7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
1/27
JOSEPH CONRAD
The mind of man is capable of anything because everything is in it, all the
past as well as all the future. What was there after all? Joy, fear, sorrow,
devotion, valour, rage who can tell? but truth truth stripped of its
cloak of time.(Heart of Darkness, 106)
Conrads deserving a place in the history of English literature is rather
unusual. He was not English. He was not even born in an Anglo-American
cultural environment. Born to Polish parents in the Russian-dominated
Ukraine, he saw England only when he was twenty-one. A seaman and an
officer in the merchant marine, he was primarily seen by his contemporaries
as a writer of sea stories. What attracted his audiences was the adventurous
side of his novels. Yet understanding Conrad has never been an easy task for
readers, which is clear evidence for the fact that, beyond the apparent
adventure pattern of his stories, there always is some deep seriousness. His
stories were mainly enjoyed as stories, which is not surprising if one considers
the quality of the events that he narrated. *The readers+ interpreted as an
amateurs or foreigners clumsiness certain experiments in structure and style
which anticipated those of William Faulkner.1
It was only later in the
twentieth century that Conrad came to be appreciated as one of the most
accomplished English stylists, whose writings have a marked philosophical and
psychological character. Yet, no matter how English Conrad may have become
1Albert J. Guerard, Introduction to Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness and The Secret Sharer(NewYork and Toronto:The New American Library, 1950) 7.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
2/27
by serving under the English flag and writing novels in English, he would
remain, to the end of his life, an exile. Unlike any of his fellow novelists,
Conrad is English, while essentially remaining European, which accounts for
the very special sceptical and ironic views expressed in his novels.
The obvious difficulty of his style has, more often than not, made readers
keep aloof from his work. This is so much the more surprising if we consider
the fact that, from among all modernist or modernism anticipating novels, his
has enjoyed the benefit of being, in terms of plot at least, closest to the
adventure stories audiences seemed to be used to and like. Inspired from the
authors first-hand experience, Conrads novels appealed to the nineteenth-
century general public mainly because of their adventurous quality. Set in very
exotic, sometimes known or recognisable environments, they have deluded
readers into thinking that they were just adventure stories, devoid of deeper
meanings, thus primarily intended for entertainment. The fact that Conrad
was a Pole and a seaman who had so presumptuously taken to writing novels
in English has made even more learned readers misunderstand the purpose
and scope of his novels for quite a long time. Conrad was not credited with
the seriousness of a professional writer, he was not taken seriously by his
contemporaries in literary matters. A work that clearly anticipated the
techniques to be perfected later on by the modernist novelists seemed to be
predisposed only to superficial readings. Readers did not seem willing to move
beyond the comfortable surface made up of just a succession of inciting
events. Besides, Conrad, as compared to the other modernist writers, did not
extensively use the various consciousness-rendering techniques in his novels,
the techniques for which the modernist experimental novels have been
recognised as innovating by the educated twentieth-century readers. It seems
that no category of readers has felt totally comfortable with Conrads literary
offer. The common readers, who could have been attracted b y the
adventurous aspect of Conrads writings, must have found them too
technically difficult to cope with. The comparatively fewer elite readers may
have disliked his work precisely on account of its too facile and accessible
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
3/27
content. This is a paradoxical situation that, starting with Conrad and the
tradition he and Henry James set up, came to characterise the work of all
modernist novelists and its reception.
While displaying clear affinities with the realist novel, while being,
superficially, adventure stories, Conrads novels have confronted audiences
with very elaborate narrative schemes, constantly challenging the readers
knowledge both of the world and of the novelistic conventions. His work has
incited interest as much as it has baffled and scared readers away. Under the
circumstances, this chapter is not intended as an exhaustive analysis of
Conrads work. It is just an attempt to reach a better and more profound
understanding of Conrads literary performance in the context of the turn -of-
the-century and modernist literature.
Anticipating the devices of modernism, Conrads technical innovation
was prompted by his very personal sense of value and philosophy of life.
Given the source of inspiration of his novels, Conrads technique was
supposed to perform a double function. It had, on the one hand, to strike a
correct balance between the subjectivity presupposed by personal experience
and the objectivity and impersonality required from any valuable piece of
narrative writing. On the other hand, it had to be made into an instrument
capable of rendering the relativity of a changing world. Bridging the gap
between the stable Victorian value system and the relative, fluctuating one of
the twentieth century, Conrads work evolves around a very original co de of
essential and perennial values, such as manliness, loyalty, courage, and duty.And, in a fairly paradoxical way, a technique of indirectness and relativity
manages to sustain, in Conrads case, the assertion of a solid system of old
and stable chivalric values, while placing under a huge question mark the
inner balance of the individual in permanent search of his inner self.
The main feature of the Victorian age is its apparent sense of security
and stability. This is mainly due to its being perceived as underlain by a set of
unquestioned and unquestionable values. The turn of the century confronted
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
4/27
the individual with a state of crisis manifested by the destruction of the unity,
by the explosion of the universe in infinite value fragments. By reading
Conrads work, we have the chance to find out what happens in the moment
of crisis, at the turn of the century, in a moment when stability and instability
interact, which creates a cultural whirl that literature considers it its task to
represent. The technique Conrad devised, in anticipation of the elaborate
purely modernist stream of consciousness technique, turned his literature
into a means of investigation of the darkest recesses of the human soul and of
the essentials of the human nature. Yet, readers cannot help noticing that the
cultural and literary heritage of modern(ist) Conrad, no matter how reluctant
to accept it they may be, is Victorian. Just like his future modernist fellow
writers, Conrad incorporated this heritage into his work, possibly aware of the
fact that readers are incapable of appropriately decoding the novelty in
absence of the proper amount of given and known information. Thus the
issues, theories and philosophical ideas Conrad dealt with and enlarged upon
in his novels, as well as the technique he used indicate his turn-of-the-century
condition. They testify, on the one hand, to his belonging to the nineteenth-
century, while they point to his contribution to modernism, on the other.
