,:).6 30
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 1
DECISION DOCUMENTATION PACKAGECOVER SHEET
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
TRACK 1 SITES: GUIDANCE FOR ASSESSING
LOW PROBABILITY HAZARD SITESAT THE INEL
SITE DESCRIPTION: Southeast Corner Oil Spill
SITE ID: NRF-65
WASTE AREA GROUP: 8
OPERABLE UNIT: 8-04
I. SUMMARY - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE:
NRF Unit 65 is the historical site of an oil spill which is located approximately 1200 feetsoutheast of the southeast corner of the Naval Reactors Facility (NRF) perimeter fence.The exact time of occurrence of the spill is unknown. It appears that light oil, such aslubricating oil, was dumped in this area. The affected area is approximately 30 feet by100 feet. The depth of contamination varies across the site from a few inches to morethan a foot.
Sampling was performed in the area and analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene,and xylene (BTEX), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), total metals, and a solventscreen. Results showed small amounts of benzene and toluene along with TPH up to8200 parts per million (ppm).
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 2
DECISION RECOMMENDATION
II. SUMMARY - QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF RISK:
Low qualitative risk is highly certain at this site. This decision combination falls into the'no action required' area of the decision graph.
III. SUMMARY - CONSEQUENCES OF ERROR:
There is evidence that hazardous constituents are present at this site; however, thequantities are very small compared to the risk based concentration levels. If an incorrectdecision is made to perform no action, and the site actually contained significantquantities of undetected hazardous substances, they could possibly migrate from thearea, although migration is unlikely because the volume of the spill is limited, and basaltis present just below the soil surface. Wrongly making the decision to remediate thisarea would result in the unnecessary expenditure of resources that could be used forother higher priority sites at NRF.
IV. SUMMARY - OTHER DECISION DRIVERS:
No other decision drivers are present.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This site is recommended for no further action. Although there are hazardousconstituents present, they are in such small quantities that the risk associated with thesite would be very small.
SIGNATURES # PAGES: DATE: s cy,
2L As7:2,,,,,..,/ /
PREPARED BY- •-,S C_CI)Lcrece ,.--DOE WAG MANAGER y A.<7e,, ,/,
APPROVED RY: L't e c , :,' / e. _ 1 - INDEPENDENT REVIEW: /1.1/2/ /,'
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 3
NO FURTHER ACTION DETERMINATION
The U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Region 10, andthe State of Idaho have completed a review of the referenced information for Waste AreaGroup 8-04 Unit 65 hazardous site, as it pertains to the INEL Federal Facility Agreement.Based on this review, the Parties have determined that no further action for purposes ofinvestigation or study is justified. This decision is subject to review at the time of issuance ofthe Record of Decision.
References: 774„,A. /
DOE Project Manager
EPA Project Manager
/4/ 7Wd...% age%at
Idaho Project Manager 7 0
-4;D e
1241/9yDate
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 4
DECISION STATEMENTby DOE RPM
Date recd:
Disposition:
/o/_,V9v
//W7cita /_,//Wet-
AntA f-e;// de-4-10ezu40(14 ,LeZ //0- Ale„-ax.452-e,
Fee," .4-t-e-et 30 ,e /00 /
DATE
NAME
/0/90r
4,ev 647 /14bd ate y
# PAGES IDEGISION CEMENT}
SIGNATUHE
71->/
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 5
DECISION STATEMENTby EPA RPM
Date recd:lo 2 )' gi PPF. & )
Disposition:set-C... ci 5,0,/ file j
G9/..A.4 a ef 5 p , li ta-,ALOca.9-0-
I -zoo ft 5 5 of il.) R F ,f4..e. )fr-;
S tit Vt5Lla.9 CD C 94RA Lictie-
(.4 i IC 'TUC . 50-wicle as tilts9 Low 4 .2.. -tr-t - ct‘02 SL--Cs-tc-j
(041.4_4.- pet:je e-L*-- ce9r15
gait ci a-- ; ace
f1foaek (c94.0 le die „, of
r sinfaret- Lyre-4. C04—IcAgrics.,....,
e517.140, y cv 5.,
7-1--ace 15 -ti-c, 19 a ,S I 5 At-
...i- ix ,, ,,,,,,,,,,_, c.a. c.,
et
0,/ i sa,,e/mi -,....,-0734-•-t 5 WA - j A... /4_4- (A., ic7-7,.. •.7‘,...„ /f...fiz..._. . ,,„.„
it .1,7-5,- , , 40 -,i czci
DATE.
/olz6 'V
PAGES (DECISION STATEMENT).
SIGNATURE AZ
at"
NAME
2//1"7/V, 7 fl. fl ." .
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 6
DECISION STATEMENTby STATE RPM
Date recd: • /6124/My f- ofej thvil oc"
Disposition:
/420 e.--c-rtf i ir .7;tc. s----/
'CP ' ti c2-/2.0---'^c-e ' /20e>„xi,
-1, ek le a.4.11-
_..t 0-t- /4
(
)
en.--'174
, 5 aft...,ce,..,
/ors-
i_er at___ see.-
ie,--e--c ,-----„,__=c--g_AA_ "--,0,10,77--( 4- inn.
,,,,„....:t c...c.ott-t—C 0
/ a ma/ 61 14 r ...n
cernia en .7, zaa--4 cat:sr-car)
0---,-< Lrec id .."-.1 { 4
on <ear....-e_ ......c-..--.-4-1
.„..„.1.4, c - e - - ( i', 2 2.._ •
4 4 4.46.....1/4„) / Ai e...-p-s/ 1 - ha- 744-44..?.
DATE
/ 0/2 i1/447# PAGES IDECISION STATEMENT}
/
NAME SI ATURE )fin
--Dc-a- A/..., 7„, ._,-(.________,-7;e_01
4/Yr‘-.1"
8-04 UNIT 65, PAGE 7
PROCESS/WASTE WORKSHEETSITE ID NRF UNIT 65
Col 1Processes Associated with thisSite
Col 2Waste Description & HandlingProcesses
Col 3Description and Location of anyArtifacts/Structure/Disposal Areas Associated withthis Waste or Process
Oil spill Soil contaminated with petroleumhydrocarbons
Artifact Discolored, barren soilLocation 1200' southeast of southeast corner of
NRF perimeterDescription Oil-contaminated soil
Artifact Dead vegetation in central area of spillLocation 1200' southeast of southeast corner of
NRF perimeterDescription Dead vegetation
ArtifactLocationDescription
ArtifactLocationDescription
ArtifactLocationDescription
ArtifactLocationDescription
ArtifactLocationDescription
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 8
CONTAMINANT WORKSHEETSITE ID NRF Unit 65
WASTE (Col 2) Petroleum contaminated soilPROCESS (Col 1) Oil Spill
Col 4
What known potential hazardous
substances constituents are assocrated wrth this
waste or process'
Col 5
Potentral sources aSSCheated mth thrs
hazardous materral
Col 9
Known estimated
concentration of hazardous
substances'constauents
InN kg)
Col 7
Risk based
concentration
(mg kg1
Cr' 6
O.] lattve rosk
assessment
H Med Lo
Col 9
Overall reliabilrty
Iii:MediLo
TPH Contaminated Soil 8200 ppm' 1000 ppm` Low High
Benzene Contaminated Soil .0049 ppm 20 ppm` Low High
Toluene Contaminated Soil .0002 ppm 50,000 ppm' Low High
_.a is va ue represen s the maximum va ue of tour samp es ta en at t e site.b No risk based concentration was calculated for TPH, however the State of Idaho Guidelines for Cleanup of
Petroleum Contaminated Soil is 1000 ppm TPH.c From Track 2 Guidance, Revision 6. January 1994, Table 11-2, pages D-18 and D-20.
