+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Lower Cretaceous carbonate platform facies, Western Carpathians

Lower Cretaceous carbonate platform facies, Western Carpathians

Date post: 11-Nov-2023
Category:
Upload: independent
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
ELSEVIER Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994) 263-277 PAIAEO Lower Cretaceous carbonate platform facies, Western Carpathians Jozef Michalik Geological Institute, Slovakian Academy of Sciences, Dfibravsk& cesta 9, 842 26 Bratislava, Slovak Republic Received 18 February, 1993; revised and accepted 21 February, 1994 Abstract Two principal belts with "Urgonian" carbonate platform sedimentation evolvedduring the Barremian-Early Albian in the Western Carpathians. The northern grew on an accretionary belt in the convergence zone between the external and internal units. The limestones here contain rich ophiolite detritus. The other belt formed on the Tatric Ridge. In both belts, carbonate platforms were subsequently destroyed: only slope sediments, clastic fan sediments and calciturbidites are preserved in the studied successions. 1. Introduction During the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, several shallow marine carbonate platforms evolved along both sides of the Penninic Oceanic Trough of the Mediterranean Tethys. Those plat- forms formed a part of the widespread "Urgonian" complexes in the Tethyan Realm. Well-preserved sequences of this type have been documented from Tunisia (Philip et al., 1989), Spain (Babinot et al., 1991), the Prfalpes and the Jura Mrs. of France and Switzerland (Arnaud-Vanneau et al., 1979, 1982; Masse et al., 1990), and from the Helvetic Zone of Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Strong tectonism during Alpine orogenesis, collision of the Alpine mobile belt with the Bohemian Massif, and formation of the Carpathian Arc resulted in considerable thrust faulting and deformation. As a consequence, elevated blocks bearing carbonate platforms were mostly uplifted, thrusted over its foreland, and subsequently eroded. The only rem- nants of the Urgonian carbonate platform deposits are slope, near-slope, slope fan sediments, calcitur- bidites, slumped blocks or olistoliths, as well as pebbles in younger (Late Cretaceous or Tertiary) 0031-0182/94/$7.00 © 1994 ElsevierScienceB.V.All rightsreserved SSDI 0031-0182(94)00020-9 clastic formations. However, by studying their lithology and micro-biofacies, a reconstruction was made of the principal features of the Cretaceous carbonate platform and its development in the Western Carpathians. 2. Regional setting Late Jurassic carbonate platform complexes evolved along the edge of the North European Craton. Early Cretaceous post-Kimmerian exten- sional stresses formed an extensive W-E oriented horst-and-basin system in the Outer Carpathians. Edges of its elevated blocks could also support reef constructions and local carbonate platforms, including the famous Stramberk Reef. Their eroded material supplied olistostromes, clastic wedges and turbidites to nearby basins of the Outer Carpathian area. In contrast, no shallow marine carbonates have been found in breccia horizons, which simulta- neously originated in Central Carpathian area in very similar conditions. Fragments of the oldest Lower Cretaceous shallow marine limestones and
Transcript

ELSEVIER Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994) 263-277

PAIAEO

Lower Cretaceous carbonate platform facies, Western Carpathians

Jozef Michalik

Geological Institute, Slovakian Academy of Sciences, Dfibravsk& cesta 9, 842 26 Bratislava, Slovak Republic

Received 18 February, 1993; revised and accepted 21 February, 1994

Abstract

Two principal belts with "Urgonian" carbonate platform sedimentation evolved during the Barremian-Early Albian in the Western Carpathians. The northern grew on an accretionary belt in the convergence zone between the external and internal units. The limestones here contain rich ophiolite detritus. The other belt formed on the Tatric Ridge. In both belts, carbonate platforms were subsequently destroyed: only slope sediments, clastic fan sediments and calciturbidites are preserved in the studied successions.

1. Introduction

During the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, several shallow marine carbonate platforms evolved along both sides of the Penninic Oceanic Trough of the Mediterranean Tethys. Those plat- forms formed a part of the widespread "Urgonian" complexes in the Tethyan Realm. Well-preserved sequences of this type have been documented from Tunisia (Philip et al., 1989), Spain (Babinot et al., 1991), the Prfalpes and the Jura Mrs. of France and Switzerland (Arnaud-Vanneau et al., 1979, 1982; Masse et al., 1990), and from the Helvetic Zone of Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Strong tectonism during Alpine orogenesis, collision of the Alpine mobile belt with the Bohemian Massif, and formation of the Carpathian Arc resulted in considerable thrust faulting and deformation. As a consequence, elevated blocks bearing carbonate platforms were mostly uplifted, thrusted over its foreland, and subsequently eroded. The only rem- nants of the Urgonian carbonate platform deposits are slope, near-slope, slope fan sediments, calcitur- bidites, slumped blocks or olistoliths, as well as pebbles in younger (Late Cretaceous or Tertiary)

0031-0182/94/$7.00 © 1994 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved SSDI 0031-0182(94)00020-9

clastic formations. However, by studying their lithology and micro-biofacies, a reconstruction was made of the principal features of the Cretaceous carbonate platform and its development in the Western Carpathians.

2. Regional setting

Late Jurassic carbonate platform complexes evolved along the edge of the North European Craton. Early Cretaceous post-Kimmerian exten- sional stresses formed an extensive W-E oriented horst-and-basin system in the Outer Carpathians. Edges of its elevated blocks could also support reef constructions and local carbonate platforms, including the famous Stramberk Reef. Their eroded material supplied olistostromes, clastic wedges and turbidites to nearby basins of the Outer Carpathian area.

