+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Addmath Project 2013

Addmath Project 2013

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: florence-najla
View: 224 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 30

Transcript
  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    1/30

    1 | P a g e

    Objectives

    The aimsfor carrying out this project work are:

    To improves thinking skills.

    To promote effective mathematical communication.

    To apply and adapt a variety of problem solving strategies to solve

    problems.

    To developed mathematical knowledge through knowledge solving in a way

    that increases students interest and confidence.

    To use the language of mathematics to express mathematical ideas precisely.

    To provide learning environment that stimulates and enhances effective

    learning.

    To develop positive attitudes towards mathematics.

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    2/30

    2 | P a g e

    Acknowledgement

    First and foremost, I would like to thank my Additional Mathematic teacher,

    Encik Anuar B. Mat Yusuf as he gives us important guidance and commitment

    during this project work. She has been a very supportive figure throughout the

    whole project.

    I also would like to give thanks to all my friends for helping me and always

    supporting me to help complete this project work. They have done a great job or at

    surveying shops and sharing information with other people including me. Without

    them this project would never have had its conclusion.

    For their strong support, I would like to express my gratitude to my beloved

    mother and also my father for supplying the equipment and money needed for the

    resources to complete this project. They have always been by my side through

    thick and thin, and helped me with this project against all odds.

    Last but not least, I would also like to thank all the nice shopkeepers, staffs

    and citizens for helping me collect the much needed data and prices for this. Not

    forgetting to all the other people who were involved directly or indirectly towards

    making this project a vivid reality.

    I really appreciate all the help I have got. Again, thank you very much.

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    3/30

    3 | P a g e

    Content

    NO. CONTENT PAGE

    1. Objectives2. Acknowledgement3. Introduction4. Part 1

    Part 1(a)

    Part 1(a)(i)Part 1(a)(ii)

    Part 1(b)

    5. Part 2Part 2(a)

    Part 2(b)

    Part 2(c)

    Part 2(d)(i)

    Part 2(d)(ii)

    Part 2(d)(iii)

    6. Part 3Part 3(a)

    Part 3(b)(i)

    Part 3(b)(ii)

    7. Part 4Part 4(a)Part 4(b)

    8. Reflection

    9. References

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    4/30

    4 | P a g e

    IntroductionMalaysia, the place called Truly Asia. It lies on the Southeastern Asian peninsula

    bordering Indonesia, Brunei, and the South China Sea. Its filled with different Asiancultures from Malay, Chinese, Borneo and other indigenous groups. Having no or little

    issues about societal upheavals, corruptions and such being published in international

    media, Malaysia continues to be a puzzling country known for its present natural

    splendor as it continues to flourish as one of Asias leading countries. However, knowing

    its experiences that led to its present growth is whats really interesting about this

    country.

    After gaining independence from Britain in 1957, it was noted that the Chinese was the

    chief force in Malaysias economy. In the 1960s, Malaysias economy was dependent on

    exports of agricultural goods. During this period annual Gross Domestic Product

    increases on an average rate of 6 percent per year. Then in the late 1960s racial pressure

    started and caused the creation of the New Economic Policy which aimed to ensure that

    by 1990s at least 20% of the economy must be controlled by ethnic Malays.

    In the 1970s, high deflation and mismanagement of government enterprise caused its

    economy to experience severe economic downturn. By 1985, recession having negative

    1.2 percent GDP growth was experienced. As solution to the downfall of the economy,

    the government shifted its focus from the agriculture sector to the manufacturing sector.

    It liberalized foreign equity ownership from 10 to 20 percent in order to attract foreigninvestments. These efforts resulted to a success by achieving a positive GDP growth of

    13.4 percent from 1986 to 1990.

    Although the countrys internal economic factors continued to be strong, its external

    economic factors affected it in a negative way. Huge capital outflows from the Malaysian

    economy and other South East Asian economies were hurt by the Asian crisis. From

    positive 7.7 percent Malaysias real growth rate in declined to negative 7.5 percent in

    1998.

    Despite its condition, Malaysia rejected IMF assistance and stabilized its money with thehelp of Bank Negara Malaysia, its Central Bank, through lowering exchange rates,

    interest rates, and government spending. Also, the government increased capital controls

    by halting, several mega projects and established the National Economic Action Council

    (NEAC). With all these efforts, the country achieved a positive annual growth rate of 5.4

    per cent in 1999.

