Addressing the Crisis in Developmental Mathematics and College Readiness Amy Getz Manager of Community College Services NCTM 2014 Annual Meeting April 11, 2014
an initiative of the Charles A. Dana Center and the Texas Association of Community Colleges
Today’s Goals
! Present data about student success in the transition from high school to college.
! Share information about the New Mathways Project and other Dana Center work to improve student success.
2
The Problem
In mathematical terms, it is a problem of both
input and output.
3
“Developmental math is a burial ground for the
aspirations of myriad students.” -- Uri Treisman
Input: Too many students not “college ready”
National data: 59 -- 67% of community college students are referred to one or more developmental math courses.
In 2011-2012, there were 8.3 million students enrolled in public 2-year colleges, approximately 46% of all undergraduates in the country.
In Texas, 44% of community college students are placed into developmental mathematics.
4
Output: Too few students earn college credit
! Developmental course sequences are long.
! Individual course success rates are often very low: for both developmental and gateway mathematics courses.
! Students get lost at the transition points.
5
An illustration of the progression
6
Not completed: 12%
Not completed:25%
Not enrolled 7%
Not enrolled 18%
3 levels below
Not enrolled 16%
2 levels below
Completed 16%
82% Enroll
57% Pass
Referred to Level 3 100%
1 level below
29% Pass
Not completed: 6%
41% Enroll
Orange and Black: Percent out of original 100% at each step with duplication, i.e., students who continue are counted in multiple steps
Blue: Percent out of original 100% without duplication, i.e., each student is counted once
Source: Jobs for the Future, Community College Research Center
Data from 35 Achieving the Dream Colleges, 2009
Math is a particular challenge
7 Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
44.3%
28.6% 28.7%
9.0% 7.8% 8.7%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Math Reading Writing
Percentage of Non-College Ready by Subject Fall 2011 First-Time in College Students
CTC Univ
The good news and the bad news in Texas
8 Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
35.6%
27.1%
37.4%
51.7%
Fall 2003 Fall 2011
% Ready-Non-Direct from H.S.
% Ready-Direct from H.S.
Percentage of College Ready Students Entering Community and Technical College in Texas
How should college readiness be defined?
We advocate for: College readiness should be determined by the likelihood a student will be able to earn college credit in a gateway course.
9
Three gateway mathematics courses
! College Algebra (or Pre-Calculus)
! Statistics
! Math for Liberal Arts "Quantitative Reasoning
10
Three gateway mathematics courses
Traditional developmental mathematics sequence is designed solely to lead to College Algebra. Placement tests are designed to place students into a traditional, manipulation-focused algebra sequence.
11
Is College Algebra the “gold standard”?
Growing call from business and education leaders to teach more data analysis and quantitative reasoning. “Unfortunately, there is often a serious mismatch between the original rationale for a college algebra requirement and the actual needs of the students who take the course.” -- Mathematical Association of America Committee on Undergraduate Programs in Mathematics (CUPM) 2004 Curriculum Guide
12
The Dana Center advocates for...
Reforming developmental and gateway mathematics based on four fundamental principles: 1. Multiple pathways with relevant and challenging mathematics
content aligned to specific fields of study
2. Acceleration that allows students to complete a college-level math course more quickly
3. Intentional use of strategies to help students develop skills as learners
4. Curriculum design and pedagogy based on proven practice
13
The New Mathways Project (NMP)
Working in Texas with the Texas Association of Community Colleges (TACC)
! All 50 community colleges districts in the state contributing to development costs
! 47 of the 50 actively engaged with the Dana Center to examine and re-envision programs
Work outside of Texas will start in the fall of 2014.
14
The NMP at multiple levels
State:
! Policy
Institutional:
! Implementation support with tools and services
Classroom:
! Faculty training
! Curricular materials
15
The NMP Courses
16
Timeline for Development and Implementation
*A PDF version of the Frameworks course is available for open use.
17
Courses First Implementation
Publically Available
Frameworks for Mathematics and Collegiate Learning*
Spring 2013 Fall 2013
Foundations of Mathematical Reasoning Fall 2013 Fall 2014
Statistical Reasoning Spring 2014 Spring 2015 Quantitative Reasoning Spring 2015 Spring 2015 STEM-Prep and bridge course Spring 2016 Spring 2017
Back to the input...
Dana Center’s future steps to increase number of students leaving high school college ready...
Develop 4th year course options that are rigorous alternatives to Pre-Calculus and current “remedial” courses that
! Engage students in relevant, challenging mathematics.
! Build upon what we know about how to support learning.
! Consider both college-ready/non-college ready options.
18
Bridges not shut doors...
As differentiated pathways become available, we must also...
! Ensure that students are advised into pathways based on their individual needs and strengths.
! Ensure that students have viable bridges that allow them to change pathways if their interests or ambitions change.
19
A need for a national discussion...
Think about how we define “college readiness” for mathematics:
! What are the core competencies for different pathways?
! How can we assess those competencies, especially to go beyond manipulation skills?
! How should we account for non-cognitive factors that affect a student’s chances for success?
! Explore ways to “certify” students are college-ready at the high school level.
20
Contact Information
! General information about the Dana Center: www.utdanacenter.org
! Higher Education work: www.utdanacenter.org/higher-education/
! To receive monthly updates about the NMP, contact us at: [email protected]
! Amy Getz (general project issues): [email protected]
21
About the Dana Center
22
The Charles A. Dana Center at The University of Texas at Austin works with our nation’s education systems to ensure that every student leaves school prepared for success in postsecondary education and the contemporary workplace.
Our work, based on research and two decades of experience, focuses on K–16 mathematics and science education with an emphasis on strategies for improving student engagement, motivation, persistence, and achievement. We develop innovative curricula, tools, protocols, and instructional supports and deliver powerful instructional and leadership development.