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 9
QUALITATIVE RISK AND RELIABILITY EVALUATION TABLE
Low
QUALITATIVE RISK
Medium High
HIGHLYUNRELIABLE
HIGHLYREUABLE
robabrlintLOW
coneentratron resulting in nsk < 104
MEDIUM HIGHconcentration remltinp in
risk >
Qualitative nsk
*If sufficient data exist to identify an appropriate remedy.
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 10
Question 1. What are the waste generation process locations and dates of operationassociated with this site?
Bleck I Answer.
NRF Unit 65 is the historical site of an oil spill approximately 1200 feet southeast of thesoutheast corner of the Naval Reactors Facility (NRF) perimeter fence. The exact timethe spill occurred is unknown. It appears that light oil, such as lubricating oil, wasdumped in this area. The site is adjacent to a dirt road previously used as a connectionto the main road (Lincoln Boulevard) located east of the NRF.
The spill is located in an area where the topography differs from its surroundings. Itappears that the area was scraped level many years ago, possibly with the intent ofexcavating a gravel pit. The presence of basalt immediately below the soil surface wouldhave precluded this use. What appears to be a canal bank is located approximately 20feet east of the spill. This dike is elevated about six feet above the adjacent ground level,and has a longitudinal depression on top. This may have been one of the canals builtbefore the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) was established.
Block 2 How reliable is/are the information source/s? _High x Med _Low (check one(Explain the reasoning behind this evaluation.
This information is based on an inspection of the area.
Block 3 Has this INFORMATION been confirmed? _Yes x No few* oneiIf so, describe the confirmation.
Block 4 Sources of Information: It heck approporde heat/. numb
Analytrcal data
source(s)
INo available mforrnettenDocumentatron about dateAnecdotaiDosposal dataHistormal process dataO. A. dataCusrent process dataSafety anarisrs reportAreal photographsD&D reportEngrn eennorsite draworgsfriar& assessmentUnusual Doctor once ReportWell dataSummary document s
F acrtty SOPs Construction data i I
111M10 xl 2
8-04; LINIT 65, PAGE 11
Question 2. What are the disposal process locations and dates of operation associatedwith this site?
Block 1 Answer
The disposal process in this area was the probable dumping of oil from a vehicle such asa pickup truck. The date of the event is unknown. The disposal location is thatdescribed in Question 1.
Block 2 How reliable is/are the information source/s? _High x Med _Low (check onel
Explain the reasoning behind this evaluation.
Visual inspection indicates oil has been spilled in this area.
Block 3 Has this INFORMATION been confirmed? _Yes x No (check onelIf so, describe the confirmation.
The exact disposal process and time are not known.
Block 4 Sources of Information: lcheck appropriate box/es & number
Analytical data
source/s1
No evadable onlormatroir— — Documentation abuut data
Anecdotal-- —" Dmdosal dataHistorical process dal..
0 A. dataCurrent process data
Safety analysis reportAreal photographs
D&D ipponEngineenngisite drawings
Inotial assessmentUnusual Occurrence Report
Well dataSummary documents
Construction dataFacriny SOPs
Other xl 2
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 12
Question 3. Is there evidence that a source exists at this site? If so, list the sourcesand describe the evidence.
Block 1 Ansa
There is evidence that a source exists at the site. Visual inspection of the area revealedsoil that is discolored (black). Sampling performed on the soil in June of 1994 indicatedthat a crust existed on the surface similar to asphalt. This crust varied in thicknessacross the spill area up to 1-1/2 inches. Discolored soil was encountered up to one footdeep and may have been deeper, but the extent of the excavation was only one footdeep. Four samples were taken from 3 different locations within Unit 65. TPH rangedfrom 190 ppm to 8200 ppm. Detectable levels of benzene were noted in two samplestaken from the same location. The samples showed 4.8 parts per billion (ppb) and 4.9ppb benzene. Toluene was also detected in one sample at the same location thatbenzene was detected. The toluene measured 2.0 ppb. Ethylbenzene and xylene werenot detected. A solvent screen did not detect any semi-volatiles. Total metal analysisshowed maximum results of: 216 ppm barium, 29 ppm chromium, 12.6 ppm lead, and7.6 ppm arsenic. No other metals were detected. All total metal results are below theupper tolerance limit and 90th percentile for the Test Area North (TAN) according to the"Track 2 Sites: Guidance for Assessing Low Probability Hazard Sites at the INE12. TANis the closes facility to NRF for comparison purposes.
Block 2 How reliable is/are the information source/s? x High _Med _Low (check onelExplain the reasoning behind this evaluation.
This information is based on visual observation and sampling.
Block 3 Has this INFORMATION been confirmed? x Yes _No (check onel
If so, describe the confirmation.
Confirmation was obtained by sampling the affected area.
Block 4 Sources of Information: {check appropriate box/es & number
Analytical data
source/sl
xl 6No available informationDocumentatdo about /1st, IAnecdotal
blistormal process data Disposal data
C) A. dataCurrent process dataSafety analyus room(A(eal photographsD&O reportEngineering/site drawings
Unusual Occurrence Report Initial assessmentWell dataSummary documentsConstruction fetaFaciSty sops
Other 5] 2,5,7
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 13
Question 4. Is there empirical, circumstantial, or other evidence of migration? If so,what is it?
Block 1 Answer
There is evidence that some migration has occurred. This is evident from the darkcolored soil that was encountered approximately one foot deep. The extent of migrationis not known, however as noted in the field log book, basalt outcrop was present on thesurface in the unit. This would tend to limit migration to the layer of soil above thebasalt.
BlOck 2 How reliable is/are the information source/s? x High _Med _Low (check onel
Explain the reasoning behind this evaluation.
This information is based on visual observation and sampling.
Mock .1 Has this INFORMATION been confirmed? x Yes _No (check one1lf so, describe the confirmation.
This was confirmed by digging approximately one foot in depth and noting the discoloredsoil.
Block 4 Sources of Information: lcheck appropriate box/es & number
Analytical data
source/s1
No available information
AnecdotalDocumentation about data
Historical process data Disposal data
Current process datael A. data
Areal photographsSafety analysis report
Engineering/site diewingsD&D report
Unusual Occurrence Report initial assessment
Well dataSummery documents 1 IConstruction data 1
r acility SON [ iOther ix] 2,5
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 14
Question 5. Does site operating or disposal historical information allow estimation ofthe pattern of potential contamination? If the pattern is expected to be ascattering of hot spots, what is the expected minimum size of a significanthot spot?
Block 1 Answer.
Site operating or disposal historical information was not found for this site. Therefore, anestimation of the pattern of contamination based on this information could not be made,however because of the uniformity of the appearance of the spill site, it suggests that theoil was dumped on one occasion only. The heaviest saturation appears to be in thecenter of the spill area.
Block 2 How reliable is/are the information source/s? High x Med _Low (check wetExplain the reasoning behind this evaluation.
This information is based visual inspection.
Medi 1 Has this INFORMATION been confirmed? Yes x No oneck one,lf so, describe the confirmation.