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    5/30

    5 | P a g e

    Malaysia's economy continued to surge despite all terrorist threats and health diseases

    such as the SARS. The Package of New Strategies was established in 2003 to generalize

    domestic sources of growth, promote private investment and strengthen the country's

    competitiveness. In 2006, The Ninth Malaysia Plan was issued. This plan reiterates the

    target of lifting Malaysias economy to "developed nation" by 2020. After knowing all

    these facts, this paper will now discuss about the economic condition of Malaysia starting

    from the year 2002 to 2006. It will tackle the GDPs contribution to growth and growth

    by sector, lending and inflation rate, money supply, trade and economic indicators and

    some movements of selected exports.

    Malaysia could be an interesting topic for a lot of economic enthusiasts because of the

    cycle that it has gone through. Malaysias economy has undergone many changes. It

    started as a well-off economy until it experienced a lot of crises including the Asian

    crisis. This country is among the lucky ones who have been able to get back on its feet

    and improve its condition. The increased growth in the pattern of its GDP signifies thestrength of their economy. It shows how their national income increases as being affected

    by the said factors. However, it should still continuously work on improving the

    condition of its net exports and investments because increasing consumption now could

    result to less consumable goods in the future. When it comes to the sectors, the

    performance has been good.

    The increased electronic productions, crop harvesting and service providing could boost

    their economy further. In addition, employment is greatly increased by these factors.

    Moreover, they have a fine control of their money supply. The positive increase in their

    money supply enables the increased consumption and decreased interest rates but higherinflation. Their inflation is not worrisome being stable at a low inflation figure. With their

    exchange rate, it has been a right move to shift to a managed rate instead of the pegged

    rate since more investments and profits would be generated from this.Factors other than

    the exchange rate have had more influence on imports and exports. Since their exports

    are still more than their imports its positive contribution to the national income could still

    be anticipated. Lastly, with regards to their government revenue and expenditure they

    should find ways in generating more revenue but increasing the spending at the same

    time because government spending is one of the main factors of national income.

    With all of these, it could be deduced that Malaysia has a chance of achieving more

    economic growth. However, the possibility of achieving the Ninth Malaysia Plan is still

    unfeasible. Although their economy is rising they should still consider more expansionary

    means of creating a long-run growth and produce realistic goals. This will enable them to

    catch up and become one of the developed countries.

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    6/30

    6 | P a g e

    Part 1(a): Describe in brief of

    price index, weightage and

    composite index

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    7/30

    7 | P a g e

    Part 1(a)(i): Price IndexA price index (plural: price indices or price indexes) is a

    normalized average (typically aweightedaverage) ofprices for a given classofgoods orservices in a given region, during a given interval of time. It is

    a statistic designed to help to compare how these prices, taken as a whole, differ between

    time periods or geographical locations.

    Price indexes have several potential uses. For particularly broad indices, the index can be

    said to measure the economy's price level or a cost of living. More narrow price indices

    can help producers with business plans and pricing. Sometimes, they can be useful in

    helping to guide investment.

    Some notable price indices include:

    Consumer price index Producer price index GDP deflator

    History of early price indices

    No clear consensus has emerged on who created the first price index. The earliest

    reported research in this area came from Welshpoet Henry Rice Vaughan who examined

    price level change in his 1675 bookA Discourse of Coin and Coinage. Vaughan wantedto separate the inflationary impact of the influx of precious metals brought by Spain from

    the New World from the effect due to currency debasement. Vaughan compared labor

    statutes from his own time to similar statutes dating back to Edward III. These statutes set

    wages for certain tasks and provided a good record of the change in wage levels.

    Vaughan reasoned that the market for basic labor did not fluctuate much with time and

    that a basic laborers salary would probably buy the same amount of goods in different

    time periods, so that a laborer's salary acted as a basket of goods. Vaughan's analysis

    indicated that price levels in England had raised six to eightfold over the preceding

    century.

