HEC SUNT CONSUETUDINES, PRIVILEGIA
AC ORDINATIONES CIVITATIS BALAGARII:
THE LEGAL BACKGROUND OF LLEIDA
AS A BASE FOR THE LOCAL LAW OF THE CITY
OF BALAGUER (13TH
-15TH
CENTURIES).
A LINGUISTIC APPROACH1
ROBERT CUELLAS CAMPODARBE UNIVERSITAT DE LLEIDA
Introduction
In the field of municipal law in medieval Catalonia, the new law of the
city of Lleida emerged very early, just after the Christian conquest in the
mid-Twelfth Century,2 the first real city law in its own right that was put
in writing, and which would become one of the primary and fundamental
sources of Catalan law.3
Normally, the law is summed up in three generic sections – tam
canonico quam civili aut municipali et cuicumque consuetudini, scripte et
1 The following study forms part of the PhD thesis project, Corpus pergaminorum civitatis Balagarii. El testimoni documental de la puixança medieval i la decadència moderna d’una ciutat catalana, directed by Dr. Flocel Sabaté and funded through PhD grants awarded by the Vicerectorat de Recerca at the Universitat de Lleida (UdL), during the period from 2013 to 2016. Abbreviations used: ACL, Arxiu Capitular de Lleida; ACN, Arxiu Comarcal de la Noguera;
ACUR, Arxiu Comarcal de l’Urgell; AML, Arxiu Municipal de Lleida; BC, Biblioteca de Catalunya; BN, Biblioteca Nacional. 2 Flocel Sabaté, Història de Lleida. Alta Edat Mitjana (Lleida: Pagès Editors, 2003), pp. 215-291. 3 Josep Serrano, “La projecció del dret de Lleida”, Revista de Dret Històric Català, 3 (2004), p. 233.
Robert Cuellas Campodarbe
167
non scripte –4 in which the capacities of local governments and others do
not depend on a jurisdictional assignment, and a description of its contents
includes, perfectly naturally, the element defined as municipal. In turn, in
a field that involves all entities under full baronial jurisdiction, the law is
summed up by citing iuribus communibus et municipalibus.5
Custom, instituted as a new element of legislative nature, appears as
one of the essential sources of general territorial law, but is also the basis
of the new municipal and stately rights that arise and which, together,
make up the juridical system of our territory.6
Consequently, even though the challenges and new stimuli developed
througout the feudalism involved many problems that cannot find a solution in the traditional codes, legally the Visigoth law continued been
still used and invoked until the twelfth century.7 There were, however,
many issues that should be resolved through a specific focus on
applications and usages, which in the county of Barcelona led to a new
code, the Usatici Barcinone.8 In the case of the city of Lleida, one can
understand how this process of fixation of own law began in 1228, when
the consul Guillem Botet9 arranged aliquantulam operam, ut
consuetudines civitatis varias et diversas in unum colligerem et scriptis
4 ACUR, Fons Municipal de Tàrrega, Llibre de Privilegis III, unit: T1-3, f. 89v; Gener Gonzalvo, Josep Hernando, Flocel Sabaté, Max Turull and Pere Verdés, Els llibres de privilegis de Tàrrega (Barcelona: Fundació Noguera, 1997), p. 383 (doc. n. 202). 5 ACN, Fons Ajuntament de Balaguer, Pergamins de Privilegis, n. 25, unit: 2025, 111, 00 X 64, 50 cm; Dolors Domingo, Pergamins de Privilegis de la ciutat de Balaguer (Lleida: Edicions de la Universitat de Lleida-Institut d’Estudis Ilerdencs,
1997), p. 111 (doc. n. 25). 6 Joan Egea and Josep M. Gay, “Eficàcia de les normes a la tradició jurídica catalana des de la baixa edat mitjana fins al decret de nova planta”, Revista Jurídica de Catalunya, 2-3 (1979), pp. 249-294. 7 Flocel Sabaté, “Evolución del sistema judicial”, La feudalización de la sociedad catalana (Granada: Universidad de Granada, 2007), p. 87. 8 Aquilino Iglesia, “De Usaticis quomodo inventi fuerunt”, Initium: Revista Catalana d’Història del Dret, 6 (2001), pp. 25-212; Aquilino Iglesia, “The birth of the Usatici”, Imago Temporis. Medium Aevum, 5 (2011), pp. 119-134. 9 On the figure of Guillem Botet and his work, see: Antonio Hernández, “El régimen dotal en las ‘Consuetudines Ilerdenses’ de Guillermo Botet”, Ilerda, 3/2 (1945), pp. 5-17; Antonio Hernández, El derecho civil en las “Consuetudines Ilerdenses” de Guillermo Botet (Lleida: Gráficas Larrosa, 1985); Ferran Valls-Taberner, Las “Consuetudines Ilerdenses” y su autor Guillem Botet (Barcelona: without publisher, 1913).
The Legal Background of Lleida
168
comprehenderem, ut aufferretur quibusdam occasio malignandi, qui
quando erat pro eis consuetudo et esse consuetudinem affirmabant.10
Thanks to the embodiment of this first code and its projection over the
lands of new Catalonia and those to the north of the kingdom of Valencia,
custom became one of the primary sources in the configuration of
municipal law in the Catalan region.
1. The Llibre Verd Petit of the city of Lleida
The codex known as the Llibre Verd Petit of the city of Lleida11
contains, in leaves 69r-92v, the oldest collection of text available, that of
Consuetudines Ilerde,12
that, at least, forms part of the set that is appraised
on the back of the same manuscript, where we read: Privilegis, statuts e
ordinacions de la ciutat de Lleida. Anys 1299 a 1413.
The reading of the customs of Lleida,13 where we find contained the
origins of the different institutions of public and private law of the city,
brings the various problems of everyday life in this city to us and its
corresponding regulations through the drafting of a series of chapters, distinguished perfectly thanks to a series of individual rubrics in a
different colour to the text.
2. The Llibre de Costums, Privilegis i Ordinacions
of the city of Balaguer
The compilation of Balaguer’s own law, written at an uncertain date,14
passes through the creation of a codex that adds several conceptual
10 AML, Fons Municipal de Lleida, Llibre Verd Petit, unit: 1376, f. 69. 11 AML, Fons Municipal de Lleida, Llibre Verd Petit, unit: 1376. 12 Despite not having the original thirteenth century manuscript, there are five copies preserved from between the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries: ACL, cupboard L, drawer M (14th century); BN, ms. 865 (14th century); BC, ms. 483 (14th century); BC, ms. 702 (15th century); AML, Fons municipal de Lleida, Llibre Verd Petit, unit: 1376. 13 We take as a basis for our study the superb critical edition by: Pilar Loscertales, Costumbres de Lérida (Barcelona: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Barcelona, 1946). 14 Robert Cuellas, El “Llibre de Costums, Privilegis i Ordinacions” de la ciutat de Balaguer (Lleida: Publicacions i Edicions de la Universitat de Lleida, 2012), pp. 71-73.
Robert Cuellas Campodarbe
169
categories15 which, in turn, refer to a central point: the articulation of the
city of Balaguer as a municipality.16
The manuscript, created with a clear practical purpose, concentrates,
throughout the 68 pages of which it is made, all those elements that were
necessary to prevent new conflicts over the city's law, as it is stipulated at
the moment in which the magistrates of Balaguer utile visum est hic illa
ponere, inserere et manifestare, in simul congregata et sub verbis
brevibus, concludere ea que in multis cartis et aliis diversi mode erant
sparsa.17
The juxtaposition of the various elements which make up this code –
which are perfectly encompassed by the epigraph [...] consuetudines et privilegia hac ordinaciones civitatis Balagarii –18 become the result of a
clear fixation on the paradigm of the Lleidatan text, if we consider, for
example, the relationship of geographic vicinity or political relations of the
two cities.
3. A comparison of two sources of medieval municipal law
The former local law of the city of Balaguer; a sample of which is
enclou al seu torn unes proporcions modestes en la seva extensió i sense
massa personalitat en el seu contingut,19 is presented as a clara selección,
adaptación y ajuste20 of the text drafted by the consul from Lleida,
Guillem Botet, in the first half of the Thirteenth Century.
15 Just as the Llibre Verd Petit of the city of Lleida, the Llibre de Costums, Privilegis i Ordinacions of the city of Balaguer brings together a diverse selection of privileges granted by the Counts of Urgell and the Kings of Aragon and the ordinances of the market, dictated by the municipal government of the city. 16 Flocel Sabaté, “Reivindicació de la ciutat de Balaguer com a municipi medieval”, El “Llibre de Costums, Privilegis i Ordinacions” de la ciutat de Balaguer, p. 11. 17 ACN, Fons Ajuntament de Balaguer, “Llibre de Costums, Privilegis i Ordinacions” o “Llibre dels Juraments” de la ciutat de Balaguer [1300]-1435, unit: 3070, f. 11r. 18 General rubric encompassing the content of the entire codex. ACN, Fons Ajuntament de Balaguer, “Llibre de Costums, Privilegis i Ordinacions” o “Llibre dels Juraments” de la ciutat de Balaguer [1300]-1435, unit: 3070, f. 11r. 19 “encloses in its turn modest proportions in its extension and without much personality in its content” (Josep Maria Font, “L’antic dret local de Balaguer”, Els grans espais baronials a l’edat mitjana. Desenvolupament socioeconòmic, ed. by Flocel Sabaté [Lleida: Pagès Editors, 2002], p. 83). 20 “clear selection, adaptation and adjustment” (Josep Maria Font, “El antiguo derecho local de la ciudad de Balaguer”, Estudis sobre els drets i institucions
The Legal Background of Lleida
170
The juridical colouration offered by these procedural or civil nature
precepts, adds to other customary chapters which also are adjusted, for
direct affiliation, to the family from Lleida,21 which allows us to
understand the great influence of this text in the configuration of
legislative codes elsewhere.
The intensity of the relationship between the two texts which occupy
this study can be assessed in the sense that, of the 22 chapters that make up
the text of the code of Balaguer reproduced here, 32 have a close
relationship with the wording of Lleida,22 either by content, syntactic
structure or affiliation of the respective precepts.
Cases which allow us to see firsthand these similarities are the following:23
Customs of the city of Balaguer
Customs of the city of Lleida
De minoribus etate
Statuerunt, insuper, paciarii cum con-
siliariis et assensu hominum civitatis
predicte quod minor XXVe annis qui
vicesimum annum perfecerit, non
restituantur ut minor, set pro maiore XXVe annis in litibus et aliis omnibus
censeatur.
De minoribus
Item, idem consules hanc consue-
tudinem firmaverunt: Quod minor
XXVe annis a XIIII annis comple-
tis non restituatur racione minoris
etatis, set pro maiori XXVe anno-rum in omnibus habeatur.
locals en la Catalunya medieval [Barcelona: Publicacions i Edicions de la
Universitat de Barcelona, 1985], p. 225). 21 The main cases, all related to the legal background screening of Lleida, demonstrate to us the importance of having taken this text as a basis: Arcadi Garcia, “Las ‘Consuetudines Ilerdenses’ y los ‘Furs de València’”, Boletín de la Sociedad Castellonense de Cultura, 41 (1956), pp. 1-26; J. L. Garriga, “Diferències entre les ‘Consuetudines Ilerdenses’ i les d’Horta i Miravet”, Miscel·lània Borrell i Soler (Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans, 1962), pp. 183-188; Ana María Barrero, “Las costumbres de Lérida, Horta y Miravet”, Anuario de Historia del Derecho Español, 4 (1974), pp. 485-536; Josep Maria Font, “El
antiguo derecho local de la ciudad de Balaguer”, pp. 207-278. 22 In this regard, the division into chapters that appears in the case of code of Balaguer and the division into rubrics found in the case of Lleida are continued. 23 In this present comparative study we omit the fragments of text referring to laws relating to paeria, given that they have already been studied in: Robert Cuellas, El “Llibre de Costums, Privilegis i Ordinacions” de la ciutat de Balaguer, pp. 45-51.
