Post on 07-Mar-2016
description
transcript
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
1 AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
Hi Hi Hi Hi AIESEC Slovakia!AIESEC Slovakia!AIESEC Slovakia!AIESEC Slovakia!
Welcome to Incoming and Outgoing programIncoming and Outgoing programIncoming and Outgoing programIncoming and Outgoing program''''s reports reports reports report for Q4for Q4for Q4for Q4. MC decided to create this
report in order to present the current reality of incoming and outgoing programs not just on
national level but on local as well. By this report, LCs have chance to check their results
and compare it with other LCs. What is more, LCs can see also their contribution to the
results of AIESEC Slovakia.
The report is divided in 3 parts3 parts3 parts3 parts:
The The The The first partfirst partfirst partfirst part is general so you can find there general statisticgeneral statisticgeneral statisticgeneral statistics of Global Internship s of Global Internship s of Global Internship s of Global Internship
ProgramProgramProgramProgram (GIP) and Global Commun(GIP) and Global Commun(GIP) and Global Commun(GIP) and Global Community Development Programity Development Programity Development Programity Development Program (GCDP(GCDP(GCDP(GCDP) mainly from national
point of view.
The second partThe second partThe second partThe second part is focused mainly on outgoing programoutgoing programoutgoing programoutgoing programssss. You can find there except from
general performance of OGP in Q4 also performance of individual LCs.
The aim of the third partthe third partthe third partthe third part is to present performance performance performance performance of incoming programof incoming programof incoming programof incoming programssss in Q4 on national
and local level. Furthermore, you will find there interesting interesting interesting interesting ratesratesratesrates such as calls/meetings,
meetings/raises etc. and GCPs of some LCsGCPs of some LCsGCPs of some LCsGCPs of some LCs.
I hope you will find this report useful. In case you have some feedback towards it, do not
hesitate to approach one of the MC VP responsible for incoming and outgoing programs.
Enjoy!
Katka (MC VP ICP) & Zuska (MC VP OGP)
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
2 AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
General partGeneral partGeneral partGeneral part
The first part of general statistics is devoted to comparing GIP & GCDP results between
2010 and 2011.
Regarding GIP, AIESEC Slovakia is dropping and did not manage to overcome the results
from previous year in any aspects.
In terms of GCDP, we manage to overcome the results from previous year almost in all
aspects except of raises and matches in October.
8 1225
45
2 311 16
GIP RAGIP RAGIP RAGIP RA
2010
2011
8 59
22
5 3 311
GIP GIP GIP GIP MAMAMAMA
2010
2011
11 8 9
28
9 5 3
17
GIP GIP GIP GIP RERERERE
2010
2011
2110 8
39
6 1321
40
GCDP GCDP GCDP GCDP RARARARA
2010
2011
6 5 8
19
5 616
27GCDP MAGCDP MAGCDP MAGCDP MA
2010
2011
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
3 AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
In the following graphs, you can find the comparison of plan and reality of GIP & GCDP in
Q4. Starting with GIP, the plan was not fulfilled. The gap between plan and reality in quite
high starting with gap of 27 raises, continue with gap of 29 matches and finish with gap of 31
realizations.
Continue with GCDP the fulfillment of the plan is quite better. We manage to fulfill the
plan just in one case – no of realizations in October and we overcome the plan in November
also in no of realizations.
5 3 2
106 4 4
14GCDP REGCDP REGCDP REGCDP RE
2010
2011
921
13
43
2 311 16
GIP GIP GIP GIP RARARARA
Plan
Reality
12 15 13
40
5 3 311
GIP MAGIP MAGIP MAGIP MA
Plan
Reality
20 13 15
48
9 5 317
GIP REGIP REGIP REGIP RE
Plan
Reality
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
4 AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
In the following graph, you can find the fulfillment of the plan for term 2011/2012. The
percentage of plan fulfillment is: GIP – 29%29%29%29%, GCDP – 27%,27%,27%,27%, Together (GIP+GCDP) – 28%.28%.28%.28%.