In contrast, no shallow marine carbonates have been found in breccia horizons, which simulta- neously originated in Central Carpathian area in very similar conditions. Fragments of the oldest Lower Cretaceous shallow marine limestones and

264 J. Michalik/Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994) 263-277

organic skeletons (Borza et al., 1980; Va~i~ek et al., 1983; Michalik and Sot~ik, 1990) indicating exis- tence of unknown carbonate platforms somewhere close to this area occur in calciturbidite intercal- ations of the Hauterivian pelagic limestone sequence. Similar facies have not been found in outcrops elsewhere in the Western Carpathians.

A much wider variety of platform carbonates has been preserved in Barremian, Aptian and Lower Albian sequences. At that time, the carbon- ate platform belt evolved around the deep oceanic (.9) Penninic Trough separating the Outer- and Central Carpathian regions. Cretaceous and Paleogene conglomerates in the Pieniny Klippen Belt (border of Paleoeuropean shelf, now forming part of the Paleoalpine Accretion Belt (PAB) between Outer and Central Carpathians) contain large olistoliths (up to 24 m) of Urgonian lime- stones (along with ophiolite detritus) derived from unknown older platform deposits, rimming the Outer Carpathian region on the south.

In the Central Carpathians, Tatric sequences comprise locally remnants of another carbonate platform system, including biohermal and lagoonal facies. However, practically only platform margin facies of Lower Cretaceous shallow marine carbon- ates are known from the majority of the Tatric and Manin sequences. The occurrences, which were described from the Vysokfi-, Bel~i-, Havran-, and Humenn6 Units (belonging to a more internal, Fatric Unit of the Central Carpathians) contain slope and turbiditic sediments, deposited near to, or even below the carbonate platform slope (Fig. 1 ).

Fossils and structures preserved in the rock fragments allowed to reconstruct paleoenviron- ments of the source area. Their occurrences plotted into a palinspastic scheme indicate the extent of ancient platforms. The combination of microfacies analysis and heavy mineral studies support the dynamic interpretation of the depositional condi- tions. Microfacies study and analyses of terrige- nous grains show that the Urgonian limestones in preserved sequences never contain ophiolite detri- tus and glaucophane derived from subduction met- amorphites; their microfaunas are impoverished in comparison with the pebble material.

The limestones of Urgonian facies were found

in several areas of the Outer and Central Western Carpathians (Migik, 1990). The "Urgonian" of the Outer Carpathians is represented by secondary deposits in flysch sequences of the PAB. Fragments of another, Central Carpathian belt are preserved in the Tatric Zone (northern slopes of the High Tatra Mrs., Qerven~i Magura in Low Tatra Mts., Tribe6 Mts.), in the Manin Unit (Mt. Manin, Mt. Butkov, Haligovce, Ni2n~i in Orava Valley) and in the peripheral units of the Kri~na Nappe: Humenn6 Unit (Humenn6 Mts.), Havran Unit (Belianske Tatry Mts.), Bel~i Unit (Str~izov Mts.), Boca Unit (Biele Karpaty Mts.), Vysok~i Unit (Mal6 Karpaty Mts.; Figs. 1, 2). Pebbles of the Urgonian limestones occur in younger conglomer- ate deposits (Upper Cretaceous Valchov Conglomerate, Paleogene Sambron Conglomerate, or Borov6 Formation).

3. Urgonian facies of the Outer Carpathians

Abundant pebbles and blocks of Urgonian Orbitolina-bearing limestones in post-Early Albian conglomerates of the PAB pose a special problem. They frequently contain a considerable admixture of ophiolite detritus (chromian spinels; Mi~ik and S~,kora 1981, etc.). It is remarkable that the Urgonian limestones known from pebbles are better microscopically investigated than those outcropping in continuous sequences. Another handicap is connected with the lack of information about ophiolite detritus from the East and South Carpathian Urgonian limestones.

These Western Carpathian occurrences yield the only data about a lost segment of the Paleoeuropean Urgonian belt between the Helvetic localities of the Bavarian Alps (Mialler, 1985), or the Penninic Schrattenkalk localities of the Switzerland Alps and the East Carpathian Marmarosh outcrops (Chernov et al., 1980).

The exotic origin of the Outer Carpathian Urgonian pebbles could be demonstrated by their clastic component (ophiolite detritus) and by the composition of microfaunal remnants. The ophio- lite detritus is represented by chromian and ferroan spinels (Mi~ik et al., 1981 ) and rare tiny serpentine fragments (Mi~ik, 1990). Spinels were found in

J. Michalik/Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994)263 277 265

B--~.. . . . . . "" "- \ , \~\ _WARSZAVA . U , ~ - L " a BON N / / \ \\\ ~ . \ \ \ \ ~;x A

• / / \ \ ~ ~; . / .

• ~I, ~ \Bohemian ~ \o - . PARIS I ~ (.0 \ e p R A H A "-- _ z .~¢ ' , , . . . ~ ¢,~ ~ \ . . : ~ •

't" ~ \ Massif I I "'" ~':

~,.9 "" \ x..\ .. x ".~ ~@,. ~ ] . , , Y ~ eBUCURESTI

, , \ \ ~ ~ ~,.

P " , ' "

t i " ~/,-.-,~:K--~/~°.:~, 6 c ° ~ , . { ! i : .~ - o ' r 9 a t h i a ~ s ~ ' ~ ! : : ' . . i ' : ! i . ; . ? r ~ ~ ~ J ~ : : : ~ - ~ ~ - : ~ ...... : ; ' [ ~ : . . : / / ~ . " ~ ) / ~ , ~ , / V ok6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O ~ ""~-~-'~':: %" : : ' ~ ' " : : " : " ys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -,-.... 'X~ ,,.-~.;.. x..~ • .. ~." :

~: ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . o .. . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : " . . '~ ; . " - '~ I ' " ' ~e . . . . . . : . . . . . ' ' I f . ~ . • . . . . /.+ ". . . . . . "~-: . . . . . : , + : , - ; + : •

~@ .. ' " - " " ' . Y : : ' ~ : ! i i . - : : : : " ' : : " ' : : : : : : : ' : " " : ' ' : ; ===================== , . - , I I I I I I I I i i . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . : 1 1 1 1 ~ • ~ I i I I I . . . . . .