Robert Cuellas Campodarbe
171
De foro competenti
De quolibet potest homine querimonia
proponi sub curia Balagarii, si inveni-
antur. Ibidem licet sit alterius fori, cle-
ricis, religiosis, rem ad censum tenen-
tibus et illis qui conveniuntur de pos-
sessione in alio territorio constituta ac
aliis qui sub alia curia sunt conventi,
dumtaxat exceptis. Milites, autem, licet ibi inveniantur,
nisi racione delicti, domicilii seu con-
tractus aut rei, de qua contra eos cau-
sa movetur, hic iudicium suscipere
non cogantur, set querelator, vicinus
noster, si debitum fuerit liquidum,
bona eorum que ibi habuerint poterit
pignorare, nisi ibi iustitiam facere
sint parati.
Si qui plura tenuerint, de franquitate quam de feudataria, cum conveniun-
tur, firment directum in posse maioris
domini.
Si, vero, plura tenuerint, de feudata-
ria quam de franquitate in posse
castllani firmabunt.
De franquitate sunt hec:
De his qui sub curia ilerdensis
tenentur respondere vel non
[...] Sub curia huius civitatis tene-
tur quilibet respondere, dummodo
hic inveniatur. Non obstante, eo
quod sit de alio loco vel foro, nisi
sit clericus vel religiosus vel is qui
ad censum tenet [...] possessio in
alio territorio constituta vel is qui
in alia curia firmat directum [...]. Miles, vero, cogitur respondere
sub curia huius civitatis, racione
contractus hic initi vel dampni
dati nobis vel rebus nostris, alias
non cogitur illati hic vel extra, set
conquerens potest eum pignorare.
With no correspondence.
De libelli oblacione
Si de VII solidis aut infra querimonia
exposita fuerit, libellus hic non offer-tur, sed sufficit simpliciter dicere:
“De tali conqueror qui ex tali causa
michi tantum debet”.
De proponendo
Non offertur hic libellus, set actor
viva voce proponit iudici quod in libello erat proponendum.
De conquerente
Cum, autem, quis conqueritur, de
aliquo debet persona nominare et
rem quam petit.
The Legal Background of Lleida
172
De iuramento calupnie
Non prestatur hic de calumpnie iura-
mentum.
De ius iurando
Non iuratur hic de calumpnia, nisi
in casibus supradictis [...].
De dilacionibus
Reus potest, si voluerit, in continenti
respondere libello, alioquin dabitur
trium dierum dilacio et, ex tunc,
ducatur causa de tercia in terciam diem. Et si actor extraneus fuerit, ute-
tur iure vicini, set, si reus fuerit
extraneus non dabitur actori licencia
negocium pro trahendi, set ducetur de
die in diem, nisi gracia testium vel
instrumentorum dilaciones sibi con-
cedende fuerint longiores.
De indutiis
Reus, si statim, vult respondere
querimonie facte potest. Sin, autem,
habet inducias trium dierum. Dein-
de, de tercio in tercium diem trac-tatur causa et ad vanandum, etiam,
datur dilacio trium dierum, nisi gra-
tia auctoris longe manentis dilacio
maior petatur, secundum modera-
men locorum vel gratia testium vel
instrumentorum vel alterius iuste
cause.
Si, vero, actor sit extraneus, utetur
iure vicini, set, si reus fuerit extra-
neus non datur auctori licencia
differendi, set tractatur causa de die
in diem, nisi gratia auctoris vel testium vel instrumentorum.
De feriis humanis
De feriis habemus duos menses,
iunium pro messibus, septembrem
pro vindemiis, si lis non fuerit con-
testata, lite, enim, contestata predicte
ferie denegantur.
De eodem
Item, differtur causa gratia mes-
sium et vindemiarum ante litem
sive sit rustici sive alterius, set, si
sit cepta, non differtur propter
tempora statim dicta.
De feriis divinis
Molendina non molent a die sabbati,
post pulsacionem vesperorum usque
ad diem dominicam pulsatis vesperis,
alioquin molendinarius amittat unam
De molendinis
Molendinum non molat in die
sabbati pulsantibus vesperis usque
in diem dominicam in pulsacione
vesperarum. Sin, autem, constet
Robert Cuellas Campodarbe
173
fanequam mixture pro pena. molendinario illam fanecam bladi
quam in sabbato accipere debet.
De dolo et contumacia
Si conventus hic non inveniatur, bona
eius cum inveniantur creditore ins-
tante, iudex non debet bona illa em-
parare et sufficientem terminum eo-
rum domino assignare, ut venit.
Eciam, si sit miles et querimonie res-pondeat et, si non venerit vel se iuste
non excusaverit, iudex debet tradere
querelanti, si iustam causam habuerit,
tantum de bonis debitoris quod suffi-
ciat peticioni eiusdem recepta.
Tamen, primitus a querelante fideius-
soriam cautionem quod quandocum-
que dominus rerum illarum venerit,
faciat eidem de bonis illis iusticie
complementum.
Faticha domini maioris est X solidos,
castllani, autem, quinque.
De eodem super conquerente
Si, autem, res debitoris vel
fideiussoris hic invenintur me de
debitore illo conquerente debet iu-
dex eas emparare et tempus com-
petens assignare, ut dominus re-
rum veniat et respondeat conque-renti. Etiam et si miles, quod, si
non venerit vel iuste se non excu-
saverit, hostendet curie conque-
rens ius suum et, si summatim, vi-
derit iudex actorem bonam cau-
sam habere, tradet ei de rebus illis
iuste extimatis, si suffecerint iuxta
petiti debiti quantitatem.
