Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 8
4 C A T C H M E N T A N A L Y S I S
Catchment analysis and a static expenditure distribution model have been used to estimate the likely
expenditure available to the potential development. The analysis estimates the retail demand and supply in
2019, the earliest date the potential neighbourhood centre could be operational.
4.1 Demand
The primary and secondary catchment areas of the potential neighbourhood centre were identified in order
to estimate retail demand. SPP 4.2 defines the indicative trade area of a neighbourhood centre as 1 km radius
with 2,000 -15,000 persons in catchment. This guide serves as a basis for the primary catchment.
The main catchment of the potential neighbourhood centre contains limited residential land with a high
proportion of industrial land to the north of the site (Figure 1. Site LocationFigure 1 and Figure 2). The
secondary trade area of 3 km radius reflects the broader catchment where the neighbourhood centre would
likely compete with existing and future activity centres.
Figure 2. Trade Area
Source: WAPC 2010 SPP4.2 Activity Centres for Perth and Peel, Pracsys 2017
Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 9
4.2 Dwellings
ABS Census 2011 data was used to estimate the number of dwellings in the catchment. Dwelling growth to
2019 was estimated based on WA Tomorrow Band C projections (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Catchment Area Dwellings, 2019
Source: WA Tomorrow 2015, ABS 201, Pracsys 2017
4.3 Catchment Income Profile
ABS Census 2011 data was used to estimate the distribution of income level per dwelling in primary and
secondary catchments (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Catchment Area Population Weekly Income Profile
Source: Pracsys 2017, ABS HHES Survey 2008/2009
967 1,047
8,910 9,513
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
2016 2019
Dwell
ings
Secondary Catchment
Primary Catchment
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
$0 - $599 $600 - $999 $1,000 - $1,499 $1,500 - $2,499 $2,500 +
Primary Catchment Secondary Catchment
Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 10
The analysis found that the biggest proportion of households are in the first income quintiles. This indicates a
lower level of discretionary spend within the primary catchment.
4.4 Expenditure
Average spend per dwelling was estimated by income quintile using ABS Household Expenditure Survey data.
The total expenditure pool of the catchment was approximated based on average spend estimates (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Catchment Area Expenditure Pool, 2019
Source: Pracsys 2017, ABS HHES Survey 2008/2009
Total expenditure (less online leakage) is expected to be $270 million in 2019. Expenditure from the primary
catchment ($26 million) comprises only 10% of total expenditure.
4.5 Supply
The retail floorspace for the catchment was estimated through data from multiple sources. These include:
• The Department of Planning Land Use Survey (2008)
• Property Council Shopping Centre Directory (2015)
• Urbis Retail Averages (2016)
The analysis considered the Net Lettable Area (NLA) of activity centres that were deemed likely to compete in
the defined catchment, based on proximity and type of retail (Figure 6).
$0
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
$300,000,000
Retail Expenditure
Primary catchment Secondary Catchment
Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 11
Figure 6. Major Competitors
Source: DoP Land Use Survey 2008, Shopping Centre Directory 2015, Pracsys 2017
The trade area of the potential neighbourhood centre contains:
• A Strategic Metropolitan Centre
• Three Neighbourhood centres
• An additional approved Neighbourhood centre (Aldi)
• An additional proposed Neighbourhood centre (Midvale Coles)
• Two planned Local centres (floorspace not included in analysis)
The catchment already contains significant convenience retail elements. By the end of 2018 another
neighbourhood centre – an Aldi Supermarket - will be operational, with construction due to commence later
this year. The same year Midvale Coles neighbourhood centre with a supermarket of 3,800 m2, 1,435 m2 of
retail speciality space, a service station and some non-retail commercial uses is proposed to be built in the
area. An application is currently going through an approval process.
Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 12
Midland Gate is to be expanded by 15,000 m2 of proposed retail floorspace by 2018, with an additional 15,000
m2 expansion also planned8. The total floorspace in the catchment is estimated to be at least 95,000 m2 in 2019
or 101,000 m2 if Midvale Coles neighbourhood centre is approved for construction.