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : t ~ ! i i i i i l i i ~ : : :" : : ' . ' . ' . " : : " : : : : : " : ' : : : " ~/:'! :~'~-'k~ , ' " . , , ~ . S II BR ~BGY-~" ATISLAVA: : : : : : : ' : : : : : " '. "r.'~:-" ".L: .~."~ :: . . . . • ~ ================================= . . . . . . . .

: : : : ..... + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t ' - .

. . . . . ! "%:~i : : : : :" ~ ~ ! ~ ! " : . : . ' : ' • . . . .

f " ~ ~ ' e n ~ r a I ~ M ~ s T H U N G " " : ' : . . : ' . . .. R Y o : ~ : : : : Neogene basinSlOokm

Fig. 1. A. Location of the area studied in the f lame of the Central European Alpine Mountains Belt. B. A sketch of the principal units of the Western Carpathians with location of the sections mentioned in the text.

266 J. Michalik/Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994) 263-277

N o r t h E u r o p e a n _ _WARS_ZA_WA_ _0_ _ _ East E u r o p e a n - - A

- - - - - - ) 2 " J ~ 2 ~ \k. cOuter Carpathian\

NI ~ - - - , ' e l v ~ t i ~ ~ . ~ , - - - ~ - . ~ " _ - m \ _ _ _ ~ . s ~ e ~ . ~, _ _ . . ~ X - ~ , , ~ ' .

- - \ ~ ~ _ , _ ~ m ~ ~ - -7/~ ,'

;;-t- r

-~I dry land

-"lePi continental sea

F ]~------~] carbonate shetf

~11~ carbonate ptotforms

~ stapes

~ intra shelf basins ~ oceanic basins

Fig. 2. A. Paleogeographical situation of the northern part of the Mediterranean Tethys during the late Early Cretaceous. B. Barremian/Aptian paleogeography of the Central Western Carpathians.

No

rth

E

uro

pea

n

Ou

ter

Car

pat

hia

ns

Pen

nini

c G

entr

al

Car

pat

hia

ns

“Cim

mer

ion

V

ard

ar

Oce

an

Car

pat

hio

ns”

0 50

km

Mo

nin

F

m

Po

dh

ori

e F

m

L6E

kovs

k6

Fm

0 B

’ M

rlrz

nic

o

Fo

rmat

ion

fan

1 /

hem

ipel

agic

b

asin

Fig.

A

. Pa

linsp

astic

th

roug

h th

e C

arpa

thia

n pa

rt

the

nort

hern

ne

arsh

ore

duri

ng

Ear

ly

Cre

tace

ous.

D

etai

ls

of

sect

ions

sh

owin

g

carb

onat

e pl

atfo

rms.

Fi

g.

2 lo

caliz

atio

n of

se

ctio

n lin

es).

268 J. Michalik/Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994) 263-277

10,5ram A I 10,5ram B

I ~ l m m

I I0 ,1 m m C ~ ' fO,5mm D

t . - ~ ' - " ~ - - - i I m m

I lmm

E

J. Michalik/Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994)263-277 269

approximately one fifth of the Urgonian pebbles from the Upohlav Conglomerates (western part of the Klippen Belt; they contain locally up to 67% of the spinel in their heavy fraction), in one tenth of the Urgonian pebbles from the Pro~ Conglomerates (eastern part of the Klippen Belt). On the other hand, spinels were found only in one of 18 Urgonian pebbles from the Strihovce Conglomerates (Krynica Subunit of the Magura Unit, East Slovakian part of the Flysch Belt). According to Mi~ik (1990), the ophiolite detritus was derived from strongly tectonized triturated ultramafic rock bodies which have been obducted into the source area at the end of Early Cretaceous. These ultramafic rocks were involved in an intensely thrust, partially emerged structural high, called "Andrusov Ridge" by Birkenmajer (1988). This opinion is supported by the co-occurrence of clastic glaucophane with the spinels (Mi~ik, 1978). These facts, as well as the transport direction in the Urgonian limestone-bearing olistostromes and flysch beds in the Pieniny Klippen Belt of Poland (Birkenmajer and Lefeld, 1969) which is from the S and SE, indicate the probable position of scat- tered small "Urgonian" platforms on structural elevations (partially with obducted oceanic crust?) along the very southern margin of the Outer Carpathian Pieniny Klippen Belt (Fig. 3).

From a micropaleontological point of view, the presence of many species of Orbitolinopsis, Choffatella decipiens, Archalveolina and other ele- ments (Fig. 4) unknown from the "Urgonian" limestone outcrops in the Central Carpathians is noteworthy. A typical lagoonal facies with milio- lids and dasycladaceans (Fig. 5) occurs rarely. Archalveolines are regarded as south Neo-Tethyan elements (Bassoullet et al., 1985). Recently, they were mentioned from the Vill~ny Mts in Hungary

by Schlagintweit (1990). This fact, together with the spinel content in Urgonian limestones in some Dinaric localities, inspired several authors to for- mulate the hypothesis of a Dinarian source of the West Carpathian exotic pebbles, contrary to Migik and Marschalko (1988). The special faunal com- position could be rather explained by the proximity of the area to the Vardar sea-way (Fig. 2).

4. Urgonian facies in the central western Carpathians

The Alpine-Carpathian shelf fragment has been dissected by tensional faults during the late Early Cretaceous. The northern edges of several elevated blocks provided suitable conditions for the origin, stabilization and development of "Urgonian" car- bonate platforms, similar to those which rimmed the opposite, northern side of the Penninic Trough (Fig. 3).

