LA IMPORTANCIA DE LAS ASOCIACIONES PUBLICO PRIVADAS EN EL DESARROLLO PORTUARIO
#OAS_CIP #OEA_CIP www.portalcip.org
Jorge Durán Chief of the Secretariat Inter-American Committee on Ports (CIP) [email protected]
XXXIX REPICA, JULY 25-28, 2017, BELIZE CITY, BELIZE
Member States
1. Antigua and Barbuda
2. Argentina 3. Bahamas 4. Barbados 5. Belize 6. Bolivia 7. Brazil 8. Canada 9. Chile 10. Colombia 11. Costa Rica 12. Cuba 13. Dominica 14. Ecuador 15. El Salvador 16. Grenada 17. Guatemala 18. Guyana
19. Haiti 20. Honduras 21. Jamaica 22. Mexico 23. Nicaragua 24. Panama 25. Paraguay 26. Peru 27. Dominican Republic 28. St. Kitts and Nevis 29. St. Vincent and the
Grenadines 30. St. Lucia 31. Suriname 32. Trinidad and Tobago 33. United States 34. Uruguay 35. Venezuela
National Port Authorities
United
States
CIP Structure
Mexico
Barbados Uruguay CIP Secretariat
Panama Mexico Peru Uruguay
Argentina
Public
Policy,
Legislation
and
Regulation
CSR, Gender
Equality and
Empowerment
of Women
Port
Protection
and
Security
Sustainable
Port
Management
and
Environmental
Protection
Logistics,
Innovation and
Competitiveness
Tourism, Inland
Ports and
Waterways,
Ship Services
and Navigation
Safety
CIP Structure
Inter-American Committee on Ports(CIP)
1. l
Only permanent inter-governmental forum at the highest level to promote the development of the maritime sector in the region.
2. C
Promote and improve management and technical capabilities of port officials.
3. A
Assist Member States on issues or specific projects upon request.
4. P
Promote win - win partnerships with private sector in the maritime industry to develop projects.
Political Dialogue
Capacity Building
Technical Assistance
Active Collaboration with the Private Sector
Associate Members
Strategic Partners
Competitiveness
In Ports, what is Competitiveness?
It is determined by the cost, speed and efficiency of each one of the factors and processes that are used by trading in the logistics corridor.
Member States
“Competitiveness is the set of institutions, policies and factors that determine the level of productivity of a country”.
102
83
79
88
80
93
127
100
115
113
80
90
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Institutions
Infrastructure
Macroeconomic Environment
Health and Primary Education
Training and Higher Education
Goods Market efficiency
Labor Market Efficiency
Financial Market Development
Technology Readiness
Market Size
Business Sophistication
Innovation
Source: WEF Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
Global Competitiveness Map 2016-2017
Source: WEF Competitiveness Index 2016–2017
Country LPI Ranking
Germany 1
USA 10
Canada 14
Panama 40
El Salvador 83
Costa Rica 89
Nicaragua 102
Guatemala 111
Honduras 112
Bahamas 78
Source: World Bank, 2016
The LPI analyzes 160 Countries in areas such as Customs, Infrastructure, Logistics Competence, International Shipments, among others.
Global Logistic Performance 2016
Source: World Bank, 2016
Country Quality
Panama 6.3
USA 5.7
Canada 5.5
Honduras 4.6
El Salvador 4
Guatemala 3.9
Costa Rica 3.1
Nicaragua 2.8
Port Infrastructure Quality 2016
Source: ECLAC
#1 Santos: 3. 64
#2 Colon: 3.57
#3 Balboa: 3.29
#4 Cartagena: 2.60
#5 Manzanillo: 2.45
Millions of TEUs
Port Ranking in Latin America and the Caribbean
Vessel Design:
Capacity: 14.000 TEU Tonnage: 157.000 DWT
Total Longitude: 365.8 m Bao: 48.8 m
Draft: 15.2 m
However , vessels of 16, 18 and 20 thousand TEUs do not fit
Panama Canal Expansion
Infrascope 2017 • Infrascope measures a
country’s ability to mobilize private investment in infrastructure through PPPs.
