Characterizing Battery Rejuvenators

Post on 23-Feb-2016

45 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Characterizing Battery Rejuvenators. Team Shock Therapy: Tim Blake, David Bankhead, Travis McMillen. Presentation outline. Background Process of Defining the Project Our Problem Definition/Goal Test Setups Procedure Design Matrix Future Work. Background. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transcript

1

CHARACTERIZING BATTERY

REJUVENATORS

Team Shock Therapy: Tim Blake, David Bankhead, Travis McMillen

2

Presentation outline Background Process of Defining the Project Our Problem Definition/Goal Test Setups Procedure Design Matrix Future Work

3

Background Goal of Acoustic

Research Detachment Create quieter

NAVY vehicles Use lead-acid

batteries to power their vehicles

A ship uses hundreds of batteries Example: LSV-2

Cutthroat Batteries need to

be replaced every 4 years

NAVY wants to improve battery performance

4

Process of Defining the Project NAVY

Originally CCCV vs. Pulse Analyze rejuvenators Indications of health of battery

University of Idaho Navy specs not design, need design project!

5

Project Definition/Goals Project Definition

Navy needs a reliable way to extend the life of their batteries.

They are considering using battery rejuvenators.

Project Goal Design a procedure/algorithm that the Navy

can use to characterize their rejuvenators.

6

Test setups

RintVOC VLoaded

I

Figure 3: Internal Resistance Test Setup

Figure 2: Discharge Test SetupFigure 1: Rejuvenation Test Setup

7

ProcedureDischarged

Battery

Internal Resistance Measureme

nt

Rejuvenate Battery

Internal Resistance Measureme

nt

Discharge Battery

Perform Calculations

Decision

Matrix

8

Design Matrix

Compared Spec Sheets 35 Ah rating Renaissance RC-2A12-2 BatteryMinder Renaissance RC20A-12-240 Max value Min value standard

Capacity Restoration 80% 95% 65% 100% 0 1.000Internal Resistance 0.097691279 0.110684674 0.354608217 100% 0 1

Time Taken (h) 100 5.579732407 11.13221521 24 0 24   Renaissance RC-2A12-2 BatteryMinder Renaissance RC20A-12-240 Weight

Capacity Restoration 0.80 0.95 0.65 60%

Internal Resistance 10% 11% 35% 20% Legend

Time Taken (h) -3.17 0.77 0.54 20% -1 - 0.3 Terrible, do not use

0.3 - 0.7 Okay

-0.132277439 0.744766765 0.565751983 0.7-1 Great

9

Future work Automated control system Verification of 2 Volt batteries Quantify Internal resistance of batteries Compare constant current constant

voltage to pulse rejuvenators First 10 min. of a rejuvenation.

10

First 10 min. of Rejuv.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011.511.611.711.811.9

1212.112.2

Rejuvenation of Used Battery #3 with Bat-teryMINDer Rejuvenator

Time (Minutes)

Volta

ge (

V)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011.811.9

1212.112.212.312.412.512.6

Rejuvenation of Unused Battery #4 with BatteryMINDer Rejuvenator

Time (Minutes)

Volta

ge (

V)

11

Conclusions Pulse rejuvenators work

BatteryMINDer works the best Most important characteristics have been

determined in characterizing a rejuvenator

Difference between two batteries pulsing in first 10 min.

Recommend pulse charging for the next charge setup

12

Special Thanks to…. Acoustic Research Detachment of the

Navy Jim Klein Dr. Herb Hess Dr. Greg Donohoe Dr. Touraj Assefi

13

QUESTIONS