Block 4 Sources of Information: icheck appropriate box, & number
Analytical data I
source/el
No available informationDocumentation about data IAnecdotalDisposal Ciatti IHistorical process data0 A data ICurrent process dataSafety anatysts wort IAreal photographsO&D report ihiltral assevrineiti 1Unusual Occili i an C 0 Repot\
IConetruction Wilt IFarah/ SOPs
Other xl 2,5
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 15
Question 6. Estimate the length, width, and depth of the contaminated region. What isthe known or estimated volume of the source? If this is an estimatedvolume, explain carefully how the estimate was derived.
Block t Ari,wo/
There is no source or evidence of migration in this area. The area of soil contaminatedwith petroleum hydrocarbons is approximately 30 feet by 100 feet, and conservativelyestimated at one foot deep across the whole site. An upper bound estimate of thevolume of oil necessary to cause the volume of contaminated soil which is present canbe determined by the equation below.
"37°4 SP - 111.12Area 100' 30' 3000 ft2 1.0 ft 3000 ft3,-- x x = x yd3ft3
0.2 V„,V -$ p (Rs)
Where Vic = Volume of hydrocarbons (barrel)
Vs = yds of soil requlred for saturation
P = Soll porosity (assume 35%)RS = Residual saturation capacity (gas = 0.1, diesel = 0.15, lube oil = 0.2)
111.12 yd3 = 0.2 (x) / 0.35 (0.2)111.12 = x i 0.35
= 38.9 barm 44 gallonslsx - 1711x gallonsbarrel
Block 2 How reliable is/are the information source/s? _High x Med _Low (check one)
Explain the reasoning behind this evaluation.
This information is based on direct observation, a referenced equation, and sampling.
BloCk 3 Has this INFORMATION been confirmed? x Yes _No (check one)If so, describe the confirmation.
This has been partially confirmed by the sampling evolution.
Block 4 Sources of Information: (check appropriate box/es & number
Analytcal data
source/sI
No available int e/mation I
Anecdotal IDocumentaton about data
Historical process data IDisposal data
Current process data 1D. A. data
Areal photographs ;Safety analysis report
Engineering/sole diawoga ID&D report
Irate! assessmentUnusual Occurrence Report I ISummary documents I i
Well data
Construction dataFacility SOPs l I
Other 'XI 2 3 F.
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 16
Question 7. What is the known or estimated quantity of hazardoussubstance/constituent at this source? If the quantity is an estimate,explain carefully how the estimate was derived.
Block 1 Answer.
As previously identified benzene and toluene have been detected in small amounts fromtwo samples taken from the same location. TPH was found in all four samples between190 and 8200 ppm. Total metals detected were below upper tolerance limits and 90thpercentile levels given in the Track 2 Guidance Document. The maximum estimatedquantity of oil as identified in the answer to Question 6 is 1711 gallons contaminating3000 fe of soil.
Block 2 How reliable is/are the information source/s? x High _Med _Low (check one/Explain the reasoning behind this evaluation.
This information is based on sampling and personal observation of the site.
Block 3 Has this INFORMATION been confirmed? x Yes _No (check One/If so, describe the confirmation.
This has been confirmed by sampling, however the extent of contamination is based onpersonal observation and conservative estimates.
Block 4 Sources of Information: lchnok appropriate boxles 8/ number
Analytical data
source/sl
xl 6No available informationDocumentation about dataAnecdotalDrsposal dataHistorical plooeSs dataD. A. dataCorient process dataSafety analyws moonAreal photographsIAD reportEng,neenno/site drawingsinitial as ssnwntseUnusual Occurrence ReportN/ell dataSurnsnary documentsConstruction jstaFacility sops
Othei 51 5,7
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 17
Question 8. Is there evidence that this hazardous substance/constituent is present atthe source as it exists today? If so, describe the evidence.
Block 1 Answer
Sampling has confirmed that hazardous constituents are present at the site in very smallquantities that are below risk based concentration levels. Total petroleum hydrocarbonsare also present. Site inspection revealed the soil is discolored indicating the presenceof oil contaminated soil.
Block 2 How reliable is/are the information source/s? x High _Med _Low (check one)
Explain the reasoning behind this evaluation.
Sampling and visual site inspection show that hazardous constituents at very small levelsdo exist at the site.
Block 3 Has this INFORMATION been confirmed? x Yes _No (check onelIf so, describe the confirmation.
Information was confirmed by sample results.
Block 4 Sources of Information: (check appropriate boxies & number sourcedsl
Analytical date 14 6No available information IAnecdotal
Documentation about data i
Historical process dataDisposal data I
Current process dataQ. A. data I
Areal photographsSafety analysis report I
Engineenng/site drawingsD&D report I
Unusual Occurrence ReportIngial assessment I
Summary documentsWell data I
i
Facility SnPS Construction data I
Other 1.1 5 7
8-04; UNIT 65, PAGE 18
REFERENCES
1. Envirodyne Engineers Drawing labelled Figure 2-6, Background Borehole Locations.
2. Inspection of Unit 65 from Environmental Remediation Field Log Book #8, pages 47and 48.
3. Dragun, James. The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials. Silver Spring, MD:Hazardous Material Control Research Institute. Pages 20, 41, 42.
4. NRFEM-RR-679 dated January 8, 1993, Interview of K. N. Drewes on Waste DisposalSites.
5. Sampling of Unit 65 from Environmental Remediation Field Log Book #8, pages 50-52.
6. Analytical Report, Quanterra Environmental Services, July 25, 1994.
7. Track 2 Sites: Guidance for Assessing Low Probability Hazard Sites at the INEL,EG&G Idaho, Revision 6, January 1994. (Not attached)
4866'
4834
19
dsniVACi3E AC ticp.
30
•ct
O
31
FACILITY
WT
BOtro.v
•-•am .esa
///
484.1 /
•
20
0
0°-°
co 0 p
C‘)Borrow A ; L-1/ ̀ ,
i
Borrow -,Pe.;
„„ • __ . _ 48p
Te;dor row /4
_,
vt
✓ „' Reference 1
: Page 1 of 1
68311---1r.
-'
N
/
BorrowAPB-------- —
BM W843
21
- 28
Borrow PBS Cr
Wren
Borrow ORA
BorrowPit
Borrow P.14,
32
SCALEo 1 MrE
1000 o 1000 2003 3000 4000 8:00 6000 7000 FEET
ENVIROOYNE
ENGINEERS
FIGURE 2-6
Background Borehole Locations
Reference 2Page 1 of 2
f ~lac ca,„ 0, (se_.-__L-_C 137; s C c„ciL_
7 Li—, I 5 c_4_,.......--\--H 5 roc, .._, ,-,— -\--LQ. ,:-/wrix-. „I c____S ,. ..---- , t
OL f i-• (---1--- --vo ywo..0,__ jusc,C4, cS <0 c.„:..)..fas Lk .3f--,,c, . i--A 1,,4eucc., }
‘i s , A Lo ic-Ls_-_, kc, „,,I, ,sy, ,„ 4,3. -_-\._A -A__L 0..k 1„_-\,, A,o , \ c.„-,.._, i, ofe„_, 1-.‘ orn-04-t t Q 0 C b V- c. (1,2—• .5 +ilea No, -)--1.
-Lc' S-̂ -1 L-) a-S 3 cL,-( k- Ls) ct c cAz- L.) wc c).-}? A--Lt ct. , _f„
t•••
a -c +L._ 0-4-4_ G- Lc s crr,-li ci-as ci u-e3,2_ -4,---"C 51r1 e-cast-vtill.
