IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ...

(sgi)

(Medha adg Member (A)

12.8.2021

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN

Original Application No.

of 20

of 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,

Appearance, Tribunal's orders or

directions and Registrar's orders

Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.151 of 2021

V.B. Taskhedkar Vs.

Tire. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..Applicant

..Respondents

heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar. lea'rned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. On perusal of the record produced by the Ld. PO Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, it was noticed that I had processed the case of the applicant during my tenure in Government. Therefore, the above matter may not be placed before me.

3. The matter may be placed before the Hon'ble Chairperson for placing it before appropriate Bench.

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

FAAAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,

Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

Date : 12.08.2021.

0.A.No.340/2011 with 0.A.No.341/2011 with O.A.No.342/2011 with O.A.No.343/2011 with 0.A.No.344/2011 with O.A.No.687/2011 with

0.A.No.875/2011 with 0.A.No.757/2011

K.P. Shah (0.A.340/2011) G.C. Lalka (0.A.341/2011) J.D. Mehta (0.A.342/2011) A.D. Mehta (0.A.343/2011) A.S. Dalvi (0.A.344/2011) M. Mehta (0.A.687/2011) U.G. Parikh (0.A.875/2011) R.G. Kukreja (0.A.757/2011) ....Applicants

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents.

1. Heard Mr. U.V. Bhosale, learned Advocate for the Applicants in 0.A.No.340/2011 with 0.A.No. 341/2011 with 0.A.No.342/2011 with 0.A.No. 343/2011 with 0.A.No.344/2011 with O.A.No.

687/2011 with O.A.No.875/2011, Mr. S.P. Lahane,

learned Counsel for the Applicant in O.A.No.757/

2011 and Mr. A. Khandekar, learned Counsel with

Ms. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

Tribunal's orders

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019)

iSpl.- MAT-P-2 E. IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MlUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No. of 20

IN

Original Application. No of 20

2• In the course of hearing of the matter of the

Temporary part time Lecturers working in

Sydenham College seeking the regularization as

permanent part time Lecturers it is found necessary to know :-

How many permanent sanctioned posts full time for the subject of Accountancy in Sydenham College ?

(b) How many permanent part time posts for the subject Accountancy in Sydenham College ?

(c) On which date last the representation

was made by the College or proposal was sent by the State of Maharashtra

to the M.P.S.C. for the Sydenham College of filling up vacant posts for the subject of Accountancy?

(a)

[pro.

1



Tribunal' s orders

3. Copy of the proposal or representation to be

brought to the Tribunal made by the Principal of

Sydenharn College to the State of Maharashtra and

the copy of the requisition made by the State to

M.P.S.C. for filling up the posts of the Lecturer for

Accountancy in the Sydenham College.

4. We want Principal, Sydenham College of

Commerce & Economics and Principal Secretary,

Higher and Technical Education to answer the

queries in the form of affidavit.

5. At the request of learned Counsel Mr.

Khandekar the matter is adjourned to 31.08.2021.

As sufficient time is given to answer in these three

queries by the two officers on the affidavit if the

requisite information is not answered to the point in

the form of affidavit Tribunal will be constrained to

take further steps.

6. Adjourned to 31.08.2021.

(>-°4 (Medha Gadgil) (Mridula Bhatkar, J.)

Member(A)

prk

Chairperson

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHARASHTRA. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20


Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or


Tribunal' s orders

2.08.2020

M.A 28g/2021 in 0.A 540/2021

Y.M Meshram ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors ... Respondents

1. Heard Shri R.M Kolge, learned advocate for the e pplicant, proposed Respondent no. 2, Smt K.S Gaikwad, learned P.O for the Respondent no. 1 and Shri B.A Bandiwadekar, learned advocate for Original Applicant.

. Misc Application seeking intervention is allowed, e s the applicant, Respondent no. 2, is going to be adversely affected.

S. Learned counsel Mr Bandiwadekar for the original e pplicant seeks permission to amend the Original Application. Permission granted. Amendment to be carried out till tomorrow.

. Interim relief to continue till tomorrow.