Prestita, tamen, ab actore idonea
caucione quod quandocumque do-
minus rerum illarum venerit, faciat eis de rebus illis iusitcie
complementum.
With no correspondence.
De testibus
Testes qui nominati fuerint, veritate
quam noverint dicere compellantur.
De testibus
Numquam mulieres ad testimonium
admittuntur nisi in his que in balneis
feminarum fiunt. Non coguntur testes nisi se promi-
serint probaturos vel nisi in cartis
scripti inveniatur vel nisi eligan-
tur, ut sint testes et, tunc, congun-
tur vel iurabunt se nichil scire.
The Legal Background of Lleida
174
De presumpcionibus
Cum quis in testem producitur nisi ab
inicio expressum sit quod in presum-
cione producitur non facit, postea,
presumpcionem.
Ita, quod iuramentum producenti de-
feratur, set presumcio unius boni et
honesti testis admittatur, cum iura-
mento actoris usque ad summam XX
solidorum.
De presumptionibus
Quando producitur testis nisi ex-
presum fuerit quod pro presump-
cione producitur.
Non faciet, postea, presumpcio-
nem ille testis.
Ita, quod deferatur producenti ius
iurandum.
Admittitur, autem, presumpcio
unius testis, cum iuramento suo et
producentis usque ad summam centum solidorum tantum.
De iure iurando
Iuramentum a parte parti delatum nisi
iusta de causa recusari non posse uti-
mur, si pars cui delatum est illud
referre poterit, si viderit deferendum.
With no correspondence.
De prescripcionibus
Prescripcionibus trium, X vel XX
annorum non utimur, set solis XXX
et XL annorum prescripcionibus.
De prescripcionem temporis
Prescripcione usucapione triennii
vel X vel XX annorum non uti-
mur, set XXXª annorum.
De sentenciis et cuius expense fieri
debent
Non oportet in scriptis sentenciam
ferri in causa que sit usque ad VII
solidos vel infra. Sufficit, enim quod iudex eam referat et si aliqua partium
voluerit eam in scriptis habere, iudex
faciat eam scribi.
Primam difinitivam sentenciam ex-
pensis propriis fert curia seu baiulus
De sentenciis
Non est necesse quod sentencia
feratur in scriptis, set sufficit quod
iudex dicat eam et, si qua parcium voluerit eam in scriptis habere, fa-
ciat eam scribi iudex.
Robert Cuellas Campodarbe
175
Balagarii et, si ab ea fuerit appella-
tum a principio, ambe partes conve-
niant de salario cum iudice appella-
tionis et victus victori in causis
appellacionis condempnabitur in ex-
pensis.
With no correspondence.
De expensis in lite factis
In causis negociorum principalium, victor victori in expensis non con-
dempnatur. In excepcionibus dilato-
riis aut peremptoriis sive aliis quibus-
cumque in negociis principalibus
propositis non fit condempnacio ex-
ceptis excepcionibus spoliacionis et
excomunicationibus, in quibus, si
pars eas apponens vel earum altera
non probaverit infra terminos a iure
statutos condempnetur parti alteri in
expensis, quas diebus illis se fecisse iuraverit, tatxacione iudicis preceden-
te.
De expensis non restituendis
Si quis defuerit cause sue sive semel sive pluries audientur,
postea, sine dacione impensarum
et victus victori non condempna-
tur in expensis.
De pignoribus
Creditor, qui aliqua tenet pignori
obligata, teneat illa per spacium X
dierum, quibus transactos potest illa
tradere cursori et exponantur venalia
et currantur per civitatem per tres
dies et, postea, possunt vendi.
Proponenti querimoniam de pecunia
quam mutavit ludenti ad ludum nisi
pignora tenuerit penes se ius non
reddatur per curiam vel baiulum, set
in continenti absolvitur reus.
De pignoribus
Pignus captum a creditore tenetur
per X dies ab eo, secundum car-
tam comitis Barchinone, quibus
completis curritur per tres dies per
civitatem venale et, postea, potest
vendi.
De aleatoribus
Illud quod quis lucratur, ad ludum
potest retinere, cum effectu vel
pignus, etiam, si illud possidet re-
tinebit, donec, ei sit satisfactum
de eo quod in ludo est lucratus.
The Legal Background of Lleida
176
Si quis alicui ludenti ad ludum taxe-
lliorum vel dugesse vel ad quemcum-
que alium ludum pecuniam suam
mutuaverit super vestibus conpella-
tur, vestes reddere sine pecunia.
Vestes vel panni lectorum pro tertio non pignoratur.
Quia usitatum fuerat actenus in civi-
tate Balagarii quod quilibet poterat
fideiussorem vel principalem quem
primo vellet convenire, statuerunt pa-
ciarii et consiliarii, cum assensu
universitatis predicte, illa de cetero non servari, set in presenti illis
deliberacione habita revocatis.
Statuerunt quod de cetero observen-
tur que de iure servanda fuerint in
predictis.
Si quis, vero, dederit pecuniam
mutuam ludenti, non cogitur eam
reddere qui accepit, set creditor
potest retinere, si habeat pignus.
Debitor, etiam, dictor vel fideius-
sor inde datus non teneatur nec
luedens habet licitum pignorandi.
De creditore ludi
Creditor ad ludum non mutuet su-
per vestes alicuius. Sin, autem,
sine pecunia vestes reddat.
Nemo traditur pro tercia curie...
Nemo traditur pro tercia curie nec capitur nec traditur aliquis pro
usuris nec pignorantur vestes pro
tercia neque lectum.
De fideiussore conveniendo
Consuetum est quod quilibet po-
test convenire, cum effectu primo
fideiussorem vel, si vult, rerum
principalem.
