2017 FLEET BAROMETER · 6 * Company size boundary depends of the country – see previous page **...

1

2017 FLEET BAROMETER

International report Focus Europe

Table of content

I CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLEET

II FINANCING

III TELEMATICS

IV PERSPECTIVES IN TERMS OF MOBILITY

p.26

p.53

p.77

p.94

2

V p.108 INFORMATION SOURCES

3

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2002

Creation in

France

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Greece out

of the study

India out of

the study

2017 Brazil and Russia

out of the study

Perimeter of the study

Focus Europe

DATA COLLECTION METHOD

CATI System (Computer Assisted

Telephone Interviewing)

JANUARY

2017

16

FIELDWORK PERIOD TARGET

FEBRUARY

2017

6

QUOTAS

Company size

& sector 10 minutes in average

(without SME focus)

SAMPLE DURATION OF INTERVIEWS

3847 interviews including

3540 through Europe

4

Fleet managers in

companies of all industries

using at least 1 corporate

vehicle

Methodology

5

Less than 10 employees

10 to 99 employees

100 to 249 employees



250 employees and

more

500 employees and

more

1000 employees and

more

FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH LU

Sample

6

* Company size boundary depends of the country – see previous page

** Fleet size: the size of the fleet has been defined according to the total number of vehicles given in question A5.

Company size

10 – 99 employees

100 to 249/499/999* employees

250/500/1000* employees and more

Less than 10 employees

Fleet size **

Medium fleet = 10 – 49 vehicles

Large fleet = 50 vehicles and more

Small fleet = 1 – 9 vehicles

Pictograms

7

Data weighting

2017 2005 to 2015 2016

Same perimeter as 2005 to 2015

period (at least 1 vehicle)

BUT

Use of a sample that allows to be

representative of company cars

volume involved in each segment.

No additional weighting used.

New survey perimeter:

companies with a fleet of

at least 10 company

vehicles

Comparison not possible

Perimeter of the survey: companies

with at least one company vehicle.

Weighting of the data in order to

be representative of the number

of companies: very low weight of

the larger companies (less than

1%) even if more or less 20% of

the company vehicles are bought

by larger companies.

In order to be able to compare 2017’s results with the results of the previous years, CSA has

recalculated the 2011 to 2015 results with the 2017 process.

Results displayed in this report concerning the previous years (2011 to 2016) may differ from the

one displayed in the previous years reports as they used an other weighing calculation (with

other objectives in terms of representativeness).

!

8

EU BE CZ FR DE IT PL PT ES CH UK NL LU

Total

interviews 3536 300 297 300 300 302 300 300 220 314 303 300 300

1175

(33%)

101

(33%)

74

(25%)

100

(33%)

100

(33%)

100

(33%)

98

(33%)

102

(34%)

101

(46%)

98

(31%)

100

(34%)

100

(33%)

101

(33%)

762

(22%)

60

(20%)

78

(26%)

60

(20%)

60

(20%)

65

(22%)

61

(20%)

61

(20%)

61

(28%)

74

(24%)

62

(20%)

60

(20%)

60

(20%)

916

(26%)

80

(27%)

84

(28%)

80

(27%)

80

(27%)

79

(26%)

81

(27%)

82

(28%)

29

(13%)

81

(26%)

80

(26%)

80

(27%)

80

(27%)

683

(19%)

59

(20%)

61

(21%)

60

(20%)

60

(20%)

58

(19%)

60

(20%)

55

(18%)

29

(13%)

61

(19%)

61

(20%)

60

(20%)

59

(20%)

Sample

Perimeter of the survey: companies owning at least 1 fleet vehicle.

This sample structure was set up in order to be roughly representative of the number of cars registered by companies for each company size

segment and activity sector as well as to allow comparisons between countries on a similar bases.

In the following slides, no additional weighting of the data are applied to company sizes or activity sectors segments contrary to previous waves.

9

EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK

Total

interviews 3536 300 297 300 300 302 300 300 220 314 303 300 300

Industry 492 (14%)

32 (11%)

37

(12%)

32

(11%)

35

(12%)

44

(15%)

54

(17%)

31

(10%)

36

(16%)

75

(24%)

29

(10%)

37

(12%)

50

(17%)

Construction 1046 (29%)

82

(27%)

96

(32%)

94

(31%)

95

(32%)

81

(27%)

77

(26%)

133

(44%)

24

(11%)

57

(18%)

133

(44%)

109

(37%)

65

(22%)

Trade 1261

(36%)

108

(36%)

96

(32%)

108

(36%)

138

(46%)

123

(41%)

83

(28%)

89

(30%)

106

(48%)

63

(20%)

83

(27%)

100

(33%)

164

(54%)

Service 737 (21%)

78

(26%)

68

(23%)

66

(22%)

32

(11%)

54

(18%)

86

(29%)

47

(16%)

54

(25%)

119

(38%)

58

(19%)

54

(18%)

21

(7%)

Sample

This sample structure was set up in order to be roughly representative of the number of cars registered by companies for each company size

segment and activity sector as well as to allow comparisons between countries on a similar bases.

In the following slides, no additional weighting of the data are applied to company sizes or activity sectors segments contrary to previous waves.

Perimeter of the survey: companies owning at least 1 fleet vehicle.

10

CONTEXT AND MAIN RESULTS

11

A – CONTEXT

Context

Compared evolution of personal car sales in the 12 European countries that were part of this observatory on the scale to

the left versus GDP growth rate on the scale to the right

12

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

10 000 000

10 500 000

11 000 000

11 500 000

12 000 000

12 500 000

13 000 000

13 500 000

14 000 000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total sales europe Real GPD Growth rate, EU28 @Eurostat

Context

2008: onset of the crisis, simultaneous personal car (PC) sales and GDP drop.

2009: slight sales recovery thanks to the support of scrappage schemes.

2010: market collapse following the cessation of the scrappage schemes measures despite an uptick of GDP growth rates.

2011 – 2012: fall of PC sales volumes in line and at the same time the GDP declined.