SectA-1-( u-e Jr fec4ts,n of FLA.A a_A-..0 ..j. cf. CC --1-L 43,..._.71-(4 x eicycs...-y- 1-4_ cv.a._,..._ ....3,...w-c, i-4- e-CL, -FL_ -5 pal 0- re-C 47.--k .3
6,--n rticti-C-v-ca-l' -1,4 - r ( c a _J- as i IC 1 4-- La il.k: -el-- i FS :ale" -C-I) ,J .La V a- c;,-/ c(„Lbefu,lis aft-e_ et_Lst,,J -44„,,,,A1 i --6-4.42_6,4 -a--< (1,10_,J e•-).` i sa A 0 I 4-4, Cir.( (- coaci is
a _Ir.) -1 ei-12-- e) f ,120_e-5,:, c.--,A1 iszc,_ ett_c-z—tce , •---1
_3_0........A_L. a....._ s k....., zi 0 c -0.,..., r A e_Q (3 4-c_ts Loie...c> ce 4 \cu.() 0,..4.,-.1__ . A 4-tx.,..\\-, - kck- c,,,a4 4-LL_
Li -
Ref erence 2Page 2 of 2
a _17)C_ock_c s -
C > ',NCI 43c.4_,-‘ tk. i cas4 -I Lt.
( Joel ek, CA- kJ ocrf—
e--, C 4-- Le- - _.1.,. 2._-_A/5 e, 4,-, _cyC ,___ 5 n-iii r ci 11" LAe--- / 3 nLTJIt e.:_k ,,., .,..._. ,,,,_.,,, ,,,....._.) °cc,...) ,_ -1- 4--.-- c_,,,----ft__-- 0 -I- 1— C._
(LAt---c-• ..4 V. ----e i3 -If la-04“ au. I. ,...,,c, „ torz,LJ"1" \--.- a--,1--, r e--- CIL \Lit CZ-4-QC-- -k 3 (CC-CA-a CC L.}‘,"SCL- ryl.._ cts -r t
0 --. Aa0,,, ,0 _s c ,, la,n_asi-- r-d4 las n.c.4 _LI:— ci-cts 1-t_._i_t_, k c_J-1
/7--c-1° ' 3`,) . ..,5 N rra_ • L,t-23 Mt L e t• " Met .--1,_:_iLo-Ct .
f) \ c\r‘,0t c-a,.."--e- " e "V ̀ C-- P-r-A-‘-"-'1/4-4-,C CLC2-4- INA1 j,C, c.14--t C --I
L._) L c_u, .....) c .:-. „,s= „,_. 4; , .,../ La -4-Lp c- a_-, c_O COTh-e el-aI\ _,/ Pc-c,c1-1- :-{i_eic-C. e).--eitC
CS
- ,,„„k Q. ey-L C,
0 L A C-A-c) &A. y\_.a.;_ti
0
s rv-GA_C--CC_C c-josc.-12-
rnisairaisssissams.
Reference 3Page 1 of 3
20 Migration of Water and Bulk Hydrocarbons in Soil
GLACIAL TILL
SILT
GRAVEL
SAND
CLAY KATE
1
10 20 30 40 50 60 90
POROSI TY
FIGURE 21 Ranges of porosity for subsurface soils."
I
Reference 3Page 2 of 3
Migration of Water and Bulk Hydrocarbons in Soil 41
soil under isothermal conditions, the radius R of a mass of bulk hydrocar-bon can be grossly estimated":
R = (Q/3.142h), (2.9)where
Q = rate of hydrocarbon additiont = time after initial hydrocarbon addition to soilh = height of the oil film
Migration and Distribution of Light Bulk Hydrocarbon. Light bulk hydro-carbon will migrate downward in unsaturated zone soil due to gravity andcapillary forces. If the volume of released hydrocarbon is large, such as thoserelated to catastrophic spills, maximum lateral spreading and downward flowoccurs with all soil pores being saturated with hydrocarbon6°. Figure 2.12illustrates the hydrocarbon distribution most often displayed in the publishedliterature. The distribution illustrated in Figure 2.12 is valid for major gaso-line spills or tanker ruptures, but not for slow leaks; this case will be dis-cussed later in this chapter. The downward migration of light bulkhydrocarbon will eventually cease because (a) the mobile light bulk hydrocar-bon will be transformed into residual saturation, or (b) it will encounter animpermeable bed, or (c) it will reach the capillary fringe. Each situation isdescribed in greater detail below.As a mass of bulk hydrocarbon migrates beyond a unit mass of unsaturated
zone soil, a small amount of the total hydrocarbon mass will remain attachedto these soil particles via capillary forces. The bulk hydrocarbon that isretained by soil particles is known as immobile or "residual saturation." Themaximum amount of bulk hydrocarbon that can be retained by a soil is knownas residual saturation capacity. Residual saturation can potentially reside insoil in this state for years. If the migrating mass of bulk hydrocarbon is smallrelative to the soil surface area, the mass of bulk hydrocarbon will be even-tually exhausted as it is converted into residual saturation. When conversionis complete, downward migration ceases.The volume of soil required to immobilize a mass of bulk hydrocarbon
depends upon the porosity of the soil and the physical properties of the bulkhydrocarbon. The number of ycl, of soil required to immobilize a volume(barrels) of bulk hydrocarbon, VHC, can be grossly estimateclm:
V, = 0.2 Viic./P (RS) (2.10)where
VHC = volume of discharged hydrocarbon, in barrels(44 gal = 1 barrel)
V, = yd1 of soil required to attain residual saturation
Reference 3Page 3 of 3
42 Migration of Water and Bulk Hydrocarbons in Soil
P = soil porosityRS = residual saturation capacity
In general, the residual saturation capacity of soils is about 33 percent of
their water-holding capacity". The maximum residual saturation for light
oil and gasoline is 0.1; for diesel and light fuel oil, 0.15; for lube and heavy
fuel oil, 0.20. The maximum possible depth of penetration, D, in yards, can
be grossly estimated using the equation630:
D = V, / A (2.11)
where A is the area of infiltration. There is an alternative equation which
grossly estimates the maximum depth of penetration of a volume of bulk
hydrocarbon released on a soil":
D = KV,,c / A (2.12)
where K is a constant dependent upon the soil's retentive capacity for oil
and upon oil viscosity (see Table 2.3).Another non-rigorous formula for grossly estimating the maximum depth
of penetration of a volume of bulk hydrocarbon into the unsaturated zone
D = 1000 Vi4C / ARC (2.13)
whereR = soil retention capacityC = approximate correction factor based on the bulk
_ hydrocarbon viscosity (0.5 for gasoline to 2.0 for lightfuel oil).
Recommended values of R in liters per cubic meter are: 5 for stone to coarse
gravel, 8 for gravel to coarse sand, 15 for coarse to medium sand, 25 for
medium to fine sand, and 40 for fine sand to silt. If the soil has an inter-
mediate texture relative to those listed above, an intermediate value of
R should be used. Also, these values for R are for soils with an average
moisture content. For dry soils, R will be greater than the values listed above.
If a mass of bulk hydrocarbon which is migrating downward encounters
an empermeable layer, it will spread laterally until (a) the bulk hydrocarbon
is transformed into residual saturation, or (b) it migrates past the lateral extent
of the impermeable layer. If the latter situation occurs, vertical migration
will commence at the point where the lateral extent of the impermeable layer
has ceased. Downward migration will continue until (a) the bulk hydrocarbon
is transformed into residual saturation, (b) another impermeable barrier is
encountered, or (c) the bulk hydrocarbon encounters the capillary fringe.