Cretaceous and Paleogene conglomerates in PAB contain large Urgonian limestone blocks and olistoliths. Several of them belong probably to remnants of tectonic bodies transported from the south.

4.1. Carbonate plat forms and upper slope

Pale cream-yellow organodetrital biocalcirudites to biocalcarenites are equivalent to the Alpine Schrattenkalk, and to the Zirc- or Krrnyes Formation of the Hungarian Transdanubian Central Mts. These limestones were deposited in reef-, fore-reef- and also slope zones of a carbonate platform. Lefeld et al. (1985) analysed the com- position of the reef builders in the Wysoka Turnia Formation in the High Tatra Mts. They were

Fig. 4. A. Chromium spinel grains in an intraclast: arenaceous oobiosparite in contact with intrabiomicrite. Barremian Aptian pebble from Upper Cretaceous conglomerates of the Klippen Belt. Z~istranie, magn. × 43. B. Cylindroporella sugdeni Elliott, Barremian-Aptian "Urgonian" limestone pebble from Upper Cretaceous conglomerates of the Klippen Belt, Kotrcina Lfika, magn. × 30. C. Concentration of chromite grains in Barremian/Aptian pebble with Palorbitolina lenticularis. Coniacian conglomerates of the Kysuca Unit, Klippen Belt, magn. x 136. D. Serpentine clast in Barremian/Aptian sandy Orbitolina limestone. Pebble in Albian/ Cenomanian conglomerates of the Klape Unit, PAB. Nosice, magn. x 43. E. Cuneolina sp. and Mesorbitolina ? sp. in Upper Aptian biomicrite. Pebble from Paleogene Proc Conglomerate, magn. x 20. F. Orbitolina (Mesorbitolina) sp. in Upper Aptian biomicrite. Pebble from Paleogene Proc Conglomerate. Ladickovce, magn. x 30. G. Sabaudia capitata Arnaud-Vanneau, Upper Aptian pebble from Proc Conglomerate. Inovce, magn. x 30.

270 J. Michalik/Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994) 263-277

Fig. 5. A. Orbitolinidae sp. ind. and Cuneolina sp. in biomicrite with Mesorbitolina parva. Upper Aptian pebble from Pro~ conglomerate. N. Ladickovce, magn. x 48. B. Orbitolinopsis ? sp. in Barremian micrite pebble in Cenomanian conglomerate, Klippen Belt. Povazsk~, Hrad castle, magn. x 30. C. Orbitolinopsis cuvillieri MouUade in Barremian biosparite pebble from Paleogene Proc Conglomerate. Pro~ locality, magn. x 48. D. Palorbitolina ? sp. and Munieria grambasti Bystrick~ in Upper Barremian/Lower Aptian biosparite pebble from Senonian Valchov Conglomerate. Hrabov6, magn. x 39. (Large foraminifers were determined by Dr. E. K6hler and Prof. A. Arnaud-Vanneau).

J. Michallk/Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994) 263-277 271

dominated by colonial corals, hydrozoans and calcareous algae, and accompanied by bivalves, gastropods and other organisms. The formation is about 60-90 m thick, dated as Barremian to Lower Aptian. It is covered by Middle Albian glauconite- phosphoritic marls of the Zabijak Formation.

Deformations of the pelagic substrate, described from Mt. Butkov by Michalik and Va~i6ek (1987), were interpreted as a loading effect by organoclas- tic slope debris of the Podhorie Formation (Borza et al., 1987; Fig. 6). The base of this complex is formed by a 4-5 m thick rough carbonate breccia (in 70-80 cm thick gradational cycles). The clasts were derived from underlying rocks, the youngest of them containing late Early Aptian Deflandronella veracruzana (Michalik and Sotfik, 1990).

A substantial part of the Podhorie Formation (65-75 m thick) consists of fine-grained cherty limestones rich in organic matter. Biomicrites, biopelsparites and intrabiosparites contain frag- ments of bivalves, crinoid columnalia, hedbergellid foraminifers and other microfauna (Michalik and Sotfik, 1990). Microplankton is represented by Praecolomiella trejoi, P. boneti, Deflandronella veracruzana, Parachitinoidella cuvillieri and other more-or-less typical late Aptian forms.

Massive pale organogenic limestones of the Manin Formation cover detrital slope carbonates of the Podhorie Formation in the Manin Unit (Figs. 6 and 7). Biomicrites and biomicrosparites contain fine biogenic detritus, crinoid columnalia, bivalves, microfossils, including Lower Albian col- omiellids. Intercalations with rudist shell fragments were found in the Manin Narrows. The sequence is terminated by a hard-ground horizon, covered by marls with Upper Albian foraminifers. Clastic material derived from growing and contempora- neously destroyed carbonate platforms was trans- ported through the adjacent channels (Michalik and Va~i6ek, 1984) into fans on the basinal slope.

A hill near Haligovce in the eastern sector of the Klippen Belt (Birkenmajer, 1959; Birkenmajer and Lefeld, 1969; Kotanski, 1963) exposes another type of Urgonian-like sequence: the Haligovce Formation, similar to the Manin Formation. The lower part of an about 40 m thick sequence is formed by bituminous bedded cherty limestones

analogous to the Podhorie Formation, the upper part consists of pale massive organodetrital lime- stones with bivalves, arenaceous foraminifers, echi- noderm plates and scarce bryozoans.

4.2. Lower slope of the carbonate platform

The majority of the Western Carpathian Lower Cretaceous limestones represent bathyal, deep neritic and slope facies; a substantial part of the platform bodies has been destroyed either by sub- sequent erosion or by tectonic reduction. Slope facies show dinstinct progradation in time and space. The base of the Tatric slope sequences is of Late Hauterivian age. The same sedimentation in the Manin Zone started in the early Barremian, but in the Butkov area of the same zone, or in the Belfi Unit, during the Aptian (Michalik et al., 1987; Michalik and Vagi~ek, 1987).