2013: sales decline limited to -1.68%, it seems that the market has bottomed out in 2013.

2014 - 2016: Growth of the European GDP (28 Europeans countries) that reaches annual increase rates of respectively +1.6%, +2.2% and +1.9% for the years 2014, 2015 and 2016. Car market turnaround that registers a 3 years increase in a row with significant annual increase rates for the whole 12 countries included in the survey of +5.1%, +9.1% and +6.0% (a global increase rate of +21.7%). With 13.2 millions units sold in 2016, the market reached the 2009’s level. The sales’ volume is quite close from the pre-crisis level: there is still a difference of 4% or 0.5 million units in order to reach this boundary.

Even if uncertainty is high, experts foresee the general economy to register modest growth rates for the 2 coming years that should reach +1.8% per year (annual increase rate of the GDP), a similar level that the ones observed during the last 3 years. The ACEA expects the car market dynamism to slow down and foresees a low increase rate of only +1% in terms of units sold for the coming year (versus +6.8% for the whole Europe in 2016).

13

Context

The light commercial vehicle market (LCV), which is nearly exclusively bought by companies, is much more strongly correlated to the evolution of the GDP growth rate.

3 years increase in a row of the LCV market for the 12 European countries included in the scope of the survey. Sales respectively increase of +10.5%, +22.9% and +22.3% for the years 2014, 2015 and 2016.

Compared evolution of LCV sales in the 12 European countries that were part of this observatory on the scale to the left

versus GDP growth rate on the scale to the right

14

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

1 000 000

1 500 000

2 000 000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

total sales europe Real GPD Growth rate, EU28 @Eurostat

Context

Sales of personal vehicles evolution, base 100 in 2004, on the scale to the right compared with the GDP growth

evolution on the scale to the left

15

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

FR/DE UK ES/PT/IT CH CZ/PL LU/BE/NL Real GPD Growth rate, EU28 @Eurostat

Context

• France and Germany supported the personal vehicles sales as of the start of the crisis in 2009 by putting

into place a scrappage scheme or incentives for clean, energy efficient vehicles. The suspension of

these measures explains, in part, the declines we saw in these countries between 2010 and 2013. Over

the period, sales went from a 100 index in 2004 to an index of 90 in 2013. 2014 was the year of the

turnaround with a growth of 1.9 % in 2014, + 6.0% in 2015 and +4.8% in 2016.

• Spain, Portugal and Italy are the 3 countries that have been hit the hardest by this economic crisis.

Since 2007, personal vehicle sales haven’t stopped sliding every year going from an index of 109 in 2007

to 54 in 2013. These countries group have a significant reversal in 2014. Since 2013, they register a 3

years in a row increase of respectively +10.6 %, +18% and +14% for the years 2014, 2015 and 2016.

Since 2013, sales volume of Personal Cars increase of +49.1%. Nevertheless, we are still far from the pre-

crisis level: -26.6% in 2016 compared with sales of the year 2007.

• On the opposite spectrum, Switzerland has always seen their personal vehicles sales volume grow from

2009 to 2012 but recorded a significant decline in 2013 and 2014. The market registers a turnaround in

2015 with an increase of +7.2% a slight decrease of -2% in 2016 certainly due to anticipated sales

recorded in 2015 because of the decrease of imported products price.

• Czech Republic and Poland: Wide collapse of the polish market between 2000 and 2006. Personal cars

sales volumes wasn’t widely impacted by the financial crisis (between 2007 and 2013) but register since

2013 an increase of 3 years in a row of respectively +14.4%, +12.7% and +15.4% per year or +48.6% for

the whole period between 2013 and 2016.

16

Context

• UK: Personal cars sales volumes were widely impacted by the financial crisis between 2007 and

2011. During the last 2 years of this period, the market was supported by corporate sales. During the 2012

to 2016 period, the country registers five years of growth in a row and a wide rise in sales of +38.7%.

Despite political and economic uncertainty (Brexit of June 2016), the market continues to increase in

2016 (up +2.3%), reaching highest ever number of new cars demanded by UK customers.

• Benelux: Sales down in 2009 at the time of the crisis (-16.3%), in 2011 the losses were largely met

(+8.2% compared with 2008), overall decline in sales in the next period: 2011-2014 with a decrease of

14.8%. In the last 2 years, only Belgium registers a wide increase of +11.7% (The Netherlands register a

decrease of -1.2% and Luxembourg an increase of +1.5%).

17

Context

Sales evolution of light commercial vehicles, base 100 in 2007, on the scale to the right compared to the

European GDP growth rate on the scale to the left

18

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

30

50

70

90

110

130

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

FR/BE/UK/NL/DE/PL ES/PT/IT CH/LU Real GPD Growth rate, EU28 @Eurostat

Context

• The light commercial vehicle market, less subject to government grants, is much more strongly correlated

with the GDP growth rate.

• Spain, Portugal and Italy saw their volumes divided by 2.6 between 2007 and 2012. It would appear

that the low point was hit in 2013, as the market showed a significant growth between 2013 and 2015

(nearly doubled). Despite this, it still remains far from the pre-crisis levels with 406,379 units in 2016

versus 561,000 in 2007 (down 27.6%).

• The group of the other main European countries (composed of France, Germany, UK, Belgium, The

Netherlands, Poland, Switzerland and Luxembourg) records a strong correlation between sales evolutions

and GDP growth. Sharp decline of LCV sales in 2009 following the decline of the GDP growth rate, then

rise through 2011. Decline in terms of sales volume in 2012 and 2013. Turnaround in 2014 with an

increase of +23.8% compared with the previous period.

19

Context

Special case of the Czech Republic where the collapse in the number of recorded LCV for the 2009 – 2010 period is explained by a change in the law. A law was enforced (87/2009 Sb) which extended to all vehicles the possibility of getting a tax rebate. Previously, this benefit was reserved to LCVs. We therefore observed a transfer of demand from LCVs to PCs. Sales volumes were thus divided by 4 in 2 years (between 2008 and 2010).

No significant evolution in terms of LCVs sales between 2010 and 2013.

