Plan for Effective Project Implementation 1

8.3 Multi-Partite Monitoring Team (MMT) 2

8.3.1 Roles of MMT .................................................................................................................. 2

8.3.2 MMT Team Composition .............................................................................................. 2

8.3.3 Environmental Guarantee Fund (EGF) and Environmental Monitoring Fund (EMF) ...... 2

8.4 Grievance Redress Mechanism 3

8.4.1 Objectives and Advantages of Developing a Grievance Redress Mechanism ...... 3

8.4.2 Procedures of Grievance Redress ................................................................................. 3


Institutional Plan for EMP Implementation | 1

8 INSTITUTIONAL PLAN FOR EMP IMPLEMENTATION 8.1 Designation of the Environmental Officer The Institutional Plan is equally important. The purpose of the plan is to clearly delineate the functions of each of the players in this project, especially the function of Environmental Officer (EO) or Pollution Control Officer (PCO). The position entails the overall management and planning of all environment-related issues and concerns that may arise during the preconstruction, construction, operation and abandonment stages of the proposed Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project. The proponent shall closely coordinate with the Department of Environment Natural Resources – Environmental Management Bureau (DENR-EMB) for the project’s environmental compliance. For an effective coordination, the proponent will designate an Environmental Officer or Pollution Control Officer (PCO) who will be responsible for all environmental matters regarding the project. This is in compliance with DAO 2014-02 that requires the appointment/designation of an Environmental Officer or Pollution Control Officer. Specifically, the following are the responsibilities of the Environmental Officer or Pollution Control Officer:

1. Coordinates with DENR - EMB Regional Office on the environmental aspects of the operation/activities of the project;

2. Coordinates with all concerned agencies on the solid waste collection and disposal of the project;

3. Ensure the compliance with the requirements of PD 1586, RA 6969, RA 8749, RA 9003, RA 9275, their respective implementing rules and regulations (IRRs), and other pertinent rules and regulations.

4. Assist in the identification of significant environmental aspects and impacts of the project’s operation activities and recommend possible mitigating measures in the formulation/preparation and/or review of the Environmental Management Plan and Contingency Plan

5. Attend to all permitting and registration requirements of the project prior to the construction, installation, or operation of pollution sources and control facilities.

6. Ensure the proper performance, operation, and maintenance of environmental management facilities or systems of the project

7. Monitor compliance to the requirements specified in the Environmental Compliance Certificate and the commitments stipulated in the Environmental Performance Report and Management Plan (EMRMP)

8. Submit the CMRs and SMRs to EMB on a timely manner. 8.2 Institutional Plan for Effective Project Implementation The Provincial Government of Samar in coordination with other concerned government agencies and other government unit/s will conduct monitoring of the project. This is necessary



in order to determine if the Provincial Government is implementing the prescribed mitigating measures recommended in the Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) of the project. The Provincial Government in compliance with the requirement of the DENR-EMB and other concerned government agencies, shall appoint fulltime regular Pollution Control Officer (PCO)/Safety Officer, who will lead the Environment, Safety and Health Department. His/her responsibility is for the formulation and implementation of environmental conservation and health/safety programs. The PCO is responsible for the monitoring not only the construction area but also of the machineries, equipment and utilities being installed. He/she makes representation with other government units and non- government organizations and submits the required reports on the filling operation and structures, roads, utilities being constructed, machineries, equipment used with the regional office of DENR- EMB. The implementation of the project’s entire environmental management and monitoring program shall fall under his/her direct supervision. He/she reports to the Construction Manager. Also under his department are a Community Relations and Development Officer who will oversee the community assistance program of the Provincial Government in relation with the reclamation project. 8.3 Multi-Partite Monitoring Team (MMT) 8.3.1 Roles of MMT A Multi-Partite Monitoring Team (MMT) shall be formed immediately. The main goal of the MMT is to monitor the Provincial Government of Samar as well as its Contractor’s compliance to the ECC conditions, the Environmental Management Plan (EMP), and other applicable laws, rules, and regulations. In addition to these, the MMT shall also:

1. Gather relevant data to determine possible causes of unavoidable and residual adverse impacts and validity of public complaints or concerns about the project; and

2. Prepare, integrate, and disseminate monitoring reports and submit recommendations to the DENR.

8.3.2 MMT Team Composition The Provincial Government of Samar shall set-up a Multipartite Monitoring Team (MMT) composed of its own representatives, concerned LGUs, NGO, stakeholders, DENR/EMB R-VIII immediately. an Environmental Monitoring Fund (EMF) and Environmental Guarantee Fund (EGF) to cover all costs attendant to the operation of the MMT and damages and compensation cost shall be established. 8.3.3 Environmental Guarantee Fund (EGF) and Environmental Monitoring Fund (EMF) The ECC requires that a readily available and replenishable Environmental Guarantee Fund (EGF) be set up amounting to PhP 50 Million. The EGF is intended to cover the following:

1. Expenses for further environmental assessments;



2. Compensation/indemnification for whatever damages to life and property that may be caused by the project; and

3. Rehabilitation and/or restoration of areas affected by the project’s implementation. It also requires the establishment of Environmental Monitoring Fund (EMF) amounting to PhP 10 Million to cover all costs attendant to the operation and monitoring activities of the MMT.

The amount and mechanics of the above-mentioned funds shall be determined by EMB and PLGU of Samar in consultation with stakeholders and EMB Regional Office through a Memorandum of Agreement which shall be submitted to the EMB Central Office as expected to be stated on the ECC. 8.4 Grievance Redress Mechanism 8.4.1 Objectives and Advantages of Developing a Grievance Redress Mechanism A well-designed grievance redress mechanism can help ensure the sound implementation of the project. The mechanism shall provide the project affected persons (PAPs) a platform to lodge their complaints, if any, towards the project especially on matters relating to environmental protection. It shall facilitate accessible and efficient delivery of concerns directly to the decisionmakers as compared to the formal judicial process. This mechanism shall also allow the proponent to get hold of the concerns immediately so that corresponding response measures can be formed and implemented in a timely manner. Recognizing and addressing grievances early on makes them more manageable and resolvable, and will therefore benefit both parties. A good grievance redress mechanism also helps build trust between the parties. Thus, a proper grievance redress mechanism shall be established for this project. A person within the PLGU of Samar shall be assigned to receive and process the grievances. His/her name and contact information shall be shared with all PAPs. The PLGU of Samar shall also ensure that the PAPs know and understand the mechanism including the people involved, the procedure, and the time and costs needed in order for it to be functional and effective. Special consideration shall be given to vulnerable people such as the illiterate, for which the PLGU of Samar may wish to explain the mechanism in a different manner (e.g. verbally instead of by paper). Grievances received must then be properly treated and discussed, and the resolution or conclusion delivered to the complainants within a reasonable time. 8.4.2 Procedures of Grievance Redress Grievances related to any aspect of the project will be dealt with through dialogue and negotiations with the aim of rapidly and amicably addressing the concerns in a less costly manner compared to those dealt with as legal cases. The Environmental Officer (EO) or Pollution Control Officer (PCO) has the responsibilities to receive and record the voices, complaints, opinions and suggestions provided by the PAPs, and address them as the first level of decisionmakers. If the response to the complaint is



deemed inadequate in the view of the PAPs, the PAPs may elevate their grievance to the Office of the Governor. Should the grievance still not be settled, the PAPs may finally resort to filing a case with the court. Under this project, grievances from the PAPs shall be handled in the following manner:

1. Grievance shall be filed by the PAP with the PCO. The PCO shall act on the grievance within 15 days upon receipt, with the exception of complaints and grievances that specifically pertain to the valuation of affected assets, since such will be decided upon by the proper courts;

2. If no understanding or amicable solution can be reached, or if the PAP does not receive

a response from the MRIC within 15 days of the filing of the complaint, he or she can appeal to the Office of the Governor which should then act on the complaint or grievance within 15 days from the day of its filing;

3. If the PAP is still not satisfied with the decision of Office of the Governor, he/she, as a

last resort, can submit the complaint to any court of law. PAPs shall be exempted from all administrative and legal fees incurred. All complaints received in writing (or written when received verbally) from PAPs will be documented and shall be acted upon immediately according to the procedures detailed above.


Annexes | 1

Annex 1. Proof of Authority over the Project Site (Notice to Proceed with EIA Process by the DENR Region 8)


Annexes | 2

Annex 2. Accountability Statements of Preparers


Annexes | 3


Annexes | 4

Annex 3. Accountability Statements of Proponent


Annexes | 5

Annex 4. Duly Accomplished Project Environmental Monitoring & Audit Prioritization Scheme (PEMAPS) Questionnaire


Annexes | 6


Annexes | 7


Annexes | 8


Annexes | 9


Annexes | 10


Annexes | 11


Annexes | 12


Annexes | 13


Annexes | 14

Annex 5. Land Use Compatibility Certification


Annexes | 15

Annex 6. Letter Of No Objection from BFAR


Annexes | 16

Annex 7. Letter Of No Objection from DPWH Region 8


Annexes | 17

Annex 8. Letter Of No Objection from PPA


Annexes | 18

Annex 9. Letter Of No Objection from PRA


Annexes | 19

Annex 10. Letter Of No Objection from DOT Region 8


Annexes | 20

Annex 11. Wind Rose Data and Models


Annexes | 21


Annexes | 22


Annexes | 23


Annexes | 24


Annexes | 25


Annexes | 26


Annexes | 27


Annexes | 28


Annexes | 29


Annexes | 30


Annexes | 31

Annexes | 32

ANNEXES| ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT REPORT


Annexes

Annex 2. A3 Maps

Figure 1 Administrative Map


Annexes

Figure 2 Barangay Classification Map


Annexes

Figure 3 Location Map


Annexes

Figure 4 Ground Shaking Hazard Map


Annexes

Figure 5 Rain-Induced Landslide Hazard Map


Annexes

Figure 6 Storm Surge Hazard Susceptibility Map (Advisory 1)


