+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 2nd Assessment En

2nd Assessment En

Date post: 10-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: mohamed-wahby
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 73

Transcript
  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    1/73

    UNEP

    PNUE

    WM O

    OMM

    INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE

    IPCC S e c o n d As s e s s m e n tCl im a t e Ch a n g e 1 9 9 5

    A REPORT OF THE

    INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    2/73

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    3/73

    UNEP

    PNUE

    WM O

    OMM

    INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE

    IPCC S e c o n d As s e s s m e n t

    Cl im a t e Ch a n g e 1 9 9 5

    A REPORT OF THE

    INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    4/73

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    5/73

    CONTENTS

    Page

    PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v

    FOREWORD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii

    IPCC SECOND ASSESSMENT SYNTHESIS OF SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL INFORMATION RELEVANT TO

    INTERPRETING ARTICLE 2 OF THE UN FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

    1. Addressing the UNFCCC Article 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

    2. Anth ropogenic in terference with th e cl imate system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

    3. Sensit ivi ty and adaptat ion of systems to cl imate change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

    4. Analyt ical approach to s tabi lizat ion of atmospheric concentrat ions of greenhouse gases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

    5. Technology and policy options for mit igat ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

    6. Equity and social considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

    7. Economic development to proceed in a sustainable mann er . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

    8. The road forward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

    SUMMARY FOR POLICYMAKERS: THE SCIENCE OF CLIMATE CHANGE IPCC WORKING GROUP I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

    1. Greenhou se gas concentrat ions have continued to increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

    2. Anth ropogenic aerosols tend to produce negative radiat ive forcings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

    3. Climate has changed over the past century . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

    4. The balance of evidence suggests a d iscernible human influence on global cl imate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

    5. Climate is expected to continue to change in th e future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

    6. There are still man y uncertainties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

    SUMMARY FOR PO LICYMAKERS: SCIENTIFIC-TECH NIC AL ANALYSES OF IMPACTS, ADAPTATIONS

    AND MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE IPCC WORKING GROUP II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

    1. Scope of the assessmen t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

    2. Nature of the issue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

    3. Vulnerability to climate chan ge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283.1 Terrestrial and aq uatic ecosystems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

    3.2 Hydrology and water resources management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

    3.3 Food an d fibre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

    3.4 Hum an infrastructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

    3.5 Hum an h ealth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

    4. Options to reduce emissions and enhan ce sinks of greenh ouse gases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

    4.1 Energy, industrial process and h uman set t lement em issions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

    4.1.1 Energy deman d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

    4.1.2 Mitigat ing industrial process and hum an set t lemen t emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

    4.1.3 Energy supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

    4.1.4 Integrat ion of energy system m it igat ion options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

    4.2 Agriculture, rangelands and forestry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 394.3 Cross-sectoral issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

    4.4 Policy instrum ents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

    SUMMARY FOR PO LICYMAKERS: THE ECONO MIC AND SOC IAL DIMENSION S OF CLIMATE CHANGE

    IPCC W ORKING G ROUP III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

    1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

    2. Scope of the assessmen t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

    3. Decision-making frameworks for addressing climate chan ge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

    4. Equity and social considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

    5. Intertemporal equity and discounting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

    6. Applicability of cost and benefit assessment s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

    7. The social costs of anthropogenic climate change: Damages of increased greenh ouse gas emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

    iii

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    6/73

    Page

    8. Generic assessment of response strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

    9. Costs of respon se option s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

    10. Integrated assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

    11. An econom ic assessmen t of policy instruments to combat cl imate change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

    APPENDIX: HEAD AUTHORS, AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

    LIST OF IPCC OUTPUTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

    CLIMATE CHANGE 1 995 : IPCC SECO ND ASSESSMENT REPORT

    iv

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    7/73

    The Intergovernm ental Panel on Climate Ch ange (IPCC) was jointlyestablished by th e World Meteorological Organization an d th e United

    Nations Environm ent Programm e in 1988, in order to: (i) assess avail-

    able scientific information on climate change, (ii) assess the

    environmental and socio-economic impacts of climate change, and

    (iii) formulate response strategies. The IPCC First Assessment Report

    was completed in August 1990 an d served as the basis for n egotiating

    the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. The IPCC also

    completed its 1992 Supplement and Climate Change 1994: Radiative

    Forcing of Climate Change and An Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emission

    Scenarios to assist the Con vention process further.

    In 1992, the Panel reorganized its Working Groups II and III to

    assess, respectively, the impacts and response options, and the

    social and econom ic aspects of climate ch ange. It comm itted itself

    to com pleting its Second Assessment in 1995, not only upd ating th e

    information on th e same range of topics as in the First Assessment ,

    but also includin g the n ew subject area of techn ical issues related to

    th e socio-econom ic aspects of climate chan ge. We applaud t he IPCC

    for prod ucin g its Secon d Assessmen t Report (SAR) as scheduled. We

    are convinced that the SAR, as the earlier IPCC reports, would

    become a standard work of reference, widely used by policymakers,

    scientists and oth er experts.

    As usual in th e IPCC, success in p roducing th is report h as depended

    upon the enthusiasm and cooperation of numerous busy scientistsand other experts worldwide. We are exceedingly pleased to note

    here the very special efforts made by the IPCC in ensuring the

    participation of scientists and other experts from the developing

    and transitional econom y coun tries in its activities, in particular in

    th e writing, reviewing and revising of its reports. Th e scient ists an d

    experts from the developed, developing and transitional economy

    countries have given of their time very generously, and govern-

    ments have supported them, in the enormous intellectual and

    ph ysical effort requ ired, often going substantially beyond reason-

    able demand s of duty. Without such conscientious and professional

    involvement, th e IPCC would be greatly im poverished. We express

    to all these scientists and experts, and the governments whosupported them, our sincere appreciation for their commitment.

    We take th is opportunity to express our gratitude to th e following

    individuals for nurtu ring anoth er IPCC report th rough to a success-

    ful com pletion:

    Prof. Bolin, th e Chairman of the IPCC, for his able leadership andskilful guidan ce of th e IPCC;

    th e Vice-Chairmen of th e IPCC, Prof. Yu. A. Izrael (Russian

    Federation ) an d Dr A. Al-Gain (Saudi Arabia);

    th e Co-Chairmen of Working Group I, Dr L.G. Meira Filho (Brazil)

    and Sir John Houghton (UK); the Vice-Chairmen of the W orking

    Group, Dr Ding Yihui (China), Dr H. Grassl and later Prof.

    D. Ehh alt (German y) and Dr A.B. Diop (Senegal);

    the Co-Chairmen of Working Group II, Dr R. T. Watson (USA) and

    Dr M.C. Zinyowera (Zimbabwe); the Vice-Chairmen of the

    Working Group, Dr O. Canziani (Argentina), Dr M. Petit (France),

    Dr S. K. Sha rma (India), Mr H. Tsukam oto (Japan ), Prof. P. Vellinga

    (the Netherlands), Dr M. Beniston (Switzerland) Dr A. Hentati and

    later Dr J. Friaa (Tunisia) and Ing. (Mrs) M. Perdom o (Venezuela);

    the Co-Chairmen of Working Group III, Dr J.P. Bruce (Canada) and

    Dr Hoesung Lee (Republic of Korea); the Vice-Chairmen of the

    Working Group, Prof. R. Odingo (Kenya) and Dr T. Hanisch and

    later Dr L. Loren tsen (Norw ay);

    th e Regional Representatives in th e IPCC Bureau, Dr A. Adejokun

    (Nigeria for Africa), Dr H. Nasrallah (Kuwait for Asia), Dr F. Fajardo

    Moros (Cuba for North and Central America and the Caribbean),

    Dr N. Sabogal and later Dr K. Robertson (Colombia for South

    Am erica), Dr J. Zillman (Australia for Sout h west Pacific) an d Dr

    M. Bautista Perez (Spain for Europ e); Dr B. Callander, the Head of the Technical Support Unit of

    Working Group I and his staff, Ms K. Maskell, Mrs J.A. Lakeman

    and Mrs F. Mills, and those who provided additional assistance,

    namely, Dr N. Harris (European Ozone Research Co-ordinating

    Unit, Cambridge, UK) and Dr A. Kattenberg (Royal Netherlands

    Meteorological Institute);

    Dr R. H. Moss, the Head of the Technical Support Unit of Working

    Group II and his staff, interns or volunteers, namely, Mr

    S. Agarwala, Mr D.J. Dokken, Mr S. Greco, Ms D. Hagag, Ms

    S. MacCracken, Ms F. Ormo nd , Ms M. Taylor, Ms A. Tenney an d

    Ms L. Van Wie;

    Dr E. Haites, the Head of the Technical Support Unit of Working

    Group III and h is staff Ms L. Lawson an d Ms V. Dreja;

    and Dr N. Sundararaman, the Secretary of the IPCC and his staff in

    the IPCC Secretariat, the late Mr S. Tewungwa, Mrs R. Bourgeois,

    Ms C. Ettori an d Ms C. Tanikie.

