Armament Directorate War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
AFPEO for Weapons
Overview
Maj Gen Ken Merchant
AFPEO(Weapons) NDIA Air Armament Symposium
16 October 2012
Integrity « Service « Excellence 96ABW-2012-0443
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
Overview
• AFMC Reorganization • Portfolio Capabilities and Successes • Challenges for the Future • Final Thoughts
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
5-Center Construct (5CC)
What is it? An approach to implement true life-cycle management as a response to significant manpower reductions
What will it do? • Increase effectiveness & efficiencies
– Single face to customer – Improves integrated life cycle management (ILCM) – Drives standard processes across mission areas – Fosters integration of maintenance and supply chain to
improve depot performance – Simplifies and reduces overhead structure
• Allow elimination of 1,051 positions at staff levels – Minimal impact below Center level (cuts “tail,” not “tooth”) – Equates to ~$109M per year
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
Previous AFMC State
ASC (WPAFB, OH)
AEDC (Arnold AFB, TN)
AAC (Eglin AFB, FL)
ESC (Hanscom AFB, MA)
OO-ALC (Hill AFB, UT)
OC-ALC (Tinker AFB, OK)
WR-ALC (Robins AFB, GA)
AFGLSC (Scott AFB, IL)
AFFTC (Edwards AFB, CA)
AFRL (WPAFB, OH)
AFSAC (WPAFB, OH)
HQ Air Force Materiel Command
Technology
Acquisition
Testing
Sustainment AFNWC
(Kirtland AFB, NM)
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
AF Life Cycle Mgmt Ctr (AFLCMC)
AF Test Ctr (AFTC)
Acquisition Includes: PEOs Former Aerospace
Sustainment Directorate Programs Offices
AFSAC Directorate 66 Air Base Group 88 Air Base Wing
Sustainment Includes: WR, OK City, &
Ogden Air Logistics Complex
448 Supply Chain Operations Wing
635 Supply Chain Operations Wing
72, 75, 78 ABWs
Testing Includes: Arnold Engineering
Development Complex
96 Test Wing (incorporates 96th Air Base Wing)
412 Test Wing (incorporates 95th Air Base Wing)
Nuclear Includes: 498 NSW to be
Nuc Cap Dir
377 ABW w/ 498 NUMG to 377 W
898 MUNS to 377 ABW
WSAs to AFGSC
PEO to AFLCMC
AF Research Lab (AFRL)
AF Nuc Wpns Ctr (AFNWC)*
Technology Includes: Merge 10 to 9
Directorates
Consolidate like activities in four others
Current AFMC State
HQ Air Force Materiel Command
*AFNWC is a hybrid of acquisition and sustainment activities
AF Sustainment Ctr (AFSC)
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
v Product Ø Deliver Cost Effective Acquisition
Solutions
Ø Deliver Affordable and Effective Product Support
v Process Ø Launch High
Confidence Sustainable Programs
Ø Standardize and Continuously Improve Center Processes
v People Ø Develop and
Place Right Person at Right Time
Ø Assure a Safe, Secure, and Quality Work Environment
DELIVER TO COMMITMENTS
Acquire and Support War-Winning Capabilities
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
FM
Functional Operating Location
Eglin AFB, FL
AQ
EN DP
SB PK
XR
Air Force Test Ctr (AFTC)
AF Life Cycle
Mgmt Ctr (LCMC)
HQ Air Force Materiel Command
SAE
Air Armament Center (AAC)
Eglin AFB, FL
AAC Then…to Now
AQ
EN
SB
XR
PK
FM
DP
JA
EO
SE
XP
46 OG
46 MXG
46 RANG
AF SEEK EAGLE
46 TG (Holloman AFB, NM)
46 Test Wing
96 Air Base Wing
AAC Center Staff
CS
96 MDG
96 MSG
96 CEG
96 CPTS
HC
IG
PA
XP
MUSEUM
IP
CP
96 Test Wing Eglin AFB, FL
CCC
CS
CCP
CCQ
CAG
HO
CSH
96 MDG
96 MSG
96 CPTS
96 CEG
96 OG
96 MXG
96 RANG
AF SEEK EAGLE
PA
IG
MUSEUM
IP
XP
EO
JA
SE
CP
46 TG (Holloman AFB, NM)
XP
Air Force Test Ctr (AFTC)
Edwards AFB, CA
AF Life Cycle Mgmt Ctr (LCMC)
WPAFB, OH
MUNS SUST (Hill AFB, UT)
Armament Directorate
Eglin AFB, FL
AIR DOM
DIR ATTK
LR SYS
MINI MUN
ADV PRGM
TST & TRNG
STRAT SYS SPEC MGT
(Robins AFB, GA)
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
SAE HQ Air Force Materiel Command
PEO / Center Alignment
AF Life Cycle Mgmt Ctr (LCMC)
WPAFB, OH
STRAT SYS
*AFNWC is a hybrid of acquisition and sustainment activities
Legend Reporting OTE
PEO Strategic Systems Kirtland AFB, NM
AF Nuc Wpns Ctr (AFNWC)*
Kirtland AFB, NM
AIR DOMINANCE
DIRECT ATTACK
LONG RANGE SYS
MINI MUNITIONS
ADVANCED PRGM
TEST & TRNG
MUNS SUST
SPEC MGT
SPACE & C3I
PEO Weapons Eglin AFB, FL
PEO Battle Mgt Hanscom AFB, MA
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost Armament Enterprise Forum
• Purpose: – Forum for Eglin leadership to discuss cross-cutting issues – Maintain a viable RDAT&E Armament Enterprise – Roundtable format
• Members include: – PEO(Weapons) – AFRL/RW – 96 TW – 53 WG – AFOTEC Det 2 – DTRA – AFLCMC OLs (XZW, EN, PK, AQ, FM)
