Date post: | 05-May-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | independent |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Human MutationRESEARCH ARTICLE
Molecular Analysis Expands the Spectrum of PhenotypesAssociated with GLI3 Mutations
Jennifer J. Johnston,1� Julie C. Sapp,1 Joyce T. Turner,1 David Amor,2 Salim Aftimos,3 Kyrieckos A. Aleck,4
Maureen Bocian,5 Joann N. Bodurtha,6 Gerald F. Cox,7 Cynthia J. Curry,8 Ruth Day,9 Dian Donnai,10 Michael Field,11
Ikuma Fujiwara,12 Michael Gabbett,13 Moran Gal,14 John M. Graham Jr,15 Peter Hedera,16 Raoul C.M. Hennekam,17
Joseph H. Hersh,18 Robert J. Hopkin,19 Hulya Kayserili,20 Alexa M.J. Kidd,21 Virginia Kimonis,5 Angela E. Lin,22
Sally Ann Lynch,23 Melissa Maisenbacher,24 Sahar Mansour,25 Julie McGaughran,13 Lakshmi Mehta,26 Helen Murphy,10
Margarita Raygada,27 Nathaniel H. Robin,28 Alan F. Rope,29 Kenneth N. Rosenbaum,30 G. Bradley Schaefer,31 Amy Shealy,32
Wendy Smith,33 Maria Soller,34 Annmarie Sommer,35 Heather J. Stalker,24 Bernhard Steiner,36 Mark J. Stephan,37
David Tilstra,38 Susan Tomkins,39 Pamela Trapane,40 Anne Chun-Hui Tsai,41 Margot I. Van Allen,42 Pradeep C. Vasudevan,43
Bernhard Zabel,44 Janice Zunich,45 Graeme C.M. Black,10 and Leslie G. Biesecker1
1Genetic Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; 2Murdoch
Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; 3Northern Regional Genetic Service, Auckland City Hospital,
Auckland, New Zealand; 4St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona; 5Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Department
of Pediatrics, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California; 6Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Pediatrics,
Obstetrics–Gynecology, Epidemiology and Community Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia ; 7Division of Genetics, Children’s
Hospital Boston and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Clinical Research, Genzyme Corporation,
Cambridge, Massachusetts; 8Genetic Medicine Central California/University of California, San Francisco, California; 9Cheshire and Merseyside
Clinical Genetics Service, Liverpool, United Kingdom; 10Genetic Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Heath Science
Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; 11Clinical Genetics Department, Nepean
Hospital, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia; 12Department of Pediatrics, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai,
Miyagi, Japan; 13School of Medicine, The University of Queensland and Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Brisbane,
Australia; 14Medical Genetic Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; 15Medical Genetics Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center,
Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; 16Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University,
Nashville, Tennessee; 17Department of Pediatrics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, AZ Amsterdam, The
Netherlands; 18Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky; 19Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati
Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; 20Medical Genetics Department, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Capa 3439
Istanbul, Turkey; 21Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand; 22Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts;23National Centre for Medical Genetics, Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin 12, Republic of Ireland; 24Division of Genetics and Metabolism,
Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; 25SW Thames Regional Genetics Service, St. George’s, University of London,
London, United Kingdom; 26Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Genetics & Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York;27Section on Clinical and Developmental Genomics, Program on Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; 28Department of Genetics and Pediatrics, University
of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; 29University of Utah School of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, Salt Like City, Utah;30Department of Medical Genetics, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC; 31Department of Genetics and Pediatrics, University of
Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Section of Genetics and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas;32Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; 33The Barbara Bush Children’s Hospital Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine;34University and Regional Laboratories Region Skane, Division Clinical Genetics, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; 35Department of Pediatrics,
The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio and Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; 36Institute of Medical Genetics,
University of Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland; 37Department of Pediatrics, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington; 38Department
of Pediatrics, CentraCare Clinic, St. Cloud, Minnesota; 39Clinical Genetics, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; 40Department
of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa; 41Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center,
Denver, Colorado; 42Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 43Medical Genetics, University of
Leicester, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom; 44Department of Pediatrics, University
Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 45Genetics Center, Indiana University School of Medicine–Northwest, Gary, Indiana
Communicated by Ravi SavarirayanReceived 26 March 2010; accepted revised manuscript 18 July 2010.
Published online 29 July 2010 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI 10.1002/humu.21328
OFFICIAL JOURNAL
www.hgvs.org
& 2010 WILEY-LISS, INC.
�Correspondence to: Jennifer J. Johnston, Genetic Disease Research Branch,
National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building
49, Room 4C64, Bethesda, MD 20892-4472. E-mail: [email protected]
ABSTRACT: A range of phenotypes including Greigcephalopolysyndactyly and Pallister-Hall syndromes(GCPS, PHS) are caused by pathogenic mutation of theGLI3 gene. To characterize the clinical variability of GLI3mutations, we present a subset of a cohort of 174probands referred for GLI3 analysis. Eighty-one probandswith typical GCPS or PHS were previously reported, andwe report the remaining 93 probands here. This includes19 probands (12 mutations) who fulfilled clinical criteriafor GCPS or PHS, 48 probands (16 mutations) withfeatures of GCPS or PHS but who did not meet theclinical criteria (sub-GCPS and sub-PHS), 21 probands(6 mutations) with features of PHS or GCPS and oral-facial-digital syndrome, and 5 probands (1 mutation)with nonsyndromic polydactyly. These data supportpreviously identified genotype–phenotype correlationsand demonstrate a more variable degree of severity thanpreviously recognized. The finding of GLI3 mutations inpatients with features of oral–facial–digital syndromesupports the observation that GLI3 interacts with cilia.We conclude that the phenotypic spectrum of GLI3mutations is broader than that encompassed by theclinical diagnostic criteria, but the genotype–phenotypecorrelation persists. Individuals with features of eitherGCPS or PHS should be screened for mutations in GLI3even if they do not fulfill clinical criteria.Hum Mutat 31:1142–1154, 2010. & 2010 Wiley-Liss,Inc.
KEY WORDS: GLI3; Greig syndrome; Pallister-Hall syn-drome; oral–facial–digital syndrome
Introduction
Mutations in the zinc-finger transcription factor encoding geneGLI3 (MIM] 165240) on chromosome 7p14.1 cause Greig cephalo-polysyndactyly syndrome (GCPS; MIM] 175700) [Vortkamp et al.,1991], Pallister-Hall syndrome (PHS, MIM] 146510) [Kang et al.,1997] and, less frequently, other phenotypes such as acrocallosalsyndrome (MIM] 200990) [Elson et al., 2002] and nonsyndromicpolydactyly (MIM] 174700) [Radhakrishna et al., 1999] (MIM]174200) [Radhakrishna et al., 1997]. The GCPS and PHSphenotypes are clinically distinct, and there is a robust genotype–phenotype correlation for truncating mutations in GLI3 for thesetwo phenotypes [Johnston et al., 2005]. Truncating mutations in themiddle third of the gene generally cause PHS, whereas largedeletions or truncating mutations elsewhere in the gene (aminoterminal-encoding or carboxy terminal-encoding thirds of the gene)cause GCPS. There are important biologic correlates for thisgenotype–phenotype correlation. The mutations that predicttruncations in the amino-terminal third of the gene are predictedto be null mutations, caused by loss of the zinc-finger DNA bindingdomain. In contrast, the truncations in the middle third of theprotein are predicted to generate a constitutive repressor proteinthat skews the balance of activator and repressor forms of GLI3,which is a key downstream modulator of SHH signaling. Themutations that predict truncations in the carboxyterminal third ofthe gene are predicted to cause the loss of a transactivation domainof GLI3 [Shin et al., 1999]. To date, genotype–phenotype studieshave been predominantly based on mutations found in patients withtypical forms of GCPS and PHS, and it therefore remains unclearwhether there are variant phenotypes that are caused by mutations
in GLI3 and if so, whether the same correlations hold for these otherphenotypes. To address these questions, we have continued toanalyze a large cohort of 174 probands with a wide spectrum ofphenotypic manifestations that include features of GCPS or PHS. Ofthese 174 probands, we present data on 93 patients not previouslyreported representing a wide range of phenotypes. We have analyzedGLI3 in these patients to determine the frequency and type ofmutations and assessed whether the mutation positions correlatedwith the phenotypes.
Methods
Patients
This study was reviewed and approved by the institutionalreview board of the National Human Genome Research Institute.The overall GLI3 project included 174 probands with features ofPHS or GCPS. Ninety-three probands were the focus of thisreport, and they were subdivided into the following groupsaccording to inclusion criteria in Table 1. Eighty-one probands(174–93) have been reported previously [Galasso et al., 2001;Johnston et al., 2005; Killoran et al., 2000; Kos et al., 2008; Nget al., 2004; Turner et al., 2003] and details on these probands arenot included in this report.
Probands with features of GCPS or PHS insufficient to meetclinical criteria
These probands had one or more features of GCPS or PHS butdid not meet clinical criteria for either disorder. Detailed clinicaldata are reported for these 53 probands (plus 9 relatives) who didnot fulfill clinical criteria for either GCPS or PHS. Anomalies weredefined according to the recently published standard terminology[Biesecker et al., 2009; Hall et al., 2009]. This pool of 53 probandswas subdivided into three groups based on phenotypic manifesta-tions. The first group (28 probands and six affected familymembers) (Tables 2 and 3) was designated as sub-GCPS andcomprised patients with one or more features of GCPS, includingpreaxial polydactyly, cutaneous syndactyly, widely spaced eyes, ormacrocephaly, but who did not meet the suggested clinical criteriafor GCPS. The second group comprised patients who had one ormore features of PHS, polydactyly, bifid epiglottis, and/orhypothalamic hamartoma, but who did not meet the publishedcriteria for PHS. We refer to this group as sub-PHS patients(20 probands and 3 affected family members) (Tables 4 and 5). Weplaced individuals with isolated postaxial polydactyly (PAP-A) intoa separate group that could overlap with PHS or GCPS as PAP-A isa manifestation of both GCPS and PHS (five probands).