Without impudently offending the public sense of value, Conrad learned to
play with his readers horizons of expectations. He asserted and denied,
confirmed and refuted the Victorian heritage, both in terms of ideas and of
technique, by satisfying and challenging at the same time his readers
expectations.
Although he started creating in the Victorian period, when the realist
convention of novel writing was at its highest, Conrad is never labelled as a
Victorian writer. If histories of literature mention him, it is less for the
Victorian quality of his work than for his being a precursor of modernism. To
be more accurate as to his position in the evolution of the English novel,
however, it is better to consider him a turn-of-the-century writer. Thus Conrad
is neither a fully-fledged realist, nor a perfectly defined modernist. Yet he is
both by his Janus-like way of facing backwards, towards the achieved realist
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
5/27
tradition, and forwards, towards the nascent modernism. What makes his
work worth including in histories of literature is exactly his having had the
privilege of contemplating the period of crisis of the Victorian value system
and, more importantly, his being aware of it. This state of awareness
prompted him to choose that technique able to render the complexity of an
old new age, which made him known and worth mentioning in relation to the
modernist enterprise. Conrads novels perform a clear shift of focus from the
outer to the inner aspects of the self, dictated by the novelists awareness of
the state of crisis at the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth
century. Yet, the subject matter of Conrads novels seems to be anchored in
the solid Victorian tradition, which sometimes makes readers mistake his
technical devices for the conventions of realism. These two contradictory, yet
possible, readings simultaneously activated by Conrads text give us the
measure of the complexity and profoundness of Conrads work. While being
rooted in the factual reality of the turn-of-the-century period, it opens up
toward a deeper symbolical dimension, thus effectively bridging the gap
between the particular and the general. The paradox about Conrads work is
that it simultaneously asserts and subverts a stable value system, giving
prominence to the potentialities of the self to be in and out of an inherited
moral framework. References to the Empire should not, therefore, be a
surprise to any reader familiar with the turn-of-the-century matters, but they
certainly cannot prove Conrad to be a Victorian writer, since matters relating
to Britains imperialistic experience had been, by consensus, taken as taboo
subjects at the time.
As ambiguously suggested by the title, Conrads Heart of Darkness may
be simultaneously seen as a novel about a voyage into the heart of the jungle,
about the condition of the Empire at the end of the Victorian period, as well as
about a journey into the self. The form of Conrads novel, result of the
carefully selected narrative method, encourages each and all of these readings,
separately and simultaneously. All readings, however, contribute to
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
6/27
understanding Conrads work as an investigation of the human self in its
various aspects.
Described in unequivocal terms as the powerful long novella of
imperialism
2
, Conrads Heart of Darkness, written in 1899 and published involume form in 1902, challenges the nineteenth-century readers horizon of
expectations, ironically questioning and undermining the very bases of the
value system that it seems to assert and impose. Heart of Darkness artfully
contrasts two value systems whose encounter defines the turn-of-the-century
period, Victorianism and the twentieth century. It thus creates the background
against which the potentialities of the novel as an art form are revealed as a
valuable instrument of investigation of the self. Introducing Marlow, eye
witness and narrator, from the very beginning of the novel as part of the
intended technique of indirectness, pointing to Marlows propensity to moving
and searching meanings beyond the palpable reality, Conrad clearly indicates
that the novel will not be like any other novel, that the form the shell is
part of the meaning and has to be understood as well as the events described. A
new form is necessary because the novel is not a mere reflection of the
tangible, and known reality, but an exploration of different types of reality.3
[] Marlow was not typical [] and to him the meaning of an episode was
not inside like a kernel but outside, enveloping the tale which brought it out
only as a glow brings out a haze, in the likeness of one of these misty halos
that sometimes are made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine.
(67-68)
Apparently assuming a position of objectivity that conveys the meaning
of an undoubted pride in and submission to the values of the Empire,
permeated, however, with a subtle ironic flavour, Conrad presents the Thames
in the opening pages of the novel. The reference to the history associated with
the river, presented in binary oppositions, helps the reader see the meaning
directions opened by Conrads further treatment of the subject.
2Malcolm Bradbury, The Modern British Novel(Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1993) 95.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
7/27
The old river in its broad reach rested unruffled at the decline of day, after
ages of good service done to the race that peopled its banks, spread out in
the tranquil dignity of a waterway leading to the uttermost ends of the
earth. [] It had known the ships and the men. [] the adventurers and
the settlers; kings ships and the ships of men on Change; captains,
admirals, the dark interlopers of the Eastern trade, and the
commissioned generals of East India fleets. Hunters for gold or pursuers
of fame, they all had gone out on that stream, bearing the sword, and often
the torch, messengers of themight within the land, bearers of a spark from
the sacred fire. What greatness had not floated on the ebb of that river into
the mystery of an unknown earth! The dreams of men, the seed of
commonwealths, the germs of empire. (66-67)
Starting in London at an indefinite moment of time, which, however, is
historically suggestive of the time of the British Empire, Conrads Heart of
Darkness raises a number of issues relating to the advent of a new era,
characterised by relativity, fragmentariness, instability, lack of a shared sense
of public value.