Market turnaround in 2014: LCV sales increase by 64.9% between 2013 and 2016.

Sales evolution of light commercial vehicles in the Czech Republic, base 100 in 2007 on the scale to the right compared to

the European GDP growth rate evolution on the scale to the left

20

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

-

20

40

60

80

100

120

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

CZ Real GPD Growth rate, EU28 @Eurostat

21

B – MAIN RESULTS

22

#1 – European companies' confidence for the coming years European fleet managers interviewed in the survey are globally confident with the fleet growth potential for the next three

years. The balance between the fleet managers who expect an increase and the fleet managers who expect a decrease is

equal to +11 (quite steady compared with 2015 score).

Like in previous waves of the CVO survey, fleet managers of Large and very large companies are more optimistic than the

others, getting respectively a balance score of +14 and +15. On this segment, the balance score is even more high in the UK,

Poland (+24), Italy and Belgium (+23) contrary to Germany, at the end of the ranking with a negative balance (-1).

On average, European companies keep their vehicles in fleet 5.9 years before reselling them. Small fleet as well as ‘small and

medium companies’ have a lower vehicles turnover and keep them 6.5 years on average.

Germany, France and Luxembourg are the countries that keep their vehicles the shortest duration before reselling them

(respectively 3.6, 4.1 and 4.2 years on average for large fleets). On the opposite, Poland, Spain and Swiss companies keep

them the longest (from 7.3 to 7.8 on average for small fleets).

MAIN RESULTS (1/4)

23

#2 – Operating leasing, different use in Europe

As in previous years we can note a clear positive relation between the company size and the use of Operating leasing as

main financing method. Indeed, larger the companies are, the more they are to use Operating leasing as their main financing

method. If 14% of European companies with Small fleet use Operating leasing, they are more than half of companies

with large fleet (more than 50 vehicles) to use it (56%).

Nevertheless, disparities by country should be noticed:

- Concerning large fleets (more than 50 vehicles), with 64% to 72% of companies using Operating Leasing as their main

financing method, Spain, Belgium, The Netherlands, France, Italy and Germany reach the higher penetrations (on the

opposite, Switzerland, Luxembourg and Poland reach the lowest penetrations)

- Concerning small fleets (less than 10 vehicles), only Germany and Spain already register higher penetration in terms of

Operating Leasing (with respectively 35% and 22% versus 15% for the whole Europe) ; on the opposite, Poland and Portugal

reach the lower penetration (6% for both countries).

All company sizes segments register an upward trend of Operating Leasing. Since 2013, it increases of respectively +2,

+3, +4 and +4 points in small, medium, large and very large companies. The proportion of companies using it as their main

financing method reached 44% for large and very large companies and 52% in very large companies.

Globally, in the whole Europe area, the intention to develop Operating Leasing (in the next three years) is about 24% (with 9%

of companies who declare it certainly). Poland get the highest intention rate (43%), followed by France, Italy (32%) and

Luxemburg (30%).

The analysis by segment highlights various dynamisms. Concerning the large fleets, Belgium already reaches an high

penetration of Operating Leasing but still intend to develop it whereas in Spain, with an high penetration of Operating

Leasing, only few fleet managers declare having the intention to develop it in the next 3 years. In Poland, large fleet

doesn’t reach an high penetration of Operating Leasing but a lot of polish fleets managers declare having the intention to

develop it.

Regarding small fleets, Germany already reach an high penetration of Operating Leasing but only few fleet managers

declare having the intention to develop it in the next 3 years. France and Italy reaches standard penetration of Operating

Leasing but an higher proportion of fleet managers intend to develop it in the next 3 years.

MAIN RESULTS (2/4)

24

MAIN RESULTS (3/4)

#3 – Hybrid energies, 1rst alternative technology consider to be used in Europe

Globally, the development of new energies / technologies in fleet has increased since 2015 in the whole Europe area

whatever the company size (+5 points). Main evolutions are observed on:

- Plug-in hybrid : +7 points of companies that already implement or consider to implement that technology (20% versus 13%)

- Hybrid: +5 points (26% versus 21%)

- Electric vehicle: +5 points (21% versus 16%)

Among new or alternative energies, hybrid vehicle is the main technology already implemented in fleet (12%) or that will be

considered to be used in the next three years (26%).

The Netherlands and the UK are the most interested countries in the use of these new energies / technologies (respectively

62% and 56% of their fleet managers declare having already implemented or considered to implement it). Moreover we can

note an increasing interest since 2015 for these clean energies (respectively +14 and +7 points). The highest increase is

observed in Italy with a +17 evolution (mainly due to an high increase of Hybrid consideration: +20 points). Most of the

countries surveyed registers positive increase rate in terms of implementation and consideration of these new or alternative

energies between 2017 and 2015 (except Switzerland, Czech Republic and Germany).

#4 – Telematics: significant disparities between countries

Regarding Telematics use (without including data transmission by the mean of users Smartphone), the European average

(20%) hides important differences between countries taking part of the survey.

Poland (35%), the UK (34%), Czech Rep. (32%), The Netherlands (30%) and Spain (20%) get the highest level of the

Europe area. In the opposite, France (11%), Switzerland (10%) and Germany (8%) are less equipped than other countries.

More the fleet/company size is important more the Telematics is implemented in fleets: 37% among fleets with more than 50

vehicles versus only 12% among fleets with less than 10 vehicles.

Even if the main purpose for implementing telematics is related to the vehicle location (68%), several other reasons are given

by fleets managers: in one hand, optimize journeys (54%), reducing fleet costs (50%) and in the other hand, improve

driver safety (52%) and behavior (50%). This pattern is similar whatsoever the country surveyed.

The main telematics provider is closely related with the country. It will mainly be a telecom company in France, Portugal,

Belgium or Czech Republic. In Germany and Switzerland, it will mainly be a car manufacturer. In the Italy, it is often the

leaser or lessor. In the UK, it will be more often a car part supplier.

