Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure

Case Studies

Value Capture

Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure Stephen Engblom Senior Vice President Global Director, Cities stephen.engblom@aecom.com Twitter: @stephengblom Sydney, March 15, 2017

Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure

Case Studies • San Francisco, CA • Brooklyn, New York City, NY

Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure

Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure

Engineering Performance

Social Benefit

Environmental Benefit Financial

Cost

Economic development / employment Air quality Water quality Community development Natural Resources

TBL Model

Triple Bottom Line Approach : Balancing the Value Proposition

Traditional Emphasis

Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure

4

Resiliency tools, Triple Bottom Line Approach

Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure

Triple Bottom Line Primary Objectives 1. To inform and support the analytical process

for developing alternatives by considering social and environmental components in the process alongside performance and economic considerations

2. To provide decision-making support for project leaders; and

3. To increase project selection transparency and facilitate a reporting-out of expected project benefits.

4. Creates a comparative database of projects.

5

Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure

TBL follows a basic set of principles

6

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission: Storm Sewer Improvement Program, San Francisco Balance of green and grey infrastructure approaches and innovative design.

Case Studies

$3.5B USD

Cost of public elements over

20 years

Health and Well Being HW1 Food Exposure HW2 Heat Island HW3 Access to Open Space / Recreation HW4 Community Stablization HW5 Local Employment Opportunities

Economy and Society ES1 Community Cohesion ES2 Safe Routes ES3 Local Private Investment ES4 Leverage City Resources ES5 Cost Effectiveness ES6 Long term Sustainability

Infrastructure and Environment IE1 Resource Recovery IE2 Water Quality IE3 Resilient and Responsive to Natural Disasters IE4 Investment in Habitat

Leadership and Strategy LS1 Community Preparedness LS2 Community Education

Significantly positive Positive Neutral Negative Significantly negative Unknown / TBD / NA

$

LS1

LS2

LS3 HW1

HW2

HW3

HW4

HW5

ES1

ES2

ES3

ES4

ES5 ES6 IE1

IE2

IE3

IE4 $

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission: Storm Sewer Improvement Program Soundness of Approach - Proposed Process: Measurement of Co-benefits Triple Bottom Line: Equity, Economy and Environment

Case Studies

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

NYC has a housing crisis

Case Studies

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

NYC’s vacancy rate is 3.45%

Case Studies

city to be?

Case Studies

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

The majority of NYC’s residents are rent burdened.

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

NYC needs more jobs

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

Flooding

Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure NEW JERSEY

G O VERNOR ISLAND

SUNSET PARK

RED HOOK

BROOKLYN S

132 ACRES

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

2000 0 4000 N

9 New Subway

BQX

Subway Line

Planned Ferry Stop Ferry Route

F D R N G

9 New subway extension to Red Hook

$

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

Alternatives to a wall

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

Protecting the edge

$

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

Triple Bottom Line Model

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

Weighing costs and benefits

N

KEY

ENVIRONMENTAL E1 GHG Emissions Per Capita E2 Water Quality E3 Connected Habitat E4 Green Coastal Protection E5 Tree Coverage

SOCIAL S1 Community Resiliency S2 Employment S3 Parks Per Capita S4 Pedestrian & Bicycle Environment S5 Accessible Waterfront S6 Access to Jobs by Transit S7 Housing Growth S8 A

FINANCIAL F1 Cost to Revenue Gap F2 New Tax Revenue

GROWTH EQUITY

RESILIENCY SUSTAINABILITY N

E1 GHG Emissions Per Capita E2 Water Quality E3 Connected Habitat E5 Tree Coverage

E4 Green Coastal Protection S1 Community Resiliency

S3 Parks Per Capita S4 Pedestrian & Bicycle Environment S5 Accessible Waterfront S6 Access to Jobs by Transit S8 A

F1 Cost to Revenue Gap F2 New Tax Revenue S2 Employment S7 Housing Growth

What do you

city to be?

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

TBL Goals tied to guiding principles

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

Red Hook today

city to be?

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

Infill development

city to be?

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

Infill development

25Mft2

What do you want your city to be?

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

25Mft2

35Mft2

What do you want your city to be?

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

What do you want your city to be?

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

35Mft2

45Mft2

What do you want your city to be?

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

What do you want your city to be?

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

45Mft2

Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC

Case Studies

Comparing outcomes

Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure

Case Studies

Value Capture

Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure Stephen Engblom Senior Vice President Global Director, Cities stephen.engblom@aecom.com Twitter: @stephengblom Sydney, March 15, 2017