Familiar with the new philosophical ideas emerging in the age, with the
premises of anthropological studies combined with Freudian theories, Conrad
voices his interest in the problems of the Empire and in imperialism as a
starting point for his investigation of the nature of mans relation to himself and
to other. The incursion of the white civilised missionaries into the heart of the
African darkness is only a pretext for Conrads unveiling the mysteries of the
human nature, and analysing the darkness of the human heart. The ambiguously
formulated title encourages the reading of the novel at these two levels. Heart
of darkness may be seen as a metaphor of the jungle of Africa, but it can
equally be decoded as the dark aspects of the human heart. The modern
individual oscillates between two conflicting tendencies. One implies the effort
to find and cast meaning upon an apparently incoherent and meaningless
reality, the other implies a denial of any unifying value, a questioning of the
very possibility of any meaning. The former tendency presupposes an
interpretation of the title as a journey into the darkness, which has a heart, so
3Brian Spittles,Joseph Conrad, Text and Context(London: Macmillan, 1992) 62.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
8/27
eventually a meaning worth looking for. The latter focuses on the innermost
and darkest aspects of the human being, whose investigation is nothing but a
failure. The individual must acknowledge his condition of duplicity, as part of a
stable moral system, of meaningfulness, on the one hand, and as part of thepuzzle of existence, of meaninglessness, on the other.
The main features of the Victorian age, self-confidence, progress,
stability, trust in the individual, originate all in the power and the scope of the
Empire. It is the Empire that provides the individual with the comforting
feeling of belonging to an immutable and incontestable value system. Under
the circumstances, it is hardly conceivable that the British would ever think of
questioning the almightiness of the monarchy or Londons being the
commercial and financial centre of the world. Much of the individual sense of
confidence and stability is given by these two major Victorian strongholds that
give the measure of Britishness and lead to the definition of the place of Great
Britain in the world. For this particular beneficial effect that the Empire and its
institutions were considered to have on the individual at the end of the
nineteenth century, one cannot expect that they will ever become plain subject
matters of literature and be seen as other than taboo subjects.
This mentality characteristic of the nineteenth-century Victorian England
can be considered to be the reason why Conrad chose to write Heart of
Darkness adopting the standpoint of the cultural exile, which was what gave
him, to a certain extent, the freedom to tackle such a delicate problem. That is
also the premise from which Conrad may have started when he conceived
Heart of Darkness as a highly ambiguous narrative text, asking far more
questions than it proved ready to offer answers to. By a method of indirectness,
which presupposed the presence of Marlow, protagonist and narrator, Conrad
invites the reader to perform the act of reading at various levels simultaneously,
to learn to become an active participant in the act of meaning of creation. The
main quality ofHeart of Darkness is its being challenging to its readership
artistically, philosophically and politically.4
The choice of the method of
framing the narration of events within a narrative is dictated by Conrads
intention to allow the creation of deliberate thematic ambiguities, a critical
4Brian Spittles, op. cit., 62.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
9/27
historical perspective and a tone of ironic detachment.5
In all situations, it is
Conrad, the lifelong exile and the precursor of modernism, in conflict with
Conrad, the nineteenth-century British subject, who tries to refresh his readers
perception of reality and to formulate and impose a new status of literature.It would be thus too easy to say that Heart of Darkness is the story of a
voyage of exploration in search for ivory down the Congo into the heart of
Africa. Reading the novel as a story of the rightful and beneficial transfer of the
values of white civilisation to the black savage people of Africa would be
oversimplifying. The sophisticated symbolical texture of Conrads novel
reveals unsuspected meanings, rather unorthodox for the age, about the essence
of the relationships established between civilisation and primitivism in the light
of the theories formulated by anthropology at the turn of the century.
Primitivism is almost as old, it may be supposed, as civilisation; both
terms, of course, being relational. As a literary convention, primitivism allows
the civilised to inspect, or to indulge, itself through an imaginary opposite. It is
often a self-critical motif within the culture []. But in the modernist period a
radical questioning of the present civilisation along with the close study of
tribal people gave a new edge to the primitivist impulse.6
In line with the ideas forwarded by anthropology, Conrad focuses on
issues such as the classification and relationship of races and cultures, hinting
at the environmental and social relations. Yet his major interest, which
benefited from the most extensive treatment, engendering thus the best artistic
achievement, is in mans nature and destiny, especially from the perspective of
mans relation to God. It is not surprising, therefore, that Conrad uses religious
symbols to interpret the nature of the colonisation process. Man performs an
exploratory descent into the primitive sources of the human being, as Conrad
seems to believe that, only by exposure to evil, can man achieve self-
knowledge and understand the essence of reality, or life.
5Ibid., 62.
6Michael Bell, The Metaphysics of Modernism, The Cambridge Companion to Modernism,
ed.Michael Levenson (Cambridge:Cambridge UP, 1999) 20.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
10/27
They [the colonists] wandered here and there with their absurd long staves
in their hands, like a lot of faithless pilgrims bewitched inside a rotten fence.
The word ivory rang in the air, was whispered, was sighed. You would
think they were praying to it. A taint of imbecile rapacity blew through it
all, like a whiff from some corpse. By Jove! Ive never seen anything so
unreal in my life. Andoutside, the silent wilderness surrounding this clear
speck on earth struck me as something great and invincible, like evil or
truth, waiting patiently for the passing away of this fantastic invasion.
(Heart of Darkness, 89)
By establishing an analogy between the modern colonists and the Middle
Ages pilgrims, Conrad challenges the readers knowledge of the benefits ofcolonisation. Although the modern colonists look very much like the pilgrims
in the Middle Ages, with the staves in their hands reminding of the old palm
leaves, Conrad repeatedly and ironically points to the fact that the pilgrims
were armed to the teeth. Thus all the essential humanistic values lying at the
core of the pilgrimage in Christian terms are questioned and invalidated by the
greed, rapacity and violence that characterise the group of people in search for
ivory. Wealth, symbolically present under the form of ivory, is the only faiththat the white people have.
Throughout the novel, ivory is the shrine at which the pilgrims pray.