    While Vaughan can be considered a forerunner of price index research, his analysis did

    not actually involve calculating an index. In 1707 Englishman William Fleetwood created

    perhaps the first true price index. An Oxford student asked Fleetwood to help show how

    prices had changed. The student stood to lose his fellowship since a fifteenth century

    stipulation barred students with annual incomes over five pounds from receiving a

    fellowship. Fleetwood, who already had an interest in price change, had collected a large

    amount of price data going back hundreds of years. Fleetwood proposed an index

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Averagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_meanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_meanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_meanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pricehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_(economics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_(economics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_levelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_livinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_price_indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Producer_price_indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GDP_deflatorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waleshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Vaughanhttp://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/vaughan/coinhttp://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/vaughan/coinhttp://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/vaughan/coinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spainhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Worldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debasementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_Labourers_of_1351http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_IIIhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Fleetwoodhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Fleetwoodhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_IIIhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_Labourers_of_1351http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debasementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Worldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spainhttp://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/vaughan/coinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Vaughanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waleshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GDP_deflatorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Producer_price_indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_price_indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_livinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_levelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_(economics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_(economics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pricehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_meanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Average
  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    8/30

    8 | P a g e

    consisting of averaged price relatives and used his methods to show that the value of five

    pounds had changed greatly over the course of 260 years. He argued on behalf of the

    Oxford students and published his findings anonymously in a volume entitled Chronicon

    Preciosum.

    Formal calculationFurther information: List of price index formulas

    Given a set of goods and services, the total market value of transactions in in some

    period would be

    Where,

    represents the prevailing price of in period

    represents the quantity of sold in period

    If, across two periods and , the same quantities of each good or service were sold,

    but under different prices, then

    and

    would be a reasonable measure of the price of the set in one period relative to that in the

    other, and would provide an index measuring relative prices overall, weighted by

    quantities sold.

    Of course, for any practical purpose, quantities purchased are rarely if ever identical

    across any two periods. As such, this is not a very practical index formula.

    One might be tempted to modify the formula slightly to

    This new index, however, doesn't do anything to distinguish growth or reduction in

    quantities sold from price changes. To see that this is so, consider what happens if all the

    prices double between and while quantities stay the same: will double. Now

    consider what happens if all the quantities double between and while all

    theprices stay the same: will double. In either case the change in is identical. As

    such, is as much a quantity index as it is aprice index.

    Various indices have been constructed in an attempt to compensate for this difficulty.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_price_index_formulashttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_price_index_formulas
  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    9/30

    9 | P a g e

    Paasche and Laspeyres price indices

    The two most basic formulae used to calculate price indices are the Paasche index (after

    the economist Hermann Paasche[pa]) and the Laspeyres index (after the

    economist Etienne Laspeyres[laspejres]).

    The Paasche index is computed as

    while the Laspeyres index is computed as

    where is the relative index of the price levels in two periods, is the base period

    (usually the first year), and the period for which the index is computed.

    Note that the only difference in the formulas is that the former uses period n quantities,whereas the latter uses base period (period 0) quantities.

    When applied to bundles of individual consumers, a Laspeyres index of 1 would state

    that an agent in the current period can afford to buy the same bundle as she consumed in

    the previous period, given that income has not changed; a Paasche index of 1 would state

    that an agent could have consumed the same bundle in the base period as she is

    consuming in the current period, given that income has not changed.

    Hence, one may think of the Paasche index as one where the numeraire is the bundle of

    goods using current year prices but base year quantities. Similarly, the Laspeyres index

    can be thought of as a price index taking the bundle of goods using current prices and

    current quantities as the numeraire.

    The Laspeyres index tends to overstate inflation (in a cost of living framework), while the

    Paasche index tends to understate it, because the indices do not account for the fact that

    consumers typically react to price changes by changing the quantities that they buy. For

    example, if prices go up for good then,ceteris paribus, quantities of that good should

    go down.

    Fisher index and MarshallEdgeworth index

    A third index, theMarshallEdgeworth index(named for economists Alfred

    Marshall and Francis Ysidro Edgeworth), tries to overcome these problems of under- and

    overstatement by using the arithmetic means of the quantities:

    A fourth, the Fisher index (after the American economist Irving Fisher), is calculated as

    the geometric mean of and :

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Paaschehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_Germanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_Germanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_Germanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etienne_Laspeyreshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_Germanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_Germanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_Germanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerairehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceteris_paribushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceteris_paribushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceteris_paribushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall%E2%80%93Edgeworth_indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall%E2%80%93Edgeworth_indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall%E2%80%93Edgeworth_indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall%E2%80%93Edgeworth_indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall%E2%80%93Edgeworth_indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Marshallhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Marshallhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Ysidro_Edgeworthhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Fisherhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_meanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_meanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Fisherhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Ysidro_Edgeworthhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Marshallhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Marshallhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall%E2%80%93Edgeworth_indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceteris_paribushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerairehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_Germanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etienne_Laspeyreshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_Germanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Paasche
  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    10/30

    10 | P a g e

    Fisher's index is also known as the ideal price index.

