Date post: | 22-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | edward-stevenson |
View: | 357 times |
Download: | 20 times |
15-1
Chapter 15
Consumer Behavior,Consumer Behavior,Eighth EditionEighth Edition
SCHIFFMAN & KANUK
The Consumer’s Decision-Making Process
15-2
Opinion Leadership
The process by which one person (the opinion leader)
informally influences the consumption
actions or attitudes of others who may be opinion seekers or opinion recipients.
15-3
What is Opinion Leadership?
Opinion Leader
Opinion Receiver
Opinion Seeker
15-4
Examples of Opinion Leadership
• During a coffee break, a co-worker talks about the movie he saw last night and recommends seeing it.
• A person shows a friend photographs of his recent Australian Outback vacation and the friend suggests that using a polarizing filter might produce better pictures.
15-5
Special Issues• Opinion leaders are four times more likely to be
asked about political issues, three times more likely to be asked about computers or investments, and twice as likely to be asked about restaurants
• Information seekers seek a “strong-tie” source when they know little about a topic, and “weak-tie” sources when they have some knowledge
15-6
Chat Rooms and Opinion Leadership
15-7
Reasons for the Effectiveness of Opinion Leadership
• Credibility• Positive and Negative Product
Information• Information and Advice• Opinion Leadership Is Category-
Specific• Opinion Leadership Is a Two-way
Street
15-8
Viral Marketing• Buzz Marketing
• Wildfire Marketing
• Avalanche Marketing
These terms describe any strategy that encourages individuals to pass on a
marketing message to others;The marriage of email and word-of-mouth
communication
15-9
Yahoo’s Buzz Index
15-10
Figure 15.1 Factors Leading to Negative Word-of-Mouth Behavior
Individual Factors
Product Involvement
Situational Factors
Attitudinal Factors
NegativeWOM
Likelihoodof
Repurchase-
+
+
+
+
15-11
Figure 15.2 Word-of-Mouth in Action
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Restaurants
Computer
Consumer Electronics
Travel
Automotive
Financial Services% of respondentsthat used a referral to make oneof these purchases over the past year
15-12
Motivations Behind Opinion Leadership
• The Needs of Opinion Leaders
• The Needs of Opinion Receivers
• Purchase Pals
• Surrogate Buyers versus Opinion Leaders
15-13
The Needs of Opinion Leaders
• Self involvement• Social involvement• Product involvement• Message involvement
15-14
The Needs of Opinion Receivers
• New-product or new usage information• Reduction of perceived risk• Reduction of search time• Receiving the approval of the opinion
leader
15-15
Table 15.3 A Comparison of Motivations(Excerpts)
OPINION LEADERS OPINION RECEIVERS
SELF-IMPROVEMENT MOTIVATIONS
• Reduce post-purchase uncertainty or dissonance
• Gain attention or status• Assert superiority and expertise• Feel like an adventurer
• Reduce the risk of making a purchase commitment
• Reduce search time
PRODUCT-INVOLVEMENT MOTIVATIONS
• Express satisfaction or dissatisfaction with a product or service
• Learn what products are new in the marketplace
• Learn how to use or consume a product
15-16
Table 15.4 Key Differences Between Opinion Leaders and Surrogate Buyers
OPINION LEADER 1. Informal relationship with end-users 2. Information exchange occurs in the context of a casual interaction 3. Homophilous (to a certain extent) to end-users 4. Does not get paid for advice 5. Usually socially more active than end-users 6. Accountability limited regarding the outcome of advice 7. As accountability limited, rigor in search and screening of alternatives
low 8. Likely to have used the product personally 9. More than one can be consulted before making a final decision10. Same person can be an opinion leader for a variety of related product
categories
15-17
Table 15.4 Key DifferencesSURROGATE BUYER 1. Formal relationship; occupation-related status 2. Information exchange in the form of formal instructions/advice 3. Heterophilus to end users (that is, is the source of power) 4. Usually hired, therefore gets paid 5. Not necessarily socially more active than end-users 6. High level of accountability 7. Search and screening of alternatives more rigorous 8. May not have used the product for personal consumption 9. Second opinion taken on rare occasions10. Usually specializes for a specific product/service category
15-18
Measurement of Opinion Leadership
• Self-Designating Method
• Sociometric Method• Key Informant Method• Objective Method
15-19
Table 15.5 Measuring Opinion Leadership
SELF-DESIGNATING METHOD
“Do you influence other people in their selection of products?”