8 The second expansion has been excluded from the analysis as no timeline has been set, this represents a conservative approach to
modelling the available expenditure
Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 13
5 E X P E N D I T U R E C A P T U R E
Catchment analysis was used to estimate the possible expenditure captured by the potential neighbourhood
centre development. The turnover captured by the site can come from three sources:
• Growth in available expenditure either as a result of population growth or as a result of growth in real
expenditure
• Capture of expenditure from competing centres
• Reduction of expenditure leakage from the catchment area
5.1 Consumer Behaviour
Considering convenience retail, the distance between a household and each centre primarily defines the
attractiveness of the centre. Geographical barriers and complexity of the route from households to the centre
reduces the attractiveness. The more floorspace a centre offers the more attractive it is.
Consumers also form a habit of returning to the same store for their daily or weekly shopping. As the newest
player to enter the market, the potential development will have to modify this habit.
Distance
The distance plays a critical role in consumer decision-making process. Google maps was used to identify the
most likely time and route through which consumers would access the activity centres. Based on this
information, it was possible to estimate the most convenient store for residential areas within the primary
catchment (Figure 7).
Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 14
Figure 7. Most Convenient Centres for Primary Catchment
Source: Google Maps 2017, Pracsys 2017
Midland Gate & Midland IGA
The most attractive store for the population residing to the west of Roe Highway, based on time and simplicity
of route, is Midland Gate. It takes approximately three minutes for the residents to access the store via Great
Eastern Highway or Morrison Road.
The area south the railway line will likely also be attracted to Midland Supa IGA or Midland Gate. The customers
from this area can access these centres through Clayton Street almost without the need to enter Great Eastern
Highway.
Swan View IGA
The north of primary catchment is mainly industrial, with a small section of residential dwellings at the north-
east corner. The Swan View IGA is located within ten minutes by foot from this settlement or just two minutes
driving. The centre has a good range of local shops and it has a good access for Morrison Road traffic. While at
a similar distance, the potential centre would require residents to cross Great Eastern Highway decreasing its
Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 15
attraction. It would also have to disrupt the current behaviour of the catchment area. The residents of this area
are most likely to continue accessing the Swan View IGA.
Swan View Coles Supermarket
The area to the east of the railway line and north of Great Eastern Highway has limited access to the potential
centre. There is only one access point to Great Eastern Highway, through Bullarra Road. In addition, residents
of this area would need to cross the two lanes of Great Eastern Highway, with no traffic signals, to visit the
potential centre. It is more convenient for residents to take a local road to Swan View Coles, which is only a
two minute drive.
The Midland Gate Effect
Midland Gate is a Strategic Metropolitan Centre and is the primary retail focus for Midland and the largest
centre in the eastern and north-eastern region of Perth, beyond Morley. The centre has two full-line
supermarkets operated by Coles and Woolworths and 144 specialty shops. The last published turnover level
for the centre was $406 million in 2015. Its average productivity across the centre is $8,000 per m2.
Strategic Metropolitan Centres generally attract larger weekly shopping trips. The location of Midland Gate,
within the potential neighbourhood centre’s trade area, makes it likely that a significant proportion of
households would access Midland Gate for their shopping purposes with limited spend for daily shopping
trips. This reduces the available expenditure, which the potential neighbourhood centre could capture.
An activity centre of this type and size attracts a catchment of at least 10 km radius with a primary catchment
including the whole of the trade area of the potential neighbourhood centre. Based on these information, it
was conservatively assumed that at least 20% of the whole primary catchment expenditure would be
captured by the Midland Gate.
The Aldi Effect
Aldi will have a presence in the primary catchment by 2018. The shopping centre chain is the newest player
to enter the West Australian grocery market after a period of relative duopoly and has demonstrated
considerable market pull and interest from the general public. Aldi’s business model is set up to attract people
and reinforce habit forming behaviours to ensure they continue returning to the store on a weekly basis. Aldi
does this through offering specials on relatively large ticket items at set times during the week; this could
range from deals on TVs to hardware. These specials get users in the door where they then see and try the
other products on offer (typically discounted in comparison to other supermarkets as a result of much more
efficient supply chains) and form habitual behaviours. It is expected that Aldi will attract a significant
proportion of expenditure from the potential neighbourhood centre’s trade area.
5.2 Expenditure and Floorspace Productivity
The distribution of population based on the centre attractiveness helped to identify the residential population
likely to use the potential neighbourhood centre at 49 Great Eastern Highway. This catchment totals 416
dwellings or 850 people in 2019. SPP 4.2 indicates that a neighbourhood centre should service between 2,000
Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 16
and 15,000 people in its primary catchment9. This is well above the likely population that will use the potential
neighbourhood centre. Even if all dwellings in primary catchment preferred the potential neighbourhood
centre for their convenience retail, the total trade population would still be only 2,415 persons.
