Date post: | 20-Aug-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | dr-m-m-bagali-phd-in-hr |
View: | 176 times |
Download: | 0 times |
The Making of an Empowered Workforce:
Demystifying a Case of Practicing Indian
Organisation
M M Bagali, PhD
Jain university, India
www.jainuniversity.ac.in
agenda
• Why such study in empowerment area
• How and what this company uniquely practiced
• Lessons to learn
the thinking
• How can HR be innovatively developed, managed and
nurtured
• Crystallizing the reasons as to “WHY TOP COMPANIES” are
different
• To explore conditions that makes workplace empowered
the studies
• Pati,1997
• Sengupta and
Shaikh,1997
• Venkatachalam,
1998
• Dwivedi,1998
• Mohapatra,1998
• Tripathy,1999
• Barnes and Kaftans, 1970, 1985
• Myron Eichen,1989
• Marjorie Reynolds,
1991
• Michael Quarrey,
1992
• Cyndy Payne,1993
• Bo Burlingham, 1999
work of prominence
• Foundation for Enterprise Development – FED, and Beyster Institute for
Entrepreneurial Employee Ownership , USA
• Argyris, Chris (1998):“Empowerment: The Emperor’s new Clothes”,
Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp: 98 -105
• Kantar, R. M , 1977, 1979, 1989,1995
• Lawler, E. E III , 1986, 1988, 1992, 1994, 1995
the impressions
Adi Godrej,Chairman and MD, Godrej Soaps ltd,1992
“It has opened my eyes in best people management practices”
Ricardo F Semler,Chairman, SEMCO, Brazil, 1994
“I have seen an exceptionally empowerment practiced at workplace”
Sri Sharadrao Pawar,Ex-CM, present Cabinet Minister, GOI,1997
“Congrats for good work done in people management strategies”
Thus, Polyhydron Private Limited -PPL : A Case
the workWorkers Empowerment :
A Study of Polyhydron Private Limited,
Belgaum, Karnataka State, IndiaEstablished in 1981-82
Address: # 80, Machhe Industrial Estate,Machhe, Belgaum- 590014,Karnataka State
website: www.polyhydron.com
The need for research work
HR is crucial and empowerment systems and practices are important components
To look at the Renaissance Strategies for Creating High Performance Workforce and workplace
Thus, an enquiry into various empowerment systems and practices
Theoretical and Conceptual framework
E M POWER M E N T
em-pow-er-ment (im-pau [-] r-ment)
Oxford English Dictionary says, to empower is
“to authorize, to enable”
Rosabeth Moss Kanter (1977)
Professor at Harvard Business School,
Ernest L. Arbuckle Professorship
“giving power to people who operate at an advantage in
the organization success”
Bowen and Lawler (1992)
Director, the Centre for Effective Organization, University
of Southern California,
“ Complete Power to make decisions that influence
organizational direction and performance”
essentially, empowerment
• an environment where absolute control is given up, allowing everyone make decisions, set goals, accomplish results and receive rewards
• it liberates people from constraints such as checking with the boss before taking actions
• decision-making authority and responsibility percolates from managers to the employees at the lowest rung, and to everyone, per se
why an enquiryo The syntax of empowerment is simple… give
people the freedom and power at
workplace, they will surely grow the
organization responsibly [Let us look at the
concept ]
o What are the areas and dimensions of
practicing empowerment
o What are the limitations one faces, when
you empower employees
research objectives� to understand factors that contribute to
empowerment--the systems, practices,
policy and the leadership
� understand the impact of empowering
employees at workplace
participation
Total 73 Responded 60
areas of enquiry
Accountability / Bureaucracy / Culture / Leadership/
Management Style and approach / Structure / liberty /
Communication / Decision Making / Discipline/ Ethos /
Industrial Democracy / Knowledge Sharing / Ownership
Culture / Organizational Health / Power Distribution/
Responsibility Sharing / Transparency / Information sharing
/ Degree of trust & loyalty……….