5. S.0 to 13.8.2021.

(Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson

Alcn

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) 1Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20


Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

Tribunal' s orders

12.08.2020

0.A 547/2021

Shri A.P Suryawanshi ... Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Smt Punam Mahajan, learned advocate for the applicant, Shri A.J Chougule, learned P.O for the Respondents no 1, 2 & 3 and Shri K.R Jagdale, learned advocate for Respondents no 4, 5 & 7. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that she has served Respondent no. 6, through email, which is mentioned in the caption of the Original Application.

2. Learned counsel for Respondents no 4, 5 & 7 had joined at their respective places where they have been posted. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has a preferential claim over the Respondents no 4, 5 & 7.

3. Learned P.O submits that he has taken instructions to the grounds (a) to (e) as mentioned in the order dated 10.8.2021.

4. So far as the transfer of the applicant and his wife are concerned, the Tribunal found that ex-facie they are contrary to the policy of the State laid down in G.R dated 9.4.2018.

5. On query, I am informed that the post at Indapur and Daund is vacant and either the applicant or his spouse can be posted.

6. The applicant and his wife is directed to submit a joint application to the Respondent nos 2 & 3 of their place of posting at Indapur or Daund. Respondents no 1, 2 and 3 are hereby directed to transfer applicant and his wife at Daund or Indapur as per the choice given by them. Accordingly, the necessary orders to be passed on or before 19.8.2021.

7. With the above directions, Original Application stands disposed of.


Akn

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

G.C.P.() J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20




Tribunal' s orders

12.08.2020

O.A 494/2021

M.P Jamadar ... Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Shri M.P Jamadar, applicant in person and Ms Swati Manchekar, learned C.P.0 for the Respondents.

2. Issue notice made returnable on 13.8.2021.

3. Applicant is authorized and directed to serve on Respondents intimation/notice of date of hearing duly authenticated by Registry, along with complete paper took of O.A. Private service is allowed in view of this present COVID-19 Pandemic situation. Respondents are put to notice that the case may be taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission hearing.

4. This intimation/notice is ordered under Rule 11 of tie Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1988, and the questions such as limitation and alternate remedy are kept open.

5. The service may be done by hand delivery/ speed post/courier and acknowledgement be obtained and produced along with affidavit of compliance in the Registry within one week before returnable date or on the same date. Applicant is directed to file affidavit of compliance and notice.

6. S.0 to 13.8.2021.


Axn

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20




Tribunal' s orders

12.08.2020

0.A 528/2021

D.B Mundhe ... Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Shri M.D Lonkar, learned advocate for the applicant and Smt K.S Gaikwad, learned P.O for the Respondents no 1, 2 8; 3 and Shri B.A Bandiwadekar, learned advocate for Respondent no. 4.

. Learned P.O files affidavit in reply on behalf of Respondent no. 1. Same is taken on record. Learned oounsel for Respondent no. 4 also files affidavit in reply. Same is taken on record.

Status quo ante to continue till next date.

4. S.0 to 13.8.2021.


Arm

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

G.C.P. J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021.

C.A.No.17 of 2017 in O.A.No.586 of 2016

Dr. S.S. Chappalwar ....Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Mr. Bhushan A. Bandiwadekar,

learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. S.P.

Manchekar, learned Chief Presenting Officer for the

Respondents.

2. The learned C.P.O. submits that the order of

the Tribunal is complied with.

3. The learned Advocate produces copy of letter

dated 11.08.2021 written by the Applicant to the

applicant wherein he has stated that he wants to

withdraw the C.A. Copy whereof is take on record

and marked as Exhibit-I.

4. In view of this, C.A. is disposed off.

()11-/(P41 (Mridula Bhatkar, J.)

Chairperson

prk

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.J J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.46 of 2019

S.R. Nikumbh & Ors. Applicant

Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Smt. Punam Mahajan, learned Advocate

for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned

Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Learned P.O. submits that Government has again

considered the claim of the Applicant in terms of G.R.

dated 31.08.2019, but the Applicant is lot found ',DI-

entitled to the pay scale she claimed. She therefore

wants to file Additional Affidavit along with order

passed by the Government.

3. Two weeks time as granted for filing Additional

Affidavit.

4. S.O. to 23.08.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (3)

NMN

[RTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4 2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHAR.A.SHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20




Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

M.A. No.184 of 2021 in O.A. No.574 of 2020

L.D. Veer Applicant Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Shri Arvind V. Bandiwadekar, learned

Advocate for the Applicant, Shri A.J. Chougule, learned

Presenting Officer for the Respondents and Shri Vivek

Rane, learned Advocate for the Respondents No.5 & 7 is

absent.