There is only one exception, when ivory acquires a much deeper meaning than
that of material wealth that is associated with the rapacious plunder of the
jungle. Mr. Kurtz, Marlows double and symbol for his unconscious, the Holy
Grail that the uninitiated Marlow is in search for, is the man who had proved
the ablest of all colonists. Kurtzs original status in the African territories is
particularly revealing as regards the value standards in circulation at the end
of the nineteenth century as far as the purpose and scope of the Empire were
concerned. Educated in Britain, Kurtzs perception of the uncivilised savages
was infused with all the clichs currently associated with the native
populations in occupied territories, which Conrad seems to demolish in an
ironic tone.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
11/27
The original Kurtz had been educated partly in England, and as he was
good enough to say himselfhis sympathies were in the right place. His
mother was half-English, his father was half-French. All Europe contributed
to the making of Kurtz [](122)
The report that he wrote for the International Society for the Suppression
of Savage Customs concluded by Exterminate all the brutes! gives the whole
dimension of Kurtzs, and implicitly Europes, colonising potential. Yet under
the pressure of darkness, Kurtz, and through him Marlow, is the one who
discovers the immensity and impenetrability of the unconscious, having the
revelation of the power of the unconscious to invade and control consciousness.
It is significant to remark at this point that Conrad created in a period of
colonial expansion scientifically grounded by the rise of anthropology, with
Freudbecoming fascinated by primitive life and artefacts. The relationship
of consciousness to the unconscious in his [Freuds] metaphorical discourse
reflects the structure of colonialism with the unconscious as the region to be
colonised and controlled by the ego.7
My ivory. Oh, yes, I heard him. My Intended, my ivory, my station, my
river, my everything belonged to him. It made me hold my breath in
expectation of hearing the wilderness burst into a prodigious peal of
laughter that would shake the fixed stars in their places. Everything
belonged to him but that was a trifle. The thing was to know what he
belonged to, how many powers of darkness claimed him for their own.
(121)
At the heart of the jungle, Kurtz dares challenge the very position of God,
he places himself at the centre of the universe, gesture of impiety which
jeopardises his integrity. Kurtz becomes the God of darkness, and he is
immortalised into a monument of darkness. Kurtz, the dying man, leaves room
for Kurtz, the God of the worshippers. At this moment, ivory no longer stands
for the object of human greed, it symbolically becomes the material out of
7 Michael Bell, op cit., 23.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
12/27
which Kurtz, God and man, is made. It is in ivory that the darkest and finest
threads of the individual conscious and unconscious being are carved.
Anything approaching the change that came over his features I have never
seen before, and hope never to see again. Oh, I wasnt touched. I was
fascinated. It was as though a veil had been rent. I saw on that ivory face
the expression of sombre pride, of ruthless power, of craven terrorof an
intense and hopeless despair. Did he live his life again in every detail of
desire, temptation, and surrender during that supreme moment of complete
knowledge? He cried in a whisper at some image, at some vision he
cried out twice, a cry that was no more than a breath: The horror! The
horror! (147)
The ambiguity that Kurtzs last words create, as Conrad chooses to give
no clear indication regarding the referent of Kurtzs vision, encourages the
interpretation of the novel in terms of various realities, other than the palpable
one. In confrontation with the other, the individual manages to discover his
hidden, darker self. Marlow is exposed to the evil existing latently in the human
nature, and it is only through evil that he can reach the truth and purify himselfto be able to understand the essence of the good.
In order to demonstrate the force, and yet the vulnerability of the
individual, confronted with the aggressiveness of hostile forces, Conrad resorts
to a much older set of values, that he transplants in the new context of the
twentieth-century relativity. He takes over and personally interprets the
chivalric code, making it pliable to the new co-ordinates of a tainted
civilisation. In a world marked by the death of God, Conrad tries to transfer the
values of chivalry, and to make them consonant, up to a certain point, with the
modern cultural environment. His attempt is to accommodate the Christian
chivalric value system to the questioned, questionable and deformed modern
one.
Yet in spite of the apparent solidity and simplicity of the ideas Conrad
constructed his work on, Heart of Darkness turns out to be a sophisticated
investigation of the darkness of the self, avoiding at the same time , by the
choice of narrative technique, simple-mindedness and straightforwardness. The
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
13/27
narrative structure being centred on Marlow, and the story being filtered
through memories means that meaning is deliberately placed under question,
that nothing can be taken for granted, as the narrators themselves are
susceptible to questioning. Yet, in a manner that would become commonpractice in modernism, Heart of Darkness demonstrates that the mind and the
inner life of the individual are far more complex than what can become
apparent at the level of the restricted reality of external events.
The mind of man is capable of anythingbecause everything is in it, all the
past as well as all the future. What was there after all? Joy, fear, sorrow,
devotion, valour, ragewho can tell?but truthtruth stripped of its cloak
of time.(106)
Marlow, as the narrator and experiencer of the story, serves Conrads
artistic purpose by his investigating abilities, of self and other. His readiness to
expose himself to the challenge of initiation makes him into the perfect
embodiment of Conrads philosophy.
He was a seaman, but he was a wanderer, too, while most seamen lead, if
one may so express it, a sedentary life. (67)
Artistically, Marlow is meaning, while being, at the same time, the way of
access to the meaning of reality. In Heart of Darkness, moreover, Marlow is
individually engaged in a process of initiation, which grants him ascendancy on
his fellow sailors. Embarking upon a test and quest initiation journey, or
voyage, suggested by his sailing down the Congo into the heart of the jungle,Marlow performs an incursion into the self, as well as into human nature.
Substantially and in its central emphasis Heart of Darkness concerns Marlow
[] and his journey toward and through certain facts and potentialities of the
self.8
What is surprising about Conrads thesis is that Marlow may not be,
technically speaking, a reliable narrator, but he is to be fully trusted as to the
8Albert J. Guerard, The Journey Within, Conrad. A Casebook. Heart of Darkness, Nostromo and
Under Western Eyes, ed. C. B. Cox (London: Macmillan, 1981) 52.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
14/27
investigations of the self and of the human nature in his capacity as a captain.
