U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science
Dr. Raymond L. OrbachDirector, Office of ScienceApril 29, 2004
PRESENTATION FOR THE BIOLOGICAL AND
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTTEE
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
2
The Office of Science
OneSC – Reorganization of the Office of Science Organizational Structure Impact
20 Year Facility Outlook Status of implementation Competition GTL Facilities
3
DirectorPrincipal Deputy Director
Deputy Director for Operations
Chief of Staff
Office of IT
Management
Office ofBiological
and Environmental Research
Previous Office of Science Structure
Office of Planning
& Analysis
Office of Resource
Management
BrookhavenSite
Office
Assistant Secretary
Environmental Management
RichlandOperations
Office
AssociateManager forScience &
Technology
Office ofHigh Energyand Nuclear
Physics
Office ofBasic Energy
Sciences
Office ofFusion Energy
Sciences
Office ofAdvanced Scientific
Computing Research
AmesSite
Office
ArgonneSite
Office
PrincetonSite
Office
FermiSite
Office
AssistantManager
ForLaboratories
ThomasJefferson
Site Office
Oak RidgeSite
Office
BerkeleySite
Office
StanfordSite
Office
PacificNorthwest
Site Office
Oak RidgeOperations
Office
ChicagoOperations
Office
Office of LabOperations
& ES&H
Office ofLaboratory
Policy
U.S. Department of Energy’sOffice of Science
UnderSecretary
Nuclear Security
“OaklandOperations
Office”
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
4
The OneSC Structure
Berkeley Site Office
Biological & Environmental
Research
WorkforceDevelopment for
Teachers & Scientists
Basic EnergySciences
High EnergyPhysics
Fusion EnergySciences
Advanced ScientificComputingResearch
Pacific NorthwestSite Office
ArgonneSite Office
AmesSite Office
Thomas JeffersonSite Office
BrookhavenSite Office
FermiSite Office
StanfordSite Office
PrincetonSite Office
Major SystemsAssessment
Budget andPlanning
Chicago Office
Oak Ridge OfficeLaboratory Policy& Infrastructure
InformationManagement
Program Direction &Corporate Analysis
Nuclear Physics
Deputy for Programs
Chief Operating Officer
Director Principal Deputy
Chief of Staff
Integrated SupportCenter
Line
Staff
Virtual
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
5
OneSC Impact
Removes a layer of management and integrates the site managers with headquarters
Clarifies Roles, Responsibilities, Authorities and Accountabilities
Integrates the Office of Science’s program, operational, and support elements
Provides a management structure that provides the Director of the Office of Science with a coordinated “sense of the laboratory” for the Office of Science’s national laboratories
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
6
Implementing the 20 Year Facility Outlook
The Path to 21st Century Scientific Leadership
ITER Negotiations Continue•Siting major issue
Leadership-Class Computer Competition
•Four excellent proposals•Widely differing architectures
CD-0 complete:•Linac Coherent Light Source•Protein Production & Tags•Rare Isotope Accelerator•Characterization & Imaging•CEBAF Upgrade•BTeV
Funds Requested in FY05 for:•Linac Coherent Light Source Preliminary Engineering Design and Long Lead Procurement•Protein Production and Tags Facility Preliminary Engineering Design
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
7
Facility Siting Competition
“Where existing facilities provide capabilities critical to a new user facility, colocation is appropriate; where this is not the case, the location of new user facilities should be openly competed”
FY04 AppropriationsConference Report
DOE is barred from competing FFRDCs against non-FFRDCs, except for “…management and operation of an FFRDC.”
•Protein Production and Tags Facility will be competed among DOE laboratories
•Laboratories may competitively select university partners•Imaging and Characterization Facility will be competed among universities•Decision on remaining GTL facilities depends on further definition of facility requirements.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
8
BER Budget FY04 vs FY05
FY 2004 Appropriation, $641 Million
CE/GPP/GPE, $16M, 2%
User Facilities, $121M, 19%
Research, $505M, 79%
Universities & Colleges$147M, 23.0%
National Laboratories$198M, 30.9%
All OtherResearch ¹
$159M, 24.8%
Facility Operations$110M, 17.2%
FacilityCE/AIP/GPP$11M, 1.7%
2005 Request, $502 Million
CE/GPP/GPE, $16M, 3%
User Facilities, $125M, 25%
Research, $360M, 72%
Universities & Colleges
$116M, 23.0%
National Laboratories$197M, 39.2%
All OtherResearch ¹$48M, 9.6%
Facility Operations$111M, 22.1%
FacilityCE/AIP/GPP$14M, 2.8%
FY 2004, Excluding Earmarks, $501M
All Other¹ $59M, 11.9%
CE/GPP/GPE, $16M, 3%
User Facilities, $121M, 24%
Research, $364M, 73%
Universities and Colleges$106M, 21.2%
National Laboratories$198M, 39.6%
Facility Operations$110M, 22.0% As
GTL facilities will significantly increase future BER construction
and operations budgets.