Haeckelite and Graphene Formation on a Metal Surface: Evidence for a Phase Transition at the Edge of Criticality
Ying Wang, Alister J. Page, Yoshio Nishimoto, Hu-Jun Qian, Keiji Morokuma, Stephan Irle
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, JapanFukui Institute for Fundamental Chemistry, Kyoto University, Japan
.
Kyoto University Nagoya University
http://kmweb.fukui.kyoto-u.ac.jp/nano http://qc.chem.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Talk XX5.62012 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting, San Francisco, CA
April 11, 2012
2
Haeckelite
Overview
Crespi et al. Phys. Rev. B 53, R13303 (1996); Terrones et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1716 (2000); Rocquefelte et al. Nano Lett. 4, 805 (2004)
DE(TB) (meV/C atom)DE(PBE) (meV/C atom)
00
307261
304246
408375
419380
C60:
Ernst Haeckel(1834-1919)
Thrower-Stone-Wales Transformation
Radiolara
3
Haeckelite
Overview
Rocquefelte et al. Nano Lett. 4, 805 (2004) a) graphite b) rectangular
c) oblique d) hexagonal
& Haeckelite Nanotubes
4
Overview Experiments
Graphene CVD SynthesisNagashima et al. Phys. Rev. B 4, 17487 (1994)
• “monolayer graphite (MG)”
• C2H4 decomposition on Ni(111) at 600°C
• No bulk carbide
Graphene Formation from Ni-C AlloyShelton et al. Surf. Sci. 43, 493 (1974)
• “graphitic monolayer” = modern picture
• Carbon doping of Ni(111) with CO at 1200°C
• Phase transition: Carbon segregationGrüneis et al. Phys. Rev. B 77, 193401 (2008)
Overview Theoretical Studies
How Does Graphene Form on Ni(111)?Gao et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 5009 (2011)
• GGA PW91/UPP-PW (VASP) geometry optimizations• individual clusters on Ni(111) C1-C24
5
Geometries and energetics only
No information on structure evolution with time (growth)!
Want QM/MD Simulations!
6
Self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding (SCC-DFTB)
12
2tot i i repi
E f E q q
0vi iv
c H S Second order-expansion of DFT total energy with respect to charge fluctuation
TB-eigenvalue equation
Method SCC-DFTB
Single-zeta STO basis set
Finite temperature approach (Mermin free energy EMermin)
1
exp / 1ii B e
fk T
2 ln 1 ln 1e B i i i ii
S k f f f f
Te: electronic temperatureSe: electronic entropy
0 1
2N
repi i i i
i
EH H SF f c c q q
SR R R R
0 1if
Atomic force
M. Weinert, J. W. Davenport, Phys. Rev. B 45, 13709 (1992)
EMermin = Etot - TeSe
E
2fi0 1 2
m
7
DFTB/MD Results H model
QM/MD of 30 C2 on Ni(111), 1180 KY. Wang, A. J. Page, Y. Nishimoto, H.-J. Qian, K. Morokuma, SI, JACS (2011)
Haeckelite!
A
t = 0
100 ps 410 ps
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Num
ber
of poly
gonal rings
Time [ps]
five-membered ring six-membered ring seven-membered ring
200 ps 300 ps
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Num
ber
of poly
gonal rings
Time [ps]
five-membered ring six-membered ring seven-membered ring
5
Average 5- and 6-ring counts over 10 annealing
trajectories
Formation of first condensed 2-ring
system (5/5 or 5/6)
Always pentagon first!
Hollow in Fe is required
Y. Ohta, Y. Okamoto, A. J. Page, SI, K. Morokuma, ACS Nano 3, 3413 (2009)
Nanotube cap nucleation
DFTB/MD Results Why Pentagons?
8
9
DFTB/MD Results H model
QM/MD of 30 C2 on Ni(111), 1180 KY. Wang, A. J. Page, Y. Nishimoto, H.-J. Qian, K. Morokuma, SI, JACS (2011)
top side
10
DFTB/MD Results G Model
QM/MD of 18 C2 + C24 on Ni(111), 1180 KY. Wang, A. J. Page, Y. Nishimoto, H.-J. Qian, K. Morokuma, SI, JACS (2011)
• Pentagon-first vs. template effect.• Suppression of heptagons and
pentagons
Wang et al., Nano Lett., (2011)
Graphene!
