Date post: | 20-Feb-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | khangminh22 |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Thr DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 356 760 IR 015 980
TITLE Going the Distance: A Handbook for DevelopingDistance Degree Programs Using Television Courses andTelecommunications Technologies.
INSTITUTION Annenberg/CPB Project, Washington, DC.; PublicBroadcasting Service, Alexandria, VA. Adult LearningService.; Toby Levine Communications, Inc., Bethesda,MD.
PUB DATE 92NOTE 229p.PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom Use (055) Information
Analyses (070) -- Reference MaterialsBibliographies (131)
EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Cost Effectiveness; Courseware; *Distance Education;
Educational Radio; Educational Technology;Educational Television; Higher Education;*Instructional Development; Library Services; Models;Nontraditional Education; Telecommunications;*Telecourses
ABSTRACTThis handbook is designed to serve the needs of
colleges and universities considering the development of distancedegree programs. Its objectives are to report on current practicesamong colleges offering degree programs primarily throughtelecommunications; to describe current distance degree programs thatcan be used as models; and to identify nationally availabletelevision and audio courses that can be used in distance degreeprograms. The following is an overview of each chapter: (1)"Introduction" looks at current trends in distance learning in highereducation; (2) "Major issues that need to be examined early" analyzesthe potential market, missions, barriers to success, admissionspolicies, accreditation, and consortium membership; (3) "Building abroad base of support" identifies levels of approvals needed withinthe institution and the state; (4) "Issues in program development"discusses building a successful degree program; (5) "Support servicesneeded by distance students" describes models used by colleges andaddresses library services; (6) "Faculty issues" examines facultyselection, rewards, and training; (7) "Looking at costs" presents aframework for costs and benefits of distance degree programs; (8)"Sample distance degree programs" describes development of severalprograms; and (9) "Directory of distance learning courseware"describes more than 150 nationally available television and audiocourses. A list of 96 resources, a glossary of technology terms, andPublic Broadcasting Service Adult Learning Liaisons by state areappended. (ALF)
***************
Reproducti*
***************
********************************************************
ons supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.
********************************************************
c)
US. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice of Education& Resnick end Imorawament
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER Igigici
nee document nee bean reproduced aereceived from the porton or organizationoriginating itMinor ellenges Kara bean mad( to improverewoduebou
e PGntaoI,IeworOpmumeetaledmtOradOCV-nlent do not AeCeeeznIY rooreseni
othemi
OERI !radon or PobrY
11'
BEST CON 4711101:
A HANDBOOKF 0 R
DEVELOPINGDISTANCEDEGREEPROGRAMS
A Publication of
The Annenberg/CPB Project
and
The PBS Adult Learning Service
"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRAWILD BY
David A. Johnston
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
4 INFORMATION CENTER tun)
OAG THE
DISTA111GHA HANDBOOK FOR
DEVELOPING DISTANCE
DEGREE PROGRAMS USING
TELEVISION COURSES
AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGIES
prepared by"l'uln I .es ine (:oltantinicra ions. Inc.
hestla. Niars land
Kiel mil I ,,(11(1% dintior
Patrick J. Gallagher. publications manager13orcuti and Trays .11 Niner. research assistants
k Publication of the .1imenberg/CP13 Project andthe PUS .%dull I .earning Service
4
ADVISORS
Marcia Bankirer, Assistant Academic Vice President, Colorado State University; NationalUniversity Continuing Education Association
Beth Grobman-Burruss, Coordinator, Independent Study Program, De Anza College,Cupertino, California
Jacques Dubois, Director of Telecommunications and Weekend Programs, PrinceGeorge's Community College, Largo, Maryland
Peggy A. Falkenstein, Director, TV Sinclair, Sinclair Community College, Dayton, Ohio;The Instructional Telecommunications Consortium of the American Association ofCommunity and Junior Colleges
Lin Foa, Senior Project Officer, The Annenberg /CPB Project, cx officio
Jinny Goldstein, Vice President, Education Project Development, Public BroadcastingService, ex officio
Philip D. Hanson, Telecourse Coordinator, St. Louis Community College
Susan M. Rogers, Director of the Office of Distance Learning, Rochester Institute ofTechnology
Table of Contents
Foreword
Overview
Part 1. Introduction
5
7
9
Higher education at a crossroadsDistance learning studentsDistance learning and collegesDistance degree trends summarizedStages in a typical distance degree planning process
Pa. 2. Major issues that need to be examined early 15
Is there a need for a distance degree program?What is the mission of the program?Are there hidden barriers to success?How will the program be administered?How can you psepare for state authorization and accreditation of the program?What policies will govern admission to the program?How will the program be evaluated?Should you join a consortium?
Part 3. Building a broad base of support 29
What approvals are needed?How will you get the support you need?What messages will build your case?
Part 4. Issues in program development 35
What degree or degrees will be offered?What should you consider in addition to course requirements?How will courses be selected, adapted, or developed?How will courses be delivered?How will faculty and students interact?How will distance students be evaluated?What flexibility is needed by learners with time constraints?
6
Part 5. Support services needed by distance students 53
How are support services made accessible to the distance learner?What registration procedures are helpful?What orientation programs should be planned?What types of counseling programs are needed?What library resources and services are needed by distance learners and howwill they be accessed?How will distance students access videotapes, course texts, and equipment?Looking to the future
Part 6. Faculty issues 65
What key distance degree issues are related to faculty?On what basis should distance faculty be selected?What kinds of training and support are needed by distance faculty?
Part 7. Looking at costs 71
What sources of information are available?How are costs (and benefits) being shared among departments and institutions?What cost-related policy issues need consideration?What future cost-related research is needed?
Part 8. Sample distance degree programs 79
An overview of examplesSelected programs
Northern Virginia Community College Extended Learning Institute (ELI),Annandale, Virginia: Associate in Science, Business Administration
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania: ExtendedLetters, Arts, and Sciences (ELAS)
Prince George's Community College, Largo, Maryland: Associate in ArtsBusiness Management; Associate in Arts General Studies;
Management Studies Transfer ProgramRochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York: Bachelor of
Science in Applied Arts and ScienceUniversity of Maine at Augusta, Augusta, Maine: Associate of Arts in
Social ServicesWayne County Community College, Detroit, Michigan: Associate of Arts
P.;
2
Part 9. Directory of distance learning courseware
IntroductionUsing the databaseDatabase
Arts and HumanitiesBusiness and ManagementCareersCommunications and CompositionComputer ScienceEducationEngineeringForeign LanguagesGovernment/Political Science/Area StudiesHealthHistoryMathematicsPhysical SciencesSocial Sciences
Directory of ProducersDirectory of Distributors
Appendices
1. Resources2. Glossary of Technology Terms3. PBS Adult Learning Liaisons4. Acknowledgements
Foreword
by Sally M. Johnstone, Director, Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications, aproject of the Western Interstate COMItliSSi011 for Higher Education (WICHE)
Higher education today is faced with the challenges of expanding the reach, the quality,and the effectiveness of instruction within a context of dwindling resources. In additionto serving the needs of traditional college-age students, colleges and universities alsomust help retrain workers for a changing economy. Indeed, the term "college-age" hasitself taken on new meaning as an increasingly large proportion of students fall into thebroad category of "adult learners," bringing with them new demands on the nature,timing, and delivery of higher education.
In response to these challenges, a growing number of institutions are turning to the useof telecommunications technologies specifically distance learning as a way to reachmore students and to address a broader range of instructional goals.
Developing and implementing successful distance learning programs is a complex task,requiring careful consideration of a considerable number of key issues. Yet, as someinstitutions are identifying these issues and defining the mix of techniques andinstruction, they are also discovering the barriers that must be overcome to enable aninstitution to succeed in this arena.
One group of pioneering institutions is involved in the Annenberg/CPB Project's NewPathways to a Degree Project. The seven New Pathways colleges, universities, andstatewide consortia are using different combinations of technologies and strategies tooffer degree programs to underserved populations. They are one of the primary sourcesof information for Going the Distance. The initial evaluation of their efforts reveals onecentral issue: the specific technologies are less important to the success of a programthan are the "people variables," the factors that allow faculty and students alike tofunction effectively within these new environments.
All the pioneering institutions have found that not only do faculty and students have tobe assisted in changing how they go about teaching and learning, but the institutionaladministrative and support services must be modified, often in the most basic of ways.For example, because of work, family responsibilities, or other constraints, distancelearners often find it difficult to come to campus to register for courses or to usereference and resource materials in the on-campus library. In short, colleges must revisitissues of accessibility of student support services from registration and counseling tolibrary and information resources and bring these services into conformance with theexpectations and needs of the distance learner.
Institutions also are discovering 'arger administrative and political challenges to thesuccessful implementation of distance learning programs. Personnel and funding
5
policies, accreditation standards, and the requirements of state authorizing agencies allevolved in the era of the conventional classroom and often do not serve the verydifferent requirements and attributes of telecommunicated instruction. To complicatematters further, telecommunications technologies, by definition, ignore geographical andpolitical boundaries.
A compelling need exists to share resources, not only among institutions but betweenstates and regions. The concept of such sharing is not new. Four regional, legislativecompacts now exist between groups of states in the West, the South, New England, andthe Midwest that facilitate this sharing. What is new is the means by which these statesare able to share their resources and avoid unnecessary duplication of costly degreeprograms. Instead of moving students to other states or to other communities withintheir own state, educators are on the threshold of being able to easily move theinformation and programs to the students. Ample evidence now exists of the value andeffectiveness of these programs.
We are still "en the threshold" of significant use because the number of institutions thatoffer complete distance learning degree programs is still relatively small. Further, thetechnologies undergirding distance learning are constantly evolving: that which we takefor granted today was revolutionary ten years ago, and what we can only now dreamof will be commonplace in another decade. A critical point to keep in mind, however,is that the administrative structures that are set into place to deliver high qualitydistance degree programs will easily adapt to the inevitable technological changes.
Going the Distance: A Handbook for Developing Distance Degree Programs brings together athorough discussion of the issues and challenges involved in establishing distance degreeprograms, information about the educational telecommunications resources currentlyavailable, and descriptions of sample programs at pioneering colleges and universities.It can be a great guide in the transition from traditional administrative practices to thosethat will effectively serve the distance learner, the faculty, and the institution.
1 0
6
Overview
This handbook is designed to serve the needs of colleges and universities consideringthe development of distance degree programs. Its purpose is to:
report on current practices among colleges that are already offeringdegree programs primarily through telecommunications,
describe current distance degree programs that can be used asmodels and references, and
identify nationally available television and audio courses that can beused in distance degree programs.
Following is an overview of each chapter.
Part 1 Introduction looks at the status of distance learning inhigher education and identifies current trends in the developmentof distance degree programs, including an identification of typicalstages of development.
Part 2 Major issues that need to be examined early focuseson analyzing the potential market, missions, potential barriers tosuccess, accreditation issues, admissions policies, and the benefits ofconsortium membership.
Part 3 Building a broad base of support identifies thedifferent levels of approvals that are needed to put your programon a solid foundation both within your institution and within yourstate.
Part 4 Issues in program development discusses how to thinkabout building a degree program that is more than the sum of itsparts.
Part 5 Support services needed by distance studentsdescribes a variety of models colleges al using to make highereducation for distance learners a rich and supportive experience,including the critically important area of library services.
Part 6 Faculty issues examines how faculty are selected andrewarded and their need for training in the selection and use of newtechnologies and instructional packages.
7
Part 7 Looking at costs identifies sources of information aboutthe financial costs involved in using telecommunicationstechnologies and presents a framework for thinking about the costsand benefits of distance degree programs.
Part 8 Sample distance degree programs describes thedevelopment of several degree programs at colleges and outlineshow a variety of colleges have matched degree requirements withdistance learning options. It includes two-year terminal degrees,two-year transfer degrees, and programs that enable students whohave already completed two years of undergraduate credits toachieve a baccalaureate degree at a four-year institution from adistance. Further, it demonstrates the variety of approaches beingused: from complete degree programs composed entirely ofpreproduced telecourses, to degree programs that mix telecoursesand instruction delivered via other technologies, to degree programsthat rely entirely on other forms of distance learning, for example,interactive classes delivered in real time via satellite. None of thesecategories is clear cut, however, and as technologies change, themeans of developing and delivering instructional material andresources is likely to change as well.
Part 9 Directory of distance learning courseware describesmore than 150 nationally available television and audio courses andprovides directions on how to obtain more complete informationabout them. Many readers will be surprised by both the variety andnumber of courses that are available.
1c
Part 1.
Introduction
Higher education at a crossroads
Distance learning students
t, Distance learning and colleges
Distance degree trends summarized
ot° Stages in a typical distance degree planningprocess
9
Higher education at a crossroads
We stand at an important crossroads in higher education, a time in which educatorsare grappling with an unusually large number of challenges. Tidal waves of economic,demographic, educational, and technological changes demand that colleges reconsiderwhat they will teach, how they will teach, whom they will teach, and the degree towhich the classroom of tomorrow will look and feel anything like the classroom ofyesterday. Even the question of whether learning will take place in locations calledclassrooms is debatable.
Many of these issues are joined in discussions of distance learning coursework inwhich instruction takes place primarily through the use of telecommunicationstechnologies, allowing faculty and students to be in different locations, often in asmany locations as the number of students enrolled.
V Distance learning students
In recent years, the entire demographic picture of undergraduate life has changed. Itis no longer the norm for a student to graduate high school, proceed directly tocollege, study full time for two or four years and, somewhere around the age oftwenty or twenty-two, exit into the world with degree in hand. Students are delayingtheir entrance into college, are more likely to study part time than full time, and aremost likely to be employed and have work and family responsibilities outside theclassroom. All of these factors have led to an increase in the number of studentsinterested in distance learning. Television and audio courses have been among themost widely offered types of distance learning options during the last 15 years. Morerecently, computer-based courses have joined the mix of distance learning options.
The overriding reason that students enroll in distance learning courses is convenience.This convenience is needed for one or both of two reasons:
Students are time-bound: Students who work on shifts, whotravel a great deal, or whose heavy responsibilities at home or atwork do not allow time for regular classroom attendance preferdistance learning. Lisa Youngdahl, for example, a student at St.Louis Community College who is a flight attendant, notes,"Because of my travel, it would have been impossible for me toreach my goals without telecourses."
Students are place-bound: Some students simply live too far awayfrom a campus to pursue their educational goals in a traditionalmanner. Others may he kept at home by family responsibilities orillness or disability, or they may be in hospitals, rehabilitationhomes, or prisons. These students need distance learning becausethey do not have the mobility to come to campus.
10
14
Even students who take courses on campus may enroll in distance learning coursesas a way to advance toward their degree, while simultaneously working and/ortaking care of a family.
if Distance learning and colleges
Because television courses complete and integrated instructional systems thatgenerally include television programs, a textbook, and a variety of other instructionalmaterials represent one of the most widely used telecommunications resources fordistance learning, most distance learning research has focused on their use andimpact. We know, for example, that more than 2,000 colleges and universities haveoffered such courses over the last ten years through the PBS Adult Learning Serviceand that these institutions are almost equally divided between two-year and four-year colleges. This group of colleges represents roughly 60 percent of the highereducation institutions in America. In addition to the use of preproduced televisioncourses, many colleges also transmit live classes via television. As Sally Beaty,executive director of INTELECOM, a producer of television courses, has said:
In today's fiscally challenging postsecondary envinmment, telecommunications-based courses provide colleges with effective and efficient ways to maintain thequality of their instructional programs while making educational opportunitiesmore accessible to the communities they serve.
Many of the factors that affect the use of distance learning courses in highereducation have changed over the last several years, and in many cases these changeshave been exponential rather than incremental.
A dramatic expansion of available courseware makes distancelearning possible in a wide array of disciplines and at allacademic levels.
As new telecommunications technologies have become morewidely used, the means of delivering courses to students alsohave increased dramatically, as has the challenge of selecting thebest system or systems by which to deliver instruction.
Finally, a technological revolution has occurred, and it hasproduced so many opportunities for enriching and enhancinginstruction, for connecting people who are geographically distant,and for redefining the classroom that the challenge is not whetherto use telecommunications as a part of higher education but howto use it. Today's classroom can be anywhere. VCRs allowstudents to access programs when and where they need to andreview course material at will. Students can participate in aseminar via computer conferencing and then use the computer to
11
1 5
-Ur
LI L/
access databases for research and to request that books from thecollege library be delivered to a local community site.
This combination of factors a wide variety of courseware, multiple deliverysystems, the new majority of older, part -time students, and a greater array ofavailable technologies provides new challenges to colleges and new opportunities.For the first time, colleges can offer complete degree programs in which instructionis primarily delivered through telecommunications technologies and in whichinteraction between faculty and students, among students, and between students andother instructional resources is accomplished primarily from a distance.
toe Distance degree trends summarized
Our research has identified several trends:
In most cases, administrators planning distance degree programswill not be limited by policy. Instead, logistics, economics, andthe need to develop a broad base of institutional support aremore likely to determine the planning challenges to be met.
Distance learning degree programs typically use a variety ofinstructional approaches and delivery systems to offer a full rangeof options to students for the completion of degree requirements.Students may take courses at community sites, from home, fromthe workplace, or combine these opportunities with on-campusoptions.
Colleges are continuing to adopt television courses, audio courses,and other complete course packages, but increasingly, they areadapting them in new ways to meet local needs by adding locallyproduced material, combining portions of different courses,changing the order of assignments to meet local needs, and soforth.
The addition of newer telecommunications technologies E-mail, voice mail, computer conferencing, audiobridges,audiographic devices, and the like gives both students andfaculty opportunities for more communication and greaterinvolvement both with one another and with other resources thatenrich and broaden the learning experience.
Distance degree programs that are in the mainstream ofinstitutional planning are more likely to be successful than thosethat are on the fringe.
12
IC
-Ur
LL,
4,/ Stages in a typical distance degree planning process
Colleges currently offering or developing distance degrees seem to progress througha series of specific planning activities. While these are presented here as discretesteps, in mast cases several stages will occur simultaneously.
1. Determine whether a demand exists for a distance degreeprogram and whether your institutional mission would be wellserved by the development of such a program.
2. Identify policies both external and internal that might affectthe success of a distance learning degree program and work toeliminate those that might serve as barriers.
3. Build a broad base of support for the legitimacy and value ofdistance education.
4. Examine the degree programs currently offered at your institutionto see which adapt readily to distance education models.
5. Select from among available courseware those instructionalpackages that meet local needs.
6. Develop locally produced distance learning courses to completedegree requirements.
7. Evaluate the cost effectiveness and availability of telecom-munications alternatives for content delivery and student-facultyinteraction that meet both course objectives and the needs ofdistance learners.
8. Ensure that student services meet the needs of distance learners.
9. Select top-notch faculty and train them in effective distancelearning teaching methods and in the use of telecommunicationstechnologies.
10. Develop an evaluation plan that involves faculty, administrators,and students.
These activities are examined more fully in the sections that follow.
We are in a time of transition. As more and more colleges move toward distancedegree programs, new models will emerge, and research will provide new guidanceon how to proceed. Colleges are invited to share their experiences with the PBSAdult Learning Service and the Annenberg/CPB Project so that lessons learned canbe shared with others.
13
17
= -u
ill1111
Part 2.
Major issues that need to be examined early
V Is there a need for a distance degree program?
What is the mission of the program?
Are there hidden barriers to success?
How will the program be administered?
How can you prepare for state authorization andaccreditation of the program?
What policies will govern admission to theprogram?
V How will the program be evaluated?
Should you join a consortium?
1S
15
Is there a need for a distance degree program?
In Part 1, we identified a number of trends in undergraduate distance learning. Thesetrends indicate that the increased availability of both undergraduate television coursesand telecommunications technologies now make it possible for colleges to offer distancedegree programs. Knowing that it is possible, however, does not necessarily mean thatit is needed. Research will help answer several questions:
Does a market exist for a distance degree program?
How large is it?
What are the specific needs and interests of potential distancedegree students?
To gain institutional support for the establishment and/or expansion of a distance degreeprogram, it is necessary to demonstrate that potential students exist who would preferto enroll in a degree program offered through distance learning modes, for one reasonor another. But how does a college demonstrate that demand?
First, the distinction between a demand analysis and a needs assessment requires someclarification. Most surveys of adult learning deal with "need" or "interest," but suchstudies usually yield results that grossly overestimate what adults actually do. A moreuseful study is one that examines the actual demand for learning. In order to acquireaccurate information about probable adult learning behavior, a study on behalf ofdistance degree programs needs to survey current or recent adult students to find outwhat they have studied, their preferences, and their viewpoints regarding degree studyat a distance.
The Office of Adult Learning Services at The College Board has conducted demandstudies over the last decade. In using that experience on behalf of distance degree study,Carol B. Aslanian, Director of the Office, suggests a number of steps:
First, identify adults in your geographical service area who have,within the last three years, participated in undergraduate degreeprograms. If feasible, identify those adults who have studiedthrough distance learning alternatives as well.
Second, conduct telephone interviews with these current and pastlearners to discover their current and past learning behavior andtheir understanding of and opinions abot.: distance learning.Telephone interviewing enables researchers to probe for furtherexplanations of responses when necessary and may reach peoplewho would not return questionnaires.
1619
-ur
Third, gather information from current and past adult learnersabout what degree programs they have enrolled in, at whichinstitutions, on what schedule, with what support services, at whatcost, and so forth. Next, learn what the respondents understandabout distance learning and gather their preferences aboutalternative means for learning at a distance, such as the use oftelecommunications versus class attendance at community-basedsites. Finally, gather the respondents' opinions as to what it wouldtake for them to participate in an undergraduate degree programoffered through distance learning alternatives rather than oncampus.
Fourth, if the sample of respondents includes those who havestudied through distance learning alternatives, these individualsshould be questioned much like those above, but with an additionalcomponent that focuses on what they like and do not like aboutdistance learning options.
The major purpose of such a survey is to determine how many adults in a college'sservice area are studying in undergraduate degree programs, and, more importantly,what portion of them would be interested in distance learning. Given the fact that thosewho have engaged in higher education recently are those who are the most likely poolof students for distance learning, the information gained from recent learners is far morereliable than discussions with other adults in the community who have not learned inrecent times, who may have no intentions of learning in the near future, or whoseexpectations to do so may never be realized. Bear in mind, however, that the newlearning options made possible by telecommunications technologies may attract newlearners to higher education and that these individuals will not be identified in thisparticular study.
It would also he useful for a college to survey its current adult student body as well asits faculty and administration regarding the availability and acceptability of distancelearning undergraduate degree programs. Current students are readily available forinterviews and represent those persons that the college has already been able to attract.The question at hand, however, is would these persons also consider studying throughdistance learning. The viewpoints of the faculty and administration are critical todeveloping good information on how to shape and offer potential new programs throughdistance learning and will help balance the information on student demand.
What is the mission of the program?
Once the demand for a distance degree program has been clearly demonstrated, amission statement must be developed to communicate the educational philosophy, goals,
17
20
purposes, and intent of the program. Among the questions the mission statement willneed to answer are:
What is the purpose of the program?
What is the program's relationship to the institution of which it isa part?
How does the program define its audience and its understanding oftheir needs?
How is the program's mission to be communicated internally andexternally?
In what geographic area will the program be offered?
Development of a mission statement is not a one-person exercise. In fact, considerableinput from a variety of constituencies should be sought and taken into account. (See Part3: Building a broad base of support for a further discussion of this issue.)
Are there hidden barriers to success?
While many colleges report that no particular policy would limit their ability to offer adistance degree, some may find their efforts affected by one or another of the followingissues:
Residency rules that require some percentage of a student'scoursework to be taken on campus. Many institutions require oneyear of residency to satisfy baccalaureate degree requirements, forexample.
Regulations that require students to take courses delivered viatelecommunications on a pass/fail basis and limit the number ofpass/fail credit hours that can be applied to a degree program.
Policies that require transcripts to show that a course was taken ata distance (Brey (1990) found that fewer than two percent ofcolleges specifically indicate on transcripts that a course was takenin a distance learning mode.)
Limits on the number of telecourse credit hours that can be appliedto a degree program. The state of Texas currently has such aregulation, for example.
18 21
States that do not recognize off-campus courses for institutionalfunding purposes. Texas, for example, provides no funding fordistance learning, and Colorado does not fund continuing educationprograms at four-year institutions, which include credit coursesoffered via telecommunications.
Class size limitations, e.g., California community colleges limitenrollment in independent study courses (which include telecourses)to 125 students per instructor. Faculty contracts also may limit classsize.
Federal or state regulations that treat students taking distancelearning courses differently from students enrolled in on-campuscourses for purposes of financial aid. Veterans Administrationbenefits may be one area to study, for example.
if any of these policies are likely to affect your program adversely, begin immediately towork toward change. Consult with institutions similar to your own particularly withinyour state or region to determine if a group of colleges with like interests might worktogether to advocate for particular changes. Colleagues at other institutions also may havedeveloped creative means of overcoming these limitations.
How will the program be administered?
Colleges next will need to determine the manner in which a distance degree program willbe administered within the institution.
Will it be administered through a continuing education department?Through a distance learning division? Through the sameadministrative unit as the on-campus program?
To whom will the program director report?
What are the implications of different management structures?
It is important here to differentiate between the administration of the program from amanagement point of view and its academic administration. While the former typicallyis handled by a special division continuing education, off-campus programs, specialservices, and the like the academic development and content of the distance degreeprograms typically fall under on-campus departments and college functions.
How can you prepare for state authorization and accreditation of theprogram?
19
As distance learning offerings expand into distance degree programs, they will comeunder the strict scrutiny of state authorizing agencies and accrediting bodies. Olcott(1992) very properly notes:
Institutional accreditation does not automatically extend to off-campus delivery.. . . Distance degree programs may be viewed as changing the scope of theinstitutional mission, expanding the institutional geographical service area, orextending new or existing degree programs to off-campus locations. . . . These maybe substantive changes that require accreditation review.
Olcott points out, however, that "accreditation review and formal degree approvalprovide the foundations for ensuring a high-quality program."
Typically, accrediting bodies focus on four primary areas:
definition of program goals
resources
achievement of program goals
a program's capacity to continue to accomplish the goals
Some also assess program quality.
Policies on the accreditation of distance degree programs are still evolving. While somesuggest evaluating distance degree programs using a set of questions that are equivalentto those used in evaluating campus-based degree programs, others raise distancelearning-specific issues.
Kate Gulliver (COPA, 1991), for example, asks:
Should distance education be judged by its equivalency to classroom-basededucation, or by some other standard? Is that equivalency a given, or somethingto be proven by research and practice? What do we really know about the qualityand effectiveness of what takes place in the classroom?
Looking at the issue from a different perspective, Michael Goldstein (COPA, 1991), in hiskeynote address to the Spring 1991 Professional Development Program on DistanceLearning and Accreditation sponsored by the Council on Postsecondary Accreditation,asks:
How can a balance be struck between the need for effective regulation and qualitycontrol on the one hand and the encouragement of innovation in the delivery of
20C
educational services in hitherto unimagined ways?
He calls for the accrediting community to "develop a coordinated, coherent approach tothe review and approval of technology-based distance learning, in a manner that servesthe dual purpose of protecting quality while encouraging innovation in the delivery ofpostsecondary education."
The Center for Adult Learning and Educational Credentials of the American Council onEducation (ACE) and The Alliance: An Association for Alternative Degree Programs forAdults have already published Principles of Good Pi actice for Alternative and External DegreePrograms for Adults (1990). Following is an overview of the principles of good practicedeveloped by ACE and The Alliance:
Principle 1: Mission Statement: The program has a mission statement thatreflects an educational philosophy, goals, purposes, and general intent and thatclearly complements the institutional mission.
Principle 2: Personnel Faculty and Academic Professionals: Faculty andacademic professionals working in alternative and external degree programs sharea commitment to serve adult learners and have the attitudes, knowledge, and skillsrequired to teach, advise, counsel, and assist such students.
Principle 3: Learning Outcomes: Clearly articulated programmatic learningoutcomes frame the comprehensive curriculum as well as specific learningexperiences; in developing these outcomes tl. program incorporates generalstudent goals.
Principle 4: Learning Experiences: The program is designed to provide diverselearning experiences that respond to the characteristics and contexts of adultlearners while meeting established academic standards.
Principle 5: Assessment of Student Learning: The assessment of a student'slearning is based on the achievement of comprehensive and specific learningoutcomes.
Principle 6: Student Services: The policies, procedures, and practices of theprogram take into account the conditions and circumstances of adult learners andpromote the success of those students.
Principle 7: Program Administration: The administrative structures and thehuman, fiscal, and learning resources are sufficient, appropriate, and stable foraccomplishing the program mission.
Principle 8: Program Evaluation: Evaluation of the program involves faculty,
-ur
academic professionals, administrators, and students on a continuing, systematicbasis to assure quality and standards, and to stimulate program improvement.
This project has led to an ongoing corollary study by the Institute for Distance Learningat Regents College. The Project on the Principles of Good Practice for Distance HillierEducation is cosponsored by the American Council on Education, The Alliance ofAlternative Degree Programs for Adults, the International University Consortium, andthe Educational Telecommunications Division of the National University ContinuingEducation Association.
State Licensure
Goldstein's comment about striking an appropriate balance between regulation andencouraging innovation is equally applicable to the second prong of the external reviewstructure faced by an institution initiating a distance learning degree program. The licensegranted an institution by its home state specifies the institution's degree-grantingauthority. In many cases, it also defines its programmatic authority, and a few go so faras to delineate the form of delivery. For state institutions, the authorization may alsospecify a service area. New state authorization may be required for a distance learningprogram that results in new offerings, a new mode of delivery, or that covers a differentservice area.
A far more difficult issue arises when the distance learning degree program is offered tostudents outside of the institution's home state. As a general principle, an institution maynot offer a course of studies leading to a degree within a state without the prior approvalof that state. A strict application of this principle would require a program offered on anational basis to be separately approved by every state.
As long ago as 1985, the State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) recognizedthis problem when they issued, in conjunction with COPA, the report on Accreditationand Licensure of Long Distance Learning via Telecommunications (Project ALLTEL). Thereport called for interstate cooperation to facilitate the development of innovative distancelearning programs while maintaining effective regulatory controls. It proposed the useof a common information form to enable states to more effectively evaluate suchprograms with a minimum of burden to the offering institution.
State higher education officers are addressing this issue at several levels. The WesternConsortium for Instructional Telecommunications, a component of the Western InterstateCommission on Higher Education (WICHE), a multistate compact for the coordinationof higher education in the western United States, has begun consideration of a commonsystem for the approval of distance learning programs offered throughout its region.Similarly, the higher education officers of New York and Virginia have developed auniform information form for "Degree and Credit-Bearing Certificate l'rograms to be
22
25
c
Offered Via Telecommunications." The form addresses the following areas:
program identification and instructional sites
institutional mission
organization and administration
finance
programmatic information
instructional staff
student services provisions
learning resources/services
telecommunications delivery systems
academic oversight
The WICHE initiative and the New York/Virginia effort are being closely examined byindividual state higher education officers nationwide and by SHEEO. Under considerationare a variety of options, ranging from common reporting of distance learning programsto the establishment of uniform standards for the authorization of such programs.
These efforts are, in part, a recognition of the blurring of state boundaries bytelecommunications. While telecommunications may help colleges deliver a more uniformquality of experience to distance learners than might even be possible in campus-basedinstruction, its use raises critical questions of authority and responsibility. Further, suchcommon accreditation practices as the site visit pose new challenges when identicaleducational experiences are delivered at various times and at hundreds of sites, themajority of which would probably not be traditionally defined as educational institutions.As Steven Crow (COPA, 1991) puts it: "Accreditors will have difficulty dealing with thedisappearance of boundaries."
What policies will govern admission to the program?
Distance degree planners will need to determine whether distance degree stud nts aresubject to the same admissions criteria as on-campus students. Other admissions-relatedissues include financial aid and prior credit assessment.
23
26
-Ur
Study financial aid policies to assess the degree to which they areconsistent for all students matriculating for a degree. Not only dodistance students have the same range of financial circumstances ason-campus students, many will be embarking on degree programsprecisely because of a changed employment or life-cycle status thatlimits their financial resources.
Policies about the assessment of prior credits and the transferabilityof credits also are needed for distance degree programs. Because themajority of distance students are also adult students, their prioracademic record may include courses taken many years earlier.They may also bring to academic life considerable experience frompersonal and work situations that may be relevant both to anassessment of their capacity to enter a degree program and to theamount of credit they bring to the program. Students applying foradmission to a distance degree program need to know whether theinstitution accepts CLEP, ACT-PEP, and other proficiencyexamination credits.
Related to these admissions questions is a determination of whetherstudents taking distance courses will be treated as "in residence" andunder what conditions, or if they will need to transfer their credits.
How will the program be evaluated?
The establishment of a distance degree program is a milestone, not an ending. Programstandards need to be articulated from the very beginning, and plans need to be set inplace for the regular assessment of their achievement.
In developing a sound program evaluation process, numerous questions will need to beanswered.
Who will participate in the evaluation? Among those who shouldbe considered are:
faculty
administrators
current and former students
providers of support services, e.g., librarians andtelecommunications professionals
242';
_
-- community agencies on which the program has an impact,e.g., public libraries and schools used as distance learningsites
What will be assessed? Verduin and Clark (1991), in discussing thework of Cooler (1979), suggest the following areas:
access participation of target populations, extent ofgeographic coverage, availability of media needed forparticipation
relevancy to needs and expectations societal, individual,and employment-related as well as the relationship of theseto the mission of the institution
quality of programs offered learning materials, ease ofuse, total educational experience, short- and long-term impacton lives (i.e., is the sum of the educational experience morethan simply a succession of courses)
learner outcomes how many students graduate inrelationship to the number entering, what period of time isneeded to achieve a degree, how many course failures arerecorded, how many courses are repeated, what is thedropout rate, how do students' performance in distancecourses compare with their performance on campus, howwell do they perform on standardized tests, is there evidencethat learning is taking place
effectiveness are programs meeting the needs anddemands of students and society
efficiency what is the cost of achievement (a fullerdiscussion of cost issues is found in Part 7: Looking at costs)
With what frequency will the program be evaluated?
How will the results of the evaluation be shared?
Will the distance program be compared with more traditionalprograms in terms of such variables as cost, achievement,accessibility?
Will longitudinal studies be conducted to assess changes in theprogram over time?
25
2
Should you join a consortium?
Consortia of institutions have been organized for a variety of purposes in highereducation. Those involved with distance education are beginning to expand their scopeto include consideration of distance degree issues. These issues include delivery systems,course development or acquisition needs, and specific courses of study offered by thoseinstitutions that join together either statewide, regionally, or nationally.
Consortia can offer many advantages. While the particular mix of services will vary fromorganization to organization, typical consortia services include the following:
members may be able to license instructional material for lower feesthan a single institution would pay
members may participate in preproduction license arrangements fortelevision courses that individual institutions could not afford toproduce themselves
members may share the cost of broadcast transmission or theoperation of an educational access cable television network or eventhe development of a fiber-optic network
members may jointly fund a professional to represent them beforestate and federal agencies and boards, including legislatures
the consortium may apply for grants that would benefit all members
individual members might specialize in certain functions needed byall, e.g., researching the latest advances in distance learning tech-nologies, evaluation services, materials duplication, training facultyin the use of new technologies, etc.
Television Course Consortia
Numerous consortia of colleges offering television courses have emerged in the last tenyears. These include:
local or state groups such as the Northern Illinois LearningResources Cooperative (NILRC), the Maryland College of the AirTeleconsortium, and the Southern California Consortium forCommunity College Television (INTELECOM)
26 2S
_
regional groups such as the Eastern Educational Consortium
national groups such as the Instructional TelecommunicationsConsortium (ITC) of the American Association of Community andJunior Colleges (AACJC) and the National Universities DegreeConsortium (NUDC).
In a survey of telecourse users, Brey (1990) found that 73 percent of the two-yearinstitutions he studied belong to at least one consortium and most belong to at least two;only 10 percent do not belong to any. Adult Learning Liaisons at local public televisionstations (see Appendix 3 for list) can help an institution new to the process identifyconsortia at all three levels.
Distance Degree Consortia
Olcott (1992) suggests a model in which "lead institutions" deliver the majority ofprogram coursework through a variety of instructional delivery systems and enableother member institutions to facilitate degree completion for their own students.
AG"SAT, for example, was formed by 23 land grant institutions in1989. During Spring 1992, seven credit courses were offerednationwide via satellite and other distance learning technologies.The courses originated from seven different land grant institutionsand were used by 18 of 35 affiliated AG*SAT institutions. Inaddition to sharing credit courses, AG*SAT also shares CooperativeExtension programs.
Olcott points out that by "combining institutional academic resources to support leadinstitution programs, extended degree programs can be designed with maximumflexibility to meet student needs. Moreover, the lead institution concept is predicated onprogram quality and academic standards that allow institutions to extend their mostreputable programs."
Statewide Telecommunications Networks
Both Hezel (1990, 1992) and WICHE (1991) have been following the development ofstatewide telecommunications activity for several years and offer up-to-date state-by-stateprofiles of progress. Participation in statewide networks may be appealing because itoffers potential fiscal savings, resource sharing, transcendence of traditional serviceboundaries, consolidation of telecommunications activity, and an expansion of theavailable range of services. Olcott (1992) notes, however, that "most statewidetelecommunications networks are a hybrid of institutions, each with its own educational,political, and economic agendas that must be implemented cooperatively with those ofother members." Meuter (Markwood and Johnstone, 1992) suggests that the most difficult
27
issues to resolve in such collaborations concern the primacy of each institution. lie alsounderscores the need for consistent policies and procedures across institutions using thetelecommunications network.
Other Types of Consortia
Many other reasons exist for forming consortia. EDUCOM, for example, is a nonprofitconsortium of ever 650 colleges and universities that provides a forum for the exchangeof ideas on Critical issues related to computing in higher education. EUIT (EducationalUses of Information Technology), a division of EDUCOM, encourages the development,distribution, and use of software in higher education.
The Western 'Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications was formed in 1989 by theWestern' Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE) to share informationabout new strategies for implementing telecommunications technology at both thestrategic and practical levels. The Western Cooperative is brokering a degree program inthe western states and acts as a clearinghouse for state, regional, and federal policy issuesregarding educational telecommunications. Its 150 members include colleges, universities,school districts, state agencies, other consortia, and interested corporations.
Forming New COnsortia
Should the opportunity to form a new consortium be appealing, consider the followingquestions:
What is the goal of collaboration?
Is the goal congruent with each institution's mission?
How will the consortium be governed?
Will all members have equivalent standing?
What will it cost to join?
Who will offer what and to whom?
What fiscal, human, and support resources will be available?
Will the consortium be fiscally viable over time?
What are the financial goals of the consortium?
How will the quality of the consortium's programs be evaluated?
These questions are, of course, similar to those that any new distance degree programwill need to answer.
28 31
Part 3.
Building a broad base of support
V What approvals are needed?
V How will you get the support you need?
V What messages will build your case?
29
Si 4
-Ur
Change advocacy is a slow process. Patience is a part of the process.Jacques Dubois, Prince George's Community College
What approvals are needed?
To ensure a broad base of support for your program, consider the following:
Do you have the support of influential faculty members? Will theyteach in the program? Will they help evaluate courses for adoption?Will they participate in the development of new distance learningcourses?
Do you have the support of student support personnel (e.g.,counselors, librarians, bursar, resource centers, etc.) who are neededto make the program successful?
Has the program gotten curriculum approval at the institutionallevel by the institution's policy-making bodies, including thecurriculum and graduate councils of the faculty senate and theprovost or chief academic officer? Olcott (1992) warns that curricularreview procedures for distance degree programs by institutional,system, and state policy-making bodies differ significantly fromthose governing the approval of a single course or even a series ofcourses and may take as long as six to nine months. Many suggestan even longer period is needed.
Does the program have central administration support? Gellman-Buzin (1987) says, "Telecommunications will not succeed in anyorganization without top-level administrative support. Thosecolleges that lead in the technological marketplace have presidentswho are convinced that telecommunications is good for theinstitutions and for the President."
Does it need to be approved by the state system admi listration andthe state board of higher education or equivalent authority, and, ifso, how will these approvals be obtained?
In many cases, community support will be needed as well. When University of Maineat Augusta president George Connick was charged with the responsibility to develop adistance degree program statewide, he set out to meet with a variety of constituencies,including those that were community-based and those involved in higher educationinstitutions throughout the state. Connick scheduled these meetings both to gathersupport and to obtain input on course offerings, off-campus sites, community needs, and
30
33
so forth. In Oregon, too, community meetings were held to determine local interest andneeds before a statewide distance degree program was put into place.
How will you get the support you need?
Obtaining the support you need will not happen overnight. While leadership from thecollege president or vice president will go a long way toward winning the support ofother administrators and faculty, on many campuses, the strongest case for distancelearning will more likely be built on a person-by-person basis between the distancelearning administrator and key faculty and staff. As support for the program builds,successful distance learning administrators caution against too rapid program growth.They also recommend avoiding promises about growth that may be impossible to keepand setting conservative goals so that success is attainable and growth is clear. Amongthe steps to be taken are the following:
Identify key people and their concerns.
Develop well-documented responses to those concerns.
Build a cadre of influential faculty and administrators with equityin the success of the program. Whenever possible, use regularfaculty to teach telecourses, for example, and ask them to describetheir experiences to other faculty.
Understand the effect of an increased telecourse program on thelibrary/resource center and other academic support departmentsand help to either minimize it or pay for it.
What messages will build your case?
Consider what messages are most likely to be compelling.
Some colleges will find that a distance degree program furthers thecollege mission to reach out into the community and serve moreadult students.
Others will find that it makes good economic sense to offer adistance degree rather than see current and potential students goelsewhere to complete their education.
Yet others will be able to document that they serve a population ofstudents who could never enroll in a campus-based degreeprogram.
31
At Colorado State University, for example, while 80 percentof the students live near a college or university, theremainder are spread out across the state and could notattend college in any way other than through distancelearning.
In Maine, the knowledge that an exceedingly low percentageof residents achieved college degrees caused the legislatureto demand that higher education become more widelyavailable to residents regardless of their location.
In Oregon, a changing economy, in which unemployed highschool graduates were unlikely to ever be re-employed in theindustries that once supported them, meant that access tohigher education statewide was essential to meet the needsof new economic trends. Because unemployed adults weredispersed throughout the state, telecommunications-baseddegree programs provided the means to reach them.
Finally, administrators planning distance degree programs should be prepared to countercertain myths about distance learning in general, prior to advocating a distance degreeprogram:
Myth 1. Interaction between faculty and students is limited.
In distance learning, the amount of interaction between faculty andstudents has been significantly increased through the use of a variety oftelecommunications technologies (see Part 4: Issues in programdevelopment for a fuller discussion of this issue). Given that students onmany traditional campuses are complaining that large lecture coursespreclude the kind of faculty-student interaction they expected to find,telecommunications may, in fact, offer a way to meet students' needs formore personalized instruction. Many faculty and students engaged incomputer conferencing, for example, are reporting that it actively involvesmore students than traditional instruction. It also democratizes the processsince student comments are judged more on their content than on thegender, background, or personality of the individual commenting. The useof computer conferencing may also put students with poor Englishlanguage skills at less of a disadvantage because they have more time tocompose a response to a question than they would have if they had beencalled upon in class. It also encourages students to write continually,something faculty value. In some classes, this "interaction" has been sosuccessfully developed that students are complaining about having tolisten to too many other students when they want to hear the instructor(Markwood and Johnstone, 1992).
32 3'lJ
Myth 2. Nationally marketed, prepackaged courses are not equal in quality totraditionally delivered courses.
Television courses typically undergo a two- to three-year developmentperiod during which input from scholars and administrators nationwideis obtained and materials are subjected to several formative evaluationstudies. These procedures seek to ensure that:
the instructional level of the course material is appropriatefor and acceptable to institutions across the country
the materials are instructionally rigorous and effective indistance learning
the course has sufficient appeal to college administrators,faculty, and television professionals to warrant adoption andbroadcast
the course has sufficient appeal to students to warrantenrollment and course completion
the formats of the various course components are appropriateand effective
In addition, college adoption procedures typically require detailed courseevaluation by faculty, further ensuring that only courses of high academicvalue are offered. Courses that are found to be of poor quality simply arenot adopted.