    PREFACE

    G.O.P. Obasi

    Secretary-General

    World Meterological Organization

    Ms E. Dowdeswell

    Executive D irector

    United Nations Environment Programme

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    8/73

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    9/73

    The IPCC completed its Second Assessment Report (SAR) inDecemb er 1995. Th e SAR consists of four part s:

    th e IPCC Second Assessment Synthesis of Scientific-Techn ical

    Information Relevant to Interpreting Article 2 of the UN

    Framework Convention on Climate Change;

    the Report of Working Group I of the IPCC, the Science of Climate

    Change, with a Summary for Policymakers (SPM);

    th e Report of Working Group II of th e IPCC, Scient ific-Techn ical

    Analyses of Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate

    Change, with SPM;

    the Report of Working Group III of the IPCC, the Economic and

    Social Dimensions of Climate Change, with SPM.

    The IPCC Second Assessment Synthesis and the Summaries for

    Policymakers of the th ree Working Groups constitute th e Report of

    th e IPCC (1995). They are published in t h is volum e and available in

    the six UN languages, namely, Arabic, Chinese, English, French,

    Russian an d Span ish. Th e Reports of the W orking Group s, with th eir

    respective SPMs, are available in English on ly and each is separately

    published com mercially.

    We take this opportunity, because of much misinformation and

    misunderstanding on the subject , to inform the reader on h ow the

    IPCC conducts its assessments.

    1 . Th e Pa nel a t t h e o ut set d ecid es t h e co n ten t , b ro ken d ow n

    into chapters, of the report of each of its Working Group s. A writing

    team of th ree to six experts (on som e rare occasions, m ore) is con sti-

    tuted for the in itial drafting and subsequent revisions of a ch apter.

    Governm ents and intergovernm ental and non -governm ental orga-

    nizations are requested to nominate individuals with appropriate

    expertise for consideration for inclusion in the writing teams. The

    publication record of the nom inees and ot her relevant in formation

    are also requested. Lists of such individuals are compiled from

    which the writing team is selected by the Bureau of the Working

    Group con cerned (i.e., the Co-Chairmen an d th e Vice-Chairmen of

    th e Working Group). The IPCC requires that at least one m ember ofeach writing team be from the d eveloping world.

    2. Th e rep ort s are req uired to h ave a Su m m ary fo r

    Policymakers (SPM). The SPM should reflect the state-of-the-art

    understanding of the subject matter and be wri t ten in a manner

    that is readily comprehensible to the non-specialist. Differing but

    scientifically or technically well-founded views should be so

    exposed in the reports and th e SPMs, if they cann ot be reconciled in

    th e course of the assessmen t.

    3 . Th e w rit in g t ea m s d ra ft t h e ch a pt er s a n d t h e m a te ria l fo r

    inclusion in the SPMs. The drafts are based on literature published

    in peer-reviewed journals and reports of professional organizationssuch as th e Internat ional Coun cil of Scient ific Unions, the World

    Meteorological Organization, the United Nations Environment

    Programm e, the World Health O rganization an d th e United Nations

    Food an d Agriculture Organization. Som etimes, the IPCC holds

    workshop s to collect in formation that is otherwise n ot readily avail-

    able; th is is particularly done t o en courage information-gathering

    on an d in th e developing count ries.

    4 . Ea ch d r aft ch a pt er is se n t t o te n s o f e xp ert s w or ld wid e fo r

    expert review. The reviewers are also chosen from nominations

    made by governments and organizations. The mandated time for

    this review is six weeks. The draft, revised in the light of the

    comments received, is sent to governments and organizations for

    th eir techn ical review. The man dated tim e for this (second) review

    is also six weeks. In som e cases, the exp ert an d govern m ent reviews

    are conducted simultaneously when the time factor would not

    permit sequential reviews.

    5 . Th e dr aft is r ev ise d a se co n d tim e in t h e ligh t o f t h e r ev ie ws

    received from governments and organizations. It is then sent to

    governments (and organizations) one month in advance of the

    session of the Working Group wh ich would con sider it. The Wo rking

    Group approves the SPM line by line and accepts the underlying

    chapters; the two together constitute the Report of the Working

    Group. It is not practical for th e Working Group to app rove its Reportwhich usually runs to two h un dred pages or more. The meanin g of

    the term acceptance in th is context is that t he un derlying chapters

    and the SPM are consistent with each other.

    6 . W h en t h e W orkin g G ro up ap pro ves t h e SPM , select ed

    mem bers of the writing teams from the d eveloping as well as the

    developed wo rlds are present an d th e text of th e SPM is revised at

    th e session with t heir con currence. Thu s, in reality, the Reports of

    the Working Groups are written and revised by experts and

    reviewed by other experts.

    7 . Th e Rep ort of t h e W orkin g G ro up (w it h th e ap pro vedSPM) is sent to governments and organizations one month before

    th e session of the IPCC which would con sider it for acceptan ce.

    8 . Th e r ea der m a y n o t e t h at th e IPC C is a fu lly in t er go ve rn -

    m en tal, scient ific-techn ical body. All States th at are Memb ers of th e

    United Nation s and of th e World Meteorological Organization are

    Members of the IPCC and its Working Groups. As such, govern-

    men ts approve the SPMs and accept th e un derlying chap ters, which

    are, as stated earlier, written and revised by experts.

    The IPCC Second Assessment Synthesis was drafted by a Drafting

    Team con st itu ted un der the chairmanship of the Ch airman of the

    FOREWORD

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    10/73

    IPCC. It un derwent expert and governm ent reviews simultan eously.

    It was approved line by line by the IPCC at its Eleventh Session

    (Rom e, 11-15 December 1995).

    May we reiterate that the reports of the IPCC and of its Working

    Groups contain the factual basis of the issue of climate change,

    gleaned from available expert literature and further carefullyreviewed by experts and governm ents. In tot al more than two th ou-

    sand experts worldwide participate in drafting an d reviewing th em.

    Governm ents of th e world approve/accept them for their scientific-

    techn ical conten t. The final product is written by experts selected

    worldwide an d accepted by governm ents sitting in plenary sessions.

    We also take this opportunity to record the sad loss of a valued

    m em ber of the IPCC Secretariat. Mr Sam uel Tewungwa, wh o passed

    away in January 1996, was seconded by the United NationsEnvironment Programme to the Secretariat. His good cheer and

    good hum our and d edication to du ty are, and will be, much missed.

    CLIMATE CHANGE 1 995 : IPCC SECO ND ASSESSMENT REPORT

    viii

    N. Sun dararaman

    Secretary of th e IPCC

    B. Bolin

    Chairman of the IPCC

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    11/73

    IPCC SECOND ASSESSMENT SYNTHESIS OF

    SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL INFORMATION

    RELEVANT TO INTERPRETING ARTICLE 2

    OF THE UN FRAMEWORK CONVENTION

    ON CLIMATE CHANGE

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    12/73

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    13/73

    1 .1 Fo ll ow in g a r eso lu t io n o f t h e Ex ec ut iv e C ou n c il o f t h e

    World Meteorological Organization (July 1992), the IPCC decided

    to in clude an exam ination of approaches to Article 2, th e Objective

    of the UN Framework Convent ion on Climate Chan ge (UNFCCC),

    in its work programme. It organized a workshop on th e subject in

    October 1994 in Fortaleza, Brazi l , at the invi tat ion of the

    Governm ent of Brazil. Thereafter, th e IPCC Chairman assembled a

    team of lead authors (listed at the end of this report in the

    Appen dix) under h is chairman ship to draft th e Synth esis. The team

    produced th e draft which was subm itted for expert and governm ent

    review and com m ent . The final draft Synt hesis was approved lin e by

    line by the IPCC at its eleventh session (Rome, 11-15 December

    1995), where representatives of 116 governments were present as

    well as 13 intergovernmental and 25 non-governmental organiza-

    tions. It may be no ted for information that all Member States of the

    World Meteorological Organization and of the Un ited Nations are

    Members of the IPCC and can attend its sessions and those of its

    Working Groups. The Synth esis presents informat ion on th e scien-

    tific and technical issues related to interpreting Article 2 of the

    UNFCCC, drawing on the underlying IPCC Second Assessment

    Report. Since the Synthesis is not simply a summary of the IPCC

    Second Assessment Report, the Summaries for Policymakers of the

    three IPCC Working Groups should also be consulted for a

    summ ary of th e Second Assessmen t Report.