Percolating water, in unsaturated zone soil containing residual saturation,
,Co;•.• m0l0
NRFEM-RR-679
From : Environmental Remediation
Date : January 8, 1993Subject : Interview of K. N. Drewes on Waste Disposal Sites
To : File
On the morning of January 6, 1993, I called K N. Drewes of the Idaho Branch Office
(IBO) in an attempt to obtain information about oil spill areas. Mr. Drewes visried the
Environmental Remediation office area in the S1W balcony about 1100 hours and
provided the following information while viewing Drawing 908E424, NRF Disposal Sites.
31 - A1W Oily Waste Soill
This is an area northwest of the A1W building where many portable compressors, both
diesel and electric, have been placed in support ot the plant air system. These
compressors have leaked both lube oil and fuel oil in this area.
59 - Original S1W Refuse Pit
Various types of waste oil were deposited in this area, including sludge from storaga
tanks in the S1W boiler house.
66 - Hot Storage Pit
Just south and east of the center line of the area matted on the drawing, an area was
excavated through asphalt and a gravel overlay. A black tarry substance oozed out of
the sides of the excavation, and expanded somewhat This area was at about the 18'
level. Recommend a three foot core sample in this area. (Could this be another part of
the oil/water separator overfiow?)
Between 1970 and 1974, there was a 13,000 gallon tank behind S1W which was used to
store chromated water.
58 - S1W Old Fuel Tank Soill
Two above ground fuel tanks were located north of the flammable storage shed east of
#1 Spray Pond. The actual truck unloading area was by the S1W pumphouse. A steam
plate on the ground between these two points identifies the underground trench which
carries service lines into the SW/ building. On one occasion, enough light fuel oll was
spilled to fill the service line trench, whith had to be bailed out with buckets.
65 - Southeast Corner Oil SDill
This is located on the side of an arroyo southeast of the perimeter fence off the
telephone line access road. It appears that approximately two barrels of oil similar to
File • 2 • NRFEM-RR•679
turbine lube oil (2190) were dumped here. Possibly oil which was contaminated withbilge water, or did not meet quality standards.
60 - Old Incinerator
The old incinerator was moved at the time of the perimeter fence upgrade because it didnot meet the 50 foot clearance requirement.
Corner of Batfish and Antietam
A newer curb is visible at this location. A fire main leak caused a sinkhole to form. Thearea was contaminated with Cesium, so the fire main was rerouted to the south at thispoint, and tied into the line just east of 624. The original line (86 - 101 was abandonedin place.
Area East of S1W Pumohouse (—NRF-151
The retention basins were overflowed to the storm drain by Geisler.
44 - S1W Waste Water Soill Area
Drains ran from S1W to NRF-44 and north along the east side of the Radiographybuilding and along the north side of the Radiography building and also drained to thearea south of NRF - 1, Field Area North of S1W.
South End of Building 624
Cesium has been found in this area, which was previously the Main Coolant PumpRefurbishment area. (I have heard that this area was contarninated from the PlantServices shower drain which was also located in this area.)
22 - A1W Paint Locker French Drain
This area was originally the A1W Chlorinator Shed. Mr. Drewes discovered two sailorspouring paint and solvent down the pipe stub in this area during the A1W Overhaul.
56 • Degreasing Facility
The building (627) was originally located on Gilbert Island Ave., which was west of theoriginal ECF building, and was used for railcar maintenance. It was moved to its currentlocation when the CESA was built. Three bays in the building, still visible as depressionsin the floor, were used to degrease A1W components packed in Cosmoline. Threedrains penetrated the north side of the building. A fractured conaete slab now coversthe area north of 627. Recommend sampling the drains and under the fractured slab.
File - 3 • NRFEM-RR-679
39 • Old Radicgraohy Area
The only artifact which remained in this area was the concrete backstop for the target.This was pulled into the ditch and the area backfilled during the perimeter fenceupgrade.
2 - S5G Surge Pond
This area was used for contaminated water and steam generator water disposal fromS5G, and includes the concrete 'steaming box' from S5G, which was dumped in thisarea in 1985-6.
13 - St VV Seepage Basin #3
This area can be located by the discontinuity in the inner perimeter fence.
S. Rhodes-Chynov0ethEnvironmental Remediation
NRF Unit 65
Page 1 of 3
Reference 5
'‘014-49-10",• co-C i4,2:)C01,14.)0E1 -S[T,_)Losj rc,r7L0-t4CpNo o- r el/ s-tik oc Co nit nA-Ls-km rm '19e La 4-14. frat can-e0,
EPA ellefehe- olio(icA opictliarael
e-gokuckii ̀SY‘ 1C-/24-4 0/4 Ang soi da nit& 0.4s.L5
.13TE> -rto ,ssiy.„,-(;Ai Li 0410 ..a.;-) 4-444- --sr coinfi-4-) st2L-Q-91 •
vi- saentati- Wrenn ea-nt .444_
c--"A" -11-• hi) _sa tA) Ls-4 t et _sc„,,e_e_g__
;Jae At as,12-1 - ,3. - 40rv) on-v1i3t-3 y ica rt.).cx-ryt pit,— so H.LeArLI--/ o f Ataii et 3 (.....rca-Z2/
neLCLA 4-6-t: "-ad . fickti to_zat, 5 -5--•rne--)Pore\ 41-_. czn-(0_,./.....A _so seat Ora_ )
oott_ Lk_ cx-4 a_ca0,44.-J /300
Vi2n,a 40cC-4-, LS; -0--‘ 91~ i xo-A-Cctia4,
Fk(Sk Seeblek CI* 04o, qqR 01711 izsczaech'wca.va loo rdc 0-4-ei -=1 _re) r .
'T (Janh-A,A cm-.-a. Lit A-A- elz5 colon. cis°
cw•-t. pit ;Jai 4-1,k1.4" 4.0 a = / basal) cwp.
--itc-3 aeroa tat 413 Cat- 41-e 0-44c Cktot cmccilarrou4-d C4- -ito Co {_so k t 4 L<An •L> C<.. 3o-teriaistirottr.
1"- 3" dui). P‘s T cia-6 44-4 sc),\ ra,,s/
‘‘c-"4-01- air oxf no.)cb
-u s.% -fact, ‘,) orte. a So( cri-CS Ot5 (C) r od5c.rn
ra
'frisotti2 dcw 44,c1
hIaL Lit TA-4-c 6.)a..5 /err co-( untoLd reo.:_ji 2? a- 7 4.11
►
t
NRF Unit 65Page 2 of 3Reference 5
cs0A-krw-u29. 61)-0.342.4-vice .50.-nial, In no ifelin LA.) a ..S.04444n LO-05 )
&set 01 I-44 cria-l-cd a-426— / °eager., or, ar Iowa
ist- n o-- ct-cet-Zner- sze-n-,2c/ loes-t c--L° r'rtg-12 " .04 k " AAA -/C) cztr+
c. Co Httheidefro-lk "04 a_ f 4 -sti-vne-6-;qg - 11.1-"L-el ile- 0717 34 ainitt od re CC) cL
nts.sA _140;f ouscx,(nr-d,f-4-tem co- ; 06_to L as etc+ tsti,..4
et.s r precAtaLt-3 sa en etc 4 1.3 0 #40 rocE cfiatti-Chae frann " "
s a en to se-‘ ca a-4 1-2:64_,./-cii.. 1- Las !-aft re - 0 CIL, 13...5-25-: ter•-•-4-0-y.- „..-int-c_CO No \it 4.4-.:0-4-;
I. A "4-i 1"--A /es I S ,n-r, 1 ,latt, 4. as-s-et.td-cA ofr olsoi/
des ceetm cs- crr, r
LAJ-(4.4. Co Ls 0 ft-04.4 erta,o-ci t_ . a ”wio 4-0 3 •Ct-‘4' el-Kit..4 CO • /4- °si "a din 1- .