Finally, each college that licenses a preproduced course adapts it to its owngoals and objectives, determines its own student assignments, andevaluates students according to its own standards.
Myth 3. Courses delivered to students in nontraditional ways draw studentsaway from traditional courses.
Most students who take television courses do so because they like thisstyle of learning and they cannot or do not want to enroll in campus-basedinstruction on a full-time basis. For these students, the alternative totelevision courses is not traditional instruction; the alternative is not goingto college at all. Other students combine enrollment in distance courseswith traditional instruction. Distance learning should not be seen as acompetitor of traditional courses, but as one of a variety of optionsincluding on-campus instruction from which students of all kinds canchoose to complete a degree.
33 0
Part 4.
Issues in program development
What degree or degrees will be offered?
What should you consider in addition to courserequirements?
V How will courses be selected, adapted, ordeveloped?
a/ How will courses be delivered?
V How will faculty and students interact?
V How will distance students be evaluated?
What flexibility is needed by learners with timeconstraints?
35
3 7
11111111=11111
What degree or degrees will be offered?
Four options exist for developing a distance degree program at the undergraduate level:
1. a terminal associate-level degree
2. a two-year transfer program in which a student may or may not getan associate-level degree prior to moving on to a four-yearinstitution
Community or two-year colleges that select this option will want first todetermine if a statewide strategic articulation program exists that specifiesprecisely what requirements must be met before transferring to a four-yearcollege.
3. an upper division degree in which students with two years ofundergraduate credit complete a concentration in a particulardiscipline
4. a four-year baccalaureate degree
John Witherspoon (Markwood and Johnstone, 1992) suggests three criteria for selectinga particular distance degree program. These are to:
e build on experience with existing programs
e respond to a needs assessment
e choose programs that are self-renewing, either because they dealwith changing technologies or because a succession of new studentpopulations is guaranteed
In most cases, distance degree planners will want to start with an existing on-campusdegree program rather than try to develop a new one, which is a lengthy and difficultprocedure. One strategy is to create a task force of key faculty and administrators todetermine the most feasible and best place to start. This technique builds support for theprogram at the same time as it defines it. Research into the needs of local employers forworkers with particular skills also can provide guidance. An external demandassessment, such as the one described in Part 2: What major issues need to be examinedearly?, is another source of information that can be applied to decision making.
Most colleges that have gone through the degree-selection process have tended to startwith a general studies or liberal arts degree, an option that allows students to tailor theirstudies to fit individual career goals or personal needs. In most cases, these are at theassociate degree level although a few are baccalaureate degree completion programs.
36
Colleges offering associate-level general studies or liberal arts distance learning degreesinclude Metropolitan Community College in Omaha; Prince George's CommunityCollege in Largo, Maryland; Pennsylvania State University; the University of Maine atAugusta; Rio Salado Community College in Arizona; Rockland Community College inSuffern, New York; Northern Virginia Community College; and the Rochester Instituteof Technology, among others.
Distance degree programs in specific disciplines do exist, however, e.g., Applied Science(Metropolitan Community College), Business Management (Prince George's CommunityCollege), Business Administration (University of Maine and Northern VirginiaCommunity College), and Social Services (University of Maine).
Few schools currently offer a complete four-year degree program at a distance, but some,such as Rochester Institute of Technology and the University of Maryland, are buildingtoward this goal. Oregon also is planning to use telecommunications to make availablestatewide four baccalaureate programs that are currently offered by one or another ofits higher education institutions (a B.S. in Agricultural Business Management, a B.A. andB.S. in Liberal Studies, and a B.S. in Nursing).
A number, of schools are very close to being able to offer a degree program, but are notyet formally advising students that such a degree is available. Wayne CountyCommunity College, for example, needs faculty approval for one distance learningscience requirement that includes a laboratory before it will be able to offer an associatedegree using all preproduced television courses. Similarly, at Rose State in Oklahomaand at the University of Kentucky, distance options exist to meet nearly all associatedegree requirements, but the distance degree program is not yet being offered in aformal way.
New Pathways Projects
In 1990, the Annenberg/CPB Project funded seven projects through its New Pathwaysto a Degree initiative. Many either are offering distance degrees or are well along in theplanning process. The initiative is testing the proposition that colleges can offer a newkind of academic program, made possible by technologies, that is accessible, supportive,academically rich, and rigorous. New Pathways projects are at the Oregon State Systemof Higher Education; the College of St. Catherine in St. Paul, Minnesota; the Universityof Maine at Augusta and the Maine Community College System; Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis; Northern Virginia Community College; the WestVirginia Higher Education System; and the Rochester Institute of Technology.
Selecting Majors
In regard to the selection of majors and/or concentrations, a study by the University ofMaryland (1990) found that the demand for certain external baccalaureate majorsappears to reflect the demand in adult education as a whole, that is, for businessmanagement and administration degrees.
37
What should you consider in addition to course requirements?
Several writers stress that a simple pairing of distance courses and degree requirementsis only one part of building a degree program.
Gary Miller, Associate Vice President of Program Development, University of MarylandUniversity College (Moore, 1990), reminds us that "the curriculum operates on at leastfour levels and that the levels are fundamentally linked":
institutional level where the mission and social goals ofinstruction are set
academic department level where basic standards of breadth anddepth, scope and sequence are established
course level where specific knowledge and experiences areorganized and performance standards set
delivery level where issues of instructional support andtechnology are addressed
Daniel Granger, Director of the Center for Distance Learning at SUNY Empire State, theState University of New York's innovative college for adult students (Moore, 1990),discussing issues involved in focusing on the individual distance learner, also delineatesfour areas that distance degree planners need to consider:
academic in terms of the content areas included
pedagogical in terms of the mix of content and methods
experiential in terms of studies that build on a student'sbackground and incorporate experiential activities among theinstructional options
technological in terms of the media used for various studies andthe modes of ongoing communication that are selected
Both sets of issues underscore the need for ongoing student assessment and counselingboth to determine that a student's program is appropriate and proceeding on a
reasonable schedule and to assess what experiences outside of formal course work maybe needed to complete a student's program. These issues are discussed more fully inPart 5: What support services do distance students need?
38
4U
iallHow will courses be selected, adapted, or developed?
First determine whether your degree program will contain only distance learning optionsor whether it is acceptable for some requirements to be met by traditional means. Manycampuses are now experimenting with models of distance learning that combine the useof preproduced television courses, locally developed video courses that use interactivetelecommunications technologies, and some on-campus work.
At Lewis-Clark State College in Idaho, for example, some studentshave received degrees by combining various distance learningoptions, e.g., locally produced courses, nationally developed courses,off-campus instruction, computer-based courses, independent study,and a one-week intensive study class.
Course Selection
Part 9 of this Handbook (Directory of distance learning courseware) lists more than 150preproduced television and audio courses available nationwide from which colleges canselect to develop degree programs. Colleges will face some key decisions in this process.
In order to offer a range of elective offerings and /or upper levelcourse requirements, institutions must move away from the ideathat distance learning divisions only offer introductory coursesknown to attract a high enrollment. Some courses with traditionallylow enrollments will need to be offered as well. Distance learningstrategies may actually facilitate this. Specialized courses normallytaught in seminar fashion, for example, may lend themselves readilyto being taught to students at a distance via computer conferencing.
Colleges must determine distance course offerings over a longerperiod of time. Students who enroll in distance degree programsneed to plan their programs out over several years in the same wayon-campus students do and need to be assured of programcontinuity.
Colleges also need to think creatively about degree requirements for which no distancelearning option exists or meets their institution's requirements. The three areas in whichthis is most likely to occur are speech communications, laboratory science, and physicaleducation. A number of individuals and colleges have offered suggestions in these areas.
Speech Communications
Because many speech courses require students to make oral presentations to the class,some faculty have been reluctant to use a distance learning mode to fulfill thisrequirement.
39
41
This challenge can be met in any of several ways:
The Oregon Community College Consortium plans to use its two-way interactive narrowcast system for this particular requirement,rather than broadcasting a preproduced television course.
Depending on where distance learning students actually live (inmany cases, students choose distance learning for conveniencerather than because they are geographically dispersed), somecolleges will find it acceptable to require a few on-campus sessionsat which students can present speeches to their peers. Severaladministrators recommend caution in requiring on-campusactivities, however, and stress the need to know your students andto strike a balance between on- and off-campus required activities.
Some students will be able to videotape their speeches, perhaps ata local cable company or during off hours at television facilities oncampus. Some may even have access to videotaping equipment athome or at work or will be able to rent it from a local video store.
Laboratory Sciences
This requirement, perhaps more than any other, raises numerous questions amongdistance degree planners:
How can colleges provide hands-on science experiences to distancestudents?
What is the role of technology? (Some distance degree plannersrecommend that colleges use the lowest level of technology that willdo the job to minimize the time needed for students to learn howto use the technology and to minimize the expense.)
How safe are home-based laboratory experiments?
Should students be charged a special fee for kits to use at home?
What are the legal ramifications of having students completelaboratory work in an unsupervised environment?
Are important laboratory experiences eliminated because theycannot be safely done in an off-campus environment?
Several trends seem to be emerging in response to these problems. These involve the useof videodiscs, the use of home-based laboratory kits, and combinations of home-basedand campus-based laboratory work.
Vider discs In the not too distant future, videodiscs andcomputer-based simulations are likely to change the way studentsengage in laboratories both on and off campus. With more schools
40
42
1111M!1111111111111111111
investing in videodisc players, and more and more videodiscproducers developing products that simulate laboratory experiences.colleges may find this use of technology an attractive option for theprovision of laboratory experience.
One drawback to this option, however, is the difficulty of providingvideodisc players to off-campus students, who are less likely to ownvideodisc equipment than they are to own VCRs, for example. Somecolleges may be able to place (or find) a sufficient number ofvideodisc players in community sites to overcome this disadvantage.Even in situations where students must come on campus to usevideodisc equipment, the option can be made more palatable todistance learners by having the facility open evenings and weekendsand by providing flexibility in the period of time over whichstudents may complete specific learning experiences.
Using Laboratory Kits A number of colleges have developed orpurchased laboratory kits that students use at home. Several haveproduced videotapes that guide the distance student through thelabs.
Chemistry
Students taking Introductory Chemistry at Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis (IUPUI) receive a homelaboratory kit. The college supplies nonhousehold chemicals inminuscule quantities, and students supply a variety of other, easilyobtainable materials. IUPUI emphasizes safety: even home chemicalsthat are relatively safe when used properly are excluded, e.g.,chlorine bleach and drain cleaner. Home-based laboratoryassignments are supplemented with a few on-campus laboratoriesand with videotapes that show physical phenomena. Distancestudents pay the same laboratory fee as on-campus students.
Biology
Beginning with the Fall 1992 semester, students taking HumanBiology at the University of Maine, Bangor, will take a one-creditlaboratory section taught primarily at a distance. Students willreceive a laboratory kit containing a fetal pig, dissecting equipment,and a guide. A series of videotapes developed by the course facultywill accompany the kit to guide students through the dissectionprocess The first three labs will be completed in one on-campussession to train students in the use of the equipment. The remaindercan be done at home. The laboratory final, in which students willidentify portions of the pig's anatomy, will be delivered overMaine's instructional video system.
41
Northern Virginia Community College also offers a biology coursefor off-campus learners that includes a series of eleven laboratoryassignments that can be completed at home using readily availableand inexpensive materials. No laboratory kit is provided. Studentsmake only one trip to campus for a laboratory assignment thatrequires a microscope; video is used to prepare them for thisparticular lab so that they get the maximum benefit.
Western Illinois University (WIU) in Macomb sends distancestudents dissection kits purchased from biological supply houses.Both Carolina Biological in Burlington, North Carolina, andNebraska Scientific Corporation in Omaha sell fetal pigs (and otherspecimens), dissection kits, and laboratory manuals, although WIUchose to prepare its own manual.
Geology
The Earth Revealed, a preproduced television course, recommends anoptional laboratory manual and laboratory kit that containsspecimens and tools needed to complete each lab assignment. Kitsare available from Burminco in Monrovia, California.
Prince George's Community College in Largo, Maryland, combinesa two-credit weekend geology laboratory with The Earth Revealed.
Metropolitan Community College (Omaha, Nebraska) distancegeology students receive a box of rock specimens to study andparticipate in a field trip.
Physics
At Northern Virginia Community College, physics experiments arepresented on ten hours of video that cover all the introductoryconcepts in the course. Students borrow and /or copy tapes from thelibrary.
Physical Education
At Rockland Community College (Suffern, New York). three coursesfulfill the requirements for physical education: 1) Aerobics 2)Strength Building and 3) Diet and Exercise. In addition, distancestudents receive a "Wellness for Life" packet, developed by theinstructor, that includes a chart on which students record theirwellness activities.
Northern Virginia Community College is creating an independentcredit system for its physical education requirement in which the
42
off-campus student contracts with the on-campus physical educationinstructor to undertake a specific amount and type of physicalactivity.
At Rose State College in Midwest City, Oklahoma, students canfulfill their physical education requirement by taking Here's To YourHealth, a preproduced television course.
Other Courses with Special Needs
St. Louis Community College requires Art of the Western Worldstudents to take field trips to various museums and theaters. In OurOwn Image students must attend the theater and engage in othercultural activities.
The American history television course at Northern VirginiaCommunity College requires students to complete various projects,some of which involve trips to local historic sites.
Adapting Preproduced Courses
Most colleges that license preproduced courses make few, if any, changes. However,adapting a preproduced course may help a college overcome a lack of fit between theinstitution's own goals and objectives for a particular course and that of the prepackagedtelevision course. Some colleges treat preproduced course packages as a starting pointfor course development rather than as an end product.
Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) describes its approach tocourse development as one of deconstruction and reconstruction.First, the instructional objectives of nationally available coursepackages are compared to RIT's course objectives. Next, dependingon the course needs, faculty members develop additional materialsand select interactive communications strategies that meet thespecific needs of the course.
A course called Human Communications, for example, whichprovides an overview of the field of communications, including thecontexts of interpersonal, group, mass, and public communications,delivers the main course content through 20 videotapes from avariety of sources and in a variety of formats. In addition, studentsparticipate in computer conferences for class discussion andinteraction as well as for course updates, participate inaudioconferences for small group discussions on specific coursetopics, and read a published text.
By contrast, RIT's Elementary Statistics course uses 22 videos fromthe preproduced television course Against All Odds. Students submit
43 4
homework assignments via computer using a VAX version ofMINITAB, a popular statistics software package, and communicatewith the instructor via electronic mail. In addition, class discussiontakes place weekly via an audioconference, and students read a text,a television course study guide, and the MINITAB Handbook.
Developing New Courses
An increasing number of colleges are supplementing available course packages withlocally produced courses, an option that requires money, expertise, and access toproduction facilities. While sometimes these are simply videotaped lectures, in manycases colleges are making use of sophisticated interactive technologies (see next section)in the delivery of distance courses. Local course development enables colleges tobroaden student access to senior faculty and to address degree requirements that arecollege-specific while enabling students to continue to pursue degree requirements at adistance.
Colleges will need to decide how much course development they wish to undertake aswell as who will be responsible for its development. Such issues as the following willquickly come under discussion:
Who will develop the course course faculty, instructionaldesigners, or a combination?
Will the course be designed to be delivered in real time or on atime- delayed basis?
Will course faculty be given released time or additional stipends toprepare the course?
Will they be provided with assistance on the effective use oftelecommunications technology?
Where will video segments be produced and at what cost?
What print materials will be used?
How will courses be delivered?
When colleges first began to serve distance learners, few means of delivering courses tostudents were available other than local broadcast or independent, print-based study.Flexible and rapid interactive elements were virtually unheard of. Today, many meansexist for students and faculty to communicate easily from disparate locations. Further,
446
the available technologies do not necessarily operate independently; they often arecombined to reach the greatest possible number of students regardless of their location.
Systems that bring students and instruction together can be divided into two types:
Delivery Systems in which students access the instructionalmaterial directly from a television, satellite, computer, radio,facsimile machine, telephone, or by mail
Information Storage Systems in which the student receives somemedia, such as a computer disc, videodisc, videocassette, oraudiocassette, or more traditionally, a printed text, is handed to astudent for direct use or playback on some type of machine.
Among the nonprint technologies, some are synchronous they enable two or morepeople to communicate with one another in real time and others are asynchronous
or time-delayed. In selecting from among available methods of communication,planners will want to consider issues of cost and ease of student access to thetechnology. Colleges planning distance degree programs also will want to give carefulconsideration to training faculty, students, and support staff to use the technologiesproperly both for teaching and advising.
The selection of a particular system or systems will depend on many factors, includingthe following:
availability
cost
the desired degree of interactivity
the need for real time (synchronous) vs. time-delayed(asynchronous) communciation
How will faculty and students interact?
The increasing availability and general use of telecommunications technologies haveenabled colleges to greatly increase the amount and manner of faculty-studentinteraction in distance learning courses.
Synchronous or Real-time Communication
The most obvious example of synchronous communication is telephone conferencingwhich is still the most widely used form of technology-assisted communication buttwo-way video systems, some computer conferencing systems, audiographic
45
conferencing systems, picture phones, and keypads all allow synchronous conversation,although they also require special equipment at every student's location.
An audiographic conference, for example, combines a telephoneconference call (so that all members of the class can be in voicecommunication) with some means of graphic support such as anelectronic blackboard, writing table, still video, or computer-generated visual material. All participants can converse whilelooking at the same text and graphics on their computer screens. Ina calculus course, for example, anyone in the class could display anequation, a graph, or a still video image (which is then displayed oneveryone's computers); point to a number in the equation (everyonewill see the cursor on their screens); draw a new graph (which thenalso appears on each screen); and simultaneously describe aloudwhat they are doing and why,
A picture phone which is an ordinary telephone with a cameraand a small video screen attached to it allows participants toshare black and white versions (admittedly in relatively crude form)of such graphics as photographs, flow charts, floor plans, andmathematical figures with a time lapse of about four seconds fromwhen the camera is pointed at the drawing or photograph to thetime it appears on the screens of the other picture phones in theconversation. At Rochester Institute of Technology, every distancestudent in certain courses is lent a picture phone.
For instructional situations in which many individuals at variouslocations need to be in voice communication, e.g., for a seminar,many colleges are using audiobridges, which allow high-fidelityconference calls involving many parties. Brey (1990) found thatother than regular telephone and mail, this was the most popularform of communication among students and telecourse instructors.
Some computer conferencing systems sometimes called "chat" or"text-based conferencing" enable people to type messages thatappear instantaneously on the receivers' computer screens, makingthem a synchronous form of communication. As comments areadded, the discussion takes the form of a transcript scrolling up thecomputer screen. (Computer conferencing can also be asynchronous,as discussed in the next section.)
Currently available systems restrict messages to text. Barbara M.Florini (Moore, 1990) describes computer conferencing as "atechnology that combines the convenience of mail with somethingapproximating the communicative interaction of the telephone." Shenotes that it can reach learners in their homes, at worksites, orduring travel, and stresses its "novel support" of group interactionor communication.
46 4 8
Educators at the University of Toronto, New Jersey Institute ofTechnology, Rochester Institute of Technology, the New School forSocial Research, Syracuse University, and Empire State College areamong those using conferencing activities as part of instruction.Florini reports that whole courses also have been offered viacomputer conferencing in Great Britain and at the graduate level.
She does point out, however, that while computer conferencingsystems are very flexible, both students and faculty may needtraining in their use and that some costs may be involved, includingthose for student computer accounts that permit adequate storagespace for the semester. She suggests that training and support beprovided in the following areas:
host computer, terminal, and microcomputer features
-- emergency procedures
keyboard features
word processing functions
telecommunications procedures
conferencing program features
procedures for text file transfer
Instructors also may need some training and certainly experiencein setting a climate for productive computer-based conversations.
Florini likens the kinds of skills needed as similar to but differentfrom those of a good discussion leader.
Based on her experience at Syracuse University, Florini concludesthat with training and ongoing support, technically unsophisticatedlearners can successfully participate in computer conferencing-basedcourses.
Keypads sometimes called "button boxes" are a real-time formof communication, but the data flows in only one direction.Typically, keypads have been used in instructional situations inwhich students are watching a class at the same time the instructoris teaching it. Keypads allow a faculty member to ask a questionand have every student in the class answer simultaneously bypushing a button on a box at his or her learning location. Thekeypad data is automatically entered into a computer that transmitsthe information via modem to the faculty member's computer. Thefaculty member instantaneously sees a graph or chart of the
47
students' responses on a computer monitor. Keypads are used forquizzes as well as for pacing, e.g., the instructor might ask students,"How many of you would like me to explain that point again?"
Asynchronous or Time-delayed Communication
Asynchronous, or time-delayed, forms of interaction are methods that allow people toconverse without having to be "on" at the same time. Mail, fax, voice mail, and electronicmail are good examples.
Increasingly, colleges are using facsimile machines and electronicmail to deliver to students such material as articles, assignments,and other text material. Students are using facsimile machines tosend in assignments.
Voice mail a technology similar to an answering machine alsois being used extensively for the exchange of class information,student questions, homework, and tests. At Northern VirginiaCommunity College, it is even being used to facilitate testing inforeign language courses.
Computer conferencing, discussed earlier as a synchronous form ofcommunication, also is frequently used asynchronously. As NormanCoombs (1992) describes in "Teaching in the Information Age,"Rochester Institute of Technology set the instructional goal in 1985of using computer-mediated communication to provide the samehigh-quality educational experiences for off-campus learners thatwere available to on-campus students. In the framework of atraditional telecourse in American history that had previously (andunsatisfactorily) used mail and telephones for faculty-studentinteraction, Professor Coombs instituted the use of E-mail andcomputer conferencing. Coombs notes that "computer conferencingnot only provided a framework for questions and answers but alsoserved as a platform for sharing opinions and differing perceptionsabout course content," communications that had been missing fromthe television course previously. Among the other advantagesCoombs cites are the following:
Students learned from one another.
-- Students were able to measure their progress based onclassmates' comments.
-- Students could set their own schedules and proceed at theirown pace.
-- Closer relationships among the students were formed.
48 3
Coombs also sent personal E-mail messages weekly to each studentand felt he "knew the individual telecourse students better" than hedid students enrolled in his regular classes.
Similarly, researchers at the New Jersey Institute of Technology,where several computer conferencing courses have been taught on-line as part of the Virtual Classroom Project, found that studentswho took the courses believe that the use of the technologyimproved the educational quality of their courses, made access toeducation more convenient, involved them more actively in theclasses, and improved their access to professors.
Case Study
What does a fully interactive course look like from a student's point of view? MichaelSouder, Coordinator of the New Pathways Project, Weekend College, at the College ofSt. Catherine in St. Paul, Minnesota, developed the following case study to illustratewhat such a course might encompass:
At 8:30 p.m., Betty Jean Sidenowski finally got her children into bed. Betty turnedon her computer and popped a disc labeled Psychology 100 Lesson 12 into thedrive. She also inserted a videotape with the same title into the VCR. Shenavigated her mouse to the hypertext stack for Lesson 12.
The Menu card told her that she had not started the lesson yet. Betty decided tocheck her electronic mail box to see how she did on a test she took on the computerthe week before. She read her test results (she earned an "A") as well as a critiqueof the answers she gave to questions in Lesson 11. Then Betty read theinstructor's response to some questions she left for the teacher during the Lesson11 lecture.
After reading her correspondence, Betty clicked the "Begin" button with hermouse. The hypertext displayed the beginning screen of a 50-card lecture on hercomputer.
The card asked Betty if she had a video driver on her computer. Betty indicatedthat she did not. The computer then asked her to set the video counter at zero andto run the VCR for the first twenty seconds of the video lecture. Betty did thisand recorded the VCR counter number into the computer. The computer thancalibrated the counter number to the hypertext lecture cards.
Betty pressed "Play" on the VCR, began the audio lecture, and followed theoutline and diagrams on her computer. Each time she was supposed to change thecard, the television beeped. 'The cards presented information to her in a variety ofways. New concepts were wrapped in thought balloons. Some key words werewritten on a mock chalkboard (if Betty didn't understand one of the terms shecould stop the tape and click her mouse on the word to access a definition, then
49
C I
resume the tape). Snippets of video appeared on the television screen and thecomputer directed her attention toward the TV.
At one point, Betty got confused and stopped the lecture and flipped the cardsback to the point where her confusion began. The card told her the approximatecounter reading on the tape, and Betty rewound the tape to that point. She ranthe section of lecture again, but that did not end her confusion. She went to thecard again and clicked the "Ask Teacher Question" button. The computer showeda hand being raised, and Betty typed her question (the computer copied theinformation from the card along with her question into a text file). Betty fastforwarded the tape to the point where she left off and resumed the lecture.
At one point, the computer and the tape asked Betty to stop the lecture tape. Shedid so. On the computer screen, a card posed a question. Betty typed a one-paragrai response (the question and the response were put into a another textfile). As the lecture continued there were breaks for teacher- or student-posedquestions (each going to its respective text file).
At the end of the lecture Betty clicked the "Class Discussion" button. Thecomputer dialed the college's computer and displayed a menu with options for fourelectronic conferences on VAX Notes, one each for Lessons 10, 11, 12, and 13.
Betty had been one of the first students to complete Lesson 10 so she decided tosee the responses on VAX Notes to a statement she had entered the previous week.She clicked the mouse to access Sounding Board Pg 100.10.3. Betty read theteacher's discussion question, her response (which was first after the question),and the responses of other students to the original question as well as to eachother. Betty added another response to the electronic conference, then worked onanswering the question in the electronic conference for Lesson 12.
After responding to several electronic conference topics, Betty decided to call it anight. She pressed the "Class Dismissed" button and waited. The computercombined the text files containing her questions to the instructor and her answersto the questions Cie teacher had asked and E-mailed them to the instructor. Thecomputer then noted where Betty had stopped on the lecture and output thisinformation to the screen. Betty was satisfied the information was accurate andpressed the "Quit" button. The hypertext stack closed, and Betty turned off thecomputer and VCR.
Betty checked on her sleeping kids and went to bed.
How will distance students be evaluated?
The extensive range of technologies being used by colleges involved in distance learninghas significantly broadened opportunities for faculty to evaluate students' understandingof course content, progress in meeting course objectives, and depth of knowledge. As in
50 r4
on-campus courses, individual faculty members determine the range of assignments theywill make to assess students' progress and learning. These may include projects, researchpapers, quizzes, and other types of presentations in addition to formal examinations.
Most institutions require distance students to take formal examinations on campus. Inmany instances, institutions operate testing centers, which are proctored sites whereexaminations can be taken days, evenings, or weekends. Students often are given a one-week "window of opportunity" to take examinations on file in the testing center. In somecases a photo identification is required for students to be admitted to the exam. Ifcoming to the campus is impossible, however, many colleges will allow students toarrange for someone to proctor the examination elsewhere, with instructor approval.Pennsylvania State University even provides a list of suggestions, e.g., faculty from anyother accredited institution of higher education, librarians, local high school faculty oradministrators, or commissioned officers in the armed forces. Some colleges areexperimenting with the use of telecommunications technologies for examinations, e.g.,via voice mail, facsimile machines, and on-line computer testing.
What flexibility is needed by learners with time constraints?
Because so many distance learning students have time-consuming career and personalresponsibilities, a flexible approach with regard to when course and/or degreerequirements must be completed will be welcomed by students.
The Extended Learning Institute (ELI) at Northern VirginiaCommunity College is an example of an institution that offerscourses that are not time-bound. ELI student guides state:
This course is divided into six monthly units of study. . . . Fromyour Enrollment Date until six months later (26 weeks), you areto complete all the assignments and examinations for the course.You can work at your ozvn pace in this course as long as yousubmit each month's required work within a month of when it isdue (i.e., you can get only one month behind) and you finish all therequirements by the End of Enrollment Date.
Two checkdates tell when instructors will review students' work tomake sure they are not falling more than a month behind.
Pennsylvania State University's Office of Independent Learning alsohas an interesting approach to time flexibility. It offers a completeassociate degree in liberal arts/general studies in which eachstudent has a full year to complete each course, if necessary. ELAS(Extended Letters, Arts, and Sciences) students have no set numberof years to complete the 60 credits required for the degree, althoughdemonstration of continued satisfactory progress may be needed ifthe student receives financial aid.
51.1-.3
Metropolitan Community College in Omaha, Nebraska, offers a"Time Option" program that leads to either an Associate of Arts inLiberal Arts degree or an Associate in Applied Science inProfessional Studies with a concentration in Business. Time Optionclasses are scheduled over a 15-week semester rather thanMetropolitan's regular 11-week quarter and are available three timesper year.
525C
Part 5.
Support services needed by distance students
How are support services made accessible to thedistance learner?
What registration procedures are helpful?
What orientation programs should be planned?
What types of counseling programs are needed?
What library resources and services are needed bydistance learners and how will they be accessed?
V How will distance students access videotapes,course texts, and equipment?
Looking to the future
53
5 5
How are support services made accessible to the distance learner?
In general, colleges planning distance degree programs must consider that distancedegree students require a wide variety of support services. Further, distance studentsneed to access these services in the same way they access instruction from a distanceand at times that fit their schedules that is, often during evenings and weekends. Injudging the acceptability of the program, state higher education authorization agenciesand accreditation organizations may assess the degree to which these services areprovided as well as the appropr;.teness of the delivery system. Finally, Verduin andClark (1991) point out that "all of these services must be consonant with and supportiveof the central institution's philosophy and goals and must be closely coordinated withthe total mission of the distance education program."
Colleges are using many telecommunications technologies to offer a wide range ofstudent services to distance learners from 1-800 numbers to voice mail to libraryaccess by computer.
What registration procedures are helpful?
The registration process can smooth the entry of students to the college or act as abarrier. If a special distance learning division exists, its staff may process registration forall distance learning options, whether or not they are degree-related. At some colleges,however, the registrar's office handles registration for both on-campus and distancelearning courses.
In either case, registration of distance learners will be facilitated by specific procedures:
mail-in registration
phone-in registration particularly when combined with theexistence of a 1-800 slumber and touch-tone selection
payment by credit card (although some states prohibit this)
evening and weekend walk-in registration hours
If the registrar's office handles registration, distance learning administrators should briefthe registration staff regularly and completely about all distance learning options. Thisenables the registration staff to handle students' questions intelligently or refer them tothe proper authority. it is equally important to advise the registrar of any specialpromotional efforts you undertake so that any interest you generate is treatedappropriately.
54
56
Many colleges and universities keep distance learning course registration open longerthan on-campus course registration particularly for television courses so thatstudents whose interest is stimulated by the broadcast of the first few programs can beaccommodated. A few have restructured their programs sufficiently to permit rollingregistration, since adults' obligations rarely can be divided neatly into semesters. (Foran additional discussion on time flexibility in distance learning, see Part 4: Issues inprogram development.)
What orientation programs should be planned?
Almost all colleges require students enrolled in distance learning courses to come tocampus for a course orientation session. In addition, some institutions videotape theorientation for those who cannot attend.
Schools with distance degree programs will want to consider more general orientationsessions that focus on semester-to-semester program planning and on how to accessstudent support services from a distance. The Center for Adult Learning and EducationalCredentials of the American Council on Education and The Alliance: An Association forAlternative Degree Programs for Adults recommend that orientation "help studentsunderstand themselves as learners and their new learning environment" (ACE, 1990).
Orientation programs may be offered at a variety of times:
following admission but before registration for all students admittedto degree programs
around the time of registration
following registration for all students enrolled in distance learningoptions
Colleges are encouraged to try multiple approaches to presenting orientation programs,including the use of video and its distribution through multiple means, e.g., broadcast,cablecast, videocassette, and so forth.
What types of counseling programs are needed?
As colleges implement distance degree programs, the nature of counseling offered todistance students is changing from a relatively casual process to a more formal ore. Itis also changing from a system in which students' counseling needs are met or. asemester-by-semester basis to one in which students are formally assisted in long-range
55
planning. Academic advisement programs that are proactive in helping distance studentsplan their degree programs reduce unnecessary confusion about distance degree optionsand requirements. Consider making them available to students as part of the admissionsprocess.
A counseling service for distance students will need:
counselors who are knowledgeable about degree requirements andthe distance learning alternatives for meeting them
counselors who are available at times and in ways that areappropriate to students' status as distance learners
is counselors who are sensitive to and understanding of the needs ofdistance learners
mechanisms for notifying distance students of the availability ofcounseling
advisors who can help provide continuity to a student's programand assess students' progress over time
Notification of degree possibilities and requirements should begin early and should bepublicized widely. (Of course, this implies that the curriculum has been sufficientlystructured and course offerings scheduled over several years so that students cancomplete degrees.) Even the student who claims to be interested in just one course maywell develop the interest and/or confidence to commit to a larger goal.
Some colleges tie the first offer of counseling to the number of credits a student hascompleted and begin counseling somewhere between 15 credits and 45 credits. Manycolleges now advocate that such counseling begin much earlier, preferably not later thanthe completion of the first distance learning course.
Students who plan to transfer from a two-year college to a four-year college haveparticularly specific needs for program planning. They need to know exactly what isrequired for transfer and what options exist for fulfilling these requirements. Suchstudents also may need to differentiate between requirements for a two-year degree andrequirements for transfer to a four-year program, since these may differ.
Knowing Students' Goals Helps Colleges
By knowing students' goals in advance, administrators can develop degree programsthat meet students' needs. Often such advance planning will enable the college to obtainmore cost-effective rates on long-term television course leases and begin instructional
56
planning early for courses that will be developed locally. A formal counseling programalso enables the administration to determine if a cohort of students on the same trackexists and to devise ways of communicating with such students as a group.
Special Counseling Needs of Adult Learners
Paula Hooper Mayhew (COPA, 1991) notes that "even more than most, these students[at a distancel need degree-program planning in the major that is realistic and that takesaccount of individual needs and aspirations." She suggests that distance degree-programplanning "begin to develop outcomes-based norms for student achievement that take intoaccount individual student differences."
Dan Granger, Director of the Center for Distance Learning at SUNY Empire State College(Moore, 1990), notes the need for counselors to be sensitive to the fact that "adultstudents usually pursue advanced education because of a perceived need or lack inthemselves." He stresses a difference, for example, between presenting a deficiency as"in need of remediation" and telling an adult learner of "an area for development toenhance existing abilities."
Numerous adult education programs currently encourage students to develop portfoliosof prior learning, notes Granger, and these can provide a comprehensive picture of astudent's strengths, weaknesses, and experiences as well as 1-9 a tool for awarding credit.In addition, Granger suggests the development of a learner profile that takes intoaccount an individual's background, learning styles, prior experience, skills level, andmotivation. He recommends that profiles be developed with a "common, coherent, andcomprehensive set of categories."
Verduin and Clark (1991) point out that "adults have educational, personal, and careerproblems that must be resolved in order for them to learn effectively." They also discussa variety of methods being used successfully to counsel adult learners. These include;
written correspondence
telephone communication (On the basis of research by R. Pau let(1987), however, Verduin and Clark caution that "effective tutoringand counseling by telephone necessitates highly developedcommunications skills that many counselors lack.")
audiocassettes
computer conferencing linkages
Carol B. Aslanian and Henry M. Brickell (1980) suggest that it is "adults in transition"who are most likely to need counseling assistance. They identify a number of concernsto which distance learning counselors should be sensitive. Many adults in transition donot know that learning can help them succeed, for example, and they do not know what
57
they have to learn to help them succeed. They also may not know their own potential,suggest Aslanian and Brickell.
Other Kinds of Counseling Needs
Academic counseling is not the only form of support distance degree students may need.Distance planners also will need to consider the following questions:
How will distance learners access career counseling?
This is particularly vital since many will be seeking distance degreesspecifically to upgrade their career potential. Aslanian and Brickell (1980)note, for example, that "information and counseling centers need up-to-date information about the world of work and, in particular, predictedcareer patterns for the nation's workers," in order to advise adults how tomeet their career goals.
Will remedial and study skills courses be made available at adistance?
What provisions exist for students with learning difficulties?
What personal counseling services will be available to distancestudents?
Is psychological assistance available? Is a statewide referral serviceavailable? Is it covered by student health insurance policies? Are studenthealth insurance policies available to distance learners?
What library resources and services are needed by distance learnersand how will they be accessed?
The Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) has published Guidelines fExtended Campus Library Services (1990). These guidelines point out that degree-granting programs need to provide access to collections that meet the ACRL standardsfor the level of the program, e.g., associate, baccalaureate, and so forth. The guidelinesalso provide examples of the wide range of informational and bibliographic needs of anextended campus community. These include:
reference assistance
computer-based bibliographic and informational services
consultation services
58
user instruction designed specifically to meet the needs of theextended campus community
assistance with nonprint media and equipment
reciprocal borrowing, contractual borrowing, and interlibrary loanservices
prompt document delivery through a courier system or electronictransmission
access to reserve materials
promotion of library services to the extended campus community
In addition to an understanding of what is needed, colleges considering distance degreeprograms will need to consider that the same factors that limit students' ability to cometo class on campus limit their access to library resources. Further, authorizing and/oraccrediting bodies are likely to assess the degree to which distance students have accessto appropriate library resources as an important factor in determining the equality of thedistance degree program with on-campus instruction.
Among the issues that will need to be considered are the following:
What telecommunications technologies will be used to providedistance students with access to library resources?
How will students obtain or access the necessary equipmentand software?
If costs re involved, who will pay them?
How will students be trained to use the technologieseffectively?
To what library resources will they have access?
How will students know what resources are available?
If students identify resources through telecommunications,how will they obtain the actual reference?
What are the copyright implications of supplying materialsthrough telecommunications?
As an alternative to telecommunications access for students who cancome to campus occasionally, are on-campus libraries open at timesdistance learners are available?
59us.
M1111==MS,
Can materials be placed at outlying sites, e.g., local libraries,community agencies, other educational facilities?
A number of commercial computer-based services are now available to distance learners,and colleges with significant distance learner programs are beginning to incorporatethem into instruction. Such services allow students to access library services through acomputer and a modem. Depending on the system used for searches, students may beable to check on the library's current holdings, find out what books are currentlyavailable, order books for delivery to an off-campus site, consult bibliographic resources,order resources through an interlibrary loan, and consult various databases. TheKnowledge Index, for example, a service of Dialog Information Services, Inc., is an onlinecollection of databases accessible through several public data networks and the Internet.It offers more than 100 of the over 400 databases available on DIALOG. Shapiro andHughes (1992) caution, however, that even when an on -line service has an excellentuser's manual, students need to be encouraged to read it and need to be provided withadditional user support.
Among the institutions making library resources available to distance learners are thefollowing:
At the University of Kentucky (UK), an extension librarian can bereached via a 1-800 number to help students obtain books andphotocopies of journal articles from the UK and other libraries, toassist with reference questions, to instruct students how to uselibrary resources, and to provide computer-assisted literaturesearches.
At the College of St. Catherine in St. Paul, students soon will be ableto go to local libraries to pick up references that they have requestedby computer from the campus library.
At the Community College of Maine, students use computers atcommunity-based sites to access URSUS, the University'scomputerized library catalog. URSUS lists the book holdings,periodicals, and state and federal documents of the University ofMaine System. Users may also order holdings from the system.Through electronic gateways, URSUS users also may search thecollections of several other college libraries in the state and searchfor journal articles through two academic databases. Materialsidentified through the computer search are delivered to local sites.
At Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis (1UPU1),the University Library is rapidly becoming an electronic learningcenter as a result of a two-year university-wide planning processthat integrated the University's Telecommunications Services (voice),Computing Services (data), and Learning Technologies (video) intoa single organization named Integrated Technologies. IUPU1 isworking toward a system in which library resources can be accessed
60
anywhere in the community or the state, reports Garland Elmore(1992). According to Elmore, the system will feature the followingadvantages over traditional libraries:
search time will be minimized and access to materials will bemuch faster
systems will deliver text, graphics, images, and motion videoin multimedia applications to meet user needs
electronic filters will enable users to search, identify, access,and retrieve relevant material from a much greater overallvolume of information
specialized workstations will better meet the needs ofstudents and faculty with disabilities
the potential will exist to offer more current information atless cost
These advantages will benefit all students and faculty at IUPUI, notonly distance learners.
Brey (1991) suggests that by the end of the 1990s, on-line access to CD-ROM maybecome "one of the more important technologies to provide distance learners with accessto reference and research materials."
Training Students in the Use of Technology-Based Resources
Shapiro and Hughes (1992) point out that in addition to rusty (or nonexistent) researchskills, adult distance students may find that "the world of libraries and informationaccess has been completely transformed" since they last enrolled in college. Students,therefore, may require an orientation to the use of a contemporary research library.
A number of colleges are looking at how to train distance students to use technology-based library resources. Several issues are raised here:
Do distance students own or have easy access to a computer andmodern? If not, can such systems be borrowed or rented from thecollege?
Do students know how to use such a system?
Are students familiar with the range of resources available?
Do faculty know how to use such resources effectively forinstruction?
61
C.)
At the University of Maine, for example, the freshman seminar includes a three-weekunit introducing the library. Other colleges are developing or considering special coursesin this area.
How will distance students access videotapes, course texts, andequipment?
Brey (1991) reports that most institutions with distance learning programs use multipletechnologies to provide students with flexible access to video materials. Communitycolleges, for example, typically select two to three of the following video deliverysystems: public television, low-power television, commercial television, cable educationalaccess, cable national network, library viewing, tape check-out, videodiscs, CD-ROM,and CDI/DVI.
Numerous issues relate to the ease with which distance learners obtain a variety ofinstructional materials.
Are videotapes available at community libraries or other off-campussites to accommodate students who cannot receive a broadcast orcable signal or who miss broadcasts?
Will the college send videocassettes to students free or for a modestuse fee?
Are tapes available for rental at convenient locations?
Can students order texts by mail using a 1-800 number and creditcards?
How will such learning equipment as computers and modems bemade available to students? Can they be rented? Can they be madeavailable at a reduced price? Can equipment be placed at suchcommunity sites as local libraries or high schools? Can studentsaccess equipment at places of employment after regular workhours?
Looking to the future
In spite of the fact that students enrolled in distance degree programs may rarely cometo campus or perhaps because of it colleges will need to find creative ways toencourage students to feel part of the institution. Eastern Oregon State College, forexample, discovered that distance students value the idea of having a regular studentidentification card. The college also publishes directories of students taking a givencourse (with the permission of those involved), in order to encourage student-to-studentcontact.
62
Colleges also will need to put into place programs that evaluate their success in meetingstudent needs. In 1990, Dee Brock, then Senior Vice President for Education at PBS(Moore, 1990), cited a number of areas related to student services that need additionalresearch. These include the following questions:
What services are most important from the students' perspective?
How effective are counseling and library services delivered elec-tronically?
Distance degree program administrators will need to examine these key questions closelyin coming years. It will be important that they share their experiences and the results oftheir research in order to move everyone's understanding forward on these importantissues. Finally, this is an area in which it would be fruitful for distance learningadministrators to build in regular internal reviews of their policies and procedures.
63
Part 6.
Faculty issues
What key distance degree issues are related tofaculty?
On what basis should distance faculty be selected?
What kinds of training and support are needed bydistance faculty?
65
-Ur
LI L/
What key distance degree issues are related to faculty?
Distance learning and the increasing use of interactive telecommunications throughouthigher education have challenged many assumptions about the role of the faculty. Fiveyears ago, we included the following introduction in Opportunities and Options (Levine,1987):
A Telecourse Sourcebook for the 80s, edited by Louise M. Hewitt for the CoastCommunity Colleges, describes the ditties of a telecourse faculty member as"different, but not less demanding or critical, than those of an instructor offeringthe same course in an on-campus setting." Although a faculty member in atraditionally taught class may focus primarily on the preparation and delivery oflectures to groups of students meeting on campus, telecourse faculty are morelikely to focus on communicating with students in a more personal manner thatis often tutorial in nature.
Several trends support a more comprehensive approach for the 1990s:
The use of an increasing variety of distance learning methodsfrom the completely preproduced television course to the livedelivery of two-way audio, two-way video interactive lecturesrequires faculty to have skills that include not only those expectedof traditional faculty, but also those that enhance distance learningand that make effective use of a variety of technologies.