Robert Cuellas Campodarbe
177
De solucionibus
Si quis convictus fuerit, aliquid se
debere vel ad aliqua obligatum et
solvendo non reperiatur, iuret se non
posse solvere et post prestitum iura-
mentum preconizetur publice per
civitatem Balagarii ipsum non esse
solvendo, ut quilibet sibi caveat ne
secum contrahat in futurum.
Curia vel baiulus primo faciat satis-
fieri de pecunia creditori, quam ter-
tium levet.
De traditis
Moris est et carta statutum quod,
si debitor non potest suo satisfa-
cere creditori et creditor non hos-
tendat unde sibi satisfieri posset,
recepto iuramento ab eo per cu-
riam, quod non habet unde solvat,
statim debet iudex debitorem tra-
dere creditori, ut teneat eum penes
se captum in compendibus aut
catena et de ei panem et aquam tantum, donec sit ei pro debito
satisfactum aut compositum inter
eos.
Si, vero, iudex ad liberandum re-
rum fuerit necgligens vel remis-
sus, licet creditori, recepto iura-
mento in curia supradicta, suum
capere debitorem et tenere penes
se dicto modo.
Si, autem, creditor ille in fraudem
aliorum creditorum noluerit suum debitorem capere vel tenere vel in
curia vel in necgligentia.
Tali modo, illi alii creditores pos-
sunt per ordinem rerum predictum
capere vel tenere.
De usuris rei iudicate
Condempnatus non habet tempus
quadrimestre, set statim solvit nec
prestat usuras rei iudicate et est primo satisfaciendum de bonis
victi victori, quam iudex habeat
suam terciam.
The Legal Background of Lleida
178
Cum iuramentum deferetur alicui sub
hac forma quod iuret pecuniam sibi
deberi quam petit et illa pecunia vel
pignora, si pecunia non habet, debet
poni ante eum.
Ideo, ut facto sacramento, in continenti
pecuniam recipere possit.
De ius iurando
[...] Delato alicui iuramento, ut iu-
ret sibi pecuniam deberi in cons-
pectu debet esse posita, ut prestito
iuramento statim recipiat eam.
De instrumentis et testamentis
In omni instrumento sufficiunt duo
testes et in testamentis et codicillis,
licet heres institutus in testamento
non sit manumissores electi vel ordi-
nati non, tamen, minorem obtineat
firmitatem.
In legitimis servatur Balagarii lex
romana.
De heredibus
Non instituuntur heredes nomina-
tim per consuetudinem, set fiunt
manumissores in testamento, qui
rogantur sic: “Precor ut dividant
omnia bona mea, sicut inferius
apparebit”, et in legitima serva-
mus legem romanam de triente et
semisse.
De fide instrumentorum
In quolibet instrumentorum suffi-
ciunt duo testes et in qualibet re
vel causa.
Suspectum potest quis dicere
quodlibet instrumentum, etiam, si-
ne inscripcione non abolitum vel
deletum et est ei fides facienda.
De testamentis
Ideo, ad sollempnitatem testamen-ti sufficiunt duo testes nec sigi-
llantur testamenta et ita, nec pu-
blicantur et valet cum manumisso-
ribus et sine manumissoribus tes-
tamentum.
Robert Cuellas Campodarbe
179
De religiosis domibus
Hospitalia et domus infirmorum sunt
sub defensione dominorum et univer-
sitatis predicte civitatis regimine ac
custodia constituta.
De hospitalibus
Hospitalia civitatis et domus le-
prosorum sunt in gubernacione et
regimine consulum et universitatis
nostre.
De censibus
Censatarius, si die qua censum facit, solvit censum et reddit instrumentum
domino rei quam tenet ad censum,
potest rem illam dimittere alioquin
non potest.
Statuerunt, insuper, quod, si quis
vendiderit vel alienaverit rem quam
tenet ad censum, habita fatica domi-
no rei vel, si dominus se emere nolle
dixerit vel maliciose distulerit et infra
spacium decem dierum dominus rem
noluerit retinere, censatarius possit
rem alii vendere et domini compe-
llantur firmare directum, salvo, ta-
men, censu et dominio eisdem.
De re ad censum data
Emphiteota, si in die pensionis solvende solverit precisionem do-
mino suo et instrumentum emphi-
teoticum reddiderit, eodem die
potest dimittere rem in emphiteo-
sim datam, alias non licet ei. In
instrumento emphiteosis non tene-
tur subscribere emphiteota.
De alienatione rei censualis
Concedit, etiam, nobis quod de
possessionibus ad censum datis, si
eas vel partem earum vendere vo-
luerit emphiteote vel pignori obli-
gare, facta fatiga in dominis vel
eorum baiulis in carta donacionis
apposita, si domini eas communi
precio noluerint retinere vel distu-
lerint maliciose, liceat emphiteotis
vel illis qui eas tenuerit vendere et
inpignorare, exceptis militibus et
sanctis et locis religiosis. Soluta, tamen, fideliter quinquage-
sima parte tocius precii rei vendite
vel inpignorate et, ex tunc, tenean-
tur domini cartam firmare velint,
nolint, salvis, tamen, censu et senio-
ratico eorumdem.
The Legal Background of Lleida
180
De dote et donacione propter
nupcias
Si centum in dotem data fuerint, Lª
pro sponsalicio assignentur et, sic
aliis quantitatibus.
Marito defunto vel vergente ad ino-
piam uxor nisi aliud inter eos con-
ventum fuerit, habeat medietatem
sponsalicii sibi assignati ad suas vo-
luntates perpetuo faciendas vel totum sponsalicium, prestita cautione suffi-
cienti quod ea mortua sponsalicium
ad ipsum maritum vel heredes eius
libere revertatur, ipsi marito vel here-
di eius super predictis obcione
relicta.
Item, utimur quod mortuo marito, de
rebus eius ministrentur necessaria
uxori per unum annum, si dos consis-
tit in rebus mobilibus nisi heredes
mariti in continenti dotem solvant ipsi uxori.