bo ", 7- 4 ri--0 -7tit------CAOf V 4)/44) , Lis" A 0 to le<latea-444, of x_44 a- 7111 4 /pc Loje
Cii.o/eh{
0
(21)-9(14 UlLt•-:- (JD d.kt..,,t Gyt nt, 0, (
NRF Unit 65Page 3 of 3Reference 5
04 40 _sci-n-yak n ctutv2 iCPr
neto-4,1L3 --Ftn Nuly..50,rnefrt-a- „sort& 9c-ie.017G ocionitell
3;3 .40 at.ta_. e-c-rwtei ko c--s\e--c_t-,--4-c-t,oLte--‘k SO' . of roci-S ti-J D-0 fitaie3/ or
(.5 -40 0.reft-6( ((LI( -
,-VLL (0-4 40 a_s o, s.,t0
Lea 4- ) -11 evz_ ot. _5 c,o-6Da-
.ioe4.y2k f Cid < - oo
/2-1->cetA kSv1 CZ -‘-) I -31=r°A L of
0 c zet-‘ re\ Ctu:>.-t\r. (x--4.Acs-irs-D ceStia(--0/ cirt.,34tfe-0177a-e0 QV tons, ato9fo
c;41 aiD F co3 CA-CA: 4M-el la I
&AC- tatt-•e_c4-44% 1.5 rt-o" ( a s gr.e - rr-ov-e tn4-1515 ectilly nn-t-t c 41--k t_o_th eel of 3.12:1-P
os_s ...
c4A--d Ztoca 0.--1 1 S NOr F t+-fr e-S t edy of . /1-
tvol. oirtrakari. L t ss %soil CL3C0/54(2A6I"
fa_ Aa_ / c,r,..„ -4 nh,coas Tkz. s °Lae- t.--)a-fs
va..S.--‘ r re-o-c) - as f (Jet, .
sraw.d.5
NRF Unit 65
Page 1 of 26
Reference 6
SAMPLE SUMMARY
The analytical results of the samples listed below are presentedon the following pages.
MA LABORATORY ID SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
09697 A46020001-001 94R-0171 NRF-65 6-20-94 134009698 A4G020001-002 94R-0172 NRF-65 6-20-94 134809699 A4G020001-003 94R-0173 NRF-65 6-20-94 134909700 A4G020001-004 94R-0174 NRF-65 6-20-94 1355
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0171 NRP-65 6-20-94 1340
NO II: 09697LAB 0: A4G020001-001MATRIX: SOLID
REQUESTED METALS
NRF Unit 65Page 2 of 26Reference 6
DATE SAMPLED: 6/20/94DATE RECEIVED: 6/23/94
PARAMETER RESULTREPORTINGLIMIT UNIT MEMOD
PREPARATION -ANALYSIS DATE
QCHATCH
Silver ND 1.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Barium 95.6 1.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Cadmium ND 1.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015
Chromium 15.9 2.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Lead ND 10.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Arsenic 5.8 0.50 mg/kg SK846 7060 7/05- 7/06/94 4186015
Mercury ND 0.10 mg/kg SW846 7471 7/05- 7/06/94 4186015Selenium ND 0.50 mg/kg SW846 7740 7/05- 7/12/94 4186015
NOM AS RECEIVEDND NOT DETECT/2D AT THE STATED ItEPORTD4G UMIT
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0171 NRIP-65 6-20-94 1340
NO 8: 09697LAB #: A4G020001-001MATRIX: SOLID
INORGANIC ANALTTICAL REPORT
NRF Unit 65Page 3 of 26Reference 6
DATE SAMPLED: 6/20/94DATE RECEIVED: 6/23/94
REPORTING PREPARATION - QCPARAMETER RESULT LIMIT UNIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE HATCH
Petroleum Hydrocarbons 8,200 500 mg/kg MCANW 418.1 M 7/05- 7/07/94 4186004Total Recoverable
Solids, Total (TS) 98.1 0.50 MCANW 160.3 M 7/12- 7/13/94 4193096
NOM AS RECEIVED
NRF Unit 65Page 4 of 26
Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0172 NRP-65 6-20-94 1348
WO II: 09698LAB 8: A4G020001-002MATRIX: SOLID
PARAMETER RESULT
REQUESTED METALS
REPORTINGLIMIT gmi
DATE SAMPLED: 6/20/94DATE RECEIVED: 6/23/94
PREPARATION - QCMETHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
Silver ND 1.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Barium 216 1.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Cadmium ND 1.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015
Chromium 29.0 2.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Lsad 12.6 10.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Arsenic 7.6 1.0 mg/kg SW846 7060 7/05- 7/06/94 4186015
Mercury ND 0.10 mg/kg SW846 7471 7/05- 7/06/94 4186015Selenium ND W 0.50 mg/kg SW846 7740 7/05- 7/12/94 4186015
NOM AS RECEIVED
ND NOT DETECTED AT ME STATED REPORTING LIMITW - POST DIGESTION SPIKE RECOVERY PELL BETWEEN 40 - I15% WHILE SAMPLE
RESULT WAS LESS MAN ONE-HALF ME REPORTING LIMIT.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0172 NRP-65 6-20-94 1348
WO •: 09698LAS A: A4G020001-002MATRIX: SOLID
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
NRF Unit 65
Page 5 of 26
Reference 6
DATE SAMPLED: 6/20/94DATE RECEIVED: 6/23/94
REPORT/NG PREPARATION - QCPARAMETER RESULT LIMIT UNIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE HATCH
Petroleum Hydrocarbons 5,900 500 mg/kg MCAMW 418.1 M 7/05- 7/07/94 4186004Total Recoverable
Solids, Total (TS) 99.2 0.50 4 MCAMW 160.3 M 7/12- 7/13/94 4193096
NOTE, AS RECEIVED
NRF Unit 65Page 6 of 26
Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0173 NRP-65 6-20-94 1349
MO 8: 09699LAD 0: A40020001-003MATRIX: SOLID
PARAMETER RESULT
REQUESTED METALS
REPORTINGLIMIT guIT
DATE SAMPLED: 6/20/94DATE RECEIVED: 6/23/94
PREPARATION - QCMETHOD ANALYSIS DATE RATCH
Silver ND 1.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Barium 178 1.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Cadmium ND 1.0 mg/kg 'SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015
Chromium 25.4 2.0 mq/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Lead ND 10.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Arsenic 4.6 1.0 mg/kg SW846 7060 7/05- 7/06/94 4186015
Mercury ND 0.10 mg/kg SW846 7471 7/05- 7/06/94 4186015Selenium ND W 0.50 mg/kg SW846 7740 7/05- 7/12/94 4186015
NOTE+ AS RECIIVED
ND NOT DETECTED AT THE SEATO) REPORTING LIMIT
W - POST DIGESTION SPIKE RECOVERY FELL BETWEEN 40 - 15% WHILE SAMPLERESULT WAS LESS DIAN ONE-HALP THE REPORTINO UMIT.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0173 NRP-65 6-20-94 1349
WO 09699LAS M: A4G020001-003MATRIX: SOLID
PARAMETER
Pstrolsum HydrocarbonsTotal Recoverable
Solids, Total (TS)
NOM AS RECEIVED
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
NRF Unit 65Page 7 of 26Reference 6
DATE SAMPLED: 6/20/94DATE RECEIVED: 6/23/94
REPORTING PREPARATION - QCRESULT tun UNIT METHOP ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
5,400 500 mg/kg XCAMW 418.1 M 7/05- 7/07/94 4186004
99.3 0.50 t 1CA1494 160.3 M 7/12- 7/13/94 4193096
NRF Unit 65Page 8 of 26Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0174 NRP-65 6-20-94 1355
WO *: 09700LAB 8: A4G020001-004MATRIX: SOL/D
PARAMETER RESULT
REQUESTED METALS
REPORTINGLIMIT UNIT
DATE SAMPLED: 6/20/94DATE RECEIVED: 6/23/94
PREPARATION - QCMETHOD ANALYSIS DATS pATCH
Silver ND 1.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 41B6015Barium 94.1 1.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Cadmium ND 1.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Chromium 15.9 2.0 mg/kg swa46 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Lead 10.9 10.0 mg/kg SW846 6010 7/05- 7/14/94 4186015Arsenic 4.7 1.0 mg/kg SW846 7060 7/05- 7/07/94 4186015Mercury ND 0.10 mg/kg SW846 7471 7/05- 7/06/94 4186015Selenium ND 0.50 mg/kg SW846 7740 7/05- 7/12/94 4186015
NOM AS RECEIVEDND NOT DETECTED AT THE STATED REPORTING LIMIT
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0174 MRP-65 6-20-94 1355
WO Mt 09700LAB 4): A4G020001-004MATRIX: SOLID
PARAMETER
Petroleum HydrocarbonsTotal Recoverable
Solids, Total (TS)
NOM A.S RECNVED
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
REPORTINGRESULT LIMIT UNIT
190 10
99.6
NRF Unit 65
Page 9 of 26
Reference 6
DATE SAMPLED: 6/20/94DATE RECEIVED: 6/23/94
METHODPREPARATION - QCANALYSIS DATE BATCH
mg/kg MCAMW 418.1 M 7/05- 7/07/94 4186004
0.50 t MCAMW 160.3 M 7/12- 7/13/94 4193096
NRF Unit 65Page 10 of 26Reference 6
SAMPLE SUMMARY
The analytical results of the samples listed below are presentedon the following pages.
WO it LABORATORY ID SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
09704 A4G020004-001 94R-0176 UNIT 65 6-29-94 085509705 A4G020004-002 94R-0177 UNIT 65 6-29-94 091009706 A40020004-003 94R-0178 UNIT 65 6-29-94 091509707 A4G020004-004 94R-0179 UN/T 65 6-29-94 0938
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0176 UN/T 65 6-29-94 0855WO E: 09704101
LAB E: A4G020004-001
MATRIX: SOLID
GC Volatiles
NRF Unit 65Page 11 of 26Reference 6
DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94
DATE RECEIVED: ' 7/01/94
RESULT REPORTING EXTRACTION- QCPARAMETER (uq/kq) LIMIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
Benzene ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/13/94 4195080Toluene ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/13/94 4195080Ethylbenzene ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/13/94 4195080
Xylenes, Total ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/13/94 4195080
SURROGATE RECOVERY
Trifluorotoluene
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