Faculty also may need to develop different kinds of instructionalmaterials, some of which use a variety of technologies. These coursematerials may need to be completed prior to the start of thesemester in order for them to be disseminated in a cost-effectivemanner.
Many, if not most, distance degree programs will rely on a varietyof technologies to facilitate communication between faculty andstudents. Faculty will need to be open to these new approaches andlearn how to use them effectively.
Finally, distance faculty need an ability to work with a more diversestudent body.
This last point that different skills May be required to teach adult learners (who arethe majority of distance learners) than are used with 18- to 22-year-olds has becomemore widely recognized in recent years. The ACE/Alliance Principles of Good Practice(1990), for example, note that:
The academic competencies of the faculty must he complemented by theirunderstanding of adult learners and the goals and nature of the adult degreeprogram. Likewise, part-time or adjunct fiwulty, who often provide special
66 6
perspectives, resources, and expertise, need similar orientation and development.Meeting the needs of these part-time faculty members and integrating them intodegree programs for adults are issues for the future.
On what basis should distance faculty be selected?
Ralph Meuter, in evaluating the New Pathways-funded project in West Virginia(Markwood and Johnstone, 1992), calls faculty selection "an important factor in thedevelopmental stages of an innova,Lve project" and concludes that "the extra effortrequired to entice quality faculty is worth it. Such faculty participation in the early stagesprovides credibility that will have long-term payoffs."
The ACE/Alliance Principles of Good Practice include the following two sub-principlesthat relate to faculty selection:
Criteria, rationale, and procedures for the selection and evaluation offaculty and academic professionals in the program are congruent with thestandards of the institution.
Specific criteria, standards, and expectations for the role of part-time oradjunct faculty are clearly articulated.
Oregon, which is also developing distance degree options in part with New Pathwaysfunding, uses the following criteria for selecting distance faculty:
they should be relatively senior people, highly visible, respected bytheir peers
they should be known to be good teachers
they should like the idea of distance learning and want toparticipate in it
One issue that has consistently emerged in distance learning programs is: Will facultybe selected from within the academic department or from outside the institution? Whileeach institution tends to approach this question differently and may decide the issue ona course-by-course basis, most agree that the more on-campus faculty that are involvedin the program, the greater the base of support for the project as a whole. The corollaryissue then becomes: How do you convince senior faculty to work at a distance?
At Old Dominion University, a discussion of the university's distance educationprograms is part of the recruitment process for the vast majority of potential newfaculty. When they are hired, it is with the understanding that they may be asked toteach on television.
67
r:
Many colleges have found that the question is less fraught with difficulty than it usedto be. Many faculty members who initially needed to be talked into teaching distancecourses have found that the experience provides an opportunity for professional renewal,to learn new skills, and to work with a dedicated and diverse student population. Theynow form a core of internal support for distance learning. Meuter points out that"certain faculty appreciate the opportunity to experiment, improve their courses, anddevelop themselves as better teachers."
What other incentives can you use to get the best faculty on campus involved in yourprogram?
Will you provide financial incentives? Institutions vary widely onthis issue. Some provide cash, some released time for coursedevelopment, some consider one distance learning course to be theequivalent of two on-campus courses. Some hire on-campus facultyonly on an overload basis. In some cases, this issue has beendetermined through collective bargaining.
Will administrative support be available for distance faculty withlarge classes?
Will distance teaching count in consideration for reappointment,promotion, and tenure? Verduin and Clark (1991) suggest that "asin any conventional education unit, the distance education unit mustcontain a clearly defined faculty or faculties." This would suggestthat traditional forms of faculty appraisal be instituted. TheACE/Alliance principles underscore this, requiring that faculty andacademic professionals in the program participate in the institution'ssystems for evaluation, incentive, and reward, e.g., promotion andtenure.
Will special training be available?
Do you have ways of promoting and disseminating the success andenjoyment that faculty experience?
Underpinning the work of the Annenberg/CPB Project New Pathways initiative hasbeen the opportunity for project participants and associates to share both their problemsand their successes. In the area of faculty issues, New Pathways participants have madethe following suggestions:
minimize risk of failure
create opportunities for faculty networking, including adjunctfaculty
provide opportunities for peer recognition
68,9
c
find ways to reward faculty for time and effort
share master teacher models with other faculty
consider new compensation packages, perhaps with reducedworkload to compensate for the additional work involved indistance learning
What kinds of training and support are needed by distance faculty?
Training and support will be needed by faculty in three areas: course development,course delivery, and student interaction.
While faculty members develop courses on a regular basis, distance learning raises issuesof course development that many faculty members have never thought about. Whetherthey are adapting preproduced television courses to local goals and objectives and theirown areas of expertise or preparing a lecture for delivery over a closed circuit network,many new issues will emerge. The sheer number of what some call "instructionalenhancements" that technology now makes it possible to use with lectures can be seenas a challenge or a concern, depending on the individual. Colleges should consider thefollowing issues:
Will instructional designers be available to distance faculty?
Will graphics and technology experts be on-hand during she coursedevelopment process?
Markwood and Johnstone (1992) point out that the technologies create opportunities forfaculty to rethink content and make new decisions on how to present content." Theyreport that New Pathways projects have invested in professional course designers toassist faculty in preparing their courses and conclude, "Faculty are changing, and thetechnology is an instrument in faculty renewal."
Distance degree program planners will find that suggesting or providing a variety oftelecommunications technologies to faculty to support their interactions with studentsis not sufficient. Substantive training programs w be needed. This is true regardlessof whether a preproduced television course is being, used or a live, two-way interactivecourse is being developed.
The Community College of Maine, whose courses are all deliveredon a live, interactive basis, offers a series of workshops during theacademic year to introduce faculty and staff to the technologies theyneed to use. During the summer, Maine's Center for DistanceEducation runs a week-long institute on adult learning, servingdisabled students, and the use of technologies in developing coursesthat are accessible to these students.
69
The Utah Educational Network requires faculty to participate intraining prior to teaching over their satellite network. The Networkoffers an EDNET faculty development workshop called "Reachingand Teaching Through Television" approximately six weeks prior tothe beginning of each academic quarter.
Helen Lacy, of the Utah Education Network, reports that allworkshops offered by the Network are delivered on the EDNETsystem. Using the system gives faculty participants an opportunityto become familiar with how the system works and to consider howthey can best use it.
The primary goals of each one-day workshop are:
- to explain distance learning technologies to system users andpresenters
to prepare participants to convert teaching abilities andtechniques from a regular classroom setting to a tele-communications-based environment
to allow participants to practice on the system(s) before theybegin teaching
Key components of the faculty and presenter workshop are:
simulation of the distance education classroom environmentby actually using technologies available in Utah
mod ling and discussing effective distance learning instruc-tional techniques
giving participants an opportunity to discuss the distanceeducation experience with faculty who have had a successfultelevision teaching experience
providing each participant with an opportunity to prepareand deliver a brief presentation using technology (thepresentation is videotaped for the participant to take withhim or her)
providing each participant with an extensive training manualentitled Reaching and Teaching Through Television
70
Part 7.
Looking at costs
What sources of information are available?
V How are costs (and benefits) being shared amongdepartments and institutions?
What cost-related policy issues needconsideration?
What future cost-related research is needed?
71
What sources of information are available?
The topic of cost analysis, perhaps more than any other concerned with the developmentof distance degree programs, has had relatively little attention. While the costs of specificaspects of distance learning are well known course acquisition, for example, orparticular telecommunications alternatives little has been written about the total scopeof cost analysis in distance degree programs. Further, even among colleges that aredeeply involved in distance degrees, marked differences exist in how costs are identified,what costs are considered part of the degree program, and where benefits of substantialvalue have accrued to the program from planning and purchases taking place eitherelsewhere in the institution or statewide. This is not unlike the difficulty of pinpointingcosts in higher education generally.
Various organizations are working on these issues, however, and several sources mayprove helpful to the distance degree planner:
Two organizations are tracking the development of statetelecommunications planning and provide numerous examples ofcollaboration and analyses of specific systems. Since the capital costsof distance degree programs typically are heaviest in the areas oftelecommunications systems, understanding how various states haveapproached or are approaching this issue should prove helpful.Further, through these resources, planners may discovertelecommunications activities taking place in their own states thatcan benefit their institutions. Prior to jumping into the statewidetelecommunications planning process, however, the distance degreeplanner is advised to check thoroughly within his or her owninstitution to see if someone has been given authority to representthe institution in this matter.
Hezel Associates (1992) has been conducting statewideassessments on telecommunications planning since 1987 andhas recently issued the third edition of its report (previouseditions in 1987 and 1990 -- were supported by theAnnenberg /CPB Project). Hezel notes that "more and morestates are adopting a comprehensive approach to educationaltelecommunications planning," and that "in many cases,under mandate from the governor or the state legislature,educational institutions plan cooperatively."
The Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education(1991) has published the results of its study of educationaltelecommunications plans, policies, and programs of states inthe western region.
72
71-
Both documents identify the organizations involved in these issuesin each state, although they rarely indicate the specific costsinvolved in different systems.
A number of other cost-planning resources are available:
Arlene Krebs (1991) has amassed a significant amount ofinformation on funding sources for distance learning andeducational technology that can help colleges find external fundingfor specific parts of their distance degree planning. Hezelunderscores the trend toward external funding, noting that "privatesector funding is frequently viewed as the solution to the financingneeds" of statewide telecommunications systems. He reports thateducational partnerships with business and industry have increasedover the last two years. New course development, trainingprograms, demonstrations of new uses of technology, new softwaredevelopment, and the like, all are areas that external seed moneymight benefit.
The PBS Adult Learning Service (see Appendix 3 for AdultLearning Liaisons at public television stations) can assist colleges inanalyzing the costs of course acquisition, and particularly in helpingcolleges think through the cost implications of licensing televisioncourses for longer periods of time and of licensing larger numbersof courses than they have traditionally. The Adult Learning Servicealso is looking at the development of course groupings that wouldassist colleges to offer degree sequences.
The Annenberg/CPB Project New Pathways projects have recentlyundergone a first-year evaluation (Markwood and Johnstone, 1992)that included an assessment of cost factors. Project evaluatorsacknowledge their struggle with issues of costs and benefits,however, and identify several key reasons why this area is soproblematic:
The costs of these projects are nearly impossible to isolate.John Witherspoon, one of the evaluators, asks: How do youcalculate such items as maintenance of multi-use facilities,evening or weekend access to facilities, incremental costs ofaffected administrative units, and so forth." Ralph Meuter,another New Pathways evaluator, notes that "highlyintegrated and cooperative projects make it extremelydifficult to isolate and allocate costs accurately."
Planned outcomes -- for example, revitalizing faculty orenhancing cooperation throughout the system arefrequently intangible.
73
e.
The investments in the telecommunications technologies usedin these projects were intended to serve special populationsthat would otherwise not have access to higher educationalresources. These populations are generally quite small, whichis "counterintuitive to the usual economic models forinfrastructure development." The critical mass needed tojustify the significant costs involved in building such systemsmay take several years to develop.
These projects are still evolving; continued evaluation of them islikely to result in more specific cost models in the future.
How are costs (and benefits) being shared among departments andinstitutions?
Distance degree program planners will find that any costs that can be shared (or facilitiesborrowed) will reduce out-of-pocket expenditures. For example:
Does a computer laboratory exist on campus that is not used nightsand weekends?
is a fiber-optic network being constructed statewide that canprovide an inexpensive means of delivering courseware?
Has some department on campus already invested in a site licensefor software that would facilitate computer conferencing?
Does the medical center or engineering school have satellite-receivecapacity that can be used to capture PBS Adult Learning Serviceprograms?
Is there a communications department television studio that can beused for the production of video courseware, providing experiencesfor department students in addition to cost savings for distancelearning?
Is the institution a licensee of a public television station?
Utah is a good example of statewide cost-sharing.
The Utah Education Network plans, constructs, maintains, manages,and programs the state's nonbroadcast educational systems(EDNET, TITS, satellite services, and fiber optics) and broadcastingstation KULC Channel 9 on behalf of Utah's systems of higher andpublic education and state government. It also provides leadership,
74
advice, and advocacy to educators and public officials in the fieldof telecommunications and programs the school day schedule onKUED Channel 7 in cooperation with the Utah Network forInstructional Television.
In 1982 construction began on a statewide two-way interactivemicrowave system capable of audio, video, and data transmission.NTIA provided the primary funding for the $4.4 million microwavesystem. Local matching funds were used to leverage the federalfunds. In 1986, the state microwave system was given the nameEDNET (for "educational network") and began regular operation.Ten sites were operational that fall. Twenty-six sites in 20 differentcities will be operational by 1992. Operational support comes fromfour sources: 1) in-kind support from participating institutions andthe University of Utah Department of Media Services, 2) state fundsadministered through the Utah State Board of Regents, 3) user fees,and 4) direct legislative appropriation.
Montana also is developing a statewide educational telecommunications network(METNET), mandated by the state legislature in 1989.
METNET, which will consist of voice, data, and two-way videocomponents, is a cooperative venture involving the Department ofAdministration, the Office of the Commission of Higher Education,and the Office of Public Instruction. The Legislature appropriated$450,000 a year for two years for METNET, with the stipulation that$300,000 come out of a general fund and that there be a 50 percentmatch of cash or equivalent value from private sources. By 1995,METNET is expected to include over 300 distance education sites,25 regional training centers, 25 two-way compressed video sites, onehigh-speed public television link, and one Ku-band uplink (Hezel,1992).
Hezel also identifies several other economic trends relating to statewidetelecommunications costs that merit watching:
In increasing numbers, distance educators are recognizing the needfor state telecommunications tariff regulation that allows more cost-effective use of telecommunications by education and governmentusers.
A growing emphasis has emerged on the development of multiplesystems both terrestrial and satellite.
75
What cost-related policy issues need consideration?
The actual costs involved in offering a distance degree program depend to a large extenton how costs are calculated, on what types of technologies are used, on whether thesetechnologies are acquired for a single program or are shared, and on what types ofdistance courses are used. Preproduced television courses may have high developmentcosts for the producer, for example, but these costs can be amortized across many years;institutions licensing the use of courses pay modest fees. Live, two-way interactivecourses may have lower development costs but must be reproduced each semester withcontinuing expenditures.
Most distance-learning administrators stress the need to prepare budgets that reflect themainstream of institutional budgeting rather than a specialized function. Distancelearning administrators also point out the need to describe distance learning costs interms that are comparable to costs incurred in traditional instruction, whether or notsuch costs are apportioned in traditionally delivered courses. The example most typicallygiven concerns the cost of community-based instructional sites versus the costs ofproviding classroom space, the latter being a cost that is rarely broken out in budgetingtraditional instruction. Similarly, administrative support personnel may be budgeteddirectly to distance learning courses, but department administrative personnel often arecharged to the overall unit budget rather than to specific courses.
Among the other questions being asked in this area are:
Should the costs of a particular course be seen as a departmentalresponsibility or should the distance learning unit be self-supportingwith its own operating budget? A related issue is: Who pays thefaculty?
Does every distance learning course have to "break-even" (doesevery on-campus course have to break-even?) or will some courseswith low enrollments be supported in order to offer studentsdistance learning options for all degree requirements?
Should distance faculty be given released time for coursedevelopment (and who pays for this time) or incremental pay basedon large course enrollments?
What are the administrative/coordinating costs incurred in runningthe program?
In states where institutional budgets are determined by the numberof students enrolled, who benefits from the enrollments of distancelearners? At Northern Virginia Community College, the FTEs (full-time equivalents) generated in the Extended Learning Institute (ELI)
76
'r 7
are credited to the faculty member's home campus so that benefitsof the ELI accrue directly to the campuses.
In trying to assess the real costs involved in distance degree programs, a number ofquestions about the ultimate benefits of the project are raised. Markwood and Johnstone(1992) note, for example,
If the costs extend access to and enable the success of underserved studentpopulations in ways that fulfill the mission, then the costs are warranted; if thecosts fail to address the mission or if they buy more tools than are effectively beingused by the students and faculty, then the costs obviously outweigh the benefits.
Others raise one or another of the following questions:
Does the program provide access to higher education to studentswho otherwise would remain unserved or underserved?
What are the general economic benefits that accrue to states with amore highly educated citizenry? Is unemployment reduced? Areexisting industries more competitive? Are new industries attractedto the area?
Will the program retain students who might otherwise drop out orattract new students to the institution?
Are there benefits e.g., faculty renewal, curriculum reform,introduction of new technologies to the campus that in the finalanalysis outweigh the costs? How can these benefits be measured?
is the program helping the institution to overcome such otherproblems as a physical plant that limits its ability to expandenrollment?
Does the program enable the institution to expand its curriculuminto newer, cutting-edge areas that better serve government andother important community segments?
What future cost-related research is needed?
The entire area of cost assessment and the development of cost models needs futureresearch. What costs emerge from the development of a distance degree program thatare over and above those incurred when distance learning divisions offer an array ofindividual courses? Which of these are operational as opposed to start-up? These areimportant questions. Answers should emerge from more experience and the involvementof many more institutions in the process.
7778
Liu
Today, the number of institutions actually offering distance degree programs is relativelysmall. Even among institutions that have announced distance degree programs, thecomplete program may not yet actually be in place. Typically, initial enrollments arelimited so that a true picture of operating costs for a fully enrolled system is nearlyimpossible to determine. It is an area to watch closely.
78
Part 8.
Sample distance degree programs
VAn overview of examples
Selected programs
Northern Virginia Community College Extended LearningIr titute (ELI), Annandale, Virginia
Associate in Science, Business Administration
Pennsylvania State University, University Park,Pennsylvania
Extended Letters, Arts, and Sciences (ELAS)
Prince George's Community College, Largo, MarylandAssociate in Arts Business ManagementAssociate in Arts General Studies
-- Management Studies Transfer Program
Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York-- Bachelor of Science in Applied Arts and Science
University of Maine at Augusta, Augusta, Maine-- Associate of Arts in Social Services
Wayne County Community College, Detroit, MichiganAssociate of Arts
79
a
An overview of examples
A 1990 study conducted by the University of Maryland University College for theAnnenberg/CPB Project concluded that "the key characteristic of external baccalaureatedegree programs in the United States is that they are as varied and unique as the regionsin which they are located and the students they serve." This may well reflect thediversity of the mission, structures, and student profiles in the types of academicprograms they offer and to whom.
In fact, distance degree programs exist along a continuum from those colleges that useall preproduced television courses to those that mix television courses with othertechnologies and campus-based instruction, to those that use only other technologies ordistance learning options.
Some colleges offer a large enough number of distance learning courses each year thatan individual student can attain a degree using only (or primarily) courses taken at adistance. Until recently, such situations were largely dependent on student initiative orthe luck of finding a good counselor to help identify a sequence of courses that wouldfulfill degree requirements. More recently, colleges have begun to structure andinstitutionalize the process. Many are not finding this a very difficult process,particularly when only single institutions are involved (as opposed to a statewidesystem). if each distance course has been carefully reviewed and evaluated prior toadoption and is known to meet college requirements, then the aggregate of courses thatconstitute the degree program already has approval. In most cases the distance learningprograms discussed in this section have been in place for a long period of time. Theyhave built support at many levels and serve a sizable number of students. Distancelearning administrators also have kept various constituencies within their collegesinformed and involved at every step of the way, and have been encouraged to continueto evaluate potential distance learning course options until a distance option exists forall degree requirements.
At Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC), for example,students can now earn the 64-credit Associate of Arts in Liberal Artsand Sciences degree by taking a combination of predominantlyvideo- and some campus-based courses. Bill Quirmbach, coordinatorof MATC's College of the Air, Videoconferencing and CommunityServices, credits the availability of many new television courses withenabling the college to offer a broad spectrum of required andelective courses toward a degree. All television courses requireapproval by their respective departments and, as with traditional,campus-based enrollment, students must apply to the college andbe accepted in order to earn credit toward a degree.
8O b
Among the programs presented later in this section, Wayne CountyCommunity College, which is one course away from being able tooffer a distance learning option for every degree requirement, is alsoa prime example of this approach.
Other colleges have embarked on a more long-term planning process that surveys theneeds of students currently enrolled in distance courses.
Jacques Dubois, at Prince George's Community College in Largo,Maryland, for example, surveys telecourse students at the end ofeach semester both to gauge their level of satisfaction and to assisthim in long-range planning to meet their needs. Most of histelecourse students, he learned, defined themselves as workingtoward a degree. Knowing which degrees students are workingtoward has helped him plan which television courses to offer. Threedifferent degrees are presented later in this section.
Some colleges have been spurred to action by legislative initiatives or a directive fromthe Board of Trustees.
The Oregon Community College Telecommunications Consortiumis in the process of obtaining final approval from all communitycollege presidents for a two-year Associate of Arts transfer degreethrough integrated distance learning methods. Although studentscould begin the program immediately, the Consortium is one to twoyears away from having all courses and policies in place. Amongthe issues still being addressed through the planning process arethose concerning the amount of interaction that will be required andwhether the number of interactive courses will be mandated, howto adapt available courses to the quarter system, and how to dealwith the residency requirements of different institutions. In mostcases, courses have been approved at all institutions. In the case ofthe occasional new course that has been approved by only oneinstitution, degree planners are grappling with how to enablestudents statewide to take the course where it is approved andtransfer the credits to their home community college, withoutjeopardizing residency status. (When television courses are offeredby the community college in which the student is enrolled, theymeet residency requirements.) The initiative began in 1987 with adirective from the legislature. Prior to the initiative, communitycolleges in the state had no common set of requirements, andtransferring among them, as well as transferring to a four-yearinstitution, was difficult. A second initiative has resulted in thedevelopment of a distance learning two-year completion Bachelorof Arts in Liberal Studies at Oregon State University.
81
Both initiatives have been tied to the development of Ed-Net, astatewide satellite delivery system consisting of three networks: Ed-Net I is a two-channel, one-way video, two-way audio, full-motionnei vork available to all public K-12 and higher educationalinstitutions; Ed-Net II is a 15-channel, two-way video, two-wayaudio, compressed video network available to 39 communitycolleges and higher educational institutions; Ed-Net III is a highspeed data network with access nodes throughout the state. Amongother things, Ed-Net will enable conventional television courses tocontinue to be offered, but in an expanded form, with somepreproduced television courses being systematically supplementedwith interactive Ed-Net satellite sessions to create a form ofinstruction OCCTC calls "interactive telecourses."
The distance degree program at the University of Maine at Augustawas instituted to address a statewide need to increase access tohigher education among the state's primarily rural population. TheBoard of Trustees mandated that university resources be extendedacross the state after learning that the percentage of Maine citizenswith only a two-year degree was the lowest of any state in thecountry. The use of telecommunications was seen as the only wayto reach all the rural Lind often isolated parts of the state. Of the 85sites where people can take courses (all Maine distance courses aredelivered live, in real time, and are interactive), most are in localhigh schools. Students at all locations may earn an Associate Degreein General Studies, a 60-credit-hour program that can be transferredto an appropriate baccalaureate degree program after graduation.The Community College of Maine, as the statewide distance degreeprogram is called, is a model that links all public higher educationinstitutions with such off-campus sites as public schools andcommunity centers to offer a coherent sequence of courses for anassociate of arts degree to distance learners.
Other institutions have engaged in a long-term planning process focused on the use oftelecommunications technology to meet the college's mission of making higher educationavailable to all residents in the region.
Northern Virginia Community College's Extended Learning Instituteis developing policies and procedures that will enable distancelearning students enrolled at any of NVCC's five campuses toreceive a rigorous and integrated degree experience usingtelecommunications technology. This will involve the developmentor revision of courses that use integrated delivery technologies bestsuited to their content and design. Among the goals NVCC has setfor itself are the following: to improve communication betweenstudents and campus support services through a comprehensivevoice mail system and a series of five counseling videos made
82
available to distance and campus learners; to provide students withalternative means of access to reference materials and databasesearches; to provide faculty and staff with improved commu-nications methods through voice mail, computer bulletin boards,and audioconferencing; to develop methods of delivery that suit thenew NVCC compressed video delivery system that is capable ofboth two-way audio and two-way video instruction; and to deter-mine the best instructional techniques and applications for this newtechnology.
The College of St. Catherine, in St. Paul, Minnesota, a New Pathways program, servesas an exampl of how colleges particularly those with weekend programs can usetechnology to remove educational barriers and meet the needs of the adult student.
St. Catherine's first established a weekend baccalaureate program in1979. Weekend College courses are the same as those taught in theday school and are offered by the same faculty. Only the format isdifferent. St. Catherine's targeted two groups of students who theyfelt were being underserved: students who had "stopped out" of theon-campus program and students who lived in areas of the statewhere access to four-year degree programs was more limited thanin metropolitan areas. The project uses HyperCard software tosequence and deliver the curriculum including syllabi, assignments,lectures (in Text form), bibliographies, and study guides. Thisindividualized delivery is supplemented with electronic mail andcomputer conferencing to allow students to interact with theinstructor and with other students.
Selected programs
Following are eight sample degree programs. For each, you will find a chart thatincludes the following information:
degree requirements
how many credits are needed in each requirement area
on-campus course options for fulfilling the requirement
distance learning course options for fulfilling the requirement alongwith an indication of the primary technologies used for delivery andinteraction
These are current as of Summer 1992. As in traditional programs, change is inevitable.
83 EC
The following programs are included:
The Extended Learning Institute at Northern Virginia CommunityCollege offers an Associate in Science in Business Administration,a curriculum designed for students who plan to transfer to a four-year college or university to comple to a baccalaureate degreeprogram in business administration. The NVCC Telecommu-nications Center has remote and studio production capabilities,satellite uplink and downlink capabilities, its own cable TV channel,air time on other cable systems, and teleconferencing facilities. Inaddition to telecourse and print-based instructional deliverysystems, NVCC is introducing computer conferencing and live,compressed video at five off-campus sites.
Pennsylvania State University's Department of IndependentLearning offers a complete 60-credit two-year degree program withthe option of full- or part-time study. Although the requirements forthe LAS (Letters, Arts, and Sciences) associate degree and those forthe ELAS (Extended Letters, Arts, and Sciences) associate degree arethe same, ELAS students have no set number of years within whichthey must complete the degree requirements. In some cases coursesare offered in two different sections: one with a video component,and one without. In general, the program combines the use ofpreproduced television courses, print courses, and a few audiocourses. A characteristic of this example is the extensive number ofdistance learning options a student has for each degree requirement.
Prince George's Community College in Largo, Maryland, offersseveral distance learning degrees: Associate of Arts in GeneralStudies, a program that provides substantial coursework in theliberal arts, Associate of Arts in Business Management, which isstructured for transfer to a four-year institution, and a ManagementStudies transfer program, which does not result in a degree, butallows students to complete as many as 60 credits that will transferto the University of Maryland University College's Bachelor ofScience in Management Studies program. Distance options includemany preproduced television courses and some weekend courses.The latter meet on campus Friday evenings and all day Saturday forthree to four consecutive weekends.
Rochester Institute of Technology offers students who have alreadycompleted an associate degree or equivalent the opportunity tocomplete upper-level coursework through distance learning andobtain a Bachelor of Science in Applied Arts and Science. Inaddition to coursework in math/science, humanities, andcompletion of a liberal arts concentration which includes electivesand a senior seminar, students select two professionalconcentrations from among the following options: management,telecommunications, applied computing, or health systems
84
administration. The program is administered through RIT's Collegeof Continuing Education. RIT uses a variety of delivery systems tofacilitate instruction, interaction, and practice including video,audioconferencing, audiographic conferencing, and computerconferencing.
so The University of Maine at Augusta, through its new CommunityCollege of Maine, offers four different two-year degrees: Associateof Arts in Social Services (presented here), Associate of Science inGeneral Studies, Associate of Arts in Liberal Arts, and Associate ofScience in Business Administration. All courses are offered throughthe college's statewide ITV system, which students receive atcommunity sites. This delivery system is supplemented by the useof computer software, occasional instructor visits to communitysites, computer conferencing, electronic mail, and fax.
Wayne County Community College in Detroit, Michigan, is onecourse away from offering a complete Associate of Arts degreeentirely through preproduced television courses. The onerequirement still being studied is a science course with a laboratoryrequirement. Several options are being considered.
85 8 6
C'7
Nor
ther
n V
irgi
nia
Com
mun
ity C
olle
geA
ssoc
iate
in S
cien
ceE
xten
ded
Lea
rnin
g In
stitu
te (
EL
I), A
nnan
dale
, Vir
gini
aB
usin
ess
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Thi
s cu
rric
ulum
is d
esig
ned
for
stud
ents
who
pla
n to
tran
sfer
to a
four
-yea
r co
llege
or
univ
ersi
ty to
com
plet
e a
bacc
alau
reat
e de
gree
pro
gram
in b
usin
ess
adm
inis
trat
ion.
The
NV
CC
Tel
ecom
mun
icat
ions
Cen
ter
has
rem
ote
and
stud
io p
rodu
ctio
n ca
pabi
litie
s, s
atel
lite
uplin
k an
d do
wnl
ink
capa
bilit
ies,
its
own
cabl
e T
V c
hann
el, a
ir tim
e on
oth
er c
able
sta
tions
, and
tele
conf
eren
ce fa
cilit
ies.
In a
dditi
on to
tele
cour
se a
nd p
rint-
base
d in
stru
ctio
nal d
eliv
ery
syst
ems,
NV
CC
is a
lso
intr
oduc
ing
com
pute
r co
nfer
euci
irg a
nd li
ve, c
ompr
esse
d vi
deo
at fi
ve o
ff-ca
mpu
s si
tes.
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of in
stru
ctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Stud
ent D
evel
opm
ent
Eng
lish
Com
posi
tion
Eng
lish/
Hum
aniti
es/
Philo
soph
y
1 6 6
STD
100
Ori
enta
tion
STD
107
Car
eer
Edu
catio
n
EN
G 1
11 C
olle
ge C
ompo
sitio
n I
EN
G 1
12 C
olle
ge C
ompo
sitio
n II
EN
GE
NG
EN
GE
NG
EN
GE
NG
EN
GE
NG
241
Surv
ey o
f A
mer
ican
Lite
ratu
re I
242
Surv
ey o
f A
mer
ican
Lite
ratu
re 1
124
3 Su
rvey
of
Eng
lish
Lite
ratu
re I
244
Surv
ey o
f E
nglis
h L
itera
ture
II
251
Wor
ld L
itera
ture
I25
3 A
fro-
Am
eric
an L
itera
ture
I25
4 A
fro-
Am
eric
an L
itera
ture
II
257
Myt
holo
gy
EN
G 2
71 T
he W
orks
of
Shak
espe
are
I(T
rage
dies
)E
NG
272
The
Wor
ks o
f Sh
akes
pear
e II
(Com
edie
s)E
NG
273
Wom
en in
Lite
ratu
re I
EN
G 2
74 W
omen
in li
tera
ture
II
EN
G 2
79 F
ilm a
nd L
itera
ture
- M
yste
ries
EN
G 2
79 F
ilm a
nd L
itera
ture
- C
ritic
alV
iew
ing
PHI
101
Intr
oduc
tion
to P
hilo
soph
y I
PHI
102
Intr
oduc
tion
to P
hilo
soph
y lI
PHI
111
Log
icPH
I 11
2 L
ogic
II
tape
d, te
levi
sed
lect
ures
(1)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
tape
d. te
levi
sed
lect
ures
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Jos
eph
Cam
pbel
l: T
rans
form
atio
nsof
Myt
h T
hrou
gh T
ime
(3)
sele
cted
pla
ys o
n vi
deot
ape
avai
labl
e fr
omE
LI
lab
(3)
sele
cted
pla
ys o
n vi
deot
ape
avai
labl
e fr
omE
LI
lab
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
sele
cted
vid
eos
avai
labl
e fr
om lo
cal v
ideo
rent
al s
tore
s (3
)se
lect
ed v
ideo
s av
aila
ble
from
loca
l vid
eore
ntal
sto
res
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Fro
m S
ocra
tes
to S
artr
e(3
)ta
ped,
tele
vise
d le
ctur
es (
3)ta
ped,
tele
vise
d le
ctur
es (
3)ta
ped,
tele
vise
d le
ctur
es (
3)
(cm
:tinn
ed S
)
F F
CO N
(con
tinue
d)N
orth
ern
Virg
inia
Com
mun
ity C
olle
geA
ssoc
iate
in S
cien
ceB
usin
ess
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
His
tory
Mat
hem
atic
s
Nat
ural
Sci
ence
/ Lab
Acc
ount
ing
Eco
nom
ics
Gen
eral
Ele
ctiv
es
PH
I 220
Eth
ics
6F
RS
101
His
tory
of W
este
rn C
ivili
zatio
n I
HIS
102
His
tory
of W
este
rn C
ivili
zatio
n II
HIS
121
U.S
, His
tory
IH
IS 1
22 U
.S. H
isto
ry II
6-10
MT
H 1
65 C
olle
ge A
lgeb
raM
TH
271
App
lied
Cal
culu
s
8B
ID 1
01 G
ener
al B
iolo
gy I
PH
Y 1
11 T
echn
ical
Phy
sics
1
6A
CC
115
App
lied
Acc
ount
ing
AC
C 2
11 P
rinci
ples
of A
ccou
ntin
g 1
AC
C 2
12 P
rinci
ples
of A
ccou
ntin
g II
AC
C 2
31 C
ost A
ccou
ntin
g
6E
CD
120
Sur
vey
of E
cono
mic
sE
CD
201
Prin
cipl
es o
f Eco
nom
ics
IE
CD
202
Prin
cipl
es o
f Eco
nom
ics
II
15B
US
100
Intr
oduc
tion
to B
usin
ess
BU
S 1
25 A
pplie
d B
usin
ess
Mat
hem
atic
sB
US
150
Prin
cipl
es o
f Man
agem
ent
BU
S 1
65 S
mal
l Bus
ines
s M
anag
emen
tB
US
241
Bus
ines
s La
w I
CIS
100
Intr
oduc
tion
to In
form
atio
n S
yste
ms
Tel
ecou
rse:
eth
ics
in A
mer
ica
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Wes
tern
Tra
ditio
n 1
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Wes
tern
Tra
ditio
n 11
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
4)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls, i
nclu
des
2 on
-cam
pus
Labs
and
2 fie
ld tr
ips
to th
e S
mith
soni
an (
4)ta
ped,
tele
vise
d le
ctur
es, o
n-ca
mpu
s le
as (
4)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
, com
pute
r ap
plic
atio
ns (
31pr
int m
ater
ials
, com
pute
r ap
plic
atio
ns (
3)co
mpr
esse
d vi
deo
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eco
nom
ics
LIS
A !
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eco
nom
ics
US
A II
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eco
nom
ics
US
A II
I (3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Bus
ines
s of
Man
agem
ent (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Bus
ines
s an
d th
e La
w (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
(con
tinue
d
0 tI
00 CO
(con
tinue
d)N
orth
ern
Virg
inia
Com
r»un
hy C
olle
geA
ssoc
iate
in S
cien
ceB
usin
ess
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
EN
G 1
15 T
echn
ical
Wri
ting
EN
G 1
16 W
ritin
g fo
r B
usin
ess
EN
G 1
31 T
echn
ical
Rep
ort W
ritin
g I
EN
G 1
35 A
pplie
d G
ram
mar
EN
G 1
50 C
hild
ren'
s L
itera
ture
EN
G 2
11 C
reat
ive
Wri
ting
FIN
107
Per
sona
l Fin
ance
FRE
101
Beg
inni
ng F
renc
h I
FRE
102
Beg
inni
ng F
renc
h II
FRE
201
Int
erm
edia
te F
renc
h II
I
FRE
202
Int
erm
edia
te F
renc
h IV
GE
O 2
00 I
ntro
duct
ion
to P
hysi
cal G
eogr
aphy
CE
O 2
10 I
ntro
duct
ion
to C
ultu
ral G
eogr
aphy
HIS
269
Civ
il W
ar a
nd R
econ
stru
ctio
nL
BR
105
Lib
rary
Ski
lls f
or R
esea
rch
MK
T 1
00 P
rinc
iple
s of
Mar
ketin
g
MT
H 0
01 D
evel
opm
enta
l Mat
hem
atic
sM
TH
115
Tec
hnic
al M
athe
mat
ics
IM
TH
116
Tec
hnic
al M
athe
mat
ics
11M
TH
166
Alg
ebra
and
Tri
gono
met
ryM
US
111
Mus
k T
heor
y I
MU
S 12
1 M
usic
App
reci
atio
n 1
MU
S 12
2 M
usic
App
reci
atio
n 11
OFT
107
Edi
ting
and
Proo
frea
ding
Ski
lls
com
pute
r co
nfer
enci
ng (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
4 ta
ped,
tele
vise
d le
ctur
es, p
rint
mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)T
elec
ours
e:F
renc
h hr
Ada
mI,
voi
ce m
ail f
oras
sign
men
ts (
5)T
elec
ours
e:F
renc
h in
Act
ion
I,vo
ice
mai
l for
assi
gnm
ents
(5)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Fre
nch
in A
ctio
n II,
com
pres
sed
vide
o, v
oice
mai
l for
ass
ignm
ents
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Fre
nch
in A
ctio
n//,
com
pres
sed
vide
o, v
oice
mai
l for
ass
ignm
ents
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(1)
prin
t mat
eria
ls, t
rips
to lo
cal s
tore
s an
dlib
rari
es (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
tape
d, te
levi
sed
lect
ures
(3)
tape
d, te
levi
sed
lect
ures
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
4)co
mpr
esse
d vi
deo
(3)
Aud
ioco
urse
:B
asic
0.11
1C0M
Sof
Mus
ic 1
3)A
udio
cour
se:
Bas
ic C
once
pts
of M
usic
r3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
S)
(con
tinue
d)N
orth
ern
Virg
inia
Com
mun
ity C
olle
geA
ssoc
iate
in S
cien
ce -
Bus
ines
s A
dmin
istr
atio
n
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
ecr
edit)
Phy
s E
d
Spe
ech
and
Dra
ma
Tot
al m
inim
um c
redi
ts65
OF
T 1
36 O
ffice
OF
T 1
37 F
iling
OF
T 1
41 W
ord
Wor
dPer
fect
OF
T 1
42 W
ord
Wor
dPer
fect
OF
T 2
37 P
rinci
ples
of O
ffice
Aut
omat
ion
PLS
130
Bas
ics
of A
mer
ican
Pol
itics
PLS
211
U.S
. Gov
ernm
ent I
PLS
212
U.S
. Gov
ernm
ent I
IP
SY
100
Prin
cipl
es o
f App
lied
Psy
chol
ogy
PS
Y 2
01 In
trod
uctio
n to
Psy
chol
ogy
NY
202
Intr
oduc
tion
to P
sych
olog
y II
PS
Y 2
31 L
ife S
pan
Hum
an D
evel
opm
ent I
NY
235
Chi
ld P
sych
olog
yP
SY
236
Ado
lesc
ent P
sych
olog
yN
Y 2
37 A
dult
Psy
chol
ogy
SO
C 2
01 In
trod
uctio
n to
Soc
iolo
gy I
SO
C 2
02 In
trod
uctio
n to
Soc
iolo
gy II
SO
C 2
15 S
ocio
logy
of t
he F
amily
SO
C 2
36 C
rimin
olog
yS
OC
245
Soc
iolo
gy o
f Agi
ng
2av
aila
ble
as in
depe
nden
t stu
dy c
ours
e on
cam
pus
3av
aila
ble
Fal
l 199
2 th
roug
h E
LI
Rec
ordk
eepi
ngan
d R
ecor
ds M
anag
emen
tP
roce
ssin
g I:
Intr
oduc
tion
to
Pro
cess
ing
II: A
dvan
ced
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls, c
ompu
ter
appl
icat
ions
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls, c
ompu
ter
appl
icat
ions
;3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Gov
ernm
ent B
y C
onse
nt(3
)T
elec
ours
e: G
over
nmen
t By
Con
sent
II (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)co
mpu
ter
conf
eren
cing
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
(j4
C.
e.
Penn
sylv
ania
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
Ext
ende
d L
ette
rs, A
rts,
Uni
vers
ity P
ark,
Pen
nsyl
vani
aan
d Sc
ienc
es (
EL
AS)
Pen
nsyl
vani
a S
tate
Uni
vers
ity's
Dep
artm
ent o
f Ind
epen
dent
Lea
rnin
g of
fers
a c
ompl
ete
degr
ee p
rogr
amth
e de
gree
req
uire
men
ts fo
r th
e Le
tters
, Art
s, a
nd S
cien
ces
(LA
S)
degr
ee a
nd th
eE
LA
Sde
gree
are
the
stud
ents
hav
e no
set
num
ber
of y
ears
with
in w
hich
they
mus
t com
plet
e th
e de
gree
req
uire
men
ts. i
ndi
ffere
nt s
ectio
ns: o
ne w
ith a
vid
eo c
ompo
nent
, and
one
with
out.
The
Dep
artm
ent o
f Ind
epen
dent
Lea
rcr
edit
for
cour
ses
avai
labl
e vi
a sa
telli
te c
m th
e La
w E
nfor
cem
ent T
elev
isio
n N
etw
ork
(LE
M.
with
the
optio
n of
full-
or
part
-tim
e st
udy.
Alth
ough
sam
e, E
xten
ded
Lette
rs, A
rts,
and
Sci
ence
s (E
LAS
)so
me
case
s, th
e sa
me
cour
se w
ill b
e of
fere
d in
two
ning
wor
ks w
ith th
e lo
cal p
olic
ede
part
men
t to
offe
r
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
NO
D-.