11
DFTB/MD Results G Model
QM/MD of 18 C2 + C24 on Ni(111), 1180 KY. Wang, A. J. Page, Y. Nishimoto, H.-J. Qian, K. Morokuma, SI, JACS (2011)
• Pentagon-first vs. template effect.• Suppression of heptagons and
pentagons
Wang et al., Nano Lett., (2011)
Graphene!
12
DFTB/MD Results G Model
QM/MD of 18 C2 + C24 on Ni(111), 1180 KY. Wang, A. J. Page, Y. Nishimoto, H.-J. Qian, K. Morokuma, SI, JACS (2011)
top side
DFTB/MD Results Templating effect
Ring count analysis(average over 10 trajectories)
13
Our “haeckelite index” h
Y. Wang, A. J. Page, Y. Nishimoto, H.-J. Qian, K. Morokuma, SI, JACS (2011)
Haeckelite is a Metastable Phase
DFTB/MD Results Ostwald’s rule
14
F. W. Ostwald, Z. Phys. Chem. 22, 289 (1897)
MC Study: Karoui et al., ACS Nano 4, 6114 (2010)
Self-Organized Criticality Random Graph Theory
15
S. Kauffman, At Home in the Universe (1996)
Phase Transformation in Random Graph Theory
20 nodesedgesnodes
= 520
largest cluster:
3
1020
5
1520
15
2020
18
2520
20
largest cluster:
edgesnodes
x x
xx x
Self-Organized Criticality Random Graph Theory
16
S. Kauffman, At Home in the Universe (1996)
Edges Number of BondsNodes Number of Atoms
Phase transition!
Self-Organized Criticality Carbon phase transition
17
Haeckelite/Graphene Formation: Carbon spsp2 Phase Transition?
18
Self-Organized Criticality Carbon phase transition
What is Self-Organized Criticality (SOC)?P. Bak, C. Tang, K. Wiesenfeld (BTW), Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987)
Avalanche sizes (time)
frequency P over size x
P(x) x∝ -α (x>1)
19
Self-Organized Criticality Carbon phase transition
What is Self-Organized Criticality (SOC)?P. Bak, C. Tang, K. Wiesenfeld (BTW), Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987)
Universality of self-organized critical state and 1/f noise:Gutenberg-Richter Law N/NTOT = 10-bM
(Earthquake probability vs magnitude)
Source: wikipedia
Marine extinction on geological time scale
Source: wikipedia
time (Ma)
Others: Stock market, epidemics, solar flares, rivers, mountain ranges, etc. etc. = FRACTALS!
20
Self-Organized Criticality Carbon phase transition
Michael Hilke, McGill Universityhttp://www.physics.mcgill.ca/webgallery/michael1/
• Universality of pentagon-first mechanism in carbon condensation
• Possibility to synthesize Haeckelite: fast carbon supply, rapid cooling
• Graphene nucleation follows pentagon-first mechanism; subsequent annealing required (Ostwald’s rule of stages)
• C24 template imprints hexagonal structure on growing flat carbon network: suggestion to experiment
• spsp2 condensation at high [C] is a phase transition with fractal characteristics of self-organized criticality (SOC)
Summary http://qc.chem.nagoya-u.ac.jp
21
22
Acknowledgements
July 8, 2011
The Group:
Dr. Oraphan Saengsawang (Visitor)Dr. Ying WangDr. Hu-Jun QianDr. Matt Addicoat (JSPS)Dr. Cristopher CamachoMs. Lili Liu (D3)Mr. Yoshifumi Nishimura (D1)Ms. Elena Vyshnyakova (D1, visitor)Mr. Yoshio Nishimoto (M2)Undergraduates
CREST “Multiscale Physics” (2006-2011)CREST “Soft -p materials: (2011-2015)
SRPR tenure track program (2006-2011) JSPS KAKENHI
Funding: