(sgi)
(Medha adg Member (A)
12.8.2021
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
IN
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.151 of 2021
V.B. Taskhedkar Vs.
Tire. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Applicant
..Respondents
heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar. lea'rned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. On perusal of the record produced by the Ld. PO Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, it was noticed that I had processed the case of the applicant during my tenure in Government. Therefore, the above matter may not be placed before me.
3. The matter may be placed before the Hon'ble Chairperson for placing it before appropriate Bench.
[PTO.
FAAAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Date : 12.08.2021.
0.A.No.340/2011 with 0.A.No.341/2011 with O.A.No.342/2011 with O.A.No.343/2011 with 0.A.No.344/2011 with O.A.No.687/2011 with
0.A.No.875/2011 with 0.A.No.757/2011
K.P. Shah (0.A.340/2011) G.C. Lalka (0.A.341/2011) J.D. Mehta (0.A.342/2011) A.D. Mehta (0.A.343/2011) A.S. Dalvi (0.A.344/2011) M. Mehta (0.A.687/2011) U.G. Parikh (0.A.875/2011) R.G. Kukreja (0.A.757/2011) ....Applicants
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents.
1. Heard Mr. U.V. Bhosale, learned Advocate for the Applicants in 0.A.No.340/2011 with 0.A.No. 341/2011 with 0.A.No.342/2011 with 0.A.No. 343/2011 with 0.A.No.344/2011 with O.A.No.
687/2011 with O.A.No.875/2011, Mr. S.P. Lahane,
learned Counsel for the Applicant in O.A.No.757/
2011 and Mr. A. Khandekar, learned Counsel with
Ms. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
Tribunal's orders
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019)
iSpl.- MAT-P-2 E. IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MlUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No. of 20
IN
Original Application. No of 20
2• In the course of hearing of the matter of the
Temporary part time Lecturers working in
Sydenham College seeking the regularization as
permanent part time Lecturers it is found necessary to know :-
How many permanent sanctioned posts full time for the subject of Accountancy in Sydenham College ?
(b) How many permanent part time posts for the subject Accountancy in Sydenham College ?
(c) On which date last the representation
was made by the College or proposal was sent by the State of Maharashtra
to the M.P.S.C. for the Sydenham College of filling up vacant posts for the subject of Accountancy?
(a)
[pro.
1
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
3. Copy of the proposal or representation to be
brought to the Tribunal made by the Principal of
Sydenharn College to the State of Maharashtra and
the copy of the requisition made by the State to
M.P.S.C. for filling up the posts of the Lecturer for
Accountancy in the Sydenham College.
4. We want Principal, Sydenham College of
Commerce & Economics and Principal Secretary,
Higher and Technical Education to answer the
queries in the form of affidavit.
5. At the request of learned Counsel Mr.
Khandekar the matter is adjourned to 31.08.2021.
As sufficient time is given to answer in these three
queries by the two officers on the affidavit if the
requisite information is not answered to the point in
the form of affidavit Tribunal will be constrained to
take further steps.
6. Adjourned to 31.08.2021.
(>-°4 (Medha Gadgil) (Mridula Bhatkar, J.)
Member(A)
prk
Chairperson
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
IN
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
2.08.2020
M.A 28g/2021 in 0.A 540/2021
Y.M Meshram ... Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ... Respondents
1. Heard Shri R.M Kolge, learned advocate for the e pplicant, proposed Respondent no. 2, Smt K.S Gaikwad, learned P.O for the Respondent no. 1 and Shri B.A Bandiwadekar, learned advocate for Original Applicant.
. Misc Application seeking intervention is allowed, e s the applicant, Respondent no. 2, is going to be adversely affected.
S. Learned counsel Mr Bandiwadekar for the original e pplicant seeks permission to amend the Original Application. Permission granted. Amendment to be carried out till tomorrow.
. Interim relief to continue till tomorrow.
5. S.0 to 13.8.2021.
(Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
Alcn
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) 1Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
IN
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
12.08.2020
0.A 547/2021
Shri A.P Suryawanshi ... Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ... Respondents
1. Heard Smt Punam Mahajan, learned advocate for the applicant, Shri A.J Chougule, learned P.O for the Respondents no 1, 2 & 3 and Shri K.R Jagdale, learned advocate for Respondents no 4, 5 & 7. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that she has served Respondent no. 6, through email, which is mentioned in the caption of the Original Application.