O.;F
cour
se m
ay a
pple
to G
EN
ER
AL
ED
UC
AT
ION
RE
QU
IRE
ME
NT
SIN
D -
cou
rse
may
app
ly to
RE
QU
IRE
ME
NT
S F
OR
TI I
F. M
AJO
R
GE
NE
RA
L E
DU
CA
TIO
N
Wri
ting/
Spea
king
Qua
ntif
icat
ion
6E
NG
L 0
15 R
heto
ric
and
Com
posi
tion
(GM
)E
NG
L 2
02A
Eff
ectiv
e W
ritin
g: W
ritin
g in
the
Soci
al S
cien
ces
(GM
)E
NG
L 2
02D
Eff
ectiv
e W
ritin
g: B
usin
ess
Wri
ting
(GM
)SP
CO
M 1
00C
Spe
ech
Com
mun
icat
ion
(GM
)
3C
MPB
D 1
00 I
ntro
duct
ion
to C
ompu
ters
with
App
licat
ions
(M
)M
AT
H 0
05 C
olle
ge A
lgeb
ra I
(G
M)
MA
TH
006
Pla
ne T
rigo
nom
etry
(G
M)
MA
TH
007
Col
lege
Alg
ebra
II
and
Ana
lytic
Geo
met
ry (
GM
)M
AT
H 0
17 F
inite
Mat
hem
atic
s (G
M)
MA
TH
018
Ele
men
tary
Lin
ear
Alg
ebra
(C
M)
MA
TH
035
Gen
eral
Vie
w o
f M
athe
mat
ics
(GM
)M
AT
H 0
35 G
ener
al V
iew
of
Mat
hem
atic
',(G
M)
MA
TH
036
Ins
ight
s in
to M
athe
mat
ics
(GM
)M
AT
H 0
36 I
nsig
hts
into
Mat
hem
atic
s (G
M)
MA
TH
087
Tec
hnic
al M
athe
mat
ics
(GM
)M
AT
H 0
88 T
echn
ical
Mat
h an
d C
. Icu
lus
(GM
)M
AT
H 1
10 T
echn
ique
s of
Cal
culu
s I
(GM
)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
vari
ous
sele
cted
vid
eos
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Com
pute
rWor
ks, a
udio
cass
ette
s, P
Cso
ftw
are
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
itik
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
For
All
Prac
tical
Pur
pose
s 1
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)T
elec
ours
e: F
orA
ll P
ract
ical
Pur
pose
s II
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
(con
tinue
dP
)
(con
tinue
d)Pe
nnsy
lvan
ia S
tate
Uni
vers
ityE
xten
ded
Let
ters
, Art
,an
d S
cien
ces
(ELA
S)
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Nat
ural
Sci
ence
97
MA
TH
111
Tec
hniq
ues
of C
alcu
lus
II (
GM
)M
AT
H 1
40 C
alcu
lus
with
Ana
lytic
Geo
met
ryI
(GM
)M
AT
H 1
41 C
alcu
lus
with
Ana
lytic
Geo
met
ryII
(G
M)
MA
TH
200
Mat
rice
s (G
M)
MA
TH
231
Cal
culu
s of
Sev
eral
Var
iabl
es (
M)
MA
TH
250
Ord
inar
y D
iffe
rent
ial E
quat
ions
1M)
PHIL
012
Ele
men
ts o
f Sy
mbo
lic L
ogic
(G
M)
STA
T 2
00 E
lem
enta
ry S
tatis
tics
(GM
)
6C
HE
M 0
12 C
hem
ical
Pri
ncip
les
(GM
)C
HE
M 0
34 O
rgan
ic C
hem
istr
y (M
)M
ET
E)
452
Tro
pica
l Met
eoro
logy
(M
)M
ET
ED
474
App
licat
ions
of
Stat
istic
s (M
)PH
SC
007
Phy
sica
l Sci
ence
(M
)PH
YS
001
The
Sci
ence
of
Phys
ics
(GM
)PH
YS
202
Gen
eral
Phy
sics
with
lab
(GM
)I'l
lYS
203
Gen
eral
Phy
sics
(G
M)
BL
SC
002
Gen
etic
s, E
colo
gy a
nd E
volu
tion
(GM
)B
L S
C 0
03 E
nvir
onm
enta
l Sci
ence
(G
M)
BIO
L 0
20 P
lant
s, P
lace
s, a
nd l'
eopl
e (M
)B
lOL
041
Phy
siol
ogy
(GM
)A
STR
O 0
01 A
stro
nom
ical
Uni
vers
e (G
M)
EM
SC
ISO
Out
of
the
Fier
y Fu
rnac
e (G
M)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)T
elec
ours
e: A
gain
stA
ll O
dds:
Insi
de S
tatis
tics
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)T
elec
ours
e:T
he M
echa
nica
l Uni
vers
e(3
)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
pint
mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Out
of th
e F
iery
Furn
ace
(3)
(con
tinue
d al
iq'
C
1111
1111
1111
111L
(con
tinue
d)P
enns
ylva
nia
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
.E
xten
ded
Lette
rs, A
rt, a
nd S
cien
ces
(ELA
S)
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of in
stru
ctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Art
s
Hum
aniti
es
GE
OS
C 0
20 P
lane
t Ear
th (
GM
)
6A
RT
001
The
Vis
ual A
rts
and
the
Stu
dio
(GM
)A
RT
H 1
11 S
urve
y of
Wes
tern
Art
I (G
M)
AR
T 1
1 11
2 S
urve
y of
Wes
tern
Art
II (
GM
)A
RT
H 2
97A
Spe
cial
Top
ics:
Afr
ican
Art
(M
)A
RT
H 3
40 H
isto
ry o
f Jap
anes
e A
rt (
M)
AR
TS
001
The
Art
s (G
M)
AR
TS
001
The
Art
s (G
M)
MU
SIC
005
An
Intr
oduc
tion
to W
este
rnM
usic
(G
M)
MU
SIC
007
Evo
lutio
n of
Jaz
z (G
M)
MU
SIC
008
Rud
imen
ts o
f Mus
ic (
M)
TH
EA
440
Prin
cipl
es o
f Pla
ywrit
ing
(M)
6A
M S
T 1
00 In
trod
uctio
n to
Am
eric
an S
tudi
es(G
M)
CLA
SS
001
Gre
ek a
nd R
oman
Lite
ratu
re(G
M)
C L
IT 0
01 M
aste
rpie
ces
of W
este
rn L
itera
ture
Thr
ough
the
Ren
aiss
ance
(G
M)
C L
IT 1
08 N
on-W
este
rn M
yths
and
Myt
holo
gies
(G
M)
EN
GL
001
Und
erst
andi
ng L
itera
ture
(G
M)
EN
GL
100
Eng
lish
Lang
uage
Ana
lysi
s (M
)E
NG
L 21
5 In
trod
uctio
n to
Art
icle
Writ
ing
(M)
EN
GL
232
Am
eric
an L
itera
ture
from
186
5 (M
)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Ear
th E
xplo
red
(3)
vario
us s
elec
ted
vide
os (
3)
sele
cted
pro
gram
s fr
om: A
rt o
f the
Wes
tern
Wor
ld I
(3)
Tel
ecom
se:
Art
of t
he W
este
rn W
orld
II (
3)va
rious
sel
ecte
d vi
deos
(3)
vario
us s
elec
ted
vide
os (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Flu
num
ities
Thr
ough
the
Art
s (3
)va
rious
sel
ecte
d au
dioc
asse
ttes
and
reco
rds
(3)
vario
us s
elec
ted
audi
ocas
sette
s (3
)va
rious
sel
ecte
d au
dioc
asse
ttes
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
(con
tinue
d IN
)
0
(con
tinue
d)Pe
nnsy
lvan
ia S
tate
Uni
vers
ityE
xten
ded
Let
ters
, Art
, and
Sci
ence
s (E
LA
S)
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
EN
GL
407
His
tory
of
the
Eng
lish
Lan
guag
e(M
)H
IST
001
The
Wes
tern
Her
itage
1 (
GM
)H
1ST
002
The
Wes
tern
Her
itage
n (
GM
)H
IST
012
His
tory
of
Penn
sylv
ania
(G
M)
HIS
T 0
20 A
mer
ican
Civ
iliza
tion
to 1
877
(GM
)14
1ST
021
Am
eric
an C
ivili
zatio
n si
nce
1877
(GM
)H
IST
143
His
tory
of
Fasc
ism
and
Naz
ism
(GM
)H
IST
156
His
tory
of
the
Am
eric
an W
orke
r(M
)H
IST
181
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
the
Mid
dle
Fast
(GM
)14
IST
444
The
Uni
ted
Stat
es in
Civ
il W
ar a
ndR
econ
stru
ctio
n 18
50-1
877
PHIL
001
Bas
ic P
robl
ems
of P
hilo
soph
y (G
M)
PHIL
004
Maj
or F
igur
es in
Phi
loso
phy
(GM
)PH
IL 0
04 M
ajor
Fig
ures
in P
hilo
soph
y (G
M)
PHIL
010
Cri
tical
Thi
nkin
g an
d A
rgum
ent
(GM
)PH
IL 1
02 E
xist
entia
lism
(G
M)
PHIL
103
Eth
ics
and
Soci
al I
ssue
s (G
M)
PHIL
103
Eth
ics
and
Soci
al I
ssue
s (G
M)
POR
T 4
% B
razi
lian
Lite
ratu
re in
Eng
lish
Tra
nsla
tion
(M)
RL
ST
001
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Wor
ld R
elig
ions
(GM
)
101
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Sto
ry o
f E
nglis
h (3
)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Wes
tern
Tra
ditio
n 1
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Wes
tern
Tra
ditio
n II
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
vari
ous
sele
cted
vid
eos
(3)
sele
cted
vid
eo (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Mid
dle
Eas
t (3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Civ
il W
ar (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Fro
m S
ocra
tes
to S
artr
e (3
)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eth
ics
in A
mer
ica
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
10(c
ontin
ued
wo)
P
(con
tinue
d)Pe
nnsy
lvan
ia S
tate
Uni
vers
ityE
xten
ded
Let
ters
, Art
, and
Sci
ence
s (E
LA
S)
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Soci
al a
nd B
ehav
iora
lSc
ienc
es
RL
ST
003
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Rel
igio
ns o
f th
eE
ast (
GM
)R
L S
T 0
04 J
ewis
h an
d C
hris
tian
Foun
datio
ns(G
M)
RL
ST
140
Rel
igio
n in
Am
eric
an L
ife
and
Tho
ught
(G
M)
SPA
N 2
31 M
aste
rpie
ces
of S
pani
sh A
mer
ican
Lite
ratu
re in
Eng
lish
Tra
nsla
tion
(GM
)
AD
M J
111
Intr
oduc
tion
to th
e A
mer
ican
Cri
min
al J
ustic
e Sy
stem
(M
)A
NT
H 0
01 I
ntro
duct
ory
Ant
hrop
olog
y (G
M)
AN
TH
045
Cul
tura
l Ant
hrop
olog
y (G
M)
BL
ST
100
Evo
lvin
g St
atus
of
Bla
cks
in th
eT
wen
tieth
Cen
tury
(G
M)
EC
ON
002
Int
rodu
ctor
y M
icro
econ
omic
Ana
lysi
s an
d Po
licy
(GM
)E
CO
N 0
04 I
ntro
duct
ory
Mac
roec
onom
icA
naly
sis
and
Polic
y (G
M)
EC
ON
014
Pri
ncip
les
of E
cono
mic
!: (
GM
)E
CO
N 3
15 L
abor
Eco
nom
ics
(GM
)E
CO
N 4
00 H
isto
ry o
f E
cono
mic
Tho
ught
I(M
)E
CO
N 4
28 E
nvir
onm
enta
l Eco
nom
ics
(M)
GE
OG
020
Hum
an G
eogr
aphy
: An
Intr
oduc
tion
(GM
)H
IST
142
His
tory
of
Com
mun
ism
(G
M)
HIS
T 1
73 V
ietn
am a
t War
(G
M)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Lon
g Se
arch
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
vari
ous
sele
cted
vid
eos
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eye
s O
n th
e Pr
ize
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
vari
ous
sele
cted
vid
eos
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Vie
tnam
: A T
elev
isio
n H
isto
ry (
3)
(con
tinue
d le
)
al)
(con
tinue
d)P
enns
ylva
nia
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
Ext
ende
d Le
tters
, Art
, and
Sci
ence
s (E
LAS
)
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
10 7
,
HD
FS
129
Intr
oduc
tion
to I
ndiv
idua
l and
Fam
ily D
evel
opm
ent (
GM
)H
D F
S 22
9 In
fant
and
Chi
ld D
evel
opm
ent
(GM
)H
D N
249
Adu
lt D
evel
opm
ent a
nd A
ging
(GM
)L
ING
001
The
Stu
dy o
f L
angu
age
(GM
)L
ING
010
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Lan
guag
e (M
)L
I R
100
Ind
ustr
ial R
elat
ions
(C
M)
L I
R 1
56 H
isto
ry o
f th
e A
mer
ican
Wor
ker
(M)
PL S
C 0
01 I
ntro
duct
ion
to A
mer
ican
Nat
iona
lG
over
nmen
t (G
M)
PL S
C 0
03 I
ntro
duct
ion
to C
ompa
rativ
ePo
litic
s (G
M)
PL S
C 0
14 I
nter
natio
nal R
elat
ions
(C
M)
PL S
C 0
20 C
ompa
rativ
e Po
litic
s of
Wes
tE
urop
e (M
)PL
SC
297
Pol
itics
and
Film
PL S
C 2
97C
Spe
cial
Top
ics
(M)
PL S
C 4
17 A
mer
ican
Loc
al G
over
nmen
t and
Adm
inis
trat
ion
(M)
PI, S
C 4
25 G
over
nmen
t and
Pol
itics
of
Am
eric
an S
tate
s (M
)PL
SC
495
Pol
itica
l Sci
ence
Int
erns
hip
(M)
PSY
002
Psy
chol
ogy
(GM
)PS
Y 0
02 P
sych
olog
y (G
M)
SO C
001
Int
rodu
ctor
y So
ciol
ogy
(GM
)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
sele
cted
pro
gram
s fr
om T
elec
ours
e: S
easo
nsof
Life
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
vari
ous
sele
cted
vid
eos
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Con
stitu
tion:
Tha
t Del
icat
eB
alan
ce (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
fiel
d w
ork
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)T
elec
ours
e: D
isco
veri
ngP
sych
olog
y(3
)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
1i C
(con
tinue
d a'
)
MSS
(con
tinue
d)Pe
nnsy
lvan
ia S
tate
Uni
vers
ityE
xten
ded
Let
ters
, Art
, and
Sci
ence
s (E
LA
S)
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
es
SOC
003
Int
rodu
ctor
y So
cial
Psy
chol
ogy
(GM
)SO
C 0
05 S
ocia
l Pro
blem
s (G
M)
SOC
015
Urb
an S
ocio
logy
(G
M)
SOC
030
Soc
iolo
gy o
f th
e Fa
mily
(G
M)
SOC
416
Soc
iolo
gy o
f E
duca
tion
(M)
Gen
eral
Edu
catio
n E
lect
ive
3an
y co
urse
who
se n
ame
is f
ollo
wed
by
(G)
orN
OO
N(G
M)
RE
QU
IRE
ME
NT
S FO
R T
HE
MA
JOR
9 ap
prov
ed c
redi
ts (
cour
ses
9FR
001
Ele
men
tary
Fre
nch
I (M
)FR
002
Ele
men
tary
Fre
nch
11 (
M)
who
se n
ame
is f
ollo
wed
by
"M"
or "
GM
" --
see
pre
viou
sly
liste
d co
urse
s) in
one
of
the
follo
win
g ar
eas:
Art
s,H
uman
ities
, Soc
ial a
nd
FR 0
03 I
nter
med
iate
Fre
nch
(M)
GE
R 0
01 E
lem
enta
ry G
erm
an I
(M
)G
ER
002
Ele
men
tary
Ger
man
11
(M)
GE
R 0
03 I
nter
med
iate
Ger
man
(M
)B
ehav
iora
l Sci
ence
s, S
cien
ce/
POL
001
Beg
inni
ng P
olis
h (M
)M
athe
mat
ics,
or
Fore
ign
SPA
N 0
03 I
nter
med
iate
Spa
nish
(M
)L
angu
ages
EL
EC
TIV
ES
15A
DM
J 4
01 P
roba
tion,
Par
ole,
and
Par
dons
AD
M J
421
Vio
lent
Cri
me
in th
e U
.S.
AD
M J
430
Cor
rect
iona
l Ins
titut
ions
and
Serv
ices
AD
M J
482
Sem
inar
, Cri
min
al J
ustic
e A
genc
y10
7A
dniin
istr
atio
n
Mod
e of
Ins
truc
tion
(cou
rse
cred
it)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
audi
ocas
sette
s (4
)au
dioc
asse
ttes
(4)
audi
ocas
sette
s (4
)au
dioc
asse
ttes
(4)
audi
ocas
sette
s (4
)au
dioc
asse
ttes
(4)
audi
ocas
sette
s (4
)au
dioc
asse
ttes
(4)
TeI
ncct
urse
IB
A; b
road
cast
on
LE
TN
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse
IBA
; bro
adca
st o
n L
ET
N (
31pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse
TB
A; b
road
cast
on
LE
TN
(3)
(con
tinue
d w
)
(con
tinue
d)P
enns
ylva
nia
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
Ext
ende
d Le
tters
, Art
, and
Sci
ence
s (E
LAS
)
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of In
stru
ctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
1 0
AD
M J
485
Pol
icin
g in
Am
eric
aA
DM
J 4
97 U
se a
nd A
pplic
atio
n of
Com
pute
rs in
Cri
min
al J
ustic
eA
DM
I 4
97H
Sup
ervi
sion
of
Law
Enf
orce
men
tPe
rson
nel
EN
GL
004
Bas
ic W
ritin
g Sk
ills
FIN
100
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Fin
ance
FIN
108
Per
sona
l Fin
ance
RN
204
Sec
urity
Mar
kets
HL
ED
005
Hea
lth A
spec
ts o
f Sp
ort (
G)
HI.
ED
015
life
-sty
le f
or B
ette
r H
ealth
(G
)H
L E
D 0
19 H
ealth
and
Dis
ease
(G
)Il
L E
D 0
43 D
rugs
in S
ocie
ty (
G)
HL
ED
046
Hea
lth A
spec
ts o
f H
uman
Sexu
ality
(G
)1-
IL E
D 0
57 C
onsu
mer
Hea
lth (
G)
HI.
ED
060
Pri
ncip
les
and
Prac
tices
of
Hea
lthfu
l Liv
ing
(G)
HL
ED
415
Edu
catio
n fo
r W
elln
ess
HI
ED
457
Con
sum
er H
ealth
Edu
catio
nE
LL
ED
495
Hea
lth E
duca
tion
Prac
ticum
H D
EV
395
Fie
ld P
roje
cts
HD
FS
200
Em
piri
cal I
nqui
ry in
Hum
anD
evel
opm
ent
HD
FS
297E
Spe
cial
Top
ics:
Chi
ldM
altr
eatm
ent
I-ID
FS
315
Fam
ily D
evel
opm
ent
HD
FS
2330
A O
bser
vatio
n or
Exp
erie
nce
with
Pres
choo
l Chi
ldre
n
vari
ous
sele
cted
vid
eos
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse
TB
A; b
road
cast
on
LE
TN
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse
TB
A; b
road
cast
on
LE
TN
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)va
riou
s se
lect
ed v
ideo
s (3
)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
1-3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
1-3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
1-3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
1-3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
1-3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
(con
tinue
d )
(con
tinue
d)P
enns
ylva
nia
Sta
te U
nive
rsity
Ext
ende
d Le
tters
, Art
, and
Sci
ence
s(E
LA
S)
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
MG
MT
100
Sur
vey
of M
anag
emen
tM
GM
T 1
00 S
urve
y of
Man
agem
ent
MG
MT
321
Org
aniz
atio
nal B
ehav
ior
MG
MT
341
Hum
an R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent
MK
TG
221
Con
tem
pora
ry A
mer
ican
Mar
ketin
gM
AT
H 0
04 I
nter
med
iate
Alg
ebra
NU
TR
100
Con
tem
pora
ry N
utri
tion
Con
cern
s(G
)N
UT
R 1
51 N
utri
tiona
l Com
pone
nt o
f Fo
odSe
rvic
eN
UT
R 2
51 I
ntro
duct
ion
to P
rinc
iple
s of
Nut
ritio
n (C
)N
UT
R 2
52 D
iet T
hera
py a
nd N
utri
tion
Car
ein
Dis
ease
NU
TR
296
E I
ndep
ende
nt S
tudi
es: N
utri
tion
inA
ctio
n
Tot
al60
111
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)T
elec
ours
e:M
anag
ing
in O
rgan
izat
ions
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)pr
int m
ater
ials
(3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
prin
t mat
eria
ls (
3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Nut
ritio
n in
Act
ion
(3)
lie
Prin
ce G
eorg
e's
Com
mun
ity C
olle
geL
argo
, Mar
ylan
dA
ssoc
iate
in A
rts
Bus
ines
s M
anag
emen
t
Pro
vidi
ng a
con
cent
ratio
n in
bus
ines
s m
anag
emen
t and
a b
road
ran
ge o
f gen
eral
edu
catio
n re
quire
nwnt
s, th
is p
rogr
am is
str
uctu
red
both
for
busi
ness
appl
icat
ions
and
for
tran
sfer
to a
four
-yea
r in
stitu
tion.
In a
dditi
on to
the
core
cou
rses
, cou
rse
optio
ns in
clud
e te
leco
urse
inst
ruct
ion
and
on-c
ampu
s w
eeke
ndco
urse
s th
at m
eet f
or e
ither
thre
e or
four
con
secu
tive
wee
kend
s. M
eetin
g tim
es fo
r w
eeke
nd c
ours
es a
re F
riday
eve
ning
s an
d al
l day
Sat
urda
y.
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
CO
RE
CO
UR
SE
S
Bus
ines
s an
d M
anag
emen
t19
AC
C 1
01 I'
rinci
ples
of A
ccou
ntin
g 1
BU
S 1
22 B
usin
ess
Law
IM
GT
101
Bus
ines
s O
rgan
izat
ion
MG
T 1
60 P
rinci
ples
of M
anag
emen
tM
GT
162
Fin
anci
al P
lann
ing
SU
PP
OR
TIN
G C
OU
RS
ES
Com
pute
r In
form
atio
nS
yste
ms
Eng
lish
Hum
aniti
es
Mat
hem
atic
s
3 3 6
MG
T 2
61 P
erso
nnel
Adm
inis
trat
ion
CIS
150
Com
pute
r Li
tera
cy
Ea.
101
Com
posi
tion
IE
CL
102
Com
posi
tion
and
Intr
oduc
tion
toLi
tera
ture
SP
H 1
01 In
trod
uctio
n to
Spe
ech
Com
mun
icat
ion
MA
T 1
25 A
lgeb
ra, B
usin
ess
and
Soc
ial
Sci
ence
MA
T 1
12 M
athe
mat
ics
for
Gen
eral
Edu
catio
n
Sci
ence
3-4
PS
C 1
05 In
trod
uctio
n to
Phy
sica
l Geo
logy
Tel
ecou
rse:
Prin
cipl
es o
f Acc
ount
ing
I (4)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Bus
ines
s an
d th
e La
w (
3)T
elec
ours
e: T
he B
usin
ess
File
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Bus
ines
s cf
Man
agem
ent (
3)T
elec
ours
e: P
erso
nal F
inan
ce a
nd M
oney
Man
agem
ent (
3)w
eeke
nd c
ours
e op
tion
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
New
Lite
rary
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Writ
e C
ours
e (3
)T
elec
ours
e: L
itera
ry V
isio
ns (
3)
wee
kend
cou
rse
optio
n (3
)
Tel
ecou
rse:
lotto
dild
ion
to M
ath
(3)
wee
kend
cou
rse
optio
n (3
)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Ear
th R
evea
led:
Intr
oduc
tory
Geo
logy
(3)
11Ly
(con
tinue
d S
)
0
(con
tinue
d)Pr
ince
Geo
rge'
s C
omm
unity
Col
lege
Ass
ocia
te .n
Art
s -
Bus
ines
s M
anag
emen
t
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Soci
al S
cien
ces
3E
CN
100
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Eco
nom
ics
orPO
S 10
1 A
mer
ican
Nat
iona
l Gov
ernm
ent
Phys
ical
/Hea
lth E
duca
tion
2-3
HL
E 1
15 P
erso
nal a
nd C
omm
unity
Hea
lth
Bus
ines
s-re
late
d E
lect
ives
Gen
eral
Ele
ctiv
es
Tot
al
12A
CC
102
Pri
ncip
les
of A
ccou
ntin
g 11
(req
uire
d)M
GT
155
Ele
men
ts o
f Su
perv
isio
n (r
equi
red)
MG
T 1
57 S
mal
l Bus
ines
s M
anag
emen
t(r
equi
red)
MG
T 1
80 M
icro
com
pute
r A
pplic
atio
ns
MG
T 2
51 I
ntro
duct
ion
to M
arke
ting
6H
ST 1
31 A
ncie
nt a
nd M
edie
val H
isto
ryH
ST 2
37 H
isto
ry o
f th
e V
ietn
am W
arFI
ST 1
41 U
.S. H
isto
ryH
ST 1
43 U
.S. H
isto
ry I
I?S
Y 1
01 G
ener
al P
sych
olog
ySC
)C 1
01 I
ntro
duct
ion
to S
ocio
logy
Or
any
othe
r te
leco
urse
off
ered
63-6
5
Min
imum
tota
l req
uire
d fo
r63
asso
ciat
e's
degr
ee
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eco
nom
ics
USA
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Gov
ernm
ent b
y C
onse
nt (
3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Her
e's
to Y
our
Hea
lth (
3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Pri
ncip
les
of A
ccou
ntin
g 11
(4)
wee
kend
cou
rse
optio
n (3
)T
elec
ours
e: S
omet
hing
Ven
ture
d: A
nE
ntre
pren
euri
al A
ppro
ach
to S
mal
l Bus
ines
sM
anag
emen
t (3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Com
pute
r W
orks
, aud
ioca
sset
tes,
PC
soft
war
e (3
)T
elec
ours
e: M
arke
ting
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Wes
tern
Tra
ditio
n 1
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Vie
tnam
: A T
elev
isio
n H
isto
ry (
3)T
elec
ours
e: T
he A
mer
ican
Adv
entu
re (
3)T
elec
ours
e: A
mer
ica
in P
ersp
ectiv
e (3
)T
elec
ours
e: D
isco
veri
ng P
sych
olog
y (3
)T
elec
ours
e: T
he S
ocio
logi
cal i
mag
inat
ion
(3)
ssy
II
Prin
ce G
eorg
e's
Com
mun
ity C
olle
geA
ssoc
iate
in A
rts
Lar
go, M
aryl
and
Gen
eral
Stu
dies
in a
dditi
on to
the
core
cou
rses
, the
follo
win
g as
soci
ate'
s de
gree
pro
gram
pro
vide
s su
bsta
ntia
l cou
rsew
ork
in th
e lib
eral
art
s.C
ours
e op
tions
incl
ude
tele
cour
se in
stru
ctio
n an
d on
-cam
pus
wee
kend
cou
rses
that
mee
t for
eith
er th
ree
or fo
ur c
onse
cutiv
e w
eeke
nds.
Mee
ting
times
for
wee
kend
cou
rses
are
Frid
ay e
veni
ngs
and
all d
ay S
atur
day.
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
CO
RE
CO
UR
SE
S
Eng
lish
Mat
hem
atic
s
Scie
nce
one
cour
se m
ust
carr
y la
b cr
edit
I hi
man
ities
SUPP
OR
TIN
GC
OU
RS
ES
Eng
lish
His
tory
Hum
aniti
es
Soci
al S
cien
ces
6E
GL
101
Com
posi
tion
IE
GL
102
Com
posi
tion
and
Intr
oduc
tion
toL
itera
ture
MA
T 1
25 A
lgeb
ra, B
usin
ess
and
Soci
alSc
ienc
e
7-8
BIO
111
Hum
an E
colo
gyPS
C 1
05 I
ntro
duct
ion
to P
hysi
cal G
eolo
gy
PSC
106
Phy
sica
l Geo
logy
Lab
3SP
H 1
09 I
nter
pers
onal
Com
mun
icat
ion
3E
GL
201
Eng
lish
Lite
ratu
re I
6I1
ST 1
41 U
.S. H
isto
ry I
HST
143
U.S
. His
tory
II
6PF
IL 1
01 I
ntro
duct
ion
to P
hilo
soph
yA
RT
101
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
An
MU
S 10
1 In
trod
uctio
n to
Mus
icT
HE
101
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
The
ater
6PS
Y 1
01 G
ener
al P
sych
olog
y
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Writ
e C
ours
e(3
)T
elec
ours
e:Li
tera
ry V
isio
ns(3
)
Tel
ecou
rse:
intr
oduc
tion
to M
ath
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Rac
e to
Sam
the
Pla
net
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Ear
th R
evea
led:
Intr
oduc
tory
Geo
logy
(3)
wee
kend
cou
rse
optio
n (2
)
wee
kend
cou
rse
optio
n (3
)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eng
lish
Lite
ratu
re I
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Am
eric
an A
dven
ture
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Am
eric
a in
Per
spec
tive
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Fro
m S
ocra
tes
to S
artr
e (3
)ev
enin
g co
urse
opt
ion
(3)
even
ing
cour
se o
ptio
n (3
)ev
enin
g co
urse
opt
ion
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Dis
cove
ring
Psy
chol
ogy
(3)
1(c
ontin
ued
W)
NJ
(con
tinue
d)Pr
ince
Geo
rge'
s C
ornr
nuni
ty C
olle
geA
ssoc
iate
in A
rts
- G
ener
al S
tudi
es
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Phys
ical
/Hea
lth E
duca
tion
Gen
eral
Ele
ctiv
es
Tot
al
SOC
101
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Soc
iolo
gy
2-3
HL
E 1
13 P
erso
nal a
nd C
omm
unity
Hea
lth
21A
NT
103
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Cul
tura
lA
nthr
opol
ogy
CIS
150
Com
pute
r L
itera
cyE
CL
215
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Cre
ativ
e W
ritin
gH
ST 1
31 A
ncie
nt a
nd M
edie
val H
isto
ryH
ST 2
33 H
isto
ry o
f th
e A
mer
ican
Civ
il W
arH
ST 2
37 H
isto
ry o
f th
e V
ietn
am W
arPH
L 1
27 T
hink
ing
abou
t Rel
igio
n
PHL
133
Con
tem
pora
ry M
oral
Val
ues
POS
101
Am
eric
an N
atio
nal G
over
nmen
tPS
C 1
01 I
ntro
duct
ion
to A
stro
nom
yPS
C 1
07 I
ntro
duct
ion
to O
cean
ogra
phy
PSC
113
Sci
ence
and
Soc
iety
PS?
207
Hum
an G
row
th a
nd D
evel
opm
ent
SOC
102
Mar
riag
e an
d th
e Fa
mily
oran
y ot
her
tele
cour
se o
ffir
ed
65
Min
imum
tota
l req
uire
d fo
r63
asso
ciat
e's
degr
ee
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Soc
iolo
gica
l Im
agin
atio
n (3
)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Her
e's
to Y
our
Hea
lth (
3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Fac
es o
f C
ultu
re (
3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
New
Lite
racy
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Wri
ter's
Wor
ksho
p (3
)T
elec
ours
e: T
he W
este
rn T
radi
tion
1 (3
)T
elec
ours
e: T
he C
ivil
War
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Vie
tnam
: A T
elev
isio
n H
isto
ry (
3)T
elec
ours
e: J
osep
h C
ampb
ell:
Tra
nsfo
rmat
ions
of
Myt
h T
hrou
gh T
ime
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eth
ics
in A
mer
ica
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Gov
ernm
ent b
y C
onse
nt (
3)T
elec
ours
e: P
roje
ct: U
nive
rse
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Oce
anus
: The
Mar
ine
Env
iron
men
t(3
)T
elec
ours
e: T
he W
orld
of
Che
mis
try
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Sea
sons
of
Lif
e (3
)T
elec
ours
e: P
ortr
ait o
f a
Fam
ily (
3)
w
IIII
MSI
MII
1111
11IP
Prin
ce G
eorg
e's
Com
mun
ity C
olle
ge, L
argo
, Mar
ylan
dM
anag
emen
t Stu
dies
Uni
vers
ity o
f M
aryl
and
Uni
vers
ity C
olle
ge, C
olle
ge P
ark,
Mar
ylan
dT
rans
fer
Prog
ram
Usi
ng th
e cu
rric
ulum
list
ed b
elow
, PG
CC
stu
dent
s ca
n co
mpl
ete
as m
any
as 6
0 cr
edits
that
will
tran
sfer
to U
MU
C's
bac
helo
r of
sci
ence
deg
ree
prog
ram
in m
anag
emen
t stu
dies
. An
addi
tiona
l 60
cred
its a
re r
equi
red
at U
MU
C to
rec
eive
the
bach
elor
's d
egre
e.
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
GE
NE
RA
L E
DU
CA
TIO
N
Com
mun
icat
ions
/C
ompo
sitio
n9
EG
L 1
01 C
ompo
sitio
n I
EG
L 1
02 C
ompo
sitio
n an
d In
trod
uctio
n to
Lite
ratu
reE
GL
215
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Cre
ativ
e W
ritin
g
Soci
al S
cien
ces
6A
NT
103
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Cul
tura
lA
nthr
opol
ogy
POS
101
Am
eric
an N
atio
nal G
over
nmen
tPS
Y 1
01 G
ener
al P
sych
olog
ySO
C 1
01 I
ntro
duct
ion
to S
ocio
logy
Hum
aniti
es /H
isto
ry6
EN
G 2
01 E
nglis
h lit
erat
ure
IH
ST 1
41 U
.S. H
isto
ry I
HST
143
U.S
. His
tory
II
HST
131
Anc
ient
and
Med
ieva
l His
tory
PHL
101
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Phi
loso
phy
Mat
hem
atic
s/Sc
ienc
e/9
1310
111
Hum
an E
colo
gyC
ompu
ter
CIS
150
Com
pute
r L
itera
cyM
AT
125
Alg
ebra
, Bus
ines
s an
d So
cial
Scie
nce
PSC
101
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Ast
rono
my
I'SC
107
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Oce
anog
raph
y
PSC
113
Sci
ence
and
Soc
iety
7 I'
1 4
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Wri
te C
ours
e (3
)T
elec
ours
e: L
itera
ry V
isio
ns (
3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Wri
ter's
Wor
ksho
p (3
)
Tel
ecou
rse:
FO
CI'S
of
Cul
ture
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Gov
ernm
ent b
y C
onse
nt (
3)T
elec
ours
e: D
isco
veri
ng P
sych
olog
y (3
)T
elec
ours
e:S
ocio
logi
cal
Imag
inat
ion
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eng
lish
Lite
ratu
re I
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Am
eric
an A
dven
ture
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Am
eric
a in
Per
spec
tive
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Wes
tern
Tra
ditio
n I
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Fro
m S
ocra
tes
to S
artr
e (3
)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Rac
e to
Sav
e th
e Pl
anet
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
New
Die
m/ (
3)T
elec
ours
e: I
ntro
duct
ion
to M
ath
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Pro
ject
: Uni
vers
e (3
)T
elec
ours
e: O
cean
us; T
he M
arin
e E
nvir
onm
ent
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Wor
ld o
f Che
mis
try
(3)
744
(con
tinue
d *I
(con
tinue
d)P
rince
Geo
rge'
s C
omm
unity
Col
lege
and
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mar
ylan
d U
nive
rsity
Col
lege
Man
agem
ent S
tudi
es T
rans
fer
Pro
gram
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
PR
IMA
RY
CO
NC
EN
TR
AT
ION
Man
agem
ent S
tudi
es9
MG
T 1
01 B
usin
ess
Org
aniz
atio
nM
GT
160
Pri
ncip
les
of M
anag
emen
tM
KG
251
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Mar
ketin
g
Cou
rses
Rel
ated
to12
AC
C 1
01 P
rinc
iple
s of
Acc
ount
ing
Con
cent
ratio
n A
rea
(BS)
BU
S 12
2 B
usin
ess
Law
1or
For
eign
Lan
guag
e (B
A)
EC
N 1
00 I
ntro
duct
ion
to E
cono
mic
sM
GT
180
Mic
roco
mpu
ter
App
licat
ions
Ele
ctiv
es9
H L
E 1
15 P
erso
nal a
nd C
omm
unity
Hea
lthH
ST 2
33 H
isto
ry o
f th
e A
mer
ican
Civ
il W
arH
ST 2
37 H
isto
ry o
f th
e V
ietn
am W
arM
GT
162
Fin
anci
al P
lann
ing
PHL
127
Thi
nkin
g ab
out R
elig
ion
I'HL
133
Con
tem
pora
ry I
ssue
sPS
Y 2
03 C
hild
Psy
chol
ogy
PSY
207
Hum
an G
row
th a
nd D
evel
opm
ent
SOC
102
Mar
riag
e an
d th
e Fa
mily
Max
imum
tran
sfer
cre
dits
toU
nive
rsity
of
Mar
ylan
dU
nive
rsity
Col
lege
60
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Bus
ines
s F
ile(3
)T
elec
ours
e:T
he B
usin
ess
of M
anag
emen
t (3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Mar
ketin
g(3
)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Prin
cipl
es o
f Acc
ount
ing
1(4
)T
elec
ours
e:B
usin
ess
and
the
Law
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eco
nom
ics
US
A(3
)T
elec
ours
e:C
ompu
ter
Wor
ks, a
udio
cass
ette
s, P
Cso
ftw
are
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Her
e's
to Y
our
Hea
lth(3
)T
elec
ours
e: T
he C
ivil
War
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Vie
tnam
: A T
elev
isio
n H
isto
ry (
3)T
elec
ours
e:P
erso
nal F
inan
ce a
nd M
oney
Man
agem
ent
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Jose
ph C
ampb
ell:
Tra
nsfo
rmat
ions
of
Myt
h T
hrou
gh T
ime
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eth
ics
in A
mer
ica
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Tim
eto
Gro
w (
3)T
elec
ours
e:S
easo
ns o
f Life
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Por
trai
tof
a F
amily
(3)
ui
Roc
hest
er I
nstit
ute
of T
echn
olog
y,B
ache
lor
of S
cien
ceR
oche
ster
, New
Yor
kin
App
lied
Art
s an
d Sc
ienc
e
Stu
dent
s w
ho h
ave
alre
ady
com
plet
ed a
n as
soci
ate'
s de
gree
or
equi
vale
nt c
redi
t may
lake
the
uppe
r-le
vel c
ours
ewor
k re
quire
d fo
r th
is b
ache
lor
of s
cien
cede
gree
thro
ugh
RIT
's C
olle
ge o
f Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion.
RIT
use
s a
varie
ty o
f del
iver
y sy
stem
s to
faci
litat
e in
stru
ctio
n, in
tera
ctio
n, a
nd p
ract
ice.
Pro
fess
ors
can
choo
se to
lect
ure
and
hold
cla
ss d
iscu
ssio
ns v
ia v
ideo
, aud
ioco
nfer
enci
ng, a
ndio
grap
hic
conf
eren
cing
, and
com
pute
r co
nfer
enci
ng (
VA
X N
OT
ES
softw
are)
. E-m
ail (
VA
X M
AIL
sof
twar
e) a
nd o
n-lin
e te
stin
g (C
ET
SR
IT-p
rodu
ced
softz
vare
) al
so a
re u
sed
to s
uppo
rt a
cade
mic
inst
ruct
ion.
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Mat
h/Sc
ienc
e
Hum
aniti
es
Lib
eral
Art
s C
once
ntra
tion
12E
8E
lem
enta
ry S
tatis
tics
Mod
ern
Wea
pons
Tec
hnol
ogy
and
Arm
sC
ontr
ol
Rad
iatio
n Ph
ysic
s
4B
lack
Civ
il R
ight
s
Mod
ern
Am
eric
a
Philo
soph
y of
Sci
ence
2H
uman
Com
mun
icat
ion
Mas
s C
omm
unic
atio
nO
rgan
izat
iona
l Com
mun
icat
ion
Tec
hnic
al W
ritin
g
Tel
ecou
rse:
Aga
inst
All
Odd
s: In
side
Sta
tistic
s,au
dioc
onfe
renc
ing,
com
pute
r so
ftw
are
pack
age
(MIN
ITA
B),
pic
ture
pho
nes,
E-m
ail
(4)
Tel
ecou
rse:
War
and
Pea
ce in
the
Nuc
lear
Age
,R
IT v
ideo
s, c
ompu
ter
conf
eren
cing
, E-m
ail
(4)
in d
evel
opm
ent (
4)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eye
s on
the
Priz
e, c
ompu
ter
conf
eren
cing
incl
udes
dis
cuss
ions
of
stud
ents
' pap
ers,
E-m
ail (
4)T
elec
ours
e: T
he A
mer
ican
Adv
entu
re,
com
pute
rco
nfer
enci
ng, E
-mai
lR
IT v
ideo
tape
s, c
ompu
ter
conf
eren
cing
, E-
mai
l, on
-lin
e te
stin
g (4
)
sele
ctio
ns f
rom
Tel
ecou
rses
:D
oub
lesp
eak,
The
Bus
ines
s of
Man
agem
ent,
Psy
chol
ogy:
The
Stu
dy o
f Hum
an B
ehav
ior,
Pub
lic M
ind,
RIT
vide
otap
es, a
udio
conf
eren
cing
, com
pute
rco
nfer
enci
ng (
4)in
dev
elop
men
t (4)
in d
evel
opm
ent (
4)R
IT v
ideo
tape
s, c
ompu
ter
conf
eren
cing
,au
dioc
onfe
renc
ing
126
(con
tinue
d s)
8
(con
tinue
d)R
oche
ster
Inst
itute
of T
echn
olog
yB
ache
lor
of S
cien
ce in
App
lied
Art
s an
d S
cien
ce
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of In
stru
ctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Libe
ral A
rts
Ele
ctiv
es
Sen
ior
Sem
inar
16A
bnor
mal
Psy
chol
ogy
Gov
ernm
ent a
nd P
oliti
cs o
f Rus
sia
and
the
CIS
Per
suas
ion
Soc
iolo
gy o
f Hea
lth
2S
enio
r S
emin
ar
Tw
o of
the
follo
win
gP
rofe
ssio
nal C
once
ntra
tions
Man
agem
ent C
once
ntra
tion
24M
arke
ting
for
Tot
al C
usto
mer
Sat
isfa
ctio
n
The
orie
s an
d A
pplic
atio
n of
Bas
ic F
inan
cial
Con
cept
sIn
trod
uctio
n to
Wor
k O
rgan
izat
ions
Too
ls f
or T
otal
Qua
lity
Man
agem
ent
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Wor
ld o
f Abn
orm
al P
sych
olog
y,R
IT c
ompu
ter-
base
d in
stru
ctio
nal m
odul
es,
com
pute
r co
nfer
enci
ng, E
-mai
l (4)
in d
evel
opm
ent (
4)
RIT
vid
eota
pes
whi
ch s
how
on-
cam
pus
clas
sroo
m s
emin
ars,
stu
dent
s' v
ideo
tape
s,co
mpu
ter
conf
eren
cing
, aud
ioco
nfer
enci
ng,
E-m
ail (
4)T
elec
ours
e: H
ere'
s to
You
r H
ealth
, aud
io-
conf
eren
cing
, com
pute
r co
nfer
enci
ng, E
-m
ail,
on-li
ne te
stin
g (4
)
curr
icul
um c
hang
es e
ach
time
it is
offe
red
prev
ious
ly u
sed
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Con
stitu
tion:
Tha
t Del
icat
e B
alan
ce, f
utur
e co
urse
inde
velo
pmen
t (2)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Mar
ketin
g, c
ompu
ter
conf
eren
cing
,E
-mai
l, au
dioc
onfe
renc
ing
(4)
in d
evel
opm
ent (
4)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Bus
ines
s F
ile, R
IT v
ideo
tape
s,au
dioc
onfe
renc
ing,
com
pute
r co
nfer
enci
ng,
fax
mac
hine
s, E
-mai
l (4)
in d
evel
opm
ent (
4)
(con
tinue
d
0
(con
tinue
d)R
oche
ster
Ins
titut
e of
Tec
hnol
ogy
Bac
helo
r of
Sci
ence
in A
pplie
d A
rts
and
Scie
nce
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Tel
ecom
mun
icat
ions
Con
cent
ratio
n
App
lied
Com
putin
gC
once
ntra
tion
Man
agem
ent C
once
pts
The
Rol
e of
Acc
ount
ing
in th
e O
rgan
izat
ion
24D
ata
Com
mun
icat
ion
Tec
hnol
ogie
sIn
trod
uctio
n to
Tel
ecom
mun
icat
ions
Pol
icy
and
Issu
esN
etw
ork
Man
agem
ent
Switc
hing
Tec
hnol
ogie
sT
elec
omm
unic
atio
n Fu
ndam
enta
ls
Voi
ce C
omm
unic
atio
n Pr
inci
ples
and
Tec
hnol
ogy
24A
pplie
d D
atab
ase
Man
agem
ent
Com
pute
r C
once
pts
and
Soft
war
eSy
stem
sD
ata
Com
mun
icat
ions
and
Com
pute
rN
etw
orks
Dat
a C
omm
unic
atio
n T
echn
olog
y
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Bus
ines
s of
Man
agem
ent,
audi
o-co
nfer
enci
ng (
optio
nal)
, com
pute
rco
nfer
enci
ng, E
-mai
l (4)
in d
evel
opm
ent (
4)
in d
evel
opm
ent (
4)in
dev
elop
men
t (4)
in d
evel
opm
ent (
4)in
dev
elop
men
t (4)
RIT
vid
eota
pes,
aud
ioco
nfer
enci
ng, c
ompu
ter
conf
eren
cing
, tel
ewri
ter
conf
eren
cing
,in
depe
nden
t lab
wor
k (4
)R
IT v
ideo
tape
s w
hich
incl
ude
equi
pmen
tde
mon
stra
tions
, lec
ture
s, to
urs,
aud
io-
conf
eren
cing
, on-
tine
labs
with
RIT
'ste
leco
mm
unic
atio
ns te
st e
quip
men
t,co
mpu
ter
conf
eren
cing
, E-m
ail (
4)
RIT
vid
eota
pes
with
som
e tu
tori
al f
orm
at,
rela
tiona
l dat
abas
e sy
stem
pac
kage
of
stud
ent's
cho
ice,
com
pute
r co
nfer
enci
ng, o
n-lin
e te
stin
g (4
)R
IT v
ideo
tape
s, a
udio
conf
eren
cing
, com
pute
rco
nfer
enci
ng, E
-mai
l (4)
RIT
vid
eota
pes
with
lect
ure,
on-
site
tour
san
d de
mon
stra
tions
, aud
ioco
nfer
enci
ng,
com
pute
r co
nfer
enci
ng (
4)in
dev
elop
men
t (4)
12E
1:31
,(c
ontin
ued
a)
131
(con
tinue
d)R
oche
ster
Inst
itute
of T
echn
olog
yB
ache
lor
of S
cien
ce in
App
lied
Art
s an
d S
cien
ce
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Hea
lth S
yste
ms
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Con
cent
ratio
n
Intr
oduc
tion
to P
rogr
amm
ing
Prog
ram
min
g D
esig
n an
d V
alid
atio
n
24H
ealth
Sys
tem
s A
dmin
istr
atio
n
Surv
ey o
f H
ealth
Car
e Sy
stem
s
1-le
alth
Car
e E
cono
mic
s an
d Fi
nanc
e
Hea
lth C
are
Qua
lity
Ass
uran
ce
Leg
al A
spec
ts o
f H
ealth
Car
eA
dmin
istr
atio
nH
ealth
Pla
nnin
g an
d Pr
ogra
mD
evel
opm
ent
Tot
al90
RIT
vid
eota
pes,
RIT
VA
X/V
MS
syst
em in
subm
ittin
g pr
ogra
ms,
aud
ioco
nfer
enci
ng(o
ptio
nal)
, com
pute
r co
nfer
enci
ng, E
-mai
l(4
)R
IT v
ideo
tape
s, R
IT tu
tori
al (
PASC
AL
),au
dioc
onfe
renc
ing,
LA
BSE
ND
, com
pute
rco
nfer
enci
ng, E
-mai
l (4)
RIT
vid
eota
pes,
aud
ioce
nfer
enre
s w
ith g
uest
lect
urer
s, c
ompu
ter
conf
eren
cing
, E-m
ail (
4)R
IT v
ideo
s w
ith s
ome
on-s
ight
inte
rvie
ws,
com
pute
r-ba
sed
tuto
rial
, com
pute
rco
nfer
enci
ng, E
-mai
l (4)
R1T
vid
eota
pes,
com
pute
r co
nfer
enci
ng,
audi
ocon
fere
ncin
g, E
-mai
l (4)
R7
vide
otap
es, c
ompu
ter
conf
eren
cing
,au
dioc
onfe
renc
ing,
E-m
ail (
4)in
dev
elop
men
t (4)
RIT
vid
eota
pes,
com
pute
r co
nfer
enci
ng,
audi
ocon
fere
ncin
g,(4
)
Uni
vers
ity o
f M
aine
at A
ugus
ta,
Ass
ocia
te o
f A
rts
Aug
usta
, Mai
nein
Soc
ial S
ervi
ces
The
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mai
ne a
t Aug
usta
offe
rs li
ve c
ours
es, d
eliv
ered
via
one
-way
vid
eo, t
wo-
way
aud
io IT
V s
yste
m, t
om
ore
than
80
off-
cam
pus
loca
tions
acr
oss
Mai
ne. T
hese
cou
rses
, bro
adca
st fr
ont e
ach
of th
e se
ven
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mai
ne S
yste
m c
ampu
ses,
are
des
igne
d by
the
facu
lty fo
r ef
fect
ive
deliv
ery
ata
dist
ance
usin
g in
tera
ctiv
e te
levi
sion
and
oth
er in
form
atio
n te
chno
logi
es fo
r m
axim
um s
tude
nt/fa
culty
inte
ract
ion.