The total retail expenditure of this population amounts to $10 million in 2019. At least 20% of it will however
be lost to the Strategic Metropolitan centre Midland Gate. The expenditure available to the potential centre is
therefore was estimated at $8 million. The productivity of the neighbourhood centre based on the amount of
floorspace is summarised in Figure 8.
Figure 8. Floorspace Productivity, 2019
Floorspace, m2 Floorspace Productivity, $
1,000 8,000
2,000 4,000
3,000 2,667
4,000 2,000
5,000 1,600
6,000 1,333 Source: Pracsys 2017
The convenience retail has a relatively high level of floorspace productivity, between $8,000 and $10,000 per
m2. Setting a benchmark at conservative $8,000 indicates that the viable floorspace for the potential activity
centre is below 1,000 m2. A centre above this size is likely to be not supported by the service population.
9 https://www.planning.wa.gov.au/dop_pub_pdf/activity_centres_policy_2.pdf (Section 5.3.2, 2010)
Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 17
6 Q U A L I T A T I V E A S S E S S M E N T
6.1 Principles of Centre Success
From a centre design and ongoing management perspective, there are certain economic principles that can
be implemented to ensure that a place is as user-friendly as possible to maximise the number and length of
visits. A successful place must understand what its user groups need and want and provide an environment
that both attracts and retains people.
There are five principles of economic sustainability and urban form that are relevant to neighbourhood centre
performance (Figure 9).
Figure 9. Principles of Centre Success
Principle Impact on Centre Success
Activity Diversity A diverse mix of users and activity are desirable for an economically, environmentally and socially sustainable city, enabling users to access multiple needs with fewer trips and contributing to higher rates of employment self-sufficiency.
Activity Intensity Co-locating activity centres within a vibrant, intense space ensures walkability, social interaction and economic activation. Intense agglomerations of activity have been shown to increase industry productivity.
Centre Accessibility Centres must be accessible to a wide mix of user groups utilising different modes of transport. This reduces the impact of petrol price shocks, increases sustainable centre catchments and facilitates movement between nodes.
Urban Amenity Offering opportunities for recreation and leisure within the centre and ensuring the comfortable use of the centre by pedestrians increases centre attractiveness and activation and is conducive to more frequent and prolonged use.
Mobility
Facilitating easy movement around the centre for all users and ensuring a variety of well linked and positioned transport options means the potential for the centre to be equitably accessible by a range of user groups will be maximised, and use of the centre may be induced.
Source: Pracsys Activity Centre Performance Toolkit 2016
For an activity centre to be successful and attract the most from its user base it must adhere as closely as
possible to these five principles.
Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 18
6.2 Multi-criteria Analysis
A multi-criteria analysis has been designed to rank the performance of the potential neighbourhood centre
against the principles of centre success. The analysis is summarised in Figure 10.
Figure 10.Multi-criteria Analysis
Principle Potential Neighbourhood Centre
Activity Diversity
A neighbourhood centre generally provides for daily and weekly household shopping needs and a small range of convenience services. A diverse mix of users are desirable for a sustainable centre.
The tenancy mix of the potential centre is unknown, however due to the restricted amount of floorspace available (after the parking requirements of 4 bays per 100m2 of floorspace are satisfied) and site location, it is unlikely that the centre will be able to offer a wide range of speciality shops.
Score 2/5
Activity Intensity
The site is located in a predominantly industrial area with a limited number of residential dwellings. The primary catchment area in 2019 is expected to have an estimated dwelling per gross hectare ratio of 3:1. Successful neighbourhood centres should be located within an intense residential development and directly linked to its service population.
Score 1/5
Centre Accessibility
The site is located on a major road, Great Eastern Highway, and is separated from its catchment to the south by the railway and to the west by Roe Highway. The site has a limited access from Great Eastern Highway eastbound. Walkable catchment is particularly important for a neighbourhood centre. The node between Great Eastern Highway and the railway is the only segment of population which can safely and easily access the neighbourhood centre by foot. The population to the north of the site will have to walk a great distance through an industrial area and across a busy road to access the centre. The catchment to the south of the site would have to walk around the railway to find an access point to the site.
Score 1/5
Urban Amenity The site is exposed to continuing noise emission from the Great Eastern Highway and provides limited opportunity for comfortable use of the centre by pedestrians. These factors will decrease the centre’s attractiveness.
