U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science

Dr. Raymond L. OrbachDirector, Office of ScienceApril 29, 2004

PRESENTATION FOR THE BIOLOGICAL AND

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTTEE

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

2

The Office of Science

OneSC – Reorganization of the Office of Science Organizational Structure Impact

20 Year Facility Outlook Status of implementation Competition GTL Facilities

3

DirectorPrincipal Deputy Director

Deputy Director for Operations

Chief of Staff

Office of IT

Management

Office ofBiological

and Environmental Research

Previous Office of Science Structure

Office of Planning

& Analysis

Office of Resource

Management

BrookhavenSite

Office

Assistant Secretary

Environmental Management

RichlandOperations

Office

AssociateManager forScience &

Technology

Office ofHigh Energyand Nuclear

Physics

Office ofBasic Energy

Sciences

Office ofFusion Energy

Sciences

Office ofAdvanced Scientific

Computing Research

AmesSite

Office

ArgonneSite

Office

PrincetonSite

Office

FermiSite

Office

AssistantManager

ForLaboratories

ThomasJefferson

Site Office

Oak RidgeSite

Office

BerkeleySite

Office

StanfordSite

Office

PacificNorthwest

Site Office

Oak RidgeOperations

Office

ChicagoOperations

Office

Office of LabOperations

& ES&H

Office ofLaboratory

Policy

U.S. Department of Energy’sOffice of Science

UnderSecretary

Nuclear Security

“OaklandOperations

Office”

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

4

The OneSC Structure

Berkeley Site Office

Biological & Environmental

Research

WorkforceDevelopment for

Teachers & Scientists

Basic EnergySciences

High EnergyPhysics

Fusion EnergySciences

Advanced ScientificComputingResearch

Pacific NorthwestSite Office

ArgonneSite Office

AmesSite Office

Thomas JeffersonSite Office

BrookhavenSite Office

FermiSite Office

StanfordSite Office

PrincetonSite Office

Major SystemsAssessment

Budget andPlanning

Chicago Office

Oak Ridge OfficeLaboratory Policy& Infrastructure

InformationManagement

Program Direction &Corporate Analysis

Nuclear Physics

Deputy for Programs

Chief Operating Officer

Director Principal Deputy

Chief of Staff

Integrated SupportCenter

Line

Staff

Virtual

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

5

OneSC Impact

Removes a layer of management and integrates the site managers with headquarters

Clarifies Roles, Responsibilities, Authorities and Accountabilities

Integrates the Office of Science’s program, operational, and support elements

Provides a management structure that provides the Director of the Office of Science with a coordinated “sense of the laboratory” for the Office of Science’s national laboratories

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

6

Implementing the 20 Year Facility Outlook

The Path to 21st Century Scientific Leadership

ITER Negotiations Continue•Siting major issue

Leadership-Class Computer Competition

•Four excellent proposals•Widely differing architectures

CD-0 complete:•Linac Coherent Light Source•Protein Production & Tags•Rare Isotope Accelerator•Characterization & Imaging•CEBAF Upgrade•BTeV

Funds Requested in FY05 for:•Linac Coherent Light Source Preliminary Engineering Design and Long Lead Procurement•Protein Production and Tags Facility Preliminary Engineering Design

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

7

Facility Siting Competition

“Where existing facilities provide capabilities critical to a new user facility, colocation is appropriate; where this is not the case, the location of new user facilities should be openly competed”

FY04 AppropriationsConference Report

DOE is barred from competing FFRDCs against non-FFRDCs, except for “…management and operation of an FFRDC.”

•Protein Production and Tags Facility will be competed among DOE laboratories

•Laboratories may competitively select university partners•Imaging and Characterization Facility will be competed among universities•Decision on remaining GTL facilities depends on further definition of facility requirements.

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

8

BER Budget FY04 vs FY05

FY 2004 Appropriation, $641 Million

CE/GPP/GPE, $16M, 2%

User Facilities, $121M, 19%

Research, $505M, 79%

Universities & Colleges$147M, 23.0%

National Laboratories$198M, 30.9%

All OtherResearch ¹

$159M, 24.8%

Facility Operations$110M, 17.2%

FacilityCE/AIP/GPP$11M, 1.7%

2005 Request, $502 Million

CE/GPP/GPE, $16M, 3%

User Facilities, $125M, 25%

Research, $360M, 72%

Universities & Colleges

$116M, 23.0%

National Laboratories$197M, 39.2%

All OtherResearch ¹$48M, 9.6%

Facility Operations$111M, 22.1%

FacilityCE/AIP/GPP$14M, 2.8%

FY 2004, Excluding Earmarks, $501M

All Other¹ $59M, 11.9%

CE/GPP/GPE, $16M, 3%

User Facilities, $121M, 24%

Research, $364M, 73%

Universities and Colleges$106M, 21.2%

National Laboratories$198M, 39.6%

Facility Operations$110M, 22.0% As

GTL facilities will significantly increase future BER construction

and operations budgets.