    1 .2 D ur in g th e pa st fe w d eca de s, tw o im p o rt an t fa ct or s

    regarding th e relationship between h um ans and the Earths climate

    have become apparent. First, human activities, including the

    burn ing of fossil fuels, lan d-use chan ge and agriculture, are increas-

    ing the atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases (which

    tend to warm the atmosphere) and, in some regions, aerosols

    (microscopic airborne particles, which tend to cool the atmos-

    phere). These changes in greenhouse gases and aerosols, taken

    together, are projected to change regional and global climate and

    climat e-related parameters such as tem perature, precipitation, soil

    moisture and sea level. Second, some human communities have

    become more vulnerable1

    to hazards such as storms, floods anddroughts as a result of increasing population density in sensitive

    areas such as river basins and coastal plains. Potentially serious

    chan ges have been identified, including an increase in som e regions

    in the incidence of extreme high-temperature events, floods and

    drought s, with resultant consequences for fires, pest ou tbreaks, and

    ecosystem composit ion, s t ructure and funct ioning, including

    primary p roductivity.

    1 .3 Scie n t ific an d t e ch n i ca l a sse ssm e n t s o f c lim a t e c h an g e a n d

    its imp acts have been conducted by th e Intergovernmen tal Panel on

    Climate Change (IPCC). The First Assessment, published in 1990,

    provided a scientific and technical base for the UN Framework

    Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) which was open for

    signat ure at th e Earth Sum mit in Rio in 1992.

    1 .4 Th e u lt im a t e o b je ct iv e o f t h e UN FC CC , a s e xp re sse d i n

    Article 2 is:

    . . . stabilization o f greenh ouse gas concen trations in th e atmo sphere at

    a level that wou ld prevent dan gerous ant hrop ogenic interference with

    the climate system. Such a level should be achieved within a time-

    frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate

    change, to ensure that food production is not threatened and to enable

    econom ic developmen t to proceed in a sustainable man ner.

    1 .5 Th e c h all en g es p re se n t ed to th e p o lic ym a ke r b y Ar tic le 2

    are the determination of what concentrations of greenhouse gases

    might be regarded as dangerous anthropogenic interference with

    the climate system and the charting of a future which allows for

    economic development which is sustainable. The purpose of this

    synthesis report is to provide scientific, technical and socio-

    economic information that can be used, inter alia, in addressing

    these challenges. It is based on the 1994 and 1995 reports of the

    IPCC Working Groups.

    1 .6 Th e re po rt fo llo ws th r ou gh t h e va rio us m at ter s w h ich a r e

    addressed in Article 2. It first briefly summarizes the degree ofclimat e change th e int erference with th e climate system

    which is projected to occur as a result of hum an activities. It th en

    goes on to highlight what we know about the vulnerabilities of

    ecosystems and human communities to likely climate changes,

    especially in regard to agriculture and food production and to oth er

    factors such as water availability, health and the impact of sea-level

    rise which are important considerations for sustainable develop-

    m ent . The task of the IPCC is to pro vide a sound scien tific basis th at

    would enable policymakers to better interpret dangerous anthro-

    pogenic interference with th e climat e system.

    1 .7 G iv en cu r re n t t re n d s o f i n cr ea si n g e m issio n s o f m o stgreenhouse gases, atmospheric concentrations of these gases will

    increase through th e next century and beyond. With th e growth in

    atm ospheric concentration s of greenh ouse gases, int erference with

    the climate system will grow in magnitude and the likelihood of

    adverse impacts from climate chan ge that could be judged danger-

    ous will become greater. Therefore, possible pathways of future net

    emissions were considered which might lead to stabilization at

    different levels and the general constraints these imply. This

    3

    1 Vulnerability defines the extent to which climate change may damage orharm a system. It depends not only on a systems sensitivity but also on itsability to adapt to new climatic conditions.

    ADDRESSING THE UNFCCC ARTICLE 2 1

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    14/73

    consideration forms the n ext part of the report an d is followed by a

    summ ary of the techn ical and policy options for reducing emissions

    and enh ancing sinks of greenho use gases.

    1 .8 Th e re po rt th e n ad d re sse s i ssu e s r ela t ed t o e q ui ty a n d to

    ensuring that economic development proceeds in a sustainable

    manner. This involves addressing, for instance, estimates of thelikely dam age of climate chan ge impacts, and th e impacts, includ-

    ing costs and benefits, of adaptation and mitigation. Finally, a

    nu mb er of insights from available studies point to ways of taking

    initial actions (see the section on Road Forward) even if, at present,

    it is difficult to decide upon a target for atm osph eric concen tration s,

    includin g consideration s of time-frames, that would prevent danger-

    ous anth ropogenic interference with th e climat e system.

    1 .9 C lim a te ch a n ge p resen t s t h e de cisio n m a ke r w it h a set o f

    formidable complications: considerable remaining uncertainties

    inherent in the complexity of the problem, the potential for

    irreversible damages or costs, a very long planning horizon, long

    tim e lags between em ission s and effects, wide regional variation s in

    causes and effects, an irreducibly global problem, and a multiple of

    greenhouse gases and aerosols to consider. Yet another compli-

    cation is that effective protection of the climate system requires

    international cooperation in the context of wide variations in

    income levels, flexibility and expectations of the future; this raises

    issues of efficiency and intra-national, international and inter-

    generational equity. Equity is an importan t elemen t for legitimizing

    decisions and prom oting cooperation.

    1 .10 Decis ions with respect to Art icle 2 of the UNFCCC involve

    three distinct but interrelated choices: stabilization level, net

    emissions pathway and mitigation technologies and policies. The

    report presents available scientific and techn ical information on th ese

    th ree choices. It also n otes where un certainties rem ain regarding such

    informat ion. Article 3 of th e UNFCCC ident ifies a range of prin ciples

    that shall guide, inter alia, decision-making with respect to t he u ltimate

    objective of the Con vent ion, as foun d in Article 2. Article 3.32 provides

    guidance, inter alia, on decision-makin g where th ere is a lack of full

    scientific certainty, n amely th at th e Parties shou ld:

    take precautionary measures to anticipate, prevent or minimize the

    causes of climate ch ange an d m itigate its adverse effects. Where th ere

    are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific

    certainty sh ould n ot be used as a reason for postpon ing such m easures,

    taking into account that policies and measures to deal with climate

    chan ge should b e cost effective so as to en sure global benefits at th e

    lowest possible cost. To achieve this, such po licies and m easures sho uld

    take into account different socio-economic contexts, be comprehen-

    sive, cover all relevant sou rces, sinks an d reservoirs of greenho use gases

    and adaptation and comp rise all econ om ic sectors. Efforts to address

    climat e chan ge may be carried o ut cooperatively by in terested Parties.

    The Second Assessment Report of the IPCC also provides informa-

    tion in th is regard.

    1 .11 The long t ime-sca les involved in the c limate system (e .g .,

    the lon g residence time of greenhou se gases in th e atmo sphere) and

    in th e time for replacement of infrastructure, and th e lag by man y

    decades to centuries between stabilization of concentrations and

    stabilization of temperature and mean sea level, indicate the

    importan ce for timely decision-making.

    CLIMATE CHANGE 1 995 : IPCC SECO ND ASSESSMENT REPORT

    4

    ANTHROPOGENIC INTERFERENCE WITH

    THE CLIMATE SYSTEM 2

    Interference to the present day

    2 .1 In o r der t o u n d er st an d w h at co n st it u te s co n cen t ra tio n s o f greenh ouse gases that would prevent dangerous interference with

    the climate system, it is first necessary to u nd erstand current atm os-

    pheric concentrations and trends of greenhouse gases, and their

    consequences (both present an d projected) to the climate system.

    2 .2 Th e at m o sp h er ic co n ce n tr at io n s o f t h e gr ee n h ou se ga ses,

    and am ong them , carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous

    oxide (N2O), have grown significantly sin ce pre-ind ustrial times (about

    1750 A.D.): CO2 from about 280 to almost 360 ppmv3, CH4 from 700

    to 1720 ppbv and N2O from about 275 to abou t 310 ppbv. These trends

    can be attribut ed largely to h um an activities, m ostly fossil-fuel use,

    land-use change and agriculture. Concentrations of other anthro-

    pogenic greenh ouse gases have also increased. An increase of green-

    house gas concentrations leads on average to an additional warming

    of the atmosphere and the Earths surface. Many greenhouse gasesremain in th e atmosph ere and affect climate for a long tim e.

    2 .3 Trop o sp h e ric ae ro so ls re su lt in g from c o m b u st io n o f fo ssi l

    fuels, biomass burning and other sources have led to a negative

    direct forcing and possibly also to a negative indirect forcing of a

    similar m agnitude. Wh ile the n egative forcing is focused in partic-

    ular regions and subcontinental areas, it can have continental to

    hemispheric scale effects on climate patterns. Locally, the aerosol

    forcing can be large enough to m ore than offset th e positive forcing

    3 ppmv stands for parts per million by volume; ppbv stands for parts perbillion (th ousan d million) by volume. Values quoted are for 1992.

    2 Kuwait registered its objection to q uotin g on ly subparagraph 3 of Article 3

    and n ot th e Article in its entirety.

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    15/73

    due to greenhouse gases. In contrast to the long-lived greenhouse

    gases, anth ropogen ic aerosols are very short-lived in t he atm osph ere

    and hence their radiative forcing adjusts rapidly to increases or

    decreases in em issions.

    2 .4 G lo ba l m e an s ur fa ce te m p erat u re h as in c re ase d b y b et we en

    about 0.3 and 0.6C since the late 19th century, a change that isunlikely to be entirely natural in origin. The balance of evidence,

    from changes in global mean surface air temperature and from

    changes in geographical, seasonal and vertical patterns of atmos-

    ph eric tem perature, suggests a discernible hum an in fluence on global

    climate. There are uncertainties in key factors, including the magni-

    tude and patterns of long-term natural variability. Global sea level

    has risen by between 10 an d 25 cm o ver the past 100 years and mu ch

    of the rise may be related to th e increase in global mean temperature.

    2 .5 Th e re ar e in a deq u at e d at a t o de ter m in e wh e th e r co n sist -

    ent global chan ges in climate variability or weather extrem es have

    occurred over the 20th century. On regional scales there is clear

    evidence of chan ges in some extremes an d climate variability indi-

    cators. Some of these changes have been toward greater variability,

    some have been toward lower variability. However, to date it has

    not been possible to firmly establish a clear connection between

    th ese region al changes and h um an activities.

    Possible consequences of future interference

    2 .6 In the absence o f mi t igat ion pol ic ies o r sign ifican t techno-

    logical advances that reduce emissions and/or enhance sinks,

    concen trations of greenho use gases and aerosols are expected to grow

    throughout the next century. The IPCC has developed a range of

    scenarios, IS92a-f, of future green ho use gas and a erosol precursor em is-sions based on assumptions concerning population and economic

    growth, land-use, techn ological chan ges, energy availability and fuel

    m ix during the period 1990 to 21004. By th e year 2100, carbon d iox-

    ide emissions un der th ese scenarios are projected to be in th e range of

    about 6 GtC5 per year, roughly equal to current em ission s, to as much

    as 36 GtC per year, with th e lower end of th e IPCC range assum ing low

    population and economic growth to 2100. Methane emissions are

    projected to be in th e range 540 to 1170 Tg6 CH 4 per year (1990 emis-

    sions were about 500 Tg CH4); nitrous oxide emissions are projected

    to be in th e range 14 to 19 Tg N per year (1990 em ission s were about

    13 Tg N). In all cases, the atm ospheric concent rations of greenhou se

    gases and total radiative forcing con tinu e to increase throu ghout th esimulation p eriod of 1990 to 2100.

    2 .7 Fo r th e m i d-r an g e IPC C em i ssio n sc en a rio , IS9 2a , a ssu m -

    ing the best estimate value of climate sensitivity7 and including

    the effects of future increases in aerosol concentrations, models

    project an increase in global m ean surface temp erature relative to

    1990 of about 2C by 2100. This estimate is approximately one-

    th ird lower than the best estimate in 1990. This is due primarily

    to lower emission scenarios (particularly for CO 2 and CFCs), the

    inclusion of th e cooling effect of sulphate aerosols, and improve-

    ments in the treatment of the carbon cycle. Combining the lowest

    IPCC emission scenario (IS92c) with a low value of climate

    sensitivity and including the effects of future changes in aerosol

    concent rations leads to a projected increase of about 1C by 2100.

    The corresponding projection for the highest IPCC scenario (IS92e)

    com bined with a high value of climat e sensitivity gives a warmin g

    of about 3 .5C. In all cases the average rate of warmin g would pro b-

    ably be greater than any seen in the last 10,000 years, but the actu al

    ann ual to decadal chan ges would include con siderable natural vari-ability. Regional temperature changes could differ substantially

    from the global mean value. Because of the thermal inertia of the

    oceans, only 50-90% of the eventual equilibrium temperature

    change would have been realized by 2100 and temperature would

    contin ue to in crease beyond 2100, even if concentrations of green-

    house gases were stabilized by that time.

    2 .8 Av erag e se a l ev el is e xp e ct e d t o ri se as a re su l t o f t h e rm a l

    expansion of th e oceans an d m elting of glaciers and ice-sheets. For

    th e IS92a scenario, assum ing th e best estimate values of climat e

    sensitivity and of ice melt sensitivity to warming, and including

    the effects of future changes in aerosol concentrations, models

    project an in crease in sea level of about 50 cm from th e present to

    2100. This estimate is approximately 25% lower than the best

    est imate in 1990 due to the lower temperature project ion, but

    also reflect ing im provements in the cl imate and ice melt mod els.

    Combining the lowest emission scenario (IS92c) with the low

    climate and ice melt sensitivities and including aerosol effects

    gives a projected sea-level rise of about 15 cm from t he p resent to

    2100. The corresponding projection for the highest emission

    scenario (IS92e) combined with high climate and ice-melt

    sensitivities gives a sea-level rise of about 95 cm from th e present

    to 2100. Sea level would con tinu e to rise at a similar rate in future

    centu ries beyond 2100, even if concentration s of greenh ouse gases

    were s tabi l ized by that t ime, and would continue to do so evenbeyond the t ime of s tabi l izat ion of g lobal mean temperature.

    Regional sea-level chan ges may differ from th e global mean value

    owing to land m ovement an d ocean current ch anges.

    2 .9 Conf idence i s h igher in the hemispheric -to -con t inen tal sca le

    projections of coupled atmo sphere-ocean climate mo dels th an in th e

    regional projections, where confidence remains low. There is more

    confidence in temp erature projections th an h ydrological chan ges.

    2 .10 Al l model simula t ions , whether they were fo rced with

    increased concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols or with

    increased concent rations of greenho use gases alon e, show th e follow-ing features: greater surface warming of the land than of the sea in

    winter; a maximum surface warming in high northern

    IPCC SECOND ASSESSMENT SYNTHESIS OF SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL INFORMATION RELEVANT

    TO INTERPRETING ARTICLE 2 OF THE UN FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE

    5

    4 See Table 1 in t he Sum mary for Policymakers of IPCC Working Group II.

    5 To convert GtC (gigatonnes of carbon or thousand mill ion tonnes ofcarbon) to m ass of carbon dioxide, multiply GtC by 3.67.

    6 Tg: teragram is 1012 grams.

    7 In IPCC reports, climate sensitivity usually refers to long-term (equilib-rium) change in global mean surface temperature following a doubling ofatmospheric equivalent CO2 concentration. More generally, it refers to theequilibrium change in surface air temperature following a unit change inradiative forcing (C/Wm -2).

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    16/73

    latitudes in wint er, little surface warmin g over the Arctic in sum m er;

    an enhanced global mean hydrological cycle, and increased precipi-

    tation an d soil moisture in h igh latitudes in win ter. All these changes

    are associated with iden tifiable physical m echan isms.

    2 .1 1 W a rm e r te m p er at u re s w ill le ad t o a m o re vigo ro u s

    hydrological cycle; this translates into prospects for more severedroughts and/or floods in some places and less severe droughts

    an d/o r floods in ot h er places. Several mod els ind icate an in crease in

    precipitation intensity, suggesting a possibility for more extreme

    rainfall events. Knowledge is currently insufficient to say whether

    there will be any changes in the occurrence or geographical

    distribution of severe storm s, e.g., tropical cyclones.

    2 .1 2 Th e re a re m a n y u n ce rt a in t i es a n d m a n y fa ct o rs c u rr en t l y

    l imit our abi l i ty to project and detect fu ture cl imate change.

    Future unexpected, large and rapid cl imate system changes

    (as have occurred in the past) are, by their nature, difficult to

    predict. This im plies th at future climat e chan ges m ay also involve

    surprises. In particular, these arise from the non-linear nature

    of the climate system. When rapidly forced, non-linear systemsare especially subject to unexpected behaviour. Progress can

    be made by invest igat ing non-l inear processes and sub-

    compon ents of th e cl imatic system. Examples of such non -linear

    behaviour include rapid circulat ion changes in the North

    Atlantic and feedbacks associated with terrestrial ecosystem

    changes.

    CLIMATE CHANGE 1 995 : IPCC SECO ND ASSESSMENT REPORT

    6

    SENSITIVITY AND ADAPTATION OF

    SYSTEMS TO CLIMATE CHANGE 33 .1 Th i s se ct io n p rov id es sc ie n t ific an d t e ch n i ca l in form a tio n

    that can be used, inter alia, in evaluating whether the projected

    range of plausible impacts constitutes dangerous anthropogenic

    interference with th e clim ate system , as referred to in Article 2, an d

    in evaluating adaptat ion op tions. However, it is not yet possible to

    link particular imp acts with specific atmosph eric concen trations of

    greenhouse gases.

