1

US Cost & Schedule Summary

W. R. EdwardsUS Project Manager

CD-2/3a ReviewJanuary 8, 2008

BNL

2

Outline

US Baseline Cost Overview Contingency Analysis Comparison of CD-1 vs CD-2 Costs DOE & Project Funding Profiles Construction Schedule & Major Milestone

Overview Critical path analysis Long-Lead Items for CD-3a Summary

3

WBS & Experiment Scope

1.1 Antineutrino Detector (AD) 1.2 Muon System 1.3 Calibration and Monitoring Systems 1.4 Electronics & Online 1.5 Offline Hardware & Software 1.6 Conventional Construction and Equipment 1.7 Installation and Test 1.8 System Integration 1.9 Photomultiplier Systems New WBS item 1.10 Project Management

4

Notes:

TPC is in At Year (AY) US $ - escalated at 3% per year in the Resource Loaded Schedule

Cost Books are in Base Year FY08 US $ - unescalated

Be aware of this subtle difference when reviewing all the numbers.

It amounts to a difference of less than $300K for the total Project

I will attempt to point this variation out throughout my talk(s)

5

US Cost - TPC

WBS Task Description Base Cont. Cont. TPC$ % $ $

1 Daya Bay Project (TEC + OPC) $25,723,780 32.2% $8,276,220 $34,000,000

1.1 Antineutrino Detector $8,285,277 31.3% $2,596,562 $10,881,839

1.2 Muon System $2,559,603 34.2% $876,524 $3,436,127

1.3 Calibration & Monitoring $2,044,083 32.0% $654,107 $2,698,190

1.4 Electronics & Online $215,183 18.3% $39,431 $254,615

1.5 Offline $1,883,409 27.2% $512,373 $2,395,783

1.6 Civil Construction $0 0.0% $0 $0

1.7 Installation Planning and Support $2,513,158 26.4% $662,630 $3,175,788

1.8 System Integration $750,967 20.6% $154,843 $905,810

1.9 PMT Systems $3,801,212 31.6% $1,202,422 $5,003,635

1.10 Project Management $3,670,887 43.0% $1,577,327 $5,248,214

Note: TPC is in AY US $ - Escalated

6

Contingency Analysis

1.1 Antineutrino Detector (TEC + OPC) $8,285,277 31.3% $2,596,562 $10,881,8391.1.1 Detector Tank $0 0% $01.1.2 Acrylic Vessels $522,863 16% $83,6581.1.3 Gd-LS Production $1,106,241 32% $349,4231.1.4 PMT AD Mechanical Systems $1,535,322 31% $479,7641.1.5 System for Measuring Physical Detector Properties $386,342 16% $61,8151.1.6 Lifting & Transport $0 0% $01.1.7 Materials Compatibility and Low BacCground counting $157,532 36% $56,7121.1.8 Other AD Systems $424,153 40% $168,9371.1.9 AD Integration $120,050 34% $40,8171.1.10 AD Assembly&Installation $594,770 34% $202,2221.1.11 Subsystem Management $416,311 16% $65,4051.1.12 Univ of Wisconsin Milestone Payments $3,021,693 36% $1,087,809

1.2 Muon System (TEC + OPC) $2,559,603 34.2% $876,524 $3,436,1271.2.1 Resistive Plate Chambers $362,043 43% $155,8201.2.2 PMT Supports $341,590 33% $112,6271.2.3 Oxygen Difficiency Hazard System $0 0% $01.2.4 Pool Liner $161,887 47% $75,6031.2.5 Water System $43,249 18% $7,6541.2.6 Subsystem Management $276,513 16% $44,2421.2.7 Muon PMT calibration system $43,282 47% $20,5271.2.8 Reflectors for AD's $36,330 55% $20,1341.2.9 Pool cover $128,609 69% $89,0751.2.10 Princeton Milestone Payments $354,890 44% $156,1521.2.11 RPI Milestone Payments $811,210 24% $194,690