To be a captain, in Conrads view, means having a position reached by personal
effort, and due to personal value. Ascendancy is gained by qualities intrinsic to
the individual, and not imposed from the outside. The crew functions as anentity and a unified body, because its members agree to observe a code similar
to the chivalric one, they agree to see in one another the values and qualities
that counterbalance the threat of the hostile, dismembering and distorting forces
in the universe. Conrad emphasises the applicability of the hierarchical system
from the very beginning ofHeart of Darkness.
The Lawyerthe best of old fellowshad, because of his many years and
many virtues, the only cushion on deck, and was lying on the only rug. The
Accountant had brought out already a box of dominoes, and was toying
architecturally with the bones. Marlow sat cross-legged right aft, leaning
against the mizzenmast. (66)
Marlow is not only a technical invention and innovation to ensure the
appropriate degree of involvement and detachment at the same time on the part
of the writer. Marlow himself reiterates often enough that he is recounting a
spiritual voyage of self-discovery. He remarks casually but crucially that he did
not know himself before setting out []9
The encounter between Marlow and Kurtz points to the central theme of
Heart of Darkness, that of initiation. Man performs an exploratory descent into
the primitive sources of the human being. Conrad seems to believe that, only by
exposure to evil, can man achieve self-knowledge and understand the essence
of reality, or life.Yet, even if Marlow reaches a state of self-awareness at the end of the
voyage, the novel does not posit, optimistically, the idea of a meaning
underlying all things. Marlows voyage of self-exploration is just another form
of mans attempt to come to terms with a universe devoid of stable central
values. Yet his being incapable of producing an appropriate explanation as far
as Kurtz was concerned is indicative of the fact that at the end of his journey,
9Albert J. Guerard, The Journey Within, 53.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
15/27
far from being redeemed and in possession of moral truths, as the pattern of the
novel seems to suggest, Marlow becomes only more self-aware, cursed to
acknowledge his inner darkness, and to learn to live with it. The perennial
values that the initiation journey implies are undermined by the discovery thatthe self is ultimately darkness.
The ambiguity of the language used in connection with Marlows meeting
Kurtz points to the potential stability of Marlows value system, subversively
undermined by his final discovery. In the interior you will no doubt meet Mr.
Kurtz. (84)
The reading of Conrads works in terms of simultaneous stability and
fragmentation, of strongly asserted values and horribly questioned ones is
synthesised in Marlows symbolic encounter with Kurtz, or, in the light of our
demonstration, with his real self.
Soul! If anybody ever struggled with a soul, I am the man. And I wasnt
arguing with a lunatic either. Believe me or not, his intelligence was
perfectly clear concentrated, it is true, upon himself with horrible
intensity, yet clear; [] But his soul was mad. Being alone in the
wilderness, it had looked within itself, and, by heavens! I tell you, it had
gone mad. I had for my sins, I suppose to go through the ordeal of
looking into it myself. [] I saw the inconceivable mystery of a soul that
knew no restraint, no faith, and no fear, yet struggling blindly with itself.
(144)
Notromo, just like Heart of Darkness, simultaneously is a novel about
imperialism and about the human condition, about the individuals search foridentity, about his propensity towards progress and self-destruction, about
good and evil, about the darkness inherent in human greatness. In a typically
modernist manner, Conrad plays with his readers horizon of expectations and
draws him into the challenging game of coping with interrelated layers of
significance.
Nostromo derives its title from the name of one, we could say the main,
character. That is what the readers expected from a turn-of-the-century novel,
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
16/27
that was one of the ways titles were made use of in relation to the novels
progress according to the Victorian conventions. The feeling of confidence
before things known in point of narrative organisation is so great that the reader
is not tempted to give a second thought to the strangeness of the name itselfNostromo. Only on concluding the reading of the novel does he feel invited to
correlate the name with Conrads statement in the Authors Note to
Nostromo. Antonia the Aristocrat and Nostromo the Man of the People are the
artisans of the New Era, the true creators of the New State; he by his legendary
and daring feat, she, like a woman, simply by the force of what she is: the only
being capable of inspiring a sincere passion in the heart of a trifler.10
The novel undoubtedly offers an image of Western imperialism. Yet by
interpreting the title in the light of Conrads statement, the reader is forced to
move back to a remote cultural and literary tradition, of a more general value,
embedded and inherent in the modern one the medieval system and the
allegorical mode of creation. Thus the appropriate, even if not exhaustive,
access to the meaning of the novel necessarily implies the r eaders ability to
activate at least two horizons of knowledge and to use two interpretative
schemes. Conrads novel is not strictly about imperialism and the effects it has
on the individual, as John Holloway suggests. Nostromo (1904),
unquestionably Conrads masterpiece, provides a definitive picture of how
Western financial imperialism *+, proffering to bring to an equatorial
American society material advancement and an end to the picturesque
banditry of the past, in fact brings only spiritual emptiness and an unnoticed
compromise with principle, or progressive blindness to it.11
Nostromo focuses on the effects of the colonists presence in the
imaginary Republic of Costaguana. Apparently in deference to the commonly
accepted value system established by the British Empire, Conrad sees the
European, especially English intrusion as beneficial to the countrys interests.
The order and prosperity that the silver mine brought to the region of Sulaco
10Joseph Conrad, Authors Note toNostromo (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1994) 13.
11 John Holloway, The Literary Scene, The New Pelican Guide to English Literature, 7, From Jamesto Eliot, ed. Boris Ford (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1990) 66-67.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
17/27
relieved the native inhabitants of the terror and poverty inflicted upon them
by the dictatorship of the Spanish. In this way, Conrad asserts and implicitly
questions the beneficial effects of European imperialism. Yet in the
description of Mrs Goulds house in Sulaco, he seems to plead for unity in
diversity, for all the moral values that were said to be underlying the
imperialistic expansion in compensation for the destructive effects of the
same action.