In a
dditi
on to
the
Ass
ocia
te o
f Art
s in
Soc
ial
Ser
vice
s de
gree
list
ed b
elow
, UM
A o
ffers
thre
e ot
her
degr
ees
at a
dis
tanc
e: A
ssoc
iate
of S
cien
ce in
Gen
eral
Stu
dies
, Ass
ocia
te o
f Art
s in
Lib
eral
Art
s, a
ndA
ssoc
iate
of S
cien
ce in
Bus
ines
s A
dmin
istr
atio
n.
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Eng
lish
& C
omm
unic
atio
n6
EN
G 1
01 C
olle
ge W
ritin
g
Sl'E
101
Pub
lic S
peak
ing
I lu
nwni
ties
Mat
hem
atic
s
Lab
orat
ory
Scie
nce
Soci
al S
cien
ces
Soci
al S
ervi
ces
1,3'
3M
US
123
Und
erst
andi
ng M
usic
3M
AT
112
Col
lege
Alg
ebra
4B
lO 1
05A
Hum
an B
iolo
gy a
nd L
ab
PSY
100
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Psy
chol
ogy
PSY
123
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Com
mun
ity M
enta
lH
ealth
Car
ePS
Y 2
32 C
risi
s Id
entif
icat
ion
and
inte
rven
tion
PSY
308
Dev
elop
men
tal P
sych
olog
yPS
Y 3
30 I
nter
view
ing
and
Cou
nsel
ing
SOC
101
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Soc
iolo
gySO
C 1
02 S
ocia
l Pro
blem
sSO
C 3
05 G
roup
Pro
cess
es12
SOS
101
Intr
oduc
tion
to S
ocia
l Ser
vice
Syst
ems
SOS
210
Car
eer
Exp
erie
nce
in S
ocia
l and
Reh
abili
tativ
e Se
rvic
es
ITV
sys
tem
, com
pute
r so
ftw
are,
inst
ruct
orvi
sits
som
e re
mot
e si
tes,
E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
ITV
sys
tem
, vid
eota
pes
of s
tude
ntpe
rfor
man
ces,
E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
ITV
sys
tem
, abi
lity
to li
nk u
p w
ith c
once
rt,
oper
a an
d ba
llet p
erfo
rman
ces
inde
velo
pmen
t, E
-mai
l, fa
x (3
)
ITV
sys
tem
, com
pute
r la
bs, E
-mai
l, fa
x (3
)
ITV
sys
tem
, vid
eo m
ater
ials
for
stu
dent
s to
com
plet
e la
bs a
t hom
e, E
-mai
l, fa
x (4
)
ITV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
ITV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
ITV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
ITV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
ITV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
ITV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
ITV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
ITV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
[TV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
ITV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax
(4)
1 3
(con
tinue
d et
13
(con
tinue
d)U
nive
rsity
of
Mai
ne a
t Aug
usta
Ass
ocia
te o
f A
rts
in S
ocia
l Ser
vice
s
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Ele
ctiv
es
SOS
212
Cas
e M
anag
emen
tSO
S 21
5 In
trod
uctio
n to
The
rape
utic
Act
iviti
es
7-10
AR
T 1
07 T
he E
xper
ienc
e of
the
Art
s
EC
O 1
01 P
rinc
iple
s of
Eco
nom
ics
1E
NG
102
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Lite
ratu
reH
IS 4
14 L
aw a
nd A
mer
ican
Soc
iety
PSY
400
Abn
orm
al P
sych
olog
y
Add
ition
al e
lect
ives
in d
evel
opm
ent
Tot
al62
ITV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
ITV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax
(3)
ITV
sys
tem
, com
pute
r co
nfer
enci
ng, E
-mai
l,fa
x (3
)IT
V s
yste
m, E
-mai
l, fa
x (3
)
ITV
sys
tem
, E-m
ail,
fax,
mul
timed
iapr
esen
tatio
ns b
y M
acro
Min
d M
edia
Mak
er o
rD
irec
tor,
com
pute
r co
nfer
enci
ng (
3)IT
V s
yste
m, E
-mai
l, fa
x (3
)
Y. U
Way
ne C
ount
y C
omm
unity
Col
lege
Det
roit,
Mic
higa
nA
ssoc
iate
of
Art
s
Thi
s te
leco
urse
-ba
sed
curr
icul
um p
rovi
des
a st
rong
libe
ral a
rts
back
grou
nd w
ith a
n op
port
unity
to u
tiliz
e el
ectiv
e cr
edits
for
bus
ines
s-re
late
d co
urse
wor
k.T
he r
equi
red
cour
ses
faci
litat
e tr
ansf
er to
a f
our-
year
inst
itutio
n.
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
es
Eng
lish
Mat
hem
atic
s/Sc
ienc
e
Hum
aniti
es
Am
eric
an G
over
nmen
t
Soci
al S
cien
ce
Mod
e of
Ins
truc
tion
(cou
rse
cred
it)
6E
NG
110
Eng
lish
EN
G 1
20 E
nglis
h II
8G
EL
210
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Geo
logy
MA
T 1
10 B
usin
ess
Mat
hem
atic
sM
AT
155
Col
lege
Alg
ebra
9E
NG
231
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Poe
try
HU
M 1
03 A
rt o
f H
uman
ities
and
one
of th
e fo
llow
ing:
HIS
151
Wor
ld C
ivili
zatio
n I
HIS
152
Wor
ld C
ivili
zatio
n
HIS
249
U.S
. His
tory
IH
IS 2
50 U
.S. H
isto
ry I
I
3PS
101
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Pol
itica
l Sci
ence
or b
oth
HIS
249
U.S
. His
tory
Ian
dH
IS 2
50 U
.S. H
isto
ry 1
1
9A
NT
154
Cul
tura
l Ant
hrop
olog
yE
CO
101
Eco
nom
ics
IE
CO
102
Eco
nom
ics
II
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Wri
te C
ours
e (3
)T
elec
ours
e: R
ead,
Wri
te, R
esea
rch:
Wri
ting
the
Res
earc
h Pa
per
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Ear
th R
evea
led:
Int
rodu
ctor
y G
eolo
gy
Tel
ecou
rse:
By
the
Num
bers
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Col
lege
Alg
ebra
: In
Sim
ples
t Ter
ms
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Voi
ces
and
Vis
ions
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Hum
aniti
es T
hrou
gh th
e A
rts
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Wor
ld: A
Tel
evis
ion
His
tory
1(3
)T
elec
ours
e: T
he W
orld
: A T
elev
isio
n H
isto
ry I
I(3
)T
elec
ours
e: 7
7w A
mer
ican
Adv
entu
re (
3)T
elec
ours
e: A
mer
ica:
The
Sec
ond
Cen
tury
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Gov
ernm
ent b
y C
onse
nt (
3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Am
eric
an A
dven
ture
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Am
eric
a: T
he S
econ
d C
entu
ry (
3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Fac
es o
f C
ultu
re (
3)T
elec
ours
e: E
cono
mic
s L
IM I
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Eco
nom
ics
U$A
ll (
3)
(con
tinue
d a)
1 .3
71
3
1
(con
tinue
d)W
ayne
Cou
nty
Com
mun
ity C
olle
geA
ssoc
iate
of
Art
s
Deg
ree
Req
uire
men
tsC
redi
tsC
ours
esM
ode
of I
nstr
uctio
n (c
ours
e cr
edit)
Ele
ctiv
es
Tot
al
* pe
ndin
g ap
prov
al
HIS
151
Wor
ld C
ivili
zatio
n I
HIS
152
Wor
ld C
ivili
zatio
n 11
HIS
249
U.S
. His
tory
IFI
TS
250
U S
. His
tory
II
PSY
101
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Psy
chol
ogy
SOC
100
Soc
iolo
gy
25B
L 2
01 B
usin
ess
Law
IB
US
112
Pers
onal
Mon
ey M
anag
emen
t
60
BU
S 15
0 In
trod
uctio
n to
Bus
ines
sB
US
225
Com
pute
r A
pplic
atio
ns in
Bus
ines
s
CIS
110
Int
rodu
ctio
n to
Dat
a Pr
oces
sing
MG
T 2
05 M
anag
emen
t Pri
ncip
les
MK
T 2
00 P
rinc
iple
s of
Mar
ketin
gPH
L 1
01 C
ompa
rativ
e R
elig
ions
IPH
L 1
02 C
ompa
rativ
e R
elig
ions
II
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Wor
ld: A
Tel
evis
ion
His
tory
I(3
)T
elec
ours
e: T
he W
orld
: A T
elev
isio
n H
isto
ry I
I(3
)T
elec
ours
e: T
he A
mer
ican
Adv
entu
re (
3)T
elec
ours
e: A
mer
ica:
The
Sec
ond
Cen
tury
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Psy
chol
ogy:
Tir
e St
udy
of H
uman
Beh
avio
r (3
)T
elec
ours
e: T
he S
ocio
logi
cal I
mag
inah
on (
3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Bus
ines
s an
d th
e L
aw (
3)T
elec
ours
e: P
erso
nal F
inan
ce a
nd M
oney
Man
agem
ent (
3)T
elec
ours
e: T
he B
usin
ess
File
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Com
pute
rWor
ks, a
udio
cass
ette
s, P
Cso
ftw
are
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
New
Lite
racy
(4)
Tel
ecou
rse:
The
Bus
ines
s of
Man
agem
ent (
3)T
elec
ours
e: M
arke
ting
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Bel
iefs
and
Bel
ieve
rs 1
(3)
Tel
ecou
rse:
Bel
iefs
and
Bel
ieve
rs 1
1 (3
)
Directory of distance learning courseware
Introduction
Using the database
Database
Arts and HumanitiesBusiness and ManagementCareersCommunications andCompositionComputer ScienceEducationEngineering
Directory of Producers
Directory of Distributors
141
Part 9.
Foreign LanguagesGovernment/PoliticalScience/Area StudiesHealthHistoryMathematicsPhysical SciencesSocial Sciences
H3
-Ur
V Introduction
This section shows the range of preproduced distance learning courseware that isavailable to colleges. It includes more than 150 currently available courses, the largemajority of which are video-based. To develop this database, we began with twodocuments: The 1992-1993 PBS Adult Learning Service Catalog and the 1988 TelecourseInventory published by the Annenberg/CPB Project. All entries were sent todistributors and producers to verify data and to elicit information on new coursewareand courseware in the pipeline.
Listings in this database share certain characteristics:
each is available to colleges nationwide
each constitutes an undergraduate course for credit
each has at least eight units of instruction, although these are notalways video-based or audio-based (individual units within media-based courses may be print-based)
most include at least a textbook and a faculty guide (exceptionsare noted)
they were produced in 1980 or later
These courses represent a very wide range of production styles and courseapproaches. Colleges are strongly urged to preview and evaluate all courses priorto adoption. The railability and cost of specific rights for specific uses must bechecked with the distributor and/or the producer.
V Using the database
While the database is not meant to provide all possible information on every course,each entry should give you an overview and help determine if you want to obtainadditional information.
Courses have been grouped into the following categories to facilitate the process ofmatching courseware with degree requirements:
Arts and HumanitiesBusiness and ManagementCareersCommunications andCompositionComputer Science
EducationEngineeringForeign LanguagesGovernment /PoliticalScience/Area StudiesHealth
HistoryMathematicsPhysical SciencesSocial Sciences
114
140
Database Key
Course The official name of the course. The information in parentheses underthe course title indicates the broad discipline within which the coursecontent falls.
Med Medium: V = video; A = audio; VD = videodisc
#/RT Number of programs/running time of each program
Description A brief description of the course approach and content. The date inbrackets at the end of the description, e.g., 119881, is the year inwhich the course was first produced. If the course has undergone arevision since its original release, both the original production yearand the revision year are given.
Producer The course producer. A list of producers' names and addressesappears at the end of the database.
Distributor The organization to contact about licensing or purchasing. In general,when more than one distributor is listed, the first °ionizationlicenses the course for credit use, and the second distributes cassettesfor audiovisual use. A list of distributors' names and addresses is atthe end of this section.
TX
FG
SG
Text
Faculty Guide
Student Guide
1151 4 aJ
rn
uJ
Art
s an
d H
uman
ities
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Age
of
Enl
ight
enm
ent,
The
(hum
aniti
es)
Am
eric
an C
inem
aPr
ojec
t*(f
ilm)
Art
of
Bei
ng H
uman
(hum
aniti
es)
Art
of
the
Wes
tern
Wor
ld*
(art
his
tory
)
7/:2
8E
xplo
res
the
cultu
re o
f th
e "A
ge o
f R
easo
n" a
t its
hei
ght;
stud
ies
maj
or te
xts
IUC
and
cert
ain
lead
ing
figu
res;
incl
udes
phi
loso
phy,
his
tory
, sci
ence
, mus
ic, a
ndar
t. 11
9841
131:
60E
xam
ines
cen
tral
con
cept
s an
d th
emes
in A
mer
ican
film
mak
ing
duri
ng th
epa
st 6
0 ye
ars
of th
e so
und
era;
pre
sent
s an
d an
alyz
es im
port
ant w
orks
of
film
art
and
film
's im
pact
. [av
aila
ble
1994
1
30/3
0In
trod
ucto
ry h
uman
ities
cou
rse
arra
nged
them
atic
ally
rat
her
than
chro
nolo
gica
lly. T
hem
es in
clud
e ar
t, m
usic
, phi
loso
phy,
dra
ma,
lite
ratu
re,
and
relig
ion.
119
821
NY
Cen
ter
for
Vis
ual
His
tory
M-D
CC
91:6
0In
trod
uces
Wes
tern
art
fro
m a
ncie
nt G
reec
e to
pre
sent
day
usi
ng th
eW
NE
Tba
ckdr
op o
f its
tim
e; c
over
s ar
t tha
t has
com
e to
def
ine
the
Wes
tern
vis
ual
trad
ition
, 119
891
Bas
ic C
once
pts
of M
usic
* A
(mus
ic)
Bel
iefs
and
Bel
ieve
rs(r
elig
ion)
12/:3
0In
trod
ucto
ry m
usic
sur
vey
cour
se. C
over
s su
ch b
asic
topi
cs a
s rh
ythm
,m
elod
y, f
orm
, and
sty
le; a
lso
expl
ores
mus
ical
text
ure,
mea
ning
in m
usic
,R
adio
and
mus
ic's
rel
atio
nshi
p to
oth
er a
rts.
119
911
241:
59In
trod
uces
the
maj
or w
orld
rel
igio
ns a
s th
ey a
rc p
ract
iced
in th
e U
.S.,
as w
ell
Gov
erno
rsas
sys
tem
s de
emed
out
side
the
scop
e of
mai
nstr
eam
rel
igio
us in
stitu
tions
.St
ate
Uni
v.11
9911
IUC
PBS,
A/C
PB
M-D
CC
PBS,
A/C
PB
Wis
c. P
ublic
The
Aud
io S
tore
Chi
nese
Bru
sh P
aint
ing
V
(art
)
Eth
ics
in A
mer
ica*
(eth
ics)
14;
20/:3
0D
emon
stra
tes
the
styl
e an
d te
chni
que
of tr
aditi
onal
Chi
nese
bru
sh p
aint
ing;
CC
U)
teac
hes
desi
gn, c
ompo
sitio
n, b
rush
wor
k te
chni
que,
ink
and
colo
r us
e, a
ndm
ater
ials
sel
ectio
n. (
No
TX
) 11
9871
10/:6
0A
31:6
0
Part
of
The
Ann
enbe
rg/C
PB C
olle
ctio
n
Use
s a
case
stu
dy a
ppro
ach
to e
xam
ine
cont
empo
rary
per
sona
l and
prof
essi
onal
eth
ical
con
flic
ts. P
rovi
des
a gr
ound
ing
in th
e la
ngua
ge, c
once
pts,
and
trad
ition
s of
eth
ics.
119
881
PBS,
Gov
erno
rsSt
ate
Uni
v.
Coa
st T
elec
ours
es
Col
umbi
aPB
S, A
/CPB
Uni
v. M
edia
and
Soci
ety
Sem
inar
s
1 ft
F.)
(con
tinue
d S)
ME
MA
rts
and
Hum
aes
Cou
rse
Med
NA
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Focu
s on
Wat
erco
lor
V
(art
)
Intr
oduc
tion
to M
odem
AE
nglis
h an
d A
mer
ican
Lite
ratu
re I
: The
Nin
etee
nth
Cen
tury
*(l
itera
ture
)
Intr
oduc
tion
to M
odem
AE
nglis
h an
d A
mer
ican
Lite
ratu
re I
I: T
he 2
0th
Cen
tury
*(li
tera
ture
)
Jose
ph C
ampb
ell:
Tra
nsfo
rmat
ions
of
Myt
hT
hrou
gh T
ime
(hum
aniti
es)
Lite
rary
Vis
ions
*(li
tera
ture
)
Lite
ratu
re o
f the
Am
eric
as(li
tera
ture
)
Mus
ic T
heor
y(m
usic
)
131:
30E
xplo
res
thre
e m
ajor
ele
men
ts o
f wat
erco
lor
art t
hat s
houl
d be
bal
ance
d:C
CC
Dpe
rson
al e
xpre
ssio
n, a
rt c
once
pts,
and
tech
niqu
es; p
rese
nts
both
the
tech
niqu
es a
nd th
e cr
eativ
e di
men
sion
s. 1
1987
1
Coa
st T
elec
ours
es
121:
30In
trod
ucto
ry a
udio
-prin
t cou
rse.
Pre
sent
s w
orks
from
Eng
lish
Rom
antic
ism
,W
isc.
Pub
licT
he A
udio
Sto
reth
e A
mer
ican
Ren
aiss
ance
, and
Vic
toria
n E
ngla
nd. 1
1987
1R
adio
12/:3
0in
trod
ucto
ry a
udio
-prin
t cou
rse.
Exp
lore
s w
orks
from
lite
rary
mod
erni
smW
isc.
Pub
licT
he A
udio
Sto
rean
d co
ntem
pora
ry w
riter
s fr
om W
orld
War
II to
the
pres
ent.
1198
81R
adio
V14
1:60
Pre
sent
s m
ytho
logy
's r
ole
in h
uman
his
tory
; inc
lude
s m
yths
/ph
iloso
phie
s/re
ligio
ns fr
om A
mer
ican
Indi
ans,
the
Neo
lithi
c P
erio
d, E
gypt
,th
e E
ast,
Anc
ient
Gre
ece,
and
Art
huria
n le
gend
s. 1
1989
1
V V
26/:3
0In
trod
ucto
ry li
tera
ture
cou
rse
that
inco
rpor
ates
con
tem
pora
ryan
dtr
aditi
onal
wor
ks o
f sho
rt fi
ctio
n, p
oetr
y, a
nd d
ram
a; e
xam
ines
lite
rary
ele
men
tsin
clud
ing
char
acte
r, p
lot,
and
sym
bolis
m. 1
1992
1
Myt
holo
gyP
135,
Film
s In
c.Lt
d.
MP
T &
PB
S, A
/CP
B,
INT
ELE
CO
M IN
TE
LEC
OM
61:2
9C
ompa
res
Spa
nish
-Am
eric
an, A
fric
an-A
mer
ican
, and
Fre
nch
and
Eng
lish-
IUC
Can
adia
n fic
tion;
ana
lyze
s th
e in
terp
lay
betw
een
wor
ks o
f lite
ratu
re a
nd th
eso
ciet
ies
from
whi
ch th
ey e
mer
ge. 1
1987
1
V13
1:30
Pre
sent
s th
e ba
sic
elem
ents
of m
usic
incl
udin
g sc
ales
, int
erva
ls, c
hord
s,no
tatio
n, a
nd r
hyth
m; a
ssum
es s
ome
know
ledg
e of
pos
ition
ing
and
nam
ing
note
s. 1
1986
1
IUC
Hum
ber
Mag
ic L
ante
rnC
oll.
ofA
pplie
d A
rts
and
Tec
h.
Par
t of T
he A
nnen
berg
/CP
B C
olle
ctio
n(c
om`ii
nto/
1r.
1r.
Art
s an
d H
uman
ities
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Pho
togr
aphi
c V
isio
n: A
llV
Abo
ut P
hoto
grap
hy, T
he(p
hoto
grap
hy)
Ple
ase
Sta
nd B
y: A
AH
isto
ry o
f Rad
io(h
uman
ities
)
Rel
igio
us Q
uest
/The
VLo
ng S
earc
h, T
he(r
elig
ion)
Sci
ence
and
Cul
ture
inV
the
Wes
tern
Tra
ditio
n(h
uman
ities
)
Sha
kesp
eare
: Pow
er a
ndJu
stic
e(li
tera
ture
)
V A
Six
Cen
turie
s of
Ver
seV
(poe
try)
Ske
tchi
ng T
echn
ique
sV
(art
)
Tra
vele
rs A
cros
s T
ime:
VP
eopl
es a
nd C
ultu
res
ofth
e M
iddl
e E
ast
(rel
igio
n)
14 el,
20/:3
0
30/:3
0
10/:5
5
301:
30
51:5
06/
.22
16[2
6
3(1/
:30
14/3
0
* P
art o
f The
Ann
enbe
rg/C
PB
Col
lect
ion
Pre
sent
s te
chni
cal p
rinci
ples
, che
mic
al r
eact
ions
, cam
era
mec
hani
cs,
CC
CD
equi
pmen
t, an
d qu
ality
tech
niqu
es o
f pho
togr
aphy
; inc
lude
s th
e hi
stor
y an
dim
pact
of p
hoto
grap
hy. 1
1984
1
Stu
dies
the
hist
ory
of r
adio
bro
adca
stin
g in
Am
eric
a, it
s im
pact
, and
prog
ram
mat
ic d
iver
sity
; sur
veys
bus
ines
s, g
over
nmen
t, so
ciet
al, a
nd a
rtis
ticpr
eble
ms
in b
road
cast
ing.
119
861
Coa
st T
elec
ours
es
INT
ELE
CO
M IN
TE
LEC
OM
Intr
oduc
es w
orld
rel
igio
ns; e
mph
asiz
es s
peci
fic fo
rms
of r
elig
ious
exp
ress
ion
IUC
and
prac
tice
rath
er th
an m
ore
abst
ract
or
theo
logi
cal a
spec
ts; c
over
str
aditi
onal
rel
igio
ns a
nd a
ltern
ativ
es. 1
1983
1
Pre
sent
s th
e hi
stor
y of
the
Wes
tern
wor
ld fr
om a
ncie
nt G
reec
e to
the
pres
ent
CC
CD
in te
rms
of th
e in
terp
lay
betw
een
scie
ntifi
c di
scov
erie
s an
d cu
ltura
lde
velo
pmen
ts. 1
1987
1
Stu
dies
eig
ht o
f Sha
kesp
eare
's m
aste
rpie
ces;
sho
ws
how
the
play
s ar
e lin
ked
by c
omm
on th
emes
; inc
lude
s ba
ckgr
ound
on
com
edy,
trag
edy,
and
Eng
lish
dram
a be
fore
Sha
kesp
eare
. 119
901
Ope
nLe
arni
ngA
genc
y, B
.C.
Dem
onst
rate
s th
e va
riety
, ent
erta
inm
ent v
alue
, and
em
otio
nal i
mpa
ct o
fT
ham
espo
etry
from
the
14th
cen
tury
to p
rese
nt d
ay; i
nclu
des
Cha
ucer
, Sha
kesp
eare
,T
elev
isio
nM
ilton
, the
Rom
antic
s, a
nd th
e R
ealis
ts. 1
1984
1
Rev
iew
s th
e ba
sics
of s
ketc
hing
; foc
uses
on
inco
rpor
atin
g co
mpl
exity
, var
iety
, KO
CE
and
inte
rest
to th
e ar
t. (N
o F
G)
1198
41C
CC
D
Rec
ords
the
peop
les,
cul
ture
s, c
ivili
zatio
ns, k
ingd
oms
and
empi
res
that
hav
eU
. of S
outh
had
an im
pact
on
the
Mid
dle
Eas
t: in
clud
es s
ects
and
rel
igio
ns, s
oldi
ers
and
Flo
rida
philo
soph
ers,
kin
gs a
nd p
easa
nts.
(N
o R
D 1
1989
1
LUC
Coa
st T
elec
ours
es
!VC
Mag
ic L
ante
rn
Coa
st T
elec
ours
es
ITS
1t
( (0
111(
1111
O1
S)
Art
s an
d H
uman
ities
Cou
rse
Med
it/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Voi
ces
and
Vis
ions
V13
1:60
Sur
veys
mod
ern
Am
eric
an p
oetr
y; e
xplo
res
the
lives
and
wor
ks o
f 13
New
Yor
kP
BS
, A/C
PB
(poe
try)
Am
eric
an p
oets
from
Rob
ert F
rost
to S
ylvi
a ?l
ath;
doc
umen
ts c
aree
rs;
anal
yzes
key
wor
ks. 1
1987
1C
ente
r fo
rV
isua
lH
isto
ry
Wes
tern
Tra
ditio
n, T
he(h
uman
ities
)V
521:
30W
eave
s to
geth
er h
isto
ry, a
rt, l
itera
ture
, rel
igio
n, g
eogr
aphy
, gov
ernm
ent,
and
econ
omic
s fr
om p
re-W
este
rn c
ivili
zatio
n th
roug
h th
e R
enai
ssan
ce a
nd th
eW
GB
IP
BS
, A/C
PI3
War
s of
Rel
igio
n to
the
pres
ent.
1198
81
Whi
le S
oldi
ers
Foug
ht:
War
and
Am
eric
anSo
ciet
y(h
uman
ities
)
V16
/:28
Exp
lore
s ho
w a
nd w
hy A
mer
ica
has
gone
to w
ar; e
xam
ines
war
's im
pact
durin
g co
mba
t and
pea
cetim
e; s
tudi
es c
ultu
ral a
nd s
ocia
l con
text
of w
arth
roug
h hi
stor
y an
d lit
erat
ure.
119
861
IUC
IUC
150
151 (c
ntin
ued
is
Bus
ines
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Acc
ount
ing
Prin
cipl
esV
65/:1
5In
trod
ucto
ry a
ccou
ntin
g co
urse
. Tea
ches
bas
ic "
bow
s" a
nd "
why
s" o
fK
irkw
ood
Kir
kwoo
d C
omm
.(a
ccou
ntin
g)ac
coun
ting
prin
cipl
es. 1
1987
; Rev
. 199
11C
omm
. Col
l.C
oll.
Am
eric
an E
ntre
pren
eur
V14
1:30
Focu
ses
on th
e en
trep
rene
urth
e ne
w A
mer
ican
her
o. S
ix o
f th
e U
nite
dG
PNPB
S, G
PNT
oday
, The
Stat
es' m
ost s
ucce
ssfu
l ent
repr
eneu
rs d
iscu
ss th
e fa
ctor
s th
at le
d to
thei
r(b
usin
ess)
busi
ness
suc
cess
. 119
911
Bus
ines
s an
d th
e L
awV
301:
30In
trod
ucto
ry la
w c
ours
e. E
mph
asiz
es c
ontr
acts
and
the
lega
l sys
tem
; giv
esIN
TE
LE
CO
M P
BS,
IN
TE
LE
CO
M(l
aw)
com
preh
ensi
ve o
verv
iew
of
law
and
the
wor
ld o
f bu
sine
ss. 1
1989
1
Bus
ines
s Fi
le, T
heV
281:
30In
trod
ucto
ry b
usin
ess
cour
se. P
rovi
des
com
preh
ensi
ve v
iew
of
the
DC
CC
DPB
S, D
alla
s(b
usin
ess)
cont
empo
rary
bus
ines
s en
viro
nmen
t, fr
om in
tern
al f
unct
ions
to th
eT
elec
ours
esch
alle
nges
of
cond
uctin
g in
tern
atio
nal b
usin
ess.
119
851
Bus
ines
s L
ogis
tics
and
V30
1:30
Use
s an
inte
grat
ed s
yste
ms
appr
oach
to in
trod
uce
the
func
tion
and
PSU
ITS
N M
anag
emen
tm
anag
emen
t of
busi
ness
logi
stic
s in
com
pani
es. (
No
FG)
c (b
usin
ess)
1198
1; R
ev. 1
9871
Bus
ines
s of
V26
/:30
Intr
oduc
tory
cou
rse
on th
e co
ncep
t of
man
agem
ent a
nd b
usin
ess.
Des
crib
esIN
TE
LE
CO
M P
BS,
IN
TE
LE
CO
MM
anag
emen
t, T
hees
sent
ial m
anag
eria
l ski
lls a
nd h
ow to
app
ly th
em. 1
1983
; Rev
. 198
61(m
anag
emen
t)
By
the
Num
bers
V26
/:30
Subt
itled
"Pr
actic
al A
pplic
atio
ns o
f B
usin
ess
Mat
hem
atic
s."
Cov
ers
the
mat
hIN
TE
LE
CO
M P
BS,
IN
TE
LE
CO
M(b
usin
ess
mat
h)st
uden
ts w
ill e
ncou
nter
in th
eir
prof
essi
onal
and
per
sona
l liv
es. 1
1990
1
Eco
nom
ics
USA
*V
/A28
1:30
Com
preh
ensi
ve c
ours
e in
mac
ro-
and
mic
roec
onom
ics.
Est
ablis
hes
the
EFC
PBS,
A /C
PB(e
cono
mic
s)re
latio
nshi
p be
twee
n ab
stra
ct e
cono
mic
pri
ncip
les
and
conc
rete
hum
anex
peri
ence
thro
ugh
docu
men
tari
es. 1
1985
; Rev
. 198
9, 1
9921
Eth
ics
in B
usin
ess"
A12
1:30
An
audi
o-pr
int c
ours
e. U
ses
a ca
se s
tudy
app
roac
h to
exa
min
e th
e di
ffer
ence
Wis
c. P
ublic
The
Aud
io S
tore
(phi
loso
phy)
betw
een
lega
l and
mor
al is
sues
in b
usin
ess
from
a p
hilo
soph
ical
per
spec
tive.
Rad
io11
9881
Insi
de B
usin
ess
Tod
ayV
131:
30In
trod
ucto
ry c
ours
e th
at u
ses
case
stu
dies
to d
escr
ibe
the
func
tiona
l are
as in
Wilf
rid
Mag
ic L
ante
rn(b
usin
ms)
toda
y's
busi
ness
wor
ld; i
nclu
des
mar
ketin
g, R
&D
, pro
duct
ion,
fin
ance
, lab
orL
auri
er U
niv.
1r
rela
tions
, and
inte
rnat
iona
l bus
ines
s. 1
1983
1
1,I
* Pa
rt o
f T
he A
nnen
berg
/CPB
Col
lect
ion
(con
tinue
d 6)
Bus
ines
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
Cou
rse
Med
#/11
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Man
agin
g in
Org
aniz
atio
ns(m
anag
emen
t)
Mar
ketin
g(m
arke
ting)
Mar
ketin
g Pe
rspe
ctiv
es(m
arke
ting)
Mon
ey P
uzzl
e: T
heW
orld
of
Mac
roec
onom
ics,
The
(eco
nom
ics)
Mon
ey S
mar
t(f
inan
ce)
Peop
le a
ndO
rgan
izat
ions
(man
agem
ent)
Pers
onal
Fin
ance
and
Mon
ey M
anag
emen
t(f
inan
ce)
Plac
es T
hat B
ecko
n(t
ouri
sm)
8/A
ddre
sses
thre
e vi
ewpo
ints
: the
sys
tem
s ap
proa
ch, t
he b
ehav
iora
l app
roac
h,IU
C:2
0-25
and
the
man
agem
ent p
ract
ice
appr
oach
. [19
881
26/3
0Pr
esen
ts b
asic
pri
ncip
les
of m
arke
ting
as th
ey a
pply
to s
mal
l bus
ines
ses
and
larg
e co
rpor
atio
ns; u
ses
real
wor
ld c
ase
stud
ies.
[19
85; R
ev. F
all 1
9921
26/:3
0E
mph
asiz
es f
unda
men
tals
of
mar
ketin
g an
d pr
ofita
ble
oper
atio
n of
a bu
sine
ss e
nter
pris
e; p
rovi
des
basi
c ye
t tho
roug
h kn
owle
dge
of m
arke
ting.
1197
9; R
ev. 1
981
and
1985
1
CC
CD
MA
TC
IUC
Coa
st T
elec
ours
es
Wis
c. V
TA
E
30/:3
0Fo
llow
s a
wor
king
cou
ple
stru
gglin
g w
ith th
e co
ncep
ts o
f a
mac
roec
onom
icM
-DC
CM
-DC
Csy
stem
incl
udin
g in
flat
ion,
une
mpl
oym
ent,
grow
th, a
nd r
eces
sion
. 119
821
13/:2
5C
over
s th
e te
chni
cal,
fina
ncia
l, an
d ec
onom
ic c
once
pts
of p
erso
nal f
inan
ceSo
ma
Film
Mag
ic L
ante
rnan
d m
oney
man
agem
ent;
prov
ides
pra
ctic
al in
form
atio
n on
ski
lls n
eede
d fo
rPr
od.
pers
onal
fin
anci
al p
lann
ing.
[19
851
8/:2
9E
xam
ines
the
natu
re o
f bu
reau
crac
y; r
aise
s qu
estio
ns a
bout
the
legi
timac
y of
IUC
IUC
orga
niza
tiona
l pow
er; h
ighl
ight
s cl
assi
cal a
nd c
onte
mpo
rary
theo
ry a
ndm
etho
dolo
gy. [
1989
]
26/3
0T
each
es th
e ba
sics
of
budg
etin
g an
d bu
ying
, hom
e ow
ners
hip,
inco
me
tax
INT
EL
EC
OM
PB
S, I
NT
EL
EC
OM
and
inve
stm
ents
, and
insu
ranc
e, w
ills,
and
trus
ts.
1198
2; R
ev. 1
9871
V/ A
131:
30Il
lust
rate
s th
e co
mpo
nent
s of
the
tour
ism
fun
ctio
nal s
yste
m; e
xam
ines
tour
ism
's im
pact
on
plac
es a
nd h
ow it
use
s re
sour
ces.
1198
41
Prin
cipl
es o
f A
ccou
ntin
gV
(acc
ount
ing)
15C
Wilf
rid
Mag
ic L
ante
rnL
auri
er U
niv.
30/:3
0Pr
esen
ts th
e pr
oces
ses
of a
ccou
ntin
g, th
e th
eory
and
pri
ncip
les
of th
ePS
U R
rla
ngua
ge o
f bu
sine
ss, a
nd a
pplie
s ac
coun
ting
prac
tices
to e
very
day
busi
ness
DC
CC
Dac
tiviti
es. (
1984
1
Dal
las
Tel
ecou
rses
155
(con
fini
ted
S)
I
II
Bus
ines
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
Cou
rse
Med
# /R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Prin
cipl
es o
fM
acro
econ
omic
s(e
cono
mic
s)
Prin
cipl
es o
f M
arke
ting
Man
agem
ent
(man
agem
ent)
Sale
s C
onne
ctio
n, T
he(s
ales
)
241:
58In
trod
ucto
ry e
cono
mic
s co
urse
. Pre
sent
s a
desc
ript
ive
and
theo
retic
al m
odel
Gov
erno
rsG
over
nors
Sta
teof
the
U.S
. eco
nom
y; f
ocus
es o
n pr
inci
pal p
olic
ymak
ers
and
thei
rSt
ate
Uni
v.U
niv.
inte
rrel
atio
nshi
ps. (
No
PC)
1199
11
151:
30In
trod
ucto
ry m
arke
ting
man
agem
ent c
ours
e. T
each
es a
mar
ketin
g sy
stem
sIU
C &
PBS,
IU
C, C
oast
appr
oach
to m
arke
t ana
lysi
s fo
cusi
ng o
n se
gmen
tatio
n. C
over
s th
e fo
ur P
sC
CC
DT
elec
ours
espr
oduc
t, pr
ice,
pro
mot
ion,
and
pla
ce. [
1990
] [V
ideo
por
tion
prod
uced
198
5]
26/:3
0Sa
les
expe
rts
disc
uss
how
to id
entif
y sa
les
pros
pect
s an
d de
velo
p an
d1N
TE
LE
CO
M P
BS,
1N
TE
LE
CO
Mm
aint
ain
good
sal
es r
elat
ions
hips
; sho
ws
prof
essi
onal
s pu
tting
theo
ries
and
proc
esse
s to
pra
ctic
al u
se. 1
1992
1
261:
30Pr
esen
ts d
ocum
enta
ries
of
a va
riet
y of
sm
all b
usin
esse
s in
ope
ratio
n; s
how
s1N
TE
LE
CO
M P
BS,
IN
TE
LE
CO
Mfi
rsth
and
wha
t it i
s lik
e to
sta
rt a
nd o
pera
te a
sm
all b
usin
ess.
Exp
erts
ana
lyze
and
asse
ss th
e do
cum
enta
ry f
oota
ge. [
1991
1
Som
ethi
ng V
entu
red:
An
VE
ntre
pren
euri
alrs
aA
ppro
ach
to S
mal
lB
usin
ess
Man
agem
ent
(man
agem
ent)
Star
ting
A B
usin
ess
(bus
ines
s)
The
re's
Mor
e T
oB
usin
ess
(man
agem
ent)
1 5
ti
131:
30Pr
esen
ts th
e se
lf-a
naly
sis,
res
earc
h, f
inan
cial
, and
org
aniz
atio
nal r
equi
rem
ents
Som
a Fi
lmM
agic
Lan
tern
faci
ng th
ose
invo
lved
in b
usin
ess
star
t-up
; inc
lude
s in
terv
iew
s w
ithPr
od.
succ
essf
ul b
usin
ess
peop
le. (
No
TX
) 11
9831
131:
30Su
rvey
s m
anag
emen
t org
aniz
atio
n th
eory
; inc
lude
s th
e fo
ur s
choo
ls o
fW
ilfri
dM
agic
Lan
tern
man
agem
ent t
houg
ht; e
xam
ines
the
rela
tions
hip
betw
een
man
agem
ent a
ndL
auri
er U
niv.
func
tiona
l are
as o
f bu
sine
ss. [
1984
1
(cin
ifin
lied
a)
Car
eers
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Api
cultu
re(b
eeke
epin
g)
Art
of
Bed
side
Car
e: T
heA
BC
's o
f N
ursi
ng(n
ursi
ng)
Invi
tatio
n to
Fly
, An
(avi
atio
n)
Mak
ing
A L
ivin
g W
ork
(cou
nsel
ing)
Voy
age:
Cha
lleng
e an
dC
hang
e in
Car
eer/
Lif
ePl
anni
ng(c
ouns
elin
g)
9/In
trod
uces
bee
s an
d be
ekee
ping
; exa
min
es b
ees'
impo
rtan
ce to
hum
ans,
Sim
on F
rase
r M
agic
Lan
tern
:29-
36co
lony
str
uctu
re, a
nato
my,
man
agem
ent a
nd c
are,
and
pro
cess
ing
and
Uni
v.m
arke
ting
hone
y. (
No
FG, T
X)
1198
41
19/:4
0Pr
esen
ts th
e ra
nge
of g
ener
ally
acc
epte
d pr
actic
es a
nd p
roce
dure
s as
taug
htM
-DC
CM
-DC
CV
Din
nur
sing
pro
gram
s na
tionw
ide;
dem
onst
rate
s ba
sic
nurs
ing
proc
edur
es a
ndin
tera
ctio
ns. [
1992
]
30/:3
0H
elps
stu
dent
s ob
tain
the
know
ledg
e an
d sk
ills
need
ed to
pas
s th
e FA
Aw
ritte
n ex
am f
or a
Pri
vate
Pilo
t Cer
tific
ate,
air
plan
e ca
tego
ry. [
1988
; Rev
.19
921
Col
lege
of
San
Mat
eoSa
n M
ateo
Co.
Com
m. C
oll.
Dis
t.
8/:3
0Fe
atur
es a
dults
who
hav
e su
cces
sful
ly c
hang
ed th
eir
care
er o
r lif
e di
rect
ion;
Ohi
o U
niv.
