+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Bank Swallow Response to Rock Revetment Removal on the ...

Bank Swallow Response to Rock Revetment Removal on the ...

Date post: 10-Dec-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
35
Bank Swallow Response to Rock Revetment Removal on the Sacramento River, California Ron Melcer Jr. Adam Henderson California Department of Water Resources Floodway Ecosystem Sustainability Branch Photo: Dan Brown
Transcript

Bank Swallow Response to Rock Revetment Removal on the Sacramento River, California

Ron Melcer Jr. Adam Henderson

California Department of Water Resources Floodway Ecosystem Sustainability Branch

Photo: Dan Brown

Bank Swallow Riparia riparia

Hirundinidae

Photo: Jim Dunn

Photo: Eddie Bartley

Bank Swallow – California Populations Riparia riparia

Photo: Steve Hampton

Bank Swallow – Habitat Requirements Riparia riparia

• Vertical banks or bluffs • Friable soils • Source of renewal

Photo: Jim Dunne

Bank Swallow – Habitat Not Made to Last Riparia riparia

Bank Swallow – Habitat Not Made to Last Riparia riparia

Bank Swallow – Habitat Not Made to Last Riparia riparia

Bank Swallow – Linked to River Process Riparia riparia

Bank Swallow – Linked to River Process Riparia riparia

RM 166 - 1999 RM 166 - 2009

Bank Swallow – Impacts to Habitats and River Processes Riparia riparia

SepAugJulJunMayAprMarFebJanDecNovOct

22500

20000

17500

15000

12500

10000

7500

5000

Month

Dis

ch

arg

e (

cfs

)

Pre-Shasta Dam (1901-1944) Pre-Trinity Imports (1945-1964) Current (1965-2011)

• Changes in flow regimes • River bank stabilization • Loss of foraging habitat

2020201020001990198019701960195019401930

50

40

30

20

10

0

35000

30000

25000

20000

15000

10000

5000

Year

Re

ve

tme

nt

(Lin

ea

r M

ile

s)

Ba

nk

Sw

all

ow

Bu

rro

ws

State Threatened

Bank Swallow – Sacramento River Reach 4 Riparia riparia

Red Bluff

Corning

Hamilton City

Ord Bend

Butte City

Colusa

Bank Swallow – Sacramento River Reach 2 - 3 Riparia riparia

Bank Swallow – Recovery of Sacramento River Populations Riparia riparia

Habitat Protection

Artificial habitat

Bank Protection Removal

Bank Swallow – Recovery of Sacramento River Populations Riparia riparia

Habitat Protection

Artificial habitat

Bank Protection Removal

Methods: Aerial photographs (NAIP and other imagery) USACE 1991 Atlas DWR 1978 Atlas Channels 1896-1999 (DWR) Rip-rap Dataset (DWR) Bank Swallow Survey Dataset (1999-2012)

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

Would Bank Swallows respond to the removal of bank protection along the Sacramento River?

Methods: Aerial photographs (NAIP and other imagery) USACE 1991 Atlas DWR 1978 Atlas Channels 1896-1999 (DWR) Rip-rap Dataset (DWR) Bank Swallow Survey Dataset (1999-2012)

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

Would Bank Swallows respond to the removal of bank protection along the Sacramento River?

Methods: Aerial photographs (NAIP and other imagery) USACE 1991 Atlas DWR 1978 Atlas Channels 1896-1999 (DWR) Rip-rap Dataset (DWR) Bank Swallow Survey Dataset (1999-2012)

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

Would Bank Swallows respond to the removal of bank protection along the Sacramento River?

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

Red Bluff

Corning

Hamilton City

Ord Bend

Butte City

Colusa

RM 237L

RM 233R

RM 233.4L

RM 227L

RM 232L

RM 196.5R

RM 185.9R

RM 198.8L

RM 208L

RM 174R

RM 154R

Bank Swallow – Results Riparia riparia

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

No data 2006

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

# o

f B

urr

ow

s

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

BANS return within 2 years to the site; in 2007-2008, > 1000 burrows at site

Revetment fails

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

200

150

100

50

0

# o

f B

urr

ow

s

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

BANS return within 3 years to the site; in 2003, > 200 burrows at site

Revetment Fails

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

200

150

100

50

0

# o

f B

urr

ow

s

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

BANS return within 3 years to the site; in 2003, > 200 burrows at site

Revetment Fails

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

200

150

100

50

0

# o

f B

urr

ow

s

Bank Swallow – Response to Revetment Removal Riparia riparia

BANS return within 3 years to the site; in 2003, > 200 burrows at site

Revetment Fails

Bank Swallow – Summary of Results Riparia riparia

• 11 sites located where revetment removed, failed, or no longer serving design purpose. • Approximately 3339 meters (11,018 ft) in total. • Average length 371 meters (240 m median length), or 800-1200 feet. • Most sites were probably the result of 1997 high water event • All but 1 site on alluvium; historic meander deposits.

Revetment:

Bank Swallow – Summary of Results Riparia riparia

• 10 of 11 sites were re-colonized by BANS • On average, sites were re-colonized in 2.5 years; (min = same year; max = 6 years) • Soil types at sites were mapped as Columbia, Gianella, moonbend, silty or sandy loam • Site that was not colonized did not form cut bank

Bank Swallows:

Photo: Jaime Chavez

Bank Swallow – Conclusions Riparia riparia

• We have empirically shown that BANS will re-colonize locations where bank protection is removed. • Sites are not large- there is habitat potential with modest modifications to the flood system. • BANS are likely habitat limited on the Sacramento River given their nearly universal response to novel habitats along the waterway. • Deliberate removal of revetment will likely provide more habitat to the species – affording benefits to other ecosystems and taxa. • We need to study where revetment removal makes the most sense based on flood management needs, and based on suitability for Bank Swallows (soil type, meander potential, etc). • Revetment removal in conjunction with conservation easements should be considered in providing breeding and foraging habitat.

Acknowledgements

CA Department of Water Resources (FESSRO) US Fish and Wildlife Service CA Department of Fish and Wildlife Bank Swallow Technical Advisory Committee Joe Silveira Dawn Garcia (Altacal Audubon) Greg Golet Ryan Martin Mike Bradbury Rachel Gardiner Eric Larsen Dan Brown Danika Tsao Jim Dunne Eddie Bartley Steve Hampton Maggie Smith Joan Humphrey And others...

Questions?


Recommended