Annexes



Annexes



Annexes



Annexes

Figure 10 Tsunami Prone Areas Map


Annexes

Figure 11 Liquefaction Susceptibility Map


Annexes

Figure 12 PGA Map of the Philippines 500-YR Period on Rock Site


Annexes

Figure 13 PHIVOLCS Map


Annexes

Figure 14 Land Classification Map


Annexes

Figure 15 Land Cover Map


Annexes

Figure 16 NPAAAD Map


Annexes

Figure 17 Slope Map


Annexes

Figure 18 Soil Map


Annexes

Figure 19 Topographic and Bathymetric Map


Annexes

Figure 20 Component Map


Annexes

Figure 21 Land Use Map


Annexes

Figure 22 Direct Impact Area Map


Annexes

Figure 23 Indirect Impact Area Map


Annexes

Figure 24 Air and Noise Sampling Survey Map


Annexes

Figure 25 Air and Noise Sampling Survey Map Station 1


Annexes



Annexes



Annexes



Annexes

Figure 29 Drilling Survey Map


Annexes

Figure 30 Water Sampling Survey Map


Annexes

Figure 31 Water Sampling Survey Map Station 1


Annexes



Annexes



Annexes



Annexes



Annexes



Annexes



Annexes



Annexes



Annexes


Proposed Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project | Public Hearing Report

i

Annex 3. Public Hearing Report

Table of Contents

Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................. i

List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... ii

List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. ii

1 Proof of Conduct of Public Hearing ..................................................................................... 1

2 Transcription of the Proceedings .......................................................................................... 3

3 Issues and Concerns raised during the Open Forum ....................................................... 20

3.1 Project Description ........................................................................................................ 20

3.2 Land ................................................................................................................................ 21

3.3 Water ............................................................................................................................... 23

3.4 People ............................................................................................................................. 27

3.5 Other Concerns ............................................................................................................. 28

4 Annexes ................................................................................................................................... 30

4.1 Proof of Newspaper Publications ............................................................................... 30

4.2 Received Invitation Letters .......................................................................................... 32

4.3 Presentation during the Public Hearing .................................................................... 55


ii

List of Tables

Table 1.1. List of Attendees per Municipality ............................................................................. 1 Table 2.1. Issues and Concerns on Project Description ............................................................ 20 Table 2.2. Issues and Concerns on Land ................................................................................... 21 Table 2.3. Issues and Concerns on Water .................................................................................. 23 Table 2.4. Issues and Concerns on People .................................................................................. 27 Table 2.5. Issues and Concerns Raised (Others) ........................................................................ 28

List of Figures

Figure 1.1. Attendance sheet at the Public Hearing venue, page 1 .......................................... 1 Figure 1.2. Attendance sheet at the Public Hearing Venue, page 2 ......................................... 2 Figure 1.3. Screenshots taken during the Public Hearing via Zoom ........................................ 1 Figure 1.4. Photos taken on-site during the Public Hearing ..................................................... 1 Figure 1.5. More on-site photos of the Public Hearing .............................................................. 2 Figure 4.1. Affidavit of Publication ............................................................................................. 30 Figure 4.2. Proof of first publication ........................................................................................... 31 Figure 4.3. Proof of second publication ...................................................................................... 31 Figure 4.4. Received Invitation Letter-Poblacion 1 ................................................................... 32 Figure 4.5. Received Invitation Letter-City Mayor ................................................................... 33 Figure 4.6. Received Invitation Letter-DTI ................................................................................ 34 Figure 4.7. Received Invitation Letter-DOT ............................................................................... 35 Figure 4.8. Received Invitation Letter-Poblacion 4 ................................................................... 36 Figure 4.9. Received Invitation Letter-BFAR Region 8 ............................................................ 37 Figure 4.10. Received Invitation Letter-PPA/PMO Eastern Leyte/Samar ............................. 38 Figure 4.11. Received Invitation Letter-Poblacion 2 ................................................................. 39 Figure 4.12. Received Invitation Letter-PPA ............................................................................. 40 Figure 4.13. Received Invitation Letter-Poblacion 5 ................................................................. 41 Figure 4.14. Received Invitation Letter-DPWH Regional Office 8 ......................................... 42 Figure 4.15. Received Invitation Letter-Samar State University ............................................. 43 Figure 4.16. Received Invitation Letter-Business Group in Catbalogan City ....................... 44 Figure 4.17. Received Invitation Letter-District Representative ............................................. 45 Figure 4.18. Received Invitation Letter-Two Eco, Inc. ............................................................. 46 Figure 4.19. Received Invitation Letter-Poblacion 3 ................................................................. 47 Figure 4.20. Received Invitation Letter-Samar Chamber of Commerce and Industry ........ 48 Figure 4.21. Received Invitation Letter-Philippine Reclamation Authority ......................... 49 Figure 4.22. Received Invitation Letter-Poblacion 10 ............................................................... 50


iii

Figure 4.23. Received Invitation Letter-GIOS-Samar, Inc. ....................................................... 51 Figure 4.24. Received Invitation Letter-PENRO ....................................................................... 52 Figure 4.25. Received Invitation Letter-PCG ............................................................................. 53 Figure 4.26. Received Invitation Letter-CENRO ....................................................................... 54


1

1 Proof of Conduct of Public Hearing

The Public Hearing for the Proposed Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project was

spearheaded by the Project Proponent, the Provincial Government of Samar, with the

assistance of the Project Consultant, Envia Consultancy. The notice of the Public Hearing

released by the DENR-Environmental Management Bureau – Central Office was published in

newspaper publications by the proponent on September 28 and October 5, 2021 (Annex 3.1) and the invitation letters for the government offices, the barangay officials, a business group

and a fisherfolk organization were likewise prepared and distributed on September 27, 2021

(Annex 3.2).

The Public Hearing proper for the affected stakeholders was held last October 15, 2021, 9:00

AM – 12:00 noon via Zoom Application and on-site venue at the 2nd floor, Session Hall,

Provincial Capitol Building in Catbalogan City. The briefing and orientation on the purpose

of the Public Hearing was presented by Engr. Jason Paolo Esguerra, case handler from EMB

Central Office; the rules on the conduct of Public Hearing were explained by Mr. Sherwin

Avestruz, Public Hearing Officer from EMB Regional Office 8; the description of the project

alternatives and EIA study process and results as well as the latest master development plans

were presented by Mr. Von Czar Meneses from Envia Consultancy, Inc. and Architect Berlin

Gaile Gascon from Two Eco, Inc.

Prior to this, the activities conducted were as follows:

• The Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) Campaigns were

conducted on December 17 to 18, 2019, January 16, 2020, and February 27, 2020;

• The Public Scoping was conducted on May 10, 2021; and

• The Technical Scoping was conducted on May 26, 2021.

The detailed list of the attendance for the Public Hearing can be found in the table below:

Table 1.1. List of Attendees per Municipality

Name Company/Affiliation Position

Engr. Victor Tingzon Philippine Ports Authority -

PMO Tacloban Senior Engineer A

Kristine Dator San Lorenzo EMS II

Hannah Jane Atole Philippine Reclamation

Authority -

Cherry Grace Ungab DENR-CENRO, Catbalogan

City Government Employee

CG ENS Jabin M. Castellano

Allen Avenue, City Proper Serviceman


2

Name Company/Affiliation Position Ann Geron Loyola Heights, QC Research Associate

Eleno Edwin C. Nuevo Brgy. Cinco Government Employee

Mabel Barroga Poblacion, Kabacan, North

Cotabato Student

Jason Esguerra EMB Site Engineer Pablo G. de los Reyes, Jr. QC Govt employee

Mark John Pineda PRA Makati PRA Makati

Meilou C. Macabare Brgy. Munoz, Catbalogan

City, Samar Government Employee

Nadia Conde N/A EIA CONSULTANT Gelleene Casino Lagutan Brgy 34 - Tacloban City Government employee

Jean N/A EIA Consultant for ENVIA Azyleah Ignacio-Ibaviosa San Lorenzo, Makati Lawyer

Danika Astilla - Researcher and Social Science Practitioner

Wilfredo L. Lacambra Mercedes Government Employee-

PLGU Samar

Angelito B. Villanueva Brgy. Guinadpunan,

Catbalogan City Government Employee

Dakila Kim P Yee Pawing, Palo, Leyte Assistant Professor Isabel Calantoc Makati Resident Officer

Antonio Angeles Sumague

Barangay Amihan, Project 3 QC

Civil Engineer

Lucy D. Francisco Poblacion 04 ENGINEER II Marlon C. Sale BFAR-PFO Samar Provincial Fishery Officer Arnaldo Aroza LGU-Catbalogan City CPDC

Elizabeth Illlavera NCR BFAR Staff

Adrian P. De Jesus Mercedes Senior Ecosystem

Management Specialist Emerson B. Darroles Manila Consultant Rene Zaldy Porlaje Quezon City Government employee

Balilia Winnievir S Biodiversity Management

Bureau-DENR Government Employee

Oskar D. Cruz Quezon City EIARC Nelieta Baguna Catbalogan City Chief of Staff

Elsie M. Borja Poblacion 7 Government Official - CENR

Officer Catbalogan Label Jude Edgar G. Brgy. Savinte e-II-u9mo FLML

Alcres B. Golong BUS or BAW Lucita S. Uy Brgy. Mercedes Kagawad

Mercedes G. Sedorante Brgy. Mercedes Brgy. Secretary Medilisa M. Picludo Brgy. or Pob. Brgy. Kagawad

Michael L. Cruz PLGU-PEO CM6F


3

Name Company/Affiliation Position Rajul M. Jucaton Brgy. 10 Brgy. Kagawad Sonny Boy Cinko Brgy. 10 Brgy. Kagawad Caesar M. Ragae Brgy. 10 Punong Barangay

Ruben Tillie -do- Kagawad Antonio L. Juy LGU Punong Barangay

Kyuho G. Uyagullo LGU Mercedes Lupon Virgie A. Machate - P3 Amos D. Estrebor LGU Mercedes Lupon

Postura L. Phehapurru LGU Lupon Eden H. Pinjcas LGB P-Pres

Jujus Bobon EMB 8 Trom Staff Dave Eden Niedo EMB 8 Sr. EMS Bea Mae Albarig EMB 8 EMSI Sheryin Alesireb EMB 8 SITU

Armando Dupio Jr. EMB 8 Chief ELA Qamilo O. Belasmido Brgy. 08 Kagawad

Nilo Maurk LGU Lupon Muardo M. Villa LGU Lupon Chairman

Benjiento Beleniju LGU Kagawad Justin T. Uy LGU Kagawad

Julius Uy Brgy. 02 Kapitan Alex N. De Luna PLGU-Samar PFO AT

Luzviminda G. Naga LGU PB Canolyn A. Fabon PEO Provincial Engineer

Roel C. Bohol GIOS SAMAR Vice Chair Rocky C. Adap LGU Kagawad Janet R. Pitato President -

Mariano N. Trozoar Jr. Brgy. 05 Barangay Secretary Maris R. Picazor SPTU PLGU


1

Figure 1.1. Attendance sheet at the Public Hearing venue, page 1


2

Figure 1.2. Attendance sheet at the Public Hearing Venue, page 2


1

Figure 1.3. Screenshots taken during the Public Hearing via Zoom


1

Figure 1.4. Photos taken on-site during the Public Hearing


2

Figure 1.5. More on-site photos of the Public Hearing


3

2 Transcription of the Proceedings

SIR BRETT: Ito pong proyekto ng Provincial Government ay ang Brgy. Mercedes Reclamation

Project. Magpapasalamat din kami kay Cong. Sharee Ann Tan dahil since Day 1 ay nasa likod

siya ng Provincial Government para tumulong na matapos ang project na ito. We hope na

itong dialogue na ito ay magiging platform para masagot ang issues and concerns na hindi

nasagot before at na sana within the next few hours ay magiging healthy and fruitful ang

discussions natin with our stakeholders. So, in behalf of Gov. Mike Tan and the rest of the

PLGU of Samar, I welcome you all, all the way here from the Catbalogan City of Samar, to the

Public Hearing of the Proposed Brgy. Mercedes Reclamation Project. Damo nga salamat and

Spark Samar.