data collection
Pre Pilot Observation
Pre Pilot Observation
Observed the
System
Observed the
System
Questionnaire
Administered
Questionnaire
Administered
Case-by-
Case
discussion
Case-by-
Case
discussion
Discussion
with CEO
Discussion
with CEO
Pooling all the
responses
Pooling all the
responses
The format of Data collection from Employees
Observed the system
Discussion with CEO
System/ Practices interface
Case by case discussion
Back to CEO
Pooling all responses in
presence of all
The format of Data collection from CEO / MD
• An in-formal observation over a period
• Discussion with CEO at one-one level
• The opinions of CEO and system interfaced
All the collected data of CEO through opinions were observed, verified case by case with each employees
• The opinions / views of employees were put back to CEO / MD for discussion, and
• Open House
what we saw at ppl
• Estd 1981-82
• Conventional way of Management 1982-1988
• Visit to SEMCO, Sau Paulo, Brazil 1988
• Changed People practices 1988-1996
• Empowered People practices 1996 onwards
what we saw at ppl
empowerment@work: the making of an empowered workforce
Conventional Present
Do what is told Do what is required
Liberty misused Liberty made use to fullest extent
Not my job attitude Its everyone's job
Commitment level low High commitment
Boundary defined No Boundary
Lack of scope for improvement High scope for improvement
Various committees / councils Never a designated committee
Trust level low Trust is core
Supervised work No Supervision
Freedom restricted More freedom / liberty
Closed behavior Transparent behavior
Apply for leave / off Decide on leave / off
empowerment@workplace
•The HR practices
•The Culture
•The Leadership, and the
•The Traits
•Value given to Human beings
•Each is accountable / responsible for his actions and can’t blame others
•All information is open and shared
•Each is boss in himself
•Common rooms are shared
•Suggestions are given regularly and open
•Management is open to ideas and more information sharing
•Every one can have own objectives, mission, and goals;
•No Security or guard
the culture
the hr practices
Complete FreedomTotal TransparencyComplete Shared ResponsibilityAccountability for ones actionsLiberty to decide course of actionsInvolvement / Participation Transparent feedbackDelegated authorityNo hidden AgendaComplete AutonomyPower to take decisions
Freedom to do work in one’s own way
No Supervision/ Foreman
No Bureaucratic and Administrative interference
No Red-tapism
Sharing Common Platform
Trusting each persons actions
No restrictions for new inventions
One can fail, no punishment
Suggestions are part of daily work
Accepts critics
Open House
leadership
employee traits
Open and TransparentPositive Approach
No defined mind setFree from Bias
No scapegoat attitudeHigh Commitment
Disciplined Trustworthy
Enjoys the workLoyal and Truthful
Work that extra mile
language@workplace
My door is open to you
Let us all discuss on the idea
Your problem / issue is our concern
Let us join hands together
Kindly teach me the new technique
Let us all announce your achievement
outcome of such practices
• Engagement with Organsiation
• Production and products
• Profits and Income Generating
• Turnover and loyalty
• Reputation and Customers
• Market Standing
• NO IR issues
• Employer BRANDING
drawbacks
• Why power to me
• Is it the game plan of management
• Its not my job to have power
• Its not my job to decide
• I am not the right person to have power
• My me as leader and decision maker
•First ‘No’ RULE
•Platform for Empowerment /
create conditions for
empowerment
•Prioritise the area
•Attitudinal Surveys
•Accountability
•Define the Purpose
•Open Door Policy and
Transparency
•Ownership Culture
Don’t hold unto data
Informal Relations
Create Opportunity
Desired Future
Education the gains
Time to empower or not to
empower
Can’t empower areas
Don’t impose empowerment
Power of Empowerment
Fun at workplace
Ideas for practices: lessons to learn
academic discussion
• OB
• HR practices
• HRM / SHRM
• Leadership
• Organizational Change
• Restructuring / OD
• Sociology of Culture
• Change Management
advantage corporate
• CEO
• HR Chief
• Chief Peoples Officer
• Dean and Directors of
MBA
• MDP’s
Endorsement on the Work
David Ang, MSHRIExecutive Director,Singapore Human Resources Institute, SingaporeA Talk to Senior Practising HR Managers of Singapore
The presentation (your paper) was informative and interesting. They have learned insights on the aspects and benefits of employee empowerment. The talk was timely, as organizations have to give their employees both authority and responsibility to inspire renewed commitment, innovation and initiative.
(19th Sep, 2003 / Through Personal Letter)
questions asked
• Each are accountable for their action & can’t blame others
• I am made part of organization & take part in Organisation development process
• There is red tapesim & more bureaucracy
• I can permit visitors, if I feel so, without any ones consent
• One is responsible for ones actions
• Management is open to ideas & more information sharing
• An open line of communication follows in each team
• I can openly give feed back of my boss action
• Management feed back is always subjective
• I am also involved in decision-making process at all level
• I know who appraises me, when, how
• I can promise the customers on behalf of management
thank [email protected] / [email protected]
Harvard Business Review
HBR, July-August, 2010, p:57
When workers are made to feel empowered,
the whole organization wins
Roger L MARTIN,
Dean, Rotman School of Management
University of Toronto, Canada
PPL
mm bagaliPresent
Professor, HR and Management,
Jain University, India
Work HistoryResearch Officer, PRC,Dharwad
Director, MBA program, KLE Sy - IMSR, Hubli
Director, PGDM / MBA program, CIMR, Indore
Dean, MBA program, IASMS, Blore,
Dean, MBA program, Acharya Institute of Engg, Blore
Dean, MBA program, Horizon Group, Bangalore
Education • Global HR Certification
• Advanced FDP – Mgt- XLRI
• PhD in Social Work (area: PMIR); PhD in Management (area: HR)
• 16+ years of HR Teaching