Submarine channels and canyons in the lower part of the platform slope supported extensive debris fans below their base. The Mur~fi Formation (Borza, 1957; Michalik and Sot/tk, 1990; Figs. 6 and 7) illustrates well such a develop- ment. It attains more than a hundred meters in thickness.

The basal member of the Mur~ifi Formation is about 15-20 m thick. It contains numerous marly intercalations with pelagic microfauna wedging out in fine detrital grainstones with packstone layers (Michalik and Sotfik, 1990). Calpionellids, sponge spicules, and bivalve and echinoderm frag- ments occur together with ooids and microoncoids in carbonate intra- and extraclasts. Sporadic fora- minifers indicate a Valanginian to early Hauterivian age of the clasts. Moreover, small forms of Calpionella alpina found in clasts in the lower part of one of the Mt. Mur~fi sections (Michalik and Sotfik, 1.c.) indicate considerable erosion of the bottom in the supporting channels.

The middle part of the Mur~fi Formation con- sists of about 30 m of well-bedded fine detrital limestones, characterized by alternation of the grainstones (with an increased share of the matrix and fine grains) with the packstones. Pseudo- oolitic limestones occur locally. Chert nodules form local stratiform horizons as in the Podhorie Formation (Michalik and Vagi~ek, 1987). They

Ma

n(n

U

n

it

MT

MA

NI'N

NA

RR

OW

S

MT

BU

TKO

V

.~ B

UT

KO

V

M

=ro

sio

n

z

~

;urf

ac

es

[

=_M

AN

[N F

OR

~

n -

PO

DH

C

~as

ina[

~

-...

. n

or

Is

LUC

K~

~ c

arb

on

ate

p

latf

orm

li

me

sto

ne

ca

rbo

na

te

KA

LIS

CO

p

latf

orm

",

1--

, J

slo

pe

de

bri.,

F

OR

MA

TIO

I'

che

rty

lime

sto

ne

s

bre

ccia

ted

li

me

sto

ne

s

~]

h

emip

elag

ic

bio

turb

ate

d

lim

est

on

es

~ ~

1

MR

AZ

~

bian

cone

FO

RM

lim

est

on

es

" --

~ in

dis

tin

ctly

,D

CE

n

od

ula

r R

NA

TIO

h

lim

est

on

es

~ ,,

Am

mo

nit

ico

R

oss

o "

li

me

sto

ne

s

Be

l6

U

nit

;I

UA

RR

Y

VA

LAS

KA

, BE

LA, N

AR

RO

WS

~a

vra

n

\ /

/

\\

/ M

, \\

/

\\

/ \\

'

MU

R,~

N

\\ \\

LO

KA

\

~ tR

MA

TIO

t

\ ~

/ \

\ /

\ /

\ /

\ \ \ \ \ ', IU

RA~I

\

~N

AT

IOI

\

\N

SK

A \

x

,TIO

N

'

Jnil

25m

15

10

0

• iT M

UR

AI~

7ig.

6.

Lit

holo

gica

l lo

gs o

f fo

ur L

ower

Cre

tace

ous

sect

ions

com

pris

ing

orga

noge

nic

lim

esto

ne c

ompl

exes

sho

win

g th

eir

prin

cipa

l li

thos

trat

igra

phic

al d

ivis

ion.

n~

,j

J. Michallk/Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994) 263-277 273

Fig. 7. A. Steep rock walls of Mt Muran consisting of the Murfin Limestone Formation (Hauterivian-Barremian debris fan of the Tatric carbonate platform slope, resting on basinal marlstones of the Koscieliska Fm). Havran Nappe Unit, Belianske Tatry Mts. B. Cherts in coarse organodetrital limestone of the Murb_n Formation. NW slope of Mt Mur~n, Belianske Tatry Mts. C. A p t i a ~ Lower Albian platform carbonates of "Urgonian type" (PF= slope sediments of the Podhorie Formation) covered by Upper Albian basinal shales of the Butkov Formation (BF). Butkov Quarry, Manln Unit. Str~zovsk6 Vrchy Mts.

274 J. Michallk/Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994) 263-277

contain rare, well preserved fossils of Acrasiales (Misik and Locquin, 1983). The foraminifer asso- ciation (Michalik and Sot~ik, 1990) indicates a Late Hauterivian to Early Barremian age.

The upper member is more than 50 m thick. Massive pale limestones are formed by fine detrital grainstones containing packstone intercalations. Coarse bioclastic rudstones occur relatively fre- quently. They contain intraclasts of lithified grainstones and extraclasts of micrite mudstones with calpionellids and sponge spicules, indicating continuing erosion in transport channels. Rudstones are formed by detritus of bioherm organisms, predominantly by corals, hydrozoans, bryozoans, the encrusting alga Ethelia alba, the sessile foraminifer Koskinobullina socialis, coralline algae and the microproblematic Pieninia oblonga. Dasycladacean algae occur more rarely, layers with rudist fragments seldom (Michalik and Sot~tk, 1.c.; Lefeld, 1974). The foraminifers indicate a Barremian age.

The Mur~fi Formation in the top part of Mt Mur~in (Fig. 7) is covered by a shaly sequence of the Mur~inska LOka Formation, several tens of meters thick, consisting of dark intensely biotur- bated marlstones with black- to gray limestone intercalations. Nannoconid wackestones and mud- stones contain cadosinids, calcisphaerulids, colo- misphaerids, globochaetes, ostracods, and echinoderm fragments. Nodosariid foraminifers dominate, the planktonic foraminifers indicate a Bedoulian-Gargassian age. The sequence contains gradational cycles, slump breeeias and olistoliths. Lefeld (1974) has found Palorbitolina lenticularis, Va~irek (in Michalik et al., 1990) identified early Aptian ammonites and the belemnite rostrum Duvalia grasiana. Michalik and Sot~ik (1990) rec- ognized colomiellids, which indicate a late Aptian (or even early Albian?) age.