25

#5 – Mobility alternatives

45% of European companies are already using or considering to use in the next 3 years mobility alternatives like car

sharing, ride sharing and mobility budget. Larger companies and larger fleets are logically more numerous to use such

alternatives: at least one for 66% of large fleets (50 vehicles or more in fleets) versus 34% for small fleets (less than 10

vehicles in fleets) and 64% for the very large companies (500/1000 employees or more) versus 29% for small companies

(less than 10 employees).

The UK, Czech Republic, Switzerland, and in a lesser extend France and The Netherlands are the countries who already

use or declare the highest interest to use at least one of alternative mobility solutions in the future (among car sharing, ride

sharing and mobility card or budget). On the other hand, Germany get the lowest rate of the survey (only 26% of companies

having implemented or considering to implement at least one of these three mobility alternatives).

Globally we note that ride sharing is already implemented in 23% of our European companies sample. This alternative

mobility solutions is particularly developed in Czech Republic and in the UK (respectively 36% and 33% already used).

Czech Republic is the only country where ‘mobility budget’ is already strongly used in companies (44% versus 16% for the

whole Europe area).

However, companies are not yet ready to give up company cars for such alternatives with only 13% of fleet managers

declaring it. The Netherlands and Switzerland are the countries with the highest proportion of companies to be ready to

give up at least part of their fleet vehicles for such alternatives (with respectively 21% and 20% of the fleet managers

declaring yes certainly or yes probably). On the other hand, Spain, Germany and in a lesser extend Poland, UK, Czech

Republic and Portugal appears to be most reluctant (with scores of 4%, 9%, 10%, 11% 11% and 12%).

MAIN RESULTS (4/4)

26

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLEET

I

27

A – FLEET ASPECT

Number of vehicles in fleet

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 499 vehicles

500 vehicles and more

28

A5. Can you please tell me the total number of vehicles of less than 3.5 tons in your fleet? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

1 to 9 vehicles

Total

3% 15% 9% 10%

29% 34%

1%

34%

64%

47% 54%

99%

66%

26%

9%

29


1 to 9 vehicles 86% 80% 90% 90% 92% 93% 90% 96% 87% 78% 86% 63% 86%

10 to 99 vehicles 14% 19% 10% 10% 8% 7% 9% 4% 13% 22% 14% 38% 14%

100 to 499 vehicles <1% 1% - - - - 1% - - - - - -

More than 500

vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - -

1 to 9 vehicles 19% 7% 30% 21% 18% 35% 12% 32% 15% 11% 26% - 19%

10 to 99 vehicles 57% 56% 57% 66% 50% 40% 53% 45% 66% 54% 63% 80% 47%

100 to 499 vehicles 18% 30% 11% 11% 18% 17% 24% 19% 18% 27% 8% 16% 21%

More than 500

vehicles 6% 6% 2% 3% 14% 8% 11% 4% 1% 8% 3% 4% 12%

+

Number of vehicles in fleet

+

Increase Decrease Balance

2014

Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease

Fleet growth potential by company size

Balance

2013 Balance

2017

+11 +10 +9 +5

+8 +4 +6 +3

+9 +9 +6 +8

+14 +10 +10 +6

+15 +20 +15 +3

30

A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Balance

2015

% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…

Total 18%

13%

14%

21%

26%

7%

5%

5%

7%

11%

6%

12%

19%

16%

23%

10%

21%

5%

9%

5%

8%

6%

6%

3%

31

Balance 2017

+8

+8

+4

+10

+5

+2

+1

+3

+15

+8

+17

+4

+18



Balance 2017


13%

13%

11%

13%

8%

4%

5%

5%

7%

3%

3%

2%

Increase Decrease

EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

+

32




+

18%

30%

26%

23%

29%

19%

39%

11%

7%

6%

15%

5%

12%

14%

Balance 2017

+14

+23

+3

+16

-1

+18

+7

+23

+20

+8

+24

+7

+24

Balance 2017

23%

29%

17%

19%

8%

24%

9%

6%

14%

3%

9%

6%

Increase Decrease

EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

Increase Decrease


Fleet growth potential by fleet size

Balance

2017

33


Total +11

+7

+13

+19


18%

12%

21%

29%

7%

5%

8%

10%

34




6%

15%

20%

12%

22%

8%

18%

6%

9%

6%

5%

6%

3%

5%

Balance 2017

+7

+4

+3

+10

+3

+3

0

+6

+14

+7

+16

+5

+13

Balance 2017

12%

9%

10%

12%

6%

6%

5%

5%

7%

2%

3%

3%

Increase Decrease

EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

35




18%

24%

21%

24%

28%

17%

37%

10%

6%

5%

15%

3%

10%

13%

Balance 2017

+13

+14

+3

+17

+2

+20

+8

+18

+16

+8

+25

+7

+24

Balance 2017

21%

20%

17%

21%

7%

24%

8%

6%

14%

4%

5%

3%

Increase Decrease

EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

36




18%

37%

30%

28%

41%

20%

50%

9%

4%

3%

16%

12%

16%

13%

Balance 2017

+19

+35

+9

+16

-1

+27

+9

+33

+27

+11

+29

+4

+38

Balance 2017

29%

40%

25%

16%

13%

34%

10%

5%

15%

15%

7%

Increase Decrease

EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

37

A25. On average, how long do you keep your vehicles before being sold ? – NEW 2017

Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

How long the company keeps its vehicles before

reselling them by fleet size

Average

in years

5.9 6.3 7.1 6.0 4.9 6.7 5.1 6.2 4.8 5.7 7.1 6.2 4.5


6.5 6.7 7.3 6.1 5.4 7.7 6.2 7.0 5.0 6.5 7.8 7.1 4.9

5.5 6.3 6.8 6.0 4.8 5.3 3.8 4.8 4.8 5.1 6.4 6.2 4.6

4.7 5.7 6.7 5.7 3.6 4.3 4.1 4.8 4.2 4.7 5.3 4.7 3.6

Total

38

A25. On average, how long do you keep your vehicles before being sold ? – NEW 2017