933 26
68
6 13 2140
GCDP GCDP GCDP GCDP RARARARA
Plan
Reality
6 1230
48
5 616
27
GCDP MGCDP MGCDP MGCDP MAAAA
Plan
Reality
63
10
19
6 4 4
14
GCDP REGCDP REGCDP REGCDP RE
Plan
Reality
164202
366
48 54102
GIP GCDP GIP+GCDP
Fulfillment of the plan 11/12Fulfillment of the plan 11/12Fulfillment of the plan 11/12Fulfillment of the plan 11/12
Plan 11/12
July - Dec
5 AIESEC Slovakia
The third part is devoted to contribution of individual LCs to
Slovakia in Q4. In terms of GIP, LC BA contributed the most with 35% (6 RE) followed by
LC CU with 29% (5 RE) and LC BB with 18% (3 RE).
Regarding GCDP, the largest contributor is again LC BA with 36% (5 RE) followed by LC CU
with 29% (4 RE) and LC NR which contributed with 3 RE
18%
7% 36%
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
The third part is devoted to contribution of individual LCs to the results of AIESEC
Slovakia in Q4. In terms of GIP, LC BA contributed the most with 35% (6 RE) followed by
LC CU with 29% (5 RE) and LC BB with 18% (3 RE).
Regarding GCDP, the largest contributor is again LC BA with 36% (5 RE) followed by LC CU
h 29% (4 RE) and LC NR which contributed with 3 RE – 21%.
35% 29% 6% 12%
GIP RGIP RGIP RGIP Realizationsealizationsealizationsealizations Q4Q4Q4Q4
BB BA CU KE NR TT
36% 29% 21%
GCDPGCDPGCDPGCDP RRRRealizationsealizationsealizationsealizations Q4Q4Q4Q4
BB BA CU KE NR TT
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
the results of AIESEC
Slovakia in Q4. In terms of GIP, LC BA contributed the most with 35% (6 RE) followed by
Regarding GCDP, the largest contributor is again LC BA with 36% (5 RE) followed by LC CU
12%
7%
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
6 AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
Outgoing ProgramOutgoing ProgramOutgoing ProgramOutgoing Programssss
First of all, we would like to present you a general perspective on how is the OGP area
performing in terms of fulfilling the plan.
LCLCLCLC FulfillmentFulfillmentFulfillmentFulfillment towards LCtowards LCtowards LCtowards LC plan plan plan plan (July(July(July(July----December)December)December)December)
Fulfillment Fulfillment Fulfillment Fulfillment towards Skia towards Skia towards Skia towards Skia reality reality reality reality (July(July(July(July----December)December)December)December)
FulfillmentFulfillmentFulfillmentFulfillment towards LC towards LC towards LC towards LC
plan (Q4plan (Q4plan (Q4plan (Q4))))
FulfillmentFulfillmentFulfillmentFulfillment towards Skia towards Skia towards Skia towards Skia realityrealityrealityreality (Q4(Q4(Q4(Q4))))
BratislavaBratislavaBratislavaBratislava 56%56%56%56% 31%31%31%31% 63636363%%%% 25252525%%%%
Comenius Comenius Comenius Comenius UniversityUniversityUniversityUniversity
70%70%70%70% 33%33%33%33% 55554%4%4%4% 35353535%%%%
Banská BystricaBanská BystricaBanská BystricaBanská Bystrica 100%100%100%100% 11%11%11%11% 100%100%100%100% 10101010%%%%
KošiceKošiceKošiceKošice 12%12%12%12% 3%3%3%3% 0000 0000
NitraNitraNitraNitra 88%88%88%88% 10%10%10%10% 100%100%100%100% 15151515%%%%
TrnavaTrnavaTrnavaTrnava 100%100%100%100% 6%6%6%6% 100%100%100%100% 15%15%15%15%
As you can see majority of the LCs are above 50%50%50%50% of plan fulfillment what is pretty good
sign. Here you can also see how much you are contributing towards the national numbers.
Q4 general performanceQ4 general performanceQ4 general performanceQ4 general performance
The following graphs are showing how your LC did, but also Skia performed in Q4. You can
also see the division of GIP and GCDP. It is clear that we are stronger on GCDPstronger on GCDPstronger on GCDPstronger on GCDP, what
means that we have to continue capitalizing on it, but we also have to start focusing more
on GIP as well (targeting, timing, matching).