Score 1/5
Mobility
Despite being located on the arterial road, it does not provide a wide range of transport options. It is inconvenient for the eastbound traffic to access the centre due to the busy road conditions. Regarding public transport, there is a bus stop across from the site. There is only a bus route along Great Eastern Highway, which implies that it doesn’t improve the access to the centre from the south and north of the site. Walkability has been discussed in Centre accessibility principle.
Score 2/5
Average Score 7/25
Source: Pracsys 2017
Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 19
The multi-criteria analysis highlights a low feasibility of potential centre success. As shown, the site’s location
and characteristics significantly limit the potential neighbourhood centre’s ability to attract and retain a
sufficient user catchment. It is, therefore, evident that the potential centre is unlikely to be a positive addition
to a local activity centre network.
Retail Assessment – no. 49 Great Eastern Highway
H O Developments Pty Ltd 20
7 C O N C L U S I O N
The purpose of the analysis was to explore the feasibility and sustainability of the potential activity centre
located at no. 49 Great Eastern Highway.
The analysis identified the following factors:
• Previous local centres had not been successful at the same site
• There is a limited number of residential dwellings in the primary catchment as the area to the north
and the west of the site is predominantly industrial
• There is a lower level of discretionary spend within the primary catchment as most dwellings earn
below $600 a week
• A large proportion of the expenditure is already captured by Midland Gate (a Strategic Metropolitan
centre) and existing neighbourhood centres. Additionally, floorspace expansions, to be completed in
2018, have already been accepted for Midland Gate and an Aldi in the proposed centre’s primary
catchment, further reducing the potential expenditure available to the potential centre
A multi-criteria analysis was used to assess the potential centre against activity centre principles including
diversity, intensity, accessibility, urban amenity and mobility. The arguments include:
• The potential centre is exposed to the small number of residential dwellings
• The site is safely and conveniently accessible by foot only to a small proportion of population located
in the node between Great Eastern Highway and the railway
• The site is exposed to a continuing noise emission from the Great Eastern Highway and provides a
limited opportunity for a comfortable use of the centre by pedestrians
• Despite sites location on the arterial road, it does not provide a wide range of transport and walking
options
The analysis found that the No. 49 Great Eastern Highway development is not likely to be viable as a
neighbourhood centre. Modelling results indicated the potential upper bound of viable floorspace in 2019 is
approximately 1,000 m2, equivalent to a local centre in size. The assessment of the site against activity centre
principles concluded that a neighbourhood centre located at the site is unlikely to be successful and would
not be a positive addition to the activity centre network in the area. It is recommended that the proposed site
is not developed as a neighbourhood centre.
31 March 2017 Our Ref: 17058
Leon Van der Linde Manager Strategic Planning City of Swan By email: [email protected]
Dear Leon,
Re: Bellevue East Neighbourhood Centre Advice
The Bellevue East Land Use Study (BELUS) provides a framework for the future use and development of land in Bellevue East. BELUS was adopted by Council in August 2013 and identified land for the consolidation of a Neighbourhood Centre (referred to as the Horace Street NC) at the intersection of Great Eastern Highway and Horace Street.
H O Developments Pty Ltd own land at 49 Great Eastern Highway and are proposing the development of a service station. The proposal is currently subject to an application to the Metro East JDAP, and the City of Swan are concerned the proposal will limit the ability for a Neighbourhood Centre to be developed in Bellevue East.
In support of the proposal, information has been provided by the City of Swan which includes the following:
A letter from Moharich & More describing the statutory and policy framework
A report by Urbis that provides further information on the proposal and examples of where retail centres are co-located with service stations
A Retail Assessment prepared by Pracsys assessing the demand for a Neighbourhood Centre at the subject site.
Essential Economics recently prepared the draft City of Swan Local Commercial Activity Centre Strategy (LCACS). The draft LCACS identifies potential for either a Local Centre or a Neighbourhood Centre in Bellevue East (referred to as Horace Street in the LCACS). We are currently reviewing submissions on the Strategy received during the public exhibition period.
2
With regard to Bellevue East and the proposed service station, the City has requested the following advice:
A review of the economic components of the proposal (including Pracsys report)
Analysis of whether a Neighbourhood or Local Centre could be supported at the site
Views on the implications of the proposed service station on the future opportunities for either a Local or Neighbourhood Centre.