ENGR. DEXTER: The next part of our program would be the presentation on the objectives of

the Public Hearing. For this, may I call on Engr. Jason Esguerra to present. Sir Jason, please go

ahead.

ENGR. JASON: Thank you po, sir. I-present ko lang po itong objectives ng Public Hearing

natin ngayon. Ang Public Hearing ay isang parte ng EIA Process, isa din po siyang form ng

public participation, at ginagawa po siya pursuant to PD 1586 and DENR AO 2003-30. So ang

EIA, o ang Environmental Impact Assessment, ay isang planning and management tool na

nakakatulong sa gobyerno, sa proponent, sa mga maapektuhang komunidad, at sa mga iba

pang decision makers para malaman natin kung ang mga benepisyo ng project ay mas

matimbang kesa sa mga negatibong epekto nito sa ating kalikasan.

Dito naman po ay ipapakita ko ang steps sa ating EIA Process. Kapag nagawa na po ng

proponent ang EIA Study ay magsusubmit po sila sa EMB CO, at doon po ay magkakaroon

tayo ng procedural screening. Sa procedural screening po ay titignan natin kung ang kanilang

sinubmit ay kumpleto, at kung ito po ay pumasa na, magkakaroon po tayo ng Review &

Evaluation. Mayroon po tayong experts from different fields, at sila po ang EIA Review

Committee na tutulong po sa atin na ma-review ang EIA Document na na-submit. Currently

po ay andito po tayo sa stage na ito, yung Public Hearing po ay sa Review & Evaluation Stage

na din po. Dito rin po malalaman kung ang kanilang project ay iissuehan ng ECC o idedeny.

Dito naman po tayo sa objectives ng Public Hearing. So, ang una pong objective ay ma-verify

po natin kung accurate po ba ang kanilang mga nakuhang data in relation po sa project site;

dito din po natin makukumpirma kung ang affected stakeholders po ba ay nakonsulta ng

mabuti at naging parte ng pagdedesisyon; nag-ooffer din po tayo ng platform para

magkaroon ng dialogue at para magbigay ng komento o opinyon ang mga stakeholders sa


4

project; eto din po ay para ma-promote ang effective public participation at ma-ensure ang

confidence sa proseso ng EIA tapos po ang suporta po sa magiging project.

Nabanggit ko po kanina ang ECC. So ang ECC po ay ang Environmental Compliance

Certificate. Ito po ay isang decision document na ini-issue ng office sa proponent pagkatapos

ng thorough review ng EIA Report. Dito po ipapakita ang commitment ng proponent, para

po makapagcomply sila sa mga existing na environmental regulations, at para makapag-

operate sila within the best environmental practice. Yun lang po, maraming salamat po.

ENGR. DEXTER: Maraming salamat po, Engr. Jason Esguerra. So, yun po ang objectives ng

ating Public Hearing. For next part po ng ating program, proceed po tayo sa presentation ng

project at results ng EIA Study. Hinihingi ko po sa ating mga participants na for now ay

makinig po tayo sa presentation ng ating proponent, ng kanilang consultant, at kung may

mga katanungan po tayo ay pwedeng isulat lang muna, at mamaya po sa ating Open Forum

ay doon po natin itanong sa ating proponent. Okay so, for the presentation po ng Project

Description, sa consultant po, please go ahead.

KATE: Let us welcome po Sir Von Meneses of Envia Consultancy. Good morning, Sir Von.

VON: Good morning po. Eto po ang Public Hearing ng Brgy. Mercedes Reclamation Project.

For today’s meeting, eto po ang agenda natin – meeting objectives, project overview, project

area, timeline, EIA Process and results, project benefits, and open forum.

So eto po ang ating meeting objectives – we shall be discussing the project overview, EIA

study process and results, then gather stakeholders’ comments and suggestions, and gain

stakeholders’ support for the project. Yun po ang ating pinaka-main objective para sa Public

Hearing na ito.

Eto naman po ang overview natin – context, the project, goals and objectives, facilities and

components, and alternatives. Alam naman po natin na under President Duterte’s

administration, patuloy ang pagulong natin sa imprastruktura under the Build Build Build

Infrastructure Plan. Alinsunod din po ito sa ating Philippine Development Plan para sa taong

2017-2022. Dito po ay gusto natin mapabilis ang development ng mga imprastruktura dahil

alam po natin na may benepisyo ito sa ating ekonomiya. Ang lokasyon po nito ay sa coastal

waters ng Barangay Mercedes, Poblacion 3, Poblacion 4, and Poblacion 5. Ang project

proponent po ay ang Provincial Government of Samar. Ilan po ang mga ito sa mga kinonsider

nating guidelines para sa proyektong ito: EO 543 – Delegating to the PRA the Power to

Approve Reclamation Projects; EO 146 – Delegating to the NEDA Board the Power of the

President to Approve Reclamation Projects; EO 74 – Repealing EO 798 and EO 146,


5

Transferring the PRA to the Office of the President, Delegating to the PRA Governing Board

the Power of the President to Approve Reclamation Projects, and for Other purposes; and

DAO 2018-14 – Guidelines on the Issuance of Area Clearance for Reclamation Projects and

Proclamation and Special Patents over Reclaimed Area.

Ang ating project goal and objective is to establish a large contiguous area to contain

residential and commercial development without having to face the problems on land

consolidation, high land value, and right-of-way acquisition. Pero sa pagsulong po ng

economic boost, ayaw po natin na may nasasagasaang tao.

Para naman sa ating project facilities and components, magkakaroon tayo ng commercial and

residential lots, institutional offices and facilities, road network, water distribution system,

drainage system, sewage collection system, centralized sewage treatment facility, power

distribution system, telecommunication system, at land mass.

Kinonsider din po natin ang project alternatives. Nagbase po tayo sa lokasyon, kung saan ba

ang area na irereclaim, at yung site selection na tinatawag. Ito po ba ay suitable na tayuan ng

ating reclamation project, gaano po ito kalapit sa City, sino po ba ang matatamaang mga

residente, meron pa tsyong masisira.

Meron po tayong irereclaim na 35 hectares for this project, along Barangays Mercedes,

Poblacion 3, Poblacion 4, and Poblacion 5. Eto po ang ating location map. So eto pong affected

areas natin, ginather po natin ang kanilang mga concern at comments para ilagay sa EIS

Report at para ma-address po natin.

Inaasahan po natin na itong project natin, kasama na ang construction, ay magtatagal po ng

48 months. Medyo matagal po ang proseso natin, pero pagkatapos po ng construction ay

magkakaroon naman po tayo ng economic boost, na magbebenefit ang lahat.

So, iprepresent ko na po ang results ng ating EIA. Based po ito sa EMB MC 2014-005 – Revised

Guidelines for Coverage Screening and Standardized Requirements. Ito pong proyekto natin

ay nagfafall under Category A – Environmentally Critical Projects, since 35 hectares po yung

area na irereclaim natin. Under po siya sa Projects/Description 3.3. Reclamation and other land

restoration projects. So eto pong public consultation/participation ay pangatlo na po nating

pagkikita – nauna na po ang IEC, at sumunod po ang Public Scoping, at ngayon po ay andito

na tayo sa Public Hearing.

Eto naman po ang nakikita naming mga suliranin ng proyektong ito: presence of critical slope;

geohazards; land use change; impact on existing waterways; impact on air, noise, and


6

vibration; and impact on existing road traffic and linkages. Nagpropropose naman po kami

ng mitigation measures na gagawin ni proponent para po ma-lessen ang mga ganitong

impact.

Eto naman po ang mga EIA Survey na kinonduct namin: una po ang soil quality survey,

tinignan po namin kung magkakaroon ba ng soil compaction; flora and fauna survey, tinignan

po namin ang biodiversity na madidisplace at abrupt changes po ecological system;

groundwater quality survey, tinignan po namin kung posible bang ma-contaminate ang

groundwater sources natin pwede iyong makaapekto sa kalusugan ng tao; surface/marine

water quality survey; freshwater/marine ecology survey; air quality survey and noise and

vibration level survey, ano po ba ang posibleng maging epekto ng ingay at malapit po ba sa

ating kabahayan, opisina, paaralan, at simbahan; initial perception survey naman po ay

kinonduct natin during the IEC meeting upang ma-gather ang mga concerns ninyo; and

finally, ang perception survey na kinonduct natin during the public scoping.

So eto po ang resulta ng aming pag-aaral. Para po sa land, maaari tayong magkaroon ng mga

sumusunod:

• Impacts on compatibility with existing land use classification;

• Impact on compatibility with classification as an ECA;

• Only minimal impairment of visual aesthetics due to similar adjacent land use and

lack of tourist spots near the site;

• Reduction of coastal waters and permanent change;

• Possible devaluation of land value as a result of improper solid waste management

during construction phase;

• Change in geomorphology due to the formation of new land mass;

• Change in subsurface geology/underground conditions;

• Inducement of geologic hazards;

• Disturbance of soil where the project is near may lead to soil erosion;

• Change in soil quality/fertility;

• Minimal loss of habitat and vegetation; and

• Noise generated during construction will impact behavior of different species.