    3 .2 H u m an h e a lt h , t er re st ri al a n d aq u at ic ec olo gi ca l sy st em s ,

    an d socio-econom ic system s (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries an dwater resources) are all vital to hu m an d evelopm ent and well-being

    and are all sensitive to both t he m agnitude and th e rate of climate

    chan ge. Whereas man y region s are likely to experience th e adverse

    effects of climate change some of which are potentially

    irreversible some effects of climate change are likely to be

    beneficial. Hence, different segments of society can expect to

    confront a variety of chan ges and th e need to adapt to th em.

    3 .3 H um a n -in d uced c lim a te ch a n ge rep resen t s a n im p o rt an t

    additional stress, particularly to the many ecological and socio-

    econo mic systems already affected by po llution, in creasing resource

    demands, and non-sustainable management pract ices . Thevulnerability of h um an health and socio-econom ic systems and,

    to a lesser extent, ecological systems depends upon economic

    circumstances and institutional infrastructure. This implies that

    system s typically are more vulnerable in developin g count ries wh ere

    economic and institutional circumstances are less favourable.

    3 .4 Alt h o u gh o u r k n ow le dge h as in c re ase d sign i fica n t ly

    during th e last decade and qualitative estim ates can be developed,

    quantitative projections of the impacts of climate change on any

    particular system at any particular location are difficult because

    regional-scale climate chan ge projections are un certain; o ur curren t

    understanding of many critical processes is limited; systems are

    subject to mu ltiple climatic and non -climatic stresses, th e interac-

    tion s of wh ich are no t always linear or add itive; and very few studies

    have con sidered dyn amic responses to steadily increasing con cen-

    trations of greenhouse gases or the consequences of increases

    beyond a dou bling of equivalent atmo spheric CO2 concentrations.

    3 .5 U n am b igu ou s d et ect io n o f clim a te -in d u ce d ch a n ge s in

    m ost ecological and social system s will prove extrem ely difficult in

    the coming decades. This is because of the complexity of these

    systems, their m any n on-linear feedbacks, and their sensitivity to alarge nu mb er of clim atic and non -climat ic factors, all of which are

    expected to continue to change simultaneously. As future climate

    extends beyond the boundaries of empirical knowledge (i.e., the

    documented impacts of climate variation in the past), it becomes

    more likely that actual outcomes will include surprises and

    un anticipated rapid chan ges.

    Sensitivity of systems

    Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems

    3 .6 Ecosystems con ta in the Earth s en t ire reservoi r o f gene t icand species diversity an d provide m any good s and services including:

    (i) providing food, fibre, medicines and energy; (ii) processing and

    storing carbon an d ot her n utrient s; (iii) assimilating wastes, purifying

    water, regulating water run off, and con trolling floods, soil degrada-

    tion and beach erosion; and (iv) providing opportunities for

    recreation and tourism. The comp osition and geographic distribu-

    tion of man y ecosystem s (e.g., forests, rangelands, deserts, moun tain

    system s, lakes, wetlands an d o ceans) will shift as in dividual species

    respond to changes in climate; there will likely be reductions in

    biological diversity and in the goods and services that ecosystems

    provide society. Som e ecological systems m ay no t reach a n ew equi-

    librium for several cent uries after th e climate ach ieves a n ew balance.

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    17/73

    This section illustrates the impact of climate chan ge on a nu mber of

    selected ecological systems.

    3.7 Forests: Models project that as a consequence of possible

    chan ges in tem perature and water availability under doubled equiv-

    alent8 CO 2 equilibrium condition s, a substantial fraction (a global

    average of one-third, varying by region from one-seventh to two-th irds) of the existing forested area of the wo rld will un dergo major

    changes in broad vegetation types with the greatest changes

    occurring in high latitudes and the least in the tropics. Climate

    chan ge is expected to occur at a rapid rate relative to the speed at

    which forest species grow, reproduce and re-establish themselves.

    Therefore, the species composition of forests is likely to change;

    en tire forest types may disappear, wh ile new assemblages of species

    and hence new ecosystems may be established. Large amounts of

    carbon could be released into the atmosphere during transitions

    from one forest type to another because the rate at which carbon

    can be lost during tim es of high forest mortality is greater than th e

    rate at which it can be gained th rough growth to m aturity.

    3. 8 Deserts and desertification : Deserts are likely to becom e

    m ore extreme in th at, with few exceptions, they are projected to

    become h otter but not significantly wetter. Temperature increases

    could be a threat to organisms that exist near their heat tolerance

    limits. Desertification lan d degradation in arid, semi-arid and dry

    sub-humid areas resulting from various factors, including climatic

    variations and human activities is more likely to become irre-

    versible if the environment becomes drier and the soil becomes

    further degraded through erosion and compaction.

    3.9 Mountain ecosystems: The altitudinal distribution of

    vegetation is projected to shift to h igher elevation ; some species withclimatic ranges limited to mountain tops could become extinct

    because of disappearance of habitat or reduced migration potential.

    3.10 Aquatic and coastal ecosystems: In lakes and streams,

    warm ing would h ave the greatest biological effects at h igh latitudes,

    where biological productivity would increase, and at the low-

    latitude boundaries of cold- and cool-water species ranges, where

    extinctions would be greatest. The geographical distribution of

    wetlands is likely to shift with chan ges in temp erature and precipi-

    tation . Coastal system s are econo m ically and ecologically import an t

    and are expected to vary widely in their response to changes in

    climate and sea level. Some coastal ecosystems are particularly atrisk, including saltwater marshes, mangrove ecosystems, coastal

    wetlands, sandy beaches, coral reefs, coral atolls and river deltas.

    Chan ges in these ecosystems would h ave major n egative effects on

    tourism, freshwater supplies, fisheries and biodiversity.

    Hydrology and water resources management

    3 .1 1 M od els p ro je ct t h at b et w ee n o n e-t h ird a n d on e -h a lf o f

    existing mountain glacier mass could disappear over the next

    hundred years. The reduced extent of glaciers and depth of snow

    cover also would affect the seasonal distribution of river flow and

    water supply for hydroelectric generat ion and agricul ture.

    Ant icipated h ydrological chan ges and reductions in th e areal extent

    and depth of permafrost could lead to large-scale damage to in fra-

    structure, an add itional flux of carbon dioxide into th e atmosph ere,

    and changes in processes that contribute to the flux of methane

    into the atm osphere.

    3 .1 2 C lim a t e c h an g e w il l le ad t o an i n t en s ific at io n o f t h eglobal hydrological cycle and can have m ajor impacts on regional

    water resources. Changes in the total amount of precipitation and

    in its frequency and intensity directly affect the magnitude and

    timin g of run off and the in tensity of floods and drough ts; however,

    at present, specific regional effects are uncertain. Relatively small

    changes in temperature and precipitation, together with the non-

    linear effects on evapotranspiration and soil m oisture, can result in

    relatively large changes in runoff, especially in arid and semi-arid

    regions. The quantity and quality of water supplies already are

    serious problems today in man y regions, including som e low-lying

    coastal areas, deltas and small islands, making countries in these

    regions particularly vulnerable to any additional reduction in

    indigenous water supplies.

    Agriculture and forestry

    3 .13 Crop y ie lds and changes in p roduct iv ity due to c limate

    change will vary considerably across regions and among localities,

    th us chan ging the pattern s of produ ction. Productivity is projected to

    increase in some areas an d decrease in oth ers, especially the tro pics

    an d subtropics. Existin g stud ies show th at on th e who le, global agri-

    cultural production could be maintained relative to baseline

    production in the face of climate chan ge projected under do ubled

    equivalent CO2 equilibrium conditions. This conclusion takes into

    accoun t th e beneficial effects of CO2 fertilization but d oes not allowfor chan ges in agricultural pests and th e possible effects of changin g

    climatic variability. However, focusing o n global agricultural prod uc-

    tion does not address the potentially serious consequences of large

    differences at local and regional scales, even at m id-latitud es. There

    may be in creased risk of hun ger and famine in some locations; man y

    of th e worlds poorest people particularly those living in subt rop-

    ical and tropical areas and depen den t on isolated agricultural system s

    in sem i-arid and arid region s are mo st at risk of increased hu n ger.

    Global wood supplies during the next cent ury m ay become increas-

    ingly inadequate to meet projected consumption due to both

    climatic and non-climatic factors.

    Human infrastructure

    3 .14 Climate change clearly wil l increase the vu lnerab il ity o f

    some coastal populations to flooding and erosional land loss.

    Estimat es put abou t 46 million people p er year currently at risk of

    flooding due to storm surges. In the absence of adaptation

    measures, and not taking into account anticipated population

    growth , 50-cm sea-level rise would increase this num ber to abou t 92

    m illion ; a 1-m eter sea-level rise would raise it to about 118 m illion .