95 ( 64 - 140)
NOTE: Af UCEIVED
ND NOT DETECTED AT TIE STATED REPORTING LIMIT
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0176 UNIT 65 6-29-94 0855WO *: 09704102LAB 0: A4G020004-001MATRIX: SOLID
PARAMETERRESULT
(10
GC Semi-Volatiles1 OF 2
REPORTINGLIMIT
NRF Unit 65Page 12 of 26Reference 6
BATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94
METHODEXTRACTION- QCANALYSIS DATE BATCH
o-Cresol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144m-Cresol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144p-Cresol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
2-Butanone ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Pyridine ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Nitrobenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Xylenes, Total ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Chlorobenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Ethylbenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Isobutanol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144o-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Cyclohexanone ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
4-Methy1-2-pentanone ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192Toluene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921i.Benzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
2-Ethoxyethanol ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921442-Nitropropane ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Tetrachloroethene ND 0.020 SW846 '8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Trichloroethene ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Ethyl acetate ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Ethyl ether ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Acetone ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921441,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
BURROGATE RECOVERY
n-Butyl acetate 96
NOM AS RECEIVEDND NOT DETECTED AT THE STATED REPORTING ILIAffT
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
( 50 - 150)
NRF Unit 65Page 13 of 26
Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
WO S: 09704102LAB M: A4G020004-001
94R-0176 UNIT 65 6-29-94•
GC Semi-Volatiles2 OF 2
RESULT REPORTING(t) LIMIT
0B55
DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94
EXTRACTION- QCNEI= ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
MATRIX: SOLID
MIME=
Methanol ND 0.050 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921441,1,2-Trichloro- ND 0.050 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
1,2,2-trifluoroethaneMethylene chloride ND 0.050 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.10 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.10 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Carbon disulfide ND 0.20 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
n-Butanol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Cresylic Acid ND 0.10 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
SURROGATE RECOVERY
n-Butyl acetate
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
96 ( 50 - 150)
NOTE AS JIMMIE])ND NOT DETECTED AT TOE STATED REPORTING EMIT
NRF Unit 65Page 14 of 26
Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0176 UNIT 65 6-29-94 0855
WO 8: 09704 DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94LAD it; A4G020004-001 DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94MATRIX: SOLID
PARAMETER
Solids, Total (TS)
NOM AS RECEIVED
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
REPORTING PREPARATION - QCRESULT LIMIT UNIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
98.0 0.50 ♦ NCANW 160.3 M 7/12- 7/13/94 4193096
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0177 UNIT 65 6-29-94 0910WO IN: 09705101LAB Ss A4G020004-002MATRIX: SOLID
GC Volatiles
NRF Unit 65
Page 15 of 26
Reference 6
DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94
RESULT REPORTING EXTRACTION- QCPARAMETER (uo/k4) LIMIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
Benzene 4.9 2.0 SW846 8020 07/12/94 4194066Toluene 2.0 2.0 SW846 8020 07/12/94 4194066Ethylbenzene ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/12/94 4194066
Xylenea, Total ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/12/94 4194066
SURROGATE RECOVERY
Trifluorotoluene
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
86 ( 64 - 140)
Nan: AS RECEIVEDND NOT prison AT ME STATED REPORTING LIMIT
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0177 UNIT 65 6-29-94 0910WO e: 09705102LAB e: A4G020004-002MATRIX: SOLID
IDARAMETER
GC Semi-Volatiles
NRF Unit 65Page 16 of 26Reference 6
DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94
1 OF 2RESULT REPORTING(%) LIMIT MERIQD
EXTRACTION- QCANALYSIS DATE BATCH
o-Cresol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144m-Cresol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144p-Cresol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
2-Butanone ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Pyridine ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Nitrobenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Xylenes, Total ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Chlorobenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Ethylbenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Isobutanol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144o-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Cyclohexanone ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921Toluene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 419214tBenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
2-Ethozyethanol ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921442-Nitropropane ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Tetrachloroethene ND 0.020 SW846 ticas 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Trichloroethene ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Ethyl acetate ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Ethyl ether ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Acetone ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921441,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
$URROGATE RECOVERY 1 ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
n-Butyl acetate 99 ( 50 - 150)
NOTEI AS RECENT])ND NOT DETECTED AT THE STATED REPORTING LIMIT
NRF Unit 65
Page 17 of 26
Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
WO 0: 09705102LAB B: A4G020004-002MATRIX: SOLID
94R-0177 UNIT 65 6-29-94
GC Sewi-Volatiles2 OF 2
0910DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94
RESULT REPORTING EXTRACTION- QCRAMNSTILE (t) LIMIT NE= ANALYSIS DAYS AATCH
Methanol ND 0.050 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921441,1,2-Trichloro- ND 0.050 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
1,2,2-trifluoroethaneMethylene chloride ND 0.050 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.10 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.10 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Carbon disulfide ND 0.20 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
n-Butanol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Cresylic Acid ND 0.10 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
BURROGATE RECOVERY
n-Butyl acetate
1 ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
99 ( 50 - 150)
NOM AS RECEIVT)XD NOT DETECT]) AT TIE STATED REPORTING LIMIT
NRF Unit 65Page 18 of 26Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0177 UNIT 65 6-29-94 0910
NO a: 09705 DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94LAB a: A40020004-002 DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94MATRIX: SOLID
PARAMETER
Solids, Total (TS)
NOM AS RECEIVED
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
REPORTING PREPARATION - QCRESULT LIMIT UNIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
97.9 0.50 t MCAWW 160.3 M 7/12- 7/13/94 4193096
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0178 UNIT 65 6-29-94 0915WO II: 09706101LAB 8: A4G020004-003MATRIX: SOLID
GC Volatiles
NRF Unit 65Page 19 of 26Reference 6
DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94
RESULT REPORTING EXTRACTION- QCPARAMETER (uolkO) LIMIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