2. Learned counsel for Respondents no 4, 5 & 7 had joined at their respective places where they have been posted. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has a preferential claim over the Respondents no 4, 5 & 7.
3. Learned P.O submits that he has taken instructions to the grounds (a) to (e) as mentioned in the order dated 10.8.2021.
4. So far as the transfer of the applicant and his wife are concerned, the Tribunal found that ex-facie they are contrary to the policy of the State laid down in G.R dated 9.4.2018.
5. On query, I am informed that the post at Indapur and Daund is vacant and either the applicant or his spouse can be posted.
6. The applicant and his wife is directed to submit a joint application to the Respondent nos 2 & 3 of their place of posting at Indapur or Daund. Respondents no 1, 2 and 3 are hereby directed to transfer applicant and his wife at Daund or Indapur as per the choice given by them. Accordingly, the necessary orders to be passed on or before 19.8.2021.
7. With the above directions, Original Application stands disposed of.
(Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
Akn
[PTO.
G.C.P.() J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
12.08.2020
O.A 494/2021
M.P Jamadar ... Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ... Respondents
1. Heard Shri M.P Jamadar, applicant in person and Ms Swati Manchekar, learned C.P.0 for the Respondents.
2. Issue notice made returnable on 13.8.2021.
3. Applicant is authorized and directed to serve on Respondents intimation/notice of date of hearing duly authenticated by Registry, along with complete paper took of O.A. Private service is allowed in view of this present COVID-19 Pandemic situation. Respondents are put to notice that the case may be taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission hearing.
4. This intimation/notice is ordered under Rule 11 of tie Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1988, and the questions such as limitation and alternate remedy are kept open.
5. The service may be done by hand delivery/ speed post/courier and acknowledgement be obtained and produced along with affidavit of compliance in the Registry within one week before returnable date or on the same date. Applicant is directed to file affidavit of compliance and notice.
6. S.0 to 13.8.2021.
(Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
Axn
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
12.08.2020
0.A 528/2021
D.B Mundhe ... Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ... Respondents
1. Heard Shri M.D Lonkar, learned advocate for the applicant and Smt K.S Gaikwad, learned P.O for the Respondents no 1, 2 8; 3 and Shri B.A Bandiwadekar, learned advocate for Respondent no. 4.
. Learned P.O files affidavit in reply on behalf of Respondent no. 1. Same is taken on record. Learned oounsel for Respondent no. 4 also files affidavit in reply. Same is taken on record.
Status quo ante to continue till next date.
4. S.0 to 13.8.2021.
(Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
Arm
[PTO.
G.C.P. J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021.
C.A.No.17 of 2017 in O.A.No.586 of 2016
Dr. S.S. Chappalwar ....Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents.
1. Heard Mr. Bhushan A. Bandiwadekar,
learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. S.P.
Manchekar, learned Chief Presenting Officer for the
Respondents.
2. The learned C.P.O. submits that the order of
the Tribunal is complied with.
3. The learned Advocate produces copy of letter
dated 11.08.2021 written by the Applicant to the
applicant wherein he has stated that he wants to
withdraw the C.A. Copy whereof is take on record
and marked as Exhibit-I.
4. In view of this, C.A. is disposed off.
()11-/(P41 (Mridula Bhatkar, J.)
Chairperson
prk
[PTO.
(G.C.P.J J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.46 of 2019
S.R. Nikumbh & Ors. Applicant
Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Heard Smt. Punam Mahajan, learned Advocate
for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned
Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Learned P.O. submits that Government has again
considered the claim of the Applicant in terms of G.R.
dated 31.08.2019, but the Applicant is lot found ',DI-
entitled to the pay scale she claimed. She therefore
wants to file Additional Affidavit along with order
passed by the Government.
3. Two weeks time as granted for filing Additional
Affidavit.