5. Caleiturbiditic intercalations in basinal sediments

Gravity flows originating on the slope of the Lungau Swell deposited below its foot a complex of coarse detrital to brecciated limestones with marly intercalations (Mahel, 1959; Mahel et al., 1967). Jablonsk~, et al. (1993) described this, about

30-60 m thick, Barremian to Aptian sequence of the Ore~any and Solirov Unit as the Sollrov Formation. The components of turbidite cycles (Td and Te Bouma intervals) consist of lithoclasts (quartzite blocks up to 1-2 m3), fragments of organisms, predominantly crinoids, and dismicrite limestones. Cross-bedding and the orientation of grains and lithoclasts indicate transport currents from NW. Structural elements of clastic beds, as well as their rich fossil content indicate erosion of older pelagic carbonates. Pelagic intervals consist of argillaceous calcilutite with Barremian to Aptian microplankton and benthic foraminifers. The for- mation rests on the Lurivn~i Formation, being overlain by the Albian Homrlka Marl of the Poruba Formation.

Dark, almost black, fine- organodetrital lime- stones with brownish cherts crop out above the pelagic Lower Cretaceous limestone sequence in the Tatric units of the High Tatra- and Mahi Fatra Mts. Lefeld (1968) and Lefeld et al. (1985) described this development as the Osobit~i Forma- tion belonging to a "distal Urgonian facies", 45-60 m thick. Barremian and early Aptian orbitolinids occur sporadically, belemnites, brachiopods and bivalves are rare. The sequence contains relatively frequent calciturbiditic gravellites to calcarenites with gradation and with rests of a neritic fauna (Michalik et al., 1990: in the Bralo quarry). Mikro- planktic remnants are represented by cadosinids and calpionellopseUas (Michalik and Sot~ik, 1990).

A rhythmically bedded complex of organodetri- tal cherty and marly limestones of calciturbidite origin named the Str~i~.ovce Formation character- izes the deeper basinal slope of the Kri~na Nappe sedimentary area (Vasisek et al., 1983). The base of each rhythm consists of a coarse-grained grada- tionally bedded horizon with frequent extraclasts. Organic remnants are fragmented, belonging to neritic organisms (gastropods, solenoporid algae, bryozoans, etc.). The formation attains 1-65 m in thickness, it wedges into a terminal Lower Hauterivian micritic spotted marly basinal lime- stone complex (Mr~iznica Formation).

6. Decline of the Urgonian carbonate platforms

Diastrophic events, which affected the Western Carpathians during the late Barremian and Aptian,

J. Michalik/Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994) 263-277 275

are manifested as breccias, turbidites, paracon- glomerates (Michalik and Va~irek, 1984), basic volcanics and tufts.

Blocking of sea currents by the dissected mor- phology of the sea bottom caused expansion of the anoxic black shale sedimentation area in the Outer Carpathians. Deposition of pelitic distal flysch (Verovice, Kapusnica, Konhora, Brodno lithostratigraphic units) characterized the depres- sions, while carbonate sedimentation was restricted to the surface of elevated blocks (Chmielowa Formation). The tensional regime spread over a great part of the area.

Subsequent shortening of the sedimentary area in PAB caused formation of accretionary prisms consisting of coarse conglomerates with clasts derived from tectonically deformed zones (Mi~ik et al., 1980; Mi~ik and Marschalko, 1988). Structural highs and subduction complexes emerged as an outer accretionary arc ("Andrusov Ridge" or "Pieniny Cordillera"). This elevation was rimmed by shallow marine Urgonian lime- stone containing a high admixture of ophiolite detritus. The complex structure and fragmentary knowledge of the zone between the Outer- and Central Carpathians make the reconstruction of its paleogeography and paleotectonic development extremely difficult. During the Middle Albian, sudden depth increase (collapse-like) in the Central Carpathian area caused lowering of carbonate platforms below the photic zone. Removal of shallow marine barriers opened way to cold upwelling currents (Michalik and Kov~ic, 1982), which definitively blocked the carbonate sedi- mentation in this part of Mediterranean Tethys. Consecutively, monotonous relatively deep marine pelites and siltites (Zabijak Marls, Butkov- and Poruba Formations) were deposited in this, for- merly diversified, area.

material was transported southwards in calcitur- bidite intercalations (Kri~na Unit, etc.).

The Andrusov Ridge (sensu Birkenmajer, 1988) formed by obducted slices of accretionary prism at the transition between the Outer and Central Carpathians (PAB) was the substrate of Urgonian limestone sedimentation with a relatively rich content of microorganic remnants. Exotic pebbles derived from this ridge contain, unlike the sequences mentioned above, rich ophiolite detritus. Besides this source (Ultrapieninic Ridge, Roumanian Ridge), another, southerly located, source from the limestones, covering the Tirolic Domain is supposed by several Alpine geologists (Hagn, 1982 ; Faupl and Pober, 1991; Schlagintweit, 1987, 1990). This southern source is known also from the Dinarides and from the Hungarian Gerecse Mts, where Orbitolina lime- stones contain detritus rich in ophiolite, as well (Sztanr, 1990).

Acknowledgments

My sincere thanks is directed to M. Mi~ik (Bratislava), who actively contributed to this paper, H. Arnaud (Grenoble), K. Birkenmajer (Krakow), W.A. Morgan (Houston), J.-P. Masse (Paris), T. Simo (Madison), and Finn Surlyk (Copenhagen) are gratefully acknowledged for valuable inspiring comments, as well as to Martin C. Styan for linguistic correction of the English text. The work was partially sponsored by Grant Agency of the Slovakian Academy of Sciences (Grant Project GA-126). The paper resulted in the frame of the IGCP Project no. 362.