Privatization of the Kingston Container Terminal
Concession Agreement Project Funding
• High cost to optimize and expand the KCT and dredge the navigation channel. • Expansion plans by competitors; investment needed to maintain and grow
business. • Other developments in the International Shipping Industry.
Privatization of the Kingston Container Terminal
The Outcome – Win Win
Privatization of the Kingston Container Terminal
Jamaica investing US$ 660 million to become a Regional
Logistic Hub
Mexico National Infrastructure Program
52 Highways
80 Roads
3 Passenger Trains
1 New Airport in CDMX
25 Port Projects
1 Telecom Network
~83 Billions
USD
Mexico National Infrastructure Program
The Program consider 25 port expansion/improvement projects with an investment of more than 62 billion Mexican Pesos (USD $ 3.7 billion).
Investment in the National Infrastructure Program (by type of investment in millions of Mexican Pesos)
[VALUE]
[VALUE]
[VALUE]
Investment
Private Sector (75%)
Fiscal Resources (13%)
Own Resources (12%)
Mexico National Infrastructure Program
Lázaro Cárdenas
Manzanillo
Puerto Vallarta
Tampico
Salina Cruz
Seybaplaya*
Isla del Carmen*
Coatzacoalcos
Tuxpan
Topolobampo
Ensenada
Guaymas
Mazatlán Altamira
Matamoros*
Veracruz
Puerto Chiapas
Dos Bocas
2.62 6.37 7.11
26.60 42.34 44.77
5.82 13.69 18.88
6.92 12.36 17.55
5.39 12.89 18.81
3.27 8.72 12.16
29.10 38.09 47.49
10.66 17.11 22.42
0.56 1.43 3.03
15.21 26.17 36.26
12.17 24.76 31.88
20.89 30.26 46.03
30.71 45.86 56.24
8.16 27.80 45.65
3.86 7.14 8.72
Other PPPs Samples
Costa Rica: Concession Agreement for Moin Container Terminal
• Concession agreement for the design, planning, financing, building, exploitation and maintenance of the new Puerto Moín Container Terminal in Costa Rica.
• The project involves the Government of Costa Rica, APM Terminals Moín S.A. and APM Terminals Central America B.V.
Honduras: Puerto Cortés Container and Cargo Terminal
• Management Trust Agreement for the Structuring, Development and Financing of the Operation of the Puerto Cortés Container and Cargo Terminal between the Comisión para la Promoción de Alianzas Públicas-Privadas (COALIANZA), Empresa Nacional Portuaria (National Port Company) and Banco Financiera Comercial Hondurena S.A. (FICOHSA BANK).
Honduras: Puerto Cortés Bulk Cargo Terminal
• Management Trust Agreement for the Structuring, Development and Financing of the Operation of the Puerto Cortés Container and Cargo Terminal between the Comisión para la Promoción de Alianzas Públicas-Privadas (COALIANZA), Empresa Nacional Portuaria (National Port Company) and Banco Atlantida S.A. Source: World Bank, 2016
Port Community System/ Single Window
Cyber Security risk at each step/Institution due to more Automated Processes
Final Considerations
• The private sector is the main catalyst for change. Treat the private sector as a partner: private sector are the solutions.
• PPPs critical for sustainable development.
• Cooperation is essential for progress.
• Countries should consider:
• A coherent PPP policy with directions, responsibilities and goals;
• Strong enabling institutions;
• Legal Framework;
• Cooperative risk sharing and mutual support. Focus on a concrete deliverables that is in everyone's interest, a Win – Win partnership;
• A confident investment and business climate.
• More transparency and accountability in the development PPPs.
• Developing strong, well-functioning maritime transport infrastructure is a key element of economic growth.
• Public-private partnerships (PPPs) in ports have become a means to manage port operations more effectively.
Jorge Durán
Chief of the Secretariat
Inter-American Committee on Ports (CIP)
Inter-American Committee on Ports (CIP)
#OAS_CIP www.portalcip.org
Thank You!