4. S.O. to 23.08.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (3)
NMN
[RTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4 2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHAR.A.SHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
M.A. No.184 of 2021 in O.A. No.574 of 2020
L.D. Veer Applicant Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Heard Shri Arvind V. Bandiwadekar, learned
Advocate for the Applicant, Shri A.J. Chougule, learned
Presenting Officer for the Respondents and Shri Vivek
Rane, learned Advocate for the Respondents No.5 & 7 is
absent.
2. On request of learned P.O. one week time is
granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply to M.A. as last
chance.
3. S.O. to 20.08.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
[PTO.
G.C.P. ) J 2737 ( 50,000-4-2019 ) ISp!.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.449 of 2021
P.R. Khedekar Applicant Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Heard Shri Arvind V. Bandiwadekar, learned
Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K.,
learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. On request of learned P.O. matter be kept for
tomorrow for filing Affidavit-in-Reply.
3. S.O. to 13.08.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
[PTO.
2
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.452 of 2021
V.E. Jog Applicant Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Heard Shri Arvind V. Bandiwadekar, learned
Advocate for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule,
learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. In this O.A. the Applicant has challenged
suspension order dated 28.06.2021.
3. The Applicant has filed one more O.A. i.e.
197/2021, challenge is to the transfer order which is
shown temporary shifting order dated 01.03.2021 (in
order date is wrongly typed as 01.03.2020) in O.A.
No.197/2021 Reply is already filed and matter is riped
for hearing at the stage of Admission.
4. However, in suspension matter Reply is not filed
since there is temporary shifting and later suspension it
is desirable to hear both the O.A. together.
5. On request of learned P.O. two weeks time is
granted as last chance for filing Affidavit-in-Reply in O.A.
452/2021.
6. O.A. No.197/2021 be also kept with this O.A.
7. S.O. to 24.08.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
2
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.502 of 2021
D.K. Yadav Applicant Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Heard Shri Arvind V. Bandiwadekar, learned
Advocate for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule,
learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Applicant has challenged suspension order dated
06.07.2021, whereby he is suspended under
contemplation of Departmental Enquiry (D.E.) and
Headquarter is kept at Pune.
3. Indeed, in view of circular dated 19.03.2008,
Headquarter should be the place where a Government
servant is suspended. In present case the Applicant was
serving as Naib Tehsildar, Shirur but his Headquarter is
kept at Pune which is in contravention of circular dated
19.03.2008.
4. On previous date i.e. 29.07.2021, taking note of
circular dated 19.03.2008, Respondents were directed
to take remedial measures and to keep Headquarter at
Shirur. However, no such orders are passed.
5. Today learned P.O. sought time to file Reply.
6. Short time is granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply .
7. However, so far as Headquarter is concerned, it
should have been at Shirur and not Pune, therefore
Applicant Headquarter during the period of suspension
be kept at Shirur.
8. S.O. to 25.08.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
2
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.297 of 2020
M.N. Chaudhary Applicant
Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Heard Shri D.B. Khaire, learned Advocate for the
Applicant, Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer
for the Respondents No.1 to 3 and Shri Arvind V.
Bandiwadekar, learned Advocate for the Respondent
No.4.
2. Shri D.B. Khaire, learned Advocate for the
Applicant submits that his client wants to make
representation to claim post of Respondent No.4 — Shri
P.R. Singarwad, who was posted at Thane-Vashi III .
According to him recently Respondent No.4 has been
transferred from Thane-Vashi III to Palghar, and
therefore, Applicants claim for Thane-Vashi III can be
considered.
3. Shri D.B. Khaire, therefore submits that matter
be kept pending till the decision of his representation
and if it is accepted, O.A. may not survive.
4. In view of above, this O.A. is adjourned for Final
Hearing so that the Applicant can make representation
to Respondent No.1.
5. The Applicant is at liberty to make
representation to Respondent No.1 within a week.
Respondent No.1 is directed to decide the said
representation if made within a week and it should be
decided appropriately within three weeks from the date
of receipt of the Representation.
6. S.O. to 07.09.2021.
[,
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
2
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.479 of 2021
C.S. Mane
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Applicant
Respondents.
1. Heard Shri Arvind V. Bandiwadekar, learned
Advocate for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule,
learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Today learned P.O. has filed Affidavit-in-Reply of
Shri Dikshit A. Gedam, Superintendent of Police, Sangli
in terms of the order passed by the Tribunal on
05.08.2021. It is taken on record. Learned P.O. further
submits that it be treated as Reply on merit too.
3. Learned Advocate for the Applicant however
pointed out that what was tendered before the Tribunal
on previous date i.e. 05.08.2021 as observed in para. 4
of the order passed on 05.08.2021 was something
different then the minutes of Police Establishment
Board (P.E.B.) filed along with Affidavit today. On previous date when file was tendered by learned P.O. it
was only about alleged mis-conduct of the Applicant
and there were no such recommendation of his
transfer. He further submits minutes of P.E.B. tendered
today are after thought and prepared later.
4. Minutes of P.E.B. which was tendered before the
Tribunal on 05.08.2021 are not produced today along
with Affidavit-in-Reply and what is tendered is minutes
of P.E.B. recommending transfer of the Applicant.
5 In view of above, learned P.O. is directed to file
minutes of P.E.B. which was tendered before the
Tribunal on 05.08.2021 along with Additional Affidavit
and to explain the position.
6. S.O. to 20.08.2021.
1\14.)0
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpi.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.487 of 2021
P.N. Patil Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Heard Shri M.D. Lonkar, learned Advocate for
the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting
Officer for the Respondents.
2. On request of learned P.O. two weeks time is
granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply.
3. S.O. to 20.08.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
[PTO.
J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) 1Sp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHA.RASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
IN
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.463 of 2021
D.D. Sonune Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Heard Shri Arvind V. Bandiwadekar, learned
Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K.,
learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. On request of learned P.O. two weeks time is
granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply.
3. S.O. to 20.08.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
[PTO.
G.C.P. J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) iSp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.368 of 2021
J.R. Chavan Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Heard Shri Arvind V. Bandiwadekar, learned
Advocate for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule,
learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. On request of learned P.O. one week time is
granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply by way of last
chance.
3. S.O. to 20.08.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
[PLO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MIJMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No. of 20
I N
Original Application No. of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.347 of 2021
S.S. Jadhav Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Heard Shri Arvind V. Bandiwadekar, learned
Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K.,
learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Enough time is granted for filing Affidavit, but
the same is not filed. However on request of learned
P.O. two weeks time is granted for filing Affidavit-in-
Reply by way of last chance.
3. S.O. to 25.08.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpl.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No. of 20
IN
Original Application No. of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.321 of 2021
D.N. Tonde Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Applicant and his Advocate both are absent.
2. Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting Officer for
the Respondents is present.
3. On request of learned P.O. two weeks time is
granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply.
4. S.O. to 27.08.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000----4-2019) iSp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
IN
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.254 of 2021
S.B. Gavit Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Heard Shri Arvind V. Bandiwadekar, learned
Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K.,
learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Today matter is for filing Rejoinder on behalf of
the Applicant, which is already filed in the Office.
3. O.A. therefore be kept for hearing at the stage
of admission.
4. S.O. to 23.09.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar) Member (J)
NMN
_[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.180 of 2021
F.MD. I. Souraj Applicant Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.
1. Heard Smt. Punam Mahajan, learned Advocate
for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned
Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. On request of learned P.O. two weeks time is
granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply by way of last
chance.
3. S.O. to 27.08.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
[R O.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019)
ISp1.- IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALMAT-F-2 E.
MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
IN
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders Tribunal' s orders
Date: 12.08.2021
O.A. No.166 of 2020
U.S. Jagtap
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Applicant
Respondents.
1. Applicant and his Advocate both are absent.
2. Smt. Ranjana Todankar, learned Advocate for
the Applicant has sent her leave note.
3. Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting Officer for
the Respondents is present.
4. No Rejoinder is filed by the Applicant.
5. Since pleading is complete, it be kept for Final
Hearing on 21.09.2021.
(A.P. Kurhekar)
Member (J)
NMN
[PTO
I G.C.P. J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARA.SHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.563 of 2021
A.V. Pardeshi Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Applicant
..Respondents
Heard Shri M.D. Lonkar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Status quo as of today to be maintained till tomorrow.
3. Ld. PO to produce the record tomorrow.
4. S.O. to 13.8.2021. Hamdast.
Ga bil) Member (A)
12.8.2021
(sgj)
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.571 of 2021
A.S. Thool Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Applicant
..Respondents
Heard Shri Gunratan Sadavarte, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Status quo as of today to be maintained till tomorrow.
3. Ld. PO to produce the record tomorrow.
4. S.O. to 13.8.2021. Hamdast.
(Medtliadg ) Member (A)
12.8.2021 (sgj)
[PTO.
(sgj)
(Me h V Gad Member (A
12.8.2021
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) iSp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.572 of 2021
A.N. Bhagat Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Applicant
..Respondents
Heard Shri Gunratan Sadavarte. learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad. learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Status quo as of today to be maintained till tomorrow.
3. Ld. PO to produce the record tomorrow.
4. S.O. to 13.8.2021. Hamdast.
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Sp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.573 of 2021
M.P. Igave Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
„Applicant
..Respondents
Heard Shri Gunratan Sadavarte, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Status quo as of today to be maintained till tomorrow.
3. Ld. PO to produce the record tomorrow.
4. S.O. to 13.8.2021. Hamdast.
(Med Ga 1) Member (A)
12.8.2021 (sgj)
[PTO.
J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021
O.A.No.981 of 2019
Dr. L.V. Bhandarkar ... Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ... Respondents
1. Heard Ms. Punam Mahajan, learned
Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. S.P. Manchekar,
learned Chief Presenting Officer for the
Respondents.
2. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits
that she has received instructions from the
applicant to withdraw the O.A.
3. O.A. is allowed to be withdrawn.
(Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
prk
[PTO.
2
Tribunal' s orders Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Date : 12.08.2021.
M.A.No.258 of 2021 in O.A.No.371 of 2021
P. G. Ghavalikar ....Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents.
1. Heard Mr. R.M. Kolge, learned Advocate for
the Applicant and Mr. A.J. Chougule, learned
Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. The office objections, if any, are to be
removed and court fees to be paid, if not already
paid.
3. Issue notice before admission returnable on
08.09.2021.
4. Applicant is authorized and directed to serve
on Respondent intimation/notice of date of hearing
duly authenticated by Registry, along with complete
paper book of O.A. Private service is allowed in view
of this present COVID-19 Pandemic situation.
Respondents are put to notice that the case may be
taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission
hearing.
5. This intimation/notice is ordered under Rule
11 of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal
(Procedure) Rules, 1988, and the questions such as
limitation and alternate remedy are kept open.
6. The service may be done by Hand delivery,
speed post, courier and acknowledgement be
obtained and produced along with affidavit of
compliance in the Registry within one week.
Applicant is directed to file Affidavit of compliance
and notice.
7. S.O. to 08.09.2021.
prk
(Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) (Sp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal's orders
Date : 12.08.2021.
M.A.No.281 of 2021 in O.A.No.480 of 2021
Y. D . Kanoj a ....Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents.
1. Heard Mr. Bhushan A. Bandiwadekar,
learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. S.P.
Manchekar, learned Chief Presenting Officer for the
Respondents.
2. The affidavit of service of Respondents No.3
to 5 is filed by the learned Advocate for the
Applicant.
3. Respondent- Government is directed to file
reply regarding the seniority of the Applicant.
4. Matter fixed on 31.08.2021.
(Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
Irk
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpl.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal's orders
Date : 12.08.2021.
O.A.No.124 of 2021
M.V. Ghuge ....Applicant
Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents.
1. Heard Ms. S.P. Manchekar, learned Chief
Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Mr. S.S. Solwat, learned Advocate for the
Applicant is absent.
3. The learned C.P.O. files affidavit-in-reply
dated 10.08.2021 on behalf of Respondent No.2,
through Mr. Rajesh P. Bhoir, Joint Director, office of
Joint Director Accounts and Treasury Kokan
Division, CBD Belapur. The same is taken on
record.
4. Admitted and kept for final hearing
06.11.2021
(Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
prk
[PTO.
J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal's orders
Date : 12.08.2021.
O.A.No.247 of 2021
M.A. Amgaonkar ....Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents.