2. On request of learned P.O. one week time is

granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply to M.A. as last

chance.

3. S.O. to 20.08.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

G.C.P. ) J 2737 ( 50,000-4-2019 ) ISp!.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20




directions and Registrar's orders Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.449 of 2021

P.R. Khedekar Applicant Versus



Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K.,

learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. On request of learned P.O. matter be kept for

tomorrow for filing Affidavit-in-Reply.

3. S.O. to 13.08.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2



Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.452 of 2021

V.E. Jog Applicant Versus



Advocate for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule,


2. In this O.A. the Applicant has challenged

suspension order dated 28.06.2021.

3. The Applicant has filed one more O.A. i.e.

197/2021, challenge is to the transfer order which is

shown temporary shifting order dated 01.03.2021 (in

order date is wrongly typed as 01.03.2020) in O.A.

No.197/2021 Reply is already filed and matter is riped

for hearing at the stage of Admission.

4. However, in suspension matter Reply is not filed

since there is temporary shifting and later suspension it

is desirable to hear both the O.A. together.

5. On request of learned P.O. two weeks time is

granted as last chance for filing Affidavit-in-Reply in O.A.

452/2021.

6. O.A. No.197/2021 be also kept with this O.A.

7. S.O. to 24.08.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2


Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.502 of 2021

D.K. Yadav Applicant Versus





2. Applicant has challenged suspension order dated

06.07.2021, whereby he is suspended under

contemplation of Departmental Enquiry (D.E.) and

Headquarter is kept at Pune.

3. Indeed, in view of circular dated 19.03.2008,

Headquarter should be the place where a Government

servant is suspended. In present case the Applicant was

serving as Naib Tehsildar, Shirur but his Headquarter is

kept at Pune which is in contravention of circular dated

19.03.2008.

4. On previous date i.e. 29.07.2021, taking note of

circular dated 19.03.2008, Respondents were directed

to take remedial measures and to keep Headquarter at

Shirur. However, no such orders are passed.

5. Today learned P.O. sought time to file Reply.

6. Short time is granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply .

7. However, so far as Headquarter is concerned, it

should have been at Shirur and not Pune, therefore

Applicant Headquarter during the period of suspension

be kept at Shirur.

8. S.O. to 25.08.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2


Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.297 of 2020

M.N. Chaudhary Applicant

Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Shri D.B. Khaire, learned Advocate for the

Applicant, Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer

for the Respondents No.1 to 3 and Shri Arvind V.

Bandiwadekar, learned Advocate for the Respondent

No.4.

2. Shri D.B. Khaire, learned Advocate for the

Applicant submits that his client wants to make

representation to claim post of Respondent No.4 — Shri

P.R. Singarwad, who was posted at Thane-Vashi III .

According to him recently Respondent No.4 has been

transferred from Thane-Vashi III to Palghar, and

therefore, Applicants claim for Thane-Vashi III can be

considered.

3. Shri D.B. Khaire, therefore submits that matter

be kept pending till the decision of his representation

and if it is accepted, O.A. may not survive.

4. In view of above, this O.A. is adjourned for Final

Hearing so that the Applicant can make representation

to Respondent No.1.

5. The Applicant is at liberty to make

representation to Respondent No.1 within a week.

Respondent No.1 is directed to decide the said

representation if made within a week and it should be

decided appropriately within three weeks from the date

of receipt of the Representation.

6. S.O. to 07.09.2021.

[,

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2


Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.479 of 2021

C.S. Mane

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Applicant

Respondents.




2. Today learned P.O. has filed Affidavit-in-Reply of

Shri Dikshit A. Gedam, Superintendent of Police, Sangli

in terms of the order passed by the Tribunal on

05.08.2021. It is taken on record. Learned P.O. further

submits that it be treated as Reply on merit too.

3. Learned Advocate for the Applicant however

pointed out that what was tendered before the Tribunal

on previous date i.e. 05.08.2021 as observed in para. 4

of the order passed on 05.08.2021 was something

different then the minutes of Police Establishment

Board (P.E.B.) filed along with Affidavit today. On previous date when file was tendered by learned P.O. it

was only about alleged mis-conduct of the Applicant

and there were no such recommendation of his

transfer. He further submits minutes of P.E.B. tendered

today are after thought and prepared later.