    However, there is no guarantee with either the MarshallEdgeworth index or the Fisher

    index that the overstatement and understatement will exactly cancel the other.

    While these indices were introduced to provide overall measurement of relative prices,there is ultimately no way of measuring the imperfections of any of these indices

    (Paasche, Laspeyres, Fisher, or MarshallEdgeworth) against reality.

    Relative ease of calculating the Laspeyres index

    As can be seen from the definitions above, if one already has price and quantity data (or,

    alternatively, price and expenditure data) for the base period, then calculating the

    Laspeyres index for a new period requires only new price data. In contrast, calculating

    many other indices (e.g., the Paasche index) for a new period requires both new price

    data and new quantity data (or, alternatively, both new price data and new expenditure

    data) for each new period. Collecting only new price data is often easier than collecting

    both new price data and new quantity data, so calculating the Laspeyres index for a new

    period tends to require less time and effort than calculating these other indices for a new

    period.

    Calculating indices from expenditure data

    Sometimes, especially for aggregate data, expenditure data is more readily available than

    quantity data. For these cases, we can formulate the indices in terms of relative prices and

    base year expenditures, rather than quantities.

    Here is a reformulation for the Laspeyres index:

    Let be the total expenditure on good c in the base period, then (by definition) we

    have and therefore also . We can substitute these

    values into our Laspeyres formula as follows:

    A similar transformation can be made for any index.

    Quality change

    Price indices often capture changes in price and quantities for goods and services, but

    they often fail to account for variation in the quality of goods and services. Statistical

    agencies generally usematched-modelprice indices, where one model of a particular good

    is priced at the same store at regular time intervals. The matched-model method becomes

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement
  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    11/30

    11 | P a g e

    problematic when statistical agencies try to use this method on goods and services with

    rapid turnover in quality features. For instance, computers rapidly improve and a specific

    model may quickly become obsolete. Statisticians constructing matched-model price

    indices must decide how to compare the price of the obsolete item originally used in the

    index with the new and improved item that replaces it. Statistical agencies use several

    different methods to make such price comparisons.

    The problem discussed above can be represented as attempting to bridge the gap between

    the price for the old item at time t, , with the price of the new item at the later

    time period, .

    The overlap methoduses prices collected for both items in both time periods, t and t+1.The price relative / is used.

    The direct comparison methodassumes that the difference in the price of the two items isnot due to quality change, so the entire price difference is used in the index. /

    is used as the price relative.

    The link-to-show-no-change assumes the opposite of the direct comparison method; itassumes that the entire difference between the two items is due to the change in quality.

    The price relative based on link-to-show-no-change is 1.

    The deletion methodsimply leaves the price relative for the changing item out of theprice index. This is equivalent to using the average of other price relatives in the index as

    the price relative for the changing item. Similarly, class mean imputation uses the

    average price relative for items with similar characteristics (physical, geographic,

    economic, etc.) to M and N

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    12/30

    12 | P a g e

    Part 1(a)(ii): WeightageAccording to dictionary.com: weightage is a weighting factor assigned to compensate for a

    perceived disadvantage or simply "A weight factor or ratio; weight"

    An example for its usage is: "The admission holds 80% weightage while the interview holds

    20% weightage of the admission process".

    It seems to be a word commonly used in Asia.

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    13/30

    13 | P a g e

    Part 1(a)(iii): Composite Index

    Definition of 'Composite Index'

    A grouping of equities, indexes or other factors combined in a standardized way, providing a

    useful statistical measure of overall market or sector performance over time.

    Also known simply as a composite.

    Usually, a composite index has a large number of factors which are averaged together to form a

    product representative of an overall market or sector. For example, the Nasdaq Composite index

    is a market capitalization-weighted grouping of approximately 5,000 stocks listed on the Nasdaq

    market. These indexes are useful tools for measuring and tracking price level changes to anentire stock market or sector. Therefore, they provide a useful benchmark against which to

    measure an investor's portfolio. The goal of a well-diversified portfolio is usually to outperform

    the main composite indexes.

    A composite or a composite index is combination of equities or indexes intended to measure the

    overall market performance over time.

    A composite index may also be used in the natural or social sciences to summarize complex or

    multidimensional data or redundant measures. An example of a composite index in the social

    sciences is used in the European Lifelong Learning Indicators (ELLI) project.