How long the company keeps its vehicles before

reselling them by company size

Average

in years

5.9 6.3 7.1 6.0 4.9 6.7 5.1 6.2 4.8 5.7 7.1 6.2 4.5


6.5 6.5 7.4 6.1 5.5 8.3

6.1 7.2 4.8 6.5 7.7 6.8

4.9

5.2 6.1 6.9 5.9 4.1 5.0 4.1 5.2 4.7 4.7 6.3 5.6 4.2

Total

+

+

39

A26. Did Volkswagen’s Dieselgate have consequences for your car policy regarding models or CO2 limits ? – NEW 2017


Volkswagen’s Dieselgate consequences

Total 89% 8% 3%

No consequence Yes, few consequences Yes, many consequences

92%

91%

88%

84%

5%

8%

10%

13%

3%

1%

2%

3%

91%

88%

83%

6%

10%

14%

3%

2%

3%

40




total

EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

89%

86%

87%

95%

83%

86%

8%

12%

9%

5%

11%

10%

3%

2%

4%

6%

4%

85%

92%

81%

95%

95%

93%

90%

11%

6%

14%

4%

4%

6%

10%

4%

2%

5%

1%

1%

1%

41




by fleet size

EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

91%

89%

90%

95%

86%

93%

6%

8%

6%

4%

8%

4%

3%

3%

4%

1%

6%

3%

87%

93%

80%

97%

97%

97%

93%

11%

5%

13%

2%

3%

3%

7%

2%

2%

7%

1%

42




by fleet size

EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

88%

89%

78%

95%

85%

80%

10%

8%

17%

5%

12%

17%

2%

3%

5%

3%

3%

80%

92%

83%

94%

95%

93%

87%

17%

6%

13%

6%

4%

6%

13%

3%

2%

4%

1%

1%

43




by fleet size

EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

83%

77%

87%

94%

74%

68%

14%

23%

10%

6%

19%

25%

3%

3%

7%

7%

82%

86%

80%

95%

91%

84%

83%

9%

10%

20%

5%

6%

10%

15%

9%

4%

3%

6%

2%

44




by company size

EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

+

92%

88%

94%

95%

86%

93%

6%

8%

4%

4%

8%

5%

2%

4%

2%

1%

6%

2%

87%

95%

79%

96%

97%

95%

94%

11%

3%

14%

3%

3%

5%

6%

2%

2%

7%

1%

45




by company size

EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

+

86%

83%

79%

95%

80%

80%

11%

17%

15%

5%

14%

15%

3%

6%

6%

5%

82%

90%

83%

95%

95%

90%

84%

12%

9%

14%

5%

4%

7%

15%

6%

1%

3%

1%

3%

1%

46

B – ENERGY

Development potential of new energies or

technologies since last year

E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

At least one technology

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid

CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)

LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)

Electric Vehicle

Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen

47

% present and future use …

+

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

21%

19%

12%

9%

8%

4%

3%

3%

4%

5%

9%

7%

1%

1%

40%

35%

26%

21%

20%

13%

7%

7%

8%

8%

21%

16%

6%

5%

Already implemented + considered

Considered in the next 3 years

Already implemented

12%

10%

5%

4%

3%

1%

2%

1%

3%

3%

3%

3%

-

1%

31%

26%

19%

15%

14%

9%

5%

5%

8%

7%

14%

10%

5%

4%


32%

30%

20%

16%

14%

8%

5%

5%

5%

7%

15%

12%

1%

1%

50%

45%

34%

29%

26%

18%

10%

9%

9%

10%

29%

23%

7%

6%


+ Total


technologies since last year


At least one technology

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid

CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)

LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)

Electric Vehicle

Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen

48


2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015



Already implemented



Total

21%

19%

12%

9%

8%

4%

3%

3%

4%

5%

9%

7%

1%

1%

40%

35%

26%

21%

20%

13%

7%

7%

8%

8%

21%

16%

6%

5%


11%

11%

5%

3%

3%

1%

2%

2%

3%

4%

3%

3%

-

1%

30%

25%

18%

14%

13%

8%

5%

5%

8%

7%

14%

10%

5%

4%

26%

23%

14%

11%

10%

6%

3%

4%

3%

5%

10%

8%

1%

1%

43%

38%

28%

23%

21%

15%

7%

9%

7%

9%

22%

17%

4%

6%

45%

42%

31%

28%

22%

13%

8%

6%

7%

7%

24%

19%

2%

1%

63%

58%

46%

42%

37%

26%

14%

10%

12%

12%

41%

34%

11%

7%

49


% Already implemented + considered


40% 62% 56% 52% 50% 48% 43% 39% 31% 31% 26% 25% 15%



technologies At least one technology

Evolution vs 2015

EU

+5% +14% +7% +17% +7% -2% +7% +3% +6% +1% -3% +7% -2%

50

26% 47% 46% 37% 30% 30% 30% 26% 21% 15% 14% 13% 4%


technologies Hybrid / Plug-in Hybrid

E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100% % Already implemented

+ considered

20% 17% 19% 37% 46%

8% 35%

- 10% 8% 13% 20% 22%

Hybrid

Plug-in

Hybrid


FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH LU EU

EU

Evolution vs 2015

+5% +10% +10% +3% +3% +6% +20% -12% +4% +1% +5% +6% -

Evolution vs 2015

+6% +6% +15% +14% +17% -1% +10% -1% - +5% +6% -4% +11%


51


technologies CNG / LPG


% Already implemented + considered


CNG

LPG

7% 17% 13% 13% 9% 8% 7% 5% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2%