4. Minutes of P.E.B. which was tendered before the

Tribunal on 05.08.2021 are not produced today along

with Affidavit-in-Reply and what is tendered is minutes

of P.E.B. recommending transfer of the Applicant.

5 In view of above, learned P.O. is directed to file

minutes of P.E.B. which was tendered before the

Tribunal on 05.08.2021 along with Additional Affidavit

and to explain the position.

6. S.O. to 20.08.2021.

1\14.)0

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpi.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.487 of 2021

P.N. Patil Applicant

Versus


1. Heard Shri M.D. Lonkar, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting

Officer for the Respondents.


granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply.

3. S.O. to 20.08.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) 1Sp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHA.RASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20




Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.463 of 2021

D.D. Sonune Applicant

Versus







3. S.O. to 20.08.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

G.C.P. J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) iSp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.368 of 2021

J.R. Chavan Applicant

Versus





2. On request of learned P.O. one week time is

granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply by way of last

chance.

3. S.O. to 20.08.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PLO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MIJMBAI


I N

Original Application No. of 20




Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.347 of 2021

S.S. Jadhav Applicant

Versus





2. Enough time is granted for filing Affidavit, but

the same is not filed. However on request of learned

P.O. two weeks time is granted for filing Affidavit-in-

Reply by way of last chance.

3. S.O. to 25.08.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpl.- MAT-F-2 E.



IN






Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.321 of 2021

D.N. Tonde Applicant

Versus


1. Applicant and his Advocate both are absent.

2. Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting Officer for

the Respondents is present.



4. S.O. to 27.08.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000----4-2019) iSp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.254 of 2021

S.B. Gavit Applicant

Versus





2. Today matter is for filing Rejoinder on behalf of

the Applicant, which is already filed in the Office.

3. O.A. therefore be kept for hearing at the stage

of admission.

4. S.O. to 23.09.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar) Member (J)

NMN

_[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20




Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.180 of 2021

F.MD. I. Souraj Applicant Versus


1. Heard Smt. Punam Mahajan, learned Advocate

for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned



granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply by way of last

chance.

3. S.O. to 27.08.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[R O.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019)

ISp1.- IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALMAT-F-2 E.

MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20





Date: 12.08.2021

O.A. No.166 of 2020

U.S. Jagtap

Versus


Applicant

Respondents.

1. Applicant and his Advocate both are absent.

2. Smt. Ranjana Todankar, learned Advocate for

the Applicant has sent her leave note.

3. Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting Officer for

the Respondents is present.

4. No Rejoinder is filed by the Applicant.

5. Since pleading is complete, it be kept for Final

Hearing on 21.09.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

I G.C.P. J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHARA.SHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





O.A. No.563 of 2021

A.V. Pardeshi Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Shri M.D. Lonkar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Status quo as of today to be maintained till tomorrow.

3. Ld. PO to produce the record tomorrow.

4. S.O. to 13.8.2021. Hamdast.

Ga bil) Member (A)

12.8.2021

(sgj)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.571 of 2021

A.S. Thool Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Shri Gunratan Sadavarte, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.



4. S.O. to 13.8.2021. Hamdast.

(Medtliadg ) Member (A)

12.8.2021 (sgj)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(sgj)

(Me h V Gad Member (A

12.8.2021

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) iSp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.572 of 2021

A.N. Bhagat Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Shri Gunratan Sadavarte. learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad. learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.



4. S.O. to 13.8.2021. Hamdast.

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Sp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.573 of 2021

M.P. Igave Vs.


„Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Shri Gunratan Sadavarte, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.



4. S.O. to 13.8.2021. Hamdast.

(Med Ga 1) Member (A)

12.8.2021 (sgj)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021

O.A.No.981 of 2019

Dr. L.V. Bhandarkar ... Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Ms. Punam Mahajan, learned

Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. S.P. Manchekar,

learned Chief Presenting Officer for the

Respondents.

2. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits

that she has received instructions from the

applicant to withdraw the O.A.

3. O.A. is allowed to be withdrawn.

(Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson

prk

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2

Tribunal' s orders Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,



Date : 12.08.2021.