Note: All numbers in AY US $ - Escalated

7

Contingency Analysis

1.8 System Integration (TEC + OPC) $750,967 20.6% $154,843 $905,8101.8.1 Mechanical Systems Integration $99,952 32% $31,9841.8.2 Electrical Systems Integration $19,038 28% $5,3311.8.3 Experimental Assembly $57,561 28% $16,1171.8.4 Safety Systems Integration $203,005 28% $56,8411.8.5 Subsystem Mangement $371,413 12% $44,570

1.9 PMT Systems (TEC + OPC) $3,801,212 31.6% $1,202,422 $5,003,6351.9.1 deisgn of cable penetration $0 0% $01.9.2 Signal/HV Decouplers - Baseline Restoration Board $430,079 48% $206,4381.9.3 PMTs, Bases, HV & Testing $778,802 48% $373,8251.9.4 UC Berkeley Milestone Payments $2,592,332 24% $622,160

1.10 Project Management (TEC + OPC) $3,670,887 43.0% $1,577,327 $5,248,2141.10.1 LBNL Project Management $2,063,076 23% $482,6711.10.2 BNL Project Management $702,530 28% $199,0731.10.3 Pre-Ops Commissioning $305,281 28% $85,4791.10.4 Other Project Expences & Contingency (see below) 600,000$ 135% 810,105$

Line 1.10.4 above is to cover additional expences & contingency such as -

Potential Facility Capital Cost of Money expence (Universities), US supplied 3m Acrylic Vessel lids or entire 3m vessel assembly, installation delays due to weather or civil construction, repeal ofscope deletions, rescope of LS testing equipment, additional required safety equipment, etc.

8

Comparison of CD-1 vs CD-2 Costs

The values below are in FY07 US$ - UNESCALATED The values below are in FY08 US$ - UNESCALATED

WBS Description CD-1 Cost WBS CD-2/3a Description CD-2/3a ∆ Cost

1 Daya Bay Project 23,999,128 1 Daya Bay Project 25,434,001 (1,434,873)1.1 Antineutrino Detectors 8,455,791 1.1 Antineutrino Detector 8,211,745 244,0461.2 Muon System 3,700,295 1.2 Muon System 2,545,604 1,154,6901.3 Calibration and Monitoring 1,939,967 1.3 Calibration & Monitoring 2,035,424 (95,457)1.4 Electronics and Online 212,876 1.4 Electronics & Online 214,364 (1,488)1.5 Offline 1,364,574 1.5 Offline 1,871,540 (506,966)1.6 Conventional Construction & Equipment - 1.6 Civil Construction - 01.7 Installation and Test 1,961,186 1.7 Intallation, Planning and Support 2,485,995 (524,809)1.8 System Integration 1,027,593 1.8 System Integration 737,711 289,882

- 1.9 PMT Systems 3,797,546 (3,797,546)1.9 Project Management 1,766,037 1.10 Project Management 3,534,073 (1,768,036)1.10 Other Project Costs (OPC) 3,570,809 3,570,809

OPC costs are not included in Subsystems at CD-1 OPC costs are subsumed in subsystems at CD-2/3aPMT's are included in AD and Muon Subsystems PMT's are broken out in WBS 1.93 year funding profile 4 year profile - additional management and administrative costs

(note: via forward funding from Universities, we've shortened this to 3.5 yrs)WBS 1.10 PM includes $905K in Univ FCCM, Pre-ops & other OPC costs

Note: These values are in FY07 & FY08 US $ - unescalated

9

Funding Profile -

DYB Funding vs Spending

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

35,000,000

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011

Cum TEC Funding Cum OPC Funding Cum OPC Spending Cum TEC Spending

10

Contingency by FY-

11

Schedule Overview -

12

Major Milestones Summary

Milestone Milestone Description Milestone Date Level (1 or 2)Number

Chinese Funding Secured March-07 L31 US CD-1 Review April-07 L12 Start Civil Construction October-07 L23 US CD-2/3a Review January-08 L14 Final Design Reviews of all Long Lead Items Completed January-08 L25 CD-3a Approval & Long Lead Contract Award March-08 L15a PMT Order Placed - long lead March-08 L25b AGV Transporter Order Placed - long lead April-08 L25c Acrylic Vessel Order Placed - long lead April-08 L26 US CD-3b Review Q3 FY08 L18 PMT #1-100 Arrive Dongguan University July-08 L2