8% 21% 19% 16% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3%


NL UK LU FR BE CH DE PT ES IT PL CZ

Evolution vs 2015

- +4% -8% +4% +2% +2% -1% +4% -3% -0% -4% -2% +1%

Evolution vs 2015

+1% +8% +7% +5% - +2% -6% - +2% -1% -3% - -4%

EU

EU

52


technologies Electric / Fuel Cell Electric - Hydrogen



% Already implemented + considered Electric

21% 35% 33% 32% 29% 25% 21% 20% 18% 16% 15% 4% 2%

6% 20% 10% 7% 6% 6% 6% 4% 4% 3% 3% 2% 1%


NL UK LU FR BE CH DE PT ES IT PL CZ

FCE

Hydrogen

Evolution vs 2015

+5% +10% +5% +4% +7% +11% +13% - - -1% +9% - -3%

Evolution vs 2015

+1% +9% +10% -1% +1% -2% -1% +4% -2% - -3% -2% -1%

EU

EU

53

FINANCING

II

39%

46%

34%

24%

7%

11%

4%

1%

26%

29%

26%

19%

28%

14%

36%

56%

54

B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Main financing method by fleet size

Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*

Total

% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…

*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies

55


Main financing method



EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

39%

35%

60%

51%

30%

34%

7%

14%

6%

11%

6%

9%

26%

17%

24%

24%

17%

20%

28%

34%

10%

14%

47%

37%

24%

28%

28%

49%

46%

35%

47%

14%

5%

8%

1%

5%

6%

2%

24%

36%

38%

13%

40%

39%

21%

38%

31%

26%

37%

9%

20%

30%


Total

56





EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

45%

47%

58%

55%

36%

42%

11%

25%

8%

14%

8%

13%

29%

18%

26%

27%

21%

23%

15%

10%

8%

4%

35%

22%

24%

35%

28%

73%

48%

41%

58%

26%

8%

11%

1%

6%

10%

3%

33%

40%

43%

12%

40%

43%

21%

17%

17%

18%

14%

6%

6%

18%


57





EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

35%

32%

59%

43%

28%

23%

4%

8%

4%

9%

5%

2%

26%

22%

20%

25%

25%

17%

35%

38%

17%

23%

42%

58%

21%

14%

31%

32%

44%

34%

39%

3%

1%

6%

3%

3%

3%

21%

32%

29%

15%

45%

38%

20%

55%

53%

34%

53%

8%

25%

38%


58





EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

23%

14%

64%

44%

17%

15%

1%

2%

2%

2%

1%

19%

13%

24%

11%

17%

9%

57%

73%

10%

43%

64%

75%

23%

14%

23%

17%

36%

20%

25%

2%

10%

22%

38%

11%

30%

29%

23%

67%

64%

37%

72%

34%

51%

52%


59


Main financing method by company size



EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

45%

44%

55%

54%

38%

45%

12%

25%

10%

16%

9%

14%

29%

19%

28%

26%

15%

25%

14%

12%

7%

4%

38%

16%

26%

36%

27%

69%

44%

40%

59%

26%

9%

10%

1%

6%

9%

4%

33%

41%

43%

13%

44%

42%

20%

15%

14%

20%

17%

6%

9%

17%

+


60


Main financing method by company size

% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles… +


EU

BE

CH

CZ

DE

ES

FR

IT

LU

NL

PL

PT

UK

31%

23%

64%

46%

22%

23%

2%

2%

2%

5%

2%

2%

23%

16%

20%

22%

18%

13%

44%

59%

14%

27%

58%

62%

21%

18%

28%

27%

47%

29%

31%

1%

5%

3%

2%

1%

14%

29%

33%

12%

37%

35%

22%

65%

52%

34%

61%

13%

34%

46%


Evolution of the main financing method by company size

61

47% 46% 46% 46% 45%

11% 11% 11% 11% 12%

30% 31%

31% 30% 29%

12% 12% 12% 13% 14%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017


*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies. Results provided for 2016 are calculated by the mean of an extrapolation between the results of the years 2015 and 2017.



