Post on 16-Jan-2016
transcript
Recycling Tear Off Asphalt Shingles:
Best Practices Guide
October 11, 2007
A presentation
at the
3rd Asphalt Shingles
Recycling ForumOn Friday,
November 2, 2007
In Chicago
Acknowledgments• U.S. EPA staff:
Julie Gevrenov Paul Ruesch
• Bill Turley, CMRA
• Deb Haugen
• Innovative Waste Consulting Services: Dr. Tim Townsend Jon Powell, et . al.
Acknowledgments(Case studies)
• Sean Anestis, Roof Top Recycling
• Ken Snow, Recycle America Enterprises
• John Adelman, Commercial Paving & Recycling Systems
• Ron Sines, PJ Keating
Acknowledgements (Additional case studies, resources, and peer reviwer*)
• Dusty Ordorff, Bituminous Roadways
• Jim Omann, Omann Brothers
• Roger Brown, Pace Construction **
• Joe Schroer, MoDOT *
• Mn/DOT
• NAPA
BPG Peer Reviewers• John Adelman
Commercial Paving & Recycling CorporationScarborough, ME
• U.S. EPA Staff: Dr. Kimberly Cochran Truett DeGeare and David Carver Julie Gevrenov Paul Ruesch
BPG Peer Reviewers(continued)
• Gary DavisRecycling & Processing Equipment, Inc.Peru, IN
• Charles FandaleFlorida Shingle Recycling, LLCBradenton, FL
• Dr. Jenna JambeckRecycled Materials Resource Center (RMRC)Durham, NH
• Jenna KundeWasteCap Wisconsin, Inc.Milwaukee, WI
We welcomeyour continued comments!
BP#1: Recyclers handling tear – off
shingles should carefully plan and implement a supply quality assurance / quality control
(QA/QC) system.
BP#2: Tear – off shingle recyclers should
optimize their operations to produce a RAS product that meets or exceeds specifications of their
end markets.
BP#3: Tear – off shingle recyclers should
develop a comprehensive marketing plan based on multiple outlets.
“Supply” BP’s
1.1 Written specification
1.2 Clean tear-off scrap only
1.3 Must be free of ACM
1.5 Certification and sorting
“Supply” BP’s(continued)
1.6 Sort shingles from non-shingle debris
1.8 No hazardous waste permitted.
If found, charge back to supplier.
“Supply” BP’s(continued)
1.12 Must follow NESHAP:
* Asbestos management plans
* No ACM
1.13 Consider restricting initial supply to
“non-regulated facilities”
1.14 Written, signed certification
“Supply” BP’s(continued)
1.18 Each load must be inspected
1.19 Mutually acceptable asbestos testing
plan
1.20 Initial asbestos lab data should
establish “baseline” (* See Appendix D)
1.21 Random and unannounced testing for
ongoing sampling procedure
“Processing” BP’s
2.1 Meet or exceed market specifications
Maximize TPH and capacity
2.3 Elevated sort line
2.5 Agency inspections
2.6 Maximize protection of worker health
and safety
“Processing” BP’s(continued)
2.9 Provide workers with best available
information about asbestos risks
2.10 Dust control plan
2.11 Water
2.12 Dust control devices on grinders
and other processing equipment(e.g., loaders should be equipped with
enclosed, air conditioned cabs)
“Processing” BP’s(continued)
2.13 Standard protective clothing and
personal safety equipment
2.15 Invite OSHA staff to visit / inspect
“Marketing” BP’s
3.1 Short-term and long-term marketing
plans
3.2 Guarantee RAS to be:
a) Asbestos free
b) Nail free
c) In specified mix ratios
“Marketing” BP’s(continued)
3.3 Internal sampling and testing as part of
larger QA/QC program
3.4 Data feedback from customers
3.6 State DOT and academic institutions
may wish to consider additional testing
“Marketing” BP’s(continued)
3.7 Recyclers should advocate for state and
local government owner / agencies
to use “affirmative, environmentally
preferable procurement” policies
that give preference for RAS - derived HMA.
CMRA’s Web Site
Dan KrivitDKA
DKrivit@bitstream.net
651-489-4990