Date post: | 04-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | eric-barton |
View: | 226 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Allosteric enzymes
Allosteric enzymes tend to be
multi-sub unit proteins
The reversible binding of an
allosteric modulator (here a
positive modulator M) affects
the substrate binding site
T
T
R
T
[S]
vo
Mechanism and Example of Allosteric Effect
S S
R
R
SS
RS
A
I
T[S]
vo
[S]
vo
(+)
(-) X X
X
R = Relax(active)
T = Tense(inactive)
Allosteric siteHomotropic(+)Concerted
Heterotropic(+)Sequential
Heterotropic(-)Concerted
Allosteric site
Kinetics Cooperation Models
(-)
(+)
(+)
Enzyme Inhibitors
• Specific enzyme inhibitors regulate enzyme activity and help us
understand mechanism of enzyme action. (Denaturing agents are not
inhibitors)
• Irreversible inhibitors form covalent or very tight permanent bonds with
aa at the active site of the enzyme and render it inactive. 3 classes:
groupspecific reagents, substrate analogs, suicide inhibitors
• Reversible inhibitors form an EI complex that can be dissociated back
to enzyme and free inhibitor. 3 groups based on their mechanism of
action: competitive, non-competitive and uncompetitive.
Enzyme Inhibition
Competitive inhibitors
• Compete with substrate for binding to enzyme
• E + S = ES or E + I = EI . Both S and I cannot bind enzyme at the same time
• In presence of I, the equilibrium of E + S = ES is shifted to the left causing dissociation of ES.
• This can be reversed / corrected by increasing [S]
• Vmax is not changed, KM is increased by (1 + I/Ki)
• Eg: AZT, antibacterial sulfonamides, the anticancer agent methotrexate etc
Competitive Inhibition
Kinetics of competitive inhibitor
Increase [S] toovercomeinhibition
Vmax attainable,
Km is increased
Ki =dissociationconstant forinhibitor
V max unaltered, Km increased
Non-competitive Inhibitors
• Inhibitor binding site is distinct from substrate binding site. Can bind to free enzyme E and to ES
• E + I = EI, ES + I = ESI or EI + S = ESI
• Both EI and ESI are enzymatically inactive
• The effective functional [E] (and [S]) is reduced
• Reaction of unaffected ES proceeds normally
• Inhibition cannot be reversed by increasing [S]
• KM is not changed, Vmax is decreased by (1 + I/Ki)
Mixed (Noncompetitive) Inhibition
Kinetics of non-competitive inhibitor
Increasing [S] cannotovercome inhibition
Less E available,V max is lower,Km remains the samefor available E
Km unaltered, V max decreased
Uncompetitive Inhibitors
• The inhibitor cannot bind to the enzyme directly, but can only bind to the enzyme-substrate complex.
• ES + I = ESI
• Both Vmax and KM are decreased by (1+I/Ki).
Uncompetitive Inhibition
Substrate Inhibition
Caused by high substrate concentrations
E + S ES E + PKm
’ k2
KS1
+
S
ES21
2'
'
2
][][
][
][
]][[,
][
]][[
Sm
m
mSi
KS
SK
SVv
ES
ESK
ES
ESSK
Substrate Inhibition
At low substrate concentrations [S]2/Ks1<<1 and inhibition is not observed
Plot of 1/v vs. 1/[S] gives a line Slope = K’
m/Vm
Intercept = 1/Vm
][
111
][1
'
'
SV
K
Vv
SK
Vv
m
m
m
m
m
Substrate Inhibition
At high substrate concentrations, K’m/[S]<<1, and
inhibition is dominant
Plot of 1/v vs. [S] gives a straight line Slope = 1/KS1 · Vm
Intercept = 1/Vm
mSm
S
m
VK
S
Vv
KS
Vv
1
1
][11
][1
1'
max][
0][/
SmKKS
Sddv
1/V I>0
I=0
1/Vm
-1/Km -1/Km,app 1/[S]
1/VI>0
I=0
1/Vm
-1/Km-1/Km,app 1/[S]
1/Vm,app
1/VI>0
I=0
1/Vm
-1/Km 1/[S]
1/Vm,app
1/V
1/Vm
-1/Km 1/[S]
Competitive Uncompetitive
Non-Competitive Substrate Inhibition
Enzyme Inhibition (Mechanism)
I
I
S
S
S I
I
I II
S
Competitive Non-competitive Uncompetitive
EE
Different siteCompete for
active siteInhibitor
Substrate
Car
toon
Gui
deEq
uatio
n an
d D
escr
iptio
n
[II] binds to free [E] only,and competes with [S];increasing [S] overcomesInhibition by [II].