She kept her old Spanish house (one of the finest specimens in Sulaco) open
for dispensation of the small graces of existence. She dispensed them with
simplicity and charm because she was guided by an alert perception of values.
She was highly gifted in the art of human intercourse which consists in
delicate shades of self-forgetfulness and in the suggestion of universal
comprehension. Charles Gould (the Gould family, established in Costaguana
for three generations, always went to England for their education and for
their wives) imagined that he had fallen in love with a girls sound common
sense like any other man *+ (50)
Mrs Gould is of Italian origin, but she is made to embody the whole spirit
of the Victorian age. The quoted passage ironically refers to the generally
acknowledged superiority of the English, to their privileged but also
providential role, no matter in which part of the world they decided to set
foot with civilising intentions. The reader may be thus tempted to take things
literally and consider Conrad a writer whose late assimilation as a British
subject dictated a position of acceptance of and subservience to the
imperialistic values. Yet the readers expectations are challenged by the
novels being opened towards a symbolic dimension.
The symbolic texture ofNostromo is exquisite and highly elaborate. It
gives the novel the atemporal dimension that is absent in the apparent strict
chronology of the story, whether the chronological aspects cover the extended
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
18/27
history of the Republic of Costaguana or the detailed description of the three
revolutionary days of Sulaco.
The first part The Silver of the Mine introduces one of the central
symbols of the novel, in the light of which most of the meaning ofNostromointended by Conrad is to be interpreted. The silver of the San Tome mine is
presented in the novel both as destructive and regenerative, yet central to the
existence of practically all the characters of the novel. Apparently, it is the
cause of some of the characters wealth and progress and of some others death.
This is, however, an oversimplifying reading that could be avoided by a closer
look at the symbolic valences of this noble metal. The interpretation of silver as
a symbol is beneficial to the overall meaning of the novel, since this symbol is
not used in isolation, but interwoven in the novels symbolic texture in close
correlation with two other significant ones - the light and the island.
White and shining, silver symbolises purity and purification, the purity of
consciousness, sincerity and loyalty. It is also associated with the royal dignity.
Yet from an ethical point of view, silver symbolises greed and moral
degradation, which is a form of perversion of its original value.12
Since silver is
essential to the story ofNostromo, all the characters relating to it in one way or
another, its centrality is one of the main engines actuating the interpretation of
the novel on different levels of significance. Nostromo dwells upon the
destructive effects of imperialism in its material interests, as much as it does on
the voyages of initiation and exploration of the self undertaken by Decoud and
Nostromo.
Ivory as a symbol generates the same ambiguity of interpretation in
Heart of Darkness. The novels underlying value system oscillates between the
greed and destruction inherent in the imperialistic experience, and more
elaborately in human nature, and the civilising beneficence of the same
experience. Because of its white colour, ivory is a symbol of purity. The fact
that it was used as a material for Solomons throne, it could mean power, in the
sense that it cannot be broken or destroyed. It may also be associated with
incorruptibility.13
In the light of this symbol, Heart of Darkness may be
12
see Jean Chevalier and Alain Gheerbrant,Dicionar de simboluri, vol.3 (Bucureti: Editura Artemis,1995) 140.13
see Jean Chevalier and Alain Gheerbrant, op. cit., vol.2, 50.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
19/27
interpreted both as a novel of and about imperialism in Africa, but also as a
novel of initiation focusing on mans need and ability to investigate the
darkness of human nature.
Due to the centrality of the two symbols to the structure of the novels,both Nostromo and Heart of Darkness encourage a reading in which time and
timelessness merge. Thus the reader is compelled to consider simultaneously
both meanings relating to the imperialistic experience at the end of the
nineteenth century and meanings pertaining to much older value systems
ranging from primitivism to the Middle Ages.
From a narrative point of view, Conrad uses in both novels knowledge
strategies similar, in the sense that he starts from what his readers expect given
the moral system in which they were born and educated. Then, subtly, in most
cases ironically, he challenges their expectations, compelling them to
reorganise their perceptions and knowledge horizon.
Conrads standpoint as regards the imperialistic experience is more
clearly formulated in Heart of Darkness than in Nostromo, simply because he
decides to leave aside an explicit reference to the presence of the British in
Africa. This is contrary to historical facts, but it allows him to take a less biasedview of the mechanism and philosophy of the empire.
Following the common public opinion at the time, according to which the
white peoples presence in the colonised territories had a highly moral
civilising effect upon the savage native inhabitants, Conrad presents the
colonists as pilgrims, expected to behave in moral purity, humility and pity
towards the other. Contrary to expectations, they all wear guns, as they are
driven by material rather than moral or spiritual interests.
Familiar with Darwins theory of evolution according to which living
things developed differently in different places over a long period of time,
theory launched at a moment when most Western people believed that all
things were created by God, Conrad makes Kurtz into an idol and God of the
savages. He thus questions his readers common perception of the savage
people and forces them to rethink their existing system of knowledge.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
20/27
Following the same line of argument, Conrad who endows Marlow, the
narrator and experiencer of the story along the Congo, with discerning and
judgement faculties, conceives him as a materialisation of the same clash
between inherited patterns and clichs and new ideas emerging at the turn ofthe century. Thus Marlow initially perceives the savages as an inferior species
on the line of evolution
A slight clinking behind me made me turn my head. Six black men
advanced in a file, toiling up the path. They walked erect and slow,
balancing small baskets full of earth on their heads, and the clink kept time
with their footsteps. Black rags were wound round their loins, and the short
ends behind waggled to and fro like tails. (80)
to be able just later on to assess and understand them as what they
really were a different civilisation, distinct from and yet similar to
the white European one.