Probands with features that overlappedwith the oral– facial– digital syndromes (OFDS)
Key features of the OFDS include tongue and other oralhamartomas, multiple buccal–oral frenula, cleft lip and/or cleftpalate, polydactyly, tibial hypoplasia, or cerebellar vermishypoplasia [Gurrieri et al., 2007]. There are 13 clinical types ofOFDS but only OFDS type 1 has a known molecular etiology[Ferrante et al., 2001]. We delineated this group because therehave been reports of patients with manifestations that overlappedPHS, OFDS, and other disorders [Muenke et al., 1991]. We
HUMAN MUTATION, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1142–1154, 2010 1143
identified 21 probands who had polydactyly and one or morefeatures of an OFDS (Tables 6 and 7).
Probands with typical GCPS or PHS
Nineteen probands who fulfilled diagnostic criteria for GCPS[Johnston et al., 2005] (17 probands) or PHS [Biesecker et al.,1996] (2 probands) were included in this report as they have notbeen reported previously. Detailed clinical data are reported forthese 19 probands (plus 4 relatives) (Tables 8–11). The clinicaldiagnostic criteria for PHS require the presence of mesoaxialpolydactyly and a hypothalamic hamartoma in the proband[Biesecker et al., 1996]. Suggested clinical criteria for GCPSinclude (1) preaxial polydactyly in at least one limb or broad greattoes or thumbs, and (2) cutaneous syndactyly, macrocephaly, andwide-spaced eyes [Biesecker, 2001]. For this study we set GCPSeligibility criteria of preaxial polydactyly and the presence of atleast one additional feature (cutaneous syndactyly, macrocephaly,wide-spaced eyes, postaxial polydactyly).
DNA Isolation, PCR, and Sequencing
DNA was isolated from whole blood using the salting out method(Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.PCR of GLI3 exons and flanking intron sequences was performedusing standard methods and primers as described [Johnston et al.,2005]. Sequencing of the GLI3 coding exons was performed withv3.1 BigDye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems,Foster City, CA) and either the ABI 377 (Applied Biosystems) or ABI3100 (Applied Biosystems) per the manufacturer’s protocol.Sequence data were compared with the published GLI3 sequence(GenBank reference number NM_000168.5) using Sequencher 4.9
(Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI). Nucleotide numbering reflectscDNA numbering with 11 corresponding to the A of the ATGtranslation initiation codon in the reference sequence, according tojournal guidelines (www.hgvs.org/mutnomen). The initiation codonis codon 1. The entire coding region was analyzed for all probandsexcept OFD2 due to insufficient DNA.
DHPLC Analysis
For some probands, screening of exons 3 through 12 and thelast third of exon 15 was performed using dHPLC as described inJohnston et al. [2005].
Classification of Sequence Variants
We classified sequence variants as causative mutations if they were:a nonsense or frameshift variant or, (2) a missense variant thatpredicted a nonconservative amino acid change and segregated withthe phenotype in multiple family members or was de novo in apatient with a GLI3-related phenotype and unaffected parents.
qPCR Analysis
qPCR was performed in a subset of individuals to identifydeletions and duplications of GLI3 exons. qPCR analysis of the GLI3coding exons was performed with the Platinum SYBR Green qPCRSuperMix UDG kit (Invitrogen) and the ABI PRISM 7000 (PEApplied Biosystems) as described in Johnston et al. [2005] (Table 3).
Array Hybridization
Zoom-in comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) forchromosome 7p14 was performed as described previously
Table 1. Inclusion Criteria for Patient Groups
Column A All required Column B Minimum of one required Column C Confirming featuresa
OFD-overlap Polydactyly Oral frenulae
Oral hamartoma
Clef lip/palate
Cerebellar vermis hypoplasia
Tibial hypoplasia
PHS Mesoaxial polydactyly
Hypothalamic hamartoma
GCPS Preaxial polydactyly Syndactyly
Macrocephaly
Hypertelorism
Postaxial polydactyly
Sub-PHS Mesoaxial polydactyly Bifid epiglottis
Hypothalamic hamartoma Imperforate anus
Oligodactyly Small nails
OR Hypopituitarism
Postaxial polydactyly plus one feature from column C Growth hormone deficiency
Genital hypoplasia
Sub-GCPS Preaxial polydactyly Hypoplasia of the corpus callosum
Broad thumbs or great toes
Syndactyly
Macrocephaly
Hypertelorism
OR
Postaxial polydactyly plus one feature from column C
aConfirming features were used to place individuals into sub-PHS or sub-GCPS groups when their only feature from column B was postaxial polydactyly. Probands were evaluatedsequentially for inclusion in the OFD-overlap group, then the PHS or GCPS groups, and last the sub-PHS or sub-GCPS groups. Probands were placed into the first group where theyfulfilled the inclusion criteria. Individuals who fulfilled the criteria for both sub-PHS and sub-GCPS were placed based upon the number of features they demonstrated for each group.
1144 HUMAN MUTATION, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1142–1154, 2010
[Johnston et al., 2007] in a subset of individuals to identify largedeletions and duplications on chromosome 7 including GLI3(Tables 2, 3, 5–9 and 11).
FISH Analysis
FISH analysis was performed in a subset of individuals toidentify large deletions on chromosome 7 in the vicinity of GLI3.FISH analysis was performed as described in Johnston et al. [2003](Tables 3 and 7).
Results
The cohort delineated in this study included 93 probands andwas drawn from a pool of 174 probands who were referred to ourresearch protocol because they had one or more manifestationsconsistent with either (or both) GCPS or PHS. In addition, someof these probands were from multiplex families and clinical dataon some of those affected family members are included in thiscohort. These 93 probands were divided into several groups (seeinclusion criteria) (Table 1) and each group is described in turn.
GLI3 mutations in probands with features of GCPS or PHSinsufficient to meet clinical criteria
The first group included 53 probands with features thatoverlapped with GCPS or PHS, but these probands did not havesufficient features to warrant a clinical diagnosis of either disorder.Of these 53 probands, 28 were categorized in the sub-GCPS groupand 8 of them had mutations. Of these eight mutations, five wereframeshift or nonsense mutations, one was a splice mutation, onewas a missense mutation, and one was a large genomic deletion.Four of the truncation or termination mutations were in thepredicted domains (either 50 of position 1998 or 30 of 3481);c.4240C4T, which predicts p.Q1414X; c.4430_4431delCT, whichpredicts p.S1477X; c.4432G4T, which predicts p.E1478X; andc.4594_4596delTCCinsA, which predicts p.S1532TfsX2. The fifthwas at the 30 border of the PHS region; c.3474delG, which predictsp.I1160FfsX46. The splice site alteration, c.149711G4C, IVS10,has been identified previously [Kalff-Suske et al., 1999]. Themissense alteration, c.2708C4T, which predicts p.S903L, was alsoidentified in this study in a proband who fulfilled the clinicalcriteria for GCPS.
We noted that all five of the frameshift or nonsense mutationsin the sub-GCPS group were located in the 30 region of the gene.Overall, the mutation yield for patients with typical GCPS was 39of 57 (68%), compared to 8 of 28 (29%) for the sub-GCPS group(P 5 0.0006, Fisher’s exact test). The distribution of mutations fortypical GCPS with frameshift or nonsense mutations is as follows;31 were in the 50 region, 9 were in the PHS region, and 14 were inthe 30 region [Fujioka et al., 2005; Furniss et al., 2009; Johnstonet al., 2005]. Interestingly, all five of the patients with sub-GCPSwho have frameshift or nonsense mutations have those mutationsin the 30 region (P 5 0.0023 Fisher’s exact test).
Of the 20 probands in the sub-PHS group, 8 had mutations(40%). Of these eight mutations, all were nonsense or frameshiftmutations and all but one of these mutations were in thepreviously defined PHS region (between cDNA positions 1998and 3481). One proband had a c.3887_3894del mutation thatpredicts p.L1297SfsX4. As this mutation would be predicted tocause GCPS, some clinical details are provided here. The probandhad bilateral mesoaxial polydactyly of the hand, isolated growthTa
ble
2.S
ub-G
CP
SP
atie
nts
Wit
hM
utat
ions
Fin
din
gsan
dSy
mp
tom
s
Ind
ivid
ual
Mu
tati
on
Mes
oax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Po
stax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Pre
axia
l
po
lyd
acty
ly
Cu
tan
eou
s
syn
dac
tyly
Mac
roce
ph
aly
Wid
e-sp
aced
eyes
MR
I
fin
din
gsA
dd
itio
nal
fin
din
gs
G1-
1c.
1497
11G
4C
,IV
S10
HB
HB
3,F
B3
11
G1-
2c.
1497
11G
4C
,IV
S10
HB
HB
3,F
B3
FB
1A
uti
sm
G1-
3c.
1497
11G
4C
,IV
S10
HB
HB
3,F
B3
2,3
toe
1Sp
eech
del
ay
G2
c.27
08C4
T,
p.S
903L
HB
3,F
BH
ypo
spad
ias,
nas
ald
erm
oid
G3-
1c.
3474
del
G,
p.I
1160
Ffs
X46
HB
HB
Wil
ms
tum
or
G3-
2c.
3474
del
G,
p.I
1160
Ffs
X46
HB
G4-
1c.
4240
C4
T,
p.Q
1414
XH
R,
FB
2,3
toe
1N
orm
alT
rigo
no
cep
hal
icsk
ull
shap
e,fr
on
tal
bo
ssin
g,d
epre
ssed
nas
alb
rid
ge,
do
ub
leh
air
wh
orl
,ab
sen
ceo
fki
dn
ey,
DD
G4-
2c.
4240
C4
T,
p.Q
1414
XH
R,
FB
2,3
toe
Hig
han
teri
or
hai
rlin
e,p
rom
inen
tm
eto
pic
sutu
res,
bro
adn
asal
roo
t
and
tip
,h
ypo
spad
ias,
DD
G5-
1c.
4430
_44
31d
elC
T,
p.S
1477
XH
B,
FB
11
No
rmal
G5-
2c.
4430
_44
31d
elC
T,
p.S
1477
XH
B,
FB
1P
arti
alem
pty
sell
aC
ran
iosy
no
sto
sis
of
met
op
icsu
ture
s,b
ifid
epig
lott
is,
hyp
op
itu
itar
ism
,
ano
smia
,A
sper
ger’
s
G5-
3c.