1. Heard Mr. Bhushan A. Bandiwadekar,
learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. S.P.
Manchekar, learned Chief Presenting Officer for the
Respondents.
2. The learned Counsel for the Applicant
submits that he will file affidavit-in-rejoinder during
the course of the day.
3. Admitted and kept for final hearing.
4. Adjourned to 09.09.2021.
RIALotl" (Mridula Bhatkar, J.)
Chairperson
prk
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) iSp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHAR.ASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021.
O.A.No.261 of 2021
V.S. Kulkarni & Ors. ....Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents.
1. Heard Mr. S.S. Dere, learned Advocate for
the Applicants and Ms. S.P. Manchekar, learned
Chief Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. The learned C.P.O. files affidavit-in-reply
dated 10.08.2021 on behalf of Respondent No.2,
through Mr. Gajendra Govindrao Dighavkar, Chief
Administrative Officer, Office of the Director of
Medical Education & Drugs, Mumbai.
3. Admitted and kept for final hearing with
liberty to file rejoinder.
4. Adjourned to 29.10.2021.
LAAAA-u-k
(Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
prk
[PLO.
prk
I/
(i47\A/01,-Nt-
(Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Sp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal's orders
Date : 12.08.2021.
O.A.No.187 of 2021
D.N. Shinde ....Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents.
1. Heard Mr. D.B. Khaire, learned Advocate for
the Applicant and Ms. K.S. Gaikwad, learned
Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. By way of last chance time granted to
learned P.O. to file affidavit-in-reply.
3. Adjourned to 08.09.2021.
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No. of 20
IN
Original Application No. of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021
O.A.No.469 of 2012 with O.A.No.682 of 2013 with O.A.No.879 of 2015
Dr. A.R. Tarale & Ors (0.A.469/2012) Dr. M.B. Deeolikar & Ors. (0.A.682/2013) Dr. G.P. Wadekar & Ors. (0.A.879/2015)
... Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ... Respondents
1. Heard Shri Bhushan A. Bandiwadekar,
learned Advocate for the Applicants in
O.A.No.469/2012, Shri N.Y. Chavan, learned
Advocate for the Applicants in O.A.No.879/2015
and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer
for the Respondents.
2. Shri J.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for
the Applicant in O.A.No.682/2013 is absent.
3. Parties to take note that this matter will be
taken up for final hearing on 31.08.2021. The
learned P.O. is directed to come with all necessary
record, Government Resolutions and Hon'ble High
Court judgments.
4. Adjourned to 31.08.2021
(Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
prk
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal's orders
Date : 12.08.2021
0.A.No.1059 of 2012
D.C. Kalambe ... Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ... Respondents
1. Heard Shri Bhushan A. Bandiwadekar,
learned Advocate for the Applicants and Mr.. K.S.
Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for the
Respondents.
2. The learned Counsel submits that during
pendency of the Original Application the applicant
retired on 30.08.2014.
3. Accordingly it is necessary to amend the
O.A. and so also relief. However, there is no
amendment to that effect. If the applicant does not
carry out the necessary amendment it will become
infructuous.
4. As the applicant retired in 2014 and the
matter is pending since 2012, the learned Advocate
request for permission to make necessary
amendments.
5. Permission granted. Adjourned to
02.09.2021.
/)n(jAlt/1/4).1
(Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
prk
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No. of 20
I N
Original Application No. of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021
M.A.No.164 of 202 in O.A.No.165 of 2021 in O.A.No.38 of 2021
Dr. V.V. Patil & Ors. ... Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ... Respondents
1. Heard Ms. Punam Mahajan, learned
Advocate for the Applicants and Ms. S.P.
Manchekar, learned Chief Presenting Officer for the
Respondents.
2. The learned C.P.O. seeks time for taking
compliance report.
3. Adjourned to 17.08.2021.
(Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
prk
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAIIA.RASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No. of 20
I N
Original Application No. of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021
O.A.No.217 of 2021
Dr. D.R. Deore ... Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ... Respondents
1. Heard Ms. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting
Officer for the Respondents.
2. Mr. S.B. Deore, the learned Advocate for the
Applicant is absent.