M.A.No.258 of 2021 in O.A.No.371 of 2021

P. G. Ghavalikar ....Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Mr. R.M. Kolge, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Mr. A.J. Chougule, learned


2. The office objections, if any, are to be

removed and court fees to be paid, if not already

paid.

3. Issue notice before admission returnable on

08.09.2021.

4. Applicant is authorized and directed to serve

on Respondent intimation/notice of date of hearing

duly authenticated by Registry, along with complete

paper book of O.A. Private service is allowed in view

of this present COVID-19 Pandemic situation.

Respondents are put to notice that the case may be

taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission

hearing.

5. This intimation/notice is ordered under Rule

11 of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal

(Procedure) Rules, 1988, and the questions such as

limitation and alternate remedy are kept open.

6. The service may be done by Hand delivery,

speed post, courier and acknowledgement be

obtained and produced along with affidavit of

compliance in the Registry within one week.

Applicant is directed to file Affidavit of compliance

and notice.

7. S.O. to 08.09.2021.

prk


HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) (Sp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal's orders

Date : 12.08.2021.

M.A.No.281 of 2021 in O.A.No.480 of 2021

Y. D . Kanoj a ....Applicant Vs.





Respondents.

2. The affidavit of service of Respondents No.3

to 5 is filed by the learned Advocate for the

Applicant.

3. Respondent- Government is directed to file

reply regarding the seniority of the Applicant.

4. Matter fixed on 31.08.2021.


Irk

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpl.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20




Tribunal's orders

Date : 12.08.2021.

O.A.No.124 of 2021

M.V. Ghuge ....Applicant

Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents.

1. Heard Ms. S.P. Manchekar, learned Chief


2. Mr. S.S. Solwat, learned Advocate for the

Applicant is absent.

3. The learned C.P.O. files affidavit-in-reply

dated 10.08.2021 on behalf of Respondent No.2,

through Mr. Rajesh P. Bhoir, Joint Director, office of

Joint Director Accounts and Treasury Kokan

Division, CBD Belapur. The same is taken on

record.

4. Admitted and kept for final hearing

06.11.2021


prk

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal's orders

Date : 12.08.2021.

O.A.No.247 of 2021

M.A. Amgaonkar ....Applicant Vs.





Respondents.

2. The learned Counsel for the Applicant

submits that he will file affidavit-in-rejoinder during

the course of the day.

3. Admitted and kept for final hearing.


RIALotl" (Mridula Bhatkar, J.)

Chairperson

prk

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) iSp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHAR.ASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021.

O.A.No.261 of 2021

V.S. Kulkarni & Ors. ....Applicants Vs.


1. Heard Mr. S.S. Dere, learned Advocate for

the Applicants and Ms. S.P. Manchekar, learned

Chief Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. The learned C.P.O. files affidavit-in-reply

dated 10.08.2021 on behalf of Respondent No.2,

through Mr. Gajendra Govindrao Dighavkar, Chief

Administrative Officer, Office of the Director of

Medical Education & Drugs, Mumbai.

3. Admitted and kept for final hearing with

liberty to file rejoinder.


LAAAA-u-k


prk

[PLO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

prk

I/

(i47\A/01,-Nt-


(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Sp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal's orders

Date : 12.08.2021.

O.A.No.187 of 2021

D.N. Shinde ....Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Mr. D.B. Khaire, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Ms. K.S. Gaikwad, learned


2. By way of last chance time granted to

learned P.O. to file affidavit-in-reply.


[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.



IN






Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021

O.A.No.469 of 2012 with O.A.No.682 of 2013 with O.A.No.879 of 2015

Dr. A.R. Tarale & Ors (0.A.469/2012) Dr. M.B. Deeolikar & Ors. (0.A.682/2013) Dr. G.P. Wadekar & Ors. (0.A.879/2015)

... Applicants Vs.


1. Heard Shri Bhushan A. Bandiwadekar,

learned Advocate for the Applicants in

O.A.No.469/2012, Shri N.Y. Chavan, learned

Advocate for the Applicants in O.A.No.879/2015

and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer

for the Respondents.

2. Shri J.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

the Applicant in O.A.No.682/2013 is absent.

3. Parties to take note that this matter will be

taken up for final hearing on 31.08.2021. The

learned P.O. is directed to come with all necessary

record, Government Resolutions and Hon'ble High

Court judgments.