4430
_44
31d
elC
T,
p.S
1477
XF
BN
orm
al
G6
c.44
32G4
T,
p.E
1478
XF
LH
BF
B3
HR
,F
B1
Hyp
op
lasi
ao
fth
eC
CF
ine
mo
tor
del
ay
G7
c.45
94_
4596
del
TC
Cin
sA,
p.S
1532
Tfs
X2
HB
HB
3,F
BH
B,
FB
En
larg
edve
ntr
icle
sG
ingi
val
ove
rgro
wth
,es
tro
pia
,h
igh
,n
arro
wp
alat
e,h
ypo
ton
ia,
DD
G8
Ch
r7:d
el41
.7-4
4.9
Mb
HB
HB
3,F
B3
HL
,F
L1
1C
CM
Stra
bis
mu
s,R
SVp
neu
mo
nit
is/a
sth
ma,
um
bil
ical
her
nia
,SZ
/DD
HB
,han
ds
bila
tera
l;H
R,h
and
righ
t;H
L,h
and
left
;HB
3,w
ide
thu
mb
s;F
B,f
oo
tb
ilat
eral
;FL
,fo
ot
left
;FB
3,w
ider
grea
tto
es;C
C,c
orp
us
collo
sum
;CC
M,c
ereb
ralc
aver
no
us
mal
form
atio
n;S
Z,s
eizu
res;
DD
,dev
elo
pm
enta
ldel
ay;1
,pre
sen
ceo
ffi
nd
ing.
Nu
cleo
tid
en
um
ber
ing
refl
ects
cDN
An
um
ber
ing
wit
h1
1co
rres
po
nd
ing
toth
eA
of
the
AT
Gtr
ansl
atio
nin
itia
tio
nco
do
nin
the
refe
ren
cese
qu
ence
,ac
cord
ing
tojo
urn
algu
idel
ines
(ww
w.h
gvs.
org
/mu
tno
men
).T
he
init
iati
on
cod
on
isco
do
n1.
HUMAN MUTATION, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1142–1154, 2010 1145
Tabl
e3.
Sub
-GC
PS
Pat
ient
sW
itho
utM
utat
ions
Fin
din
gsan
dsy
mp
tom
s
Ind
ivid
ual
Del
etio
n
anal
ysis
Mes
oax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Po
stax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Pre
axia
l
po
lyd
acty
ly
Cu
tan
eou
s
syn
dac
tyly
Mac
roce
ph
aly
Wid
e-sp
aced
eyes
MR
Ifi
nd
ings
Ad
dit
ion
alfi
nd
ings
G9
Arr
ayH
BF
LH
BM
icro
cep
hal
y1
No
rmal
Cra
nio
syn
ost
osi
s,h
ern
ia,
hyp
osp
adia
s,SZ
,D
D
G10
HB
,F
B1
Hyp
op
lasi
ao
fth
eC
C,
fro
nta
l
po
lym
icro
gyri
a,ce
reb
ella
rgr
ey
mat
ter
het
ero
top
ia
Um
bil
ical
her
nia
,tr
ansv
erse
vagi
nal
mem
bra
ne,
DD
G11
FR
HB
11
Den
tal
cyst
s
G12
QP
CR
Oli
god
acty
lyH
RH
L,
FR
HB
,2,
3to
e1
1E
nla
rged
ven
tric
les
Co
arse
face
,ea
rslo
wse
t,w
ith
incr
ease
dp
ost
erio
r
angu
lati
on
,h
ypo
do
nti
a,G
Hd
efic
ien
t,D
D
G13
QP
CR
HB
HB
31
DD
G14
QP
CR
HB
,F
B1
No
rmal
Sho
rtd
ista
lp
hal
ange
s
G15
QP
CR
HL
,F
BF
L1
1M
ild
colp
oce
ph
aly
Sku
llas
ymm
etry
,h
igh
pal
ate,
den
tal
cro
wd
ing,
lon
g
nec
k,p
ectu
sex
cava
tum
,p
rom
inen
tfe
tal
pad
s,SZ
,
mil
dD
D
G16
FIS
HH
B,
FB
1P
rom
inen
tve
ntr
icle
sB
road
fore
hea
d,
hyd
ron
eph
rosi
s,in
guin
alh
ern
ias,
DD
G17
Arr
ayH
BH
BM
icro
cep
hal
y1
Age
nes
iso
fC
CF
ron
talb
oss
ing,
infa
nti
lesp
asm
s,ex
tra
rib
,DD
,hea
rin
g
loss
,co
nst
ipat
ion
,co
ntr
actu
res
G18
Arr
ayH
BH
B3
Bro
adh
and
s
wit
hu
nu
sual
crea
ses
11
Hyp
op
lasi
ao
fth
eC
CP
rom
inen
tfo
reh
ead
,d
epre
ssed
nas
alb
rid
ge,
do
wn
slan
ted
pal
peb
ral
fiss
ure
s,d
isti
nct
ive
ears
,m
ild
sixt
h
cran
ial
ner
vep
alsy
,tr
ach
eom
alac
iaw
ith
on
en
arro
w
bro
nch
us,
shaw
lsc
rotu
m,
elb
ow
dim
ple
s,lo
wto
ne
G19
QP
CR
HL
2,3
toe
Hyp
op
lasi
ao
fth
eC
CB
ilat
eral
clu
bfe
et,
VSD
/ASD
,ig
uin
alh
ern
ia
G20
Arr
ayF
BA
gen
esis
of
CC
,ce
reb
ella
ran
db
rain
stem
hyp
op
lasi
a,sc
hiz
ence
ph
aly
Hig
hp
alat
e,fi
fth
fin
ger
clin
od
acty
ly,
left
tib
ial
bo
win
g,
dec
ease
dat
8d
ays
G21
QP
CR
FB
G22
Arr
ayH
B,
FL
Sho
rtd
ista
lph
alan
ges,
abse
nt
fin
ger
nai
ls,s
ho
rth
um
eri
G23
Arr
ayH
RIn
crea
sed
CSF
spac
eo
nu
ltra
sou
nd
Hem
iver
teb
rae,
10ri
bs
bil
ater
ally
,m
ild
pla
gio
cep
hal
y,
dep
ress
edn
asal
bri
dge
,fr
on
tal
bo
ssin
g
G24
Arr
ayB
ifid
seco
nd
toe
FL
FB
3N
orm
alC
om
ple
xca
rdia
can
ato
my,
bel
lsh
aped
rib
cage
,h
ip
dys
pla
sia,
smal
lp
enis
,re
tin
ald
ysp
lasi
a,fo
veal
hyp
op
lasi
a,p
reau
ricu
lar
skin
tag,
dia
ph
ram
atic
her
nia
,su
per
nu
mer
ary
nip
ple
,sh
ort
met
acar
pal
s
and
met
atar
sals
,cr
ypto
rch
idis
m,
sco
lio
is
G25
Arr
ayC
om
ple
te2,
3to
e1
1N
orm
alA
nte
vert
edn
ares
,sh
ort
no
se,
hyp
erex
ten
sib
lejo
ints
,le
g
len
gth
dis
crep
ancy
,D
D
G26
Arr
ayH
LA
gen
esis
of
CC
,ce
reb
ella
ran
d
bra
inst
emh
ypo
pla
sia,
mid
lin
ecy
st
Ora
lfr
enu
la,
hyd
ron
eph
rosi
s,D
D
G27
QP
CR
11
G28
HB
,F
BP
on
toce
reb
ella
rh
ypo
pla
sia,
hyp
op
lasi
a
of
the
CC
Fac
ial
dys
mo
rph
ism
,re
du
nd
ant
ton
gue
tiss
ue,
ruff
led
gum
s,h
ors
esh
oe
kid
ney
,d
ecea
sed
at5
mo
nth
s,
1af
fect
edsi
bli
ng
HB
,h
and
sb
ilat
eral
;H
R,
han
dri
ght;
HL
,h
and
left
;H
B3,
wid
eth
um
bs;
FB
,fo
ot
bil
ater
al;
FR
,fo
ot
righ
t;F
L,
foo
tle
ft;
FB
3,w
ide
grea
tto
es;
CC
,co
rpu
sco
llo
sum
;C
SF,
cere
bra
lsp
inal
flu
id;
GH
,gr
ow
thh
orm
on
e;SZ
,se
izu
res;
DD
,d
evel
op
men
tal
del
ay;
VSD
/ASD
,ve
ntr
icu
lar/
atri
alse
pta
ld
efec
t;1
,p
rese
nce
of
fin
din
g.
1146 HUMAN MUTATION, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1142–1154, 2010
Tabl
e4.
Sub
-PH
SP
atie
nts
Wit
hM
utat
ions
Fin
din
gsan
dsy
mp
tom
s
Ind
ivid
ual
Mu
tati
on
Mes
oax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Po
stax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Pre
axia
l
po
lyd
acty
ly
Cu
tan
eou
s
syn
dac
tyly
Cra
nio
faci
al
feat
ure
s
Bif
id
epig
lott
isM
RI
fin
din
gsA
dd
itio
nal
fin
din
gs
PH
1c.
2149
C4
T,
p.Q
717X
HB
2,3
toe
FB
Dee
pse
tey
es,
smal
ln
ose
,
dia
stem
a,sm
all
ears
1H
Hw
ith
mu
ltic
ysti
c
exte
nsi
on
Clo
aca
(man
ysu
rger
ies)
,u
nil
ater
alre
nal
agen
esis
,
dec
reas
edre
nal
fun
ctio
n,
thro
mb
ocy
top
enia
,
SZ,
seve
reM
R
PH
2c.
2437
C4
T,
p.Q
813X
HB
,F
BN
AH
HSm
all
nai
ls,
PD
A,
ASD
,tr
icu
spid
regu
rgit
atio
n,
abse
nt
pit
uit
ary
and
adre
nal
glan
ds,
pu
lmo
nar
y
hyp
erte
nsi
on
,ab
no
rmal
lun
glo
bu
lati
on
,
imp
erfo
rate
anu
s,ge
nit
alh
ypo
pla
sia,
dec
ease
d
at1
day
PH
3c.