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
AFPEO(W) Portfolio
• Programs ‒ 5 ACAT I ‒ 5 ACAT II ‒ 11 ACAT III ‒ Muns Sustainment Div
• 1590 Personnel Assigned • $59.6B Portfolio
Mission: Equip Our Warfighters with Air Dominance, Strike, and Combat Support Capabilities to
Fight and Win Decisively
For Official Use Only
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
Portfolio Capabilities
Miniature Muni*ons
Long Range Systems Test & Training
Advanced Programs
Air Dominance Direct A;ack
Strategic Systems
Muni*ons Sustainment
Space and C3I
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost Challenges for the Future
• Net Enabled Weapons (NEW) • Industrial Base • Evolutionary/Revolutionary Concepts to Align
Weapons to 5th Gen Fighters • Workforce Recapitalization
13
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
• Network-Enabled Weapons are here – Capability requirements will continue to grow
• NEWIWG stood up to get standards in place, but zeroed out in FY12 – NEW included in Joint Aerial Layer Network roadmap
• Coordinating body needed to ensure System of Systems approach between SDB II and C2 programs – Need forcing function for integration & interoperability – Essential aspect of Weapons net-ready KPP
Network-Enabled Weapons (NEW)
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
-‐100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
FMU-‐139 FMU-‐152 Combined Objective
USA
F On-‐Han
d Qty
Fiscal Year
AF GP Fuze Inventory Baseline
15
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost Countermeasure Funding (FYDP)
16
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
In Billions $
Inventory in $
Requirements
2 Year produc*on lead *me to affect inventory
Need Funding in FY15 to prevent inventory shorRall
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
In M
illions $
Requested Funding
OCO CM Funding
CM Funding
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
AFPEO(W) Portfolio
IOC
Technology Development
Engineering & Manufacturing Development
Production & Deployment
Operations & Support
Sustainment
LRIP Decision
Review IOT&E Critical Design Review
Material Solution Analysis
Preliminary Design Review
AC
AT I
AC
AT II
A
CAT
III
AC
AT IV
• HTM
AoA
Spec
ial
Inte
rest
A B C
• JMM BRU
• SDB II
• HTVSF
• JASSM
• MALD
• HCSM
FRP
FOC
• CRIIS
• AFSAT • JPF • MDS HTS • QF-4 FSAT • P5CTS • JTE
• SDB I
• QF-16 FSAT
• JI2 • CEAR
For Official Use Only
• JASSM-ER
• MALD-J
• JDAM • AMRAAM
LRTSCM * UMTE *
3
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
Final Thoughts
• Budget forecast – mostly cloudy – Efficiency is required for survival
• Our Armament Enterprise is sound
• Challenges remain to meet future requirements – Intelligent weapons on the horizon – Industrial Base & Workforce issues in work
• We must continue to be the world’s premier suppliers of air armament solutions – Can’t do it without industry partners
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
Questions
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
Fuze Inventory • Current fuze inventory well below objective & declining
– FMU-139 End Of Shelf Life Window Is FY14-19 – POM doesn’t support FMU-152 EOQ
• Shrinking Electro-Mech Safe-Arm Device (EMSAD) base – Complex fire-chain dependent on mult components – Lot Acceptance Test failures caused by manufacturing/
test process – Less suppliers available for mech & explosive
components • Industry moving To Electronic Safe-Arm Devices (ESAD)
– More robust supplier base w/ less components – Multiple efforts on-going (SDB I, II, HTVSF, JASSM, etc)
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost • Issue:
– Countermeasure funding was reduced by 75% starting in FY12 though the FYDP due to forecasted reduction in usage
– Tier 1 industry partners struggling to keep lines open
• Impact: – Company “A”: Closed one of three plants—Loss of Surge capability. Rapidly losing
experienced employees to layoffs. – Company “B”: Chaff plant in jeopardy of closing—FMS sales keeping facility open
• Mitigation Plan: ü Met w/ industry partners to discuss way ahead when cuts first indentified ü Engaged w/ A5RC to discuss impacts to the Industrial Base ü Built strategy to best suit each factory ü Provided first available funds to countermeasures – Continue to closely monitor contract actions – Continue to meet regularly w/ industry partners and adjust acquisition strategy as needed
Countermeasure Industrial Base
