1 Managing the Gemini Project Matt Mountain - Director Jim Oschmann -Project Manager Background Project Management approach Results Final Thoughts National Science Board Committee on Programs & Plans 15 th November, 2001
Transcript
Slide 1
1 Managing the Gemini Project Matt Mountain - Director Jim
Oschmann -Project Manager Background Project Management approach
Results Final Thoughts National Science Board Committee on Programs
& Plans 15 th November, 2001
Slide 2
2 Jim Oschmann Experience 20 years experience working in optics
industries Defense R&D in High Energy Lasers, Laser
Communications, Laser Radar & IR systems TRW, Hughes, Sensis
Corp (Optical Systems Engineer and Systems Engineer) Commercial
Optical Industrial experience Phase Shift Technology (Manager of
Optical Systems) With Gemini for nine years Systems Engineer in
1992 Acting Project Manager 1993 Systems Engineering Manager
1994-1997 Project Manager 1998 to present Optical Systems Systems
Engineering Project Management Education in Optical Sciences
University of Rochester and University of Arizona
Slide 3
3 The Gemini Scientific Mission The main themes of the science
programs are concerned with observing and understanding the origins
and evolution of stars and planetary systems, of galaxies, and of
the Universe itself. The telescopes will be used to observe objects
ranging in distance from within own our Solar System to within 10%
of the observable horizon of the Universe Gemini Science
Requirements, 1991
Slide 4
4 International Agreement and Gemini Board defined Gemini
Construction Two 8m telescopes, on Mauna Kea and Cerro Pachon
Superb image quality, infrared optimized configuration Initial
instrument complement Operations Operations infrastructure at Hilo
and La Serena Build up and training of operations staff Enable and
support community access and exploitation of the Gemini telescopes
to undertake forefront astrophysical research Development On-going
Instrumentation Program Upgrades and enhancements of existing
instruments Facilities development Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics
Detector development Internet-II infrastructure
Slide 5
5 Gemini Schedule 19922002 Construction Operations Development
$184M 1997 Science Requirements & Implementation Plan accepted
International Agreement signed Australia joins$8M Telescope first
light $68M $31M
Slide 6
6 Site Construction
Slide 7
7 Completed Telescopes
Slide 8
8 Gemini Construction Schedule 1991Initial Hiring of Central
Project Team - Concept Design Begins 1992Primary Mirror Blanks
Procured (long lead item) 1993International Agreement Signed
1994Construction Activities Begin (polishing, enclosure, & site
construction) 1995Telescope Structures Contract 1996 Mauna Kea
& Cerro Pachon Foundations Complete 1997 First Primary Mirror
Completed & Telescope Structure Delivered to GN 1998 Telescope
Installed with Primary Mirror (GN), Telescope Structure Delivered
to GS, GS Primary Mirror Completed 1999 Engineering First Light on
Gemini North 2000Initial Science Observations from Gemini North
Engineering First Light on Gemini South 2001Initial Science
Observations from Gemini South 2002Construction Close-out Science
Observing and Instrument Commissioning
Slide 9
9 Construction Project Australia Joins +$9.2M
Slide 10
10 Both Gemini Telescopes Completed Mauna Kea, Hawaii and on
Cerro Pachon, Chile Gemini North - Mauna KeaGemini South - Cerro
Pachon Budget = $184M + $0M - $0.3M Schedule - 3 months Both
Observatories in limited science observations punch list
construction and commissioning activities in full swing
Slide 11
11 Features of the Gemini Construction Project AURA Managed
Dedicated division set up to concentrate on Gemini Oversight
committee including senior engineering manager input JPL Chief
Engineer Lockheed Martin Engineering Manager Carried out as one
unified project Two construction sites Limited initial instrument
complement Partner funding provided when required NSF worked with
partners to ensure project not limited by cash flow concerns
Partners took responsibility timely funding for transition to
operations and for continued development
Slide 12
12 Features of the Gemini Construction Project Science
objectives defined and prioritized Cost fixed, so constant tension
built into process Effort to get most for the money Central single
management of effort Contingency funds managed centrally Product
Oriented Work Breakdown Organization matches WBS Subcontractors
managed rigorously Project Scientist part of design team Partner
with Project Management Instrument Management was the exception
Initially had more control at the partner level
Slide 13
13 Gemini Construction Project Organization
Slide 14
14 Design Process Establish science requirements Perform
conceptual design and analysis Design requirements Flow down
through error budgeting process System breakdown and major
interfaces defined Initial integration plan established early
Schedule reworked from bottom up Trades in concepts Cost, risk, and
science trades Hard choices made early Long lead items designed and
procured early Minimizing schedule risk Focuses remaining design
effort
Slide 15
15 Systems and subsystem reviews Science and engineering
reviews Major cost trades performed early Systems reviews Science
representatives from all partners High level plan and trades
presented and discussed Conceptual, preliminary, and critical
design reviews for major subsystems Mix of internal and external
reviewers Brought in specialists as required Several science
working groups for specific reviews and trades Vendor reviews in
some cases
Slide 16
16 Cost Estimates Cost estimates reviewed consistent with
reviews Bottoms up cost estimates Drove major trades and risks
Trade of budget across WBS to solve problems Systems Engineering
involvement Cost, schedule and technical trades Cost progress
reviewed on monthly basis Problems identified early Competitive
bidding where possible Some partner work altered to full
international bidding Goal was producing the most science for the
money Major exception was instrumentation Partners took on cost
risk for this freedom Instrument costs ring-fenced
Slide 17
17 Schedule Schedule was structured from bottoms up Driven by
Systems Engineering Sub system organization Integration & Test
planning for flow of assembly Schedule Options, trades, feedback
into Integration & Test planning Major elements followed WBS
Progress reviewed monthly along with budget
Slide 18
18 Development of systems plan: Defining Interfaces Gemini
Example: Science Instruments Internal Interfaces
Slide 19
19 System I&T Plan
Slide 20
20 Schedule based upon flow diagram Gemini overall example
(details too numerous to present)
Slide 21
21 Design Smooth Transition to Operations (Gemini Example)
Slide 22
22 Contingency Planning A Key to Risk mitigation Hold budget in
project office for contingency (