References

7. Final remarks

Relics of vanished Barrernian-Aptian carbonate platforms in the Western Carpathian sequences contain deposits of upper slope and basin margin. The cores of the platforms were preserved only locally (High Tatra Mts.). Destroyed platform

Arnaud-Vanneau, A., Arnaud, H., Charollais, J., Conrad, M.A., Cotillon, P., Ferry, S., Masse, J.-P. and Peybernes, B., 1979. Palrogrographie des calcaires urgonien du sud de la France. Grobios, 3: 363-383.

Arnaud-Vanneau, A., Arnaud, H., Cotillon, P., Ferry, S. and Masse J.-P., 1982. Caract~res et 6volution des plates-formes carbonatres prrivocontiennes au Crrtac6 infrrieur (France Sud-Est). Cretaceous Res., 3: 3-18.

Babinot, J.-F., Barbaroux, L., Tronchetti, G., Philip, J.,

276 J. Michalik/Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994) 263-277

Canerot, J., Koyoumontzakis, G. and Redondo, C., 1991. Les palroenvironnements margino-littoraux de la plate- forme albo-crnomanienne du Bas-Aragon (Iberides septentri- onales, Espagne). Bull. Soc. Grol. Fr., 162 (4): 753-762.

Bassoullet, J.-P., Fourcade, E. and Peybernes, B., 1985. Palrobiogrographie des grands foraminifrres benthiques des marges n6o-t6thysiennes au Jurassique et au Cr6tac6 inf6- rieur. Bull. Soc. G6ol. Ft., 8, 1, 5: 699-713.

Birkenmajer, K., 1959. The Pieniny Mts. Geological cross- sections through the Poland, 10. Wyd. Geol. Warszawa, pp. 1-20 (in Polish).

Birkenmajer, K., 1988. Exotic Andrusov Ridge: its role in plate- tectonic evolution of the West Carpathian foldbelt. Stud. Geol. Pol., 91: 7-37.

Birkenmajer, K. and Lefeld, J., 1969. Exotic Urgonian limestones from the Pieniny Klippen Belt of Poland. Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., Sci. Geol. Geogr., 17 (1): 13-23.

Borza, K., 1957. Notes to the Murfin Limestone. Geol. Sb. SAV 8, 1:116-118 (in Slovakian).

Borza, K., Gagparik6v, V., Michalik, J. and Vagi~ek, Z., 1980. Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous sequence of the Krna Nappe (Fatric) in the Strovce section, Strovsk Vrchy Mts (Western Carpathians). Geol. Zb. Geol. Carpathica, 31, 4: 541-562.

Borza, K., Michalik, J. and Va~i~ek, Z., 1987. Lithologlcal, biofacial and geochemical characterization of the Lower Cretaceous pelagic carbonate sequence of Mt. Butkov (Mann Unit, Western Carpathians). Geol. Zb. Geol. Carpathica, 38, 3, pp. 323-348.

Chernov, V.E. et al., 1980. Urgonian deposits of the Soviet Carpathians. Izd. Nauka, Moscow, pp. 1-239 (in Russian).

Faupl, P. and Pober, E., 1991, Zur Bedeutung detritischer Chromspinelle in der Ostalpen: Ophiolitischer Detritus aus der Vardarsutur. In: Jubilumschrift 20-Jahre geologlscher Zusammenarbeit sterreich-Ungarn, 1, pp. 133-143.

Gaupp, R., 1983. Die palogeographische Bedeutung der Konglomerate in der Losensteiner Schichten (Alb, Nrdliche Kalkalpen). Zitteliana, 10: 155-171.

Hagn, H., 1982. Neue Beobachtungen in der Unterkreide der Nrdlichen Kalkalpen (Thierseer Mulde SE Landl, Kalkalpine Randschuppe SW Bad Wiessee). Mitt. Bayer. Staatsamml. Pala/~ntol. Hist. Geol., 22:117-132.

Jablonsk~, J., Michallk, J., Pla~ienka, D. and Sot/tk, J., 1993. Sedimentary environment of the Solrov Formation and correlation with Lower Cretaceous turbidites in Central West Carpathians, Slovakia. Cretaceous Res., 14: 613-621.

Kotanski, Z., 1963. On the Triassic Haligovce cliff and the paleogeographic position of the Haligovce Succession. Acta Geol. Pol., 13 (2): 295-313 (in Polish).

Lefeld, J., 1968. Stratigraphy and paleogeography of the high Tatric Lower Cretaceous in the Tatra Mts. Stud. Geol. Pol., 24, 115 pp.

Lefeld, J., 1974. Middle-Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous biostratigraphy and sedimentology of the Sub-Tatric Succession in the Tatra Mts (Western Carpathians). Acta Geol. Pol., 24 (2): 277-364.

Lefeld, J., Gazdzicki, A., lwanow, A., Krajewski, K. and

W6jczik, K., 1985. Jurassic and Cretaceous lithostratigraphic units of the Tatra Mountains. Stud. Geol. Pol., 84, 93 pp.

Masse, J.-P., Masse, P.-J.-L. and Tronchetti, G., 1990. Variations srdimentaire sous contrrle tectonique durant l'Aptien suprrieur-Crnomanien moyen l'articulation des block provencal et languedocien (SE de la France): cadre palrocranographique et implications palrogrographiques. Bull. Soc. Grol. Fr., 8, 6, 6: 963-971.

Mahel, M., 1959. Stratigraphic problems of the paraauthoch- thonous sequence in the Mal6 Karpaty Mts. Geol. Pr. Zpr., 15:5-17 (in Slovakian).

Mahel, M. et al., 1967. Regional geology of Czechoslovakia II, Western Carpathians 1. Academia, Praha, 486 pp.