2
0
5
1 1 1
9
1 12 2
01
7
0
2
4
6
8
10
LC BA LC BB LC CU LC NR LC KE LC TT Skia
Nu
mb
er
of
GC
DP
OG
Nu
mb
er
of
GC
DP
OG
Nu
mb
er
of
GC
DP
OG
Nu
mb
er
of
GC
DP
OG
Plan vs. Reality GCDPPlan vs. Reality GCDPPlan vs. Reality GCDPPlan vs. Reality GCDP Q4Q4Q4Q4
GCDP Plan
GCDP Reality
7 AIESEC Slovakia
LC BratislavaLC BratislavaLC BratislavaLC Bratislava
LC Banská BystricaLC Banská BystricaLC Banská BystricaLC Banská Bystrica
6
14
1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
LC BA LC BB
Nu
mb
er
of
GIP
OG
Nu
mb
er
of
GIP
OG
Nu
mb
er
of
GIP
OG
Nu
mb
er
of
GIP
OG
2023
86 6 5
Raised Matched Realized
BA Q4 OGPBA Q4 OGPBA Q4 OGPBA Q4 OGP
LC BA Plan
LC BA Reality
7
10
1
7
2 2
Raised Matched Realized
BB Q4 OGPBB Q4 OGPBB Q4 OGPBB Q4 OGP
LC BB Plan
LC BB Reality
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
Q4 LCQ4 LCQ4 LCQ4 LCssss performanceperformanceperformanceperformance
LC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius University
LC NitraLC NitraLC NitraLC Nitra
8
25
2
24
5
1 02
13
LC BB LC CU LC NR LC KE LC TT Skia
Plan vs. RealityPlan vs. RealityPlan vs. RealityPlan vs. Reality GIPGIPGIPGIP Q4Q4Q4Q4
LC BA Plan
LC BA Reality
20 20
13
2
8
Raised Matched Realized
CU Q4CU Q4CU Q4CU Q4
LC BB Plan
LC BB Reality
13 13
3
8 8
Raised Matched Realized
NR Q4 OGPNR Q4 OGPNR Q4 OGPNR Q4 OGP
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
LC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius University
GIP Plan
GIP Reality
13
7
Realized
CU Q4CU Q4CU Q4CU Q4 OGPOGPOGPOGP
LC CU Plan
LC CU Reality
3
Realized
NR Q4 OGPNR Q4 OGPNR Q4 OGPNR Q4 OGP
LC NR Plan
LC NR Reality
8 AIESEC Slovakia
LC KošiceLC KošiceLC KošiceLC Košice
Raising: In terms of raising the LCs that were doing pretty well in Q4 were
(100%), Nitra (62%) and Trnava (50%(100%), Nitra (62%) and Trnava (50%(100%), Nitra (62%) and Trnava (50%(100%), Nitra (62%) and Trnava (50%
supposed to, so generally we are in the loss for the quarter.
Matching: The only LC that fulfilled the plan
you can see lack of raises have direct consequences on the matches as well, that is why we
do not have desired results. And also we are not working with the available pipeline
sufficiently. So for the upcoming quarter we need to pay attention to 2 factors:
matchability of the EPs and servicing while matching
Realization: The situation in realizations is not that dark, we have 3 LCs that
overachieved their targetsoverachieved their targetsoverachieved their targetsoverachieved their targets for the quarter
of matches reflects also on the realizations.
So as you know everything is strongly connected, so if we fail with raising
matching and realizations as well. Therefore we need
achieve the desired results.
17
6 64
0 0
Raised Matched Realized
KE Q4 OGPKE Q4 OGPKE Q4 OGPKE Q4 OGP
LC KE Plan
LC KE Reality
51
37
Raised
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
LC TrnavaLC TrnavaLC TrnavaLC Trnava
SlovakiaSlovakiaSlovakiaSlovakia
: In terms of raising the LCs that were doing pretty well in Q4 were
(100%), Nitra (62%) and Trnava (50%(100%), Nitra (62%) and Trnava (50%(100%), Nitra (62%) and Trnava (50%(100%), Nitra (62%) and Trnava (50%). However, none of the LCs raised more than they were
supposed to, so generally we are in the loss for the quarter.
LC that fulfilled the plan of matches on more than
you can see lack of raises have direct consequences on the matches as well, that is why we
do not have desired results. And also we are not working with the available pipeline
ly. So for the upcoming quarter we need to pay attention to 2 factors:
servicing while matching.
The situation in realizations is not that dark, we have 3 LCs that
for the quarter –––– LC BB, LC TT and LC NRLC BB, LC TT and LC NRLC BB, LC TT and LC NRLC BB, LC TT and LC NR. But again, the lack
of matches reflects also on the realizations.