It was very curious to see the contrast of expressions of the white men and
of the black fellows of our crew []. The whites, of course greatlydiscomposed, had besides a curious look of being painfully shocked by such
an outrageous row. The others had an alert, naturally interested expression;
but their faces were essentially quiet [] (111)
Yet Conrad was not interested in the imperial experience per se, the
ideological implications of imperialism are hardly resonant with the writers
more philosophical interest in the evolution of the self. The intimate contact
with the primitive and the savage, the isolation from the constraining forces of
institutionalised civilisation, revealed a truth of human nature. It is latently both
barbaric and insecure: capable of inflicting almost inconceivable cruelty on
other humans, and always on the brink of ontological crisis and consequent
self-destruction.14
This brings about, on Conrads part, a questioning of the
fundamental values of the civilisation that is capable of undergoing such
disintegration. For Conrad, darkness is the possible equivalent of the unknown,
14Brian Spittles, op. cit., 21.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
21/27
but first of all it stands for the primitive condition of human life, with a return
towards the primordial jungle and water, an opportunity to rediscover the
depths of the individual soul.
Conrads point is that ultimately, when contemplating mans real nature,there is no essential difference between an individual socially perceived as evil
and one that the admiring eyes of men see as good. The same fear, anxiety,
even puzzlement experienced by Nostromo, Marlow or Kurtz before human
darkness also torment Sotillo or the Negroes, apparently the embodiment of the
principle of evil according to the generally accepted Western standards at the
end of the nineteenth century.
The fusion of the timeless and of the temporal, or better said the
embedding of the temporal into the timeless, is a characteristic of most
modernist novels, covering the specific treatment of time in modernist fiction.
As the modernist novelists develop an explicit interest in the individual, more
precisely in the mental life of the individual, ranging from the conscious to the
unconscious, they inevitably have to reorganise their perception of time. Time
is no longer perceived only in its chronological, clock-measured aspects, but
mainly in its subjective dimension. The concept of time was probably one of
the most clearly affected by the shift of interest of modernist fiction from the
objective to the subjective, from external events to the inner life of the
individual.
The elaborate and sophisticated narrative technique Conrad uses in his
novels opens up deeper meaning possibilities in the interpretation of the
novelists work. The interposing of a narrator, or narrators, between the reader
and the story, as well as the masterly woven symbolic texture of the novels help
Conrad go beyond the strictly delimited historical time and place his work into
an atemporal dimension. His novels are about distinct individuals evolving in a
distinct cultural environment, as much as they are novels about the human
nature and the condition of the human being in relation to himself, to the other
human beings and to the universe in which he lives. Conrads novels are in and
out of their time simultaneously, making readers reorganise both their
knowledge of the contemporary world and their perception of the place
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
22/27
contemporaneity has within the time continuum. Conrad oscillates between the
particular and the general, freely moving between the two in his conception of
the novel. Unlike other modernist novelists who seemed to have taken refuge in
their work from the aggressive and shifting reality they lived in, Conrad daresconfront significant issues specific to the turn-of-the-century period, asserting
and undermining at the same time the stable and hardly contested Victorian
value system. Drawing on his experience on board the ship, Conrad builds his
own system of values on the perennial hard core of the much older moral code
of chivalry. In this way, he transgresses the boundaries of his age and places his
work in a dimension of timelessness.
As far as time handling is concerned, Heart of Darkness, which is the
story of Marlows voyage along the Congo into the heart of the jungle, is
expected to progress in clear sequence, following a more or less clear
chronology. Even if the initiation meaning is associated to the voyage, in line
with the chivalric code that Conrad refers to from the first pages of the novel
when he emphasises the hierarchical organisation on board The Nellie, it is still
in stages that one expects the process to take place. The story of the voyage into
the jungle, literally, or into the human self, symbolically, represents the core of
the novel and occupies most of the space of the book with the exception of the
first two and the last pages. It is understandable that the most audible voice
should be Marlows, who narrates his adventures in the first person, as
experiencer, witness and interpreter of the events. On a first reading of the
novel, few will notice that Marlows point of view is subtly embedded in a
more neutral and detached perspective of another anonymous narrator, in
whose voice the narrative opens and ends. Unobtrusive as this narrative voice
may be, to such an extent that it is almost ignored, being mistaken at first sight
for Marlows, in the few pages in which it appears, it raises a lot of
interpretation problems on account of the person and tenses used. Although the
perspective is undoubtedly that of a third-person omniscient narrator, the
narrators presence in the narrative is marked by the use of the personal
pronoun we, which suggests his being part of the group of seamen on board
the ship.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
23/27
What we should observe is that Conrad does not simply alternate the
two voices. He embeds the first-person narrators voice into a more
comprehensive first-person narrative context, which resembles, in
generalising and evaluating force, a third-person omniscient one. If asked
about the point of view from which Conrads novel is narrated, most readers
will yield to a first impulse and decree that Heart of Darkness is a first-person
narrative, from the single perspective of one single narrating character. This is
because Marlows story constitutes the centre of interest of the novel and
Conrad narratively decided in favour of a more vivid, unmediated rendering of
events. This is what makes the story attractive and easier to follow. The
almost unnoticed presence of the more knowledgeable anonymous narrator
only complicates things and reduces the degree of involvement that Conrad
achieved by delegating narrative powers to Marlow. Yet, given Conrads
stylistic accuracy and effectiveness, the explanation of this choice of technique
will contribute to better understanding the overall meaning of the novel.