4. Adjourned to 31.08.2021


prk

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal's orders

Date : 12.08.2021

0.A.No.1059 of 2012

D.C. Kalambe ... Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Shri Bhushan A. Bandiwadekar,

learned Advocate for the Applicants and Mr.. K.S.

Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for the

Respondents.

2. The learned Counsel submits that during

pendency of the Original Application the applicant

retired on 30.08.2014.

3. Accordingly it is necessary to amend the

O.A. and so also relief. However, there is no

amendment to that effect. If the applicant does not

carry out the necessary amendment it will become

infructuous.

4. As the applicant retired in 2014 and the

matter is pending since 2012, the learned Advocate

request for permission to make necessary

amendments.

5. Permission granted. Adjourned to

02.09.2021.

/)n(jAlt/1/4).1


prk

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.



I N






Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021

M.A.No.164 of 202 in O.A.No.165 of 2021 in O.A.No.38 of 2021

Dr. V.V. Patil & Ors. ... Applicants Vs.


1. Heard Ms. Punam Mahajan, learned

Advocate for the Applicants and Ms. S.P.


Respondents.

2. The learned C.P.O. seeks time for taking

compliance report.



prk

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAIIA.RASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI


I N






Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021

O.A.No.217 of 2021

Dr. D.R. Deore ... Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Ms. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting


2. Mr. S.B. Deore, the learned Advocate for the

Applicant is absent.

3. The learned P.O. submits that by order dated

15.01.2021 the Government has taken a policy

decision that the technical break of Bms doctor who

are Group-B not to be posted is condoned and the

same prayer is made that directions be given to the

Government to decide this representation.

4. The learned Counsel submits that he needs

to amend the prayer and the relevant portion in

0.A.. He seeks permission to file this amendment

application.

5. Permission granted.

27.09.2021.

Adjourned to


prk

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

G.C.P.(1 J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [STA.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021

O.A.No.585 of 2016

R. S. Bodake ....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents.

1. Heard Shri A. V. Bandiwadekar, learned Counsel for

the Applicant and Shri A. J. Chougule, learned Presenting


2. At the very outset, it is noticed that one of us (Smt.

Medha Gadgil, Member-A) had processed the file in the

matter of promotion of the Applicant and appropriate

decision was taken. Therefore, this O.A. needs to be heard by

the Division Bench of which she is not a Member.

3. The Registrar is, therefore, directed to take

appropriate step.

(Medha Gadgil (A.P. Kurhekar) Member (A) Member(J)

vsm

[P TO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

[,46

(Me' clga Gadgil)

Member (A) (A.P. Kurhekar)

Member(J)

) G C P .1 2737 (50,0OO-4-2019) ISD1 - MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MTJMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20




Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021

O.A.No.1122 of 2019 with 0.A.1123/2019 with O.A.

No.1124 of 2019 with O.A.No.1127 of 2019 with O.A.

No.1128 of 207"

E.L. Barshinge ....Applicant

Versus


1. Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, learned Counsel for

the Applicant and Smt. Kranti Gaikwad, learned Presenting


2. These Original Applications were to be heard along

with another connected Original Applications which are also

on today's board.

3. Insofar as these five Original Applications are

concerned, last time learned P.O. was directed to file reply so

that all these nine Original Applications could be heard

together.

4. In first set of O.A., the challenge is to the

appointment of Enquiry Officer. Whereas, in second set of

D.A., the challenge is to the punishment order imposed

against the Applicant after completion of D.E.

5. Today, again learned P.O. requested for two weeks

ime to file reply.

6. Last chance is granted for filing reply.

7. S.O. to 31.08.2021.

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

G.C.P.() J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) isnl - MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021

O.A.No.914 of 2016

A. A. Desale ....Applicant

Versus





2. On request of learned Counsel for the Applicant, two

weeks time is granted for final hearing by way of last chance.

3. S.O. to 31.08.2021.

\01\1

(Medh Gadgil) (A.P. Kurhekar) Member (A) Member(J)

vsm

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISO.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20




Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021

O.A.No.701 of 2016

D. R. Dighole ....Applicant

Versus


1. Heard Shri K. R. Jagdale, learned Counsel for the

Applicant and Shri A. J. Chougule, learned Presenting Officer

for the Respondents.