2466
del
G,
p.M
824X
Oli
god
acty
lyH
L,
fusi
on
of
met
acar
pal
s
FL
HR
,2,
3to
eF
L,
2,3,
4F
R
NA
HH
Smal
ln
ails
,d
ecea
sed
at3
mo
nth
s
PH
4c.
2542
del
G,
p.D
848T
fsX
12H
RM
acro
cep
hal
y,
smal
lte
eth
1H
HV
isu
alp
rob
lem
s,h
eari
ng
pro
ble
ms,
ecto
pic
righ
t
kid
ney
,G
Hd
efic
ien
cy,
ob
esit
y,SZ
,D
D
PH
5c.
2621
_26
24d
el,
p.R
874P
fsX
15B
ilat
eral
NA
HH
Smal
ln
ails
,p
ulm
on
ary
hyp
op
lasi
a,ab
sen
t
pit
uit
ary
glan
d,
adre
nal
hyp
op
lasi
a,th
yro
id
hyp
op
lasi
a,va
gin
alat
resi
a,ve
sico
vagi
nal
fist
ula
,
hyd
roco
lpo
s,b
ilat
eral
ren
alh
ypo
pla
sia,
dec
ease
dan
tep
artu
mat
41w
eeks
PH
6c.
3004
del
G,
p.V
1002
XO
ligo
dac
tyly
HR
NA
HH
Oss
eou
ssy
nd
acty
lyo
fm
etac
arp
als
and
met
atar
sals
,sh
ort
stat
ure
,gr
ow
thh
orm
on
e
def
icie
nt,
lau
ghin
gsp
ells
PH
7c.
3302
du
pA
,p
.N11
01K
fsX
28H
B1
HH
Smal
ln
ails
,h
ypo
pla
stic
toes
,p
oin
ted
teet
h,
mid
lin
efr
enu
la,
lary
nge
alcl
eft,
GH
def
icie
nt,
gen
ital
hyp
op
lasi
a,n
euro
sen
sory
hea
rin
glo
ss,
gela
stic
SZ
PH
8-1
c.38
87_
3894
del
,p
.L12
97Sf
sX4
HB
FB
1E
nla
rged
cere
bel
lar
ton
sils
Gro
wth
ho
rmo
ne
def
icie
nt,
13:1
7tr
ansl
oca
tio
n
PH
8-2
c.38
87_
3894
del
,p
.L12
97Sf
sX4
HB
,F
B1
No
rmal
PH
8-3
c.38
87_
3894
del
,p
.L12
97Sf
sX4
HB
1T
ho
raci
csc
oli
osi
s,n
ysta
gmu
s,D
D
PH
8-4
c.38
87_
3894
del
,p
.L12
97Sf
sX4
HB
,F
BB
road
fore
hea
d1
Sph
eno
idsi
nu
sE
xtra
bo
ne
inri
ght
foo
t,ch
ron
icsi
nu
sp
rob
lem
s,
13:1
7tr
ansl
oca
tio
n
HB
,han
ds
bil
ater
al;H
R,h
and
righ
t;H
L,h
and
left
;FB
,fo
ot
bil
ater
al;F
R,f
oo
tri
ght;
FL
,fo
ot
left
;HH
,hyp
oth
alam
ich
amar
tom
a;SZ
,sei
zure
s;M
R,m
enta
lret
ard
atio
n;P
DA
,pat
ent
du
ctu
sar
teri
osu
s;A
SD,a
tria
lsep
tald
efec
t;G
H,g
row
thh
orm
on
e;D
D,d
evel
op
men
tal
del
ay;1
,pre
sen
ceo
ffi
nd
ing.
Nu
cleo
tid
en
um
ber
ing
refl
ects
cDN
An
um
ber
ing
wit
h1
1co
rres
po
nd
ing
toth
eA
of
the
AT
Gtr
ansl
atio
nin
itia
tio
nco
do
nin
the
refe
ren
cese
qu
ence
,acc
ord
ing
tojo
urn
algu
idel
ines
(ww
w.h
gvs.
org
/m
utn
om
en).
Th
ein
itia
tio
nco
do
nis
cod
on
1.
HUMAN MUTATION, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1142–1154, 2010 1147
Tabl
e5.
Sub
-PH
SP
atie
nts
Wit
hout
Mut
atio
ns
Fin
din
gsan
dsy
mp
tom
s
Ind
ivid
ual
Del
etio
n
anal
ysis
Mes
oax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Po
stax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Pre
axia
l
po
lyd
acty
ly
Cu
tan
eou
s
syn
dac
tyly
Cra
nio
faci
alfe
atu
res
Bif
id
epig
lott
isM
RI
fin
din
gsA
dd
itio
nal
fin
din
gs
PH
9H
BF
ine
scal
ph
air
1D
isru
pti
on
bet
wee
nh
ypo
thal
amu
s
and
pit
uit
ary
Nu
chal
fold
s,h
ypo
ton
ia,
pan
hyp
op
itu
itar
ism
,D
D
PH
10H
BM
icro
cep
hal
y,p
oin
ted
teet
hN
orm
alSm
all
nai
ls,
pit
uit
ary
pro
ble
m,
mic
rop
hal
lus,
SZ,
DD
PH
11H
BD
epre
ssed
nas
alb
rid
ge1
No
rmal
Smal
ln
ails
,p
anh
ypo
pit
uit
aris
m,
vagi
nal
tag,
hyd
ron
eph
rosi
s,u
rin
ary
refl
ux
PH
12H
B,
FB
HB
,F
BL
arge
ante
rio
rfo
nta
nel
le1
Mic
rop
hal
lus,
un
ilat
eral
un
des
cen
ded
test
es
PH
13H
BH
BSm
all
mo
uth
and
ton
gue
1H
HA
trio
ven
tric
ula
rca
nal
def
ect,
dec
ease
dat
5m
on
ths
PH
14A
rray
HB
,F
BM
icro
cep
hal
y,fr
on
tal
bo
ssin
g,
mil
dd
oli
cho
cep
hal
y,h
igh
nar
row
pal
ate
Ven
tric
ulo
meg
aly,
per
iven
tric
ula
r
leu
kom
alac
ia
Slig
htl
yh
ypo
pla
stic
left
fift
hm
etac
arp
al,
hyp
oto
nia
,p
ost
nat
algr
ow
th
fail
ure
,p
seu
do
stra
bis
mu
s,m
ild
righ
tes
tro
pia
,b
ilat
eral
acce
sso
ry
nip
ple
s,m
ult
iple
bla
dd
erin
fect
ion
,u
reth
ral
ob
stru
ctio
n,
con
stip
atio
n,
abn
orm
alE
EG
,st
arin
gsp
ells
,D
D
PH
15H
BP
lagi
oce
ph
aly
Sho
rt
epig
lott
is
Po
ssib
leH
H,
abse
nt
ante
rio
r
pit
uit
ary
Lar
ynge
alw
eb,
lary
nge
alcl
eft,
ASD
,m
itra
lva
lve
clef
t,u
reth
ral
refl
ux,
hyp
op
itu
itar
ism
PH
16H
B3,
FB
3H
ypo
telo
rism
,le
ftm
icro
ph
tham
ia,
NA
HH
Pan
hyp
op
itu
itar
ism
,ch
oan
alat
resi
a,d
iap
hra
gmat
ich
ern
ia,
seve
reD
D
PH
17ri
ght
ano
ph
thal
mia
,cl
eft
lip
and
pal
ate
NA
HH
SZ,
DD
PH
18M
icro
cep
hal
y,cl
eft
lip
and
pal
ate
NA
HH
Mic
rop
hal
lus,
DD
PH
19a
Ora
lfr
enu
lae
NA
HH
Hyp
op
last
icfi
fth
fin
ger
PH
20a
Ora
lfr
enu
lae
NA
HH
Hyp
op
last
icm
idd
lep
hal
anx
of
fift
hd
igit
,en
do
crin
ed
efic
ien
cy
HB
,h
and
sb
ilat
eral
;H
B3,
wid
eth
um
bs;
FB
,fo
ot
bil
ater
al;
FB
3,w
ide
grea
tto
es;
NA
,n
ot
asse
ssed
;H
H,
hyp
oth
alam
ich
amar
tom
a;D
D,
dev
elo
pm
enta
ld
elay
;SZ
,se
izu
res;
ASD
,at
rial
sep
tal
def
ect;
1,
pre
sen
ceo
ffi
nd
ing.
a[B
on
nem
ann
,su
bm
itte
d].
Tabl
e6.