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    14/30

    14 | P a g e

    Part 1(b): Weightage RepresentationsFour examples of weightage representation:-

    TABLE

    Item

    Average Monthly

    Expenditure for the year

    2013 (to the nearest RM)

    Percentage of monthly

    expenses (to the nearest %)

    Food RM800 16%

    Accommodation

    (Rental/Loan)

    RM1200 24%

    Transportation

    (Petrol/Loan/Bus fare etc.)

    RM400 8%

    Clothing RM300 6%

    Education RM730 15%

    Recreation RM300 6%

    Utilities

    (Water/Electricity/Telephone)

    RM670 13%

    Medication RM200 4%

    Miscellaneous RM400 8%

    TOTAL RM5000 100%

    column CHART

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    Percentage of 2013 Monthly Expenses

    Percentage of 2013 MonthlyExpenses

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    15/30

    15 | P a g e

    LINE GRAPH

    PIE CHART

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    Percentage of 2013 Monthly Expenses

    Percentage of 2013 Monthly

    Expenses

    Percentage of 2013 Montly Expenses

    Food

    Accomodation

    Transportation

    Clothing

    Education

    Recreation

    Utilities

    Medication

    Miscellaneous

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    16/30

    16 | P a g e

    Part 2(a): Table for my familysExpenditure for the year 2013.

    Item

    Average Monthly

    Expenditure for the year

    2013 (to the nearest RM)

    Percentage of monthly

    expenses (to the nearest %)

    Food RM800 16%

    Accommodation

    (Rental/Loan)

    RM1200 24%

    Transportation

    (Petrol/Loan/Bus fare etc.)

    RM400 8%

    Clothing RM300 6%

    Education RM730 15%

    Recreation RM300 6%

    Utilities

    (Water/Electricity/Telephone)

    RM670 13%

    Medication RM200 4%

    Miscellaneous RM400 8%

    TOTAL RM5000 100%

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    17/30

    17 | P a g e

    Part 2(b)(i) and Part 2(b)(ii):

    Item

    Average Monthly Expenses

    for the year 2010 as the baseyear (RM)

    Average Monthly Expenses

    for the year 2013 (RM)

    Food RM400 RM800

    Accommodation

    (Rental/Loan)

    RM1200 RM1200

    Transportation

    (Petrol/Loan/Bus fare etc.)

    RM200 RM400

    Clothing RM150 RM300

    Education RM535 RM730

    Recreation RM200 RM300

    Utilities(Water/Electricity/Telephone) RM465 RM670

    Medication RM150 RM200

    Miscellaneous RM200 RM400

    TOTAL RM3500 RM5000

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    18/30

    18 | P a g e

    Part 2(c)(i):

    Item

    Price indices for the year

    2013 based on the year 2010

    Weightage

    Food 200 16%

    Accommodation

    (Rental/Loan)

    100 24%

    Transportation

    (Petrol/Loan/Bus fare etc.)

    200 8%

    Clothing 200 6%

    Education 136.45 15%

    Recreation 150 6%

    Utilities(Water/Electricity/Telephone) 144.09 13%

    Medication 133.33 4%

    Miscellaneous 200 8%

    TOTAL 1463.87 100%

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    19/30

    19 | P a g e

    Part 2(c)(ii): Calculation of compositeindex for the average monthly expenditure in

    the year 2013 based on the year 2010

    Composite Index,

    =

    16(200)+24(100)+8(200)+6(200)+15(136.45)+6(150)+13(144.09)+4(133.33)+8(200)

    100

    =

    15353.24 = 153.53 = 154

    100

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    20/30

    20 | P a g e

    Part 2(d): Conclusion about my familysexpenditure.

    Based on my findings, my familys average monthly expenditure increases in the year

    2013 based on the year 2013. This is because cost of living increases due to the escalating prices

    of all items except for accommodation during the course from the year 2010 to 2013. The

    increase of items is probably caused by inflation which increases the price of household items

    and other items such as food products, clothing, recreational activities, utilities, education,

    medication and also miscellaneous conduct.

    The composite index for the average of my familys expenditure from the year 2013

    based on the year 2010 is 154. This means my familys average expenditure increases 54% from

    the year 2010 to the year 2013. However, my family can continue to sustain a comfortable andsuitable lifestyle if my familys income also increases by 54%. This should be done so that my

    family can pay the escalating prices of certain household items without any hassle.