Para naman po sa water, eto po ang mga results:

• The project site is devoid of wetlands or marshes and will therefore not aggravate the

flooding in the area;

• Depletion of water resources;

• Change/disruption in water circulation pattern, littoral current, and coastal erosion

and disposition;


7

• Degradation of water quality due to generated waste and discharges during

construction activities;

• Impact on freshwater ecology not that significant due to the lack of water uses

including fishing and species with commercial value within the impact area;

• Threats to existence and/or loss of important marine local species and habitat;

• Possible wastewater contamination caused by improper disposal system;

• Increase in seawater turbidity due to the flow of sediment streams brought about by

reclamation activities; and

• Mangrove planting will be implemented in suitable areas to be identified.

Sa air and noise naman po ay ito:

• Minimal changes in local micro-climate;

• Contribution in the locality’s greenhouse emission mainly during the construction and

operation phase;

• Degradation of air quality; and

• Increase in ambient noise level.

Under people module naman po:

• Improve road capacity and safety for pedestrians;

• Traffic congestion within the impact area will worsen during construction phase;

• Development of a walkable neighborhood;

• Creation of new jobs for the community and boost the local economy;

• The project will utilize other means of resources and thus will not create competition;

• The Proposed Reclamation Project does not pose a threat on the existing peace and

order as all construction activities will be confined at sea and managed by the

proponent; and

• Minimal impact on public health because the activities and the small number of

persons involved will be based on the sea vessels.

Eto naman po ang project benefits: una, to improve and continue Catbalogan City as the

primary economic hub of the Province; to provide easier access to the tourist and investment

destinations; and to provide jobs and employment benefits during project construction and

operations. Yun lamang po. Maraming salamat.

KATE: Thank you po. Ngayon po let’s all welcome Ar. Berlin Gascon from Two Eco.

AR. BERLIN: This presentation is for the proposed waterfront projects in Brgy. Mercedes. Eto

po yung project data ng Mercedes site, which is envisioned to be a modern central business

district that will provide competitive business and job opportunities for the residents. The


8

land use is dominantly mixed-use in nature; ang mixed-use po ay type ng land use na

pwedeng magsama ang commercial and residential; or commercial and institutional.

Pinapakita ko po ngayon itong land use plan, at makikita ninyo na divided siya into

development zones, which are based on existing development in the area. We have three

major development zones: mixed-use commercial in red, mixed-use tourism in yellow, and

mixed-use institutional in blue. The remaining smaller zones naman po sa masterplan are

introduced as support to the main development – light industrial in brown, utilities in grey,

and fisherman’s village in orange.

ENGR. DEXTER: Before po tayo magproceed sa ating Open Forum, may I request our Hearing

Officer to present yung mga house rules para po maging maayos ang daloy ng ating Open

Forum. Kaunting reminder na lang din po para sa ating mga on-site participants, pwede tayo

magpakilala in Waray, Tagalog, o English, kung saan tayo komportable. Sir Sherwin, kindly

facilitate po.

SIR SHERWIN: First of all po, I would like to welcome everyone to this Public Hearing. I

would like to formally open the Public Hearing. Unang-una po sa lahat, my name is Sherwin

Avestruz, ako po ay taga-EMB Office, at na-designate po ako bilang Hearing Officer para sa

Public Hearing na ito, by the EMB CO. Bilang Hearing Officer po, it is my job to ensure na

orderly and peaceful ang conduct of this Public Hearing; therefore, meron po tayong kaunting

rules and regulations na kailangan i-observe. I would like to emphasize that above all, if there

are any untoward incidents, I reserve my right to remove anyone na magcacause ng untoward

incident in this meeting. First and foremost, I would like to emphasize that for everyone in

the zoom meeting, please ensure that your audio is muted. Another thing is for your mobile

phones to be switched to silent mode. The comments should be based on correct data and

information, so ibig ko pong sabihin ay sana walang mga fake news; the discussion should be

directly relevant to the issue at hand; comments should be made on the behalf of public

interest and not on personal interest; and of course, proper decorum, so no catcalls, booing,

etcetera. Since it’s about 11am na din, I would like to ask the stakeholders to state your name

and representation ninyo, before the question, for documentation purposes. Thank you.

RAUL: Ako po si Raul, Vice-Chairman ng [inaudible] Samar. My question is paano yung mga

kagaya namin na affected ng project?

SIR BRETT: As presented po by Ar. Gascon kanina, magkakaroon po tayo ng fisherman’s

village, yung color orange. Maglalagay po tayo ng area ng market para sa mga fresh catch

natin. Actually po sir, magkausap kami ni Sir Gerry, at magcocoordinate po kami para ma-

address ang concern ni sir regarding the project.


9

SIR SHERWIN: Let’s proceed sa next question po.

VON: May question po dito sa chat box, babasahin ko lang po: Good morning, meron po bang

private proponent for this project?

SIR BRETT: As of now ay wala tayong private proponent since the project is initiated by the

Provincial Government of Samar.

VON: Next question po natin ay: Can we ask for a copy of the EIA. Sasagutin ko na po: yes,

you can ask for a copy of the EIA natin, yung presentation kanina. We can send that thru

email. Kindly provide us with your email, and we can send a copy.

ENGR. DEXTER: To add lang po doon sa nagtanong, meron po tayong softcopy na available

sa ating website. Andun po ang softcopy ng EIS as well as notice sa Public Hearing. Punta

lang po tayo sa EIA website – eia.emb.gov.ph. For those naman po na nasa on-site, meron

pong hardcopy ng EIS Report ang LGU ng Catbalogan City, pwede po ninyo tignan.

SIR SHERWIN: So ulitin ko lang po ang next question natin, from ma’am. Ang tanong po ni

ma’am ay ano po ba ang plano ng project proponent during construction para sa mga

madidisplace o maapektuhan ng trabaho? We would like to recognize Atty. Allan Rambano,

Legal Officer; he is to answer the question.

ATTY. ALLAN: Kung mapapansin niyo po sa presentation kanina, hindi po siya one-time

big-time na gagawin lahat. We shall be doing this po phase by phase.

SIR SHERWIN: One follow up question po, ma’am. Tinatanong po ni ma’am kung saan po

pupunta yung mga madidisplace na fishermen temporarily, habang kino-construct?

SIR BRETT: Para maklaro po ang lahat, kasi po ang iba, ang alam lang nila ay reclamation

project lang ang meron sa Mercedes. So andito po ang representative po ng implementing

office na gumagawa ng isang project na ongoing na ngayon, yung Brgy. Mercedes Coastal

Dike. Andito po si Engr. Jun.

ENGR. JUN: Good morning po, I am from the implementing office in DPWH. To answer

ma’am’s question where will be the temporary place for the fisherfolks while the project is

ongoing, the ongoing embankment is under the implementation of the contractor. There are

allowances for the access of the equipments going to the project. So yun po, ma’am.


10

SIR SHERWIN: Eto po bang embankment ay project din ng Provincial Government? May

pagtatambak na po ba?

ENGR. JUN: Yes po. Eto pong pagtatambak sa site ay para po gawing access ng contractor

pagpunta dito sa reclamation.

STAKEHOLDER (name is inaudible): Sa ngayon ay ongoing ang embankment for the access

road going to the reclamation project. Now there are fisherfolks that are being affected.

Ngayon saan sila lulugar? Nagrereklamo ang fisherfolks.

SIR SHERWIN: Ibig ninyo sabihin sir may mga madidisplace?

STAKEHOLDER (name is inaudible): Yes. Meron pong mga affected dahil sa ginagawang

embankment project. Saan temporarily ilalagay ang mga fisherfolks na affected nitong

project?

ENGR. JUN: Okay, to answer your question, sir, hindi naman po lahat ay matatambakan. Sabi

nga po si Atty. Allan, by phasing po itong projects. So ang ginagawa po ni contractor ay ito

po munang sa isang side; at ongoing po ang aming assessment para po sa right-of-way. Hindi

naman po matatambakan ito, so pwede po sa part na yun.

STAKEHOLDER (name is inaudible): Pinaaalis daw sila ng contractor, yun ang sabi ni

Kapitana. Saan po sila pwede ilagay?

ENGR. JUN: Sige po sir, i-verify po muna namin. Salamat po.

SIR SHERWIN: To the proponent, please take note of the issue.

STAKEHOLDER (name is inaudible): Hindi po namin alam sa barangay na may ganitong

project pala na iniimplement.

SIR SHERWIN: I-tatake note po ito ng proponent, kasi po sir, napapansin ko na this is a

separate project. Para ho hindi tayo mag-do away sa purpose nitong Public Hearing na ito,

which is the Mercedes Reclamation Project. I suggest we move forward, pero duly noted po

itong issue. Bigyan naman ho natin ng chance those mga nasa zoom meeting.

ENGR. DEXTER: Sir, naka-raise hand po si Sir Mark John Pineda from PRA.


11

SIR MARK: Good morning, sir. Question lang po. Saan po ang location nung nagface-to-face?

Saan po exact location ninyo?

REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE PLGU: Sir, ang venue po ng face-to-face meeting ay nasa

Session Hall ng Sangguniang Panlalawigan ng Samar. Catbalogan po, Capitol Building,

second floor.

SIR MARK: Tapos po my next question ay doon sa pinresent kanina ni Ar. Gascon, about the

masterplan. Kasi she mentioned about the open space and green space. Included po ba ang

mga road sa kanyang computation?

AR. BERLIN: The green and open space computation includes all roads, retention ponds, and

esplanade.

SIR MARK: Irereiterate lang po namin ang policy ng PRA, AO 2019-05, requiring all proposed

reclamation na magkaroon ng 5% open space. Excluded po dyan ang roads sa green space.

You can check po our policy para sa provision na yan. We are stating po this early para po

ma-consider ng proponent sa planning stage. And then last, sir, there was some mention of

the connecting bridge from the reclamation site at sa road. Was that part of the development?

Na-cover din ba siya ng application ng ECC?