    IPCC SECOND ASSESSMENT SYNTHESIS OF SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL INFORMATION RELEVANT

    TO INTERPRETING ARTICLE 2 OF THE UN FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE

    7

    8 See paragraph 4.17 for a description o f equivalent CO 2.

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    18/73

    Studies using a 1-meter projection show a particular risk for small

    islan ds and deltas. This increase is at th e top ran ge of IPCC Working

    Group I estimates for 2100; it should be noted, however, that sea

    level is actually projected to continue to rise in future centuries

    beyond 2100. Estimat ed land losses range from 0.05% in Uruguay,

    1.0% for Egypt, 6% for the Netherlands and 17.5% for Bangladesh

    to about 80% for the Majuro Atoll in th e Marshall Islands, given th epresent state of protection systems. Some small island nation s and

    other countries will confront greater vulnerability because their

    existing sea and coastal defense systems are less well established.

    Coun tries with h igher population den sities would be m ore vulner-

    able. Storm surges and flooding could threaten entire cultures. For

    these countries, sea-level rise could force internal or international

    migration of populations.

    Human health

    3 .15 Climate change is like ly to have wide-rang ing and mos tly

    adverse im pacts on hu man health , with significant loss of life. Direct

    health effects include increases in (predomin ant ly cardio-respiratory)

    mortality and illness due to an anticipated increase in the in tensity and

    durat ion of heat wa ves. Temperat ure increases in colder regions sh ould

    result in fewer cold-related d eaths. Ind irect effects of climate chan ge,

    which are expected to predom inate, include increases in th e potent ial

    tran smission of vector-borne in fectious diseases (e.g., malaria, dengu e,

    yellow fever and some viral enceph alitis) resulting from exten sion s of

    th e geographical range and season for vector organ ism s. Models (that

    entail necessary simplifying assumptions) project that temperature

    increases of 3-5C (compared to the IPCC projection of 1-3.5C by

    2100) could lead to potential increases in malaria incidence (of the

    order of 5080 m illion ad ditional an nu al cases, relative to an assum ed

    global background total of 500 million cases), primarily in tropical,subtropical and less well-protected temperate-zone populations.

    Some increases in non-vector-borne infectious diseases such as

    salmonellosis, cholera and giardiasis also could occur as a result of

    elevated temperatures and increased flooding. Limitations on fresh-

    water supplies and on nu tritious food, as well as the aggravation of air

    pollution, will also have human health consequences.

    3 .16 Quan t ifying the p ro jected impacts i s d i ff icu lt because the

    extent of climate-induced health disorders depends on numerous

    coexistent an d interacting factors that characterize the vulnerability

    of the particular population, including environmental and socio-

    economic c i rcumstances , nu t r i t iona l and immune s ta tus ,

    popu lation den sity an d access to quality health care services. Hen ce,

    populations with different levels of natural, technical and social

    resources would differ in their vulnerability to climate-induced

    health impacts.

    Technology and policy options for adaptation

    3 .17 Techno logica l advances genera lly have increased adap ta-

    tion op tion s for man aged systems. Adapta tion op tion s for freshwater

    resources include more efficient management of existing supplies

    and infrastructure; institutional arrangements to limit future

    deman ds/promote con servation; improved m onitoring and forecast-

    ing systems for floods/droughts; rehabilitation of watersheds,

    especially in t h e tropics; and constru ction of n ew reservoir capacity.

    Adaptation options for agriculture such as changes in types and

    varieties of crops, improved water-management and irrigation

    systems, and changes in planting schedules and tillage practices

    will be impo rtan t in limitin g negative effects and taking advan tage of

    beneficial changes in climate. Effective coastal-zone management

    and land-use plann ing can h elp direct po pulation shifts away from

    vulnerable locations such as flood plains, steep hillsides and low-

    lying coastlines. Adaptive options to reduce health impacts include

    protective technology (e.g., housing, air conditioning, water purifi-

    cation and vaccination), disaster preparedness and appropriate

    health care.

    3 .1 8 H ow ev er , m a n y re gio n s o f t h e wo rld cu r re n tl y h a ve

    l imited access to these techn ologies and app ropriate information.

    For some is land nat ions, the high cost of providing adequateprotection would make it essentially infeasible, especially given

    th e limited availability of capital for investm ent . The efficacy an d

    cost-effective use of adaptation strategies will depend upon the

    availabi l i ty of f inancial resources , technology transfer, and

    cultural , educat ional , managerial , ins t i tu t ional , legal and

    regulatory pract ices , both domestic and internat ional in scope.

    Incorporating climate-change concerns into resource-use and

    development decis ions and plans for regularly scheduled

    investments in infrastructure will facilitate adaptation.

    CLIMATE CHANGE 1 995 : IPCC SECO ND ASSESSMENT REPORT

    8

    ANALYTICAL APPROACH TO STABILIZATION OF

    ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATIONS OF GREENHOUSE GASES 44 .1 Ar ticle 2 o f t h e U N Fr am e wo rk Co n ve n tio n o n Clim a te

    Change refers explicitly to stabilization of greenhouse gas concen-

    trat ions. This sect ion provides information on the relat ive

    importance of various greenhouse gases to climate forcing and

    discusses how greenhouse gas emissions might be varied to achieve

    stabilization at selected atm ospheric concen tration levels.

    4 .2 C arbo n dio xid e, m e th a n e a n d n it ro u s o xid e h a ve n a tu ra l a s

    well as anth ropogen ic origin s. The anth ropogen ic em issions of th ese

    gases have contributed about 80% of the additional climate forcing

    due to greenhouse gases since pre-industrial times (i.e., since about

    1750 A.D.). The contribution of CO 2 is about 60% of this forcing,

    about four times that from CH4.

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    19/73

    4 .3 O t h er gr ee n h o use ga se s in c lu d e t ro p osp h e ric ozo n e (w h o se

    chemical precursors include n itrogen oxides, non -methan e h ydro-

    carbons and carbon m onoxide), halocarbons9 (including HCFCs and

    HFCs) and SF6. Tropospheric aerosols and tropospheric ozone are

    inhomogeneously distributed in time and space and their atmos-

    pheric lifetimes are short (days to weeks). Sulphate aerosols are

    amen able to abatement m easures and such m easures are presum ed inth e IPCC scenarios.

    4 .4 M ost em i ssio n sc en a rio s in d i ca te t h a t, in t h e a bse n ce o f

    mitigation policies, greenhouse gas emissions will continue to rise

    during th e next century and lead to greenh ouse gas concentration s

    that by the year 2100 are projected to change climate more than

    th at projected for twice the pre-industrial concen trations of carbon

    dioxide.

    Stabilization of greenhouse gases

    4 .5 Al l r ele va n t gr ee n h o u se ga se s n e ed t o b e c on si de re d in

    addressing stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations. First,

    carbon d ioxide is considered which, because of its imp ortance an d

    complicated behaviour, needs more detailed consideration t han th e

    oth er greenh ouse gases.

    Carbon dioxide

    4 .6 C arb on d io xid e is r em o ve d fro m t h e a tm o sp h er e b y a

    n um ber of processes that op erate on d ifferent t ime-scales. It has a

    relatively lon g residence tim e in t he climate system of th e order

    of a cent ury or more. If net global an th ropogenic em issions10 (i.e.,

    anthropogenic sources minus anthropogenic s inks) were

    main tained at current levels (about 7 GtC/ yr including emissionsfrom fossi l -fuel combustion, cement production and land-use

    change), they would lead to a nearly constant rate of increase in

    atmospheric concentrat ions for at least two centuries , reaching

    about 500 ppmv (approaching twice the pre-industrial

    concentrat ion of 280 ppmv) by the end of the 21st century.

    Carbon cycle models show that immediate s tabi l izat ion of the

    concentration of carbon dioxide at its present level could only be

    achieved th rough an imm ediate reduction in i ts emissions of 50-

    70% and further reductions thereafter .

    4 .7 C arbo n cy cle m o d els h a ve b ee n use d t o e st im a t e p rofil es

    of carbon dioxide emissions for stabilization at various carbondioxide concentration levels. Such profiles have been generated for

    an illustrative set of levels: 450, 550, 650, 750 and 1000 ppmv.

    Amon g the m any p ossible pathways to reach stabilization, two are

    illustrated in Figure 1 for each o f the stab ilization levels of 450, 550,

    650 and 750 ppmv, and one for 1000 ppmv. The steeper the

    increase in th e emissions (hen ce concentration ) in th ese scenarios,

    th e more qu ickly is the climate projected to chan ge.