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    21/30

    21 | P a g e

    Part 3(a): Table 4(a) ~payment by cash~

    Brand

    Size

    of television

    (inches)

    Price (RM)

    SHOP A SHOP B SHOP C

    Mean

    Price

    (RM)

    Standard

    Deviation

    (RM)

    24 649 647 825 707 83.44

    SAMSUNG 32 1190 1099 1349 1212.67 103.27

    40 2190 2170 2449 2269.67 127.01

    24 650 620 699 656.33 32.63

    SHARP 32 799 788 888 825 44.77

    40 1290 1199 1399 1296 81.76

    MEAN

    PRICE OF

    EACH

    SHOP

    - 1128 1087.17 1268.17 - -

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    22/30

    22 | P a g e

    Part 3(a): Table 4(b) ~payment by 6 month installment~

    Brand

    Size

    of television

    (inches)

    Price (RM)

    SHOP A SHOP B SHOP C

    Mean

    Price

    (RM)

    Standard

    Deviation

    (RM)

    24 108.17 107.83 137.50 117.83 13.94

    SAMSUNG 32 198.33 183.17 224.83 202.11 17.22

    40 365 361.67 408.17 378.28 21.18

    24 108.33 103.33 116.50 109.39 5.36

    SHARP 32 133.17 131.33 148 137.50 7.46

    40 215 199.83 233.17 216 13.63

    MEAN

    PRICE OF

    EACH

    SHOP

    - 188 181.19 211.36 - -

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    23/30

    23 | P a g e

    Part 3(b):

    The brand and size of the television my family decided to buy is a Sharp 40 inch

    television at shop B. The reason why my family chooses to buy this television is because of its

    size of 40 inches, the largest size of television, which suits my familys living area. Besides that,the brand of television, Sharp; also offers a cheaper price rather than the Samsung 40 inch

    television. The price this size and brand of television offers is RM1199 by cash and RM199.83

    by installment of 6 months which is suitable and also within the range ofmy familys budget.

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    24/30

    24 | P a g e

    Part 3(c):

    If I was one of the panels for the Ministry of Domestic Trade and Consumer

    Affairs, I would present the Fair Price Shop Award to Shop B. This is because Shop B offers the

    cheapest price when selling the televisions rather than Shop A and Shop C which consumers cansave money when buying any brand and of television of their choosing. In addition, I do not

    consider the value of the standard deviation in making the decision in choosing the shop for this

    award because it has nothing to do in finding the shop with the lowest average price for each

    shop. On the other hand, I do consider the mean price of each shop or the average price for each

    shop in making my decision because by taking the mean price for each shop into consideration I

    can find the lowest average or mean price in each shop to see which shop deserves this award.

    On the contrary, I do not consider the mean price of each size of television because it is not

    relevant in finding and determining the shop with the lowest average price for each shop. In a

    nutshell, with all my justifications, I am confident that the fair price award should be given to

    shop B.

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    25/30

    25 | P a g e

    Part 4(a): ~pay by 6 month installment~

    Item

    Average Monthly

    Expenditure for the year

    2013 (to the nearest RM)

    Percentage of monthly

    expenses (to the nearest %)

    Food RM800 16%

    Accommodation

    (Rental/Loan)

    RM1200 24%

    Transportation

    (Petrol/Loan/Bus fare etc.)

    RM400 8%

    Clothing RM200 4%

    Education RM730 15%

    Recreation RM200 4%

    Utilities

    (Water/Electricity/Telephone)

    RM670 13%

    Medication RM200 4%

    Miscellaneous RM400 8%

    Savings for new television RM200 4%

    TOTAL RM5000 100%

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    26/30

    26 | P a g e

    Part 4(b):

    Item

    Average Monthly

    Expenditure for the year

    2013 (to the nearest RM)

    Percentage of monthly

    expenses (to the nearest %)

    Food RM600 24%

    Accommodation

    (Rental/Loan)

    RM250 10%

    Transportation

    (Petrol/Loan/Bus fare etc.)