SIR BRETT: As of now, hindi pa siya nasali sa application namin for ECC kasi yung project pa

lang po natin na gagawin at ang priority is the reclamation. Kung meron na po kaming pondo,

then yun po yung time na mag-aapply kami for another ECC for the separate project. Thank

you.

SIR MARK: Hindi po kakailangain ang bridge sa pagtambak? Kasi po land-based ang quarry

natin.

SIR BRETT: Yes po. Yung bridge po required lang siya para maka-connect ang Mercedes to

the other proposed reclamation site, which is located sa Pier 1 to Bunuanan.

SIR SHERWIN: Gusto ko lang po basahin yung nagchat ng question nila, for the benefit of

those in the zoom meeting. This one is from DIPH, Ma’am Isabel Calantoc. Ma’am Calantoc

is asking: Meron na bang contractor for this project to do the reclamation? Meron po bang

bidding process?


12

ENGR. BOYET: Meron pong bidding process na ginawa dito, at meron na din po tayong

contractor. Pero ulitin ko lang po, this project is Provincial Government of Samar initiated and

funded. Wala pong private proponent dito.

SIR SHERWIN: I would like to move on to the next question in the chat box. This one is from

Ma’am Nikka Oquias. Ma’am Nikka is asking: may cost-benefit analysis ba na ginawa for this

project looking into its long-term effects on the fragile marine ecosystem and the livelihood of

the fisherfolks?

VON: Yes po, may ginawa pong cost-benefit analysis for this project.

SIR SHERWIN: Is this available po ba? Sa EIA Study po ba ay na-report na ito?

VON: Yes po, meron po sa EIS Report natin. Kung gusto po nila ma-access, we can send the

copy of the cost-benefit analysis for this project.

SIR SHERWIN: Ang question po ni sir [on-site stakeholder] ay ano daw po ang magiging

status ng occupancy ng mga existing land owners on the area which will be affected by this

proposed reclamation? Yung mga nagreclaim na daw po, kasi meron na daw pong

nagreclaim.

ATTY. ALLAN: Yung mga private individuals na nagreclaim na, hindi po yun kasama dito

sa project na ito. PRA po ang may jurisdiction sa private individuals na nagreclaim na; pero

sa tanong niyo po ay magiging ano ang status ng area na nireclaim nila, hindi po namin

masasagot iyon dahil hindi po namin sakop yun. Outside po iyan sa area of this project.

ENGR. DIOMEDES: This is Engr. Diomedes Tan from PRA, Reclamation Department. That’s

true – existing and unauthorized reclamations in the area will be under the jurisdiction of

PRA. We intend to undertake a survey of these illegal reclamations in Mercedes. The survey

and the Presidential Proclamation that will be secured by PRA will cover the entire area that

is illegally reclaimed. The occupants or reclaimers can avail of the existing policy of PRA on

how to legally acquire the ownership of these reclaimed lands. That’s all.

ENGR. BOYET: Affected po kayo dahil nasa isang coastal area kayo. Kung ano po ang

mangyayari sa implementation sa Mercedes, there is a possibility na yung effects, for example

po sa water quality, ay mapupunta din sa coastal area ninyo kasi ilang metro lang ang haba.

Part po ng public consultation ay kailangan namin kayo isali dahil concern din namin kayo.

Directly or indirectly ay maapektuhan po kayo, kaya po kailangan aware din kayo na may

ganito tayong project.


13

SIR RENE: Ako po si Rene Zaldy Porlaje, from BFAR-CO. Yung una ko pong question: nakita

ko po sa mapa na malawak pa ang land area ng Catbalogan. So bakit po magrereclaim e

malawak naman ang area? Magkukumpulan tayo dito sa coastal area na maraming masisira

na marine resources at maapektuhan ang communities. Pwede pong pakipaliwanag sa aming

lahat kung bakit kailangan natin magreclaim e hindi pa naman po siksikan kagaya sa

Maynila?

REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE PLGU: Taga-Catbalogan po ba kayo, sir?

SIR RENE: Ah, hindi po, sa Northern Samar po ako. Pero sa Maynila po ako nagtrabaho, sa

Central Office.

REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE PLGU: Ah, ganito po kasi yun, sir. Ang structure po ng

Catbalogan, mula po sa shoreline, hindi po aabot ng isang kilometro ay bundok na kaagad.

So yung bundok po na yun, mas mahirap po tanggalin yun kesa mag-reclaim. Kung andito

po kayo sa Catbalogan, makikita niyo po na yung inexplain niyo ngayon na malawak ang

Catbalogan City, hindi po yun tugma in a way na ang Catbalogan po ay bundok-bundok,

hindi po pwedeng i-develop kaagad. So etong option po namin ay reclamation, which is

allowed naman po sa batas. So kung ang sinasabi po ninyo ay mas madaling i-develop ang sa

bundok, hindi po kami agree doon, sir, dahil kung nakikita po ninyo ang topography dito ay

bundok po talaga.

SIR RENE: Ang next ko pong tanong ay meron po kaya kayong listahan ng fisherfolks na

maapektuhan? Tsaka kasama ang kanilang mga bangka? Pwede po kami makakuha ng

listahan?

SIR BRETT: Yes sir, meron po kaming listahan from BFAR R8, kasi prior to our request sa

DENR-EMB for the ECC Clearance, humingi tayo ng certification from BFAR. Nagconduct po

ang BFAR-RO ng assessment, validation, and thankfully ang recommendation nila is okay to

construct the reclamation project. Kung wala po kayong kopya sir, bibigyan namin kayo.

Thank you.

SIR RENE: Ang concern po namin ay paano naman po ang hanapbuhay ng ating fisherfolks

kung sila ay ma-displace? Malawak po itong project ninyo. Next ko pong tanong ay: na-

delineate na po ba ang Catbalogan City, ang kanila pong city waters? Na-mapa na po ba ito

ng NAMRIA?


14

ENGR. BOYET: Hindi po natin masasagot yan sir, kung na-delineate na ang city waters ng

Catbalogan, pero I can assure you na ang coverage ng project is well within the waters ng

Catbalogan. Whether or not may delineation po yun ay hindi po affected ang nearby

municipal waters.

SIR RENE: Kaya ko po natanong ay kasi 35 hectares po itong project, maapektuhan po ang

municipal waters, mag-eextend po siya kasi shoreline po ang ating baseline. Paano po ma-

resolve ang issue na ito?

ENGR. DIOMEDES: The definition of the municipal waters is that its coverage is measured at

90 degrees from the shoreline, 15 kilometers outward. So, our reclamation project is less than

1 kilometer. What can I say is that it is well within the municipal waters of Catbalogan City

ENGR. DEXTER: Sir, naka-raise po ang virtual hand ni Ma’am Cherry Grace Ungab, from the

CENRO.

MA’AM CHERRY: Good morning po. I am Cherry Grace Ungab of CENRO Catbalogan. May

concern lang po ako since na-mention po kanina na sa reclamation, ang in charge po doon ay

PRA. So, ang concern ko lang po ay anong mangyayari sa may existing foreshore lease

application sa office that are still pending due to lack of certification from DPWH and CPDO

since na-deny ang mga application/certification nila since may proposed yung Province natin

for the reclamation. Although matagal na kasi yung ibang application doon sa table namin,

hindi kasi namin siya maproprocess because of that lack of certification. Itatanong ko lang

sana kung pwede na ba namin ma-proceed yung processing o kailangan po bang pending

muna yun?

ENGR. DIOMEDES: Our advice to the DENR-CENRO is that applications should be held in

abeyance because PRA is going to apply for the titling and ownership of those reclaimed

lands, in behalf of the national government. That’s the law, and that’s the existing policy of

the PRA. So, the applicant that can claim the ownership of those reclaimed lands will be the

PRA. We’ll just be complicating the process if DENR will have to act/approve those

applications for foreshore lease agreement, because at the end, PRA is going to apply for

Presidential Proclamation for those reclaimed lands, and PRA is going to ask DENR to exclude

those areas for the tenurial instrument, so that the survey plan of those areas can be approved

in favor of the PRA.

MA’AM CHERRY: Okay sige po, we will arrange that in our office kasi merong iba kasi na

foreshore lease applicants, na although hindi ganun kalakihan ang application nila, gusto pa

din nila mag-apply ng foreshore lease siguro para ma-legalize ang occupation nila.


15

ENGR. DIOMEDES: Maybe CENRO can process an irrevocable permit application, which is

one-year renewable to legalize the occupancy of the people residing in those areas.

MA’AM CHERRY: Yes po, since illegal na nga po ang pag-occupy nila ng area, hindi pa po

sila nagbabayad sa government. Yun lang naman po ang concern ko.

SIR SHERWIN: Ma’am Cherry Grace, sorry po, but I believe this can be best addressed if you

directly coordinate na lang po with the PRA. Pasensya na po, so that we can move forward

with the next question. Basahin ko po yung nasa chat box, galing po ito again kay Ma’am

Nikki Oquias: Saan po kukunin ang filling materials for this project?

ENGR. BOYET: Ma’am, the source of fill materials would be on-site po. Yun lang po, ma’am.

SIR SHERWIN: Another question po from the chat box. Sir, follow up po: if awarded na yung

project, may we know kung sino po yung contractor to do the reclamation project?

REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE PLGU: Awarded na po siya sa Northern Builders.

SIR SHERWIN: Saan po based ito?

REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE PLGU: Catarman, Northern Samar.

SIR SHERWIN: Tinatanong po ni sir (on-site stakeholder) kung na-implement na daw po ba

o nagstart na yung project as of today?

REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE PLGU: Kanina po nasagot na ng UPMO yan, ang ongoing

pong works ay para sa dike. Eto pong reclamation na ito ay for implementation pa, at wala

hindi pa pwedeng iimplement dahil wala pa tayong Notice to Proceed from PRA at ang ECC.

Kaya po tayo andito ngayon para sa ECC. Under DPWH po yung nakikita niyong works sa

ngayon.

SIR SHERWIN: For the information po for those in the zoom meeting, ang sabi po ni sir ay

sana ho ma-coordinate ni proponent sa barangay kung ano mang activities or related activities

na meron yung project, especially daw itong implemented by the DPWH, kasi for example

daw po, eto ngayon ay hindi nila alam.

REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE PLGU: Actually po, nagkaroon kami recently lang ng Public

Hearing din po para doon sa works natin.