There are at least two reasons for this narrative solution. First, Conrad did not
want to give up the complete control of an omniscient-like narrator over the
narrative. Marlow had been endowed with the critical faculties likely to make
him function as a refined analyst of human nature. Yet, he was emotionally
involved in the events he recounted, he was too subjective for his perspective
to be unconditionally relied on. The more detached omniscient-like narrator
was used in the beginning of the story to introduce Marlow and give the
reader the size of Marlows potential as a narrator due to his ability to observe
and judge things. He was also brought in the end of the story to endorse, in away, Marlows findings. He was there to reinforce the conclusion Marlow
could barely put into words.
The story begins on board a cruising yawl in a London harbour and ends,
after an incursion into the very bowels of the earth, into the darkness of the
human soul, into the heart of the jungle, into the essence of evil, the very
same place and moment of time. Though constructed in an apparently
chronological succession, the novels main quality is its structural circularity
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
24/27
generated by the iterative temporal pattern. The novel begins and ends in the
same point, Marlows highly subjective narrative being enveloped in the more
objective and detached one of the anonymous narrator, a member of The
Nellies crew.
Conrad delimits the historical time the novel is set into not by mentioning
a specific year, but by subtly alluding to the place and cultural context that
moment of time belonged to. London, suggested by the presence of the
Thames, is referred to as the biggest, and the greatest, town on earth, which,
in association with the Companies, undoubtedly places the novel in the
Victorian age and the days of the Second British Empire. The novelist
purposely avoids the use of either of these two terms, which gives him the
freedom to analyse, without bias or deference to the Victorian system,
Britains, as well as other European countries, imperialist tendencies. By
extension, Conrad sees expansionism and greed as inherent in human nature, as
an inevitable counterpart of the splendour and wealth of civilisations. He thus
transgresses chronological time and can afford to generalise on essential
existential issues, by the mediation of the we omniscient-like narrator. More
importantly, by his vacillation between the temporal and the timeless, between
the particular and the general, he finds a way, not thought of before him, to
challenge the very foundations of the system he seemed to praise. Only by
understanding the movement Conrads narrative performs in and out of
chronological time, can the reader make sense of the extremely subtle
subversiveness of the novelists discourse. Conrad manages to assert and deny,
to confirm and refute a stable, never contested and almost unanimously praised
value system. He is very serious and ironic at the same time, but only on
condition the reader can become aware of the two time dimensions.
The following fragment from Heart of Darkness illustrates the temporal
strategy Conrad uses in his novels. Significant events and outstanding figures
of Englands history encourage generalisations on human nature. It is as if the
Thames did not flow only into the sea of water, but also into the sea of time.
The narrative moves forwards and backwards in time, from the present of the
narrative to the past recorded by history.
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
25/27
The tidal current runs to and fro in its unceasing service, crowded with
memories of men and ships it had borne to the rest of home or to the
battles of the sea. It had known and served all the men of whom the nation
is proud, from Sir Francis Drake to Sir John Franklin, knights all, titled and
untitled the great knights-errant of the sea. *+ Hunters for gold or
pursuers of fame, they all had gone out on that stream, bearing the sword,
and often the torch, messengers of the might within the land, bearers of
the spark from the sacred fire. What greatness had not floated on the ebb
of that river into the mystery of an unknown earth! (67)
Besides, the permanent alternation between the present of the narrative,
rendered in tenses of the past time, and the present of Marlows story, rendered
in tenses of the present time, creates the illusion of a time continuum and blurs
the perception of time as chronology. This gives Conrad the freedom to
formulate his own value judgements within a highly restrictive ideological
framework.The same difficulty of the narrative pattern characterises Nostromo.
Seemingly benefiting from the backbone solidity of a coherently and
conventionally constructed plot, which would easily mislead the reader into
reading the novel as one designed in perfect compliance with the nineteenth-
century conventions, Nostromo turns out to be highly modern in point of time
handling. The obvious modernist opening is given by an intricate, sometimes
difficult to follow, interweaving of two chronological schemes, one coveringthe history of the Republic of Costaguana, the other with reference to the three
days of the Sulaco revolution. The shorter and more strictly delimited period is
embedded into the longer and more indefinite one, although frequent
movements from the one to the other are performed through the mediation of
various characters and narrators voices. The reader is hardly given
chronological certainties. In most cases, he is forced to move backwards and
forwards in time, which accentuates the feeling of doubt already born out of the
sense of the characters belonging to a relative value system. Anticipating the
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
26/27
modernist preference for subjectivity in time treatment, Conrads narrative
displays a number of time layers mentally activated by the characters in the
novel. In Part the First, for example, the time scheme is circular, denying the
traditional convention of a simple linear plot development. Many occurrencesare described and analysed, but with the action ending at the exactly the
temporal point at which it began in the novel. The effect of these devices is to
involve the reader intellectually.15
The symbolic texture of Nostromo is
exquisite and highly elaborate. It gives the novel the atemporal dimension that
is absent in the apparent strict chronology of the story, whether the
chronological aspects cover the extended history of the Republic of Costaguana
or the detailed description of the three revolutionary days of Sulaco.
Artfully combining the temporal and the timeless, Conrad made his work
into an efficient instrument of investigation of truth, or life, or reality. His
fiction is thus to be seen as a highly sophisticated form of knowledge. By
devising a narrative technique capable of taking him always closer to the
essence of the individual human being and of humanity, Conrad came to be
undoubtedly acknowledged as a forerunner, or even initiator of modernism in
terms of novel writing. Ant yet, it is precisely because of this oscillation
between the timeless and the temporal that his work has constantly lent itself
to controversy, being sometimes misunderstood, sometimes rejected
altogether.
Conrads novelsare simultaneously novels about imperialism and about
the human condition, about the individuals search for identity, about his
propensity towards progress and self-destruction, about good and evil, about
the darkness inherent in human greatness. In a typically modernist manner,
Conrad plays with his readers horizon of expectations and draws him into the
challenging game of coping with interrelated layers of significance.
15Brian Spittles, op. cit., 4
7/28/2019 Curs Conrad
27/27