Post on 20-Jan-2016
description
transcript
1
2003 – 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results
Data by Student Groups
2
2008 Accountability Ratings for NEISD
RATING HIGH MIDDLE ELEM. TOTAL
EXEMPLARY 1 3 15 19 31%
RECOGNIZED 1 4 23 28 45%
ACCEPTABLE 5 6 4 15 24%
ACADEMICALLY UNACCEPTABLE 0 0 0 0 0%
TOTAL 7 13 42 62 100%
EXEMPLARY/RECOGNIZED
28.6% 53.8% 90.5% 75.8%
3
Major Highlights75% of all NEISD Campuses rated
Exemplary or RecognizedMore than 90% of Elementary Campuses
are rated Exemplary or Recognized27% Increase in Exemplary campuses Once again, NEISD has more Exemplary
campuses than any other district in Bexar County
4
Major Highlights
2008 TAKS passing rates increased in every subject for every student group
Marked improvement in Science for African Americans (+13%), Hispanic(+11%), and Economic Disadvantaged (13%)
5
Are There Gaps in Student Are There Gaps in Student Achievement?Achievement?
6
NO GAPSNO GAPSAll HispanicAll HispanicAll WhiteAll WhiteAll African AmericanAll African AmericanAll Economically DisadvantagedAll Economically DisadvantagedAll Special Education StudentsAll Special Education StudentsAll Limited English Proficient (LEP)All Limited English Proficient (LEP)
Equity and Excellence for All Students
7
– All children are capable of high levels of All children are capable of high levels of academic success;academic success;
– Academic success equitably includes all Academic success equitably includes all student groups; student groups;
– Adults in schools are primarily Adults in schools are primarily responsible; responsible;
– Traditional school practices result in Traditional school practices result in inequity and must be changed.inequity and must be changed.
Core BeliefsCore Beliefs
8
Process of Finding the Gaps
• Look at current year results and compare them to prior years– Disaggregate by student groups– Close attention to ethnic groups and special
populations– Use a variety of tabular and graphic formats
• Look at our progress in closing gaps over time• Examine within and across ethnic groups and
special populations to determine the extent of gaps
9
2008 District Accountability Rating
10
% = % Pass All = Total W=White H =Hispanic AA = Afr. American ED=Eco. Disadvantaged
11
High Schools
What are educationally important differences - District ± 3%
12
TAKS Reading/ELA Achievement GAPS:2003 - 2008
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008African American -11 -9 -5 -4 -4 -3Hispanic -7 -5 -4 -3 -3 -2White 6 6 5 4 3 3Eco. Disadvantaged -12 -9 -8 -6 -6 -4District % Pass 83 87 89 93 94 95
13
TAKS Writing Achievement Gaps: 2003 - 2008
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008African American -8 -6 -5 -3 -4 -2Hispanic -5 -2 -2 -2 -1 -2White 6 2 2 2 2 1Eco. Disadvantaged -11 -4 -4 -4 -3 -4District % Pass 86 93 94 96 95 97
14
TAKS Social Studies Achievement GAPS: 2003 - 2008
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008African American -8 -7 -5 -5 -2 -3Hispanic -7 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1White 5 4 4 4 3 3Eco. Disadvantaged -10 -10 -8 -6 -5 -4District % Pass 86 92 92 94 95 96
15
TAKS Science Achievement Gaps: 2003 - 2008
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008African American -19 -16 -17 -8 -12 -11Hispanic -14 -12 -11 -9 -9 -7White 12 11 11 9 9 8Eco. Disadvantaged -20 -19 -18 -13 -14 -12District % Pass 55 72 76 84 83 85
16
TAKS Math Achievement Gaps: 2003 - 2008
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
African American
Hispanic
White
Eco. Disadvantaged
District
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008African American -18 -16 -15 -13 -12 -11Hispanic -10 -8 -7 -6 -6 -5White 10 9 9 7 8 6Eco. Disadvantaged -14 -13 -12 -10 -10 -9District % Pass 68 75 79 84 84 87
17
2008 TAKS MATH GAP ANALYSISBY ETHNICITY AND ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGED
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
AFR. AMER. HISPANIC WHITE TOTAL
MATH
ME
T S
TA
ND
AR
D
ECO DIS
NOT ECO
DISTRICT
13
11
11
14
18
2008 TAKS MATH GAP ANALYSISBY ETHNICITY AND ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGED
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
AFR. AMER. HISPANIC WHITE TOTAL
MATH
ME
T S
TA
ND
AR
D
ECO DIS
NOT ECO
DISTRICT
-10-4
4
19
2008 TAKS MATH GAP ANALYSISBY ETHNICITY AND ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGED
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
AFR. AMER. HISPANIC WHITE TOTAL
MATH
ME
T S
TA
ND
AR
D
ECO DIS
NOT ECO
DISTRICT
-9
-1
7
20
2008 TAKS MATHEMATICS GAP ANALYSISBY SCHOOL TYPE BY ETHNICITY AND ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
AF
R.
AM
ER
.
HIS
PA
NIC
WH
ITE
TO
TA
L
AF
R.
AM
ER
.
HIS
PA
NIC
WH
ITE
TO
TA
L
AF
R.
AM
ER
.
HIS
PA
NIC
WH
ITE
TO
TA
L
ES MS HS
MATHEMATICS
ME
T S
TA
ND
AR
D
ECO DIS
NOT ECO
DISTRICT
21
Bottom Line
• It is not about the gaps. Our goal is to make certain each and every child receives a quality education and is prepared for college and workforce readiness.
NEISDNEISD
Where Every Child Is Prepared for the FutureWhere Every Child Is Prepared for the Future
22
The EndThe End
23
Preliminary 2008 AEISAccountability Ratings:Elementary School
Exemplary
Recognized
Acceptable
# #
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
# #
#
#
#
# #
##
##
#
#
#
#
#
##
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
##
#
COKER
BULVERDECREEK
ROANFOREST
RIDGEVIEW
CANYONRIDGE
WILDERNESSOAK
HIDDENFOREST
HUEBNER
WETMORE
CAMELOT
SERNA
ENCINOPARK
OAKGROVE
WINDCREST
FOXRUN
LARKSPUR
STAHL
HARDYOAK
HARMONYHILLS
WOODSTONE
STONEOAK
CLEARSPRING
THOUSANDOAKS
ROYALRIDGE
NORTHWOOD
REDLANDOAKS
OAKMEADOW
JACKSONKELLER
WILSHIRE
NORTHERNHILLS
CASTLEHILLS
ELDORADO
WALZEM
OLMOS
DELLVIEW
LONGSCREEK
MONTGOMERY
STEUBINGRANCH
REGENCYPLACE
E TERRELLHILLS
COLONIALHILLS
WESTAVENUE
1604
24
Preliminary 2008 AEISAccountability Ratings:Middle School
Exemplary
Recognized
Acceptable
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
# #
##
#
#
TEJEDABUSH
NIMITZ
LOPEZ
BRADLEY
WHITE
GARNER
WOODDRISCOLL
JACKSON
KRUEGER
HARRIS
EISENHOWER
1604
25
Preliminary 2008 AEISAccountability Ratings:High School
Exemplary
Recognized
AcceptableNote: ISA is Exemplary
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
REAGAN
LEE
CHURCHILL
MACARTHURROOSEVELT
MADISON
MAC TEMP 2
MAC TEMP 1
1604