Ohi
o U
niv.
incl
udes
inte
rvie
ws
with
exp
erts
in th
e fi
eld
on th
e na
ture
of
wor
k an
d th
ead
ult c
aree
r ch
ange
r. (
No
FG)
1198
21
30/:3
0Fo
cuse
s on
the
proc
ess
by w
hich
peo
ple
may
pla
n ef
fect
ive
and
satis
fyin
gre
latio
nshi
ps o
f w
ork
to li
fe; e
xplo
res
area
s of
inte
rest
con
cern
ing
a ch
ange
inca
reer
/life
pla
nnin
g. (
No
FG)
1198
01
Bay
Are
aC
omm
. Col
l.T
V Con
sort
ium
15E
Coa
st T
elec
ours
es
Com
mun
icat
ions
and
Com
posi
tion
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
App
lied
Com
mun
icat
ion
VSk
ills
(com
mun
icat
ion)
Eff
ectiv
e C
omm
unic
atio
n V
Skill
s(c
omm
unic
atio
n)
Intr
oduc
tion
to T
echn
ical
V&
Bus
ines
sC
omm
unic
atio
n(c
ompo
sitio
n)
Prin
cipl
es o
f H
uman
VC
omm
unic
atio
n(c
omm
unic
atio
n)
Rea
d, W
rite
, Res
earc
h:V
Wri
ting
the
Res
earc
hPa
per
(com
posi
tion)
Wri
te C
ours
e, T
heV
(com
posi
tion)
Wri
ter's
Wor
ksho
pV
(com
posi
tion)
1E0
26/:3
0C
over
s di
scus
sion
, per
suas
ion,
wri
ting,
med
ia, a
nd li
tera
ture
; stu
dies
adva
nced
ele
men
ts o
f th
e hu
man
com
mun
icat
ions
pro
cess
. (N
o FG
, TX
)[1
977;
Rev
. 198
61
28/:3
0E
xplo
res
the
trad
ition
al c
omm
unic
atio
n sk
ills
of w
ritin
g, s
peak
ing,
list
enin
g,an
d re
adin
g, a
s w
ell a
s se
lf-a
war
enes
s an
d no
nver
bal s
kills
; com
bine
s th
eory
and
appl
icat
ion.
(N
o FG
, TX
) [1
981;
Rev
. 198
61
101:
30C
over
s th
e w
ritin
g pr
oces
s fr
om in
form
atio
n ga
ther
ing
to p
olis
hing
; inc
lude
srh
etor
ical
str
ateg
ies,
met
hods
of
orga
nizi
ng te
chni
cal i
nfor
mat
ion,
and
pre
cise
use
of la
ngua
ge. (
No
FG)
[198
3]
10/:3
0St
udie
s th
e or
igin
s an
d na
ture
of
lang
uage
; exa
min
es th
e re
latio
nshi
pbe
twee
n cu
lture
and
the
mea
ning
of
wor
ds; i
nclu
des
nonv
erba
lco
mm
unic
atio
n an
d lis
teni
ng. (
No
PG)
[198
31
24/:3
0G
oes
beyo
nd in
trod
ucto
ry le
vel t
o in
clud
e es
say
wri
ting,
wri
ting
the
rese
arch
pape
r, w
ritin
g ac
ross
the
curr
icul
um, w
ritin
g fo
r bu
sine
ss, a
nd w
iltin
g ab
out
liter
atur
e. 1
1991
1
MA
TC
Wis
c. V
TA
E
MA
TC
Wis
c. V
TA
E
U. o
f M
inn.
GPN
U. o
f M
inn.
GPN
Fla.
Jun
ior
PBS
Col
l./Ja
ckso
nvill
e
30/:3
0T
each
es E
nglis
h co
mpo
sitio
n an
d rh
etor
ic f
rom
a p
roce
ss p
oint
of
view
;D
CC
CD
PBS,
A/C
PBem
phas
izes
aud
ienc
e aw
aren
ess
and
purp
ose
for
wri
ting;
pre
sent
s de
liber
ate
stra
tegi
es f
or p
rew
ritin
g an
d re
visi
on. [
1984
1
15/3
0Fo
cuse
s on
var
ious
dim
ensi
ons
of th
e w
ritin
g pr
oces
s as
vie
wed
by
15 o
fU
. of
So.
SCE
TV
cont
empo
rary
lite
ratu
re's
maj
or ta
lent
s; e
ach
disc
usse
s hi
s or
her
per
sona
lC
arol
ina
&w
ritin
g m
etho
ds. [
1982
1SC
ET
V
ILI
* P
art o
f The
Ann
enbe
rg/C
PB
Col
lect
ion
(rw
itim
ini
Com
pute
r Sc
ienc
e
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Com
pute
r W
orks
(com
pute
rs)
New
Lite
racy
, The
*(c
ompu
ters
)
1C4
V16
/:30
Surv
eys
and
anal
yzes
the
use
of m
icro
com
pute
rs in
the
busi
ness
envi
ronm
ent;
desc
ribe
s an
d sh
ows
the
capa
bilit
ies
of c
omm
only
ava
ilabl
em
icro
com
pute
r ap
plic
atio
ns a
nd p
rogr
ams.
[19
871
V26
/:30
Prov
ides
a c
ompr
ehen
sive
ove
rvie
w o
f th
e co
mpu
ter:
wha
t it c
an a
nd c
anno
tIN
TE
LE
CO
M P
BS,
A/C
PB,
do, h
ow it
ope
rate
s; in
trod
uces
term
inol
ogy
of d
ata
proc
essi
ng; e
xam
ines
INT
EL
EC
OM
com
pute
r ap
plic
atio
ns. 1
19£1
4; R
ev. 1
9881
INT
EL
EC
OM
PB
S, I
NT
EL
EC
OM
l'art
of
The
Ann
enbe
rg/C
PB C
olle
ctio
n(c
ontin
ued
)
rn
1111
11.1
11
Edu
catio
n
Cou
rse
Med
# /R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Ado
lesc
ent S
ubst
ance
Abu
ser,
The
(dru
g ab
use)
Beg
inni
ngs:
Han
dica
pped
Chi
ldre
nB
irth
to A
ge F
ive
(spe
cial
edu
catio
n)
Cal
ico
Pie
(met
hodo
logy
)
Dea
ling
with
Cla
ssro
omPr
oble
ms
(met
hodo
logy
)
Edu
catio
n of
the
Gif
ted
and
Tal
ente
d(s
peci
al e
duca
tion)
Eff
ectiv
e T
each
er, T
he(m
etho
dolo
gy)
I'm S
peci
al(s
peci
al e
duca
tion)
Inte
ract
ion
(ed.
psy
ch.)
Jum
p O
ver
the
Moo
n(c
hild
ren'
s lit
.)
22/:5
9E
xam
ines
ado
lesc
ent s
ubst
ance
abu
se a
nd th
e in
volv
emen
t of
scho
ols
and
fam
ilies
in p
reve
ntio
n, in
terv
entio
n, a
nd tr
eatm
ent.
(No
FG, T
X)
1199
11G
over
nors
Gov
erno
rs S
tate
Stat
e U
niv.
Uni
v.
127:
30T
rain
s te
ache
rs a
nd o
ther
pro
fess
iona
ls w
ho d
eal w
ith h
andi
capp
ed c
hild
ren
MD
-IT
VPB
Sth
roug
h ag
e fi
ve; p
rovi
des
theo
retic
al b
ackg
roun
d; d
emon
stra
tes
teac
hing
stra
tegi
es. 1
1984
1
167:
30C
once
rned
with
chi
ldre
n ag
es th
ree
to f
ive;
dis
cuss
es a
ctiv
ities
and
mat
eria
lsus
ed to
mak
eth
e in
form
atio
n ta
ught
to th
ese
youn
g ch
ildre
n m
ore
mea
ning
ful f
or th
em. [
1983
1
127:
29E
xam
ines
app
roac
hes
to im
prov
ing
clas
sroo
m a
tmos
pher
e; in
clud
es te
ache
r-st
uden
t and
stu
dent
-stu
dent
com
mun
icat
ion,
dis
cipl
ine,
adm
inis
trat
ion,
and
clas
sroo
m m
anag
emen
t sug
gest
ions
. (N
o FG
) 11
9821
107:
30E
xplo
res
the
orig
in,
deve
lopm
ent,
and
impl
icat
ions
for
educ
atio
nal p
ract
ice
of s
uch
term
s as
gift
edne
ss, c
reat
ivity
, gen
ius,
tale
nt, a
nd in
telli
genc
e; a
lso
expl
ores
cur
rent
issu
esan
d tr
ends
. (N
o PC
)11
986i
261:
30S
how
s ho
w to
use
cla
ssro
om ti
me
effic
ient
ly; e
xam
ines
pre
sent
mod
els
ofte
achi
ng b
ased
on
curr
ent r
esea
rch;
sug
gest
s pl
anni
ng, m
anag
emen
t, an
din
stru
ctio
nal p
roce
dure
s. 1
1987
1
87:3
0P
rovi
des
info
rmat
ion
onte
achi
ng p
hysi
cal e
duca
tion
to h
andi
capp
edel
emen
tary
chi
ldre
n; in
clud
es a
ttitu
des
tow
ard
hand
icap
ped
pers
ons
and
back
grou
nd o
n m
otor
dev
elop
men
t. (N
o FG
) 11
9851
307:
30In
crea
ses
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
and
res
pect
for
hum
an a
nd c
ultu
ral s
imila
ritie
san
d di
ffer
ence
s in
a p
lura
listic
soc
iety
; cov
ers
effe
ctiv
e in
terp
erso
nal a
ndin
terg
roup
rel
atio
nshi
ps. 1
1980
1
15/1
0C
over
s th
e hi
stor
y an
d di
vers
ity o
f ch
ildre
n's
liter
atur
e; f
eatu
res
a va
riet
y of
reco
mm
ende
d w
orks
; sug
gest
s cr
iteri
a fo
r se
lect
ing
and
eval
uatin
g ho
oks,
1198
21
SCE
TV
SCE
TV
BB
CFi
lms
Inc.
U. o
f M
inn.
CPN
U. S
o.SC
ET
V, P
BS
Car
olin
a &
SCE
TV
U. o
f So
uth
ITS
Flor
ida
MD
-IT
Vl'B
S, M
PT
U. o
f So
.SC
ET
VC
arol
ina
&SC
ET
V
frtin
tillff
i'd1.
09
N.)
Edu
catio
n
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nP
rodu
cer
Dis
trib
utor
Lite
ratu
re fo
r C
hild
ren
Van
d A
dole
scen
ts(c
hild
ren'
s lit
.)
Nex
t Ste
ps w
ithC
ompu
ters
in th
eC
lass
room
(com
pute
r sc
ienc
e)
V
Nut
ritio
n in
Act
ion
V(n
utrit
ion)
Pro
gram
min
g fo
r th
eV
Gift
ed(s
peci
al e
duca
tion)
Sec
ond
Lang
uage
VP
rogr
ams
for
You
ngC
hild
ren:
Lik
e C
hild
'sP
lay
(met
hodo
logy
)
Tea
cher
s T
ackl
eV
Thi
nkin
g(m
etho
dolo
gy)
Tea
chin
g C
hild
ren
toV
Rea
d(r
eadi
ng)
Tea
chin
g S
tude
nts
with
Spe
cial
Nee
ds(s
peci
al e
duca
tion) 16
6
25/:5
9In
trod
ucto
ry c
ours
e on
chi
ldre
n's
and
adol
esce
nt li
tera
ture
. Exa
min
es s
uch
sele
ctio
n cr
iteria
as
read
ing
leve
ls, s
tude
nt in
tere
sts,
qua
lity,
and
psyc
holo
gica
l, cu
ltura
l, an
d so
cial
issu
es. (
No
FG
) [1
9881
127:
30E
xplo
res
how
to b
est u
se c
ompu
ters
in a
cla
ssro
om s
ettin
g; v
iew
s tr
end-
setti
ng a
pprc
iach
es; e
xam
ines
effe
cts
of n
ew te
chno
logi
es o
n te
achi
ng. 1
1984
1
Gov
erno
rsG
over
nors
Sta
teS
tate
Uni
v.U
niv.
WH
A &
PB
SU
WE
X
10[3
0P
rovi
des
basi
c in
stru
ctio
n on
nut
ritio
n; c
over
s m
etho
dolo
gy to
teac
h nu
triti
on P
SU
to e
lem
enta
ry s
tude
nts;
intr
oduc
es n
utrit
iona
l con
cept
s an
d vi
sits
a c
lass
room
in w
hich
they
are
taug
ht. (
No
TX
) [1
9871
12/:3
0C
onsi
ders
five
gen
eral
pro
gram
mod
els
for
educ
atin
g gi
fted,
tale
nted
, and
crea
tive
child
ren,
K-1
2; s
ugge
sts
a va
riety
of d
esig
ns fo
r m
eetin
g th
eir
need
s.It9
811
101:
30S
tres
ses
that
the
best
lang
uage
pro
gram
s fo
r yo
ung
child
ren
seem
to b
e th
ose
in w
hich
lang
uage
is le
arne
d as
a b
y-pr
oduc
t of s
uch
othe
r ac
tiviti
es a
s pl
ay.
(TX
, FG
- tb
a) 1
1991
1
ITS
, WC
UW
EX
PB
S
U. o
f Min
n.G
PN
121:
30C
over
s co
nten
t lea
rnin
g an
d th
inki
ng s
kills
and
acq
uisi
tion;
pro
vide
sU
WE
Xex
ampi
es o
f tea
chin
g fo
r th
inki
ng in
the
cont
ent a
rea
disc
usse
s po
int a
tw
hich
stu
dent
s le
arn
how
to th
ink.
119
88)
12/:2
9In
corp
orat
es a
bal
ance
of s
peci
fic te
chni
ques
, the
oret
ical
dis
cuss
ion,
pra
ctic
alB
BC
stra
tegi
es, a
nd in
nova
tive
idea
s fo
r pe
rson
aliz
ing
and
impr
ovin
g re
adin
gin
stru
ctio
n. (
No
EC
, SG
, TX
) 11
9821
151:
30A
ssis
ts in
iden
tifyi
ng a
nd a
sses
sing
the
need
s of
sec
onda
ry-le
vel s
tude
nts
who
hav
e le
arni
ng p
robl
ems;
pre
sent
s a
varie
ty o
f use
ful i
nstr
uctio
nal
tech
niqu
es a
nd s
trat
egie
s. 1
1981
1
MD
-IT
V
GP
N
Film
s In
c.
PB
S, M
PT 16
7(c
,,lim
ed
CO
Edu
catio
n
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Tea
chin
g W
ritin
g: A
V9/
:30
Pres
ents
a f
ive-
step
mod
el f
or te
achi
ng w
ritin
g ba
sed
on c
urre
nt k
now
ledg
eM
D-I
TV
PBS
Proc
ess
App
roac
hof
the
wri
ting
proc
ess;
incl
udes
dia
gnos
is, p
rew
ritin
g, w
ritin
g, r
ewri
ting,
and
(com
posi
tion)
eval
uatio
n. 1
1982
1
Usi
ng M
edia
for
V20
,1:3
0Pr
ovid
es tr
aini
ng in
the
sele
ctio
n an
d us
e of
med
ia f
or le
arni
ng; i
nclu
des
all
Vir
gini
aL
earn
ing
form
s of
cur
rent
ly a
vaila
ble
med
ia; s
how
s pr
oper
util
izat
ion
met
hods
for
Poly
tech
.IT
S
(met
hodo
logy
)ea
ch f
orm
. (N
o FG
) 11
9821
Inst
.
11.
(con
tinuo
/ l)
Eng
inee
ring
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Bas
ic A
C C
ircu
itsV
29/
Prov
ides
theo
ry a
nd p
robl
em-s
olvi
ng te
chni
ques
for
ana
lyzi
ngT
exas
Wis
c. V
TA
E(e
lect
roni
cs)
VD
:9-2
9an
d ap
plyi
ng a
ltern
atin
g cu
rren
t cir
cuits
; exp
lain
s fu
ndam
enta
l con
cept
s,In
stru
men
tsla
ws,
and
term
inol
ogy.
(N
o FG
) 11
9811
Inte
grat
ed O
ptic
sV
22/
Intr
oduc
es th
e ap
proa
ch to
sig
nal p
roce
ssin
g an
d tr
ansm
issi
onsi
gnal
s ar
eU
. of
Del
.U
. of
Del
.(e
lec.
eng
inee
ring
):1
1-1b
carr
ied
by b
eam
s of
ligh
t and
cir
cuits
are
con
nect
ed b
y op
tical
wav
egui
des.
1197
9; R
ev. 1
9851
N.)
I
Fore
ign
Lan
guag
esac
irC
ours
eM
edM
RT
Des
crip
tion
Prod
ucer
Dis
trib
utor
iCon
vers
erno
s! -
- L
et's
V30
1:30
Tea
ches
beg
inni
ng c
onve
rsat
iona
l Spa
nish
; pro
vide
s la
ngua
ge a
nd c
onte
xt.
Palo
mar
Coa
st T
elec
ours
esT
alk
Inst
ruct
ors
prov
ide
cont
inuo
us a
sses
smen
t and
rei
nfor
cem
ent.
1198
81C
oll.
(Spa
nish
)
Des
tinos
"V
/A52
1:30
Intr
oduc
es S
pani
sh la
ngua
ge to
giv
e st
uden
ts f
ull c
omm
unic
ativ
e pr
ofic
ienc
y.W
GB
EI
PBS,
A/C
PB(S
pani
sh)
Cov
ers
basi
c st
ruct
ures
, lan
guag
e fu
nctio
ns, a
nd v
ocab
ular
y gr
oups
; inc
lude
scu
ltura
l con
text
. 119
921
Deu
tsch
Dir
ekt!
(Ger
man
)V
20/:2
5C
onsi
sts
of d
ocum
enta
ry m
ater
ial f
or g
ener
al c
ompr
ehen
sion
sup
plem
ente
dw
ith e
lem
ents
of
the
lang
uage
to b
e le
arne
d. C
over
s st
anda
rd v
isito
ren
coun
ters
and
var
ious
acc
ents
. 119
851
BB
CFi
lms
Inc.
Fren
ch I
n A
ctio
n I
& I
I*(F
renc
h)V
/A52
/:30
Com
bine
s vi
deo,
aud
io, a
nd p
rint
to te
ach
Fren
ch in
the
cont
ext o
f Fr
ench
-sp
eaki
ng c
ultu
res.
Lea
rner
s se
e an
d he
ar n
ativ
e sp
eake
rs in
tera
ctin
g in
fam
iliar
situ
atio
ns. 1
1987
1
Yal
e U
niv.
PBS,
A/C
PB
In I
talia
no(I
talia
n)26
1:30
Com
bine
s so
lid la
ngua
ge in
stru
ctio
n w
ith a
n in
trod
uctio
n to
ltal
y's
peop
le,
plac
es, h
isto
ry, c
usto
ms,
and
cul
ture
. Eac
h pr
ogra
m f
ocus
es o
n a
part
icul
aras
pect
of
the
lang
uage
. (A
dapt
ed f
rom
Ita
lian
Rad
io &
TV
and
Ita
lian
CC
CD
Coa
st T
elec
ours
esPB
S
Uni
vers
ity f
or F
orei
gner
s.)
IFal
l 199
21
Surv
ival
Spa
nish
(Spa
nish
)V
/A36
/:30
Intr
oduc
es c
onve
rsat
iona
l Spa
nish
; use
s di
alog
ues
to p
rese
nt o
r re
info
rce
key
phra
ses
and
gram
mat
ical
con
cept
s re
leva
nt to
the
conv
ersa
tion.
119
841
M-D
CC
M-D
CC
1*
Part
of
The
Ann
enbe
rg/C
PB C
olle
ctio
n(c
ontin
ued
SP)
I
Gov
ernm
ent/P
oliti
cal S
cien
ce/A
rea
Stud
ies
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Am
eric
an N
atio
nal
Gov
ernm
ent*
(pol
itica
l sci
ence
)
Am
eric
as*
(pol
itica
l sci
ence
)
A V
Chi
nese
: Ada
ptin
g th
eV
Past
, Fac
ing
the
Futu
re,
The (pol
itica
l sci
ence
)
Con
stitu
tion:
Tha
tD
elic
ate
Bal
ance
, The
*(p
oliti
cal s
cien
ce)
V
Dile
mm
as o
f W
ar a
ndA
Peac
e*(p
oliti
cal s
cien
ce)
Gov
ernm
ent b
y C
onse
ntV
(gov
ernm
ent)
Mid
dle
Eas
t, T
heV
(pol
itica
l sci
ence
)
Paci
fic
Cen
tury
, The
*V
(pol
itica
l sci
ence
) 17 C
12/:3
0In
trod
ucto
ry a
udio
-pri
nt c
ours
e. C
over
s th
e st
ruct
ure
of U
nite
d St
ates
Wis
c. P
ublic
The
Aud
io S
tore
gove
rnm
ent
its p
rinc
iple
s, p
roce
sses
, rel
atio
nshi
ps, a
nd in
stitu
tions
;R
adio
pres
ents
vie
ws
on th
e ro
le o
f go
vern
men
t. 11
9881
101:
60A
mul
tidis
cipl
inar
y st
udy
of th
e 20
th-c
entu
ry p
oliti
cal,
econ
omic
, soc
ial,
and
WC
B1-
1PB
S, A
/CPB
cultu
ral h
isto
ry o
f L
atin
Am
eric
a an
d th
e C
arib
bean
. Foc
uses
on
key
issu
esan
d ev
ents
in th
eir
deve
lopm
ent.
[ava
ilabl
e 19
931
261:
30Sh
ows
the
Chi
nese
peo
ple,
thei
r hi
stor
y, a
nd th
e st
rugg
les
they
fac
eN
VC
and
polit
ical
ly, s
ocia
lly, e
cono
mic
ally
, and
cul
tura
lly a
s th
ey a
ppro
ach
a ne
wC
PNce
ntur
y. U
ses
rece
nt C
NN
file
foo
tage
. (19
911
131:
60In
trod
uces
con
stitu
tiona
l rig
hts
and
publ
ic p
olic
y; in
clud
es s
uch
cont
rove
rsia
lis
sues
as
capi
tal p
unis
hmen
t, ab
ortio
n, a
nd n
atio
nal s
ecur
ity v
s. f
reed
om o
fth
e pr
ess.
119
841
131:
30In
trod
ucto
ry a
udio
-pri
nt c
ours
e. S
urve
ys th
e hi
stor
y of
war
and
pea
ce;
anal
yzes
the
orig
ins
and
caus
es o
f w
ar; r
evie
ws
sugg
este
d so
lutio
ns to
war
.11
9921
Col
umbi
aU
niv.
Med
iaan
d So
ciet
ySe
min
ars
Wis
c. P
ublic
Rad
io
PBS,
GPN
I'BS,
A/C
PB
The
Aud
io S
tore
Surv
eys
Uni
ted
Stat
es g
over
nmen
t; fo
cuse
s on
teac
hing
stu
dent
s ho
w to
DC
CC
D26
1:30
PBS,
Dal
las
acce
ssth
eir
gove
rnm
ent.
Com
bine
s po
litic
al s
cien
ce w
ith e
xam
ples
of
how
Tel
ecou
rses
stud
ents
invo
lve
them
selv
es in
gov
ernm
ent.
1198
91
141:
30A
ddre
sses
suc
h is
sues
as
wha
t is
the
Mid
dle
Eas
t, w
hat a
re th
e or
igin
s of
the
IUC
1UC
curr
ent p
oliti
cal c
ondi
tions
, and
wha
t lin
ks it
s di
spar
ate
ethn
ic, r
elig
ious
, and
polit
ical
gro
ups.
119
901
101:
60In
trod
uces
the
mod
ern
hist
ory,
eco
nom
ics,
pol
itics
, and
cul
ture
s of
the
Paci
fic
Paci
fic
Bas
in1.
13S,
A/C
PBB
asin
reg
ion;
exp
lore
s its
evo
lutio
n in
to a
pri
ncip
al p
oliti
cal/e
cono
mic
cen
ter.
Inst
.11
9921
177
* Pa
rt o
f T
he A
nnen
berg
/CPU
Col
lect
ion
tem
:61m
M 1
.1
Gov
ernm
ent/P
oliti
cal S
cien
ce/A
rea
Stud
ies
Cou
rse
Med
NII
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Que
st f
or P
eace
V30
1:29
Exp
lain
s th
e te
chni
cal,
mili
tary
, pol
itica
l, an
d m
oral
dile
mm
as o
f ac
hiev
ing
CC
CD
Coa
st T
elec
ours
es(p
oliti
cal s
cien
ce)
peac
e in
a n
ucle
ar a
ge; i
nclu
des
the
scie
ntif
ic e
ffec
ts o
f nu
clea
r w
ar a
ndpe
ace
in te
rms
of h
isto
ry a
nd p
sych
olog
y. f
1984
1T
his
Con
stitu
tion:
AV
51:2
8E
xplo
res
the
basi
c pr
inci
ples
and
inst
itutio
ns o
f co
nstit
utio
nal g
over
nmen
t;[U
CIU
CH
isto
ryem
phas
izes
his
tori
cal e
vent
s an
d pr
oces
ses
that
infl
uenc
e co
ntem
pora
ry(p
oliti
cal s
cien
ce)
inte
rpre
tatio
n of
the
Con
stitu
tion.
119
871
War
V8/
:60
Use
s do
cum
enta
ry f
ilm to
foc
us o
n th
e na
ture
, con
sequ
ence
s, a
nd f
utur
e of
KC
TS
&Fi
lms
Inc.
(pol
itica
l sci
ence
)m
oder
n w
arfa
re; a
rgue
s th
at w
ar is
out
date
d as
a w
ay to
set
tle d
ispu
tes
Nat
'l Fi
lmbe
twee
n na
tions
. 119
851
Boa
rd o
fC
anad
a
War
and
Pea
ce in
the
V13
/:60
Doc
umen
ts k
ey c
hapt
ers
in th
e st
ory
of th
e nu
clea
r ag
e; e
xplo
res
the
even
tsW
GB
H &
PBS,
A/C
PBN
ucle
ar A
ge"
of th
e pe
riod
and
the
unde
rlyi
ng is
sues
of
nucl
ear
polic
y, s
trat
egy,
and
CIT
V,
r (p
oliti
cal s
cien
ce)
tech
nolo
gy. 1
1988
1E
ngla
ndni
t)"
Part
of
The
Ann
enbe
rg/0
'B C
olle
ctio
n
1' f hi
lted
S)
Hea
lth
Cou
rse
Med
0/11
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Her
e's
to Y
our
Hea
lthV
26/:3
0E
xam
ines
toda
y's
heal
th is
sues
and
pre
sent
s co
ntem
pora
ry a
ppro
ache
s to
KE
RA
&PB
S, D
alla
s(p
erso
nal h
ealth
)m
aint
aini
ng g
ood
heal
th; f
ocus
es o
n su
ch to
pics
as
stre
ss, n
utri
tion,
and
DC
CC
DT
elec
ours
esse
xual
ly tr
ansm
itted
dis
ease
s. 1
1985
; Rev
. 199
21
Nut
ritio
n T
oday
*A
121:
30Pr
esen
ts b
asic
nut
ritio
n co
ncep
ts; i
nclu
des
nutr
ition
al n
eeds
and
ass
essm
ent,
Wis
c. P
ublic
The
Aud
io S
tore
(nut
ritio
n)w
eigh
t con
trol
, the
eff
ects
of
vari
ous
food
com
pone
nts
on h
ealth
, and
life
-R
adio
stag
e nu
triti
onal
con
cern
s. 1
1990
1
Subs
tanc
e A
buse
V24
/:59
Intr
oduc
es th
e ph
ysio
logi
cal a
nd s
ocio
logi
cal a
spec
ts o
f ps
ycho
trop
ic d
rug
Gov
erno
rsG
over
nors
Sta
te(d
rug
abus
e)ab
use
in c
onte
mpo
rary
soc
iety
; inc
lude
s hi
stor
ical
and
con
tem
pora
ry p
atte
rns
Stat
e U
niv.
Uni
v.of
abu
se. (
No
FG)
1198
81
17rS
* Pa
rt o
f T
he A
nnen
berg
/CPI
3 C
olle
ctio
n(c
ontin
uo!
I)
His
tory
Cou
rse
Med
ft/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Am
eric
a in
Per
spec
tive:
U.S
. His
tory
Sin
ce 1
877
(U.S
. his
tory
)
V26
7:30
His
tori
ans
and
eyew
itnes
ses
use
an a
naly
tical
fra
me
of r
efer
ence
to ju
dge
past
and
pre
sent
eve
nts.
Exp
lain
s ho
w a
nd w
hy th
e U
.S. i
s w
hat i
t is
toda
y;co
nnec
ts h
isto
ry to
ord
inar
y pe
ople
. 119
921
DC
CC
DPB
S, D
alla
sT
elec
ours
es
Am
eric
an A
dven
ture
,T
heV
267:
30Il
lust
rate
s ho
w w
ars
and
trea
ties,
ele
ctio
ns a
nd le
gisl
atio
n ha
ve a
ffec
ted
the
peop
le o
f th
e U
.S. f
rom
Col
umbi
an c
onta
ct to
the
Civ
il W
ar a
ndD
CC
CD
PBS,
Dal
las
Tel
ecou
rses
(U.S
. his
tory
)R
econ
stru
ctio
n. 1
1987
1
Am
eric
an H
isto
ry, 1
492-
A13
7:30
Exa
min
es s
eque
ntia
lly th
e 3o
cial
, eco
nom
ic, a
nd p
oliti
cal d
evel
opm
ent o
f th
eW
isc.
Pub
licT
he A
udio
Sto
re18
651
The
Ori
gin
and
U.S
. fro
m th
e E
nglis
h se
ttlem
ent a
t Jam
esto
wn
to th
e C
ivil
War
. 119
841
Rad
ioG
row
th o
f th
e U
nite
dSt
ates
(U.S
. his
tory
)
Am
eric
an H
isto
ry, 1
865
to th
e Pr
esen
t: T
heA
157:
30T
race
s se
quen
tially
the
soci
al, e
cono
mic
, and
pol
itica
l dev
elop
men
t of
the
U.S
. fro
m R
econ
stru
ctio
n to
the
pres
ent.
[198
6]W
isc.
Pub
licR
adio
The
Aud
io S
tore
Ori
gin
and
Gro
wth
of
the
Uni
ted
Stat
es*
(U.S
. his
tory
)
Am
eric
an S
outh
Com
esof
Age
, The
(U.S
. his
tory
)
V14
7:30
Exa
min
es th
e ec
onom
ic, s
ocia
l, an
d po
litic
al tr
ansf
orm
atio
n of
the
Sout
h si
nce
Wor
ld W
ar 1
1 an
d pl
aces
thos
e ch
ange
s w
ithin
the
hist
ory
of th
e re
gion
and
the
natio
n. 1
1985
]
U. o
f So
.C
arol
ina
&SC
ET
V
SCE
TV
Civ
il W
ar, T
heV
97U
ses
arch
ival
pho
togr
aphs
to p
rese
nt th
e en
tire
swee
p of
the
Civ
il W
ar f
rom
Flor
entin
ePB
S(U
.S. h
isto
ry)
vari
esth
e ba
ttlef
ield
s to
the
hom
efro
nts
and
from
the
caus
es o
f th
e w
ar to
Lin
coln
'sas
sass
inat
ion.
119
901
Film
s &
WE
TA
Eye
s on
the
Priz
e I
& I
I(U
.S. h
isto
ry)
V14
/:60
Pres
ents
a c
ompr
ehen
sive
his
tory
of
the
peop
le, s
tori
es, e
vent
s, a
nd is
sues
of
the
civi
l rig
hts
stru
ggle
in A
mer
ica
from
Wor
ld W
ar I
I to
the
pres
ent.
1198
6B
lack
side
,ln
c.PB
S
& 1
9891
krt o
f T
he A
nnen
berg
/CPB
Col
lect
ion
1.44
.
(con
tinue
dS)
4.1
cn
His
tory
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Leg
acie
s: A
nIn
trod
uctio
n to
the
His
tory
of
Wom
en a
ndth
e Fa
mily
in A
mer
ica
1607
-187
0*(w
omen
's s
tudi
es)
Vie
tnam
: A T
elev
isio
nH
isto
ry(U
.S. h
isto
ry)
Wor
ld: A
Tel
evis
ion
His
tory
, The
(wor
ld h
isto
ry)
182
A18
/:30
Intr
oduc
tory
aud
io-p
rint
cou
rse.
Inc
lude
s ho
w th
e ex
peri
ence
of
slav
ery
was
Publ
ic M
edia
A/C
PBdi
ffer
ent f
or m
en a
nd w
omen
; the
rel
atio
nshi
p be
twee
n ch
ange
s in
mar
riag
eFo
und.
and
larg
er h
isto
rica
l dev
elop
men
ts. 1
1987
1
V V
13/:6
0E
xam
ines
the
hist
oric
al a
nd p
oliti
cal c
onte
xt o
f th
e V
ietn
am e
raits
cau
ses,
reco
rd, a
nd in
flue
nce;
pro
vide
s ba
ckgr
ound
on
Vie
tnam
and
its
peop
le f
rom
1945
to 1
975.
119
831
261:
30O
ffer
s a
glob
al a
nd g
eogr
aphi
cal v
iew
of
hum
an h
isto
ry; i
nclu
des
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f A
fric
a, th
e U
.S.,
and
Rus
sia,
and
the
impa
ct o
f th
e gr
eat
relig
ions
and
var
ious
em
pire
s. 1
1986
1
WG
BH
PBS,
Film
Inc
.
SCE
TV
Sr
SCE
TV
Gol
dcre
stFi
lms
Part
of
The
Ann
enbe
rg/C
PB C
olle
ctio
n(a
mtim
ieda
)
Mat
hem
atic
s
Cou
rse
Med
#IR
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Aga
inst
All
Odd
s: I
nsid
e V
Stat
istic
s(s
tatis
tics)
Col
lege
Alg
ebra
*(a
lgeb
ra)
Col
lege
Alg
ebra
: In
Sim
ples
t Ter
ms*
(alg
ebra
)
For
All
Prac
tical
Purp
oses
*(m
athe
mat
ics)
cr,
Prin
cipl
es o
f St
atis
tics*
(sta
tistic
s)
1E.;
26/:3
0In
trod
uces
sta
tistic
al p
roce
sses
; em
phas
izes
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f co
llect
ing
and
desc
ribi
ng d
ata
rath
er th
an u
sing
the
path
fro
m p
roba
bilit
y to
for
mal
infe
renc
e. 1
1989
1
A12
1:30
An
audi
o-pr
int c
ours
e; p
rovi
des
a lin
k be
twee
n m
any
mat
hem
atic
al p
robl
em-
solv
ing
tech
niqu
es a
nd th
e m
ore
abst
ract
con
cept
s re
quir
ed in
cal
culu
s. [
1987
;R
ev. 1
9901
V26
/:30
Intr
oduc
es th
e co
ncep
ts a
nd p
ract
ical
, rea
l-lif
e ap
plic
atio
ns o
f al
gebr
a; ta
kes
stud
ents
ste
p-by
-ste
p to
a th
orou
gh w
orki
ng k
now
ledg
e. [
1991
1
V26
1:30
Subt
itled
"In
trod
uctio
n to
Con
tem
pora
ry M
athe
mat
ics.
" E
xplo
res
mat
hem
atic
sap
plic
atio
ns in
dif
fere
nt f
ield
s; in
clud
es m
anag
emen
t sci
ence
, sta
tistic
s, s
ize
and
shap
e, a
nd c
ompu
ter
scie
nce.
[19
871
CO
MA
PPB
S, A
/CPB
Wis
c. P
ublic
The
Aud
io S
tore
Rad
io
CO
MA
PPB
S, A
/CPB
CO
MA
PPB
S, A
/CPB
A12
1:30
Intr
oduc
es k
ey c
once
pts
of e
xper
imen
tatio
n, in
fere
nce
from
dat
a se
ts, a
ndW
isc.
Pub
licT
he A
udio
Sto
rede
cisi
on m
akin
g; il
lust
rate
s m
ain
issu
es a
nd b
asic
tech
niqu
es o
f m
oder
nR
adio
stat
istic
s. 1
1991
1
* Pa
rt o
f T
he A
nnen
berg
/CPB
Col
lect
ion
C I
" U(c
ontin
ued
le)
Phys
ical
Sci
ence
s
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
er
Ear
th E
xplo
red,
The
(geo
logy
)
Ear
th R
evea
led:
Intr
oduc
tory
Geo
logy
*(g
eolo
gy)
Liv
ing
Plan
et, T
he(e
nvir
onm
enta
l sci
ence
)
Mec
hani
cal U
nive
rse,
The
*(p
hysi
cs)
Mec
hani
cal U
nive
rse
&B
eyon
d, T
he*
(phy
sics
)
Oce
anus
: The
Mar
ine
Env
iron
men
t(o
cean
ogra
phy)
Plan
et E
arth
*(E
arth
sci
ence
)
Prot
ect:
Uni
vers
e(a
stro
nom
y)
14/:3
0In
trod
uces
the
forc
es th
at s
hape
d an
d co
ntin
ue to
sha
pe th
e E
arth
fro
m th
eto
p of
the
Alp
s to
the
botto
m o
f D
eath
Val
ley;
pro
vide
s an
"in
tern
atio
nal
fiel
d tr
ip."
[19
84]
26/:3
0St
udie
s th
e E
arth
's p
hysi
cal p
roce
sses
and
pro
pert
ies;
em
phas
izes
the
scie
ntif
ic th
eori
es b
ehin
d ge
olog
ical
pri
ncip
les.
Pre
sent
sdr
amat
icfo
rces
as
wel
l as
mor
e su
btle
, eve
r-pr
esen
t one
s. 1
1992
]
121:
55T
race
s E
arth
's c
hang
ing
face
ove
r th
e m
illen
nia
in c
ycle
s of
cre
atio
n an
dde
stru
ctio
n; e
mph
asiz
es h
ow o
rgan
ism
s ad
apt t
o th
eir
phys
ical
sur
roun
ding
s.(N
o FO
119
841
26/:3
0in
trod
uces
phy
sics
; use
s co
mpu
ter
anim
atio
n, s
cien
tific
exp
erim
ents
, and
othe
r vi
sual
tech
niqu
es to
teac
h cl
assi
cal m
echa
nics
; inc
lude
s ne
cess
ary
calc
ulus
inst
ruct
ion.
[19
851
261:
30Fo
cuse
s on
ele
ctri
city
and
mag
netis
m, r
elat
ivity
, wav
es a
nd o
ptic
s, h
eat a
ndth
erm
odyn
amic
s, a
nd m
oder
n ph
ysic
s; in
clud
es h
isto
rica
l ree
nact
men
ts.
1198
61
30/:3
0In
trod
uces
the
know
ledg
e, th
eori
es, a
nd p
redi
ctio
ns o
f N
orth
Am
eric
a's
lead
ing
ocea
nogr
aphe
rs; f
ocus
es o
n th
e m
arin
e en
viro
nmen
t as
a un
ique
feat
ure
of th
e pl
anet
Ear
th. [
1980
]
71:6
0In
trod
uces
Ear
th's
inte
rior
, oce
ans,
con
tinen
ts, m
ount
ains
and
vol
cano
es,
oren
ergy
and
min
eral
res
ourc
es, c
limat
e, s
un, a
nd a
tmos
pher
e. E
xper
ts s
hare
141:
30th
eori
es, m
odel
s, a
nd o
pini
ons.
119
851
301:
30In
trod
uces
ast
rono
my.
Exa
min
es th
e or
igin
, cha
ract
eris
tics,
and
evo
lutio
n of
the
sola
r sy
stem
, the
sta
rs, t
he g
alax
ies,
and
the
univ
erse
; inc
lude
ssp
ecul
ativ
e th
eori
es. 1
1978
; Rev
. 198
31
10/:6
0D
escr
ibes
the
thre
ats
that
dif
fere
nt n
atur
al s
yste
ms
face
in th
e gl
obal
envi
ronm
ent;
expl
ains
the
scie
nces
invo
lved
; dis
sect
s th
e co
nnec
tions
that
bind
hum
ans
to th
e en
viro
nmen
t. 11
9901
26/:3
0St
ress
es a
hum
anis
tic a
ppro
ach
to c
hem
istr
y th
at d
e-em
phas
izes
mat
hem
atic
al p
robl
em s
olvi
ng; p
rese
nts
chem
ical
pri
ncip
les,
fac
ts, a
ndth
eori
es; i
nclu
des
chem
istr
y's
hist
oric
al f
ound
atio
ns. 1
1989
1
Rac
e to
Sav
e th
e Pl
anet
*V
(env
iron
men
tal s
cien
ce)
Wor
ld o
f C
hem
istr
y,T
he*
(che
mis
try)
BB
C &
KR
MA
Dis
trib
utor
PBS
INT
EL
EC
OM
PB
S, A
/CPB
,IN
TE
LE
CO
M
BB
C &
Tim
e-L
ife
Cal
. Tec
h &
INT
EL
EC
OM
Cal
. Tec
h &
INT
EL
EC
OM
INT
EL
EC
OM
WQ
ED
CC
CD
&IN
TE
LE
CO
M
WG
BH
U. o
f M
d.&
EFC
Am
bros
e V
ideo
PBS,
A/C
PB,
INT
EL
EC
OM
PBS,
A/C
PB,
INT
EL
EC
OM
INT
EL
EC
OM
PBS,
A/C
PB
Coa
st T
elec
ours
es
PBS,
AIC
PB
PBS,
A /C
PB
" Pa
rt o
f T
he A
nnen
berg
/CPB
Col
lect
ion
(con
tinue
d 10
)
18C
187
Soci
al S
cien
ces
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Adu
lt Y
ears
: Con
tinui
tyV
and
Cha
nge,
The
(psy
chol
ogy)
Beh
avio
ur. D
istu
rbin
gV
and
Dis
turb
ed(p
sych
olog
y)
Chi
ld A
buse
and
Neg
lect
V(s
ocio
logy
)
opLo
Dis
cove
ring
Psy
chol
ogy*
V(p
sych
olog
y)
Face
s of
Cul
ture
(cul
tura
l ant
hrop
olog
y)V
In th
e N
ame
of J
ustic
eV
(cri
min
olog
y)
Intr
oduc
tion
toPs
ycho
logy
*(p
sych
olog
y)
Intr
oduc
tion
toSo
ciol
ogy*
( so
ciol
ogy) 't
A
71:2
8In
trod
uces
the
adul
t yea
rs a
s a
com
plex
and
var
iabl
e pr
oces
sra
ther
than
an
orde
rly
sequ
ence
of
pred
icta
ble
stag
es; c
over
s th
e se
lf,
rela
tions
hips
, and
the
adul
t as
wor
ker
and
lear
ner.
119
85;
Rev
. 199
21
13/:6
0In
trod
uces
bas
ic p
sych
opat
holo
gy: i
ts c
ause
s an
d co
rrel
ates
, sig
ns a
ndsy
mpt
oms,
and
met
hods
of
trea
tmen
t; em
phas
izes
the
com
mun
ity a
spec
t of
abno
rmal
beh
avio
r. 1
1988
1
10/:3
0Su
rvey
s ba
sic
conc
epts
and
pre
sent
s hi
stor
ical
ove
rvie
w o
f th
e pr
oble
m o
fab
used
and
neg
lect
ed c
hild
ren;
cov
ers
the
need
s an
d ri
ghts
of
such
chi
ldre
nw
ithin
the
fam
ily. (
No
Ft)
1198
31
26/3
0In
trod
uces
the
fund
amen
tal p
rinc
iple
s an
d m
ajor
con
cept
s of
psy
chol
ogy;
incl
udes
bra
in a
nd b
ehav
ior,
life
-spa
n de
velo
pmen
t, ps
ycho
path
olog
y an
dth
erap
y, a
nd m
etho
dolo
gy. 1
1989
1
261:
30In
trod
uces
cul
tura
l ant
hrop
olog
y; h
ighl
ight
s m
ajor
life
styl
es f
rom
aro
und
the
wor
ld; i
llust
rate
s hu
man
ada
ptat
ion
to th
e en
viro
nmen
t fro
m th
e be
ginn
ings
of th
e hu
man
spe
cies
to th
e pr
esen
t. 11
9831
13/:6
0E
xplo
res
the
issu
es a
nd p
roce
sses
of
the
crim
inal
just
ice
syst
em; e
xam
ines
tech
niqu
es f
or p
reve
ntio
n an
d re
habi
litat
ion
and
the
bala
nce
betw
een
indi
vidu
al r
ight
s an
d pu
blic
saf
ety.
119
841
Ohi
o U
niv.
IUC
& I
UC
Wilf
rid
Mag
ic L
ante
rnL
auri
er U
niv.
U. o
f M
inn.
CPN
WG
131-
1PB
S, A
/CPB
CC
CD
PBS,
Coa
stT
elec
ours
es
Wilf
rid
Mag
ic L
ante
rnL
auri
er U
niv.
13/:3
0In
trod
ucto
ry a
udio
-pri
nt c
ours
e. P
rovi
des
a br
oad,
gen
eral
ove
rvie
w o
n th
eU
. of
Min
n.A
/CPB
com
plex
ity o
f hu
man
thou
ght a
nd b
ehav
ior;
em
phas
izes
bot
h th
eory
and
appl
icat
ion.