    4 .8 An y ev en t u al st ab ilize d c on c en t r at io n is go ve rn e d m or e

    by the accumulated anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions from

    now unti l the t ime of s tabi l izat ion, than by the way those

    emissions change over the period. This means that, for a given

    stabilized concentration value, higher emissions in early decades

    require lower emissions later on . Cum ulative emissions from 1991

    to 2100 corresponding to these stabilization levels are shown in

    Table 1, together with t he cum ulative emissions of carbon dioxide

    for all of th e IPCC IS92 em ission scenar ios (see Figure 2 below a n d

    Table 1 in th e Sum m ary for Policymakers of IPCC Working Grou p

    II for details of these scenarios).

    4 .9 Fig ure 1 an d Ta ble 1 a re pr ese n t ed t o c la rify so m e of t h e

    constraints that wo uld be imposed on future carbon dioxide emis-

    sions, if stabilization at the concentration levels illustrated were to

    be achieved. These examples do n ot represent an y form of recom-

    men dation about how such stabilization levels might be ach ieved or

    th e level of stabilization wh ich m ight be ch osen.

    4 .10 Given cumula t ive emissions , and IPCC IS92a popu la t ion

    and economic scenarios for 1990-2100, global annual average

    carbon d ioxide emission s can be derived for the stabilization scen ar-

    ios on a per capita or per unit of economic activity basis. If the

    atmo spheric concentration is to remain below 550 ppm v, the future

    global annual average emissions cannot, during the next century,

    exceed th e current global average and would h ave to be mu ch lower

    before and beyond the end of the next century. Global annual

    average emissions could be higher for stabilization levels of 750 to

    1000 ppmv. Nevertheless, even to achieve these latter stabilization

    levels, the global annual average emissions would need to be less

    th an 50% above current levels on a per capita basis or less th an h alf

    of current levels per un it of econom ic activity11 .

    4.1112 The global average annual per capita emissions of carbon

    dioxide due to the combu stion of fossil fuels is at present abou t 1.1

    ton nes (as carbon). In add ition, a net of about 0.2 ton nes per capitaare emitted from deforestation and land-use change. The average

    ann ual fossil fuel per capita emission in developed an d tran sitional

    economy countries is about 2.8 tonnes and ranges from 1.5 to 5.5

    tonnes. The figure for the developing countries is 0.5 tonnes

    ranging from 0.1 ton nes to, in some few cases, above 2.0 tonn es (all

    figures are for 1990).

    4.1213 Using World Bank estimates of GDP (gross domestic

    product) at market exchange rates, the current global annual

    average emission of energy-related carbon dioxide is about 0.3

    ton nes per th ousand 1990 US dollars output. In add ition, global net

    emissions from land-use changes are about 0.05 tonnes perth ousand US dollars of output. The current average ann ual energy-

    IPCC SECOND ASSESSMENT SYNTHESIS OF SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL INFORMATION RELEVANT

    TO INTERPRETING ARTICLE 2 OF THE UN FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE

    9

    9 Most halocarbons, but neither HFCs nor PFCs, are controlled by theMontreal Protocol and i ts Adjustments an d Amendm ents.

    10 For th e remaind er of Section 4, n et global anth ropogenic em issions (i.e.,anthropogenic sources minus anthropogenic sinks) will be abbreviated toemissions.

    11 Chin a registered its disagreemen t on t he use of carbon dioxide emissionsderived on th e basis of a per unit econ om ic activity.

    12 The Panel agreed that th is paragraph shall not p rejudge the current n ego-tiations under the UNFCCC.

    13 The Panel agreed that th is paragraph shall not p rejudge the current n ego-tiations under the UNFCCC.

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    20/73

    10

    CLIMATE CHANGE 1 995 : IPCC SECO ND ASSESSMENT REPORT

    CO2concentration(ppmv)

    S 450

    S 550

    S 650

    S 750

    S 10001000

    950

    900

    850

    800

    750

    700

    650

    600

    550

    500

    450

    400

    350

    Year2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250 2300 2350

    10

    5

    0

    15

    20

    Anthropog

    enicCO2emissions(GtC/yr)

    Current anthropogenic

    CO2 emissions

    Year2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250 2300 2350

    S1000S750S650S550S450

    IS92a

    Figure 1 (a ) . Carbon dioxide concentration profiles leading to

    stabilization at 450, 550, 650 and 750 ppm v following the p athways

    defined in IPCC (1994) (solid curves) and for pathways that allow

    emissions to follow IS92a until at least the year 2000 (dashed

    curves). A single profile that stabilizes at a carbon dioxide concen-

    tration o f 1000 ppm v an d follows IS92a emissions u ntil at least th eyear 2000 has also been defined. Stabilization at concen trations of

    450, 650 and 1000 ppmv would lead to equilibrium temperature

    increases relative to 199014 due to carbon dioxide alone (i.e., not

    includ ing effects of oth er greenh ouse gases (GHGs) and aero sols) of

    about 1C (range: 0.5 to 1.5C), 2C (range: 1.5 to 4C) and 3.5C

    (range: 2 to 7C), respectively. A doubling of the pre-industrial

    carbon dioxide concen tration of 280 ppmv would lead to a concen-

    tration of 560 ppmv and doubling of the current concentration of

    358 ppmv would lead to a concentration of about 720 ppm v.

    Figu re 1 (b) . Carbon dioxide emissions leading to stabilization at

    concentration s of 450, 550, 650, 750 and 1000 ppm v following the

    profiles shown in (a) from a mid-range carbon cycle model. Results

    from oth er mod els could differ from th ose presented h ere by up to

    approximately 15%. For comparison, the carbon dioxide em is-

    sions for IS92a and current emissions (fine solid line) are also

    shown.

    40

    30

    20

    10

    02000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100

    AnthropogenicCO2emission

    s(GtC/yr)

    Year

    IS92e

    IS92f

    IS92aIS92b

    IS92d

    IS92c

    Figu re 2 . Ann ual anth ropogenic carbon dioxide emissions under

    the IS92 emission scenarios (see Table 1 in the Summary for

    Policym akers of IPCC Workin g Group II for furth er details).

    14 These nu mbers do n ot take into account the in crease in temperature (0.1to 0.7C) which would occur after 1990 because of CO 2 emissions prior to1990.

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    21/73

    11

    related em issions p er th ousand 1990 US dollars output, evaluated at

    market exchange rates, is about 0.27 tonnes in developed and

    t rans i t iona l economy coun t r ies and abou t 0 .41 tonnes in

    developing countries. Using World Bank estimates of GDP at

    purchasing power parity exchange rates, the average ann ual energy-

    related emissions per thou sand 1990 US dollars outpu t is about 0.26

    ton nes in developed and tran sitional econom y coun tries and abou t

    0.16 tonn es in d eveloping coun tries.15

    Methane

    4 .1 3 At m o sp h e ric m e th a n e co n ce n t ra ti on s ad ju st t o ch a n ge s in

    anthropogenic emissions over a period of 9 to 15 years. If the

    annual methane emissions were immediately reduced by about 30

    Tg CH4 (about 8% of current anthropogenic emissions), methane

    concentrations would remain at todays levels. If methane emis-

    sions were to remain constant at their current levels, methane

    concent rations (1720 ppbv in 1994) would rise to about 1820 ppbv

    over the n ext 40 years.

    Nitrous oxide

    4 .1 4 N it ro u s o xid e h as a lo n g life ti m e (a bo u t 12 0 y ea rs). In

    order for th e concent ration t o be stabilized near current levels (312

    ppbv in 1994), anthropogenic sources would need to be reduced

    imm ediately by more th an 50%. If emissions of nitrous oxide were

    held con stant at current levels, its concentration would rise to about

    400 ppbv over several hundred years, which would increase its

    incremental radiative forcing by a factor of four over its current

    level.

    Further points on stabilization

    4 .15 Stab il izat ion o f the concen t ra t ions o f very long-l ived

    gases, such as SF6 or perfluorocarbons, can only be achieved effec-

    tively by stopping emissions.

    4 .1 6 Th e im p o rt an c e o f t h e co n tr ib ut io n of C O2 to climate

    forcing, relative to that of the other greenhouse gases, increases

    with tim e in all of th e IS92 em ission scen arios (a to f). For exam ple,

    in the IS92a scenario, the CO 2 contribution increases from thepresent 60% to about 75% by the year 2100. During the same

    period, methane and nitrous oxide forcings increase in absolute

    terms by a factor that ran ges between two an d th ree.

    4 .17 The combined e ffec t o f a ll g reenhouse gases in p roducing

    radiative forcing is often expressed in terms of the equivalent

    concentration of carbon dioxide which would produce the same

    forcing. Because of the effects of the other greenhouse gases, stabi-

    lization at some level of equivalent carbon d ioxide con centration

    implies maintainin g carbon dioxide con centration at a lower level.

    4 .18 The stabi li za t ion o f g reenhouse gas concen t ra tions doesnot imply that there will be no further climate change. After

    stabilization is achieved, global mean surface temperature would

    cont inu e to rise for som e centuries and sea level for man y centu ries.