62




31% 31% 29%

31% 31%

3% 2% 3% 2% 2%

26% 26% 27% 25%

23%

40% 41% 41% 42% 44%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017




63



50% 48%

47%

46% 46%

13% 13% 13% 14% 14%

28% 30% 31% 30% 29%

9% 9% 9% 10% 11%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017




64



43% 44% 44% 44% 43%

8% 8% 8% 8% 8%

32% 31% 31% 30% 29%

17% 17% 17% 18% 20%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017



65




34% 33% 35% 34% 34%

3% 3% 3% 3% 3%

29% 28% 28% 27% 25%

34% 36%

34% 36%

38%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017



66




28% 26% 26% 27% 28%

2% 2% 1% 1% 1%

22% 23% 24% 22%

19%

48% 49% 49% 50% 52%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017



Evolution of the main financing method by fleet size

67



48% 48%

46%

46% 45%

11% 10% 11% 11% 11%

29% 30% 30% 29% 29%

12% 12% 13% 14% 15%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017




68



34%

33% 32% 33%

35%

3% 3% 4% 4% 4%

31% 30% 30% 28% 26%

32%

34% 34% 35% 35%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017



69




25% 25% 24% 23% 23%

2% 1% 1% 1% 1%

20% 21% 23%

21% 19%

53% 53% 52% 55%

57%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017



70

B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

% of intention to develop Operating leasing in the next three years…

Intention to develop Operating leasing


9% 16% 6% 6% 3% 4%

17% 8% 15% 9% 17%

5% 6%

24% 29%

15% 19%

12% 20%

32% 32% 30%

18%

43%

23% 20%

% YES

Yes probably

Yes certainly

Reminder

OL as main

financing method 28% 34% 10% 14% 47% 37% 38% 31% 26% 37% 9% 20% 30%

Total

71



Intention to develop Operating leasing by company size

+

Yes probably

Yes certainly


% YES

Reminder

OL as main


21% 22% 12% 12% 9%

21% 27% 35%

23% 10%

43%

18% 21%

27% 30%

16% 14% 12%

25%

35% 42%

35%

15%

58%

20% 26%

72



Intention to develop Operating leasing by company size

+

Yes probably

Yes certainly


% YES

Reminder

OL as main


28% 36%

17% 26%

16% 19% 38%

28% 39%

27% 44%

29% 19%

41%

60%

26%

37%

19% 22%

64%

36%

58%

42%

62%

36%

27%

73



Intention to develop Operating leasing by fleet size

Yes probably

Yes certainly


% YES

Reminder

OL as main


20% 21% 12% 11% 8%

18% 24% 34%

22% 8%

37%

14% 21%

25% 27%

15% 13% 10%

20%

32% 39%

31%

11%

51%

16%

27%

74




Yes probably

Yes certainly


% YES

Reminder

OL as main


28% 30% 16%

28% 10%

34% 44%

32% 38% 21%

47%

26% 15%

40% 45%

24%

37%

12%

42%

66%

48%

66%

31%

63%

30%

18%

75




Yes probably

Yes certainly


% YES

Reminder

OL as main


33% 41% 25% 32% 26%

10%

39% 22%

44% 34%

65%

33% 23%

51%

73%

43% 54%

32%

12%

69%

31%

58% 54%

100%

43% 33%

Global fleet growth potential in the next 3 years

according to main financing method

Operating

leasing

Finance

leasing

Car credit

Self purchase*

76

A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will…


Increase Decrease


Balance 2017

+8

+9

+14

+14

14%

14%

20%

23%

6%

5%

6%

9%

*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit)

Total % which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…

77

TELEMATICS

III

Use of Telematics

78

E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle location...

from vehicles on the move. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

% which has implemented telematics in their fleet…


20% 14% 10%

32%

8% 20%

11% 16% 15%

30% 35%

15%

34%

Total

% YES

Use of Telematics

79


from vehicles on the move. New precision added for the 2017 questionnaire: Data are transmitted by the mean of an original or an after sales equipment or box

installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Total

20% 12%

25% 37%


% YES

Use of Telematics by fleet size

80






12% 9% 5% 21%

2% 10% 6% 8% 10% 20% 23%

5% 17%

% YES


81






25% 16% 13%

41%

5% 34%

11%

30% 16%

27% 43%

18%

48%

% YES


82






37%

19% 25%

59%

26%

46%

22% 35%

26%

51%

76%

24%

62%

% YES

Use of Telematics

83




Total

20% 9%

19% 25%

33%


% YES

Use of Telematics by company size

84

E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour,

vehicle location... from vehicles on the move. New precision added for the 2017 questionnaire: Data are transmitted by the mean of an original or

an after sales equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%



13% 12% 6% 19%

3% 8% 9% 10% 9%

23% 22%

10% 21%

+

% YES

Use of Telematics by company size

85

E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption,

driver behaviour, vehicle location... from vehicles on the move. New precision added for the 2017 questionnaire: Data are transmitted

by the mean of an original or an after sales equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by

the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%



28%

16% 14%

47%

14%

34%

13% 24% 22%

39% 50%

20%

49%

+

% YES

86

E23b. And could you tell me who is the supplier of your telematics ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies which has implemented telematics

Supplier of Telematics

Who is the supplier of your Telematics

%YES

Vehicles bought were already equipped with Telematics by

the car manufacturer

You asked a car part supplier like Valeo, Bosh or

Delphi to provide you with Telematics

Vehicles were equipped with telematics by your car leaser

or lessor

You asked a Telecom company for a Telematic

solution


16% 2% 25% 19%

36% 27%

12%

37% 24%

6% 6% 20%

11%

17% 27%

21% 14% 4%

32% 15%

8% 21% 17% 8% 7%

29%

27% 39%

24% 29% 4%

18%

59%

20% 24% 17% 26%

59%

20%

Total

16% 20% 10% 8%

20% 25% 15%

53%

6% 19% 8% 9% 16%

87


Supplier of Telematics


%YES

Total

16% 21% 14% 14%

Vehicles bought were already equipped with Telematics by the

car manufacturer

You asked a car part supplier like Valeo, Bosh or Delphi to provide

you with Telematics

Vehicles were equipped with telematics by your car leaser or

lessor

You asked a Telecom company for a Telematic solution

17% 15% 18% 19%

16% 14% 16% 19%

27% 23% 30% 28%

88


Supplier of Telematics by fleet size


%YES






or lessor


solution


21% 8%

39% 22%

50% 43% 20%

47% 34%

- 10% 20% 11%

15% 15% 7% 3% - 24%

- 18% 21% 20% 15% - 29%

23% 38%

24% 24% - 10%

70%

29% 6% 17% 15%

80%

21%

14% 8% - 8% - 14% 20% 41%

17% 17% 10% - 14%

89




%YES






or lessor


solution


14% -

27% 14% -

25% 14%

40% 26%

4% 3% 19% 9%

18% 38%

17% 8% 33% 35%

14% 7% 16% 17% 3% 11% 38%

30% 54%

17% 30%

- 15%

57%

20% 16% 17% 35%

52% 24%

16% 23% 20% 5%

33% 35% 14%

53%

- 17%

8% 11% 12%

90




%YES



You asked a car part supplier like Valeo, Bosh or Delphi to provide you with Telematics


or lessor


solution


14% - 10% 23%

39%

11% 6% 24% 12% 12% 4%

25% 13%

19% 27% 39% 41%

-

37% 24%

- 24%

15% 8% - 23%

28% 27% 30% 36%

6% 32%

53%

12%

52%

17% 31%

67%

15%

19% 27% 10% 14%

22% 26% 12%

65%

- 22%

4% 8% 20%

91

Purposes for using Telematics

E25. For which reasons do you use Telematics in your company ? – NEW 2017 Basis : use telematics = 100%

Reasons for using Telematics

%YES

To locate vehicles

To optimize journeys

To improve drivers safety

To improve drivers behaviours

To reduce fleet costs

68%

54%

52%

50%

55%

Total

64%

52%

55%

55%

61%

74%

53%

53%

49%

57%

68%

57%

49%

47%

47%

92

Purposes for using Telematics



%YES

To locate vehicles





68%

54%

52%

50%

55%

Total

61%

52%

56%

49%

59%

71%

56%

52%

56%

60%

78%

59%

46%

47%

49%

65%

46%

53%

44%

44%

93

Purposes for using Telematics by company size



%YES

52% 46% 38% 51% 28% 45% 68% 53% 55% 24% 54% 50% 88%



To locate vehicles




68% 59% 49% 66% 36% 53% 94%

47% 83% 59% 78% 68% 91%

55% 29% 25% 67% 48% 43% 76% 51% 53% 41% 58% 57% 76%

54% 41% 37% 64% 32% 42% 71% 47% 67% 57% 45% 43% 70%

50% 41% 28% 53% 16% 25% 88%

35% 54% 37% 50% 34% 93%

Small

basis

Total

94

PERSPECTIVE IN TERMS OF

MOBILITY

VI

95

Development potential of alternatives mobility

solutions by fleet size

MM9. In the next three years, would you consider using the following alternatives? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%