OFD
-Ove
rlap
Pat
ient
sW
ith
Mut
atio
ns
Fin
din
gsan
dsy
mp
tom
s
Ind
ivid
ual
Mu
tati
on
Mes
oax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Po
stax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Pre
axia
l
po
lyd
acty
ly
Ora
l
fren
ula
Ora
l
ham
arto
ma
Cle
ftli
p/
pal
ate
Cer
ebel
lar
verm
is
hyp
op
lasi
a
Tib
ial
hyp
op
lasi
a
Cu
tan
eou
s
syn
dac
tyly
MR
Ifi
nd
ings
Oth
erfi
nd
ings
OF
D1a
c.20
77A4
T,
p.K
693X
HB
FR
11
HH
Eso
tro
pia
,am
bly
op
ia,
op
tic
ner
veh
ypo
pla
sia,
pre
coci
ou
s
pu
ber
ty,
sup
ern
um
erar
ym
axil
lary
inci
sor,
gela
stic
seiz
ure
s,D
D
OF
D2
c.29
77C4
T,
p.Q
993X
HL
HL
1Sh
ort
pal
peb
ral
fiss
ure
s,sh
ort
fin
gers
,sm
all
nai
ls,
imp
erfo
rate
anu
s,A
SD,
dec
ease
dat
5d
ays
OF
D3
c.30
02d
elG
,
p.G
1001
Afs
X2
HB
Pal
ate
1H
H,
agen
esis
of
the
CC
Bil
ater
alch
oan
alat
resi
a,sm
all
wid
esp
aced
eyes
,sm
all
mo
uth
,sy
ngn
ath
ia,
dys
pla
stic
kid
ney
,sh
ort
lim
bs,
imp
erfo
rate
anu
s,sh
ort
fin
gers
,sm
all
nai
ls,
pre
gnan
cy
term
inat
edat
22w
eeks
OF
D4
c.30
40G4
T,
p.E
1014
XO
ligo
dac
tyly
HL
HR
1H
RH
ypo
thal
amic
mas
sA
bse
nt
left
kid
ney
,im
per
fora
tean
us,
dec
ease
dat
1w
eek
OF
D5b
c.33
70d
up
C,
p.H
1124
Pfs
X5
HB
,F
B1
1R
HB
,F
BH
H,
left
cere
bra
l
atro
ph
y
Sho
rtle
ftu
lna,
smal
lfi
bu
lae,
hyd
rom
etro
colp
os
wit
ha
vagi
no
-cys
tic
fist
ula
,p
reco
cio
us
pu
ber
ty,
MR
OF
D6
Ch
r7:d
el33
.2-4
7.2
Mb
FB
11
1D
ilat
edve
ntr
icle
s,
du
ral
der
mo
idcy
st
Mac
roce
ph
aly,
hyp
erte
lori
sm,
bif
idep
iglo
ttis
,b
ilat
eral
cho
anal
hyp
op
lasi
a,p
aten
tfo
ram
eno
vale
,h
ors
esh
oe
kid
ney
,ac
cess
ory
sple
en,
bil
ater
alu
nd
esce
nd
edte
stes
,
kyp
ho
sis,
dec
ease
dat
2.5
year
s
HB
,han
ds
bil
ater
al;H
R,h
and
righ
t;H
L,h
and
left
;FB
,fo
ot
bil
ater
al;F
R,f
oo
tri
ght;
FB
3,w
ide
grea
tto
es;H
H,h
ypo
thal
amic
ham
arto
ma;
CC
,co
rpu
sca
llo
sum
;ASD
,atr
ials
epta
ldef
ect;
DD
,dev
elo
pm
enta
ld
elay
;1,p
rese
nce
of
fin
din
g.N
ucl
eoti
de
nu
mb
erin
gre
flec
tscD
NA
nu
mb
erin
gw
ith
11
corr
esp
on
din
gto
the
Ao
fth
eA
TG
tran
slat
ion
init
iati
on
cod
on
inth
ere
fere
nce
seq
uen
ce,
acco
rdin
gto
jou
rnal
guid
elin
es(w
ww
.hgv
s.o
rg/m
utn
om
en).
Th
ein
itia
tio
nco
do
nis
cod
on
1.a[S
tep
han
etal
.,19
94].
b[F
uji
war
aet
al.,
1999
].
1148 HUMAN MUTATION, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1142–1154, 2010
Tabl
e7.
OFD
-Ove
rlap
Pat
ient
sW
itho
utM
utat
ions
Fin
din
gsan
dsy
mp
tom
s
Ind
ivid
ual
Del
etio
n
anal
ysis
Mes
oax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Po
stax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Pre
axia
l
po
lyd
acty
ly
Ora
l
fren
ula
Ora
l
ham
arto
ma
Cle
ftli
p/
pal
ate
Cer
ebel
lar
verm
is
hyp
op
lasi
a
Tib
ial
hyp
op
lasi
a
Cu
tan
eou
s
syn
dac
tyly
MR
Ifi
nd
ings
Oth
erfi
nd
ings
OF
D7
HB
,F
BH
B,
FB
Lip
and
pal
ate
1A
gen
esis
of
CC
,fu
sed
bas
alga
ngl
ia,
abn
orm
alco
rtic
algy
ral
pat
tern
Sho
rtli
mb
s,cl
ub
feet
,A
Vca
nal
,cy
stic
pan
crea
s,
dec
ease
d
OF
D8
FIS
HH
L1
2,3
toe
Hig
han
teri
or
hai
rlin
e,p
ylo
ric
sten
osi
s,
un
der
dev
elo
ped
rib
s,m
icro
ph
allu
s,m
ild
DD
OF
D9
Arr
ayF
BP
alat
eN
orm
alC
TD
epre
ssed
nas
alb
rid
ge,
epil
epsy
,h
ydro
nep
hro
sis,
refl
ux,
seve
reD
D
OF
D10
Arr
ayH
BF
B1
Lip
,to
ngu
e1
HB
,F
BM
ild
hea
rin
glo
ss,
wid
esp
aced
eyes
,cl
efte
d
epig
lott
is,
DD
OF
D12
FL
1H
HM
ild
hyp
osp
adia
s,SZ
,D
D
OF
D12
HB
,F
B1
1E
nd
oca
rdia
lcu
shio
nd
efec
t,
Dan
dy-
Wal
ker
mal
form
atio
n
Smal
lea
rs,
bil
ater
alp
oly
cyst
icki
dn
ey
OF
D13
HB
,F
BL
ip/p
alat
eA
bse
nt
pre
max
illa
and
mid
lin
efr
enu
lum
,V
SD/
ASD
,ab
sen
tp
itu
itar
y,p
anh
ypo
pit
uit
aris
m,
DD
OF
D14
HB
11
1H
H,
agen
esis
of
CC
Wid
esp
aced
eyes
,h
ypo
pla
stic
left
hea
rt,
imp
erfo
rate
anu
s,d
ecea
sed
at4
mo
nth
so
fag
e
OF
D15
FIS
HH
BH
BP
alat
eN
orm
alW
ide
spac
edey
es,
fro
nta
lb
oss
ing,
dep
ress
edn
asal
bri
dge
,m
icro
gnat
hia
,re
tin
ald
ysp
lasi
a,o
pti
c
ner
veh
ypo
pla
sia,
det
ach
edre
tin
a,se
vere
hea
rin
g
loss
OF
D16
Arr
ayH
L,
FB
HB
,F
BL
ip/p
alat
e1
FB
HH
Ab
sen
tfi
bu
lae,
sho
rtri
bs,
sho
rtlo
ng
bo
nes
,sm
all
jaw
,p
regn
ancy
term
inat
edat
20w
eeks
OF
D17
1H
B1
HB
Age
nes
iso
fC
CU
nil
ater
alra
diu
sh
ypo
pla
sia,
bil
ater
alti
bia
hyp
op
lasi
a,gi
ngi
vao
verg
row
th,
cyst
icki
dn
eys
OF
D18
HB
FB
11
Lip
/pal
ate
1M
ola
rto
oth
sign
,H
HM
arke
drh
izo
mel
ican
dm
eso
mel
icsh
ort
enin
gw
ith
smal
lh
and
san
dfe
etan
db
rach
ydac
tyly
,ab
sen
t
epig
lott
is,
op
tic
ner
veco
lob
om
asw
ith
sear
chin
g
nys
tagm
us
and
abse
nt
VE
Rs,
no
tch
edm
idli
ne
smal
lja
w
OF
D19
HL
11
Ham
arto
ma
Mac
roce
ph
aly,
smal
lfi
nge
rn
ails
,sh
ort
5th
fin
ger,
seco
nd
deg
ree
mic
roti
a,ge
last
icse
izu
res,
bif
id
too
th,
abse
nt
too
th,
sup
ern
um
erar
yto
oth
OF
D20
HB
,F
BH
B,
FB
1L
ip/p
alat
eH
HTe
ther
edto
ngu
e,va
gin
alat
resi
a,D
D,
dec
ease
d
OF
D21
11
HH
,h
ypo
pla
sia
of
cere
bel
lum
,
Dan
dy
Wal
ker
cyst
wit
h
mo
lar
too
thsi
gn
Mac
roce
ph
aly,
wid
esu
ture
s,fr
on
tal
bo
ssin
g,b
road
dep
ress
edn
asal
bri
dge
,d
ecea
sed
at2
mo
nth
s
HB
,h
and
sb
ilat
eral
;H
L,
han
dle
ft;
FB
,fo
ot
bil
ater
al;
FL
,fo
ot
left
;C
C;
corp
us
call
osu
m;
HH
,h
ypo
thal
amic
ham
arto
ma;
NA
,n
ot
asse
ssed
;D
D,
dev
elo
pm
enta
ld
elay
;SZ
,se
izu
res;
VSD
/ASD
,ve
ntr
icu
lar/
atri
alse
pta
ld
efec
t;1
,p
rese
nce
of
fin
din
g.
HUMAN MUTATION, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1142–1154, 2010 1149
Tabl
e8.
GC
PS
Pat
ient
sW
ith
Mut
atio
ns
Fin
din
gsan
dsy
mp
tom
s
Ind
ivid
ual
Mu
tati
on
Mes
oax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Po
stax
ial
po
lyd
acty
ly
Pre
axia
l
po
lyd
acty
ly
Cu
tan
eou
s
syn
dac
tyly
Mac
roce
ph
aly
Wid
e-sp
aced
eyes
MR
Ifi
nd
ings
Ad
dit
ion
alfi
nd
ings
G29
c.10
96C4
T,
p.R
366X
HB
HB
3,F
BH
B,
FB
11
Den
tal
cro
wd
ing,
tali
pes
equ
ino
varu
s,u
nd
esce
nd
edte
stis
,
righ
tin
guin
alh
ern
ia
G30
c.15
61_
1576
del
,p
.S52
1Pfs
X9
FB
FB
11
Hyp
op
lasi
ao
fco
rpu
sca
llo
sum
,
calc
ifie
dfa
lx
Lip
om
ao
nfo
reh
ead
,d
elay
eder
up
tio
no
fm
ola
rs
G31
c.17
28C4
A,
p.Y
576X
HB
FB
FB
11
Cra
nio
syn
ost
osi
s,ep
ican
thal
fold
s,d
epre
ssed
nas
alb
rid
ge
G32
c.17
48G4
T,
p.C
583F
HB
FB
FB
No
rmal
U/S
Um
bil
ical
her
nia
G33
-1c.
2374
C4
T,
p.R
792X
HB
FB
FB
1N
orm
alSZ
G33
-2c.
2374
C4
T,
p.R
792X
HB
FB
Bro
adn
asal
bri
dge
G34
-1c.
2708
C4
T,
p.S
903L
FB
FB
No
rmal
Ast
hm
a
G34
-2c.