This letter provides a high level analysis of the future opportunities for a centre at Bellevue East and includes the following information:
Overview of the subject site and proposed development
Review of the Pracsys report
Overview of considerations for the development of Local and Neighbourhood Centres
A high-level retail demand assessment
Discussion of the implications associated with the proposed service station.
1 Subject Site and Proposed Developments
BELUS identified the opportunity for a Neighbourhood Centre on land located at the intersection of Great Eastern Highway and Horace Street. This site, shown in Figure 1, contains land to the south of Great Eastern Highway, and to the east and west of Horace Street. In total, 10,370m2 of land has been identified for the future use as a Neighbourhood Centre, including the following:
7,075m2 of land to the east of Horace Street
3,295m2 of land to the west of Horace Street in two separate parcels.
The site currently contains a variety of retail and commercial uses, including the following retail uses:
Lunch bar
Indian restaurant
Thirsty Camel bottle-shop
Chinese Restaurant.
In addition, a number of non-retail commercial businesses are also located on the site and these include a TAB, printing shop, pools and pumps, and forklift stores.
3
H O Developments are proposing the development of a service station on land at 49 Great Eastern Highway, which is situated on land to the east of Horace Street identified for a Neighbourhood Centre in BELUS. The site of the proposed service station is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: BELUS Neighbourhood Centre and Proposed Service Station Site
Produced by Essential Economics using MapInfo, StreetPro and Nearmap
2 Review of Pracsys Report
Pracsys were engaged by H O Developments Pty Ltd to investigate the viability of a neighbourhood centre at 49 Great Eastern Highway. In particular, the Pracsys analysis sought
4
to identify the size of a neighbourhood centre that could be supported at the site. Their report provided the following information:
A review of relevant policies, including State Planning Policy 4.2 (SPP 4.2), City of Swan Commercial Centres Strategy (2004), the draft Local Commercial and Activity Centres Strategy (2016), and the BELUS.
Analysis of the potential catchment of a neighbourhood centre
Review of the network of competing centres
Analysis of the likely expenditure
Assessment of the ‘local activation potential’.
The Pracsys report concluded that a neighbourhood centre would not be viable, and that a local centre comprising approximately 1,000m2 retail floorspace and achieving average sales of $8,000/m2 is the more likely outcome.
We have reviewed the Pracsys report and make the following comments:
1 Clarification on commentary relating to the draft LCACS: Pracsys correctly state that the draft LCACS identifies the potential for a Neighbourhood or a Local Centre. However, Pracsys’ commentary implies the draft LCACS specifically makes comments relating to the potential for alternative uses at the Horace Street NC, including a petrol station.
For the purpose of clarification, the draft LCACS states the following in relation to Local Centres, not the Horace Street centre specifically:
“…it is acknowledged that local centres have been subject to an increasingly competitive environment, with many centres struggling to attract the required investment to remain commercially viable. In cases where the retention of a commercially viable local centre is no longer a realistic opportunity, these centres may be considered for an alternative use.” (p45, draft LCACS)
In addition, the draft LCACS does not make any acknowledgement of the potential for a convenience store attached to a petrol station at the Horace Street centre (that is not to say potential does not exist for such a development).
2 Confusion between the Primary Catchments used in the analysis: The Pracsys report appears to adopt two different catchments. The first catchment is based on a 1km (Primary Catchment) and 3km (Secondary Catchment) radii from the subject site and references SPP 4.2 as the basis for using these catchments. According to the Pracsys report, the 1km (Primary Catchment) will accommodate 1,047 dwellings in 2019 or a population of approximately 2,500 people (assuming an average household size of 2.4 persons) who will have a retail expenditure of approximately $26 million in 2019.
5
However, it appears the retail analysis is based on an alternative Primary Catchment derived using drive-time analysis. According to Pracsys, this alternative catchment will accommodate only 850 residents in 2019 and retail spending of $10 million. While we prefer to use catchments which take into consideration the level of access to a centre and location of competing centres, we believe a centre at the Subject Site would capture trade from a slightly different trade area (our trade area is identified later in this Letter). We also believe that trade areas overlap and this reflects the real-world practise of residents having a choice of centres.
3 Methodology used for assessing retail development potential: In order to undertake a detailed review of the retail demand assessment, further clarity is required regarding which catchments are used. However, we note that the Pracsys analysis does not take into consideration the following:
- Potential for a centre to capture trade from beyond either of its identified catchments. This is an important consideration for the site in view of its location on the Great Eastern Highway (attracting passing trade) and proximity to a major employment area (attracting the expenditures of non-residents).