10 1st 4m AV Pair Arrives at SAB December-08 L214 PMT Dry Run & Offline SW Integration Challenge January-09 L215 Begin Muon Veto Testing - DB Near Hall May-09 L218 1st AD Pair Filled (in LS Hall) July-09 L222 Begin Overall System Testing – DB Near Hall October-09 L223 DB Near Hall Physics Ready November-09 L227 US CD-4a Approval Request Q2 FY10 L130 Begin Overall System Testing – LA Near Hall May-10 L232 LA Near Hall Physics Ready June-10 L234 Begin Overall System Testing – Far Hall October-10 L235 Far Hall Physics Ready November-10 L236 US CD-4b Approval Request Q3 FY11 L1

13

Daya Bay Near Hall Critical Path

Install AD's and fill poolInstall calibration unitsDB Near Hall ready to take data

Filling hall ready for beneficial occ.Prepare filling hall liquid storage tanksMix all required LS in filling hallPrep filling hall for first filling operation

Fill DB near, install cover gas & sealMuon PMT system test in DB NearEmpty DB Near pool

4 weeks float

Install muon PMT’s, cables in supports Install muon PMT support modulesInstall tyvek sheeting on PMT frame

4 weeks floatPMT procurement, testing and prepAvailability of PMT's for muon systemInstall muon PMT’s, cables in supports

3 weeks floatDB Near Hall ready for beneficial occ.DB Near Hall prepped for installations

Fill first AD pair in filling hall

4 weeks float

1st pair steel & acrylic vessels at SABPrep SSV’s and install acrylic vesselsInstall PMT ladders & tank coversConnect PMT cables, debug & test (SAB)

Transporter delivered to SAB

4 weeks float

14

Ling Ao Near Hall Critical Path

LA Near Hall available for beneficial occ.LA Near Hall prepped for installationsInstall pool lining in LA Near HallInstall AD support structureInstall PMT support modules in poolInstall Tyvek sheeting on muon framesFill DB near, install cover gas & seal

3 weeks float

Install AD's and fill poolInstall calibration units

Checkout & commissioning of LA NearLA Near Hall ready to take data

LA Near Hall available for beneficial occ.Install RPC HV elements in LA Near HallInstall RPC supports in LA Near HallInstall RPC panels in LA Near HallTest RPC's in LA Near Hall

Muon PMT system test in LA NearEmpty LA Near Hall pool

Fill 2nd AD pair in filling hall

15

Far Hall Critical Path

5 weeks float

Fill 2nd AD pair for Far HallInstall 2nd AD pair in Far HallFill pool in Far HallInstall calibration unitsFar Hall ready to take data

Delivery of PMT mounts and ladders for Far Hall 2nd AD pairAssembly of PMT ladders for 2nd AD pair for Far HallInstallation of PMT ladders in 2nd AD pair for Far Hall

Far Hall available for beneficial occ.Install FAR hall pool liningInstall AD support in FAR HallInstall PMT support modules in poolInstall Tyvek sheeting on muon framesFill pool, install cover gas & seal

Muon PMT system test in Far HallEmpty LA Near Hall pool

Fill 1st AD pair for Far Hall

16

Long Lead Items (CD-3a)

Highest to lowest $ value : Phototubes & bases (full spec & RFP exists) Acrylic Vessels (PDR done; FDR in Dec) Transporter (full spec written) Hi-Resistivity Water System elements PMT High-Voltage System Teflon-lined ISO tank (filling Hall) Gd-LS production processing equipment Gd-Chloride, acids and Bis-MSB

17

Summary -

US scope well defined – international scope split complete – per MOU Detailed Deliverables List

US cost estimate is very mature – Basis of Estimate is well detailed

Integrated and resource loaded Project Schedule is complete - 1470 lines

Budget is sufficient; very adequate contingency – problem has been the funds profile, especially FY08

University Agreements have made it possible to begin experiment operations early (FY10)

Project Cost and Schedule is ready to be baselined

18

Backup slides