Michalik, J., Borza, K., Snopkov~i, P., Svobodov~i, M. and Va~irek, Z., 1987. Contemporaneous trends in Lower Cretaceous stratigraphy and their application to the Western Carpathian formations. Geol. Pr. Spr., 86:179-195 (in Slovakian).

Michalik, J. and Kov~i~, M., 1982. On some problems of palinspastic reconstruction and Ceno-Mesozoic development of the Western Carpathians. Geol. Zb. Geol. Carpathica, 33 (4): 481-508.

Michalik, J., Sot~ik, J., Br~ith, I. and Va~irek, Z., 1990. Remarks to the lithology, stratigraphy and biofacies of the Mur Limestone Formation, its position both in the Lower Cretaceous sequence and in the West Carpathian sedimentary area. In: Conf. Volume 50 Years of Teaching Geology and Paleontology in Slovakia. Bratislava, pp. 31-43 (in Slovak, with English summary).

Miehalik, J. and Sot/tk, J., 1990. Lower Cretaceous shallow- marine buildups in Western Carpathians and their relation to the pelagic facies. Cretaceous Res., 11:211-227.

Michalik, J. and Va~i~ek, Z., 1984. To the Early- and Mid Cretaceous West Carpathian development: the age and environmental position of the "Skalica Breccia". Geol. Zb. Geol. Carpathica, 35 (5): 559-581.

Michalik, J. and Va~i~ek, Z., 1987. Geology and stratigraphy of the environs of the Lower Cretaceoues limestone deposit of Mt Butkov (Mann Unit, middle Vh Valley). Miner. Slovaca, 19 (2): 115-134 (in Slovakian).

Michalik, J. and Va~i~ek, Z., 1989. Lower Cretaceous stratigra- phy and paleogeography of the Czechoslovakian Western Carpathians. In: J. Wiedmann (Editor), Cretaceous of the Western Tethys. Proc. 3rd Int. Symp., Tbingen, 1987. Stuttgart, pp. 505-523.

Michalik, J., Va~i~ek, Z., Peter~akov, M. and Sot~ik, J., 1990. On Lower Cretaceous bio- and lithostratigraphy of Tatric sequence in the Zzriv Valley (Mt Bralo near Prnica, Mal Fatra Mts). Knihovna zemnho plynu a nafty 9a, pp. 7-22 (in Slovakian).

Mi~ik, M., 1978. Some paleogeographical problems concerning the Klippen Belt of Western Carpathians. In: J. Vozfir (Editor), Paleogeographical Development of Western Carpathians. Bratislava, pp. 147-159 (in Slovakian).

Mi~ik, M., 1990. Urgonian facies in the Western Carpathians. Knihovna zemniho plynu a nafty 9a, pp. 25-54.

Mi~ik, M., Jablonsk~,, J., Fejdi, P. and S~,kora, M., 1980.

J. Michalik/Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 111 (1994) 263-277 277

Chromian and ferrian spinels from Cretaceous sediments of the West Carpathians. Miner. Slovaca, 12 (3): 209-228.

Migik, M., Jablonsk~,, J., Mock, R. and S~,kora, M., 1981. Konglomerate mit exotischen Material in dern Alb der Zentralen Westkarpaten-palogeographische und tektonische Interpretation. Acta Univ. Comeniae Geol., 37: 5-56.

Migik, M. and Locquin, M. v., 1983. Acrasiales fossiles dans les concr6tions siliceuses du Barr6mien dans les Carpathes Occidentales (Tch6coslovaque). C.R. 108me Congr. Natl. Soc. Savantes, Sci. Terre 1 (2): 167-173.

Mi~ik, M. and Marschalko, R., 1988. Exotic conglomerates in flysch sequences: examples from the Western Carpathians. In: M. Rak6s, J. Dercourt and A.E.M. Nairn (Editors), Evolution of the N margin of Tethys, 1. M6m. Soc. G6ol. Fr., n.s., 154: 95-113.

Migik, M. and S~kora, M., 1981. Pieniny exotic Ridge, as reconstructed from carbonate pebbles in Cretaceous con- glomerates of the Klippen Belt and Manin Unit. Z~p. Karpaty Geol., 7:7 111.

Miiller, M., 1985. Zwei Tiefbohrungen in das Helvetikum des bayerischen Allgaus. Jahrb. Geol. Bundesanst., 127 (4): 639 641.

Philip, J., Masse, J.-P. and Bessais, H., 1989. Organisation et 6volution s6dimentaires d'une marge de plate-forme carbo- nat6e: l'Albien-C6nomanien de Tunisie centrale. G6ol. M6dit., 16 (2-3): 155-169.

Pla~ienka, D., Michalik, J., Kov~t~, M., Gross, P. and PutiL M., 1991. Paleotectonic evolution of the Mal6 Karpaty Mts. An overview. Geol. Carpathica, 42 (4): 195-208.

Schlagintweit, F., 1987. Allochthone Urgon-Kalke aus Konglomeraten der basalen Gosau (Coniac) yon Oberw6ssen (Chiemgau/N6rdliche Kalkalpen). Mitt. Bayer. Staatsamml. Pal/iontol. Hist. Geol., 27: 145-158.

Schlagintweit, F., 1990. Allochthonous Urgonian limestones of the Northern Calcareous Alps: Facies and palaeogeographic framework within the Alpine Orogeny. Cretaceous Res., 11:261 272.

Sztan6, O., 1990. Submarine fan-channel conglomerates of Lower Cretaceous, Gerecse Mts., Hungary. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Pal~iontol. Monatsh., 7:431 446.

Va~i6ek, Z., Michalik, J. and Borza, K., 1983. To the "Neocomian" biostratigraphy in the Krizna Nappe of the Str~izovsk6 Vrchy Mountains (northwestern Central Carpathians).- Zitteliana, 10: 467-483.


Recommended