2708
C4
T,
p.S
903L
HB
,F
BF
B1
1A
gen
esis
of
the
CC
,
mil
dve
ntr
icu
lar
pro
min
ence
Do
lich
oce
ph
aly,
sagi
ttal
cran
iosy
no
sto
sis,
bu
lbo
us
no
se,
um
bil
ical
her
nia
wit
hd
iast
asis
rect
i,D
D
G34
-3c.
2708
C4
T,
p.S
903L
FB
FB
Hig
han
teri
or
hai
rlin
e,
G35
-1c.
2741
del
G,
p.G
914A
fsX
38H
B,
FB
2,3
toe
11
Fam
ily
his
tory
of
pre
axia
lp
oly
dac
tyly
G36
-1c.
4072
C4
T,
p.Q
1358
XH
B,
FB
FB
G36
-2c.
4072
C4
T,
p.Q
1358
XH
B,
FB
FB
11
Um
bil
ical
her
nia
,SZ
,D
D
G37
Ch
r7:d
el37
.1-4
9.3
Mb
HB
,F
BH
B,
FB
1C
CM
,ab
no
rmal
CC
Bil
ater
alh
ydro
nep
hro
sis,
L-u
rete
ral
refl
ux,
cou
rse
live
r,
lary
ngo
mal
acia
,SZ
/DD
G38
Ch
r7:d
el39
.7-4
5.8
Mb
HB
3,F
B2,
3to
e1
1C
CM
,ve
ntr
icu
lom
egal
yD
uan
esy
nd
rom
e,V
SD/A
SD,
SZ/D
D
G39
Ch
r7:d
el41
.0-4
5.1
Mb
FB
HB
FB
,H
B1
Sub
du
ral
effu
sio
nC
ryp
torc
hid
ism
,h
ori
zon
tal
earl
ob
ecr
ease
s,an
tih
elix
pit
,
sin
gle
tran
sver
sep
alm
arcr
ease
of
the
left
han
d,
SZ,
DD
HB
,han
ds
bil
ater
al;H
R,h
and
righ
t;F
B,f
oo
tb
ilat
eral
;CC
,co
rpu
sco
llosu
m;C
CM
,cer
ebra
lcav
ern
ou
sm
alfo
rmat
ion
;SZ
,sei
zure
s;D
D,d
evel
op
men
tal
del
ay;V
SD/A
SD,v
entr
icu
lar/
atri
alse
pta
ldef
ect;
1,p
rese
nce
of
fin
din
g.N
ucl
eoti
de
nu
mb
erin
gre
flec
tscD
NA
nu
mb
erin
gw
ith
11
corr
esp
on
din
gto
the
Ao
fth
eA
TG
tran
slat
ion
init
iati
on
cod
on
inth
ere
fere
nce
seq
uen
ce,
acco
rdin
gto
jou
rnal
guid
elin
es(w
ww
.hgv
s.o
rg/m
utn
om
en).
Th
ein
itia
tio
nco
do
nis
cod
on
1.
1150 HUMAN MUTATION, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1142–1154, 2010
hormone deficiency without a hypothalamic hamartoma, and abifid epiglottis. Her three affected family members have two tofour limb postaxial polydactyly with a bifid epiglottis without ahypothalamic hamartoma. One family member had a broadforehead. The biologic mechanism of how this variant causes asub-PHS phenotype requires further study.
Seven of the eight mutations in the sub-PHS group were novel.One mutation (c.2149C4T, p.Q717X) has been describedpreviously in a patient with typical PHS [Johnston et al., 2005].The overall mutation yield for the sub-PHS probands was 8 of 20(40%), which is significantly lower than for patients with typicalPHS (20 of 22, 91%; P 5 0.0008, Fisher’s exact test).
One of five patients (20%) in the isolated PAP-A group wasfound to have a mutation in GLI3, c.874C4T, p.R292C. Thismutation is upstream of the zinc finger in a conserved region ofthe protein.
GLI3 mutations in probands with features of OFDSs
We identified 21 probands from our cohort who had one ormore features of PHS or GCPS and in addition, one or morefeatures of OFDS. Among these 21 probands we identified fiveframeshift or nonsense mutations that we concluded were
pathologic and one large genomic deletion of 14.0 Mb. All five ofthe frameshift or nonsense mutations were similar in positionwithin GLI3 to other mutations that have been reported to causePHS (Fig. 1). Indeed, several of the probands in this group met theclinical criteria for PHS (OFD1, c.2077A4T, p.K693X; OFD2,c.2977C4T, p.Q993X; OFD3, c.3002delG, p.G1001AfsX2). PatientOFD4 with the c.3040G4T, p.E1014X mutation did not meetclinical criteria for PHS but he had oligodactyly, which we haveobserved in affected relatives of probands with typical PHS(unpublished observations). Similarly, patient OFD5 with thec.3371dupC, p.H1124PfsX5 mutation had postaxial polydactyly anda hypothalamic hamartoma. Although not sufficient for a clinicaldiagnosis of PHS, this combination of features has been observed inaffected relatives of probands with PHS. Six of 21 patients withfeatures that overlap an OFDS had a GLI3 mutation for an overallyield of 29%. This yield of mutations is significantly below that fortypical PHS (20 of 22, 91%, Po0.0001, Fisher’s exact test).
GLI3 mutations in probands with typical GCPS or PHS
The final group included patients with typical manifestations ofGCPS or PHS. These patients were similar in their clinicalmanifestations to patients described previously [Johnston et al.,
Table 9. GCPS Patients Without Mutations
Findings and symptoms
Individual
Deletion
analysis
Mesoaxial
polydactyly
Postaxial
polydactyly
Preaxial
polydactyly
Cutaneous
syndactyly Macrocephaly
Wide-spaced
eyes MRI findings Additional findings
G40 Array FL 1
G41 HB FB, soft
tissue
HB Agenesis of CC, brain cyst,
brain stem hypoplasia
G42 Array HB FB FB
G43 Array HB HR 1 Agenesis of CC Small nose, prominent forehead,
deformed ear, MR
G44 Array FB 1 Porencephaly of left occipital
and left temporal lobes,
absence of septum pellucidum,
hypoplastic optic nerves
Bilateral hernia, midline capillary
vascular malformation,
tetralogy of Fallot
G45 Array HB3, FB HB, FB Trigonocephaly
HB, hands bilateral; HR, hand right; FB, foot bilateral; FL, foot left; HB3, wide thumbs; CC, corpus collosum; MR, mental retardation; 1, presence of finding.
Table 11. PHS Patients Without Mutations
Findings or symptoms
Individual
Deletion
analysis
Mesoaxial
polydactyly
Postaxial
polydactyly
Preaxial
polydactyly
Cutaneous
syndactyly
Craniofacial
features
Bifid
epiglottis
MRI
findings Additional findings
PH22 Array HB 1 HH Small nails, pointed teeth, genital hypoplasia,
microglossia, MR
HB, hands bilateral; HH, hypothalamic hamartoma; MR, mental retardation; 1, presence of finding.
Table 10. PHS Patients With Mutations
Findings and symptoms
Individual Mutation
Mesoaxial
polydactyly
Postaxial
polydactyly Preaxial p
Cutaneous
syndactyly
Craniofacial
features
Bifid
epiglottis
MRI
findings
Additional
findings
PH21 c.2685C4G, p.Y895X HB HB HB, FB NA HH Bilateral renal hypoplasia
HB, hands bilateral; FB, foot bilateral; HH, hypothalamic hamartoma; NA, not assessed. Nucleotide numbering reflects cDNA numbering with 11 corresponding to the A ofthe ATG translation initiation codon in the reference sequence, according to journal guidelines (www.hgvs.org/mutnomen). The initiation codon is codon 1.
HUMAN MUTATION, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1142–1154, 2010 1151
2005]. Among the 17 probands with GCPS we identified 11mutations. Of these 11 mutations, 6 were frameshift or nonsensemutations, 2 were missense mutations, and 3 were large genomicdeletions. Of the six frameshift or nonsense mutations, threewere in the 50 segment of GLI3 (between the start codon andcDNA position 1998); c.1096C4T, which predicts p.R366X;c.1561_1576del, which predicts p.S521PfsX9; and c.1728C4A,which predicts p.Y576X. One nonsense mutation (c.4072C4T,p.Q1358X) was in the 30 segment of GLI3 (between cDNA position3481 and the normal stop codon). Two nonsense or frameshiftmutations were in the middle region of GLI3 (between cDNApositions 1998 and 3481), which in most cases is associated with aphenotype of Pallister-Hall syndrome. Mutation (c.2374C4T,p.R792X) represents the eighth report of this variant associatedwith GCPS and this variant has been associated with nonsense-mediated mRNA decay [Furniss et al., 2007]. The secondframeshift or nonsense mutation in the middle region of GLI3 isc.2741delG, which predicts p.G914AfsX38. The proband with thismutation did not have preaxial polydactyly but was included inthe GCPS group based on an extensive family history of preaxialpolydactyly in combination with macrocephaly. Two missensemutations were identified, c.1748G4T, p.C583F, and c.2708C4T,p.S903L. Of these eight mutations, six are novel. There were threeprobands in this group with deletions that included GLI3 andranged from 4.1 Mb to 12.2 Mb. All three of these deletions havenovel breakpoints. These individuals were given a diagnosis ofGCPS contiguous gene syndrome based on their molecularfindings. This phenotype can include microcephaly or normoce-phaly, cognitive impairment, seizures, and other manifestations.
Of the two probands with PHS, one had a mutation in GLI3,c.2685C4G, p.Y895X. This mutation conforms to the previouslydescribed correlation that PHS mutations lie between cDNApositions 1998 and 3481 and is novel.
The overall yield of mutations was 65% for GCPS (11 of 17) and50% for PHS (1 of 2). We previously showed that among patientswith typical GCPS, 28 of 40 patients had a GLI3 mutation (70%)and 19 of 20 probands with PHS had GLI3 mutations (95%)[Johnston et al., 2005]. The results in the current study are similarfor GCPS. Merging these data, the current estimates for GCPS wouldbe 39 of 57 (68%) and for PHS would be 20 of 22 probands (91%).