So as you know everything is strongly connected, so if we fail with raising
matching and realizations as well. Therefore we need to be careful in each step in order to
LC KE Plan
LC KE Reality
6
433
0
Raised Matched Realized
TT Q4 OGPTT Q4 OGPTT Q4 OGPTT Q4 OGP
47
33
2320
Matched Realized
Skia Q4 OGPSkia Q4 OGPSkia Q4 OGPSkia Q4 OGP
Skia Plan
Skia Reality
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
: In terms of raising the LCs that were doing pretty well in Q4 were Banska Bystrica Banska Bystrica Banska Bystrica Banska Bystrica
). However, none of the LCs raised more than they were
f matches on more than 50%50%50%50% was NitraNitraNitraNitra. As
you can see lack of raises have direct consequences on the matches as well, that is why we
do not have desired results. And also we are not working with the available pipeline
ly. So for the upcoming quarter we need to pay attention to 2 factors:
The situation in realizations is not that dark, we have 3 LCs that either hit or either hit or either hit or either hit or
. But again, the lack
So as you know everything is strongly connected, so if we fail with raising, we will fail with
in each step in order to
3
Realized
TT Q4 OGPTT Q4 OGPTT Q4 OGPTT Q4 OGP
LC TT Plan
LC TT Reality
Skia Reality
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
9 AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
January planJanuary planJanuary planJanuary plan
SlovakiaSlovakiaSlovakiaSlovakia PlanPlanPlanPlan Current RealityCurrent RealityCurrent RealityCurrent Reality
RaisedRaisedRaisedRaised 14141414 8888
MatchedMatchedMatchedMatched 27272727 6666
RealizedRealizedRealizedRealized 29292929 2222
As you can see we have planned pretty high numbers for the month, so be careful and focus
on matching your available pipeline and realizing what you have currently matched ☺
And just for you to see how we stand with our overall plan:
Plan for term 2011Plan for term 2011Plan for term 2011Plan for term 2011----2012 OGP2012 OGP2012 OGP2012 OGP
OGPOGPOGPOGP PlanPlanPlanPlan RealityRealityRealityReality
OverallOverallOverallOverall 245245245245 77777777
GIPGIPGIPGIP 108108108108 42424242
GCDPGCDPGCDPGCDP 137137137137 35353535
So you can see that half a year already passed and we are on 29% of plan fulfillment. But we
still have very potential half a year and I do believe that we can catch up with the results,
but we need to follow our plans ☺
RecognitionRecognitionRecognitionRecognition
At the end, I would like to recognize LC NitraLC NitraLC NitraLC Nitra for being very disciplined during matching,
because they managed to match 4 their GCDP EPs in December and already 1 in January match 4 their GCDP EPs in December and already 1 in January match 4 their GCDP EPs in December and already 1 in January match 4 their GCDP EPs in December and already 1 in January
from the GCDP RCTMfrom the GCDP RCTMfrom the GCDP RCTMfrom the GCDP RCTM ☺
Keep on doing a great job ☺
10 AIESEC Slovakia
Firstly, let’s check LC's fulfillment
generally.