(N
o FC
) 11
9841
A13
1:30
Intr
oduc
tory
aud
io-p
rint
cou
rse.
Exa
min
es h
uman
soc
ial r
elat
ions
hips
and
Wis
c. P
ublic
The
Aud
io S
tore
soci
al s
truc
ture
s; e
mph
asiz
es b
asic
con
cept
s, p
rinc
iple
s, a
nd m
etho
ds. (
No
Rad
ioFG
) 11
9841
* Pa
rt o
f T
he A
nnen
berg
/CPB
Col
lect
ion
Mou
tiiiit
ed le
t
Soci
al S
cien
ces
Cou
rse
Med
NA
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Lan
d, L
ocat
ion,
and
VC
ultu
re: A
n In
trod
uctio
nto
Geo
grap
hy(g
eogr
aphy
)M
arri
age
and
the
AFa
mily
*(s
ocio
logy
)
Out
of
the
Past
: An
VIn
trod
uctio
n to
Arc
haeo
logy
*(a
rcha
eolo
gy/ a
n th
ro-
polo
gy)
Port
rait
of a
Fam
ilyV
(soc
iolo
gy)
Psyc
holo
gy: T
he S
tudy
V
of H
uman
Beh
avio
r(p
sych
olog
y)
Rur
al C
omm
uniti
es:
V
Leg
acy
and
Cha
nge
(soc
iolo
gy)
Seas
ons
of L
ife
V
(psy
chol
ogy)
A
Soci
al P
sych
olog
yV
(psy
chol
ogy)
12 /:
56E
xplo
res
the
fund
amen
tal p
ersp
ectiv
es o
f m
odem
geo
grap
hy; c
over
s su
chis
sues
as
the
inte
ract
ion
betw
een
peop
le a
nd th
e en
viro
nmen
t and
geog
raph
y's
effe
ct o
n hu
man
beh
avio
r. 1
1991
1
13/:3
0A
n au
dio-
prin
t cou
rse.
Cov
ers
defi
nitio
ns a
nd v
arie
ties
of U
.S. f
amili
es;
expl
ores
the
fam
ily li
fe c
ycle
fro
m m
ate
sele
ctio
n to
par
entin
g; d
iscu
sses
Rad
iopr
oble
m a
reas
in th
e U
.S. f
amily
. 119
871
Wilf
rid
TV
Ont
ario
, Mag
icL
auri
er U
niv.
Lan
tern
Wis
c. P
ublic
The
Aud
io S
tore
8/:6
0St
uden
ts e
xplo
re h
ow a
rcha
eolo
gist
s re
cons
truc
t anc
ient
soc
ietie
s an
d ex
plai
nPS
U &
how
and
why
they
evo
lved
. Use
s a
broa
dly
com
para
tive
pers
pect
ive
toW
QE
Dill
ustr
ate
how
arc
haeo
logy
and
ant
hrop
olog
y in
tera
ct. [
avai
labl
e 19
931
26/:3
0L
ooks
clo
sely
at m
arri
age,
fam
ily, a
nd a
ltern
ativ
e lif
esty
les
at th
e cl
ose
of th
e20
th c
entu
ry; b
alan
ces
rese
arch
and
theo
ry; e
xam
ines
per
sona
l cho
ice.
119
881
26/:3
[)In
trod
uces
bas
ic p
sych
olog
y: f
acts
, the
orie
s, p
ersp
ectiv
es, a
nd te
rmin
olog
y;ex
plor
es th
e ev
eryd
ay a
pplic
atio
ns a
nd im
plic
atio
ns o
f ps
ycho
logy
. 119
90]
13/:6
0A
ddre
sses
the
chal
leng
es f
acin
g ru
ral A
mer
ica
by tr
avel
ing
to 1
5 ru
ral
regi
ons
and
exam
inin
g va
riou
s fa
cets
of
com
mun
ity li
fe. E
xplo
res
deci
sion
son
how
muc
h ch
ange
is a
ccep
tabl
e an
d ne
cess
ary.
119
921
5/:6
0In
trod
uces
life
-spa
n ps
ycho
logy
. Exa
min
es s
igni
fica
nt e
vent
s fr
om in
fanc
y26
/:30
and
earl
y ch
ildho
od to
ado
lece
nce,
ear
ly a
nd m
iddl
e ad
ulth
ood,
and
late
adul
thoo
d. 1
1989
1
8/:3
0Su
rvey
s th
e fi
eld
of s
ocia
l psy
chol
ogy.
Exp
lore
s m
ajor
topi
cs in
clud
ing
com
mun
icat
ion,
fri
ends
hip,
pre
judi
ce, c
onfo
rmity
, lea
ders
hip,
rio
ts, a
ndhe
lpin
g ot
hers
. 119
891
PBS,
A/C
PB
INT
EL
EC
OM
PB
S, I
NT
EL
EC
OM
CC
CD
Coa
st T
elec
ours
es
Ohi
o U
niv.
PBS,
A/C
I'B
U. o
f M
ich.
PBS,
A/C
PB&
WQ
ED
IUC
IUC
Part
of
The
Ann
enbe
rg/C
PB C
olle
ctio
n(c
ontin
ued
1;:G
4 n
0
Soci
al S
cien
ces
Cou
rse
Med
#/R
TD
escr
iptio
nPr
oduc
erD
istr
ibut
or
Soci
olog
ical
Im
agin
atio
n, V
The (soc
iolo
gy)
Stor
y of
Dev
elop
men
t,V
The
(psy
chol
ogy)
Tim
e to
Gro
w(p
sych
olog
y)
Tow
ard
anU
nder
stan
ding
of
Chi
ldSe
xual
Abu
se(p
sych
olog
y)
V V
Wor
ld o
f A
bnor
mal
VPs
ycho
logy
, The
'(p
sych
olog
y)
Wor
lds
of C
hild
hood
V(p
sych
olog
y)
1E'
26/:3
0In
trod
uces
gro
ups,
com
mun
ities
, ins
titut
ions
, and
soc
ial s
ituat
ions
that
illus
trat
e m
ajor
soc
iolo
gica
l con
cept
s. D
ocum
enta
ry s
truc
ture
cov
ers
such
issu
es a
s so
cial
con
trol
and
edu
catio
n. 1
1991
1
121:
60E
xplo
res
child
and
ado
lesc
ent b
iolo
gica
l, co
gniti
ve, a
nd s
ocia
l dev
elop
men
t;pr
esen
ts th
e pr
oces
ses
that
sha
pe th
e jo
urne
y fr
om in
fanc
y to
ado
lesc
ence
;bl
ends
theo
ry a
nd il
lust
ratio
ns. 1
1988
1
Add
ress
es a
ll as
pect
s of
chi
ldre
n's
phys
ical
, cog
nitiv
e, a
nd p
sych
osoc
ial
deve
lopm
ent;
incl
udes
rec
ent t
heor
etic
al a
nd a
pplie
d pe
rspe
ctiv
es o
n ca
ring
for
and
wor
king
with
chi
ldre
n. [F
all 1
992]
26/3
0
10/:3
1)O
ffers
a c
ompr
ehen
sive
vie
w o
f chi
ld s
exua
l abu
se; t
race
s th
e hi
stor
y of
chi
ldse
xual
abu
se a
nd p
edop
hilia
; add
ress
es id
entif
icat
ion,
inte
rven
tion,
trea
tmen
t,an
d pr
even
tion.
119
911
131:
60E
xplo
res
the
com
plex
cau
ses,
man
ifest
atio
ns, a
nd tr
eatm
ent o
f com
mon
beha
vior
dis
orde
rs; s
how
s ab
norm
al b
ehav
iors
alo
ng a
con
tinuu
m fr
omfu
nctio
nal t
o dy
sfun
ctio
nal.
1199
21
24/:3
0E
xplo
res
the
lives
of c
hild
ren
grow
ing
up in
div
erse
soc
ial,
econ
omic
, and
cultu
ral c
ondi
tions
aro
und
the
wor
ld; e
mph
asiz
es h
ow c
hild
ren
activ
ely
shap
e th
eir
man
y so
cial
inte
ract
ions
. 119
921
DC
CC
DP
BS
, Dal
las
Tel
ecou
rses
Wilf
ridM
agic
Lan
tern
Laur
ier
Uni
v.
CC
CD
&C
oast
Tel
ecou
rses
INT
ELE
CO
M
U. o
f Min
n.G
PN
AH
P &
TLC
IP
BS
, A/C
PB
Geo
ffP
BS
, GP
NI i
aine
s-S
tiles
l'rod
. and
NV
CI
1.1
(con
tinue
d 11
)
Directory of Producers
(A1-11')Alvin H. Perlmutter, Inc.45 West 45th St.New York, NY 10036
Antenne 2 TV/France5, Avenue De VillarsParis, France 75007
Bay Area Comm. Coll. TVConsortium(No longer operating.)
Blackside, Inc.486 Shawmut Ave.Boston, MA 02118
(BBC)British Broadcasting Corp.EnterprisesWoodlands80 Wood Ln.London, England W12 On
California Institute ofTechnologyMechanical Universe Project305 South Hill Ave.Pasadena, CA 91104.
(CITY)Central Independent TV, England35-38 Portman SquareLondon, England WIA 2112
(CCCD)Coast Community College District11460 Warner Ave.Fountain Valley, CA92708-2597
College of San Mateo1700 West Hillsdale Blvd.San Mateo, CA 94402
Columbia University-GraduateSchool of JournalismMedia and Society Sem Jars475 Riverside Dr., Suite 248New York, NY 10115
(COMAP)Consortium for Mathematics andIts Application, Inc.57 Bedford, Suite 210Lexington, MA 02173
iDCCCD)Dallas County Community CollegeDistrict9596 Walnut St.Dallas, TX 75243-2112
(EFC)Educational Film Center5101-F Back lick Rd.Annandale, VA 22003
Florentine FilmsMaple Grove Rd.PO Box 613Walpole, NH 03608
Florida Junior College/JacksonvilleJacksonville, FL 32202
Geoff Haines-Stiles Productions41 Rowan Rd.Summit, NJ 07901
Goldcrest Films444 Madison Ave.New York, NY 10022
Governors State UniversityCommunications ServicesUniversity Park, IL 60466
(GPN)Great Plains NationalP.O. Box 80669Lincoln, NE 68501-0669
Humber College of Applied Arts& Technology205 Humber College Blvd.Rexdale, Ontario M9W 5L9
(INTELECOM)Southern California Consortiumfor Community College Television150 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 300Pasadena, CA 91105
(IVOInternational UniversityConsortiumThe University of MarylandUniversity CollegeUniversity Blvd. at Ade 1phi Rd.College Park, MD 20742-1612
KCTS401 Mercer St.Seattle, WA 98109
KERA3000 Harry Hines Blvd.Dallas, TX 75201
Kirkwood Community CollegeP.O. Box 2068Cedar Rapids, [A 52406
KOCE15751 Cothard St.Huntington Beach, CA 92647
KRMA1261 Glenarm Pl.Denver, CO 80204-9972
MacNeil-Lehrer Productions356 West 58th St.New York, NY W019
(MD-ITV)Maryland Instructional Television11767 Owings Mills Blvd.Owings Mills, MD21117-1499
(M-DCC)Miami-Dade Community CollegeProduct Development andDistribution11011 SW 104th St., Rm. 1009Miami, FL 33176-3393
(MATC)Milwaukee Area Technical CollegeCollege of the Air700 West State St.Milwaukee, WI 53233
Mythology Ltd.110 Sunnyside Ave.Piedmont, CA 94611
National Film Poard of Canada16th Floor1251 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10020
(NVC1)National Video Con munications,Inc.P.O. Box 254Charlevoix, MI 4972(1
141
194
-ur
The New York Center for VisualHistory625 Broadway, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10012
Ohio UniversityTelecommunications Center9 S. College St.Athens, OH 45701
Open Learning Agency, B.C.7671 Alder Bridge WayRichmond, British ColumbiaV6X 129
The Pacific Basin Institute7 East Mission St., Suite CSanta Barbara, CA 93101
Palomar Coltege1140 West Mission Rd.San Marcos, CA 92069-1487
WSWThe Pennsylvania State UniversityWagner AnnexUniversity Park, PA 16802
Public Media Foundation74 Joy St.Boston, MA 02114
Simon Fraser UniversityContinuing StudiesBurnaby, BC V5i 1S6
Soma Film Productions343 Car law Ave., Suite 200Toronto, Ontario M4M 2T1
(SCETV)South Carolina ETVMarketingPO. Drawer LColumbia, SC 29205
Texas InstrumentsPO Box 655474Mail Station 439Dallas, TX 75265
Thames Television International149 Tottenham Court Rd.London, England W1P 911
Time-LifeDept. TV1450 East Parham Rd.Richmond, VA 23280
(TLC)Toby LevineCommunications, Inc.Suite 13047910 Woodmont Ave.Bethesda, MD 20814
TVOntarioSuite 3081140 Kildare Farm Rd.Cary, NC 27511
University of DelawareDivision of Continuing EducationJohn M. Clayton HallNewark, DE 19716-7410
University of Maryland-CollegeParkDepartment of ChemistryCollege Park, MD 20742
The University of Michigan -DearbornCollege of Arts, Sciences,and LettersDept. of Behavioral SciencesDearborn, MI 48128
University of MinnesotaDept. of Independent Study45 Weshrook Hall77 Pleasant St., S.E.Minneapolis, MN 55435
University of South CarolinaDistance Education915 Gregg St.Columbia, SC 29208
University of South FloridaTampa, FL 33620
(UWEX)University of Wisconsin -Extension821 University Ave.Madison, WI 53706
Virginia Polytechnic InstituteLearning Resource CenterBlacksburg, VA 24061
WETA3700 South Four MileRun Dr,Arlington, VA 22206
WGBli125 Western Ave.Boston, MA 02134
WHA-TV821 University Ave.Madison, WI 53706
Wilfrid Laurier UniversityTelecollege Productions75 University Ave.Waterloo, Ontario M2L 3C6
Wisconsin Public Radio821 University Ave.Madison, WI 53706
V/NETEducational Division356 West 58th St.New York, NY 10019
WQED4802 Fifth Ave.Pittsburgh, PA 15213
WTTIN5400 North St. Louis Ave.Chicago, IL 60625
Yale UniversityYale Language Laboratory111 Grove St.New Haven, CT 06511
142
195
Directory of Distributors
Ambrose Video Publishing, Inc.1290 Avenue of the Americas,Suite 2245New York, NY 101041 (800) 843-0048
(A/CPB)The Annenberg/CPB CollectionPO Box 2345S. Burlington, VT 05407-23451 (800) LEARNER
The Audio Store975 Observatory Dr.Madison, WI 53706I (800) 97 -AUDIO
Coast Telecourses11460 Warner Ave.Fountain Valley, CA 92708-2597(714) 241-6109
Dallas Telecourses9596 Walnut St.Dallas, TX 75243-2112(214) 952-0333
Films Incorporated5547 N. Ravenswood Ave.Chicago, IL 60640-11991 0300) 323-4222
Governors State UniversityCommunications ServicesUniversity Park, EL 60466(708) 534-4096
(GI'N)Great Plains NationalP.O. Box 80669Lincoln, NE 68501-06691 (800) 225-4630
(INTELECOM)Southern California Consortiumfor Community College Television150 East Colorado Blvd., Ste. 300Pasadena, CA 91105(816) 796-730(1
(ITS)International TelecommunicationServices Inc2492 Freetown Dr.Reston, VA 22091(703) 476-4468
(IUC)International UniversityConsortiumThe University of MarylandUniversity CollegeUniversity Blvd. at Adeiphi Rd.College Park, MD 20742-1612(410) 581-4025
Kirkwood Community CollegeP.O. Box 2068Cedar Rapids, IA 52406(319) 398-5481
Magic Lantern CommunicationsLtd.#38-775 Pacific Rd.Oakville, Ontario L6L 6M4(416) 827-1155
(MPT)Maryland Public Television11767 Owings Mills Blvd.Owings. Mills, MD 21117-1499(301) 356-5600
(M-DCC)Miami-Dade Community CollegeProduct Development andDistribution11011 SW 104th St., Rm. 1009Miami, FL 33176-3393(305) 237-2158
Ohio UniversityTelecommunications Center9 S. College St.Athens, OH 45701(614) 593-1771
(PBS)Public Broadcasting ServiceAdult Learning Service1320 Braddock Pl.Alexandria, VA 22314-1698(703) 739-5361
San Mateo County CommunityCollege District1700 West Hillsdale Blvd.San Mateo, CA 94402(415) 574-6600
(SCETV)South Carolina ETV MarketingPD. Drawer LColumbia, SC 29205(803) 737-3200
TVOntarioSuite 3081140 Kildare Farm Rd.Cary; NC 27511(919) 380-0747
University of DelawareDivision of Continuing EducationJohn M. Clayton HallNewark, DE 19716-7410(302) 831-1114
University of MinnesotaDept. of Independent Study45 Wesbrook Hall77 Pleasant Street S.E.Minneapolis, MN 55455(612) 624-1669
(VTAE)The Wisconsin Foundation forVocational, Technical & AdultEducation, Inc.2564 Branch St.Middleton, WI 53562(608) 831-6313
143196
Appendix 1. Resources
The following list of resources is intended to provide a start on finding documents andhandbooks that may be helpful in planning your distance degree programs. Many ofthese documents themselves have wonderful reference and resource sections includedin them. We see this as only a snapshot of what is available at this time and whatwe have learned about to date. You should regularly update the list for your own use,and we hope you'll keep us informed about new resources that you've found useful.
AUTHOR: Albright, MichaelTITLE: It's Time to Rethink Instructional Technology Service in Higher Education.DATE: 1989SOURCE: TechT rends, vol.34, no.5 (Oct.), pp.40-45.
This discussion of the role of instructional technology in higher educationhighlights a model for Integrated Instructional Technology Service (IITS).Topics include instructional development, faculty development, learningresources, media development, instructional telecommunications, instructionalcomputing, research and evaluation, and the relationship of the library andcomputer center to the IITS model.
AUTHOR: American Council on Education Center for Adult Learning and EducationalCredentials and The Alliance: An Association for Alternative DegreePrograms for Adults
TITLE: Principles of Good Practice for Alternative and External Degree Programs forAdults.
DATE: 1990SOURCE: Washington, DC: American Council on Education
An overview and expanded discussion of the principles of good practice withsections on mission statement, personnel, learning outcomes, learningexperiences, assessment, student services, program administration, andprogram evaluation.
AUTHOR: Anadam, Kama laTITLE: instructional Technology 15 Years Later: What Has Happened, What Has
Not?DATE: 1989SOURCE: Community, Technical, and Junior College Journal, vol.60, no.2 (Oct.-Nov.), pp.28-
35.
Draws from site visits to 50 two-year colleges to identify computerapplications in instruction, services to disabled students, and testing anddistance education. Discusses areas in which computer technology has notbeen used to its full potential.
(
AUTHOR: Aslanian, Carol B.; Brickell, Henry M.TITLE: Americans in Transition: Life Changes as Reasons for Adult Learning.DATE: 1980SOURCE: New York: College Entrance Examination Board
Reports the findings of a two-year national College Board survey of 2,000Americans 25 years of age and older designed to determine why, when, andwhat they learn.
AUTHOR: Association of College and Research Libraries Task Force to Review theGuidelines for Extended Campus Library Services
TITLE: ACRL Guidelines for Extended Campus Library Services.DATE: 1990SOURCE: College and Research Library News, April.
A revision of a previous publication; approved by the ALA StandardsCommittee at the 1990 Annual Conference.
AUTHOR: Bates, A.W.TITLE: Application of New Technologies (Including Computers) in Distance Education:
Implications for the Training of Distance Educators.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Report available from ERIC - document #ED333893
This paper, from the Open Learning Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia,analyzes the impact of technology change on distance education and theimplications for training and distance education staff development.
AUTHOR: Bates, A.W.TITLE: Interactivity as a Criterion for Media Selection in Distance Education.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Report available from ERIC - document #ED329245
This paper discusses the different levels of decision-making regarding mediaselection and technology use in distance education and suggests a set ofcriteria and procedures that are practical yet rigorous. Interactivity is oneof the main criteria proposed, and the value and meaning of interaction andinteractivity in a distance education context are discussed.
146
1 PP
AUTHOR: Bates, A.W.TITLE: The Challenge of Technology for European Distance Education: IET Papers in
Broadcasting No. 288.DATE: 1989SOURCE: Report available from ERIC - document #ED318424
Internal challenges are identified as: the need for clearly defined policiesregarding transporter activities; low use of technology in member institutions;communications among member institutions (postal services, courier services,telephone, telefacsimile, face-to-face meetings, and audioconferencing); jointcourse production; transborder delivery of courses; and course design anddelivery in Europe.
AUTHOR: Beaudoin, MichaelTITLE: The Instructor's Changing Role in Distance Education.DATE: 1990SOURCE: The American Journal of Distance Education, vol.4, no.2, pp.21-29.
Discusses the role of the instructor in distance education programs and howthat role differs from faculty in traditional educational settings. The impactof instructional technology is considered; methods of improving facultyattitudes toward distance education are described; and duties of faculty indistance education are discussed.
AUTHOR: Bedard, Rene, editorTITLE: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for the Study
of Adult Education.DATE: 1989SOURCE: Report available from ERIC document #ED311202
Contains 45 papers in English including: "Teaching by Teleconference";"Computer-Mediated Communication in Distance Education";"Telecommunications and the Adult Learner"; and "Ethical Considerations inLearning at a Distance." Also includes 23 papers in French.
AUTHOR: Berenson, Sarah B.; Stiff, Lee V.TITLE: Uses of Instructional Technologies: First-Year Report on Change at a
University.DATE: 1991SOURCE: Journal of Coinputers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol.10, no.2 (Winter),
pp.11-19.
Describes significant changes in a university faculty's practices and attitudestoward uses of instructional technologies and active learning strategies forundergraduate mathematics and science instruction.
147189
AUTHOR: Brey, RonaldTITLE: Telecourse Utilization Survey Project Third-Year Report: Fall 1986 - Summer
1989.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Austin: Austin Community College
Assesses the growing use of television courses among members of theInstructional Telecommunications Consortium of the American Associationof Community and Junior Colleges.
AUTHOR: Brey, RonTITLE: U.S. Postsecondary Distance Learning Programs in the 1990s: A Decade of Growth.DATE: 1991SOURCE: Washington, DC: The Instructional Telecommunications Consortium/
American Association of Community and Junior Colleges
This research report examines the telecommunications and electronictechnologies that postsecondary institutions will use for their distancelearning programs during the 1990s and the academic levels at which theseprograms will be offered.
AUTHOR: Brock, DeeTITLE: Symposium on Telecommunications and the Adult Learner.DATE: 1991SOURCE: Washington, DC: The Instructional Telecommunications Consortium/
American Association of Community and Junior Colleges
Summarizes presentations and group discussions of the Symposium, whichwas convened to address such issues as depleting funding sources fortelevision course production and the underrating of television courses withinhigher education. Considers how new applications of educational televisioncould alleviate the pressing national needs for equity and access in highereducation and Americans' needs for training and retraining.
AUTHOR: Cates, JeanetteTITLE: Faculty Training Gains Support for Technology.DATE: 1987SOURCE: Technological Horizons in Education, vol.14, no.10 (June), pp.67-69.
Describes a series of training workshops and activities in computer-basedinstruction for the faculty of Austin Community College. Reviews the topicsaddressed in the various programs and specifies the services that areavailable for the participants. Outlines future plans.
148 200
INEM!MiIMIP
AUTHOR: Coombs, NormanTITLE: Teaching in the Information Age.DATE: 1992SOURCE: EDUCOM, March/April, pp.28-31.
Describes the use of computer conferencing at the Rochester Institute ofTechnology not only as a framework for questions and answers, but as aplatform for sharing opinions and differing perceptions about course content.
AUTHOR: Council on Postsecondary Accreditation (COPA); Marjorie Peace Lenn, editorTITLE: Distance Learning and Accreditation: Professional Development Series.DATE: 1991SOURCE: Washington, DC: Council on Postsecondary Accreditation
A series of papers by Michael B. Goldstein, Paula Hooper Mayhew, KateGulliver, June Lester, Timothy M. Grieder, Steven Crow, and Allan 0.Pfnister delivered at COPA's April 1991 Professional Development Session.
AUTHOR: Crane, ValerieTITLE: Academic Evaluation of the Annenberg /CPB Telecourses.DATE: 1988SOURCE: Washington, DC: The Annenberg/CPB Project
AUTHOR: De Landsheere, GilbertTITLE: The Information Society and Education: Synthesis of the National Reports.DATE: 1989SOURCE: Report available from ERIC document #ED327209
Two major areas of focus emerge: the question of how to teach studentscritical and autonomous judgment with regard to the mass media, and howbest to use new information and communication technology and the mediafor educational purposes.
AUTHOR: De Loughry, Thomas J.TITLE: Remote Instruction Using Computers Found as Effective as Classroom
Sessions.DATE: 1988SOURCE: Chronicle of Higher Education, vol.34, no.32, pp.A15, A21.
Reports on the use of on-line instruction at the New Jersey Institute ofTechnology and Upsala College as part of the Virtual Classroom Project.
149
201
AUTHOR: Dennis, Nancy; Harrington, Nancy-DoddTITLE: Librarian and Faculty Member Differences in Using Information Technologies.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Reference Services Review, vol.18, no.3, pp.47-52.
Examines library programs that teach information technologies and arguesthat many fulfill the wishes of librarians, not faculty and students. Facultyvisions for the use of technology in teaching, research, and publishing arediscussed. It concludes that librarians must look at technology from thefaculty viewpoint in order to develop effective bibliographic instruction.
AUTHOR: Dennis, Nancy; Stadthaus, AliceTITLE: Teaching Information Technologies in a Classroom Setting.DATE: 1991SOURCE: Computers in Libraries, vol.11, no.1, pp.17-19.
Describes an undergraduate course that was developed at Salem State Collegeto provide students with an overview of information technologies, includingon-line databases, on-line catalogs, CD-ROM, hypertext, interactive video,electronic bulletin boards, and computer networks. Student reactionsincluding changed perceptions are discussed, and further research issuggested.
AUTHOR: Dillon, Connie; Blanchard, Dana; Price, Mike (Oklahoma Research Center forContinuing Professional and Higher Education)
TITLE: Improving Teaching at a Distance: A Guide to Resources.DATE: 1990SOURCE: For copies, call the University of Oklahoma, (405) 325-6882
AUTHOR: Dirr, Peter J.TITLE: Building a Program for Distant Learners.DATE: 1988SOURCE: The Distant Learner in the Human Service Professions: .A Reader, edited by E.
Waddell and A.S. Willis. Columbia: The University of South Carolina
AUTHOR: Dirr, Peter J.TITLE: Understanding Television-Based Distance Education: Identifying Barriers to
University Aitendance.DATE: 1991SOURCE: Research in Distance Education, vol.3, no.1 (Jan.), pp.2-4.
150 202
L
AUTHOR: Dive ly, Dwight; McGill, Mollie (Western Cooperative for EducationalTelecommunications)
TITLE: State Planning and Implementation of Educational Telecommunications Systems inthe West.
DATE: 1991SOURCE: For copies, call the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education
(W1CHE), (303) 541-0290
This report summarizes the status of major educational telecommunicationssystems and plans in 16 western states as of early 1991. Fifth in a seriesof state telecommunications activities. Useful for compiling planningapproaches, taking inventory of existing resources and expertise, andidentifying possibilities for cooperation.
AUTHOR: Ehrmann, Stephen C.TITLE: Reaching Students, Reaching Resources: Using Technologies to Open the
College.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Academic Computing, vol.1V, no.7 (April).
AUTHOR: Eisner, John; Carter, ThomasTITLE: University Faculty Teaching Activities in an Electronic Curriculum.DATE: 1989SOURCE: Educational Technology, vol.29, no.4, pp.17-22.
Discusses changes in the instructional activities of university faculty membersas a result of new computer-related educational technologies. Topics includecomputer-assisted instruction, computer-managed instruction, optical discs,microcomputers, lecturing versus computer-based tutorials, videodiscs,computerized evaluative feedback, cross-disciplinary collaboration,instructional design changes, and authoring systems.
AUTHOR: Elmore, Garland C.TITLE: Integrated Technologies: An Approach to Establishing Multimedia
Applications for Learning.DATE: 1991SOURCE: EDUCOM, Jan./Feb., pp.20-26.
This paper reports on the results of a two-year planning process that resultedin the integration of all voice, data, and video technologies and developeda long-term plan for a high-technology library system.
151
2115:
AUTHOR: Emery, MaryTITLE: Some Potentials and Limitations of Technology in Serving Rural Postsecondary
Learners,DATE: 1986SOURCE: Report available from ERIC - document #E0296854
This paper examines the potential impact of technology on postsecondaryrural education, based on the experiences of people currently usingtechnological delivery systems.
AUTHOR: Feasley, Charles E.; Krieger, Ellen; Markowitz, Harold Jr.; Rose, SylviaTITLE: Independent Study Program Profiles, 1986-1987.DATE: 1988SOURCE: Washington, DC: National University Continuing Education Association
(NUCEA)
AUTHOR: Feenberg, AndrewTITLE: Network Design: An Operating Manual for Computer Conferencing.DATE: 1986SOURCE: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications, vol.PC29, no.1 (March)
AUTHOR: Foa, Lin (The Annenberg/CPB Project)TITLE: Pathways to Success: Using Technologies to Reach Distant Learners.DATE: 1991SOURCE: Washington, DC: Corporation for Public Broadcasting
Projects that applied to the Annenberg/CPB Project's New Pathways to aDegree initiative share their innovative ideas about how to use technologiesto improve both the accessibility and quality of higher education. Contactnames and numbers provided.
AUTHOR: Garrison, Randy D.TITLE: Distance Education.DATE: 1989SOURCE: Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education, edited by Sharan B. Merriam and
Phyllis M. Cunningham. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
AUTHOR: Gellman-Buzin, B.TITLE: Telecommunications as an Element of Competitive Strategy.DATE: 1987SOURCE: Competitive Strategies for Continuing Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
152204
AUTHOR: Gilcher, Kay W.; Johnstone, Sally M.TITLE: A Critical Review of the Use of Audiographic Conferencing Systems by Selected
Educational Institutions.DATE: 1989SOURCE: For copies, call The International University Consortium, (301) 985-7811
AUTHOR: Cooler, D.TITLE: Evaluating Distance Education Programmes.DATE: 1979SOURCE: Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, vol.6, no.1, pp.43-55.
AUTHOR: Granger, DanielTITLE: Open Universities: Closing the Distances to Learning.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Change, vol.22, no.4, pp.44-50.
The development of distance learning seems assured by students' needs,faculty recognition of its effectiveness, and institutional efficiencies. Whilethe United States is not likely to have a British-style Open University, it hasmany institutions developing new ways to serve students by combining newtechnologies with new ways of teaching and learning.
AUTHOR: Habour, J., et al. (Idaho National Engineering Laboratory and Boise StateUniversity)
TITLE: Distributed Training for the Reserve Component: Instructor Handbook for ComputerConferencing.
DATE: 1990SOURCE: For copies, call Ruth H. Phelps, U.S. Army Research Institute for the
Behavioral and Social Sciences, (208) 334-9390
AUTHOR: Hahn, Heidi A., et al. (Idaho National Engineering Laboratory and BoiseState University)
TITLE: Distributed Training for the Reserve Component: Course Conversion andImplementation Guidelines for Computer Conferencing.
DATE: 1990SOURCE: For copies, call Ruth H. Phelps, U.S. Army Research Institute for the
Behavioral and Social Sciences, (208) 334-9390
AUTHOR: Harasim, Linda M.TITLE: Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment.DATE: 1990SOURCE: New York: Praeger
1532 5
L-LrUni/
AUTHOR: Harker, VictoriaTITLE: Long-distance Learning: Busy Mom Earns Degree While Staying at Home.DATE: 1992SOURCE: Arizona Republic, May 16, 1992.
AUTHOR: Hedberg, John G., editorTITLE: Converging Technologies. Selected Papers from the EdTech'90 Conference of
the Australian Society for Educational Technology (Sydney, Australia, July1990).
DATE: 1990SOURCE: Report available from ERIC - document #ED323968
This collection contains 30 selected papers and abstracts of six additionalpapers. The papers include "Computerized Out-of-Class Exercises," "InteractiveVideotape and Videodisc Language Packages," "The Use of Interactive VideoConferencing in Education and Training," and "Developing an IntelligentTutoring System," among others.
AUTHOR: Helal, Hamed H.; Weiss, Joachim W., editorsTITLE: Information Technology and Library Management.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Report available from ERIC - document #ED335041
The 16 papers in this collection focus on the impact of new technologies onlibraries and library managers.
AUTHOR: Hezel, RichardTITLE: Enrolling in On-Campus Courses: Telecourse Students' Constraints.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Washington, DC: The Annenberg/CPB Project
AUTHOR: Hezel, RichardTITLE: Planning for Educational Telecommunications: A State by State Analysis 1992.DATE: 1992SOURCE: Syracuse, NY: Hezel Associates
The third, most comprehensive edition of reports on statewide planning foreducational telecommunications in the United States. This follows andupdates reports from 1990 and 1987.
154
206
-ur
AUTHOR: Hezel, RichardTITLE: Policies for Educational Technology: A National, State, and Local Agenda.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Report available from ERIC - document #ED327174
Since 1987, Hezel Associates has studied how each of the 50 statescoordinates the planning of technology, especially the use oftelecommunication" for education and related activities.
AUTHOR: Hezel, RichardTITLE: Telecourse Inventory.DATE: 1988SOURCE: Washington, DC: The Annenberg/CPB Project
AUTHOR: Hiltz, Starr RoxanneTITLE: Teaching in a Virtual Classroom (Final Evaluation Report of a Virtual
Classroom on Electronic Information Exchange Systems [EIES]).DATE: 1988SOURCE For copies, call New Jersey Institute of Technology, (201) 596 -EIES
AUTHOR: Johnston, JeromeTITLE: Electronic Learning: From Audiotape to Videodisc.DATE: 1987SOURCE: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
An excellent historical review and evaluation of the use of technologies ineducation.
AUTHOR: King, Kenneth M.TITLE: Information Technologies in Support of Teaching and Learning.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Higher Education Management, vol.2, no.3, pp.294-298.
This analysis of information technology's role in higher education looks atthe pressure to use technology, the slow pace of adoption, current directionsin technological advancement, and its impact on institutional policy andresources requirements.
155
207
AUTHOR: Krause, JulieTITLE: Telecommunications in Foreign Language Education: A Resource List. ERIC Digest.DATE: 1989SOURCE: Report available from ERIC - document #ED317039
This ERIC digest examines many of the resources available to foreignlanguage educators including De Orilla A Orilla, The Computer WritingNetwork, CompuServe, Minitel, The Global TELEclass Project(Telecommunication Enriches Language Experience), and SatelliteCommunications for Learning (SCOLA). Highlights the advantages of usingtelecommunications in the foreign language classroom.
AUTHOR: Krebs, ArleneTITLE: The LISDLA Funding Sourcebook for Distance Learning and Educational Technology.DATE: 1991SOURCE: New York: New Orbit Communications
Covers requirements and grant priorities from foundations, corporations, andthe federal government in support of telecommunications and "new media."Includes a reference section to assist in funding and research of distancelearning and educational technology.
AUTHOR: Kromholz, Susan; Johnstone, SallyTITLE: A Practical Application to Training Instructional Television Faculty and
Students.DATE: 1988SOURCE: Lifelong Learning, vol.11, no.8, pp.15-16.
AUTHOR: Lacina, Lorna J.; Book, Connie LedouxTITLE: Creative Teaching on Television.DATE: 1989SOURCE: Report available from ERIC - document #ED325069
Reports on two lessons from a graduate general education course that werepresented in a live-television format. One group of students was placed inthe studio with the instructor and another group in a classroom away fromthe studio.
AUTHOR: Lacy, Helen; Wolcott, LindaTITLE: Effective Telecommunications Presentations: A Handbook for Distance Education
Professionals.DATE: 1988SOURCE: For copies, call Helen Lacy at Utah Educational Network, (801) 581-4194
156 .21_ s
,
AUTHOR: Latham, Sheila; Slade, Alexander L.; Budnick, CarolTITLE: Library Services for Off -Campus and Distance Education: An Annotated BibliographyDATE: 1991SOURCE: Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Library Association
AUTHOR: Lavin, TomTITLE: Best's External Degree Directory.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Northridge, CA: Academic Research Institute
AUTHOR: Lessin, Barton M., editorTITLE: Off -campus Library Services: Selected Readings from Central Michigan University's
Off -campus Library Services ConferencesDATE: 1991SOURCE: Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
AUTHOR: Levine, Toby KlebanTITLE: Teaching Telecourses: Opportunities and Options.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Washington, DC: The Annenberg/CPB Project and PBS Adult Learning
Service
Assists faculty in assessing the value of television courses for students andin utilizing the materials most effectively. Examines how television coursesare developed a id how they compare co other forms of instruction, whatis involved in teaching television courses, and how they are adopted andused by colleges and universities.
AUTHOR: Malinconico, S. MichaelTITLE: Technology and the Academic Workplace.DATE: 1991SOURCE: Library Administration & Management, vol.5, no.1 (Winter), pp.25-28.
Discusses the influence electronic technologies are having on academiclibraries. Highlights include the combination of computer technology andtelecommunications; the impact of integrated systems; adding value toinformation through the use of workstations and on-line databases; teachingand learning roles of librarians; library user fees; and the importance ofplanning.
157 2 0
AUTHOR: Markowitz, Harold, Jr.TITLE: The Next Twenty Years in American Independent Study.DATE: 1988SOURCE: The American Journal of Distance Education, vol.2, no.2, pp.89-94.
AUTHOR: Markwood, Richard A.; Johnstone, Sally M. (Western Cooperative forEducational Telecommunications), editors
TITLE: The New Pathways to a Degree Project Evaluation. First Year Report to theAnnenbergICPB Project.
DATE: 1992SOURCE: For copies, call the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education
(W1CHE), (303) 541-0290
First-year observations by a team of evaluators working with each of theseven A/CPB New Pathways to a Degree initiative are reported. The sevenschools participating are Oregon State System of Higher Education, Collegeof St. Catherine, Community College of Maine, Indiana University-PurdueUniversity at Indianapolis, Northern Virginia Community College, WestVirginia Higher Education Sys:em, and Rochester Institute of Technology.
AUTHOR: Mason, Robin; Kaye, AnthonyTITLE: Mindweave: Communication, Computers, and Distance Education.DATE: 1989SOURCE: New York: Pergamon Press
AUTHOR: McAnge, Thomas R., Jr.TITLE: A Survey of Educational Computer Networks.DATE: 1990SOURCE: For copies, call the Virginia Cooperative Extension, (703) 231-6910
AUTHOR: Miller, Gary E.TITLE: Distance Education in the United States: Collaboration Amid Diversity.DATE: 1989SOURCE: Open Learning, November, pp.23-27.
158
91i)
AUTHOR: Moore, Michael G., editorTITLE: Contemporary Issues in American Distance Education.DATE: 1990SOURCE: New York: Pergamon Press
Chapters include: "Bridging distances to the individual learner" (Granger);"Research needs for adult learners via television" (Brock); "Distance educationand the curriculum: Dredging a new mainstream" (Miller); "Delivery systemsfor distance education: Focus on computer conferencing" (Florini); and"Instructional design and development: Contingency management for distanceeducation" (Wagner).
AUTHOR: National Universities Degree Consortium (NUDC)TITLE: Student Handbook.DATE: 1991SOURCE: Englewood, CO: NUDC.
Explains how the degree program works and includes some interestingmaterial on the evaluation of transfer credit and the completion of a self-advising worksheet.
AUTHOR: National University Continuing Education Association (NUCEA)TITLE: Lifelong Learning TrendsDATE: 1992SOURCE: Washington, DC: NUCEA
AUTHOR: National University Continuing Education Association (NUCEA)TITLE: Standards of the Division of Independent Study.DATE: 1978; Rev. 1989SOURCE: Washington, DC: NUCEA
Guidelines for conducting and improving the quality of independent studyprograms and to assist in the internal and external evaluation of theseprograms. Includes sections on philosophy, mission, administration, staff,faculty, instruction, services, and research and evaluation.
1592 1 1
AUTHOR: Olcott, Donald J., Jr.TITLE: Policy Issues in Statewide Delivery of University Programs by
Telecommunications.DATE: 1992SOURCE: The American Journal of Distance Education, vol.6, no.1, pp.14-25.
This article discusses such policy issues as program prioritization, reviewprocedures, academic residency, fee structures, and accreditation. Asserts thatprogram approval, academic policy revision, and accreditation review arenecessary prerequisites for successfully extending academic degree programsand enhancing student access.
AUTHOR: Oregon Community College Telecommunications ConsortiumTITLE: "Ed-Net Update" and 'Two Year AA Transfer Degree Integrates Telecourses
and Ed-Net".DATE: 1992SOURCE: OCCTC Newsletter, Spring.
Reports that Oregon Ed-Net's Network I, H, and III are partially completedand already in use. Also announces that the OCCTC may be the firstconsortium nationwide to offer a complete two-year AA transfer degreethrough integrated distance learning methods.
AUTHOR: Pau let, R.TITLE: Counseling Distance Learners.DATE: 1987SOURCE: Tech Trends, vol.32, no.4 (Sept.), pp.26-28.
AUTHOR: PBS Adult Learning ServiceTITLE: Guide to PBS Adult Learning Service Television Courses.DATE: 1992SOURCE: Alexandria, VA: Public Broadcasting Service
AUTHOR: Phelps, RuthTITLE: Distributed Training for the Reserve Component: Remote Delivery Using
Asynchronous Computer Conferencing.DATE: 1990SOURCE: For copies, call Ruth Phelps, U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral
and Social Sciences, (208) 334-9390
160 214
-c
AUTHOR: Rapaport, M.TITLE: Computer Mediated Communications.DATE: 1991SOURCE: New York: John Wiley & Sons
AUTHOR: Ready, Barbara C.; Sacchetti, Raymond D., editorsTITLE: The Independent Study Catalog: NUCEA's Guide to Independent Study Through
Correspondence Instruction, 1986-1988.DATE: 1986; Rev. 1992SOURCE: Princeton: National University Continuing Education Association (NUCEA)
and Peterson's Guides
AUTHOR: Roberts, Linda. (U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment)TITLE: Linking For Learning: A New Course for Education.DATE: 1989SOURCE: Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
Analyzes the various technological options, examines current development,and identifies how federal, state, and local policies could encourage moreefficient and effective use of telecommunications technologies in distancelearning.
AUTHOR: Sachs, Steven G.TITLE: Teaching Thinking Skills to Distant Learners.DATE: 1991SOURCE: Tech Trends, vol.36, no.1 (Jan./Feb.), pp.28-32.
Recommends strategies for working with distance learners that require thosestudents to have a model of set procedures to follow, so that they produceresults that show their thought processes. Part of a special project onthinking skills by three Virginia community colleges.
AUTHOR: Schaffer, James M.TITLE: Preparing Faculty and Designing Courses for Delivery Via Audio
Teleconferencing.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Journal of Adult Education, vol.18, no.2 (Spring), pp.11-18.
The University of Wyoming uses two-way audio teleconferencing to deliverinstruction to distance learners. The design of telecourses follows five stages:faculty recruitment, precourse discussions with the course coordinator, facultyworkshop, small-group instructional diagnosis for midcourse feedback, andfinal course evaluation.
161
213
-ur
LI L/
AUTHOR: Shapiro, Jeremy J.; Hughes, Shelley K.TITLE: Networked Information Resources in Distance Education for Adults.DATE: 1992SOURCE: Technological Horizons in Education, vol.19, no.11 (June), pp.66-69.
Discusses The Fielding Institute in Santa Barbara, California, where graduateeducation is offered to adult students located all over the world. On-lineinformation is key to its curriculum; on-line searching and the many usesto which students apply the acquired information is examined.
AUTHOR: Staman, E. MichaelTITLE: An Action Plan for Infusing Technology into the Teaching Learning Process.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Cause /Effect, vol.13, no. 2 (Summer), pp.34-40.