Discussion
GLI3 mutations have been associated with several phenotypesincluding GCPS [Vortkamp et al., 1991], PHS [Kang et al., 1997]isolated polydactyly types A, A/B, and preaxial polydactyly type 4[Radhakrishna et al., 1997, 1999], and a single case of acrocallosalsyndrome [Elson et al., 2002]. By combining the data in thisreport with those of our prior work [Johnston et al., 2005] wepredict that when an individual manifests features sufficient for
the clinical diagnostic criteria for PHS or GCPS, their chance ofhaving a mutation in GLI3 is high: 91 and 68%, respectively. Thedata presented here extend these observations into several distinctgroups of patients.
In the early phases of gene discovery efforts, it is important tomaximize the likelihood of locus homogeneity by setting strictclinical eligibility criteria. This was done successfully for PHS, andwas likely done for GCPS as well. As noted above, nearly all patientswho met the clinical criteria for PHS had a truncating mutationin the middle third of GLI3. In this study we hypothesized that arelaxation of the clinical criteria would identify additional patientswith GLI3 mutations. By relaxing the criteria to allow subjects witheither mesoaxial polydactyly or hypothalamic hamartoma (but notrequiring both), we show that a substantial proportion (50% or 8 of16) of patients have mutations in GLI3, a substantial and clinicallyuseful yield that is slightly more than half the rate for patients whomeet clinical criteria. When the criteria are relaxed even furtherto allow patients with syndromic postaxial polydactyly withoutmesoaxial polydactyly or hypothalamic hamartoma, no mutationswere identified in four additional probands. Similar to the situationfor PHS, the relaxation of the clinical criteria for GCPS allowed usto identify mutations in 29% of patients in the sub-GCPS category,again about half the yield for patients who meet the former criteria.We had a limited set of probands enrolled in the study who hadnonsyndromic polydactyly, which was mostly postaxial polydactyly.The yield in these patients was one of five or 20% but becausethis cohort is small, we believe that the implications of this findingare limited.
We also identified a cohort of patients who had one or morefeatures of an OFDS. Other than OFDS type 1, there is no knownmolecular etiology for the many types that have been described(up to 13 types have been proposed). We reasoned that some casesof OFDS could be caused by mutations in GLI3 because: (1) therewere a number of clinical reports of patients whose findingsoverlapped OFDS and PHS; (2) OFDS type 1 is a ciliopathy[Ferrante et al., 2006]; and (3) GLI3 requires ciliary function forproper processing [Haycraft et al., 2005]. We selected 21 casesfrom our cohort with one or more features of an OFDS. Some ofthe patients had sufficient features to warrant a diagnosis of PHSor GCPS as well, but some of the patients have been accepted asexamples of an OFDS as evidenced by their publication in theliterature [Fujiwara et al., 1999; Stephan et al., 1994]. Among these21 probands, we identified 6 cases with causative mutations inGLI3, establishing molecular evidence that mutations of this genecan cause phenotypes within the OFDS spectrum.
Taken together, these data suggest that clinicians and moleculardiagnostic laboratories should encourage a relaxation of clinicalcriteria for GLI3 testing for patients with one or more features ofGCPS or PHS. This would include patients with a feature of PHSor GCPS and one or more features of an OFDS. In this way
34811998
sub-PHS
sub-GCPS
OFD-overlap
Figure 1. Diagram of the position within the gene of newly described nonsense and frameshift mutations in probands with sub-GCPS, sub-PHS, and OFD-overlap. Some of the closely spaced mutations have been adjusted for increased visual clarity. Red bars denote the 50 and 30 limitsof the PHS region at nucleotides 1998 and 3481, respectively. The colored bars on the protein show the conserved domains of GLI3 as definedelsewhere [Ruppert et al., 1990].
1152 HUMAN MUTATION, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1142–1154, 2010
additional patients will be diagnosed molecularly, which can bevaluable for directing further clinical evaluations (endocrine andimaging studies), prognostic advice, molecular diagnostics inother family members, and family planning.
Beyond the clinical diagnostic utility, these data further theunderstanding of the biology of this gene and its pathway. Themutational spectra of typical GCPS and PHS are distinct; GCPS iscaused by a wide range of mutations, but PHS is caused essentiallyonly by truncating mutations. The data presented here, combinedwith published cases [Borg et al., 2007; Fujioka et al., 2005; Furnisset al., 2009; Johnston et al., 2005; Mendoza-Londono et al., 2005;Roscioli et al., 2005; Yilmaz et al., 2008], describe 147 mutations inpatients with typical GCPS or PHS. The mutation distribution inthese two phenotypes is distinct. The GCPS mutations includelarge deletions/duplications (n 5 31) and translocations (n 5 5),and a variety of point mutations including missense (n 5 9), inframe deletions (n 5 1), splice (n 5 11), and frameshift ornonsense mutations (n 5 54). The distribution among patientswith PHS is limited to one splice mutation and 35 frameshift ornonsense mutations. The difference in these mutation spectra ishighly statistically significant (frameshift/nonsense vs. all othertypes; Fisher’s exact test o0.0001). We have previously shown thatamong the patients with truncating or frameshift mutations, theposition of the mutations in GLI3 robustly correlates with thephenotype; patients with PHS have mutations only in the middleportion of the gene (cDNA position 1998–3481), whereas patientswith GCPS typically have mutations 50 of position 1998 or 30 of3481. Again, the association between mutation position andphenotype is highly significant (50 or 30 mutation vs. middlesegment, Fisher’s exact test o0.0001).
The data presented here not only strengthen the knownassociation among those with typical GCPS and PHS but alsoshow the same mutation trend in atypical forms of the disorders.Among eight probands with sub-PHS, all eight mutations areframeshift or nonsense, whereas this is the case for slightly morethan half, five of eight, of the sub-GCPS probands. Seven of eightof the PHS truncation or nonsense mutations lie in the middlethird of the gene, whereas this is the case for none of five frameshiftor nonsense mutations among patients with sub-GCPS. These datasupport the notion that the anomalies of GCPS and PHS arespecific to their mutational mechanism, whether those anomaliesare typical (PHS and GCPS) or atypical (sub-PHS and sub-GCPS).
There was no apparent correlation for the type or position offrameshift or nonsense mutations within the sub-PHS group thatexplained or predicted that these mutations caused an atypicalphenotype as distinct from typical PHS, as nearly all were in themiddle third of the gene. However, we did find a correlation ofmutations in sub-GCPS patients that distinguished them fromGCPS. In probands with GCPS, the frameshift or nonsensemutations were distributed among the three segments of the gene;50 segment (n 5 31), middle segment (n 5 9), and 30 segment(n 5 14). In contrast, five of five frameshift or nonsense mutationsin probands with sub-GCPS were in the 30 segment of the gene (30
mutation vs. 50 or middle segment, Fisher’s exact test 5 0.0023).These data suggest that the frameshift and nonsense mutations inthe 30 segment of the gene cause distinct biologic and phenotypicconsequences from those in the other two segments of the gene.
The transition at nucleotide 1998 relates to the position of thesemutations with respect to the zinc-finger domain-encoding regionand the normal proteolytic processing site of the GLI3 protein [Kalff-Suske et al., 1999]. The transition at nucleotide 3481 may relate to thepresence of the transactivation domain [Ruppert et al., 1990; Shinet al., 1999]. There are known exceptions to these correlations. There
is a recurrent c.2374C4T, p.R792X mutation, which lies within thePHS region of the gene, but in eight of eight families (including oneproband in this report) is associated with a typical GCPS phenotype[Debeer et al., 2003; Furniss et al., 2009; Johnston et al., 2005; Kalff-Suske et al., 1999]. A similar mutation, c.2741delG, p.G914AfsX38,has been identified in a single family with a typical GCPS phenotypein this report. The proband in this case manifested postaxialpolydactyly with macrocephaly and hypertelorism and had a familyhistory of preaxial polydactyly. A third exception is a single familywith PHS that has a splice mutation instead of a frameshift ornonsense mutation, although that mutation likely produces atruncated gene product [Johnston et al., 2005].
These data show that the clinical spectrum of phenotypescaused by mutations in GLI3 is wider than previously appreciated.Further, they demonstrate that some mutant alleles of GLI3 cancause malformations that are milder than the typical, clinicallydefined pleiotropic picture of these disorders, in that they do notdemonstrate all of the features required for a clinical diagnosis.The previously reported association of mutation type andphenotype (PHS vs. GCPS) is strengthened by this report and itis extended into milder phenotypes as well. In addition, thedistribution of frameshift and nonsense mutations in patientswith sub-GCPS is distinct from that in those with typical GCPS,which suggests that these mutations are pathogenetically distinct.The data presented here should encourage molecular diagnosticlaboratories to test a wider array of patients and the data should beuseful to further understand the pathogenesis of these distinctpleiotropic developmental anomalies.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the following genetic professionals for referring patients
to our study: William P. Allen, David J. Aughton, Christopher Cunniff,
Sally Davies, William B. Dobyns, Linda Genen, Daniel Gruskin, Ketil
Heimdal, Gail Herman, Jodi Hoffman, Helen Hughes, LaDonna Immken,
Jeffrey Innis, Ian Krantz, David Manchester, Elizabeth McPherson, Thomas
Morgan, Maximilian Muenke, Tracy Oh, Melissa Parisi, Betsy Peach, Lynda
Pollack, Nazneen Rahman, Miranda Splitt and LuAnn Weik. Grant
sponsors: SHARE’s Childhood Disability Center, the Steven Spielberg
Pediatric Research Center, the NIH/NICHD Program Project Grant; grant
number: HD22657; the Medical Genetics NIH/NIGMS Training Program
Grant; grant number: 5-T32-GM08243 (all to J.M.G). Grant sponsor:
funding from the Intramural Research Program of the National Human
Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health. We also
acknowledge the Manchester NIHR Biomedical research Centre.
Disclaimer: The opinions and assertions contained herein are the views of
the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views
of the United States Department of Defense.
References
Biesecker LG. 2001. Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome. In: GeneReviews at
GeneTests: medical genetics information resource (database online). Copyright,
Seattle, WA: University of Washington; 1997–2004.
Biesecker LG, Aase JM, Clericuzio C, Gurrieri F, Temple IK, Toriello H. 2009.