3. The learned P.O. submits that by order dated
15.01.2021 the Government has taken a policy
decision that the technical break of Bms doctor who
are Group-B not to be posted is condoned and the
same prayer is made that directions be given to the
Government to decide this representation.
4. The learned Counsel submits that he needs
to amend the prayer and the relevant portion in
0.A.. He seeks permission to file this amendment
application.
5. Permission granted.
27.09.2021.
Adjourned to
(Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson
prk
[PTO.
G.C.P.(1 J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [STA.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021
O.A.No.585 of 2016
R. S. Bodake ....Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents.
1. Heard Shri A. V. Bandiwadekar, learned Counsel for
the Applicant and Shri A. J. Chougule, learned Presenting
Officer for the Respondents.
2. At the very outset, it is noticed that one of us (Smt.
Medha Gadgil, Member-A) had processed the file in the
matter of promotion of the Applicant and appropriate
decision was taken. Therefore, this O.A. needs to be heard by
the Division Bench of which she is not a Member.
3. The Registrar is, therefore, directed to take
appropriate step.
(Medha Gadgil (A.P. Kurhekar) Member (A) Member(J)
vsm
[P TO.
[,46
(Me' clga Gadgil)
Member (A) (A.P. Kurhekar)
Member(J)
) G C P .1 2737 (50,0OO-4-2019) ISD1 - MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MTJMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021
O.A.No.1122 of 2019 with 0.A.1123/2019 with O.A.
No.1124 of 2019 with O.A.No.1127 of 2019 with O.A.
No.1128 of 207"
E.L. Barshinge ....Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents.
1. Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, learned Counsel for
the Applicant and Smt. Kranti Gaikwad, learned Presenting
Officer for the Respondents.
2. These Original Applications were to be heard along
with another connected Original Applications which are also
on today's board.
3. Insofar as these five Original Applications are
concerned, last time learned P.O. was directed to file reply so
that all these nine Original Applications could be heard
together.
4. In first set of O.A., the challenge is to the
appointment of Enquiry Officer. Whereas, in second set of
D.A., the challenge is to the punishment order imposed
against the Applicant after completion of D.E.
5. Today, again learned P.O. requested for two weeks
ime to file reply.
6. Last chance is granted for filing reply.
7. S.O. to 31.08.2021.
[PTO.
G.C.P.() J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) isnl - MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021
O.A.No.914 of 2016
A. A. Desale ....Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents.
1. Heard Shri A. V. Bandiwadekar, learned Counsel for
the Applicant and Smt. Kranti Gaikwad, learned Presenting
Officer for the Respondents.
2. On request of learned Counsel for the Applicant, two
weeks time is granted for final hearing by way of last chance.
3. S.O. to 31.08.2021.
\01\1
(Medh Gadgil) (A.P. Kurhekar) Member (A) Member(J)
vsm
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISO.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021
O.A.No.701 of 2016
D. R. Dighole ....Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents.
1. Heard Shri K. R. Jagdale, learned Counsel for the
Applicant and Shri A. J. Chougule, learned Presenting Officer
for the Respondents.
2. On request of learned P.O., one week time is granted
to file reply to the amendment carried out by the Applicant in
O.A.
3 S.O. to 25.08.2021.
,12 (Medha‘j*Gldgil)
Member (A) (A.P. Kurhekar)
Member(J)
vsm
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) 3 2737 (50,000-4-2019) 1801.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA. ADMTNISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
IN
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021
O.A.No.301 of 2016
J. A. M. H. Momin & Ors. ....Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents.
1. Heard Shri A. V. Bandiwadekar, learned Counsel for
the Applicant and Shri A. J. Chougule, learned Presenting
Officer for the Respondents.
2. Today, learned Counsel for the Applicant has filed
Affidavit-in-Rejoinder along with the final seniority list as on
01.01.2016. It is taken on record.
3. On request of learned P.O., the matter is adjourned
for taking necessary instructions for final hearing.
4. S.O. to 31.08.2021.
(Medhal)Gad 11) Member (A)
1:NW'
(A.P. Kurhekar) Member(J)
vsm
[PTO.