Each respondent is asked a series of questions to determine the degree to which he or she perceives himself or herself to be an opinion leader.
OPINION LEADERSHIP OPINION LEADERSHIP MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT METHODMETHOD
SAMPLE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ASKEDQUESTIONS ASKED
DESCRIPTION OF METHODDESCRIPTION OF METHOD
SOCIOMETRIC METHOD
Members of a social system are asked to identify to whom they give advice and to whom they go for advice.
“Whom do you ask?”“Who asks you for info about that product category?”
15-20
Table 15.5 continued
OPINION OPINION LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT METHODMETHOD
SAMPLE SAMPLE QUESTIONS QUESTIONS
ASKEDASKEDDESCRIPTION OF METHODDESCRIPTION OF METHOD
KEY INFORMANT METHOD
“Who are the most influential people in the group?”
Carefully selected key informants in a social system are asked to designate opinion leaders.
Artificially places individuals in a position to act as opinion leaders and measures results of their efforts.
“Have you tried the product?
OBJECTIVE METHOD
15-21
Table 15.6 Profile of Opinion Leaders
GENERALIZED ATTRIBUTES ACROSS PRODUCT CATEGORIES
CATEGORY-SPECIFIC ATTRIBUTES
InnovativenessWillingness to talkSelf-confidenceGregariousnessCognitive differentiation
InterestKnowledgeSpecial-interest media exposureSame ageSame social statusSocial exposure outside group
15-22
Market Market MavenMaven
Individuals whose influence stems from a general knowledge or market expertise that
leads to an early awareness of new
products and services.
15-23
The Interpersonal Flow of Communication
• Two-Step Flow– A communication model that portrays opinion
leaders as direct receivers of information from mass media sources who, in turn, interpret and transmit this information.
• Multistep Flow– A revision of the traditional two-step theory
that shows multiple communication flows
15-24
Figure 15.4 Two-Step Flow of Communication Theory
Mass MediaMass Media Opinion Leaders
Opinion Leaders
Opinion Receivers
(the masses)
Opinion Receivers
(the masses)
Step 1 Step 2
15-25
Figure 15.5 Multistep Flow of Communication Theory
Mass MediaMass Media
Information Receivers
Information Receivers
Opinion Receivers/
Seekers
Opinion Receivers/
Seekers
Opinion Leaders
Opinion Leaders
Step 1a
Step 1b
Step 2
Step 3
15-26
Issues In Opinion Leadership and Marketing Strategy
• Programs Designed to Stimulate Opinion Leadership
• Advertisements Stimulating Opinion Leadership
• Word of Mouth May Be Uncontrollable• Creation of Opinion Leaders
15-27
15-28
Diffusion Diffusion ProcessProcess
The process by which the acceptance of an
innovation is spread by communication to members of social
system over a period of time.
15-29
Adoption Adoption ProcessProcess
The stages through which an individual consumer passes in
arriving at a decision to try (or not to try), to continue using (or
discontinue using) a new product.
15-30
Elements of the Diffusion Process
• The Innovation• The Channels of Communication• The Social System• Time
15-31
Defining Innovations
• Firm-oriented definitions• Product-oriented definitions• Market-oriented definitions• Consumer-oriented definitions
15-32
Product-Oriented Definitions
Continuous Innovation
Dynamically Continuous Innovation
Discontinuous Innovation
15-33
Figure 15.6 Continuous Innovation
15-34
Figure 15.7 Telephone Innovations
Telephone
Cell Phone
Fax Machine
Telephone answering machinesCall forwardingCall waitingCaller IDBanking by telephoneCall-prompting systems
Hold buttonLine-in-use indicatorRedial buttonAuto dialing featureTouch-tone service800 Numbers900 Numbers
Ability to send/receive emailIncorporate PDA functionsCalendar/PhonebookVoice-activated dialing
Switch from analog to digital
Include cameraRinger stylesPlay games
Fax modemMobile fax machinesHome office systems
(combined fax, copier, computer printer)
Plain paper faxSpeed dial buttonsDelayed sendCopy functionPaper cutter
Discontinuous Innovations
Dynamically ContinuousInnovations
ContinuousInnovations
15-35
Product Characteristics That Influence Diffusion
• Relative Advantage• Compatibility• Complexity• Trialability• Observability
15-36
Figure 15.8 Ad Stressing Ease of Use
and
Convenience
15-37
Table 15.7 Characteristics That Influence Diffusion
CHARACTERISTICSCHARACTERISTICS EXAMPLESEXAMPLES
Relative Advantage
Air travel over train travel, cordless phones over corded telephones
Compatibility
Gillette MACH3 over disposable razors, digital telephone answering machines over machines using tape
ComplexityElectric shavers, instant puddings
15-38
Table 15.7 continued
CHARACTERISTICSCHARACTERISTICS EXAMPLESEXAMPLES
Trialability
Trial size jars and bottles of new products, free trials of software, free samples, cents-off coupons
Observability
Clothing, such as a new Tommy Hilfiger jacket, a car, wristwatches, eyeglasses
15-39
Time and Diffusion
• Purchase Time• Adopter Categories• Rate of Adoption
See Table 15.8
Time Line for Selecting a New
Automobile
15-40
Adopter Adopter CategoriesCategories
A sequence of categories that
describes how early (or late) a consumer
adopts a new product in relation to other
adopters.