[II] binds to free [E] or [ES] complex; Increasing [S] cannot overcome [II] inhibition.
[II] binds to [ES] complex only, increasing [S] favorsthe inhibition by [II].
E + S → ES → E + P + II↓EII
←
↑
E + S → ES → E + P + + II II↓ ↓EII + S →EIIS
←
↑ ↑
E + S → ES → E + P + II ↓ EIIS
←
↑
EI
S X
Km
Enzyme Inhibition (Plots)
I II Competitive Non-competitive Uncompetitive
Dir
ect
Plo
tsD
ou
ble
Rec
ipro
cal
Vmax Vmax
Km Km’ [S], mM
vo
[S], mM
vo
II II
Km [S], mM
Vmax
II
Km’
Vmax’Vmax’
Vmax unchangedKm increased
Vmax decreasedKm unchanged
Both Vmax & Km decreased
II
1/[S]1/Km
1/vo
1/ Vmax
II
Two parallellines
II
Intersect at X axis
1/vo
1/ Vmax
1/[S]1/Km 1/[S]1/Km
1/ Vmax
1/vo
Intersect at Y axis
= Km’
Factors Affecting Enzyme
Kinetics
Effects of pH
- on enzymes
- enzymes have ionic groups on their active sites.
- Variation of pH changes the ionic form of the active sites.
- pH changes the three-Dimensional structure of enzymes.
- on substrate
- some substrates contain ionic groups
- pH affects the ionic form of substrate
affects the affinity of the substrate to the enzyme.
Effects of Temperature
Reaction rate increases with temperature up to a limit
Above a certain temperature, activity decreases with temperature
due to denaturation
Denaturation is much faster than activation
Rate varies according to the Arrhenius equation
tkRTE
RTEdd
tk
RTE
da
a
d
a
eEAev
eAk
eEE
Aek
Ekv
0/
/
0
/2
2
][][
][Where Ea is the activation energy (kcal/mol)
[E] is active enzyme concentration
Factors Affecting Enzyme Kinetics Temperature
- on the rate of enzyme catalyzed reaction
k2=A*exp(-Ea/R*T)
T k2
- enzyme denaturation
T
][][
2ESk
dt
Pdv
v
][][
Edkdt
Ed
Denaturation rate:
kd=Ad*exp(-Ea/R*T)
kd: enzyme denaturation rate constant;
Ea: deactivation energy
REFERENCES
Michael L. Shuler and Fikret Kargı, Bioprocess Engineering: Basic Concepts (2 nd Edition),Prentice Hall, New York, 2002.
1. James E. Bailey and David F. Ollis, Biochemical Engineering Fundementals (2 nd Edition), McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986.
www-nmr.cabm.rutgers.edu/academics/
biochem694/2005BioChem412/
Biochem.412_2005_Lect.18.ppt –
juang.bst.ntu.edu.tw/BCbasics/Animation.htm - 37k –
www.saburchill.com/IBbiology/chapters03/images/
ENZYME%20INHIBITION.ppt –
http://www.wiley.com/college/pratt/0471393878/student/animations/enzyme_inhibition/index.html