Set, si in rebus consistat inmobilibus
in continenti post mortem dotem re-
cuperaret et bona sibi pro sponsa-
licio obligata teneat et, ex tunch, non
vivit uxor de bonis mariti, set lucre-
tur fructus illorum bonorum, que sunt
sibi pro sponsalicio obligata quous-
que de sponsalicio satisfactum sit ei-
dem.
Si maritus fugerit aut latitaverit aut
alias uxori defecerit vel ei de neces-sariis non minstraverit, uxor potest
petere bona mariti sibi pro dote et
sponsalicio obligata, sicut posset pe-
tere eo vergente ad inopiam.
Actor licet in causa non obtineat, ter-
cium, tamen, non det.
De donationibus ante nuptias
Si centum dentur in dotem, quin-
quaginta erit sponsalicium et sic
de aliis summis.
Possidet, autem, sponsalicium
mulier in tota vita sua mortuo viro
vel ad inopiam vergente, etiam, si
nichil lucretur, de dote vir mortua
muliere. Si, autem, aliter convenerit inter
eos observatur iure aliquo non
obstante.
Mortuo, vero, viro, uxor debet ha-
bere victualia per annum integrum
de bonis viri, si dos consistat in
pecunia numerata.
Si, vero, consistat in possessioni-
bus rerum inmobilium statim post
mortem recuperat eas cum rebus
sibi pro sponsalicio obligatis et, ex tunc, non alitur de bonis mariti.
Fructus, vero, rerum pro dote et
sponsalicio obligatarum lucratur
uxor quamdiu possidet res predic-
tas, donec ei dos et sponsalicium
sit solutum.
Si, autem, vir fugerit vel alias
abfuerit vel uxori sue non dederit
alimenta, mulier potest petere res
mariti sibi pro dote et sponsalicio
obligatas, sicut posset viro ad
inopiam vergente.
With no correspondence.
Robert Cuellas Campodarbe
181
De contumacia malefactoris
absentis
Si aliquis se absentaverit a civitate
Balagarii ratione furti, vulneris vel
homicidii, dominus facit illum publi-
ce preconitzari per villam Balagarii,
ut veniat firmare directum infra spa-
cium viginti dierum, alia pro confes-
so haberetur.
In molendinis teneant almut vendale
e mig almut.
Caminale molendini sit integrum et
unicum et amola usque ad caminale
predictum debet esse spacium unius
digiti tantum.
Quattuor sunt in civitate Balagarii
platee: Prima, apud Almudafar, cum
turre; alia, als Perxets et alia, ad car-
niceriam; alia, ad Capud Pontis, ultra
Sicorim, que omnes sunt omni popu-
De bannitis
Temporibus Bernardi Boteti, Petri
Valentini, Guillermi d’Oscha et
Gaufredi, consulum, statutum est
quod quicumque occiderit vel vul-
neraverit civem ilerdensem, si in-
fra decem dies postquam preconi-
zatus fuerit per civitatem se iure
non obtulerit, pro convicto et con-fesso deinceps habeatur.
Temporibus, autem, Guillem Bo-
teti et aliorum consulum fuit addi-
tum huic statuto: “Quod iudex,
cum consilio consulum, capiat
hunc preconizatum quandocum-
que poterit et faciat inde iusticiam
qualem decet, querelem, etiam,
nemine prosequente”.
With no correspondence.
De eodem
Caminallum molendini sit unicum
et integrum et debet esse de mola
ad caminallum unus digitus tan-
tum.
De donatione viarum et
platearum
Donat nobis idem Alfonsus rex et
concedit omnes vias et vicos et
plateas civitatis, ut possimus inde
ire, manere et reddire libere et
spaciose ad profectum nostrum, ut
The Legal Background of Lleida
182
lo eiusdem civitatis communes et in
quibus nulli est licitum edificare.
melius dici potest et quod non fa-
ciat vel fieri permittat opus ali-
quod vel structuram quominus
possimus inde ire ample et spacio-
se et expedite per superius memo-
rata.
De iniuriis
Si quis aliquem irato animo cum
palma vel pugno percusserit, LXª so-lidos det dominationi.
Sic, enim, nobilis dominis Poncius,
condam urgellensis comes, fieri man-
davit in Balagario.
With no correspondence.
4. Linguistic commentary of the two versions
To complete the study in another aspect of the text that we have
presented, we believe that it is appropriate to carry out a linguistic
commentary about the Latin text, in order to see, first hand, the
characteristic elements that have been taken into account when executing
the texts relating to the two legislative codes.
Thus, based on this comparison and their characteristics, we see
reflected in the Medieval Latin language aspects that are not often found in
classical Latin.
4. 1. Phonetics and Orthography
The diphthong ae, dative and genitive singular and nominative and
vocative plural ending of the first Latin declension, monophthong by
reciprocal assimilation of the two elements in e. The result of this process
is represented by some scribes by adding a kind of small tail to indicate the
aforementioned diphthong.
Some cases, although not in full, are included in the following
examples: [...] non restituatur racione minoris etatis; [...] vult respondere
querimonie facte; [...] contestata predicte ferie denegantur; [...] instrumentorum dilaciones sibi concedende fuerint; [...] cause sue sive
semel sive pluries audientur; [...] traditur pro tercia curie nec capitur.
Robert Cuellas Campodarbe
183
Another characteristic element is the changing of the classic Latin -ti to
-ci, in front of a vowel, due to a process of palatalization. The
phenomenon entails the use indistinctly, as we can see exemplified in any
of the following examples: tertia > tercia; licentia > licencia; negotium >
negocium; dilationes > dilaciones; indutias > inducias; petitioni >
peticioni; cautione > caucione; iustitie > iusticie; prescriptionibus >
prescripcionibus.