    RM400 16%

    Clothing RM150 6%

    Recreation RM200 8%

    Utilities

    (Water/Electricity/Telephone)

    RM150 6%

    MedicationRM100 4%

    Miscellaneous RM200 8%

    Savings RM250 10%

    Contributions to parents RM200 8%

    TOTAL RM2500 100%

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    27/30

    27 | P a g e

    REFLECTION

    Throughout conducting this project, there was a lot of information that I had

    found. I also learnt some moral values which I will practice in the future. Firstly,

    we need to spend our income according to our abilities. Besides that, we need to

    buy only necessary things and spend less on our wants. In addition, we should set

    aside money from our income into our savings in order to buy things that we want

    and for future emergencies.

    This project has taught me to be more responsible on the works that were

    given to me, so that I can complete it with flying colours. This project also made

    me confident to do the works given to me and to not give up so easily when I could

    not find the solution for the question. I also learnt to be more discipline especiallyin managing my time, which I was given about three weeks to complete this

    project and to pass up to my teacher according to the duration given. I also enjoyed

    doing this project during my school holiday as I spent my time with friends to

    complete this project which had tightened our friendship.

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    28/30

    28 | P a g e

    SAVING MONEY (poem)

    Lets save money,

    My friends and family,

    Lets save money,We will be happy.

    Our future relies on money,

    Buy things that are necessary,

    Dont waste it away,

    So, that we can use it someday.

    Lets spend money,Think before spending,

    So our lives will be lively,

    Because seeing is believing.

    Lets use our money,

    To help people in need,

    Lets give in honestly and sincerely,

    Thus, we will be blessed indeed.

  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    29/30

    29 | P a g e

    REFERENCES

    1.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight_(representation_theory)2.http://www.qfinance.com/dictionary/composite-index3.http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Composite+Index4.http://www.answers.com/topic/composite-index5.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composite_(finance)6.http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/compositeindex.asp7.http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/weightage8.http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/WEIGHTAGE)9.http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/weightage10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_index11. http://www.ukessays.com/essays/economics/malaysia-

    economy-exports.php

    12. http://www.ecb.int/ecb/educational/hicp/html/index.en.html13. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/environmental-reporting/report-

    cards/household-consumption/2009/index.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight_(representation_theory)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight_(representation_theory)http://www.qfinance.com/dictionary/composite-indexhttp://www.qfinance.com/dictionary/composite-indexhttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/Composite+Indexhttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/Composite+Indexhttp://www.answers.com/topic/composite-indexhttp://www.answers.com/topic/composite-indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composite_(finance)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composite_(finance)http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/compositeindex.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/compositeindex.asphttp://dictionary.reference.com/browse/weightagehttp://dictionary.reference.com/browse/weightagehttp://www.wordwebonline.com/en/WEIGHTAGE)http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/WEIGHTAGE)http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/weightagehttp://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/weightagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_indexhttp://www.ukessays.com/essays/economics/malaysia-economy-exports.phphttp://www.ukessays.com/essays/economics/malaysia-economy-exports.phphttp://www.ukessays.com/essays/economics/malaysia-economy-exports.phphttp://www.ukessays.com/essays/economics/malaysia-economy-exports.phphttp://www.ukessays.com/essays/economics/malaysia-economy-exports.phphttp://www.ecb.int/ecb/educational/hicp/html/index.en.htmlhttp://www.ecb.int/ecb/educational/hicp/html/index.en.htmlhttp://www.mfe.govt.nz/environmental-reporting/report-cards/household-consumption/2009/index.htmlhttp://www.mfe.govt.nz/environmental-reporting/report-cards/household-consumption/2009/index.htmlhttp://www.mfe.govt.nz/environmental-reporting/report-cards/household-consumption/2009/index.htmlhttp://www.mfe.govt.nz/environmental-reporting/report-cards/household-consumption/2009/index.htmlhttp://www.mfe.govt.nz/environmental-reporting/report-cards/household-consumption/2009/index.htmlhttp://www.mfe.govt.nz/environmental-reporting/report-cards/household-consumption/2009/index.htmlhttp://www.ecb.int/ecb/educational/hicp/html/index.en.htmlhttp://www.ukessays.com/essays/economics/malaysia-economy-exports.phphttp://www.ukessays.com/essays/economics/malaysia-economy-exports.phphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_indexhttp://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/weightagehttp://www.wordwebonline.com/en/WEIGHTAGE)http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/weightagehttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/compositeindex.asphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composite_(finance)http://www.answers.com/topic/composite-indexhttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/Composite+Indexhttp://www.qfinance.com/dictionary/composite-indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight_(representation_theory)
  • 7/30/2019 Addmath Project 2013

    30/30


Recommended