LCLCLCLC Fulfillment Fulfillment Fulfillment Fulfillment towards LCtowards LCtowards LCtowards LCplan (Julyplan (Julyplan (Julyplan (JulyDecember)December)December)December)
BratislavaBratislavaBratislavaBratislava 55557777%%%%
Comenius Comenius Comenius Comenius UniversityUniversityUniversityUniversity
83838383%%%%
Banská BystricaBanská BystricaBanská BystricaBanská Bystrica 75757575%%%%
KošiceKošiceKošiceKošice 26262626%%%%
NitraNitraNitraNitra 38383838%%%%
TrnavaTrnavaTrnavaTrnava 50505050%%%%
As you can see, LCs which fulfilled
and LC TT with exactly 50%. In terms of results of AIESEC Skia from the beginning of
term, LCs which mostly contributed to the
both with 16%. Regarding Q4,
Regarding general performance of LCs in Q4,
GCDP as the plan was almost fulfilled. The only LC which fulfilled the plan for 100% was
LC CU. Other LCs are generally missing one
In terms of GIP, LCs which fulfilled the plan
which didn’t plan any realization
5
1
4
00
2
4
6
8
10
BA BB
Nu
mb
er
of
GC
DP
N
um
ber
of
GC
DP
N
um
ber
of
GC
DP
N
um
ber
of
GC
DP
ICIC ICIC
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
Incoming ProgramIncoming ProgramIncoming ProgramIncoming Programssss
fulfillment towards their plan and results of AIESEC Slovakia
Fulfillment Fulfillment Fulfillment Fulfillment towards LCtowards LCtowards LCtowards LC plan (Julyplan (Julyplan (Julyplan (July----December)December)December)December)
Fulfillment Fulfillment Fulfillment Fulfillment towards Skia towards Skia towards Skia towards Skia reality (Julyreality (Julyreality (Julyreality (July----December)December)December)December)
Fulfillment Fulfillment Fulfillment Fulfillment towards LC towards LC towards LC towards LC
plan (Q4)plan (Q4)plan (Q4)plan (Q4)
%%%% 44441%1%1%1% 46464646%%%%
%%%% 16161616%%%% 50505050%%%%
%%%% 9999%%%% 67676767%%%%
%%%% 16161616%%%% 0000%%%%
%%%% 9999%%%% 33333333%%%%
%%%% 3333%%%% 0%0%0%0%
As you can see, LCs which fulfilled their plan more than 50% are LC CU, LC BB, LC BA
and LC TT with exactly 50%. In terms of results of AIESEC Skia from the beginning of
term, LCs which mostly contributed to the results are LC BA with 41%,
both with 16%. Regarding Q4, LC BA, LC BB and LC CU contributed mostly to the results.
Q4 general performanceQ4 general performanceQ4 general performanceQ4 general performance
Regarding general performance of LCs in Q4, you can see that LCs are better performing
as the plan was almost fulfilled. The only LC which fulfilled the plan for 100% was
LC CU. Other LCs are generally missing one realization.
which fulfilled the plan were LC BB with 2 realizations
realization☺. The biggest gap records LC BA with
21
21
9
2
01
0
7
CU KE NR TT Skia
Plan vs. Reality GCDPPlan vs. Reality GCDPPlan vs. Reality GCDPPlan vs. Reality GCDP Q4Q4Q4Q4
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
an and results of AIESEC Slovakia
Fulfillment Fulfillment Fulfillment Fulfillment towards Skia towards Skia towards Skia towards Skia reality (Q4)reality (Q4)reality (Q4)reality (Q4)
55555555%%%%
18181818%%%%
18181818%%%%
0000%%%%
9999%%%%
0000%%%%
plan more than 50% are LC CU, LC BB, LC BA
and LC TT with exactly 50%. In terms of results of AIESEC Skia from the beginning of the
, LC Cu and LC KE
LC BA, LC BB and LC CU contributed mostly to the results.
better performing in
as the plan was almost fulfilled. The only LC which fulfilled the plan for 100% was
LC BB with 2 realizations and LC Trnava
with 6 realizations.
GCDP plan
GCDP reality
11 AIESEC Slovakia
Generally speaking about plan vs. reality of AIESEC Skia
realizations, what indicating a weak performance on this side
LC BLC BLC BLC Brrrratatatatiiiisssslalalalavvvvaaaa
LC BanskLC BanskLC BanskLC Banskáááá BystricaBystricaBystricaBystrica
8
22 2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
BA BB
Nu
mb
er
of
GC
DP
N
um
ber
of
GC
DP
N
um
ber
of
GC
DP
N
um
ber
of
GC
DP
ICIC ICIC
19
13 13
41
6
Raised Matched Realized
BA Q4 BA Q4 BA Q4 BA Q4 ICICICICPPPP
11 11
3
10
32
Raised Matched Realized
BB Q4 ICPBB Q4 ICPBB Q4 ICPBB Q4 ICP
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
Generally speaking about plan vs. reality of AIESEC Skia in GIP, there is
, what indicating a weak performance on this side of incoming programs
LC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius University
LC NitraLC NitraLC NitraLC Nitra
23
10
17
0 0 0 0
4
CU KE NR TT Skia
Plan vs. Reality GIPlan vs. Reality GIPlan vs. Reality GIPlan vs. Reality GI P Q4P Q4P Q4P Q4
Plan
Reality
9 9
11
9
Raised Matched
CU Q4CU Q4CU Q4CU Q4
Plan
Reality
3
4
0
1
Raised Matched
NR Q4 ICPNR Q4 ICPNR Q4 ICPNR Q4 ICP
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
there is gap of 13
of incoming programs.