15-41
Figure 15.9 Adopter Categories
Innovators2.5%
EarlyAdopters
13.5%
Laggards
16%
Percentage of Adopters by Category Sequence
EarlyMajority
34%
LateMajority
34%
15-42
Innovators: Description
• 2.5% of population• Venturesome• Very eager to try new ideas• Acceptable if risk is daring• More cosmopolite social relationships• Communicates with other innovators
15-43
Early Adopters: Description
• 13.5% of population• Respected• More integrated into the local social system• The persons to check with before adopting a
new idea• Category contains greatest number of
opinion leaders• Are role models
15-44
Early Majority: Description
• 34% of population• Deliberate• Adopt new ideas just prior to the average
time• Seldom hold leadership positions• Deliberate for some time before adopting
15-45
Late Majority: Description
• 34% of population• Skeptical• Adopt new ideas just after the average
time• Adopting may be both an economic
necessity and a reaction to peer pressures• Innovations approached cautiously
15-46
Laggards: Description
• 16% of population• Traditional• The last people to adopt an innovation• Most “localite” in outlook• Oriented to the past• Suspicious of the new
15-47
Table 15.11 Stages in Adoption Process
NAME OF STAGE
WHAT HAPPENS DURING THIS
STAGEEXAMPLE
AwarenessConsumer is first exposed to the product innovation.
Janet sees an ad for a new MP3 player in the magazine she is reading.
Interest
Consumer is interested in the product and searches for additional information.
Janet reads about the MP3 player on the manufacturer’s Web site and then goes to an electronics store near her apartment and has a salesperson show her a unit.
Evaluation
Consumer decides whether or not to believe that this product or service will satisfy the need--a kind of “mental trial.”
After talking to a knowledgeable friend, Janet decides that this MP3 player will allow her to easily download the MP3 files that she has on her computer. She also feels that the unit’s size is small enough to easily fit into her beltpack.
15-48
Table 15.11 Stages in Adoption Process
Trial
Consumer uses the product on a limited basis
Since an MP3 player cannot be “tried” like a small tube of toothpaste, Janet buys the MP3 player online from Amazon.com, which offers a 30-day full refund policy.
Adoption (Rejection)
If trial is favorable, consumer decides to use the product on a full, rather than a limited basis--if unfavorable, the consumer decides to reject it.
Janet finds that the MP3 player is easy to use and that the sound quality is excellent. She keeps the MP3 player.
NAME OF STAGE
WHAT HAPPENS DURING THIS
STAGEEXAMPLE
15-49
Figure 15.11 An Enhanced Adoption Process Model
Pre-existing problem or
NeedAwareness Interest Evaluation Trial
Adoption or
Rejection
Postadoption or Postpurchase
Evaluation
Evaluation
Adoption or Rejection
Discontinuation
Discontinuation or Rejection
Rejection
15-50
Figure 15.12 The Relative Importance of Different Types of Information Sources in the
Adoption Process
Importance
High
Low
Aw
aren
ess
Ad
opti
on
Tri
al
Eva
luat
ion
Inte
rest
Personal and interpersonal sources
Impersonal mass-media sources
15-51
Issues in Profiling Consumer Innovators
• Defining the Consumer Innovator• Interest in the Product Category• The Innovator Is an Opinion Leader• Personality Traits• Media Habits• Social Characteristics• Demographic Characteristics• Are There Generalized Consumer Innovators?
15-52
Figure 15.13 Ad Appeals to Fashion Innovators