Benzene 4.8 2.0 SW846 8020 07/12/94 4194066Toluene ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/12/94 4194066Ethylbenzene ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/12/94 4194066
Xylenes, Total ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/12/94 4194066
SURROGATE RECOVERY
Trifluorotoluene
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
81 ( 64 - 140)
NOM AS RECEIVEDND NOT DETECTED AT THE STATED REPORTING LOOT
NRF Unit 65Page 20 of 26Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
NO E: 09706102LAB A4G020004-003MATRIX: SOLID
FARM:137ER
94R-0178 UNIT 65 6-29-94
GC Semi-Volatiles1 OF 2
RESULT REPORTING(i) LIMIT
0915
DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94
EXTRACTION- QCMETHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
o-Creeol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144m-Creeol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144p-Creeol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
2-Butanone ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Pyridine ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Nitrobenzene • ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Xylenes, Total ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Chlorobenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Ethylbenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
IsObutanOl ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144o-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Cyclohexanone ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
4-Nethy1-2-pentanone ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921Toluene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Benzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
2-Ethoxyethanol ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921442-Nitropropane ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Tetrachloroethene ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Trichloroethene ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Ethyl acetate ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Ethyl ether ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Acetone ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921441,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
SURROGATE RECOVERY
n-Butyl acetate 105
NOTE. AS RECEIVEDND NOT DETECTED AT THE STATED REPORTING LIMIT
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
( 50 - 150)
NRF Unit 65Page 21 of 26Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
NO S: 09706102LAB B: A4G020004-003MATRIX: SOLID
RAEakumm
94R-017B UNIT 65 6-29-94
GC Semi-Volatiles2 OF 2
RESULT REPORTING(t) LIMIT
0915DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94
EXTRACTION- QCMETHOD ANALYSIS DATE HATCH
Methanol ND 0.050 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921441,1,2-Trichloro- ND 0.050 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
1,2,2-trifluoroethaneMethylene chloride ND 0.050 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.10 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.10 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Carbon disulfide ND 0.20 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
n-Butanol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Cresylic Acid ND 0.10 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
SURROGATE RECOVERY
n-Butyl acetate 105
NOM AS RECEIVEDND NOT DETECTED AT THE STATED REPORTING LIMIT
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
( 50 - 150)
NRF Unit 65Page 22 of 26Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0178 UNIT 65 6-29-94 0915
WO 8: 09706 DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94LAB 8: A4G020004-003 DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94MATRIX: SOLID
PARAMETER
Solids, Total (TS)
NOM AS RECOVED
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
REPORTING PREPARATION - QCRESULT LIMIT UNIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
98.3 0.50 4 MCAWN 160.3 M 7/12- 7/13/94 4193096
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0179 UNIT 65 6-29-94 0938WO 8: 09707101LAB 8: A4G020004-004
MATRIX: SOLID
GC volatiles
NRF Unit 65
Page 23 of 26
Reference 6
DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94
RESULT REPORTING EXTRACTION- QCPARAMETER (uo/kO) LIMIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
Benzene ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/13/94 4195080Toluene ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/13/94 4195080Ethylbenzene ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/13/94 4195080
Xylenes, Total ND 2.0 SW846 8020 07/13/94 4195080
SURROGATE RECOVERY
Trifluorotoluene
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
78 ( 64 - 140)
NMI: AS RECEIVEDND NOT DETECTED AT THE MITA REPORTING LIMIT
NRF Unit 65Page 24 of 26Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0179 UNIT 65 6-29-94 0938WO 11: 09707102
LAB B: A4G020004-004MATRIX: SOLID
PAPAW:ER
GC Semi-Volatiles 1 OP 2
RESULT REPORTING(t) LIMIT
DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94DAT! RECEIVED: 7/01/94
EXTRACTION- QCMETHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
o-Cresol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144m-Cresol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144p-Cresol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
2-Butanone ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Pyridine ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Nitrobenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Xylenes, Total ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Chlorobenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Ethylbenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Isobutanol ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144o-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Cyclohexanone ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192Toluene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Benzene ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
2-Ethoxyethanol ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921442-Nitropropane ND 0.010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Tetrachloroethene ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Trichloroethene ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Ethyl acetate ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Ethyl ether ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Acetone ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921441,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.020 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
SURROGATE RECOVERY 1 ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
n-Butyl acetate 106 ( 50 - 150)
NOTE. AS RECEIVEDNI) NOT DETECTED AT THE STATED REPORTING LIMIT
NRF Unit 65
Page 25 of 26Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
WO 0: 09707102LAB B: A4G020004-004MATRIX: SOLID
94R-0179 UNIT 65 6-29-94
GC Semi-Volatiles2 OF 2
093B
DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94DATE RECEIVED: 7/01/94
RESULT REPORTING EXTRACTION- QC(B) LIMIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE DA=
Methanol ND 0.050 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 41921441,1,2-Trichloro- ND 0.050 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
1,2,2-trifluoroethaneMethylene chloride ND 0.050 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.10 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.10 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Carbon disulfide ND 0.20 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
n-Butanol ND 0 .010 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144Creeylic Acid ND 0.10 SW846 8015 07/11-07/12/94 4192144
SURROGATE RECOVERY
n-Butyl acetate 106
NOM AS RECEIVED
ND NOT DETECTED AT THE STATM REPORTING LIMIT
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
( 50 - 150)
NRF Unit 65Page 26 of 26Reference 6
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
94R-0179 UN/T 65 6-29-94 0938
WO II: 09707 DATE SAMPLED: 6/29/94LAB *: A40020004-004 DATE RECE/VED: 7/01/94NATRIE: SOLID
Solids, Total (TS)
NOTE: AS RECEIVED
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
REPORTING PREPARATION - QCRESULT LIMIT UNIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH
99.6 0.50 t ACANW 160.3 M 7/12- 7/13/94 4193096