LC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius University
GIP plan
GIP reality
4
2
Realized
CU Q4CU Q4CU Q4CU Q4 ICICICICPPPP
Plan
Reality
3
1
Realized
NR Q4 ICPNR Q4 ICPNR Q4 ICPNR Q4 ICP
Plan
Reality
12 AIESEC Slovakia
LC KošiceLC KošiceLC KošiceLC Košice
Raising: In terms of raising, the strongest LCs which really performed in Q4 are
BB and LC TT. Raises were mainly for GCDP projects organized on LCs and nationally and
regarding LC BB also 4 GIP raises
Matching: Generally, matching in Q4 was the weakest. The only LC with 100% fulfillment of
the plan is LC CU. The matches were just on GCDP
managed to match any TN what has to be focus for Q1.
Realization: In Q4, there were just
realizations is LC BA as there were some GIP realizations and project KEMPEL
realized as well.
SlovakiaSlovakiaSlovakiaSlovakia
RaisedRaisedRaisedRaised
MatchedMatchedMatchedMatched
RealizedRealizedRealizedRealized
7
11
4
0 0 0
Raised Matched Realized
KE Q4 ICPKE Q4 ICPKE Q4 ICPKE Q4 ICP
39
26
Raised
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
LC TrnavaLC TrnavaLC TrnavaLC Trnava
In terms of raising, the strongest LCs which really performed in Q4 are
BB and LC TT. Raises were mainly for GCDP projects organized on LCs and nationally and
also 4 GIP raises – internships focused on IT and Language Education.
ly, matching in Q4 was the weakest. The only LC with 100% fulfillment of
the plan is LC CU. The matches were just on GCDP, in GIP we unfortunately
what has to be focus for Q1.
In Q4, there were just few realizations. The LC with the highest number of
realizations is LC BA as there were some GIP realizations and project KEMPEL
SlovakiaSlovakiaSlovakiaSlovakia
January planJanuary planJanuary planJanuary plan
PlanPlanPlanPlan Current RealityCurrent RealityCurrent RealityCurrent Reality
10101010
15151515
22222222
Plan
Reality
3
44
0
Raised Matched
TT Q4 ICPTT Q4 ICPTT Q4 ICPTT Q4 ICP
3226
1411
Matched Realized
Skia Q4 ICPSkia Q4 ICPSkia Q4 ICPSkia Q4 ICP
Plan
Reality
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
In terms of raising, the strongest LCs which really performed in Q4 are LC CU, LC
BB and LC TT. Raises were mainly for GCDP projects organized on LCs and nationally and
focused on IT and Language Education.
ly, matching in Q4 was the weakest. The only LC with 100% fulfillment of
unfortunately didn’t
few realizations. The LC with the highest number of
realizations is LC BA as there were some GIP realizations and project KEMPELEN was
Current RealityCurrent RealityCurrent RealityCurrent Reality
6666
4444
8888
1
0
Realized
TT Q4 ICPTT Q4 ICPTT Q4 ICPTT Q4 ICP
Plan
Reality
Reality
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
13 AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
January is about realization of current running projects; Educate Slovakia which will be
realized in LC CU and LC BB and AIESEC to Kids. What is more, in January, LCs should
focus on matching GIP TN forms so we can ensure the realization in the term 11/12.
And just for you to see how we stand with our overall plan:
Plan for term 2011Plan for term 2011Plan for term 2011Plan for term 2011----2012 2012 2012 2012 ICICICICPPPP
ICICICICPPPP PlanPlanPlanPlan RealityRealityRealityReality
OverallOverallOverallOverall 121121121121 49494949
GIPGIPGIPGIP 56565656 10101010
GCDPGCDPGCDPGCDP 65656565 39393939
In the following table you can see some indicators of performance which were recorded in Q4.
Generally, there is high number of calls and meetings what indicates the strong selling wave in
most of the LCs. The meetings are divided between GIP and GCDP – in Slovakia, it still means
corporate & non-corporate sector:
GIP:GIP:GIP:GIP: LCs managed to go for 132 meeting in Q4132 meeting in Q4132 meeting in Q4132 meeting in Q4. The strongest month was November with 65
meetings. The rate between 1st and follow-up meeting is 4,54,54,54,5, it means that to set 1 follow-up GIP
meeting, there is need to experience at least 5555 first meetings. The rate between meetings and
raises is 22222222 (132/6). It means that for 1 raise, we needed to attend in Q4 at least 22 meetings which
is quite high number.