    IPCC SECOND ASSESSMENT SYNTHESIS OF SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL INFORMATION RELEVANT

    TO INTERPRETING ARTICLE 2 OF THE UN FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE

    Accumulated carbon dioxide emissions1991 to 2100 (GtC)

    IS92 scenariosc 770d 980b 1430

    a 1500f 1830e 2190

    Stabilizat ion case For profiles A* For p rofiles B

    450 ppm v 630 650550 ppm v 870 990650 ppm v 1030 1190750 ppm v 1200 13001000 ppm v 1410

    Table 1 . Total anthropogenic carbon dioxide emis-

    sions accum ulated from 1991 to 2100 in clusive (GtC)

    for the IS92 scenarios (see Table 1 in the Summary for

    Policym akers of IPCC Workin g Group II) and for stabi-

    l izat ion at various levels of carbon dioxide

    concentration following the two sets of pathways

    shown in Figure 1 (a). The accumulated emissions

    leading to stabilization of carbon dioxide concentra-

    tion were calculated using a mid-range carbon cycle

    model. Results from other models could be up to

    approx imate ly 15% h igher o r lower than those

    presented h ere.

    For compar ison , emissions dur ing the per iod 1860 to 1994 amounted to about360 GtC, of which abo ut 240 GtC w ere due to fossil-fuel use and 120 GtC du eto d eforestation an d land-use chan ge.

    * As in IPCC (1994) see Figure 1 (a) (solid curves).

    Profiles th at allow emissions to follow IS92a until at least th e year 2000 see figure 1 (a) (dashed curves).

    Con centration s will no t stabilize by 2100.

    15 These calculations of emissions per unit of economic activity do notinclude em issions from land -use chan ges or adjustm ents to reflect th e infor-mal economy.

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    22/73

    5 .1 The IPCC Second Assessmen t Report (1995) examines a wide

    range of approaches to reduce em ission s and en han ce sinks of green-

    ho use gases. This section provides techn ical informat ion on option s

    that could be used to reduce anth ropogenic emissions and en han ce

    sinks of th e principal greenh ouse gases with a view to stabilizing t heir

    atm ospheric concentration s; ho wever, th is analysis does not attem pt

    to quan tify poten tial macroecon om ic consequen ces th at may be asso-

    ciated with m itigation.

    5 .2 Sign i fic an t r ed u ct io n s in n e t gr ee n h o u se ga s e m issio n s a re

    technically possible and can be economically feasible. These reduc-

    tion s can be ach ieved by utilizing an exten sive array of tech no logies

    and policy measures that accelerate techn ology developmen t, diffu-

    sion and transfer in all sectors, including the energy, industry,

    transportation, residential/commercial and agricultural/forestry

    sectors.

    5 .3 Th e de gree t o w h ic h te ch n i ca l p o t en t ia l a n d co st -e ffe c-

    tiveness are realized is dependen t on initiatives to coun ter lack of

    information and overcome cultural, institutional, legal, financial

    and econom ic barriers which can h inder diffusion of techn ology or

    behavioural chan ges.

    5 .4 By t h e y ea r 2 10 0, t h e w or ld s co m m e rc ia l e n ergy sy st em i n

    effect will be replaced at least twice, offering opportunities tochange the energy system without premature retirement of capital

    stock; significant amounts of capital stock in the industrial,

    com m ercial, residential an d agricultural/forestry sectors will also be

    replaced. These cycles of capital replacement provide opportunities

    to u tilize new, better p erformin g techn ologies.

    Energy demand

    5 .5 Th e IPC C p ro je ct s (IPC C 1 99 2; IPC C 1 99 4) th a t wit h o ut

    policy intervention, there could be significant growth in emissions

    from th e ind ustrial, tran sportation an d comm ercial/residen tial build-ings sectors. Numerous studies have indicated that 10-30% energy

    efficiency gains above p resent levels are feasible at negative16 to zero

    cost in each of the sectors in m any parts of the world th rough tech-

    nical conservation measures and improved management practices

    over the n ext two t o th ree decades. Using techn ologies that presently

    yield the highest output of energy services for a given input of

    energy, efficiency gains of 5060% wou ld be t echn ically feasible in

    man y count ries over the same time period. Achieving th ese poten -

    tials will depend on future cost reductions, the rate of development

    and im plementation of new technologies, finan cing and techn ology

    transfer, as well as measures to overcome a variety of non-technical

    barriers. Because energy use is growing worldwide, even replacing

    current tech no logy with m ore-efficient tech no logy could still lead to

    an absolute increase in greenhouse gas emissions in the future.

    Technologies and measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in

    energy end -use sectors include:

    Industry: improvin g efficiency; recycling m aterials and switchin g tothose with lower greenhouse gas emissions; and developing

    processes that use less energy and materials.

    Transportation: the use of very efficient vehicle drive-trains, light-weight construction and low-air-resistance design; th e use of smaller

    vehicles; altered land-use patterns, transport systems, mobility

    patterns and lifestyles; and shifting to less energy-intensive trans-

    port modes; and the use of alternative fuels and electricity from

    renewable and other fuel sources which do not enhance atmos-

    pheric greenhouse gas concentration s.

    Commercial/residential: reduced heat transfers through buildingstructures and m ore-efficient space-cond itioning an d water supply

    systems, light ing an d appliances.

    Energy supply

    5 .6 It i s t echn ically possib le to realize deep emissions reduct ions

    in the energy supply sector within 50 to 100 years using alternative

    strategies, in step with the normal timing of investments to replace

    infrastructure and equipment as it wears out or becomes obsolete.Promising app roaches, not ordered according to priority, include:

    (a) Greenhouse gas reductions in th e use of fossil fuels

    More-efficient con version of fossil fuels (e.g., combin ed h eatand power production and more-efficient generation of

    electricity);

    Switching to low-carbon fossil fuels and suppressing emis-sions (switchin g from coal to oil or n atural gas, and from oil

    to n atural gas);

    Decarbonization of flue gases and fuels and carbon dioxidestorage (e.g., rem oval an d storage of CO2 from t h e use of fossil

    fuel feedstocks to make hydrogen-rich fuels); Reducing fugitive emissions, especially of methane, in fuelextraction an d distribution .

    (b) Switching to non-fossil fuel sources of energy

    Switching to nuclear energy (if generally acceptableresponses can be found to concerns such as about reactor

    safety, radioactive-waste transport and disposal, and nuclear

    proliferation);

    Switching to renewable sources of energy (e.g., solar,biomass, wind, h ydro and geoth ermal).

    CLIMATE CHANGE 1 995 : IPCC SECO ND ASSESSMENT REPORT

    12

    16 Negative cost means an economic benefit.

    TECH NO LOGY AND POLICY OPTIONS FOR MITIGATION 5

  • 8/8/2019 2nd Assessment En

    23/73

    Integration of energy system mitigation options

    5 .7 Th e po t en t ia l fo r gr ee n h o use ga s e m issio n re du ct io n s

    exceeds the potential for energy use efficiency because of the

    possibility of switching fuels and en ergy sources, and redu cing th e

    demand for energy services. Even greater energy efficiency, and

    hence reduced greenhouse gas emissions, could be attained withcom preh ensive energy source-to-service chains.

    5 .8 To asse ss t h e p o te n t ia l i m p ac t o f c om b in a t io n s o f i n di vi d-

    ual measures at the energy systems level, thought experiments

    exploring varian ts of a low-CO2 em itting energy supply system were

    described. These variants illustrate the technical possibility of d eep

    reductions in CO 2 emissions from t he en ergy supply system within

    50 to 1 00 years using altern ative strategies. These exercises indicate

    th e technical possibility of reducing annual global emissions from 6

    GtC in 1990 to about 4 GtC in 2050 and to about 2 GtC by 2100.

    Cumulative CO2 emissions from 1990 to 2100 would range from

    about 450 GtC to about 470 GtC in these constructions, thus

    keeping atm ospheric concen trations below 500 ppm v.

    5 .9 C o st s fo r in t e grat ed e n ergy se rv ic es re la t iv e t o co st s fo r

    convention al energy depend on relative future en ergy prices, which

    are uncertain within a wide range, and on the performance and

    cost characteristics assum ed for alternative t echn ologies. However,

    within the wide range of future energy prices, one or more of the

    variants would plausibly be capable of providing the demanded

    energy services at estimated costs th at are approxim ately the same

    as estimat ed future costs for current conven tional en ergy. It is not

    possible to iden tify a least-cost futu re energy system for th e longer

    term, as th e relative costs of options depen d on resource constraints

    and technological opportunities that are imperfectly known, andon actions by governments and the private sector. Improving

    energy efficiency, a strong and sustained investment in research,

    and development and demonstrat ion to encourage transfer and

    diffusion o f alternative en ergy supply techn ologies are critical to

    deep reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Many of the

    technologies being developed would need initial support to enter

    th e market


Recommended