(G.C.P.i J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Sol- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
IN
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021
O.A.No.117 of 2016
D. B. Jadhav ....Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents.
1. Heard Shri A. V. Bandiwadekar, learned Counsel for
the Applicant and Smt. Kranti Gaikwad, learned Presenting
Officer for the Respondents.
2. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that he
wants to file Rejoinder on Affidavit to the reply filed by the
Respondents to the amendment made by him in O.A. during
the course of the day. Statement is accepted. It be taken on
record.
3. Be kept for final hearing.
4. S.O. to 30.08.2021.
(Medlatadgil) (A.P. Kurhekar) Member (A) Member(J)
vsm
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) 'Sol.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
Date : 12.08.2021
O.A.No.594 of 2015
M. V. Gawas ....Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents.
1. Heard Shri A. V. Bandiwadekar, learned Counsel for
the Applicant and Shri A. J. Chougule, learned Presenting
Officer holding for Ms S. P. Manchekar, learned Chief
Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Today, learned P.O. has filed reply to the amendment
made in O.A. by the Applicant. It is taken on record.
3. The matter is adjourned for final hearing.
4. S.0 to 30.08.2021.
(Medadgil) (A.P. Kurhekar) Member (A) Member(J)
sm
[PTO.
G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [SO.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.151 of 2021
V.B. Taskhedkar Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Applicant
..Respondents
Heard Shri A.V. Bandiy‘adekar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. By consent adjourned to 24.8.2021.
(Me G.14gil) Member (A)
12.8.2021
(sgj)
[PTO.
J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpi.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.411 of 2019
S.P. Kapile Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Applicant
..Respondents
Heard Shri U.V. Bhosale, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. At the request of Ld. Advocate for the applicant adjourned to 31.8.2021.
c--e
(Medh Ga il)
e
Member (A) 12.8.2021
(sgj)
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4 2019) 1Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
IN
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.224 of 2021
B.N. Sathe Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Applicant
„Respondents
Heard Shri A.V. Bandiv‘adekar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Ld. Advocate for the applicant files affidavit in rejoinder of the applicant and the same is taken on record.
3. S.O. to 17.8.2021 for final hearing.
(MedLeildgil Member (A)
12.8.2021 (sgj)
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.1059 of 2019
M.G. Pathan Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
' ..Applicant
..Respondents
Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Ld. Advocate for the applicant seeks time to file additional rejoinder.
3. S.O. to 2.9.2021.
(Me a G gil) Member (A)
12.8.2021
(sgi)
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Sp', MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
IN
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.318 of 2021
C.J. Yemal Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Applicant
..Respondents
Heard Ms. Savita Suryawanshi holding for Shri V.B. Dhage, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Ld. PO seeks time to file reply.
3. S.O. to 23.8.2021
(Medha Gad 11) Member (A)
12.8.2021
(sgj)
[PTO.
(sgj)
(Medh Member (A)
12.8.2021
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Sp', MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.471 of 2021
A.E. Salunkhe Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Applicant
..Respondents
Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Ld. PO seeks two days time to file reply.
3. S.O. to 17.8.2021.
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
IN
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.470 of 2021
N.A. Ashtekar Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Applicant
..Respondents
Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. IA. PO seeks three weeks time to file reply.
3. S.O. to 2.9.2021.
(Medl '1) Member (A)
12.8.2021
(sgj)
[PTO.
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpi.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.396 of 2021
N.G. Pawar ..Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
Heard Shri C.T. Chandratre, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Ld. PO seeks one weeks time to file reply.
3. S.O. to 24.8.2021.
(Mecla Gast) Member (A)
12.8.2021 (sgj)
[PTO.
(sgi)
(Medha iadgi Member (A)
12.8.2021
(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpi.- MAT-F-2 E.
IN THE MAHARASHTRA. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
M.A./R.A./C.A. No.
I N
Original Application No.
of 20
of 20
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
Appearance, Tribunal's orders or
directions and Registrar's orders
Tribunal' s orders
O.A. No.737 of 2020
S.R. Gaud Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Applicant
..Respondents
Heard Shri A.V. Bandiwadekar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Shri D.B. Khaire, learned Special Counsel with Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.
2. Ld. Advocate for the applicant seeks time to file rejoinder.
3. S.O. to 2.9.2021.
[PTO.