Date post: | 03-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | posy-simon |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 2 times |
1
Some new equations presented at NCSU 2011-06-28
Peter Lohmander
2
( ),...
0
max ( ( ),...) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )x t
x t m t x t F t B t P t dt
0dm
dt ?
Subject to dynamic equations and constraints.
( ) 1m t m ?
In general, (.) Is strictly concave, with a maximumthat gives the ”ideal climate”.
3
( ),...
0
max ( ( ),...) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )x t
x t m t x t F t B t P t dt
0dm
dt ?
( ) 1m t m ?
If we replace the nonlinear objective function by a linear objective funcion, this could lead to extreme variations and make sustainability impossible.
4
_ ( )x Th
T
With “complete rotation forestry”:
5
In case of continuous harvesting:
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
1
h t E t k
E t k h t
E k h
dE
dh
6
In general:
__dF
k hdt
_
( ) (0)dF
F Fdt
7
_
( ) (0)F F h k
_
( )dF
d h
_ _
_ _
d x d Ffor T
d h d h
8
_
_
_
_
lim 0
d x
d h
d F
d h
9
Focus on replacing coal by biomass! The carbon stored in the forest is almost irrelevant compared to the substitution effect in the long run.
_
_
_
_
lim 0
d x
d h
d F
d h
10
Forestry with maximum harvest in relation to forestry with maximum carbon in the forest
11
Derivation of a “carbon optimal” harvest rule using a simple functional form that can be generalized.
2( )x t a bt ct 2_ a bt ct
ht
_1h at b ct
12
_
2
_2
32
0
2 0
d hat c
dt
d hat
dt
13
_
2
2
*
0d h
at cdt
at
c
at t
c
14
*
*
_*
_*
_*
( )
( ) 2
( )
( )
( ) 2
a ax t a b c
c c
ax t a b
c
a ah t b c
cac
h t ac b ac
h t ac b
15
Numerical example:
2( )x t a bt ct 2( ) 40 10 0.1x t t t
16
First: Let us maximize the average harvest level based on rotation
forestry:
* at
c
* 40400 20
0.1t
17
* * * 2
* 2
*
*
( ) ( )
( ) 40 10(20) (20)
( ) 40 200 0.1(400)
( ) 120
x t a bt c t
x t c
x t
x t
18
_* *
*
_*
_*
_*
( )
40( ) 10 0.1(20)
20
( ) 2 10 2
( ) 6
ah t b ct
t
h t
h t
h t
19
Second: Let us maximize the stock level of the forest:
2( )x t a bt ct 2( ) 40 10 0.1x t t t
20
2
2
2 0
2 0
0 2
1050
2 0.2
dxb ct
dt
d xc
dtdx
b ctdt
bt
c
21
( ) 40 10(50) 0.1(2500)
( ) 40 500 250
( ) 210
x t
x t
x t
_ 210( ) 4.2
50h t
22
Optimal combination of carbon storage and timber production:- Joint production and rational adaption to different conditions
1 2( ) ( )Z w x w x
23
23( ) 3
4x x x
24
2
2
3( ) 3
44 1
( )3 9
x x x
x x x
25
Numerical example:
1 2
2 21 2
( ) ( )
3 4 13
4 3 9
Z w x w x
Z w x x w x x
26
Optimal forest management decision rule with two objectives:
1 2
2
1 22
3 4 23 0
2 3 9
6 20
4 9
dZw x w x
dx
d Zw w
dx
27
* *1 1 2 2
*1 2 1 2
1 2*
1 2
0
3 4 23 0
2 3 94 3 2
33 2 9
43
33 22 9
dZ
dx
w w x w w x
w w w w x
w wx
w w
28
1 2*
1 2
43
33 22 9
w wx
w w
29
• How should forestry be adapted to roundwood net price changes and carbon storage subsidy changes?
• (OR: Why should you not manage all forest stands in exacctly the same way?)
1 2
3 4 23 0
2 3 9
dZw x w x
dx
2* * *
1 2 2
3 4 23 0
2 3 9
dZ d Zd x dw x dw dx
dx dx
30
1 2*
1 2
43
33 22 9
w wx
w w
31
* 1 2 1 2
21
1 2
3 2 4 33 3
2 9 3 2
3 22 9
w w w wdx
dww w
* 2
21
1 2
*
21
43
3 22 9
0 0
wdx
dww w
dxfor w
dw
32
* 1 2 1 2
22
1 2
* 1
22
1 2
*
12
4 3 2 4 23
3 2 9 3 9
3 22 9
43
3 22 9
0 0
w w w wdx
dww w
wdx
dww w
dxfor w
dw
33
The End