- The potential for a supermarket to be attracted to the site. As supermarkets typically act as anchor tenants for neighbourhood centres, the viability of a supermarket should be assessed when assessing the overall potential for a neighbourhood centre.
- Potential for non-retail uses that would typically locate in a neighbourhood centre.
3 Considerations for the Development of a Local or Neighbourhood Centre at Bellevue East
While the land identified for the Horace Street NC fronting the Great Eastern Highway is currently zoned Highway Service, the presence of a number of convenience stores indicates the locality is currently serving a role a ‘quasi’ Local Centre.
The future opportunities for a viable and well-functioning activity centre at Bellevue East, whether it is a Local Centre or a Neighbourhood Centre, are influenced by a variety of factors. A brief overview of these considerations is provided below.
Competition
Residents in Bellevue and the surrounding areas are served by the following centres which contain neighbourhood level retail facilities:
Midland Gate is the main shopping location in the Midland Strategic Metropolitan Centre (SMC). Midland is a regional-level shopping centre providing a wide variety of convenience and comparison shopping.
6
Swan View is a Neighbourhood Centre located 1.6km to the north-east. The centre is anchored by a Coles supermarket.
Darling Ridge is a small neighbourhood centre located 1.5km to the north-east anchored by an IGA.
Helena Valley Shopping Centre is a Neighbourhood Centre located 2.2km to the south and is anchored by an IGA supermarket.
In addition, proposals exist for a Neighbourhood Centre on Morrison Road and an ALDI supermarket in another location on Morrison Road. The draft City of Swan LCACS identifies the potential for a new Neighbourhood Centre in this locality.
Exposure to Great Eastern Highway
The Great Eastern Highway is a major transport route connecting the eastern parts of metropolitan Perth to regional areas further to the east and north. Future retailers at a centre in Bellevue will be able to capture a share of their turnover from the high level of passing traffic.
Accessibility to the Site
Access to the site will be via the Great Eastern Highway and Horace Street. A signalised intersection at Horace Street/Great Eastern Highway will enable access to the centre from the north via Farrell Road.
Constraints Limiting its Trade Area
A number of physical and perceived constraints may limit the geographic areas of a trade area for a centre at Bellevue. These constraints include:
Railway line to the south, limiting vehicle access. It is noted that a pedestrian walkway is provided at the end of Bellevue Road.
Great Eastern Highway is a six-lane separated highway at the intersection of Horace Street; this can be seen as a perceived constraint for potential customers travelling westward along the Great Eastern Highway.
Roe Highway limits the extent to which a trade area would extent to the west.
The major employment area to the north limits the extent of a residential catchment to the north.
7
Employment Areas
According to 2011 ABS Census of Population and Housing data, almost 1,700 jobs are provided in the major employment areas situated to the immediate north of the Great Eastern Highway. Potential exists for a centre in Bellevue to capture a share of retail spending from these workers. (Note that 2016 Census data not yet available).
Potential for Increased Residential Density
BELUS identifies potential for a significant increase in residential densities. For instance, areas surrounding the planned Neighbourhood Centre are nominated to be zoned R60. The proposed R60 areas are currently zoned R40 and accommodate 40 dwellings. Under the proposed R60 zone they could potentially accommodate a total of approximately 175 dwellings, or a net increase of 135 dwellings.
The development of a well-functioning centre, either Local or a Neighbourhood Centre, will be an important component of creating a level of amenity that would be required to attract investment into medium-density housing in the area. When planning for a centre in the BELUS area, consideration of the potential residential outcome arising from the implementation of BELUS should to be considered.
Capacity of Land Planned for the BELUS Neighbourhood Centre
The site identified for the Horace Street Neighbourhood Centre accounts for a total of 10,370m2 of land (or approximately 1.0ha). In our experience in planning for single-level neighbourhood centres throughout Australia, it is prudent to plan for floorspace equivalent to approximately 1/3 of the land area. The eventual floorspace will depend on site-specific requirements.
On this basis, land identified for the Horace Street centre could accommodate approximately 3,500m2 of floorspace.
4 Retail Assessment
A high-level assessment of the potential for a Neighbourhood Centre at Horace Street is provided below which takes into consideration aspects discussed previously in this Letter, along with the following:
A trade area to be served by a neighbourhood centre
Forecast population and dwelling growth
Estimates of retail spending