Already using

Car sharing

Ride sharing

Mobility budget or

card

Already using + considered

Total

18%

23%

16%

23%

28%

23%

32%

35%

23%

42%

43%

33%

23%

29%

20%

27%

33%

27%

10%

17%

12%

14%

21%

17%

ST At least one alternative

(Already using or considered) 45% 34% 54% 66%

96




Already using

Development potential of alternatives mobility

solutions by company size

Car sharing

Ride sharing

Mobility budget

or card

Already using + considered

Total

7%

13%

9%

11%

17%

14%

13%

23%

14%

17%

27%

20%

23%

28%

19%

28%

34%

27%

33%

34%

27%

41%

42%

35%

18%

23%

16%

23%

28%

23%


(Already using or considered) 45% 29% 43% 55% 64%

97

Development potential of Car sharing




Already using


18% 13% 22%

28%

4% 12%

26%

9% 17% 18% 22% 19% 20%

23% 17%

29% 31%

10%

17%

28%

17% 20%

23% 24% 24% 29%

% YES

Total

Car sharing

98

Development potential of Ride sharing




Already using


% YES

Total

Ride sharing

23% 23% 23%

36%

17% 16% 24%

16% 23%

29% 20% 21%

33%

28% 27% 33%

39%

21% 21%

29%

20%

26% 32%

24% 25%

42%

99

Development potential of Mobility budget




Already using


% YES

Total

Mobility budget or card

16% 9% 13%

44%

8% 17% 14% 16% 17%

11% 19%

14% 11%

23% 24% 19%

47%

13%

23% 17%

27%

20% 19%

26%

19% 19%

100

Development potential of alternatives




% YES

Total

At least one alternative (used or considered in the next 3 years)

45% 46% 52%

60%

26%

40% 47% 43% 45% 47% 44% 42%

52%

101

MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

% of ready to give up all or part of company cars for alternatives (amongst all companies)

Yes probably

Yes certainly

Car sharing

Ride sharing


Total

ST YES

2%

3%

2%

6%

7%

6%

4%

5%

4%

12%

13%

11%

1%

2%

1%

4%

5%

5%

3%

2%

2%

7%

8%

7%

Part of companies ready to give up all or part of their

company cars for alternative mobility solutions

by fleet size


(Yes certainly or probably) 13% 9% 15% 22%

102



Yes probably

Yes certainly

Total

ST YES

5%

5%

4%

11%

12%

11%

2%

2%

2%

7%

8%

8%

2%

2%

2%

5%

7%

6%


company cars for alternative mobility solutions

by company size

Car sharing

Ride sharing


2%

3%

2%

6%

7%

6%


(Yes certainly or probably) 13% 7% 13% 16% 21%

1%

2%

1%

2%

4%

4%

103

EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK % YES

Total

Car sharing

Yes probably

Yes certainly



2% 2% 5% 3% 1% 1% 4% 2% 1%

4% 2% 3% 1%

6% 6%

12%

6% 4%

2%

7% 8%

3%

9%

5% 7%

5%


company cars for Car sharing

104


Total

Ride sharing

Yes probably

Yes certainly



3% 3% 4% 3% 1% 1% 4% 2% 1%

7% 2% 1% 1%

7% 8% 10%

7% 7%

3%

10%

4% 6%

14%

5% 6% 7%


company cars for Ride sharing

105


Total

Yes probably

Yes certainly




2% 2% 4% 4% 1% - 2% 3% 1% 4% 2% 1% -

6% 9%

6% 8%

5% 2%

4%

12% 9%

8% 5% 6%

4%


company cars for Mobility budget

106


13% 15% 20%

11% 9% 4%

15% 16% 15% 21%

10% 12% 11%

% YES

Total MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%


At least one alternative (certainly or probably)

Ride sharing, Car sharing or Mobility budget


company cars for alternative solutions

107

0%

10%

20%

20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Inte

nti

on

to

giv

e u

p a

ll o

r p

art

of

co

mp

an

y c

ars

fo

r at

least

on

e

alt

ern

ati

ve s

olu

tio

ns

(S

T c

ert

ain

ly +

pro

bably

) :

Car

sharin

g,

rid

e s

harin

g a

nd m

obili

ty b

udget

/ card

Part of companies already using or considering to use at least one

alternative solutions Car sharing, ride sharing and mobility budget / card

Perspective in terms of alternative mobility solutions

Forward-looking countries

Alternative solutions-

oriented countries but

company cars lovers No interest in

alternative

solutions

Already users but

not convinced to

give up company

cars yet

108

INFORMATION SOURCES

VI

109

T13. Which are your main sources of information when you are looking for technical information related to your fleet management (such as safety, specifications of

vehicle model, costs…)? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Main sources of information when looking for technical

information related to fleet management

Information from car manufacturers

Websites

Information from long-term lessor / leasing company

Specialized press

Social Media

Blogs and consumers' feedbacks

Information from apps

59%

54%

29%

28%

17%

15%

10%

Total

Part of main sources of information…

71%

54%

49%

42%

19%

15%

13%

58%

51%

33%

28%

14%

12%

8%

56%

55%

20%

23%

17%

16%

10%

en savoir plus : www.csa.eu - @InstitutCSA 10, rue Godefroy - 92800 Puteaux Tel . : 01.57.00.58.00 - Fax : 01.57.00.58.01

110

Date post:	28-Jun-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

2017 FLEET BAROMETER · 6 * Company size boundary depends of the country – see previous page **...

Documents