Date post: | 16-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | kenneth-mcbride |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
SLIDE PRESENTATION
BUILDING ETHICAL INSTITUTIONS
THE EXPERIENCE OF THE LAGOS STATE JUDICIARY
Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, SAN
2
INTRODUCTION
• One of the worst consequences of Military Rule is usually the deliberate decimation or undermining of the institutions of civil governance. Administration of Justice usually suffers most.
• Nigeria had been under Military rule for about 30 years since 1967. (with a break of 4 years of civil rule1975-79).
• Lagos State, Nigeria’s commercial nerve centre, and most populous State, had to confront this aftermath of Military rule – widespread judicial corruption and inefficiency and loss of public confidence in the administration of justice system.
3
THE JUDICIARY
The High Court of Lagos State:
• By far the largest judiciary; currently 52 high courts
• 109 Magistrates
• Customary courts in local governments
4
High Court of Lagos State: Case load
Year Court Fresh cases filed
Pending cases
1999 Lagos 10,226 40,000
2000 Lagos 9,969 23,197
5
Perceptions on corruptionA Survey of Perceptions of lawyers on
corruption in the administration of Justice(conducted in 2000 by the Lagos State Ministry of
Justice)
Sample 100 LawyersHighlights
99% agree there is corruption in Lagos Judiciary.
80% of lawyers between 11 and 15 years at the bar agree that the prevalence of corruption is either high or very high.
6
Highlights continued90% of lawyers agree that between
judges, magistrates, lawyers, registry personnel and bailiffs, the level of corruption is highest in the magistracy.
Over 65% of lawyers between of 11 and 15 years at the bar believe that confidence in the judiciary is very low.
7
WHY IS CORRUPTION SO PERVASIVE?
• Corruption is systemic• No consequence• Every institution or power used for rent-seeking.• High social toleration level/ culture.• Poor remuneration – Awesome power
Judicial Corruption: The misuse of Judicial office or power for private
gain
““It’s absurd to give men power and then It’s absurd to give men power and then require them to live in penury”require them to live in penury”
- Robert Clive- Robert Clive
8
Types of Corrupt Practices• Financial & other inducements• Group/Ethnic loyalties.Main targets are Judges, Magistrates, Baillifs, Clerical Staff
Judges & Magistrates: • Early hearing• Allowing delays • Favourable outcome• Assailable judgments even when against corrupter
Bailiffs:• To ensure service or non-service of processes.• To ensure enforcement of judgments. • Favourable purchase of attached goods
Clerical Staff:• Quick filing of processes• Ensuring quick movement of files
9
Identified Causes in surveys• Long delays in trial process (allowing for
corrupt use of discretion).
• Poor remuneration. An honest judge could not reasonably expect to buy or build a home
• Winner-takes-all outcome litigation.
• Low reportability of corrupt practices and no sanctions when reported.
• Cultural Problems?• Informality of relationships• High social toleration level for corruption (no
consequences)
10
Delays in Trial ProcessMay 1999• Pending cases at the High Court – 30,000• Long delays in trial process
Type of case Trial Time
Land Matters 7 – 8 years
Personal Matters 3 – 4 years
Commercial Cases 3 – 5 years
Family Cases 2 – 5 years
Administrative processes of instituting a case from
filing to assignment to a judge takes at least 6 weeks.
The overall average for cases is 4.25years. These
figures assumed that there would be no
interlocutory appeals which could drag the process
on for an additional 50% of the stipulated periods.
11
Outmoded Procedure
• Form emphasized over substance.
• No judicial control over proceedings
• Led to extensive dilatory tactics
• Poor costs regime
• No limit interlocutory appeals
12
Remuneration
• In 1991• Judges of the High Court:
Salary – just over $300 (US Dollars) per monthCarOfficial
• Magistrates Salary - $50 (US Dollars) a monthNo carNo official quarters.
13
THE REFORM INITIATIVES1. Reversing Delays
2. Alternative Dispute Resolution
• The Multi Door Court House
• The Mediation Centres
3. Remuneration
4. Detection/Sanctions
5. Introduction of Code of Conduct for Judges
6. New Culture – New Values
14
1. Reversing Delays:
• In 2001 26 Judges were appointed.
• A new appointment procedure, exams and interviews. Emphasis on merit.
• New Rules• Case Management• Front Loading• Costs Regime• Limited adjournments
• Creation of Specialist Divisions• Criminal Division
15
• Creation of Specialist Divisions continued
• Commercial Division• Family Division• Land Division• General Civil Division etc.
• Electronic Recording Machines• Computerisation
16
2. Alternative Dispute Resolution -Multi Door Court House
Mediation Centres
• Antidote to winner-takes-all
&
Delays
17
Remuneration – since 1999
• Judges Salary and - $3,500 US Dollars per
running cost month and other benefits.- Car and driver.
House - in choice low density location, given gratis.
Shares - worth about $20,000 (US Dollars)
Land - in choice low density location.
• Magistrates Entry level salary- $300 dollars per month up to
$1,000 dollars Car - given gratis. Land
18
• Creation of Specialist Divisions
continued
• Commercial Division
• Family Division
• Land Division
• General Civil Division etc.
• Electronic Recording Machines
• Computerisation
19
4. Detection• 40% of Lawyers not inclined to report corrupt
judicial officers because believe no action will be taken.
• 53% of Lawyers between 1 and 5 years at the bar will not report corruption for fear of victimization.
Antecedents
• No sanction of Magistrates prior to 1999
• No sanction of Judges prior to 1999
20
5. Sanctions
• Once reported any complaint of corruption will be processed up to the National Judicial Council automatically.
• 21 Magistrates terminated.
• 3 Judges retired.
21
New Culture – New Values
• Different criteria for appointment of Judges & Magistrates
• Merit
• Examinations
• Performance Evaluation
22
Some Results…
1. Pending cases
1999 30,000
2002 13,802
2003 5,227
2. No reports of corruption since 2002.
3. Greater corporate focus in Judicial integrity (by peer influence).
23
2008 perception Survey Results On how the lawyers surveyed rate public confidence in the judiciary –• Very good – 32%• Requires improvement – 45% • Poor – Only 5 % • Very poor - Only 1 %
On the performance of the Lagos State Judiciary - • Excellent – 4 % • Very good 45% • Requires improvement • Poor – 2%• Poor – 1 %
24
Challenges
• Ensuring sustainability of reforms (executive commitment).
• Computerisation (sluggish acceptance).
• Retraining of staff and continuing Education.
• Use of Code of Conduct not well monitored.
• No reforms in the appellate court system.