The cases relating to an assimilation process, can be seen in the
following examples: nt > nct: santis > sanctis; mn > mpn: calumnia >
calumpnia, condemnabitur > condempnabitur, sollemnitatem >
sollempnitatem or damni > dampni. The cases of confusion between voiceless and voiced stops are almost
nonexistent with the exception of: sed > set, which we find numerously.
4. 2. Nominal Morphology
The use of declensions and syncretism of cases of Medieval Latin is as
a reflection of a very slow process of the evolution of language.
Regarding pronouns, there is a clear predominance of demonstratives,
especially hic, haec, hoc; iste, -a, -ud, a function shared also by, sometimes, ipse, -a, -um. Also the pronouns idem, eadem, idem are
frequently used or the anaphoric is, ea, id.
The adverb item is a typical formula used in notarial documents, as
well as legal documents. Generally, it can be found at the beginning of
successive paragraphs with added value in respect to its context. Some
examples are: I t e m, idem consules hanc consuetudinem [...]; I t e m,
differtur causa gratia messium et vindemiarum [...]; I t e m, utimur quod
mortuo marito [...].
4. 3. Prepositions
A fundamental feature in the transformation of Latin is the importance
taken by prepositions to strengthen the value of the cases. Besides, they
are also used to provide meanings/nuances by themselves if the case
doesn’t have one.
It is common, in medieval Latin, for prepositions to combine and form
new adverbs. A very clear example is the compound insuper, which is
detected in the following cases: Statuerunt, i n s u p e r, paciarii cum
consiliariis [...]; Statuerunt, i n s u p e r, quod, si quis vendiderit vel
alienaverit [...]. Another case is this: deinde: D e i n d e, de tercio in
tercium diem tractatur causa [...].
The Legal Background of Lleida
184
Furthermore, a significant proliferation in the use of prepositions with
their different cases can be seen.
First, it is notable the use of the preposition de, which has a lot of
nuances in its meaning. It can act as a substitute for other prepositions,
such as ex or ab, to express some of the meanings of the ablative without
preposition or replacing the genitive by other turns.
With regard to this preposition, we highlight mainly the uses with
locative values, economic sphere, possession and object or subject: eo
quod sit d e alio loco vel foro [...]; Si d e VII solidis aut infra querimonia
exposita fuerit [...]; qui conveniuntur d e possessione in alio territorio
constituta [...]; D e sentenciis et cuius expense fieri debent. The prepositions ex i ab usually accompany the ablative case. In
classical Latin, the first is used to express place, time of departure, cause,
matter or original state and point of reference. Regarding the second, and
the many uses that it can encompass, we emphasize the ones that
express point of departure, time, source/origin, cause, favour and job or
position. Regarding medieval Latin, as previously mentioned, some of the
uses of this preposition have been absorbed by de. Other values that can be
found are instrumental/causal, subject/agent, comparative and, in some
cases, economic material uses. Regarding the preposition ex, we can
appreciate the following: [...] qui e x tali causa michi tantum debet; [...] e x
tunc, ducatur causa de tercia in terciam diem. Respecte a la preposició ab: [...] Prestita, tamen, a b actore idonea caucione; [...] in testem producitur,
nisi a b inicio; [...] si a b ea fuerit appellatum a principio.
The use of ad + the accusative is also very frequent. In general, the
tendency in medieval Latin is to keep the meaning of classical Latin:
proximity, direction, purpose and value/comparison, but other meanings
have also been acquired over time, such as place with stillness verbs,
purpose or time when something happens. Some examples are: [...] rem a
d censum tenentibus et illis qui conveniuntur; [...] a d diem dominicam
pulsatis vesperis; [...] a d testimonium admittuntur nisi; [...] iudex a d
liberandum rerum fuerit necgligens vel remissus.
The uses related to the preposition in, are also important in terms to the
process of evolution of the Latin language. This can accompany both the accusative – to express “direction” with a secondary value – as well as the
ablative – to express “place where” with a primary value. In addition, it
retains its own uses from the classical and later periods.
The uses in which this preposition is predominantly used are eminently
simple, and we emphasize in both cases local and temporal values: [...] i n
omnibus habeatur; [...] i n alio territorio constituta; [...]; i n alia curia;
Robert Cuellas Campodarbe
185
[...] fuerat actenus i n civitate Balagarii; [...] i n terciam diem; [...] i n diem
dominicam.
The prepositions per, pro i propter, maintain, on the whole, a very
similar meaning, especially in the first two cases, with considerable
frequency of use about the text that we are discussing.
The uses related to the preposition per + the accusative are those
containing both local and temporal value and intermediate or medium
person: [...] p e r villam Balagarii; [...] p e r annum integrum; [...] p e r
civitatem p e r tres dies; [...]; p e r spacium X dierum; [...] p e r curiam vel
baiulum; [...] p e r X dies ab eo; [...] p e r tres dies p e r civitatem; [...]
heredes nominatim p e r consuetudinem; [...] p e r unum annum. In classical Latin, the preposition pro already had little values. One of
the most common is the protection or defence of someone. In medieval
Latin, this takes also causal and final values: [...] p r o maiore XXe annis;
[...] septembrem p r o vindemiis; [...] p r o tertio non pignoratur; [...] p r o
dote et sponsalicio obligata.
The preposition apud, testified in a single case, takes a locative sense:
[...] sunt in civitate Balagarii platee: Prima, a p u d Almudafar, cum turre.
This text uses cum to highlight the preference of union of two subjects,
at the expense of the coordinated copulative conjunction et: [...] paciarii c
u m consiliariis et assensu hominum.
4. 4. Verbal Morphology
The Latin verb, unlike the cases mentioned above, resisted much better
the pass of evolution. However, we can only highlight some differences in
relation to its formation and syntax over the texts, which we will briefly
note below.
The use of adjectival participles with forms such as predicti,
supradicte or dicto and other variations, is frequent: [...] assensu hominum
civitatis p r e d i c t e; [...] contestata p r e d i c t e ferie denegantur; [...]
recepto iuramento in curia s u p r a d i c t a; [...] iure servanda fuerint in p r e d i c t i s; [...] ordinem rerum p r e d i c t u m capere.