16

SIR SHERWIN: For the record po, ang sabi po ni sir (another on-site stakeholder) ay yung

mga residents daw from the Barangay Mercedes are worried na baka sila ay maisali sa

reclamation proponent. Nanghihingi po si sir ng response or comment from the proponent.

ATTY ALLAN: Magandang umaga po, sir. Kagaya po ng sinabi ko kanina sir, yung mga

residente po dito, whether legal or illegal, hindi po sila kasama sa project na ito. So kung ano

po ang inookupahan nila dun ngayon, ay sasagutin nila sa PRA. Pero hindi po sila sakop sa

area ng project na ito. So kung may pag-aalala po sila sir, siguro po dapat ay

makipagcoordinate na sila sa PRA tulad ng na-discuss natin kanina at yung discussion ng

CENRO at PRA regarding pending applications. Thank you po.

SIR SHERWIN: For the record po, ang tanong ni sir (different on-site stakeholder) is na-

coordinate na ba City Government of Catbalogan? Kasi ang inemphasize ni sir ay ang

importance ng comprehensive land use program, so he’s asking if na-cooordinate daw ba ito

sa City Government?

ATTY ALLAN: Klaruhin ko lang, sir, kasi sabi po ninyo “nag-umpisa,” pero hindi pa po tayo

nag-umpisa. For the information ng lahat, wag po tayo macoconfuse, hindi pa po ito nag-

umpisa. Ngayon, sa pangalawang question po ninyo kung nagcoordinate ba sa City

[Government], nag-coordinate po tayo; meron po silang representative na present sa meeting

na ito at meron din po kaming nirequest sa kanila na No Objection Resolution para sa project

na ito. Isa po yun sa mga requirements na hinihingi.

SIR SHERWIN: (Talking to the on-site stakeholder asking a question) So gusto ho ninyo

malaman kung ano ang plano nila para sa waterways, kasi po affected daw sila ng flooding

even before the implementation of the reclamation project.

ATTY ALLAN: Ito pong project na ito ay isa sa ginawa para maiwasan yung current flooding

sa Mercedes. Kung napansin po ninyo kanina, mayroon po doon sa plano na mga waterways,

tapos yung tubig po doon ay mapupunta sa isang water pump. Mayroon po tayong

consultants na nagstudy kung ano po ang current status ng flooding doon para ma-

incorporate siya sa project.

SIR SHERWIN: For the benefit po ng mga nasa zoom meeting and for the record na po din,

ang tanong po ni sir (another on-site stakeholder) is nakakasigurado ba ang project na hindi

magagaya ang Barangay Mercedes sa mga nangyaring baha sa Malabon?


17

REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE PLGU: Yung pagtatagpo po ng highest level ng lupa at tubig,

yun po ay act of God. Pero sinisigurado po ng Province na gagawin po namin lahat ng

precautionary measures para hindi mangyari yung pagbabaha ngayon sa Malabon. Kung

sakali mang dumating yung panahon na magbaha pa din, hindi po natin mapipigilan yun

kasi ang ulan ay hindi po natin hawak. Pero yung project po natin ay may ginagawang mga

study, kasama po doon ang drainage improvement, master development plan upang

matanggal ang problema sa pagbaha. Ang magagawa lang po natin ay gawing leksyon kung

ano man ang nangyayari sa Malabon para ma-apply natin dito upang maiwasan yun.

REPRESENTATIVE FROM DPWH: Ang maisasagot ko po, sa part ng DPWH, ay yung tide

embankment po na ginagawa natin ay nagkaroon po ng study sa Bureau of Design na naka-

design po siya na kahit magkaroon po ng storm surge o di kaya ay highest tide na sinasabi

ninyo, naka-design po siya na i-withstand po yung ganung klaseng sakuna. Pagkatapos po

nitong coastal dike, may proposed po ang DPWH doon po sa pumping stations. Ang

mangyayari po doon, ang magiging mechanics po ng pumping station, kapag nagkaroon po

ng baha sa reclamation area, i-pupump out po ng pumping station yung tubig palabas para

lahat po ng tubig na ma-iimpound doon sa loob ay mailabas po. Actually po yung coastal dike

po natin ay naka-design siya para sa 50-year return period, ibig sabihin po ay doon po sa 50

years na yun, more or less ay kaya niya i-withstand ang mga phenomena na pwede mangyari.

SIR SHERWIN: For those in the zoom meeting, basahin ko po muna yung nasa chat box: from

Ma’am Nikka Oquias, nanghihingi po si ma’am ng access sa list of affected fisherfolks. To the

proponent, please take note po. From Sir Rene again: ilan po ba ang total area ng city waters

ng Catbalogan at ilang percent po ang mababawas for this project? The proponent po is

requesting for a resource person from the City Government.

REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE PLGU: Kasi po kung ang tinatanong ay city waters of

Catbalogan, hindi po namin masasagot yun, sir, the exact area of the city waters.

SIR SHERWIN: Any representative po from Catbalogan Planning [and Development Office]?

Okay po, we shall ask the preparer na lang po to take note of this question. Another question

po from BFAR, sabi po ni sir: Please clarify, is this a PLGU proposal or from the PRA?

REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE PLGU: Province of Samar initiated and funded po, sir.

SIR SHERWIN: For those raising their hands po, from PRA, Ma’am Christine?


18

MA’AM CHRISTINE: Yung question ko po ay regarding the source of filling material. Saan

po kukunin ang filling material? Parang hindi po nasagot kanina. Request ko na lang po sana

yung ibang information kasi hindi po clear yung audio.

SIR SHERWIN: For the preparer po, kindly take note of this, salamat po. From Sir Marlon

Sale, PFO.

SIR MARLON: Good morning, everyone. By the way, I am Marlon Sale, OIC-PFO ng Province

of Samar. Yung office namin is nasa Catbalogan. Para lang po ma-clarify and additional

information for Sir Rene ng BFAR-CO, last January, Gov. Mike Tan requested BFAR R8 to

conduct a rapid resource assessment sa proposed reclamation area dito sa Catbalogan. Yung

result ng rapid resource assessment, finorward na po sa BFAR-CO, baka po Sir Rene hindi

niyo pa nakikita, last March 2021. Makikita niyo po doon ang coral assessment, yung fish

biodiversity and biomass, nandoon po. Regarding naman po sa registered fisherfolks sa

Barangay Mercedes at Bunuanan, actually kami sa RO, yung available data po ay yung nasa

system, pero mas accurate po kung kukuha tayo ng list of fisherfolks sa City Agriculture

Office ng Catbalogan. Yun ang mas accurate kasi every year yung registration nila.

SIR SHERWIN: For the last question siguro, from Ma’am Anita, from DENR-BMB po.

MA’AM ANITA: Dapat po kasi ang sumasagot sa question sa assessment ay ang proponent,

but then again ay wala na tayong time. But then may comment po dito si sir na nasa EIS

[Report], pero hindi naman kasi lahat ay nakakabasa doon. I think you have to present din, in

a powerpoint presentation, yung assessment na nagawa. At sa source of filling materials,

sinagot naman siya dito, nakalagay sa Catbalogan City. Ang alam ko dapat ito may ECC din.

May ECC din ang area na pagkukuhanan ninyo ng filling materials. Yun lang naman for now.

SIR SHERWIN: We would like to recognize Mr. John Gopez, from the preparer.

ENGR. JOHN: Ma’am Anita, good morning. For the question ng kasamahan natin for BFAR,

nagkaroon po ng rapid resource assessment ang BFAR, as requested by the Provincial

Government, and the result of the assessment was forwarded to Director Bayate. Then again,

the Provincial Government, ni-reinforce po nila ang resource assessment na ginawa ni BFAR;

nagconduct po ng another resource assessment yung preparer. Basically, the methodology na

ginamit po for the benthic lifeforms is yung manta-tow and spot-dive surveys. Based po sa

suggestion po ni Ma’am Anita, we shall include that in the powerpoint presentation para po

mas ma-appreciate ng participants dito sa Public Hearing yung naging resulta po ng

assessment. Tapos sa filling materials naman po, tama po kayo doon na dapat may application

yan ng ECC; but dito po, for this reclamation project, hindi na po namin siya isinama. It will


19

have a separate ECC application. Basically, the coverage of the ECC application is yung

reclamation lang po. Pero yung members po ng Review Committee, pina-include lang po

kung saan ang source of filling material para lang po ma-identify kung saan dadaan yung

mga hauling trucks para po makuhanan namin ng air quality baseline data. We’ll closely

coordinate with the PLGU regarding the matter po, salamat.

SIR SHERWIN: Hindi naman po nagtatapos dito; for those po na may issues or concerns, you

may submit a position paper or send us an email. At this point, I would like to take it upon

myself yung next portion, which is the recap of issues and concerns, for lack of material time.

ENGR. DEXTER: Yes, sir, we can proceed with the recap of issues and concerns. May isa pa

naman po tayong Public Hearing, which is for the Pier 1 Reclamation Project, later po ng 2pm.

SIR SHERWIN: Given there are no more concerns, I move to adjourn the Public Hearing. Are

there any violent reactions po? Given there are none, the Public Hearing is adjourned po at

exactly 12:20 PM.

ENGR. DEXTER: Sir, quick na next steps lang po. Ididiscuss po ito ni Engr. Joel.

ENGR. JOEL: Thank you, Dexter. For our next steps and way forward. Currently we are

already in the conduct of Public Hearing, the proponent has already presented the Mercedes

Reclamation Project. Later po we shall have the one for Pier 1 to Bunuanan Reclamation

Project, considering po na adjacent yung mga lugar kaya we are doing the review

simultaneously. Yung documentation po nito, we shall provide sa ating website; and at the

same time, yung updated po na EIS incorporating the issues and concerns raised during this

Public Hearing para ma-address po nila further. You may visit our website at emb.gov.ph and

kindly click lang po yung “Environmental Impact Assessment”, and look for the “Notice of

Online Public Hearing/Consultation,” and then hanapin niyo lang po yung project na ito,

since andun naman po ang schedules ng lahat ng mga hearing na pinapagawa sa amin ng

aming office. Makikita niyo din po doon ang Revised EIA Report.

Sa mga stakeholders po na hindi naka-join ng ating Public Hearing, kindly send an email and

address it to our director, Engr. William Cunado, and attention to our Division Chief, Engr.