Elements of morphology: standard terminology for the hands and feet. Am J
Med Genet A 149A:93–127.
Biesecker LG, Abbott M, Allen J, Clericuzio C, Feuillan P, GrahamJr JM, Hall J,
Kang S, Olney AH, Lefton D, Neri G, Peters K, Verloes A. 1996. Report from the
workshop on Pallister-Hall syndrome and related phenotypes. Am J Med Genet
65:76–81.
Borg K, Nowakowska B, Obersztyn E, Cheung SW, Brycz-Witkowska J, Korniszewski L,
Mazurczak T, Stankiewicz P, Bocian E. 2007. Complex balanced translocation
t(1;5;7)(p32.1;q14.3;p21.3) and two microdeletions del(1)(p31.1p31.1) and
del(7)(p14.1p14.1) in a patient with features of Greig cephalopolysyndactyly
and mental retardation. Am J Med Genet A 143A:2738–2743.
Debeer P, Peeters H, Driess S, De Smet L, Freese K, Matthijs G, Bornholdt D,
Devriendt K, Grzeschik KH, Fryns JP, Kalff-Suske M. 2003. Variable phenotype
HUMAN MUTATION, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1142–1154, 2010 1153
in Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome: clinical and radiological findings in 4
independent families and 3 sporadic cases with identified GLI3 mutations. Am J
Med Genet 120A:49–58.
Elson E, Perveen R, Donnai D, Wall S, Black GC. 2002. De novo GLI3 mutation in
acrocallosal syndrome: broadening the phenotypic spectrum of GLI3 defects and
overlap with murine models. J Med Genet 39:804–806.
Ferrante MI, Giorgio G, Feather SA, Bulfone A, Wright V, Ghiani M, Selicorni A,
Gammaro L, Scolari F, Woolf AS, Sylvie O, Bernard L, Malcolm S, Winter R,
Ballabio A, Franco B. 2001. Identification of the gene for oral–facial–digital type
I syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 68:569–576.
Ferrante MI, Zullo A, Barra A, Bimonte S, Messaddeq N, Studer M, Dolle P, Franco B.
2006. Oral–facial–digital type I protein is required for primary cilia formation
and left-right axis specification. Nat Genet 38:112–117.
Fujioka H, Ariga T, Horiuchi K, Otsu M, Igawa H, Kawashima K, Yamamoto Y,
Sugihara T, Sakiyama Y. 2005. Molecular analysis of non-syndromic preaxial
polydactyly: preaxial polydactyly type-IV and preaxial polydactyly type-I. Clin
Genet 67:429–433.
Fujiwara I, Kondo Y, Iinuma K. 1999. Oral–facial–digital syndrome with
hypothalamic hamartoma, postaxial ray hypoplasia of the limbs, and vagino-
cystic communication: a new variant? Am J Med Genet 83:77–81.
Furniss D, Critchley P, Giele H, Wilkie AO. 2007. Nonsense-mediated decay and the
molecular pathogenesis of mutations in SALL1 and GLI3. Am J Med Genet A
143A:3150–3160.
Furniss D, Kan SH, Taylor IB, Johnson D, Critchley PS, Giele HP, Wilkie AO. 2009.
Genetic screening of 202 individuals with congenital limb malformations and
requiring reconstructive surgery. J Med Genet 46:730–735.
Galasso C, Scire G, Fabbri F, Spadoni GL, Killoran CE, Biesecker LG, Boscherini B.
2001. Long-term treatment with growth hormone improves final height in a
patient with Pallister-Hall syndrome. Am J Med Genet 99:128–131.
Gurrieri F, Franco B, Toriello H, Neri G. 2007. Oral–facial–digital syndromes: review
and diagnostic guidelines. Am J Med Genet A 143A:3314–3123.
Hall BD, Graham Jr JM, Cassidy SB, Opitz JM. 2009. Elements of morphology:
standard terminology for the periorbital region. Am J Med Genet A 149A:
29–39.
Haycraft CJ, Banizs B, Aydin-Son Y, Zhang Q, Michaud EJ, Yoder BK. 2005. Gli2 and
Gli3 localize to cilia and require the intraflagellar transport protein polaris for
processing and function. PLoS Genet 1:e53.
Johnston JJ, Olivos-Glander I, Turner J, Aleck K, Bird LM, Mehta L, Schimke RN,
Heilstedt H, Spence JE, Blancato J and others. 2003. Clinical and molecular
delineation of the Greig cephalopolysyndactyly contiguous gene deletion
syndrome and its distinction from acrocallosal syndrome. Am J Med Genet
123A:236–242.
Johnston JJ, Olivos-Glander I, Killoran C, Elson E, Turner JT, Peters KF, Abbott MH,
Aughton DJ, Aylsworth AS, Bamshad MJ, Booth C, Curry CJ, David A,
Dinulos MB, Flannery DB, Fox MA, Graham JM, Grange DK, Guttmacher AE,
Hannibal MC, Henn W, Hennekam RC, Holmes LB, Hoyme HE, Leppig KA,
Lin AE, Macleod P, Manchester DK, Marcelis C, Mazzanti L, McCann E,
McDonald MT, Mendelsohn NJ, Moeschler JB, Moghaddam B, Neri G,
Newbury-Ecob R, Pagon RA, Phillips JA, Sadler LS, Stoler JM, Tilstra D,
Walsh Vockley CM, Zackai EH, Zadeh TM, Brueton L, Black GC, Biesecker LG.
2005. Molecular and clinical analyses of Greig cephalopolysyndactyly and
Pallister-Hall syndromes: robust phenotype prediction from the type and
position of GLI3 mutations. Am J Hum Genet 76:609–622.
Johnston JJ, Walker RL, Davis S, Facio F, Turner JT, Bick DP, Daentl DL, Ellison JW,
Meltzer PS, Biesecker LG. 2007. Zoom-in comparative genomic hybridisation
arrays for the characterisation of variable breakpoint contiguous gene
syndromes. J Med Genet 44:e59.
Kalff-Suske M, Wild A, Topp J, Wessling M, Jacobsen EM, Bornholdt D, Engel H,
Heuer H, Aalfs CM, Ausems MG and others. 1999. Point mutations throughout
the GLI3 gene cause Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome. Hum Mol Genet
8:1769–1777.
Kang S, Graham Jr JM, Olney AH, Biesecker LG. 1997. GLI3 frameshift
mutations cause autosomal dominant Pallister-Hall syndrome. Nat Genet
15:266–268.
Killoran CE, Abbott M, McKusick VA, Biesecker LG. 2000. Overlap of PIV syndrome,
VACTERL and Pallister-Hall syndrome: Clinical and molecular analysis. Clin
Genet 58:28–30.
Kos S, Roth K, Korinth D, Zeilinger G, Eich G. 2008. Hydrometrocolpos, postaxial
polydactyly, and hypothalamic hamartoma in a patient with confirmed Pallister-
Hall syndrome: a clinical overlap with McKusick-Kaufman syndrome. Pediatr
Radiol 38:902–906.
Mendoza-Londono R, Kashork CD, Shaffer LG, Krance R, Plon SE. 2005. Acute
lymphoblastic leukemia in a patient with Greig cephalopolysyndactyly and
interstitial deletion of chromosome 7 del(7)(p11.2 p14) involving the GLI3 and
ZNFN1A1 genes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 42:82–86.
Muenke M, Ruchelli ED, Rorke LB, McDonald-McGinn DM, Orlow MK,
Isaacs A, Craparo FJ, Dunn LK, Zackai EH. 1991. On lumping and splitting:
a fetus with clinical findings of the oral-facial-digital syndrome type VI, the
hydrolethalus syndrome, and the Pallister-Hall syndrome. Am J Med Genet
41:548–556.
Ng D, Johnston JJ, Turner JT, Boudreau EA, Wiggs EA, Theodore WH, Biesecker LG.
2004. Gonadal mosaicism in severe Pallister-Hall syndrome. Am J Med Genet
124A:296–302.
Radhakrishna U, Bornholdt D, Scott HS, Patel UC, Rossier C, Engel H,
Bottani A, Chandal D, Blouin JL, Solanki JV and others. 1999. The pheno-
typic spectrum of GLI3 morphopathies includes autosomal dominant
preaxial polydactyly type-IV and postaxial polydactyly type-A/B; no pheno-
type prediction from the position of GLI3 mutations. Am J Hum Genet
65:645–655.
Radhakrishna U, Wild A, Grzeschik KH, Antonarakis SE. 1997. Mutation in GLI3 in
postaxial polydactyly type A. Nat Genet 17:269–271.
Roscioli T, Kennedy D, Cui J, Fonseca B, Watson GF, Pereira J, Xie YG, Mowat D.
2005. Pallister-Hall syndrome: unreported skeletal features of a GLI3 mutation.
Am J Med Genet A 136A:390–394.
Ruppert JM, Vogelstein B, Arheden K, Kinzler KW. 1990. GLI3 encodes a 190-
kilodalton protein with multiple regions of GLI similarity. Mol Cell Biol
10:5408–5415.
Shin SH, Kogerman P, Lindstrom E, Toftgard R, Biesecker LG. 1999. GLI3 mutations
in human disorders mimic Drosophila cubitus interruptus protein functions and
localization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:2880–2884.
Stephan MJ, Brooks KL, Moore DC, Coll EJ, Goho C. 1994. Hypothalamic
hamartoma in oral-facial-digital syndrome type VI (Varadi syndrome). Am J
Med Genet 51:131–136.
Turner C, Killoran C, Thomas NS, Rosenberg M, Chuzhanova NA, Johnston J,
Kemel Y, Cooper DN, Biesecker LG. 2003. Human genetic disease caused by de
novo mitochondrial-nuclear DNA transfer. Hum Genet 112:303–309.
Vortkamp A, Gessler M, Grzeschik KH. 1991. GLI3 zinc-finger gene interrupted by
translocations in Greig syndrome families. Nature 352:539–540.
Yilmaz Z, Gokdemir M, Derbent M, Sahin FI. 2008. Greig syndrome based on a de
novo translocation. Pediatr Int 50:248–250.
1154 HUMAN MUTATION, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1142–1154, 2010