2. On request of learned P.O., one week time is granted

to file reply to the amendment carried out by the Applicant in

O.A.

3 S.O. to 25.08.2021.

,12 (Medha‘j*Gldgil)

Member (A) (A.P. Kurhekar)

Member(J)

vsm

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) 3 2737 (50,000-4-2019) 1801.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHARASHTRA. ADMTNISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20




Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021

O.A.No.301 of 2016

J. A. M. H. Momin & Ors. ....Applicants

Versus





2. Today, learned Counsel for the Applicant has filed

Affidavit-in-Rejoinder along with the final seniority list as on

01.01.2016. It is taken on record.

3. On request of learned P.O., the matter is adjourned

for taking necessary instructions for final hearing.

4. S.O. to 31.08.2021.

(Medhal)Gad 11) Member (A)

1:NW'

(A.P. Kurhekar) Member(J)

vsm

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.i J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Sol- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20




Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021

O.A.No.117 of 2016

D. B. Jadhav ....Applicant

Versus





2. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that he

wants to file Rejoinder on Affidavit to the reply filed by the

Respondents to the amendment made by him in O.A. during

the course of the day. Statement is accepted. It be taken on

record.

3. Be kept for final hearing.

4. S.O. to 30.08.2021.

(Medlatadgil) (A.P. Kurhekar) Member (A) Member(J)

vsm

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) 'Sol.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.08.2021

O.A.No.594 of 2015

M. V. Gawas ....Applicant

Versus




Officer holding for Ms S. P. Manchekar, learned Chief


2. Today, learned P.O. has filed reply to the amendment

made in O.A. by the Applicant. It is taken on record.

3. The matter is adjourned for final hearing.

4. S.0 to 30.08.2021.

(Medadgil) (A.P. Kurhekar) Member (A) Member(J)

sm

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [SO.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.151 of 2021

V.B. Taskhedkar Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Shri A.V. Bandiy‘adekar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. By consent adjourned to 24.8.2021.

(Me G.14gil) Member (A)

12.8.2021

(sgj)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpi.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.411 of 2019

S.P. Kapile Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Shri U.V. Bhosale, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. At the request of Ld. Advocate for the applicant adjourned to 31.8.2021.

c--e

(Medh Ga il)

e

Member (A) 12.8.2021

(sgj)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4 2019) 1Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.224 of 2021

B.N. Sathe Vs.


..Applicant

„Respondents

Heard Shri A.V. Bandiv‘adekar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Ld. Advocate for the applicant files affidavit in rejoinder of the applicant and the same is taken on record.

3. S.O. to 17.8.2021 for final hearing.

(MedLeildgil Member (A)

12.8.2021 (sgj)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.1059 of 2019

M.G. Pathan Vs.


' ..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Ld. Advocate for the applicant seeks time to file additional rejoinder.

3. S.O. to 2.9.2021.

(Me a G gil) Member (A)

12.8.2021

(sgi)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Sp', MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.318 of 2021

C.J. Yemal Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Ms. Savita Suryawanshi holding for Shri V.B. Dhage, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Ld. PO seeks time to file reply.

3. S.O. to 23.8.2021

(Medha Gad 11) Member (A)

12.8.2021

(sgj)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(sgj)

(Medh Member (A)

12.8.2021

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Sp', MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.471 of 2021

A.E. Salunkhe Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents


2. Ld. PO seeks two days time to file reply.

3. S.O. to 17.8.2021.

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.470 of 2021

N.A. Ashtekar Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents


2. IA. PO seeks three weeks time to file reply.

3. S.O. to 2.9.2021.

(Medl '1) Member (A)

12.8.2021

(sgj)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpi.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.396 of 2021

N.G. Pawar ..Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents

Heard Shri C.T. Chandratre, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Ld. PO seeks one weeks time to file reply.

3. S.O. to 24.8.2021.

(Mecla Gast) Member (A)

12.8.2021 (sgj)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(sgi)

(Medha iadgi Member (A)

12.8.2021

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpi.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.737 of 2020

S.R. Gaud Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Shri D.B. Khaire, learned Special Counsel with Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Ld. Advocate for the applicant seeks time to file rejoinder.

3. S.O. to 2.9.2021.

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

Date post:	26-Jan-2023
Category:	Documents
Upload:	khangminh22
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ...

Documents