In the case of the passive voice, we see the preference in the use of
verbal forms composed of simple tenses: [...] nisi ab inicio e x p r e s s u m
s i t quod in presumptione; [...] ei s i t s a t i s f a c t u m de eo quod in ludo
est.
Also, it is worth noting some significant cases of verbal periphrasis
formed from verbs in infinitive + the verb debeo: [...] illam fanecam bladi
quam in sabbato a c c i p e r e d e b e t; [...] iudex d e b e t t r a d e r e
querelanti; [...] uxor d e b e t h a b e r e victualia per annum integrum.
The Legal Background of Lleida
186
4. 5. Syntax
The cases that we found in the text, following the usual casuistry of
this type of texts in notarial and chancellery prose, present different characteristics that make the Latin in which they are expressed in both
versions of the customs different from any other text considered classic.24
The use of the conjunction quod with completive value – instead of the
classic conjunction ut – is very common, and in this sense, should be
mentioned as a clear tendency that does not correspond to the usual. Some
examples are: [...] q u o d minor XXVe annis a XIIII annis completis non
restituatur; [...] iudex debet tradere querelanti, si iustam causam habuerit,
tantum de bonis debitoris q u o d sufficiat peticioni; [...] utimur q u o d
mortuo marito de rebus eius ministrentur necessaria uxori; [...] q u o d
quandocumque dominus rerum illarum venerit; [...] de eo q u o d in ludo
est lucratus; [...] nobis q u o d de possessionibus ad censum datis.
4. 6. Copies
The configuration of texts with a clear relationship with Lleida,
presents several copies which are quite evident with regard to the original
text. The examples which enrich this statement present slight syntactical
changes or turns: [...] quod minor XXVe annis a XIIII annis completis >
[...] quod minor XXVe annis qui vicesimum annum perfecerit; [...] iuratur
hic de calumpnia > [...] prestatur hic calumpnie iuramentum; [...] non molat in die sabbati pulsantibus vesperis > [...] non molent a die sabbati,
post pulsacionem vesperorum; Hospitalia civitatis et domus leprosorum
sunt in gubernacione [...] > Hospitalia et domus infirmorum sunt sub
defensione [...].
Conclusions
Attempts to understand Late Medieval society cannot be successful
without understanding that the municipal strength25 passes the urban
projection over the region,26 which is depicted in a profile of regional
24 Most of these features have already been presented in previous cases – see the
corresponding sections on “nominal morphology”, “verbal morphology” and “prepositions” – and, therefore, we believe that it is not necessary to repeat them. 25 Carme Batlle, “La organización municipal de Cataluña”, Historia 16, 8 (1976), pp. 74-78. 26 Flocel Sabaté, “Ejes vertebradores de la oligarquía urbana en Cataluña”, Revista d’Història Medieval, 9 (1998), pp. 143-148.
Robert Cuellas Campodarbe
187
ordinances where a network of cities and towns seek institutional
translation of the socio-economic pre-eminence.27
The perception of this vision has reached even the jurists themselves;
when providing a definition of Medieval Catalonia, it is specified that this
is la unión de una serie de ciudades que tiene a otra, Barcelona, por
centro28 and, therefore, makes it conceive its capital over a stretch of
towns and cities that articulate the country through various relationships
between municipalities and regions.
All this, moreover, is based on the actual dynamics of some urban
centres led by an oligarchy that founded its own income on the projection
of the regional environment. The combination of all these elements allows us to justify that the
fixation of a municipal own law of a royal city of great influence such as
Lleida, goes beyond the jurisdictional limits itself, if we look, for example,
at several cases from other western centres that have a clear influence in
the creation of their legislative codes.
Medieval Catalonia was a country of fragmented and impenetrable
jurisdictions because not all of them collaborate with each other. This is
the reason why territories like the royal city of Lleida, or the late-medieval
capital of the County of Urgell, Balaguer,29 or those of the Commanderies
of the military orders further south, Horta30 and Miravet,31 have no
apparent institutional relation. Interestingly, however, these four territories share certain common
characteristics, and very similar actions, which originate in Lleida. This
fact may lead us to deduce that despite the jurisdictional differences, social
and economic factors are an important element for establishing
relationships between them. The concordance among the respective legal
local texts testifies these relations.
27 Flocel Sabaté, “Els eixos articuladors del territori medieval català”, L’estructuració territorial de Catalunya. Els eixos cohesionadors de l’espai (Barcelona: L’Avenç, 2000), p. 40. 28 “the union of a number of cities which has another, Barcelona, as its centre” (Ángel López-Amo, “El pensamiento político de Eximeniç en su tratado de ‘Regiment de Prínceps’”, Anuario de Historia del Derecho Español, 17 [1946], p.
24). 29 Cuellas, El “Llibre de Costums, Privilegis i Ordinacions”. 30 Josep Serrano, Els costums d’Orta (1296). Estudi introductori i edició (Horta de Sant Joan: Ajuntament d’Horta de Sant Joan, 1996). 31 Josep Serrano, Els costums de la batllia de Miravet (Gandesa: Consell Comarcal de la Terra Alta, 1999).
The Legal Background of Lleida
188
The written representation of the first legislative code in the city of
Lleida, based on a stately and municipal law that includes a tradition
which collects a number of existing rules – scriptis et non scriptis – allows
us to capture a clear need which arose to fix an oral tradition in a new
procedural regulation, since this meant that many legal provisions would
be exposed susceptible to changes over time.
The linguistic study carried out in this contribution has enabled us to
identify and corroborate what we have just said, because many of the
inherent characteristics detach from the crystallization of the legal depths
of Lleida they present many ideas which can, once commonly placed,
relativize the jurisdictional weight, and in turn allow us to see how many of the characteristics that are in the text from Lleida are also in the text
from Balaguer.