Esperanza Sajul. Our email address is [email protected] and [email protected]. You may

also contact us at (02) 8539 4378 loc. 116. Happy lunch po, and thank you po sa pag-attend

nitong Public Hearing.


20

3 Issues and Concerns raised during the Open Forum

After the presentation of the Project Description and EIA process, an Open Forum was

conducted and was facilitated by Mr. Sherwin Avestruz, Public Hearing Officer, from EMB

Regional Office 8 to maintain the peace and order.

The issues/concerns raised during the open forum are presented verbatim in the tables

below:

3.1 Project Description Table 3.1. Issues and Concerns on Project Description

Issues and Concerns

Sector or Persons who raised the issues/concerns

Proponent response/ DENR response to the issues and

concern

EIS page number

Good morning, meron po bang

private proponent for this

project?

Isabel Calantoc,

DIPH

As of now ay wala tayong

private proponent since the

project is initiated by the


Samar. (Sir Brett, PLGU of

Samar)

Meron na bang contractor for

this project to do the

reclamation? Meron po bang

bidding process?

Isabel Calantoc,

DIPH

Meron pong bidding process

na ginawa dito, at meron na

din po tayong contractor. Pero

ulitin ko lang po, this project is


Samar initiated and funded.

(Engr. Boyet, PLGU of Samar)

If awarded na yung project, may

we know kung sino po yung

contractor to do the reclamation

project?

Isabel Calantoc,

DIPH

Awarded na po siya sa

Northern Builders. [Based po

sila] sa Catarman, Northern

Samar. (Representative of the

PLGU of Samar)

Na-implement na daw po ba o

nagstart na yung project as of

today?

On-site

stakeholder

Kanina po nasagot na ng

UPMO yan, ang ongoing pong

works ay para sa dike. Eto

pong reclamation na ito ay for

implementation pa, at wala

hindi pa pwedeng iimplement

dahil wala pa tayong Notice to

Proceed from PRA at ang ECC.

Kaya po tayo andito ngayon

para sa ECC. Under DPWH po

yung nakikita niyong works sa

ngayon. (Representative of the

PLGU of Samar)


21

Issues and Concerns



concern

EIS page number

Sana ho ma-coordinate ni

proponent sa barangay kung ano

mang activities or related

activities na meron yung project,

especially daw itong

implemented by the DPWH, kasi

for example daw po, eto ngayon

ay hindi nila alam.

On-site

stakeholder

Actually po, nagkaroon kami

recently lang ng Public

Hearing din po para doon sa

works natin. (Representative

of the PLGU of Samar)

Na-coordinate na ba City

Government of Catbalogan?

On-site

stakeholder

Sa question po ninyo kung

nagcoordinate ba sa City

[Government], nag-coordinate

po tayo; meron po silang

representative na present sa

meeting na ito at meron din po

kaming nirequest sa kanila na

No Objection Resolution para

sa project na ito. Isa po yun sa

mga requirements na hinihingi.

(Atty. Allan, PLGU of Samar)

Please clarify, is this a PLGU

proposal or from the PRA?

BFAR FRMD Province of Samar initiated

and funded po, sir.

(Representative from the

PLGU of Samar)

Saan po kukunin ang filling

material?

Ma’am Christine On-site po, sa Catbalogan City.


3.2 Land

Table 3.2. Issues and Concerns on Land

Issues and Concerns



concern

EIS page number

My next question ay doon sa

pinresent kanina ni Ar. Gascon,

about the masterplan. Kasi she

mentioned about the open space

and green space. Included po ba

ang mga road sa kanyang

computation?

Irereiterate lang po namin ang

policy ng PRA, AO 2019-05,

requiring all proposed

reclamation na magkaroon ng

Sir Mark John

Pineda, PRA

The green and open space

computation includes all roads,

retention ponds, and

esplanade. (Ar. Berlin, Two

Eco)


22

Issues and Concerns



concern

EIS page number

5% open space. Excluded po

dyan ang roads sa green space.

You can check po our policy

para sa provision na yan.

There was some mention of the

connecting bridge from the

reclamation site at sa road. Was

that part of the development?

Na-cover din ba siya ng

application ng ECC?

Sir Mark John

Pineda, PRA

As of now, hindi pa siya nasali

sa application namin for ECC

kasi yung project pa lang po

natin na gagawin at ang

priority is the reclamation.

Kung meron na po kaming

pondo, then yun po yung time

na mag-aapply kami for

another ECC for the separate

project. (Sir Brett, PLGU of

Samar)

Hindi po kakailangain ang

bridge sa pagtambak? Kasi po

land-based ang quarry natin.

Sir Mark John

Pineda, PRA

Yes po. Yung bridge po

required lang siya para maka-

connect ang Mercedes to the

other proposed reclamation

site, which is located sa Pier 1

to Bunuanan. (Sir Brett, PLGU

of Samar)

Nakita ko po sa mapa na

malawak pa ang land area ng

Catbalogan. So bakit po

magrereclaim e malawak naman

ang area? Magkukumpulan tayo

dito sa coastal area na maraming

masisira na marine resources at

maapektuhan ang communities.

Pwede pong pakipaliwanag sa

aming lahat kung bakit

kailangan natin magreclaim e

hindi pa naman po siksikan

kagaya sa Maynila?

Sir Rene Zaldy

Porlaje, BFAR-CO

Ang structure po ng

Catbalogan, mula po sa

shoreline, hindi po aabot ng

isang kilometro ay bundok na

kaagad. So yung bundok po na

yun, mas mahirap po tanggalin

yun kesa mag-reclaim. Kung

andito po kayo sa Catbalogan,

makikita niyo po na yung

inexplain niyo ngayon na

malawak ang Catbalogan City,

hindi po yun tugma in a way na

ang Catbalogan po ay bundok-

bundok, hindi po pwedeng i-

develop kaagad. So etong

option po namin ay

reclamation, which is allowed

naman po sa batas. So kung ang

sinasabi po ninyo ay mas

madaling i-develop ang sa

bundok, hindi po kami agree

doon, sir, dahil kung nakikita

po ninyo ang topography dito

ay bundok po talaga.


23

Issues and Concerns



concern

EIS page number

(Representative from the PLGU

of Samar)

Saan po kukunin ang filling

materials for this project?

Ms. Nikka Oquias, Oceana

Ma’am, the source of fill

materials would be on-site po.


3.3 Water

Table 3.3. Issues and Concerns on Water

Issues and Concerns



concerns

EIS Page Number

May cost-benefit analysis ba na

ginawa for this project looking

into its long-term effects on the

fragile marine ecosystem and

the livelihood of the fisherfolks?

Ms. Nikka

Oquias, Oceana

Yes po, may ginawa pong cost-

benefit analysis for this project.

(Von, Envia Consultancy)

Na-delineate na po ba ang

Catbalogan City, ang kanila

pong city waters? Na-mapa na

po ba ito ng NAMRIA?

Sir Rene Zaldy

Porlaje, BFAR-CO

Hindi po natin masasagot yan

sir, kung na-delineate na ang

city waters ng Catbalogan,

pero I can assure you na ang

coverage ng project is well

within the waters ng

Catbalogan. Whether or not

may delineation po yun ay

hindi po affected ang nearby

municipal waters. (Engr. Boyet,

PLGU of Samar)

Kaya ko po natanong ay kasi 35

hectares po itong project,

maapektuhan po ang municipal

waters, mag-eextend po siya

kasi shoreline po ang ating

baseline. Paano po ma-resolve

ang issue na ito?

Sir Rene Zaldy

Porlaje, BFAR-CO

The definition of the municipal

waters is that its coverage is

measured at 90 degrees from

the shoreline, 15 kilometers

outward. So, our reclamation

project is less than 1 kilometer.

What can I say is that it is well

within the municipal waters of

Catbalogan City. (Engr.

Diomedes, PRA)

Gusto ho malaman kung ano

ang plano nila para sa

waterways, kasi po affected daw

sila ng flooding even before the

implementation of the

reclamation project.

On-site

stakeholder

Ito pong project na ito ay isa sa

ginawa para maiwasan yung

current flooding sa Mercedes.

Kung napansin po ninyo

kanina, mayroon po doon sa

plano na mga waterways,

tapos yung tubig po doon ay

mapupunta sa isang water


24

Issues and Concerns



concerns

EIS Page Number

pump. Mayroon po tayong

consultants na nagstudy kung

ano po ang current status ng

flooding doon para ma-

incorporate siya sa project.


Nakakasigurado ba ang project

na hindi magagaya ang

Barangay Mercedes sa mga

nangyaring baha sa Malabon?

On-site

stakeholder

Yung pagtatagpo po ng highest

level ng lupa at tubig, yun po

ay act of God. Pero

sinisigurado po ng Province na

gagawin po namin lahat ng

precautionary measures para

hindi mangyari yung

pagbabaha ngayon sa

Malabon. Kung sakali mang

dumating yung panahon na

magbaha pa din, hindi po natin

mapipigilan yun kasi ang ulan

ay hindi po natin hawak. Pero

yung project po natin ay may

ginagawang mga study,

kasama po doon ang drainage

improvement, master

development plan upang

matanggal ang problema sa

pagbaha. Ang magagawa lang

po natin ay gawing leksyon

kung ano man ang nangyayari

sa Malabon para ma-apply

natin dito upang maiwasan

yun. (Representative from the

PLGU of Samar)

Ang maisasagot ko po, sa part

ng DPWH, ay yung tide

embankment po na ginagawa

natin ay nagkaroon po ng

study sa Bureau of Design na

naka-design po siya na kahit

magkaroon po ng storm surge

o di kaya ay highest tide na

sinasabi ninyo, naka-design po

siya na i-withstand po yung

ganung klaseng sakuna.

Pagkatapos po nitong coastal

dike, may proposed po ang


25

Issues and Concerns



concerns

EIS Page Number

DPWH doon po sa pumping

stations. Ang mangyayari po

doon, ang magiging mechanics

po ng pumping station, kapag

nagkaroon po ng baha sa

reclamation area, i-pupump

out po ng pumping station

yung tubig palabas para lahat

po ng tubig na ma-iimpound

doon sa loob ay mailabas po.