GCDP:GCDP:GCDP:GCDP: LCs managed to go for 66 meetings in Q466 meetings in Q466 meetings in Q466 meetings in Q4. Again, November was the strongest month
with 35 meetings. The rate between 1st and follow-up meeting is 1,641,641,641,64, it means that to set 1 follow-
up GCDP meeting, there is need to experience at least 2222 first meetings. The rate between
meetings and raises is 3,33,33,33,3 (66/20). It means that for 1 raise, we needed to attend in Q4 at least 4
meetings which reflects affectivity of LCs in terms of GCDP.
Other thing, I would like to highlight is number of initiatives organized for interns.number of initiatives organized for interns.number of initiatives organized for interns.number of initiatives organized for interns. LCs
organized for interns in Q4 52 52 52 52 reception activitiesreception activitiesreception activitiesreception activities that indicate that LCs are really taking care
of interns and thus ensuring the quality of internships.
OctoberOctoberOctoberOctober NovemberNovemberNovemberNovember DecemberDecemberDecemberDecember Q4Q4Q4Q4
CallsCallsCallsCalls 114 341 135 590590590590
1111stststst meemeemeemeetingtingtingting GIPGIPGIPGIP 16 53 39 108108108108
1111stststst meetinmeetinmeetinmeetingggg GCDPGCDPGCDPGCDP 10 27 4 41414141
FollowFollowFollowFollow----up up up up mtg GIPmtg GIPmtg GIPmtg GIP 6 12 6 24242424
FollowFollowFollowFollow----up up up up mtg GCDPmtg GCDPmtg GCDPmtg GCDP 12 8 5 25252525
Meetings GIPMeetings GIPMeetings GIPMeetings GIP 22 65 45 132132132132
Meetings GMeetings GMeetings GMeetings GCDPCDPCDPCDP 22 35 9 66666666
Number of initiatives Number of initiatives Number of initiatives Number of initiatives organized on LCsorganized on LCsorganized on LCsorganized on LCs
16 10 0 26262626
Number of LC2LC Number of LC2LC Number of LC2LC Number of LC2LC 1 1 0 2222
MC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOneMC PlusOne
14 AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10
cocococo----operations setoperations setoperations setoperations set
Number of LC2MC Number of LC2MC Number of LC2MC Number of LC2MC cocococo----operations setoperations setoperations setoperations set
1 0 0 1111
Number of initiatives Number of initiatives Number of initiatives Number of initiatives organized for interns:organized for interns:organized for interns:organized for interns:
29 13 10 52525252
Number of networking Number of networking Number of networking Number of networking events attendedevents attendedevents attendedevents attended
2 0 0 2222
In the end I would like to highlight some GCPs from individualGCPs from individualGCPs from individualGCPs from individual LCs which I gathered during
individual meetings with LCs:
LC BratislavaLC BratislavaLC BratislavaLC Bratislava has developed tracking tool for management of teams and as well tracking tool of
legislation process mainly for corporate sector. For more information contact Matus Braun (LC
VP Corporate).
LC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius UniversityLC Comenius University was the fastest LC in matching of GCDP. How are they doing it? If you
have problems with matching of GCDP or want to know more contact Nada Khafajová (LC VP
ICX).
LC BLC BLC BLC Banska Bystricaanska Bystricaanska Bystricaanska Bystrica has the strongest MDM and what is more, they organized for new sellers
initiative Negotiations Meetings where they gave space for newies to experience the simulation
of the meeting with one of the experience sellers on LC and thus see the sales skills of individual
members and gaps in their knowledge. To find out more, how the MDM works and about the
initiative, contact Vlado Blazek (LC VP ICX).
LC NitraLC NitraLC NitraLC Nitra created 1 new project Paint your future! and one more initiative Ubytuj stážistu to
find free accommodation for interns coming for GCDP. If you want to know more, approach
Mata Trepakova (LC VP ICX).
TTTThat’shat’shat’shat’s it from our side! We hope you found it from our side! We hope you found it from our side! We hope you found it from our side! We hope you found in this report in this report in this report in this report all all all all necessarynecessarynecessarynecessary
information for youinformation for youinformation for youinformation for you and your LC.and your LC.and your LC.and your LC.
Katka & ZuskaKatka & ZuskaKatka & ZuskaKatka & Zuska