This article proposes a model for a supported, managed effort to create anenvironment in which faculty can successfully integrate technology into theinching process. The model is based on needs identified by the informationservices organization at West Chester University. An alternative financialmodel is offered.
AUTHOR: Strain, JohnTITLE: Policies in American External Study: Credit for Extra-Institutional Learning.DATE: 1989SOURCE: Distance Education, vol :0, no.2, pp.230-241.
AUTHOR: Thorson, Marcie KisnerTITLE: Campus-Free College Degrees, Fourth Edition.DATE: 1989SOURCE: Tulsa: Thorson Guides
AUTHOR: U.S. Department of the Navy.TITLE: DANTES Catalog of External Degree Programs.DATE: 1988 (Dec.)SOURCE: Pensacola: U.S. Department of the Navy
16221e;
AUTHOR: University of Maine at Augusta Office of Distance EducationTITLE: The Community College of Maine Annual Report, Year Two, 1990-1991.DATE: 1991SOURCE: For copies, call the University of Maine at Augusta, (207) 621-3403
The Community College of Maine was created to provide greatly increasedaccess to educational opportunity for Maine citizens; 1990-91 marked thesecond full year in operation. This report provides a detailed accounting ofthe activities and events of that year.
AUTHOR: University of Maryland University CollegeTITLE: External Baccalaureate Degree Programs in the United States.DATE: 1990SOURCE: Washington, DC: The Annenberg/CPB Project
The University of Maryland University College identified and examined 15external baccalaureate degree programs nationally to elicit specific informationon administrative policies, admission and graduation requirements, supportservices, distance education course design, and pedagogical strategies.
AUTHOR: Utah Education Network, TheTITLE: Network Offers Final Faculty Training Gass for 1991-1992.DATE: 1992SOURCE: Electronic Distance Education in Utah Update, April, p.5.
Faculty and Staff Development Workshops are required of all personsscheduled to use any of the Utah Education Network's telecommunicationssystems, and faculty representing public education and Utah's colleges anduniversity are expected to attend. One of only a handful of in-depth trainingprograms for distance education faculty offered around the country.
AUTHOR: Verduin, John It, Jr.; Clark, Thomas A.TITLE: Distance Education: The Foundations of Effective Practice.DATE: 1991SOURCE: San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Gives adult educators in a range of fields a comprehensive reference fordeveloping educationally sound, creative, nontraditional approaches tolearning that use a variety of media in a wide range of settings. Presentsand gives applications for an innovative approach to distance instructionbased on adult learning theory.
163
215
c
AUTHOR: Wagner, Ellen D.TITLE: Teaching on Tele-Systems: A Faculty Development Handbook.DATE: 1991SOURCE: The University of Northern Colorado. For copies, call the Western
Cooperative for Educational Television, (303) 541-0231
AUTHOR: Watkins, Barbara L., and Wright, Stephen J., editorsTITLE: The Foundations of American Distance Education: A Century of Collegiate
Correspondence Study.DATE: 1991SOURCE: Continuing Education Bookstore, Texas Tech University, (806) 742-2352
Describes the history of collegiate correspondence study, discusses its currentstate of practice, and speculates on its prospects for the future. Nineteenindividuals several of whom are recognized as leaders in the field ofdistance education contributed to this volume.
AUTHOR: Wells, Rosalie A. (Boise State University)TITLE: Computer-Mediated Communications for Distance Education and Training: Literature
Review and International Resources.DATE: 1990SOURCE: For copies, call Ruth H. Phelps, U.S. Army Research Institute for the
Behavioral and Social Sciences, (208) 334-9390
AUTHOR: Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications FacultyDevelopment Subcommittee
TITLE: Faculty Resource Guide to Distance Education.DATE: 1990SOURCE: For copies, call the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education
(WICHE), (303) 541-0290
AUTHOR: Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications (WICHE)TITLE: Reports from Western States. Educational Tel Plans, Policies,
Programs,DATE: 1991SOURCE: For copies, call the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education
(WICHE), (303) 541-0290
Contains reports from Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho,Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, SouthDakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
164216
AUTHOR: Wisconsin Public Telecommunications for EducationTITLE: MATC to Offer Video-based Degree.DATE: 1992SOURCE: Tele link, vol.5, no.5 (May/June), p.1.
Reports that Milwaukee Area Technical College has become the first schoolin Wisconsin to offer a degree that could be earned primarily via distanceeducation, the 64-credit Associate of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences degree.
AUTHOR: Zigerell, JamesTITLE: The Uses of Television in American Higher Education.DATE: 1991SOURCE: New York: Praeger
Describes instructional television audiences and the attitudes and concernsof faculties. Also discusses instructional TV design and production.Succeeding chapters review efforts made to evaluate the effectiveness oftelevision instruction and the characteristics of television learners. Focuseson how technologies help educators serve people in new ways, not on thetechnologies themselves.
TITLE: Helping Learners at a Distance. Proceedings from the Annual Conference onTeaching at a Distance (Madison, Wisconsin).
DATE: 1989SOURCE: Report available from ERIC document #ED315551
This document contains 35 papers including: "Distance Education with aHuman Face" (Holmberg); "Time Is Money and Vice Versa: Reflections onUsing Satellite Delivery to Improve Cycle Time and Quality" (Robinson);"Hypertext" (Kearsley); ''Site Coordination and Support Services" (Roberts,Harvey-Foulds); "Coordinating the Use of Cable Technology in OaklandCounty, Michigan" (O'Donnell, Gholz); "Telecommunications InstructionalConsortium" (Blakesley, Regnier). Proceedings also are available from 1990and 1991.
165
217
Appendix 2. Glossary of Technology Terms
Audioconference: A telephone call involving more than two people.
Audiobridge: A device that allows high-fidelity conference calls involving many parties.
Audiographic: Combines an audioconference with some means of graphic support that enables peopleat various locations to talk, look at visual images, and draw visual images.
Audiotape or audiocassette: The electromagnetic storage of sound.
Broadcast television: An electronic system of transmitting full motion video and synchronized soundthrough space by electrical waves.
Cable television: A communication system that distributes audiovisual material on a coaxial cable.
CDROM (Compact DiscRead Only Memory): A laser disc exactly like an audio CD, except that itcan store text, graphics, and full-motion video in addition to sound.
Closed circuit television: A system for transmitting audiovisual signals with receiving and originatingequipment linked directly by cable, microwave, or telephone lines. Generally, circuits are limited toa single building on a campus or to a few specific off-campus sites.
Compressed video: A transmission system in which special equipment is used to "compress" the videosignal before sending it, a technique that gets rid of redundant information. A similar piece ofequipment is used at the receiving end to "decompress" the video so that it can once again be put ona screen. Compressed video signals typically are transmitted by satellite or fiber-optic cable directlyto the viewing site where they are captured by a satellite antenna or receiver. New ultra-compressiontechniques may eventually allow video to be transmitted over regular telephone lines.
Computer conferencing: Similar to electronic mail but with many more features. In addition to regularmail, comments can he organized and stored by topic. In an E-mail system, the student reads allmessages in the order they were received. In a computer conferencing system, the student might firstread current (or past) contributions to a conference on this week's material, then turn to anotherconference storing the growing transcript about a project he or she is doing with other students, andthen pause to read the "hallway conversation. Conferencing systems often offer additional featuresas well to make team work easier.
Direct Broadcast Satellite (DRS): Television programming that is transmitted via satellite directly tothe user who receives visual and aural information using a satellite antenna or receiver.
Electronic mail: Allows people to send each other text messages and, in some systems, other typesof computer-based information as well. A computer and modem ordinarily are used to transmit E-mail through telephone lines.
Fax: A system that transmits a facsimile of print material over telephone lines.
Fiber-optic cable: Uses laser light instead of electricity to carry a signal. Has the capacity to carry farmore information at less cost than copper wire or coaxial cable. Permits two-way audio, data, andvideo transmission, has a high capacity and speed, easily expandable channel capacity, and a high-quality signal.
Hypertext and Hypermedia: Hypertext takes advantage of the random access storage of a computerto organize its text in a nonlinear way; each piece of text can be linked to one or more other piecesin no preferred linear order. Hypermedia sometimes is used to denote hypertexts that include graphicsand even sound and video.
167 218
_±
Instructional Television Fixed Service (ITFS): A form of closed circuit television that uses microwavesto transmit video and audio. Permits one-way broadcast or point-to-point audio, data, and videocommunication. Low-cost delivery but crowded frequencies, especially in cities; FCC licensing required;limited transmission range; line of sight required. Wider coverage area can be achieved using repeaters;is sometimes used to rebroadcast satellite-delivered programming.
Integrated Services Digital Network: ISDN equipment can transmit voice, data, and compressed videoover a single, copper telephone line. Because of the way ISDN transmits information, computers donot need modems if ISDN is available.
Internet: A growing network of computer networks extending worldwide with a common addressstructure so that electronic mail or other files originating at one computer on one network can be sentto other computers on other networks. Among the many networks that are part of this burgeoningstructure are Internet, Bimet, CompuServe, MCI Mail, and Applelink.
Modem: A device that translates computer information so that it can be sent over an ordinarytelephone line.
One-way video: Any system that only sends audiovideo signals from one site to another, but not thereverse. This may be accomplished via broadcast transmission over standard UHF and VHF televisionchannels or via such other transmission technologies as ITFS, microwave, closed circuit, or cable.
Optical disc (also called laser disc): Any disc on which data is stored and read with a laser beam.An audio disc (CD) is an example of an optical disc. Other examples include videodisc and CDROMs.
Picture phone: An inexpensive audiographic device that has a camera and a very small video screen,and attaches to an ordinary telephone. It allows participants to share still images.
Satellite, communications: A man-made vehicle that orbits the Earth. Communications satellites receiveelectronic signals from Earth and beam them back to Earth at different locations.
Videodisc: An optical disc about the size of a record that can store full motion video, stillphotographs, and text.
Videotape or videocassette: Electromechanical storage of audio and video information.
Voice mail: A technology similar to an answering machine.
VSAT (Very Small Aperture Terminal): Very small satellite dishes are used to send and receive digitalinformation via satellite. VSATs provide the same function as a modem but can be accessed througha local phone call, transmit information more rapidly than most modems, and can transmit voice, text,data, and (in somewhat rough form) full motion video. Numerous VSAT messages can travel overphone lines simultaneously.
168 2 1 s
_
Appendix 3. PBS Adult Learning Liaisons(Accurate as of July 1992)
ALABAMA
HENRY BONNERALABAMA PUBLICTELEVISION2101 MAGNOLIA AVENUEBIRMINGHAM, AL 35205-2827(205) 328-8756
ALASKA
DICK ENDERSKAKM/CHANNEL 72677 PROVIDENCE DRIVEANCHORAGE, AK 99508 -4612(907) 563-7070
ALLEN AUXIERKYUK/CHANNEL 4RADIO STREETBETHEL, AK 99559(907) 543-3131
GREG RUFFKUAC/CHANNEL 9U. OF ALASKA312 TANANA DRIVEFAIRBANKS, AK 99701(907) 474-7491
BETSY BRENNEMANKTOO/CHANNEL 3224 FOURTH STREETJUNEAU, AK 99801-1144(907) 586-9981
AMERICAN SAMOA
NANCY SATELEKVZK/CHANNEL 2GOVT. OF AMERICAN SAMOAPAGO PAGO, AS 96799(684) 633-4191
ARIZONA
MICHAEL A. THOMSENKAET/CHANNEL 8ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITYSTAUFFER B249TEMPE, AZ 85287-1405(602) 965-2316
OLIVIA SMITHKUAT/CHANNEL 6UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONATUCSON, AZ 85721-0001(602) 621-7465
ARKANSAS
JOHN CHEEKARKANSAS PTV NETWORK350 SOUTH DONAGHEYCONWAY, AR 72032-6828(501) 682-2386
CALIFORNIA
ST. CL AIR ADAMSKEET/CHANNEL 13P.O. BOX 13EUREKA, CA 95502-0013(707) 445-0813
JOHN C. WHITEKVPT/CHANNEL 181544 VAN NESS AVENUEFRESNO, CA 93721-1213(209) 266-1800
PAT PETRICKOCE/CHANNEL 5015751 GOTHARD STREETHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA92647(714) 895-5623
DAVID CRIPPENSKCET/CHANNEL 284401 SUNSET BOULEVARDLOS ANGELES, CA 90027-6017(213) 666-6500
PATRICIA MARSHALLKLCS/CHANNEL 581061 WEST TEMPLE STREETLOS ANGELES, CA 90012-1590(213) 625-6958
MYRON TISDELKIXE/CHANNEL 9P.O. BOX 9REDDING, CA 96099-0009(916) 243-5493
KAY MCCABEKRCB/CHANNEL 225850 LABATH AVENUEROHNERT PARK, CA 94928-2041(707) 585-8522
SUSAN PRINCEKVIE-TVCORPORATE SUPPORTP.O. BOX 6SACRAMENTO, CA 95812-0005(916) 929-5843
LARRY BERTRANDKVCR/CHANNEL 24701 S. MT. VERNON AVENUESAN BERNARDINO, CA92410-2748(714) 888-6511
VANESSA GEORGEKPBS/CHANNEL 15SAN DIEGO STATEUNIVERSITYSAN DIEGO, CA 92182-0002(619) 594-5714
KATHYRN DREWKQED/CHANNEL 92601 MARIPOSA STREETSAN FRANCISCO, CA94110-1400(415) 553-2280
KAREN ROBERTSKTEH/CHANNEL 54100 SKYPORT DRIVESAN JOSE, CA 95115(408) 437-5454
RICHARD ZANARDIKCSM/CHANNEL 601700 WEST HILLSDALEBOULEVARDSAN MATEO, CA 94402-3757(415) 574-6586
COLORADO
KIRBY MCCLUREKBDI/CHANNEL 122246 FEDERAL BLVD.DENVER, CO 80211-4642(303) 458-1200
JOSEFINA TUASONKRMA/CHANNEL 61261 GLENARM PLACEDENVER, CO 80204-2112(303) 892-6666
GREG SINNKTSC - TV2200 BONFORTE BLVD.PUEBLO, CO 81001-4901<719) 543-8800
CONNECTICUT
LARRY RIFKINCONNECTICUT ETV240 NEW BRITAIN AVENUEP.O. BOX 260240HARTFORD, CT 06126-0240(203) 278-5310
169
220
ADULT LEARNING LIAISONWEDW/CHANNEL 49307 ATLANTIC STREETSTAMFORD, CT 06901(203) 965-0440
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
KAREN ZILLWETA/CHANNEL 26P.O. BOX 2626WASHINGTON, DC 20827-2626(703) 998-2716
MONICA RILEYWHMM/CHANNEL 322222 FOURTH STREET, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20001-2312(202) 806-3200
FLORIDA
KIRK LEHTOMAAWSFP/CHANNEL 30CHANNEL 30 DRIVEBONITA SPRINGS, FL 33923(813) 598-9737
BILL REIDWRES - TV1519 CLEAR LAKECOCOA, FL 32922-6419(407) 632-1111
RUSS ADKINSWCEU/CHANNELP.O. BOX 2811DAYTONA BEACH, FL32120-2811(904) 255-8131
LYN GANZWUFT/C HAN NEL 5UNIV. OF FLORIDA1200 WEIMER HALLGAINESVILLE, FL 32611-2003(904) 392-5551
RICHARD V. BROWNWJCT/CHANNEL 7100 FESTIVAL PARK AVENUEJACKSONVILLE, FL 32202-1397(904) 353-7770
RAY CRUZWLRN/CHANNEL 17172 N.E. 15TH STREETMIAMI, FL 33132-1348(305) 995-2245
JOHN FELTONWPBT/CHANNEL 214901 N.E. 20TH AVENUEMIAMI, FL 33181-1121(305) 949-8321
MALCOLM WALLWMFE/CHANNEL 2411510 EAST COLONIAL DRIVEORLANDO, FL 32817-4605(305) 273-2300
ALLAN PIZZATOWSRE/CHANNEL 231000 COLLEGE BLVDPENSACOLA, FL 32504-8910(904) 484-1200
DENISE HALLWFSU /CHANNEL 112565 POTTSDAMER STREETTALLAHASSEE, FL 32310-6046(904) 487-3170
STEVE STROUFWEDU/CHANNEL 31300 NORTH BOULEVARDTAMPA, FL 33607-5645(813) 254-9338
THOMAS WILSONWUSF/CHANNEL 16SVC BUILDING 116TAMPA, FL 33620(813) 974-4000
JIM MORANWXEL/CHANNEL 42P.O. BOX 6607WEST PALM BEACH, FL33405-0607(407) 737-8000
GEORGIA
BILL SCOTTGEORGIA PUBLIC TELEVISION1540 STEWART AVE., S.W.ATLANTA, GA 30310-4446(404) 756-4700
DR. MARY ARMSTRONGWPBA/CHANNEL 30740 BISMARK ROAD, N.E.ATLANTA, GA 311324-4102(404) 827-8900
GUAM
ARLENE QUICHOCHOKGTF/CHANNEL 12P.O. BOX 21449, GMFAGANA, GU 96921(617) 734-2207
HAWAII
CARLOS MOLINAKHET/CHANNEL 112350 DOLE STREETHONOLULU, HI 96822-2410(808) 955-7878
IDAHO
RON PISANESCHIKAID /IDAHO NETWORK1910 UNIVERSITY DRIVEBOISE, ID 83725-0001(208) 385-3344
ILLINOIS
CAND1S ISBERNERWSIU/CHANNEL 81048 COMMUNICATIONSSOUTHERN ILLINOISUNIVERSITYCARBONDALE, IL 62901(618) 453-4343
KEN BENOWEN /CHANNEL 51EASTERN ILLINOISUNIVERSITYBUZZARD 139CHARLESTON, IL 61920(217) 581-5956
JENNIFER BENSONW77W/CHANNEL 115400 NORTH ST. LOUIS AVE.CHICAGO, IL 60625-4623(312) 509-5523
JOAN BRANTWYCC/CHANNEL 207500 SOUTH PULASKI RD.CHICAGO, IL 60652-1242(312) 838-4854
LAURAN HALDEMANWQPT/CHANNEL 24600 34TH AVENUEMOLINE, IL 61265-5870(309) 796-1311
KENNETH J. GARRYWUSI/CHANNEL 16PO. BOX 430OLNEY, IL 62450-0430(618) 395-3422
SHIRLEY ROCHMANWTVP/CHANNEL 471501 WEST BRADLEY AVE.PEORIA, IL 61625-0001(309) 676-4747
170
221
SCOTT MULFORDWMEC/CHANNEL 22P.O. BOX 6248SPRINGFIELD, IL 62708-6248(217) 786-6647
ELAINE HARBISONWILL/CHANNEL 121110 WEST MAIN STREETURBANA, IL 61801-2413(217) 333-1070
INDIANA
GINO BRANCOLINIWTIU/CHANNEL 30INDIANA UNIVERSITYRADIO & TV BLDG. #215BLOOMINGTON, IN 47405(812) 885-5900
KEN LAWRENCEWNIT/CHANNEL 34P.O. BOX 3434ELKHART, IN 46515-3434(219) 674-5961
BONNIE RHEINHARDTWNIN/CHANNEL 9405 CARPENTER STREETEVANSVILLE, IN 47708-1027(812) 423-2973
KRISTEN RAJCHELWFWA/FORT WAYNE PTVP.O. BOX 39FORT WAYNE, IN 46801-0039(219) 484-8839
ALAN CLOEWFYI/CHANNEL 201401 N. MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46202-2304(317) 636-2020
ICHARD PARKERWYIN/CHANNEL 568625 INDIANA PLACEMERRILLVILLE, IN 46410-6369(219) 736-5656
BOB SMITHWIPB/CHANNEL 49P.O. BOX 1708MUNCIE, IN 47308-1708(317) 285-1249
KAREN SUTTONWVUT/CHANNEL 221200 NORTH 2ND STREETVINCENNES, IN 47591-2325(812) 885-4120
IOWA
LINDA SCHATZIOWA PUBLIC TELEVISION6450 CORPORATE DRIVEP.O. BOX 6450JOHNSTON, IA 50131-1636(515) 281-4500
KANSAS
BARBARA BALDWINKOOD/CHANNEL 96TH & ELM STREETSBUNKER HILL KS 67626(913) 483-6990
DALE N. ANDERSONKTWU/CHANNEL 11301 NORTH WANAMAKER RD.TOPEKA, KS 66606-9601(913) 272-8181
CARL CHANCEKPTS/CHANNEL 8P.O. BOX 288WICHITA, KS 67201-0288(316) 838-3090
KENTUCKY
CHARLES M. ANDERSONWKYU/CHANNEL 24153 ACADEMIC COMPLEXBOWLING GREEN, KY 42101(502) 745-2153
MARY L. OLSONKETV/KENTUCKY ETV600 COOPER DRIVELEXINGTON, KY 40502-2248(606) 233-3000
HELEN STRONGWKPC/CHANNEL 154309 BISHOP LANELOUISVILLE, KY 40218-4517(502) 459-9572
LOUISIANA
BARBARA WEBERLOUISIANA PUBLICBROADCASTING7860 ANSELMO LANEBATON ROUGE, LA 70810-1101(504) 767-5660
SISTER ROSE MARY WESSELWLAE-TVINSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES2929 S. CARROLTON AVE.NEW ORLEANS, LA 70118-4301(504) 866-7411
BETH SCHWARTZWYES/CHANNEL 12P.O. BOX 24026NEW ORLEANS, LA 70184-4026(504) 486-5511
MAINE
CHUCK HALSTEDMPBN/MAINE NETWORK65 TEXAS AVENUEBANGOR, ME 04401-4324(207) 941-1010
HARRY J. WEIST, JR.WCBB/CHANNEL 101450 LISBON STREETLEWISTON, ME 04240-3514(207) 783-9101
MARYLAND
MARY ANN SPANGLERMARYLAND PUBLICTELEVISION11767 OWINGS MILL BLVD.OWINGS MILLS, MD 21117-1499(301) 356-5600
MASSACHUSETTS
MARGIE YAMAMOTOWGBH/CHANNEL 2125 WESTERN AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02134-1098(617) 492-2777
CAROL PAQUETTEWGBY/CHANNEL 5744 HAMPDEN STREETSPRINGFIELD, MA 01103-1286(413) 781-2801
MICHIGAN
DOUG HALLADAYWTVS/CHANNEL 567441 2ND BOULEVARDDETROIT, MI 48202-2701(313) 873-7200
ROBERT MULBACHWKAR/CHANNEL 23212 COMMERCIAL ARTS BLDG.MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYEAST LANSING, MI 48824(517) 356-2300
PAMELA POLLARDWFUM/CHANNEL 28UNIV. OF MICHIGAN/FLINTFLINT, MI 48503-6207(313) 762-3028
171222
BARBARA FOURNIERWGVU /WGVK-TV301 WEST FULTON STREETGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49504-6492(616) 895-3386
JAN MCKINNONWGVU/WGVK-TV301 WEST FULTON STREETGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49504-6492(616) 771-6666
IRENE ILMONENWNMU/CHANNEL 13LRC, NORTHERN MICHIGANUNIV.MARQUETTE, MI 49855(906) 227-1300
LINDA HYDEWCMU/CHANNEL 14CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIV.MT. PLEASANT, MI 48859-0001(517) 774-3105
RUBY T. IWAMASAWUCM/CHANNEL 19DELTA COLLEGE.DELTA ROADUNIVERSITY CENTER, Ml 48710(517) 686-9361
MINNESOTA
JUDY FASTKWCM/CHANNEL 10120 WEST SCHLIEMANAPPLETON, MN 56208-1351(612) 289-2622
MARK GODDARDKSMQ/CHANNEL 151900 8TH AVENUE, N.W.AUSTIN, MN 55912-1473(507) 433-0678
EMILY LAHTIKAWE/CHANNEL 9P.O. BOX 9BEMIDJI STATE UNIV.BEMIDJI, MN 56601-0009(218) 751-3407
NANCY HOENEWDSE/CHANNEL 81202 E. UNIVERSITY CIRCLEDULUTH, MN 55811-2420(218) 724-8567
DENNIS LACOMBKTCA 2/KTCI 17172 EAST FOURTH STREETST. PAUL, MN 55101-1447(612) 222-1717
ELISE MARQUAM-JAHNSKTCI /CHANNEL 17172 EAST FOURTH STREETST. PAUL MN 55101-1400(612) 222-1717
MISSISSIPPI
JODY JAEGERWMAA/MISSISSIPPI ENP.O. DRAWER 1101JACKSON, MS 39215-1101(601) 982-6565
MISSOURI
KATHERINE SODENKCPT/CHANNEL 19125 EAST 31ST STREETKANSAS CITY, MO 64108-3216(816) 756-3580
REBECCA GOODRUMKETC/CHANNEL 969% MILLBROOK BLVD.ST. LOUIS, MO 63130-4433(314) 725-2460
KIM MEYERKOZK/CHANNEL 21MPO BOX 21SPRINGFIELD, MO 65801-0021(417) 865-2100
MIKE O'KEEFEKMOS TVCENTRAL MISSOURI STATEUNIV.WARRENBURG, MO 64093-5000(816) 429-4042
MONTANA
RONALD GJESTSONKUSWCHANNEL 9MONTANA STATE UNIV.VISUAL COMM. BLDG 172BOZEMAN, MT 59717-0002(406) 994-3437
NEBRASKA
GWEN NUGENTKUON/CHANNEL 12UNIV. OF NEBRASKAP.O. BOX 8311LINCOLN, NE 68501(402) 472-3611
MARCHETTA STEVENSNEBRASKA ETV NETWORK1800 NORTH 33RD STREETLINCOLN, NE 68503-1409(402) 472-3611
NEVADA
RUTH UHLSKLVX/CHANNEL 104210 CHANNEL 10 DRIVELAS VEGAS, NV 89119-5454(702) 737-1010
REX L. GUNDERSONKNPB/CHANNEL 5P.O. BOX 14730RENO, NV 89507-4730(702) 784-4555
NEW HAMPSHIRE
DENNIE FORTENEW HAMPSHIRE NETWORKBOX 1100 MAST ROADDURHAM, NH 03824-0110(603) 868-1100
NEW JERSEY
WALT FREASNEW JERSEY NETWORK1573 PARKSIDE AVE., CN-777TRENTON, NJ 08638-2606(609) 530-5252
NEW MEXICO
ELISEO CASILLASKNME-TV CHANNEL 51130 UNIVERSITY BLVD., NEALBUQUERQUE, NM 87102-1736(505) 277-2121
JIM FICKLINKRWG/CHANNEL 22BOX TV-22LAS CRUCES, NM 88003(505) 646-2222
CLYDE POWELLKENW/CHANNEL 3EAST NEW MEXICO UNIV.PORTALES, NM 88130(505) 562-2112
NEW YORK
FAITH ROGOWWSKG/CHANNEL 46P.O. BOX 3000BINGHAMTON, NY 13902-3000(607) 775-0100
TERRENCE O'DRISCOLLWNYE/CHANNEL 25112 TILLARY STREETBROOKLYN, NY 11201-2926(718) 935-4480
172
22-1
ANTHONY BUTTINOWNED/CHANNEL 17184 BARTON STREETBUFFALO, NY 14213-1588(716) 881-5000
CAROL SATCHWELLWCNY/CHANNEL 24506 OLD LIVERPOOL ROADLIVERPOOL, NY 13088(315) 453-2424
SANDRA SHEPPARDWNET/CHANNEL 13356 WEST 58TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10019-1804(212) 560-2000
DORIS FLAXWLIW/CHANNEL 21CHANNEL 21 DRIVEP.O. BOX 21PLAINVIEW, NY 11803-5015(516) 367-2100
JOANNE PERRYWCFE-TV/CHANNEL 57ONE SESAME STREETPLATTSBURGH, NY 12901-9769(518) 563-9770
PATRICIA HETTRICHWXXI/CHANNEL 21P.O. BOX 21ROCHESTER, NY 14601-0021(716) 325-7500
EILEEN NASHWMHT/CHANNEL 17BOX 17SCHENECTADY, NY 12301-0017(518) 356-1700
JEREMY GRAVESWNPE/CHANNEL 161056 ARSENAL STREETWATERTOWN, NY 13601-2210(315) 782-3142
NORTH CAROLINA
SHEILA TUCKER1N1VI/CHANNEL 4242 COLISEUM DRIVECHARLOTTE, NC 28205-7029(704) 372-2442
RON PLUMMERUNC CENTER FOR PUBLIC TVP.O. BOX 1490010 T.W. ALEXANDER DRIVERESEARCH TRIANGLE PK, NC27709-4900(919) 549-7000
NORTH DAKOTA
VAL BABBPRAIRIE PUBLIC BROAD.207 N. 5TH STREETFARGO, ND 58102-4827(701) 241-6900
OHIO
MARVIN BOWMANWOUB/CHANNEL 20,WOUC/CHANNEL 44OHIO UNIV. TELECOMM. CTR.ATHENS, OH 45701(614) 594-5682
TONY SHORTWBGU/CHANNEL 57245 TROUPE AVENUEBOWLING GREEN, OH43402-3158(419) 372-2700
BEVERLY THIELMEYERWCET/CHANNEL 481223 CENTRAL PARKWAYCINCINNATI, OH 45214-2812(513) 381-4033
CAROL BOSLEYWVIZ/CHANNEL 254300 BROOKPARK ROADCLEVELAND, OH 44134-1124(216) 398-2800
MARCELITA HASKINSWOSU/CHANNEL 342400 OLENTANGY RIVER RD.COLUMBUS, OH 43210-1059(614) 292-9678
RON HINTONWPTD/CHANNEL 16110 SOUTH JEFFERSONDAYTON, OH 45402-2402(513) 220-1600
STEVE MITCT;ELLWNEO/CF.ANNEL 451750 CAM,'US CENTER DR,BOX 5191KENT, OH 44240-5191(216) 678-1656
JO ANN SHIELDSWGTE/CHANNEL 30P.O. BOX 30TOLEDO, OH 43697-0030(419) 243-3091
OKLAHOMA.
LOIS HAWKINSKXON/CHANNEL 35WILL ROGERS & COLLEGEHILLCLAREMORE, OK 74017(918) 341-7510
PATTY THAXTONOKLAHOMA ETV AUTHORITY7403 NORTH KELLEY AVENUEOKLAHOMA CITY, OK73111-8420(405) 478-4300
OREGON
FRED FLAXMANKSYS/CHANNEL 834 SOUTH FIR STREET
. MEDFORD, OR 97501-3114(503) 779-0808
CHERYLL FLANINGAMOREGON PB7140 S.W. MACADAM A.VE.PORTLAND, OR 97219-3099(503) 293-1903
PENNSYLVANIA
FRANK DOBIASWLVT/CHANNEL 39MOUNTAIN DRIVEBETHLEHEM, PA 18015(215) 867-4677
TOM McLARENWQLN/CHANNEL 548425 PEACH STREETERIE, PA 16509-4718(814) 864-3001
JOEL BECHTELWITF/CHANNEL 331982 LOCUST LANEHARRISBURG, PA 17109-3332(717) 236-6000
DAVID RUBINSOHNWHYY/CHANNEL 12150 NORTH SIXTH STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-1508(215) 351-1200
NICHOLE HARMONWYBE/CHANNEL 356117 RIDGE AVENUEPHILADELPHIA, PA 19128-1604(215) 483-3900
173
224
MARC POLLOCKWQED/CHANNEL 134802 FIFTH AVENUEPITTSBURGH, PA 15213-2918(412) 622-1300
[IM WIENERWQEX-TV/CHANNEL 164802 FIFTH AVENUEPITTSBURGH, PA 15213-2918(412) 622-1550
JOY EVANSWVIA/CHANNEL 44OLD BOSTON ROADPITTSTON, l'A 18640-9603(717) 344-1244
DAVID MERCERWPSX/CHANNEL 3PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV.WAGNER ANNEXUNIVERSITY PARK, PA 16802(814) 865-9531
PUERTO RICO
GLORIA HERNANDEZWMTJ/CHANNEL 40P.O. BOX 21345RIO PIEDRAS, PR 00928-1345(809) 766-2600
RHODE ISLAND
LER01 CZASKOSWSBE/CHANNEL 3650 PARK LANEPROVIDENCE, RI 02907-3124(401) 277-3676
SOUTH CAROLINA
RONALD SCHOENHERRWJWJ/CHANNEL 16P.O. BOX 1165BEAUFORT, SC 29901-1165(803) 524-0808
CHARLOTTE HARRISSOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC TVDIV. OF
CONTINUING ED.2712 MILLWOOD AVENUECOLUMBIA, SC 29205-1221(803) 737-3452
ROBERT FREIRSONWNSC/CHANNEL 30P.O. BOX 11766ROCK HILL, SC 29731-1766(803) 324-3184
JAMES L. BARNARDWRJA/CHANNEL 27P.O. BOX 1836SUMTER, SC 29151-1836(803) 773-5546
SOUTH DAKOTA
LARRY MILLERKESD/CHANNEL 8SOUTH DAKOTA STATEUNIVERSITYPUGSLEY CENTER, BOX 2218-BBROOKINGS, SD 57007(605) 688-4191
ALLEN KIRTSSOUTH DAKOTA ETV414 EAST CLARK STREETVERMILLION, SD 57069-2307(605) 677-5861
TENNESSEE
YVONNE DERRICKSONWTCl/CHANNEL 45411 AMNICOLA HIGHWAYCHATTANOOGA, TN 37406-1016(615) 629-0045
REBECCA MAGURAWCTE/CHANNEL 22PO BOX 2040COOKVILLE, TN 38502-2040(615) 528-2222
FRANK D. MILLERWSJK/CHANNEL 2UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE209 COMM. BLDG.KNOXVILLE, TN 37996-0003(615) 974-5281
PAMELA COPELANDWLJT/CHANNEL 11P.O. BOX 966MARTIN, TN 38237-0966(901) 587-7561
THELMA STEIGWKNO/CHANNEL 10900 GET WELL STREETMEMPHIS, TN 38111-7418(901) 458-2521
JO ANN SCALFWDCN/CHANNEL 8P.O. BOX 120609NASHVILLE, TN 37212-0609(615) 259-9325
TEXAS
JOYCE HERRINGKACV/CHANNEL 2P.O. BOX 447AMARILLO, TX 79178-0001(806) 371-5230
LINDA SCHMIDKLRU/CHANNEL 18P.O. BOX 78713AUSTIN, TX 78713-7158(512) 4714811
RODNEY L. ZENTKAMU/CHANNEL 15TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYMOORE COMMUN. CENTERCOLLEGE STATION, TX77843-2473(409) 845-5611
ANDY COOKKEDT/CHANNEL 16P.O. BOX 81690CORPUS CHRISTI, TX78468-1690(512) 855-2213
BRANDON BARNESKERA/CHANNEL 133000 HARRY HINES BLVD.DALLAS, TX 75201-1098(214) 871-1390
ELLEN GOODMANKCOS/CHANNEL 13BOX 650U. OF TEXAS/EL PASOEL PASO, TX 79968(915) 747-6500
JOZY MALDONADOKMBH/CHANNEL 601701 NORTH TENNESSEEHARLINGEN, TX 78550(512) 421-4111
KEN LAWRENCEKUHT/CHANNEL 84513 CULLEN BOULEVARDHOUSTON, TX 77004-6518(713) 749-8228
MARGARET DUNCANKNOT /CHANNEL 46P.O. BOX 1800KILLEEN, TX 76540-1800(8:7) 526-1176
174
co
_
FRED W. McCLUNGKTXT/CHANNEL 5P.O. BOX 4359LUBBOCK, TX 79409-2161(806) 742-2209
CLAYTON ALREDKOCV-TV CHANNEL 36P.O. BOX 113ODESSA, TX 79760-0113(915) 335-6336
CAM MESSINAKLRN/CHANNEL 9801 SOUTH BOWIESAN ANTONIO, TX 78205(512) 270-9000
UTAH
NORMA COLLETTKBYU/CHANNEL 11BRIGHAM YOUNGUNIVERSITYC-302, HFACPROVO, UT 84602-1001(801) 378-5298
DIENA SIMMONSKBYU/CHANNEL 11BRIGHAM YOUNGUNIVERSITYC-302, I-IFACPROVO, UT 84602-1001(801) 378-5298
KATHY NELSONKUED/CHANNELS 7 41 9UNIVERSITY OF UTAH101 GARDNER HALLSALT LAKE CITY, UT84112-1102(801) 581-7777
VERMONT
SCOTT CAMPITELLIVERMONT ETV88 ETHAN ALLEN AVENUE.WINOOSKI, VT 05404(802) 655-4800
VIRGINIA
MARY SOOHWNVT/CHANNEL 53CENTkAL VA EDUC. TELE.CORP.8101-A LEE HIGHWAYFALLS CHURCH, VA 22042-1195(703) 698-9682
SID SMITHWVPT/CHANNEL. 51298 PORT REPUBLIC ROADHARRISONBURG, VA 22801-3052(703) 434-5391
DUSTYLEE GRAYWHRO/CHANNEL 155200 HAMPTON BOULEVARDNORFOLK, VA 23508-1507(804) 489-9476
CALVIN NUNNALYWCVE/CHANNEL 2323 SESAME STREETRICHMOND, VA 23235-3713(804) 320-1301
JON BOETTCHERBLUE RIDGE PUBLIC TVP.O. BOX 13246ROANOKE, VA 24032-3246(703) 344-0991
VIRGIN ISLANDS
CALVIN F. BASTIANWTJX/CHANNEL 12P.O. BOX 7879ST. THOMAS, VI 00801(809) 774-6255
WASHINGTON
GUY UECKERTKWSU/CHANNEL 10WASHINGTON STATE UNIV.E.R. MURROW CENTERPULLMAN, WA 99164(509) 335-6588
LESLIE ROMEKCTS/CHANNEL 9401 MERCER STREETSEATTLE, WA 98109-4640(206) 443-6778
CLAUDE KISTLERKSPS/CHANNEL 7SOUTH 3911 REGAL STREETSPOKANE, WA 99223(509) 353-5777
REINO MOISIOKTI'S /CHANNEL 281101 S. YAKIMA AVENUETACOMA, WA 98405-4831(206) 596-1528
DIANE ULRICHKYVE/CHANNEL 471015 SOUTH 15TH AVENUEYAKIMA, WA 98901-2007(509) 452-4700
WEST VIRGINIA
KAREN AKERSWSWP/CHANNEL 9P.O. BOX AHBECKLEY, WV 25802-2831(304) 255-1501
WILLIAM RUSSELLWPBY/CHANNEL 33THIRD AVENUEHUNTINGTON, WV 25701(304) 696-6630
ANNE G. SELINGERWNPB/CHANNEL 24P.O. BOX TV-24MORGANTOWN, WV 26507(304) 293-6511
WISCONSIN
BYRON KNIGHTWHA/CHANNEL 21821 UNIVERSITY AVENUEMADISON, WI 53706-1412(608) 263-2151
CHARLOTTE BELLWISCONSIN PUBLIC TV3319 W. BELTLINE HIGHWAYMADISON, WI 53713-2834(608) 273-5500
JOHN PUSHKASHWMVS/CHANNEL 10,WMVT/CHANNEL 331036 NORTH 8TH STREETMILWAUKEE, WI 53233-1409(414) 271-1036
WYOMING
JOHN COBESKCWC/CHANNEL 4CENTRAL WYOMINGCOLLEGE2660 PECKRIVERTON, WY 82501(307) 856-9291
175
226
Appendix 4. Acknowledgements
In addition to the efforts of the advisory committee, many people have givenextensively of their time, knowledge, and experience in the creation of thispublication. We are grateful for the contributions of all of the individuals listedbelow. All were willing on numerous occasions to discuss the details of theirprograms with us. Many read this manuscript in draft form and contributed to itsimprovement. Any errors are the author's responsibility, however, and opinionsexpressed, unless specifically attributed, do not necessarily reflect those of theorganizations or individuals cited below or of any advisors.
Peter Din, Stephen C. Ehrmann, Christine Wilson-Jackson, The Annenberg/CPBProject, Washington, D.C.Nancy Smith Tidwell, Arkansas Educational Television Network, Conway, ArkansasRon Brey and Judy Doyen, Austin Community College, Austin, TexasLaurie Bingel and Lloyd Gentry, Belleville Area College, Belleville, IllinoisNancy Ness, Boise State University, Boise, IdahoRobert Threlkeld, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CaliforniaKathleen Glenn, Cameron University, Lawton, OklahomaMaryhelen Garrett, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MichiganEleanor Minich and Barbara Willis, Chicago City-Wide College, Chicago, IllinoisLeslie Purdy, Coastline Community College, Orange County, CaliforniaMichael Souder, College of St. Catherine, St. Paul, MinnesotaCarol B. Aslanian, The College Board, New York, New YorkJoan Bowen, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, ColoradoJack Sousa, Community College of Rhode Island, Lincoln, Rhode IslandScott Mulford, CONVOCOM/WMEC-TV, Springfield, IllinoisRichard Browning, Cuyahoga Community College, Cleveland, OhioMichael Kuhn, Florida Department of Education, Tallahassee, FloridaAlan Hoffman, Garland County Community College, Hotsprings, ArkansasMary Emery and Cheryl Grim, Lewis-Clark State College, Lewiston, IdahoEly Miller, Luzerne County Community College, Nanticoke, PennsylvaniaMary Ann Spangler, Maryland College of the Air, Owings Mills, MarylandGwen Thornton, Metropolitan State College of Denver, Denver, ColoradoAndrea Binkley, Metropolitan Community College, Omaha, NebraskaBill Quirmbach and Joe Pellegrin, Milwaukee Area 'lechnical College, Milwaukee,WisconsinDon Sutton, Mind Extension University, Englewood, ColoradoAnn Lippel, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New JerseySandra Scott-Smith, Northern California Telecommunications Consortium, Sacramento,CaliforniaDon Drake, Northern Illinois Learning Resources Cooperative, Sugar Grove, IllinoisRandal Lemke, Northern Virginia Community College, Annandale, VirginiaElaine Yandal-Roth, Office of Commissioner of Community Colleges Services,Portland, OregonStephen Johnson, Oregon Public Broadcasting, Portland, OregonEllen Gfroehrer and Jerry Goff, Pennsylvania State University, University Park,Pennsylvania
177 227
Janice L. Friddle, Pikes Peak Community College, Colorado Springs, ColoradoDawn Bozek, Stan Cahill, Fiona Gawad, Virginia Kirk, and Will Philipp, PBS AdultLearning Service, Alexandria, VirginiaKate Gulliver, Regents College, Institute for Distance Learning, Albany, New YorkBetsy Frank, Rio Salado Community College, Phoenix, ArizonaSusan Commanday, Rockland Community College, Suffern, New YorkTerry Britton, Rose State College, Midwest City, OklahomaRobert Zeigler, San Antonio College, San Antonio, TexasLeroy Jordan, Sangamon State University, Springfield, IllinoisSally Beaty, Southern California Consortium (INTELECOM), Pasadena, CaliforniaJames Mingle, State Higher Education Executive Officers, Denver, ColoradoJack Pirkey, Tarrant County Junior College, Fort Worth, TexasFred Stewart, Troy State University in Montgomery, Montgomery, AlabamaNofflet Williams, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KentuckyGeorge Connick and Jane Russo, University of Maine at Augusta, Augusta, MaineSusan Cloninger, Paul Hamlin, Rita Tschiffely and William Wolff, University ofMaryland University College, College Park, Maryland and National UniversitiesDegree ConsortiumDoyle Howitt, University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, NebraskaRon Plummer, North Carolina Center for Public Television, Research Triangle Park,North CarolinaDavid Rand, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South DakotaHelen Lacy, The Utah Education Network, Salt Lake City, UtahCecelia Fox ley, Utah System of Higher Education, Salt Lake City, UtahDarl Walker, Valercia Community College, Orlando, FloridaBrenda White, Washburn University of Topeka, Topeka, KansasDeborah Fiedler, Wayne County Community College, Detroit, MichiganSally M. Johnstone, Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications, DenverColoradoRoberta Morelli and Joyce E. Nielsen, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IllinoisJudith Parker, WNPT, Morgantown, West Virginia
Toby Kleban LevineAugust 1992
178 2
nno