Actually po yung coastal dike

po natin ay naka-design siya

para sa 50-year return period,

ibig sabihin po ay doon po sa 50

years na yun, more or less ay

kaya niya i-withstand ang mga

phenomena na pwede

mangyari. (Representative

from DPWH)

Ilan po ba ang total area ng city

waters ng Catbalogan at ilang

percent po ang mababawas for

this project? The proponent po

is requesting for a resource

person from the City

Government.

Sir Rene Zaldy

Porlaje, BFAR-CO

We shall ask the preparer na

lang po to take note of this

question. (Sir Sherwin, EMB)

Para lang po ma-clarify and

additional information for Sir

Rene ng BFAR-CO, last

January, Gov. Mike Tan

requested BFAR R8 to conduct

a rapid resource assessment sa

proposed reclamation area dito

sa Catbalogan. Yung result ng

rapid resource assessment,

finorward na po sa BFAR-CO,

baka po Sir Rene hindi niyo pa

nakikita, last March 2021.

Makikita niyo po doon ang

coral assessment, yung fish

biodiversity and biomass,

nandoon po. (Sir Marlon,

PLGU of Samar)

I think you have to present din,

in a powerpoint presentation,

yung assessment na nagawa. At

sa source of filling materials,

sinagot naman siya dito,

nakalagay sa Catbalogan City.

Ma’am Anita,

DENR-BMB

For the question ng kasamahan

natin for BFAR, nagkaroon po

ng rapid resource assessment

ang BFAR, as requested by the

Provincial Government, and

the result of the assessment


26

Issues and Concerns



concerns

EIS Page Number

Ang alam ko dapat ito may ECC

din. May ECC din ang area na

pagkukuhanan ninyo ng filling

materials.

was forwarded to Director

Bayate. Then again, the

Provincial Government, ni-

reinforce po nila ang resource

assessment na ginawa ni BFAR;

nagconduct po ng another

resource assessment yung

preparer. Basically, the

methodology na ginamit po for

the benthic lifeforms is yung

manta-tow and spot-dive

surveys. Based po sa

suggestion po ni Ma’am Anita,

we shall include that in the

powerpoint presentation para

po mas ma-appreciate ng

participants dito sa Public

Hearing yung naging resulta

po ng assessment. Tapos sa

filling materials naman po,

tama po kayo doon na dapat

may application yan ng ECC;

but dito po, for this reclamation

project, hindi na po namin siya

isinama. It will have a separate

ECC application. Basically, the

coverage of the ECC

application is yung reclamation

lang po. Pero yung members

po ng Review Committee,

pina-include lang po kung saan

ang source of filling material

para lang po ma-identify kung

saan dadaan yung mga hauling

trucks para po makuhanan

namin ng air quality baseline

data. We’ll closely coordinate

with the PLGU regarding the

matter po, salamat. (Engr. John,

Envia Consultancy)


27

3.4 People Table 3.4. Issues and Concerns on People

Issues and Concerns



concerns

EIS Page Number

My question is paano yung mga

kagaya namin na affected ng

project?

Raul, Vice

Chairman of an

organization of

fisherfolks

As presented po by Ar. Gascon

kanina, magkakaroon po tayo

ng fisherman’s village, yung

color orange. Maglalagay po

tayo ng area ng market para sa

mga fresh catch natin. Actually

po sir, magkausap kami ni Sir

Gerry, at magcocoordinate po

kami para ma-address ang

concern ni sir regarding the

project. (Sir Brett)

Ano po ba ang plano ng project

proponent during construction

para sa mga madidisplace o

maapektuhan ng trabaho? Saan

po pupunta yung mga

madidisplace na fishermen

temporarily, habang kino-

construct?

On-site

stakeholder

Kung mapapansin niyo po sa

presentation kanina, hindi po

siya one-time big-time na

gagawin lahat. We shall be

doing this po phase by phase.


Okay, to answer your question,

sir, hindi naman po lahat ay

matatambakan. Sabi nga po si

Atty. Allan, by phasing po

itong projects. So ang ginagawa

po ni contractor ay ito po

munang sa isang side; at

ongoing po ang aming

assessment para po sa right-of-

way. Hindi naman po

matatambakan ito, so pwede

po sa part na yun. (Engr. Jun,

DPWH)

Meron po kaya kayong listahan

ng fisherfolks na maapektuhan?

Tsaka kasama ang kanilang mga

bangka? Pwede po kami

makakuha ng listahan?

Sir Rene Zaldy

Porlaje, BFAR-CO

Yes sir, meron po kaming

listahan from BFAR R8, kasi

prior to our request sa DENR-

EMB for the ECC Clearance,

humingi tayo ng certification

from BFAR. Nagconduct po

ang BFAR-RO ng assessment,

validation, and thankfully ang

recommendation nila is okay

to construct the reclamation

project. Kung wala po kayong

kopya sir, bibigyan namin


28

Issues and Concerns



concerns

EIS Page Number

kayo. Thank you. (Sir Brett,

PLGU of Samar)

May cost-benefit analysis ba na

ginawa for this project looking

into its long-term effects on the

fragile marine ecosystem and

the livelihood of the fisherfolks?

Ms. Nikka

Oquias, Oceana

Yes po, may ginawa pong cost-

benefit analysis for this project.

(Von, Envia Consultancy)

Yung mga residents daw from

the Barangay Mercedes are

worried na baka sila ay maisali

sa reclamation proponent.

Nanghihingi po si sir ng

response or comment from the

proponent.

On-site

stakeholder

Kagaya po ng sinabi ko kanina

sir, yung mga residente po

dito, whether legal or illegal,

hindi po sila kasama sa project

na ito. So kung ano po ang

inookupahan nila dun ngayon,

ay sasagutin nila sa PRA. Pero

hindi po sila sakop sa area ng

project na ito. So kung may

pag-aalala po sila sir, siguro po

dapat ay makipagcoordinate

na sila sa PRA tulad ng na-

discuss natin kanina at yung

discussion ng CENRO at PRA

regarding pending

applications. Thank you po.


3.5 Other Concerns Table 3.5. Issues and Concerns Raised (Others)

Issues and Concerns Sector or Persons

who raised the issues/concerns


concerns

EIS Page Number

Ano daw po ang magiging

status ng occupancy ng mga

existing land owners on the

area which will be affected

by this proposed

reclamation? Yung mga

nagreclaim na daw po, kasi

meron na daw pong

nagreclaim.

On-site stakeholder Yung mga private individuals na

nagreclaim na, hindi po yun

kasama dito sa project na ito.

PRA po ang may jurisdiction sa

private individuals na

nagreclaim na; pero sa tanong

niyo po ay magiging ano ang

status ng area na nireclaim nila,

hindi po namin masasagot iyon

dahil hindi po namin sakop yun.

Outside po iyan sa area of this

project. (Atty. Rambano, PLGU

of Samar)


29

That’s true – existing and

unauthorized reclamations in the

area will be under the

jurisdiction of PRA. We intend to

undertake a survey of these

illegal reclamations in Mercedes.

The survey and the Presidential

Proclamation that will be

secured by PRA will cover the

entire area that is illegally

reclaimed. The occupants or

reclaimers can avail of the

existing policy of PRA on how to

legally acquire the ownership of

these reclaimed lands. That’s all.

(Engr. Diomedes Tan, PRA)

May concern lang po ako

since na-mention po kanina

na sa reclamation, ang in

charge po doon ay PRA. So,

ang concern ko lang po ay

anong mangyayari sa may

existing foreshore lease

application sa office that

are still pending due to lack

of certification from DPWH

and CPDO since na-deny

ang mga

application/certification

nila since may proposed

yung Province natin for the

reclamation. Although

matagal na kasi yung ibang

application doon sa table

namin, hindi kasi namin

siya maproprocess because

of that lack of certification.

Itatanong ko lang sana

kung pwede na ba namin

ma-proceed yung

processing o kailangan po

bang pending muna yun?

Ma’am Cherry

Grace Ungab,

CENRO

Our advice to the DENR-CENRO

is that applications should be

held in abeyance because PRA is

going to apply for the titling and

ownership of those reclaimed

lands, in behalf of the national

government. That’s the law, and

that’s the existing policy of the

PRA. So, the applicant that can

claim the ownership of those

reclaimed lands will be the PRA.

We’ll just be complicating the

process if DENR will have to

act/approve those applications

for foreshore lease agreement,

because at the end, PRA is going

to apply for Presidential

Proclamation for those reclaimed

lands, and PRA is going to ask

DENR to exclude those areas for

the tenurial instrument, so that

the survey plan of those areas

can be approved in favor of the

PRA. Maybe CENRO can

process an irrevocable permit

application, which is one-year

renewable to legalize the

occupancy of the people residing

in those areas.

(Engr. Diomedes, PRA)


30

Figure 4.1. Affidavit of Publication

4 Annexes

4.1 Proof of Newspaper Publications


31

Figure 4.3. Proof of second publication

Figure 4.2. Proof of first publication


32

4.2 Received Invitation Letters

Figure 4.4. Received Invitation Letter-Poblacion 1


33

Figure 4.5. Received Invitation Letter-City Mayor


34

Figure 4.6. Received Invitation Letter-DTI


35

Figure 4.7. Received Invitation Letter-DOT


36



37

Figure 4.9. Received Invitation Letter-BFAR Region 8


38

Figure 4.10. Received Invitation Letter-PPA/PMO Eastern Leyte/Samar


39



40

Figure 4.12. Received Invitation Letter-PPA


41



42

Figure 4.14. Received Invitation Letter-DPWH Regional Office 8


43

Figure 4.15. Received Invitation Letter-Samar State University


44

Figure 4.16. Received Invitation Letter-Business Group in Catbalogan City


45

Figure 4.17. Received Invitation Letter-District Representative


46

Figure 4.18. Received Invitation Letter-Two Eco, Inc.


47



48

Figure 4.20. Received Invitation Letter-Samar Chamber of Commerce and Industry


49

Figure 4.21. Received Invitation Letter-Philippine Reclamation Authority


50



51

Figure 4.23. Received Invitation Letter-GIOS-Samar, Inc.


52

Figure 4.24. Received Invitation Letter-PENRO


53

Figure 4.25. Received Invitation Letter-PCG


54

Figure 4.26. Received Invitation Letter-CENRO


55

4.3 Presentation during the Public Hearing


56


57


58


59

Date post:	27-Nov-2023
Category:	Documents
Upload:	khangminh22
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

EIS for the Proposed Barangay Mercedes Reclamation Project

Documents